Front. Neurosci. Frontiers in Neuroscience Front. Neurosci. 1662-453X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fnins.2017.00260 Neuroscience Correction Corrigendum: Brain Metabolic Changes in Rats following Acoustic Trauma He Jun 1 Zhu Yejin 1 Aa Jiye 1 Smith Paul F. 2 3 4 5 De Ridder Dirk 3 4 5 6 Wang Guangji 1 Zheng Yiwen 2 3 4 5 * 1Key Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, China Pharmaceutical University Nanjing, Jiangsu, China 2Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago Dunedin, New Zealand 3Brain Health Research Centre, University of Otago Dunedin, New Zealand 4Brain Research New Zealand Dunedin, New Zealand 5Eisdell Moore Centre for Hearing and Balance Research, University of Auckland Auckland, New Zealand 6Department of Neurosurgery, Dunedin Medical School, University of Otago Otago, New Zealand

Edited and reviewed by: Winfried Schlee, University of Regensburg, Germany

*Correspondence: Yiwen Zheng yiwen.zheng@otago.ac.nz

This article was submitted to Neuropharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience

 08 05 2017 2017 11 260 01 04 2017 21 04 2017 Copyright © 2017 He, Zhu, Aa, Smith, De Ridder, Wang and Zheng. 2017 He, Zhu, Aa, Smith, De Ridder, Wang and Zheng

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A corrigendum on Brain Metabolic Changes in Rats following Acoustic Trauma by He, J., Zhu, Y., Aa, J., Smith, P. F., De Ridder, D., Wang, G., et al. (2017). Front. Neurosci. 11:148. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00148 metabolomics acoustic trauma tinnitus brain rats

In the original article, the same graph was used for Figures 3A, 3E and 3I by mistake. The corrected Figure 3 appears below.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.

OPLS-DA and S-plot analysis comparing the OPLSDA scores between sham and acoustic trauma animals in different brain regions. Left panel, OPLSDA scores plots, red dots: Sham, purple dots: Acoustic trauma; Right panel, S-plots. (A,B) AC (Predictive component: R2X = 0.194, R2Y = 0.76, Q2 = 0.45; Orthogonal component 1: R2X = 0.446; All components: R2X (cum) = 0.64); (C,D) CB (Predictive component: R2X = 0.152, R2Y = 0.973, Q2 = 0.68; Orthogonal component 1: R2X = 0.364; All components: R2X (cum) = 0.927); (E,F) IC (Predictive component: R2X = 0.293, R2Y = 0.978, Q2 = 0.702; Orthogonal component 1: R2X = 0.417; All components: R2X (cum) = 0.905); (G,H) SC (Predictive component: R2X = 0.238, R2Y = 0.791, Q2 = 0.691; Orthogonal component: R2X = 0.562; All components: R2X (cum) = 0.8); (I,J) VNC(Predictive component: R2X = 0.403, R2Y = 0.779, Q2 = 0.445; Orthogonal component: R2X = 0.389; All components: R2X (cum) = 0.792). AC, auditory cortex; CB, cerebellum; IC, inferior colliculus; CN, cochlear nucleus; VCN, vestibular nucleus complex.

 Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.