Front. Neurosci. Frontiers in Neuroscience Front. Neurosci. 1662-453X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fnins.2016.00555 Neuroscience Correction Corrigendum: Associations between Family Adversity and Brain Volume in Adolescence: Manual vs. Automated Brain Segmentation Yields Different Results Lyden Hannah 1 * Gimbel Sarah I. 2 Del Piero Larissa 1 Tsai A. Bryna 1 Sachs Matthew 2 Kaplan Jonas T. 1 2 Margolin Gayla 1 Saxbe Darby 1 1Department of Psychology, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA 2Department of Psychology, Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA

Edited and reviewed by: Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Dartmouth College, USA

*Correspondence: Hannah Lyden lyden@usc.edu

This article was submitted to Brain Imaging Methods, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience

 29 11 2016 2016 10 555 01 11 2016 18 11 2016 Copyright © 2016 Lyden, Gimbel, Del Piero, Tsai, Sachs, Kaplan, Margolin and Saxbe. 2016 Lyden, Gimbel, Del Piero, Tsai, Sachs, Kaplan, Margolin and Saxbe

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A corrigendum on Associations between Family Adversity and Brain Volume in Adolescence: Manual vs. Automated Brain Segmentation Yields Different Results by Lyden, H., Gimbel, S. I., Del Piero, L., Tsai, A. B., Sachs, M., Kaplan, J. T., et al. (2016). Front. Neurosci. 10:398. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00398 amygdala hippocampus methodology family aggression early life stress adolescence F32 HD63255 R01 HD046807 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development10.13039/100009633 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development10.13039/100000071 National Institutes of Health10.13039/100000002

Reason for Corrigendum:

In the original article there was an error in the beta value reporting the association between left amygdala volume calculated with manual segmentation and family aggression exposure in early life. The correct version of Table 3 appears below.

Separate multivariate linear regression analyses of family aggression exposure manual and automated bilateral hippocampal and amygdala segmentations adjusting for age, gender, and total brain volume.

Segmentation Structure β
FSL
L.HC −0.75**
R.HC −0.48*
L.Amyg −0.18
R.Amyg −0.20
MANUAL
L.HC 0.04
R.HC −0.06
L.Amyg 0.39+
R.Amyg 0.47*
NEUROQUANT
L.HC −0.09
R.HC −0.13
L.Amyg −0.03
R.Amyg −0.15

p < 0.05,

p < 0.001,

p = 0.09. L.HC, Left Hippocampus; R.HC, Right Hippocampus, L.Amyg, Left Amygdala; R.Amyg, Right Amygdala. TBV Ratio, Ratio of each segmentation to total gray matter plus white matter. Bold values indicate significant values.

In the “Results” section, sub section “Manual Segmentation,” the second sentence has been added stating the following: A positive relationship between left amygdala volume and family aggression exposure using manual segmentation was approaching significance (b = 0.39, p = 0.09). The authors sincerely apologize for the error. This correlation was not previously mentioned or discussed in the manuscript. Therefore, this error does not change the scientific conclusions of the paper in any way.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.