Front. Neurol. Frontiers in Neurology Front. Neurol. 1664-2295 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fneur.2024.1405773 Neurology Systematic Review Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in cervical spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis Luo Hua 1 † Yang Yu 1 † Wang Zhitao 2 † Ma Lingping 3 * Xie Chengxin 1 * 1Department of Orthopedic, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China 2Department of Pharmacy, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China 3Department of Operation Room, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China

Edited by: Qingchun Mu, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, China

Reviewed by: Yue Lv, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, China

Ning Li, Southeast University, China

 *Correspondence: Lingping Ma, malp@enzemed.com Chengxin Xie, chengxin_xie@163.com

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

 06 05 2024 2024 15 1405773 23 03 2024 25 04 2024 Copyright © 2024 Luo, Yang, Wang, Ma and Xie. 2024 Luo, Yang, Wang, Ma and Xie

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 Background

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic drug associated with reduced blood loss in a range of surgical specialties. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of TXA in cervical surgery, focusing on its effects on intraoperative blood loss and related outcomes.

 Methods

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases to identify all literature related to TXA used in cervical spinal surgery. Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, total blood loss, postoperative hematological variables, and complications were analyzed.

 Results

Eight trials met the inclusion criteria. The pooled results showed that intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss, and postoperative drainage volume were significantly lower in the TXA group than in the control group. The hemoglobin and hematocrit on postoperative day 1 was significantly higher in the TXA group than in the control group. There was no significant difference in complications between the two groups.

 Conclusion

The available evidence indicates that TXA effectively reduces blood loss in cervical spinal surgery while maintaining a favorable safety profile, without increasing associated risks.

 Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023459652.

 tranexamic acid blood loss cervical complications meta-analysis section-at-acceptance Movement Disorders Introduction

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a well-established antifibrinolytic agent that has been shown to reduce blood loss during joint replacement, cardiac surgery, and spine surgery (1–3). In spine surgery, perioperative bleeding can have serious consequences, including spinal cord injury and compression of the esophagus and trachea by hematoma (4). To reduce surgical blood loss and the associated morbidity and mortality, researchers have been exploring a variety of strategies, including administration of erythropoietin to promote preoperative hematocrit, intraoperative autologous transfusion, controlled hypotension, and isovolumetric hemodilution (5). However, these methods are not without risks and complications, and in some cases may not meet the requirements for cost-effectiveness. Therefore, there has been a focus on the potential of hemostatic agents, such as desmopressin, aprotinin, and others, to reduce blood loss and the need for transfusions (6). Unfortunately, desmopressin has not been shown to be effective, and aprotinin has not been cost-effective. Furthermore, the safety of antifibrinolytic agents remains uncertain, and previous studies have found that they are associated with an increased incidence of thromboembolic events (7). For these reasons, TXA is being studied as an alternative antifibrinolytic agent as one of the attempts to reduce blood loss during spinal surgery. In the normal fibrinolytic pathway, plasmin binds to fibrin through its lysine binding site and then undergoes fibrin degradation through its serine protease activity. TXA is a lysine analog that significantly reduces lysis of fibrin by competitively blocking lysine binding sites and inhibiting the activity of tissue plasminogen activator, plasminogen (a plasmin precursor), and plasmin (8). Therefore, TXA reduces degradation of platelets and promotes clot formation, thereby reducing the amount of blood lost during surgery. Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have shown that TXA can reduce blood loss in a variety of spine surgeries, including posterior lumbar interbody fusion, correction of spinal deformities in adults, and multilevel spine surgery (2, 9–13). However, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no meta-analyses of the efficacy of TXA in cervical surgery. In this meta-analysis and review, we present data from eight studies that investigated the safety and value of TXA in patients undergoing cervical surgery. The aim of this research was to further evaluate the effect of TXA on perioperative blood loss and complications, to update the medical evidence base, and to further clarify the specific role of TXA in cervical surgery so as to provide a reference for clinical work and accelerate the recovery of patients.

 Methods

According to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement, this meta-analysis was performed in agreement (14). The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (Registration No: CRD 42023459652).

Inclusion criteria

Study type: randomized controlled trial (RCT), cohort study or case–control study. Study population: patients undergoing cervical surgery. Intervention and control: TXA used in the treatment group, no-TXA in the control group. Outcome index: intraoperative blood loss (IBL), postoperative drainage, total blood loss (TBL), postoperative hemoglobin (HB) and hematocrit (HCT) 1 day after surgery, and complications.

 Exclusion criteria

Letters, case reports, meeting, reviews, animal trials, or republished studies; TXA wasn’t used topically and intravenously in the treatment group; Studies lacking a control group; Patients with a past medical history of coagulopathy, bleeding disorders, seizures, blood clots.

 Search strategy

One of the authors performed the search in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science (Medline), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from the inception dates to 30 October 2023, using the keywords “(tranexamic acid or transexamic acid or TXA or Ttxa or t-amcha or amcha or cyklokapron or transamine) and (cervical or spinal or spine or vertebra or vertebrae) and (blood loss or complication or drainage or hemoglobin or HB or hematocrit or HCT).” No language restrictions were applied during the search.

 Study selection

Two researchers individually screened the retrieved literature strictly against inclusion and exclusion criteria. First, the documents that meet the inclusion criteria are read in full by reading the title and abstract, and the included papers are finally confirmed. If two researchers do not agree during the literature screening process, it will be left to the senior researcher.

 Data collection process

Data on relevant outcome measures that met the inclusion criteria were extracted from the literature, including author year, study design type, country, sample size, participants, TXA treatment, age, outcomes, etc.

 Assessment of risk of bias and quality of evidence

Two researchers independently assessed the quality of all included trials based on Cochrane risk-of-bias criteria (15). The Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the literature quality of the retrospective studies (16).

 Data synthesis

The Meta-analysis was performed using Stata (version 17; StataCorp, 2021) software. The heterogeneity was assessed by using the Q test and I2 value calculation. The random effects model was used. The odds ratio (OR) and their associated 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess outcomes for dichotomous outcomes. Continuous outcomes were analyzed using mean, SD, and sample size to provide a mean difference (MD) between the TXA and control groups. A p-value less than 0.05 suggested that the difference was statistically significant.

 Sensitivity analyses

We performed a sensitivity analysis by excluding the largest trial, excluding trials with a high risk of bias.

 Results

The literature search yielded a total of 450 studies, 88 of which were duplicate publications and 341 were found to be irrelevant based on the titles and abstracts. After these articles were excluded, the full-text versions of 21 articles were read. Thirteen further articles were eliminated, including six trials that did not present results and five that were reports of meetings. Two trials included surgery of the spine, and it was not possible to extract data on the cervical spine, so we only included them in the review (17, 18). Finally, eight trials (two RCT and six retrospective studies including a total of 932 patients) (19–26) were included in the meta-analysis. The literature screening process is shown in Figure 1.

Flow diagram for search and selection of included studies.

 Characteristics of included studies

The basic characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1. These studies were published between 2011 and 2023. Three studies originate from China, one from Hong Kong, two from the USA, one from Japan, and one from Iran. As illustrated in Table 2, Ma et al. (23) exhibited some bias overall due to unclear detection bias. Tsutsumimoto et al. (20) demonstrated high bias overall as a consequence of employing medical record numbers in the randomization process. All non-randomized studies received NOS of 8 points or higher, indicating high-quality research (see Table 3).

Characteristics of included studies.

Study Country Participants Treatment with TXA Design Age Sex (F/M) BMI Outcomes No. of subject
TXA Control TXA Control TXA Control TXA Control
Chen, 2022 China Degenerative cervical myelopathy Gelfoam soaked with 1 g TXA Retrospective cohort 64.4 ± 8.68 65.12 ± 8.72 11/33 9/36 22.14 ± 1.90 21.37 ± 2.27 IBL, volume and length of drainage, transfusions rate, length of hospital stay, hematological parameters, complications 44 45
1 g TXA injected into the wound 63.8 ± 9.43 9/35 21.44 ± 2.18 44
Ho, 2020 Hong Kong Multilevel compressive cervical myelopathy 10 mg/kg iv TXA + maintenance 1 mg/kg/h iv TXA Retrospective cohort 61 ± 9 63 ± 10 12/18 15/17 NA NA IBL, volume of drainage, hematological parameters, complications 30 32
Khadivi, 2023 Iran Posterior cervical laminectomy and lateral mass screw fixation 3 g TXA irrigated Retrospective cohort 51.1 ± 11.0 53.5 ± 13.7 23/25 18/22 28.3 ± 5.3 28.6 ± 5.7 IBL, volume of drainage, length of postoperative hospital, complication 48 40
Ma, 2022 China Cervical spondylotic myelopathy 15 mg/kg iv TXA RCT 62.76 ± 5.83 63.65 ± 7.45 19/36 18/37 25.39(22.58, 27.39) 26.21 (23.05, 28.08) IBL, hematological parameters, volume and length of drainage, length of hospital stay, complication 55 55
30 mg/kg iv TXA 62.34 ± 7.02 19/36 25.95(22.98, 27.85) 55
Perez-Roman, 2019 USA Cervical stenosis 10 mg/kg iv TXA + 1 mg/kg/h iv TXA Retrospective cohort 60 ± 12 65 ± 12 7/12 13/7 NA NA TBL, IBL, complication 19 20
Steinle, 2023 USA Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion 30 mg/kg iv TXA+ 3 mg/kg/h iv TXA Retrospective cohort 54.25 ± 11.28 52.53 ± 11 52/44 89/101 30.25 ± 6.5 31.36 ± 7.63 IBL, volume and length of drainage, hematological parameters, transfusions rate, complications 96 190
Tsutsumimoto, 2011 Japan Cervical multilevel compressive myelopathy 15 mg/kg iv TXA RCT 68.0 ± 11.0 65.8 ± 11.8 4/16 5/15 23.7 ± 2.5 23.1 ± 2.4 IBL, TBL, volume of drainage, complication 20 20
Yu, 2017 China Multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy 15 mg/kg iv TXA + 100 mg/h iv TXA Retrospective cohort 64.4 ± 9.13 63.7 ± 8.85 11/62 9/37 21.42 ± 1.92 21.35 ± 2.3 IBL, TBL, hematological parameters, complication 73 46

RCT, randomized controlled trial; TXA tranexamic acid; IBL, intraoperative blood loss; TBL, total blood loss; NA, not applicable.

Risk of bias assessment with the Cochrane assessment tool.

Author Bias from randomization Bias from allocation Bias from performance Bias from detection Bias from attrition Bias from reporting Bias from other Overall risk of bias
Ma, 2022 Low Low Low Some Low Low Low Some
Tsutsumimoto, 2011 High Some Some Some Low Low Low High

New Castle–Ottawa scale ratings.

Study Selection Comparability Exposure/outcome Total score
Chen, 2022 **** ** *** 9
Ho, 2020 **** ** *** 9
Khadivi, 2023 **** ** *** 9
Perez-Roman, 2019 **** ** *** 9
Steinle, 2023 **** ** *** 9
Yu, 2017 **** * *** 8

One * means score 1.

 Intraoperative blood loss

Eight studies included intraoperative blood loss as the primary outcome (19–26). The pooled results showed a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss in the TXA group (MD-48.81, 95% CI-82.01, −15.61, I2 = 90.0%, p = 0.004; Figure 2).

Forest plot of comparison: TXA vs. no-TXA; outcome: Intraoperative blood loss.

 Total blood loss

Four studies reported total blood loss (19, 20, 22, 26). In a random-effects model, the total amount of blood loss was significantly lower in the TXA group than in the control group (MD −122.29, 95% CI -157.90, −86.69, I2 = 52.3%, p < 0.0001; Figure 3).

Forest plot of comparison: TXA vs. no-TXA; outcome: Total blood loss.

 Postoperative drainage

Five studies reported on postoperative drainage (22–26). Use of TXA in cervical spine surgery significantly reduced postoperative drainage (MD −125.18, 95% CI -180.44, −69.92, I2 = 89.0%, p < 0.0001; Figure 4).

Forest plot of comparison: TXA vs. no-TXA; outcome: Postoperative drainage.

 Postoperative hematological parameters on postoperative day 1

The four studies that reported the hemoglobin level on postoperative day 1 (19–21, 26) showed that it was significantly higher in the TXA group than in the control group (MD 0.46, 95% CI 0.21–0.72, I2 = 0.0%, p < 0.0001; Figure 5). Three of these studies also reported the hematocrit level on postoperative day 1 (19–21). The hematocrit level was significantly higher in the TXA group than in the control group (MD 1.06, 95% CI 0.28–1.84, I2 = 0.0%, p < 0.0001; Figure 6).

Forest plot of comparison: TXA vs. no-TXA; outcome: Hemoglobin levels on the first postoperative day.

Forest plot of comparison: TXA vs. no-TXA; outcome: HCT levels on the first postoperative day.

 Complications

Eight studies reported complications (19–26). Six of these studies found no drug-related adverse events in either study group (19, 20, 22, 24–26). The pooled results showed no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications between the groups (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.23–2.19, I2 = 0%, p = 0.55; Figure 7).

Forest plot of comparison: TXA vs. no-TXA; outcome: Complications.

 Sensitivity analysis

The remaining studies were combined when any individual study was excluded. No individual study had a significant effect on the results.

 Risk of bias

Given that fewer than 10 trials were included, no publication bias assessment by funnel plots was performed.

 Discussion

Many individual studies and meta-analyses have highlighted the antifibrinolytic and hemostatic properties of TXA in patients undergoing spinal surgery (27–30). TXA is often associated with reduced intraoperative and postoperative blood loss and may even reduce the need for blood transfusions. However, there have been no meta-analyses of the use of TXA in cervical spine surgery. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of eight studies that included a total of 932 patients to estimate the effect of TXA in cervical surgery. Only two of these studies were RCTs that provided high-quality evidence. The main advantages of RCTs are their ability to minimize bias and make stronger causal inferences. The studies randomly assigned participants and controlled for confounding factors, which makes their conclusions more reliable. However, our study also included six trials that were not randomized or controlled. Cumulatively, our inclusion of non-RCT, each achieving NOS scores of 8 or higher, underscores their high research quality. This, in turn, bolsters our ability to furnish robust and trustworthy evidence to substantiate our conclusions. The pooled results showed significant reductions in intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss, postoperative drainage, and loss of hemoglobin and hematocrit on the first postoperative day in comparison with the control group. When patients undergo surgery, there is a transient increase in fibrinolysis, which is thought to be a precipitating factor for blood loss during spinal surgery (31). TXA functions as a competitive antagonist of lysine binding sites on plasminogen, plasmin, and tissue plasminogen. This reversible blockade hinders fibrinolysis and degradation of blood clots and is activated intraoperatively and immediately after surgery, thereby reducing bleeding (32, 33). A study of 7,331 trauma patients by Knowlton et al. (34), a study of 168 knee arthroplasty procedures by Xue et al. (35), and a posterior spinal surgery study by Luan et al. (10) showed that use of TXA did not increase the risk of venous thrombosis in the lower extremities. In our pooled results, there were five cases of thrombosis-related complications in the TXA group and nine in the control group, with no marked difference between the two groups. Luo et al. found that use of TXA in spine surgery may induce epilepsy (36), and the incidence of convulsions increased from 0.5–1.0% to 6.4–7.3% with administration of TXA 50–100 mg/kg in cardiac surgery (37). No convulsion-related complications were reported in the studies included in our meta-analysis and review.

Limitations

This research had some limitations. First, most of the results were obtained under conditions of high heterogeneity, suggesting that there may be significant differences between studies, possibly owing to differences in patient populations, surgical procedures performed, doses of TXA, route of administration, publication bias, and potentially other unknown factors. Second, there were differences in the dose of TXA and its route of administration in the different studies. For example, Chen et al. injected 1 g of TXA around the wound while Ho et al. administered 10 mg/kg of TXA intravenously (25). Other studies applied topical TXA by irrigation, while others used soaked sponges, and some used local injection (24, 26). Therefore, the consistency and interpretability of our results may be affected by multiple TXA doses and regimens. Third, there were differences between the participants in the different studies, which may have introduced limitations in terms of heterogeneity, bias, and generalization. Again, these differences may affect the interpretation and applicability of the results of pooled analyses, so more rigorous statistical analysis and interpretation are needed to ensure confidence and clinical utility. Despite these limitations, our study provides strong evidence for the role of TXA in cervical surgery. However, more research is needed to address these limitations and confirm our findings.

 Conclusion

The current evidence indicates that TXA significantly reduces blood loss in cervical surgery. Furthermore, TXA was confirmed not to increase the risk of complications. However, there was heterogeneity between studies and some outcomes differed across the different studies. Therefore, there is a need for future studies to examine the effects of TXA in different populations and types of surgery in greater detail to gain a more complete understanding of the role and applicability of TXA in cervical surgery.

 Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

 Author contributions

HL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. YY: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. ZW: Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft. LM: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. CX: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing.

 Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Enze Medical Center (Group) Scientific Research (no. 23EZA04) and Zhejiang Medicine and Health Scientific Research Project (no. 2024KY531).

 Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

 Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

 References Lin PS Yao YT Tian LJ Jiang JJ Zhang Y He LX . The efficacy and safety of intravenous administration of tranexamic acid in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: evidence from a single cardiovascular center. Medicine. (2023) 102:e33819. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000033819, PMID: 37335691 Luo H Yan X Ren Y Zhang H Pan W. The efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Rev. (2023) 8:919–25. doi: 10.1530/eor-23-0168, PMID: 38038372 Yang YZ Cheng QH Zhang AR Yang X Zhang ZZ Guo HZ. Efficacy and safety of single- and double-dose intravenous tranexamic acid in hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. (2023) 18:593. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03929-9, PMID: 37563702 Le Huec JC AlEissa S Bowey AJ Debono B El-Shawarbi A Fernández-Baillo N . Hemostats in spine surgery: literature review and expert panel recommendations. Neurospine. (2022) 19:1–12. doi: 10.14245/ns.2143196.598, PMID: 35378578 Lee SH Cho KY Khurana S Kim KI. Less blood loss under concomitant administration of tranexamic acid and indirect factor Xa inhibitor following total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. (2013) 21:2611–7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2213-1, PMID: 23052111 Mannucci PM Levi M. Prevention and treatment of major blood loss. N Engl J Med. (2007) 356:2301–11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra067742 Bryant-Smith AC Lethaby A Farquhar C Hickey M. Antifibrinolytics for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2018) 2018:CD000249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000249.pub2, PMID: 29656433 Picetti R Shakur-Still H Medcalf RL Standing JF Roberts I. What concentration of tranexamic acid is needed to inhibit fibrinolysis? A systematic review of pharmacodynamics studies. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. (2019) 30:1–10. doi: 10.1097/mbc.0000000000000789, PMID: 30585835 Hui S Xu D Ren Z Chen X Sheng L Zhuang Q . Can tranexamic acid conserve blood and save operative time in spinal surgeries? A meta-analysis. Spine J. (2018) 18:1325–37. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.017, PMID: 29246849 Luan H Liu K Peng C Tian Q Song X. Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. (2023) 18:14. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03493-8, PMID: 36604661 Luo W Sun RX Jiang H Ma XL. The efficacy and safety of topical administration of tranexamic acid in spine surgery: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. (2018) 13:96. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0815-0, PMID: 29690892 Rahmani R Singleton A Fulton Z Pederson JM Andreshak T. Tranexamic acid dosing strategies and blood loss reduction in multilevel spine surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis: tranexamic acid for multilevel spine surgery. N Am Spine Soc J. (2021) 8:100086. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100086, PMID: 35141651 Xiao K Zhuo X Peng X Wu Z Li B. The efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in lumbar surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Jt Dis Relat Surg. (2022) 33:57–85. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.432, PMID: 35361081 Liberati A Altman DG Tetzlaff J Mulrow C Gøtzsche PC Ioannidis JP . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. (2009) 6:e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100, PMID: 19621070 Cumpston M Li T Page MJ Chandler J Welch VA Higgins JP . Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2019) 10:Ed000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.Ed000142 Wells G Shea B O'Connell J. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in Meta-analyses Ottawa Health Research Institute (2014). 7 p. Available at: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp Honda A Iizuka Y Michihata N Uda K Mieda T Takasawa E . Effect of intraoperative tranexamic acid on perioperative major hemorrhage requiring transfusion in patients undergoing elective spine surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis using a National Inpatient Database. Global Spine J. (2022) 14:804–11. doi: 10.1177/21925682221123317, PMID: 36006871 Elwatidy S Jamjoom Z Elgamal E Zakaria A Turkistani A El-Dawlatly A. Efficacy and safety of prophylactic large dose of tranexamic acid in spine surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Spine. (2008) 33:2577–80. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318188b9c5, PMID: 19011538 Yu C-C Gao W-J Yang J-S Gu H Md MZ Sun K . Can tranexamic acid reduce blood loss in cervical laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation and bone grafting: a retrospective observational study. Medicine. (2017) 96:e6043. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000006043, PMID: 28151914 Tsutsumimoto T Shimogata M Ohta H Yui M Yoda I Misawa H. Tranexamic acid reduces perioperative blood loss in cervical laminoplasty: a prospective randomized study. Spine. (2011) 36:1913–8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fb3a42, PMID: 21289587 Steinle AM Fogel JD Chen JW Chanbour H Vaughan WE Karwandyar A . Determining the effect of intraoperative TXA on postoperative blood loss in ACDF. Clin Spine Surg. (2023) 37:E18–23. doi: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001508, PMID: 37559204 Perez-Roman RJ Lugo-Pico JG Burks JD Madhavan K Sheinberg D Green BA . Short-term safety of tranexamic acid use in posterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery. J Clin Neurosci. (2019) 66:41–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.05.029, PMID: 31155344 Ma S Sun X Li L Tan Y Xia Y. Safety and efficacy of different doses of tranexamic acid in posterior cervical laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation and bone graft fusion. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. (2022) 36:1506–11. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202208057, PMID: 36545859 Khadivi M Saghebdoust S Moghadam N Zarei M Moosavi M Ataei H . Effect of topical Administration of Tranexamic Acid on intraoperative and postoperative blood loss during posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion surgery: a retrospective study. Turk Neurosurg. (2023) 33:94–100. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.Jtn.37389-21.2, PMID: 36066061 Ho CH Wong RNM. Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in cervical laminoplasty: a retrospective observational study [article]. J Orthopaed Trauma Rehabilit. (2020) 27:162–5. doi: 10.1177/2210491720941872 Chen C Ye Y-Y Chen Y-F Yang X-X Liang J-Q Liang G-Y . Comparison of blood loss between tranexamic acid-soaked absorbable Gelfoam and topical retrograde injection via drainage catheter plus clamping in cervical laminoplasty surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2022) 23:668. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05626-w, PMID: 35831797 Ivasyk I Chatterjee A Jordan C Geiselmann MT Chang PS Kamel H . Evaluation of the safety of tranexamic acid use in pediatric patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery: a retrospective comparative cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2022) 23:651. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05604-2, PMID: 35804327 Izima C Sampath SG Tang AJ Ambati VS Chou D Chan AK. Systematic review and meta-analysis of topical tranexamic acid in spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus. (2023) 55:E18. doi: 10.3171/2023.7.Focus23363, PMID: 37778051 Liu ZG Yang F Zhu YH Liu GC Zhu QS Zhang BY. Is tranexamic acid beneficial in open spine surgery? And its effects vary by dosage, age, sites, and locations: a Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Neurosurg. (2022) 166:141–52. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.044, PMID: 35843575 Lotan R Lengenova S Rijini N Hershkovich O. Intravenous tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in multilevel spine surgeries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. (2023) 31:e226–30. doi: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00738, PMID: 36469851 Murray DJ Pennell BJ Weinstein SL Olson JD. Packed red cells in acute blood loss: dilutional coagulopathy as a cause of surgical bleeding. Anesth Analg. (1995) 80:336–42. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199502000-00022, PMID: 7818122 Zheng C Ma J Xu J Li M Wu L Wu Y . The optimal dose, efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid and epsilon-Aminocaproic acid to reduce bleeding in TKA: a systematic review and Bayesian network Meta-analysis. Orthop Surg. (2023) 15:930–46. doi: 10.1111/os.13678, PMID: 36878889 Hardy JF Desroches J. Natural and synthetic antifibrinolytics in cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth. (1992) 39:353–65. doi: 10.1007/bf03009046, PMID: 1373346 Knowlton LM Arnow K Trickey AW Sauaia A Knudson MM. Does tranexamic acid increase venous thromboembolism risk among trauma patients? A prospective multicenter analysis across 17 level I trauma centers. Injury. (2023) 54:111008. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111008, PMID: 37669883 Xue CX Yao YF Lv H Cheng L Jing JH. Efficacy and safety of postoperative intravenous tranexamic acid in Total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study. Orthop Surg. (2021) 13:2227–35. doi: 10.1111/os.13045, PMID: 34668331 Luo H Shen C Qu T Chen L Sun Y Ren Y. Tranexamic acid-induced focal convulsions after spinal surgery: a rare case report and literature review on side effects of accidental spinal administration of tranexamic acid. EFORT Open Rev. (2023) 8:482–8. doi: 10.1530/eor-23-0016, PMID: 37289050 Keyl C Uhl R Beyersdorf F Stampf S Lehane C Wiesenack C . High-dose tranexamic acid is related to increased risk of generalized seizures after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. (2011) 39:e114–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.12.030, PMID: 21295991