<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Neurol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Neurology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Neurol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-2295</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fneur.2024.1381370</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Neurology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>CT texture analysis of vertebrobasilar artery calcification to identify culprit plaques</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Bo</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>Chen</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Haoyu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Cuiyan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>Shaofeng</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Huan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1325457/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Qilu Hospital, Shandong University</institution>, <addr-line>Jinan, Shandong</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>School of Medical Imaging, Binzhou Medical University</institution>, <addr-line>Binzhou, Shandong</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University</institution>, <addr-line>Tai&#x2019;an, Shandong</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University</institution>, <addr-line>Jinan</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>GE Healthcare</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn id="fn0001" fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Deqiang Qiu, Emory University, United States</p></fn>
<fn id="fn0002" fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Ning Mao, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, China</p>
<p>Xirui Hou, Johns Hopkins University, United States</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Huan Yang, <email>hyang531@163.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>13</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1381370</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>26</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>29</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2024 Liu, Xue, Lu, Wang, Duan and Yang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Liu, Xue, Lu, Wang, Duan and Yang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec id="sec1">
<title>Objectives</title>
<p>The aim of this study was to extract radiomic features from vertebrobasilar artery calcification (VBAC) on head computed tomography (CT) images and investigate its diagnostic performance to identify culprit lesions responsible for acute cerebral infarctions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2">
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease who underwent vessel wall MRI (VW-MRI) and head CT examinations from a single center were retrospectively assessed for VBAC visual and textural analyses. Each calcified plaque was classified by the likelihood of having caused an acute cerebral infarction identified on VW-MRI as culprit or non-culprit. A predefined set of texture features extracted from VBAC segmentation was assessed using the minimum redundancy and maximum relevance method. Five key features were selected to integrate as a radiomic model using logistic regression by the Aikaike Information Criteria. The diagnostic value of the radiomic model was calculated for discriminating culprit lesions over VBAC visual assessments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Results</title>
<p>A total of 1,218 radiomic features were extracted from 39 culprit and 50 non-culprit plaques, respectively. In the VBAC visual assessment, culprit plaques demonstrated more observed presence of multiple calcifications, spotty calcification, and intimal predominant calcification than non-culprit lesions (all <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). In the VBAC texture analysis, 55 (4.5%) of all extracted features were significantly different between culprit and non-culprit plaques (all <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). The radiomic model incorporating 5 selected features outperformed multiple calcifications [AUC&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.81 with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.72, 0.90 vs. AUC&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.61 with 95% CI of 0.49, 0.73; <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.001], intimal predominant calcification (AUC&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.67 with 95% CI of 0.58, 0.76; <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.04) and spotty calcification (AUC&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.62 with 95% CI of 0.52, 0.72; <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.005) in the identification of culprit lesions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Culprit plaques in the vertebrobasilar artery exhibit distinct calcification radiomic features compared to non-culprit plaques. CT texture analysis of VBAC has potential value in identifying lesions responsible for acute cerebral infarctions, which may be helpful for stroke risk stratification in clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>calcification</kwd>
<kwd>texture analysis</kwd>
<kwd>radiomics</kwd>
<kwd>computed tomography</kwd>
<kwd>plaque</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="8"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="31"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="5408"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Applied Neuroimaging</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec5">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The prevalence of vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) calcification is high in the intracranial artery, with rates of approximately 20% in the elderly and up to 50% in stroke patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>). The presence of intracranial artery calcification is suggestive of coexisting atherosclerosis and associated with an elevated risk of stroke (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>). Increasing studies have suggested location-dependent differences in the development of atherosclerosis in the posterior circulation plaques compared to the anterior circulation plaques (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>). An understanding of the characteristics of VBA calcification may aid in improving stroke risk stratification in the posterior circulation.</p>
<p>Calcification, as a component of advanced atherosclerotic plaque, has been suggested to be associated with ischemic vascular events in various arterial beds. Scattered and multiple calcifications were proposed to be correlated with a higher wall shear stress, thus potentially triggering embolic stroke and acute cardiovascular events (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>). Intimal-predominant calcification was associated with an increased risk of stroke and plaque instability in intracranial arteries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>). Nevertheless, the interpretation and analysis of calcification morphology remain restricted to the expertise of radiologists. It is essential to use advanced statistical descriptors to facilitate the non-invasive quantification of radiologic data beyond human-eye capabilities.</p>
<p>Radiomics involves texture analysis by extracting thousands of features to model the spatial distribution of voxel gray-level intensity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>). By applying high-order statistics to quantify image heterogeneity, texture analysis has been greatly developed in oncology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>). Recently, radiomics of coronary artery calcium outperformed the conventional Agatston score in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events on cardiac computed tomography (CT) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>). Therefore, we hypothesized that radiomics of intracranial artery calcification contain more information beyond what can be visually observed or manually quantified.</p>
<p>High-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (VW-MRI) allows for the identification of intracranial atherosclerotic plaque that is responsible for recent ischemic events (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>). Interpreting calcification can be challenging on routine MRI due to insufficient resolution to detect hypointensity, which is usually surrounded by soft plaque components with complex signal characteristics. CT remains the preferred modality for better visualization and characterization of calcifications. In acute stroke patients, CT is commonly used as an initial diagnostic tool for a shorter acquisition time and greater availability. Combining CT with VW-MRI images enables a comprehensive assessment of plaque calcification, which is easy to implement in the vertebrobasilar artery due to its linear trajectory above the foramen magnum. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of CT-based texture analysis, as compared to conventional visual assessments, in identifying culprit VBA plaques using VW-MRI as a reference standard.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec6">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec7">
<title>Study population</title>
<p>The cohort for this study was drawn from patients who underwent vessel wall MRI (VW-MRI) and head computed tomography (CT) scans within a two-week period at our institution from January 2020 to October 2023. Inclusion criteria were (i) a moderate-to-severe degree of luminal stenosis (&#x003E;50%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>) in the vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) on the VW-MRI and (ii) the concurrent presence of calcification on the CT images. Exclusion criteria were (i) evidence of non-atherosclerotic intracranial vascular pathology (e.g., cardiac embolism, dissection, vasculitis, aneurysm, Moya-Moya disease), (ii) patients with a history of stent or treatment of the target vessel, (iii) inadequate image quality or insufficient imaging coverage. The requirement for informed consent was waived in this Institutional Review Board-approved study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<title>MRI examination</title>
<p>MRI examinations were performed on a 3&#x2009;T MR imaging scanner (Achieva; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands). A standardized imaging protocol included diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and pre-and post-contrast VW-MRI. VW-MRI was acquired by using a T1-weighted volumetric isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition (T1-VISTA) (TR/TE, 425&#x2009;ms/19&#x2009;ms; acquired resolution, 0.7&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;0.7&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;1.1&#x2009;mm<sup>3</sup>; scan time, 6.1&#x2009;min). The T1-VISTA images were repeated 5&#x2009;min after contrast administration of 0.1&#x2009;mmol/kg contrast agent (dimeglumine gadopentetate). Luminal stenosis was measured on T1-VISTA images using criteria established in the Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease trial (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>). A culprit plaque was identified as the only or most stenotic lesion arising in the vertebrobasilar artery territory with the corresponding presence of acute cerebral infarction (hyperintensity on the DWI images and hypointensity on the ADC images) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>), and a non-culprit plaque was deemed if it occurred in patients without acute posterior circulation cerebral infarction.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>CT imaging and analysis</title>
<p>The CT was conducted on a 128-slice dual-source CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition Flash, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany). The CT scan was acquired from the foramen magnum to the top of the skull, using a tube voltage of 120&#x2009;kV, a tube current of 188&#x2009;mA, a section thickness of 1&#x2009;mm, and a slice acquisition interval of 1&#x2009;mm. Image quality was graded based on the presence and severity of artifacts (beam hardening, photon starvation and noise) using a three-point scale (poor, adequate or excellent). All the images were determined to be of adequate or excellent quality for analysis. Two radiologists independently interpreted all CT and VW-MRI images using specific anatomical landmarks (e.g., vertebrobasilar junction). The disagreement during data annotation was resolved by consulting with a senior radiologist, who had more than 10&#x2009;years of experience in plaque imaging. Calcification refers to areas of hyperdensity with a CT attenuation value of 130 Housfield units (HU) or higher. Calcification visual assessments included: (1) calcification number, categorized as either single or multiple; (2) spotty calcification, defined as calcium deposits less than 3&#x2009;mm in length within an arc of less than 90 degrees (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>); (3) calcification morphology, classified as either intimal-predominant or non-intimal predominant based on a validated grading scale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<title>CT texture analysis</title>
<p>The processes of texture analysis were as follows:</p>
<list list-type="order">
<list-item><p>Data loading: All calcification voxels accompanied by a plaque in the original CT images were converted into the Neuroimaging Informatics Technology Initiative (NIfTI) format and loaded into Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit (MITK, open-source software, <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.mitk.org" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.mitk.org</ext-link>).</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Segmentation: The region of interest (ROI) was manually delineated along the margins of calcification slice by slice in the axial plane. The adjacent cervical vertebra was carefully excluded from the ROI. A volume of interest for each VBA calcification segmentation was created semi-automatically by selecting pixels with attenuation above 130 HU (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Feature extraction: Radiomic feature extraction was performed using an open-source Python-based tool-Pyradiomcis package (Python 3.7.9, Pyradiomics 3.0.1). The calculated radiomic features are shown in <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S1</xref>. To obtain high-order textural features, two image pre-processing methods were employed for creating transformed-based datasets. For the Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) filter, sigma values were set as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5&#x2009;mm to extract fine, medium, and coarse features. Wavelet filtering yields 8 decompositions including LLH, LHL, LHH, LLL, HLL, HLH, HHL, and HHH, of which H stands for high-frequency and L stands for low-frequency.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Feature selection: All the extracted radiomics features with statistically significant differences were selected via the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) scheme, which allows for a joint effect of minimizing the redundancy and maximizing the relevance using fewer features. The number of features selected by mRMR algorithm was set to 5.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Prediction classifier: A linear combination of 5 feature variables selected by the mRMR algorithm was constructed using multivariate logistic regression method according to the Akaike Information Criteria. The predictor value in the logistic regression model was transformed into a probability for two-class prediction.</p></list-item>
</list>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Workflow of calcification segmentation. <bold>(A)</bold> The acquired image is viewed at the bone window setting [window level of 300 HU (Housfield units) and window width of 1,500 HU]. <bold>(B)</bold> The calcification region of interest is delineated slice by slice in the axial-view images (red). <bold>(C)</bold> The segmentation of calcification is achieved by selecting pixels with attenuation values above 130 HU (yellow).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fneur-15-1381370-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Categorical data were presented as frequencies. For continuous variables, mean&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;standard deviations were used for normal distribution, while median and interquartile range (IQR) were used for skewed distribution. The characteristics between different groups were tested using student&#x2019;s t-test or Mann&#x2013;Whitney U test for continuous variables, and &#x03C7;<sup>2</sup> test for categorical variables. The diagnostic performance of all models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the DeLong test. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated for identifying culprit plaques. Ten-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the robustness of the model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>). A two-tailed <italic>p</italic> value &#x003C; 0.05 was statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with R software (version 4.0.2).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec12">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>Patient and lesion characteristics</title>
<p>A total of 102 patients were eligible for the study based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eight patients with acute cerebral infarction and five without acute cerebral infarction were excluded due to incomplete high-order information from ROI segmentation. Finally, a total of 89 patients (59 male; mean age, 62.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;8.4&#x2009;years) were included in this study, of which 39 had acute cerebral infarction. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>, there were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups. Compared to non-culprit plaques, culprit plaques had a higher incidence of basilar artery calcification (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.004) and a greater degree of stenosis (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.032). In the visual assessment of calcification characteristics, culprit plaques showed a higher prevalence of multiple calcifications (28% vs. 6%, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.007), intimal predominant calcification (46% vs. 12%, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.001), and spotty calcification (54% vs. 30%, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.03) compared to non-culprit plaques. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figures 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">3</xref> present the representative CT and VW-MRI images for the culprit and non-culprit lesions, respectively.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Patients and lesion characteristics.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th rowspan="2"/>
<th align="center" valign="top">ACI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Non-ACI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>P</italic>-value</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">(<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;39)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">(<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;50)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Age, year</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">62.77&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;9.36</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">62.68&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;7.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.961</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Male</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">26 (67%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33 (66%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">BMI, kg/m<sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">27.75&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.98</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">26.97&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;3.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.401</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="4"><bold>Risk factors</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Diabetes mellitus</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">27 (69%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">30 (60%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.385</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Smoking</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13 (33%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10 (20%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.222</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Hypertension</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">36 (92%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">47 (94%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Hyperlipidemia</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18 (46%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21 (42%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.830</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Coronary heart disease</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18 (46%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17 (34%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.279</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="4"><bold>Drug use</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Cholesterol-lowering</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5 (13%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13 (25%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.184</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Antiplatelet</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8 (21%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15 (30%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.340</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Time interval between vw-MRI and CT</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2 (1, 4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4 (2, 7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.173</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Infarction locations</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">64</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Medulla</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5 (8%)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Pons</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15 (23%)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Midbrain</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1 (2%)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Cerebellum</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24 (37%)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Occipital lobe</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12 (19%)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Temporal lobe</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3 (5%)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Thalamus</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2 (3%)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Callosum</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2 (3%)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Plaque location</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.004<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Basilar artery</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10 (26%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2 (4%)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Vertebral artery</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">29 (74%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">48 (96%)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Stenosis degree (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">68.29 (9.20)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">61.94 (12.32)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.032<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Calcification characteristics</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Number</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.007<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Single</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">28 (72%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">47 (94%)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Multiple</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11 (28%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3 (6%)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Spotty calcification</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.030<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Negative</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18 (46%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35 (70%)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Positive</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21 (54%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15 (30%)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Intimal predominant calcification</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Negative</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21 (54%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">44 (88%)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Positive</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18 (46%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6 (12%)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Values are mean&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;SD or number (%). <sup>&#x002A;</sup><italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05. ACI, acute cerebral infarction; BMI, body mass index; CT, computed tomography; vw-MRI, vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Example of calcification presence in a culprit plaque of a 64-year-old male symptomatic patient. Pre-contrast <bold>(A)</bold> and post-contrast <bold>(B)</bold> vessel wall MRI show an eccentric plaque (arrow) in the basilar artery. DWI image <bold>(C)</bold> demonstrates the presence of hyperintensity (yellow arrow) in the brainstem. Axial <bold>(D)</bold>, sagittal <bold>(E)</bold>, and coronal <bold>(F)</bold> CT images demonstrate the corresponding presence of calcification (arrow) which is classified as single, spotty, and intimal predominant calcification on visual assessment.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fneur-15-1381370-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Example of calcification presence in a non-culprit plaque of a 66-year-old female asymptomatic patient. Pre-contrast <bold>(A)</bold> and post-contrast <bold>(B)</bold> vessel wall MRI images show an eccentric plaque (arrow) in V4 segment of the vertebral artery. DWI image <bold>(C)</bold> demonstrates no presence of hyperintensity in the posterior circulation. Axial <bold>(D)</bold>, sagittal <bold>(E)</bold>, and coronal <bold>(F)</bold> CT images demonstrate the corresponding presence of calcification (arrow), which is classified as multiple, non-spotty, and non-intimal predominant calcification on visual assessment.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fneur-15-1381370-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<title>Radiomic analysis of calcification features for identifying culprit plaques</title>
<p>Out of the 1,218 extracted features, 55 transform-based features showed a significant difference between culprit and non-culprit lesions (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S2</xref>). Among them, 22 (40.0%) were first order, 24 (43.6%) were gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), 3 (5.5%) were gray-level dependence matrix (GLDM), 2 (3.6%) were gray level run length matrix (GLRLM) and 4 (7.3%) were gray-level size zone matrix (GLSZM) parameters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). All the 55 calculated statistics yielded an AUC higher than 0.60.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Receiver operating characteristic scatter plot of 55 radiomics features. Radiomic parameters are situated on the x-axis, while their corresponding AUC values to identify culprit lesions are shown on the y-axis. AUC, the area under the curve; GLCM, gray level co-occurrence matrix; GLDM, gray-level dependence matrix; GLRLM, gray level run length matrix; GLSZM, gray-level size zone matrix.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fneur-15-1381370-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>After mRMR selection, 5 features (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>) were retained to construct the optimal radiomic signature, which encompassed 4 features in the LoG-filtered image and 1 feature in the wavelet-filtered image. The association between the 5 radiomics features and culprit lesions is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. A logistic regression model was built with the 5 radiomics features and defined the importance levels.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Multivariate logistic regression analyses of the radiomics features for identifying culprit plaques.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Variables</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">OR</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">95%CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>P</italic>-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">log-sigma-4-0-mm-3D_glszm_SmallAreaLowGrayLevelEmphasis</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.73</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.40, 1.32</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.295</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">log-sigma-5-0-mm-3D_glszm_LargeAreaLowGrayLevelEmphasis</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.49</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.73, 3.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.278</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">wavelet-LLH_glcm_InverseDifferenceMoment</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.34</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.27, 8.81</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.015</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">log-sigma-3-0-mm-3D_gldm_DependenceVariance</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.47</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.23, 0.95</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.036</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">log-sigma-4-0-mm-3D_firstorder_90Percentile</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.56</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.32, 0.99</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.045</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>CI, confident interval; OR, odds ratio.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>Heat map of associations between the 5 radiomics features and culprit lesions.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fneur-15-1381370-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>LLH_GLCM_InverseDifferenceMoment in wavelet-filtered image was identified as the most important feature, followed by GLDM_DependenceVariance in 3&#x2009;mm-sigma LoG-filtered image, firstorder_90Percentile in 4&#x2009;mm-sigma LoG-filtered image, GLSZM_LargeAreaLowGrayLevelEmphasis in 5&#x2009;mm-sigma LoG-filtered image and GLSZM_SmallAreaLowGrayLevelEmphasis in 4&#x2009;mm-sigma LoG-filtered image (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). Among the 5 features, Log-sigma-4-0-mm-3D_firstorder_90Percentile showed the highest AUC value [0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.58&#x2013;0.81] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p>Importance of radiomics features. Histogram showed the role of the final five selected features that contribute to the radiomics signature.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fneur-15-1381370-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption><p>Box plots and receiver operating characteristic curves of 5 radiomic features. <bold>(A)</bold> Log-sigma-4-0-mm-3D_glszm_SmallAreaLowGrayLevelEmphasis; <bold>(B)</bold> Log-sigma-4-0-mm-3D_firstorder_90Percentile; <bold>(C)</bold> Wavelet-LLH_glcm_InverseDifferenceMoment; <bold>(D)</bold> Log-sigma-5-0-mm-3D_glszm_LargeAreaLowGrayLevelEmphasis; <bold>(E)</bold> Log-sigma-3-0-mm-3D_gldm_DependenceVariance.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fneur-15-1381370-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<title>Comparison of diagnostic performance of conventional and radiomics models</title>
<p>The diagnostic performances of the conventional and radiomics models are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>, the radiomics model demonstrated significantly higher AUC for the detection of culprit plaques (0.81; 95% CI: 0.72&#x2013;0.90) compared with the presence of multiple calcifications (0.61; 95% CI: 0.49&#x2013;0.73, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.001), spotty calcification (0.62; 95% CI: 0.52&#x2013;0.72, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.005), and intimal predominant calcification (0.67; 95% CI: 0.58&#x2013;0.76, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.04). Ten-fold cross-validation was conducted to demonstrate the model&#x2019;s robustness, yielding a mean AUC of 0.76.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Diagnostic performance of conventional models and radiomics models to identify culprit plaques.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Models</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">AUC (95%CI)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Accuracy</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Sensitivity</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Specificity</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">PPV</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">NPV</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Multiple calcifications</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.61 (0.49&#x2013;0.73)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.28</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.94</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.78</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Spotty calcification</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.62 (0.52&#x2013;0.72)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.63</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.54</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.66</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Intimal calcification</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.67 (0.58&#x2013;0.76)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.88</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.46</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.68</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Radiomic model</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.81 (0.72&#x2013;0.90)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.73</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.88</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.64</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; NPV, negative predict value; PPV, positive predict value.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig position="float" id="fig8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption><p>Receiver operating characteristic curves of radiomics model and visual assessments (multiple calcifications, spotty calcification and intimal predominant calcification) in the identification of culprit lesions. Radiomics model showed the best discriminatory power [the area under the curve (AUC) = 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72&#x2013;0.90]. The discriminatory power of visual assessment with use of multiple calcifications (AUC = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.49&#x2013;0.73; <italic>P</italic> = 0.001), spotty calcification (AUC = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.52&#x2013;0.72; <italic>P</italic> = 0.005) and intimal predominant calcification (AUC = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.58&#x2013;0.76; <italic>P</italic> = 0.04) showed poor diagnostic accuracy compared with the radiomics model.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fneur-15-1381370-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec16">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In this study, we performed a three-dimensional texture analysis to determine whether CT-based radiomic features could be used to discriminate culprit lesions. We also intended to evaluate the diagnostic performance of texture analysis from VBAC compared with conventional methods. Our study found multiple calcification texture parameters differed significantly between culprit and non-culprit lesions. A model with a subset of 5 features according to the minimal-redundancy-maximal-relevance criterion achieved an AUC of 0.81 and an accuracy of 0.73, which significantly outperformed VBAC visual assessments.</p>
<p>To our knowledge, this was the first study to assess the association between radiomic features of intracranial artery calcification and plaque instability using multi-modality imaging methods. Several MRI-defined vulnerable plaque characteristics, such as intraplaque hemorrhage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>) and lipid-rich necrotic core (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>), have been validated by specimens from carotid endarterectomy. Nevertheless, current challenges in MR imaging intensity features of intracranial plaque components included spatial resolution and histopathologic validation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>). Vessel wall calcification can be objectively detected on CT images owing to its high attenuation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>). CT texture analysis of vertebrobasilar artery calcification may serve as a promising imaging marker of plaque instability, thereby assisting in clinical decision-making and improving patient outcomes in the posterior circulation stroke.</p>
<p>Several studies have investigated the visual assessment of plaque calcification in relation to stroke risk. Multiple calcifications were associated with the presence of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage, therefore implicating an increased plaque vulnerability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>). A higher prevalence of spotty calcification in the cervicocerebral artery was reported in stroke patients compared with controls (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>). A study has found that spotty calcification in nonstenotic carotid atherosclerosis is associated with ischemic stroke on the same side (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>). Other studies have demonstrated the pattern of calcification within the intimal layer was associated with unstable plaque phenotype (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>) and increased stroke risk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>). In the current study, multiple calcifications had a low sensitivity of 28%, and spotty calcification and intimal predominant calcification have relatively low specificity (54 and 46%) for the presence of culprit lesions. These performances may be explained by the simultaneous development of atherosclerotic calcification in the intimal layer and non-atherosclerotic calcification in the internal elastic lamina and medial layers. Hence, visual assessments of calcification based on its morphology may not provide sufficient data to determine plaque instability.</p>
<p>Radiomics uses computational methods to extract thousands of quantitative features for comprehensive calcification description, mostly imperceptible to the human eye (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>). In the animal model of hyperlipidemic mice, several radiomic features of vascular calcium were associated with aging and Western diet, which cannot be determined from calcium scores from conventional CT or total calcium content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>). In the clinical setting, a radiomic-based model was developed from coronary artery calcium radiomic features, resulting in significant improvement in predicting individuals at risk for clinical events (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>). In line with previous research, our study demonstrates the significance of calcification radiomics features that extend beyond conventional visual evaluations, achieving the highest AUC values. The diagnostic performance of texture analysis in identifying culprit lesions exhibited a specificity of 90%. This high level of true negative rate suggests that the radiomic model may be better at identifying non-culprit lesions than culprit ones.</p>
<p>Of the 5 selected features, LLH_GLCM_InverseDifferenceMoment in wavelet-filtered image, GLDM_DependenceVariance in 3&#x2009;mm-sigma LoG-filtered image, and firstorder_ 90Percentile in 4&#x2009;mm-sigma LoG-filtered image have the significant effect on the radiomic model. The lower value of firstorder_90Percentile in the culprit lesion implies a possible association between low calcification density and plaque instability. GLCM_InverseDifferenceMoment is a measure used to evaluate the homogeneity of an image. GLDM_DependenceVariance is a metric that measures the degree of asymmetry in the distribution of values around the mean value. The above two features suggest that calcification within culprit plaques is more uniform and homogeneous. These variations in texture analysis may offer insights into the underlying pathophysiology of calcium deposits. The lesion, consisting primarily of a specific calcium salt, may demonstrate greater homogeneity compared to the mixed type and is associated with the unstable plaque phenotype (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>).</p>
<p>Consistent with previous studies, calcification presence in the proximal intracranial artery (e.g., basilar artery) is relatively rare compared with the distal one (e.g., vertebral artery) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>). Moreover, a higher portion of basilar artery calcification was present in the culprit lesions than in the non-culprit ones. A significant discrepancy was observed in the pattern of calcification within the intracranial arteries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>). A previous study found that calcification in the middle cerebral artery is less pronounced on the symptomatic side compared to the asymptomatic side on CT images (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>). In the intracranial internal carotid artery, no difference was detected in the presence of calcification between the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>). In a study involving seven intracranial arteries, the presence of calcification is associated with mortality and vascular events in ischemic stroke patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">29</xref>). A larger sample size would be necessary to further investigate the relationship between basilar artery calcification and plaque instability.</p>
<p>This study has several limitations. First, the study is retrospective, and the possibility of selection bias cannot be avoided. Second, the sample size of enrolled patients was limited. Texture analysis exhibits significant sensitivity to technical factors, including CT acquisition parameters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">30</xref>). Therefore, all CT scans in our study were conducted using the same scanning to prevent bias in the extraction of radiomics features. Third, the ROI of calcification is small. We utilized a three-dimensional texture analysis to assess calcification texture, which provided superior performance compared to a two-dimensional approach (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>). Fourth, the mRMR algorithm may be overfitted due to the absence of a distinct validation cohort. Despite this, we employed a tenfold cross-validation technique to assess the classifier&#x2019;s performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>), improving the generalizability of the model.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec17">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>CT texture analysis provides an objective evaluation of calcification heterogeneity and outperforms visual assessments in identifying culprit plaques, thereby serving as a potential predictor for plaque instability in the vertebrobasilar artery.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec18">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="sec" rid="sec24">Supplementary material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec19">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving humans were approved by Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent from the patients/participants or patients/participants&#x2019; legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec20">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>BL: Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft. CX: Formal analysis, Software, Writing &#x2013; original draft. HL: Resources, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft. CW: Data curation, Project administration, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. SD: Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing &#x2013; original draft. HY: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec21">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (no. ZR2023MH320) and the Academic Promotion Programme of Shandong First Medical University (no. 2019QL023).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec22">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>SD was employed by GE Healthcare.</p>
<p>The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec23">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec24">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1381370/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1381370/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.DOCX" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van der Toorn</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Engelkes</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ikram</surname> <given-names>MK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ikram</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vernooij</surname> <given-names>MW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kavousi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Vertebrobasilar artery calcification: prevalence and risk factors in the general population</article-title>. <source>Atherosclerosis</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>286</volume>:<fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.05.001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31100619</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>XY</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lam</surname> <given-names>WW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ng</surname> <given-names>HK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>YH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>KS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Intracranial artery calcification: a newly identified risk factor of ischemic stroke</article-title>. <source>J Neuroimaging</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>300</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1552-6569.2007.00158.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17894617</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qiao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anwar</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Intrapiromkul</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeiler</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leigh</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Patterns and implications of intracranial arterial remodeling in stroke patients</article-title>. <source>Stroke</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>47</volume>:<fpage>434</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>40</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009955</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26742795</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Homssi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vora</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baradaran</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kamel</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Association between spotty calcification in Nonstenosing extracranial carotid artery plaque and ipsilateral ischemic stroke</article-title>. <source>J Am Heart Assoc</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>e028525</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/JAHA.122.028525</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37183863</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van den Beukel</surname> <given-names>TC</given-names></name> <name><surname>van der Toorn</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vernooij</surname> <given-names>MW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kavousi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akyildiz</surname> <given-names>AC</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Jong</surname> <given-names>PA</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Morphological subtypes of intracranial internal carotid artery arteriosclerosis and the risk of stroke</article-title>. <source>Stroke</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>53</volume>:<fpage>1339</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.036213</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34802249</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Intimal predominant calcification is associated with plaque instability in the vertebrobasilar artery by vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography</article-title>. <source>Eur J Radiol</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>168</volume>:<fpage>111132</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111132</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37806194</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schoepf</surname> <given-names>UJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Emrich</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A brave New World: toward precision phenotyping and understanding of coronary artery disease using Radiomics plaque analysis</article-title>. <source>Radiology</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>299</volume>:<fpage>107</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1148/radiol.2021204456</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33595391</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meyer</surname> <given-names>HJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schnarkowski</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pappisch</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kerkhoff</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wirtz</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>H&#x00F6;hn</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>CT texture analysis and node-RADS CT score of mediastinal lymph nodes&#x2014;diagnostic performance in lung cancer patients</article-title>. <source>Cancer Imaging</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>22</volume>:<fpage>75</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40644-022-00506-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36567339</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eslami</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parmar</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Foldyna</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholtz</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ivanov</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeleznik</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Radiomics of coronary artery calcium in the Framingham heart study</article-title>. <source>Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>e190119</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1148/ryct.2020190119</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32715301</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pavlou</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kasner</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mess&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Vessel Wall magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis: a Meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Stroke</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>52</volume>:<fpage>193</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>202</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031480</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33370193</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qiao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeiler</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mirbagheri</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leigh</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Urrutia</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wityk</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Intracranial plaque enhancement in patients with cerebrovascular events on high-spatial-resolution MR images</article-title>. <source>Radiology</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>271</volume>:<fpage>534</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1148/radiol.13122812</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24475850</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Samuels</surname> <given-names>OB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joseph</surname> <given-names>GJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lynn</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>HA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chimowitz</surname> <given-names>MI</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis</article-title>. <source>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>643</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10782772</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Diniz</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Differential features of culprit intracranial atherosclerotic lesions: a whole-brain Vessel Wall imaging study in patients with acute ischemic stroke</article-title>. <source>J Am Heart Assoc</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>705</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/JAHA.118.009705</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30033434</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gan</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Spotty calcium on Cervicocerebral computed tomography angiography associates with increased risk of ischemic stroke</article-title>. <source>Stroke</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>50</volume>:<fpage>859</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>66</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023273</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30879439</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kockelkoren</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vos</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Hecke</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vink</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bleys</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verdoorn</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Computed tomographic distinction of intimal and medial calcification in the intracranial internal carotid artery</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>e0168360</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0168360</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28060941</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>DDM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Deep-learning-enabled brain hemodynamic mapping using resting-state fMRI</article-title>. <source>NPJ Digit Med</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>116</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41746-023-00859-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37344684</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bos</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arshi</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>van den Bouwhuijsen</surname> <given-names>QJA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ikram</surname> <given-names>MK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Selwaness</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vernooij</surname> <given-names>MW</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Atherosclerotic carotid plaque composition and incident stroke and coronary events</article-title>. <source>J Am Coll Cardiol</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>77</volume>:<fpage>1426</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.038</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33736825</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brunner</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Virani</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dodge</surname> <given-names>RC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nambi</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Associations between carotid artery plaque burden, plaque characteristics, and cardiovascular events: the ARIC carotid magnetic resonance imaging study</article-title>. <source>JAMA Cardiol</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>79</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jamacardio.2020.5573</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33206125</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lindenholz</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>van der Kolk</surname> <given-names>AG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zwanenburg</surname> <given-names>JJM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hendrikse</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The use and pitfalls of intracranial Vessel Wall imaging: how we do it</article-title>. <source>Radiology</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>286</volume>:<fpage>12</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>28</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1148/radiol.2017162096</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29261469</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saba</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nardi</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cau</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kamel</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suri</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Carotid artery plaque calcifications: lessons from histopathology to diagnostic imaging</article-title>. <source>Stroke</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>53</volume>:<fpage>290</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035692</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34753301</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Woolf</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Superficial and multiple calcifications and ulceration associate with intraplaque hemorrhage in the carotid atherosclerotic plaque</article-title>. <source>Eur Radiol</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<fpage>4968</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00330-018-5535-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29876705</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Association between carotid atherosclerotic plaque calcification and Intraplaque hemorrhage: a magnetic resonance imaging study</article-title>. <source>Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>37</volume>:<fpage>1228</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.308360</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Varghese</surname> <given-names>BA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cen</surname> <given-names>SY</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hwang</surname> <given-names>DH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duddalwar</surname> <given-names>VA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Texture analysis of imaging: what radiologists need to know</article-title>. <source>AJR Am J Roentgenol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>212</volume>:<fpage>520</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2214/AJR.18.20624</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30645163</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>NR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Setya</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pradhan</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Demer</surname> <given-names>LL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tintut</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Microarchitectural changes of cardiovascular calcification in response to in vivo interventions using deep-learning segmentation and computed tomography Radiomics</article-title>. <source>Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>42</volume>:<fpage>e228</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/ATVBAHA.122.317761</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35708025</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><label>25.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bischetti</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scimeca</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bonanno</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Federici</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anemona</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Menghini</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Carotid plaque instability is not related to quantity but to elemental composition of calcification</article-title>. <source>Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>27</volume>:<fpage>768</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.numecd.2017.05.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><label>26.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baek</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yoo</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>YD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nam</surname> <given-names>HS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heo</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The protective effect of middle cerebral artery calcification on symptomatic middle cerebral artery infarction</article-title>. <source>Stroke</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>48</volume>:<fpage>3138</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017821</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28939676</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><label>27.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>WJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>XH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>ZQ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>CB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>HL</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Postmortem study exploring distribution and patterns of intracranial artery calcification</article-title>. <source>Stroke</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>49</volume>:<fpage>2767</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022591</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30355206</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><label>28.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Weert</surname> <given-names>TT</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cakir</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rozie</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cretier</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meijering</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dippel</surname> <given-names>DWJ</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Intracranial internal carotid artery calcifications: association with vascular risk factors and ischemic cerebrovascular disease</article-title>. <source>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<fpage>177</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>84</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3174/ajnr.A1301</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18842764</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><label>29.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bugnicourt</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leclercq</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chillon</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Diouf</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deramond</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Canaple</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Presence of intracranial artery calcification is associated with mortality and vascular events in patients with ischemic stroke after hospital discharge: a cohort study</article-title>. <source>Stroke</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>42</volume>:<fpage>3447</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.618652</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21940971</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><label>30.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dohan</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gallix</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guiu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le Malicot</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reinhold</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soyer</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Early evaluation using a radiomic signature of unresectable hepatic metastases to predict outcome in patients with colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI and bevacizumab</article-title>. <source>Gut</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>69</volume>:<fpage>531</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316407</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31101691</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><label>31.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ng</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kozarski</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ganeshan</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goh</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Assessment of tumor heterogeneity by CT texture analysis: can the largest cross-sectional area be used as an alternative to whole tumor analysis?</article-title> <source>Eur J Radiol</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>82</volume>:<fpage>342</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.10.023</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23194641</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
