<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Mol. Biosci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Mol. Biosci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-889X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">752668</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmolb.2022.752668</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Molecular Biosciences</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Isolated Components From Spider Venom Targeting Human Glioblastoma Cells and Its Potential Combined Therapy With Rapamycin</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Caballero et&#x20;al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">Venom Components Have Antineoplastic Effects</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Caballero</surname>
<given-names>Marcus</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barreto</surname>
<given-names>Natalia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1425945/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bonfanti</surname>
<given-names>Amanda Pires</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1311460/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Munhoz</surname>
<given-names>Jaqueline</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1689547/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rocha e Silva</surname>
<given-names>Thomaz</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sutti</surname>
<given-names>Rafael</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1563388/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Verinaud</surname>
<given-names>Liana</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/110476/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pinheiro de Mato</surname>
<given-names>Felipe Cezar</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/247007/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lanfredi</surname>
<given-names>Guilherme Pauperio</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1451764/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Rap&#xf4;so</surname>
<given-names>Catarina</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1137206/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Faculdade de Ci&#xea;ncias Farmac&#xea;uticas</institution>, <institution>Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)</institution>, <addr-line>Campinas</addr-line>, <country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Departamento de Biologia Estrutural e Funcional</institution>, <institution>Instituto de Biologia</institution>, <institution>UNICAMP</institution>, <addr-line>Campinas</addr-line>, <country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Faculdade Israelita de Ci&#xea;ncias da Sa&#xfa;de Albert Einstein</institution>, <addr-line>S&#xe3;o Paulo</addr-line>, <country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Faculdade de Ci&#xea;ncias M&#xe9;dicas, Santa Casa de S&#xe3;o Paulo</institution>, <addr-line>S&#xe3;o Paulo</addr-line>, <country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
<institution>Departamento de Bioqu&#xed;mica e Imunologia</institution>, <institution>Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeir&#xe3;o Preto</institution>, <institution>Universidade de S&#xe3;o Paulo (FMRP-USP)</institution>, <addr-line>S&#xe3;o Paulo</addr-line>, <country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/421826/overview">Mei Zhou</ext-link>, Queen&#x2019;s University Belfast, United&#x20;Kingdom</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/332218/overview">Larance Ronsard</ext-link>, Ragon Institute, United&#x20;States</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/903185/overview">Eliza Wyszko</ext-link>, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry (PAS), Poland</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Catarina Rap&#xf4;so, <email>raposo@unicamp.br</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>14</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>752668</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>03</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>28</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Caballero, Barreto, Bonfanti, Munhoz, Rocha e Silva, Sutti, Verinaud, Pinheiro de Mato, Lanfredi and Rap&#xf4;so.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Caballero, Barreto, Bonfanti, Munhoz, Rocha e Silva, Sutti, Verinaud, Pinheiro de Mato, Lanfredi and Rap&#xf4;so</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these&#x20;terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Glioblastomas (GBs) are responsible for a higher mortality rate among gliomas, corresponding to more than 50% of them and representing a challenge in terms of therapy and prognosis. Peptide-based antineoplastic therapy is a vast and promising field, and these molecules are one of the main classes present in spider venoms. Recently, our research group demonstrated the cytotoxic effects of <italic>Phoneutria nigriventer</italic> spider venom (PnV) in GBs. The present study aimed to select the purified PnV-components with potential antineoplastic effects, as well as to compare different metabolic conditions. Human GB (NG97) cells were treated with the PnV fractions: F1 (less than 3&#xa0;kDa), F2 (between 3 and 10&#xa0;kDa), and F3 (greater than 10&#xa0;kDa). After treatments, viability (MTT), proliferation (CFSE), death (Annexin V/propidium iodide-PI), and cell cycle (PI) assays were performed. The F1 and F2 fractions in acute periods (1 and 5&#xa0;h) and low concentrations (0.1 and 1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml) showed more relevant effects and were repurified in subfractions (SF1&#x2013;SF11); from these, SF3 and SF4 showed the most significant effects. The previous inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin had a synergistic effect with SFs, reducing cell viability even more significantly than the untreated control. Taken together, the results point to components present in SF3 and SF4 as potential prototypes for the development of new drugs for GB treatment and stimulate studies to use these compounds in combination therapy with a rapamycin-like activity. Future studies will be conducted to characterize, synthesize the molecules, and to evaluate the efficacy and safety in preclinical models.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>glioblastoma</kwd>
<kwd>animal venom</kwd>
<kwd>cancer therapy</kwd>
<kwd>cytotoxicity</kwd>
<kwd>mTOR</kwd>
<kwd>rapamycin</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Funda&#xe7;&#xe3;o de Amparo &#xe0; Pesquisa do Estado de S&#xe3;o Paulo<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001807</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient&#xed;fico e Tecnol&#xf3;gico<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100003593</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Gliomas are tumors originating from glial cells, mostly astrocytes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Castro et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>), and represent 80% of all malignant primary tumors in the brain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Goodenberger and Jenkins, 2012</xref>). Gliomas classified as grade IV (glioblastoma, GB) are considered of high degree and greater malignancy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Weller et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>). Since 2016, the classification of gliomas has not only been based on histopathological characteristics but also according to molecular parameters, such as mutation in isocitrate dehydrogenase (<italic>IDH1</italic> and <italic>IDH2</italic>) and codeletion 1p/19q (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Louis et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>). Gliomas also show changes in several other genes, such as <italic>EGFR</italic> (epidermal growth factor receptor), <italic>P53</italic>, <italic>NF1</italic> (neurofibromin 1), <italic>CDKN2A/B</italic> (cyclin-dependent 2A/B kinase inhibitor), and <italic>PTEN</italic> (phosphatase and tensin homolog, which inhibit the mTOR pathway). The overexpression and/or mutation of <italic>EGFR</italic> is often found in GBs, which subsequently leads to the activation of many downstream signal pathways such as the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mTOR pathway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Li et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>), and this pathway is one of the almost inevitably altered molecular pathways in <italic>IDH</italic>-wild-type GB (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Le Rhun et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). However, the contribution of several of these mutations for targeted therapy development remains unclear (Giering et&#x20;al., 2017).</p>
<p>GB is the most aggressive of malignant brain tumors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bleeker et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>), and also one of the most lethal, with an expected survival of 12&#x2013;15&#xa0;months after diagnosis; only 5% of patients survive more than 5&#xa0;years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Gallego, 2015</xref>). The treatment of GB is based mainly on surgical resection, which can be associated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy with temozolomide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Lim et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>). Given such a poor prognosis, new therapeutic approaches are needed.</p>
<p>Natural products have been used as a source for screening and developing new drugs. Currently, more than 50% of the drugs used in the world are derived from natural products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Choene and Motadi, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Lin et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>). It has been shown that biomolecules from scorpion and spider venoms have a chemotherapeutic effect on glioma, neuroblastoma, leukemia, lymphoma, breast cancer, lung cancer, hepatoma, and pancreatic and prostate cancer, among others (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Rap&#xf4;so, 2017</xref>). Our group demonstrated that <italic>Phoneutria nigriventer</italic> spider venom (PnV) decreased cell viability and proliferation, impaired cell cycle and induced apoptosis of human GB lineages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Barreto dos Santos et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>), and reduced or eradicated the development of GB in a preclinical trial developed in mice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bonfanti et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>), and PnV-isolated components impaired cell migration and adhesion through RhoA-ROCK and Na<sup>&#x2b;</sup>/K<sup>&#x2b;</sup>-ATPase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Barreto et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Continuing the investigation, the objective of this study was to select fraction(s) and subfraction(s) from the PnV, which have the most significant effect on GB&#x20;cells, considering survival, proliferation, and cell cycle. Additionally, we investigated these effects with mTOR inhibition by rapamycin, simulating the impairment of this pathway, commonly deregulated in this type of tumor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Mecca et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>
<italic>Phoneutria nigriventer</italic> Venom Production and Fractionation</title>
<p>Two samples of lyophilized crude venom were extracted by electrical stimulation of numerous adult spiders of both sexes (Sisgen A23162A). The crude PnV, fractions, and subfractions were stored at &#x2212;80&#xb0;C and dissolved in a sterile culture medium immediately prior to use. The composition and reproducibility of the venom lots were verified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The initial fractionation of the crude venom was performed using the Amicon ultra centrifugal filter (&#x23;UFC801008; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Suwannee, GA, United&#x20;States). This procedure consisted of the separation of the crude venom by molecular mass using molecular filters, generating 3 main fractions that were denominated: F1 (LW &#x3d; low weight, less than 3&#xa0;kDa), F2 (IW &#x3d; intermediate weight, between 3&#x20;kDa and 10&#xa0;kDa), and F3 (HW &#x3d; high weight, more than 10&#xa0;kDa). From these, experiments were conducted to select the more significant fraction, considering the effects presented; then, F1 and F2 were chosen, and F3 was eliminated. A new purification of F1 and F2 together, using HPLC, was carried out, obtaining new components, which were denominated subfractions 1 to 11 (SF 1&#x2013;SF 11). Reversed phase HPLC was performed using a Shimadzu VP-ODS column, with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) as the mobile phase and 90% acetonitrile 0.1% TFA as the eluent.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>Cell Culture Maintenance and mTOR Pathway Inhibition</title>
<p>Human GB (NG97) cells were donated by a patient from the Hospital das Cl&#xed;nicas/Universidade Estadual de Campinas (HC/UNICAMP), and the cell line was established and characterized in a sequence of published studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Machado et&#x20;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Schenka et&#x20;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Machado et&#x20;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Machado et&#x20;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Lin et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>). NG97 cells were seeded at a density of 1&#x20;&#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> per cm<sup>2</sup> in a 25&#xa0;cm<sup>2</sup> culture bottle and were grown using Iscove&#x2019;s modified Dulbecco&#x2019;s medium (IMDM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100 UI/ml penicillin and streptomycin (pH 7.4) (Gibco), referred to as complete IMDM. The cell culture was maintained in a humidified atmosphere at 37&#xb0;C and 5% CO<sub>2</sub> until semi-confluence (about 90% of the total surface area). For the assays, cells were transferred after careful scraping of 48- or 96-well plates (Corning, Inc.), at an initial density of 1&#x20;&#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> cells per well, and incubated at 37&#xb0;C for 72&#xa0;h. The cells were then treated with 14&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml and 280&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml of PnV (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Rap&#xf4;so, 2017</xref>), F1, F2, and F3 (0.1, 1, and 10&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Barreto dos Santos et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>), or SF 1&#x2013;11 (0.1 and 1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml), for 1, 5, 24, and/or 72&#xa0;h, depending on the method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Barreto dos Santos et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Barreto et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>), according to the following assays, while the control cells were maintained in the medium for the same times. For the mTOR inhibition assay, cells were incubated with 50&#xa0;nM of rapamycin (&#x23;051357-13 Cayman Chemical) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Foster and Toschi, 2009</xref>). The inhibitor was first diluted in DMSO to a concentration of 10&#xa0;mM, and then diluted with IMDM to the final concentration. GB NG97 cells were incubated for 1&#xa0;h prior to the treatments. Subsequently, the inhibitor was replaced during the treatment periods (1, 5, 24, and/or 72&#xa0;h) together with SF 1&#x2013;11.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>Cell Viability Assay</title>
<p>Thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT), whose reduction capacity indicates cellular activity, was used to determine the cytotoxicity of PnV, and its fractions and subfractions. MTT was added to each well and incubated at 37&#xb0;C for 4&#xa0;h, according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol. Acidified isopropanol was added to each well to solubilize the blue crystals of MTT. Absorbance at 540&#xa0;nm, which indicates cell activity, was determined using a Multiskan GO microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, United&#x20;States). The MTT assay was performed with PnV 14 and 280&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml and fractions (F1, F2, and F3; 0.1, 1, and 10&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml, respectively), at 1, 2, and 5&#xa0;h treatment times; after choosing and repurifying F1 and F2, the test was performed again using all SF (1&#x2013;11), with or without mTOR inhibition, as mentioned before.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>Cell Proliferation Assay</title>
<p>After culturing, 2&#x20;&#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> cells/mL were washed with sterile PBS and then resuspended in 1&#xa0;ml PBS containing the CSFE probe (carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester, 5&#xa0;&#x3bc;M) and maintained at room temperature for 5&#xa0;minutes, protected from light. Then, complete IMDM was added to block the effect of CFSE, and the suspensions were washed twice by centrifugation at 300&#xa0;g for 10&#xa0;min, according to the manufactures&#x2019; protocol. Cells were then resuspended with complete IMDM, cultured, and treated with F1, F2, and F3 (0.1, 1, and 10&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml). The culture was kept at 37&#xb0;C, CO<sub>2</sub> 5%, for 24 and 72&#xa0;h. The analysis of an aliquot of cells labeled with CSFE by flow cytometry was performed on the same day of labeling to define the maximum incorporation value of the probe. After treatment time, cells from each well were transferred to appropriate tubes and analyzed using the FACSVerse flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), and the results were computed using the BD FACSuite software.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>Apoptosis/Necrosis Assay and Cell Cycle Analysis</title>
<p>To determine the extent of apoptosis and necrosis, after treatments with F1, F2, and F3 (0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml) for 1, 5, and 24&#xa0;h, respectively, 2&#x20;&#xd7; 10<sup>5</sup> cells were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated Annexin V and propidium iodide (Pi), using the Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, United&#x20;States &#x23;640914), following the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. A total of 10,000 cells were analyzed, and apoptosis/necrosis was determined using the FACSVerse cytometer and FACSuite system (BD Biosciences). The data were analyzed using FlowJo software (v7.6.5). For cell cycle distribution, following the treatments, 2&#x20;&#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> cells were fixed overnight at 4&#xb0;C in 70% ethanol. The fixed cells were then washed with PBS and incubated with 1&#xa0;ml solution containing 50&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml Pi, and 0.5&#xa0;&#xb5;g RNase A, for 30&#xa0;min, in the dark. Cell cycle distribution was assessed by flow cytometry using the FACSVerse cytometer and FACSuite system (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, United&#x20;States), and the data were analyzed using FlowJo software (v7.6.5).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6">
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>Values were analyzed using the GraphPad Prism software package, v. 5.0 (San Diego, CA, United&#x20;States). The level of significance was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett&#x2019;s and Tukey&#x2019;s multiple comparisons tests. Unpaired Student&#x2019;s t-test was used to compare each treatment with the control. Error bars show the standard error of the mean (SEM). A <italic>p</italic>-value &#x3c; 0.05 indicates the statistical significance.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>Venom Quality and Fractionation Scheme</title>
<p>It was demonstrated there were no significant differences between the two extracted venom samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1A</xref>). From the first PnV separation, three main fractions were obtained (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1B</xref>). These fractions were still complex mixtures, and they were evaluated by the effects on viability, proliferation, death, and cell cycle to select those with the most significant effects on GB&#x20;cells. Then, the purification of F1 and F2 (together) by HPLC generated eleven subfractions, named SF 1 to SF 11 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1C</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Venom samples and purification. <bold>(A)</bold> Venom profile by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). There was no significant difference between the two PnV samples used in this study. <bold>(B)</bold> Stages of the first PnV fractioning. This procedure consists in separating the fractions by molecular mass using molecular filters with nominal separation at 10 and 3&#xa0;kDa. LW &#x3d; low weight, less than 3&#xa0;kDa (F1); IW &#x3d; intermediate weight, molecules between 3 and 10&#xa0;kDa (F2); HW &#x3d; high weight, above 10&#xa0;kDa (F3). <bold>(C)</bold> Fractions F1 &#x2b; F2 together were repurified, obtaining 11 subfractions (SF1&#x2013;SF11).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmolb-09-752668-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>Effectivity Reducing GB&#x20;Cells&#x2019; Viability</title>
<p>The cell viability assay (MTT) was performed using fractions F1, F2, and F3 (0.1, 1, and 10&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x20;2</xref>). After 1&#xa0;h of exposure, F1 at 0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml was the most effective treatment to reduce the viability of GB&#x20;cells significantly compared to the untreated control (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01); F1 and F2, at 10&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml, also induced a significant reduction in the viability of GB&#x20;cells compared to the untreated control (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05), while no significant effect was observed in F3 fraction (2, A). After 5&#xa0;h of exposure, the alterations were less significant than 1&#xa0;h, and fractions F1 and F2 were still effective in reducing the viability of GB&#x20;cells (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05) (2, B), while no significant effect was observed in F3 fraction. After 24&#xa0;h of treatment, only F1 0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml showed a significant effect (2, C). Controls with PnV at 14 and 280&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml induced a significant decrease of cell viability after 1 and 5&#xa0;h, and after 24&#xa0;h only the overconcentration (280&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml) was significant.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Cell viability assay (MTT): human GB&#x20;cells treated with F1, F2, and F3 (0.1, 1, and 10&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml). <bold>(A)</bold> After 1&#xa0;h of treatment, F1 0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml was the most effective in reducing the viability of GB&#x20;cells, compared to untreated control; F1 and F2 at 10&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml were also significant. <bold>(B)</bold> After 5&#xa0;h of treatment, F2 (0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml) significantly reduced the viability of GB&#x20;cells. <bold>(C)</bold> After 24&#xa0;h of exposure, no significant effect was observed. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett&#x2019;s multiple comparisons test was performed; unpaired Student&#x2019;s t-tests were used to compare each treatment with the control. &#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05, &#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01, &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.0001, compared to the control (Cont).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmolb-09-752668-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>Cell Proliferation</title>
<p>The cell proliferation assay (CFSE) was performed using fractions F1, F2, and F3 (0.1, 1, and 10&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3</xref>). In the 24&#xa0;h of treatment, F1 at a dose of 10&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml was significantly effective in reducing proliferation, compared to control (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01), while F3, at 0.1 and 1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml, was significantly effective in inducing GB&#x20;cell proliferation (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05 and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.0001, respectively) (3.1, A). Results are represented in the histogram (3.1, B). After 72&#xa0;h of treatment, F1 at a concentration of 1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05) and F2 at 0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001) were significantly effective in reducing the proliferation of GB&#x20;cells (3.2, A). Results are represented in the histogram (3.2,&#x20;B).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Proliferation test using CFSE probe: human GB&#x20;cells treated with F1, F2, and F3 (0.1, 1, and 10&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml). 3.1&#x20;<bold>(A)</bold> After 24&#xa0;h of treatment, F1 at 10&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml was the most effective in reducing proliferation, while F3 at 0.1 and 1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml significantly increased GB&#x20;cell proliferation, compared to control. 3.1&#x20;<bold>(B)</bold> Representative histogram. 3.2&#x20;<bold>(A)</bold> After 72&#xa0;h of treatment, F1 at 1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml and F2 at 0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml were significantly effective in reducing the proliferation of GB&#x20;cells. 3.2&#x20;<bold>(B)</bold> Representative histogram. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett&#x2019;s multiple comparisons test; unpaired Student&#x2019;s t-tests were used to compare each treatment with the control. &#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05, &#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01, &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001, &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.0001, compared to the control (Cont).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmolb-09-752668-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>Induced Apoptosis and Necrosis in GB&#x20;Cells</title>
<p>The apoptosis/necrosis assay (Annexin V/PI) was performed using fractions F1, F2, and F3 at 0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml dose since this concentration induced distinctive effects in viability and proliferation tests (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure&#x20;4</xref>). After 1&#xa0;h of treatment, F3 induced a significant increase of GB&#x20;cells necrosis compared to the untreated control (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01), whereas all fractions, F1, F2, and F3, were significantly effective in inducing apoptosis (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05) (4.1, A). After 5&#xa0;h of treatment, F1 induced a significant increase of necrosis, compared to control; F2 apparently increased both necrosis and apoptosis, but it was not significant (4.2, A). F3 significantly decreased necrosis at this time-point. At 24&#xa0;h of treatment, no significant differences were observed between the untreated control and the treated GB&#x20;cells (4.3, A). Results are also represented in the histograms (4.1, B; 4.2, B; and 4.3,&#x20;B).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Apoptosis/necrosis assay (Annexin V/PI): human GB&#x20;cells treated with F1, F2, and F3 at 0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml. 4.1&#x20;<bold>(A)</bold> After 1&#xa0;h of treatment, F3 induced significant increase of GB&#x20;cell necrosis, compared to the untreated control, whereas F1, F2, and F3 induced apoptosis in this time point. 4.2&#x20;<bold>(A)</bold> After 5&#xa0;h of treatment, F1 and F2 induced significant necrosis, while F2 appears to induce apoptosis, although not significantly. 4.3&#x20;<bold>(A)</bold> After 24&#xa0;h of exposure, no significant differences were observed. <bold>(B)</bold> 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 show representative histograms. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett&#x2019;s multiple comparisons test; unpaired Student&#x2019;s t-tests were used to compare each treatment with the control. &#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05, &#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01, compared to the control (Cont).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmolb-09-752668-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>Cell Cycle Arrest at G1 and S Phases</title>
<p>The cell cycle assay (Pi) was performed using fractions F1, F2, and F3 at 0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#x20;5</xref>). After 1&#xa0;h of treatment, F2 and F3 significantly increased the percentage of GB&#x20;cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle compared to the untreated control, while F3 significantly increased cells in the S phase; F1, F2, and F3 significantly decreased the percentage of cells in the G2 phase (6.1, A). After 5&#xa0;h of exposure, F1 and F2 significantly increased the number of GB&#x20;cells in the S phase (5.2, A). At 24&#xa0;h of treatment, only F2 significantly increased the number of GB&#x20;cells in the S phase (5.3, A). The results are represented in the histogram (5.1, B; 5.2, B; and 5.3,&#x20;B).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Cell cycle assessed by propidium iodide (PI): human GB&#x20;cells treated with F1, F2, and F3 at 0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml 5.1&#x20;<bold>(A)</bold> After 1&#xa0;h of treatment, F2 and F3 significantly increased the number of GB&#x20;cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle compared to the untreated control, while F3 accumulated cells in the S phase; all fractions significantly decreased the percentage of cells in the G2 phase. 5.2&#x20;<bold>(A)</bold> After 5&#xa0;h of treatment, F1 and F2 significantly increased the number of cells in the S phase. 5.3&#x20;<bold>(A)</bold> After 24&#xa0;h of treatment, only F2 significantly increased the number of cells in the S phase. <bold>(B)</bold> 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 show representative histograms. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett&#x2019;s multiple comparisons test; unpaired Student&#x2019;s t-tests were used to compare each treatment with the control. &#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05, &#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01, compared to the control (Cont).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmolb-09-752668-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-6">
<title>Screening Subfractions&#x2019; Effects</title>
<p>The cell viability assay (MTT) was performed using subfractions SF 1 to SF 11 (0.1 and 1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml) from F1 and F2 separation by HPLC. The results showed, in general, that SF 3 and SF 4 were the most effective in decreasing viability of GB&#x20;cells, and 0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml concentration was more effective than 1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml; when the cells were pretreated with rapamycin, the effect of SFs was exacerbated, except in 5&#xa0;h of 0.1&#xa0;ug/mL treatment (interestingly, the most effective time and concentration) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Cell viability assay (MTT): human GB&#x20;cells treated with subfractions (SF1 to SF11) at 0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml, with or without mTOR inhibition with rapamycin. <bold>(A)</bold> After 1&#xa0;h of exposure, SF3, SF4, SF7, and SF8 significantly reduced the viability of GB&#x20;cells, compared to the untreated control. <bold>(B)</bold> Once the cells were pretreated with rapamycin, all SFs significantly reduced cell viability (except SF11). <bold>(C)</bold> 5&#xa0;h after exposure, all SFs significantly reduced cell viability. <bold>(D)</bold> All SFs also reduced cell viability when they were pretreated with rapamycin. <bold>(E)</bold> After 24&#xa0;h of treatment, SF2, SF3, SF4, SF5, SF9, and SF11 significantly reduced cell viability, and when pretreated with mTOR inhibitor, all SFs decreased viability of GB&#x20;cells. <bold>(F)</bold> ANOVA followed by Dunnett&#x2019;s multiple comparisons test; unpaired Student&#x2019;s t-tests were used to compare each treatment with the control. &#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05, &#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01, &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001, &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.0001, compared to the control (Cont).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmolb-09-752668-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>This screening revealed that SF 3, SF 4, SF 7, and SF 8 subfractions at 0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml and 1&#xa0;h of treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6A</xref>) were more effective in reducing the viability of GB&#x20;cells than the control group. When cells were pretreated with rapamycin, SF 1 to SF 10 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6B</xref>) showed a reduction in cell viability compared to the control group, and the reduction was more significant than cells without the inhibitor. After 5&#xa0;h of treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6C</xref>), all SFs showed a reduction in cell viability compared to the control group. In cells pretreated with rapamycin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6D</xref>), all SFs also showed a reduction of viability compared to the control group; however, the data were not as significant as those without mTOR inhibition. At the 24&#xa0;h treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6E</xref>), SF 2, SF 3, SF 4, SF 5, SF 9, and SF 11 induced a significant reduction in cell viability compared to the control group. In the cells pretreated with rapamycin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6F</xref>) all SFs induced a decrease of viability compared to the control group, which was more statistically significant than that without the inhibitor.</p>
<p>After 1&#xa0;h of treatment, at 1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#x20;7A</xref>), the SFs 7, 10, and 11 showed a significant reduction of cell viability compared to the control group. In the cells pretreated with rapamycin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#x20;7B</xref>), all SFs, excepting SF 2 and 5, induced a significant reduction of viability compared to the control group. After 5&#xa0;h of exposure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#x20;7C</xref>), SF 1, SF 3, SF 7, and SF 8 showed a reduction in cell viability compared to the control group. While cells were pretreated with rapamycin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#x20;7D</xref>), all SFs, except SF9, induced a significant reduction in cell viability compared to the untreated cells. At 24&#xa0;h treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#x20;7E</xref>), no subfractions showed effective reduction in cell viability, and when the cells were pretreated with rapamycin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#x20;7F</xref>), SF 3, SF 4, and SF 9 showed a significant reduction in cell viability compared to the control&#x20;group.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Cell viability assay (MTT): human GB&#x20;cells treated with subfractions (SF1 to SF11) at 1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml, with or without mTOR inhibition with rapamycin. <bold>(A)</bold> After 1&#xa0;h of exposure to treatments, SF7, SF10, and SF11 significantly reduced cell viability. <bold>(B)</bold> In cells pretreated with rapamycin, all SFs (except SF2 and SF5) significantly decreased the viability of cells. <bold>(C)</bold> 5&#xa0;h after treatments, SF1, SF3, SF7, and SF8 significantly reduced cell viability, and when cells were pretreated with rapamycin <bold>(D)</bold>, all SFs except SF9 significantly reduced cell viability. <bold>(E)</bold> 24&#xa0;h after exposure, no significant differences were observed, but when mTOR was inhibited <bold>(F)</bold>, SF3, SF4, and SF9 significantly reduced cell viability. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett&#x2019;s multiple comparisons test; unpaired Student&#x2019;s t-tests were used to compare each treatment with the control. &#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05, &#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01, compared to the control (Cont); &#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05, compared to the control (Cont).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmolb-09-752668-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>GBs correspond to more than 50% of gliomas and are characterized by their high mortality rate. As a heterogeneous and complex tumor, GBs represent a special challenge in terms of therapy and prognosis of cancer, so the development of new therapeutic approaches has great social relevance. Instead of focusing mainly on non-specific cytotoxic therapy, new substances targeting cancer-causing molecules can be a promising path in the treatment of GB. The spider venoms are potential sources of peptides with the ability to act on specific targets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Jenssen et&#x20;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Pineda et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>). In the present study, the fractions and subfractions obtained from the PnV purification were tested in different concentrations (0.1, 1, and 10&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml), to identify which of them have the most significant effect on inhibiting cell proliferation and survival of GB&#x20;cells to drive to the drug prototype molecules.</p>
<p>It was verified that the fractions F1 and F2 in acute periods (1 and 5&#xa0;h) were the most effective conditions to decrease tumor cells viability, inhibit proliferation, and induce cell death (mainly apoptosis) and cell cycle arrest. These results are in agreement with those of other studies showing spider venoms&#x2019; capability to stop tumor growth <italic>in&#x20;vitro</italic>, to inhibit proliferation, and induce apoptosis or necrosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Gao et&#x20;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wu et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; revised by; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Rap&#xf4;so, 2017</xref>). Considering these results, F1 and F2 were purified together, resulting in the subfractions SF 1 to SF 11. From these, SF 3 and SF 4 at 0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml and 5&#xa0;h of exposure were the best conditions to decrease GB&#x20;cell viability. To better understand mTOR inhibition influence, rapamycin was used previously and during treatment with the SFs. The treatment with this inhibitor exacerbates the effects of SFs in almost all conditions, except at 5&#xa0;h with 0.1&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/ml, which interestingly is the condition that presented the best effect, suggesting a possible saturation of targets, which could limit the synergistic effect.</p>
<p>mTOR is a member of the serine/threonine protein kinase family that plays a central role in cell growth and proliferation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Duzgun et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>). Also, mutations in the tumor suppressor gene <italic>PTEN</italic>, the protein that inactivates the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, are frequent events in GBs and are associated with therapeutic resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Benitez et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>). Therefore, the (PTEN)/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway has emerged as a crucial player in GB development and progression, and is a potential target for new drugs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Yang et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). However, it has turned out to be challenging to translate this extensive knowledge into a clinical benefit.</p>
<p>mTORC1 inhibitors mainly contain rapamycin (sirolimus) and its analogs, such as RAD001 (everolimus), CCL-779 (temsirolimus), AP23573 (ridaforolimus) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Li et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>), and ABI-009 (nab-Sirolimus&#x2014;an injectable nanoparticle form of human albumin-bound sirolimus) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Hou et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). Rapamycin inactivates mTORC1 by changing the kinase conformation. Although rapamycin and its analogs exhibit efficacy in non-clinical models (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Arcella et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>), trials of phases I and II have shown that these mTOR inhibitors are not as useful as single agents in GBs and would create hyperactivation of Akt and mTORC2. This could be caused by some feedback loop and pathway cross talk, where Akt can phosphorylate mSin1, leading to hyperactivation and promoting mTORC2 activation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Saxton and Sabatini, 2017</xref>), developing escape pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chang et&#x20;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cloughesy et&#x20;al., 2008</xref>; Trials: NCT00515086&#x2014;<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00515086">https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00515086</ext-link>&#x2014;tested everolimus and was finished in 2011, NCT00022724&#x2014;<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00022724">https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00022724</ext-link>&#x2014;tested temsirolimus and was finished in 2018, and NCT00087451&#x2014;<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00087451">https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00087451</ext-link>&#x2014;tested ridaforolimus and was finished in 2015).</p>
<p>Other studies are exploring the combination treatment of rapamycin analogs with other modalities: trial NCT0062243 tested the combination of EGFR inhibitor erlotinib with sirolimus; however, it did not show promising results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Reardon et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>); trial NCT00805961 (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00805961">https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00805961</ext-link>), a phase II study of everolimus with bevacizumab (monoclonal antibody against VEGF), was feasible and efficacious (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Hainsworth et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>); and trial NCT03463265 (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03463265">https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03463265</ext-link>) (recruiting) combines ABI-009 with bevacizumab, TMZ, lomustine (an alkylating nitrosourea compound), or marizomib (a marine-derived natural product proteasome inhibitor). Then, the selected SFs tested in the present study can be candidates that are used as combining therapy with mTOR inhibitors, potentiating the effects and/or avoiding the resistance mechanisms. In addition, considering the synergistic effect observed between SFs and rapamycin, it is possible to speculate that SFs can have members of the mTOR pathway as targets. In agreement with this hypothesis, it was shown that the crude PnV decreased Akt in acute periods of envenoming in the murine model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mesquita-Britto et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>). This mechanism in GB&#x20;cells has to be confirmed.</p>
<p>Taken together, the results suggest that molecules present in SF 3 and SF 4 can be drug prototypes to develop a new chemotherapy against GBs. The best condition to continue investigating was established. In addition, the antitumor effects of the SFs were tested, indicating the action of molecules through the mTOR pathway, which represents a great challenge in the resistance to therapy. The molecules from SFs have potential to be used as combination therapy with rapamycin-like activity. Further studies will characterize the molecules and test the associated therapy in a syngeneic murine tumor&#x20;model.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>MC, NB and APB worked on the experiments. JM, FCP, GPL and LV contributed to the construction of the text. TRS and RS did the extraction and purification of the venom. CR conducted the study and writing of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and agreed to the submission.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The current study was supported by the following Brazilian foundations: Funda&#xe7;&#xe3;o de Amparo &#xe0; Pesquisa do Estado de S&#xe3;o Paulo (the S&#xe3;o Paulo Research Foundation&#x2014;FAPESP&#x2014;&#x23;2015/04194-0) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient&#xed;fico e Tecnol&#xf3;gico (the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development&#x2013;CNPq&#x2014;&#x23;431465/2016-9). MC (&#x23;2017/24331-7), NB (&#x23;2017/16196-2 and 2019/10003-3), APB (&#x23;2017/05402-0 and 2018/23559-7), and JM (&#x23;2018/03051-9) are/were fellows of FAPESP; LV is a fellow of the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s8">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s9">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors would like to thank the Funda&#xe7;&#xe3;o Florestal de S&#xe3;o Paulo, the gestors of PETAR, Intervales, and Curucutu PESM State Parks and the Center of Zoonosis Control of the city of Itu-SP for their support in fieldwork for spider collection.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Arcella</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biagioni</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Antonietta Oliva</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bucci</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frati</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Esposito</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Rapamycin Inhibits the Growth of Glioblastoma</article-title>. <source>Brain Res.</source> <volume>1495</volume>, <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.brainres.2012.11.044</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barreto dos Santos</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bonfanti</surname>
<given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rocha&#x2010;e&#x2010;Silva</surname>
<given-names>T. A. A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>da Silva</surname>
<given-names>P. I.</given-names>
<suffix>Jr</suffix>
</name>
<name>
<surname>da Cruz&#x2010;H&#xf6;fling</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verinaud</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Venom of the <italic>Phoneutria Nigriventer</italic> Spider Alters the Cell Cycle, Viability, and Migration of Cancer Cells</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Cell Physiol</source> <volume>234</volume>, <fpage>1398</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1415</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jcp.26935</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barreto</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caballero</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bonfanti</surname>
<given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Mato</surname>
<given-names>F. C. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munhoz</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>da Rocha&#x2010;e&#x2010;Silva</surname>
<given-names>T. A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Spider Venom Components Decrease Glioblastoma Cell Migration and Invasion through RhoA-ROCK and Na&#x2b;/K&#x2b;-ATPase &#x3b2;2: Potential Molecular Entities to Treat Invasive Brain Cancer</article-title>. <source>Cancer Cell Int</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12935-020-01643-8</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benitez</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>D&#x2019;Antonio</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boyer</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Camargo</surname>
<given-names>M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zanca</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>PTEN Regulates Glioblastoma Oncogenesis through Chromatin-Associated Complexes of DAXX and Histone H3.3</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms15223</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bleeker</surname>
<given-names>E. A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Jong</surname>
<given-names>W. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geertsma</surname>
<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Groenewold</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heugens</surname>
<given-names>E. H. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koers-Jacquemijns</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Considerations on the EU Definition of a Nanomaterial: Science to Support Policy Making</article-title>. <source>Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.11.007</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bonfanti</surname>
<given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barreto</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munhoz</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caballero</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cordeiro</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rocha-e-Silva</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Spider Venom Administration Impairs Glioblastoma Growth and Modulates Immune Response in a Non-clinical Model</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-62620-9</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parney</surname>
<given-names>I. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anderson</surname>
<given-names>F. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Asher</surname>
<given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernstein</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Patterns of Care for Adults with Newly Diagnosed Malignant Glioma</article-title>. <source>Jama</source> <volume>293</volume>, <fpage>557</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jama.293.5.557</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Choene</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Motadi</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Validation of the Antiproliferative Effects of Euphorbia Tirucalli Extracts in Breast Cancer Cell Lines</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>98</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>110</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1134/S0026893316010040</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cloughesy</surname>
<given-names>T. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoshimoto</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nghiemphu</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Antitumor Activity of Rapamycin in a Phase I Trial for Patients with Recurrent PTEN-Deficient Glioblastoma</article-title>. <source>Plos Med.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>e8</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pmed.0050008</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duzgun</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eroglu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biray Avci</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Role of mTOR in Glioblastoma</article-title>. <source>Gene</source> <volume>575</volume>, <fpage>187</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>190</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gene.2015.08.060</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Foster</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Toschi</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Targeting mTOR with Rapamycin: One Dose Does Not Fit All</article-title>. <source>Cell Cycle</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1026</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1029</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4161/cc.8.7.8044</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gallego</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Nonsurgical Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma</article-title>. <source>Curr. Oncol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>273</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>281</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3747/co.22.2436</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shan</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Effect of Spider Venom on Cell Apoptosis and Necrosis Rates in MCF-7 Cells</article-title>. <source>DNA Cell Biol.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>485</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>489</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/dna.2007.0579</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>G. Castro</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Candolfi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M. Kroeger</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>D. King</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>F. Curtin</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yagiz</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Gene Therapy and Targeted Toxins for Glioma</article-title>. <source>Cgt</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2174/156652311795684722</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Goodenberger</surname>
<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jenkins</surname>
<given-names>R. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Genetics of Adult Glioma</article-title>. <source>Cancer Genet.</source> <volume>205</volume>, <fpage>613</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>621</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cancergen.2012.10.009</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hainsworth</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shih</surname>
<given-names>K. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shepard</surname>
<given-names>G. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tillinghast</surname>
<given-names>G. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brinker</surname>
<given-names>B. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spigel</surname>
<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Phase II Study of Concurrent Radiation Therapy, Temozolomide, and Bevacizumab Followed by Bevacizumab/everolimus as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Glioblastoma</article-title>. <source>Clin. Adv. Hematol. Oncol.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>240</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>246</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmid</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Desai</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>ABI-009 (Nab-Sirolimus) Improves Tumor Accumulation and Antitumor Activity over Oral mTOR Inhibitors</article-title>. <source>Cancer Res.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>348</fpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jenssen</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamill</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hancock</surname>
<given-names>R. E. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Peptide Antimicrobial Agents</article-title>. <source>Clin. Microbiol. Rev.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>491</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>511</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/CMR.00056-05</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Le Rhun</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Preusser</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roth</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reardon</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van den Bent</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wen</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Molecular Targeted Therapy of Glioblastoma</article-title>. <source>Cancer Treat. Rev.</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>101896</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.101896</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yen</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway and Targeted Therapy for Glioblastoma</article-title>. <source>Oncotarget</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>33440</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33450</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18632/oncotarget.7961</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lim</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bettegowda</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weller</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Current State of Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>422</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>442</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41571-018-0003-5</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>C. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hsu</surname>
<given-names>C. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsai</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leong</surname>
<given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Natural Compounds as Potential Adjuvants to Cancer Therapy: Preclinical Evidence</article-title>. <source>Br. J.&#x20;Pharmacol.</source> <volume>177</volume>, <fpage>1409</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1423</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/bph.14816</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Louis</surname>
<given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perry</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reifenberger</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Von Deimling</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Figarella-Branger</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cavenee</surname>
<given-names>W. K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the central Nervous System: a Summary</article-title>. <source>Acta Neuropathol.</source> <volume>131</volume>, <fpage>803</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>820</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Machado</surname>
<given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ikemori</surname>
<given-names>R. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zorzeto</surname>
<given-names>T. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nogueira</surname>
<given-names>A. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barbosa</surname>
<given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Savino</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Characterization of Cells Recovered from the Xenotransplanted NG97&#x20;Human-Derived Glioma Cell Line Subcultured in a Long-Term <italic>In Vitro</italic>
</article-title>. <source>BMC Cancer</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2407-8-291</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Machado</surname>
<given-names>C. M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zorzeto</surname>
<given-names>T. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bianco</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;E. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosa</surname>
<given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Genari</surname>
<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Joazeiro</surname>
<given-names>P. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Ultrastructural Characterization of the New NG97ht Human-Derived Glioma Cell Line Using Two Different Electron Microscopy Technical Procedures</article-title>. <source>Microsc. Res. Tech.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>310</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>316</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jemt.20653</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Machado</surname>
<given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schenka</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vassallo</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tamashiro</surname>
<given-names>W. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gon&#xe7;alves</surname>
<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Genari</surname>
<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Morphological Characterization of a Human Glioma Cell Line</article-title>. <source>Cancer Cell Int</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>13</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1475-2867-5-13</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mecca</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giambanco</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Donato</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arcuri</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Targeting mTOR in Glioblastoma: Rationale and Preclinical/clinical Evidence</article-title>. <source>Dis. Markers</source> <volume>2018</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2018/9230479</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mesquita-Britto</surname>
<given-names>M. H. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mendon&#xe7;a</surname>
<given-names>M. C. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soares</surname>
<given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Oliveira</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Solon</surname>
<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Velloso</surname>
<given-names>L. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>VEGF/VEGFR-2 System Exerts Neuroprotection against <italic>Phoneutria Nigriventer</italic> Spider Envenomation through PI3K-AKT-dependent Pathway</article-title>. <source>Toxicon</source> <volume>185</volume>, <fpage>76</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.06.019</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pineda</surname>
<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sollod</surname>
<given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Darling</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sunagar</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Undheim</surname>
<given-names>E. A. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Diversification of a Single Ancestral Gene into a Successful Toxin Superfamily in Highly Venomous Australian Funnel-Web Spiders</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-15-177</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rap&#xf4;so</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Scorpion and Spider Venoms in Cancer Treatment: State of the Art, Challenges, and Perspectives</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Clin. Transl Res.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>2</fpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reardon</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Desjardins</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vredenburgh</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gururangan</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Friedman</surname>
<given-names>A. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herndon</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Phase 2 Trial of Erlotinib Plus Sirolimus in Adults with Recurrent Glioblastoma</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Neurooncol.</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>219</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>230</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11060-009-9950-0</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saxton</surname>
<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sabatini</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>mTOR Signaling in Growth, Metabolism, and Disease</article-title>. <source>Cell</source> <volume>168</volume>, <fpage>960</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>976</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.004</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schenka</surname>
<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Machado</surname>
<given-names>C. M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grippo</surname>
<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Queiroz</surname>
<given-names>L. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schenka</surname>
<given-names>N. G. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chagas</surname>
<given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Immunophenotypic and Ultrastructural Validation of a New Human Glioblastoma Cell Line</article-title>. <source>Cell Mol Neurobiol</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>929</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>941</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10571-005-4959-1</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weller</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wick</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aldape</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brada</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berger</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pfister</surname>
<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Glioma</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrdp.2015.17</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tao</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Spider Venom Peptides as Potential Drug Candidates Due to Their Anticancer and Antinociceptive Activities</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis.</source> <volume>25</volume>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-14-63-18</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nie</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Targeting PI3K in Cancer: Mechanisms and Advances in Clinical Trials</article-title>. <source>Mol. Cancer</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12943-019-0954-x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>