Introduction

Front. Mol. Biosci.

Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences

Front. Mol. Biosci.

2296-889X

Frontiers Media S.A.

770471

10.3389/fmolb.2021.770471

Molecular Biosciences

Original Research

Mapping of Brain Activity in the Analgesia Induced by Phα1β and Morphine

Diniz et al.

Brain Imaging to Phα1β Analgesia

Diniz

Danuza Montijo

¹ Malamut

Carlos

² Araújo

Marina Rios

² Ferreira

Andrea Vidal

² Silva

Juliana Figueira

¹ Cordeiro

Marta do Nascimento

³ Borges

Marcia Helena

³ Romano Silva

Marco Aurélio

⁴ Gomez

Marcus Vinicius

¹ Castro Junior

Célio Jose

¹ *

¹ Department of Neurotransmitters, Santa Casa, Institute of Education and Research, Belo Horizonte, Brazil ² Radiobiology Department, Center for the Development of Nuclear Technology, National Commission of Nuclear Energy (CDTN/CNEN), Belo Horizonte, Brazil ³ Department of Biochemistry, Ezequiel Dias Foundation, Belo Horizonte, Brazil ⁴ Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Edited by: Fernanda C. Cardoso, The University of Queensland, Australia

Reviewed by: Denis Kudryavtsev, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry (RAS), Russia

Renata Cristina Mendes Ferreira, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil

Bibiana Monson De Souza, São Paulo State University, Brazil

*Correspondence: Célio Jose Castro Junior, celiojcjunior@gmail.com

This article was submitted to Cellular Biochemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences

04 02 2022

2021

770471

03 09 2021 27 12 2021

2022

Diniz, Malamut, Araújo, Ferreira, Silva, Cordeiro, Borges, Romano Silva, Gomez and Castro Junior

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Preclinical evidence suggests the potential of Phα1β, a toxin obtained from the venom of spider Phoneutria nigriventer, as a new analgesic drug. Molecular brain imaging techniques have afforded exciting opportunities to examine brain processes in clinical pain conditions. This paper aims to study the brain regions involved in the analgesic effects of Phα1β compared with Morphine, in a model of acute pain induced by formalin in Sprague Dawley rats. We used ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose as a metabolic radiotracer to perform brain imaging of rats pretreated with Phα1β or Morphine in a model of acute inflammatory pain caused by intraplantar injection of formalin. The rats’ hind paw’s formalin stimulation resulted in a brain metabolic increase at the bilateral motor cortex, visual cortex, somatosensory cortex, thalamus, and cingulate cortex.In rats treated with Phα1β, selective inhibition of unilateral motor cortex and cingulate cortex was observed. Morphine treatment leads to small and selective inhibition at the bilateral amygdala striatum and accumbens. Our results indicate that the analgesic effect of Phα1β and Morphine possesses a differential profile of central processing in the pain state.

P. E. T pain morphine Phα1β brain 18F-FDG

Introduction

Phα1β has a broad impact on inhibiting high-voltage activated calcium channels (HVCCs) (Vieira et al., 2005) and as an antagonist of the transient receptor potential cation channel, TRPA1 (Tonello et al., 2017). Phα1β presents antinociceptive efficacy in several rodent pain models (Souza et al., 2008; Souza et al., 2008; de Souza et al., 2011; Castro-Junior et al., 2013; Rigo et al., 2013a; Rigo et al., 2013b; de Souza et al., 2014; Diniz et al., 2014; Rosa et al., 2014; Tonello et al., 2017). Considerable research in the last decade has focused on N-type calcium channel inhibitors to develop novel analgesic drugs. As it has been shown in preclinical trials, Phα1β has a wider therapeutic window than ω-conotoxin MVIIA, ziconotide, Prialt® for the pain treatment (Souza et al., 2008; de Souza et al., 2011) and has the potential to become a new analgesic drug. The better analgesic profile of Phα1β compared with ω-conotoxin MVIIA can be explained by several factors, including different affinities of the toxin for the activated states of N-type VSCCs and binding in other types of calcium channels (Lewis et al., 2000; Vieira et al., 2005; Winquist et al., 2005; Altier et al., 2007). Therefore, Phα1β can block pain with more efficacy due to its ability to interact with multiple targets of calcium channels in nociceptive pathways (Vieira et al., 2005). Despite the involvement of Phα1β in the control of HVCCs of sensory afferent neurons (Castro-Junior et al., 2013) or the spinal cord (Souza et al., 2008), nothing is known about how this peripheral inhibition of neurotransmission by Phα1β can control the activation of other superior areas of the central nervous system (C.N.S.).

The drug development process is a lengthy, high risk and costly endeavor. Although each step’s specificity and duration depend on the target indication and the drug class, in general, clinical development and investigation of a new drug submitted to regulatory approval take no less than 10 years. Molecular imaging approaches can be used in the initial stages of drug development in clinical trials such as positron-emission tomography, P.E.T. Most large pharmaceutic companies have now established molecular imaging as an integral part of both research and development. There are many expectations that molecular imaging technology investments will enhance drug development (Rudin, 2005). This technique fulfils an essential criterion for a translational approach to drugs acting on pain. Molecular imaging can allow the non-invasive assessment of biological and biochemical processes in living subjects. Such technology, therefore, has the potential to enhance our understanding of analgesic drug activity during preclinical and clinical drug development, which could aid decisions to select analgesic candidates that seem most likely to be successful.

Therefore, we performed a comparative study with ¹⁸FDG, a P.E.T. radiopharmaceutical, to investigate brain glucose metabolism changes during the development of pain induced by formalin and its effect on analgesic drugs. This paper aims to study the brain regions involved in the analgesic effects of Phα1β in comparison with Morphine in a model of acute pain induced by formalin in rats.

Materials and Methods Animals

Thirty-four adult male Wistar rats 8–10 weeks old; weighing approximately 250–280 g) were used in the present study. Rats were housed in a well-controlled environment with a 12 h light/dark cycle and constant humidity and temperature. They were housed in plastic cages at three animals per cage with free access to food and water. The experiments were performed following the current guidelines for the care of laboratory animals and the ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals (Zimmermann, 1983). Also, following the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of Laboratory animals (N.I.H. Publications No. 8023, revised 1978). All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and to reduce the number of animals used. The Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Minas Gerais authorized the studies (Protocol 347/2012).

Drugs

Na₂HPO₄, KH₂PO₄ and NaCl used to prepare PBS and 37% formaldehyde to prepare the formalin. Reagents were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., (St. Louis, United States.A). Morphine sulfate and isoflurane anaesthetic, from Cristália laboratory (São Paulo, Brazil).

Phα1β was purified from spider venom (Figure 1) according to the technique described by (Cordeiro et al., 1993). P. nigriventer venom was obtained by electrical stimulation of anesthetized spiders. Venom was centrifuged at 4000g for 10 min, and the supernatant was fractionated by gel filtration on columns of Sephadex G-50 superfine and superose 12HR, and reverse phase fast protein liquid chromatography on C2/C8 (PEP-RPC) and C1/C8 (PRO-RPC) columns as described in detail previously (Cordeiro et al., 1993). Peptides were detected by monitoring the absorbance at 216 nm (Cordeiro et al., 1993). The fraction PhTx3 obtained from the chromatography on a PRO-RPC column was dissolved in 1 ml of 0.1% (v/v) aqueous trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and subjected to reverse phase HPLC on a preparative column (22 mm _ 25 cm) of Vydac C18 (218TP1022; Technicol Ltd, Stockport, UK) equilibrated in the same solvent. The column was eluted with a linear gradient (0–40% over 180 min) of acetonitrile (HPLC grade S; Rathburn Chemical Co., Peebles, Scotland, UK) in 0.1% TFA at a flow rate of 10 ml min_1. We collected three fractions (A–C; Cordeiro et al., 1993), and fraction C was dissolved in 1 ml of 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, and fractionated on a weak cation exchange HPLC column (4.6 mm _ 25 cm) of Synchropak CM 300 (Synchrom Inc, Lafayette, IN) equilibrated in the same buffer. After absorption, the columns were eluted with a linear gradient (0–0.5 M NaCl over 90 min) in the same buffer at a flow rate of 2 ml min_1. The toxin Phα1β eluted at a salt concentration of 0.16 M (Figure 1), and was desalted by absorption onto Sep-Pak C18 cartridges (Waters, Milford, MA), which were then washed with 15 ml of 0.1% TFA, and Phα1β was eluted with 5 ml of acetonitrile containing 0.1% TFA.

FIGURE 1

Purification of Phαβ from the venom of the spider P. nigriventer (A) Reverse phase of the crude venom of Phoneutria nigriventer spider in column C4 Vydac. (B) Cation exchange HPLC of the fraction Phαβ from (A) on Hi trap Sp Hp column (C) Reverse phase desalting of Phαβ from (B) in a column C18 small pore (arrow indicates the peak used in each step) (D) Mass spectra of the Phαβ MS obtained on MALDI/TOF in positive/linear mode (laser frequency 100%, mass range 2–20,000 (m/z).

Intrathecal Injections

According to the previously described method, the intrathecal injections within the spinal cord levels of L5 and L6 (Hylden and Wilcox, 1980). Briefly, using a 28-G needle connected to a 10 µL Hamilton microsyringe to administer medication (5 µL/site, i. t) lightly restrained the animal from maintaining the needle’s position. A slight tail-flick indicated the puncture of the dura. All experiments were performed in a single-blind manner to avoid possible observer bias results.

Imaging Experiments

The images to obtain brain maps of formalin-induced nociception in the rats by P.E.T. ¹⁸F-FDG was used as a radiotracer to allow visualization of glucose metabolism in the brains. The ¹⁸F-FDG (70 MBq, averaged activity) was administered intraperitoneally (i.p). After that, the rats returned to boxes in a quiet environment to recover from i. p. injection and subsequent uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG. The fixed time for ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was 1 h. Initially, the rats received 50 µL of formalin (5%) or PBS into the right hind paw 30 min after ¹⁸F-FDG injection. This method was performed according to procedures described by (Dubuisson and Dennis, 1977). An initial set of experiments was performed (PBS or formalin group) to obtain the map of formalin-induced nociception in the rat brain. On another set of experiments, the effect of the drugs treatments was tested. The rats received intrathecal (i.t) administration of Phα1β (100 pmol/site), morphine (10 μg/site), or vehicle (PBS, 10 μL/site, control group) 1 hour before ¹⁸F-FDG injection. Therefore, the time between drug treatment and formalin injection was 1:30 h, which was enough time for the drugs to reach antinociceptive efficacy. After 55 min of ¹⁸F-FDG infusion, the animals were lightly anaesthetized with a mixture of isoflurane and oxygen and fixed their body in the microPET equipment (LabPET4, GE) coupled to an anaesthesia system to maintain anaesthesia during imaging acquisition. The rats’ body temperature (35.5°C) was maintained with a custom-made heating bed warmed with perfused hot water. Images obtained in the MicroPET for 15 min total, three head-bed positions (5 min/each).

Image Processing

To establish a relation between the number of counts per second per voxel (cps/voxel) and the activity in Bq/cm3, after the acquisition of animal’s images, an image of a phantom with known activity, weight and volume, was performed at every day of the experiment and corrected the radioactive decay of ¹⁸F-FDG automatically during the procedures. The processing and reconstruction of images for the evaluation of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the brain were done by selecting volumes of interest (V.O.I.) using the PMOD II software (PMOD Technologies, Adliswil, Switzerland). Analysis of rat brain data on selected brain regions performed by normalizing entry data with the V.O.I. template using Px Rat (W.Schiffler) atlas (Schiffer et al., 2006). Data were expressed as S.U.V. (standard uptake value). The images decay-corrected measurement of the MBq/ml radiotracer uptake obtained via P. E. T. They were normalized by the amount of activity injected and the mass in kilograms of the animal being studied. When appropriate, S. U. V. values were later normalized by the % control group intake, as indicated in the text.

Statistical Analysis

The quantification based on the S. U. V. values of each V. O. I. obtained. The importance of S. U. V.'s of each region represents the average of the five pixels with greater intensity. When indicated, the S. U. V. 's of each V. O. I. were normalized by the percentage of the control group’s capture (formalin in the paw and pretreated with intrathecal PBS or drug) and stratified by the different brain structures of each mouse. To evaluate if the data present a normal distribution, the Kolmogorov-Smirnof test was used. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to examine whether formalin stimulation induced metabolic changes in the corresponding brain regions in both hemispheres, with the significance level set at p<0.05. Factorial ANOVAs were used to assess differences in 18F-FDG uptake among the groups with formalin stimulation pre treated with PBS, formalin stimulation with Phα1β pretreatment, and formalin stimulation with morphine pretreatment, with p<0.05 again considered to be significant. Fisher’s post hoc tests were used to assess differences between groups.

Results Brain 18F-FDG Uptake Associated With Formalin Nociceptive Stimulus

Intraplantar injection of formalin (5%) into the right hind paw induced greater 18F-FDG brain uptake (Figure 2). The S.U.V. values for the whole brain were 2.55 ± 0.6 and 3.13 ± 0.8 Bw. g/mL in the groups that received PBS or intraplantar formalin, respectively (p = 0.05, t-student test). No significant differences were observed comparing the whole left and whole right hemisphere in the brain of animals that received formalin (data not shown). Posterior analysis revealed that different brain regions presented different uptake intensities (Figure 3 and Table 1). Thirty-three regions were analysed, 25 of them divided according to the cerebral hemisphere (ipsi or contralateral concerning formalin injection), and eight of them are central (under a sagittal plane) were not divided into ipsi or contralateral. The most significant differences in formalin-induced uptake were observed in the following regions: visual cortex, motor cortex, somatosensory cortex, thalamus, and cingulate cortex. Less expressive differences in formalin-induced ¹⁸F-FDG uptake were observed in the pituitary, medulla, hypothalamus, pons, and prefrontal cortex. No significant laterality differences were observed in formalin-induced ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in any of the areas studied (Figure 3 and Table 1). Although it was observed a pattern of higher ¹⁸F-FDG uptake induced by formalin in all brain regions ranging from approximatelly 10–20%, no significant difference (p > 0.05) was seen for any of the regions.

FIGURE 2

Formalin-induced cerebral metabolic activation. (A) Representative microPET images of brains from rats injected with PBS (left column) or with 5% Formalin (right column) into the right hind paw. Images are presented in different planes, as indicated. Warmer colors indicate higher uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG, hence higher metabolic activity. Small and large white circles depict regions that contains thalamus and somatosensory cortex, respectively. (B) averaged ¹⁸F-FDG uptake of the whole brain in rats that received PBS (white bar, N = 4) or 5% Formalin (black bar, N = 6) into the right hind paw. Bars represent mean+S.E.M. of the S.U.V. values (*p = 0.05, t-student test).

FIGURE 3

Differential uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG in brain areas associated to formalin-induced nociceptive stimulus. The different brain areas are presented bellow x axis. The definition of contra or ipsilateral was made in reference to the right paw where formalin or PBS was administered. Bars represent mean+S.E.M. of the S.U.V. values (N = 4 and N = 6, PBS and formalin groups, respectively) (N = 4 and N = 6, PBS and formalin groups, respectively. Repeated-measures ANOVAs with Fisher’s post hoc tests). WM, white mater; GM Gy mater; PAG periaqueductal gray.

TABLE 1

¹⁸F-FDG uptake in brain regions: Mean values of S. U. V.+S. E. M. Of the groups receiving PBS or formalin (i.pl.), in the two brain hemispheres.

Region	Ipsilateral		Contralateral
Region	Control (PBS)	Formalin	Control (PBS)	Formalin
AcbCore/Shell	2.65 ⁺ 0.27	3.30 ⁺ 0.35	2.72 ⁺ 0.18	3.19 ⁺ 0.38
Amygdala	2.09 ⁺ 0.24	2.55 ⁺ 0.33	2.11 ⁺ 0.17	2.48 ⁺ 0.28
CaudatePutamen	3.01 ⁺ 0.34	3.62 ⁺ 0.43	2.95 ⁺ 0.34	3.60 ⁺ 0.43
CortexAuditory	2.50 ⁺ 0.25	3.00 ⁺ 0.34	2.47 ⁺ 0.23	3.12 ⁺ 0.36
CortexCingulate	3.01 ⁺ 0.36	3.71 ⁺ 0.47	3.00 ⁺ 0.37	3.78 ⁺ 0.43
CortexEntorhinal	2.40 ⁺ 0.29	2.91 ⁺ 0.39	2.39 ⁺ 0.20	2.88 ⁺ 0.37
CortexFrontalAssociation ^a	2.35 ⁺ 0.33	2.96 ⁺ 0.47
CortexFrontal ^a	2.43 ⁺ 0.45	3.09 ⁺ 0.44
CortexInsular	2.75 ⁺ 0.27	3.22 ⁺ 0.40	2.81 ⁺ 0.21	3.35 ⁺ 0.39
CortexMedialPrefrontal	3.06 ⁺ 0.21	3.61 ⁺ 0.35	3.06 ⁺ 0.22	3.53 ⁺ 0.36
CortexMotor	2.52 ⁺ 0.44	3.22 ⁺ 0.44	2.45 ⁺ 0.40	3.19 ⁺ 0.45
CortexOrbitofrontal	3.02 ⁺ 0.37	3.64 ⁺ 0.50	2.93 ⁺ 0.31	3.53 ⁺ 0.042
CortexParA	2.28 ⁺ 0.43	2.98 ⁺ 0.42	2.24 ⁺ 0.48	3.11 ⁺ 0.44
CortexRetrosplenial	2.39 ⁺ 0.43	3.20 ⁺ 0.47	2.31 ⁺ 0.43	3.17 ⁺ 0.46
CortexSomatosensory	2.58 ⁺ 0.36	3.18 ⁺ 0.36	2.58 ⁺ 0.39	3.30 ⁺ 0.38
CortexVisual	2.18 ⁺ 0.43	2.95 ⁺ 0.43	2.13 ⁺ 0.46	3.03 ⁺ 0.43
HippocampusAnteroDorsal	2.84 ⁺ 0.35	3.40 ⁺ 0.37	2.86 ⁺ 0.31	3.40 ⁺ 0.37
HippocampusPosterior	2.45 ⁺ 0.21	2.84 ⁺ 0.32	2.38 ⁺ 0.20	2.83 ⁺ 0.27
Hypothalamus	2.30 ⁺ 0.15	2.64 ⁺ 0.29	2.31 ⁺ 0.12	2.70 ⁺ 0.25
Olfactory	2.69 ⁺ 0.28	3.33 ⁺ 0.45	2.69 ⁺ 0.21	3.27 ⁺ 0.43
SuperiorColliculus	2.80 ⁺ 0.40	3.40 ⁺ 0.40	2.78 ⁺ 0.33	3.39 ⁺ 0.32
Midbrain	2.59 ⁺ 0.25	3.19 ⁺ 0.37	2.67 ⁺ 0.19	3.19 ⁺ 0.34
VTA	2.30 ⁺ 0.14	2.71 ⁺ 0.29	2.25 ⁺ 0.10	2.74 ⁺ 0.27
CB-grey	2.06 ⁺ 0.30	2.51 ⁺ 0.34	2.11 ⁺ 0.32	2.61 ⁺ 0.33
CB-white	2.40 ⁺ 0.31	2.95 ⁺ 0.39	2.45 ⁺ 0.34	3.05 ⁺ 0.37
InferiorColliculus	2.82 ⁺ 0.34	3.46 ⁺ 0.35	2.69 ⁺ 0.29	3.41 ⁺ 0.35
ThalamusWhole	2.75 ⁺ 0.32	3.50 ⁺ 0.38	2.80 ⁺ 0.30	3.42 ⁺ 0.42
Pituitary ^a	1.92 ⁺ 0.13	2.12 ⁺ 0.26
CB-bloodflow ^a	3.07 ⁺ 0.38	3.70 ⁺ 0.51
CentralCanal-PAG ^a	2.68 ⁺ 0.34	3.25 ⁺ 0.40
Pons ^a	2.18 ⁺ 0.11	2.51 ⁺ 0.26
Septum ^a	2.59 ⁺ 0.37	3.27 ⁺ 0.46
Medulla ^a	2.31 ⁺ 0.13	2.59 ⁺ 0.24

Regions located in a central plane between the two cerebral hemispheres. They are not categorised as right or left by the analysis software, although they are presented as ipsilateral in the table. The definition of contra or ipsilateral was made in reference to the right paw where formalin or PBS, was administered.

Effect of Ph<italic>α</italic>1<italic>β</italic> on the Uptake of 18F-FDG in Animals Injected With Formalin

In another set of experiments, animals were injected with Phα1β toxin (100 pmol/site, intrathecal) 1 h and 30 min before induction of nociception by formalin and then subjected to P.E.T. imaging. The increase in ¹⁸F-FDG uptake induced by formalin was normalised as to 100% in every brain areas with the 0% being ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in animals pretreated with intrathecal PBS rather than Phα1β or Morphine. This formalin-induced activation of the contralateral cingulate cortex and contralateral motor cortex regions were most significantly inhibited by Phα1β (89 ± 3% and 91 ± 3.2% of the control, respectively, p < 0.05 compared to the respective ipsilateral region) (Figure 4 and Table 2). Other areas such as accumbens, somatosensory cortex, thalamus, hypothalamus and striatum showed inhibitions in the uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG compared with control animals treated with PBS, but no lateralization of the inhibitory effect was seen for these regions.

FIGURE 4

Effect of pretreatment with Phα1β toxin on metabolic changes in different brain areas of rats induced by formalin. Bars represent mean+S.E.M. ¹⁸F-FDG uptake normalised by the ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the group that received intrathecal PBS. Pretreatment with intrathecal Phα1β (100 pmol/site) led to a reduction in the metabolic activity in some neuroanatomic regions, notably in the cingulate cortex and motor cortex. The definition of contra or ipsilateral was made in reference to the right paw where formalin or PBS was administered (N = 6 and N = 10; PBS and Phα1β, respectivelly). * denotes p < 0.05, Factorial ANOVAs with Fisher’s post hoc tests). WM: white matter, GM: gray matter, PAG: periaqueductal gray.

TABLE 2

Effect of treatment with Phα1β or Morphine on formalin-induced brain activation: comparison between brain regions according to the cerebral hemisphere. Values represent mean ± S. E. M. of¹⁸F-FDG uptake normalised by uptake in the intrathecal PBS group.

Region	Ipsilateral		Contralateral
Region	Phα1β	Morphine	Phα1β	Morphine
AcbCore/Shell	93.78 ⁺ 3.52	94.46 ⁺ 3.32	94.47 ⁺ 3.40	91.18 ⁺ 3.16
Amygdala	100.87 ⁺ 8.63	93.22 ⁺ 5.60	100.39 ⁺ 8.88	89.11 ⁺ 4.59
CaudatePutamen	95.56 ⁺ 5.67	92.77 ⁺ 3.11	96.43 ⁺ 5.49	94.32 ⁺ 3.51
CortexAuditory	102.03 ⁺ 5.14	98.01 ⁺ 4.74	98.51 ⁺ 4.29	96.16 ⁺ 4.16
CortexCingulate	97.42 ⁺ 3.74	96.73 ⁺ 4.05	89.04 ⁺ 3.04	91.16 ⁺ 4.58
CortexEntorhinal	95.16 ⁺ 4.69	90.73 ⁺ 4.86	99.55 ⁺ 4.69	89.46 ⁺ 4.60
CortexFrontalAssociation ^a	98.87 ⁺ 6.36	98.20 ⁺ 6.21
CortexFrontal ^a	101.43 ⁺ 4.23	99.61 ⁺ 5.05
CortexInsular	100.70 ⁺ 7.86	94.36 ⁺ 3.51	98.31 ⁺ 5.02	94.36 ⁺ 3.51
CortexMedialPrefrontal	96.40 ⁺ 3.57	97.60 ⁺ 5.23	94.27 ⁺ 4.26	97.64 ⁺ 6.09
CortexMotor	100.39 ⁺ 4.15	96.91 ⁺ 2.99	91.49 ⁺ 3.19	92.07 ⁺ 3.98
CortexOrbitofrontal	98.62 ⁺ 5.59	97.39 ⁺ 3.21	100.79 ⁺ 3.71	98.90 ⁺ 3.39
CortexParA	100.71 ⁺ 510	99.16 ⁺ 4.89	98.72 ⁺ 4.57	101.93 ⁺ 4.14
CortexRetrosplenial	98.42 ⁺ 5.05	97.55 ⁺ 5.10	96.89 ⁺ 4.94	96.25 ⁺ 3.98
CortexSomatosensory	98.13 ⁺ 4.50	94.74 ⁺ 3.96	94.73 ⁺ 3.38	94.50 ⁺ 4.51
CortexVisual	100.01 ⁺ 5.18	100.63 ⁺ 4.86	98.52 ⁺ 4.17	100.60 ⁺ 3.96
HippocampusAnteroDorsal	98.35 ⁺ 3.79	98.23 ⁺ 4.20	100.72 ⁺ 3.81	101.34 ⁺ 3.87
HippocampusPosterior	96.48 ⁺ 6.13	96.83 ⁺ 5.47	97.66 ⁺ 5.01	94.61 ⁺ 3.00
Hypothalamus	95.01 ⁺ 4.20	95.38 ⁺ 4.18	97.06 ⁺ 4.44	95.29 ⁺ 5.31
Olfactory	93.92 ⁺ 5.09	90.52 ⁺ 4.72	98.94 ⁺ 4.44	93.69 ⁺ 2.76
SuperiorColliculus	96.63 ⁺ 4.23	97.53 ⁺ 4.88	96.48 ⁺ 4.14	98.49 ⁺ 4.16
Midbrain	99.29 ⁺ 3.92	98.42 ⁺ 4.33	99.66 ⁺ 5.70	98.19 ⁺ 4.49
VTA	97.03 ⁺ 4.89	104.24 ⁺ 6.14	95.44 ⁺ 4.60	97.71 ⁺ 5.66
CB-grey	95.91 ⁺ 4.70	101.00 ⁺ 5.40	98.23 ⁺ 5.53	103.29 ⁺ 6.00
CB-white	96.14 ⁺ 4.34	100.97 ⁺ 4.32	96.74 ⁺ 4.71	100.57 ⁺ 5.23
InferiorColliculus	97.53 ⁺ 5.04	96.22 ⁺ 3.90	96.10 ⁺ 3.63	99.96 ⁺ 5.33
ThalamusWhole	95.79 ⁺ 3.22	96.28 ⁺ 4.38	97.26 ⁺ 3.97	96.28 ⁺ 4.38
Pituitary ^a	98.44 ⁺ 6.32	97.90 ⁺ 9.98
CB-bloodflow ^a	98.52 ⁺ 4.93	98.78 ⁺ 4.34
CentralCanal-PAG ^a	95.70 ⁺ 3.90	97.40 ⁺ 4.95
Pons ^a	97.3 ⁺ 5.28	100.92 ⁺ 5.93
Septum ^a	97.32 ⁺ 4.24	95.54 ⁺ 3.84
Medulla ^a	97.86 ⁺ 6.43	99.87 ⁺ 4.94

Effect of Morphine on the Uptake of 18F-FDG in Animals Injected With Formalin

Morphine (10 μg/site, intrathecal) was injected 1.5 h before the induction of nociception by formalin and then submitted to P. E. T. imaging. Contralateral cingulate cortex, contralateral accumbens and contralateral amygdala were most significantly inhibited by Morphine (91+4.6%, and 91+3.2% and 89+4.6% of the control, respectively, p > 0.05 compared to the respective ipsilateral region) (Figure 5 and Table 2). Other regions such as the somatosensory cortex, thalamus, hypothalamus, insular cortex and striatum showed inhibition of uptake with the control-treated with PBS. Pretreatment with Morphine did not cause lateralization of the inhibitory effect at any of the analyzed areas.

FIGURE 5

Effect of pretreatment with Morphine on metabolic changes in different brain areas of rats induced by formalin. Bars represent mean+S.E.M. ¹⁸F-FDG uptake normalised by the ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the group that received intrathecal PBS. Pretreatment with intrathecal Morphine (10 µg/site) led to a reduction in the metabolic activity in some neuroanatomic regions, notably in the amygdala, striatum and accumebens. The definition of contra or ipsilateral was made in reference to the right paw where formalin or PBS was administered (N = 6 and N = 8, PBS and Morphine groups, respectivelly. ANOVAs with Fisher’s post hoc tests). WM: white matter, GM: gray matter, PAG: periaqueductal gray.

Discussion

This work’s data reveal a prominent and bilateral activation of several brain regions induced by the acute pain process, indicating these regions’ participation in the central processing of pain. More expressive metabolic activations were observed in the visual cortex, motor cortex, somatosensory cortex, cingulate cortex, thalamus and nucleus accumbens. Both the Phα1β toxin and Morphine, via intrathecal injection, attenuated the pain-induced metabolic activation in these areas. However, inhibition by Phα1β occurred mainly in the anterior cingulate cortex and motor cortex’s contralateral hemisphere. Morphine was also able to attenuate metabolic activity in these areas, mainly in the amygdala and nucleus accumbens.

Nociceptive information is transmitted from the spinal cord to the brain through different pathways. Consequently, various regions of the brain are activated during the complex experience of pain. Several imaging studies in both humans and rodents examine cortical and subcortical areas involved in pain processing. Although there are many differences in activation patterns among the studies, there is a consistent activation pattern that includes sensory, limbic and associative areas (Bushnell et al., 1999). Based on previous studies using either P.E.T. or fMRI techniques, the most commonly associated regions are primary and secondary somatosensory cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, insular cortex, prefrontal cortex, thalamus, and cerebellum.

Brain areas with differential activations in pain depending on whether these areas receive direct or indirect nociceptive inputs. For example, the primary and secondary somatosensory cortex receives nociceptive and non-nociceptive information from the thalamus (Friedman and Murray, 1986; Shi and Apkarian, 1995). The cingulate cortex receives inputs from the medial and lateral thalamic nuclei, which contain nociceptive neurons. These studies, therefore, indicate a specific role of the anterior cingulate cortex in pain processing which is a particular event and probably related to other functions of this brain region such as attention and learning. In a recent meta-analysis of studies using brain imaging techniques, Jensen et al. (2016) also demonstrated a common and central role of the anterior cingulate cortex in processing different types of pain (Jensen et al., 2016).

The formalin-induced bilateral activations observed in our study are consistent with findings from other studies using both P.E.T. and fMRI (Tuor et al., 2000; Malisza et al., 2003; Shih et al., 2008). Shih et al. (2008) observed that formalin-induced nociception leads to increased activation in the cingulate cortex, somatosensory cortex, thalamus, and amygdala (Shih et al., 2008). Casey, (1999) showed that subcutaneous injection of formalin leads to selective and progressive activation of the somatosensory and limbic systems, including the insula, anterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, premotor cortex and cerebellum, all of these areas in a bilateral way (Casey, 1999). The absence of lateralisation in the cerebral activation observed in our study and other authors’ data suggests that integration through the two cerebral hemispheres occurs in the central processing of the pain. However, the main afferent pathways reach the upper portions of the brain by contralateral routes. Bilateral activation of these areas is possibly associated with the animal representation of mirror-shaped pain in which contralateral paw licking is also observed after the addition of formalin (Aloisi et al., 1993).

The Phα1β toxin has been shown to possess analgesic action in several preclinical pain models in rodents (Diniz et al., 2014). Its potent analgesic action is associated with the inhibition of voltage-sensitive calcium channels (Vieira et al., 2005) and inhibition of TRPA1 receptors (Tonello et al., 2017) present in presynaptic nerve terminals leading to a reduction of glutamate release in the spinal cord (Souza et al., 2008) and also inhibiting the activation of afferent sensory neurons (Castro-Junior et al., 2013; Tonello et al., 2017). Our study is the first to demonstrate the brain activation profile involved with the analgesic action of Phα1β. Notably, Phα1β attenuated formalin-induced brain activation in the cingulate cortex and motor cortex. In both regions, the inhibition occurred predominantly in the hemisphere contralateral to the pain stimulus. Presumably, the inhibition of neurotransmission caused by Phα1β in the spinal synapses (Vieira et al., 2003; Vieira et al., 2005) is associated with a decrease in primary afferent inputs to be processed in the motor and sensory cortex, which receive information from circuits that are contralateral to the nociceptive stimulus. Lin et al. (2014) observed that gabapentin, another calcium channel blocker, was able to reverse metabolic changes in the prefrontal cortex, thalamus, and cerebellum, induced by sciatic nerve injury in rats (Lin et al., 2014). Gabapentin also acts as a blocker of voltage-sensitive calcium channels, and the difference between the areas inhibited by Phα1β and gabapentin in the different studies can be explained by the pain model used in both studies (acute x neuropathic), and also by the administration of drugs (intrathecal for Phα1β and systemic for gabapentin). Also, Phα1β acts predominantly on N-subtype channels and is more closely related to nociceptive stimuli’ afferent sensory transmission. Gabapentin, by binding on α2δ subunit of calcium channels, may have caused broader inhibition of neurotransmission in the C.N.S.

We evaluated the effect of Morphine on formalin-induced metabolic changes in the brain in comparison with Phα1β. Like Phα1β, Morphine attenuated the activation of the cingulate cortex and motor cortex more expressively in the contralateral hemisphere (although not statistically significant). However, Morphine significantly inhibited the amygdala in comparison to Phα1β. These data on the effect of Morphine in the amygdala are consistent with the data of Robincohen et al. (1991) which showed that Morphine decreases the of glucose uptake in regions of the limbic system and therefore morphine is able to reverse methabolic activation of those regions (Robincohen et al., 1991). The amygdala is a bilateral structure located deep and medially within the temporal lobes of the brain. It plays a crucial role in the processes of memory, decision-making and emotional reactions, being considered part of the limbic system (Amunts et al., 2005). The lack of effect of Phα1β on the amygdala suggests that the analgesic action of this toxin may be associated with a lower emotional depressant effect when compared to Morphine. Shih et al. (2008), in a similar experimental design, observed that the pretreatment with Morphine was able to inhibit brain activation in all areas analysed, with inhibition of the order of 40%, while the inhibition of Morphine in our study were close to 10%. These differences can be explained by the morphine dosage difference employed or by the experimental design. Shi et al. applied the dose of 10 mg/kg intravenously. In our study, we used the 10 μg/site of Morphine by intrathecal route. Also, we induced nociceptive process with formalin after the injection of ¹⁸F-FDG, whereas Shih et al. (2008) administered formalin before ¹⁸F-FDG injection. When analysed in parallel, the two models possibly lead to different uptake profiles induced by the nociceptive process since the formalin-induced pain response has a short duration. Ohashi et al. (2007) also observed a reversal of metabolic activation in the brain caused by Morphine in a visceral hypersensitivity model. However, in the latter study, more pronounced morphine effects were observed in the thalamus and sensory cortex (Ohashi et al., 2007).

Our study includes some limitations. ¹⁸F-FDG P.E.T. cannot discriminate inhibitory from excitatory brain activity since both activities consume energy and increase glucose’s metabolic consumption. The deactivation of a given neural network may reflect the reduced neuronal activity. However, it is not possible to differentiate whether this deactivation is caused by the suppression of glutamatergic cells or gabaergic cells’ activation. Secondly, our acquisitions of P. E. T. images are static and, therefore, do not contain information on the dynamics of ¹⁸F-FDG capture. Finally, the process of capturing images is done under anaesthesia with inhaled isoflurane. Although this stage is crucial to allow immobilisation of the animal during the pictures, it is possible that this anaesthetic action may underestimate the extent of the brain activation induced by the pain process.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study presents a brain map of formalin-induced nociception, revealing that several regions are activated and possibly involved in central pain processing. Also, the analgesic power of the Phα1β peptide and Morphine is associated with the attenuation of metabolic activation in different brain areas. This study contributes to the preclinical development of analgesic drugs and helps elucidate a common area of pain processing.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Minas Gerais authorised the studies (Protocol 347/2012).

Author Contributions

All authors conceived and designed the experiments. All authors critically contributed to the manuscript writing and approved the final version. In particular, DMD, JFS, and MRA conducted the drug treatments. MNC and MHB carried out Pha1b purification. CM, AVF, CJCJ, MARS performed positron emission tomography experiments and analyses. MVG, MARS provided funding, supervised and critically contributed to all steps of this work.

Funding

This study was supported by Fapemig CBB-RED-00006-14, CAPES Toxinology 144/2011 and CAPES Decit 2865/10, INCT Medicina Molecular, MCT/CNPq. The above funding sources had no involvement in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The reviewer (RMF) declared a shared affiliation, with one of the authors (MARS) to the handling editor at the time of the review.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

18F-FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose; CB, cerebellum; FMRI, functional magnetic resonance imaging; Gm, gray matter; Pag, periaqueductal gray; PET, positron emission tomography; Suv, Standardized Uptake Value; Voi, volumes of interest; Vta, ventral tegmental area; Wm, white matter.

References Aloisi

A. M.

Porro

C. A.

Cavazzuti

Baraldi

Carli

(1993). Mirror Pain' in the Formalin Test: Behavioral and 2-Deoxyglucose Studies. Pain. 55, 267–273. 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90156-j Altier

Dale

C. S.

Kisilevsky

A. E.

Chapman

Castiglioni

A. J.

Matthews

E. A.

(2007). Differential Role of N-Type Calcium Channel Splice Isoforms in Pain. J. Neurosci. 27, 6363–6373. 10.1523/jneurosci.0307-07.2007 Amunts

Kedo

Kindler

Pieperhoff

Mohlberg

Shah

N. J.

(2005). Cytoarchitectonic Mapping of the Human Amygdala, Hippocampal Region and Entorhinal Cortex: Intersubject Variability and Probability Maps. Anat. Embryol. 210, 343–352. 10.1007/s00429-005-0025-5 Bushnell

M. C.

Duncan

G. H.

Hofbauer

R. K.

Chen

J. I.

Carrier

(1999). Pain Perception: Is There a Role for Primary Somatosensory Cortex? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96, 7705–7709. 10.1073/pnas.96.14.7705 Casey

K. L.

(1999). Forebrain Mechanisms of Nociception and Pain: Analysis Through Imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96, 7668–7674. 10.1073/pnas.96.14.7668 Castro-Junior

C. J.

Milano

Souza

A. H.

Silva

J. F.

Rigo

F. K.

Dalmolin

(2013). Phα1β Toxin Prevents Capsaicin-Induced Nociceptive Behavior and Mechanical Hypersensitivity Without Acting on TRPV1 Channels. Neuropharmacology. 71, 237–246. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.04.001 Cordeiro

M. d. N.

de Figueiredo

S. G.

Valentim

A. d. C.

Diniz

C. R.

von Eickstedt

V. R. D.

Gilroy

(1993). Purification and Amino Acid Sequences of Six Tx3 Type Neurotoxins from the Venom of the Brazilian 'Armed' Spider Phoneutria Nigriventer (keys.). Toxicon. 31, 35–42. 10.1016/0041-0101(93)90354-l de Souza

A. H.

da Costa Lopes

A. M.

Castro

C. J.

Jr. Pereira

E. M. R.

Klein

C. P.

da Silva

C. A.

Jr. (2014). The Effects of Phα1β, a Spider Toxin, Calcium Channel Blocker, in a Mouse Fibromyalgia Model. Toxicon. 81, 37–42. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.01.015 de Souza

A. H.

Lima

M. C.

Drewes

C. C.

da Silva

J. F.

Torres

K. C. L.

Pereira

E. M. R.

(2011). Antiallodynic Effect and Side Effects of Phα1β, a Neurotoxin from the Spider Phoneutria Nigriventer: Comparison with ω-conotoxin MVIIA and Morphine. Toxicon. 58, 626–633. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2011.09.008 Diniz

D. M.

de Souza

A. H.

Pereira

E. M. R.

da Silva

J. F.

Rigo

F. K.

Romano‐Silva

M. A.

(2014). Effects of the Calcium Channel Blockers Phα1β and ω-Conotoxin MVIIA on Capsaicin and Acetic Acid-Induced Visceral Nociception in Mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 126, 97–102. 10.1016/j.pbb.2014.09.017 Dubuisson

Dennis

S. G.

(1977). The Formalin Test: a Quantitative Study of the Analgesic Effects of Morphine, Meperidine, and Brain Stem Stimulation in Rats and Cats. Pain. 4, 161–174. 10.1016/0304-3959(77)90130-0 Friedman

D. P.

Murray

E. A.

(1986). Thalamic Connectivity of the Second Somatosensory Area and Neighboring Somatosensory fields of the Lateral Sulcus of the Macaque. J. Comp. Neurol. 252, 348–373. 10.1002/cne.902520305 Hylden

J. L. K.

Wilcox

G. L.

(1980). Intrathecal Morphine in Mice: a New Technique. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 67, 313–316. 10.1016/0014-2999(80)90515-4 Jensen

K. B.

Regenbogen

Ohse

M. C.

Frasnelli

Freiherr

Lundström

J. N.

(2016). Brain Activations during Pain. Pain. 157, 1279–1286. 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000517 Lewis

R. J.

Nielsen

K. J.

Craik

D. J.

Loughnan

M. L.

Adams

D. A.

Sharpe

I. A.

(2000). Novel ω-Conotoxins From Conus Catus Discriminate Among Neuronal Calcium Channel Subtypes. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 35335–35344. 10.1074/jbc.m002252200 Lin

H. C.

Huang

Y. H.

Chao

T. H.

Lin

W. Y.

Sun

W. Z.

Yen

C. T.

(2014). Gabapentin Reverses central Hypersensitivity and Suppresses Medial Prefrontal Cortical Glucose Metabolism in Rats with Neuropathic Pain. Mol. Pain. 10, 63. 10.1186/1744-8069-10-63 Malisza

K. L.

Gregorash

Turner

Foniok

Stroman

P. W.

Allman

A.-A.

(2003). Functional MRI Involving Painful Stimulation of the Ankle and the Effect of Physiotherapy Joint Mobilization. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 21, 489–496. 10.1016/s0730-725x(03)00074-2 Ohashi

Sato

Iwata

Kawai

Kurebayashi

(2007). Colonic Mast Cell Infiltration in Rats with TNBS-Induced Visceral Hypersensitivity. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 69, 1223–1228. 10.1292/jvms.69.1223 Rigo

F. K.

Dalmolin

G. D.

Trevisan

Tonello

Silva

M. A.

Rossato

M. F.

(2013a). Effect of ω-Conotoxin MVIIA and Phα1β on Paclitaxel-Induced Acute and Chronic Pain. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 114-115, 16–22. 10.1016/j.pbb.2013.10.014 Rigo

F. K.

Trevisan

Rosa

Dalmolin

G. D.

Otuki

M. F.

Cueto

A. P.

(2013b). Spider Peptide Phα1β Induces Analgesic Effect in a Model of Cancer Pain. Cancer Sci. 104, 1226–1230. 10.1111/cas.12209 Robincohen

Kimes

London

(1991). Morphine Decreases Cerebral Glucose Utilization in Limbic and Forebrain Regions while Pain Has No Effect. Neuropharmacology. 30, 125–134. 10.1016/0028-3908(91)90195-h Rosa

Trevisan

Rigo

F. K.

Tonello

Andrade

E. L.

do Nascimento Cordeiro

(2014). Phα1β, a Peptide from the Venom of the Spider Phoneutria Nigriventer Shows Antinociceptive Effects after Continuous Infusion in a Neuropathic Pain Model in Rats. Anesth. Analg. 119, 196–202. 10.1213/ane.0000000000000249 Rudin

(2005). Imaging in Drug Discovery and Early Clinical Trials (Progress in Drug Research). Switzerland: Springer. Schiffer

W. K.

Mirrione

M. M.

Biegon

Alexoff

D. L.

Patel

Dewey

S. L.

(2006). Serial microPET Measures of the Metabolic Reaction to a Microdialysis Probe Implant. J. Neurosci. Methods. 155, 272–284. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.01.027 Shi

Apkarian

A. V.

(1995). Morphology of Thalamocortical Neurons Projecting to the Primary Somatosensory Cortex and Their Relationship to Spinothalamic Terminals in the Squirrel Monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 361, 1–24. 10.1002/cne.903610102 Shih

Y.-Y. I.

Chiang

Y.-C.

Chen

J.-C.

Huang

C.-H.

Chen

Y.-Y.

Liu

R.-S.

(2008). Brain Nociceptive Imaging in Rats Using 18f-Fluorodeoxyglucose Small-Animal Positron Emission Tomography. Neuroscience. 155, 1221–1226. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.07.013 Souza

A. H.

Ferreira

Cordeiro

M. d. N.

Vieira

L. B.

De Castro

C. J.

Trevisan

(2008). Analgesic Effect in Rodents of Native and Recombinant Phα1β Toxin, a High-Voltage-Activated Calcium Channel Blocker Isolated from Armed Spider Venom. Pain. 140, 115–126. 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.014 Tonello

Fusi

Materazzi

Marone

I. M.

De Logu

Benemei

(2017). The Peptide Phα1β, from Spider Venom, Acts as a TRPA1 Channel Antagonist with Antinociceptive Effects in Mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 174, 57–69. 10.1111/bph.13652 Tuor

U. I.

Malisza

Foniok

Papadimitropoulos

Jarmasz

Somorjai

(2000). Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rats Subjected to Intense Electrical and Noxious Chemical Stimulation of the Forepaw. Pain. 87, 315–324. 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00293-1 Vieira

L. B.

Kushmerick

Hildebrand

M. E.

Garcia

Stea

Cordeiro

M. N.

(2005). Inhibition of High Voltage-Activated Calcium Channels by Spider Toxin PnTx3-6. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 314, 1370–1377. 10.1124/jpet.105.087023 Vieira

L. B.

Kushmerick

Reis

H. J.

Diniz

C. R.

Cordeiro

M. N.

Prado

M. A. M.

(2003). PnTx3-6 a Spider Neurotoxin Inhibits K+-Evoked Increase in [Ca2+]i and Ca2+-dependent Glutamate Release in Synaptosomes. Neurochem. Int. 42, 277–282. 10.1016/s0197-0186(02)00130-4 Winquist

R. J.

Pan

J. Q.

Gribkoff

V. K.

(2005). Use-dependent Blockade of Cav2.2 Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels for Neuropathic Pain. Biochem. Pharmacol. 70, 489–499. 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.04.035 Zimmermann

(1983). Ethical Guidelines for Investigations of Experimental Pain in Conscious Animals. Pain. 16, 109–110. 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90201-4