<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2026.1764764</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effects of legume-wheat rotation patterns on wheat yield, quality, and soil microbial community in the North China Plain</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Nan</surname> <given-names>Zhenwu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2402928"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Zhu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2388250"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Nana</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Kainan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>Hongcui</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3052098"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Yubin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1403944"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>Weiwei</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x00026; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Kaichang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x00026; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>National Engineering Research Center for Wheat and Maize, Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <city>Jinan</city>, <country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <city>Jinan</city>, <country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001"><label>&#x0002A;</label>Correspondence: Weiwei Meng, <email xlink:href="mailto:wdlmww@163.com">wdlmww@163.com</email>; Kaichang Liu, <email xlink:href="mailto:liukc1971@163.com">liukc1971@163.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn001"><label>&#x02020;</label><p>These authors have contributed equally to this work</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-02-12">
<day>12</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>17</volume>
<elocation-id>1764764</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>10</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>09</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>20</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2026 Nan, Liu, Xu, Zhao, Dai, Wang, Meng and Liu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Nan, Liu, Xu, Zhao, Dai, Wang, Meng and Liu</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-02-12">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Incorporating legumes into crop rotation systems is an environmentally sound agricultural practice that improves soil quality and crop productivity. However, the mechanisms underlying these benefits, particularly the relationship between soil properties and microbial communities, remain unclear. This study evaluated the impact of three different rotation patterns, namely wheat-maize (WM), wheat-peanut (WP), and wheat-soybean (WS), on wheat yield, grain quality, soil physicochemical properties, soil enzyme activities, and microbial community. Our results demonstrated that legume-based rotations significantly improved wheat performance. In contrast to WM, WP consistently achieved the highest wheat yield, with a 3 year average increase of 10.7%. Furthermore, significant improvements in key quality parameters were observed in WP. Specifically, crude protein and wet gluten contents increased by 9.2% and 27.4%, respectively. These improvements were attributed to the enhancement of soil health. Legume rotations, particularly WP, led to significant improvements in soil total nitrogen (TN), available phosphorus (AP), and soil water content (SWC). This was accompanied by a strategic shift in soil enzymatic functions, with significantly higher activities of N-cycle (LAP, NAG) and P-cycle (ALP) enzymes. High-throughput sequencing revealed that legume rotations enriched specific bacterial phyla, such as Acidobacteria and Chloroflexi, and fostered a more complex and stable fungal co-occurrence network. Mantel test analysis revealed that wheat yield and quality were significantly correlated with several key soil parameters, including soil pH, TN, and the activities of NAG and ALP. PLS-PM analysis revealed that soil properties enhanced soil enzyme activity by shaping microbial communities, ultimately improving crop performance, demonstrating that microbial communities and soil enzyme activity play crucial roles. Collectively, these findings reveal that introducing legumes, especially peanut, boosts wheat yield and quality by enhancing soil nutrient availability and shaping a beneficial microbial community, serving as a sustainable strategy for wheat production.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>legume rotation</kwd>
<kwd>quality</kwd>
<kwd>soil microbial community</kwd>
<kwd>wheat</kwd>
<kwd>yield</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was funded by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2023QC132), the Agricultural Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CXGC2025C01), the Shandong Provincial Wheat Industry Technology System (SDAIT-01-07) and the Taishan Scholars Program (tsqn202312284).</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="11"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="72"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="9538"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Terrestrial Microbiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>As China&#x00027;s producing region, the North China Plain (NCP) contributes approximately 45% of the national wheat output and 30% of the maize output (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Zhao H. et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Xia et al., 2023</xref>). The wheat-maize double-cropping rotation system is the most prevalent cropping practice in this region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Yang et al., 2023</xref>). Due to long-term wheat-maize (W-M) rotation and sustained reliance on heavy fertilizer and pesticide inputs to maintain high yields, soil quality is deteriorating (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yan et al., 2024</xref>). This not only threatens yield stability but also triggers a series of environmental pollution issues, such as soil acidification and nitrate leaching (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Guo et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Rosas et al., 2015</xref>). Incorporating legumes into crop rotation systems is recommended as a promising approach to maintain crop productivity and mitigate soil and environmental issues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Yu et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Zhao J. et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>The core advantage of legumes lies in their unique ability to fix nitrogen biologically. Through symbiosis with rhizobia, legumes convert atmospheric nitrogen into forms usable by plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Qiao et al., 2024</xref>). Legume crops fix an estimated 33 Tg of nitrogen annually, accounting for 60% of all biological nitrogen fixation in agriculture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Reis Ely et al., 2025</xref>). Legumes not only require very little nitrogen themselves but also leave usable nitrogen for subsequent crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Geng et al., 2023</xref>). Legumes can potentially provide subsequent grain crops with an estimated 60 kg N ha<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Preissel et al., 2015</xref>), thereby enabling these crops to achieve higher yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Geng et al., 2023</xref>). A global-scale meta-analysis revealed that legume pre-crops not only increase the average yield of principal crops by 20.4%, but also demonstrate widespread effectiveness across diverse crops, soils, and climates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Zhao J. et al., 2022</xref>). In northern North America, planting wheat after leguminous crops results in a significant yield increase of up to 35% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Miller et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Gan et al., 2015</xref>). Wheat-pea rotation significantly enhanced the yield stability of the system, which may be attributed to the strong biological nitrogen-fixing capacity, higher straw incorporation, and shallow root systems of pea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Liu et al., 2020</xref>). Therefore, incorporating legume crops into rotation systems could enhance system stability.</p>
<p>The composition of legume residues, rich in nitrogen, phosphorus, sugars, and proteins with a low C/N ratio, promotes rapid decomposition in soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Yu et al., 2016</xref>). This process effectively drives nutrient cycling, thereby enhancing nutrient uptake for the subsequent crop (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Kohmann et al., 2019</xref>). Mung bean-winter wheat rotation significantly increased wheat gluten protein content, substantially exceeding that of three cereal crop-based rotations (maize, sorghum, and millet) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Wang R. et al., 2025</xref>). A deeper understanding of how different legume-wheat rotation patterns affect wheat quality will provide scientific support for sustainably enhancing this cropping system.</p>
<p>Soil microbial communities are central to driving soil nutrient cycling and organic matter transformation, with their structure and function directly regulating soil fertility and ecosystem health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bai et al., 2022</xref>). Changes in root exudates and soil nutrient release induced by crop rotation directly alter resource availability for soil microorganisms, reshaping the diversity and structure of bacterial and fungal communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ai et al., 2018</xref>). Compared to maize, wheat-soybean rotation increases soil pH and microbial biomass in the wheat rhizosphere, which benefits microbial decomposition, metabolic activity, and functional diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Song et al., 2022</xref>). By enhancing microbial biomass, promoting key enzyme activities, and alleviating microbial nitrogen limitation, the soybean-maize rotation drives nutrient cycling and organic carbon accumulation more efficiently, which ultimately improves overall soil functionality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Luo et al., 2024</xref>). However, how microbial community diversity and composition respond to different legume-wheat rotation combinations remains poorly understood.</p>
<p>This study describes experiments conducted in the NCP region from 2018 to 2021, involving the rotation of two legumes (soybean and peanut) with wheat. Based on the hypothesis that legume-wheat rotation influences crop performance through a cascade of soil and microbial changes, the objectives of this study were threefold: (1) to quantify the ultimate effects on wheat yield and quality; (2) to determine the effects of legume (soybean or peanut)-wheat rotations on key soil properties and enzyme activities; and (3) to elucidate how these rotations alter the soil microbial community and its co-occurrence network.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Experimental site</title>
<p>The field experiment was conducted at the Comprehensive Experimental Base of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, located in Jiyang District (116&#x000B0;58&#x02032; E, 36&#x000B0;58&#x02032; N), Jinan, China (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Situated on the alluvial plain of the lower Yellow River at an elevation of 20 m, the site features a warm-temperate, semi-humid monsoon climate. Key climatic characteristics include a mean annual temperature of 12.8 &#x000B0;C, annual precipitation of 580 mm, a 195-day frost-free period, and 2618 hours of annual sunshine. The soil is classified as a Luvisol derived from Yellow River alluvium, with a sandy loam texture in the topsoil. Prior to the experiment, baseline soil properties of the 0&#x02013;20 cm layer were as follows: organic matter, 12.1 g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>; total nitrogen, 0.7 g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>; total phosphorus, 0.8 g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>; total potassium, 19.2 g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>; alkaline-hydrolyzable N, 50.6 mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>; available P, 20.5 mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>; available K, 151.9 mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>; and a pH of 8.0. Prior to 2018, the area had consistently practiced a wheat-maize rotation system.</p>
<fig position="float" id="F1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Location of experimental site in the North China plain.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-17-1764764-g0001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Map with three panels showing location details. Top left, a map of China highlighting Shandong Province in green. Bottom left, a closer view of Shandong Province with the focus area in brown. Right, a detailed map of the test site marked by a red dot within the brown area, with a scale and compass.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Experimental design</title>
<p>A long-term field experiment was initiated in 2018 using a randomized complete block design. The experiment consisted of three rotation systems, each replicated three times: wheat-maize (WM), wheat-peanut (WP), and wheat-soybean (WS). The crop varie-ties used were &#x02018;Jimai 22&#x02032; for wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.), &#x02018;Denghai 605&#x02032; for maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic> L.), &#x02018;Huayu 25&#x02032; for peanut (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L.), and &#x02018;Qihuang 34&#x02032; for soybean (<italic>Glycine max</italic> L.). The fertilization regime was consistent across all treatments. A basal dose of compound fertilizer (N: P<sub>2</sub>O5: K<sub>2</sub>O = 15: 15: 15) was applied at a rate of 750 kg ha<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> before sowing each crop. Additionally, urea (46% N) was top-dressed at 225 kg ha<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> during the wheat jointing stage and the maize V12 stage. Wheat was typically sown in mid-October and harvested in early June of the following year. The summer crops (maize, peanut, and soybean) were sown in mid-June and harvested in early October. Other management practices follow conventional tillage methods, with straw incorporated into the soil.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Sample collection</title>
<p>During each harvest season from 2019 to 2021, a representative 15 m<sup>2</sup> area was harvested from each of the three replicate plots at maturity to determine wheat yield. In March (jointing stage of wheat) and June (maturity stage of wheat) of 2021, soil samples were collected from the 0&#x02013;20 cm soil layer using the five-point sampling method. For each sampling time, samples from the same plot were pooled into a single composite sample, with three replicates. All samples were collected in sterile self-sealing bags and immediately shipped on dry ice to the laboratory. Each sample was partitioned into two subsamples for different analyses. The first subsample, intended for DNA sequencing, was immediately stored at &#x02013; 80 &#x000B0;C. The second subsample was stored at 4 &#x000B0;C and used to determine extracellular enzyme activities and soil physicochemical properties.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Basic soil physicochemical properties and extracellular enzyme activity</title>
<p>Soil ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N) and nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N) were first extracted with 2 M KCl, and their concentrations were then determined colorimetrically using a SEAL Analytical AA3 continuous flow analyzer. Total nitrogen (TN) was measured using the micro-Kjeldahl method, which involved acid digestion of the soil sample followed by distillation and titration. Available phosphorus (AP) was determined using the Olsen method (sodium bicarbonate extraction) followed by molybdenum blue colorimetry, while available potassium (AK) was measured by flame photometry after extraction with ammonium acetate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Liu et al., 2024</xref>). Soil pH was measured potentiometrically in a 1:2.5 (w/v) soil-to-water suspension. Soil organic carbon (SOC) was determined by the wet oxidation method using potassium dichromate and sulfuric acid. Soil water content (SWC) was measured gravimetrically by oven-drying fresh soil at 105 &#x000B0;C to a constant weigh (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Liu et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Determination of soil extracellular enzyme activities related to the C-cycle (&#x003B2;-D-xylosidase, BX; &#x003B2;-D-cellubiosidase, CBH), the N-cycle (N-acetyl-&#x003B2;-glucosaminidase, NAG; leucine aminopeptidase, LAP), and the P-cycle (alkaline phosphatase, ALP) using spectrophotometry. Their activities were quantified by measuring the rate of release of fluorescent or colored products from artificially-labeled substrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Yang L. et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Wheat quality</title>
<p>During the wheat ripening stage, 50 representative wheat ears were selected from each plot. After threshing and drying, they were ground using a Retsch MM400 ball mill (RETSCH GmbH, Haan, Germany). The crude protein content was determined using the micro-Kjeldahl method, which involves digesting the flour sample, followed by distillation and titration of nitrogen. A nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor of 5.7 was used. Processing quality was determined using a DA7250 near-infrared grain analyzer (Perten Instruments, Stockholm, Sweden), with measurements including wet gluten content and sedimentation value.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Sustainable yield index</title>
<p>The sustainable yield index (SYI) was used to represent yield stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang Z. et al., 2025</xref>). Higher SYI values indicate greater yield stability within an agricultural system. The SYI is calculated as follows:</p>
<disp-formula id="EQ1"><mml:math id="M3"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003BC;</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x003C3;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003BC;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math><label>(1)</label></disp-formula>
<p>where &#x003C3;, &#x003BC;, and &#x003BC;<sub><italic>max</italic></sub> are the standard deviation, and the average value and maximum value of multi-year yields for a specified treatment, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>2.7</label>
<title>DNA extraction and sequencing</title>
<p>Total genomic DNA was extracted from soil samples using the E.Z.N.A.<sup>&#x000AE;</sup> Soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, USA) following the manufacturer&#x00027;s instructions. DNA quality and concentration were verified by 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis and NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometry (Thermo Scientific, USA). For amplicon sequencing, the bacterial 16S rRNA V3-V4 region and fungal ITS1 region were amplified using primers 338F/806R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Caporaso et al., 2012</xref>) and ITS1F/ITS2R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Adams et al., 2013</xref>), respectively. PCR was performed with the following thermal profile: an initial denaturation at 95 &#x000B0;C for 3 min; 27 cycles of 95 &#x000B0;C for 30 s, 55 &#x000B0;C for 30 s, and 72 &#x000B0;C for 45 s; and a final extension at 72 &#x000B0;C for 10 min. Following amplification, amplicons were gel-purified using a PCR Clean-Up Kit (YuHua, China) and quantified on a Qubit 4.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Equimolar amounts of the purified amplicons were pooled to create the final library, which was then subjected to paired-end sequencing on an Illumina Nextseq2000 platform by Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).</p>
<p>After demultiplexing, the resulting sequences were quality filtered with fastp, yielding an average of 14,295 high-quality reads per sample for 16S rRNA and 34,468 reads per sample for ITS1. These sequences were then merged with FLASH. Then, the high-quality sequences were denoied using the DADA2 plugin in the Qiime2 pipeline with the recommended parameters, which provides single-nucleotide resolution based on error profiles within each sample. DADA2-denoised sequences are often referred to as amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). Subsequently, ASVs corresponding to spike-in sequences were filtered out, and reads were quantified. For each sample, a standard curve was constructed by plotting read counts against spike-in DNA copy numbers, which was then used to determine the quantitative abundance of every ASV. ASVs were taxonomically classified using the Naive Bayes consensus classifier within Qiime2 against the SILVA 16S rRNA reference database. Assignment of fungal taxonomy was performed using the UNITE database.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Statistical analyses</title>
<p>Analysis of Variance, complemented by Duncan&#x00027;s <italic>post-hoc</italic> test, was used to assess the variations in yield, quality, soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, and alpha diversity indices. The partial least squares path model (PLS-PM) based on the &#x0201C;plspm&#x0201D; package in R was employed to evaluate relationships among soil properties, microbial communities, soil enzyme activity, and crop performance. The visualization and analysis of the microbial co-occurrence network were generated using Gephi.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Yield and quality</title>
<p>The effect of three crop rotation patterns on wheat yield from 2019 to 2021 is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2a</xref>. WP significantly increased wheat yields in all 3 years, averaging 10.7% above WM. In 2019, wheat yield showed no significant difference between the WS and WM. In 2020 and 2021, WS significantly increased wheat yield by 6.1% compared to WM, averaged over 2 years. To quantitatively assess the impact of different cropping systems on yield sustainability, we calculated the yield sustainability index (SYI). Results indicate that crop rotation patterns significantly influenced SYI (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05). Specifically, the WP and WS treatments exhibited significantly higher SYI values than WM, while no significant difference was observed between WP and WS treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2b</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="F2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Wheat yield from 2019 to 2021 <bold>(a)</bold> and the yield sustainability index (SYI) <bold>(b)</bold> under different rotation systems. Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences among rotation treatments within the same season at the <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05 level. The data are presented as mean &#x000B1; SD (<italic>n</italic> = 3). WM, winter wheat-summer maize; WP, winter wheat-summer peanut; WS, winter wheat-summer soybean.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-17-1764764-g0002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts comparing agricultural yield and sustainable yield index across three treatments (WM, WP, WS) over three years (2019, 2020, 2021). Panel (a) shows yield in kilograms per hectare, with values around 9000 kg/ha. Panel (b) shows sustainable yield index, with all treatments above 0.9. Different letters indicate statistical differences.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Over the three-year study period, the legume-based rotations, particularly WP, consistently and significantly enhanced wheat quality parameters compared to WM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). WP consistently delivered the most substantial benefits. On a three-year average, WP increased crude protein by 9.2%, wet gluten by 27.4%, and the sedimentation value by 21.6% relative to WM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3a</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">c</xref>). WS also improved quality, though to a lesser and more variable extent. It increased average crude protein content by 6.8% compared to WM. However, its effect on other parameters was inconsistent. For example, it showed no significant difference in wet gluten content in 2020, while its average sedimentation value was significantly higher than WM&#x00027;s in all years except 2020.</p>
<fig position="float" id="F3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Effects of different rotation systems on crude protein content <bold>(a)</bold>, wet gluten content <bold>(b)</bold>, and sedimentation value <bold>(c)</bold> of wheat grains. Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences among rotation treatments within the same season at the <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05 level. The data are presented as mean &#x000B1; SD (<italic>n</italic> = 3). WM, winter wheat-summer maize; WP, winter wheat-summer peanut; WS, winter wheat-summer soybean.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-17-1764764-g0003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Three grouped bar charts showing percentage differences for WM, WP, and WS from 2019 to 2021. (a) Crude protein content is highest for WP consistently, with WS close. (b) Wet gluten content peaks for WP, particularly in 2020. (c) Sedimentation value is highest for WP, especially in 2021. Error bars are present.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Soil physicochemical properties</title>
<p>The introduction of legume crops significantly altered multiple soil physicochemical properties compared to WM, with consistent effects observed across both the March and June sampling seasons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). Soil nitrogen dynamics were the most responsive. Compared to WM, WP significantly increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N content (by 24.7% in March and 9.2% in June) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N content (by 21.3% and 19.5%, respectively). WS also elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N levels by 10.8% in March. Both legume rotations led to higher TN content, with WP showing a 24.0% (March) and 20.6% (June) increase over WM. Furthermore, WP increased AP by 11.3-14.9% across both seasons, whereas AK and SOC were not significantly affected by any rotation pattern. Notably, both WP and WS consistently resulted in a lower soil pH than WM. Regarding soil moisture, WP maintained a significantly higher SWC, with increases of 5.8% (March) and 12.7% (June) over WM. WS also demonstrated superior water-holding capacity.</p>
<fig position="float" id="F4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Effects of different rotation systems on soil physicochemical properties. The components in the figure represent: <bold>(a)</bold> ammonium nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N), <bold>(b)</bold> nitrate nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N), <bold>(c)</bold> total nitrogen (TN), <bold>(d)</bold> available phosphorus, (AP), <bold>(e)</bold> available potassium (AK), <bold>(f)</bold> pH, <bold>(g)</bold> soil organic carbon (SOC), and <bold>(h)</bold> soil water content (SWC). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences among rotation treatments within the same season at the <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05 level. The data are presented as mean &#x000B1; SD (<italic>n</italic> = 3). WM, winter wheat-summer maize; WP, winter wheat-summer peanut; WS, winter wheat-summer soybean.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-17-1764764-g0004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts illustrating soil properties measured in March and June across three treatments: WM, WP, and WS. Panels (a) to (h) display data for NH4+-N, NO3--N, TN, AP, AK, pH, SOC, and SWC, respectively. Each panel compares treatment effects with letter notations indicating statistically significant differences. Error bars are included for variability.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Soil enzyme activities</title>
<p>The soil extracellular enzyme activities exhibited distinct patterns influenced by both crop rotation and season, with legume-based systems showing a significant shift in nutrient-acquisition strategies compared to WM (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). In contrast to N- and P-cycle enzymes, C-cycle enzyme activities were generally higher under the WM rotation. Legume rotations, however, significantly stimulated N- and P-cycle enzymes. In March, compared to WM, LAP activity increased by 11.0% in WP and 6.2% in WS, while NAG activity rose by 14.1% and 8.4%, respectively. This enhancement in N-cycle enzyme activities was also observed in June. For P-cycle, ALP activity was similarly higher in both legume systems than in WM during March.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>The soil extracellular enzyme activities under different rotation systems.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left" rowspan="2"><bold>Soil enzyme</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3"><bold>March</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3"><bold>June</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>WM</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>WP</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>WS</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>WM</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>WP</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>WS</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BX (U g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">673.30a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">649.26b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">653.87ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">365.91a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">352.64a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">354.03a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CBH (U g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.78a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">85.89b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86.63b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56.77a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53.51b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53.40b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">LAP (U g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">590.69c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">655.83a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">627.14b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">493.30c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">570.38a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">541.03b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NAG (U g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">162.41c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">185.24a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">176.04b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">154.27c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">171.49a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">161.96b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ALP (U g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.61b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.91a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.81a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.22b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.52a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.26a</td>
</tr></tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>WM, winter wheat-summer maize; WP, winter wheat-summer peanut; WS, winter wheat-summer soybean; BX, &#x003B2;-xylosidase; CBH, 1, 4-&#x003B2;-cellobiohydrolase; LAP, L-Leucine ami-nopeptidase; NAG, N-acetylglucosaminidase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Soil microbial community composition</title>
<p>Venn diagrams (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>) were used to visualize the shared and unique ASVs in the bacterial and fungal communities across the three rotation patterns at two key growth stages (March and June). For the bacterial communities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5a</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">c</xref>), the number of shared ASVs common to all three rotation patterns was larger in March (1056 ASVs) than in June (630 ASVs), indicating a more conserved core microbiome at the earlier growth stage. In March, the highest number of unique bacterial ASVs was observed in WP (989). The WM and WS showed lower richness, with 872 and 865 ASVs, respectively. For the fungal communities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5b</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">d</xref>), a similar pattern was observed. The number of shared ASVs common to all three rotation patterns was larger in March (287 ASVs) than in June (236 ASVs). However, the distribution of unique ASVs showed notable system-specificity. WP consistently had fewer unique fungal ASVs in both March (234) and June (224).</p>
<fig position="float" id="F5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>The Venn diagram showing the unique and shared ASVs among three rotation patterns. <bold>(a)</bold> Bacterial communities in March. <bold>(b)</bold> Fungal communities in March. <bold>(c)</bold> Bacterial communities in June. <bold>(d)</bold> Fungal communities in June. WM, winter wheat-summer maize; WP, winter wheat-summer peanut; WS, winter wheat-summer soybean.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-17-1764764-g0005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Four Venn diagrams compare bacterial and fungal communities in March and June. Diagrams (a) and (c) depict bacteria data; (b) and (d) show fungi data. Diagrams (a) and (b) pertain to March, with overlapping sections showing intersections between WM, WP, and WS. Diagrams (c) and (d), for June, illustrate similar intersections. Different numbers are in each section, reflecting varied community presences in each category.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Shifts in the relative abundance of dominant bacterial and fungal phyla in soils sampled in March and June were assessed to determine the impact of crop rotation patterns during the wheat season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Gemmatimonadota were the dominant phyla at the bacterial level across all samples. Compared to WM, the legume-based rotations consistently increased the relative abundances of Acidobacteria and Chloroflexi across both sampling seasons. Specifically, the abundance of Acidobacteria under WP was 20.34% in March and 20.21% in June, which were higher than the corresponding values in WM (14.58% and 13.68%). Similarly, Chloroflexi was more abundant in WP (11.28% in March, 12.89% in June) than in WM (9.80% in March, 8.02% in June). The relative abundance of Actinobacteria was reduced in the legume systems, particularly in June, when it was lower in WP (27.93%) and WS (24.77%) than in WM (32.80%). The response of Proteobacteria differed between the two legume crops: in June, its abundance decreased in WP (20.72%) relative to WM (24.43%), but increased in WS (27.71%). At the fungal phylum level, the Ascomycota phylum dominated all samples and constituted the core component of the fungal community. The Mortierellomycota and Basidiomycota phyla followed it. The abundance of Ascomycota exhibited significant phasic and treatment-specific variations. The highest and lowest abundances of Ascomycota in March were detected in the WP and WS treatments, respectively. By June, the WM showed the highest abundance of Ascomycota, whereas both legume rotation treatments (WP and WS) exhibited a decline in abundance. Unlike the Ascomycota, the relative abundance of the Basidiomycota consistently elevated across all treatments in June.</p>
<fig position="float" id="F6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p>Relative abundance of dominant bacterial <bold>(a)</bold> and fungal <bold>(b)</bold> phyla. WM, winter wheat-summer maize; WP, winter wheat-summer peanut; WS, winter wheat-summer soybean.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-17-1764764-g0006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two bar charts compare relative abundance percentages in March and June for samples labeled WM, WP, and WS. Chart (a) shows variations in bacterial phyla, including Proteobacteria, Acidobacteriota, and others. Chart (b) shows fungal phyla, highlighting Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. Each chart uses different colors to represent various phyla.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Soil microbial community diversity</title>
<p>Analysis of Chao1 richness and Shannon diversity indices revealed that the alpha diversity of soil microbial communities was differentially affected by both rotation pattern and sampling season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>). For bacterial communities, the cropping system had a season-dependent effect. At the March sampling, no significant differences in either bacterial richness (Chao1, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7a</xref>) or diversity (Shannon, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7b</xref>) were observed among the three rotation patterns. However, by June, a clear hierarchy emerged, with both indices showing a consistent pattern of WS &#x0003E; WP &#x0003E; WM. The fungal communities exhibited a distinctly different response pattern. In March, significant differences were observed, with WP showing significantly lower values in both fungal richness (Chao1, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7c</xref>) and diversity (Shannon, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7d</xref>) compared to WM and WS. These differences, however, diminished by June, with all three cropping systems maintaining statistically similar levels of fungal alpha diversity at the later stage. The three cropping systems significantly shaped both bacterial and fungal community structures, leading to clear separations on the PCoA plot across both sampling seasons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="F7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption><p>Alpha diversity indices of soil microbial communities under different crop rotation patterns. <bold>(a)</bold> Chao1 richness index for bacterial communities. <bold>(b)</bold> Chao1 richness index for fungal communities. <bold>(c)</bold> Shannon diversity index for bacterial communities. <bold>(d)</bold> Shannon diversity index for fungal communities. Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences among rotation treatments within the same season at the <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05 level. WM, winter wheat-summer maize; WP, winter wheat-summer peanut; WS, winter wheat-summer soybean.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-17-1764764-g0007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar graphs illustrating Chao1 and Shannon diversity indices for bacteria and fungi across WM, WP, and WS treatments in March and June. Each graph compares diversity indices, with statistical significance denoted by letters above bars. Panels (a) and (b) show Chao1 index for bacteria and fungi, respectively, while panels (c) and (d) depict the Shannon index for bacteria and fungi. Highest diversity is observed in March across treatments, with a noticeable decrease in June for some categories. Statistical differences are marked by different letters.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="F8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption><p>Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of microbial communities under different crop rotation patterns, showing bacterial <bold>(a)</bold> and fungal <bold>(b)</bold> communities in March, and bacterial <bold>(c)</bold> and fungal <bold>(d)</bold> communities in June. WM, winter wheat-summer maize; WP, winter wheat-summer peanut; WS, winter wheat-summer soybean.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-17-1764764-g0008.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Four PCoA plots showing microbial communities in different conditions. (a) Bacteria in March with clusters: WM (blue), WP (green), WS (red). PCo1 accounts for 26.39% variance, PCo2 for 15.82%. (b) Fungi in March with similar clustering and variance: PCo1 at 52.15%, PCo2 at 25.46%. (c) Bacteria in June with WM, WP, WS clusters. PCo1 explains 28.04% variance, PCo2 explains 17.11%. (d) Fungi in June, similar clustering, with PCo1 at 51.87%, PCo2 at 18.71%.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Soil microbial co-occurrence network analysis</title>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref> demonstrates that crop rotation systems exerted a strong influence on the structure of both bacterial and fungal co-occurrence networks. In bacterial networks, legume rotations (WP and WS) exhibit larger but sparser network structures compared to WM. Specifically, both WP and WS have more nodes than WM, yet their average degree and network density are lower. Among these, the WP network contained the highest number of nodes but the lowest number of edges, and exhibited the highest modularity, indicating the most stable community structure. Additionally, both legume rotation networks possessed higher average clustering coefficients than WM, suggesting their nodes tended to form tighter local clusters. The fungal networks responded more dramatically to the legume-based rotations. Both WP and WS substantially increased the network complexity compared to WM. Compared to the WM network, the fungal networks under WP and WS were more complex, featuring higher average degrees, a greater number of links, and larger proportions of both positive and negative interactions. Concurrently, these more intricate networks exhibited lower modularity and a shorter average path distance. Notably, the average clustering coefficient was also significantly higher in the legume systems, with WP showing the highest value.</p>
<fig position="float" id="F9">
<label>Figure 9</label>
<caption><p>Bacterial and fungal co-occurrence networks under different rotation systems <bold>(a)</bold>. Topological properties of empirical networks of bacteria <bold>(b)</bold> and fungi <bold>(c)</bold> under different rotation systems. WM, winter wheat-summer maize; WP, winter wheat-summer peanut; WS, winter wheat-summer soybean.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-17-1764764-g0009.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Three network graphs on bacterial and fungal communities in different environments (WM, WP, WS) with nodes representing various taxa. Color-coded circles indicate different bacterial and fungal groups, with edges marked as positive or negative. Two radar charts compare network properties such as nodes, edges, average degree, modularity, density, and average clustering coefficient across WM, WP, and WS environments.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>3.7</label>
<title>Analysis of correlations</title>
<p>Mantel test analysis revealed significant correlations between wheat yield and quality and key soil variables, including soil pH, TN, NAG, and ALP. The bacterial community structure exhibited significant correlations with SOC, AP, SWC, LAP, and NAG. The fungal communities were strongly associated with most soil factors (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="F10">
<label>Figure 10</label>
<caption><p>The relationship of soil physicochemical properties and extracellular enzyme activities with bacterial and fungal communities by Mantel tests. Pairwise comparisons of soil physicochemical properties and extracellular enzyme activities were represented by rectangular boxes, with red for positive and blue for negative correlations. Edge width indicates the coefficients of the partial Mantel tests, while edge color represents correlation significance. WM, winter wheat-summer maize; WP, winter wheat-summer peanut; WS, winter wheat-summer soybean.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-17-1764764-g0010.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Correlation heatmap and network graph showing relationships between various soil and microbial properties. Variables include bacterial and fungal presence, soil nutrients (NH4-N, NO3-N, SOC), and crop quality and yield. Spearman's correlation coefficients are color-coded from red for positive to blue for negative correlations. Mantel&#x02019;s r and p values are indicated by line thickness and color, respectively.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>3.8</label>
<title>PLS-PM analysis</title>
<p>A partial least squares path model (PLS-PM) was constructed to identify key factors driving crop performance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11</xref>). Soil enzyme activity exerted the strongest direct positive effect on crop performance, reaching a highly significant level, making it the most crucial direct determinant of final crop performance. Additionally, soil properties significantly and positively influenced crop performance. As the most fundamental driving factor in the system, soil properties significantly promoted microbial community assembly. Improvements in microbial communities further significantly elevated soil enzyme activity. Overall, soil properties not only directly enhance crop performance but, more importantly, exert a more potent influence through a key indirect pathway: soil properties first affect microbial communities, which in turn alter soil enzyme activity. This demonstrates that microbial communities and soil enzyme activity play crucial mediating roles ithin this system.</p>
<fig position="float" id="F11">
<label>Figure 11</label>
<caption><p>Partial least squares path model (PLS-PM) analysis of the relationships among soil properties, microbial communities, soil enzyme activity, and crop performance. Positive and negative effects were represented by red and blue arrows, respectively. Path coefficients with no significant difference were indicated by dashed lines. Significance is indicated by &#x0002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05, &#x0002A;&#x0002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01, and &#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A; <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-17-1764764-g0011.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Diagram showing relationships between soil properties, microbial community, soil enzyme activity, and crop performance. Arrows indicate positive or negative effects with path coefficients: microbial community to soil properties (0.60**), to crop performance (0.09), soil properties to enzyme activity (-0.41), to crop performance (0.61*), enzyme activity to crop performance (0.81***), and soil properties to microbial community (0.32*). Goodness of fit is 0.51.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec>
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Effects of legume-based rotation on soil physicochemical properties and biological properties</title>
<p>Legumes not only satisfy their own nitrogen requirements through biological nitrogen fixation, but also provide a nitrogen source for subsequent crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Geng et al., 2023</xref>). In this study, both legume systems, particularly WP, significantly increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N during the wheat season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). Legumes have been shown to store a portion of nitrogen in their root systems and nodules, which is released into the soil through rhizosphere exudates and the turnover of roots and nodules (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Hupe et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Geng et al., 2024</xref>). This also explains the increased N availability during the wheat season in this experiment. Notably, this enhancement effect is particularly pronounced in WP. This may be because peanut straw has a low C/N ratio, accounting for 40% of the plant&#x00027;s total nitrogen, which is beneficial for residue decomposition and net nitrogen mineralization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Huang et al., 2025</xref>). This study found that compared to WM, WP significantly increased SWC and AP levels in the subsequent wheat season. The increase in SWC is primarily attributed to peanuts&#x00027; lower water consumption compared to maize. The rise in AP might be due to the fact that, as a legume, peanut roots secrete organic acids and phosphatase, effectively activating immobilized insoluble phosphorus and inorganic phosphorus in the rhizosphere soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chen et al., 2025</xref>). Soil pH is a core variable among numerous factors influencing soil fertility, as it determines nutrient solubility, microbial community structure, and enzyme activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Jin et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Duan et al., 2025</xref>). This study found that, compared to WM, both WP and WS significantly decreased soil pH, which may be attributed to legume root systems secreting organic acids (such as citric and malic acids) to release phosphorus that would otherwise be immobilized in the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Nuruzzaman et al., 2005</xref>). Comparable findings were reported in a study on legume-potato rotation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wang et al., 2023b</xref>). Several studies have reported that legume-based crop rotations can increase SOC sequestration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Yang X. et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Liu W. et al., 2025</xref>). However, we found no significant difference in SOC content between the legume rotation and the maize-wheat rotation, possibly because SOC changes are slow and the 3 year trial period may be insufficient to capture such gradual shifts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Lasisi and Liu, 2023</xref>). Therefore, longer-term investigations should be conducted to validate the efficacy of legume rotation systems for enhancing soil organic carbon.</p>
<p>Soil extracellular enzymes serve as the direct tools through which microorganisms participate in nutrient cycling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Li et al., 2024</xref>). Changes in their activity profiles reveal fundamental shifts in microbial nutrient acquisition strategies under different crop rotation systems. This study found that the WM system exhibited higher C-cycle enzyme activity, while the legume rotation system significantly stimulated the activity of N- and P-cycle enzymes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). WM system introduced straw with a high C/N, causing microorganisms to be N-limited during decomposition and thus prioritizing the synthesis of C-cycle enzymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Wang et al., 2015</xref>). Conversely, the low C/N ratio residues introduced by legume rotation were rich in nitrogen, greatly stimulating microbial activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Sui et al., 2025</xref>). To meet their own rapid growth demands, microbial communities strategically upregulated the activity of nitrogen and phosphorus cycling enzymes to mineralize these key nutrients from soil organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Allison et al., 2007</xref>). This process contributes to promote subsequent higher yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yan et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Effects of legume-based rotation on soil microbial community composition and network characteristics</title>
<p>The findings of this study suggest that, from March to June, the number of core bacterial and fungal ASVs significantly decreased across all rotation patterns (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). This finding indicates that as wheat plants grew and root exudates changed, the soil microbial community underwent a succession process from a relatively generalized legacy community to a more selective and specific rhizosphere community. This shift aligns with prior research indicating that crop growth stages are primary determinants of microbial community structure evolution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chen et al., 2019</xref>). Legume rotation altered the relative abundance of key microbial phyla. Both WP and WS consistently increased the abundance of slow-growing, oligotrophic bacteria. Acidobacteria specialize in breaking down complex organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Eichorst et al., 2011</xref>). Chloroflexota promotes the dissolution of citrate phosphate, indirectly supporting nitrogen absorption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cao et al., 2017</xref>). By fixing nitrogen and leaving decomposable residues, legume crops create a favorable environment for these bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Liu Y. et al., 2025</xref>).</p>
<p>Ascomycota constitutes the predominant phylum in the fungal community (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Shen et al., 2020</xref>). The phenomenon we observed in March, in which peanut (WP) promoted and soybean (WS) inhibited this phylum, may be attributed to chemical differences in root exudates or early decomposition products between peanut and soybean (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Zhalnina et al., 2018</xref>). These differences could have specifically recruited or suppressed distinct functional subgroups within Ascomycota (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Sasse et al., 2018</xref>). By June, however, both legume rotations suppressed the phylum Ascomycota, while the WM maintained its high abundance. We speculate that this is related to the high-nitrogen environment in legume rotations, which inhibits certain saprophytic Ascomycota required to decompose organic matter with a high C/N ratio (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Purahong et al., 2016</xref>). A significant finding was the consistent increase in the relative abundance of the Basidiomycota within all treatments in June (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). Basidiomycota are considered the most efficient lignin decomposers in ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Vor&#x000ED;&#x00161;kov&#x000E1; and Baldrian, 2013</xref>). The increase indicates that at the late stage of the wheat growing season, with the depletion of labile carbon sources, the metabolic priority of the soil microbial community shifts toward the decomposition of more recalcitrant plant matter, such as senescent root systems and surface stubble.</p>
<p>By constructing a co-occurrence network, we gained further insight into how different crop rotation schemes shape the microbial community structure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>). Legume rotations had distinctly different effects on bacterial and fungal networks. For the bacterial network, even though the WP contained the maximum number of nodes, it had the fewest edges and the lowest average degree, suggesting a more modular network. This network structure may imply that while the bacterial community in WP is species-rich, its interspecific interactions are relatively fragile or straightforward (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Sun et al., 2025</xref>). Elevated biodiversity does not inherently lead to greater network intricacy and robustness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Zhang et al., 2024</xref>). In resource-rich environments, a microbial network with reduced complexity may still exhibit high functional redundancy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Yu et al., 2024</xref>). In the fungal network, legume rotations (both WP and WS) greatly increased the network complexity. Concurrently, decreases in network modularity and in the average path distance suggest that the fungal community became more interconnected and efficient (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Tylianakis et al., 2010</xref>). Notably, the highest average clustering coefficient under WP indicates the formation of more tightly knit clusters with overlapping niches within its fungal community (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Felipe-Lucia et al., 2020</xref>). Such a complex and highly connected fungal network is generally considered to possess stronger resistance and resilience, as well as higher nutrient cycling efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Morri&#x000EB;n et al., 2017</xref>). These beneficial properties could be among the key mechanisms by which legume rotations enhance soil health and functionality.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Effects of legume-based crop rotation on wheat yield and quality</title>
<p>The goal of optimizing cropping systems is to improve crop yield and grain quality. Our study unequivocally showed that legume-based rotations, particularly the WP system, significantly improved wheat performance compared to the conventional WM system. The WP rotation achieved a consistent yield increase and substantially improved nutritional quality, with crude protein and wet gluten content increasing (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). These improvements result from the synergistic effects of the optimized soil physicochemical environment and the reshaped microbial functions discussed in the previous sections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Guo et al., 2024</xref>). First, the enhancement in yield and quality is directly underpinned by improved nutrient availability. As the chief constraint for wheat yield, nitrogen is also the essential building block for grain protein and gluten accumulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Maaz et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Wang et al., 2023a</xref>). Legume crop rotation leaves behind a nitrogen legacy, characterized by elevated levels of TN, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). This abundant N supply provided the material basis for the observed surge in protein and gluten content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Z&#x000F6;rb et al., 2018</xref>). Simultaneously, legume rotation increases soil phosphorus availability. Since phosphorus is vital for energy transfer and grain filling, this increased availability likely contributed to the higher sedimentation values and overall yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ahmadi et al., 2024</xref>). The Mantel test analysis further corroborated this mechanism, identifying TN, soil pH, and AP as key environmental drivers significantly correlated with wheat yield and quality (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10</xref>). Second, the strategic shift in soil enzymatic activity catalyzed the conversion of soil nutrients into plant-available forms. A strong positive correlation was observed between wheat quality and the activities of N- and P-acquiring enzymes, as determined by a Mantel test (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10</xref>). This finding suggests that the legume-induced upregulation of these specific enzymes effectively accelerated the mineralization of organic N and P, matching nutrient supply with the requirements of wheat at key developmental phases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhang L. et al., 2025</xref>). The superior performance of the WP over the WS in terms of yield and quality can be partly attributed to greater increases in these enzymatic activities and nutrient levels in peanut stubble (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). The stability of the soil microbial ecosystem likely played an indirect but vital role in sustaining high productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Long et al., 2025</xref>). As highlighted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>, WP fostered a fungal network with higher complexity and connectivity. A robust fungal network is often associated with improved nutrient transport efficiency and enhanced crop resilience to environmental stresses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Zhang Z. et al., 2025</xref>). Combined with the higher SWC observed in legume rotations, this created a more buffered and supportive soil environment, ensuring that the wheat crop could fully realize its yield and quality potential even under varying seasonal conditions. Our study revealed the impacts of different rotation systems on sustainability of wheat yield. The results indicated that legume-wheat rotation system exhibited greater yield sustainability index (YSI). One reason is that higher crop yields can lead to more consistent production, thereby reducing the impact of meteorological variations from 1 year to the next (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Lin et al., 2026</xref>). Another possible reason is that improved soil enzyme activity and nutrient availability under legume rotation treatments enhanced crop stress tolerance and reduced yield fluctuations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Macholdt et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Relationships among soil properties, microbial communities, soil enzyme activity, and crop performance</title>
<p>Utilizing a partial least squares path model (PLS-PM), this study elucidated the key pathways driving crop yield and quality across different rotation systems (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11</xref>). Soil enzyme activity as the primary factor directly influencing crop performance. As the catalysts for material cycling and nutrient transformation, soil enzymes govern the efficiency of organic matter decomposition and nutrient mineralization, thereby ensuring a sustained supply of plant-available nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Smutny et al., 2025</xref>). Consequently, performance differences among rotation systems could be largely attributed to these variations in soil enzyme activity. Furthermore, the model delineated a critical indirect pathway through which rotation system impacts crop performance. This cascade begins with soil physicochemical properties, which in turn shape the microbial community, subsequently regulating soil enzyme activity, and ultimately affecting crop performance. Different rotation patterns, particularly the inclusion of legumes, altered soil physicochemical properties via processes like root exudation, litter input, and biological nitrogen fixation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yan et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhang L. et al., 2025</xref>). These properties then selectively structured the soil microbial community. As the main producers of soil enzymes, the microbial community&#x00027;s specific composition and function ultimately determined the overall level of enzyme activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hansen et al., 2026</xref>). Notably, while soil physicochemical properties exerted a significant direct effect on crop performance, their indirect effects that were mediated through the microbial community and soil enzyme activity proved to be of greater magnitude. This indicates that the microbial community and its enzymatic functions are the crucial mediating variables in this system, serving as the primary link between the soil environment and crop output (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hansen et al., 2026</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>This study demonstrates that incorporating legume, particularly peanut, into wheat rotation system significantly enhances wheat yield and quality compared to wheat-maize rotation. The wheat-peanut rotation was the most effective, achieving a 10.7% yield increase and a 27.4% boost in wet gluten content. These benefits stem from a holistic improvement in soil health, as legumes increase nitrogen availability and mobilize phosphorus by enhancing nutrient-cycling enzyme activities and fostering a more complex, resilient fungal network. Consequently, the wheat-peanut rotation offers a sustainable strategy to optimize both crop productivity and soil ecosystem function.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/</ext-link>, accession number PRJNA1402120.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>ZN: Writing &#x02013; original draft, Visualization. ZL: Investigation, Writing &#x02013; original draft. NX: Writing &#x02013; original draft, Project administration. KZ: Data curation, Writing &#x02013; original draft. HD: Writing &#x02013; original draft. YW: Writing &#x02013; original draft, Project administration. WM: Conceptualization, Writing &#x02013; review &#x00026; editing. KL: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing &#x02013; review &#x00026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="s9">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x00027;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>R. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miletto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bruns</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Dispersal in microbes: fungi in indoor air are dominated by outdoor air and show dispersal limitation at short distances</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1262</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1273</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2013.28</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23426013</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahmadi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hosseini</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moshiri</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alikhani</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Etesami</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Impact of varied tillage practices and phosphorus fertilization regimes on wheat yield and grain quality parameters in a five-year corn-wheat rotation system</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>14717</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-024-65784-w</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38926546</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ai</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Distinct responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to changes in fertilization regime and crop rotation</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>319</volume>, <fpage>156</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>166</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.01.010</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Allison</surname> <given-names>V. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Condron</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peltzer</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Changes in enzyme activities and soil microbial community composition along carbon and nutrient gradients at the Franz Josef chronosequence, New Zealand</article-title>. <source>Soil Bio. Bioche.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>1770</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1781</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.02.006</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The root microbiome: community assembly and its contributions to plant fitness</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>230</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>243</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jipb.13226</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35029016</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The contribution of denitrification and anaerobic ammonium oxidation to N<sub>2</sub> production in mangrove sediments in Southeast China</article-title>. <source>J. Soils Sediments</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>1767</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1776</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11368-017-1653-0</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caporaso</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lauber</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walters</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg-Lyons</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huntley</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the illumina hiseq and miseq platforms</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1621</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1624</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2012.8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22402401</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waghmode</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuramae</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Root-associated microbiomes of wheat under the combined effect of plant development and nitrogen fertilization</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>136</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-019-0750-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31640813</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>S.-B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Munz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Graeff-H&#x000F6;nninger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hartung</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Legume-based rotation increases soil phosphorus availability and enhances subsequent crop yields</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>170</volume>:<fpage>127707</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2025.127707</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petropoulos</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Soil acidification destabilizes terrestrial ecosystems via decoupling soil microbiome</article-title>. <source>Global Change Biol.</source> <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>e70174</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.70174</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40183155</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eichorst</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuske</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Influence of plant polymers on the distribution and cultivation of bacteria in the phylum acidobacteria</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>586</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>596</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01080-10</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21097594</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Felipe-Lucia</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soliveres</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Penone</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fischer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ammer</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boch</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>117</volume>, <fpage>28140</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>28149</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.2016210117</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33093203</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x00027;donovan</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cutforth</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zentner</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Campbell</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Diversifying crop rotations with pulses enhances system productivity</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>14625</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep14625</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26424172</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Geng</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen rhizodeposition from corn and soybean, and its contribution to the subsequent wheat crops</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Agric.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>2446</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2457</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jia.2023.11.018</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Geng</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Legumes can increase the yield of subsequent wheat with or without grain harvesting compared to gramineae crops: a meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>142</volume>:<fpage>126643</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2022.126643</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effects of crop rotation on sugar beet growth through improving soil physicochemical properties and microbiome</article-title>. <source>Ind. Crops Prod.</source> <volume>212</volume>:<fpage>118331</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118331</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>W. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W. F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>327</volume>:<fpage>1008</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1010</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1182570</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20150447</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hansen</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guseva</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaiser</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cotrufo</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2026</year>). <article-title>Microbial community regulation of extracellular enzyme production can mediate patterns of particulate and mineral-associated organic matter accumulation in undersaturated soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Bioche.</source> <volume>214</volume>:<fpage>110056</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.110056</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olesen</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rees</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Optimizing fertilizer N rates to maximize the N legacy effects of peanut for obtaining high wheat yields with low N surplus in a peanut-wheat rotation</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>169</volume>:<fpage>127680</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2025.127680</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hupe</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schulz</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bruns</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haase</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He&#x000DF;</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dyckmans</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Get on your boots: estimating root biomass and rhizodeposition of peas under field conditions reveals the necessity of field experiments</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>443</volume>, <fpage>449</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>462</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-019-04238-z</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Soil pH changes in a small catchment on the Chinese loess plateau after long-term vegetation rehabilitation</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Eng.</source> <volume>175</volume>:<fpage>106503</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106503</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kohmann</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sollenberger</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dubeux Jr</surname> <given-names>J. C. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Silveira</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moreno</surname> <given-names>L. S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Legume proportion in grassland litter affects decomposition dynamics and nutrient mineralization</article-title>. <source>Agron. J.</source> <volume>111</volume>:<fpage>1079</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1089</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj2018.09.0603</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lasisi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>A global meta-analysis of pulse crop effect on yield, resource use, and soil organic carbon in cereal- and oilseed-based cropping systems</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>294</volume>:<fpage>108857</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108857</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Crop diversification increases soil extracellular enzyme activities under no tillage: a global meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>235</volume>:<fpage>105870</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2023.105870</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2026</year>). <article-title>Combined ridge-film and furrow-straw mulching enhances soil structure, root growth, and yield stability for sustainable winter wheat production on the loess plateau</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>398</volume>:<fpage>110115</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2025.110115</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Legume-based rotation enhances subsequent wheat yield and maintains soil carbon storage</article-title>. <source>Agron. Sustain. Dev.</source> <volume>43</volume>:<fpage>64</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13593-023-00918-4</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bandara</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Intensifying crop rotations with pulse crops enhances system productivity and soil organic carbon in semi-arid environments</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>248</volume>:<fpage>107657</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107657</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dang</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Enhancing soil ecosystem multifunctionality through combined conservation tillage and legume-based crop rotation in the North China plain</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>379</volume>:<fpage>109355</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2024.109355</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Soybean nodulation shapes the rhizosphere microbiome to increase rapeseed yield</article-title>. <source>J. Adv. Res.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>95</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>110</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jare.2024.11.034</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39674502</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nan</surname> <given-names>Z. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>H. Q.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Peanut-based intercropping systems altered soil bacterial communities, potential functions, and crop yield</article-title>. <source>Peerj</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>e16907</fpage>doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7717/peerj.16907</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38344295</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Stable soil biota network enhances soil multifunctionality in agroecosystems</article-title>. <source>Global Change Biol.</source> <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>e70041</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.70041</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39840664</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guillaume</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Maize and soybean rotation benefits soil quality and organic carbon stock</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manag.</source> <volume>372</volume>:<fpage>123352</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123352</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39549453</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maaz</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sapkota</surname> <given-names>T. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eagle</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kantar</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bruulsema</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Majumdar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Meta-analysis of yield and nitrous oxide outcomes for nitrogen management in agriculture</article-title>. <source>Global Change Biol.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>2343</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2360</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.15588</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33831231</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Macholdt</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Piepho</surname> <given-names>H.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Honermeier</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Mineral NPK and manure fertilisation affecting the yield stability of winter wheat: results from a long-term field experiment</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>14</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>22</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2018.10.007</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcconkey</surname> <given-names>B. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clayton</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brandt</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Staricka</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnston</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Pulse crop adaptation in the Northern Great plains</article-title>. <source>Agron. J.</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>261</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>272</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj2002.2610</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morri&#x000EB;n</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hannula</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Snoek</surname> <given-names>L. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Helmsing</surname> <given-names>N. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zweers</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Hollander</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Soil networks become more connected and take up more carbon as nature restoration progresses</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>14349</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms14349</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28176768</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nuruzzaman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lambers</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bolland</surname> <given-names>M. D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Veneklaas</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus benefits of different legume crops to subsequent wheat grown in different soils of Western Australia</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>271</volume>, <fpage>175</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>187</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-004-2386-6</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Preissel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reckling</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schl&#x000E4;fke</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zander</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Magnitude and farm-economic value of grain legume pre-crop benefits in Europe: a review</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>175</volume>, <fpage>64</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>79</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2015.01.012</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Purahong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wubet</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lentendu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schloter</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pecyna</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kapturska</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Life in leaf litter: novel insights into community dynamics of bacteria and fungi during litter decomposition</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>4059</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4074</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mec.13739</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27357176</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qiao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dumack</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Legume rhizodeposition promotes nitrogen fixation by soil microbiota under crop diversification</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>2924</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-024-47159-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38575565</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reis Ely</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perakis</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cleveland</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Menge</surname> <given-names>D. N. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reed</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>B. N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Global terrestrial nitrogen fixation and its modification by agriculture</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>643</volume>, <fpage>705</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>711</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-025-09201-w</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40670639</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rosas</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Babcock</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hayes</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Nitrous oxide emission reductions from cutting excessive nitrogen fertilizer applications</article-title>. <source>Clim. Change</source> <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>353</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>367</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10584-015-1426-y</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sasse</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martinoia</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Northen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Feed your friends: do plant exudates shape the root microbiome?</article-title> <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>41</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29050989</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>X.-X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Steenwyk</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Labella</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Opulente</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kominek</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Genome-scale phylogeny and contrasting modes of genome evolution in the fungal phylum Ascomycota</article-title>. <source>Sci. Adv.</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>eabd0079</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/sciadv.abd0079</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33148650</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smutny</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holatko</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kucerik</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neudert</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dryslova</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Latal</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Exploring the role of intercrops in enhancing soil enzyme activities and nutrient cycling in maize cultivation: a four-year field study</article-title>. <source>Soil and Tillage Res.</source> <volume>254</volume>:<fpage>106728</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2025.106728</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Organic amendment regulates soil microbial biomass and activity in wheat-maize and wheat-soybean rotation systems</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>333</volume>:<fpage>107974</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2022.107974</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sui</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ba</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Contrasting seasonal effects of legume and grass cover crops as living mulch on the soil microbial community and nutrient metabolic limitations</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>380</volume>:<fpage>109374</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2024.109374</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Diversified crop rotation: synergistically enhancing peanut yield and soil organic carbon stability</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>382</volume>, <fpage>109497</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2025.109497</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tylianakis</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lalibert&#x000E9;</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bascompte</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Conservation of species interaction networks</article-title>. <source>Biol. Conserv.</source> <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>2270</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2279</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.004</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vor&#x000ED;&#x00161;kov&#x000E1;</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baldrian</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Fungal community on decomposing leaf litter undergoes rapid successional changes</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>477</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>486</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2012.116</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23051693</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Contributions of wheat and maize residues to soil organic carbon under long-term rotation in north China</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>11409</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep11409</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26100739</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Legacy effects of different preceding crops on grain yield, protein fractions and soil nutrients in subsequent winter wheat</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>2598</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants14162598</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40872222</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023a</year>). <article-title>Optimal nitrogen management to achieve high wheat grain yield, grain protein content, and water productivity: a meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manag.</source> <volume>290</volume>:<fpage>108587</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108587</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023b</year>). <article-title>Legume-potato rotation affects soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activity, and rhizosphere metabolism in continuous potato cropping</article-title>. <source>Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>132</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40538-023-00508-2</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Optimizing nitrogen management cooperates yield stability and environmental nitrogen balance from the perspective of continuous straw incorporation</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>333</volume>:<fpage>110121</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110121</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Moderation of nitrogen input and integration of legumes via intercropping enable sustainable intensification of wheat-maize double cropping in the North China plain: a four-year rotation study</article-title>. <source>Agric. Sys.</source> <volume>204</volume>, <fpage>103540</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103540</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nie</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x000E1;nchez-Rodr&#x000ED;guez</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Legume-based crop diversification with optimal nitrogen fertilization benefits subsequent wheat yield and soil quality</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>374</volume>:<fpage>109171</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2024.109171</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nie</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Reduce carbon footprint without compromising system productivity: optimizing crop rotation in the North China plain</article-title>. <source>J. Clean. Prod.</source> <volume>426</volume>:<fpage>139124</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139124</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Improving soil quality and wheat yield through diversified crop rotations in the North China plain</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>244</volume>:<fpage>106231</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2024.106231</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ju</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>198</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-023-44464-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38172570</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Afforestation alters soil microbial community composition and reduces microbial network complexity in a karst region of Southwest China</article-title>. <source>Land Degrad. Dev.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>2926</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2939</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ldr.5106</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stomph</surname> <given-names>T.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Makowski</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Der Werf</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A meta-analysis of relative crop yields in cereal/legume mixtures suggests options for management</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res..</source> <volume>198</volume>, <fpage>269</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>279</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2016.08.001</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Winter legumes in rice crop rotations reduces nitrogen loss, and improves rice yield and soil nitrogen supply</article-title>. <source>Agron. Sustain. Dev.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>633</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>640</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13593-013-0173-6</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhalnina</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Louie</surname> <given-names>K. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mansoori</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Da Rocha</surname> <given-names>U. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Dynamic root exudate chemistry and microbial substrate preferences drive patterns in rhizosphere microbial community assembly</article-title>. <source>Nat. Microbiol.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>470</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>480</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41564-018-0129-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29556109</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Peanut residue incorporation benefits crop yield, nitrogen yield, and water use efficiency of summer peanut &#x02013; winter wheat systems</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>279</volume>:<fpage>108463</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108463</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peixoto</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Legume-based rotation benefits crop productivity and agricultural sustainability in the North China plain</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>250</volume>:<fpage>106502</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2025.106502</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>H.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.-G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of continuous slope gradient on the dominance characteristics of plant functional groups and plant diversity in alpine meadows</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>4805</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su10124805</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Plateau zokor disturbance enhances soil bacterial diversity and reduces network complexity</article-title>. <source>CATENA</source> <volume>245</volume>:<fpage>108328</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2024.108328</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jatana</surname> <given-names>B. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nawaz</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suseela</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Campbell</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tharayil</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Cross-inoculation of andropogon virginicus rhizobiome enhances fungal diversity and network complexity in maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic>) rhizosphere under drought</article-title>. <source>Clim. Smart Agric.</source> <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>100056</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.csag.2025.100056</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Immediate and long-term effects of tillage practices with crop residue on soil water and organic carbon storage changes under a wheat-maize cropping system</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>218</volume>:<fpage>105309</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2021.105309</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beillouin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lambers</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>4926</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-022-32464-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35995796</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Z&#x000F6;rb</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ludewig</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hawkesford</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Perspective on Wheat Yield and Quality with Reduced Nitrogen Supply</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>1029</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1037</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2018.08.012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30249481</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1138118/overview">Ziqin Pang</ext-link>, Xianghu Laboratory, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2653705/overview">Yu-Pei Chen</ext-link>, Xiamen Medical College, China</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2977379/overview">Siyuan Cai</ext-link>, Institute Of Soil Science, CAS, China</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>
