Front. Microbiol.Frontiers in MicrobiologyFront. Microbiol.1664-302XFrontiers Media S.A.10.3389/fmicb.2026.1749626Original ResearchEbselen, a promising host-directed therapeutic option against Yersinia pseudotuberculosis infectionWuZhongbao12†Data curationInvestigationWriting – original draftWriting – review & editingTangLu12†Data curationFormal analysisInvestigationWriting – original draftWriting – review & editingWangYueqing1ConceptualizationInvestigationMethodologySoftwareSupervisionWriting – original draftNdong EllaEmmanuelle Vladia1Data curationFormal analysisMethodologyProject administrationWriting – review & editingHeJing1Data curationInvestigationMethodologySoftwareWriting – original draftChengChuang1Data curationInvestigationMethodologySoftwareSupervisionWriting – original draftXiaoLin3Writing – original draftMethodologyProject administrationFormal analysisResourcesWangYalan3Project administrationMethodologyWriting – original draftFormal analysisResourcesDongChuanjiang4Project administrationFormal analysisResourcesFunding acquisitionWriting – original draftZouLili12*Funding acquisitionWriting – original draftFormal analysisVisualizationConceptualizationValidationSupervisionInvestigationWangJun1*Writing – original draftResourcesFunding acquisitionInvestigationFormal analysisConceptualizationSupervisionHubei Clinical Research Center for Precision Prevention and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer in Elderly People, The Second People’s Hospital of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei, ChinaKey Laboratory of Tumor Microenvironment and Immunotherapy and Yichang Key Laboratory of Infection and Inflammation, College of Basic Medical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei, ChinaYiling Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Yichang, Hubei, ChinaDepartment of Urology, The First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, ChinaCorrespondence: Jun Wang, wangjfox@ctgu.edu.cn; Lili Zou, zoulili@ctgu.edu.cn
These authors have contributed equally to this work
As a prevalent food-borne zoonotic pathogen, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (Y. pseudotuberculosis) can lead to severe health issues in both animals and humans. At present, therapeutic options are quite limited. This study evaluated the pharmacological properties of ebselen (EbSe) and its potential as a host-directed therapy (HDT) against Y. pseudotuberculosis infection. EbSe has shown efficacy and safety in clinical settings, particularly against Gram-positive bacteria, as evidenced by its pharmacological properties and clinical applications; however, its efficacy against Gram-negative bacteria remains poorly characterized.
Methods
To systematically elucidate the mechanism of Ebse efficacy, an in vivo mouse model of acute gastroenteritis induced by Y. pseudotuberculosis and an in vitro macrophage-bacteria interaction model were established. Monitoring mouse survival rates and bioluminescence imaging analysis revealed Ebse’s ability against Y. pseudotuberculosis infection. Flow cytometry characterized peritoneal macrophage polarization types and in vitro ones. Transcriptome analysis identified differentially expressed mRNAs in macrophages post-Y.pseudotuberculosis infection, validated by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Cell death was assessed using the CCK-8 assay and propidium iodide (PI) staining, supplemented by morphological observation via transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The intracellular bacteria were quantified through Cytation 5 imaging and fluorescent quantification. Cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was measured by flow cytometry, while glutathione (GSH) content was determined using a micro-reduction GSH assay kit. Intracellular thioredoxin reductase 1 (Txnrd1) activity was assessed via the 5,5’-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) assay, with protein expression levels detected by Western blot.
Results and discussion
EbSe improved overall survival and reduced bacterial burden in mice with gastroenteritis. EbSe was found to modulate macrophage polarization, inhibiting apoptosis and excessive inflammation, as detailed in macrophage function and their role in inflammatory responses. Furthermore, EbSe has been shown to protect Raw264.7 cells from Y. pseudotuberculosis-induced death by enhancing antioxidant defenses. This is evidenced by a reduction in intracellular reactive oxygen species levels and an elevation in glutathione concentrations, and increased thioredoxin reductase 1 activity. Collectively, these findings suggest that EbSe enhances the host resistance to Y. pseudotuberculosis infection, likely through immunomodulatory effects rather than direct antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria.
Yersinia pseudotuberculosisebselen[host-directed therapy]macrophage polarizationantioxidantThe author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was funded by the Key project of Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation Joint Fund (2024AFD132), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation Joint Fund (2024A1515140194), the Talent Development Foundation of The First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University (GCC2023011), the project of Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation Fund (2025AFB789).section-at-acceptanceInfectious Agents and DiseaseBackground
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (Y. pseudotuberculosis), a significant food-borne zoonotic pathogen within the Enterobacteriaceae family, ranks as the third most common cause of bacterial enteritis of food-borne origin in Europe (Bai et al., 2020). Y. pseudotuberculosis, transmitted via contaminated food and water, causes gastroenteritis in humans and a variety of domestic and wild animals, including swine, sheep, deer, cattle, and poultry such as turkeys, ducks, and geese (Hulinova Stromerova and Faldyna, 2018; Rattner et al., 2024; Slee and Button, 1990; Riede et al., 2025). Systematic Y. pseudotuberculosis infection can severely impact the digestive tract, lymph nodes, and the respiratory system. Generally, prompt initiation of antimicrobial therapy is recommended to treat the Y. pseudotuberculosis, with doxycycline combined with gentamicin or ciprofloxacin/ ofloxacin (Tan et al., 2025) as the preferred regimen. However, numerous studies have documented that the misuse of antibiotics has resulted in alarmingly high resistance rates (Willcocks et al., 2019; Grygiel-Górniak, 2025). Furthermore, its ability to grow at both 4 and 25 °C enables prolonged environmental persistence (Fukushima et al., 2011), posing a continuous threat to animal health. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies are urgently needed to mitigate the infection risks that Y. pseudotuberculosis poses to both human and animal populations.
The innate immune system, particularly macrophages, play a critical role in defending against Y. pseudotuberculosis infection. Macrophages recognize, phagocytose, and eliminate bacteria through mechanisms, including reactive oxygen species (ROS)- and reactive nitrogen species (RNS)-dependent killing, as well as lysosomal degradation (Català et al., 2022; Dramé et al., 2020; Weiss and Schaible, 2015). The oxidative stress status of the host is defined by the imbalance between ROS production and the antioxidant defense system (e.g., glutathione, thioredoxin), which plays a crucial role in regulating the antimicrobial function of macrophages (Herb and Schramm, 2021). Moderate oxidative stress boosts macrophage-mediated pathogen clearance by activating the NADPH oxidase (NOX) complex to produce ROS, enhancing phagocytic activity, and regulating pro-inflammatory signaling pathways (Li et al., 2025). In contrast, excessive oxidative stress or compromised antioxidant defense could severely damage macrophage viability, thereby promoting bacterial survival and dissemination (Hu et al., 2024). Thus, the oxidative stress status of the host serves as a key regulator of macrophage function, and targeting this balance represents a promising host-directed therapy (HDT) strategy. Rather than directly targeting pathogens, HDT therapy enhances the host’s resistance to infection and alleviates infection-induced pathological damage by modulating the host’s physiological status, immune responses, and tissue microenvironment. Compared with traditional antimicrobials, its core advantages include mitigating the selective pressure for antimicrobial resistance, regulating immune homeostasis, and preserving the host’s normal microbiota (Bergman et al., 2020).
Excessive macrophage apoptosis and inflammation are major contributors to the severity of Y. pseudotuberculosis-induced disease, indicating that mitigating macrophage cell death may enhance the host defense against this pathogen (Chow et al., 2016). Hence, to deal with infections in which Y. pseudotuberculosis subverts immune clearance, disrupts cellular redox homeostasis, and induces inflammatory cell death (Avican et al., 2017; Fasciano et al., 2021; Kobayashi et al., 2018; Ruckdeschel, 2002), the HDT strategy aimed at enhancing host immunity represents a highly promising option.
Previous studies from our group established that ebselen (EbSe), a synthetic organoselenium compund, exhibited potent direct bactericidal activity against Gram-positive bacteria (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus; Chao et al., 2022) but lacked efficacy against Gram-negative pathogens (e.g., Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii; Dong et al., 2020; Wang P. et al., 2020). Notably, preliminary findings demonstrated that EbSe significantly improved overall survival in murine gastroenteritis (Dong et al., 2022), despite its limited antimicrobial efficacy against Gram-negative bacteria in vitro. This apparent contradiction prompted further investigation.
To elucidate the HDT mechanism underlying EbSe’s protective effects against Y. pseudotuberculosis infection, we employed a Y. pseudotuberculosis-macrophage interaction model. Macrophages were infected with the Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII strain and subsequently treated with EbSe. Both in vivo murine models and in vitro macrophage infection assays were conducted to elucidate the mechanistic basis underlying EbSe’s efficacy.
Materials and methodsMaterialsExperimental cell lines
Mouse mononuclear macrophage leukemia cells (Raw264.7) were acquired from Wuhan Punosai Life Technology Co., Ltd.
Experimental strains
The Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII strains was obtained from Uppsala University, Sweden. YpIII strains with different reporter systems on the plasmid were constructed and listed in Table 1. All experiments were carried out in the BSL-2 laboratory.
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis YpIII strains with different reporter systems.
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, Xen4 (pCD1 With Tn1000: Tn5 luxCDABE, KMr)
in vivo
Experimental animals
A total of 96 male Kunming mice (specific pathogen free, SPF grade) were acquired from the Laboratory Animal Center of China Three Gorges University and housed individually in separate cages. All mice had an initial body weight ranging from 18 to 20 g. The animals were acclimatized for 1 week prior to the experiment.
Housing conditions and experimental ethics
Housing environment control: The temperature was maintained at (22 ± 2) °C, with relative humidity at (60 ± 5)%, and a 12 h light/ 12 h dark cycle was set. During the housing period, mice had free access to standard feed and sterile water.
Experimental ethics approval: All animal experiments in this study were conducted in strict compliance with the ‘Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals’, adhering to the principles of laboratory animal welfare and ethics as outlined in the GB/T 35892–2018 ‘Laboratory Animal - Guideline for Ethical Review of Animal Welfare’. The animal experiments conducted at China Three Gorges University have been approved by the China Three Gorges University Medical Animal Care and Welfare Committee, ensuring compliance with ethical standards and scientific rigor (Approval No. 2023020E).
Based on EbSe’s molar mass (274.176 g/mol), add an appropriate volume of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to prepare a 100 mM stock solution. Thoroughly mix the solution by pipetting it up and down repeatedly. Prepare and store the stock solution in a light - protected environment.
For <italic>in vivo</italic> experiments
Dissolve EbSe in DMSO to prepare a 100 mg/mL stock solution. Prepare the 4 mg/mL working solution by mixing the EbSe stock solution, PEG300, 5% Tween 80, and 50% ddH2O in a volume ratio of 5:40:5:50. Add the reagents one by one in sequence, and thoroughly mix the solution after adding each reagent addition until the solution is clear and transparent. Prepare the working solution fresh for each use and store all solutions protected from light.
Experimental methodsAcute mouse <italic>Yersinia pseudotuberculosis</italic> gastroenteritis model
Forty-eight healthy male Kunming mice were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 12). The infected group was gavaged with 100 μL 2 × 109 CFU Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII-bioluminescent, and intraperitoneally injected with 20 mg/Kg EbSe (Dong et al., 2022) and DMSO at 1, and 3 days post-infection to have groups A (DMSO), B (EbSe), C (YpIII + DMSO), and D (YpIII + EbSe). Group C and D were used for overall survival observations. Groups A-D were performed bioluminescence-monitoring at 1-, 4-, and 7-days post-infection for bacterial load detection. The in vivo imaging was conducted blindedly.
Another 48 mice were constructed for Y. pseudotuberculosis-YpIII gastroenteritis model as described above, solely used for peritoneal macrophage extraction in 2.3.4.
Mice anesthesia/euthanasia methodsMethod of anesthesia for mice (IsoFluVet inhalation)
To analyze bacterial load in the gastrointestinal tracts, mice were intragastrically administered with Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII-bioluminescent, anesthetized using the XGI-8 gas anesthesia system with 2.5% IsoFluVet in oxygen, and imaged by bioluminescent imaging. The entire procedure adhered to ‘the 2020 AVMA Guidelines’ for the use of IsoFluVet inhalation.
Method of euthanasia for mice (carbon dioxide inhalation)
After overall survival analysis, mice were euthanized by gradual exposure to carbon dioxide (CO2) in strict accordance with ‘the 2020 AVMA guidelines’ for the euthanasia of animals. Mice were individually placed into a clean, transparent euthanasia chamber pre-filled with room air. CO2 (medical grade) was introduced at a displacement rate of 30–70% of the chamber volume per minute until irreversible loss of the confirmation of loss of consciousness, cessation of breathing, and heartbeat was made.
All protocols received approval from the China Three Gorges University Medical Animal Care and Welfare Committee and strictly complied with ‘the ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines’.
Bioluminescence imaging analysis
Before in vivo imaging, the mice were fasted and deprived of water for 16 h. Bioluminescence was monitored using the IVIS Lumina II imaging system (Caliper Life Sciences) at 1-, 4-, and 7- days post-infection. Prior to imaging, the mice were anesthetized using the XGI-8 gas anesthesia system (Caliper LifeSciences) with 2.5% IsoFluVet in oxygen (Orion Pharma Abbott Laboratories Ltd., Great Britain), and 0.5% IsoFluVet was used during imaging. Images were collected and analyzed using Living Image 4.5 (Caliper LifeSciences).
This analysis determined bacterial load by measuring in vivo bioluminescence intensity in mice at 1, 4, and 7 days post-infection. To ensure image clarity, each row in the Figure 1D represents imaging data from the same mouse at different time points.
EbSe protects mice from Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII-caused gastroenteritis. Mice were given Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII via gavage, and then EbSe was i.p. administered; (A) Diagram demonstrating the animal infection model’s pattern; (B) Overall survival was observed for 7 days post-infection (n = 12). The Ebse+YpIII group is 58% (95% CI 28–84%), 2.3 folds relative to the DMSO+YpIII group (95% CI 5–57%); (C,D) Bioluminescence emission from the same mice was observed using IVIS lumina II (Caliper LifeSciences) on days 1, 4, and 7 post-infection, and the total luminous flux in each group of surviving mice was quantified. p-values of < 0.05 were significant. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Diagram showing demonstrating the animal infection model’s pattern. Panel A outlines the timeline of treatment and monitoring steps. Panel B presents a survival curve, indicating higher survival in YpIII-infected mice with EbSe treatment compared to the control group. Panel C displays a plot of bioluminescence flux over seven days, highlighting significant differences post treatments. Panel D shows bioluminescent images of the same mice from different treatment groups over days one, four, and seven, with varying intensity levels.Extraction of mouse peritoneal macrophages
First, the mice were euthanized, and were submerged in 75% ethanol for 1 min. Then, sterile scissors were used to make a longitudinal incision in their abdomens, and a 5-mL disposable syringe was employed to inject 4 mL of DMEM culture medium into the abdominal cavity through the peritoneum beneath the cardiac fossa. Next, a sterile cotton swab was used to gently massage the entire abdominal cavity, ensuring that the macrophages were thoroughly rinsed with sterile water. Subsequently, a syringe was used to aspirate the culture medium, and the extracted cells were transferred to centrifuge tubes and temporarily stored on ice.
The isolated macrophages were centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 10 min. Subsequently, if a red precipitate was observed post-centrifugation, erythrocyte lysis was initiated: the supernatant was discarded first, and then 2 mL of erythrocyte lysis buffer was added to resuspend the cells. After that, the cell suspension was incubated in a 37 °C water bath for 5 min to induce lysis, and then a second centrifugation at 1,500 rpm for 10 min was carried out. If residual red precipitate remained, the lysis procedure described above was repeated until complete lysis of all erythrocytes was achieved. After erythrocyte lysis, the isolated mouse peritoneal macrophages were employed for subsequent experiments.
Immunofluorescence experiment
After cell collection, Fc receptors were blocked by incubating the cells with CD16/32 antibody at room temperature for 30 min. Unbound antibodies were removed by washing with PBS and centrifugation at 800 rpm for 10 min, followed by discarding the supernatant. Subsequently, cells were stained with BV421-conjugated anti-CD68 and BV510-conjugated anti-CD86 antibodies at 4 °C in the dark for 40 min, and then subjected to additional PBS washes and centrifugation (800 rpm, 10 min). For intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized with 100 μL of flow cytometry fixation/permeabilization solution at 4 °C in the dark for 30 min. After washing with 1 × permeabilization buffer, cells were incubated with PE/ Cy7-conjugated anti-CD206 antibody for 40 min at 4 °C in the dark. Finally, the cells were washed with PBS, resuspended in 300 μL of PBS, and then analyzed by flow cytometry.
Hematoxylin and eosin staining
Liver and kidney tissues were collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 24–48 h. Fixed tissues were rinsed with PBS, dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (70, 80, 90, 100%; 1–2 h per step), cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin. Blocks were sectioned at 3–5 μm thickness using a microtome, and sections were floated on a water bath, mounted on glass slides, and dried overnight at 37 °C. For histological analysis, sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and stained with H&E using standard protocols. Nuclei were stained with hematoxylin, differentiated in acid alcohol, blued in ammonia water, and counterstained with eosin.
Finally, slides were dehydrated, cleared in xylene, and mounted for microscopic examination. After tissue staining was completed, CaseViewer software was used to record the scanned images. Histological grading has been carried out, and the procedure was performed blindly.
Transcriptomics analysis (RNA-sequencing)Sample preparation and grouping
The Raw264.7 cells were subjected to transcriptomic sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis 24 h post infection with Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII-GFP with the multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 50. Primarily, RNA-seq was performed in two groups: uninfected and infected cells treated by 20 mg/kg DMSO or EbSe.
Experimental procedure and differential expression analysis
The RNA extraction and sequencing were employed by Novogene Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Totally, in the uninfected group, EbSe induced differential expressions in 46 genes, whereas altered the expression of 3,223 genes in the YpIII-infected group. Enrichment analysis revealed that 161 and 20 of these genes were associated with inflammatory responses and immune regulation, respectively, motivating subsequent investigation into EbSe’s mechanisms.
Determination of cell proliferation and cytotoxicity
The Raw264.7 cell suspension was diluted to a concentration of 1 × 105 cells/mL, and 100 μL of the diluted suspension was added to each well of 96-well cell culture plates. Once the cells had adhered, the culture medium was removed, and the cells were rinsed three times with PBS.
Subsequently, Raw264.7 cells were infected with a pre-determined quantity of infection complexes for 1 h. For the infected group, extracellular bacteria were treated with gentamicin (60 μg/mL) for 1 h. Post-infection, the cells were divided into 2 groups, with 20 μM EbSe or DMSO respectively, followed by incubation for 24 h. Each group was set up with four biological replicates.
Following the incubation period, the cells were subjected to three PBS washes to remove any unbound substances. Subsequently, 10 μL of CCK-8 solution was introduced into each well and incubated for 2 h. The absorbance at 450 nm was then measured using a microplate reader to determine the cell viability based on the A450 values.
Cell death assay
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis YpIII-infected Raw264.7 cells (5 × 106) were collected and washed with PBS three times, followed by centrifugation at 800 rpm for 3 min. The cell pellet was gently resuspended in 500 μL of binding buffer to create a single-cell suspension. Subsequently, 5 μL of Propidium Iodide (PI) was added to the suspension and thoroughly mixed.
After incubation for 10 min at room temperature in the dark, the cells were observed and detected using a flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, AW15093).
Intracellular bacteria determination
After washing the cells three times with PBS, Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII-infected Raw264.7 cells (5 × 106) were collected using a cell scraper. The cells were gently resuspended in 300 μL of PBS to form a single-cell suspension. Due to the GFP tag on YpIII, the samples were directly analyzed through Cytation 5 imaging and fluorescent quantification.
Cell morphology observation by transmission electron microscopy
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis YpIII-infected Raw264.7 cells (1 × 106) were collected and subjected to centrifugation at 800 rpm for 3 min and subsequently fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde. The cell morphology was meticulously observed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM, Hitachi H-7500), following standard protocols to ensure the integrity of ultrastructural details.
Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR
Raw264.7 cells (1 × 107) infected with Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII for 0, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 h were collected, respectively. Total RNA was extracted by Trizol method, and reverse transcription was performed according to the instructions of SweScript RT II First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit. RT-qPCR was conducted following the detailed instructions for the 2 × Universal SYBR Green Fast qPCR Mix, with GAPDH serving as the internal reference. This involved careful preparation of the reaction mix, adherence to specific experimental protocols, and the inclusion of appropriate controls to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the results. The detailed information on the amplification of the target gene is presented in Table 2, which is a crucial component of the data analysis.
Raw264.7 cells (5 × 106) infected with Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII for 24 h were collected, rinsed three times with PBS, and gently detached using a cell scraper, followed by centrifugation (800 rpm for 3 min) to remove the supernatant. The CellROX™ Red reagent was diluted at a ratio of 1:1000 in PBS and then added to the cells. Subsequently, the cells were stained in a 37 °C incubator for 30 min. When the incubation reached the 15 min mark, the tubes were gently inverted once to ensure homogeneity. Upon completion of the 30-min-incubation, unbound probes were removed by washing the cells three times with PBS. Cellular ROS production was quantified using flow cytometry, which involves the measurement of ROS levels within cells through the use of fluorescent probes and high-throughput analysis. The experiment should be completed within 30 min to prevent fluorescence quenching.
Intracellular glutathione assay
After the protein of Raw264.7 cells (5 × 106) infected with Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII was extracted, the micro-reduced GSH assay kit was used for operation, and A405 was measured by an enzyme-labeled instrument for recording and data in process. The data of the GSH amount assays were normalized per cell concentration.
Determination of intracellular Txnrd1 activity
The protein solution with 25 μg protein content in each group was filled with ultra-pure water to 20 μL and then mixed with 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH = 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 5 μM Trx, 1 mM DTNB, 200 μM NADPH. In the first 30 min, the activity of Txnrd1 was measured at A412 by using the slope of the first 5 min.
Determination of Txnrd1 protein in cells
Lysis Buffer and Cysteine Protease inhibitor were added to the RIPA mixture. After being rested on ice for 15 min, the supernatant was obtained by centrifugation (4 °C, 1200 rpm, 10 min), and then immunoblotting was carried out using an anti-Txnrd1 polyclonal antibody (Proteintech).
Data statistics and analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using the comprehensive suite of statistical tools available in GraphPad Prism 9.5 (GraphPad Software). Each set of experiments was independently repeated three times or more. All data distribution were tested for normality and post hoc tests were used for multiple comparisons if applicable. Means of data between the two groups were contrasted using an unpaired Student’s t-test. Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used for survival data. Sample rates between the two groups were tested with Chi-square analysis. p-values of < 0.05 were significant.
ResultsEbSe protects mice from <italic>Yersinia pseudotuberculosis</italic> YpIII-caused gastroenteritis
Recognized as the most common infection brought on by Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII, gastroenteritis is fatal and hard to treat (Wang et al., 2016). To evaluate whether EbSe could protect mice from Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII-induced gastroenteritis, 24 mice were randomly divided into two groups and gavaged with 2 × 109 CFU/100 μL of YpIII-bioluminescent to establish acute gastroenteritis models (Figure 1A). Mice were further intraperitoneally injected with 20 mg/kg of Ebse on days 1- and 3-post-infection. On day 7 post-infection, the survival rate of mice treated with EbSe was significantly higher at 58% compared to the control group at 25% (Figure 1B; p < 0.05).
To further analyze the effect of EbSe, mice were monitored for in vivo imaging studies and quantitative data on bioluminescence values on days 1-, 4-, and 7-post-infection (Figure 1A). The results showed that the EbSe-treated group exhibited the lowest total luminous flux values, indicating the lowest bacterial load (Figures 1C,D). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the tissues (livers and kidneys) were performed on 7 days post-infection, revealing that EbSe led to a reduction in the systematic inflammation (Supplementary Figure S1). All the above results demonstrated that EbSe was able to protect mice from gastroenteritis caused by Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII.
EbSe can alter the polarization status of peritoneal macrophages
As previously reported, intestinal infection related to Y. pseudotuberculosis could impair macrophage activity (Seabaugh and Anderson, 2024). To investigate the potential impact of EbSe on macrophage functions, particularly antimicrobial activity, a study was conducted with 48 mice divided into four groups (A-D groups). Groups C and D were gavaged with 2 × 109 CFU/100 μL of YpIII-bioluminescent to construct an acute gastroenteritis models. Further, groups A and C were intraperitoneally injected with DMSO, while groups B and D received intraperitoneal injections of EbSe on days 1- and 3-post-infection, respectively, resulting in groups A (DMSO), B (EbSe), C (YpIII + DMSO), and D (YpIII + EbSe). Then the mice were subjected to peritoneal macrophage extraction on days 4 and 7 post-infection.
The immune-enhancing effect of Ebse was investigated in relation to macrophage polarization by flow cytometry, as previous studies have shown that the polarization of these immune cells plays a crucial role in the immune response and disease progression, following the labeling of mouse peritoneal macrophages with CD68-BV421, CD16/32, CD86-BV510, iNOS, and CD206-PE/Cy7. The results showed that the peritoneal macrophages in the EbSe-treated group have a higher M1 phenotype rate (15.1%) compare to DMSO-treated group (8.8%) on day 4-post-infection, leading to a more intense inflammatory response and realizing the bactericidal effect (Figure 2A). On day 7-post-infection (Figure 2B), the inflammatory response in the EbSe-treated group tended to be reduced compared to DMSO-treated group (5.6%) due to a higher proportion of M2-type cells (13.3%).
EbSe can alter the polarization status of peritoneal macrophages. Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII-bioluminescent cells were orally administrated into mice and further i.p. administered with EbSe. Peritoneal macrophages were collected for immunofluorescence analyses on days 4 and 7 post-infection. (A) The polarization of the peritoneal macrophages on day 4 post-infection (n = 3); (B) the polarization of the peritoneal macrophages on day 7 post-infection (n = 3). p-values of < 0.05 were significant. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Bar graphs labeled A and B show the cell ratio percentages for peritoneal macrophages in different groups: DMSO, EbSe, YpIII infection with DMSO/Ebse treatment. Graph A depicts cell ratios for M1 and M2, ranging from 0 to 30 percent, with significant differences marked by asterisks. Graph B shows cell ratios ranging from 0 to 100 percent, also divided by M1 and M2, with significant differences indicated. Each treatment is represented by distinct colors: lavender, blue, light lavender, and green.EbSe could inhibit <italic>Yersinia pseudotuberculosis</italic> YpIII-induced inflammation in Raw264.7 cells
To explore how EbSe influences macrophages, the transcriptome of Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII-infected Raw264.7 cells was subjected to RNA-seq analysis (Figure 3A). As depicted in Figures 3B,C, EbSe markedly decreased the expression of IL-6 and iNOS, as evidenced by RT-qPCR, thereby effectively mitigating the inflammatory response triggered by YpIII infection. It is demonstrated that a rise in proinflammatory factors can polarize macrophages, inducing their formation into M1-type macrophages (Martinez et al., 2008). However, immunofluorescence investigations revealed that the polarization status of cells in the EbSe-treated group had significantly changed. The results indicated that the counts of M1 and M2 cells in the EbSe-treated group were considerably decreased within 24 h, which largely reduced the inflammatory response (Figures 3D,E). This implies that EbSe takes a part in controlling inflammation in Raw264.7 cells.
EbSe could inhibit Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII-induced inflammation in Raw264.7 cells. (A) RNA-seq analysis of the changes in the expression of inflammatory factors in the transcriptome of EbSe-treated Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII-infected cells; (B) RT-qPCR was used to detect the expression level of iNOS, GAPDH was used as an internal reference (n = 3); (C) RT-qPCR was used to detect the expression level of IL-6 (n = 3); (D) The polarization status of Raw264.7 cells on 4 h post-infection (n = 3); (E) The polarization status of Raw264.7 cells on 24 h post- infection (n = 3). p-values of < 0.05 were significant. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Heatmap and bar graphs illustrating data on mRNA expression and cell ratios. Panel A shows a heatmap comparing gene expression between YpIII infection treated by DMSO or Ebse. Panels B and C depict bar graphs of iNOS and IL-6 mRNA relative expression under Ebse. Panels D and E show bar graphs of M1 and M2 cell ratios across different treatment groups on 4/24h post infection. Statistical significance is noted with asterisks.EbSe reduces <italic>Yersinia pseudotuberculosis</italic> YpIII-induced cell death in macrophages
It is reported that Y. pseudotuberculosis can disrupt host immune defenses by releasing toxins or activating signaling pathways that lead to cell death (Bergsbaken and Cookson, 2007). To test whether EbSe has any effect on the Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII-infected Raw264.7 cells, flow cytometry was performed. Utilizing Annexin V-PI staining, a method that detects apoptotic cells by identifying the exposure of phosphatidylserine (PS) on the cell membrane, it was observed that the quantity of apoptotic cells rose subsequent to YpIII infection. Conversely, in the EbSe-treated group, a reduction in apoptotic cells was noted (Figure 4A). This staining method involves the use of Annexin V, a protein that binds to PS, and Propidium Iodide (PI), which stains the nuclei of cells that have lost membrane integrity, allowing for the differentiation between early apoptotic cells (Annexin V positive, PI negative) and late apoptotic or necrotic cells (Annexin V and PI positive). Further, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was utilized to detect morphological changes, revealing that the EbSe-treated group exhibited less cell damage and content leakage (Figure 4B).
EbSe reduces Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII-induced cell death in macrophages. After Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII infection, Raw264.7 cells were treated for 24 h with an EbSe-containing medium. (A) Annexin V-FITC staining was used to quantify the cell apoptosis (n = 3); (B) transmission electron microscopy was performed to observe the cell morphology; (C) cell viability was detected using CCK8 assay (n = 3); (D) fluorescence activated cell sorting was used to identify the fluorescence intensity of YpIII (n = 3); (E) fluorescence microscopy analysis was used to identify YpIII fluorescence intensity and cell shape; (F) Cytation 5 was used to dynamically monitor the Raw264.7 cells infected with YpⅢ over 24 hours; (G) Quantitative analysis of intracellular bacterial fluorescence intensity; Cytation 5 results demonstrate that the EbSe-treated group exhibited reduced bacterial load within Raw264.7 cells while maintaining superior cellular morphology. Scale bar: 200μm. 10 μm is the scale bar. p-values of < 0.05 were significant. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Seven-part image illustrating a scientific study on cell apoptosis and viability. A: Bar graph showing apoptotic cell proportion percentages across different treatments, indicating significance levels. B: Transmission Electron Microscope was performed to observe the cells treated with YpIII and DMSO or EbSe. C: Bar graph of relative cell viability for various treatments. D: Bar graph comparing relative MFI of GFP-YpIII over time between YpIII with EbSe and YpIII with DMSO. E: Microscopic images showing GFP expression in treated cells. F: Dynamic monitoring images of cells of YpIII infection with DMSOand EbSe treatments. G: Bar graph comparing relative MFI of GFP-YpIII over time between treatments, with significance indicators.
Eventually, we found that EbSe could significantly prevent Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII-infected Raw264.7 cells from undergoing cell death (Figure 4C). In addition, to explore the effect of EbSe on the intracellular bacterial load in Raw264.7 cells, the quantities of YpIII-GFP were measured using Cytation 5. The amounts of the YpIII-GFP in EbSe-treated group were a lot less than those of the control group at 4, 8, 16 and 24 h post-infection. And utilizing flow cytometry, a significant reduction in bacterial load was observed in the EbSe-treated group, as well as a decrease in the bacterial count within the cytophagocytic lysozyme, as depicted in Figure 4D. In line with the observations from fluorescence microscopy (Figure 4E), EbSe has been shown to mitigate YpIII-induced cell death by reducing bacterial load in macrophages and maintaining cellular integrity. Further confirmed by Cytation 5 (Figures 4F,G).
It is noteworthy that we have not yet identified markers for necrosis or pyrolysis, which will be the focus of our subsequent experimental phase.
EbSe increases the activity of Txnrd1 and enhances the antioxidant capacity of <italic>Yersinia pseudotuberculosis</italic> YpIII-infected Raw264.7 cells
To ascertain whether EbSe regulates redox homeostasis after Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII infection, two assays were employed. In the initial experiment, Raw264.7 cells were infected and cultured for 24 h, which led to a significant 214% increase in intracellular ROS content. This could be attributed to the cells’ robust response to the infection, as Raw264.7 cells are known for their strong phagocytic capabilities and the release of chemokines upon antigen uptake, potentially influencing the experimental outcome. Following treatment with 20 μM EbSe for an additional 24 h, the intracellular ROS content decreased to 155% (Figure 5A). Consistent with this, in YpIII-infected Raw264.7 cells treated with EbSe, we observed that the GSH level increased from 142 to 473% compared to the control group (Figure 5B). Furthermore, the DTNB assay demonstrated that EbSe enhanced the Txnrd1-reducing activity (Figure 5C), yet not any statistically significant expression levels were determined by Western blot (Figure 5D).
EbSe increases the activity of Txnrd1 and enhanced the antioxidant capacity of Y. pseudotuberculosis YpIII-infected Raw264.7 cells. (A) Flow cytometry was used to detect intracellular ROS levels (n = 3), the relative MFI was calculated based on the control (46.7 ± 0.8), Ebse (42.1 ± 0.7), YpIII (100 ± 1.7), Ebse+YpIII (72.4 ± 1.2); (B) Intracellular GSH (n = 3) levels were detected by the DTNB assay. The relative GSH amounts were calculated based on DMSO (21.5 ± 4.1), Ebse (37.5 ± 5.8), DMSO+YpIII (22.3 ± 2.7), Ebse+YpIII (93.7 ± 11.3); (C) Intracellular Txnrd1 (n = 4) activity was detected by the DTNB assay as GSH. (D) Western blot was used to detect the intracellular Txnrd1 expression level with β-Actin as an internal reference. p-values of < 0.05 were significant. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Graphs labeled A to D show various biochemical measurements. A: Bar graph displaying the relative MFI of ROS with values rising significantly with the YpIII infection, marked by asterisks, but deceasing post Ebse treatment.B: Bar graph of relative GSH amounts, showing a significant increase, particularly in EbSe treatment.C: Bar graph and Western blot. The bar graph shows varying Txnrd1 activity, increasing in EbSe treatment group, with significance noted by asterisks. The blot visually represents β-Actin and Txnrd1 levels.D: Bar graph of relative Txnrd1 protein level, showing non-significant differences labeled “ns” across treatments.
Collectively, all of the above findings suggest that EbSe plays an important role in regulating the level of oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity in cells by reducing intracellular ROS content and enhancing GSH synthesis, thereby enhancing cellular antioxidant defense and potentially impacting the cells’ inflammatory reactions. Considering the demonstrated immunomodulatory effects of EbSe, we suggest that activation of Nrf2-ARE or redox-mediated suppression of NF-κB would serve as the primary focus for subsequent mechanistic investigations.
Discussion
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, a common food-borne zoonotic pathogen (Kamath et al., 2016), can infect animal hosts through contact transmission, environmental exposure, or via vector intermediaries. Anthropogenic factors, including habitat fragmentation, human activity interference, and increased interspecific contact (Meissner et al., 2022), significantly elevate infection risks in wildlife populations. Similarly, farm animals (such as swine, cattle (Ali et al., 2025), sheep, etc.) constitute a high-risk group due to intensive farming practices characterized by high stocking densities, environmental stressors (Domanska-Blicharz et al., 2023), and frequent animal movement. These conditions facilitate the spread of pathogens, resulting in morbidity, production losses, and economic impact on the livestock industry. As the primary cause of bacterial gastrointestinal enteritis in animals, Y. pseudotuberculosis infection highlights the urgent need for improved therapeutic strategies. The cytomegalovirus’s ability to replicate intracellularly and evade macrophage-mediated immune surveillance, as elucidated by Moreau et al., 2010, further complicates treatment strategies (Taheri et al., 2016), necessitating the development of novel therapeutic approaches.
As a synthetic organoselenium radical scavenger compound, EbSe has demonstrated significant pharmacological characteristics. Apart from potent antioxidant activity mediated by redox system (Wang J. et al., 2020; Qu et al., 2021; Ren et al., 2018), immune regulation, inhibition of inflammatory (Bjørklund et al., 2022; Yu et al., 2024), and potential anti-depressant treatment (Ramli et al., 2022; Ramli et al., 2024) etc, global research has confirmed that EbSe exhibits significant antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacterial infections (Felix et al., 2021; Maślanka and Mucha, 2023). While our prior work established EbSe’s promising against Gram-negative bacterial infection (Chen et al., 2022; Dong et al., 2022; Wang P. et al., 2020), the precise pharmacological mechanisms underlying the efficacy are not fully understood, as evidenced by ongoing research efforts in EbSe treating Y.pseudotuberculosis infection. Showing no direct antibacterial effect against Y. pseudotuberculosis in vitro (Dong et al., 2022), EbSe managed to prevent mice from developing gastroenteritis, which suggests that EbSe may possess immune-enhancing properties applicable in HDT strategy.
Based on this, the current study utilizes a Y. pseudotuberculosis-induced acute gastroenteritis murine model to verify EbSe’s in vivo efficacy. Subsequent analyses demonstrate that EbSe increases the overall survival of mice with an acute infection by Y. pseudotuberculosis (Figure 1B). EbSe significantly reduces the bacterial load, as evidenced by the bioluminescence overflux (Figures 1C,D). To focus on the macrophages against infection (Murray, 2017), the observed polarization shift in peritoneal macrophages implies that EbSe could potentially promote the M1 phenotype (Figure 2A) on day 4-post-infection, which is commonly associated with bacterial clearance by inducing T cells but also produce proinflammatory chemicals and oxygen free radicals (Wang et al., 2014; Podinovskaia et al., 2013), thus promoting a more favorable immune response (Martinez et al., 2008). In contrast, the transition to M2 macrophages on day 7-post-infection suggests a flexible response where the inflammatory reaction subsequently decreases to aid in reducing tissue damage (Figure 2B). Moreover, the ability of EbSe to prevent Y. pseudotuberculosis-induced cell death (Figures 4A–E) in Raw264.7 cells highlights the cytoprotective properties of this compound, align with previous studies indicating that enhancing macrophage survival can improve pathogen clearance and bolster the overall immune system. Its anti-inflammatory properties are further demonstrated by the RNA-seq that shows a decreased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-6 and EbSe resulted in changes in iNOS expression (Figures 3A–C). Given that excessive inflammation can lead to tissue damage and impaired immune function, it is essential to regulate inflammatory pathways. Recent research has shown that therapies promoting macrophage polarization toward the M2 phenotype can effectively reduce inflammatory responses across various conditions, as evidenced by Wynn et al., 2013. Our findings indicate that the EbSe markedly alters the cellular redox equilibrium in YpIII-infected cells, potentially by decreasing ROS levels and increasing GSH contents, which is attributed to EbSe’s ability to not only reduce oxidative stress but to enhance the antioxidant defense systems within cells, as evidenced by the increased Txnrd1-reduction activity (Figures 5A–D), indicating that the ROS levels will decrease with the bacterial antioxidant property which led to the reduction of IL-6/iNOS levels. Recent advancement (Stoolman et al., 2025) also suggests that optimizing the redox state of immune cells can significantly bolster their efficacy in combating infections and diseases. Hence, EbSe (Lu et al., 2021) introduces a novel HDT approach that effectively combats Gram-negative pathogens via immunomodulatory mechanisms, by bolstering the host’s antioxidant defenses, modulating macrophage polarization, and enhancing cell viability.
Compared to other immune-enhancing agents, including grape seed extract (Gupta et al., 2020), mushroom extract (Nasri et al., 2025), Milkvetch Root (Guo et al., 2016), and polysaccharide (Zhang et al., 2022), or HDT candidates such as cytokine modulators and metabolic reprogrammers (Yahfoufi et al., 2018), EbSe or EbSe-derived compounds stand out as more excellent candidates for its safety profile and tolerability in humans supported by clinical investigations (e.g., NCT03013400), enabling its evaluation for conditions like stroke and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) which has entered Phase III and Phase II clinical trials. To advance the translation to clinical veterinary applications, future research must address the regulatory and formulation considerations, and develop scalable EbSe-based formulations that are efficient across species to ensure consistent performance. Worth noting that the current research has several limitations, we expect to expand our range of Gram-negative bacterial infection animal models and cell lines, and evaluate the relations between EbSe and the specific pathways as Nrf2, NF-κB and MAPKs. Furthermore, it is imperative to conduct thorough assessments of the long-term safety and dose–response profiles of EbSe in animal models to ensure readiness for clinical trials.
Taken together, we propose EbSe as a promising host-directed therapy (HDT) candidate against Y. pseudotuberculosis infection through host immune potentiation that regulates oxidative stress in macrophages to enhance their antimicrobial activity, offering a novel strategy to combat bacterial infections.
Conclusion
Collectively, our previous studies have demonstrated that EbSe significantly alleviated YpIII infection in both in vivo acute gastroenteritis murine models and in vitro Raw264.7 cell cultures, with its therapeutic efficacy mechanistically attributed to modulation regarding macrophage polarization, and it suppresses excessive inflammation, cell death, and enhances antioxidant defense by reducing ROS, elevating GSH levels, and increasing the activity of Txnrd1.
Moving forward, further mechanistic investigations are also warranted to uncover the additional pathways involved in its anti-YpIII infection effects, while systematic dosage optimization and long-term safety evaluations will be essential to validate its clinical feasibility. Given the high prevalence of YpIII across diverse animals, exploring the potential veterinary applications of Ebse are also pivotal for expanding the translational impact of this promising HDT approach in the prevention and treatment of bacterial pathogens through the augmentation of host immunity.
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accession number PRJNA1406460.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by All experimental animals obtained ethical approval (No. 2023020E) from China Three Gorges University Medical Animal Care and Welfare Committee before the usage for research. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
ZW: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LT: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YuW: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft. EN: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. JH: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft. CC: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft. LX: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Project administration, Formal analysis, Resources. YaW: Project administration, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Resources. CD: Project administration, Formal analysis, Resources, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft. LZ: Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Visualization, Conceptualization, Validation, Supervision, Investigation. JW: Writing – original draft, Resources, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization, Supervision.
Acknowledgments
We thank Helen Wang from Uppsala university for kindly provide Yersinia pseudotuberculosis strains used in this study.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
ReferencesAliB.NaeemM.UllahS.ManzoorH.AsifM.MahmoodN.. (2025). Molecular detection, seasonality, epidemiology and effect of Brucella melitensis infection on the hematological profile of cattle breeds. Sci. Rep.15:11842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94370-x, 40195375AvicanU.DorukT.ÖstbergY.FahlgrenA.ForsbergÅ. (2017). The tat substrate sufI is critical for the ability of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis to cause systematic infection. Infect. Immun.85:e00867. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00867-16, 28115509BaiY.MotinV.EnscoreR. E.OsikowiczL.Rosales RizzoM.HojgaardA.. (2020). Pentaplex real-time PCR for differential detection of Yersinia pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis and application for testing fleas collected during plague epizootics. Microbiology9:e1105. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1105, 32783386BergmanP.RaqibR.RekhaR. S.AgerberthB.GudmundssonG. H. (2020). Host directed therapy against infection by boosting innate immunity. Front. Immunol.11:1209. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01209, 32595649BergsbakenT.CooksonB. T. (2007). Macrophage activation redirects yersinia-infected host cell death from apoptosis to caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis. PLoS Pathog.3:e161. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030161, 17983266BjørklundG.ZouL.PeanaM.ChasapisC. T.HanganT.LuJ.. (2022). The role of the thioredoxin system in brain diseases. Antioxidants11:161. doi: 10.3390/antiox11112161, 36358532CatalàC.Velasco-De AndrésM.Casadó-LlombartS.Leyton-PereiraA.Carrillo-SerradellL.IsamatM.. (2022). Innate immune response to peritoneal bacterial infection. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol.371, 43–61. doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2022.04.014, 35965000ChaoT.JingxuanZ.QianqianL.BinbinL.YiC.JunW.. (2022). Synergistic effects of shikonin and ebselen against *Staphylococcus aureus*. Acta Microbiol. Sin.62, 1049–1060. doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20210396ChenH.LuQ.AnH.LiJ.ShenS.ZhengX.. (2022). The synergistic activity of SBC3 in combination with ebselen against Escherichia coli infection. Front. Pharmacol.13:1080281. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1080281, 36588729ChowS. H.DeoP.NadererT. (2016). Macrophage cell death in microbial infections. Cell. Microbiol.18, 466–474. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12573, 26833712Domanska-BlicharzK.OpolskaJ.LisowskaA.Szczotka-BochniarzA. (2023). Bacterial and viral rodent-borne infections on poultry farms. An attempt at a systematic review. J. Vet. Res.67, 1–10. doi: 10.2478/jvetres-2023-0012, 37008769DongC.ChenW.ZouL.LiuB.DengK.GuoD.. (2022). The assessment on synergistic activity of ebselen and silver ion against Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Front. Microbiol.13:963901. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.963901, 35958130DongC.WangJ.ChenH.WangP.ZhouJ.ZhaoY.. (2020). Synergistic therapeutic efficacy of ebselen and silver ions against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-induced urinary tract infections. Metallomics12, 860–867. doi: 10.1039/d0mt00091d, 32452501DraméM.BuchrieserC.EscollP. (2020). Danger-associated metabolic modifications during bacterial infection of macrophages. Int. Immunol.32, 475–483. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxaa035, 32441740FascianoA. C.DasanayakeG. S.EstesM. K.ZachosN. C.BreaultD. T.IsbergR. R.. (2021). Yersinia pseudotuberculosis YopE prevents uptake by M cells and instigates M cell extrusion in human ileal enteroid-derived monolayers. Gut Microbes13:1988390. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1988390, 34793276FelixL.MylonakisE.FuchsB. B. (2021). Thioredoxin reductase is a valid target for antimicrobial therapeutic development against gram-positive bacteria. Front. Microbiol.12:663481. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.663481, 33936021FukushimaH.ShimizuS.InatsuY. (2011). Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis detection in foods. J. Pathog.2011:735308. doi: 10.4061/2011/735308, 22567341Grygiel-GórniakB. (2025). Current challenges in Yersinia diagnosis and treatment. Microorganisms13:1133. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13051133, 40431305GuoZ.XuH. Y.XuL.WangS. S.ZhangX. M. (2016). In vivo and in vitro immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects of total flavonoids of Astragalus. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med.13, 60–73. doi: 10.21010/ajtcam.v13i4.10, 28852721GuptaM.DeyS.MarbaniangD.PalP.RayS.MazumderB. (2020). Grape seed extract: having a potential health benefits. J. Food Sci. Technol.57, 1205–1215. doi: 10.1007/s13197-019-04113-w, 32180617HerbM.SchrammM. (2021). Functions of ROS in macrophages and antimicrobial immunity. Antioxidants (Basel)10:313. doi: 10.3390/antiox10020313, 33669824HuD.LiR.LiY.WangM.WangL.WangS.. (2024). Inflammation-targeted nanomedicines alleviate oxidative stress and reprogram macrophages polarization for myocardial infarction treatment. Adv. Sci.11:e2308910. doi: 10.1002/advs.202308910, 38582507Hulinova StromerovaN.FaldynaM. (2018). Mycobacterium avium complex infection in pigs: a review. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.57, 62–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2018.06.005, 30017080KamathP. L.FosterJ. T.DreesK. P.LuikartG.QuanceC.AndersonN. J.. (2016). Genomics reveals historic and contemporary transmission dynamics of a bacterial disease among wildlife and livestock. Nat. Commun.7:11448. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11448, 27165544KobayashiS. D.MalachowaN.DeleoF. R. (2018). Neutrophils and bacterial immune evasion. J. Innate Immun.10, 432–441. doi: 10.1159/000487756, 29642066LiB.MingH.QinS.NiceE. C.DongJ.DuZ.. (2025). Redox regulation: mechanisms, biology and therapeutic targets in diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.10:72. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-02095-6, 40050273LuQ.CaiY.XiangC.WuT.ZhaoY.WangJ.. (2021). Ebselen, a multi-target compound: its effects on biological processes and diseases. Expert Rev. Mol. Med.23:14. doi: 10.1017/erm.2021.14MartinezF. O.SicaA.MantovaniA.LocatiM. (2008). Macrophage activation and polarization. Front. Biosci.13, 453–461. doi: 10.2741/2692, 17981560MaślankaM.MuchaA. (2023). Antibacterial activity of ebselen. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24:610. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021610, 36675123MeissnerK.Sauter-LouisC.HeidenS. E.SchauflerK.TomasoH.ConrathsF. J.. (2022). Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in conventional and organic pig fattening farms. Microorganisms10:603. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10030603, 35336178MoreauK.Lacas-GervaisS.FujitaN.SebbaneF.YoshimoriT.SimonetM.. (2010). Autophagosomes can support Yersinia pseudotuberculosis replication in macrophages. Cell. Microbiol.12, 1108–1123. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01456.x, 20180800MurrayP. J. (2017). Macrophage polarization. Annu. Rev. Physiol.79, 541–566. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034339, 27813830NasriA.LeeJ. A.RupasingheH. P. V. (2025). Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects in vitro of polysaccharide- and polyphenol-rich extracts of white button and Turkey tail mushrooms. J. Funct. Foods130:923. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2025.106923PodinovskaiaM.LeeW.CaldwellS.RussellD. G. (2013). Infection of macrophages with Mycobacterium tuberculosis induces global modifications to phagosomal function. Cell. Microbiol.15, 843–859. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12092, 23253353QuL.JiL.WangC.LuoH.LiS.PengW.. (2021). Synthesis and evaluation of multi-target-directed ligands with BACE-1 inhibitory and Nrf2 agonist activities as potential agents against Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Med. Chem.219:113441. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113441, 33862517RamliF. F.CowenP. J.GodlewskaB. R. (2022). The potential use of ebselen in treatment-resistant depression. Pharmaceuticals (Basel)15:485. doi: 10.3390/ph15040485, 35455482RamliF. F.SinghN.EmirU. E.VillaL. M.WatersS.HarmerC. J.. (2024). Effects of ebselen addition on emotional processing and brain neurochemistry in depressed patients unresponsive to antidepressant medication. Transl. Psychiatry14:200. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-02899-8, 38714646RattnerB. A.BeanT. G.BeasleyV. R.BernyP.EisenreichK. M.ElliottJ. E.. (2024). Wildlife ecological risk assessment in the 21st century: promising technologies to assess toxicological effects. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag.20, 725–748. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4806, 37417421RenX.ZouL.LuJ.HolmgrenA. (2018). Selenocysteine in mammalian thioredoxin reductase and application of ebselen as a therapeutic. Free Radic. Biol. Med.127, 238–247. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.05.081, 29807162RiedeL. L.Knauf-WitzensT.WesterhüsU.BonkeR.SchlezK.BüttnerK.. (2025). Occurrence and monitoring of the zoonotic pathogen Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in various zoo animal species. Microorganisms13:516. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13030516, 40142408RuckdeschelK. (2002). Immunomodulation of macrophages by pathogenic Yersinia species. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp.50, 131–137, 12022702SeabaughJ. A.AndersonD. M. (2024). Pathogenicity and virulence of Yersinia. Virulence15:2316439. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2024.2316439, 38389313SleeK. J.ButtonC. (1990). Enteritis in sheep, goats and pigs due to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis infection. Aust. Vet. J.67, 320–322. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1990.tb07814.x, 2098020StoolmanJ. S.GrantR. A.BillinghamL. K.PoorT. A.WeinbergS. E.HardingM. C.. (2025). Wildlife ecological risk assessment in the 21st century: promising technologies to assess toxicological effects. Science advances, 11:eadu4369. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu4369TaheriN.FahlgrenA.FällmanM. (2016). Yersinia pseudotuberculosis blocks neutrophil degranulation. Infect. Immun.84, 3369–3378. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00760-16, 27620724TanY.LiX.XieY.ZhangZ.LiuJ.ZhouG.. (2025). A rare case of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis infection with septic shock and splenic infarction. Infect Drug Resist18, 5057–5065. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S548492, 41020144WangH.AvicanK.FahlgrenA.ErttmannS. F.NussA. M.DerschP.. (2016). Increased plasmid copy number is essential for Yersinia T3SS function and virulence. Science353, 492–495. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7501, 27365311WangN.LiangH.ZenK. (2014). Molecular mechanisms that influence the macrophage m1-m2 polarization balance. Front. Immunol.5:614. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00614, 25506346WangJ.WangP.DongC.ZhaoY.ZhouJ.YuanC.. (2020). Mechanisms of ebselen as a therapeutic and its pharmacology applications. Future Med. Chem.12, 2141–2160. doi: 10.4155/fmc-2019-0218, 33225732WangP.WangJ.XieZ.ZhouJ.LuQ.ZhaoY.. (2020). Depletion of multidrug-resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli BC1 by ebselen and silver ion. J. Cell. Mol. Med.24, 13139–13150. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15920, 32975381WeissG.SchaibleU. E. (2015). Macrophage defense mechanisms against intracellular bacteria. Immunol. Rev.264, 182–203. doi: 10.1111/imr.12266, 25703560WillcocksS.HuseK. K.StablerR.OystonP. C. F.ScottA.AtkinsH. S.. (2019). Genome-wide assessment of antimicrobial tolerance in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis under ciprofloxacin stress. Microb. Genom.5:e000304. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000304, 31580793WynnT. A.ChawlaA.PollardJ. W. (2013). Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease. Nature496, 445–455. doi: 10.1038/nature12034, 23619691YahfoufiN.AlsadiN.JambiM.MatarC. (2018). The immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory role of polyphenols. Nutrients10:618. doi: 10.3390/nu10111618, 30400131YuB.WangQ.ZhangL.LinJ.FengZ.WangZ.. (2024). Ebselen improves fungal keratitis through exerting anti-inflammation, anti-oxidative stress, and antifungal effects. Redox Biol.73:103206. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2024.103206, 38796864ZhangM.YanM.YangJ.LiF.WangY.FengK.. (2022). Structural characterization of a polysaccharide from Trametes sanguinea Lloyd with immune-enhancing activity via activation of TLR4. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.206, 1026–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.072, 35306017
Edited by: Natalia V. Kirienko, Rice University, United States
Reviewed by: Hao Wang, Yunnan Agricultural University, China
Halina Tkaczenko, Pomeranian University of Slupsk, Poland