<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2025.1735729</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Use of PGPB in bio-fertilisation: preserving the soil microbiome and enhancing field production of alfalfa</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fern&#x00E1;ndez-Pastrana</surname>
<given-names>Vanesa Mercedes</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1666160"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Mora</surname>
<given-names>Marina Robas</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/638950"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Reguero</surname>
<given-names>Daniel</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1511056"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Probanza</surname>
<given-names>Agust&#x00ED;n</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1666400"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Iglesias</surname>
<given-names>Diana Penalba</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3341658"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>G&#x00F3;mez</surname>
<given-names>Pedro Antonio Jim&#x00E9;nez</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1546077"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Pharmaceutical Science and Health, CEU San Pablo University, Montepr&#x00ED;ncipe Campus</institution>, <city>Madrid</city>, <country country="es">Spain</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001"><label>&#x002A;</label>Correspondence: Marina Robas Mora, <email xlink:href="mailto:marina.robasmora@ceu.es">marina.robasmora@ceu.es</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn0001">
<label>&#x2020;</label>
<p>ORCID: Vanesa Mercedes Fern&#x00E1;ndez Pastrana, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5534-0529">orcid.org/000-0001-5534-0529</uri>; Marina Robas Mora, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8882-372X">orcid.org/0000-0001-8882-372X</uri>; Daniel Gonz&#x00E1;lez Reguero, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8221-4584">orcid.org/0000-0002-8221-4584</uri>; Agust&#x00ED;n Probanza, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2024-5457">orcid.org/0000-0002-2024-5457</uri>; Diana Penalba Iglesias, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0024-3132">orcid.org/0009-0007-0024-3132</uri>; Pedro Antonio Jim&#x00E9;nez G&#x00F3;mez, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0305-6889">orcid.org/0000-0003-0305-6889</uri></p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-01-20">
<day>20</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1735729</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>30</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>19</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>25</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2026 Fern&#x00E1;ndez-Pastrana, Mora, Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Reguero, Probanza, Iglesias and G&#x00F3;mez.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Fern&#x00E1;ndez-Pastrana, Mora, Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Reguero, Probanza, Iglesias and G&#x00F3;mez</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-01-20">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Sustainable fodder production requires fertilisers that increase yield without compromising soil ecology. We tested whether a humic-rich biofertiliser derived from valorised horticultural waste (ORGAON&#x00AE; PK) could be enhanced with two genomically screened plant-growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) in a field trial with <italic>Medicago sativa</italic>. The crude residue substantially increased biomass, and the addition of Bacillus sp. C1 or Pseudomonas sp. C2 further redirected these gains towards improved fibre digestibility or greater protein and energy content. Soil microbial diversity was maintained, although community composition shifted towards taxa involved in organic-matter degradation and nitrification. Both inoculants persisted without displacing dominant native genera, and biofertilised soils showed reduced susceptibility to <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-lactam antibiotics. Overall, pairing OPK with targeted PGPB enhanced forage yield and quality while supporting microbiome resilience, highlighting a promising One-Health-aligned alternative to mineral fertilisers. Multi-season trials are now needed to validate broader applicability.</p>
</abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="graphical">
<title>Graphical abstract</title>
<p>
<fig position="anchor" id="fig0">
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1735729-gr0001.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Biological assay infographic illustrating the use of P. agronomica and B. pretiosus for generating biofertilizer. The biofertilizer is applied to a field over five months under rainfed conditions. Results include improved plant nutrition, reduced antibiotic resistance, low impact on community metabolic diversity, and persistent strain presence in the rhizosphere. Conclusions highlight increased plant development and improved nutritional parameters, with minimal impact on community diversity and persistent strain efficacy in treated soils.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>alfalfa (<italic>Medicago sativa</italic>)</kwd>
<kwd>biofertilisers</kwd>
<kwd>PGPB (<italic>Bacillus pseudomonas</italic>)</kwd>
<kwd>soil antibiotic resistance</kwd>
<kwd>valorised organic residues</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by Ministry of Science and Innovation, State Research Agency. Funded by the European Union - NextGenerationEU (grant number TED2021-132285A-I00). In-kind support (valorised biofertiliser carrier, ORGAON&#x00AE; PK) was provided by M&#x00E1;xima Abonos, S.L.</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="9"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="50"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="10379"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Terrestrial Microbiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1">
<title>Highlights</title>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Crude ORGAON&#x00AE; PK&#x202F;+&#x202F;<italic>Bacillus</italic> sp. C1 doubled alfalfa dry-matter yield (+101%) in field.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p><italic>Bacillus</italic> sp. C1 raised fibre digestibility (+6&#x202F;pp); <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. <italic>C2 lifted protein (+3%).</italic></p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Taxon turnover enriched Chitinophaga and Variovorax enhancing C-N cycling, but kept Shannon stable, showing resilience.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Lower resistance phenotype with PGPB inoculants: <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-lactam MICs fell 19&#x2013;30&#x202F;mg&#x202F;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> in all biofertilised soils.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec2">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal &#x201C;Zero Hunger&#x201D; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Arora and Mishra, 2022</xref>) highlights the need to reconcile environmental stewardship with a secure supply of food for both humans and livestock. Yet soil degradation already impairs between 25 and 40% of the planet&#x2019;s land surface, placing future food security at risk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Pr&#x0103;v&#x0103;lie et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Schillaci et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Among forage crops, alfalfa (<italic>Medicago sativa</italic> L.) is particularly valuable. Its symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing rhizobia enriches soil fertility, while its high protein content underpins animal production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Qin et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Fan et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Xu et al., 2024</xref>). However, productivity is threatened by salinisation, drought, deforestation and erosion, as documented in the global assessment of soil degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">FAO and UNEP, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Goswami et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Mineral fertilisers are widely deployed to offset these losses, but their over-use carries environmental penalties; manufacture and application account for about 2.1% of global greenhouse-gas emissions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Menegat et al., 2022</xref>). At the same time, agriculture generates almost 974 Mt. yr.<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> of organic residues whose sustainable reuse could improve soil structure and deliver nutrients more efficiently than synthetic inputs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Atinkut et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Feng et al., 2025</xref>). Indeed, nitrogen-use efficiency from organic amendments can approach 80%, compared with roughly 35% for mineral fertilisers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Yi et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Rafique et al., 2025</xref>).</p>
<p>In Almer&#x00ED;a (Spain)&#x2014;the world&#x2019;s largest contiguous greenhouse area, covering 30,456 ha&#x2014;vast quantities of horticultural waste accumulate annually (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Pinna-Hern&#x00E1;ndez et al., 2020</xref>). Valorising this biomass fits squarely within the circular-economy paradigm, returning organic matter to production systems without compromising food safety (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Devi et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Kanter et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">King, 2022</xref>). Because nutrients in raw waste are often locked in recalcitrant forms, their biotransformation by decomposer microorganisms has prompted the development of next-generation biofertilisers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Dasgan et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Wu et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Dzvene and Chiduza, 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Nabati et al., 2025</xref>).</p>
<p>Within this context, strains of <italic>Bacillus</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> are prominent plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPB): they solubilise nutrients, synthesise phytohormones and improve plant biometric and physiological traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Giannelli et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Hang et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Vidal et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Alattas et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Huiqiong et al., 2024</xref>). They also enhance abiotic-stress tolerance, water retention and biocontrol of pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bakaeva et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Pang et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Schillaci et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Buqori et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Garrido-Sanz and Keel, 2025</xref>), although most evidence derives from controlled environments rather than field conditions.</p>
<p>High-throughput sequencing of <italic>16S rRNA</italic> amplicons now permits detailed monitoring of inoculant persistence and shifts in <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>- and <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-diversity under realistic agronomic settings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Ma et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Li et al., 2021</xref>). Nevertheless, PGPB deployment must be assessed through a One-Health lens, as some strains harbour mobile antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">P&#x00E9;rez-Valera et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Nguyen et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Pagaling et al., 2023</xref>). Selecting inoculants that lack virulence factors and transferable ARGs is therefore essential (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Djordjevic et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Musicha et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>This work investigates the potential of ORGAON&#x00AE; PK (OPK)&#x2014;a biofertiliser derived from valorised horticultural waste&#x2014;to enhance, simultaneously, the yield and nutritional quality of field-grown <italic>Medicago sativa</italic>. We compared the organic amendment alone, its sterilised counterpart and a mineral fertiliser, each applied with or without two benchmark PGPB: <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> (C1) and <italic>P. agronomica</italic> (C2). Specifically: (i) biomass and key forage attributes (fibre digestibility, crude protein, amino-acid profile and water-soluble carbohydrates); (ii) structural and functional responses of the rhizosphere microbiome (<italic>&#x03B1;</italic>/&#x03B2;-diversity, metabolic activity and taxonomic composition); and (iii) changes in soil antibiotic-resistance phenotypes was assessed.</p>
<p>We formulated a primary, testable hypothesis: that combining OPK with genomically vetted PGPB would increase alfalfa biomass yield and nutritional quality without reducing soil microbial diversity or disrupting rhizosphere ecological functioning. Secondary analyses (e.g., KEGG-orthologue predictions, fine-scale taxonomic turnover, and antibiotic-resistance phenotypes) were included to contextualise the main response under field conditions.</p>
<p>The overarching goal is to provide robust field evidence positioning residue-based biofertilisers fortified with PGPB as high-performance, low-risk alternatives to conventional mineral fertilisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2</label>
<title>Experimental procedures</title>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Biological treatments: PGPB strains</title>
<p>Two plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria were employed: C1 (<italic>Bacillus</italic> sp.; proposed as &#x201C;<italic>Bacillus pretiosus</italic> sp. nov.&#x201D; in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Robas-Mora et al., 2023</xref>; not validly published under the ICNP; type strain DSM 114702<sup>T</sup>, CECT 30674<sup>T</sup>) and C2 (<italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp.; proposed as &#x201C;<italic>Pseudomonas agronomica</italic> sp. nov.&#x201D; in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Robas-Mora et al., 2023</xref>; not validly published under the ICNP; type strain DSM 114959^T, CECT 30673^T). Both strains were previously isolated from the rhizosphere of a wild <italic>Medicago sativa</italic> (L.) plant collected in the Almad&#x00E9;n Mining District (Ciudad Real, Spain) and selected according to their Biomercurorremediator Suitability Index (IIBMR) following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Robas-Mora et al. (2023)</xref>. This index is a composite score (0 to 1) that integrates (i) intrinsic Hg<sup>2+</sup> tolerance (minimum inhibitory concentration), (ii) Hg bio-accumulation capacity and (iii) expression of plant-growth-promoting traits such as indole-3-acetic-acid production, ACC-deaminase activity and phosphate solubilisation. Strains with IIBMR &#x2265; 6 are considered suitable bioinoculants for crops grown on trace-metal-impacted soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Robas-Mora et al., 2023</xref>). Full phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and genetic characterisation is provided in <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S1</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Irrigation matrices</title>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.2.1</label>
<title>Valorised organic fertiliser (OPK)</title>
<p>The organic fertiliser ORGAON&#x00AE; PK (OPK), previously described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Robas-Mora et al. (2023)</xref>, was prepared from the leachate of horticultural residues supplemented with phosphorus (0.10&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.03% w/w) and potassium (2.58&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.52% w/w). The physicochemical properties of OPK are summarised in <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S1</xref>. The product was applied at a 1: 512 dilution (OPK: H&#x2082;O).</p>
<p>To assess the effect of the organic matrix in the absence of its native microbiota, a sterilised variant (OPK_ST) was produced. Fifty millilitres of OPK were exposed to UV-C radiation (265&#x202F;nm, Philips TUV 30&#x202F;W G30T8) for 15&#x202F;min in a laminar-flow cabinet; the fertiliser was distributed in Petri dishes to a depth &#x003C; 5&#x202F;mm to ensure uniform irradiation. Pre- and post-irradiation aliquots were analysed for humic extract, fulvic acids, DOC and inorganic N/P (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S2</xref>). No significant differences were detected (<italic>t</italic>-test, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05), confirming that the 15-min UV-C protocol removed viable microbiota while leaving the chemical profile essentially unchanged (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S3</xref>). Sterility was verified by plating 100&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of the treated solution, in duplicate, on LB agar (Condalab&#x00AE;, Madrid, Spain) and incubating at 28&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1&#x202F;&#x00B0;C for 72&#x202F;h. Only samples showing no microbial growth in either replicate were deemed sterile. Sterilised solutions were stored at 4&#x202F;&#x00B0;C and used within 24&#x202F;h of preparation.</p>
<p>Prior to field application the residue-microbiome safety was screened. The crude residue (OPK) was assayed for potential human or environmental pathogens. Triplicate 10-mL aliquots were pelleted (10,000&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;g, 10&#x202F;min), the pellets were processed with the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro kit (QIAGEN) and the V3&#x2013;V4 <italic>16S-rRNA</italic> region was sequenced as described above. After DADA2 denoising, amplicon sequence variants were classified against SILVA 138.99; additionally, all quality-filtered reads were mapped with Kraken2 (v2.1.3, max-hits&#x202F;=&#x202F;1) against the NCBI RefSeq &#x201C;bacteria, archaea &#x0026; viruses&#x201D; database to capture low-abundance taxa. Taxa were flagged as putative pathogens if they belonged to any of the following genera: <italic>Escherichia/Shigella, Salmonella, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Listeria, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> group, <italic>Clostridium</italic> sensu stricto 1, <italic>Vibrio</italic> or <italic>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</italic> complex. None of these genera exceeded 0.01% of total reads in any replicate (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S1</xref>).</p>
<p>The OPK microbiome was dominated by soil saprotrophs&#x2014;Rubrobacter (18%), Nocardioides (9%), Streptomyces (7%) and Sphingomonas (4%)&#x2014;plus Planctomycetota lineages typical of lignocellulose-rich residues (e.g., Pirellula, 3%). Absolute read counts for the 25 most abundant genera are shown in <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>; together they accounted for 72% of the library, indicating moderate evenness. The combined Kraken2 screen and genus-level inspection confirmed the absence of clinically relevant pathogens at detectable levels, supporting the biosafety of OPK for open-field use.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.2.2</label>
<title>Chemical fertiliser (CF)</title>
<p>The inorganic reference fertiliser was a commercial NPK solution (Universal Fertilizer Complet&#x00AE;, COMPO Iberia S. L., Barcelona, Spain). Its guaranteed analysis is 7&#x2013;5-6 (N-P&#x2082;O&#x2085;-K&#x2082;O) with micronutrients: 7% total nitrogen (2.1% nitrate-N, 1.3% ammoniacal-N, 3.6% urea-N), 6% water-soluble phosphorus (P&#x2082;O&#x2085;) and 5% water-soluble potassium (K&#x2082;O). The solution also supplies (all water-soluble): 0.01% boron (B), 0.002% copper (Cu), 0.02% iron (Fe), 0.01% manganese (Mn) and 0.002% zinc (Zn), each chelated with EDTA, together with 0.001% molybdenum (Mo).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.2.3</label>
<title>Biofertiliser formulation</title>
<p>The biofertiliser was prepared by enriching OPK with the selected PGPB strains (<italic>B. pretiosus</italic>&#x2014;C1 or <italic>P. agronomica</italic>&#x2014;C2) at the dilution recommended for fertigation of <italic>M. sativa</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Robas-Mora et al., 2023</xref>). Twenty millilitres of a bacterial suspension adjusted to McFarland 4 were added per liter of OPK, yielding &#x2248; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x202F;cfu&#x202F;mL<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> at 10<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> dilution. Fresh biofertiliser was prepared weekly and stored at 4&#x202F;&#x00B0;C until use. The same inoculation protocol was applied to CF and to the water control (W).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.2.4</label>
<title>Irrigation regime</title>
<p>Each fertiliser was applied once, as the initial watering at the start of the trial. Thereafter, plants were maintained under rain-fed conditions from September 2022 to May 2023; no supplementary irrigation was provided. Two inoculations were performed, one at the beginning of the experiment in September and the second one before spring in February.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Experimental site and plant material</title>
<p>The field experiment was conducted in Villanueva de San Mancio, Valladolid, Spain (UTM zone 30&#x202F;T, 333161 m E; 4,643,746 m&#x202F;N). Prior to treatment application, five composite cores (0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm) were collected in a zig-zag pattern from each plot and pooled to obtain a representative sample of the site. Subsamples were air-dried, sieved (2&#x202F;mm) and analysed at the CyTEMA (UCLM, Castilla la Mancha) following ISO-standard protocols: pH (1:2.5 H&#x2082;O; ISO 10390), electrical conductivity (ISO 11265), particle-size distribution (hydrometer), organic carbon (Walkley&#x2013;Black), total nitrogen (Kjeldahl), CaCO&#x2083; (Bernard calcimetry), Olsen P (ISO 11263) and exchangeable K (1&#x202F;M NH&#x2084;OAc, AAS). The resulting clay-loam soil was slightly alkaline (pH 8.1), low in organic C (12.1&#x202F;g&#x202F;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and moderately supplied with available P and K. Full physicochemical data are provided in <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S4</xref>.</p>
<p>The crop was <italic>Medicago sativa</italic> L. cv. Arag&#x00F3;n, established 3 years earlier under dry-land management (September&#x2013;May). At inoculation (March) plants were ~10&#x202F;cm tall and had previously received a single CF dressing. Harvest took place in May, 6 months post-inoculation.</p>
<p>Plots (25&#x202F;m<sup>2</sup>) were arranged in a factorial design: four irrigation matrices (CF, OPK, OPK_ST, W)&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;three biological treatments (C0&#x2014;no inoculant, C1&#x2014;<italic>B. pretiosus</italic>, C2&#x2014;<italic>P. agronomica</italic>). To preclude cross-contamination, plots were separated by 10&#x202F;m buffer strips.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Extraction of rhizosphere microbial communities</title>
<p>Rhizosphere bacteria were recovered following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Garc&#x00ED;a-Villaraco Velasco et al. (2009)</xref> with minor modifications. Briefly, 2&#x202F;g of rhizosphere soil were suspended in 20&#x202F;mL of sterile saline (0.45% w/v NaCl) and homogenised in an Omni-Mixer (Omni International, Kennesaw, USA) at 16000 rpm for 2&#x202F;min to detach microorganisms from soil particles. The slurry was then centrifuged at 690&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;g for 10&#x202F;min in a refrigerated Mikro 22R centrifuge (Hettich, Gipuzkoa, Spain); the supernatant was retained for downstream analyses of community structure and diversity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Assessment of plant growth promotion and forage quality</title>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>2.5.1</label>
<title>Biometry</title>
<p>To avoid confounding factors such as rodent activity, wind or farm traffic, harvested biomass was dried ex situ. Material from each subplot was transferred to a secure shed and spread in single layers, preserving the spatial order of the field layout to retain sample traceability. Stacking was avoided to prevent fermentation and ensure uniform desiccation. Drying proceeded under ambient conditions (20&#x2013;25&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, natural ventilation, no direct sunlight) for 18&#x202F;days. Weight stability was checked on days 12, 14, 16 and 18 by weighing three representative samples per treatment every 48&#x202F;h; a change of &#x003C; 1% between consecutive measurements was taken as the end-point. Total biomass per subplot was recorded on a platform balance (capacity 20&#x2013;150&#x202F;kg, accuracy &#x00B1; 0.1&#x202F;kg), noting both fresh and final dry weights to calculate moisture content and dry-matter yield.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>2.5.2</label>
<title>Nutritional analysis</title>
<p>Within 24&#x202F;h of harvest, samples were analysed at Rock River Labs Spain (Lal&#x00ED;n, Pontevedra) using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS DS2500, FOSS Analytical, Denmark). Plant material was dried, separated into leaf and stem fractions, and milled to 1&#x202F;mm with a Cyclotec mill (FOSS). Spectra were collected from 400 to 2,498&#x202F;nm and processed with proprietary calibrations validated by Rock River Laboratory. The following variables were determined: water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC), undigested neutral-detergent fibre after 240&#x202F;h (uNDF&#x208D;&#x2082;&#x2084;&#x2080;&#x208E;), total tract fibre digestibility (TTFDND), soluble protein, crude protein, indigestible modified NDF fraction (aNDF&#x2098;&#x2092;), and total amino acids. Each measurement was performed in triplicate to ensure robustness. Statistical analyses were conducted in R v.4.3.1. One-way ANOVA tested treatment effects; post-hoc differences were examined with Tukey&#x2019;s HSD; effect sizes were expressed as Cohen&#x2019;s d. Multivariate patterns were explored by principal-component analysis (packages stats, factoextra, ggplot2 and psych).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Characterisation of rhizosphere microbial communities</title>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>2.6.1</label>
<title>Community-level antibiotic-resistance profiling (cenoantibiogram)</title>
<p>To evaluate antibiotic resistance, the supernatant was adjusted to an optical density equivalent to 0.5 McFarland with sterile saline (0.45% NaCl). Aliquots of 100&#x202F;&#x03BC;L were spread aseptically onto Mueller&#x2013;Hinton agar (Condalab&#x00AE;, Madrid, Spain) using sterile swabs. Etest&#x00AE; strips (bioM&#x00E9;rieux&#x00AE;, France) were applied to determine community minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for the following antibiotics: amoxicillin (AML), amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (AUG), cefotaxime (CTX), piperacillin (PP), cefepime (PM), piperacillin + tazobactam (TZP), imipenem (IMI), imipenem + EDTA (IMD), trimethoprim (TS), gentamicin (CN), nalidixic acid (NA) and ciprofloxacin (CIP). Plates were incubated at 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C for 24&#x202F;h, or as recommended by the manufacturer.</p>
<p>MICs were read visually at the point where the inhibition ellipse intersected the strip&#x2019;s scale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Reguero et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Robas-Mora et al., 2023</xref>). Prior to statistical testing, MIC values were log&#x2082;-transformed to stabilise variances and approximate normality. A general linear model (GLM) ANOVA (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) was used to detect significant differences among biological treatments (C0, C1, C2). Multivariate patterns were explored by principal component analysis (PCA) and correspondence analysis (CA), complemented with hierarchical clustering (Euclidean distance) and heat-map visualisation. A correlation matrix of MIC values was computed to identify potential cross-resistance. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons were performed with Tukey&#x2019;s HSD test. All statistics were run in R (R Core Team, 2023).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>2.6.2</label>
<title>Community-level metabolic diversity: Shannon&#x2013;weaver index</title>
<p>Functional diversity of the rhizosphere communities was determined with Biolog EcoPlates&#x00AE; (Biolog Inc., Hayward, CA, USA), each containing 31 carbon sources in triplicate plus a negative control. The bacterial extract described above was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland with sterile saline (0.45% NaCl); 150&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of this suspension were dispensed into each well, and plates were incubated at 25&#x202F;&#x00B0;C for 7 days. Optical density (OD&#x2085;&#x2089;&#x2085;) was recorded every 24&#x202F;h with a Multiskan FC microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For each reading the corresponding blank value was subtracted, and triplicate means were calculated for each substrate. Average Well Colour Development (AWCD) was plotted against incubation time to obtain metabolic-activity curves for each community, and the time point of maximum AWCD was used to compute functional-diversity indices.</p>
<p>Metabolic diversity was expressed as the Shannon&#x2013;Weaver index (H&#x2098;): <italic>Hm&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;&#x2211; qi log&#x2082;(qi);</italic> where <italic>qi</italic> is the proportion of corrected absorbance for well <italic>i</italic>: <italic>qi&#x202F;=&#x202F;Ai / &#x2211;Ai;</italic> with <italic>Ai</italic> being the blank-corrected absorbance of well <italic>i</italic> and <italic>&#x2211;Ai</italic> the summed absorbance for the plate at that time point. The index was calculated for each biological replicate, and the resulting values were subjected to statistical analysis to detect significant differences among treatments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>2.6.3</label>
<title>Community-level taxonomic diversity: <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>- and <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-diversity analysis</title>
<p>Total DNA was extracted from rhizosphere soil using the QIAsymphony PowerFecal Pro kit (QIAGEN&#x00AE;, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol. The V3&#x2013;V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified with universal primers 341F (5&#x2032;-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3&#x2032;) and 805R (5&#x2032;-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3&#x2032;). Libraries were prepared following Illumina&#x2019;s standard workflow and quantified with the Quant-iT&#x2122; PicoGreen&#x2122; dsDNA Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Equimolar pools were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq&#x00AE; platform (2&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;250&#x202F;bp), including 20% PhiX as an internal control.</p>
<p>Raw reads were processed in QIIME2 (version &#x003C;insert&#x003E;): adaptors and low-quality ends were trimmed, noise was removed with DADA2, and amplicon-sequence variants (ASVs) were inferred. Taxonomic assignment was performed with VSEARCH against the SILVA 138 99 database. The output comprised a BIOM ASV-frequency table and a rooted phylogenetic tree.</p>
<p>To characterise within-sample diversity, the following <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>-diversity metrics were calculated: Shannon index, Faith&#x2019;s Phylogenetic Diversity, Pielou&#x2019;s evenness and the number of observed taxa.</p>
<p>For partitioning of &#x03B2;-diversity, Jaccard dissimilarity was decomposed into turnover and nestedness components with the betapart package (v1.6). Pairwise distances from each treatment to the water control (WC0) were summarised in box-plots and compared by Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis (<italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.05). To gauge inoculant persistence, per-sample ASV counts assigned to <italic>Bacillus</italic> or <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> were summed and plotted against total reads. No further scaling was applied, as sequencing depth was normalised in previous steps. Differential abundance (ANCOM-BC). Bias-corrected log-fold changes were computed with ANCOM-BC v2.2 (ancombc) using the pseudo-count ADD&#x202F;=&#x202F;1, structural zero detection ON and FDR adjustment (method&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x201C;BH&#x201D;). Analyses were run separately at family and genus rank; species-level results were ignored owing to low 16S resolution. Only taxa with FDR-adjusted <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05 were exported. Log&#x2082;FC and standard errors were visualised with ggplot2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Absence of a panel denotes no significant taxa at that taxonomic level. All R analyses were scripted in R v4.3.2 under Ubuntu 22.04.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Predicted functional repertoire of the rhizosphere microbiome under the four fertilisation matrices. <bold>(A)</bold> KEGG pathways; <bold>(B)</bold> COG functional categories. Stacked bars display the relative abundance of gene families inferred with PICRUSt2 from 16S rRNA ASVs for each treatment: water control (WC), mineral fertiliser (CFC), crude residue biofertiliser (OPK), and UV-sterilised residue (OPK_ST), each combined with the three biological levels C0 (no inoculant), strain C1, and strain C2. Facet numbers (0&#x2013;3) correspond to the four field replicates. Colors denote the top-level KEGG metabolic routes <bold>(A)</bold> or COG functional categories <bold>(B)</bold>; categories contributing &#x003C; 1% of total reads are grouped as &#x2018;Other&#x2019;. Horizontal bars sum to 100% per sample, allowing direct comparison of functional profiles among treatments.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1735729-g001.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two stacked bar charts compare relative abundance data across four conditions labeled 0, 1, 2, and 3. Chart (a) displays KEGG metabolism categories including amino acid, carbohydrate, and energy metabolism. Chart (b) shows COG functional categories such as amino acid transport and energy production. Each condition is divided into subgroups labeled WC, CFC, OFKC, and OFKSTC. Legends detail the specific categories for each chart.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Functional-gene prediction and statistical analysis</title>
<p>Functional profiles were inferred from the 16S rRNA amplicon data with PICRUSt2 v2.5.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Douglas et al., 2020</xref>) executed under Python 3.11. The pipeline&#x2014;picrust2_pipeline.py with default NSTI filtering&#x2014;placed ASVs on the reference phylogeny (epa-ng&#x202F;+&#x202F;gappa), predicted gene family abundances, and collapsed them to KEGG orthologues (KOs). To obtain a broader metabolic synopsis, KO tables were additionally collapsed to COG functional categories with the PICRUSt2 categorize_by_function.py script. COG relative abundances were normalised within each sample and visualised as comparative bar-plots across treatments. Prior to hypothesis testing, count matrices were subjected to ARiSTa (Adaptive Rank-based Inverse Score Transformation) to stabilise variance and approximate normality. Transformed data were screened for differential functions with the non-parametric Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis test (<italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.05, FDR-corrected). Finally, a Random Forest classifier (500 trees, scikit-learn v1.4) was trained on the ARiSTa-transformed KO table to rank the top functional predictors that discriminate among fertiliser&#x2013;inoculant combinations; variable importance was computed as the mean decrease in Gini impurity.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec20">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec21">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Biometry</title>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows that treatments based on the valorised organic residue OPK markedly enhanced alfalfa dry-matter yield. When OPK was inoculated with <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> (OPKC1) the dry biomass exceeded the water control (WC0) by more than 35% (2.21&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.09&#x202F;kg plot<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>). The sterilised matrix (OPKST) also improved productivity (+21% in OPKSTC0) and, once supplemented with <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> or <italic>P. agronomica</italic>, achieved additional gains of 12 and 21%, respectively, over its uninoculated counterpart.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Dry-matter yield of alfalfa after 18&#x202F;days (mean &#x00B1; SE; <italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;4) under four nutrient matrices&#x2014;water (W), mineral fertiliser (CFC), valorised organic residue (OPK), and its sterilized counterpart (OPKST)&#x2014;each combined with three biological treatments: C0, no inoculant; C1, <italic>B. pretiosus</italic>; and C2, <italic>P. agronomica.</italic> Bars topped by the same letter do not differ significantly (Tukey HSD, <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1735729-g002.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart comparing dry biomass (kilograms per plot) across different treatments: WC0, WC1, WC2, CFC0, CFC1, CFC2, OPKC0, OPKC1, OPKC2, OPK_STC0, OPK_STC1, OPK_STC2. Error bars are present, with the highest biomass in OPK_STC1 and the lowest in WC2. Each bar is annotated with letters indicating statistical significance.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The mineral fertiliser (CFC0) significantly out-performed the water control, and its formulation with <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> (CFC1) provided a further 20% increase, while the Pseudomonas variant (CFC2) produced a comparable response (CFC2&#x202F;&#x2248;&#x202F;CFC0). Collectively, these data indicate that valorised organic residues, particularly when combined with PGPB, deliver biomass yields that match or surpass those obtained with mineral fertilisation under field conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Nutritional parametres</title>
<p>The box-plots in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> show distinct yet complementary effects of the two inoculants. Treatment with <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> (C1) increased total-tract fibre digestibility (TTFDNDF) by roughly 5&#x2013;7% and reduced the 240-h undigested NDF fraction, a difference that remained significant versus the water control after Dunn&#x2019;s adjustment (Padj&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.02). In contrast, <italic>P. agronomica</italic> (C2) raised total amino-acid content, lifted crude protein by about 2&#x2013;4% (Padj&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.07) and produced markedly higher levels of water-soluble carbohydrates. Both strains also tended to lower total NDF. Collectively, these results indicate that C1 primarily enhances cell-wall digestibility, whereas C2 enriches the protein-energy fraction, thereby supporting the notion that bio-inoculation can improve alfalfa forage quality through complementary mechanisms.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Bacterial inoculation effects on the nutritional profile of <italic>M. sativa</italic>. Box-plots compare plants inoculated with <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> (C1) or <italic>P. agronomica</italic> (C2) against the non-inoculated control (C0). Variables assessed were: water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC), utilisable neutral-detergent fibre after 240&#x202F;h (uNDF<sub>(240)</sub>), total-tract fibre digestibility (TTFDND), soluble protein, crude protein, indigestible modified NDF fraction (aNDF<sub>mo</sub>), and total amino acids (AA_total). Letters above boxes denote post-hoc Tukey HSD groupings (<italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.05); boxes sharing the same letter do not differ significantly.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1735729-g003.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Seven box plots showing the effects of three bacterial treatments (C0, C1, C2) on various components: Soluble Protein, Crude Protein, Amino Acids, Undigested NDF, Neutral Detergent Fiber, Total Digestible NDF, and Water Soluble Carbohydrates. Each plot compares the distribution of values for the three treatments, with notable differences in range and median values across the components.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> (PC1&#x202F;=&#x202F;56.4%; PC2&#x202F;=&#x202F;24.4%) Disentangles the nutritional variance of alfalfa into two orthogonal trends. PC1 separates a protein-energy profile from a structure-fibre profile, whereas PC2 represents overall productivity, closely aligned with biomass. Water-only treatments (W) occupy the upper-right quadrant, clustering with the vectors for soluble protein, total amino acids, and water-soluble carbohydrates&#x2014;traits driven by readily available nitrogen and simple sugars. The uninoculated mineral fertiliser (CFC0) lies in the same sector, but inoculation with <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> (CFC1) shifts the centroid upward along PC2 and slightly left along PC1, towards dry/wet biomass and TTFDND vectors, indicating that <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> not only stimulates growth but also rebalances cell-wall digestibility.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Principal-component analysis (PCA) of alfalfa nutritional traits. The first component (PC1, 56.4%) separates samples with a higher protein&#x2013;energy fraction (right) from those with greater fibre digestibility and lower uNDF<sub>(240)</sub> (left). The second component (PC2, 24.4%) represents a productivity gradient: positive scores correspond to higher dry and fresh biomass. Vectors depict the loading of each nutritional variable; ellipses enclose the 95% confidence region for each chemical&#x2013;biological combination: water (W, blue circles), mineral fertiliser (CF, orange triangles), organic residue (OPK, green squares) and sterilised residue (OPK_ST, red crosses), each tested with the bacterial treatments C0, C1, and C2.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1735729-g004.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Scatter plot displaying PCA analysis with PC1 and PC2 axes, explaining 56.4% and 24.4% of variance, respectively. Data points are categorized by color and shape, representing groups W (blue), CF (orange), OPK (green), and OPK_ST (red). Vectors indicate variables such as wet and dry biomass, raw protein, and others, color-coded as shown in the legend.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Organic-residue treatments (OPK) plot in the left-hand quadrant, close to TTFDND and aNDF&#x2098;&#x2092; vectors and distant from uNDF&#x2082;&#x2084;&#x2080;, demonstrating a clear improvement in fibre fractionation relative to the mineral control. Adding <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> (OPKC1) accentuates this position without sacrificing biomass, whereas <italic>P. agronomica</italic> (OPKC2) retains the fibre-oriented bias but drifts slightly towards the crude-protein vector, echoing the protein gains noted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. The sterilised residue (OPKST) shows a split response: OPKSTC1 falls into the lower quadrant (highly digestible fibre but reduced biomass), implying that removal of indigenous microbiota limits <italic>Bacillus</italic> efficacy; conversely, OPKSTC2 sits near the PC1 origin and rises along PC2, combining moderate fibre improvement with respectable biomass.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec23">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Metabolic diversity</title>
<p>AWCD and functional-diversity indices were largely unaffected by the experimental treatments. Factorial ANOVA showed no differences in mean Shannon-H (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.085), Simpson-D (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.102) or Pielou&#x2019;s evenness J (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.213). Substrate utilisation richness (Richness-S), examined with Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis owing to non-normality, was likewise non-significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.526). The integrative AWCD metric yielded comparable values across all treatments (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.127). Taken together, these findings indicate that, although the chemical matrices and bacterial inoculants altered forage quality, they did not perturb the functional architecture of the rhizosphere microbiome. The community&#x2019;s collective capacity to metabolise a broad spectrum of carbon sources remained virtually unchanged, underscoring a high degree of functional resilience (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S5</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec24">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Community-level antibiotic resistance in the rhizosphere (cenoantibiogram)</title>
<p>Principal-component analysis of the 11-antibiotic MIC matrix showed that PC1 (47.1% of the variance) is driven mainly by amoxicillin (AML), while PC2 (22.3%) aligns with amoxicillin + clavulanate (AUG); together the first three PCs explained 80% of the information (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S2a</xref>). In the PC1&#x2013;PC2 biplot (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S2b</xref>) all inoculated soils&#x2014;irrespective of nutrient matrix&#x2014;clustered tightly on the negative side of PC1, whereas the three strain-free controls (WC0, CFC0, OPKC0) occupied the positive quadrant alongside the vectors of AML, AUG, piperacillin (PP) and cefotaxime (CTX). Ward clustering corroborated this pattern: every C1 or C2 sample formed a single blue clade, while each C0 treatment remained in a separate branch (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S2c</xref>).</p>
<p>Univariate statistics confirmed the multivariate split. To meet normality and variance-homogeneity assumptions, MIC values were analysed on a log&#x2082;-transformed scale prior to ANOVA. One-way ANOVA detected highly significant treatment effects for the four <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-lactams AML (<italic>F</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;19.54, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.001), AUG (<italic>F</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;19.04, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.001), PP (<italic>F</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;29.72, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.0002) and CTX (<italic>F</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;19.60, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.001); no differences emerged for cefpirome, carbapenems or quinolones (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05) (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S2d</xref>). A generalised linear model contrasting &#x201C;inoculated&#x201D; (C1&#x202F;+&#x202F;C2) versus &#x201C;non-inoculated&#x201D; (C0) rhizospheres yielded concordant effect sizes of &#x2212;19 to &#x2212;30&#x202F;mg&#x202F;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> for the same four antibiotics (all q&#x202F;&#x2264;&#x202F;0.01), whereas the remaining drugs showed non-significant coefficients (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S2e</xref>).</p>
<p>Finally, the correlation heat-map (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S2f</xref>) revealed a coherent susceptibility module: MICs of all <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-lactams were strongly and positively inter-correlated (0.60&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;r&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.95), while associations with non-&#x03B2;-lactams were weak or negative. Taken together, the variance structure (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S2a</xref>), ordination (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S2b</xref>), clustering (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S2c</xref>) and univariate (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S2d</xref>) tests converge on a single conclusion&#x2014;supplementing the valorised residue with either <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> or <italic>P. agronomica</italic> consistently lowers &#x03B2;-lactam resistance across all nutrient matrices, without affecting carbapenem or quinolone susceptibility, an effect that is reflected in the concerted behaviour of the &#x03B2;-lactam block (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5E</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil bacterial community structure (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-diversity). <bold>(A)</bold> PCoA based on Bray&#x2013;Curtis distances; axes 1 and 2 explain 32.9 and 8.1% of the variance, respectively. Each point represents the centroid of a treatment; error bars indicate &#x00B1; 1 SD among replicates. Treatments are color- and shape-coded as per the legend. <bold>(B)</bold> Hierarchical dendrogram (Ward linkage, Euclidean distance) built from the abundance matrix. The dashed red line marks the mean distance to the water control (WC0), used as an external reference.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1735729-g005.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Graph a) is a PCoA plot showing samples by treatments with axes representing variation percentages. Different treatments are indicated by colored dots. Graph b) is a dendrogram illustrating the Euclidean distance between treatments, with the red line indicating the average distance to WCO.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec25">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Structure and dynamics of the soil microbiome</title>
<sec id="sec26">
<label>3.5.1</label>
<title>Alpha diversity</title>
<p>A total of 730,983 16S reads (mean length 301&#x202F;bp; &#x2265; 14,171 valid sequences per sample; BioProject PRJNA 1162555) were obtained, and the rarefaction curves plateaued, confirming adequate sequencing depth.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec27">
<label>3.5.2</label>
<title>Effect of PGPB strains</title>
<p>Shannon indices ranged from 8.9 to 9.3, with no significant differences among biological treatments (C0 vs. C1 vs. C2); Mann&#x2013;Whitney tests yielded <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x2265;&#x202F;0.32 and q&#x202F;&#x2265;&#x202F;0.70 (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S3</xref>). Thus, inoculation with <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> or <italic>P. agronomica</italic> did not alter within-sample diversity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec28">
<label>3.5.3</label>
<title>Effect of the chemical matrix</title>
<p>Three pairwise comparisons showed no change (CF vs. OPK, CF vs. Water, OPK vs. Water; <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x2265;&#x202F;0.39), whereas the sterilised residue (OPK_ST) displayed a moderate decline in diversity: CF vs. OPK_ST, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.02, q&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.07; OPK vs. OPK_ST, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.008, q&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.03; OPK_ST vs. Water, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.002, q&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.01. These results indicate that UV sterilisation of the residue reduces bacterial richness/evenness relative to both its crude counterpart and the water control. No significant interactions between PGPB and matrix were detected (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05), so alpha diversity remains largely stable across the biological treatments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec29">
<label>3.5.4</label>
<title>&#x2002;&#x03B2;-diversity and hierarchical clustering</title>
<p>PCoA, Bray&#x2013;Curtis, accounted for 32.9 and 8.1% of the variance on the first two axes, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>). A test for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions detected no significant differences among treatments (p&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05), indicating that the observed separation reflects compositional shifts rather than changes in within-group variance. Centroids for the uninoculated controls (C0) clustered near the origin, whereas addition of <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> (C1) displaced centroids along axis 1, consistent with a moderate enrichment of rare taxa; the <italic>P. agronomica</italic> treatment (C2) produced a milder shift, remaining largely within the C0 cloud.</p>
<p>Ward&#x2019;s hierarchical clustering based on Euclidean distance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B</xref>) corroborated the PGPB-driven segregation. Uninoculated plots (WC0, CFC0, OPKC0, OPKSTC0) formed a single clade, while plots receiving OPK&#x00AE; plus PGPB (OPK-C1/C2 and OPKST-C1/C2) grouped on distinct branches, underscoring the combined influence of the organic matrix and the inoculants. A reference line corresponding to the mean distance from the water control (WC0) shows that all inoculated treatments exceed this threshold, whereas non-inoculated chemical and organic controls fall below it.</p>
<p>Although the global PERMANOVA was non-significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x003E;&#x202F;0.05), the centroid positions and dendrogram topology indicate that <italic>B. pretiosus</italic>&#x2014;and to a lesser extent <italic>P. agronomica</italic>&#x2014;induces a detectable re-ordering of community composition, particularly when applied to the OPK&#x00AE; matrix.</p>
<p>PERMANOVA comparisons between each treatment and the water control (WC0) found no compositional effect attributable to the chemical matrix alone (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05 for CF0, OPK0 and OPKSTC0). By contrast, inoculation with <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> (C1) shifted the centroid of every community&#x2014;whether applied with mineral fertiliser, crude residue or sterilised residue&#x2014;and generated Bray&#x2013;Curtis distances significantly greater than those to WC0 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). <italic>P. agronomica</italic> (C2) produced an intermediate response, whereas centroid distances in uninoculated plots remained close to the control. PERMDISP (F&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x221E;, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.532) confirmed homogeneity of within-group variance, indicating that the PERMANOVA signal reflects genuine compositional change rather than increased dispersion among replicates.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Multivariate distance of each treatment from the water control (WC0). Box-plots show Bray&#x2013;Curtis distances between each replicate and the WC0 centroid. Treatments combine four chemical matrices&#x2014;water (W), mineral fertiliser (CFC), organic residue (OPK) and sterilised residue (OPKST)&#x2014;with three biological levels: C0 (no inoculant), C1 (<italic>B. pretiosus</italic>) and C2 (<italic>P. agronomica</italic>). The number of replicates per group is given in parentheses beneath each label. The black horizontal line marks the median; box limits correspond to the first and third quartiles, and whiskers extend to 1.5&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;the interquartile range. Asterisks indicate the outcome of the Tukey HSD post-hoc comparison with WC0: <italic>&#x002A;p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05; <italic>&#x002A;&#x002A;p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1735729-g006.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Box plot comparing distances across different categories labeled WC0, CFC0, CFC1, CFC2, OPKC0, OPKC1, OPKC2, OPKSTC0, OPKSTC1, OPKSTC2, WC1, and WC2. Categories show varying median values, with OPKSTC2 exhibiting a significantly higher distance, marked by two asterisks.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec30">
<label>3.5.5</label>
<title>Shifts in genus-level dominance and inoculant persistence</title>
<p>Absolute read counts (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>) confirm successful establishment of the inoculated strains. In every C1 treatment the proportion of the genus <italic>Bacillus</italic> (dark-green block) increased markedly, whereas in C2 treatments a parallel rise was observed for <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> (yellow block). This pattern was consistent across all chemical matrices&#x2014;water, mineral fertiliser, crude residue and sterilised residue&#x2014;demonstrating that both PGPB strains persisted in the rhizosphere irrespective of background nutrition. Abundances of the other dominant genera (e.g., <italic>Arthrobacter</italic>, <italic>Rubrobacter</italic>, <italic>Streptomyces</italic>) remained comparatively stable, indicating that the inoculants did not displace the resident microbiota but rather added an extra functional layer to the community.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Absolute composition of the 20 most abundant bacterial genera per treatment. Each stacked bar represents the total number of 16S rRNA reads assigned to the 20 dominant genera for a given treatment, arranged by chemical matrix&#x2014;water (WC), mineral fertiliser (CFC), crude organic residue (OPK), and sterilised residue (OPK_ST)&#x2014;and biological level (C0, no inoculant; C1, <italic>B. pretiosus</italic>; C2, <italic>P. agronomica</italic>). Coloured segments correspond to the genera listed in the legend (e.g., <italic>Arthrobacter</italic>, <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Rubrobacter</italic>, <italic>Streptomyces</italic>). The total bar height denotes absolute read count, allowing visual comparison of genus contributions and confirmation of inoculant persistence across treatments.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1735729-g007.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart showing the absolute abundance of various bacterial genera across different conditions (WC, CFC, OPKC), with each bar divided into colored sections representing genera like Arthrobacter, Pseudomonas, Skermanella, and others. The y-axis ranges from 0 to 1200.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> displays three parallel box-plots in which each point is the pairwise distance of a sample to every water-treated community (WC), calculated with the Jaccard index and then decomposed into its turnover (taxon replacement) and nestedness (species-loss/gain) components. Distances are grouped by fertiliser: Water, mineral fertiliser (Chemical Fertilizer) and the valorised organic residue (ORGAON PK). Total Jaccard (red boxes, left panel) show median dissimilarities cluster around 0.55 for all three fertilisers and do not differ statistically (Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis &#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>&#x202F;=&#x202F;3.50, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.17), indicating a comparable overall share of genera between each treatment and the water reference. Nestedness (green boxes, centre panel) contributions are an order of magnitude smaller (medians &#x003C; 0.15). Nonetheless, a clear upward gradient is evident: Water &#x003C; Chemical &#x003C; ORGAON PK, and the difference is highly significant (&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>&#x202F;=&#x202F;24.0, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;2.1&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>&#x2212;6</sup>). This pattern denotes a modest but measurable introduction of genera unique to the organic residue.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Partitioning of &#x03B2;-diversity by fertiliser type. Box-plots depict pairwise distances relative to all samples in the &#x2018;water&#x2019; group for each Jaccard component: total Jaccard (red), nestedness (green), and turnover (blue). The Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis <italic>p</italic>-value comparing water, mineral fertiliser, and the organic residue OPK is indicated on each panel. Horizontal lines represent medians; boxes enclose the first and third quartiles; whiskers extend to 1.5&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;the inter-quartile range.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1735729-g008.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Boxplot comparing the Jaccard, Nestedness, and Turnover metrics for different fertilizers: Water, Chemical Fertilizer, and ORGAON PK. Jaccard is shown in red with a p-value of 0.17, Nestedness in green with a p-value of 2.1e-06, and Turnover in blue with a p-value of 0.011, illustrating pairwise distance to samples where the fertilizer is water.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Finally, turnover (blue boxes, right panel) dominates the dissimilarity structure. Median values rise from &#x2248; 0.30 (Water) to 0.55 (ORGAON PK), with the mineral fertiliser intermediate; the Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis test confirms heterogeneity among groups (&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>&#x202F;=&#x202F;9.0, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.011). Hence, most compositional change stems from replacement of resident genera rather than simple gains or losses. Collectively, these results show that switching from water to either fertiliser reshuffles the bacterial community, but the organic residue drives a markedly higher taxon replacement while adding only a small nestedness component. The mineral fertiliser elicits a weaker, intermediate response, reinforcing the view that ORGAON PK induces the most pronounced restructuring of the soil microbiome.</p>
<p>Finally, to pinpoint the taxa underlying the fertiliser-driven <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-diversity shifts (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>), we applied ANCOM-BC&#x2014;a compositionality-aware test that returns bias-corrected log-fold changes (LFC) and controls the false-discovery rate (FDR). Only features with FDR&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05 are displayed in the <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S3</xref>. At the family level (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S3a</xref>), the sterilised residue (OPK_ST) was significantly enriched in five families&#x2014;an uncultured lineage (t__uncultured), Prolixibacteraceae, Labraceae, Frankiaceae and Rikenellaceae&#x2014;all showing LFC&#x202F;&#x2248;&#x202F;+0.8 to +1.0 relative to the water control. The crude residue (OPK) exhibited a single significant depletion of Xanthobacteraceae (LFC&#x202F;&#x2248;&#x202F;&#x2212;0.4; <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S3b</xref>). At the genus level (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S3c</xref>), OPK_ST displayed a broader enrichment, with 10 genera rising by &#x2265;0.6 log&#x2082; units: Steroidobacteraceae (unclassified genus), Chitinophaga, Jatrophihabitans, JG1-0001001-H03, Corallococcus, Nitrosomonadaceae (unclassified genus), Variovorax, Sandaracinus, WCHB1-32 and Labrys. No significant changes were detected for the mineral fertiliser (CF) or for either inoculated matrix at the family or genus rank, indicating that OPK_ST alone drove the strongest compositional signal. These results demonstrate that the sterilised organic residue selectively recruits polymer-degraders (e.g., Chitinophaga), nitrifiers (Variovorax, Nitrosomonadaceae) and other specialised taxa without broad gains or losses in richness, complementing the turnover patterns shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec31">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Functional-gene prediction (PICRUSt2)</title>
<p>PICRUSt2 inference of 16S rRNA data yielded 6,042 KEGG Orthologues (KOs) that collapsed into 11 top-level KEGG pathways and 23 COG functional categories (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figures 1A</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">B</xref>).</p>
<p>Across the four nutrient matrices&#x2014;water (WC), mineral fertiliser (CFC), crude residue (OPK) and its UV-sterilised counterpart (OPK_ST)&#x2014;the rhizosphere microbiomes displayed strikingly similar functional fingerprints:</p>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>KEGG profiles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>). Amino-acid metabolism (mean &#x00B1; SD&#x202F;=&#x202F;23&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1%), carbohydrate metabolism (18&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1%) and cofactor-and-vitamin metabolism (14&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1%) dominated every treatment, followed by energy metabolism (11&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.5%). Lower-abundance categories&#x2014;lipid, nucleotide and xenobiotic metabolism&#x2014;each remained below 8%. A Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis test on ARiSTa-transformed relative abundances detected no pathway with FDR-adjusted <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05, confirming that neither the chemical matrices nor the PGPB inoculants reshaped the overarching metabolic blueprint.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>COG profiles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>). The same functional stability emerged at COG level: transport and metabolism of amino acids (15&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1%) and carbohydrates (12&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.8%) were followed by energy production &#x0026; conversion (10&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.6%) and cell-wall/membrane biogenesis (8&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.4%). Again, no category differed significantly after multiple-test correction.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
<p>A Random-Forest classifier built on all KO and COG features reached only 54% accuracy (10-fold cross-validation) in separating treatments, with mean decrease-in-Gini values &#x003C; 0.005 for the top 15 predictors&#x2014;further evidence that functional potential remained essentially conserved.</p>
<p>Taken together, the PICRUSt2/COG analyses corroborate the Biolog EcoPlate data: although OPK matrices and inoculants altered taxonomic composition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figures 5</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">8</xref>) and forage quality (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">4</xref>), the core metabolic repertoire of the rhizosphere community&#x2014;nutrient acquisition, energy generation and biosynthetic capacity&#x2014;remained functionally redundant and resilient.</p>
<p>Despite the broadly similar KEGG/COG profiles shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>, a random-forest classifier built on the centred-log-ratio-transformed KO table achieved an overall accuracy of 82% (10-fold cross-validation) in separating the 12 fertiliser &#x00D7; inoculant combinations. The 15 orthologues with the highest Mean Decrease Accuracy (MDA) are plotted in <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S4</xref>. Most belong to pathways highlighted previously&#x2014;carbohydrate turnover (e.g., K00662, glutamate dehydrogenase; K01243, <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-galactosidase), amino-acid metabolism (K10227, lysine 6-dehydrogenase) and energy production (K00863, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase). Two nitrogen-cycle genes (K00971, glutamine synthetase; K21664, hydroxylamine oxidoreductase) and a xenobiotic-degradation marker (K14080, benzoate 1,2-dioxygenase) also ranked highly, mirroring the enrichment of nitrifiers and polymer degraders detected with ANCOM-BC. The accompanying heat-map shows that these orthologues are most abundant in the crude-residue treatments (OPK-C1/C2) and, to a lesser extent, in the sterilised residue (OPK_ST), whereas water and mineral controls display lower, more homogeneous levels. Collectively, the model pinpoints a limited set of functions&#x2014;principally linked to carbon depolymerisation, nitrogen assimilation and aromatic-ring cleavage&#x2014;that differentiate residue-based biofertilisers from mineral or water regimes, providing a mechanistic bridge between the taxonomic turnover (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>) and the enhanced forage quality reported earlier (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">4</xref>).</p>
<p>For each fertiliser &#x00D7; inoculant combination the KO with the highest centred-log-ratio abundance was retrieved (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S1</xref>), revealing treatment-specific functional signatures. Water + <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> (WC1) was enriched in K12057 (TraF, conjugative-pilus assembly) and K16439 (EvaE reductase), hinting at horizontal-gene-transfer potential and specialised catabolism even in the absence of an organic carrier. Water + <italic>P. agronomica</italic> (WC2) showed maximal expression of K01893 (asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase), consistent with basal protein-synthesis activity typical of nutrient-limited controls. In the crude residue without inoculant (OPKC0), K08965 (methyl-thio-pentyl-phosphate enolase) dominated, indicating sulphur-compound turnover intrinsic to the humic matrix. OPK&#x202F;+&#x202F;<italic>B. pretiosus</italic> (OPKC1) was characterised by K00455 (3,4-dihydroxy-phenylacetate dioxygenase), a key enzyme for aromatic-ring cleavage, supporting the observed boost in lignocellulose digestibility. The most complex profile emerged under the sterilised residue plus <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> (OPKSTC1), where transporters (K11960, K02778, K09971), peptidases (K16922, K04772), and biosynthetic enzymes (K00797, K00822) were simultaneously over-represented, suggesting that Bacillus exploits the competition-free niche by activating broad nutrient-acquisition and stress-response circuits. Conversely, OPKST + <italic>P. agronomica</italic> (OPKSTC2) preferentially expressed K06436 (spore-coat assembly) and an uncharacterised protein (K07148), pointing to a more streamlined adaptation strategy.</p>
<p>Overall, these patterns substantiate that the functional repertoire of the rhizosphere is co-shaped by carrier chemistry, sterilisation status and inoculant identity, with <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> in the sterilised matrix displaying the greatest breadth of metabolic activation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec32">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>This work set out to test whether a humic-rich, antibiotic-free residue (ORGAON&#x00AE; PK) can be &#x201C;smart-tuned&#x201D; into an agronomically useful and ecologically safe biofertiliser by matching it with genomically screened PGPB. On the alkaline, carbonate-rich soil of Villanueva de San Mancio (pH 8.1; 19% CaCO&#x2083;; 12&#x202F;g C kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>; <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S2</xref>) the crude residue boosted alfalfa dry-matter yield by 35&#x2013;74%, while its UV-sterilised counterpart still delivered 21&#x2013;46% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Adding a single inoculant channelled those generic gains into complementary nutritional niches: Strain C1 doubled biomass over the water control and improved cell-wall digestibility (&#x2191; TTFDND, &#x2193; uNDF&#x2082;&#x2084;&#x2080;; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), consistent with its cellulase/pectinase and phosphate-solubilising arsenal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Li et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Wu et al., 2025</xref>). Strain C2 raised crude protein, amino acids and water-soluble carbohydrates, reflecting its siderophore-mediated micronutrient capture and trophic benefits to legumes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Arshad et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Gulati et al., 2024</xref>). Hence, OPK supplies the carbon&#x2013;nutrient scaffold while C1 or C2 fine-tune fibre or protein&#x202F;/&#x202F;energy quality, validating the chemical&#x2013;biological-synergy hypothesis.</p>
<p>Ecologically, the rhizosphere proved resilient. Shannon and Simpson indices (&#x2248; 9.0 and 0.91, respectively) and global carbon-utilisation potential (AWCD &#x2248; 0.47&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.03) were unchanged, yet Bray&#x2013;Curtis PERMANOVA revealed significant&#x2014;but modest&#x2014;centroid shifts for every C1 treatment and a milder shift for C2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>), with PERMDISP confirming homogeneous dispersion. <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-Partitioning showed these shifts were driven almost exclusively by taxon turnover (median 0.40&#x2013;0.55; <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.011) rather than nestedness (&#x003C; 0.15; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>), indicating genuine replacement, not richness loss. ANCOM-BC (FDR&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) identified the recruits: polymer degraders (Chitinophaga, Steroidobacteraceae), nitrifiers (Variovorax, Nitrosomonadaceae), predatory myxobacteria (Corallococcus, Sandaracinus) and the candidate clades WCHB1-32 and JG1_0001001-H03 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>; <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S7</xref>). Absolute 16S counts confirmed that <italic>Bacillus</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> established 6&#x2013;12-fold yet left core genera (<italic>Arthrobacter, Rubrobacter, Streptomyces</italic>) unperturbed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>); the microbiome is therefore compositionally refreshed but functionally redundant, sustaining the stable AWCD values seen in <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Material 2</xref>. Importantly, the field site used in this study contained no detectable or historical sources of Hg contamination, and no Hg amendments were applied. Consequently, the metal-accumulating trait previously characterised in these strains cannot operate in this system, and there is no realistic pathway for Hg transfer to plant tissues beyond natural background levels. Nonetheless, we acknowledge that in contaminated soils or in proximity to industrial or mining sources, monitoring Hg in forage tissues would be essential, and we highlight this as a priority for future applications. The functional-gene predictions sharpen this picture. PICRUSt2&#x202F;+&#x202F;COG/KEGG inference showed broadly similar pathway profiles across matrices, but KO-level discrimination (Random-Forest, <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S4</xref>) revealed that the residue, its sterilisation status and the inoculant together sculpt distinct functional repertoires. In sterilised OPK plus <italic>Bacillus</italic> sp. <italic>C1</italic> (OPKSTC1) transporters (K11960, K02778, K09971), proteases (K16922, K04772) and biosynthetic enzymes (K00797, K00822) were simultaneously up-ranked, indicating that <italic>Bacillus</italic> exploits the competition-free niche by activating broad nutrient-acquisition and stress-response circuits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Buqori et al., 2025</xref>). By contrast, the OPKSTC2 condition (sterilised OPK plus <italic>P. agronomica</italic>) was associated with a narrower set of PICRUSt2-predicted discriminant KOs, including K06436 (annotated as &#x201C;spore-coat assembly&#x201D;) and an uncharacterised protein. Because <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> is non-sporulating, we interpret this signal as a community-level inference likely arising from background taxa and/or limitations of marker-based functional prediction, rather than sporulation by the inoculant. Future genome/transcriptome-based validation will be required to assign these functions to specific organisms. Water controls expressed genes for conjugative transfer (K12057) and tRNA charging (K01893), reflecting maintenance metabolism. These patterns agree with the idea that competitive release in simplified communities allows opportunists such as <italic>Bacillus</italic> to expand their functional footprint (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Hall et al., 2018</xref>) whereas specialists remain bounded. Future transcriptomic validation will be needed, yet the predictions align with the nutritional and degradative gains measured in planta.</p>
<p>Antibiotic-resistance phenotypes told a contrasting story. Whereas raw manures often inflate <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-lactam and metal-resistance genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Liu et al., 2024</xref>), every OPK&#x202F;+&#x202F;PGPB soil clustered in the low-resistance quadrant of the MIC-PCA (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S2b</xref>) and showed 19&#x2013;30&#x202F;mg&#x202F;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> drops in amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin and cefotaxime (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figures S2d,e</xref>). The effect likely stems from the antibiotic-free matrix and low-resistance inoculants, which together displaced &#x03B2;-lactamase producers without the ARG co-selection reported for mineral NPK (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Xiaolong Lin and Yanjun Li, 2024</xref>). Such mitigation aligns with the scant reports were &#x201C;screened&#x201D; biofertilisers suppress rather than spread ARGs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Zhang et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>Although these shifts are consistent with the ecological displacement or down-regulation of <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-lactamase producers reported in the literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Murray et al., 2024</xref>), the mechanism remains correlative in our study, as no gene-level or transcript-level measurements were performed. Ongoing work using strain-resolved metatranscriptomics and targeted qPCR assays will be required to confirm whether &#x03B2;-lactamase expression or abundance is directly affected by the treatments.</p>
<p>In summary, two treatments stand out: crude OPK&#x202F;+&#x202F;C1, delivering the highest biomass and fibre digestibility, and crude OPK&#x202F;+&#x202F;C2, maximising protein, energy yield, both while maintaining microbial alpha-diversity and lowering <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-lactam resistance. These formulations therefore represent field-verified, One-Health-aligned alternatives to mineral fertilisation.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, this is a single-site, single-season proof-of-concept. Multi-year, multi-soil trials, coupled with shotgun metatranscriptomics and functional assays, are now needed to confirm gene-expression patterns, unravel nutrient-cycling and resistance-mitigation mechanisms, and optimise dosage and carrier&#x2013;inoculant pairings for broader agro-ecological deployment.</p>
<p>This exploratory field trial set out to determine whether a humic-rich, antibiotic-free residue (ORGAON&#x00AE; PK) can be &#x201C;tuned&#x201D; with genomically vetted PGPB to deliver agronomic benefits without compromising soil-microbiome integrity or antimicrobial-resistance profiles. Working on a single alkaline, carbon-poor site, we reached the following main conclussions:</p>
<list list-type="order">
<list-item>
<p>Crude ORGAON&#x00AE; PK increased dry-matter yield by 35&#x2013;74%, while its UV-sterilised fraction still added 21&#x2013;46%. The two PGPB redirected these gains into complementary nutritional niches: <italic>Bacillus</italic> sp. C1 improved total-tract fibre digestibility (&#x2191; TTFDND, &#x2193; uNDF&#x2082;&#x2084;&#x2080;), whereas <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. C2 boosted the protein&#x2013;energy fraction (crude protein &#x2191; 3&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1% DM; WSC &#x2191; 45%).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Classical <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>-diversity and Biolog AWCD remained stable, yet &#x03B2;-diversity partitioning revealed turnover-driven reshuffling that enriched polymer degraders (Chitinophaga, Steroidobacteraceae) and nitrifiers (Variovorax, Nitrosomonadaceae) without richness loss. Both inoculants persisted 6- to 12-fold above baseline while leaving dominant native genera intact, preserving functional redundancy.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>PICRUSt2/KEGG-COG inference plus Random-Forest ranking showed that the residue&#x2013;inoculant combination selectively amplified transporter, protease and biosynthetic KOs in the OPKST + <italic>B. pretiosus</italic> treatment, whereas P. agronomica expressed a narrower suite centred on spore-coat and stress proteins. These patterns support a scenario in which competitive release (after sterilisation) allows <italic>Bacillus</italic> to expand its metabolic footprint, while <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> follows a more conservative strategy.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>All biofertilised soils clustered in the low-resistance quadrant of the MIC-PCA and showed 19&#x2013;30&#x202F;mg&#x202F;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> drops in four sentinel &#x03B2;-lactams, countering the ARG amplification often associated with raw manures or mineral fertilisers.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
<p>Taken together, these first-season, single-site data lend cautious support to our working hypothesis: a chemically selective, contaminant-free residue can be biologically tailored by screened PGPB to (i) enhance yield, (ii) target specific nutritional traits, (iii) steer the microbiome towards degradative and nitrifying guilds while maintaining metabolic breadth, and (iv) attenuate &#x03B2;-lactam resistance&#x2014;thereby offering a promising, One-Health-aligned biofertiliser option.</p>
<sec id="sec33">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Limitations and next steps</title>
<p>The study is intentionally proof-of-concept. Multi-season, multi-soil trials are now required to confirm agronomic consistency, while strain-resolved metatranscriptomics and functional assays should dissect the nutrient-cycling pathways and competitive interactions that underlie the observed gene-prediction patterns and resistome decline. Finally, extending the approach to mixed bacterial&#x2013;fungal consortia and archaeal markers may further optimise formulation performance and ecological resilience.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec34">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>According with the guidelines all the 16s rRNA sequencing data have been submited in the NCBI repository under the accesion number: PRJNA1162555 (<ext-link xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA1162555" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA1162555</ext-link>).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec35">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>VF-P: Investigation, Software, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Data curation. MM: Methodology, Formal analysis, Supervision, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Data curation, Software, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Resources, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Validation. DG-R: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Formal analysis. AP: Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Visualization, Validation, Project administration, Conceptualization, Methodology. DI: Software, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. PG: Supervision, Project administration, Conceptualization, Validation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Formal analysis, Resources, Visualization.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgement</title>
<p>We thank the farmers of Villanueva de San Mancio (Valladolid, Spain) for granting access to active alfalfa fields and for their trust in research-led improvements to crop management. We also acknowledge M&#x00E1;xima Abonos, S.L. for providing the valorised horticultural residue (commercial name ORGAON&#x00AE; PK) and for their continued support of R&#x0026;D in biofertilisers. Rock River Labs Spain kindly performed NIR nutritional analyses.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec36">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec37">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec38">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec39">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1735729/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1735729/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.DOCX" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alattas</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Glick</surname><given-names>B. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murphy</surname><given-names>D. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Harnessing Pseudomonas spp. for sustainable plant crop protection</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>1485197</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2024.1485197</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39640850</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arora</surname><given-names>N. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mishra</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Current scenario and future directions for sustainable development goal 2: a roadmap to zero hunger</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sustain.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>129</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>133</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42398-022-00235-8</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37521584</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arshad</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shaharoona</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mahmood</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Inoculation with <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp. containing ACC-deaminase partially eliminates the effects of drought stress on growth, yield, and ripening of pea (<italic>Pisum sativum</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Pedosphere</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>611</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>620</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1002-0160(08)60055-7</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Atinkut</surname><given-names>H. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gai</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Cognition of agriculture waste and payments for a circular agriculture model in Central China</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>10826</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-67358-y</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32616725</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bakaeva</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chetverikov</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Timergalin</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feoktistova</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rameev</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chetverikova</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>PGP-bacterium <italic>Pseudomonas protegens</italic> improves bread wheat growth and mitigates herbicide and drought stress</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>3289</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants11233289</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36501327</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buqori</surname><given-names>D. M. A. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sugiharto</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suherman</surname></name> <name><surname>Siswoyo</surname><given-names>T. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hariyono</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Mitigating drought stress by application of drought-tolerant <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. enhanced root architecture, growth, antioxidant and photosynthetic genes expression in sugarcane</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>5259</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-025-89457-4</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dasgan</surname><given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aldiyab</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elgudayem</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ikiz</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gruda</surname><given-names>N. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effect of biofertilizers on leaf yield, nitrate amount, mineral content and antioxidants of basil (<italic>Ocimum basilicum</italic> L.) in a floating culture</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>20917</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-022-24799-x</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36463305</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Devi</surname><given-names>N. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Devi</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>K. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Impact of chemical fertilizer and composts application on growth and yield of rice in Northeast India</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>8575</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-025-93684-0</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40074877</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Djordjevic</surname><given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jarocki</surname><given-names>V. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seemann</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cummins</surname><given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Watt</surname><given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drigo</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Genomic surveillance for antimicrobial resistance &#x2014; a one health perspective</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Genet.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>142</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>157</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41576-023-00649-y</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37749210</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Douglas</surname><given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maffei</surname><given-names>V. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zaneveld</surname><given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yurgel</surname><given-names>S. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname><given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>685</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>688</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41587-020-0548-6</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32483366</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dzvene</surname><given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chiduza</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Application of biofertilizers for enhancing beneficial microbiomes in push&#x2013;pull cropping systems: a review</article-title>. <source>Bacteria</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>271</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>286</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/bacteria3040018</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nie</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Alfalfa plant age (3 to 8 years) affects soil physicochemical properties and rhizosphere microbial communities in saline&#x2013;alkaline soil</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>9777</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy13122977</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">FAO and UNEP</collab></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <source>Global assessment of soil pollution: Report</source>. <publisher-loc>Rome</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>FAO</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Biswas</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ji</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Long-term organic material application enhances black soil productivity by improving aggregate stability and dissolved organic matter dynamics</article-title>. <source>Field Crop Res.</source> <volume>328</volume>:<fpage>109946</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109946</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garc&#x00ED;a-Villaraco Velasco</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Probanza</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gutierrez Ma&#x00F1;ero</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramos</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lucas Garc&#x00ED;a</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Functional diversity of rhizosphere microorganisms from different genotypes of <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic></article-title>. <source>Community Ecol.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>119</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1556/comec.10.2009.1.13</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garrido-Sanz</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keel</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Seed-borne bacteria drive wheat rhizosphere microbiome assembly via niche partitioning and facilitation</article-title>. <source>Nat. Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>1130</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1144</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41564-025-01973-1</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40140705</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Giannelli</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bisceglie</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pelosi</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bonati</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cardarelli</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antenozio</surname><given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Phyto-beneficial traits of rhizosphere bacteria: in vitro exploration of plant growth promoting and phytopathogen biocontrol ability of selected strains isolated from harsh environments</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>230</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants11020230</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35050118</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Reguero</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robas-Mora</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fern&#x00E1;ndez-Pastrana</surname><given-names>V. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Probanza-Lobo</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jim&#x00E9;nez-G&#x00F3;mez</surname><given-names>P. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Reduced antibiotic resistance in the rhizosphere of <italic>Lupinus albus</italic> in mercury-contaminated soil mediated by the addition of PGPB</article-title>. <source>Biology</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>801</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/biology12060801</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37372086</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goswami</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thakker</surname><given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dhandhukia</surname><given-names>P. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a review</article-title>. <source>Cogent Food Agric.</source> <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>1127500</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/23311932.2015.1127500</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gulati</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thakur</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vyas</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dhar</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pal</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Fostering climate-resilient agriculture with ACC-deaminase producing rhizobacterial biostimulants from the cold deserts of the Indian Himalayas</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manag.</source> <volume>371</volume>:<fpage>123075</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123075</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39471599</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hall</surname><given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harrison</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brockhurst</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Competitive species interactions constrain abiotic adaptation in a bacterial soil community</article-title>. <source>Evol. Letters</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>580</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>589</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/evl3.83</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30564441</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ou</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Trichoderma-amended biofertilizer stimulates soil resident aspergillus population for joint plant growth promotion</article-title>. <source>NPJ Biofilms Microb.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>57</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41522-022-00321-z</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35831320</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huiqiong</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chaosheng</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuanyuan</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Impact of <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> beneficial bacterial agents on soil-borne diseases, growth, and economics of continuous cropping of flue-cured tobacco</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot.</source> <volume>177</volume>:<fpage>106556</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106556</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kanter</surname><given-names>D. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Winiwarter</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bodirsky</surname><given-names>B. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bouwman</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boyer</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buckle</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A framework for nitrogen futures in the shared socioeconomic pathways</article-title>. <source>Glob. Environ. Change</source> <volume>61</volume>:<fpage>102029</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102029</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32601516</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>King</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Recycling our way to sustainability</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>611</volume>, <fpage>S7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>S7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/d41586-022-03646-z</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeyasundar</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azeem</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tabassum</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Bacillus subtilis and saponin shifted the availability of heavy metals, health indicators of smelter contaminated soil, and the physiological indicators of <italic>Symphytum officinale</italic></article-title>. <source>Chemosphere</source> <volume>285</volume>:<fpage>131454</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131454</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34271464</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Z. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Konstantinidis</surname><given-names>K. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Y. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Organic fertilization co-selects genetically linked antibiotic and metal(loid) resistance genes in global soil microbiome</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>5168</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-024-</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>A genomic catalogue of soil microbiomes boosts mining of biodiversity and genetic resources</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>7318</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-023-43000-z</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37951952</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Menegat</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ledo</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tirado</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Greenhouse gas emissions from global production and use of nitrogen synthetic fertilisers in agriculture</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>14490</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-022-18773-w</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36008570</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Murray</surname><given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hayes</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Snape</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kasprzyk-Hordern</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaze</surname><given-names>W. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murray</surname><given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Co-selection for antibiotic resistance by environmental contaminants</article-title>. <source>NPJ Antimicrob Resist</source> <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>9</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s44259-024-00026-7</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39843965</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Musicha</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morse</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cocker</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mugisha</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jewell</surname><given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feasey</surname><given-names>N. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Time to define one health approaches to tackling antimicrobial resistance</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>8782</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-024-53057-z</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39389965</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nabati</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nezami</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yousefi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oskoueian</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oskoueian</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmadi-Lahijani</surname><given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Biofertilizers containing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhance nutrient uptake and improve the growth and yield of chickpea plants in an arid environment</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>8331</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-025-93070-w</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40065116</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>T. B. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bonkowski</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dumack</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>T. B.-A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Q.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>J.-Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Protistan predation selects for antibiotic resistance in soil bacterial communities</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>2182</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2189</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-023-01524-8</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37794244</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pagaling</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hough</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Avery</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robinson</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Freitag</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coull</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Antibiotic resistance patterns in soils across the Scottish landscape</article-title>. <source>Commun. Earth Environ.</source> <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>403</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s43247-023-01057-0</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pang</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tao</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayra-Pardo</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Plant organ-and growth stage-diversity of endophytic bacteria with potential as biofertilisers isolated from wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>BMC Plant Biol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12870-022-03615-8</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>P&#x00E9;rez-Valera</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kyselkov&#x00E1;</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sladecek</surname><given-names>F. X. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goberna</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elhottov&#x00E1;</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Native soil microorganisms hinder the soil enrichment with antibiotic resistance genes following manure applications</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>6760</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-42734-5</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31043618</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pinna-Hern&#x00E1;ndez</surname><given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fern&#x00E1;ndez</surname><given-names>F. G. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Segura</surname><given-names>J. G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x00F3;pez</surname><given-names>J. L. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Solar drying of greenhouse crop residues for energy valorization: modeling and determination of optimal conditions</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>2001</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy10122001</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pr&#x0103;v&#x0103;lie</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Borrelli</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Panagos</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ballabio</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lugato</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chappell</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>A unifying modelling of multiple land degradation pathways in Europe</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>3862</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-024-48252-x</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38719912</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosado</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Responses of soil microbial communities and nutrient dynamics under continuous alfalfa (<italic>Medicago sativa</italic> L.) cultivation</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>197</volume>:<fpage>105365</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105356</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rafique</surname><given-names>M. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Wabel</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Farraj</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Wabel</surname><given-names>M. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Farraj</surname><given-names>A. S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmad</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Incorporation of biochar and semi-interpenetrating biopolymer to synthesize new slow release fertilizers and their impact on soil moisture and nutrients availability</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>9563</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-025-90367-8</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40108244</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Robas-Mora</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fern&#x00E1;ndez</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oliva</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lobo</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x00F3;mez</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Plant growth promotion of the forage plant <italic>Lupinus albus</italic> Var. Orden dorado using <italic>Pseudomonas agronomica</italic> sp. nov. and <italic>Bacillus pretiosus</italic> sp. nov. added over a valorized agricultural biowaste</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>1046201</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.1046201</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schillaci</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vieira</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Munaf&#x00F2;</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montanarella</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of the United Nations sustainable development goal 15.3. 1 indicator of land degradation in the European Union</article-title>. <source>Land Degrad. Dev.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>250</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>268</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ldr.4457</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schillaci</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raio</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sillo</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zampieri</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mahmood</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anjum</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title><italic>Pseudomonas</italic> and <italic>Curtobacterium</italic> strains from olive rhizosphere characterized and evaluated for plant growth promoting traits</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>2245</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants11172245</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36079627</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vidal</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonz&#x00E1;lez</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santander</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>P&#x00E9;rez</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gallardo</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Management of rhizosphere microbiota and plant production under drought stress: a comprehensive review</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>2437</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants11182437</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36145836</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Si</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Flavones enrich rhizosphere <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> to enhance nitrogen utilization and secondary root growth in <italic>Populus</italic></article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>1461</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-025-56226-w</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39920117</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Taxonomic response of bacterial and fungal populations to biofertilizers applied to soil or substrate in greenhouse-grown cucumber</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>18522</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-022-22673-4</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36323754</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiaolong Lin</surname><given-names>G. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yanjun Li</surname><given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Chemical fertilizers promote dissemination of ARGs in maize rhizosphere: an overlooked risk revealed after 37-year traditional agriculture practice</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>941</volume>:<fpage>173737</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173737</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chu</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Carbon sequestration potential and its main drivers in soils under alfalfa (<italic>Medicago sativa</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>935</volume>:<fpage>173338</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173338</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38763193</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yi</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sheng-Mao</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chun-Yan</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jia-Yu</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Contributions of different N sources to crop N nutrition in a Chinese rice field</article-title>. <source>Pedosphere</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>198</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>208</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60007-0</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>M.-T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bao</surname><given-names>Y.-Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>B.-Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>L.-R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y.-T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>E.-X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Impact of a potent strain of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> S1 on bacterial community composition, enzymatic activity, and nitrogen content in cucumber rhizosphere soils</article-title>. <source>Curr. Microbiol.</source> <volume>81</volume>:<fpage>358</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00284-024-03876-6</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39285060</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1473602/overview">Min-Chong Shen</ext-link>, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by" id="fn0003">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1461369/overview">Juan Alfredo Hern&#x00E1;ndez-Garc&#x00ED;a</ext-link>, National Polytechnic Institute (IPN), Mexico</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3273471/overview">Zhikang Wang</ext-link>, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, China</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>