<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2025.1659475</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>EM biofertilizer and organic fertilizer co-application modulate vegetation-soil-bacteria interaction networks in artificial grasslands of alpine mining regions</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lyu</surname><given-names>Liangyu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3119817/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>Jianjun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>Pei</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3148541/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>Zongcheng</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Fayi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Academy of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Qinghai University</institution>, <addr-line>Xining</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Key Laboratory of Adaptive Management of Alpine Grassland</institution>, <addr-line>Xining</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>State Key Laboratory of Ecology and Plateau Agriculture and Animal Husbandry in Sanjiangyuan Jointly Established by the Ministry of Provincial Affairs, Qinghai University</institution>, <addr-line>Xining</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1052903/overview">Abhishek Walia</ext-link>, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, India</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0003">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1981213/overview">Rui Zhang</ext-link>, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1990227/overview">Zhenrong Lin</ext-link>, China Agricultural University, China</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Jianjun Shi, <email>shjj0318@sina.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>18</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1659475</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>04</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>26</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Lyu, Shi, Gao, Cai and Li.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Lyu, Shi, Gao, Cai and Li</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>To address vegetation establishment challenges caused by poor soil in the alpine mining areas of the Qinghai&#x2013;Tibet Plateau. Through three-year field experiments, this study systematically investigated the effects of combined EM microbial fertilizer and organic fertilizer application on vegetation community characteristics, soil physicochemical properties, and bacterial community diversity/functional structure in artificial grasslands of alpine mining areas. Key findings include: (1) The synergistic treatment of EM biofertilizer and organic fertilizer significantly improved the physical and chemical properties of soil and the characteristics of vegetation community. The Y2E2 treatment consistently enhanced vegetation community characteristics and soil physicochemical metrics in 2023 and 2024. Compared to the control (CK), it increased soil total nitrogen (TN) by 68.92 and 76.31%, reduced pH by 8.31 and 11.11%, and boosted biomass by 75.97 and 84.02%, confirming its efficacy in alleviating nutrient stress and promoting plant growth. (2) Microbiome analysis revealed that biofertilizer treatments significantly improved soil bacterial community structure. The Y2E2 and Y2E3 showed the highest OTU numbers (2,481 and 2,501 respectively). The Y2E3 increased relative abundance of Actinomycetota (+18.2%) and Acidobacteria (+12.7%) compared to CK (organic fertilizer 0.00&#x202F;kg&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>&#x202F;+&#x202F;EM biofertilizer 0.00&#x202F;kg&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>), while reducing Pseudomonadota (&#x2212;14.3%). The Y2E2 improved Shannon (2.36%), Ace (6.44%), and Chao1 (5.05%) indices versus CK. Y1E1 exhibited 67.11% positive correlations in microbial co-occurrence networks. (3) Environmental drivers and functional activation: Mantel tests and RDA revealed soil electrical conductivity (SEC) and pH were negatively correlated with bacterial diversity indices (except Simpson). Other soil physical and chemical indexes and plant community indexes are positively correlated with soil bacterial diversity index except Simpson index. Soil pH emerged as the key driver of bacterial community construction. Combined fertilization neutralized alkalinity, activated manganese-oxidizing and photosynthetic microbes, while excessive application triggered heterotroph competition. In summary, the combined application of EM microbial fertilizer and organic fertilizer accelerates biomass accumulation in plant communities by regulating soil pH and improving the structure, function, and diversity of soil bacterial communities. These ecological processes involving plant-soil-microbe interactions expedite the restoration of ecological functions in artificial grasslands within alpine mining areas. Among the treatments, Y2E2 demonstrated the best performance, with an application rate of 600.00&#x202F;kg of EM biofertilizer per hectare combined with 20.00 tons of organic fertilizer.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Muli mining area</kwd>
<kwd>EM biofertilizer</kwd>
<kwd>sown pasture</kwd>
<kwd>soil physicochemical properties</kwd>
<kwd>bacterial community structure</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn1">k152126</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn2">2024-NK-P24</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn1">China Coal Group and Qinghai University</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn2">Qinghai Provincial Science and Technology Commissioner Project</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="9"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="50"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="10203"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Terrestrial Microbiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The Muli mining area, located at the southern foot of the Qilian Mountains and adjacent to Qilian Mountains National Park, serves as the headwater region of the Datong River, a major tributary of the Yellow River (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Duan et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Lyu et al., 2024</xref>). Prolonged open-pit mining activities have led to severe vegetation degradation, soil structure disruption, and the formation of extensive exposed slag areas, posing significant threats to regional ecological security and the sustainable development of grassland animal husbandry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Zhao et al., 2025</xref>). Against this backdrop, ecological restoration in the mining area has become an urgent priority. The establishment of artificial grasslands is a critical approach for ecological restoration in alpine mining regions. However, limiting factors such as poor soil organic matter content and low microbial activity severely hinder vegetation rehabilitation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Liu et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Hu et al., 2024</xref>). While traditional chemical fertilizers can temporarily enhance soil fertility, their associated issues&#x2014;such as soil acidification, compaction, and reduced microbial diversity&#x2014;undermine the sustainability of restoration goals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Zhang et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Yu et al., 2025a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">2025b</xref>). Therefore, research on green fertilization technologies that regulate soil microbial communities has emerged as a vital breakthrough in addressing the ecological restoration challenges of alpine mining areas.</p>
<p>The collaborative remediation technology combining microbial fertilizer and organic fertilizer has garnered considerable attention due to its ecological compatibility and functional synergism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Yan et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Yin et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Zeng et al., 2016</xref>). Effective microorganisms (EM) microbial fertilizer contains over 80 functional microbial groups, including photosynthetic bacteria, lactic acid bacteria, and actinomyces. It regulates rhizosphere microbial processes through multiple pathways such as organic matter decomposition, nutrient activation, and microecological regulation, thereby improving soil environment and subsequently influencing plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Liu et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Sahu et al., 2023</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Zeng et al. (2016)</xref> demonstrated that EM microbial fertilizer enhances catalase activity in flue-cured tobacco rhizosphere soil and promotes plant biomass accumulation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Yin et al. (2019)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Yan et al. (2024)</xref> confirmed that combined application of EM microbial fertilizer and organic fertilizer can reconstruct soil-microbe interaction networks, increasing the relative abundance of beneficial microbial communities. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Zhang et al. (2024)</xref> found that EM microbial fertilizer regulates crop yield by suppressing pathogenic bacteria abundance and enhancing microbial &#x03B1;-diversity and network complexity. While existing studies on combined EM microbial fertilizer and organic fertilizer application have predominantly focused on plain agroecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Yan et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Yin et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Zeng et al., 2016</xref>), nutrient addition rates vary significantly across different study regions. In alpine mining areas, there is currently no unified fertilizer application range for the restoration of artificially restored grasslands through the co-application of microbial fertilizer and organic fertilizer. Meanwhile, the impact of fertilization on grasslands may involve a response threshold&#x2014;beyond which, increased fertilizer application could lead to slowed grassland productivity growth, or even phenomena such as species decline, biodiversity reduction, and productivity decrease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Lv et al., 2025</xref>). Therefore, determining the optimal nutrient addition level by co-applying microbial fertilizer at varying dosages based on organic fertilizer application is crucial. This approach not only avoids resource waste and enhances economic efficiency but also plays a vital role in maintaining the stability of alpine mining area grassland ecosystems and promoting their sustainable development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Lyu et al., 2025</xref>).</p>
<p>In summary, the current study has two major limitations: (1) The research scope is confined to traditional agricultural systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Yan et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Yin et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Zeng et al., 2016</xref>), lacking validation of applicability in extremely degraded habitats (e.g., alpine mining areas); (2) Functional analysis focuses on single elements (e.g., microorganisms or vegetation) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Yan et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Yin et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Zeng et al., 2016</xref>), neglecting coupled analysis of soil-plant-microbe systems. Moreover, mechanistic explanations remain at the phenomenological description stage. In extremely degraded ecosystems like alpine mining areas characterized by extremely infertile soil and low vegetation establishment success rates, the interaction mechanisms among microbial community structure, soil functions, and vegetation restoration remain unclear. To address the aforementioned limitations, we propose the hypothesis that combined application of EM bacterial fertilizer and organic fertilizer could enhance ecosystem multifunctionality by regulating soil bacterial community structure and function, thereby facilitating soil amelioration and vegetation restoration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Therefore, this study focuses on artificially established grasslands in alpine mining areas as the research object. Through a three-year field experiment, we systematically investigate the effects of combined EM bacterial fertilizer and organic fertilizer application on vegetation community characteristics, soil physicochemical properties, and soil bacterial community structure and function in alpine mining areas. The study prioritizes elucidating two scientific questions: (1) The variation patterns of soil bacterial community composition and co-occurrence network characteristics under different nutrient addition levels in alpine mining areas; (2) The interactions between bacterial community structure and soil-vegetation factors. The research findings will provide a scientific basis for ecological restoration in alpine mining areas and sustainable grassland management techniques based on soil microecology regulation.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Graphic summary. <bold>(a)</bold> Fertilizer application rates, <bold>(b)</bold> Interactions among plants, soil, and bacteria, <bold>(c)</bold> RDA analysis, <bold>(d)</bold> Contribution rates of plant and soil factors.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1659475-g001.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Diagram illustrating plant-soil-bacteria interactions. Panel (a) shows organic fertilizer with different application rates (1-3 kg/m&#x00B2; and 45-75 g/m&#x00B2;). Panel (b) depicts a cyclical interaction between soil, plant, and bacteria. Panel (c) is a scatter plot with various factors influencing the environment. Panel (d) is a bar graph indicating contribution percentages of factors such as pH, coverage, and density, with pH having the highest contribution.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Study area overview</title>
<p>The study area was located in Muli Town, Tianjun County, Qinghai Province (38&#x00B0;09&#x2032;34&#x2033;N, 99&#x00B0;09&#x2032;40&#x2033;E), with an average elevation of 4,200 meters. The region experiences long winters without summers, with the cold season lasting 7&#x2013;8&#x202F;months, significant diurnal temperature variations, and a semi-arid plateau climate. The annual average sunshine duration is 2,160&#x202F;h, the annual average temperature was &#x2212;5.3 &#x00B0;C, and the annual average precipitation is 626&#x202F;mm, with a growing season of only 120&#x202F;days (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Lyu et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Hu et al., 2024</xref>). The soil is classified as alpine meadow soil, containing significant coal gangue and rock fragments. The soil total nitrogen content is 1.05&#x202F;g&#x202F;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, total phosphorus content is 0.84&#x202F;g&#x202F;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, organic matter content is 60.34&#x202F;g&#x202F;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, electrical conductivity is 19,090&#x202F;&#x03BC;S&#x202F;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, pH is 8.50, and moisture content is 15.0%. The original vegetation type is alpine meadow, dominated by <italic>Carex parvula</italic> O. Yano, <italic>Carex alatauensis</italic> S. R. Zhang, and <italic>Elymus nutans</italic> Griseb. An overview of the study site is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figures 2a</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">b</xref>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Study area, experimental site, and plot design. <bold>(a)</bold> Geographic location of the experimental site, <bold>(b)</bold> monthly average temperature and precipitation at the experimental site from 2020 to 2024 (meteorological data sourced from the Tianjun National Weather Station), <bold>(c)</bold> landscape before and after seeding.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1659475-g002.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Map highlighting Orqihan-Tibet, a satellite image, climate data graph, and photos showing grassland restoration. The top part shows a location map and satellite view. The middle presents a graph of monthly precipitation and temperature from 2020-2024. The bottom displays a progression from a barren, pre-restoration landscape to a restored grassland achieved through artificial seeding.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Experimental design</title>
<p>The microbial biofertilizer used was a composite effective microorganisms (EM) biofertilizer, containing key functional microbial groups such as Bacillus, photosynthetic bacteria, yeast, and lactic acid bacteria (effective viable count &#x2265; 1.0&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>8</sup>&#x202F;CFU&#x202F;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>). It was provided by Hubei Qiming Bioengineering Co., Ltd., and complied with the quality standards of Agricultural Microbial Fertilizers (GB 20287-2006). The bio-organic fertilizer, a mineral-derived humic acid type, contains organic matter &#x2265;40% and N&#x202F;+&#x202F;P&#x2082;O&#x2085;&#x202F;+&#x202F;K&#x2082;O &#x2265;5.0%, supplied by Henan Liso Crop Protection Co., Ltd. The tested grass species included Qinghai Chinese fescue (<italic>Festuca sinensis</italic> Keng.), Qinghai Kentucky bluegrass (<italic>Poa pratensis</italic> L.), Qinghai alpine bluegrass (<italic>Poa crymophila</italic> Keng.), and Tongde short-awn wheatgrass (<italic>Elymus breviaristatus</italic> Keng f.). These were provided by the Grassland Institute of the Academy of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Qinghai University, with purity &#x2265;92% and germination rate &#x2265;85%.</p>
<p>On May 5, 2022, the tested forage seeds were uniformly mixed and sown in rows at a seeding rate of 18.0&#x202F;g&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>. Fertilization was conducted in early June 2023 and repeated during the same period of 2024 for two consecutive years. Based on preliminary research findings from the team, fertilizer application guidelines, and baseline soil conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">An et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Yu et al., 2025a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">2025b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Zhang L. et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Zhang X. L. et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Zhang Y. F. et al., 2025</xref>), nine treatment groups were established for the combined application of organic fertilizer and EM biofertilizer: organic fertilizer application rates of 1.00&#x202F;kg&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>, 2.00&#x202F;kg&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>, and 3.00&#x202F;kg&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>; EM biofertilizer application rates of 45.00&#x202F;g&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>, 60.00&#x202F;g&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>, and 75.00&#x202F;g&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). Control group (CK) did not add organic fertilizer and EM bacterial fertilizer. Each experimental plot measures 20 m<sup>2</sup> (4&#x202F;m&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;5&#x202F;m) with 2&#x202F;m inter-plot spacing. Nine fertilization treatments and a CK (control) treatment form one block, with 30&#x202F;m inter-block spacing. Three replicated blocks were established, totaling 30 experimental plots (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2c</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Experimental design for different fertilization treatments.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Treatment group</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Organic fertilizer (kg&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Effective microorganisms (g&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">CK</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Y1E1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">45.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Y1E2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">60.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Y1E3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Y2E1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">45.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Y2E2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">60.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Y2E3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Y3E1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">45.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Y3E2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">60.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Y3E3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Y denotes &#x201C;organic fertilizer,&#x201D; E denotes &#x201C;EM biofertilizer,&#x201D; and numbers 1&#x2013;3 indicate different application rates (the same applies hereafter).</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Vegetation survey and soil sampling</title>
<p>Vegetation height, coverage, density, and biomass were surveyed in September 2023 and the same period in 2024. Five randomly placed 0.5&#x202F;m&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;0.5&#x202F;m quadrats were established within each experimental plot. Vegetation height was measured using a tape measure (1&#x202F;mm precision) by averaging five individual plants per grass species. Plant density was calculated by counting all stems within each quadrat (the quadrat area is 0.5&#x202F;m&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;0.5&#x202F;m). Community coverage was determined using the point-intercept method. Aboveground biomass was quantified by harvesting vegetation at ground level, followed by oven-drying at 105 &#x00B0;C for 30&#x202F;min and drying at 65 &#x00B0;C for 48&#x202F;h until constant weight. Plant community height, coverage, density, and biomass for the 10 treatments are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Variations in vegetation height, coverage, density, and biomass under different treatments.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Year</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Treatment</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Plant height/cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Plant coverage/%</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Density/plant&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Biomass/(g&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="10">2023</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">CK</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">16.53 &#x00B1; 1.60f</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">58.81 &#x00B1; 2.47d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">345.33 &#x00B1; 14.47c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">198.33 &#x00B1; 14.19j</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y1E1</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">20.04 &#x00B1; 1.53e</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">61.80 &#x00B1; 1.42c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">375.67 &#x00B1; 7.23b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">220.00 &#x00B1; 10.82f</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y1E2</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">25.34 &#x00B1; 0.99d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">64.32 &#x00B1; 1.05bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">398.67 &#x00B1; 12.42a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">261.33 &#x00B1; 11.15e</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y1E3</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">25.96 &#x00B1; 1.22cd</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">65.98 &#x00B1; 1.12b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">407.00 &#x00B1; 7.21a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">275.67 &#x00B1; 11.15de</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y2E1</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">25.83 &#x00B1; 1.36cd</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">66.33 &#x00B1; 1.78b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">403.67 &#x00B1; 10.60a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">302.00 &#x00B1; 8.54c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y2E2</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">35.04 &#x00B1; 1.08a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">70.45 &#x00B1; 1.91a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">420.67 &#x00B1; 9.07a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">349.00 &#x00B1; 10.15a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y2E3</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">30.07 &#x00B1; 2.78b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">65.98 &#x00B1; 1.13b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">410.67 &#x00B1; 8.50a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">323.00 &#x00B1; 9.17b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y3E1</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">29.09 &#x00B1; 1.26bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">64.64 &#x00B1; 1.59bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">404.67 &#x00B1; 5.51a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">326.00 &#x00B1; 5.57b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y3E2</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">31.01 &#x00B1; 1.26b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">66.16 &#x00B1; 1.46b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">411.33 &#x00B1; 5.69a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">291.33 &#x00B1; 14.22cd</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y3E3</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">29.02 &#x00B1; 1.38bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">62.91 &#x00B1; 1.10bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">396.33 &#x00B1; 9.87a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">280.00 &#x00B1; 7.94de</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="10">2024</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">CK</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">16.86 &#x00B1; 1.30e</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">68.71 &#x00B1; 2.30e</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">523.33 &#x00B1; 14.64e</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">196.00 &#x00B1; 5.57e</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y1E1</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">18.71 &#x00B1; 1.25e</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">75.64 &#x00B1; 1.51d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">560.67 &#x00B1; 10.26d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">222.00 &#x00B1; 6.00d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y1E2</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">23.75 &#x00B1; 1.52d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">80.96 &#x00B1; 1.22c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">600.00 &#x00B1; 13.00c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">261.67 &#x00B1; 13.32c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y1E3</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">23.79 &#x00B1; 1.87d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">83.79 &#x00B1; 1.47b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">627.33 &#x00B1; 12.42b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">281.67 &#x00B1; 6.03c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y2E1</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">27.3 &#x00B1; 1.43c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">85.47 &#x00B1; 1.59b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">632.00 &#x00B1; 10.15b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">320.33 &#x00B1; 11.37b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y2E2</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">32.59 &#x00B1; 0.99a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">90.66 &#x00B1; 1.52a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">658.33 &#x00B1; 11.02a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">360.67 &#x00B1; 13.43a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y2E3</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">27.86 &#x00B1; 2.11c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">84.04 &#x00B1; 1.16b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">618.00 &#x00B1; 17.09bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">331.00 &#x00B1; 12.29b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y3E1</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">31.09 &#x00B1; 0.64ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">86.37 &#x00B1; 0.95b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">630.33 &#x00B1; 9.02b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">321.67 &#x00B1; 9.07b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y3E2</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">32.21 &#x00B1; 1.10a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">81.20 &#x00B1; 0.75c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">622.67 &#x00B1; 10.97b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">281.33 &#x00B1; 9.29c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y3E3</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">28.99 &#x00B1; 0.47bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">76.67 &#x00B1; 1.21d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">578.67 &#x00B1; 11.55d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">277.67 &#x00B1; 7.02c</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Data are presented as mean &#x00B1; standard deviation (SD). Different lowercase letters within the same column indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05).</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Soil samples were collected simultaneously, and 0&#x2013;10&#x202F;cm soil samples were drilled with 5&#x202F;cm diameter soil by five-point mixed sampling method. One soil sample is mixed in each plot, which is divided into three parts: one is dry in the shade, which is used to determine the contents of soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP); One part of wet soil was stored in the refrigerator at &#x2212;20 &#x00B0;C, and the soil mass moisture content, pH value and conductivity (SEC) were measured. A portion of wet soil was stored in an ultra-low temperature refrigerator at &#x2212;80 &#x00B0;C for soil microbial diversity analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Measurements and methods</title>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.4.1</label>
<title>Soil physicochemical properties</title>
<p>Soil electrical conductivity (SEC), soil water content (SWC), pH, soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) were determined following the protocols outlined in <italic>Soil Agricultural Chemistry Analysis</italic> (<italic>3rd Edition</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Gao et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Bao, 2005</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.4.2</label>
<title>Soil bacterial DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing</title>
<p>Soil samples were sequenced by Shanghai Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. The V3&#x2013;V4 region of bacterial 16S rDNA was amplified using primers 338F (5&#x2032;-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3&#x2032;) and 806R (5&#x2032;-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3&#x2032;). The analysis platform was the Illumina MiSeq PE300, with the workflow as follows: soil total DNA extraction, genomic DNA quality control, PCR amplification, agarose gel electrophoresis verification (1%), PCR product purification, MiSeq library construction, MiSeq library quality control, sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Post-sequencing raw data were processed using the QIIME2 platform (v2020.6). To investigate the species composition of each sample, sequences were aligned against the SILVA database. First, effective tags from all samples underwent OTUs (operational taxonomic units) clustering at 97% identity. Subsequently, taxonomic annotation was performed on the OTUs&#x2019; sequences.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Data analysis and visualization</title>
<p>Data organization was conducted using Microsoft Excel 2016. For plant community characteristics and soil physicochemical properties, statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Data are presented as mean &#x00B1; standard deviation (SD), with statistical significance set at <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05. Homogeneity of variances was tested using Levene&#x2019;s test. Visualization analysis of soil bacterial communities (including Venn analysis, abundance analysis, LEfSe statistical analysis, diversity analysis, cluster analysis, and FAPROTAX functional prediction) was conducted through the Majorbio Cloud Platform.<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn0001"><sup>1</sup></xref> QIIME 2 software was utilized to generate rarefaction curves, relative abundance plots of species, PCoA plots (Bray&#x2013;Curtis), hierarchical clustering trees, and calculate &#x03B1;-diversity indices including OTUs, Shannon index, Simpson index, Pielou index, Chao1 index, and ACE index. R software (version 3.3.1) was employed to generate alpha diversity boxplots. To investigate differences in community structure among grouped samples, LEfSe statistical analysis was utilized to detect significant differences in species composition and community structure. The FAPROTAX tool was applied to predict and analyze microbial community functions in ecological samples. Network analysis was conducted based on Spearman correlation coefficients (|<italic>r</italic>|&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.6, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), and single-factor correlation network diagrams were constructed using NetworkX (version 1.11). R software (version 3.5.2) was used to generate correlation heatmaps between environmental factors, soil physicochemical properties, and microbial diversity. Redundancy analysis (RDA) of environmental factors, soil physicochemical properties, and soil microbial diversity was performed using Canoco 5.0.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec10">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Effects of combined microbial and organic fertilization on soil physicochemical properties</title>
<p>The combined application of microbial biofertilizer and organic fertilizer significantly enhanced soil water content (SWC) and nutrient levels (carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus), while decreasing soil pH and electrical conductivity (SEC) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>). In the second year (2023), the Y2E2 treatment produced a soil water content (SWC) of 26.27%, which was significantly higher than the CK treatment (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), with an increase of 77.50%. The soil electrical conductivity (SEC) in the Y2E2 treatment was the lowest (818.33&#x202F;&#x03BC;S&#x202F;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), showing a significant reduction of 58.53% compared to CK (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). The pH value in the Y2E2 treatment decreased to 8.05, significantly lower than that of the CK treatment (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). The soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) contents all reached their peak in the Y2E2 treatment, with values of 253.09&#x202F;g&#x202F;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 7.50&#x202F;g&#x202F;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, and 2.40&#x202F;g&#x202F;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, respectively. These values represented significant increases of 72.72, 68.92, and 81.82% compared to CK (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Changes in soil physicochemical properties under different treatments.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Year</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Treatment</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SWC/%</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SEC/(&#x03BC;s&#x202F;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">pH</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SOM/(g&#x202F;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">TN/(g&#x202F;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">TP/(g&#x202F;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="10">2023</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">CK</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">14.80 &#x00B1; 0.82e</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1973.33 &#x00B1; 110.27a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.78 &#x00B1; 0.07a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">146.53 &#x00B1; 10.63e</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">4.44 &#x00B1; 0.08j</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1.32 &#x00B1; 0.06e</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y1E1</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">17.68 &#x00B1; 1.16d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1614.33 &#x00B1; 109b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.62 &#x00B1; 0.06b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">188.32 &#x00B1; 10.49d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">5.05 &#x00B1; 0.12f</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1.61 &#x00B1; 0.12d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y1E2</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">20.94 &#x00B1; 1.24c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1333.67 &#x00B1; 94.88cd</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.50 &#x00B1; 0.06c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">218.40 &#x00B1; 4.01c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">5.58 &#x00B1; 0.14e</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1.82 &#x00B1; 0.15c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y1E3</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">22.81 &#x00B1; 1.18bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1217.00 &#x00B1; 51.74cd</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.40 &#x00B1; 0.06cd</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">226.95 &#x00B1; 5.27bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">5.97 &#x00B1; 0.14d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1.99 &#x00B1; 0.11bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y2E1</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">24.17 &#x00B1; 0.37ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1114.00 &#x00B1; 76.49d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.30 &#x00B1; 0.07de</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">240.77 &#x00B1; 3.28ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">6.48 &#x00B1; 0.23c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">2.18 &#x00B1; 0.12ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y2E2</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">26.27 &#x00B1; 1.41a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">818.33 &#x00B1; 111.79e</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.05 &#x00B1; 0.05f</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">253.09 &#x00B1; 10.30a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">7.50 &#x00B1; 0.11a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">2.40 &#x00B1; 0.12a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y2E3</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">24.23 &#x00B1; 0.40ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1122.67 &#x00B1; 140.66d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.20 &#x00B1; 0.03e</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">239.00 &#x00B1; 7.45ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">6.99 &#x00B1; 0.16b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">2.23 &#x00B1; 0.06ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y3E1</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">23.73 &#x00B1; 1.22abc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1328.67 &#x00B1; 92.58cd</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.30 &#x00B1; 0.04de</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">227.22 &#x00B1; 8.10bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">6.91 &#x00B1; 0.09b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">2.09 &#x00B1; 0.11b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y3E2</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">21.47 &#x00B1; 1.79bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1401.33 &#x00B1; 111.85c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.41 &#x00B1; 0.04cd</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">215.79 &#x00B1; 10.10c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">6.78 &#x00B1; 0.09bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">2.17 &#x00B1; 0.07ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y3E3</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">21.68 &#x00B1; 1.15bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1448.00 &#x00B1; 31.95bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.38 &#x00B1; 0.03d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">212.69 &#x00B1; 6.12c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">6.71 &#x00B1; 0.34bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">2.18 &#x00B1; 0.07ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="10">2024</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">CK</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">13.83 &#x00B1; 0.61e</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">2086.67 &#x00B1; 103.02a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.82 &#x00B1; 0.06a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">130.33 &#x00B1; 7.52e</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">4.39 &#x00B1; 0.12j</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1.27 &#x00B1; 0.06e</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y1E1</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">18.49 &#x00B1; 1.07d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1559.00 &#x00B1; 132.55b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.56 &#x00B1; 0.11b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">200.68 &#x00B1; 4.97d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">5.47 &#x00B1; 0.07f</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1.67 &#x00B1; 0.07d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y1E2</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">22.96 &#x00B1; 1.30c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1175.33 &#x00B1; 103.36c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.40 &#x00B1; 0.10c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">226.40 &#x00B1; 9.57c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">5.86 &#x00B1; 0.06e</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1.90 &#x00B1; 0.13c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y1E3</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">23.86 &#x00B1; 0.43bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1174.67 &#x00B1; 116.80c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.30 &#x00B1; 0.08cd</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">239.48 &#x00B1; 11.93abc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">6.38 &#x00B1; 0.18d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">2.11 &#x00B1; 0.06b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y2E1</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">26.05 &#x00B1; 0.58ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1042.67 &#x00B1; 51.50c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.20 &#x00B1; 0.08de</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">258.98 &#x00B1; 16.85ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">6.76 &#x00B1; 0.11c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">2.32 &#x00B1; 0.05a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y2E2</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">28.12 &#x00B1; 1.23a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">714.00 &#x00B1; 99.45d</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">7.84 &#x00B1; 0.08f</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">261.44 &#x00B1; 8.77a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">7.74 &#x00B1; 0.09a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">2.45 &#x00B1; 0.05a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y2E3</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">26.1 &#x00B1; 1.15ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1065.33 &#x00B1; 34.95c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.11 &#x00B1; 0.07e</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">249.03 &#x00B1; 12.62abc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">7.24 &#x00B1; 0.17b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">2.39 &#x00B1; 0.07a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y3E1</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">25.28 &#x00B1; 1.47abc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1175.67 &#x00B1; 96.2c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.17 &#x00B1; 0.05de</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">240.52 &#x00B1; 15.28abc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">7.15 &#x00B1; 0.16b</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">2.41 &#x00B1; 0.14a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y3E2</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">27.75 &#x00B1; 1.22a</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1286.33 &#x00B1; 109.62c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.36 &#x00B1; 0.11cd</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">233.65 &#x00B1; 9.59abc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">7.00 &#x00B1; 0.10bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">2.38 &#x00B1; 0.07a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Y3E3</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">26.64 &#x00B1; 2.47ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">1269.33 &#x00B1; 58.16c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">8.36 &#x00B1; 0.05cd</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">230.68 &#x00B1; 9.27bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">6.88 &#x00B1; 0.09c</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00B1;">2.43 &#x00B1; 0.09a</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Data are presented as mean &#x00B1; standard deviation (SD). Different lowercase letters within the same column indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). SWC, soil water content; SEC, soil electrical conductivity; SOM, soil organic matter; TN, soil total nitrogen; TP, soil total phosphorus.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In the third year (2024), the trends in soil property changes remained consistent with the second year, and the improvement effects were even more pronounced. In the Y2E2 treatment, soil water content (SWC) further increased to 28.12%, and soil electrical conductivity (SEC) decreased to 714.00 &#x03BC;S&#x202F;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, both showing significant differences compared to the CK treatment (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). The pH value significantly decreased to 7.84, further approaching neutral conditions. The soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) contents in the Y2E2 treatment reached 261.44&#x202F;g&#x202F;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 7.74&#x202F;g&#x202F;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, and 2.45&#x202F;g&#x202F;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, respectively, representing significant increases of 100.60, 76.31, and 92.91% compared to the CK treatment (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Effects of combined microbial and organic fertilization on soil bacterial community</title>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>3.2.1</label>
<title>Quality analysis of soil bacterial 16S sequencing results and changes in OTU counts</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1a</xref>, when the sequence extraction number reached 5,000, the rarefaction curves of different treatment groups plateaued as the sample size increased (30,000 reads sparse threshold). This indicated that the current sequencing data volume approached saturation, and the sequencing depth was appropriately set. Further increasing the data volume would only identify a minimal number of low-abundance species. Venn analysis (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1b</xref>) revealed that a total of 2,549 bacterial OTUs (operational taxonomic units) were detected across the 10 treatment groups. Among these, the Y2E3 and Y2E2 treatments had the highest OTU counts, with 2,501 and 2,481 OTUs, respectively, while the CK treatment had 2,459 OTUs. A total of 2,042 OTUs were shared among all 10 treatment groups, accounting for 80.11% of the total OTUs. This indicates a high similarity in bacterial community composition across different treatment groups, with a limited distribution of unique OTUs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>3.2.2</label>
<title>Composition and relative abundance changes of soil bacterial communities</title>
<p>The relative abundances of the top 30 soil bacterial phyla under different fertilization treatments are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3a</xref>. Dominant phyla included Pseudomonadota (28.71&#x2013;35.91%), Actinomycetota (0.09&#x2013;16.35%), Acidobacteriota (9.11&#x2013;12.16%), Chloroflexi (6.91&#x2013;12.07%), Bacillota (7.82&#x2013;12.63%), and Bacteroidota (7.60&#x2013;11.85%), which consistently ranked among the highest in relative abundance across all 10 treatments. Significant differences in the relative abundances of soil bacterial phyla were observed between the CK treatment and the nine fertilization treatments. Compared with CK, the Y2E2 and Y2E3 treatments increased the abundances of Actinomycetota and Acidobacteriota while reducing the abundance of Pseudomonadota.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>(a)</bold> Changes in the relative abundance of soil bacterial phyla across different treatments. <bold>(b)</bold> Changes in the relative abundance of soil bacterial genera across different treatments.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1659475-g003.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts and circular diagrams display microbial community composition at phylum and genus levels across various samples labeled CK, Y1E1, Y1E2, Y2E1, Y2E2, Y2E3, Y3E1, Y3E2, and Y3E3. Different colors represent distinct taxa, with legends indicating specific taxa names. The left panel of each section illustrates relative abundance, while the right demonstrates inter-sample relationships with chord diagrams.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>At the genus level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3b</xref>), <italic>Sphingomonas</italic> (2.61&#x2013;4.48%), <italic>norank_</italic>f__Vicinamibacteraceae (1.76&#x2013;33.04%), <italic>norank</italic>_f__A4b (1.46&#x2013;2.76%), <italic>norank_</italic>o__Vicinamibacterales (1.73&#x2013;2.74%), <italic>Arthrobacter</italic> (1.32&#x2013;4.60%), and <italic>Devosia</italic> (1.42&#x2013;2.42%) exhibited relatively high abundances. Further analysis revealed that, compared to the CK treatment, the Y2E2 and Y2E3 treatments increased the abundance of <italic>norank_</italic>f__Vicinamibacteraceae while reducing the abundance of <italic>Devosia</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3.2.3</label>
<title>LEfSe analysis of soil bacterial communities</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S2</xref>, LEfSe analysis identified the most significant indicator species contributing to bacterial community differences across the 10 treatments (LDA score &#x003E;3.0). A total of 98 biomarkers were detected in the bacterial communities of the 10 treatments (8 in Y2E2 and 10 in each of the other treatments). At the taxonomic level, the highest-scoring biomarkers for the CK, Y1E1, Y1E2, Y1E3, Y2E1, Y2E2, Y2E3, Y3E1, Y3E2, and Y3E3 treatments were f__norank_o<italic>__Chloroplast</italic>, f<italic>__Devosiaceae</italic>, c<italic>__Bacteroidia</italic>, c_<italic>_Polyangiia</italic>, g<italic>__Castellaniella</italic>, g<italic>__</italic>norank<italic>_f__Rhodanobacteraceae</italic>, f<italic>__Nostocaceae</italic>, c<italic>__Gemmatimonadia</italic>, p<italic>__Chloroflexota</italic>, and g<italic>__Arthrobacter</italic>, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.2.4</label>
<title>Analysis of soil bacterial community diversity</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, significant differences were observed in the &#x03B1;-diversity indices of soil bacterial communities across the 10 treatments. The Y2E2 treatment exhibited the highest values for OTU number, Shannon index, Ace index, and Chao1 index, with values of 2,254, 6.60, 2,379.10, and 2,384.80, respectively. These values represented increases of 8.37, 2.36, 6.44, and 5.05% compared to the CK treatment, with the OTU number and Ace index reaching significant levels (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). The Pielou index reached its maximum value in the Y1E2 treatment (0.86), followed by the Y2E2 treatment (0.85), representing increases of 1.77 and 1.30% compared to CK. Among the 10 treatments, the Simpson index values ranked from highest to lowest as follows: Y3E3 &#x003E; CK &#x003E; Y2E3 &#x003E; Y1E3 &#x003E; Y1E1 &#x003E; Y1E2 &#x003E; Y3E2 &#x003E; Y3E1 &#x003E; Y2E2 &#x003E; Y2E1, with the Y2E2 and Y2E1 treatments exhibiting the lowest Simpson index values. In summary, the combined application of EM microbial biofertilizer and organic fertilizer significantly enhanced the &#x03B1;-diversity of soil bacterial communities, with the Y2E2 treatment performing the best, followed by the Y2E1 treatment.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Differences in soil bacterial community &#x03B1;-diversity across different treatments. <sup>&#x002A;</sup>Represents <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05. <bold>(a)</bold> OTUs index, <bold>(b)</bold> Shannon index, <bold>(c)</bold> Simpson index, <bold>(d)</bold> Ace index, <bold>(e)</bold> Pielou index, <bold>(f)</bold> Chao1 index.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1659475-g004.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Six box plots display different diversity indices across multiple sample groups labeled CK, Y1E1, Y1E2, Y1E3, Y2E1, Y2E2, Y2E3, Y3E1, Y3E2, and Y3E3. Each plot represents a specific index: (a) OTU index, (b) Shannon index, (c) Simpson index, (d) Ace index, (e) Pielou index, (f) Chao index. Significant p-values are indicated in some plots. Various colors represent the different sample groups. Data distribution and variability are shown with box plot elements.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray&#x2013;Curtis distance was performed for the 10 treatments, and the results were shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. In the CK treatment, soil bacterial communities exhibited low aggregation and high within-group variation. In contrast, the nine fertilization treatments showed higher aggregation and lower within-group variation, with the Y1E2 and Y3E1 treatments displaying the highest aggregation and the smallest within-group variation. The first principal coordinate (PC1) explained 18.32% of the variance, while the second principal coordinate (PC2) explained 13.61%, with a cumulative explanation rate of 31.93%. Significant differences were observed between groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.001), and the communities were distinctly clustered into three groups: Y3E3 formed a separate group, the remaining eight fertilization treatments clustered into one group, and the CK treatment formed another group.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Differences in soil bacterial community &#x03B2;-diversity (PCoA) across different treatments.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1659475-g005.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">A principal component analysis (PCA) plot shows data points labeled as CK, Y1E1-3, Y2E1-3, and Y3E1-3, each in different colors. The X-axis is PC1 at 18.32%, and the Y-axis is PC2 at 13.61%. Correlation indicated as R=0.5538, P=0.001000. Colored density plots are displayed on top and right, matching the data points' colors.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>3.2.5</label>
<title>Changes in soil bacterial community single-factor correlation networks</title>
<p>To explore the co-occurrence characteristics and interaction relationships of bacterial communities at the genus level under different fertilization treatments, single-factor correlation networks were constructed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). The results revealed significant differences in the structural characteristics of soil bacterial networks among treatments. The number of edges in the bacterial networks ranged from 376 to 656, showing significant variation, while the number of nodes exhibited smaller differences among treatments. The proportion of positive correlations in the bacterial networks varied significantly across treatments, with the Y1E2 treatment displayed the highest positive correlation (67.11%), followed by Y1E3 (64.52%). In contrast, the CK, Y1E1, Y2E3, Y3E2, and Y3E3 treatments had lower positive correlations, all below 50.0%, with values of 49.39, 48.26, 48.74, 48.14, and 48.58%, respectively. The key connecting nodes in the single-factor correlation networks also differed significantly among treatments. In the nine fertilization treatments, Pseudomonadota, Actinomycetota, Cyanobacteriota, and Bacillota were the most important connecting nodes. In the control treatment (CK), Bacteroidota, Pseudomonadota, Bacillota, and Chloroflexota served as key connecting nodes.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Single-factor correlation networks of soil bacteria across different treatments. Node color and size indicate species type and importance; line color indicates positive or negative correlation, with red positive and green negative; and the number of lines indicates whether the species are closely related.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1659475-g006.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Ten circular network graphs illustrating microbial interactions, with nodes labeled by microbial groups in different colors. Each graph has a color-coded legend distinguishing positive and negative interactions.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>3.2.6</label>
<title>Functional prediction of soil bacterial communities</title>
<p>Functional annotation of bacterial communities across the 10 treatments was performed using the FAPROTAX tool, identifying 30 sub-functions. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> fermentation, aerobic chemoheterotrophy, and chemoheterotrophy were the dominant functions across all treatments. Specifically, chemoheterotrophy was most pronounced in Y3E3 (10,253), Y3E1 (9,266), and Y1E3 (9,284); aerobic chemoheterotrophy was highest in Y3E3 (7,571), Y3E1 (6,616), and Y2E1 (6,501); and fermentation was most intense in Y1E3 (2,888), Y2E3 (2,696), and Y3E1 (2,526). Additionally, the manganese oxidation function was significantly higher in Y1E1, Y2E2, and Y3E3 compared to CK. Similarly, chloroplast function was significantly elevated in Y1E3, Y2E3, and Y3E2 compared to CK.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Prediction of FAPROTAX function of soil bacteria in different treatments: heatmap and inter-group test analysis. <bold>(a)</bold> Prediction of FAPROTAX functions of soil bacteria, <bold>(b)</bold> Inter-group test analysis of FAPROTAX functional groups of soil bacteria.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1659475-g007.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two-part graphical data visualization. (a) A heatmap showing various microbial functions across different samples, with a color gradient from light to dark red indicating frequency. (b) A bar graph comparing mean proportions of selected microbial functions across samples, with bars colored to match sample groups and associated p-values noted.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Further analysis revealed significant differences in specific metabolic functions among treatments. Chlorate-reducers function was significantly lower in Y1E2 (0.03) and Y3E3 (0.033) compared to CK. In Y3E3, iron respiration, anoxygenic photoautotrophy, anoxygenic photoautotrophy_S_oxidizing, and photoautotrophy functions were all lower than in CK. Nitrate respiration and nitrogen respiration functions were significantly lower in Y1E2, Y2E1, Y2E3, and Y3E3 compared to CK. Conversely, anoxygenic photoautotrophy, anoxygenic photoautotrophy_S_oxidizing, and photoautotrophy abundance were significantly lower in CK compared to other fertilization treatments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>3.2.7</label>
<title>Clustering analysis of soil bacterial communities</title>
<p>Hierarchical clustering analysis was performed on 30 soil samples based on distance metrics. As shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S3</xref>, the bacterial communities across the 10 treatments were divided into two groups: Y3E3 formed a separate group (Group 1), while the CK treatment and other fertilization treatments were grouped together (Group 2). Further analysis revealed that, at a clustering threshold of 0.17, Group 2 could be subdivided into two subgroups: CK treatment formed a distinct subgroup, while the remaining fertilization treatments clustered into another subgroup. Additionally, the three soil samples from Y1E2, Y2E2, Y1E1, Y3E2, and Y1E3 treatments were located on the same branch, indicating high similarity in their soil bacterial community structures. In contrast, the CK treatment and other fertilization treatments were distributed on different branches, reflecting differences in their soil bacterial community composition.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Coupling relationships among vegetation community characteristics, soil physicochemical properties, and soil bacterial communities</title>
<sec id="sec21">
<label>3.3.1</label>
<title>Mantel test analysis of vegetation community characteristics, soil physicochemical properties, and soil bacterial communities</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>, the Mantel test revealed a highly significant positive correlation (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001) between soil pH and electrical conductivity (SEC), while both exhibited highly significant negative correlations (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001) with other soil physicochemical properties and vegetation characteristics. Plant height, coverage, density, and aboveground biomass were all significantly positively correlated (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001) with soil water content (SWC), organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP). The number of bacterial OTUs showed significant correlations (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) with SOM and SWC, while exhibiting highly significant correlations (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) with other soil physicochemical properties and vegetation characteristics. The Shannon index was significantly correlated (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) with all soil physicochemical properties and vegetation characteristics except density and SEC. The Pielou index showed significant correlations (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) only with coverage and SOM. The Simpson index was significantly correlated (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) only with coverage. The Ace index exhibited significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) or highly significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01) correlations with all four vegetation characteristics and six soil physicochemical properties. The Chao1 index showed significant correlations (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) only with pH and TN.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Mantel analysis of vegetation community characteristics, soil physicochemical properties, and soil bacterial communities. <sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup>Denotes <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001; SWC, soil water content; SEC, soil electrical conductivity; SOM, soil organic matter; TN, soil total nitrogen; TP, soil total phosphorus.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1659475-g008.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">A correlation network diagram showcases relationships and coefficients between variables like plant height, coverage, and biomass, using colored lines and circles. The colors denote significance levels, with red for P &#x003C; 0.01 and green for 0.01&#x2013;0.05. The correlation strength is shown by line thickness and circle colors, corresponding to Pearson's r scale.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<label>3.3.2</label>
<title>Redundancy analysis of vegetation community characteristics, soil physicochemical properties, and soil bacterial communities</title>
<p>Redundancy analysis (RDA) was conducted to explore the relationships between soil bacterial community diversity, vegetation characteristics, and soil physicochemical factors, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>. The first (RDA I) and second (RDA II) axes explained 34.14 and 10.30% of the variance, respectively, with a cumulative explanation rate of 44.44%. Among the factors, soil pH had the longest arrow length, explaining 27.5% of the variance and contributing 59.1% to the model, with a significant effect (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.002). This indicates that soil pH is the most significant factor influencing bacterial community diversity in the mining area. Soil pH and electrical conductivity (SEC) were positively correlated with the Simpson index but negatively correlated with the Shannon index, OTU number, Ace index, and Chao1 index. Other soil physicochemical factors [e.g., organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP)] and vegetation characteristics were positively correlated with bacterial diversity indices (except the Simpson index).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig9">
<label>Figure 9</label>
<caption>
<p>RDA analysis of soil physicochemical properties, plant community characteristics, and soil bacterial community structure. Red arrows indicate plant community characteristics and soil factors, and blue arrows indicate bacterial diversity indices. SWC, soil water content; SEC, soil electrical conductivity; SOM, soil organic matter; TN, soil total nitrogen; TP, soil total phosphorus. <bold>(a)</bold> RDA analysis, <bold>(b)</bold> Contribution rates of plant and soil factors.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1659475-g009.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Panel (a) shows a redundancy analysis (RDA) biplot with arrows representing variables such as PH, SEC, and Biomass among others, impacting data points. Panel (b) depicts a bar chart of contribution percentages, highlighting pH as the highest contributor at over 60%, followed by other factors like Coverage, Density, and Biomass, all below 10%.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec23">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="sec24">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Effects of EM bacterial fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer on soil physicochemical properties and community characteristics</title>
<p>The application of microbial fertilizers introduces exogenous functional microbial communities into the soil, thereby revitalizing the soil ecosystem. When further combined with organic fertilizer application, it enhances organic matter decomposition processes, facilitates the conversion of organic nutrients into readily available forms, and thus improves soil nutrient cycling efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Zhao et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Pereg and McMillan, 2015</xref>). Multiple studies have demonstrated that the combined application of microbial fertilizers with organic/chemical fertilizers significantly increases vegetation biomass in degraded grassland restoration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Gao et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Ren et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">XU et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Ramakrishna et al., 2019</xref>). This study found that the combined application of EM bacterial fertilizer and organic fertilizer (Y2E2 treatment) consistently promoted vegetation growth during two consecutive growing seasons, with biomass increasing by 75.97 and 84.02% compared to the control (CK). Concurrently, soil water content (SWC), soil organic matter (SOM), and total nitrogen (TN) content were significantly enhanced. However, a distinct threshold effect was observed in application dosage&#x2014;excessive application inhibited vegetation growth, which aligns with the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Song et al. (2015)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Cai et al. (2018)</xref>.</p>
<p>Soil nutrients, as the material basis for plant growth, directly govern vegetation development through their effective availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Jyoti et al., 2024</xref>). Data from this study reveal that the Y2E2 treatment synergistically enhanced the physicochemical properties of the 0&#x2013;10&#x202F;cm topsoil layer via the combined application of microbial fertilizer and organic fertilizer. Over 2&#x202F;years, this treatment significantly increased soil water content (SWC), soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) compared to the control, while markedly reducing soil electrical conductivity (SEC) and pH levels. This improvement effect stems from functional bacterial strains enhancing nitrogen and phosphorus availability by accelerating the mineralization process of organic fertilizer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Chen et al., 2025</xref>). Additionally, organic acids produced by soil bacterial metabolism promote organic matter decomposition and neutralize alkaline substances through proton release, creating a microenvironment conducive to nutrient activation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Simon et al., 2024</xref>). These findings align with studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Song et al. (2019)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Ku et al. (2018)</xref>, which confirmed that co-application of microbial and organic fertilizers enhances soil nitrogen reserves and organic matter accumulation. Notably, a threshold effect governs the combined application: excessive use (e.g., Y3E3 treatment) elevates risks of nutrient leaching, reduces nutrient turnover efficiency, and triggers salinization and pH instability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Kong et al., 2013</xref>). In this study, Y3E3 exhibited slightly higher pH and SEC than Y2E2, indicating that soil buffering capacity becomes compromised under excessive nutrient inputs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Wang S. et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Wang Z. et al., 2025</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Chu (2014)</xref> further observed that surpassing critical application rates increases soil conductivity, corroborating the physicochemical degradation observed here due to over-application. Therefore, precise regulation of the microbial organic fertilizer ratio is critical for optimizing nutrient conversion efficiency and preserving soil ecological stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Yang et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Xu, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Zhong et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec25">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Effects of EM bacterial fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer on soil bacterial community structure and function</title>
<p>Among the 10 treatments in the Muli mining area, Pseudomonadota and Actinomycetota were the two dominant bacterial phyla with the highest relative abundances in the soil, indicating their critical functional roles in the bacterial communities of this artificial grassland (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Yang et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Xu, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Zhong et al., 2020</xref>). Numerous studies have demonstrated that variations in soil nutrient content significantly reshape bacterial community composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Yang et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Lian et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Xu et al., 2021</xref>). In the Y2E3 treatment group, Actinomycetota and Acidobacteriota exhibited a synergistic enrichment pattern, with their abundances significantly surpassing those in the CK treatment. The primary reason lies in the functional complementarity of soil bacteria: Actinomycetota bacteria drive soil carbon cycling by decomposing lignin and other complex organic matter, while Acidobacteriota bacteria stabilize the soil carbon reservoir. This functional complementarity between Actinomycetota and Acidobacteriota within soil bacteria enhances carbon conversion efficiency in soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Lian et al., 2025</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Xu et al. (2021)</xref> observed that habitats with high phosphorus content and healthy vegetation communities harbor higher relative abundances of Sphingomonas (a genus within Pseudomonadota) and Arthrobacter (a genus within Actinomycetota). This correlation likely stems from their dual nutritional traits: plant growth promotion capabilities; Optimization of soil phosphorus transformation, with their abundances positively correlated with soil phosphorus levels. Consistent with these findings, the current study revealed significantly elevated relative abundances of Sphingomonas and Arthrobacter in fertilized treatments compared to CK, further validating their role in phosphorus cycling and ecosystem health.</p>
<p>Soil bacteria, as the core components regulating soil ecosystem functions, play a pivotal role in governing material cycling and energy flow within plant&#x2013;soil systems through their community structure and functional traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Yang et al., 2024</xref>). This study found that the combined application of EM bacterial fertilizer and organic fertilizer significantly influenced soil bacterial community diversity. In the Y2E2 treatment group, compared to the control treatment (CK), the number of OTUs (operational taxonomic units) and the Ace index increased by 8.37 and 6.44%, respectively. These findings align with the conclusions of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Xu (2011)</xref> regarding the combined application of microbial and organic fertilizers. The mechanism is that organic fertilizer provides complex carbon sources, while nitrogen-fixing bacteria and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in EM microbial fertilizer accelerate organic matter decomposition by secreting extracellular enzymes. These effects create diversified soil niches, thereby enhancing the diversity of bacterial communities in artificially restored grassland soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Zhong et al., 2020</xref>). Further single-factor correlation network analysis revealed that the rhizosphere bacterial network complexity in the Y1E2 treatment group was significantly enhanced compared to CK, with a positive correlation ratio of 67.11%. This indicates that most bacterial populations in this treatment formed a tightly collaborative network through strategies such as mutualistic symbiosis (e.g., nutrient exchange) and cooperative commensalism (e.g., metabolic complementarity). Such a highly connected bacterial structure optimizes rhizosphere nutrient turnover efficiency and accelerates the synchronized metabolic activities of nitrogen-fixing and phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Che et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Zhang et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Zhang et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Zhang et al., 2025</xref>).</p>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Li et al. (2025)</xref> demonstrated that alterations in soil bacterial community structure led to distinct functional characteristics. This study corroborates their findings through FAPROTAX-based predictions of bacterial functions across different fertilization treatments, revealing significant functional divergence among the 10 treatments. Notably, the Y1E1 and Y2E2 treatments exhibited markedly higher manganese oxidation functional intensity compared to other groups. This enhancement likely stemmed from the abundant photosynthetic bacteria in EM fertilizer, which establish a unique photoenergy-manganese oxidation coupled metabolic pathway via light-driven CO&#x2082; fixation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Wang S. S. et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Wang Z. X. et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Cai et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Cohen et al., 2022</xref>). The concurrent significant increase in chloroplast-related functional intensity in these treatments further supports this hypothesis. Critically, the Y3E3 treatment group showed suppressed functional intensities in chlorate reduction, iron respiration, and phototrophic autotrophy, underscoring that excessive combined application may inhibit specific bacterial metabolic functions, reinforcing the existence of a threshold effect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Zhong et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Yang et al., 2023</xref>). The functional intensity of photosynthetic autotrophic-related functions in soil bacteria under the control treatment (CK) was significantly lower than that under other fertilization treatments. The potential reason may be attributed to the chronic deficiency of organic matter input in the <italic>in situ</italic> soil of the Muli mining area (Qinghai Province, China), which has resulted in a severe shortage of substrates (e.g., sulfides, low-molecular-weight organic compounds) required for photosynthetic bacteria growth, thereby constraining their metabolic activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec26">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Correlation analysis of rhizosphere soil microbial composition with soil physicochemical properties and plant community characteristics</title>
<p>Mantel test analysis revealed that soil pH exhibited an extremely significant positive correlation with SEC (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001), while both variables demonstrated extremely significant negative correlations with other soil physicochemical properties and vegetation community characteristics (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001). These findings align with research by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Gao et al. (2025)</xref>, which posits that higher soil nutrient and moisture levels promote superior plant community growth. Redundancy analysis (RDA) further demonstrated that soil SEC was negatively correlated with bacterial community diversity indices (Shannon, Ace, and Chao1), indicating that soil salinity stress significantly inhibits the recovery of bacterial diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Luo et al., 2025</xref>). In contrast, vegetation community traits and soil fertility indicators soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) exhibited significant positive correlations with bacterial diversity indices (except the Simpson index). This suggests that organic matter and mineral nutrients (N, P) enhance bacterial community structural succession and functional differentiation by supplying energy and metabolic substrates, thereby fostering diversity restoration. In summary, the vegetation restoration process in the Muli mining area of Qinghai achieves bidirectional enhancement of soil fertility improvement and bacterial community optimization through the &#x201C;vegetation-soil-microbe&#x201D; interaction mechanism, ultimately establishing a self-reinforcing ecological virtuous cycle.</p>
<p>Soil physicochemical properties exert a significant shaping effect on the diversity and structure of soil bacterial communities in artificial grasslands within the Muli mining area of Qinghai Province. Unlike traditional studies that prioritize soil nutrient availability as the core driver of bacterial community distribution, this study highlights the dominant regulatory role of pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Liu et al., 2018</xref>). This finding is highly consistent with the &#x201C;rugby ball model&#x201D; proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Xun et al. (2015)</xref>. The model posits that when soil pH falls within the neutral range (6.5&#x2013;7.5), soil nutrient conditions primarily govern changes in bacterial community structure and functional dynamics. However, when pH shifts to acidified (5.5&#x2013;6.5) or alkalized (7.5&#x2013;8.5) ranges, pH value becomes the primary controlling factor influencing bacterial community structure and functional dynamics. In the study area, soil pH ranged from 7.84 to 8.82 (characteristic alkaline conditions), consistent with their model. Thus, pH not only influences rhizosphere microbial communities in grasslands through soil fertility but also regulates bacterial community stability via plant-microbe interaction networks. For ecological restoration practices, adjusting soil pH to the neutral range (6.5&#x2013;7.5) can maximize bacteria-driven ecological services such as carbon cycling and nutrient transformation, optimizing ecosystem functionality.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec27">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>
<list list-type="order">
<list-item>
<p>The combined microbial fertilizer treatment demonstrated significant improvement on soil properties in the Muli mining area. Notably, the Y2E2 treatment exhibited remarkable enhancement in soil nutrient indicators, with soil organic matter content reaching 253.09&#x202F;g&#x202F;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, representing a 72.72% significant increase compared to the CK treatment. Additionally, soil electrical conductivity and pH values under Y2E2 were significantly reduced relative to CK.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>The Y2E2 treatment elevated soil bacterial diversity indices, increasing the Shannon, Ace, and Chao1 indices by 2.36, 6.44, and 5.05%, respectively, compared to CK. The Ace index improvement reached statistical significance (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>The Y1E2 treatment showed a 67.11% positive correlation ratio in single-factor correlation networks, significantly higher than CK and other microbial fertilizer treatments. Core functional microbial phyla included Pseudomonadota, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Hierarchical clustering analysis divided soil bacterial communities across 10 treatments into two distinct groups: Y3E3 formed an independent cluster, CK constituted a separate group, while other fertilization treatments aggregated into another cluster. Functional prediction revealed that all fertilization treatments except CK significantly enhanced anaerobic photoautotrophy, sulfur-oxidizing anaerobic photoautotrophy, and photoautotrophic functional capacities.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Redundancy analysis (RDA) revealed that soil pH was the core environmental factor of soil bacterial community succession in Muli mining area, Qinghai Province (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.002), which not only directly promoted bacterial diversity, but also indirectly affected bacterial metabolic function by regulating soil nutrient content and vegetation community.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Comprehensive analysis identified Y2E2 as the optimal treatment, achieved through combined application of 600.00&#x202F;kg EM biofertilizer and 20.00&#x202F;t organic fertilizer per hectare. This regimen effectively coordinated the structural and functional restoration of the alpine mining grassland ecosystem.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec28">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The data supporting the findings of this study are available in the NCBI repository under accession number PRJNA1298863.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec29">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>LL: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. JS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. PG: Data curation, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. ZC: Investigation, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. FL: Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec30">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was financially supported by the technical support service agreement cooperation project between China Coal Group and Qinghai University (k152126) and Qinghai Provincial Science and Technology Commissioner Project (2024-NK-P24).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>We sincerely thank Shancun Bao for their valuable comments on the pictures in the article. We also wish to send our profound gratitude to reviewers for their invaluable input during the review process.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec31">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec32">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec33">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec34">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1659475/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1659475/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn0001"><p><sup>1</sup><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.majorbio.com" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.majorbio.com</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>An</surname><given-names>X. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Z. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>S. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>C. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Effects of different fertilization combinations on soil physicochemical properties and enzyme activities in alpine mining area</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Acta Grassl.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>984</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>991</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.03.033</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bao</surname><given-names>S. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <source>Soil agrochemical analysis</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>China Agriculture Press</publisher-name>, <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>97</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>W. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ai</surname><given-names>T. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>Z. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>K. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effect of controlled release fertilizer and urea additive on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of double cropping rice</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>54</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11838/sfsc.20180309</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Effects of different crop rotation combinations on bacterial community structure in tobacco-cultivated soil</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Southwest Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>488</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>497</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2025.3.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Che</surname><given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Y. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>W. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lyu</surname><given-names>L. F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Metabolites of blueberry roots at different developmental stages strongly shape microbial community structure and intra-kingdom interactions at the root-soil interface</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>947</volume>:<fpage>174333</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2024.174333</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38945231</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>T. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>L. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Restoring soil health: a study on effective microorganisms and maize straw applications</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>365</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/AGRONOMY15020365</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chu</surname><given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <source>Effects of different microbial fertilizers on the growth, the quality, the production and the nitrogen accumulation of lettuce</source>. <publisher-loc>Hohhot</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Inner Mongolia Agricultural University</publisher-name>, <fpage>16</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names>A. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klepac</surname><given-names>C. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bidas</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weber</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garber</surname><given-names>A. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Christensen</surname><given-names>L. N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Deep photoautotrophic prokaryotes contribute substantially to carbon dynamics in oxygen-deficient waters in a permanently redox-stratified freshwater lake</article-title>. <source>Limnol. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>232</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>247</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/LNO.12262</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>C. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chai</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>W. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>L. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>P. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effects of different rehabilitation measures on plant community and soil nutrient of degraded alpine meadow in the Yellow River Source</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Acta Ecol. Sin.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>7652</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7662</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5846/stxb202104231063</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chai</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Effects of microbial agents combined with sheep manure on community characteristics and soil Fungal diversity of degraded grassland in the source region of the three rivers</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Environ. Sci.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.20250402.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>G. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effects of different restoration measures on plant community and soil nutrients in alpine mining areas</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Acta Prataculturae Sin.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>1218</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1227</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11733/i.issn.1007-0435.2025.04.022</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jyoti</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roshan</surname><given-names>K. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manoj</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Improving nutrient use efficiency (NtUE) in crops: an overview</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Rep.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>786</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>792</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/S40502-024-00830-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kong</surname><given-names>Q. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>D. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lyu</surname><given-names>D. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effects of EM on rhizosphere microbiota and root respiration of <italic>Cerasus avium</italic> Moench. seedling</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Shenyang Agric. Univ.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>409</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>412</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.2013.04.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ku</surname><given-names>Y. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>G. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>C. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of humic acid compounded microbial fertilizer on soil improvement and fruit quality of elderly kiwifruit orchard</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>167</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>175</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7668/hbnxb.2018.03.025</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Q. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pengmao</surname><given-names>D. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lyu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Study on soil microbial community diversity of typical plant communities in the Qaidam Haloxylon Ecosystem Reserve</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Acta Grassl.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>2227</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2237</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11733/i.issn.1007-0435.2025.07.018</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lian</surname><given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>L. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>Z. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>H. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Synergistic evolution of physicochemical properties and microbial communities in slope soil under microbial mineralization-based ecological restoration</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Eco-Agric.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>1275</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1288</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12357/cjea.20240800</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>X. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>Z. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Soil pH rather than nutrients drive changes in microbial community following long-term fertilization in acidic Ultisols of southern China</article-title>. <source>J. Soils Sediments</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>1853</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1864</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11368-018-1934-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Z. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Y. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ru</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Y. N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Native mixed microbe inoculants (M1H) optimize soil health to promote <italic>Cajanus cajan</italic> growth: the soil fungi are more sensitive than bacteria</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>1521064</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/FMICB.2025.1521064</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40109973</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname><given-names>L. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>Z. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Screening of suitable mixed grass species and seeding rates of four native grass seeds in an alpine mining area</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>9587</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/SU16219587</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>L. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Distribution patterns and formation mechanisms of prokaryotic communities in surface sediments of salt lakes/hypersaline lakes on the Qinghai&#x2013;Tibet Plateau</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Acta Ecol. Sin.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20103/j.stxb.202408071859</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lv</surname><given-names>L. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>Z. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bao</surname><given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>F. Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Effects of manure combined with chemical fertilizer on forage production and soil nutrients in degraded alpine grassland</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Acta Grassl.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>2023</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2032</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.06.033</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lyu</surname><given-names>L. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Introduction experiment of annual oat forage and screening of microbial fertilizer in Qinghai&#x2013;Tibet Plateau</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>4444</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su17104444</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lyu</surname><given-names>L. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>Z. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Screening suitable ecological grasses and the seeding rate in the Muli mining area</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>10184</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/SU162310184</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pereg</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McMillan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Scoping the potential uses of beneficial microorganisms for increasing productivity in cotton cropping systems</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>349</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>358</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.10.020</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ramakrishna</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yadav</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>K. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Plant growth promoting bacteria in agriculture: two sides of a coin</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>138</volume>, <fpage>10</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.02.019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>Z. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname><given-names>W. N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of microbial fertilizer on aboveground biomass and soil physicochemical properties in degraded alpine meadows</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Acta Prataculturae Sin.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>2265</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2273</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.10.018</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sahu</surname><given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thakur</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mitra</surname><given-names>N. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effects of bioinoculants on total chlorophyll content, yield of soybean and fertility status of a vertisols</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Agric. Int.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>266</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>272</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9734/JEAI/2023/V45I122292</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Simon</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Christa</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Natacha</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hans</surname><given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adrien</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chinwe</surname><given-names>I. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>No effect on biological or chemical soil properties when amended with effective microorganisms for improved cover crop decomposition</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>197</volume>:<fpage>105358</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.APSOIL.2024.105358</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>X. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>M. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Griffiths</surname><given-names>B. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiao</surname><given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>H. X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Interaction matters: synergy between vermicompost and PGPR agents improves soil quality, crop quality and crop yield in the field</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>89</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.01.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Y. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>C. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>X. R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of complex microbial agent on cotton physiological characteristics, microorganism and physicochemical properties in rhizosphere soil</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Soils</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>477</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>487</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2019.03.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>L. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Q. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hou</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Remediation strategies of biochar and microbial inoculum for PAHs-contaminated soil: quorum sensing-mediated PAHs degradation and element cycling</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mater.</source> <volume>490</volume>:<fpage>137854</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2025.137854</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40056520</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>Y. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>S. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Effects of different fertilization treatments on bacterial community in tomato rhizosphere soil</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Southwest Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>1105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1116</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2025.5.023</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Effect of biological bacterial fertilizer on the phosphorus, organic matter and microorganism in the reclamation soil in mining area</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Shanxi Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>250</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>252</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2011.03.17</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Z. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pei</surname><given-names>W. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of biological agents on soil physical and chemical properties and bacterial community in tobacco field and the correlation</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Anhui Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>167</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>171</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2021.12.043</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>J. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>Y. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>W. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Q. F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Effects of microbial fertilizer and nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer backfilling on soil physicochemical properties and enzyme activities in degraded alpine meadows</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Plant Ecol.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>159</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>172</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17521/cjpe.2024.0208</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xun</surname><given-names>W. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ran</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>B. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>Q. R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Environmental conditions rather than microbial inoculum composition determine the bacterial composition, microbial biomass and enzymatic activity of reconstructed soil microbial communities</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>10</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.018</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Q. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Q. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Co-application of cadmium-immobilizing bacteria and organic fertilizers alter the wheat root soil chemistry and microbial communities</article-title>. <source>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.</source> <volume>287</volume>:<fpage>117288</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.ECOENV.2024.117288</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39520748</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effects of native plant-soil microbe interaction on plant invasion</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Acta Phytoecol.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>1547</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1560</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17521/cjpe.2024.0017</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>T. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>P. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>X. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effect of microbial agents on bacterial diversity in potato rhizosphere soil</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Acta Agric. Boreali-Occident. Sin.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>781</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>790</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2023.05.014</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yin</surname><given-names>Q. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>G. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>Y. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of high-carbon-based fertilizer combined with microbial agents on soil chemical properties and microorganisms in tobacco-planting soil</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Hunan Agric. Univ.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>501</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>506</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2019.05.010</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Z. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>S. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>An</surname><given-names>X. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025a</year>). <article-title>Effects of applying sheep slat manure on the structure of soil microbial community and its function in alpine mining area</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Acta Prataculturae Sin.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>654</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>664</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.02.035</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Z. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>S. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>An</surname><given-names>X. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025b</year>). <article-title>Effects of sheep slab manure with granular organic fertilizer on vegetation and soil properties of degraded grassland in Muli mining area</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Southwest Agric.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>384</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>393</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2025.2.018</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>Q. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>C. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>R. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Microbial agents: effects on activities of urease and catalase in flue-cured tobacco rhizosphere soil</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Agric. Sci. Bull.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kou</surname><given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>L. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Y. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>R. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Analysis of soil bacterial community structure and plant productivity based on sheep plate manure and granulated organic fertilizer application in reconstruction of uninhabited soil in alpine aining area</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Microbiol.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1005-7021.2025.03.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Z. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>H. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>An</surname><given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Effects of combined application of microbial agents on microbial community diversity in rhizosphere soil of flue-cured tobacco</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Southwest Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>796</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>808</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2025.4.013</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>W. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>F. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Z. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Short-term effects of different restoration approaches on soil water holding capacity in the Alpine mining area abandoned land</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2024.08013</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>C. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hou</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>C. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effects of microbial organic fertilizer, microbial inoculant, and quicklime on soil microbial community composition in pepper (<italic>Capsicum annuum</italic> L.) continuous cropping system</article-title>. <source>Horticulturae</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1142</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/HORTICULTURAE10111142</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pei</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ji</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>L. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Enhanced rice yields are related to pronounced shifts in soil resident bacterial community structures in response to <italic>Rhodopseudomonas palustris</italic> and <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> inoculation</article-title>. <source>J. Soils Sediments</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>2369</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2380</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/S11368-021-02929-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>W. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Measures and effects of eco-geological restoration in well No.4 in the Muli mining area, Qinghai Province, China</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Coal Geol. Explor.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>127</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.01.0047</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhong</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Y. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tong</surname><given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Regulation of microbial agent on soil phenolic acid contents and microbial population</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Southwest Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>2037</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2041</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2020.9.023</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>