<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2025.1651178</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Organic fertilizer application rates affect rhizosphere microbial communities and yield optimization in potato (<italic>Solanum tuberosum</italic> L. V7)</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Xiaodong</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2713909/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Jing</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3033191/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Qi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Lan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Yuankai</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3123005/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Gai</surname> <given-names>Yaoyao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sang</surname> <given-names>Yuying</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Ziyi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2641963/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia Agriculture University</institution>, <addr-line>Hohhot</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Vocational and Technical College of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Baotou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Technology Extension Center</institution>, <addr-line>Chifeng</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Edited by: Sankalp Misra, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University, India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0003">
<p>Reviewed by: Francesca De Luca, National Research Council (CNR), Italy</p>
<p>Garima Gupta, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University, India</p>
<p>Anand Dave, Manipal University Jaipur, India</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Ziyi Zhang, <email>zzybiology@126.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn0001"><p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>These authors have contributed equally to this work</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>07</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1651178</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>21</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>22</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Han, Yang, Li, Zhang, Li, Gai, Sang and Zhang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Han, Yang, Li, Zhang, Li, Gai, Sang and Zhang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec id="sec1">
<title>Background</title>
<p>Organic fertilizers enhance sustainable agriculture by providing nutrients and supporting microbial communities. However, optimal application rates that maximize potato yield while maintaining rhizosphere microbial diversity remain poorly understood.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2">
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Four organic fertilizer levels (0, 40, 60, and 80% nitrogen replacement) were tested on potato rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities across three growth stages using high-throughput 16S rDNA and ITS sequencing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Results</title>
<p>Bacterial richness increased progressively with organic fertilizer rates (80%&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;60%&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;40%&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0), with principal coordinate analysis revealing distinct community separations and largest differentiation during tuber expansion under 80% treatment. Bacterial and fungal communities were dominated by <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>, <italic>Acidobacteriota</italic>, and <italic>Gemmatimonadota</italic>, and <italic>Ascomycota</italic>, <italic>Mortierellomycota</italic>, and <italic>Basidiomycota,</italic> respectively. T60 maintained optimal balance of beneficial rhizospheric microorganisms and delivers superior yield outcomes compared with other fertilization regime. Potato yield responded quadratically to organic fertilizer application, with optimal yield of 81,020 kg/ha at 51.25% organic fertilizer rate, while bacterial and fungal diversity correlated with yield.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Moderate organic fertilization (50&#x2013;60% nitrogen replacement) optimizes both rhizosphere microbial diversity and potato productivity through enhanced nutrient cycling efficiency, providing a sustainable approach for potato production systems.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="graphical">
<title>Graphical abstract</title>
<p><fig position="anchor" id="fig001">
<caption><p>Illustration showing the impact of organic fertilizer on potato plant growth and soil biodiversity.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1651178-gr0001.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Illustration showing the impact of organic fertilizer on potato plant growth and soil biodiversity. A central flowering plant is depicted with roots connecting to potatoes underground. Arrows highlight relationships between organic fertilizer application rates, bacterial and fungal diversity, and production. Statistical values (R&#x00B2; = 0.85, r = 0.92) indicate correlations. Icons represent soil microorganisms and potato production.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig></p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>organic fertilizer</kwd>
<kwd>rhizosphere microbiome</kwd>
<kwd>potato yield optimization</kwd>
<kwd>microbial diversity</kwd>
<kwd>sustainable agriculture</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="37"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="6298"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec5">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Organic fertilizers are essential for sustainable agriculture, providing nutrients, improving soil structure, and supporting beneficial microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Bing et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Dong et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Cheng et al., 2024</xref>). These fertilizers contain essential elements including carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, with some types enriched in bioactive substances like humic acids and enzymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Tang et al., 2012</xref>). For instance, humic acid application to Diyala Black fig seedlings enhanced growth and root development while improving soil structure and nutrient availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Shafaqat and Al-Dolaimi, 2023</xref>). A meta-analysis based on 220 studies demonstrated that organic fertilizers promote stable soil aggregation, correlating with increased soil organic carbon and microbial biomass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Liu et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Raymond et al., 2023</xref>). However, organic fertilizer effectiveness depends heavily on application rates. Optimal amounts enhance crop productivity through steady nutrient release and improved stress tolerance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Ika et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Margarida et al., 2022</xref>), while excessive application causes soil chemical imbalances, heavy metal accumulation, and harmful microbial growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Theocharis et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Root-associated microbial communities form the essential biological interface between plants and soil. These diverse assemblages include nitrogen-fixing bacteria, phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Mancilla et al., 2024</xref>), and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi that provide critical services through nutrient mobilization, plant hormone production, and disease control (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Delai et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Hamed et al., 2021</xref>). Microbial communities decompose complex organic compounds through enzymatic processes, facilitating plant nutrient acquisition via specialized metabolic pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Yuanyuan et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Hong et al., 2023</xref>). The rhizosphere environment responds dynamically to organic fertilizer inputs through altered carbon availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Bin et al., 2024</xref>), pH balance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Shoubiao et al., 2024</xref>), and oxygen levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Zhida et al., 2022</xref>), selectively promoting beneficial microbial groups while suppressing pathogens and reshaping interaction networks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">An-Hui et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Noem&#x00ED; et al., 2022</xref>). Despite documented relationships between organic fertilizer application rates and microbial community structure, understanding of specific threshold amounts and connections between microbial functional diversity and crop productivity remains incomplete (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Yijie et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Potato (<italic>Solanum tuberosum</italic> L.), the fourth most important staple crop globally, exhibits high dependence on rhizosphere microbes due to its limited root structure and intensive nutritional demands during tuber formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Feng and Alchanatis, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Martins et al., 2024</xref>). Current research has primarily focused on individual organic fertilizer types effects on potato yields while neglecting detailed studies of rhizosphere microbial community responses to varying fertilizer concentrations. Most studies provide only qualitative descriptions of fertilizer concentrations effects on rhizosphere microbial diversity, lacking quantitative analyses from systematic gradient experiments. Researchers have insufficiently characterized how plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and pathogen-suppressive microbial communities respond to fertilizer gradients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Qiuyun et al., 2024</xref>). Additionally, mechanistic connections between microbial community structural changes and potato agricultural performance remain inadequately established through comprehensive frameworks spanning taxonomic composition to metabolic functionality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Jeanne et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>This investigation addresses critical knowledge gaps through systematic field experiments examining four organic fertilizer application levels (0, 40, 60, and 80% of total nitrogen input) on potato rhizosphere bacterial and fungal community dynamics using high-throughput 16S rDNA and ITS amplicon sequencing. Our research objectives include measuring the dose-dependent relationships between organic fertilizer application rates and rhizosphere microbial community structure and <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>/<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-diversity metrics, identifying key microbial species and their response thresholds to organic fertilizer concentration gradients, and developing quantitative models linking microbial community indicators to potato yield optimization. This research tries to examine three fundamental questions whether threshold effects control relationships between organic fertilizer application and microbial diversity, how functional microbial groups respond quantitatively to organic inputs, and the mechanisms by which microbial community changes influence potato yield formation.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec6">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Experimental site characterization</title>
<p>The field trial was conducted at the First Industrial Park Experimental Station (41&#x00B0;43&#x2032;40&#x201D;N, 111&#x00B0;36&#x2032;6&#x2033;E, and elevation: 1,417.2&#x202F;m) of Xinyu Seed Industry Co., Ltd. in Wulanhua Town, Siziwang Banner, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. This region features a mid-temperate continental monsoon climate with annual precipitation of 313.8&#x202F;mm and 3,084&#x2013;3,286&#x202F;h of sunshine. The soil is classified as Kastanozem (chestnut soil), with a sandy loam texture, deep profile development, and loose structure. The soil exhibits a pH of 7.8, and an organic matter content of 11.12&#x202F;g/kg. These soil characteristics make it ideal for potato production. During the 2024 growing season, the average temperature was 14&#x00B0;C and wind speed ranged from 3&#x2013;4 on the Beaufort scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Experimental design</title>
<p>The field experiment adopted a single-ridge, unmulched cultivation system with drip irrigation, using ridges spaced 90&#x202F;cm apart and plants 16&#x202F;cm apart within each 6-meter ridge. Each plot contained five ridges, yielding a planting density of 69,444 plants/ha. Four treatments replaced 0% (CK), 40% (T40), 60% (T60), and 80% (T80) of synthetic nitrogen with organic fertilizer (OF; 7.06% N, 1.15% P&#x2082;O&#x2085;, 1.14% K&#x2082;O), as detailed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>. Synthetic fertilizers included urea (46% N), diammonium phosphate (DAP; 18% N, 46% P&#x2082;O&#x2085;), and potassium sulfate (SOP; 52% K&#x2082;O). To maintain constant nutrient inputs (250&#x202F;kg&#x202F;N, 200&#x202F;kg P&#x2082;O&#x2085;, 300&#x202F;kg&#x202F;K&#x2082;O/ha), OF nutrient contributions were calculated first. Phosphorus deficits were initially supplemented with DAP, and remaining nitrogen and potassium with urea and SOP. For T80, DAP was applied only until total nitrogen reached 250&#x202F;kg/ha, with further phosphorus from monopotassium phosphate (PDP; 52% P&#x2082;O&#x2085;, 34% K&#x2082;O), and remaining potassium from SOP. The potato cultivar V7 was planted mechanically and fertilized manually. The experiment followed a randomized complete block design with three replicates per treatment.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Gradient design of organic fertilizer application.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Treatment</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Urea (kg&#x00B7;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SOP (kg&#x00B7;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">DAP (kg&#x00B7;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">PDP (kg&#x00B7;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">OF (kg&#x00B7;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Total fertility (kg&#x00B7;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M1">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>OF</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>7.06</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>250</mml:mn>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">CK</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">373.35</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">600.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">434.78</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1408.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T40</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">169.81</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">545.87</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">399.37</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1416.43</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2531.48</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">40%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">68.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">530.34</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">381.67</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2124.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3104.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">60%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T80</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">464.97</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">277.78</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">76.24</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2832.86</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3651.85</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">80%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Organic fertilizer (OF): 7.06% N, 1.15% P&#x2082;O&#x2085;, and 1.14% K&#x2082;O. CK: 0% OF, T40: 40% OF, T60: 60% OF, and T80: 80% OF. Synthetic fertilizers: urea (46% N), diammonium phosphate (DAP: 18% N and 46% P&#x2082;O&#x2085;), potassium sulfate (SOP: 52% K&#x2082;O), and monopotassium phosphate (PDP: 52% P&#x2082;O&#x2085; and 34%K&#x2082;O) used as needed to maintain balanced nutrient inputs.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Rhizosphere soil collection</title>
<p>Rhizosphere soil samples were collected during three critical stages of potato development: seedling (June 24, 2024), tuber initiation (July 15, 2024), and tuber bulking (August 15, 2024). For each of the four treatments, three potato plants exhibiting similar growth vigor were randomly selected and excavated using a spade to approximately 20&#x202F;cm depth and 5&#x2013;10&#x202F;cm distance from the stem to ensure complete root system recovery with adhering soil. After removing loosely attached soil aggregates and excising aboveground plant material, the intact root systems with closely associated rhizosphere soil were immediately preserved on dry ice, yielding 12 total samples across all treatments. In the laboratory, soil adhering to root surfaces was gently removed using a fine brush and collected onto sterile paper, with the three replicate samples from each treatment thoroughly homogenized and subdivided into three equal portions (5&#x2013;6&#x202F;g each) before being placed in separate sterile plastic bags with appropriate labeling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Morgan et al., 2018</xref>). These samples were then stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C for the extraction of soil DNA and metabolite analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Cindy et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Amplification and sequencing of 16S rDNA</title>
<p>The total DNA was extracted from approximately 0.5&#x202F;g of rhizosphere soil sample using the E. Z. N. A.&#x00AE; Soil DNA Kit (Omega Biotek, D5625-01). DNA purity and concentration were evaluated using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer and 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. The V3-V4 regions of bacterial 16S rRNA genes were amplified via PCR using primers 341F (5&#x2019;-CCTACGGGNGGCW GCAG-3&#x2032;) and 806R (5&#x2019;-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAA T-3&#x2032;), while the fungal ITS1 region was amplified with primers ITS1F (5&#x2019;-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3&#x2032;) and ITS1R (5&#x2019;-GCTGCG TTCTTCATCG ATGC-3&#x2032;). Amplicons (400&#x2013;450&#x202F;bp for bacteria, 310&#x202F;bp for fungi) were purified via agarose gel electrophoresis. Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq Nano DNA LT Kit, incorporating dual-index adapters for multiplexed analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Microbial community analysis</title>
<p>Paired-end sequencing (2&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;250&#x202F;bp) was conducted using the Illumina NovaSeq 6,000 platform, generating raw 16S rRNA and ITS reads for bacterial and fungal communities, respectively. Demultiplexing and merging of the raw reads were performed using FLASH (v1.2.11) with a 10% mismatch tolerance, resulting in consensus sequences of 400&#x2013;450&#x202F;bp for bacteria and approximately 310&#x202F;bp for fungi. Following initial processing, sequences underwent quality filtering with fastp (v0.19.6) and further merging with FLASH (v1.2.7). High-quality sequences were subsequently de-noised using the DADA2 plugin within the QIIME2 (v2021.4) pipeline, which resolves amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) at single-nucleotide resolution based on sample-specific error profiles. Taxonomic classification of bacterial ASVs was performed against the SILVA 16S rRNA database (v138) using the RDP classifier (v2.2), while fungal sequences were annotated using the UNITE v9.0 database.</p>
<p>Microbial diversity analyses were conducted at a uniform sequencing depth. Alpha diversity metrics, including observed ASVs, Chao1 richness, and Shannon index, were calculated using Mothur (v1.30.1), while beta diversity was assessed based on weighted UniFrac distances using Bray-Curtis-based PCoA ordination and PERMANOVA validation. The top 10 most abundant genera were profiled to elucidate treatment-induced shifts in community composition. Multivariate analyses, including ANOVA and PERMANOVA, were employed to evaluate the effects of experimental conditions on dominant phyla and genera. All sequencing and bioinformatic analyses were performed in triplicate to ensure reproducibility.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Yield trait measurements</title>
<p>Potato harvesting was carried out on October 2, 2024, at physiological maturity. From each plot, three uniformly growing potato plants were randomly selected and excavated, yielding a total of nine plants across the three plots. To ensure data integrity, care was taken to minimize tuber damage during excavation, and adhering soil was gently removed from the tubers. For each plant, both the number and total weight of tubers were measured and recorded. The total potato yield was calculated, with total yield expressed as the average tuber weight per plant multiplied by the number of plants in the plot (kg/m<sup>2</sup>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The polynomial regression analysis examining the relationship between potato yield (Y) and organic fertilizer application (X) was conducted using Python, employing the model formulation Y&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x03B2;<sub>0</sub>&#x202F;+&#x202F;&#x03B2;<sub>1</sub> X&#x202F;+&#x202F;&#x03B2;<sub>2</sub> X<sup>2</sup>&#x202F;+&#x202F;&#x2107;. Model parameters (&#x03B2;<sub>0</sub>, &#x03B2;<sub>1</sub>, &#x03B2;<sub>2</sub>) were estimated via ordinary least squares (OLS) using the &#x201C;numpy.polyfit&#x201D; function, with model fit assessed through the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>). The overall statistical significance of the regression model was evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with F-tests, where <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05 served as the threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis. Correlation analyses utilized Pearson&#x2019;s correlation for normally distributed variables (confirmed by Shapiro&#x2013;Wilk tests with <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05) and Spearman&#x2019;s rank correlation for non-parametric data, with all correlation matrices subjected to Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction (q&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.1) to adjust for multiple comparisons. The relationships between microbial community and potato yield were further analyzed through SparCC cooccurrence networks, applying thresholds of&#x2223;<italic>&#x03C1;</italic>&#x2223;&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.6 and <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01 for network edge inclusion.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec14">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Overall analysis of 16S rDNA and ITS</title>
<p>High-throughput sequencing of bacterial 16S rDNA (V4 region) and fungal ITS1 regions across 12 rhizosphere soil samples generated robust datasets for microbial community analysis. Bacterial sequencing with 41F-806R primers produced 1,470,323 raw reads, yielding 1,216,234 high-quality non-chimeric ASVs after filtering and denoising, with an average of 101,352 ASVs per soil sample (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). Fungal sequencing with ITS1F-ITS1R primers generated 1,717,472 raw reads, resulting in 1,617,588 non-chimeric ASVs, averaging 134,799 ASVs per soil sample (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S2</xref>). These results provide reliable datasets for downstream diversity and community structure analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Alpha diversity analysis of potato rhizosphere microbial communities</title>
<p>Alpha diversity of potato rhizosphere microbial communities was assessed across seedling, tuber initiation, and tuber expansion stages under different organic fertilizer treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). Good&#x2019;s Coverage values exceeded 0.995 for bacteria and 0.999 for fungi across all treatments and growth stages, confirming adequate sequencing depth for reliable diversity assessment.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Alpha diversity analysis of potato inter-root microorganisms under different organic fertilizer treatments across growth periods.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">strains</th>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Treatment</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="4">Seedling stage</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="4">Tuberogenesise</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="4">Tuber expansion stage</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Chao1</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Shannon</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Ace</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Goods-coverage</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Chao1</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Shannon</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Ace</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Goods-coverage</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Chao</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Shannon</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Ace</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Goods-coverage</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4">Bacteria</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">CK</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5318.74Aab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.07Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5342.96Aab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.9962Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4286.28Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.89Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4343.92Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.9955Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5537.10Ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.91Bb</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5581.95Ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.9978Aa</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T40</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5425.26Aab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.17Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5456.00Aab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.9963Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4295.50Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.75Ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4348.14Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.9958Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7448.55Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.39Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7583.13Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.9917Aab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5605.63Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.21Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5657.35Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.9958Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4451.29Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.93Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4502.48Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.9962Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7619.64Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.61Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7734.94Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.9939Aab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T80</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4598.57Ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.01Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4613.63Ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.9981Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4325.86Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.89Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4358.77Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.9970Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7982.33Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.69Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8145.99Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.9910Ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4">Fungi</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">CK</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">650.68Aab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.89Bb</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">649.81Aab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.99984Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">601.92Abc</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.01Bb</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">603.33Abc</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.9998Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">356.24Bc</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.36Bb</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">358.21Bc</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.99991Aa</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T40</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">552.34Ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.64ABb</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">552.31Ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.99995Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">727.61Aab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.12Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">728.25Aab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.0000Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">624.86Ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.85Bb</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">625.85Ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.99994Aa</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">866.03Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.91Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">866.62Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.99993Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">789.80Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.94Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">790.53Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.9998Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">726.52Aab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.30Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">727.42Aab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.99997Aa</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T80</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">706.71Aab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.76Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">706.84Aab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.99996Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">522.90Ac</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.16Cc</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">523.74Ac</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.9998Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">793.83Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.69Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">794.51Aa</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.99997Aa</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Unit, piece. Values are the mean of three replicates. CK: 0% OF, T40: 40% OF, T60: 60% OF, and T80: 80% OF. According to Spass of Duncan&#x2019;s test, the average of the different letters (such as a, b, and c) in each column was significantly different at <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05. the average of the different letters (such as A, B, and C) in each column was highly significantly different at <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Bacterial richness indices (Chao1 and ACE) varied temporally, peaking during tuber expansion, followed by the seedling stage, with lowest values at tuber initiation. Within each growth period, bacterial richness increased progressively with organic fertilizer application rates (T80&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;T60&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;T40&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;CK). This positive relationship between bacterial richness and fertilizer application remained consistent across all developmental stages. Shannon diversity indices remained stable across treatments and growth stages, indicating that fertilization affected species richness but not overall community evenness.</p>
<p>Fungal communities exhibited distinct patterns compared with bacterial assemblages. During the seedling stage, T60 showed highest fungal richness, followed by T80, while T40 had lower diversity. At tuber initiation, T60 maintained peak fungal richness, followed by T40, while T80 showed the lowest values. By tuber expansion, T80 exhibited substantially increased fungal richness, reaching the highest observed values. T60 maintained consistently high fungal richness throughout all developmental stages.</p>
<p>Furthermore, Fungal Shannon indices were consistently lower than bacterial indices across all growth stages, approximating half the bacterial community values. CK and T40 maintained lower diversity indices, while T60 and T80 showed significantly higher values (T80&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;T60&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;T40&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;CK).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Beta diversity of microbial Community in Rhizosphere Soils</title>
<p>Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) based on ASV composition at the genus level revealed distinct compositional patterns in bacterial and fungal communities across organic fertilization treatments and developmental stages. Sample clusters separated according to fertilization regimes, demonstrating pronounced effects of organic fertilizer application on microbial community structure. For bacterial communities, PCoA1 and PCoA2 explained 49.55 and 15.29% of total variance, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>). Fungal community ordination showed PCoA1 and PCoA2 explaining 32.49 and 19.17% of variance, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>). These high variance explanations indicate that the ordination effectively captures microbial community differentiation patterns.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of rhizosphere microbial communities. PCoA plots based on Bray-Curtis distances showing (<bold>A</bold>) bacterial communities and (<bold>B</bold>) fungal communities at the genus level in potato rhizosphere. Colors represent organic fertilizer treatments. Symbols indicate growth stages: circles&#x202F;=&#x202F;seedling, triangles&#x202F;=&#x202F;tuberogenesis, squares&#x202F;=&#x202F;tuber expansion.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1651178-g001.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two panels labeled A and B show PCoA plots comparing PC1 and PC2 axes, depicting different developmental stages: seedling, tuberogenesis, and tuber expansion. Each point represents a treatment group, identified by color and shape, including CK, T40, T60, and T80. Panel A shows PC1 explaining 49.55% and PC2 15.29% of variation. Panel B shows PC1 at 32.49% and PC2 at 19.17%. The plots illustrate the variation across stages and treatments.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Microbial communities exhibited stage-specific temporal dynamics in response to organic fertilization. During the seedling stage, bacterial and fungal communities showed pronounced dispersion across fertilization treatments, indicating differential establishment of rhizosphere assemblages. Bacterial communities progressively converged through developmental stages, clustering cohesively during tuber expansion in the upper ordination space (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>). The control treatment (CK) maintained distinctly segregated positions throughout all stages, particularly in bacterial communities where CK samples consistently occupied the negative PCoA1 region. Fungal communities exhibited greater heterogeneity than bacterial assemblages, especially during tuberogenesis, suggesting taxon-specific sensitivities to organic inputs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Alterations in bacterial and fungal community composition</title>
<p>The taxonomic composition of bacterial and fungal communities in the potato rhizosphere exhibited distinct temporal dynamics across different growth stages and Organic fertilizer treatments. Bacterial communities were dominated by four phyla: Proteobacteria, Acidobacteriota, Gemmatimonadota, and Bacteroidota. Proteobacteria dominated both CK and T80 during the seedling stage but declined progressively through tuber formation and expansion stages. Conversely, Planctomycetota increased markedly during tuber expansion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>). At the genus level, <italic>Sphingomonas</italic>, <italic>Vicinamibacteraceae</italic>, <italic>Flavobacterium</italic>, and <italic>RB41</italic> were the most abundant genera. The relative abundances of <italic>Sphingomonas</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, and <italic>Massilia</italic> decreased during potato development, while <italic>Vicinamibacteraceae</italic> increased, particularly under T60 and T80 during the tuber expansion. <italic>Flavobacterium</italic> and <italic>RB41</italic> remained stable across developmental stages and treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Rhizosphere microbial community composition of potatoes at different growth stages under varying organic fertilizer treatments. Relative abundance (%) of bacterial communities at <bold>(A)</bold> phylum and <bold>(B)</bold> genus levels, and fungal communities at <bold>(C)</bold> phylum and <bold>(D)</bold> genus levels in potato rhizosphere soil. Communities were analyzed across three developmental phases (seedling, tuberogenesis, and tuber expansion stages) and four organic fertilizer treatments (CK, T40, T60, and T80). Bar charts display the top 20 most abundant taxa. The y-axis shows relative abundance percentages.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1651178-g002.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Stacked bar charts display the relative abundance of different taxonomic groups at various plant growth stages, including seedling, tuberogenesis, and tuber expansion. Panels A and B show bacterial and archaeal taxa, while C and D show fungal taxa. Each color represents a different group, detailed in the legend.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Fungal communities consisted primarily of <italic>Ascomycota</italic>, Mortierellomycota, Basidiomycota, and Olpidimycota, collectively accounting for ~95% of total abundance. <italic>Ascomycota</italic> alone represented 75&#x2013;90% of fungal communities. During potato development, Olpidimycota decreased sharply while <italic>Ascomycota</italic> and Basidiomycota increased gradually. Glomeromycota emerged prominently in T60 and T80 during tuber expansion. <italic>Ascomycota</italic> abundance followed the pattern CK&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;T40&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;T60&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;T80 at both seedling and expansion stages, while Mortierellomycota remained unchanged (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>). At the genus level, <italic>Plectosphaerella</italic>, <italic>Fusarium</italic>, <italic>Cephalotrichum</italic>, and <italic>Mortierella</italic> dominated. Increasing organic fertilizer application correlated with declining <italic>Cephalotrichum</italic> and increasing <italic>Fusarium</italic> and <italic>Plectosphaerella</italic> during the seedling stage. This trend continued through tuber formation, with <italic>Cephalotrichum</italic> declining and <italic>Fusarium</italic> increasing. During tuber expansion, both <italic>Plectosphaerella</italic> and <italic>Fusarium</italic> increased further, ranking T40&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;T60&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;CK&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;T80. The T80 consistently enriched <italic>Scutellinia</italic> throughout the growth period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2D</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>LEfSe analysis of bacterial and fungal communities</title>
<p>LEfSe analysis revealed stage-specific shifts in potato rhizosphere microbial communities under varying organic fertilization regimes. During the seedling stage, organic treatments (T40, T60, and T80) showed reduced bacterial enrichment compared with the control (CK). The CK was dominated by f_Sphingomonadaceae, o_Sphingomonadales, and g_Massilia. Organic amendments preferentially selected for p_Chloroflexi and p_Gemmatimonadota phyla, likely due to fertilizer-induced increases in soil polysaccharides. These conditions favored cellulose-degrading genera such as g_<italic>Levilinea</italic> and g_<italic>Roseiflexus</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>). At tuber formation, T60 showed limited bacterial enrichment, with only g_<italic>Flavobacterium</italic> and g_<italic>Sphingomonas</italic> reaching significance (LDA&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;3.5). In contrast, T80 promoted <italic>p_</italic>Actinobacteriota and f_Pseudomonadaceae lineages. These included nitrogen-cycling o_Micrococcaceae and antibiotic-producing g_<italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, which aligned with increased nitrogen demand and improved soil structure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref>). During tuber expansion, T60 enriched <italic>p_</italic>Acidobacteriota, o_Vicinamibacterales, and f_Sphingomonadaceae. Meanwhile, T80 selection pressure favored specialized p_<italic>Chloroflexi</italic> taxa adapted to high organic carbon environments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) of microbial communities in potato rhizosphere soil under different organic treatments (CK, T40, T60, and T80) across three growth stages. <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold> show differential abundance of rhizobacterial communities (LDA score &#x003E;3.5) during seedling stage <bold>(A)</bold>, tuberogenesis <bold>(B)</bold>, and tuber expansion stage <bold>(C)</bold>. <bold>(D&#x2013;F)</bold> display differential abundance of rhizofungal communities during seedling stage <bold>(D)</bold>, tuberogenesis <bold>(E)</bold>, and tuber expansion stage <bold>(F)</bold>. Bar colors represent the specific organic treatment where each taxon was significantly enriched, while bar length indicates the magnitude of differential abundance between treatments.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1651178-g003.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Six horizontal bar charts labeled A to F show LDA scores (log 10) for various taxa during different plant growth stages: seedling, tuberogenesis, and tuber expansion. Each chart uses red, green, blue, and purple bars to represent CK, T40, T60, and T80 treatments, respectively. The taxa and scores vary across charts, highlighting differences in taxa abundance and diversity under different conditions.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Fungal communities displayed treatment-dependent functional succession throughout potato development. Each organic amendment rate shaped distinct microbial assemblages at different growth stages. At the seedling stage, T40 enhanced plant growth-promoting fungi, including Mortierella and Mortierellomycetes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref>). During tuber formation, T60 favored ecological specialists such as Fusarium equiseti and Ascomycota. T80 led to enrichment of saprophytic and weakly pathogenic taxa, including Volutella and Nectriaceae (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3E</xref>). By the expansion phase, T60 promoted phosphorus acquisition through Glomeromycota mycorrhizae and maintained Mortierella-driven decomposition of organic intermediates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3F</xref>). Collectively, these results demonstrate that T60 achieves an optimal balance of microbial community structure and function, fostering beneficial fungi that support nutrient cycling and potato growth across developmental stages.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Potato yield under different potassium treatments</title>
<p>Moderate organic fertilizer application significantly enhanced potato yield, exhibiting a quadratic response whereby yield increased with organic fertilizer substitution up to 60% and then declined at higher rates. Specifically, T60 produced the highest yield (64,886 kg/ha), which was markedly greater than the control (49,824 kg/ha), while T40 and T80 yielded 60,507 kg/ha and 58,901 kg/ha, respectively. Although these three treatments did not differ significantly from one another, all outperformed the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Potato yield in response to different organic fertilizer application rates. Bars with different letters (a,b) indicate statistically significant differences (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). Error bars represent standard deviation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1651178-g004.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart showing yield in kilograms per hectare for four treatments: CK, T40, T60, and T80. CK has the lowest yield around 50,000 kg/ha, marked with "b". T40 and T60 have similar yields near 60,000 kg/ha, marked with "a". T80 is slightly above 60,000 kg/ha, marked with "ab". Error bars are present above each bar.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<label>3.7</label>
<title>Correlation analysis of potato yield and microbial diversity</title>
<p>Regression analysis revealed a quadratic relationship between potato yield and organic fertilizer application using Python&#x2019;s statsmodels package. Yield increased with fertilizer rate until reaching an optimal point, then declined at higher rates. The model predicted maximum yield (81,020 kg/ha) at 51.25% organic fertilizer substitution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). Beyond this threshold, yields declined progressively with further increases in fertilizer application, following a quadratic pattern where greater deviations from the optimum resulted in steeper yield reductions.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Structural equation model showing relationships between potato yield, soil microbial diversity, and organic fertilizer application. &#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.5, &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1651178-g005.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Diagram illustrating the relationship between organic fertilizer (X), production (Y), bacterial diversity (Chao 1), and fungal diversity (Shannon). Arrows indicate correlations: organic fertilizer to bacterial diversity (R&#x00B2;=0.912, r=0.768), to fungal diversity (R&#x00B2;=0.967, r=0.892), and to production with a polynomial regression (R&#x00B2;=0.85, r=0.92). Bacterial diversity to production (R&#x00B2;=0.985, r=0.913) and fungal diversity to production (R&#x00B2;=0.978, r=0.935).</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Microbial diversity exhibited similar patterns. Bacterial richness (Chao1) peaked at approximately 60% fertilization. Bacterial diversity correlated strongly with yield, likely through enhanced enzyme activity that improves nutrient cycling. Fungal diversity (Shannon) also demonstrated a quadratic relationship with yield, with optimal yield occurring at Shannon index values of 6.60. This suggests a balance between beneficial fungal symbiosis and risks from competition or disease at higher fungal diversity levels. The optimal fertilizer application rate for both yield and microbial diversity ranged between 55&#x2013;60%. At this level, bacterial nitrifiers provided most plant-available nitrogen while fungal hyphae delivered acquired phosphorus to roots.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec22">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>This study examined potato rhizosphere microbial communities across growth stages using organic fertilizer rates (0, 40, 60, 80% synthetic nitrogen replacement). PCoA analysis revealed distinct separations between organic treatments and controls, maximum differentiation during tuber expansion under 80% treatment, indicating that higher organic fertilizer doses induce more pronounced community changes. Bacterial Chao1 indices peaked at 60% during tuber formation and rose progressively with rates during expansion. Fungal Shannon indices maximized at 60% during seedling and tuber formation stages. These align with studies showing moderate organic substitution boosts microbial abundance and diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Quan et al., 2023</xref>). The mechanism involves balanced C: N ratios from appropriate fertilizer, while excess causes rapid nitrogen mineralization and carbon limitation, peaking abundance at 60% before declining at 80% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Lei et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Bacterial communities were dominated by Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, and Patescibacteria, with PGPR genera <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> and <italic>Sphingomonas</italic> increasing under 60 and 80% treatments via auxin secretion, siderophore production, and pathogen control (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Das et al., 2022</xref>). Fungal communities featured Mortierellomycota and Ascomycota, adept at decomposition and growth promotion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Rubee et al., 2020</xref>). At 60%, disease-resistant <italic>Plectosphaerella</italic> rose while harmful <italic>Cephalotrichum</italic> fell, showing synergy with plant defenses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Ning et al., 2022</xref>). LEfSe analysis revealed stage-specific changes, with organic treatments favoring Chloroflexi and Gemmatimonadota during the seedling stage due to fertilization-induced increases in soil polysaccharides that support cellulose-degrading genera (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Bose et al., 2022</xref>). During tuber formation, 60% favored fungi in high-carbon conditions, while 80% boosted nitrogen-cycling and antibiotic-producing bacteria. This suggests that high carbon loading created conditions favoring fungi while suppressing most bacterial taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Quan et al., 2023</xref>). Moderate rates (40&#x2013;60%) thus optimize structure by promoting beneficial microbes and suppressing pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Wenyi et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Organic fertilizer rates positively affected microbial diversity and yield, with fertilizer proportion correlating strongly (<italic>r</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.92, R<sup>2</sup>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.85). Bacterial Chao1 and fungal Shannon indices correlated with inputs, enhancing richness via better nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Quan et al., 2023</xref>). The 60 and 80% treatments enriched decomposition-related Actinobacteria and Ascomycota during expansion. Diversity-yield correlations were strong (bacterial Chao1: <italic>r</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.913; fungal Shannon: <italic>r</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.935), confirming diversity drives yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Martins et al., 2024</xref>). Mechanisms include enriched phosphorus-solubilizing and nitrogen-fixing groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Shaojing et al., 2022</xref>), with <italic>Vicinamibacteraceae</italic> and <italic>Nitrosomonadaceae</italic> providing nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Chengyu et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Regression showed quadratic yield response, peaking at 81,020 kg/ha with 51.25% fertilizer. Beyond this, 10% increases caused quadratic declines, steeper with greater excess. Optimal rates for yield and diversity were 55&#x2013;60%, where nitrifiers supply nitrogen and fungal hyphae deliver phosphorus. Thus, 40&#x2013;60% substitution optimizes yield via enhanced diversity, supporting precision application (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Sisay and Sisay, 2019</xref>). Moderate organic fertilization supports complementary microbial functions while over-application disrupts essential microbial networks needed for sustainable yields.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec23">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra</ext-link>, accession number SRP579091.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec24">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>XH: Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Data curation, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Software, Formal analysis. JY: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Formal analysis, Data curation, Software, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Conceptualization. QL: Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Resources. LZ: Methodology, Supervision, Resources, Writing &#x2013; original draft. YL: Resources, Software, Writing &#x2013; original draft. YG: Data curation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Resources. YS: Formal analysis, Software, Writing &#x2013; original draft. ZZ: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Investigation, Validation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Funding acquisition, Visualization.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec25">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology Plan Project (2023YFDZ0003 and 2022YFHH0130), and the Hohhot City Science and Technology Program Project (2023-Agriculture-5).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec26">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec27">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec28">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec29">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1651178/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1651178/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>An-Hui</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhenhai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jianru</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qing</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Microbial assembly and association network in watermelon rhizosphere after soil fumigation for <italic>Fusarium</italic> wilt control</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>312</volume>:<fpage>107336</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2021.107336</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiaolin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haitao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chengsheng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Microbial organic fertilizer prepared by co-composting of <italic>Trichoderma</italic> dregs mitigates dissemination of resistance, virulence genes, and bacterial pathogens in soil and rhizosphere</article-title>. <source>Environ. Res.</source> <volume>241</volume>:<fpage>117718</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2023.117718</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bing</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kunlong</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chengtun</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ying</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Differential responses of the properties of soil humic acid and fulvic acid to nitrogen addition in the North China plain</article-title>. <source>Environ. Res.</source> <volume>214</volume>:<fpage>113980</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2022.113980</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bose</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sahu</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sar</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Impact of arsenic on microbial community structure and their metabolic potential from rice soils of West Bengal, India</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>841</volume>:<fpage>156486</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156486</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35667424</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Min</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Improvement of soil organic carbon turnover and microbial community niche differentiation with the addition of commercial organic fertilizer in wheat&#x2013;green manure systems</article-title>. <source>Research Square</source>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21203/rs.3.rs-4593466/v1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chengyu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Defeng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haiqing</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhiling</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chengda</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yueping</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effects of peach branch organic fertilizer on the soil microbial community in peach orachards</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>1223420</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1223420</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cindy</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Claude-Olivier</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Val&#x00E9;rie</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eric</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cochet</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>A standardized method for the sampling of rhizosphere and rhizoplan soil bacteria associated to a herbaceous root system</article-title>. <source>Ann. Microbiol.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>471</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>476</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13213-012-0491-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>P. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>K. R. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagpure</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mansoori</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghazi</surname> <given-names>I. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Plant-soil-microbes: a tripartite interaction for nutrient acquisition and better plant growth for sustainable agricultural practices</article-title>. <source>Environ. Res.</source> <volume>214</volume>:<fpage>113821</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2022.113821</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35810815</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Delai</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Munawar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mian Noor Hussain Asghar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muhammad</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waqas</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeshan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi combined application reveals enhanced soil fertility and rice production</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source>. <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>550</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy13020550</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Impact of short-term organic amendments incorporation on soil structure and hydrology in semiarid agricultural lands</article-title>. <source>Int. Soil Water Conservation Res.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>457</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>469</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.iswcr.2021.10.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alchanatis</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <source>The potential of airborne hyperspectral images to detect leaf nitrogen content in potato fields</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing, China</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS)</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Mancilla</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Almaraz-Su&#x00E1;rez</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferrera-Cerrato</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodr&#x00ED;guez-Guzm&#x00E1;n</surname> <given-names>M. D. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taboada-Gayt&#x00E1;n</surname> <given-names>O. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Photosynthetic activity and growth of poblano pepper biofertilized with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</article-title>. <source>Curr. Res. Microb. Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>100269</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100269</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39545204</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hamed</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nematollah</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Physiological response of Arizona cypress to cd-contaminated soil inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria</article-title>. <source>Rhizosphere</source>. <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>100354</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rhisph.2021.100354</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wenjie</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shuo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hyun</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yong-Hwan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gehong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Plant domestication shapes rhizosphere microbiome assembly and metabolic functions</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>70</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-023-01513-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ika</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nurbaiti</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berliana</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yusril Esa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effect of the dosage and types of organic fertilizer plant waste to the yield of shallot (<italic>Allium ascalonicum</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>J Global Sustainable Agriculture</source>. <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>220</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32502/jgsa.v4i2.8287</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jeanne</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parent</surname> <given-names>S.-&#x00C9;.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hogue</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Using a soil bacterial species balance index to estimate potato crop productivity</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>e0214089</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0214089</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30901358</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lei</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jinsong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Junxiao</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yingjie</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shuli</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Chronic nitrogen enrichment decreases soil gross nitrogen mineralization by acidification in topsoil but by carbon limitation in subsoil</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source>. <volume>428</volume>:<fpage>116159</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116159</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Response of soil aggregate stability to phosphorus, nitrogen, and organic fertilizer addition: A Meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Sustainability.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>10601</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su151310601</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40607831</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Margarida</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leonardo Bomfim</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Juliana Aparecida</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Valdemar</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soraia</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu&#x00ED;s C&#x00E9;sar</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Excessive delay in nutrient release by controlled-release fertilizers can reduce chestnut yield</article-title>. <source>Horticulturae</source>. <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>1067</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/horticulturae8111067</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martins</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Radl</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Treder</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Micha&#x0142;owska</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pritsch</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schloter</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>The rhizosphere microbiome of 51 potato cultivars with diverse plant growth characteristics</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</source> <volume>100</volume>:<fpage>fiae088</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femsec/fiae088</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38839598</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morgan</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ellen</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daniel</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Isolation and analysis of microbial communities in soil, rhizosphere, and roots in perennial grass experiments</article-title>. <source>J. Vis. Exp.</source> <volume>24</volume>:<fpage>57932</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3791/57932</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ning</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shuya</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jinwu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fanhong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zwci</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Reduced chemical fertilizer combined with bio-organic fertilizer affects the soil microbial community and yield and quality of lettuce</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>863325</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.863325</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Noem&#x00ED;</surname> <given-names>O. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maurizio</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marcia</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fernando</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>An organic fertilizer &#x2018;doped&#x2019; with a Bacillus strain improves melon and pepper yield, modifying the rhizosphere microbiome with negligible changes in the bulk soil microbiome</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source>. <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>2620</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy12112620</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qiuyun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jichao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mengyan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mingjing</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yinhua</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Multigenerational adaptation can enhance the pathogen resistance of plants via changes in rhizosphere microbial community assembly</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>14581</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14591</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jafc.4c02200</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quan</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yongqiu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chaopu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jun</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Partial organic fertilizer substitution promotes soil multifunctionality by increasing microbial community diversity and complexity</article-title>. <source>Pedosphere</source>. <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>407</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>420</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pedsph.2022.06.044</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Raymond</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamburini</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oberson</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Magid</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00FC;ller</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Organic fertilizer amendment affect soil aggregates during crop growth: a hotspot for microbial phosphorus turnover?</article-title> <source>EGU General Assembly</source>. <fpage>13715</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/egusphere-egu23-13715</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rubee</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tanvir</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Divjot</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kusam Lata</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ashok</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ajar Nath</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Beneficial fungal communities from different habitats and their roles in plant growth promotion and soil health</article-title>. <source>Microbial Biosystems J.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21608/mb.2020.32802.1016</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shafaqat</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Dolaimi</surname> <given-names>R. M. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effect of adding organic fertilizer and humic acid on some vegetative and root growth characteristics of fig seedlings, Diyala black cultivar</article-title>. <source>IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci.</source> <volume>1252</volume>:<fpage>12081</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/1252/1/012081</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shaojing</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fengyue</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ying</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao-Zeng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hui</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Juying</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Biochar-compost amendment enhanced sorghum growth and yield by improving soil physicochemical properties and shifting soil bacterial community in a coastal soil</article-title>. <source>Front. Environ. Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1036837</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2022.1036837</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shoubiao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tingting</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yujie</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hiba</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jie</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Organic fertilizer compost alters the microbial composition and network structure in strongly acidic soil</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>195</volume>:<fpage>105263</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105263:105263</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sisay</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sisay</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The principal role of organic fertilizer on soil properties and agricultural productivity -a review</article-title>. <source>Agricultural Research Technol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19080/artoaj.2019.22.556192</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>X.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao-Jun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yong-Chao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Mechanism of fulvic acid- and organic manure-mediated phosphorus mobilization in black soil at low temperature</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutrition Fertilizers</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>894</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>900</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11674/zwyf.2012.11416</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Theocharis</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Victor</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ioannis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Organic fertilization and tree orchards</article-title>. <source>Agriculture</source>. <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>692</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture11080692</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wenyi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dufeng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guiting</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Per</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xinhong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effects of long-term organic fertilizer substitutions on soil nitrous oxide emissions and nitrogen cycling gene abundance in a greenhouse vegetable field</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>188</volume>:<fpage>104877</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.104877</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yijie</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yating</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yanhua</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jinshan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lei</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Honggang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effects of an organic amendment on cassava growth and rhizosphere microbial diversity</article-title>. <source>Agriculture</source>. <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>1830</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture13091830</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yuanyuan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiaolong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dongqing</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ling</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiahui</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xifen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Biotransformation of organophosphate esters by Rice and rhizosphere microbiome: multiple metabolic pathways, mechanism, and toxicity assessment</article-title>. <source>Environmental Science Technology</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>1776</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1787</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.est.2c07796</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36656265</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhida</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hongcai</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hui</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mingyang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sijia</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Novel liquid organic fertilizer: a potential way to effectively recycle spent mushroom substrate</article-title>. <source>J. Clean. Prod.</source> <volume>376</volume>:<fpage>134368</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134368</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>