<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2025.1646341</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Bioleaching and chemical leaching of magnesium from serpentinites (Zlatibor Mt. ophiolite massif, Serbia) with potential application in mineral carbonation process for CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stankovi&#x0107;</surname>
<given-names>Sr&#x0111;an</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2611375/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Atanackovi&#x0107;</surname>
<given-names>Neboj&#x0161;a</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3153896/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>&#x0160;trba&#x010D;ki</surname>
<given-names>Jana</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kova&#x010D;</surname>
<given-names>Sabina</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>&#x0160;ari&#x0107;</surname>
<given-names>Kristina</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nik&#x0161;i&#x0107;</surname>
<given-names>&#x0110;urica</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Schippers</surname>
<given-names>Axel</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/29619/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade</institution>, <addr-line>Belgrade</addr-line>, <country>Serbia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Faculty of Mining and Geology, University of Belgrade</institution>, <addr-line>Belgrade</addr-line>, <country>Serbia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources</institution>, <addr-line>Hannover</addr-line>, <country>Germany</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2230739/overview">Drew Gorman-Lewis</ext-link>, University of Washington, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0003">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/814598/overview">Mingjing Fang</ext-link>, Wuhan University of Technology, China</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3107463/overview">Pamela Principi</ext-link>, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Switzerland</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Axel Schippers, <email>axel.schippers@bgr.de</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>22</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1646341</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>13</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>08</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Stankovi&#x0107;, Atanackovi&#x0107;, &#x0160;trba&#x010D;ki, Kova&#x010D;, &#x0160;ari&#x0107;, Nik&#x0161;i&#x0107; and Schippers.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Stankovi&#x0107;, Atanackovi&#x0107;, &#x0160;trba&#x010D;ki, Kova&#x010D;, &#x0160;ari&#x0107;, Nik&#x0161;i&#x0107; and Schippers</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Magnesium (Mg) extraction via leaching of serpentinite rocks from of the ultramafic massif of Zlatibor Mountain, Serbia, could be applied in mineral carbonation processes for permanent CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration. Four different Mg leaching approaches were experimentally tested: (1) sulfuric acid leaching in chemical reactors, (2) bioleaching with the sulfur-oxidizing bacteria <italic>Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans</italic> in bioreactors, and (3) simulated heap leaching of coarse rock particles in percolators with both, chemical and biological methods. Experimental results show that bioleaching in bioreactors and leaching with sulfuric acid were most efficient with Mg leaching degrees of 95&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.9% and 92&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.8%, respectively. Bioleaching and leaching with sulfuric acid in percolators was less efficient, with Mg extractions of 16&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.4% and 73&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.9%, respectively. This study proposes new pathways for the development of cost-effective, scalable solutions for mitigating climate change using abundant ultramafic rock resources.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>serpentinites</kwd>
<kwd>carbon sequestration</kwd>
<kwd>magnesium extraction</kwd>
<kwd>leaching</kwd>
<kwd>bioleaching</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn1">451-03-136/2025-03/200126</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn1">scientific research of SRI in 2025</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="1"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="2"/>
<ref-count count="20"/>
<page-count count="7"/>
<word-count count="5221"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Microbiological Chemistry and Geomicrobiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1">
<title>Highlights</title>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Serpentinites from Serbia were used for Mg extraction via bioleaching and chemical leaching in stirred tank reactors and column percolators.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Chemical leaching and bioleaching in tank reactors achieved &#x003E; 90% Mg recovery.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Leaching with H&#x2082;SO&#x2084; and bioleaching in percolators extracted 73% and 16% Mg, respectively.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Heap leaching with H&#x2082;SO&#x2084; using coarse rock particles might be the optimal route for application.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec2">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Mineral carbonation of magnesium-rich rocks is a naturally occurring process that captures CO<sub>2</sub> from the atmosphere and produces magnesium carbonates, a stable and metastable group of minerals capable of storing carbon dioxide for long periods of time (hundreds and thousands of years). A wide variety of magnesium-rich rocks occur in nature. These include basalts, gabbros, a variety of peridotites, metamorphic rock series such as serpentinite and greenschists (chlorite-bearing rocks), and weathered Mg-rich laterites. Ultramafic rocks, peridotites (e.g., lherzolites, harzburgites, and dunites), are the Mg-rich rocks with the highest magnesium content (45&#x2013;35&#x202F;wt% MgO), followed by kimberlites (diamond-bearing volcanic rocks) with about 30&#x202F;wt% MgO and gabbros with about 10&#x202F;wt% MgO. The low-grade metamorphism of these rocks produces serpentinites and greenschists with Mg contents of 35&#x2013;5&#x202F;wt% MgO, depending on the type of metamorphosed rock (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Haldar, 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>The region of the Balkan Peninsula, as part of the global Alpine-Himalayan collision belt, is known for its large peridotitic massifs that crop out along two large NW-SE trending ophiolitic belts of Jurassic age (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Robertson et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Schmid et al., 2020</xref>). During the evolution of the Tethyan Ocean, ultramafic and mafic rocks were metamorphosed and significant amounts of serpentinites were formed by almost complete serpentinization of ultramafic rocks. Serpentinites can be formed wherever ultramafic rocks are infiltrated by carbon dioxide-poor hydrothermal fluids. The final mineral composition of serpentinite is usually dominated by lizardite, chrysotile and antigorite (minerals of the serpentine subgroup), remnants of olivine and pyroxenes, spinels, and variable amount of magnetite. Lizardite, chrysotile and antigorite all have approximately the chemical formula <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M1">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Mg</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Si</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>OH</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> but differ in minor components and crystal structure.</p>
<p>Exposure of peridotites and serpentinites to air and water results in their mineral carbonation, i.e., the precipitation of magnesium and calcium carbonate minerals. It is estimated that global natural weathering of ultramafic rocks contributes to the sequestration of 2.4 Gt of carbon dioxide per year (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Bullock et al., 2021</xref>). The most famous example is a large peridotite massif in Oman, which covers an area of almost <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M2">
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mn>10</mml:mn>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> km<sup>2</sup> and sequesters approximately <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M3">
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mn>10</mml:mn>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> tons of CO<sub>2</sub> per year through a natural passive carbonation process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Kelemen et al., 2020</xref>). Serpentinites and dunites are the rocks with the highest estimated theoretical carbon sequestration potential, 722 kg and 690&#x202F;kg CO<sub>2</sub> per ton of rock, respectively. Among minerals, forsterite (786&#x202F;kg CO<sub>2</sub>/t) and lizardite (663&#x202F;kg CO<sub>2</sub>/t) have the highest carbon sequestration capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Bullock et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Enhanced weathering is a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technology based on accelerated rock dissolution that sequesters CO<sub>2</sub> through alkalinity production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Bullock et al., 2022</xref>). The essence of this strategy is to accelerate the process of rock dissolution, release Mg ions into solution, and then create the alkaline conditions necessary for the crystallization and precipitation of magnesium carbonates. This process can be illustrated by the chemical weathering of serpentinite minerals. These minerals dissolve in acidic environments according to the following chemical equation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Bullock et al., 2022</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="EQ1">
<label>(1)</label>
<mml:math id="M4">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Mg</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Si</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>OH</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>Mg</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>SiO</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>In alkaline conditions, magnesium ions react with carbonate ions forming hydrated magnesium carbonates such as hydromagnesite that precipitates from the solution:</p>
<disp-formula id="EQ2">
<label>(2)</label>
<mml:math id="M5">
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>Mg</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>CO</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>OH</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Mg</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">(</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>CO</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>OH</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>Geological carbon storage in, e.g., magnesium-rich rocks according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Kelemen and Matter (2008)</xref> is limited by a:</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>a) Slow dissolution rate of Mg-bearing minerals by a slightly acidic meteoric water which limits chemical <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="EQ1">Equation 1</xref>.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>b) Low concentrations of CO<sub>2</sub> in the atmosphere which limits chemical <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="EQ2">Equation 2</xref>.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Bodenan et al. (2014)</xref> created a map of the global distribution of ultramafic massifs and mine tailings suitable for mineral carbonation, located less than 300&#x202F;km from large industrial CO<sub>2</sub> emitters. Unlike countries such as Canada and Australia, where magnesium-rich rocks and mine tailings are often located hundreds or even thousands of kilometres away from any industrial source of CO<sub>2</sub>, in Serbia&#x2014;and the Balkans in general&#x2014;magnesium-rich ultramafic rocks suitable for mineral carbonation are often located in close proximity to major industrial CO&#x2082; sources. The most economical way to transport CO&#x2082;-rich flue gas from industry is by pipeline. For distances up to 300&#x202F;km, recompression is not required, whereas longer pipelines need recompression stations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Bodenan et al., 2014</xref>). Many magnesium-rich rock deposits and mining tailings in this region are situated well within this 300&#x202F;km threshold, creating a strong opportunity to develop facilities for CO&#x2082; capture and storage from industrial flue gases.</p>
<p>The Zlatibor Mountain region, for example, lies less than 300&#x202F;km from major Serbian CO&#x2082; emitters such as coal-fired power plants and cement factories. That large ultramafic massif represents a promising location for development of carbon capture and storage infrastructure.</p>
<p>A large-scale mineral carbonation process in this context would involve extracting magnesium from ultramafic rocks and converting it into stable magnesium carbonate minerals, which can sequester CO&#x2082; over geological timescales. Given the close proximity of major CO&#x2082; sources, the availability of CO&#x2082; is unlikely to be a limiting factor; the main challenge is optimizing magnesium extraction from local rocks.</p>
<p>We experimentally investigated two approaches for magnesium extraction:</p>
<list list-type="order">
<list-item>
<p>Comparison of leaching Mg with sulfuric acid in beakers (chemical reactors) and bioleaching in stirred bioreactors by biogenic sulfuric acid using finely crushed serpentinite rocks.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Heap leaching simulation in percolators using sulfuric acid and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in two parallel experiments, using coarsely crushed serpentinite rocks.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
<p>Experiment 1 aimed to compare direct chemical leaching with 1&#x202F;M sulfuric acid against bioleaching using approximately 1&#x202F;mol of elemental sulfur (32&#x202F;g). Theoretically, complete bacterial oxidation of 1&#x202F;mol of sulfur produces 1&#x202F;mol of sulfuric acid. While bioleaching proceeds more slowly, it could offer significant cost savings&#x2014;critical for making large-scale CO&#x2082; sequestration economically viable.</p>
<p>Experiment 2: simulated heap leaching, which requires coarse rock particles, thus avoiding the high energy costs of fine grinding necessary for chemical reactors or bioreactors. Although larger particle sizes generally reduce leaching efficiency, heap leaching offers lower capital and operational costs. The optimal technology choice must therefore balance extraction efficiency with energy and cost considerations.</p>
<p>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate serpentinites bioleaching in bioreactors, providing a novel approach to coupling magnesium extraction with sustainable CO&#x2082; removal strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec3">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Rock sampling and mineralogical and chemical analyses</title>
<p>Approximately 50&#x202F;kg of serpentinites were collected from the ultramafic massif of Mountain Zlatibor in Western Serbia. Ultramafic rocks are readily available since the Mt. Zlatibor massif is constituted mostly of serpentinites. The serpentinites were collected from the road cut at the Dobroselica locality (Municipality of &#x010C;ajetina). Many serpentinite rocks are excavated in this area for construction of roads, houses and hotels, since Zlatibor is a popular touristic area, making them available for application in carbon sequestration process. The samples were hand-excavated to avoid rocks that are directly exposed at the surface. The rock samples were crushed to a grain size of maximal 2&#x202F;mm for serpentinite dissolution experiments in reactors and to a particle size between 1 and 3&#x202F;cm in diameter for percolator experiments. The mineral phase composition of the samples was determined by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). The data were collected on a Rigaku SmartLab X-ray diffractometer using Bragg&#x2013;Brentano geometry (CuK&#x03B1; radiation, 40&#x202F;kV, 30&#x202F;mA) at room temperature. The scan range was from 2 to 65&#x00B0; 2&#x03B8; with a scanning speed of 10&#x00B0;/min while step size was 0.01&#x00B0;. Rigaku PDXL 2 software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Rigaku, 2007</xref>) with PDF-2 database (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Gates-Rector and Blanton, 2019</xref>) was used for mineral phase identification. Solids were dissolved via microwave treatment in acid mixture (HF, HNO<sub>3</sub>, HCl) and consecutive element concentration measurement with ICP-OES (Thermo Scientific iCAP PRO).</p>
<p>Optical microscopy investigations were performed by polarization transmitted-light microscopy using a Leica microscope&#x2014;type DMLSP coupled with a digital camera FC290HD and software LAS V4.1. The rock sample was cut to around 0.02&#x202F;mm thickness and embedded into Canada-balsam. SEM-EDS analyses carried out at UB-FMG using a JEOL JSM-6610LV SEM coupled with an EDS detector Xplore 30 by Oxford Instruments and software AZtec 6.0 SP2 by Oxford Instruments. Samples were cut and polished, and the polished sections were covered by carbon to provide their electroconductivity, using a sputter coating instrument Leica BALTEC-SCD-005. The measurements were done under high vacuum and an acceleration voltage of 20&#x202F;kV. Both internal and external standards were used for chemical analyses. As the analyses were done on polished sections, they can be regarded quantitative. The detection limit for most elements is around 0.1&#x202F;wt%.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Experimental procedure</title>
<p>Sulfuric acid experiments in a beaker (chemical reactor): 500&#x202F;mL of 1&#x202F;M sulfuric acid and 100&#x202F;g of rock crushed to 2&#x202F;mm were used. The experiments were carried out in a 1&#x202F;L beaker placed on a magnetic stirrer (LLG Unistirrer 7 pro) by applying a stirring speed of 600&#x202F;rpm at a constant temperature of 30 &#x00B0;C controlled by a temperature probe immersed in the solution. The duration of the experiment was 24&#x202F;h. Liquid samples for ICP-OES analysis were collected at 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 and 1,440&#x202F;min and filtered through 0.22&#x202F;&#x03BC;m PTFE syringe filters (Sartorius, Germany) before dilution 10x in distilled water. pH was measured using a pH electrode with internal silver/silver chloride reference electrode. Experiments were performed in triplicate.</p>
<p>Bioreactor experiments: Experiments were conducted in three parallel 2&#x202F;L bioreactors (Fermac 310/60, Electrolab, Tawkesbury, United Kingdom) with a working volume of 1.5&#x202F;L and a constant temperature of 30 &#x00B0;C maintained by a temperature controller, using a temperature probe to measure temperature and heating belt for heating of the glass reactor. The bioreactors were inoculated with a pure culture of the mesoacidophilic sulfur oxidizer <italic>Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans</italic> DSM 9463. Prior to inoculation, bacteria were grown in 300&#x202F;mL shake flasks containing 150&#x202F;mL of bacterial culture in basal saline at pH 3 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Wakeman et al., 2008</xref>) supplemented with 1% (w/v) elemental sulfur. Flasks were placed on an orbital shaker at 120&#x202F;rpm for 7&#x202F;days at a constant temperature of 30 &#x00B0;C. Bioreactors containing 1,350&#x202F;mL of basal salt solution at pH 2.5 and 32&#x202F;g of sulfur were inoculated with 150&#x202F;mL of active bacterial culture containing approximately 10<sup>8</sup> cells/mL, determined by counting of bacterial cells using Thoma counting chamber and phase contrast microscope. In order to produce sufficient bacterial biomass, the bioreactors were run for 3&#x202F;days prior to the addition of the rock sample. After 3&#x202F;days of incubation, when the pH of the solution was lowered to 0.8 and cell density in each bioreactor reached approximately 10<sup>8</sup> cells/mL, the first batch of rock material was added to bioreactors as it was previously done for laterite bioleaching experiments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Stankovi&#x0107; et al., 2022</xref>). Each bioreactor was fed with 15&#x202F;g of crushed rock daily for 7&#x202F;days until the total mass of solid material added to the bioreactors reached 105&#x202F;g. This approach was chosen because, due to the substantial consumption of acid, an immediate addition of 105&#x202F;g of material would prevent the establishment and maintenance of a low pH of the solution required for survival of acidophilic bacteria and efficient dissolution of serpentinites. It was not necessary to add base by automatized pH control unit (Fermac 360, Electrolab, United Kingdom) in order to maintain the pH between 0.8 and 1.5 throughout the 14-day experiments, since dynamic equilibrium between acid production by bacteria and acid consumption by rock material was established.</p>
<p>Percolator experiments: four glass columns (50&#x202F;cm high and 5&#x202F;cm in diameter) were filled with 100&#x202F;g of crushed rock. Two percolators were fed with 500&#x202F;mL of 1&#x202F;M sulfuric acid using Reglo ICC peristaltic pumps at a flow rate of 2&#x202F;mL/min in recirculation mode. For the bioleaching experiment, a bacterial culture of the sulfur-oxidizing bacteria <italic>At. thiooxidans</italic> was prepared in a bioreactor as described in the previous section; 1,000&#x202F;mL of bacterial culture were equally distributed to two 1 L borosilicate glass bottles, each containing 500&#x202F;mL of liquid and connected with two percolators. Rock particles were coated with hydrophilic &#x201C;wet sulfur,&#x201D; being colonized by bacteria, and placed in percolators similar to the procedure described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Stankovi&#x0107; et al. (2024)</xref>. The bacterial leaching solution was delivered by Reglo ICC peristaltic pumps at a flow rate of 2&#x202F;mL/min in recirculation mode. The duration of the experiment was 21&#x202F;days.</p>
<p>For all experiments liquid samples for pH and metal concentration measurements were collected three times per week, solid samples were analysed at the end of the experiments as described for the rock sample.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec6">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<p>The following amounts of selected chemical elements were measured for the serpentinite sample (g/kg): Si 325; Mg 130.26; Fe 51.15; Ca 9.46; Al 5.08; Ni 1.99; Na 0.1. Mineralogical analysis of the sample by XRD (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>; <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>) revealed typical serpentine mineral phases such as lizardite and chrysotile, as well as clinochlore (chlorite) and enstatite (pyroxene). More detailed mineralogical and petrographical analysis showed that the studied rock sample is lepidoblastic to blastogranular in texture and massive, locally schistose in fabric. The majority of the rock (around 70 vol%) is composed of serpentine that creates the rock matrix that encloses remnants of primary minerals &#x2013; olivine, orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene and Cr-spinel (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figures 2a,b</xref>). Olivine appears as oval relicts or cluster of relicts with high birefringence, whereas orthopyroxene is usually elongated and displays typical pyroxene cleavages. Some orthopyroxene grains exhibit exolutions of clinopyroxene along the cleavage planes, which show textural evidence of ductile deformations characteristic for tectonite peridotites (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure 2c</xref>). Clinopyroxene is present as rare and small (0.5&#x2013;1&#x202F;mm) remnants. Cr-spinel is disseminated as individual and irregularly shaped grains with characteristic dark-brownish pleochroism (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure 2d</xref>) in transmitted-light optical microscope. SEM-EDS analyses results of the above-mentioned minerals are given in <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Crystal phases identified in the serpentinite sample and in the solid residues after selected experiments.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Mineral phase</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Serpentinite sample</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Sulfuric acid beakers leaching residue</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Bioreactors leaching residue</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Lizardite</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Chrysotile</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Clinochlore (chlorite)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Enstatite (pyroxene)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Augite (pyroxene)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Magnesiohornblende (amphibole)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hexahydrite (magnesium sulfate)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Gypsum</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Sulfur (added to the bioreactor experiment)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">x</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Crystallographic analysis of the solid residues after sulfuric acid dissolution in beakers and bacterially mediated mineral dissolution in bioreactors shows that chrysotile (present in the serpentinite sample) disappeared and four new crystal phases were detected (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>; <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figures 3, 4</xref>).</p>
<p>During the dissolution experiment with 1&#x202F;M sulfuric acid in a beaker, the solution pH increased from negative values at the beginning of experiment to approximately 0.6 at the end of experiment (data not shown). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1a</xref> shows changes in solution pH values during the experiments in percolators and bioreactors. Changes in magnesium concentrations during the experiments are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figures 1b</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">d</xref>. The final concentration of magnesium in the beaker experiment with 1&#x202F;M sulfuric acid reached approximately 24&#x202F;g/L (24,000 ppm) corresponding to Mg extraction of 92&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.8%. Final extraction values of Fe and Ca were 82.65&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;6.9% and 28.53&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.1%, respectively. Concentration of Si in final solution was approximately 110&#x202F;mg/kg, which corresponds to 0.17&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.06% of silica extraction.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Changes in pH during experiments in bioreactors and percolators. <bold>(a)</bold> Rhombus &#x2013; bioleaching in percolators, square &#x2013; leaching with sulfuric acid in percolators, triangle &#x2013; bioleaching in bioreactors; <bold>(b)</bold> Changes in Mg concentration during leaching with 1&#x202F;M sulfuric acid in beaker; <bold>(c)</bold> Changes in Mg concentration during bioleaching experiment in bioreactors; <bold>(d)</bold> Changes in Mg concentrations during leaching in percolators with sulfuric acid and bioleaching with sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, square &#x2013; bioleaching, triangle &#x2013; leaching with sulfuric acid. Error bars represent standard deviations. If error bars are not visible standard deviations fit within size of the data points.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1646341-g001.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Panel 1a shows pH levels over 18 days with three different lines, suggesting an increase over time. Panel 1b displays magnesium concentration in ppm over minutes, showing a rising trend. Panel 1c illustrates magnesium concentration over 15 days, with a notable increase. Panel 1d compares magnesium concentration over 18 days for different samples, both showing growth but at varied rates.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The magnesium concentration in bioreactors reached approximately 10&#x202F;g/L (10,000 ppm) corresponding to a Mg extraction of 95&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.9%. Final extractions of Fe, Ca and Si were 60.29&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.9%, 26.42&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.4% and 0.5&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.07%. A two-sample <italic>t</italic>-test showed no statistically significant difference between Mg extractions during bioleaching experiment in bioreactors and leaching with 1&#x202F;M sulfuric acid in chemical reactors (t&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.61, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.59). Application of the two-sample <italic>t</italic>-tests comparing Mg leaching in (1) chemical reactors versus percolators and (2) bioreactors versus percolators showed that the differences in Mg extractions were statistically significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). Final concentrations of magnesium after dissolution with sulfuric acid and microbially mediated dissolution in percolators were approximately 19&#x202F;g/L (19,000 ppm) and 4&#x202F;g/L (4,000&#x202F;ppm), respectively, corresponding to magnesium extractions of 73&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.9% and 16&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.4%. Extractions of Fe, Ca and Si after sulfuric acid dissolution in percolators were 52&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;4.7%, 10.57&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.9% and 0.23&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.4%, respectively. Dissolution with microbially generated sulfuric acid led to lower extractions of Fe, Ca and Si: 8.8&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.1%, 5.28&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.9 and 0.09%&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.01, respectively.</p>
<p>The data on extracted Mg, Fe, Ca and Si are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Mg, Fe, Ca, and Si extraction in the experiments based on concentrations in solution.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Experiment</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Mg, %</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Fe, %</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Ca, %</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Si, %</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;M sulfuric acid beakers</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">92&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">82.60&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;6.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">28.53&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.17&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Bioreactors</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">95&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">60.29&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">26.42&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.5&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;M sulfuric acid percolators</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">73&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">52&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;4.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.57&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.23&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Bioleaching percolators</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.8&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.28&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.09&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.01</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec7">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The serpentinite sample was dominated by typical serpentine group minerals such as lizardite and chrysotile, and the latter was completely dissolved during the acid leaching experiments in which Mg was efficiently extracted from the rock in most cases. The very low extraction of silica in all experiments means that the silicate framework remained intact. This finding confirms the incongruent mineral dissolution of serpentine group minerals by acid treatment: Mg<sup>2+</sup> ions are released into solution due to the preferential attack of H<sup>+</sup> ions on Mg-OH bonds in the crystal lattice of the serpentine mineral phases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Lacinska et al., 2016</xref>). The efficiency of magnesium extraction from serpentine minerals follows the trend: chrysotile &#x003E; lizardite &#x003E; antigorite (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Arce et al., 2017</xref>). Consistent with the results of our study, previous studies reported almost complete magnesium extraction from serpentinite after acid dissolution, with sulfuric acid identified as the most efficient leaching agent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Teir et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Arce et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>The percentage of Mg extracted by biogenic sulfuric acid leaching in bioreactors was comparable to that obtained by 1&#x202F;M sulfuric acid leaching in beakers and percolators, although the microbial process was significantly slower. From an economic feasibility perspective, the main products of the carbon removal process are tons of sequestered CO<sub>2</sub>. This &#x201C;commodity&#x201D; has a relatively low market value,<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn0001"><sup>1</sup></xref> so it is imperative to develop a low-cost process. Sulfuric acid has been shown to be efficient for extracting magnesium from ultramafic rocks at temperatures between 70 &#x00B0;C and 90 &#x00B0;C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Yoo et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Lacinska et al., 2016</xref>). In order to keep the energy consumption low, the application of sulfuric acid at 30 &#x00B0;C with extended reaction time was tested. The dissolution of ultramafic rocks consumes a significant amount of acid (chemical <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="EQ1">Equation 1</xref>), and high acid consumption could make a commercial process unprofitable. Therefore, we tested Mg extraction in bioreactors using elemental sulfur as a feedstock for the sulfur-oxidizing acidophilic bacteria <italic>Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans</italic>. The use of elemental sulfur instead of sulfuric acid should reduce the operating costs for Mg extraction&#x2014;sulfur is produced in large quantities as a by-product of oil rafination process; advantages of using sulfur instead of sulfuric acid also include lower transportation costs, simpler storage and lower risk of environmental hazards. Production of one ton of biogenic sulfuric acid requires 0.327 tons of sulfur. If we apply the qualified presumption that the price of 1 ton of sulfur is 100 USD, and the price of one ton of sulfuric acid is 165 USD, it can be calculated that the cost of raw material for biogenic production of 1 ton of sulfuric acid is only 32.7 USD.</p>
<p>The potential disadvantage of using chemical reactors and bioreactors for mineral carbonation is the significant capital cost of purchasing this sophisticated equipment, the operational cost of maintenance, and the need for highly skilled engineers to control and optimize the process. For this reason, we additionally tested Mg extraction using laboratory-scale columns (percolators) that simulate a &#x201C;heap leaching&#x201D; process that is routinely used on a commercial scale for the production of metals such as copper, zinc, nickel, cobalt, and uranium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Ghorbani et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Petersen, 2023</xref>). Heap leaching is based on the construction of a heap that is irrigated with an acidic leaching solution; the recirculated pregnant leaching solution is collected in a pond and then transported to downstream processing for metal extraction. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Power et al. (2010)</xref> tested a bioleaching approach for the extraction of magnesium from chrysotile asbestos mine tailings using small columns. They reported a maximum Mg extraction of 14.3% in columns amended with sulfur and inoculated with the sulfur-oxidizing bacteria <italic>Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans</italic>. This result is comparable to the Mg extraction achieved in the glass column bioleaching experiments in this study (16&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.4%). Substantially lower Mg extraction during bioleaching in percolators in comparison to bioleaching in bioreactors is not surprising. Much bigger particle size in percolators gives lower surface area for chemical reactions. Also, bioreactors provide controlled conditions (aeration, temperature, stirring, pH) that promote growth and activity of the bacterial culture. On the other side, percolators were running at room temperature, without additional aeration or stirring, which affects the activity of the bacterial culture and sulfuric acid production in percolators.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec8">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study demonstrates that serpentinites from the Zlatibor ophiolite massif can be effectively processed for magnesium extraction, offering a viable pathway toward CO&#x2082; sequestration via mineral carbonation. Both chemical leaching with 1&#x202F;M H&#x2082;SO&#x2084; and bioleaching with <italic>Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans</italic> in stirred tank bioreactors achieved high Mg recoveries (&#x003E;90%), while coarse-particle percolator leaching with H&#x2082;SO&#x2084; yielded 73% Mg recovery. Bioleaching in percolators, although less efficient (16%), confirms the feasibility of low-cost, biologically driven processes. In contrast to the bioleaching of copper sulfide ores, where oxidation of sulfide minerals like pyrite generates sulfuric acid, bioleaching of serpentine minerals does not produce acid. The process can be engineered to consume nearly all the sulfuric acid in the leaching solution, preventing acid accumulation. Moreover, the solid residues remaining after magnesium extraction are chemically inert and pose no risk of acid mine drainage. These characteristics indicate that magnesium bioleaching from serpentinites is inherently less environmentally hazardous, offering a more sustainable alternative compared to copper recovery from sulfide ores.</p>
<p>The results highlight that coarse-particle heap leaching could deliver magnesium concentrations in pregnant leach solutions comparable to those obtained from fine-particle chemical or bioreactor systems, while significantly reducing comminution energy requirements and capital expenditure. Integrating such low-energy extraction methods with downstream carbonation could enable scalable, cost-effective CO&#x2082; removal, especially when coupled to the valorisation of by-products such as magnesium carbonates. The future research direction will include experimental testing of the Mg carbonation in pregnant leach solution in pressure reactors at mild temperature, in order to produce hydrated magnesium carbonate minerals, and test their potential application as supplements for production of low-carbon cement.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec9">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec10">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>SS: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Conceptualization. NA: Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Investigation. J&#x0160;: Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Investigation. SK: Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Investigation. K&#x0160;: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. &#x0110;N: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. AS: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec11">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The petrographic investigations are partly funded by the Contract on realization and financing of scientific research of SRI in 2025, No. 451-03-136/2025-03/200126.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors are thankful to Suzana Eri&#x0107; and Filip Rajkovi&#x0107; for analyses (SEM lab, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mining and Geology) and Christian Ostertag-Henning (Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources) for scientific discussions.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec12">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
<p>The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec13">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec14">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec15">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1646341/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1646341/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.DOCX" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn0001"><p><sup>1</sup><ext-link xlink:href="https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/carbon" ext-link-type="uri">https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/carbon</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arce</surname><given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neto</surname><given-names>T. G. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x00C1;vila</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luna</surname><given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>CarvalhoJr</surname><given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Leaching optimization of mining wastes with lizardite and brucite contents for use in indirect mineral carbonation through the pH swing method</article-title>. <source>J. Clean. Prod.</source> <volume>141</volume>, <fpage>1324</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1336</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.204</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bodenan</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bourgeois</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petiot</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Auge</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bonfils</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guyot</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Ex situ mineral carbonation for CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation: evaluation of mining waste resources, aqueous carbonation processability and life cycle assesment (Carmex project)</article-title>. <source>Miner. Eng.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>52</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mineng.2014.01.011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bullock</surname><given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>James</surname><given-names>R. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matter</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Renforth</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teagle</surname><given-names>D. A. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Global carbon dioxide removal potenital of waste materials from metal and diamond mining</article-title>. <source>Front. Clim.</source> <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>694715</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fclim.2021.694175</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bullock</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Darton</surname><given-names>R. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Kinetics-informed global assessment of mine tailings for CO<sub>2</sub> removal</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>808</volume>:<fpage>152111</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152111</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34871673</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gates-Rector</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blanton</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The powder diffraction file: a quality materials characterization database</article-title>. <source>Powder Diffract.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>352</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>360</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0885715619000812</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghorbani</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franzidis</surname><given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petersen</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Heap leaching technology&#x2014;current state, innovations, and future directions: a review</article-title>. <source>Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>73</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>119</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Haldar</surname><given-names>S. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source>Introduction to mineralogy and petrology</source>. <publisher-loc>Amsterdam, Netherlands</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kelemen</surname><given-names>P. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matter</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>In situ carbonation of peridotite for CO2 storage</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>17295</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17300</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0805794105</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kelemen</surname><given-names>P. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McQueen</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilcox</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Renforth</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dipple</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paukert Vankeuren</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Engineered carbon mineralization in ultramafic rocks for CO<sub>2</sub> removal from air: review and new insights</article-title>. <source>Chem. Geol.</source> <volume>550</volume>:<fpage>119628</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119628</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lacinska</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Styles</surname><given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bateman</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wagner</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hall</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gowing</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Acid-dissolution of antigorite, chrysotile and lizardite for <italic>ex situ</italic> carbon capture and storage by mineralisation</article-title>. <source>Chem. Geol.</source> <volume>437</volume>, <fpage>153</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>169</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.05.015</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petersen</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>From understanding the rate limitations of bioleaching mechanisms to improved bioleach process design</article-title>. <source>Hydrometallurgy</source> <volume>221</volume>:<fpage>106148</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.hydromet.2023.106148</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Power</surname><given-names>I. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dipple</surname><given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Southam</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Bioleaching of ultramafic tailings by <italic>Acidithiobacillus spp</italic>. for CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>456</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>462</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/es900986n</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19950896</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">Rigaku</collab></person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <source>PDXL 2: Integrated powder X-ray diffraction software (version 2.8.4.0)</source>. <publisher-name>Rigaku Corporation</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Tokyo, Japan</publisher-loc>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Robertson</surname><given-names>A. H. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karamata</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x0160;ari&#x0107;</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Overview of ophiolites and related units in the late Palaeozoic&#x2013;early Cenozoic magmatic and tectonic development of Tethys in the northern part of the Balkan region</article-title>. <source>Lithos</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lithos.2008.09.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schmid</surname><given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>F&#x00FC;genschuh</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kounov</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matenco</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nievergelte</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oberh&#x00E4;nsli</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Tectonic units of the alpine collision zone between eastern Alps and western Turkey</article-title>. <source>Gondwana Res.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>308</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>374</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gr.2019.07.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stankovi&#x0107;</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goldmann</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kraemer</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ufer</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schippers</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Bioleaching of lateritic ore (Piaui, Brazil) in percolators</article-title>. <source>Hydrometallurgy</source> <volume>224</volume>:<fpage>106262</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.hydromet.2024.106262</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stankovi&#x0107;</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marti</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goldmann</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x00E4;bler</surname><given-names>H. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ufer</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haubrich</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effect of mineralogy on co and Ni extraction from Brazilian limonitic laterites via bioleaching and chemical leaching</article-title>. <source>Miner. Eng.</source> <volume>184</volume>:<fpage>107604</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107604</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Teir</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Revitzer</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eloneva</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fogelholm</surname><given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zevenhoven</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Dissolution of natural serpentinite in mineral and organic acids</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Miner. Process.</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>36</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.minpro.2007.04.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wakeman</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Auvinen</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>D. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Microbiological and geochemical dynamics in simulated-heap leaching of a polymetallic sulfide ore</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Bioeng.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>739</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>750</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/bit.21951</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18496880</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yoo</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>B. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeong</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Dissolution of magnesium from serpentine mineral in sulfuric acid solution</article-title>. <source>Mater. Trans.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>1225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1230</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2320/matertrans.M2009019</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>