<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2025.1626892</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Compartment-specific dynamics of soil microbiota along a <italic>Pinus armandii</italic> plantation chronosequence in karst mountain ecosystems</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Bin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3064173/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Ping</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Xiaolong</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2821164/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Wangjun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2556110/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>Shun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>College of Ecological Engineering, Guizhou University of Engineering Science</institution>, <addr-line>Bijie</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Guizhou Province Key Laboratory of Ecological Protection and Restoration of Typical Plateau Wetlands</institution>, <addr-line>Bijie</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: Amrita Chakraborty, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czechia</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: Pengpeng Duan, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China</p>
<p>Ramesha H. Jayaramaiah, Murdoch University, Australia</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Shun Zou, <email>zoushun@gues.edu.cn</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>01</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1626892</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>12</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>12</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 He, Zhang, Bai, Li and Zou.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>He, Zhang, Bai, Li and Zou</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Soil microbiomes play pivotal roles in mediating plant diversity maintenance by regulating multifunctional ecosystem services during plant development. However, how different stand age of plants influence soil microbial communities in various soil compartments remains poorly understood. Through Illumina-based 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, we systematically investigated the successional trajectories of soil microbiome in <italic>Pinus armandii</italic> plantations spanning various developmental phases. Key findings revealed that stand age exerted a stronger influence on microbial restructuring than soil compartment, significantly altering community composition in both soil types. Alpha diversity (Shannon and Chao1 indices) exhibited a U-shaped trajectory with stand age, except for fungal Chao1 in bulk soil. While dominant bacterial and fungal phyla remained relatively stable, community composition displayed significant stage-dependent variations. Co-occurrence network analysis demonstrated lower fungal network complexity compared to bacterial networks, with rhizosphere soils harboring more intricate interactions compared to bulk soils. Community assembly mechanisms diverged: deterministic processes dominated bacterial assembly, whereas stochasticity governed fungal communities. Soil properties exerted significant influences on microbial composition and diversity: bacterial composition correlated strongly with pH and stoichiometric ratios (C/N, C/P, N/P), while fungal composition showed stronger associations with TN, TP, and AN. Our results demonstrate that <italic>P. armandii</italic> plantations maintain core phylum-level microbial populations while developing stage-specific diversity patterns. Crucially, bacteria and fungi exhibit divergent responses to stand development, highlighting their divergent ecological strategies in adapting to nutrient-limited karst ecosystems.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>karst mountain ecosystems</kwd>
<kwd>soil microbial community</kwd>
<kwd>compartment-specific dynamics</kwd>
<kwd>stand age chronosequence</kwd>
<kwd>plantation</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="9"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="97"/>
<page-count count="18"/>
<word-count count="10713"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Terrestrial Microbiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The karst-dominated southwestern region of China, characterized by complex geomorphology and significant climatic heterogeneity, is a globally recognized biodiversity hotspot (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Myers et al., 2000</xref>), harboring rich rare species and serving as both a vital genetic reservoir and a key ecological barrier for the Yangtze River basin. However, extensive logging since the mid-20th century, followed by large-scale artificial afforestation, has degraded the landscape. While alleviating some ecological pressures, these plantations now face severe challenges&#x2014;including declining soil nutrients, reduced water conservation capacity, and difficulties in natural seedling regeneration&#x2014;primarily due to early practices of high-density monoculture planting. This degradation compromises ecosystem stability and service provision, making the enhancement of functional quality and ecological sustainability in these degraded plantations within the fragile karst environment a critical scientific and practical priority.</p>
<p>As fundamental constituents of soil ecosystems, soil microbial communities demonstrate remarkable biodiversity and functional complexity, constituting critical mediators in soil&#x2013;plant interactions. These microorganisms play pivotal roles in modulating biogeochemical cycles and sustaining ecosystem functionality throughout ecological restoration processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Delgado-Baquerizo et al., 2020</xref>). Soil microbes are not only key drivers of nutrient cycling, extensively participating in many ecological processes such as biological nitrogen fixation, organic phosphorus mineralization, and organic carbon assimilation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Muhammad et al., 2021</xref>), but also serve as dynamic nutrient reservoirs modulating soil fertility dynamics. The composition of soil microbiota exhibits pronounced sensitivity to environmental fluctuations, with distinct community assemblages developing across spatial gradients and temporal sequences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Jiang et al., 2018</xref>). Thus, understanding the microbial community dynamics, the factors driving these changes, and the underlying mechanisms is a central issue in ecological restoration research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Liu L. et al., 2020</xref>). Insights into microbial community dynamics during ecological restoration are critical for maintaining ecosystem services, supporting sustainable development, formulating effective management strategies, and preventing soil-borne diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Li et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Microbial communities exhibit distinct biogeographical patterns across spatial scales, with resource availability acting as a primary constraint (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Ji et al., 2020</xref>). These spatial distributions arise from complex interplay between species interactions, dispersal constraints, and environmental filtering (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Jiao et al., 2021</xref>). Particularly noteworthy is the rhizosphere microenvironment, where plant root exudates mediate dynamic plant-microbe interactions through continuous release of carbon substrates, secondary metabolites, and signaling molecules that drive co-evolutionary adaptations and mutualistic associations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Bakker et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Walters et al., 2018</xref>). This chemically enriched zone sustains 2&#x2013;3 times higher microbial biomass than bulk soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Hartmann et al., 2009</xref>), stimulating enhanced enzymatic activity and nutrient transformation rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Bakker et al., 2013</xref>). Remarkably, this rhizosphere effect creates divergent microbial functional profiles and nutrient transformation rates between root-associated and bulk soil compartments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Bakker et al., 2015</xref>). Despite these functional distinctions, current soil microbial ecology paradigms predominantly derive from bulk soil analyses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Shen et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Li D. D. et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Li J. et al., 2018</xref>), while rhizosphere dynamics remain comparatively understudied. Particular knowledge gaps exist regarding temporal variations in rhizosphere-bulk soil differentiation patterns across stand ages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">LeBauer and Treseder, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref84">Yue et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>The composition and diversity of soil microbial communities are shaped by an intricate interplay of biotic and abiotic drivers. Biotic regulators include vegetation characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Feng and Wang, 2023</xref>), while abiotic controls encompass temperature gradients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Cavicchioli et al., 2019</xref>), soil pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Rousk et al., 2010</xref>), nitrogen availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Cederlund et al., 2014</xref>), and organic carbon dynamics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Sul et al., 2013</xref>). Differential environmental responses among microbial taxa (bacteria, archaea, fungi) drive spatial distribution patterns and community assembly mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref86">Zhang et al., 2017</xref>). Although soil physicochemical properties are well-established determinants of microbial assemblage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">Wang et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Ni et al., 2021</xref>), the functional linkage between vegetation traits and forest soil microbiota remains contentious (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Huo et al., 2023</xref>). Plant communities mediate microbial composition through three primary pathways: (1) direct host&#x2013;microbe interactions in the rhizosphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Mart&#x00ED;nez-Garc&#x00ED;a et al., 2015</xref>), (2) indirect modulation of soil properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref85">Zak et al., 2003</xref>), and (3) coupled plant&#x2013;soil feedbacks that jointly regulate microbial dynamics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Bai et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Landesman et al., 2014</xref>). Such interactions drive spatiotemporal reorganization of soil biota through plant-mediated alterations in ecological processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">Ward et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref82">Yao et al., 2018</xref>), with plant species identity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Gao et al., 2015</xref>) and community diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Liu W. et al., 2020</xref>) emerging as critical determinants across ecosystems. Additionally, plant stand age are critical in shaping underground microbial communities, as different stages of plant growth release can distinctly root exudates, which influence microbial dynamics and, in turn, plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref90">Zhao et al., 2021</xref>). As a result, these interactions lead to differentiated soil microbial communities across various ecological niches. Preliminary studies suggest that microbial communities, including bacterial and fungal species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref77">Wattenburger et al., 2019</xref>), exhibit variations across different plant growth stages. Despite advances in understanding forest soil microbiomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Paula et al., 2014</xref>), critical knowledge gaps persist regarding the synergistic effects of ecological niches, edaphic factors, and stand age on microbial community assembly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref92">Zhou and Ning, 2017</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>Pinus armandii</italic>, an endemic evergreen conifer predominantly distributed across central and western China, serves as a keystone species in ecological restoration initiatives within the fragile karst landscapes of southwest China. Its ecological significance extends to safeguarding soil stability and sustaining agroforestry systems in this ecologically vulnerable region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref81">Yao et al., 2021</xref>). Currently, research on <italic>Pinus armandii</italic> has expanded to cover various aspects, including community structure, succession trends, pest control, seedling cultivation, genetic improvement, and plant diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Li et al., 2024</xref>). However, studies on its adaptability in fragile karst ecosystems, particularly concerning soil microbial community responses to stand age gradients, remain limited. This gap impedes the broader application of <italic>Pinus armandii</italic> in combating desertification and restoring degraded karst ecosystems. To address this deficiency, we conducted a comparative microbiome analysis of rhizosphere and bulk soil microbiomes in <italic>P. armandii</italic> plantations of varying stand age within karst topography using Illumina-based 16S rRNA and ITS sequencing. We hypothesized that (1) niche-based selection drives significant divergence in microbial composition and metabolic potential between rhizosphere and bulk soils, with rhizosphere bacteria and fungi being more sensitive to soil properties; and (2) microbial community assembly follows phasic successional patterns across stand age, with mature forests exhibiting greater functional stability and mutualistic interactions. Our study aims to elucidate: (i) niche differentiation in microbial structure and putative metabolic functions; (ii) temporal dynamics of bacterial/fungal assemblages across stand age; and (iii) key environmental drivers governing these successions. These findings will clarify plant-microbe interactions during long-term karst vegetation restoration, providing critical insights for sustainable subalpine plantation management and soil fertility preservation in Southwest China.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Study site and experimental design</title>
<p>The study was conducted in the dominant distribution range of <italic>Pinus armandii</italic> plantations in Bijie City (26&#x00B0;21&#x2019;N-27&#x00B0;46&#x2019;N, 103&#x00B0;36&#x2019;E-106&#x00B0;43&#x2019;E), Guizhou Province, China. This region is characterized by a subtropical humid monsoon climate, with altitudes ranging from 457 to 2910.3&#x202F;m, average annual precipitation between 849 and 1,399&#x202F;mm, and average temperatures ranging from 10&#x00B0;C to 15&#x00B0;C.</p>
<p>We investigated mono-specific <italic>P. armandii</italic> plantations at three successional stages (young, middle-aged, mature) with homogeneous geomorphic conditions in August 2021 during peak vegetation growth. A nested sampling design was implemented with three replicate 20&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;20&#x202F;m plots per stand age. Plots were intentionally spaced &#x2265;150&#x202F;m apart to minimize spatial autocorrelation and ensure independence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9001">Mariotte et al., 1997</xref>). Plot selection adhered to national forest resource survey protocols for age classification (GB/T 26424&#x2013;2010). Within each plot, all trees with DBH&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;3&#x202F;cm (diameter at breast height, 1.3&#x202F;m) were measured for dendrometric parameters (height, DBH, crown width). Understory vegetation was quantified through five randomly positioned shrub (2&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;2&#x202F;m) and herbaceous (1&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;1&#x202F;m) subplots per main plot, recording species composition and structural parameters (density, coverage, vertical stratification).</p>
<p>Rhizosphere and bulk soils were systematically collected using compartment-specific techniques with explicit replication at multiple spatial scales to ensure representativeness and analytical robustness.</p>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.1.1</label>
<title>Rhizosphere soil</title>
<p>Within each main plot (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;3 per age), five healthy trees were randomly selected. From each selected tree, rhizosphere soil (soil adhering to fine roots after gentle brushing) was collected from three equidistant points around the root zone. Soil from all five trees per plot (15 collection points) was composited into one representative rhizosphere soil sample per plot, yielding 3 composite rhizosphere samples per stand age (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Philippot et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.1.2</label>
<title>Bulk soil</title>
<p>Within each main plot (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;3 per age), bulk soil was collected using five individual cores (20-cm depth) arranged in a standardized S-pattern to cover the plot area representatively. A&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;2.5&#x202F;m buffer from plot edges was maintained. Soil from these five cores per plot was composited into one representative bulk soil sample per plot, yielding 3 composite bulk soil samples per stand age.</p>
<p>This nested design resulted in a total of 18 composite soil samples (3 stand ages &#x00D7; 3 replicate plots &#x00D7; 2 soil compartments). All samples were immediately stored in sterile bags, transported on ice, and processed for bifurcated preservation. One subsample was cryopreserved (&#x2212;80&#x00B0;C) for molecular analyses, while the air-dried counterpart served (2&#x202F;mm mesh) for physicochemical characterization. Samples were coded using a two-letter system: initial letter for soil type (B: bulk; R: rhizosphere), secondary letter for stand age (Y: young; M: middle-aged; O: mature).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Soil physicochemical characterization</title>
<p>Soil pH was determined potentiometrically in 1:2.5 (w/v) soil-water suspensions using a calibrated pH meter (InsMark<sup>&#x2122;</sup> IS126, Shanghai, China). Total carbon (TC) quantification employed high-temperature combustion with an Elementar TOC analyzer (Hanau, Germany). Soil organic carbon (SOC) was quantified via dichromate oxidation-external heating (Walkley-Black modified method). Nitrogen fractions were analyzed through: (1) total nitrogen (TN) by micro-Kjeldahl digestion, (2) available nitrogen (AN) via alkaline diffusion. Potassium speciation included: (1) total potassium (TK) by atomic absorption flame photometry, (2) available potassium (AK) through ammonium acetate extraction. Phosphorus fractions were determined calorimetrically using molybdenum antimony anti-colorimetric method for both total (TP) and available phosphorus (AP). All analyses followed standardized procedures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bao, 2000</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Microbial community profiling</title>
<p>Total DNA was extracted from both bulk soil and rhizosphere samples using the E.Z.N.A<sup>&#x2122;</sup> Mag-Bind Soil DNA Kit (OMEGA) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. Hypervariable regions were amplified with proofreading polymerase: bacterial 16S rRNA V3-V4 using 515F/806R primers and fungal ITS1-5F with ITS5-1737F/ITS2-2043R. PCR reactions (25&#x202F;&#x03BC;L) contained: 2&#x202F;&#x03BC;L template DNA, 5X buffer, 2.5&#x202F;mM dNTPs, 0.25&#x202F;&#x03BC;L HiFi polymerase, and 1&#x202F;&#x03BC;L primers. Thermal cycling conditions:</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>Bacteria: 98&#x00B0;C/1&#x202F;min; 30&#x202F;cycles of 98&#x00B0;C/10s, 50&#x00B0;C/30s, 72&#x00B0;C/30s;</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Fungi: 98&#x00B0;C/2&#x202F;min; 30&#x202F;cycles of 98&#x00B0;C/15&#x202F;s, 55&#x00B0;C/30s, 72&#x00B0;C/30s; final extension 72&#x00B0;C/30s.</p></list-item>
</list>
<p>Purified amplicons (Qiagen Gel Extraction Kit) were sequenced on Illumina NovaSeq (2&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;250&#x202F;bp) at Novogene (Beijing).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Bioinformatic processing</title>
<p>Raw sequences were demultiplexed in QIIME2 (2020.06) and processed through DADA2 (v1.8) for quality filtering, paired-end merging, and ASV clustering. Taxonomic assignment used SILVA v132 (bacteria) and UNITE v8.0 (fungi) databases with 97% similarity thresholds. Rarefaction to 1,067,590 bacterial and 1,095,406 fungal sequences ensured uniform analysis. Data are deposited in NCBI SRA (PRJNA1063200, PRJNA1132892).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Statistical analyses</title>
<p>To elucidate microbial interaction patterns across the chronosequence and soil compartments, bacterial and fungal co-occurrence networks were generated through Sparse Correlations for Compositional data (SparCC). Spearman&#x2019;s rank correlation analysis of bacterial and fungal ASVs abundance tables yielded correlation coefficients (R) and significance values (P) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Barber&#x00E1;n et al., 2012</xref>). Network topology was defined using adjacency matrices derived from correlation coefficients, with edge significance thresholds established through random matrix theory (RMT). Final network visualizations were rendered using Gephi v0.9.2.</p>
<p>To quantify assembly processes, we applied null model-based phylogenetic <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-diversity analysis using the picante R package. The &#x03B2;-Nearest Taxon Index (&#x03B2;-NTI) values were derived from 999 randomizations of the observed ASV table and phylogenetic tree. |&#x03B2;-NTI|&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;2 indicated deterministic processes (heterogeneous selection for &#x03B2;-NTI&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;2; homogeneous selection for &#x03B2;-NTI&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;&#x2212;2), while |&#x03B2;-NTI|&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;2 indicated stochastic processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9003">Stegen et al., 2012</xref>). For stochastic processes, the contribution of dispersal limitation (RCBray &#x003E; 0.95), homogenizing dispersal (RCBray &#x003C; &#x2212;0.95), and ecological drift (|RCBray|&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.95) was further quantified using the RCBray value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9002">Stegen et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>Alpha diversity indices (Chao1 and Shannon) were calculated using the sequencing company&#x2019;s analysis platform. Functional classifications of microbial communities were predicted using PICRUSt for bacteria and FUNGuild for fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Langille et al., 2013</xref>). Parametric comparisons were conducted through one-way ANOVA with post-hoc LSD tests for multi-group comparisons, supplemented by independent t-tests for pairwise chronosequence and soil compartment analyses. Microbial community structure was ordinated via principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) with Bray&#x2013;Curtis dissimilarity matrices. Mantel tests (MT) quantified correlations between soil physicochemical parameters and alpha diversity metrics. Taxon-environment relationships were elucidated through redundancy analysis (RDA) implemented in Canoco 5.0. All statistical procedures were executed in SPSS 23 (IBM Corp.) and R v3.5.3, with significance thresholds defined at <italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05</italic>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec10">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Microbial diversity</title>
<p>Alpha diversity (Shannon and Chao1 indices) varied significantly across stand age and soil niches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). In middle-aged and mature forests, rhizosphere soil exhibited lower bacterial and fungal alpha diversity than bulk soil. However, in young forests, rhizosphere soil showed lower bacterial but higher fungal alpha diversity. Overall, significant differences in alpha diversity were observed across the chronosequence for both soil compartments (<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05</italic>), generally showing an initial decline followed by an increase with increasing stand age, except for fungal Chao1 diversity in bulk soil.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Differences in bacterial <bold>(A,B)</bold> and fungal <bold>(C,D)</bold> alpha diversity between rhizosphere and bulk soil along the age gradient: <bold>(A)</bold> changes of bacterial Chao 1 diversity in rhizosphere and bulk soil; <bold>(B)</bold> changes of bacterial Shannon diversity in rhizosphere and bulk soil; <bold>(C)</bold> changes of fungal Chao 1 diversity in rhizosphere and bulk soil; <bold>(D)</bold> changes of fungal Shannon diversity in rhizosphere and bulk soil. Any statistically significant differences among the soil samples are denoted with an asterisk (&#x002A;&#x002A; and &#x002A; represent <italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;</italic> 0.01, and 0.05 according to T-test, respectively).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1626892-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Four box plots labeled A, B, C, and D display diversity indices for various groups: BH, RH, BMi, RMi, BM, and RM. Plots A and C represent Chao1 diversity index, while B and D represent Shannon diversity index. Differences between groups are marked with asterisks. Plot A shows significant differences between BM and RM, and plot C shows significant differences between BH and RH, with additional distinctions in RH. Plots B and D show significant differences between RMi and BM. Each box plot is color-coded by group.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Beta diversity analysis using Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) revealed distinct bacterial community structures across stand age in both soil compartments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>). Bulk soil showed more pronounced changes (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001; <italic>R<sup>2</sup></italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.66) than rhizosphere soil (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001; <italic>R<sup>2</sup></italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.59). Fungal community structure varied spatially; bulk soil communities separated along the second principal coordinate, while rhizosphere communities separated along the first (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>). PCoA based on Bray&#x2013;Curtis similarity confirmed significant differences in fungal community composition across stand age in both bulk (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001, <italic>R<sup>2</sup></italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.67) and rhizosphere (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001, <italic>R<sup>2</sup></italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.64) soils.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of soil bacterial <bold>(A)</bold> and fungal <bold>(B)</bold> community composition based on Bray-Curtis distance between bulk and rhizosphere soils under different stand age.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1626892-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two PCA scatter plots labeled A and B compare groupings of data points using principal components one and two. Different symbols and colors represent categories such as BH, RH, BMi, RMi, BM, and RM, indicated in the legend. Plot A has PC1 at thirty-seven point fifty-eight percent and PC2 at twenty-eight point seventy-three percent, whereas Plot B has PC1 at twenty-five point eighty-nine percent and PC2 at fifteen point sixty-nine percent. Each plot shows distinct clusters of symbols.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Taxonomic composition</title>
<p>Taxonomic analysis at the phylum level revealed consistent dominant bacterial phyla (Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Chloroflexi) across soil compartments, accounting for approximately 85% of the total relative abundance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>). However, their relative abundances varied significantly across stand age and soil niches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figures 4A</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">B</xref>; <italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05</italic>). In bulk soil, Proteobacteria decreased while Chloroflexi increased in middle-aged forests. Conversely, Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria showed a gradual increase across the chronosequence. In rhizosphere soils, Acidobacteria and Chloroflexi peaked in the middle-aged forest, while Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria displayed a declining trend. While Proteobacteria were more abundant in bulk soil and Chloroflexi in rhizosphere soil, these differences were not statistically significant (<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05</italic>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative abundance of the dominant bacterial and fungal taxa among different stand age. <bold>(A)</bold> Relative abundance of bacterial phyla (%), <bold>(B)</bold> relative abundance of fungal phyla (%).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1626892-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts labeled A and B compare the relative abundance of microbial taxa in different samples: BH, RH, BMi, RMi, BM, and RM. Chart A displays bacterial phyla, with prominent categories including Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, and Bacteroidota. Chart B shows fungal phyla, featuring Ascomycota and Basidiomycota as significant groups. Both charts use a color-coded legend to indicate various taxa.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>T-test analysis of bacterial and fungal communities in both the bulk soil and rhizosphere soil. <bold>(A,B)</bold> Represent the difference of bacterial composition among different stand ages in bulk soil and rhizosphere soil, respectively; <bold>(C,D)</bold> represent the difference of fungal composition among different stand ages in bulk soil and rhizosphere soil, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1626892-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Grouped bar charts comparing bacterial and fungal communities in bulk and rhizosphere soils. Panels A and B display differences in bacterial compositions, while C and D focus on fungal compositions. Bars show the means in groups with confidence intervals indicating statistical differences between them. Blue and orange colors represent different treatments or conditions.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Similarly, the dominant fungal phyla (Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Mortierellomycota) comprised approximately 97% of the total relative abundance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref>). Their relative abundances varied across stand age and soil niches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figures 4C</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">D</xref>), although significant differences between rhizosphere and bulk soil were not observed (<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05</italic>). Basidiomycota abundance was lowest in middle-aged rhizosphere soil, while Ascomycota peaked at this stage. The opposite trend was observed in bulk soil. Mortierellomycota abundance increased consistently across the chronosequence.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Microbial community networks</title>
<p>Network analysis revealed significant differences in microbial co-occurrence patterns between rhizosphere and bulk soils across all stand ages (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figures 5A</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">C</xref>; <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). Bacterial networks in rhizosphere soil were larger and more connected than those in bulk soil, with more nodes, a higher proportion of positive edges and greater average connectivity. However, rhizosphere networks had lower diameter, modularity, and average path length. No network hubs were detected in either soil type, although 10 and 12 module hubs were observed in rhizosphere and bulk soil networks, respectively. Keystone taxa were identified in both soil types, with Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria consistently prominent. The top seven keystone species in rhizosphere soil networks included Proteobacteria (26.67%), Actinobacteria (17.33%), Bacteroidota (12%), Firmicutes (10.67%), Chloroflexi (9.33%), Acidobacteria (6.67%), and Verrucomicrobiota (5.33%). In contrast, the bulk soil networks were dominated by Proteobacteria (25.68%), Actinobacteria (17.57%), Firmicutes (12.16%), Chloroflexi (9.46%), Bacteroidota (9.46%), Acidobacteria (6.67%), and Myxococcus (4.05%).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Bacterial and fungal co-occurrence networks across the chronosequence and soil compartment. <bold>(A,B)</bold> Represent the co-occurrence network of bacteria and fungi in the bulk soil, respectively. <bold>(C,D)</bold> Represent the co-occurrence network of bacteria and fungi in the rhizosphere soil, respectively. <bold>(E,F)</bold> Represent bacterial and fungal co-occurrence patterns between the bulk and rhizosphere soil.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1626892-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Network diagrams labeled A to F, each consisting of nodes of various colors and sizes connected by lines. Diagrams A, C, and E have a diverse array of colors including purple, gold, and green, while diagrams B, D, and F are dominated by red and green nodes. The structure and density of connections vary across each diagram.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Fungal networks in rhizosphere soil showed a larger proportion of positive edges, higher average connectivity, average cluster coefficient, density, and modularity compared to bulk soil networks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figures 5B</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">D</xref>; <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). No network hubs were identified in either soil type, but a greater number of module hubs was observed in bulk soil (15) compared to rhizosphere soil (11). The top five keystone species in bulk soil networks included Ascomycota (73.68%), Basidiomycota (22.37%), Chytridiomycota (1.32%), Mucoromycota (1.32%), and Olpidiomycota (1.32%). In rhizosphere networks, the dominant taxa were Ascomycota (75.71%), Basidiomycota (20%), Chytridiomycota (1.43%), Glomeromycota (1.43%), and Olpidiomycota (1.43%). Overall, bacterial networks exhibited greater complexity than fungal networks, as indicated by multiple topological properties (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figures 5E</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">F</xref>; <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S2</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Soil microbial community assembly</title>
<p>Null model analysis revealed distinct stand age-dependent variations in the relative contributions of stochastic and deterministic processes to microbial community assembly (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). Bacterial communities were predominantly structured by deterministic processes across all stand ages. Notably, stochasticity exerted a stronger influence on bacterial composition in rhizosphere soils than in bulk soils (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figures 6A</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">C</xref>). Conversely, fungal community assembly was primarily driven by stochastic mechanisms. A critical transition was observed in rhizosphere fungal communities, where the dominant assembly process shifted from stochastic to deterministic during forest development (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figures 6B</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">D</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Assembly processes of the soil microbial community across the chronosequence and soil compartment. <bold>(A)</bold> represent the assembly processes of bacterial communities in the bulk soil, <bold>(B)</bold> represent the assembly processes of fungal communities in the bulk soil, <bold>(C)</bold> represent the assembly processes of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere soil, <bold>(D)</bold> represent the assembly processes of fungal communities in the rhizosphere soil.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1626892-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Box plots showing bacterial and fungal &#x03B2;NTI values for bulk and rhizosphere soils. Panels (A) and (B) represent bacterial and fungal &#x03B2;NTI in bulk soil, with BH, BMi, and BM categories. Panels (C) and (D) depict the same for rhizosphere soil, with RH, RMi, and RM categories. BH and RH are in red, BMi and RMi in green, BM, and RM in blue.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Predicted microbial functions</title>
<p>PICRUSt analysis of bacterial communities revealed 44 pathways, predominantly associated with environmental information processing, genetic information processing, and metabolic pathways (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figures 7A</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">B</xref>). While no significant differences in the relative abundance of bacterial functional categories were observed between rhizosphere and bulk soils, 35 and 28 pathways showed substantial changes (<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05</italic>) across stand age for bacterial communities in bulk and rhizosphere soils, respectively.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Predicted functions of soil microbial community among different successional stages. <bold>(A)</bold> Functional group of bacterial communities in bulk soils. <bold>(B)</bold> Functional group of bacterial communities in rhizosphere soils. <bold>(C)</bold> Functional group of fungal communities in bulk soils. <bold>(D)</bold> Functional group of fungal communities in rhizosphere soils. Asterisks (&#x2217;<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05</italic>) indicate significant differences between successional stages.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1626892-g007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart comparing various biological and metabolic processes across six categories: Cellular Processes, Environmental Information Processing, Genetic Information Processing, Human Diseases, Metabolism, Organismal Systems, and Unclassified. Each category displays bars corresponding to three variables labeled BM, Bmi, and BH. The processes include aspects like cell motility, immune diseases, enzyme families, and aging, among others. Bars are color-coded and vary in length, indicating different values across the categories.</alt-text>
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart comparing RM, Rmi, and RH across various biological categories. Categories include Cellular Processes, Environmental Information Processing, Genetic Information Processing, Human Diseases, Metabolism, Organismal Systems, and Unclassified. Bars indicate varying levels for each dataset, with significant differences marked by asterisks.</alt-text>
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two bar charts labeled C and D display data on various trophic groups: pathotroph, symbiotroph, saprotroph, and unassigned. Categories include plant pathogen, ectomycorrhizal, and wood saprotroph. The bars represent different conditions or groups, with colors indicating BM, Bmi, BH for chart C, and RM, Rmi, RH for chart D. Star symbols highlight significant observations.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>FUNGuild analysis of fungal communities revealed three trophic modes (pathotroph, symbiotroph, and saprotroph), with rhizosphere soil exhibiting higher relative abundances of pathotrophic functions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figures 7C</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">D</xref>). Significant changes in specific fungal functional groups were observed across stand age in both soil compartments (<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05</italic>). Specifically, in bulk soils, the relative abundance of plant pathogens, fungal parasites, lichen parasites, leaf saprotrophs, and dung saprotrophs significantly changed (<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05</italic>) with stand age. In rhizosphere soils, significant changes (<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05</italic>) were observed in fungal parasites, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, leaf saprotrophs, and dung saprotrophs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Environmental drivers of microbial community</title>
<p>Mantel tests and redundancy analysis (RDA) demonstrated significant associations between soil physicochemical parameters and microbial community composition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figures 8</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">9</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). In bulk soil systems, bacterial Shannon diversity exhibited significant associations with total potassium (TK) and stoichiometric ratios (C/N, C/P) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8A</xref>), whereas fungal Chao1 diversity demonstrated broader nutrient sensitivity, correlating with total carbon (TC), organic carbon (SOC), nitrogen species (TN, AN), phosphorus (TP), calcium (TCa), and pH (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8B</xref>). In rhizosphere soil, bacterial alpha diversity was significantly linked to TK and N:P (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8C</xref>), while fungal Shannon diversity was significantly correlated with pH (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8D</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Mantel test (MT) analyzed the relationship between soil characteristics and microbial diversity for different niche compartments (<bold>A,C</bold>: bacteria; <bold>B,D</bold>: fungi).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1626892-g008.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Correlation plots showing relationships among soil properties in bulk soil (A, B) and rhizosphere soil (C, D). Variables include TC, SOC, TN, AN, TP, AP, TK, AK, TCa, pH, and nutrient ratios C:N, C:P, N:P. The color gradient represents correlation strength, with blue indicating positive and red indicating negative correlations. Line thickness indicates significance levels (pd) and range descriptors (rd). Chao1 and Shannon diversity indices are connected to several variables.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig9">
<label>Figure 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Redundancy analysis and correlation analysis between the microbial phyla and the soil physicochemical properties. <bold>(A)</bold> RDA of bulk soil bacterial communities and soil physicochemical variables. <bold>(B)</bold> RDA of rhizosphere soil bacterial communities and soil physicochemical variables. <bold>(C)</bold> RDA of bulk soil fungal communities and soil physicochemical variables. <bold>(D)</bold> RDA of rhizosphere fungal bacterial communities and soil physicochemical variables.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1626892-g009.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Four redundancy analysis (RDA) biplots labeled A, B, C, and D display various microbial groups and environmental factors. Each plot shows arrows representing correlations between variables, with red and blue arrows indicating different dimensions. Percentage values on axes indicate variance explained by each RDA axis.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The contributions of soil physicochemical properties to the variations for bacteria and fungi communities in the rhizosphere and bulk soils.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="3">Soil properties</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="4">Bacteria</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="4">Fungi</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Rhizosphere</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>P</italic></th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Bulk</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>P</italic></th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Rhizosphere</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>P</italic></th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Bulk</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>P</italic></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Explained (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Explained (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Explained (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Explained (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">pH</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.498</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">50.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.01</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">TC</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.07</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">TN</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.08</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.102</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">41.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.024</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">TP</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.276</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.174</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">TK</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.428</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.196</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">TC<sub>a</sub></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.272</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">SOC</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">AN</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.358</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">37.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.024</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">31.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.034</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">AP</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.644</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">AK</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.224</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.424</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">N/P</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.006</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.15</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C/N</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.096</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.042</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C/P</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.252</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.314</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">23.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.05</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Ordination analyses revealed differential explanatory power between soil compartments. For bacterial communities, the first two RDA axes explained 90.86% (bulk soil) and 86.86% (rhizosphere) of compositional variation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figures 9A</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">B</xref>). Fungal communities demonstrated significantly greater axis explanatory power at 99.84% (bulk) and 99.92% (rhizosphere) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figures 9C</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">D</xref>). Bacterial communities were predominantly structured by pH and stoichiometric ratios (C/N, C/P, N/P) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figures 9A</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">B</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>), while fungal communities were more strongly affected by TN, TP, and AN (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figures 9C,D</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). Notably, compartment-specific modulated these relationships: rhizobacterial composition were governed by nutrient availability (AN, AK) and elemental ratios (N/P, C/N, C/P), while bulk soil bacteria responded to pH and total nutrient pools (TC, TN) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figures 9A</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">B</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). Fungal biogeography exhibited similar patterns, with rhizosphere communities influenced by AN, TN, and C:P ratios, contrasting with bulk soil variations governed by TN, AN, and SOC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figures 9C,D</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec17">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Differences in microbial alpha diversity and composition</title>
<p>Long-term reforestation significantly altered soil microbial alpha diversity and community composition across the chronosequence. Consistent with expectations, <italic>P. armandii</italic> plantation exhibited significant changes in soil microbial alpha diversity, aligning with observations in temperate and subtropical forests (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Li et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref80">Yan et al., 2020</xref>). Bacterial and fungal Shannon diversity exhibited a distinct pattern: initially decreasing, then increasing with stand age. This dynamic primarily stems from shifting resource availability, changes in root exudation, and successional niche dynamics driven by plant community development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Wang et al., 2023</xref>). In young forests, harsh, variable conditions coupled with highly fluctuating resources favor r-selected microbial strategists (high reproductive rates, rapid growth, broad niches) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Liu W. et al., 2020</xref>). As plant biomass, root density, and competition increase during mid-succession, resource limitation intensifies: heightened plant and microbial nutrient uptake depletes pools, and shifts in root exudate composition and litter chemistry selectively favor fewer microbial taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Kasel and Bennett, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Malchair and Carnol, 2009</xref>). Concurrently, successional niche dynamics occur, where early-successional specialists are replaced but stable, K-selected communities are not yet established, resulting in the observed diversity minimum (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref88">Zhang et al., 2016</xref>). Ultimately, mature forests provide stable conditions with predictable, diverse resource inputs (e.g., litterfall, complex exudates). This promotes K-selected strategists (high competitiveness, specialization) and allows for resource partitioning among microbes across a broader resource spectrum, leading to higher alpha diversity than mid-succession (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Cui et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Wang et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Crucially, rhizosphere and bulk soil exhibited divergent microbial diversity patterns. Rhizosphere soil generally had lower alpha diversity than bulk soil, except for fungal Chao1 diversity in young forests, which aligns with previous studies in grasslands and agricultural soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Marilley and Aragno, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Ai et al., 2012</xref>). This is likely attributed to strong host plant selection via root exudates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Liu L. et al., 2020</xref>), which create a distinct physicochemical microhabitat favoring specific microbial populations. This rhizosphere filtering, driven by plant-derived signals and organic compounds, shapes a community distinct from the bulk soil reservoir. Microhabitat heterogeneity is thus fundamentally higher in the rhizosphere. However, the persistent similarity between compartments underscores that the rhizosphere microbiome is shaped by both recruitment from the bulk soil reservoir and local plant-microbe feedbacks within the rhizosphere environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Bram et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Veach et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Microbial community composition varied significantly across stand ages (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">4</xref>), driven primarily by shifts in the abundance of key bacterial and fungal phyla. These compositional shifts reflect functional adaptations associated with stand ages. Changes in bacterial composition were largely attributed to fluctuations in Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Actinobacteria. The high abundance of Proteobacteria in young forests is consistent with their broad ecological niche and nitrogen fixation capabilities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Kim et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Rojas et al., 2016</xref>), supporting early forest growth. In contrast, the increased abundance of Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria in middle-aged and mature forests aligns with Acidobacteria&#x2019;s tolerance to nutrient-poor soils and Actinobacteria&#x2019;s role in lignin decomposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Kirby, 2005</xref>), facilitating conifer forest development under changing conditions. The decline in Proteobacteria abundance in middle-aged and mature forests may be linked to reduced nitrogen availability, favoring non-nitrogen-fixing bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref91">Zheng et al., 2020</xref>). Fungal community shifts were primarily driven by changes in the relative abundance of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. A progressive enrichment of Basidiomycota and reduction in Ascomycota across the chronosequence indicates a transition in decomposition strategy: from preferential utilization of labile carbon compounds by Ascomycota towards the breakdown of recalcitrant complex polymers (e.g., lignin) dominated by Basidiomycota (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Lodato et al., 2021</xref>). This functional shift has significant ecosystem implications: it enhances the formation of stable soil organic carbon pools through the accumulation of recalcitrant residues and microbial necromass, contributing to long-term carbon sequestration. Concurrently, the slower decomposition of complex compounds may regulate nutrient cycling rates, influencing nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization and availability within the ecosystem.</p>
<p>Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) distinctly separated microbial communities into three groups corresponding to forest age classes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>), reinforcing the strong taxonomic dependence observed across the <italic>P. armandii</italic> chronosequence. Despite these significant temporal shifts in community structure, core bacterial and fungal phyla maintained relative stability throughout forest development. Furthermore, although rhizosphere filtering consistently differentiated the composition between rhizosphere and bulk soil compartments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Ning et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Luo et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Baudoin et al., 2003</xref>), we observed no significant temporal differences in the compositional divergence between these compartments across age classes. This finding further underscores the dual importance of bulk soil reservoirs and rhizosphere recruitment processes in shaping the microbial communities.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Microbial co-occurrence network in the bulk and rhizosphere soils</title>
<p>Soil microbial communities, like plant communities, exhibit complex interaction networks encompassing both mutualistic (e.g., symbiosis) and antagonistic (e.g., competition, predation) relationships (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">de Menezes et al., 2017</xref>). While co-occurrence network analysis does not directly reveal <italic>in situ</italic> interactions, it remains a valuable tool for elucidating microbial coexistence patterns in environmental samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Barber&#x00E1;n et al., 2012</xref>) and exploring links between ecosystem complexity and stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref94">Zhu et al., 2020</xref>). Our analysis revealed distinct co-occurrence network properties in rhizosphere versus bulk soil, indicating that differing niche conditions driven by plant roots sculpt unique bacterial and fungal interaction patterns. This differentiation is primarily attributed to plant root exudates, which alter nutrient availability, suppress pathogens, and recruit specific microbes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Chaparro et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref90">Zhao et al., 2021</xref>), demonstrating strong host-driven selection and metabolic influences. Furthermore, both forest successional stage and microhabitat significantly modulated rhizosphere network structure, highlighting the synergistic effects of plant development and environmental filtering.</p>
<p>Notably, rhizosphere networks exhibited significantly higher topological complexity (e.g., positive edge proportion, clustering coefficient, average connectivity, and density) than bulk soil networks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>; <xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). This increased complexity, potentially reflecting greater species interactions (e.g., commensalism, syntrophy, mutualism) and niche overlap (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref83">Yuan et al., 2021</xref>), may support enhanced community stability and resilience against environmental fluctuations. Three mechanisms likely underpin this complexity: (1) microenvironmental modifications induced by roots (e.g., hydrologic shifts) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Wang et al., 2018</xref>); (2) enhanced diversity of potential interactions, including cascading effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Shi et al., 2016</xref>); and (3) exudate-mediated stimulation of microbial exchanges via carbon substrates (e.g., organic acids, sugars, amino acids) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Philippot et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>Central to understanding the ecological implications of these networks are keystone taxa, identified based on their topological roles (e.g., connectors, module hubs), which are hypothesized to disproportionately influence network stability and key ecosystem functions such as soil organic matter (SOM) metabolism and nitrogen (N) cycling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref79">Xun et al., 2021</xref>). Our analysis identified keystone bacterial taxa primarily from Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Ascomycota, and Mortierellomycota, and fungal keystones from Firmicutes, Chloroflexi, and Bacteroidota, serving as critical connectors and module hubs. The ecological dominance of these keystones stems from physiological adaptations (e.g., high-affinity transporters in bacteria) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">Ward et al., 2009</xref>) and functional versatility crucial for ecosystem processes (e.g., lignocellulose degradation and mycoparasitism in fungi) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Wang et al., 2023</xref>). Environmental selection in forests, favoring taxa adept at utilizing complex organic polymers abundant in detritus (e.g., chitin, phospholipids) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Chen et al., 2019</xref>), further shapes their prominence. Crucially, the differences in keystone species composition and function between rhizosphere and bulk soil reflect the interplay of vegetation development and soil properties, directly linking these network hubs to spatial variations in nutrient cycling potential. In summary, during plantation development, the versatile metabolisms of these keystone species likely contribute significantly to shaping community structure and mediating interspecies interactions that underpin ecosystem functions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Fan et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>However, it is essential to acknowledge the limitations inherent in co-occurrence network inference from sequencing data. These networks represent statistical associations (co-occurrence/co-exclusion patterns), not confirmed biological interactions. Factors like shared environmental preferences or dispersal limitations can generate patterns indistinguishable from direct interactions. Therefore, the inferred interactions (mutualism, competition, etc.) and the direct functional roles of &#x201C;keystone&#x201D; taxa based solely on topology remain hypotheses requiring further validation (e.g., through targeted experiments, cultivation, or functional genomics). Our interpretations regarding stability, resilience, and specific functional contributions (e.g., to nutrient cycling rates) are thus cautious extrapolations based on network theory and identified taxa, avoiding claims of direct mechanistic proof.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Microbial community assembly dynamics</title>
<p>Deciphering the mechanisms governing microbial community assembly remains a central challenge in microbial ecology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref92">Zhou and Ning, 2017</xref>). In our study, deterministic processes were found to drive bacterial community assembly during the development of <italic>P. armandii</italic> plantations in both rhizosphere and bulk soils, aligning with previous research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Xu et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref89">Zhao et al., 2018</xref>). This deterministic dominance in bacteria can be attributed to several key drivers: (1) Their rapid generation times (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Sun et al., 2017</xref>) and higher transmission rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Schmidt et al., 2014</xref>) enable swift responses to environmental gradients such as shifts in soil pH, moisture, or nutrient availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Rinnan et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Ren et al., 2021</xref>). (2) Crucially, biotic interactions, particularly with the host plant, exert strong selective pressures. This is especially pronounced in the rhizosphere, where deterministic processes were significantly stronger than in bulk soil. The primary driver of this rhizosphere effect is the concentrated flux of diverse root exudates (e.g., carbon substrates, nitrogenous compounds, flavonoids, salicylic acid, phytoalexins) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref93">Zhu et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Vieira et al., 2020</xref>). These exudates create a distinct chemical environment gradient that selectively enriches microbial taxa phylogenetically or functionally adapted to utilize these resources, often enhancing nutrient cycling or promoting plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref87">Zhang et al., 2019</xref>). In contrast, the attenuated chemical gradient and weaker plant-driven biotic interactions in bulk soil result in comparatively weaker deterministic filtering.</p>
<p>Conversely, fungal community assembly exhibited stronger stochasticity, implying weaker environmental filtering overall and highlighting the importance of other drivers. This aligns with growing recognition of neutral processes in mycobiome organization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Wang et al., 2016</xref>). The enhanced stochasticity in fungi likely stems from inherent biological traits imposing constraints: (1) Limited dispersal capacity, associated with larger propagule sizes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Chen W. et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Chen W. M. et al., 2020</xref>), particularly for specialists like symbionts or biotrophs dependent on spatially constrained hosts or resources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref76">Wardle, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Wang et al., 2022</xref>), reduces their ability to track environmental gradients efficiently. (2) Multicellular growth strategies enhance substrate exploitation but inherently limit mobility, further amplifying dispersal limitation and rapid response to environmental gradients across larger spatial scales (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Heaton et al., 2020</xref>). These observations support theoretical frameworks linking microbial traits to assembly, such as the &#x201C;size plasticity&#x201D; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Farjalla et al., 2012</xref>) and &#x201C;size-dispersal tradeoff&#x201D; hypotheses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Shurin et al., 2009</xref>). Consequently, dispersal limitation and drift (random birth/death events) become more critical drivers than fine-scale environmental filtering or intense biotic selection for fungal communities. The specificity of many fungal interactions (e.g., host-pathogen or mycorrhizal symbioses) can also create patchy resource distributions, further amplifying the role of stochastic processes like dispersal limitation in assembly.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Effects of soil environmental factors on microbial communities</title>
<p>This study confirms that the structure of soil microbial communities is intricately regulated by multiple environmental factors, and this regulation varies depending on microbial groups (bacteria vs. fungi) and their specific soil microhabitats (rhizosphere vs. bulk soil). Bacterial community composition was primarily governed by soil pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Chen W. et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Chen W. M. et al., 2020</xref>) and key elemental stoichiometric ratios (C/N, C/P, N/P) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Delgado-Baquerizo et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Cao et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Dini-Andreote et al., 2014</xref>), supporting the prevailing view that pH acts as a critical filter for bacterial diversity and that stoichiometric ratios impose fundamental constraints on bacterial metabolism and community structure. Within the rhizosphere microhabitat shaped by root activity, bacterial composition was mainly driven by available nutrients (AN, AK) and elemental stoichiometric ratios (N/P, C/N, C/P), reflecting the selective effects of root exudates in enhancing nutrient availability and altering substrate stoichiometry. In contrast, bacterial communities in the bulk soil responded more strongly to factors reflecting fundamental soil conditions and total nutrient pools, such as pH, TC, and TN.</p>
<p>Conversely, fungal community composition exhibited a stronger response to total nutrient pools (TN, TP) and AN, likely related to their diverse roles in nutrient cycling (e.g., saprotrophic, symbiotic fungi) and acquisition strategies. The specific driving factors also differed by microhabitat. Rhizosphere fungal communities were primarily associated with AN, TN, and the C:P ratio, underscoring the importance of nitrogen (both total and available forms) and carbon-phosphorus balance in the root-influenced zone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Li D. D. et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Li J. et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Wang et al., 2019</xref>). In contrast, variation in bulk soil fungal communities was mainly driven by TN, AN, and SOC in combination, indicating that their structure is simultaneously influenced by nitrogen status and organic carbon availability (a key energy source for saprotrophic fungi) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Li D. D. et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Li J. et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Wang et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Collectively, these findings deepen our understanding of the mechanisms shaping soil microbial biogeographical patterns. They highlight the necessity of considering spatial heterogeneity (particularly the rhizosphere effect) and the specificity of microbial functional groups when studying the relationships between microbial communities and their environment.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec22">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study elucidated the temporal dynamics and drivers of microbial community assembly in rhizosphere and bulk soil across different stand age of <italic>P. armandii</italic> plantations in a karst ecosystem. Key findings demonstrated significant stage-dependent variations in microbial <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>-diversity, community structure, and functional profiles for both bacteria and fungi, while highlighting the higher network complexity and interconnectivity within the rhizosphere compared to bulk soil. Crucially, the assembly processes exhibited domain specificity, with bacterial communities predominantly governed by deterministic selection and fungal communities by stochastic processes, the influence of soil compartment varying temporally. Multivariate analyses consistently identified soil physicochemical properties as the primary regulator of these microbial patterns throughout plantation development. These results have critical implications for karst ecosystem restoration and soil health management: understanding the dominant role of soil properties and the temporal dynamics informs targeted interventions to manipulate microbial communities for enhancing plant establishment and soil fertility in degraded karst landscapes. Future research should prioritize: (1) long-term monitoring to link microbial dynamics with restoration outcomes, (2) functional validation of key microbial groups identified in network analyses, and (3) integrating multi-omics approaches to unravel plant-microbe-soil feedbacks driving succession in fragile karst systems.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec23">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The data presented in the study are deposited in the NCBI SRA repository, accession number PRJNA1063200 and PRJNA1132892.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec24">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>BH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. PZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. XB: Data curation, Investigation, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. WL: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. SZ: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec25">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the following funding sources: The Project of Guizhou Science and Technology Fund (no. Qiankehe Jichu-ZK [2024] Key 077); The Technology Top Talent Project in Department of Education of Guizhou Province (no. [2022]096); The Project of Bijie Science and Technology Fund (no. Bikelianhe [2023]10, 22, and 24).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec26">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec27">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec28">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec29">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1626892/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1626892/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ai</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Responses of extracellular enzyme activities and microbial community in both the rhizosphere and bulk soil to long-term fertilization practices in a fluvo-aquic soil</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>173</volume>, <fpage>330</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>338</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.07.020</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>H. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Litter-, soil-and C:N-stoichiometry-associated shifts in fungal communities along a subtropical forest succession</article-title>. <source>Catena</source> <volume>178</volume>, <fpage>350</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>358</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2019.03.037</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bakker</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berendsen</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Doornbos</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wintermans</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pieterse</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The rhizosphere revisited: root microbiomics</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>165</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2013.00165</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23755059</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bakker</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chaparro</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manter</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vivanco</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Impacts of bulk soil microbial community structure on rhizosphere microbiomes of <italic>Zea mays</italic></article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>392</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>126</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-015-2446-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <source>Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>China Agriculture Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barber&#x00E1;n</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casamayor</surname> <given-names>E. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>351</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2011.119</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21900968</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baudoin</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benizri</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guckert</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Impact of artificial root exudates on the bacterial community structure in bulk soil and maize rhizosphere</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>1183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1192</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00179-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bram</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Beeck</surname> <given-names>M. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weyens</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boerjan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vangronsveld</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Structural variability and niche differentiation in the rhizosphere and endosphere bacterial microbiome of field-grown poplar trees</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>25</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-017-0241-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Soil microbial community composition under Eucalyptus plantations of different age in subtropical China</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Soil Biol.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>128</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>135</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.12.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cavicchioli</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ripple</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Timmis</surname> <given-names>K. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azam</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bakken</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baylis</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Scientists&#x2019; warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>569</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>586</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41579-019-0222-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31213707</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cederlund</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wessen</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Enwall</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Juhanson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pell</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Soil carbon quality and nitrogen fertilization structure bacterial communities with predictable responses of major bacterial phyla</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>62</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.06.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chaparro</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Badri</surname> <given-names>D. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vivanco</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Rhizosphere microbiome assemblage is affected by plant development</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>790</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>803</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2013.196</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H. Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Meta-analysis shows positive effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and respiration</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1421</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-019-09258-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30902971</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>N. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Dispersal limitation relative to environmental filtering governs the vertical small&#x2010;scale assembly of soil microbiomes during restoration</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Ecol.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>402</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>412</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2664.13533</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Fertility-related interplay between fungal guilds underlies plant richness&#x2013;productivity relationships in natural grasslands</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>226</volume>, <fpage>1129</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1143</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.16390</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31863600</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P. F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and microbial nutrient limitation in rhizosphere soil in the arid area of the northern loess plateau, China</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>11</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.09.025</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Menezes</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thrall</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Linking fungal&#x2013;bacterial cooccurrences to soil ecosystem function</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Microbiol.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>141</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mib.2017.06.006</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28692866</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Delgado-Baquerizo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bardgett</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maestre</surname> <given-names>F. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eldridge</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Changes in belowground biodiversity during ecosystem development</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA</source> <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>6891</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6896</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1818400116</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30877251</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Delgado-Baquerizo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trivedi</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eldridge</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abades</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alfaro</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Multiple elements of soil biodiversity drive ecosystem functions across biomes</article-title>. <source>Nat. Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>210</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>220</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41559-019-1084-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32015427</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dini-Andreote</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>M. d. C. P. e.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Triado-Margarit</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casamayor</surname> <given-names>E. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Elsas</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salles</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Dynamics of bacterial community succession in a salt marsh chronosequence: evidences for temporal niche partitioning</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1989</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2001</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2014.54</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24739625</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weisenhorn</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gilbert</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Soil pH correlates with the co-occurrence and assemblage process of diazotrophic communities in rhizosphere and bulk soils of wheat fields</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>121</volume>, <fpage>185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>192</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.03.017</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farjalla</surname> <given-names>V. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marino</surname> <given-names>N. A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azevedo</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dib</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lopes</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Ecological determinism increases with organism size</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>93</volume>, <fpage>1752</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1759</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/11-1144.1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22919920</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Plant influences on soil microbial carbon pump efficiency</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>3854</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3856</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.16728</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37310165</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>N. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wubet</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Community assembly of ectomycorrhizal fungi along a subtropical secondary forest succession</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>205</volume>, <fpage>771</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>785</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13068</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25303438</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hartmann</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmid</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tuinen</surname> <given-names>D.v.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Plant-driven selection of microbes</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>321</volume>, <fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>257</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-008-9814-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heaton</surname> <given-names>L. L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fricker</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A mechanistic explanation of the transition to simple multicellularity in fungi</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>1600</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-020-16072-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32444651</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>R. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z. F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Microbial community assembly and its influencing factors of secondary forests in Qinling Mountains</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>184</volume>:<fpage>109075</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109075</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stegen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Distinct assembly mechanisms underlie similar biogeographical patterns of rare and abundant bacteria in Tibetan plateau grassland soils</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>2261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2272</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1462-2920.14993</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32216022</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lei</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Korpelainen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niinemets</surname> <given-names>&#x00DC;.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Divergent assemblage patterns and driving forces for bacterial and fungal communities along a glacier forefield chronosequence</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>118</volume>, <fpage>207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>216</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.12.019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Linking phylogenetic niche conservatism to soil archaeal biogeography, community assembly and species coexistence</article-title>. <source>Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1488</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1501</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/geb.13313</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kasel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bennett</surname> <given-names>L. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Land-use history, forest conversion, and soil organic carbon in pine plantations and native forests of south eastern Australia</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>137</volume>, <fpage>401</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>413</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.09.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jo</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Finneran</surname> <given-names>K. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kwon</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Diversity and composition of soil Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria communities as a bacterial indicator of past land-use change from forest to farmland</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>797</volume>, <fpage>148944</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>148910</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148944</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34298360</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kirby</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Actinomycetes and lignin degradation</article-title>. <source>Adv. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>125</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>168</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0065-2164(05)58004-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Landesman</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fitzpatrick</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Soil properties and tree species drive &#x00DF;-diversity of soil bacterial communities</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>201</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>209</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.05.025</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Langille</surname> <given-names>M. G. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zaneveld</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caporaso</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McDonald</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knights</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reyes</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S RRNA marker gene sequences</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>814</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>821</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt.2676</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23975157</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>LeBauer</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Treseder</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>89</volume>, <fpage>371</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>379</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/06-2057.1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18409427</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lei</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dan</surname> <given-names>C. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>B. Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Chemical nature of soil organic carbon under different long-term fertilization regimes is coupled with changes in the bacterial community composition in a Calcaric Fluvisol</article-title>. <source>Biol. Fertil. Soils</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>999</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1012</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-018-1319-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Cumulative effects of multiple biodiversity attributes and abiotic factors on ecosystem multifunctionality in the Jinsha River valley of southwestern China</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manag.</source> <volume>472</volume>:<fpage>118281</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118281</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shangguan</surname> <given-names>Z. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Assembly and enrichment of rhizosphere and bulk soil microbiomes in <italic>Robinia pseudoacacia</italic> plantations during long-term vegetation restoration</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>187</volume>:<fpage>104835</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.104835</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Stair-step pattern of soil bacterial diversity mainly driven by pH and vegetation types along the elevational gradients of Gongga Mountain, China</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>569</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/TAES.2017.2760799</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Seasonal variations of non-structural carbohydrates of young and middle-age <italic>Pinus armandii</italic> plantations</article-title>. <source>Acta Bot. Boreal.-Occident. Sin.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>0782</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>0791</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.20230635</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Graham</surname> <given-names>E. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Dynamic microbial assembly processes correspond to soil fertility in sustainable paddy agroecosystems</article-title>. <source>Funct. Ecol.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>1244</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1256</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2435.13550</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wurzburger</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Relationships between plant diversity and soil microbial diversity vary across taxonomic groups and spatial scales</article-title>. <source>Ecosphere</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>e02999</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ecs2.2999</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lodato</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boyette</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smilo</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jackson</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Halvorson</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuehn</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Functional importance and diversity of fungi during standing grass litter decomposition</article-title>. <source>Oecologia</source> <volume>195</volume>, <fpage>499</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>512</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00442-020-04838-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33423104</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Succession of the composition and co-occurrence networks of rhizosphere microbiota is linked to cd/Zn hyperaccumulation</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>153</volume>:<fpage>108120</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108120</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Malchair</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carnol</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Microbial biomass and C and N transformations in forest floors under European beech, sessile oak, Norway spruce and Douglas-fir at four temperate forest sites</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>831</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>839</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marilley</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aragno</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic diversity of bacterial communities differing in degree of proximity of Lolium perenne and <italic>Trifolium repens</italic> roots</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>136</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0929-1393(99)00028-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9001"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mariotte</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hudson</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamilton</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neilson</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boag</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Handley</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Spatial variability of soil total C and N and their stable isotopes in an upland Scottish grassland</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>196</volume>, <fpage>151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>162</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1004288610550</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mart&#x00ED;nez-Garc&#x00ED;a</surname> <given-names>L. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tylianakis</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peltzer</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dickie</surname> <given-names>I. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Host identity is a dominant driver of mycorrhizal fungal community composition during ecosystem development</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>205</volume>, <fpage>1565</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1576</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13226</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25640965</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Muhammad</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sainju</surname> <given-names>U. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Cover cropping enhances soil microbial biomass and affects microbial community structure: a meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>381</volume>:<fpage>114696</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114696</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mittermeier</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mittermeier</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>da Fonseca</surname> <given-names>G. A. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kent</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>403</volume>, <fpage>853</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>858</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/35002501</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soltis</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soltis</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Soil pH determines bacterial distribution and assembly processes in natural mountain forests of eastern China</article-title>. <source>Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>2164</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2177</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/geb.13373</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ning</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tingting</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yakov</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Rhizosphere bacteriome structure and functions</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>836</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-022-28448-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Paula</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>J. L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mueller</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mirza</surname> <given-names>B. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Land use change alters functional gene diversity, composition and abundance in Amazon forest soil microbial communities</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>2988</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2999</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mec.12786</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24806276</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Philippot</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raaijmakers</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lemanceau</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van der Putten</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>789</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>799</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro3109</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24056930</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Rhizosphere soil properties, microbial community, and enzyme activities: short-term responses to partial substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic manure</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manag.</source> <volume>299</volume>:<fpage>113650</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113650</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34481370</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rinnan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Michelsen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x00E5;&#x00E5;th</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jonasson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Fifteen years of climate change manipulations alter soil microbial communities in a subarctic heath ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>28</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01263.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rojas</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gutierrez</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bruns</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Bacterial and eukaryal diversity in soils forming from acid mine drainage precipitates under reclaimed vegetation and biological crusts</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>66</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.03.012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rousk</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baath</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brookes</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lauber</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lozupone</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caporaso</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>1340</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1351</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2010.58</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20445636</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nemergut</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Darcy</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Do bacterial and fungal communities assemble differently during primary succession?</article-title> <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>254</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>258</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mec.12589</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26010467</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Y. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>X. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Soil pH drives the spatial distribution of bacterial communities along elevation on Changbai Mountain</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>204</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>211</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.07.013</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nuccio</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Z. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Firestone</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The interconnected rhizosphere: high network complexity dominates rhizosphere assemblages</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>926</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>936</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ele.12630</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shurin</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cottenie</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hillebrand</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Spatial autocorrelation and dispersal limitation in freshwater organisms</article-title>. <source>Oecologia</source> <volume>159</volume>, <fpage>151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>159</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00442-008-1174-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18941791</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9002"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stegen</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fredrickson</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kennedy</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murray</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Quantifying community assembly processes and identifying features that impose them</article-title>. <source>ISME J</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>2069</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2079</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2013.93</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9003"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stegen</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Konopka</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fredrickson</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Stochastic and deterministic assembly processes in subsurface microbial communities</article-title>. <source>The ISME Journal</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1653</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1664</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2012.22</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sul</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asuming-Brempong</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tourlousse</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Penton</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Tropical agricultural land management influences on soil microbial communities through its effect on soil organic carbon</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>38</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Avera</surname> <given-names>B. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strahm</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Badgley</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Soil bacterial and fungal communities show distinct recovery patterns during forest ecosystem restoration</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>83</volume>:<fpage>e00966-17</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.00966-17</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28476769</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Veach</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morris</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yip</surname> <given-names>D. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Engle</surname> <given-names>N. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cregger</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Rhizosphere microbiomes diverge among <italic>Populus trichocarpa</italic> plant-host genotypes and chemotypes, but it depends on soil origin</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>76</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-019-0668-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31103040</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vieira</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sikorski</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dietz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herz</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schrumpf</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bruelheide</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Drivers of the composition of active rhizosphere bacterial communities in temperate grasslands</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>463</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>475</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-019-0543-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31659233</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walters</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Youngblut</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallace</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sutter</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Large-scale replicated field study of maize rhizosphere identifies heritable microbes</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA</source> <volume>115</volume>, <fpage>7368</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7373</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1800918115</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>L. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Dynamic microbial community composition, co-occurrence pattern and assembly in rhizosphere and bulk soils along a coniferous plantation chronosequence</article-title>. <source>Catena</source> <volume>223</volume>:<fpage>10694</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2023.106914</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Soil pH is a major driver of soil diazotrophic community assembly in Qinghai-Tibet alpine meadows</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>115</volume>, <fpage>547</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>555</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.09.024</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zuo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Plant diversity has stronger linkage with soil fungal diversity than with bacterial diversity across grasslands of northern China</article-title>. <source>Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>886</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>900</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/geb.13462</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref71"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Impact of environmental gradients on the abundance and diversity of planktonic fungi across coastal habitats of contrasting trophic status</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>683</volume>, <fpage>822</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>833</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.204</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31154160</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Higher precipitation strengthens the microbial interactions in semi-arid grassland soils</article-title>. <source>Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>570</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>580</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/geb.12718</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wiegand</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kraft</surname> <given-names>N. J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swenson</surname> <given-names>N. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davies</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Stochastic dilution effects weaken deterministic effects of niche-based processes in species rich forests</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>347</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>360</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/14-2357.1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27145610</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref74"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ward</surname> <given-names>N. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Challacombe</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Janssen</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henrissat</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coutinbo</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Three genomes from the phylum Acidpbacteria provide insight into the lifestyles of these microorganisms in soils</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microb.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>2046</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2056</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02294-08</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref75"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ward</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Orwin</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ostle</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Briones</surname> <given-names>M. J. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomson</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Griffiths</surname> <given-names>R. I.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Vegetation exerts a greater control on litter decomposition than climate warming in peatlands</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>123</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/14-0292.1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26236896</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref76"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wardle</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The influence of biotic interactions on soil biodiversity</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>870</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>886</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00931.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16796577</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref77"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wattenburger</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Halverson</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hofmockel</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Agricultural management affects root-associated microbiome recruitment over maize development</article-title>. <source>Phytobiomes J.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>260</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>272</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PBIOMES-03-19-0016-R</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref78"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ling</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quaiser</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Rare bacteria assembly in soils is mainly driven by deterministic processes</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol.</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>137</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>150</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-021-01741-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33792742</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref79"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xun</surname> <given-names>W. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Specialized metabolic functions of keystone taxa sustain soil microbiome stability</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-020-00985-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref80"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Change in composition and potential functional genes of soil bacterial and fungal communities with secondary succession in Quercus liaotungensis forests of the loess plateau, western China</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>364</volume>:<fpage>114199</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114199</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref81"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Spatial pattern and correlation of dominant plants in <italic>Pinus armandii</italic> forest in Bomi gang township</article-title>. <source>J. Northwest For. Univ.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>110</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>117</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2021.04.16</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref82"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rui</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Soil bacterial community shifts driven by restoration time and steppe types in the degraded steppe of Inner Mongolia</article-title>. <source>Catena</source> <volume>165</volume>, <fpage>228</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>236</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2018.02.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref83"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.a.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ning</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Climate warming enhances microbial network complexity and stability</article-title>. <source>Nat. Clim. Chang.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>348</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41558-021-00989-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref84"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fornara</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of three global change drivers on terrestrial C:N:P stoichiometry: a global synthesis</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>2450</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2463</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.13569</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27859966</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref85"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zak</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holmes</surname> <given-names>W. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peacock</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tilman</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Plant diversity, soil microbial communities, and ecosystem function: are there any links?</article-title> <source>Ecology</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>2042</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2050</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/02-0433</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref86"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Q. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ganjurjav</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Soil bacterial and fungal diversity differently correlated with soil biochemistry in alpine grassland ecosystems in response to environmental changes</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep43077</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref87"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Impact of soil leachate on microbial biomass and diversity affected by plant diversity</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>439</volume>, <fpage>505</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>523</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-019-04032-x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref88"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Impacts of fertilization practices on pH and the pH buffering capacity of calcareous soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>432</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>439</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00380768.2016.1226685</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref89"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>F. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Changes in soil microbial community are linked to soil carbon fractions after afforestation</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>370</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>379</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ejss.12525</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref90"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hale</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Root exudates drive soil-microbe-nutrient feedbacks in response to plant growth</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>613</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>628</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pce.13928</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33103781</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref91"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>Q. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>Y. R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Responses of soil microbial resource limitation to multiple fertilization strategies</article-title>. <source>Soil Till. Res.</source> <volume>196</volume>:<fpage>1044474</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2019.104474</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref92"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ning</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Stochastic community assembly: does it matter in microbial ecology?</article-title> <source>Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.</source> <volume>81</volume>:<fpage>e00002-17</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/MMBR.00002-17</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29021219</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref93"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vivanco</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manter</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen fertilizer rate affects root exudation, the rhizosphere microbiome and nitrogen-use-efficiency of maize</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>107</volume>, <fpage>324</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>333</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.07.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref94"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>D. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Differential impacts of nitrogen addition on rhizosphere and bulk-soil carbon sequestration in an alpine shrubland</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>2309</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2232</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.13417</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>