<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2025.1601805</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effects of yeast culture (<italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic>) on growth performance, serum biochemistry, rumen fermentation and microbiota of intake-restricted multiparous Suffolk sheep</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Chuying</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="fn00001" ref-type="author-notes"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3018111/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>Yujie</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="fn00001" ref-type="author-notes"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2632392/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Peng</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Qicheng</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Jingquan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Ning</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1862019/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Wenju</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2025265/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University</institution>, <addr-line>Shihezi</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science</institution>, <addr-line>Shihezi</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: Antonio Bevilacqua, University of Foggia, Italy</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: Long Guo, Lanzhou University, China</p>
<p>Zhian Zhang, Lanzhou University, China</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Wenju Zhang, <email>zhangwj1022@sina.com</email>; Ning Chen, <email>53499850@qq.com</email></corresp>
<fn id="fn00001" fn-type="equal"><p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>11</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1601805</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>28</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>24</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Wang, Niu, Zhang, Lu, Yang, Chen and Zhang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wang, Niu, Zhang, Lu, Yang, Chen and Zhang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>This study evaluated the effects of yeast culture (YC) supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, serum parameters, rumen fermentation, and bacterial communities in intake-restricted multiparous Suffolk sheep, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for enhancing productivity.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Thirty multiparous Suffolk sheep (Suffolk&#x2642;&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;Hu&#x2640;), with a mean body weight of 22&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.5&#x202F;kg, were arbitrarily assigned to three experimental groups: ad libitum feeding (AL), intake restriction (20% reduction, IR), and intake restriction with 30&#x202F;g/d YC supplementation (20% reduction, IRY) groups (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;10), and each sheep was housed separately.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>The findings indicated that, compared to the IR group, the IRY group exhibited significantly increased average daily gain (ADG), net weight gain (NWG), digestibility of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF), pH, total protein (TP), glucose (GLU), propionate, and immunoglobulin A (IgA) (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), while feed-to-gain ratio (F/G) and acetate: propionate ratio (A: P) were significantly decreased (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). Furthermore, differential feeding methods have significantly changed the composition of ruminal microbiota. The Shannon and Simpson indices were significantly higher in the IR and IRY groups compared with those in the AL group (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), and the Chao1 index in the IRY group was significantly higher than that in the AL group (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). The relative abundance of <italic>Prevotella</italic> in the IR group was significantly lower than that in the AL group (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). The relative abundance of <italic>Ruminococcus</italic> in the IR and IRY groups was significantly lower than that in the AL group (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). In contrast, the relative abundance of <italic>Bifidobacterium</italic> and <italic>Butyrivibrio</italic> was significantly higher in the IRY group compared with that in the AL and IR groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>These results indicate that YC supplementation under intake restriction improves growth performance by enhancing apparent nutrient digestibility, improving rumen fermentation patterns, and increasing rumen bacterial community diversity in multiparous Suffolk sheep.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>intake restriction</kwd>
<kwd>yeast culture</kwd>
<kwd>rumen fermentation</kwd>
<kwd>rumen microbiota</kwd>
<kwd>growth performance</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="3"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="74"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="10235"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Food Microbiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Suffolk sheep are commonly selected as sire breeds for producing hybrid mutton sheep owing to their superior meat yield and quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Chen et al., 2022</xref>). Hu sheep, renowned for their year-round estrus, are commonly utilized as the dam breed in hybrid mutton sheep breeding (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Yao et al., 2021</xref>). Crossbred multiparous Suffolk sheep, derived from the breeding of Suffolk and Hu sheep, exhibit high reproductive rates and meat production. Xinjiang, situated in China&#x2019;s arid and semi-arid climatic zone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Geng, 2022</xref>), is characterized by long, cold winters and dry summers. During season transitions, the forage supply is often insufficient. In recent years, the rapid development of intensive breeding farms in Xinjiang has exacerbated forage shortages, resulting in livestock experiencing mild hunger during certain periods.</p>
<p>Feed costs constitute a major restrictive element in the advancement of intensive animal breeding operations, as feed intake directly influences the overall dietary expenses. Adjusting feed intake is a widely used strategy to manage production costs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Piles, 2017</xref>). Previous research indicates that feed restriction at 70&#x2013;90% is classified as moderate, whereas restriction at 60% or below is severe, resulting in cessation of animal growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Gidenne et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Louren&#x00E7;o et al., 2022</xref>). During production, mild feed restriction reduces feed costs and enhances feed conversion rates during ad libitum feeding periods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Gibbs et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Birolo et al., 2016</xref>). Restrictive feeding decreased dairy cow feed intake by 12.8% and energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield, while enhancing feed efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Ben Meir et al., 2019</xref>). For Santa In&#x00EA;s sheep, increasing the degree of feed restriction significantly reduces the average daily gain (ADG) but expands the absorption area of the rumen and intestines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Lima et al., 2022</xref>). Lambs (36&#x202F;kg) subjected to 40% feed restriction for 5&#x202F;weeks, followed by 4&#x202F;weeks of ad libitum feeding, exhibited no significant effect on yield, while maintaining economic viability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Abouheif et al., 2013</xref>). Feed intake levels enhance the feed conversion rate (FCR) by affecting feed digestibility, retention time, and nutrient absorption. Therefore, quantitative feed restriction could serve as a viable approach to enhance the economic efficiency of large-scale farming by saving forage.</p>
<p>Probiotics are safe and efficient green feed additives that can improve growth performance, promote rumen fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Leyva-Diaz et al., 2021</xref>), and serve as alternatives to antibiotics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Zhang et al., 2016</xref>). Common probiotics include <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>, <italic>Bifidobacterium</italic>, yeast, and their cultures. Among these, yeast is commonly utilized in animal husbandry because of its low economic production costs, abundant availability, and significant effects on ruminant growth performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). Yeast culture (YC), produced through the fermentation of <italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic>, is rich in amino acids (AA), crude proteins, crude fat (EE), and polysaccharides. YC improves ruminant growth performance by enhancing Dry mattera (DM), organic matter (OM) and apparent crude protein (CP) digestibilities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Haddad and Goussous, 2005</xref>), increasing the rumen pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Dias et al., 2018</xref>), promoting rumen epithelial development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Qi and Wang, 2024</xref>), and increasing the abundance of cellulolytic bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Halfen et al., 2021</xref>) and <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> in the rumen microbiota (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Carpinelli et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Although prior studies have investigated the effects of feed restriction on sheep feeding behavior, methane emissions, and wool quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Behrendt et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Muir et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">De Brito et al., 2024</xref>), research on YC supplementation effects on rumen fermentation and microbial community structure under restricted feeding conditions is limited. Recent research shows that 0.5&#x2013;2% YC supplementation under heat stress or high-concentrate diets increases rumen pH and concentrations of propionate and butyrate, enhances microbial diversity (Chao1 and Shannon indices), and increases the abundance of functional bacteria (e.g., <italic>Prevotella</italic>, <italic>Butyrivibrio</italic>, <italic>Megasphaera</italic>), thus improving production performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Chen et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Qi and Wang, 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Wang et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Zhang et al., 2024</xref>). However, the effects of YC supplementation under feed restriction in sheep remain unexplored. Other research indicates that supplementing 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;g/d YC promotes rumen development and enhances the abundance of <italic>Ruminococcaceae</italic>, <italic>Lachnospiraceae</italic>, and <italic>Ruminococcus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Wang et al., 2023</xref>). Under feed restriction, YC improves production performance in sheep by optimizing rumen fermentation and microbial composition. This study is the first to assess whether YC supplementation mitigates body weight loss in multiparous Suffolk sheep under feed restriction, while systematically evaluating its effects on rumen fermentation [Volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and pH], microbial community interactions, feed efficiency, and production performance. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate YC&#x2019;s potential to enhance production efficiency and nutrient utilization in sheep under feed restriction, providing a theoretical foundation for its application in precision feeding systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The planning and execution of the experimental protocol and animal care procedures obtained approval from the Animal Ethics Committee of Shihezi University (Shihezi, China; Approval No. A2023-241), with all operational parameters strictly aligned to standardized guidelines outlined in the National Research Council&#x2019;s <italic>Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals</italic> (8<sup>th</sup> revised edition).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Animals, diets, and experimental design</title>
<p>The experiment was conducted at the Longrui Probiotic Forage Feed Plantation Co-operatives, located in the Fifth Group of Xiaotuguli Village, Hutubi County, Changji City. For the formal experiment, 30 purebred multiparous Suffolk rams, consistent in generation, in good body condition, aged 4&#x202F;months, and weighing 22&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.5&#x202F;kg, were selected from the 181st Corps of Altay Prefecture, Xinjiang Province. After passing quarantine, the rams were transported to the experimental site and subjected to acclimatization. Standardized prophylactic immunization protocols against foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) and peste des petits ruminants (PPR) were implemented following confirmation of stabilized nutritional intake parameters.</p>
<p>A single-factor experiment was conducted, with the experimental sheep randomly assigned to three groups: the ad libitum feeding group (AL), the intake restriction group (IR), and the intake restriction with 30&#x202F;g/d YC group (IRY). Each group had 10 replicates. The experiment lasted for 67&#x202F;days, including 60&#x202F;days of formal testing and 7&#x202F;days of preliminary testing. The apparent digestibility of nutrients trial began on day 52 of the formal experiment, lasting 7&#x202F;days, with a preceding 3-day acclimation phase.</p>
<p>Feeding protocols involved twice-daily administration at standardized intervals (0900 and 1800&#x202F;h), with ad libitum water accessibility. YC was supplemented at 30&#x202F;g/d per sheep, based on the recommended dosage (0.5&#x2013;1.5&#x202F;g/kg initial body weight) from Weifang Shengyi Biological Feed Co., Ltd. and thoroughly mixed with TMR before each feeding. Daily records of feed offered and refused were kept for the AL group. The daily feeding amounts for the IR and IRY groups were adjusted based on the average daily intake of the AL group over the first 3 days. Each experimental sheep was individually accommodated in a pen with dimensions of 1.5&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;1.7&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;1.7 cubic meters. The pens were cleaned daily, and thorough disinfection was carried out every 10&#x202F;days inside and outside the pens. Based on the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9002">National Research Council (2007)</xref> standard for 22&#x202F;kg body weight and a daily weight gain of 300&#x202F;g/d, a total mixed ration (TMR) was formulated with a constant concentrate-to-forage ratio of 60:40. The nutritional composition and formulation details of the experimental diet are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The composition and nutrient levels of basal diets (air-dry basis).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Ingredients</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Contents (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Nutrient components</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Contents</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Alfalfa</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">40.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Dry matter</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">90.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Corn</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">36.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">NDF</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">46.31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cotton meal</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">ADF</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38.84</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Soybean meal</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Crude protein</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16.80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Bran</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">ME (MJ/kg)<sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11.62</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Safflower seed meal</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Ether extract</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Premix<sup>1</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.80</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Calcium</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Wheat flour</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.80</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Phosphorus</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Soybean oil</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.50</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Brewer&#x2019;s yeast</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.00</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Total</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">100.00</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><sup>1</sup>Premix provided the following per kg diet: VA 50000 IU; VE 1,000&#x202F;mg; Fe 8&#x202F;g; Zn 1.6&#x202F;g; Mn 800&#x202F;mg; Gu 160&#x202F;mg; Se 0.3&#x202F;mg; I 1.0&#x202F;mg; Co 0.5&#x202F;mg.</p>
<p><sup>2</sup>ME was calculated value, the others were measured values.</p>
<p>Based on tabular net energy (NE) values for individual feed ingredients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9002">National Research Council, 2007</xref>), the composition and nutrient levels of basal diets (air-dry basis) were formulated.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>YC</title>
<p>The YC was provided by Weifang Shengyi Biological Feed Co., Ltd. (Shandong, China). The fermentation strain used is <italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic>, with a content of &#x2265; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x202F;CFU/g. The composition includes AA, CP&#x202F;&#x2265;&#x202F;20%, EE, crude fiber (CF), mannan &#x2265; 5%, ash, and moisture content &#x2265; 3%.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Sample collection and processing</title>
<p>During the formal experiment, each multiparous Suffolk sheep was weighed individually once a week, with weighing occurring before morning feeding. Before daily feeding, the feeds offered to and refused were recorded. For the multiparous Suffolk rams, calculations were performed to determine the dry matter intake (DMI), ADG, and feed-to-gain ratio (F/G).</p>
<p>Fecal samples were gathered via the rectal end collection method, where all feces from each multiparous Suffolk sheep over a period of 7&#x202F;days were mixed and stored at &#x2212;20&#x00B0;C. All dietary and fecal matrices underwent desiccation (65&#x00B0;C, 48&#x202F;h) followed by 24&#x202F;h rehydration. DM quantification involved gravimetric stabilization through iterative 65&#x00B0;C dehydration cycles. Processed samples were milled through 1&#x202F;mm sieves, packaged in 150&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;220&#x202F;mm hermetic containers, and maintained at 4&#x00B0;C. Each sheep has 10&#x202F;mL of blood drawn from the jugular vein. The samples were centrifuged (3,000&#x202F;rpm, 10&#x202F;min, 4&#x00B0;C), with the resultant serum being partitioned into two 5&#x202F;mL microcentrifuge tubes for preservation at &#x2212;20&#x00B0;C.</p>
<p>For rumen fluid collection, five sheep were arbitrarily chosen from each group. Rumen fluid was collected through an oral stomach tube, with the first 100&#x202F;mL discarded and the subsequent 100&#x202F;mL collected. The fluid was filtered through four layers of gauze and aliquoted into two 50&#x202F;mL sterile enzyme-free centrifuge tubes. One tube received a 25% metaphosphate solution, after which all samples were stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Analysis of growth performance, apparent nutritional digestibility, and serum biochemical and immune indices</title>
<p>Based on body weight and the amounts of feed offered and refused, DMI, ADG, and F/G were calculated. Quantitative determinations of nutritional constituents (DM, OM, CP, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF)) in feed matrices were conducted following established analytical protocols. DM content was analyzed following AOAC methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">AOAC, 1990</xref>). CP analysis employed Kjeldahl nitrogen quantification technology (Kjeltec 8,200, FOSS Analytical, Denmark) following acid digestion protocols. NDF and ADF contents were measured according to previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Soest et al., 1991</xref>). Digestibility was evaluated using the acid-insoluble ash (AIA) method.</p>
<p>The apparent digestibility (%) was computed through the AIA tracer technique using the following stoichiometric relationship:</p>
<p>Apparent nutritional digestibility (%)&#x202F;=&#x202F;100&#x202F;&#x2212;&#x202F;[(A1&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;A2)/(A3&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;A4)] (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Ara&#x00FA;jo Costa et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>Where: A1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Fecal nutrient concentration (%); A2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Dietary AIA content (%); A3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Dietary nutrient concentration (%); A4&#x202F;=&#x202F;Fecal AIA content (%).</p>
<p>Serum biochemical indices (total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), globulin (GLO), Blood urea nitrogen (BUN), glucose (GLU), triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) utilizing an automated clinical chemistry analyzer (ZY KHB-1280, Shanghai Kehua Bio-Engineering, China). Immunological parameter analysis involved enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) determinations for immunoglobulin (immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin M (IgM), immunoglobulin G (IgG)) and proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6)) employing commercial assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering, China) following manufacturer specifications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Measurement of rumen pH, NH<sub>3</sub>-N, and VFAs</title>
<p>The pH of the collected rumen fluid was promptly assessed using a handheld pH meter (WTW pH 3,110, Xylem Inc. Munich, Germany) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Niu et al., 2025</xref>). The NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentration in rumen fluids was measured using an Amphenol-hypochlorite assay (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Carpinelli et al., 2021</xref>). VFAs were determined using gas chromatography. The collected samples underwent centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10&#x202F;min. Subsequently, the resulting supernatant was passed through a 0.22&#x202F;&#x03BC;m water-phase filter membrane. Following filtration, the supernatant was subjected to extraction with an equivalent volume of ether. Finally, the extracted material was analyzed using a gas chromatograph (7890A, Agilent, United Kingdom). A 1&#x202F;&#x03BC;L sample was injected into a gas-phase capillary column (30&#x202F;m&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;0.25&#x202F;mm&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;0.25&#x202F;&#x03BC;m). The temperature program was set as follows: initial temperature at 60&#x00B0;C, increasing at 20&#x00B0;C/min to 220&#x00B0;C. The injector temperature was set at 250&#x00B0;C, and the detector temperature at 280&#x00B0;C. The sample was injected in splitless mode with a 50:1 split ratio. Helium was used as the carrier gas.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Analysis of rumen bacterial communities</title>
<p>Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis: Cryopreserved ruminal fluid specimens underwent microbial genomic DNA isolation employing commercial extraction kits under standardized protocols. Nucleic acid integrity was verified through spectrophotometric quantification (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States). DNA quality was assessed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Zhou et al., 2020</xref>). The universal primers 338F (5&#x2019;-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3&#x2032;) and 806R (5&#x2019;-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3&#x2032;) were used in a specific PCR method to amplify the V3&#x2013;V4 variable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene.</p>
<p>16S rRNA sequencing and analysis: Purified amplicons were normalized for equimolar library construction and sequenced (PE250) on an Illumina NovaSeq platform following manufacturer-specified workflows. Low-quality sequences with insufficient length or average score, as well as duplicate sequences and those containing ambiguous bases, were filtered and preprocessed. Raw sequencing data preprocessing involved adapter trimming using Trimmomatic (v 0.39), read merging via FLASH (v 1.2.11), and chimera removal with the UCHIME algorithm. High-fidelity sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a 97% similarity threshold using QIIME2 (v 2021.11). A representative sequence was selected from each OTU using default parameters. OTU taxonomic classification was conducted by BLAST searching the representative sequences set against the Greengenes Database. Non-compliant OTUs were removed. OTU subsets were averaged and compared against the SILVA database (v138) using the BLASTn algorithm with a &#x2265;70% bootstrap confidence threshold.</p>
<p>Sequence data were analyzed primarily using QIIME and R packages (v3.2.0). Alpha diversity indices at the OTU level, including Chao1, Observed Species, Shannon, and Simpson indices, were used to assess microbial community richness. Beta diversity was visualized using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis distances. Taxa abundances at the phylum and genus levels were statistically compared among groups using Metastats. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was used to identify differentially abundant taxa across groups with default parameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Raw data accession numbers</title>
<p>The raw data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number PRJNA1242813.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>2.9</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Initial statistical processing was carried out using Excel 2022, after which the normality of distribution for growth performance metrics, apparent nutrient digestibility values, serum biochemical and immune indicators, pH, VFAs, and NH<sub>3</sub>-N was evaluated via the Shapiro&#x2013;Wilk test. Parametric data are presented as arithmetic means &#x00B1; standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS 22.0 software, with <italic>post hoc</italic> multiple comparisons conducted employing the Duncan test. A probability value of less than 0.05 (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) was deemed to indicate statistical significance. Non-parametric statistical tests were applied to assess differences in rumen bacterial communities among three groups. Correlation coefficients were computed based on Spearman correlation distances, and visualization of these correlations was achieved through a heatmap constructed using Origin Pro 2021.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec12">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Growth performance and economic benefits</title>
<p>There were no significant differences in the initial body weight among the three groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05). In the AL group, final body weight (FBW), net weight gain (NWG), DMI, and ADG were significantly higher than those in the IR and IRY groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). Additionally, FBW, NWG and ADG were significantly higher in the IRY group compared with those in the IR group (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). The F/G was significantly higher in the AL and IR groups compared with that in the IRY group (<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;</italic> 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>The effect of adding YC on the growth and economic benefits of multiparous Suffolk sheep.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Items</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Groups<sup>1</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">SEM<sup>2</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>P</italic>-value<sup>3</sup></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">AL</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">IR</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">IRY</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Initial body weight, IBW (kg)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22.15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22.21</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22.24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.045</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.930</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Final body weight, FBW (kg)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">38.74<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35.41<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">36.65<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.354</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Net weight gain, NWG (kg)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.59<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.20<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.41<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.415</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Dry Matter Intake, DMI (g/day)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1350.26<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1080.21<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1080.21<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.877</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Average daily gain, ADG (g/day)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">276.50<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">220.00<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">240.17<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.968</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Feed: Gain, (F/G)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.88<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.91<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.50<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.111</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Unit price of feed, CNY/kg</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><sup>4</sup>Feed cost, CNY</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">291.66<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">233.33<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">233.33<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.213</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Unit price of YC, CNY/kg</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><sup>5</sup>YC cost, CNY</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Purchase price, CNY/kg</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">25.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">25.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">25.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><sup>6</sup>Gross profit, CNY</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">123.09<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">96.67<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">108.92<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.491</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><sup>1</sup>AL: Ad libitum feeding group: IR: 20% restricted feeding group: IRY: 20% restricted feeding group with the addition of 30&#x202F;g/d YC.</p>
<p><sup>2</sup>SEM represents the standard error of the mean.</p>
<p><sup>3a,b,c</sup>Mean values within a row bearing different superscript letters differed significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05).</p>
<p><sup>4</sup>Feed cost: Total feed consumption cost per sheep during the 60-day experimental period.</p>
<p><sup>5</sup>YC cost: Total YC supplementation cost per sheep.</p>
<p><sup>6</sup>Gross profit: 60-day profit per sheep, calculated as: Purchase price &#x00D7; NWG &#x2212; Feed cost &#x2212; YC cost.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>When considering only feed and YC costs, while excluding labor, management, health, and disease prevention costs, the net profit per sheep in the IRY group was 12.25 CNY higher than that in the IR group (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Apparent nutrient digestibility</title>
<p>There were no significant differences in DM, OM, or CP among the three groups (<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003E;</italic> 0.05). However, the digestibility of NDF and ADF was significantly lower in the AL group compared with that in the IR and IRY groups (<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;</italic> 0.05). Additionally, NDF and ADF digestibility were significantly higher in the IRY group compared with those in the IR group (<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;</italic> 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Nutritional digestibility of multiparous Suffolk sheep with or without the addition of YC.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Items<sup>1</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Groups<sup>2</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">SEM<sup>3</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>P</italic>-value<sup>4</sup></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">AL</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">IR</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">IRY</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">DM (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">63.36</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">64.74</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">65.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.937</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.082</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">OM (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75.97</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">76.93</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">76.45</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.864</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.215</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">CP (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">62.42</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">63.09</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">63.43</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.965</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.167</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">NDF (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">63.21<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">65.44<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">66.27<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.048</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.021</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">ADF (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">58.16<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">59.28<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">61.36<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.157</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.013</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><sup>1</sup>DM, dry matter; OM, organic matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber.</p>
<p><sup>2</sup>AL: Ad libitum feeding group; IR: 20% restricted feeding group; IRY: 20% restricted feeding group with the addition of 30&#x202F;g/d YC.</p>
<p><sup>3</sup>SEM represents the standard error of the mean.</p>
<p><sup>4a,b,c</sup>Mean values within a row bearing different superscript letters differed significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05).</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Serum biochemical and immune indicators</title>
<p>The TP, GLU, and IgA concentrations in the AL group were significantly higher than those in the IR and IRY groups (<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;</italic> 0.05). TP, GLU, and IgA concentrations in the IRY group were significantly higher than those in the IR group (<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;</italic> 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of adding YC on serum biochemical and immune indices in multiparous Suffolk sheep.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Items<sup>1</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Groups<sup>2</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">SEM<sup>3</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>P</italic>-value<sup>4</sup></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">AL</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">IR</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">IRY</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">TP (g/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">62.46<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">57.84<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">58.16<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.685</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">ALB (g/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">28.99</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">26.18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">27.73</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.357</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.623</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">GLB (g/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">32.32</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">32.31</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">32.34</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.137</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.916</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">UN (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.63</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.64</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.015</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.946</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">GLU (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.23<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.52<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.06<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.139</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.017</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">TG (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.42</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.40</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.39</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.054</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.893</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">TC (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.09</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.185</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.863</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">ALT (U/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.54</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.51</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.51</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.244</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.817</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">AST (U/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.57</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.52</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.55</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.914</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.793</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">ALP (U/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">38.71</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">38.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">38.74</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.091</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.673</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">HDL (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.84</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.80</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.85</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.146</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.780</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">LDL (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.58</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.59</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.52</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.215</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.739</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">IgA (g/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.42<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.87<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.04<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.667</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.034</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">IgG (g/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.34</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.53</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.52</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.432</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.689</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">IgM (g/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.78</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.82</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.94</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.457</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.343</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">IL-6 (pg/mL)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">25.21</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">26.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">26.63</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.475</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.283</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">IL-1&#x03B2; (pg/mL)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">115.43</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">117.52</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">118.32</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.431</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.115</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><sup>1</sup>TP, total protein; ALB, albumin; GLB, globulin; BUN, Blood Urea Nitrogen; GLU, Glucose; TG, Triglycerides; TC, Total Cholesterol; ALT, Alanine aminotransferase; AST, Aspartate aminotransferase; ALP, Alkaline Phosphatase; HDL, High-Density Lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; IgA, Immunoglobulin A; IgG, Immunoglobulin G; IgM, Immunoglobulin M; IL-6, Interleukin-6; IL-1&#x03B2;, Interleukin-1&#x03B2;.</p>
<p><sup>2</sup>AL: Ad libitum feeding group; IR: 20% restricted feeding group; IRY: 20% restricted feeding group with the addition of 30&#x202F;g/d YC.</p>
<p><sup>3</sup>SEM represents the standard error of the mean.</p>
<p><sup>4a,b,c</sup>Mean values within a row bearing different superscript letters differed significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05).</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Rumen fermentation parameters</title>
<p>Compared with that in the AL group, the rumen pH in the IR and IRY groups was significantly decreased (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), but that in the IRY group was significantly higher than that in the IR group (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). The IRY group significantly increased propionate concentrations compared to the AL and IR groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). Moreover, the A:P ratio was significantly reduced in IRY group compared with that in the AL and IR groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of adding YC on pH and VFAs in multiparous Suffolk sheep.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Items<sup>1</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Groups<sup>2</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">SEM<sup>3</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>P</italic>-value<sup>4</sup></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">AL</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">IR</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">IRY</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">pH</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.47<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.27<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.33<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.082</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.037</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">NH<sub>3</sub>-N (mg/dL)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.37</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.28</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.64</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.256</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.269</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Acetate (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33.26</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">32.24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">32.14</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.062</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.930</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Propionate (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.64<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.35<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.43<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.394</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Butyrate (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.94</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.067</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.192</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Acetate: propionate ratio (A: P)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.00<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.97<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.74<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.146</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.034</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Propionate: butyrate ratio (P: B)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.81</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.79</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.212</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.068</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Acetate: butyrate ratio (A: B)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.62</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.54</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.195</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.187</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">TVFAs (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">60.36</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">60.44</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">60.46</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.32</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.940</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><sup>1</sup>NH<sub>3</sub>-N, ammonia nitrogen; A: P, acetate: propionate; P: B, propionate: butyrate; A: B, acetate: butyrate; TVFAs, total volatile fatty acids.</p>
<p><sup>2</sup>AL: Ad libitum feeding group; IR: 20% restricted feeding group; IRY: 20% restricted feeding group with the addition of 30&#x202F;g/d YC.</p>
<p><sup>3</sup>SEM represents the standard error of the mean.</p>
<p><sup>4a,b,c</sup>Mean values within a row bearing different superscript letters differed significantly (<italic>P</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05).</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Analysis of the diversity of the rumen bacterial communities</title>
<p>A Venn diagram revealed 536 common amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) among all the groups. The AL, IR, and IRY groups had 2,740, 4,876, and 3,647 exclusive ASVs, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref>). The analysis of rumen microbiota diversity and richness revealed that the Chao1 index of the IRY group was significantly higher than that of the AL group (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). Both the Shannon and Simpson indices were significantly higher in the IRY and IR groups compared with those in the AL group (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). In addition, the number of observed species in the IRY group was significantly higher than that in the AL group (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>). Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) showed that the samples from the AL and IR groups were widely dispersed with little overlap, whereas samples from the IRY and IR groups were more concentrated with some overlap (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>). These results suggest that different feeding strategies affect the rumen bacterial composition in multiparous Suffolk sheep. Intake restriction modifies rumen bacterial composition, and the addition of YC further alters specific rumen bacterial communities.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>(A)</bold> Rumen alpha diversity indices (Chao 1, Shannon, Simpson, and Observed species) of the AL, IR, and IRY groups. <bold>(B)</bold> Beta diversity was assessed via principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the bacterial community structure in the AL, IR, and IRY groups. <bold>(C)</bold> Venn diagram.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1601805-g001.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Panel A shows four box plots comparing the Chao1, Shannon, Simpson, and observed species indices across three groups: AL, IRY, and IR, with significant p-values noted. Panel B is a PCoA plot illustrating clustering of the three groups along two principal coordinates. Panel C presents a Venn diagram displaying shared and unique elements among the AL, IRY, and IR groups, with corresponding numbers indicated.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Analysis of rumen bacterial phyla and genera</title>
<p>Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the dominant phyla in all three groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>). The relative abundance of Firmicutes was significantly higher in the IR and IRY groups compared with that in the AL group (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). In contrast, the AL group had a significantly higher relative abundance of Bacteroidetes than the IRY and IR groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). Additionally, the IRY group showed a significant increase in the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes compared to the IR group (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Rumen microflora composition of multiparous Suffolk sheep in the AL, IR, and IRY groups. <bold>(A)</bold> The top 5 phyla in the rumen. <bold>(B)</bold> The top 20 genera in the rumen. <bold>(C)</bold> Comparative differences of the relative abundance (%) of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, <italic>Prevotella</italic>, <italic>Ruminococcus</italic>, <italic>Bifidobacterium</italic>, and <italic>Butyrivibrio</italic> among the three groups. <bold>(D)</bold> LEfSe analysis of rumen bacterial flora in the AL, IR, and IRY groups. The biomarker taxa LDA score &#x003E;2 of rumen microbiota in the AL, IR, and IRY groups. Higher LDA scores indicate a more significant role of bacteria in the phylogenetic microbial community. <sup>abc</sup>Mean values bearing different superscript letters differed significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1601805-g002.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Four charts depicting bacterial compositions and abundance. Chart A is a stacked bar chart showing relative abundance percentages of different bacterial phyla, including Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, across three samples: AL, IRY, and IR. Chart B is a similar stacked bar chart focusing on different bacterial genera like Prevotella and Ruminococcus within the same sample groups. Chart C presents six individual bar charts comparing relative abundance percentages of specific bacterial groups among the samples, with significant differences indicated by letters. Chart D is a horizontal bar chart showing LDA scores of various bacterial families and genera, grouped by sample, with a threshold of 2.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The dominant genera were <italic>Prevotella</italic>, <italic>Ruminococcus</italic>, <italic>Butyrivibrio</italic>, <italic>Bulleidia</italic>, and <italic>Bifidobacterium</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>). The average relative abundances of <italic>Prevotella</italic> in the AL, IRY, and IR groups were 39.67, 40.99, and 24.76%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the relative abundance of <italic>Prevotella</italic> between the AL and IRY groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05); however, both groups had significantly higher abundances of <italic>Prevotella</italic> compared with those in the IR group (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>). The AL group exhibited the highest average relative abundance of <italic>Ruminococcus</italic> (20.43%), whereas the IRY and IR groups exhibited abundances of 11.13 and 13.77%, respectively. The AL group demonstrated a significantly higher relative abundance of <italic>Ruminococcus</italic> compared with that in the IRY and IR groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed between the IRY and IR groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05). Compared with that in the AL and IR groups, the IRY group exhibited higher relative abundances of <italic>Butyrivibrio</italic> and <italic>Bifidobacterium</italic> (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>). Restricting the feeding of sheep not only increased the abundance of beneficial bacteria but also led to the production of probiotics such as <italic>Selenomonas</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>3.7</label>
<title>Differential species analysis</title>
<p>LEfSe analysis identified the key species of rumen microbiota among the three groups. When the threshold was set to 2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2D</xref>), <italic>Asticcacaulis</italic> was identified as the featured bacteria in the AL group, whereas <italic>Selenomonas</italic> and <italic>Lachnospiraceae</italic> were the predominant bacteria in the IRY group.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>3.8</label>
<title>Correlation analysis of the rumen bacterial communities and fermentation parameters</title>
<p>Spearman&#x2019;s correlation analysis revealed that butyrate content was strongly negatively correlated with the abundance of <italic>Bifidobacterium</italic> (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), NH<sub>3</sub>-N content was strongly negatively correlated with <italic>Treponema</italic> abundance (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001), while a positive correlation was observed between NH<sub>3</sub>-N content and <italic>Bifidobacterium</italic> (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) and <italic>Dialister</italic> abundance (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). Furthermore, propionate was strongly positively correlated with <italic>Prevotella</italic> (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01), and positively correlated with <italic>Megasphaera</italic> (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), and <italic>Mitsuokella</italic> abundance (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). Additionally, acetate levels were positively correlated with <italic>Ruminococcus</italic> abundance (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), whereas <italic>Bulleidia</italic> abundance was positively correlated with TVFAs content (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>The heatmap visually represents the correlation between the top 20 bacterial genera in the rumen and VFAs, with red indicating a positive correlation, green indicating a negative correlation, and color intensity reflecting the correlation coefficient magnitude. &#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05, &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1601805-g003.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Heatmap displaying correlations between microbial genera (listed on the right) and variables such as butyrate, acetate, TVFAs, propionate, and NH&#x2083;-N (listed at the bottom). Color indicates correlation strength: red for positive and green for negative. Stars mark significant correlations.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec21">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="sec22">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>YC improved the growth performance and economic benefits of sheep with restricted intake</title>
<p>Restrictive feeding is a widely applied strategy in poultry farming for controlling weight, enhancing egg production, and reducing feed costs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Metzler-Zebeli et al., 2019</xref>). This strategy is crucial in the sheep industry as it improves the FCR and serves as an effective transitional method during periods of feed scarcity in spring and winter, thereby providing economic benefits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Neto et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Bezerra et al., 2013</xref>). However, the effects of different degrees of restrictive feeding on animal health vary significantly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Jiang et al., 2024</xref>). When the degree of restrictive feeding reaches 30%, the growth rate of sheep noticeably slows. At a restriction level of 60%, the weight of sheep almost stagnates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">De Ara&#x00FA;jo et al., 2017</xref>). The energy required for animal growth is primarily derived from nutrient intake. When nutrient intake decreases, the energy produced by the animal is prioritized to maintain the basal metabolic rate (BMR), with any excess energy stored in fat or muscle. Restrictive feeding can lead to slower growth rates, and increasing levels of feeding restriction can result in growth arrest in animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Almeida et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Wang et al., 2021</xref>). As anticipated, the ADG of the IR group exhibited a significant reduction in this experimental study. The addition of YC to the IRY group&#x2019;s diet increased ADG, this is consistent with the findings of previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Wang et al., 2024</xref>) observation that YC supplementation enhances ADG in goats. Furthermore, this study found that the gross profit per sheep in the IRY group was 12.25 CNY higher than that in the IR group, demonstrating the economic feasibility of YC supplementation under restricted feeding conditions. Restrictive feeding induces mild hunger in animals, slowing rumen gastric emptying, and prolonging feed retention time, facilitating adequate digestion and absorption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Liu et al., 2021</xref>). This may explain the significantly higher digestibility of ADF and NDF in the IR group compared to the AL group. YC fermentation products, rich in AA, CP, and mannan, significantly enhance ADF and NDF digestibility, which are degraded into GLU. GLU, a primary energy source, is rapidly converted to ATP during energy deficiency to meet metabolic demands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Ortega Cerrilla and Mendoza Mart&#x00ED;nez, 2003</xref>), thus promoting animal growth performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Yang et al., 2016</xref>). Thus, in this study, the improvement in ADF and NDF digestibility due to YC addition indicates their potential as contributing factors to the observed improved growth performance.</p>
<p>Ding et al. conducted a 30-day restrictive feeding trial on small-tailed Han sheep, followed by 60&#x202F;days of ad libitum feeding, and they found that compensatory growth occurred during the ad libitum phase, which not only compensated for weight loss during the restrictive feeding period but also saved 18.4% of feed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Ding et al., 2016</xref>). Restrictive feeding does not necessarily harm animals, as animals can adapt their physiological and behavioral responses according to their nutritional status. Despite mildly restrictive feeding leading to a decrease in sheep weight (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>), it also resulted in the production of beneficial bacteria (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>), thereby facilitating compensatory growth.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec23">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>YC improved serum biochemistry and immune indices</title>
<p>Serum TP levels reflect both the CP content in the diet and the efficiency of protein absorption in the intestines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Zhong et al., 2022</xref>). Within a certain range, higher TP values indicate better nutrient utilization by the animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Ahmat et al., 2021</xref>). Restriction leads to reduced nutrient intake, thereby decreasing the availability of nutrients for digestion and absorption. In this experiment, the TP concentration in the serum of the IR group decreased, but the addition of YC significantly increased the TP concentration, indicating that YC effectively promoted protein digestion and absorption. The GLU concentration in the serum of ruminants was relatively low, which typically indicates insufficient energy availability or inadequate energy utilization by animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Chai, 2015</xref>). Serum GLU concentrations in the IR group were significantly reduced. However, YC supplementation significantly increased GLU concentrations. NDF primarily comprises hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin, whereas ADF consists of cellulose and lignin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">De Souza et al., 2015</xref>). Cellulose and hemicellulose are degraded into GLU (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">G&#x00ED;rio et al., 2010</xref>), which may explain the increase in GLU concentration following YC supplementation and why the ADG in the IRY group exceeded that in the IR group. The addition of YC supplementation significantly increases villus length, width, and mucosal thickness in the rumen of calves, thereby improving their digestive and absorptive capacities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Qi and Wang, 2024</xref>). Changes in rumen morphology may contribute to increased TP and GLU concentrations, but this warrants further validation in future studies. Other studies have demonstrated that YC is associated with an elevated relative abundance of bacteria involved in protein and carbohydrate degradation, which enhances the digestion and absorption of proteins and GLU (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Wang et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Qi and Wang, 2024</xref>), leading to elevated serum TP and GLU concentrations. Within an appropriate range, GLU and TG can influence glucose-lipid metabolism in the body, and TG levels indicate the extent of fat absorption. In this study, restrictive feeding did not significantly alter the concentrations of TG or lipid metabolism indicators, such as TC and its predominant lipoprotein subclasses&#x2014;high-density (HDL-C) and low-density (LDL-C) lipoprotein-cholesterol complexes, suggesting that restrictive feeding did not significantly affect lipid metabolism.</p>
<p>IgA, IgG, and IgM constitute the primary antibody classes within the immune system, each exhibiting distinct structural characteristics, sites of production, and functional roles in immune responses. The known reference range for serum IgA is 0.53&#x2013;3.87&#x202F;g/L (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Costa et al., 2021</xref>). Moderate increases in IgA levels help enhance immune capacity. However, in the current investigation, it was observed that restrictive feeding led to a reduction in IgA concentration, indicating a decline in immune function in the experimental animals. In contrast, after the addition of YC, IgA concentration increased significantly, consistent with previous findings reporting elevated IgA levels in goats following YC supplementation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Qi and Wang, 2024</xref>). Mannan can activate immune cells (macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs), and complement components), thereby stimulating the immune system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Hagert et al., 2019</xref>). YC is rich in nutrients like mannan, which may activate the immune response and promote IgA production, potentially explaining the observed increase in IgA concentration. Additionally, other studies have indicated that the abundant AA, CP, and mannan in YC serve as essential substrates for the proliferation of immune cells and antibody synthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Demirgul et al., 2022</xref>), thereby enhancing immunity and contributing to an increase in IgA levels. Thus, they may be another key factor contributing to the increased IgA concentration observed following the addition of YC. No significant differences in IgG or IgM levels were observed among groups. Research shows that mannan oligosaccharide (MOS) specifically enhances local mucosal immune responses in the intestine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Yang et al., 2022</xref>). IgG is the primary antibody in secondary immune responses, IgM is mainly involved in primary immune responses to bacterial infections, and IgA is essential for mucosal immunity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Longbrake et al., 2021</xref>). This explains the lack of significant changes in IgG and IgM across groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec24">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>YC altered the rumen fermentation patterns</title>
<p>Under normal physiological conditions, rumen pH in ruminants ranges from 6.0 to 7.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Gr&#x00FC;nberg and Constable, 2009</xref>), Maintaining rumen pH within the normal range is crucial for sustaining rumen fermentation. Both the feeding method, fiber and starch intake significantly affect rumen pH. A reduction in fiber intake leads to a decrease in the rumen pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Zheng et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Xiao et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">An et al., 2023</xref>), which may explain the observed decline in the rumen pH in this study. Increased starch intake, a rapidly fermentable carbohydrate, causes transient accumulation of VFAs, lowering rumen pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Chen et al., 2016</xref>). Feed restriction increases the relative abundance of the lactate-utilizing bacterium <italic>Megasphaera</italic>. Although starch intake decreases, starch fermentation continues to produce lactate, which is rapidly converted to VFAs by lactate-utilizing bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Yang et al., 2018</xref>), resulting in a decline in rumen pH. Ruminants secrete saliva during feeding, containing buffering substances such as bicarbonate and phosphate that neutralize acids produced during fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Wang et al., 2016</xref>). Under feed restriction, reduced chewing leads to decreased saliva production, diminishing the availability of buffering substances and consequently lowering rumen pH. In this study, adding YC to the diet of restrictively fed sheep significantly increased the rumen pH, stabilizing it within the normal range and maintaining normal rumen fermentation function. In cattle, the addition of YC improves the rumen pH, stimulates rumen fermentation, and effectively mitigates the risks associated with dietary changes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Hansen, 2017</xref>). These findings align with the outcomes of the present investigation.</p>
<p>Acetate, propionate, and butyrate are the main VFAs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Bartel et al., 2022</xref>). The acetate-to-propionate ratio is an important indicator of rumen fermentation. Compared with the AL and IR groups, the addition of YC significantly decreased the A: P, shifting the fermentation pattern from the acetate to propionate type. Propionate serves as a precursor of GLU, and an increase in propionate levels can promote GLU synthesis. Therefore, propionate-type fermentation is favorable for the growth and fattening of livestock (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Cui et al., 2021</xref>), which explains the improved growth performance of multiparous sheep following YC supplementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec25">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Effects of YC on rumen microbiota</title>
<sec id="sec26">
<label>4.4.1</label>
<title>Ruminal bacterial diversity and phylum composition</title>
<p>Maintaining rumen microbial diversity is crucial for ruminant metabolism, immunity, and health. Comprehensive elucidation of the rumen microbiome composition and functional dynamics facilitates the formulation of targeted microbial management strategies to optimize nutritional conversion efficiency in ruminant production systems, improve animal health, and boost productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Yin et al., 2021</xref>). Rumen bacterial diversity is typically measured using alpha diversity indices, among which the Chao1 index reflects community richness, while the Shannon and Simpson indices reflect community diversity. In this study, the IRY group exhibited significantly higher community richness than the AL group, indicating that restrictive feeding combined with YC enhanced the rumen microbiome biodiversity. This observation aligns with prior research by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Wang et al. (2021)</xref>, demonstrating that elevated dietary energy intake in female Hu sheep correlated inversely with bacterial diversity indices.</p>
<p>Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are the dominant phyla within the ruminal bacterial community of sheep (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>). In this experiment, neither restrictive feeding nor the addition of YC impacted the predominant phyla in the rumen of multiparous Suffolk sheep, but they significantly adjusted the ratio of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Dietary YC supplementation resulted in an increase in Firmicutes abundance compared with that in the AL group. The primary genera within Firmicutes can decompose and utilize cellulose, thereby providing energy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Wang et al., 2019</xref>). The increased relative abundance of Firmicutes following YC supplementation contributed to elevated energy production in these animals. Conversely, excessive growth of certain genera within Bacteroidetes is closely associated with subacute rumen acidosis (SARA) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Tajima et al., 2001</xref>). In the present study, YC supplementation was associated with a diminution in the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes and a significant augmentation of the rumen pH, thereby enhancing rumen homeostasis. In summary, restrictive feeding and YC supplementation improved the rumen fermentation environment, provided more energy to the sheep.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec27">
<label>4.4.2</label>
<title>Composition of rumen bacterial genera and their relationships with rumen fermentation parameters</title>
<p><italic>Prevotella</italic> is one of the most abundant genera in the rumen, and its relative abundance is affected by fiber intake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Wang et al., 2022</xref>). In this study, the reduced intake of ADF and NDF in the IR and IRY groups was associated with a reduced relative abundance of <italic>Prevotella</italic>. Additionally, <italic>Prevotella</italic> abundance showed a strong positive correlation with propionate concentration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Consequently, the decline in <italic>Prevotella</italic> abundance observed in the IR group corresponded to a decline in propionate levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Jin et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Pitta et al., 2022</xref>). However, following the addition of YC, the relative abundance of <italic>Prevotella</italic> increased significantly, accompanied by a marked increase in propionate concentration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Betancur-Murillo et al., 2022</xref>). <italic>Butyrivibrio</italic>, a cellulose-degrading bacterium, effectively degrades fibrous materials in feed. In this research, the significant increase in <italic>Butyrivibrio</italic> abundance after YC supplementation may have contributed to the improved digestibility of ADF and NDF in multiparous Suffolk sheep. Furthermore, <italic>Bifidobacterium</italic>, classified as <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>, can ferment and decompose carbohydrates to produce acetate and propionate, as well as provide energy for protein degradation, thereby increasing NH<sub>3</sub>-N production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Flint et al., 2008</xref>). In the present study, <italic>Bifidobacterium</italic> abundance was positively correlated with NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), and its relative abundance significantly increased after YC addition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>), thereby promoting the growth performance of multiparous Suffolk sheep. LEfSe analysis revealed that the featured bacterium in the AL group was <italic>Asticcacaulis</italic>, but research on its role in the rumen is limited. In the IRY group, the featured bacteria included <italic>Selenomonas</italic> and <italic>Lachnospiraceae</italic>; <italic>Selenomonas</italic> is a lactate-utilizing bacterium capable of converting lactate to propionate, but the role of <italic>Lachnospiraceae</italic> in the rumen remains unclear. Overall, restrictive feeding and YC supplementation significantly altered the core bacterial community composition and abundance in multiparous Suffolk sheep.</p>
<p>Restrictive feeding has the dual benefits of reducing feed costs while promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria, such as <italic>Selenomonas</italic>, in the rumen bacterial community. <italic>Selenomonas</italic> can prevent rumen acidosis; when lactate accumulates and causes a decrease in rumen pH, <italic>Selenomonas</italic> migrates to the lactate accumulation area, exacerbating epithelial cell rupture and releasing intracellular materials, thereby mitigating the decline in rumen pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Petri et al., 2020</xref>). <italic>Selenomonas</italic> abundance positively correlates with the live weight of beef cattle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Holman et al., 2024</xref>), and its increased relative abundance enhances the ADG of animals. In contrast, <italic>Ruminococcus</italic>, a cellulolytic bacterium, can ferment and decompose cellulose and resistant proteins, and its relative abundance was positively correlated with acetate concentration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). However, there was no significant difference in the relative abundance of <italic>Ruminococcus</italic> between the IR and IRY groups. This indicates that YC, when used as a probiotic additive, has limitations in breaking down cellulose and carbohydrates.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec28">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study explored the effects of YC as an additive on the growth performance of multiparous Suffolk sheep under intake restriction conditions. Under restricted feeding, YC supplementation significantly increased the abundance of <italic>Butyrivibrio</italic> and <italic>Bifidobacterium</italic> in the rumen. This enhanced rumen fermentation and nutrient digestibility, thereby improving the growth performance of multiparous Suffolk sheep. This study offers a novel strategy for addressing feed shortages and provides valuable theoretical support for ruminant nutrition and bacterial regulation.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec29">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The data presented in the study are deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository, accession number PRJNA1242813.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec30">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The animal studies were approved by College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec31">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>CW: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Investigation, Methodology, Data curation, Visualization. YN: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Methodology, Data curation, Conceptualization. PZ: Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Visualization, Software. QL: Visualization, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Software. JY: Visualization, Software, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. NC: Investigation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. WZ: Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Project administration.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec32">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by the Xinjiang Autonomous Region Key Research and Development Program (Grant no. 2022B02029).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec33">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec34">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec35">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abouheif</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Owaimer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kraidees</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Metwally</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shafey</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effect of restricted feeding and realimentation on feed performance and carcass characteristics of growing lambs</article-title>. <source>Rev. Bras. Zootec.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>95</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S1516-35982013000200003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahmat</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abbas</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of <italic>bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> LFB112 on growth performance, carcass traits, immune, and serum biochemical response in broiler chickens</article-title>. <source>Antibiotics</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1427</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antibiotics10111427</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Almeida</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwalbach</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waal</surname> <given-names>H. O. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Greyling</surname> <given-names>J. P. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cardoso</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The effect of supplementation on productive performance of Boer goat bucks fed winter veld hay</article-title>. <source>Trop. Anim. Health Prod.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>443</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>449</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11250-006-4368-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>An</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zong</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effects of adding Sophora alopecuroides to high concentrate diet on rumen fermentation parameters and microbial diversity of sheep</article-title>. <source>Front. Vet. Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1200272</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2023.1200272</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37609056</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">AOAC</collab></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Association of Official Analytical Chemists</article-title>. <source>Official Methods Anal.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>684</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>710</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ara&#x00FA;jo Costa</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pinheiro Rog&#x00E9;rio</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muir</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alves</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Galvani</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fernandes Franco Pompeu</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Nutritional evaluation of lamb diets in a tropical setting formulated according to NRC (1985) and NRC (2007) specifications</article-title>. <source>Small Rumin. Res.</source> <volume>113</volume>, <fpage>20</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>29</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.smallrumres.2013.02.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bartel</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koszarska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wysocki</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koz&#x0142;owska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Szumacher-Strabel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cie&#x015B;lak</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effect of dried apple pomace (DAP) as a feed additive on antioxidant system in the rumen fluid</article-title>. <source>IJMS</source> <volume>23</volume>:<fpage>10475</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms231810475</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Behrendt</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muir</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moniruzzaman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kearney</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Automated feeding of sheep. 1. Changes in feeding behaviour in response to restricted and ad libitum feeding</article-title>. <source>Anim. Prod. Sci.</source> <volume>61</volume>:<fpage>246</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/AN20146</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ben Meir</surname> <given-names>Y. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nikbachat</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Portnik</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacoby</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levit</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bikel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Dietary restriction improved feed efficiency of inefficient lactating cows</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>8898</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8906</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2019-16321</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Betancur-Murillo</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aguilar-Mar&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jovel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title><italic>Prevotella</italic>: a key player in ruminal metabolism</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms11010001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bezerra</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neto</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Medeiros</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Mariz</surname> <given-names>T. M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oliveira</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>C&#x00E2;ndido</surname> <given-names>E. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Feed restriction followed by realimentation in prepubescent zebu females</article-title>. <source>Trop. Anim. Health Prod.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>1161</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1169</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11250-012-0341-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Birolo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trocino</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zuffellato</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiccato</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effect of feed restriction programs and slaughter age on digestive efficiency, growth performance and body composition of growing rabbits</article-title>. <source>Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>222</volume>, <fpage>194</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>203</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.10.014</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carpinelli</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Halfen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trevisi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chapman</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharman</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of peripartal yeast culture supplementation on lactation performance, blood biomarkers, rumen fermentation, and rumen bacteria species in dairy cows</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>10727</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10743</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2020-20002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effects of weaning age on growth, nutrient digestibility and metabolism, and serum parameters in Hu lambs</article-title>. <source>Anim. Nutr.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>344</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>348</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aninu.2015.11.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Transcriptome-metabolome analysis reveals how sires affect meat quality in hybrid sheep populations</article-title>. <source>Front. Nutr.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>967985</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnut.2022.967985</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effects of glucose and starch on lactate production by newly isolated <italic>streptococcus bovis S1</italic> from saanen goats</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>5982</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5989</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01994-16</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Mechanistic insights into rumen function promotion through yeast culture (<italic>saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic>) metabolites using in vitro and in vivo models</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>7024</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2024.1407024</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Penasa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nardino</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Posenato</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Marchi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Variation of immunoglobulins G, a, and M and bovine serum albumin concentration in Holstein cow colostrum</article-title>. <source>Animal</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>100299</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.animal.2021.100299</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Selenium yeast dietary supplement affects rumen bacterial population dynamics and fermentation parameters of Tibetan sheep (<italic>Ovis aries</italic>) in alpine meadow</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>663945</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.663945</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De Ara&#x00FA;jo</surname> <given-names>T. L. A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mizubuti</surname> <given-names>I. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Campos</surname> <given-names>A. C. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>M. W. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heinzen</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of quantitative feed restriction and sex on carcass traits, meat quality and meat lipid profile of Morada Nova lambs</article-title>. <source>J Animal Sci Biotechnol</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>46</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40104-017-0175-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De Brito</surname> <given-names>A. N. E. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Souza Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gois</surname> <given-names>G. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Da Silva</surname> <given-names>I. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Da Silva</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sim&#x00E3;o</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effect of quantitative feed restriction and sex class on sheep skin quality</article-title>. <source>Trop. Anim. Health Prod.</source> <volume>56</volume>:<fpage>189</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11250-024-04048-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Demirgul</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simsek</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sagdic</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Amino acid, mineral, vitamin B contents and bioactivities of extracts of yeasts isolated from sourdough</article-title>. <source>Food Biosci.</source> <volume>50</volume>:<fpage>102040</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fbio.2022.102040</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De Souza</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kamei</surname> <given-names>C. L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Torres</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pattathil</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trindade</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>How cell wall complexity influences saccharification efficiency in <italic>miscanthus sinensis</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>4351</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4365</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erv183</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dias</surname> <given-names>A. L. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Freitas</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Micai</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azevedo</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Greco</surname> <given-names>L. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santos</surname> <given-names>J. E. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effect of supplemental yeast culture and dietary starch content on rumen fermentation and digestion in dairy cows</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>201</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>221</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2017-13241</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Degen</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>P. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>Q. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Growth performance and hormonal status during feed restriction and compensatory growth of small-tail Han sheep in China</article-title>. <source>Small Rumin. Res.</source> <volume>144</volume>, <fpage>191</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>196</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.09.018</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Flint</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bayer</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rincon</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lamed</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomic analysis</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>131</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro1817</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Geng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Prediction of chlorophyll content in multi-temporal winter wheat based on multispectral and machine learning</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>896408</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.896408</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gibbs</surname> <given-names>V. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heflin</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>W. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powell</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lawrence</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Makowsky</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Optimizing dietary levels of menhaden and soybean oils and soybean lecithin for pre-gonadal somatic growth in juveniles of the sea urchin <italic>Lytechinus variegatus</italic></article-title>. <source>Aquaculture</source> <volume>446</volume>, <fpage>198</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.05.013</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gidenne</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Combes</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feugier</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jehl</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arveux</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boisot</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Feed restriction strategy in the growing rabbit. 2. Impact on digestive health, growth and carcass characteristics</article-title>. <source>Animal</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>509</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>515</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S1751731108003790</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>G&#x00ED;rio</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fonseca</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carvalheiro</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marques</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bogel-&#x0141;ukasik</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Hemicelluloses for fuel ethanol: a review</article-title>. <source>Bioresour. Technol.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>4775</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4800</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.088</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gr&#x00FC;nberg</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Constable</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>CHAPTER 6 &#x2013; function and dysfunction of the ruminant forestomach</article-title>, in <source>Food animal practice</source> (fifth Edition), eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rings</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name></person-group>. <publisher-loc>Saint Louis</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>W.B. Saunders</publisher-name>, <fpage>12</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Haddad</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goussous</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Effect of yeast culture supplementation on nutrient intake, digestibility and growth performance of Awassi lambs</article-title>. <source>Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>118</volume>, <fpage>343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>348</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.10.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hagert</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Siitonen</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. -G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liljenb&#x00E4;ck</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roivainen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holmdahl</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Rapid spread of mannan to the immune system, skin and joints within 6 hours after local exposure</article-title>. <source>Clin. Exp. Immunol.</source> <volume>196</volume>, <fpage>383</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>391</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/cei.13268</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Halfen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carpinelli</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Del Pino</surname> <given-names>F. A. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chapman</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharman</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of yeast culture supplementation on lactation performance and rumen fermentation profile and microbial abundance in mid-lactation Holstein dairy cows</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>11580</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11592</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2020-19996</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hansen</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Response of primiparous and multiparous buffaloes to yeast culture supplementation during early and mid-lactation</article-title>. <source>Anim. Nutr.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>411</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>418</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aninu.2017.08.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Holman</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gzyl</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scott</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><collab id="coll2">Service, Cara</collab><name><surname>Prieto</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x00F3;pez-Campos</surname> <given-names>&#x00D3;.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Associations between the rumen microbiota and carcass merit and meat quality in beef cattle</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>108</volume>:<fpage>287</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-024-13126-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Galv&#x00E3;o</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alharthi</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alhidary</surname> <given-names>I. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gionbelli</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McCann</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Feed restriction in angus steers impacts ruminal bacteria, its metabolites, and causes epithelial inflammation</article-title>. <source>Ruminants</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>387</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>405</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ruminants4030028</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Orlistat and ezetimibe could differently alleviate the high-fat diet-induced obesity phenotype by modulating the gut microbiota</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>908327</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.908327</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leyva-Diaz</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hernandez-Patlan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Solis-Cruz</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adhikari</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kwon</surname> <given-names>Y. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Latorre</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of curcumin and copper acetate against <italic>Salmonella Typhimurium</italic> infection, intestinal permeability, and cecal microbiota composition in broiler chickens</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>23</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40104-021-00545-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lima</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dias-Silva</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>da Cruz</surname> <given-names>G. R. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Carvalho</surname> <given-names>F. F. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guerra</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Performance and ruminal and intestinal morphometry of Santa In&#x00EA;s sheep submitted to feed restriction and refeeding</article-title>. <source>Trop. Anim. Health Prod.</source> <volume>54</volume>:<fpage>42</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11250-022-03053-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Optimisation of the extrusion process through a response surface methodology for improvement of the physical properties and nutritional components of whole black-grained wheat flour</article-title>. <source>Foods</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>437</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods10020437</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Longbrake</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mao-Draayer</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cascione</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zielinski</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bame</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brassat</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Dimethyl fumarate treatment shifts the immune environment toward an anti-inflammatory cell profile while maintaining protective humoral immunity</article-title>. <source>Mult. Scler.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>883</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>894</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1352458520937282</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Louren&#x00E7;o</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chaffringeon</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lamy-Besnier</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tit&#x00E9;cat</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>P&#x00E9;dron</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sismeiro</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The gut environment regulates bacterial gene expression which modulates susceptibility to bacteriophage infection</article-title>. <source>Cell Host Microbe</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>556</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>569.e5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chom.2022.03.014</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Metzler-Zebeli</surname> <given-names>B. U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Siegerstetter</surname> <given-names>S.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Magowan</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lawlor</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petri</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x2019;Connell</surname> <given-names>N. E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Feed restriction modifies intestinal microbiota-host mucosal networking in chickens divergent in residual feed intake</article-title>. <source>mSystems</source> <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>e00261-18</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mSystems.00261-18</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Muir</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Behrendt</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moniruzzaman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kearney</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Automated feeding of sheep. 2. Feeding behaviour influences the methane emissions of sheep offered restricted diets</article-title>. <source>Anim. Prod. Sci.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>55</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>66</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/AN20634</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9002"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>National Research Council</collab></person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <source>Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids</source>. <publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>The National Academies Press</publisher-name>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17226/11654</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Neto</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bezerra</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Medeiros</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferreira</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Filho</surname> <given-names>E. C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>C&#x00E2;ndido</surname> <given-names>E. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Feed restriction and compensatory growth in guzer&#x00E1; females</article-title>. <source>Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>791</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>799</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5713/ajas.2011.10417</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Fermentative profile and bacterial community structure of whole-plant triticale silage (<italic>Triticosecale wittmack</italic>) with or without the addition of <italic>Streptococcus bovis</italic> and <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic></article-title>. <source>mSphere</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>e00894-24</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/msphere.00894-24</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ortega Cerrilla</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mendoza Mart&#x00ED;nez</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Starch digestion and glucose metabolism in the ruminant: a review</article-title>. <source>Interciencia</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>380</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>386</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petri</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neubauer</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Humer</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kr&#x00F6;ger</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reisinger</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zebeli</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Feed additives differentially impact the epimural microbiota and host epithelial gene expression of the bovine rumen fed diets rich in concentrates</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>119</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.00119</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Piles</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Interaction of direct and social genetic effects with feeding regime in growing rabbits</article-title>. <source>Genet. Sel. Evol.</source> <volume>49</volume>:<fpage>58</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12711-017-0333-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pitta</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Indugu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Melgar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hristov</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Challa</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vecchiarelli</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The effect of 3-nitrooxypropanol, a potent methane inhibitor, on ruminal microbial gene expression profiles in dairy cows</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>146</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-022-01341-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effect of adding yeast cultures to high-grain conditions on production performance, rumen fermentation profile, microbial abundance, and immunity in goats</article-title>. <source>Animals</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>1799</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani14121799</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soest</surname> <given-names>P. J. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>3583</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3597</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tajima</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aminov</surname> <given-names>R. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagamine</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matsui</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakamura</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benno</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Diet-dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with real-time PCR</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>2766</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2774</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.67.6.2766-2774.2001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effects of yeast culture on in vitro ruminal fermentation and microbial community of high concentrate diet in sheep</article-title>. <source>AMB Express</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>37</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13568-024-01692-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Yeast culture repairs rumen epithelial injury by regulating microbial communities and metabolites in sheep</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>1305772</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1305772</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Metagenomic analyses of microbial and carbohydrate-active enzymes in the rumen of Holstein cows fed different forage-to-concentrate ratios</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>649</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.00649</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary energy levels on rumen fermentation, gastrointestinal tract histology, and bacterial community diversity in fattening male Hu lambs</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>695445</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.695445</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khas-Erdene</surname></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effects of infusing milk precursors into the artery on rumen fermentation in lactating cows</article-title>. <source>Anim. Nutr.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>110</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aninu.2016.03.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Evaluating starter feeding on ruminal function in yak calves: combined 16S rRNA sequencing and metabolomics</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>821613</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.821613</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alugongo</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>M. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of the length of oat Hay on growth performance, health status, behavior parameters and rumen fermentation of Holstein female calves</article-title>. <source>Meta</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>890</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/metabo11120890</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gebeyew</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Supplementing mannan oligosaccharide reduces the passive transfer of immunoglobulin G and improves antioxidative capacity, immunity, and intestinal microbiota in neonatal goats</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>795081</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.795081</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zotti</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McKinnon</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McAllister</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title><italic>Lactobacilli</italic> are prominent members of the microbiota involved in the ruminal digestion of barley and corn</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>718</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.00718</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effects of yeast products on the intestinal morphology, barrier function, cytokine expression, and antioxidant system of weaned piglets</article-title>. <source>J Zhejiang Univ Sci B</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>752</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>762</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1631/jzus.B1500192</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Samahy</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>lncRNA FDNCR promotes apoptosis of granulosa cells by targeting the miR-543-3p/DCN/TGF-&#x03B2; signaling pathway in Hu sheep</article-title>. <source>Molecular Ther. Nucleic Acids</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>223</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>240</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.omtn.2021.02.030</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ju</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Age-related changes in the ruminal microbiota and their relationship with rumen fermentation in lambs</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>679135</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.679135</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary supplementation of probiotic, <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic>, on growth performance, immune response, intestinal barrier function, and digestive enzyme activity in broiler chickens challenged with <italic>Escherichia coli K88</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>3</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40104-016-0061-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Geng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ling</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Yeast culture is beneficial for improving the rumen fermentation and promoting the growth performance of goats in summer</article-title>. <source>Fermentation</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>307</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/fermentation10060307</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Rumen fermentative metabolomic and blood insights into the effect of yeast culture supplement on growing bulls under heat stress conditions</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>947822</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.947822</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D. Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Characterization of the rumen microbiota and its relationship with residual feed intake in sheep</article-title>. <source>Animal</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>100161</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.animal.2020.100161</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref71"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>High rumen degradable starch decreased goat milk fat via trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid-mediated downregulation of lipogenesis genes, particularly, INSIG1</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>30</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40104-020-00436-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Freitas-de-Melo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Early weaning and milk substitutes affect the gut microbiome, metabolomics, and antibody profile in goat kids suffering from diarrhea</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>904475</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.904475</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effects of <italic>Piper sarmentosum</italic> extract supplementation on growth performances and rumen fermentation and microflora characteristics in goats</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>431</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>438</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jpn.13284</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>