<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2025.1598252</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Comparison of <italic>suansun</italic> fermentation methods based on SBSE-GC-MS combined with SVM machine learning</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Jianwen</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2898455/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Yizhao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>Mi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>Jihua</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Guangxi Laboratory of Forestry, Guangxi Forestry Research Institute</institution>, <addr-line>Nanning</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Guangxi Vocational and Technical College</institution>, <addr-line>Nanning</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: Francesco Fancello, University of Sassari, Italy</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: D&#x0131;lhun Keriman Arserim-U&#x00E7;ar, Bing&#x00F6;l University, T&#x00FC;rkiye</p>
<p>Yaping Hu, Nanjing Forestry University, China</p>
<p>Javad Hassannataj Joloudari, University of Birjand, Iran</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Jihua Guan, <email>guanjih@163.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>15</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="ecorrected">
<day>17</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1598252</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>22</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>01</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Wu, Li, Qiu and Guan.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wu, Li, Qiu and Guan</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>This study aimed to analyze the flavor profile and microbial community structure of 54 <italic>Suansun</italic> samples, fermented using three different methods: direct fermentation, natural water-sealed fermentation, and natural fermentation. The combination of SBSE-GC-MS, electronic nose, 16S rRNA, and SVM machine learning was used for comprehensive discrimination.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>The flavor components and microbial community structure were analyzed using SBSE-GC-MS, electronic nose, and 16S rRNA sequencing. SVM machine learning was employed to classify the samples based on their characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>A total of 114 common aroma components were identified, including esters, alcohols, hydrocarbons, ketones, acids, aldehydes, heterocyclic compounds, phenols, halogenated hydrocarbons, amides, and others. Using a <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05 and VIP&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;1 threshold, 27 key characteristic flavor compounds were identified, with the highest concentration found in the natural water-sealed fermentation method. The SVM model achieved a 100% discrimination rate. Dominant bacterial genera identified across the methods were <italic>Lactiplantibacillus</italic>, <italic>Lactococcus</italic>, <italic>Weissella</italic>, and <italic>Limosilactobacillus</italic>, with a 95.65% match between dominant genera and key flavor compounds in natural water-sealed fermentation.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The study highlights that natural water-sealed fermentation is the most effective method for enhancing flavor profiles, and that <italic>Weissella</italic> plays a significant role in the production of key flavor compounds, particularly <italic>p</italic>-cresol, which increased over 600 times in natural water-sealed fermentation. Direct fermentation significantly shortens the fermentation cycle, while natural water-sealed fermentation offers the best results in terms of flavor development.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>SBSE</kwd>
<kwd><italic>suansun</italic></kwd>
<kwd>SVM</kwd>
<kwd>16sRNA</kwd>
<kwd>microbial community</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="9"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="2"/>
<ref-count count="36"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="8989"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Food Microbiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Sour bamboo shoots (<italic>suansun</italic>) are a fermented vegetable product with a unique flavor. <italic>Suansun</italic> are used in many local dishes, such as Liuzhou Luosifen, Laoyou powder, Guilin rice noodles, and other traditional dishes, including northern Guangdong roast duck. <italic>Suansun</italic> are also popular among ethnic minorities in India, Southeast Asia, regions south of the Himalayas, Nepal, Bhutan, Thailand, and Taiwan in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Choudhury et al., 2012</xref>). In 2023, the sales revenue of the whole industrial chain of Luosifen in Liuzhou, China reached 66.99 billion yuan, up 11.5% year on year. In particular, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Luosifen became even more popular as a home food. The daily average production of Luosifen alone has reached 5.06 million bags. Bagged products produced by the industry have been sold all over the world, leading to a huge demand for <italic>suansun</italic>. Fresh bamboo shoots are prone to lignification after harvesting, which leads to deterioration of edibility and processing quality. Lignification is characterized by the accumulation of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, resulting in increased firmness, decreased water content, and reduced porosity of the tissue. The process is associated with transcriptional activation of lignin biosynthesis genes such as PAL, CCR, and CAD. These changes not only limit microbial access to intracellular substrates but also reduce the efficiency of fermentation, leading to weaker aroma profiles and less favorable texture in the final pickled products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Zhang et al., 2020</xref>). However, the traditional natural fermentation cycle is long, overly dependent on experience, not standardized, and far from being able to meet the surging industrial demand.</p>
<p>The main raw material for <italic>suansun</italic> is bamboo shoots. The traditional method for obtaining <italic>suansun</italic> is to peel, wash, and cut fresh bamboo shoots, soak them in mountain spring water or cold boiled water, and place them in a kimchi jar. Spontaneous fermentation at room temperature takes 15&#x2013;30&#x202F;days (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Guan et al., 2020b</xref>). Direct inoculation with various fermentation agents is the main method used for making modern <italic>suansun</italic>. Screening functional strains can ensure the safety, stability, and flavor consistency of the product, and achieve targeted fermentation. <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> is one of the most commonly used strains in inoculation fermentation. It can effectively inhibit nitrite and pathogenic bacteria, while also enhancing the overall flavor of the product (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Yu et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). While pursuing production efficiency, maintaining the flavor of <italic>suansun</italic> is also a key focus of research. The structure of the microbial community of <italic>suansun</italic> varies depending on the region and fermentation method. The characteristic flavors of <italic>suansun</italic> include acidic substances such as acetic acid and lactic acid, <italic>p</italic>-cresol, and volatile substances such as valeraldehyde and ethyl acetate.</p>
<p>Electronic nose technology (E-nose) is a new type of artificial intelligence olfactory device for rapid and non-destructive testing, but it cannot separate and identify the aroma components of samples. Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) enables automation in the aroma enrichment process, with advantages such as convenience and speed. HS-SPME-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) is commonly used for detecting and identifying aroma components (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Lin et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Liu et al., 2020</xref>). SPME uses the chromatographic stationary phase on the surface of quartz fibers to extract components from the sample through adsorption for analysis. Unlike SPME, the adsorption layer of SBSE (stir bar adsorbent extraction) relies on van der Waals forces for the extraction of compounds, rather than surface adsorption. It not only requires lower thermal energy to release compounds, avoiding the loss of thermosensitive compounds, but also lacks surface competitiveness and has a larger linear range. Therefore, in this study, SBSE-GC-MS and electronic nose were used to systematically analyze the key flavors that affect direct fermentation and natural fermentation of <italic>suansun</italic>. An SVM algorithm was used to identify fermentation methods, and 16sRNA was used to explore the changes in bacterial structure during fermentation and the correlation with key flavor compounds.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Sample preparation and collection of <italic>suansun</italic></title>
<p>Fresh bamboo shoots of <italic>Dendrocalamus latiflorus</italic> harvested from Liucheng County, Liuzhou City, Guangxi Province were stored at 4&#x00B0;C and transported to the laboratory within 24&#x202F;h. After removing the bamboo shoot shell, rinsing with sterile water, cutting it into 10&#x202F;cm&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;0.5&#x202F;cm&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;0.5&#x202F;cm thin filaments, they were placed in ceramic jars with a capacity of 1&#x202F;L. Each jar contained 800&#x202F;g of bamboo shoot filaments, which were immersed in pure water (PWLS) and <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> solution (LP) for water sealed fermentation, as well as in pure water soaking without water sealed fermentation (PW). The inoculation amount of LP is 2% of the mass of bamboo shoots. Samples were taken on the 2nd, 8th, 14th, 20th, 32nd, and 38th days of fermentation, with three replicates for each sample, totaling 54 samples. Unopened samples were randomly selected for sterile sampling and stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C for further analysis.</p>
<p><italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> was purchased from Weihai Haixi (Shandong) Bioengineering Co., Ltd. Normal alkanes and 2,4,6-trimethylpyridine were purchased from Shanghai Anpu Company. The SBSE gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (8890-5977B) was from Agilent Technologies. The PEN3 portable electronic nose was from Airsense, a German company.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>SBSE-GC-MS</title>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.2.1</label>
<title>Extraction conditions for flavor compounds</title>
<p>Extracts from <italic>suansun</italic> samples stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C were obtained by physical extrusion using a round headed glass rod, and diluting 250 times with saturated saline solution. Then, 6&#x202F;mL of the diluted solution was placed in a headspace vial along with Twisters that have been aged and 100&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of internal standard substance (2,4,6-trimethylpyridine, 1&#x202F;ng/mL), which was shaken and extracted at 50&#x00B0;C for 1.5&#x202F;h. After extraction, the Twisters were rinsed with ultrapure water and the surface was cleaned with a dust-free tissue before placing them in a hot desorption sample tube for testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.2.2</label>
<title>MPS conditions</title>
<p>Thermal desorption (TDU) program: at a rate of 50&#x00B0;C/min, from an initial temperature of 10&#x2013;250&#x00B0;C then held for 15&#x202F;min without shunting; cold inlet (CIS) program: at a rate of 12&#x00B0;C/s, from an initial temperature of 10&#x2013;250&#x00B0;C held for 10&#x202F;min with a shunt ratio of 3:1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.2.3</label>
<title>GC conditions</title>
<p>Agilent DB Wax capillary gas chromatography column (60&#x202F;m&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;0.25&#x202F;mm&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;0.25&#x202F;&#x03BC;m), heating program: initial temperature of 40&#x00B0;C, held for 4&#x202F;min; then raised to 140&#x00B0;C at a rate of 6&#x00B0;C/min, held for 5&#x202F;min; then raised to 150&#x00B0;C at a rate of 3&#x00B0;C/min, held for 1&#x202F;min; then raised to 197&#x00B0;C at a rate of 5&#x00B0;C/min and maintained for 2&#x202F;min; then raised to 205&#x00B0;C at a rate of 1&#x00B0;C/min and maintained for 0&#x202F;min; then raised to 240&#x00B0;C at a rate of 7&#x00B0;C/min and maintained for 15&#x202F;min. The flow rate of the chromatographic column was 1.7&#x202F;mL/min, with no split injections; the carrier gas was high-purity helium (He).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.2.4</label>
<title>MS conditions</title>
<p>Ionization method: EI, Electronic energy: 70 EV, transmission line temperature: 250&#x00B0;C, ion source temperature: 230&#x00B0;C, quadrupole temperature: 150&#x00B0;C, full scan mode (SCAN), scanning range: 25&#x2013;250 da.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>E-nose</title>
<p>Sample pretreatment: 5&#x202F;g of solid <italic>suansun</italic> was weighed into a 100&#x202F;mL beaker, sealed with cling film, and heated at a constant temperature water bath at 40&#x00B0;C for 10&#x202F;min until the headspace gas reached equilibrium.</p>
<p>Test method: Under the conditions of a carrier gas flow rate of 400&#x202F;mL/min, the carrier gas carried the sample headspace gas through the sensor array and into contact with the sensor array to generate a response signal. The sampling interval was 1&#x202F;s, the signal detection time was set to 120&#x202F;s, and the cleaning time was set to 60&#x202F;s. Each sample was measured in parallel three times, and the average of the test data was taken for statistical analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>DNA extraction</title>
<p>Total community genomic DNA was extracted using the E.Z.N.A&#x2122; MagBind Soil DNA Kit (M5635-02, Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA) following the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. The DNA concentration was quantified using a Qubit 4.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to ensure that adequate amounts of high-quality genomic DNA had been extracted.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>16S rRNA gene amplification</title>
<p>The target was the V3&#x2013;V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. The region was amplified by PCR immediately upon DNA extraction. The 16S rRNA V3&#x2013;V4 fragment was amplified using two universal bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplicon PCR primers (PAGE purified): the amplicon PCR forward primer (CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG) and amplicon PCR reverse primer (GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC). The reaction mixture composition was as follows: 2&#x202F;&#x03BC;L microbial DNA (10&#x202F;ng/&#x03BC;l), 1&#x202F;&#x03BC;L amplicon PCR forward primer (10&#x202F;&#x03BC;M), 1&#x202F;&#x03BC;L amplicon PCR reverse primer (10&#x202F;&#x03BC;M), and 30&#x202F;&#x03BC;L 2&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;Hieff&#x00AE;Robust PCR Master Mix (Yeasen, 10105ES03, Shanghai, China). The plate was sealed and the PCR performed in a thermal-cycling instrument (Applied Biosystems 9700, Foster City, CA, USA) using the following program: 1&#x202F;cycle of denaturation at 95&#x00B0;C for 3&#x202F;min; 5&#x202F;cycles of denaturation at 95&#x00B0;C for 30&#x202F;s, annealing at 45&#x00B0;C for 30&#x202F;s, and elongation at 72&#x00B0;C for 30&#x202F;s; 20&#x202F;cycles of denaturation at 95&#x00B0;C for 30&#x202F;s, annealing at 55&#x00B0;C for 30&#x202F;s, and elongation at 72&#x00B0;C for 30&#x202F;s; and a final extension at 72&#x00B0;C for 5&#x202F;min. The PCR products were checked by electrophoresis in 2% (w/v) agarose gels in TBE buffer stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under ultraviolet light.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>16S gene library construction, quantification, and sequencing</title>
<p>Hieff NGS&#x2122; DNA Selection Beads (Yeasen, 10105ES03) were used to purify the free primers and primer dimer species in the amplicon product. Samples were delivered to Sangon BioTech (Shanghai, China) for cDNA library construction using universal Illumina adaptors and indices. Before sequencing, the DNA concentration of each PCR product was determined using a Qubit 4.0 Green double-stranded DNA assay and quality control was performed with a bioanalyzer (Agilent 2100, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Depending on the coverage requirement, all libraries could be pooled for one run. The amplicons from each reaction mixture were pooled in equimolar ratios based on their concentration. Sequencing was performed using the Illumina MiSeq system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Sequence processing, OTU clustering, representative tags alignment, and taxonomic classification</title>
<p>After sequencing, the two short-read Illumina datasets were assembled with PEAR software (version 0.9.8) based on overlap in the short reads. The FASTQ files were processed to generate individual FASTA and QUAL files, which could then be analyzed by standard methods. The effective tags were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of &#x2265;97% similarity using Usearch software (version 11.0.667). Chimeric sequences and singleton OTUs (with only one read) were removed, after which the remaining sequences were sorted into each sample based on the OTUs. The tag sequence with the highest abundance was selected as a representative sequence within each cluster. Bacterial and fungal OTU representative sequences were classified taxonomically by conducting a BLAST search against the RDP database and the UNITE database, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Partial least squares discriminant analysis was performed using SIMCA 14.1 software and SVM discriminant analysis was performed in R language. Qualitative analysis: NIST23 spectral library and Aroma Office 2D flavor library were used to search and compare, combined with the retention index (RI) for qualitative analysis, screening compounds with a match of more than 70, and at the same time, a mixture of C7&#x2013;C40 n-alkanes was injected into the sample individually, and the warming procedure was consistent with the conditions of the GC-MS assay, so as to calculate the RI of each volatile compound. The RI of each volatile was calculated and compared with the RI values in the literature. Quantitative analysis: Using 2,4,6-trimethylpyridine as internal standard, the content of each component in the sample was calculated based on the concentration of the internal standard and the ratio of the peak area of each component in the sample to the peak area of the internal standard.</p>
<disp-formula id="EQ1">
<label>(1)</label>
<mml:math id="M1">
<mml:mi>RI</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">)</mml:mo>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>RI is the retention index; n is the number of carbons; t<sub>i</sub> is the retention time of the volatile component to be measured; t<sub>n</sub> is the retention time of the n-alkanes; t<sub>n&#x202F;+&#x202F;1</sub> is the retention time of the (n&#x202F;+&#x202F;1) carbon n-alkanes.</p>
<disp-formula id="EQ2">
<label>(2)</label>
<mml:math id="M2">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>C<sub>1</sub> is the concentration of the compound to be tested (&#x03BC;g/mL), C<sub>0</sub> is the concentration of the internal standard (2,4,6-trimethylpyridine; &#x03BC;g/mL), A<sub>1</sub> is the peak area of the compound to be tested, A<sub>0</sub> is the peak area of the internal standard, V<sub>1</sub> is the volume of the extracted sample (i.e., 6.0&#x202F;mL), and V<sub>0</sub> is the volume of the internal standard (i.e., 100&#x202F;&#x03BC;L).</p>
<p>To identify key aroma compounds that contributed to the differentiation among fermentation methods, partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was conducted using SIMCA 14.1 software. Compounds were selected as potential discriminative markers if they met two criteria: (1) a variable importance in projection (VIP) score greater than 1.0 from the PLS-DA model, indicating a strong contribution to sample separation, and (2) a statistically significant difference among groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), as determined by one-way ANOVA.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec15">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Analysis of quality differences in <italic>suansun</italic> based on E-nose technology</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, the <italic>suansun</italic> treated with three different fermentation methods were separated on both the horizontal and vertical axes of the score scatter plot, with an independent variable fitting index (R<sup>2</sup>X) of 1 and a dependent variable fitting index (R<sup>2</sup>X) of 0.568. The LP scores throughout the fermentation process were concentrated in one quadrant, achieving a clear distinction from the PW and PWLS treatments. As fermentation progressed, PW and PWLS were divided into three groups in the horizontal and vertical axes, namely on the 2nd and 8th days, 14th and 20th days, and 32nd and 38th days of fermentation, evenly distributed in the other three quadrants. Adding <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> stabilized the fermentation flavor of <italic>suansun</italic> without significant fluctuations due to prolonged fermentation time. In summary, there is a clear distinction between direct fermentation and natural fermentation in both the horizontal and vertical axes.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>OPLS-DA scatter plot of <italic>suansun</italic> electronic nose treated with different fermentation methods.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1598252-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Scatter plot depicting OPLS-DA analysis with samples represented by different colored shapes. The plot shows components t[1] and t[2] with an elliptical boundary indicating the Hotelling's T2 confidence interval. The legend maps colors and shapes to sample groups labeled LP, PW, and PWLS at various indices.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Based on the data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>, a VIP map of electronic nose characteristic odor (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) and a radar fingerprint map (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) were plotted. It can be seen that the response values of 10 sensors to the volatile components of <italic>suansun</italic> obtained by three different fermentation methods are different. Among the 10 sensors, W1W, W2W, W5S, W2S, and W1S made significant contributions to the OPLS-DA model in this experiment. Among them, W1W was sensitive to sulfides, and on the second day of fermentation, the response value of W1W sensor to direct injection fermentation was significantly higher than that of the two natural fermentations. When a watershed appeared on the 8th day of fermentation, the response value of W1W sensor to LP was slightly lower than that of PW and PWLS. As fermentation continued, the response value of LP was significantly lower than that of PW and PWLS. In addition, there was no significant difference in the response values of WIW to PW and PWLS, and from the 8th day of fermentation, the response values of PW were slightly higher than those of PWLS. Sensor W2S was sensitive to alcohols, aldehydes, and ketones, and the response value of LP is significantly lower than PW. As fermentation progressed, the gap continued to narrow until the response was comparable on the 38th day of fermentation. Overall, the response values of LP to the five key sensors were lower or comparable to PW and PWLS. The difference between PW and PWLS was mainly reflected in the first 8&#x202F;days of fermentation, with significant differences in response to three sensors: W1S, W2S, and W2W. W1S was sensitive to methyl groups, while W2W was sensitive to aromatic components and organic sulfides. After 14&#x202F;days of fermentation, PW and PWLS had comparable responses to the five sensors.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Electronic nose response values for <italic>Suansun</italic> treated with different fermentation methods (partial).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Array serial number</th>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Sensor name</th>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Sensors respond to sensitive substances</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Response value</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">LP-38</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">PW-38</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">PWLS-38</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">W1C</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Aromatic components, benzene derivatives</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.35&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.00023</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.34&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.0011</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.34&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.00046</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">W5S</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Nitrogen oxides, high sensitivity</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.67&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.0039</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.53&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.044</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.46&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.0062</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">W3C</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Aromatic components, ammonia compounds</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.63&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.00026</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.69&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.00069</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.64&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.00083</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">W6S</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hydrogenated compounds, hydrogen gas</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.56&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.00035</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.53&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.00050</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.59&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.00042</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">5</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">W5C</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Aromatic components of short chain alkanes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.65&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.0035</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.71&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.0017</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.65&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.00035</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">6</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">W1S</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Methyl group</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.86&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.0019</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.47&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.018</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.31&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.0056</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">W1W</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">sulfide</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.93&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.031</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">29.23&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">23.69&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.0048</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">W2S</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Alcohols, aldehydes and ketones</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.73&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.00052</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.15&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.029</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.26&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.0055</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">W2W</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Aromatic components, organic sulfides</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.69&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.0038</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.82&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.059</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.51&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.0099</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">W3S</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Long chain alkanes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.29&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.00025</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.15&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.00046</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.27&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.00064</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>VIP of <italic>suansun</italic> electronic nose treated with different fermentation methods.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1598252-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart displaying VIP values with error bars for various variables labeled as W1W, W2W, W5S, W2S, W1S, W3S, W1C, W6S, W5C, and W3C. Values range from approximately 0.5 to 1.8, with W1W having the highest bar.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Radar chart of <italic>suansun</italic> electronic nose treated with different fermentation methods.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1598252-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Six radar charts compare three data series labeled LP, PW, and PWLS at different numerical values. Each chart illustrates various axes labeled W1C through W6S. The charts are grouped in pairs representing measurements at 2, 8, 14, 20, 32, and 38 units, with distinct colors: blue, red, and an alternative color for each pair, reflecting changes in data distribution across the axes.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Analysis of aroma component characteristics</title>
<p>To study the changes in aroma of <italic>suansun</italic> produced by the three different fermentation methods during the fermentation process, SBSE-GC-MS was used to analyze and identify the aroma components and contents of 54 <italic>suansun</italic> samples, and a total of 148 common aroma components were detected. Using 148 common aroma components as dependent variables and different fermentation methods as independent variables, OPLS-DA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) can effectively distinguish different fermentation methods. The independent variable fitting index (R<sup>2</sup>x) in this analysis was 0.884, the dependent variable fitting index (R<sup>2</sup>y) was 0.746, and the model prediction index (Q<sup>2</sup>) was 0.617. If R<sup>2</sup> and Q<sup>2</sup> exceeded 0.5, the model fitting results were acceptable. After 200 replacement tests, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, the intersection point between the Q<sup>2</sup> regression line and the vertical axis was less than 0, indicating that the model did not exhibit overfitting and the model validation was effective. It is believed that this method can be used for the identification and analysis of aroma components in <italic>suansun</italic> treated with different fermentation methods.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>OPLS-DA plots of <italic>suansun</italic> treated with different fermentation methods.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1598252-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">A score plot from OPLS-DA showing three distinct groups: blue dots for PWLS, red dots for LP, and green dots for PW. Dots are scattered within an ellipse representing Hotelling's T-squared at ninety-five percent. Axes are labeled as R2X[1] and R2X[2].</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Permutation test.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1598252-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Scatter plot showing permutations of two components with R2 values represented by green circles and Q2 values by blue squares. Data points are scattered along the horizontal axis, with dashed lines indicating trends. R2 and Q2 values are noted as (0.0, 0.413) and (0.0, -0.574) respectively.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Based on 148 common aroma components, further removal of substances that did not have any more information in the NIST 23.LT and Aroma Office 2D flavor libraries (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="EQ1">Equations 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="EQ2">2</xref>) resulted in the screening of 114 compounds (as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>), including up to 31 esters, 16 alcohols, 16 hydrocarbons, 16 ketones, 9 acids, 7 aldehydes, 6 heterocyclic compounds, 4 phenols, 4 halogenated hydrocarbons, 3 amides, and 2 others. The main volatile flavor compounds in the early stage of fermentation (the 2nd day of fermentation) using two natural fermentation methods were alcohols, consistent with existing literature reports (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Guan, 2023</xref>). Alcohol compounds account for 36.29 and 33.8% of the total volatile substance content in PW and PWLS, respectively. As fermentation continued, esters, alcohols, and phenols were the main volatile flavor compounds in the later stages of fermentation, consistent with the sensitivity of W2S, one of the five sensors that contributed significantly to electronic nose detection, to alcohols, aldehydes, and ketones. From the 14th to the 38th day of fermentation, the main flavor compounds in PW remained stable, mainly esters (45.32&#x2013;46.98%) and phenols (35.65&#x2013;40.66%), while PWLS mainly consisted of esters (54.14&#x2013;58.19%), alcohols (19.77&#x2013;22.11%), and phenols (17.78&#x2013;21.38%). Direct fermentation was completely different from natural fermentation. Amides (37.49%) were the main flavor compounds in the early stages of LP, while esters, ketones, aldehydes, and amides were the main compounds in the later stages of fermentation. Direct fermentation consistently exhibited high levels of esters and aldehydes, as well as low levels of phenols, through the Ehrlich route, which <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> uses to transform free amino acids in <italic>suansun</italic> into aldehydes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Xue et al., 2025</xref>). By using L-histidine and L-phenylalanine, this procedure lessens astringency and bitterness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Cai et al., 2019</xref>). In summary, starting from 14&#x202F;days of natural fermentation, there is a significant change in the main categories of flavor compounds, such as esters, alcohols, and phenols, with a noticeable increase or decrease in their content. This is consistent with the results from the electronic nose, which showed significant changes in response after 14&#x202F;days of fermentation, an important time point for natural fermentation. The <italic>p</italic>-cresol in phenolic compounds is the main characteristic flavor substance in <italic>suansun</italic>, with a unique &#x201C;odor&#x201D; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Guo et al., 2021</xref>). In natural fermentation samples, <italic>p</italic>-cresol reached its peak on the 32nd day, while PW samples increased from 0.0065&#x202F;&#x03BC;g/mL to 1.24&#x202F;&#x03BC;g/mL, with a content increase of 190.77 times. The PWLS sample increased from 0.017&#x202F;&#x03BC;g/mL to 10.22&#x202F;&#x03BC;g/mL, which was also the flavor substance with the highest content detected. The results were consistent with the literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Li et al., 2022</xref>), with a content increase of 601.17 times. It is worth noting that on the second day of direct fermentation, the highest concentration of <italic>p</italic>-cresol was 0.023&#x202F;&#x03BC;g/mL. As fermentation progressed, the concentration gradually decreased to 0.0022&#x202F;&#x03BC;g/mL, a decrease of 10.45 times. From the 8th day onwards, the <italic>p</italic>-cresol content was significantly lower than that of natural fermentation. Guan et al. collected 50 samples of bamboo shoots from 23 regions in Guangxi, Guangdong, Yunnan, and Fujian provinces and found that the content of <italic>p-creso</italic>l increased by 64.5 times throughout the fermentation process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Guan, 2023</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Bar chart of 11 flavor compounds in <italic>suansun</italic> treated with different fermentation methods.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1598252-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Vertical stacked bar chart comparing different chemical groups across samples labeled PW, PWLS, and LP at various stages. Categories include esters, alcohols, hydrocarbons, ketones, acids, aldehyde, heterocyclic, phenol, halohydrocarbon, amides, and others. Bars are color-coded in red, yellow, and green, likely indicating different magnitude levels or categories.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The pronounced accumulation of p-cresol observed during the water-sealed fermentation (PWLS) is likely attributable to enhanced microbial tyrosine metabolism under strictly anaerobic conditions. Previous studies have identified tyrosine metabolism as one of the most enriched functional pathways in naturally fermented bamboo shoots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Yu et al., 2006</xref>), underscoring its pivotal role in amino acid transformation during fermentation. In this pathway, tyrosine is first converted to p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate via tyrosine aminotransferase, followed by decarboxylation to p-hydroxyphenylacetate and subsequent conversion to p-cresol, catalyzed by p-hydroxyphenylacetate decarboxylase (4-HPA decarboxylase), as reported in <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Yu et al., 2006</xref>). This enzymatic process is highly oxygen-sensitive and is typically activated under anaerobic conditions.</p>
<p>Metagenomic annotations have further confirmed the presence of key genes encoding these enzymes in <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> and <italic>Lacticaseibacillus</italic> fermentum, both of which were found to dominate the later stages of PWLS. In addition, recent studies have suggested an alternative route for p-cresol biosynthesis via S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)-dependent methylation of tyrosine in certain lactic acid bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Chen et al., 2023</xref>). Collectively, these findings provide a mechanistic basis for the observed 600-fold surge in p-cresol under PWLS and highlight the synergistic effects of microbial composition and the unique anaerobic environment on phenolic compound accumulation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Analysis of differences in aroma components of different <italic>suansun</italic></title>
<p>In order to further analyze the contribution of different aroma components to distinguishing different fermentation methods, 27 different aroma substances from three different fermentation methods were screened based on the criteria of <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05 and VIP&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;1 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>), including 7 esters, 5 alcohols, 4 halogenated hydrocarbons, 3 heterocyclic compounds, 2 acids, 2 ketones, 1 phenol, 1 aldehyde, 1 hydrocarbon, and 1 sulfonate ester. Please refer to <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref> for details. From the lollipop chart on the left side of the heatmap in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>, it can be seen that 6 out of the 27 key flavor compounds showed outstanding performance, namely <italic>p</italic>-cresol, 1-phenylpropane-1,2-diol, carbamic acid, p-tolyl ester, 3-methylphenyl-N-met, 1,2-diphenylethanol, 1,2-benzenedicarboxylicacid, 1-butyl 2-cyclohexyl ester. Throughout the fermentation period (2&#x2013;38&#x202F;days), three key flavor substances, 1-phenylpropane-1,2-diol, 1,2-diphenylethanol, and carbamic acid, <italic>p</italic>-tolyl ester, were present only in PWLS. The bar graph above the heat map shows the sum of the variables in each column, showing that the sum of the key core flavor components in PWLS was significantly different from the other two treatments, reaching its highest value at day 32 of fermentation. Throughout the metabolic processes of microorganisms, macromolecular compounds were oxidized and hydrolyzed during <italic>suansun</italic> fermentation, producing a high number of taste precursors and causing a rapid increase in volatile chemicals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Raghuvanshi et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Thermogram of different aroma composition combinations of <italic>suansun</italic> processed by different fermentation methods.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1598252-g007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Heatmap with horizontal bars in varying shades from yellow to red, representing data points of different chemicals identified by their numerical codes on the right. The x-axis shows categories labeled PW, PW/LS, and LP with numbers 2 to 38. Green circles with lines on the left side indicate additional data.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>27 different aroma substances.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">No</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Category</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">CAS No</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Compound name</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Formula</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Esters</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1850-13-1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Carbamic acid-<italic>p</italic>-tolyl ester</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>8</sub>H<sub>9</sub>NO<sub>2</sub></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Esters</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1129-41-5</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3-Methylphenyl-<italic>N</italic>-met</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>9</sub>H<sub>11</sub>NO<sub>2</sub></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Esters</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1000309-64-1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Oxalic acid, monoamide, n-propyl, propyl ester</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>8</sub>H<sub>15</sub>NO<sub>3</sub></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">4</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Esters</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1000309-64-5</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Oxalic acid, monoamide, n-propyl, hexyl ester</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>11</sub>H<sub>21</sub>NO<sub>3</sub></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">5</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Esters</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">617-35-6</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Pyruvic acid ethyl ester</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Esters</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1000325-96-9</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(3<italic>R</italic>,6<italic>S</italic>)-3,6-Dimethyl-2,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrimidine</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>18</sub>H<sub>17</sub>ClO<sub>4</sub></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Esters</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">84-64-0</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1,2-Benzenedicarboxylicacid-1-butyl 2-cyclohexyl ester</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>18</sub>H<sub>24</sub>O<sub>4</sub></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">8</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Alcohols</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1075-04-3</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1-phenylpropane-1,2-diol</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>9</sub>H<sub>12</sub>O<sub>2</sub></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Alcohols</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">5694-68-8</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1,3-Dioxolane-2-methanol</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Alcohols</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">85264-33-1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1H-Pyrazole-1-methanol,3,5-dimethyl-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>10</sub>N<sub>2</sub>O</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">11</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Alcohols</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">71-41-0</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">n-Amyl alcohol</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>12</sub>O</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">12</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Alcohols</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1000110-34-9</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1,2-Diphenylethanol</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>18</sub>H<sub>20</sub>O</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Halogenated Hydrocarbons</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">18295-27-7</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Butane, 2-iodo-3-methyl-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>11</sub>I</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">14</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Halogenated Hydrocarbons</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3377-86-4</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Hexane, 2-bromo-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>13</sub>Br</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Halogenated Hydrocarbons</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">4282-42-2</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1-Iodononane</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>9</sub>H<sub>19</sub>I</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Halogenated Hydrocarbons</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">19218-94-1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Tetradecane, 1-iodo-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>14</sub>H<sub>29</sub>I</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">17</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Heterocyclic Compounds</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1632-76-4</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3-Methylpyridazine</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>6</sub>N<sub>2</sub></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">18</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Heterocyclic Compounds</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">67-51-6</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3,5-Dimethylpyrazole</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>8</sub>N<sub>2</sub></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">19</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Heterocyclic Compounds</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">24160-42-7</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x03B2;-Methyl-1H-imidazole-4-ethanamine</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>11</sub>N<sub>3</sub></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">20</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Acids</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">6628-79-1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Pentanoic acid-3-methyl-4-oxo-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">21</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Acids</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">33795-18-5</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Phosphonic acid-<italic>p</italic>-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>7</sub>O<sub>4</sub>P</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">22</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ketones</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">27607-63-2</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">5-Ethyl-4-methyl-3-heptanone</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>10</sub>H<sub>20</sub>O</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">23</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ketones</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">563-80-4</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3-Methyl-2-butanone</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">24</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Phenols</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">106-44-5</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>p</italic>-Cresol</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">25</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Aldehydes</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">623-27-8</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1,4-Phthalaldehyde</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>8</sub>H<sub>6</sub>O<sub>2</sub></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">26</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Hydrocarbons</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">110-54-3</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Hexane</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>14</sub></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">27</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Sulfonate Esters</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1000309-20-2</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-3-hydroxy-2,2,4-trimethylpentyl ester</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>14</sub>H<sub>30</sub>O<sub>3</sub>S</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Discriminant analysis of fermentation mode based on differential aroma components</title>
<p>In order to obtain more accurate and intuitive classification results, based on the 27 aroma components screened with intergroup differences, the aroma data of <italic>suansun</italic> treated with three different fermentation methods were analyzed by fermentation method discrimination. Differential aroma data were downscaled using PCA to obtain scatter plots of <italic>suansun</italic> scores for different fermentation treatments for the first 2 PCs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8A</xref>). As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8B</xref>, the closer the PC cumulative ratio to 1, the more reliable the PCA model. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8C</xref>, the explainable variance of each PC is PC1&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;PC2&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;PC3&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;PC4&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;PC5&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;PC6, in which the variance contribution rates of PC1 and PC2 are 81 and 9% respectively, and the cumulative variance contribution rate reaches 90%, which demonstrates that the artificial selection of PC1 and PC2 analysis samples has good reliability. The SVM model was based on the first 2 PCs, and the samples were randomly divided into a training set (70%) and a test set (30%), and the SVM model discrimination rate reached 100% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8D</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>PCA plot of differential aroma of <italic>suansun</italic> treated with different fermentation methods. <bold>(A)</bold> Scatter plot of suansun scores for the first two PCs. <bold>(B)</bold> Cumulative variance ratio of the first two PCs. <bold>(C)</bold> Explained variance of each principal component. <bold>(D)</bold> SVM model discrimination rate using the first two PCs.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1598252-g008.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Panel A shows a PCA biplot with data points colored red, blue, and green. Panel B displays a line graph indicating cumulative variance with increasing PCs. Panel C features a scree plot illustrating variance explained by each PC. Panel D is a decision boundary plot, separating red and blue areas based on PC1 and PC2 scores with data points overlayed.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Association analysis of dominant colonies with characteristic flavor substances</title>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9A</xref> shows the structure of the three acid shoot bacterial communities at the genus level (only the top 30 bacteria in terms of mean relative abundance are listed; other bacterial genera are denoted by &#x201C;other&#x201D;). The sum of the abundances of the genera listed in the figure accounted for more than 94.2% of the total bacterial genus abundance in each sample, which reflects the main genus information of each sample. Some researchers have designated genera with average relative abundance &#x2265;1% as dominant genera (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Tang et al., 2022</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">2024</xref>). <italic>Lactiplantibacillus</italic> was the bacterial genus with the highest mean relative abundance (48.52%) in the <italic>suansun</italic> samples, with a range of relative abundance from 3.04 to 99.69% in the different samples, and was the dominant genus in all samples. This is inconsistent with some reported findings, which showed that the dominant genus was <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Darmayanti et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Guan et al., 2020a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Thakur et al., 2015</xref>). This may be due to the renaming of the bacterial genus. In 2020, the International Commission on Bacteriological Nomenclature undertook a comprehensive review and update of the classification of wild forking bacteria. Among the most notable changes was the renaming of a portion of the genus <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> as <italic>Lactiplantibacillus</italic>. The reclassification of <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> to <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> was part of a comprehensive taxonomic revision based on whole-genome sequencing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Zheng et al., 2020</xref>). This study systematically reassigned multiple plant-associated strains, including <italic>L. plantarum</italic>, into the newly proposed genus <italic>Lactiplantibacillus</italic>. Earlier literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Luo et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Raghuvanshi et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Romi et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Thakur et al., 2015</xref>) still refer to <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic>, whereas more recent research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Botthoulath et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Jian et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Qian et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Qin et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Wu et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Xue et al., 2025</xref>) employs the updated <italic>Lactiplantibacillus</italic> nomenclature. Despite the change in genus name, functional roles such as acid production, amino acid metabolism, and flavor compound generation remain highly consistent across both nomenclatures. Therefore, we believe our results align with both legacy and current studies, and adopting the updated classification enhances consistency with contemporary microbial ecology frameworks. Similar to most vegetable fermentations, the fermentation process of <italic>suansun</italic> is significantly influenced by lactic acid bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Das et al., 2023</xref>). The main lactic acid bacteria strain contained <italic>Weissella</italic> sp., <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic>, <italic>Lactobacillus curvatus</italic>, <italic>Pediococcus pentosaceus, and Leuconostoc</italic> sp., (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Chen et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Guan et al., 2020b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Li et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig9">
<label>Figure 9</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>(A)</bold> Bacterial community structure of different <italic>suansun</italic> at the genus level; <bold>(B&#x2013;D)</bold> LDA value distribution bar chart, abundance difference chart, and classification tree chart of different bacterial colonies in <italic>suansun</italic> at the genus level; <bold>(E)</bold> Correlation network heatmap between 19 dominant bacterial genera and 27 key flavor compounds.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1598252-g009.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Hierarchical clustering and bar graphs show bacterial community composition, similarity, and taxa for various groups labeled LP, PWLS, and PW. A box plot illustrates relative abundance of specific bacteria such as Lactiplantibacillus, Lactococcus, and Weissella across these groups. Radial and network diagrams display microbial genera relationships and correlations. The radial diagram uses colored bands to represent different genera, while the network diagram shows correlations with a heatmap and connecting lines. Both visualizations include legends for interpretations, indicating diverse associations among microbial genera.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The abundance of <italic>Lactiplantibacillus</italic> in LP increased rapidly on day 2 of fermentation (92.03% relative abundance) and peaked on fermentation day 14 (99.69% relative abundance), which was significantly higher than that of the PW and PWLS treatment groups, and then began to decline gradually to a minimum on day 32 of fermentation (86.17% relative abundance). Similar to the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Botthoulath et al. (2024)</xref> who used <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> BBS13 as a fermenter, the strain counts reached a maximum at approximately 9 log CFU/g during the first 3&#x202F;days of fermentation, with a sharp decline occurring between day 7 and the end of fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Botthoulath et al., 2024</xref>). Xue et al. showed that, in the inoculation of <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> DACN768-fermented <italic>suansun</italic>, the content of 56 volatile flavor compounds peaked at 14 d (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Xue et al., 2025</xref>). The natural fermentation, on the other hand, started to show a sharp increase in flavor content only on day 14, which peaked on fermentation day 32. This suggests that inoculation with <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> can improve on the effects of the natural microflora present in the raw material and has the potential to greatly enhance the production cycle. In addition, this study also found that <italic>Lactococcus</italic> (24.86%), <italic>Weissella</italic> (7.68%), and <italic>Limosilobacillus</italic> (5.52%) have relatively high average relative abundance, making them the dominant bacterial genera in <italic>suansun</italic>. Similarly, water sealed fermentation is used, but <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> and <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> were dominant at the genetic level in <italic>suansun</italic> soaked in mountain spring water (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Chen et al., 2022</xref>). <italic>Weissella</italic>, <italic>Lactococcus</italic>, and <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> were the predominant genera in the fermentation process, as demonstrated by the natural fermentation of <italic>suansun</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Romi et al., 2015</xref>). These are similar to our natural water-sealed fermentation results. There are few reports on <italic>Limonolobacillus</italic> as the dominant bacterial genus in naturally fermented (non-water sealed) <italic>suansun</italic>, and this difference may be caused by factors such as sampling location, <italic>suansun</italic> production process, and fermentation time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Jian et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Tang et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9B</xref> shows the characteristics of microorganisms at different taxonomic levels under various fermentation conditions, and identifies biomarkers with significant differences between different <italic>suansun</italic> samples through linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis. Overall, the linear discriminant analysis score (LDA) scores of different bacterial genera in different samples showed a clear discrete distribution, indicating significant differences in microbial community composition among different samples. Each sample had unique distribution characteristics of bacterial genera, and a total of 18 dominant bacterial genera were identified. In the LP fermentation system, <italic>Lactiplantibacillus</italic>, which may have been added due to the advantage of direct injection fermentation, can reproduce in large numbers and become the dominant microbial community, with an abundance range of 86.17&#x2013;99.69%, resulting in a high LDA value and a single bacterial species composition, becoming a key microbial marker for distinguishing other samples. In the PWLS and PW fermentation systems, the dominant bacterial genera include <italic>Lactococcus</italic>, <italic>Weissella</italic>, and <italic>Limosilobacillus</italic>. The selected biomarkers include not only bacterial genera with high average relative abundance mentioned above, but also <italic>Clostridiumsensustricto1</italic> with an average relative abundance of 0.008%. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9C</xref> provides a visual representation of the differences in average relative abundance of different bacterial genera in the various fermentation systems. The classification tree diagram in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9D</xref> shows the hierarchical classification, evolutionary relationships, and significantly different species of microorganisms during the <italic>suansun</italic> fermentation process. It can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9D</xref> that <italic>Lactiplantibacillus, Lactococcus, Weissella, Limosilactobacillus, Leuconostoc, Paucilactobacillus, Furfurilactobacillus,</italic> and other bacterial genera, although belonging to the larger group of lactic acid bacteria, have evolutionary differences which may lead to differences in their functions and metabolic pathways during the <italic>suansun</italic> fermentation process. <italic>Lactobacillus, Weissella, and Lactococcus</italic> were the main genera in <italic>suansun</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Chen et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Hu et al., 2023</xref>), which is similar to our research findings. <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> and <italic>Limosilactobacillus reuteri</italic> can increase the sourness of bamboo shoots and reduce bitterness respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Wang et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>In order to further understand the influence of microbial communities in <italic>suansun</italic> on the production of key flavor compounds, a correlation network heatmap was drawn based on the Mantel test correlation test results, showing the correlation between 18 dominant bacterial genera and the content of 27 key flavor compounds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9E</xref>). The correlation analysis showed that a total of 23 key flavor compounds were highly significantly correlated with <italic>Weissella</italic> (17), <italic>Limonolobacillus</italic> (1), and <italic>Actinmyces</italic> (5), with <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x2264;&#x202F;0.001 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>). <italic>Weissella</italic> and <italic>Actinomyces</italic>, which are both biomarkers of PWLS, significantly correlated with 22 key flavor compounds, accounting for 95.65%. For values <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x2264;&#x202F;0.01 to <italic>p&#x202F;&#x003E;</italic> 0.001, there were five bacterial genera highly correlated with key flavor compounds, namely <italic>Actinomyce</italic>, <italic>Weissella</italic>, <italic>Enterococcus</italic>, <italic>Limosilactobacillus,</italic> and <italic>Paucilactobacillus</italic>. In addition to <italic>Limonolobacillus</italic>, <italic>Paucilactobacillus</italic> is a key biomarker for PW samples, while the remaining three belong to the PWLS treatment group. For values <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05 to <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.01, there were five bacterial genera significantly associated with key flavor compounds, namely <italic>Comamonas</italic>, <italic>Enterococcus</italic>, <italic>Weissella</italic>, <italic>Actinomyce</italic>, and <italic>Furfurilactobacillus</italic>, all key microbial markers from PWLS. In addition, this study also found a positive correlation between the absolute dominant bacterial genus <italic>Weissella</italic> and <italic>p</italic>-cresol (<italic>r</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.32, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.018). Sun et al. also found that <italic>Weissella and Lactococcus</italic> were substantially linked to flavoring substances such hexanol, acetic acid, and <italic>p</italic>-cresol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Sun et al., 2023</xref>). <italic>Weissella</italic> is not only the dominant bacterium in the fermentation of <italic>suansun</italic>, but may also be the main genus of bacteria that produces key flavors in <italic>suansun</italic>. On the contrary, <italic>Lactiplantibacillus</italic>, which has the highest average relative abundance, has no statistically significant correlation with the 27 key flavor compounds, which may be one of the drawbacks of direct inoculation of a single strain. According to reports, the sensory quality of fermented foods, which are often treated with microorganisms, is altered by changes in the microenvironment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Liu et al., 2021</xref>). Additionally, scientists found that using several strains for synergistic fermentation results in a more robust flavor profile in addition to improving the fermentation process&#x2019; safety (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Huang et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Luo et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>18 key flavor compounds significantly positively correlated with three bacterial genera.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">No</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">RI</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Compound name</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Formula</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">CAS No</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Genus</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>r</italic></th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">753</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">7-Hydroxy-7,8,9,10-tetramethyl-7,8-dihydrocyclohepta[d,e]naphthalene</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>18</sub>H<sub>20</sub>O</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1000110-34-9</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.51</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">859</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Oxalic acid, monoamide, n-propyl, propyl ester</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>8</sub>H<sub>15</sub>NO<sub>3</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1000309-64-1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.51</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">859</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Oxalic acid, monoamide, n-propyl, hexyl ester</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>11</sub>H<sub>21</sub>NO<sub>3</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1000309-64-5</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.54</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">859</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">2-Butanone, 3-methyl-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">563-80-4</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.54</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2126</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3-Methylpyridazine</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>6</sub>N<sub>2</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1632-76-4</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.49</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2126</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Phosphonic acid, (p-hydroxyphenyl)-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>7</sub>O<sub>4</sub>P</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">33795-18-5</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.57</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1327</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Propanoic acid, 2-oxo-, ethyl ester</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">617-35-6</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.64</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1493</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3,5-Dimethylpyrazole</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>8</sub>N<sub>2</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">67-51-6</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.63</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1493</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1H-Imidazole-4-ethanamine, beta.-methyl-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>11</sub>N<sub>3</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">24160-42-7</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.61</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1493</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3,5-Dimethylpyrazole-1-methanol</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>10</sub>N<sub>2</sub>O</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">85264-33-1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.58</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">786</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Butane, 2-iodo-3-methyl-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>11</sub>I</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">18295-27-7</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.39</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">999</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Sulfurous acid, 2-ethylhexyl hexyl ester</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>14</sub>H<sub>30</sub>O<sub>3</sub>S</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1000309-20-2</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">879</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Hexane, 2-bromo-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>13</sub>Br</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3377-86-4</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.71</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">924</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">n-Hexane</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>14</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">110-54-3</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.40</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1718</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Tetradecane, 1-iodo-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>14</sub>H<sub>29</sub>I</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">19218-94-1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.39</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">26</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1718</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Nonane, 1-iodo-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>9</sub>H<sub>19</sub>I</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">4282-42-2</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.44</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1217</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1-Pentanol</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>12</sub>O</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">71-41-0</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weissella</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.35</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1185</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Pentanoic acid, 3-methyl-4-oxo-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">6628-79-1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Limosilactobacillus</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1327</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Propanoic acid, 2-oxo-, ethyl ester</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">617-35-6</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Actinomyces</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.62</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1493</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3,5-Dimethylpyrazole</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>8</sub>N<sub>2</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">67-51-6</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Actinomyces</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.63</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">21</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1493</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3,5-Dimethylpyrazole-1-methanol</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>10</sub>N<sub>2</sub>O</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">85264-33-1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Actinomyces</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">22</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">879</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Hexane, 2-bromo-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>13</sub>Br</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3377-86-4</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Actinomyces</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.67</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1718</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Nonane, 1-iodo-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C<sub>9</sub>H<sub>19</sub>I</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">4282-42-2</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Actinomyces</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.78</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>In summary, PWLS treatment is the most optimal of the three fermentation methods. Direct fermentation of plant lactobacilli can play an important role in accelerating the maturation of <italic>suansun</italic>, which may be beneficial for commercial production. In subsequent direct fermentation studies, inoculation with composite lactic acid bacteria may be a better exploration model for achieving commercial production.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec21">
<label>4</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Using SBSE-GC-MS combined with electronic nose technology, a comparative analysis was conducted on 54 aroma components of <italic>suansun</italic> prepared by natural fermentation and direct fermentation. The results showed significant differences in the types and amounts of aroma components among the three types of <italic>suansun</italic>, and exhibited distinct fermentation mode characteristics. A total of 114 common aroma compounds were isolated and identified, including 31 esters, 16 alcohols, 16 hydrocarbons, 16 ketones, 9 acids, 7 aldehydes, 6 heterocyclic compounds, 4 phenols, 4 halogenated hydrocarbons, 3 amides, and 2 others. Esters, alcohols, and phenols contribute more to flavor formation in natural fermentation, while esters, aldehydes, ketones, and amides in direct-pitch fermentation. Based on the <italic>p</italic>-value and VIP value, 27 characteristic flavor compounds related to the aroma quality of <italic>suansun</italic> were further screened. Based on PCA analysis of 27 characteristic aroma compounds, the cumulative variance contribution rate of the first two PCs reached 90%. Based on the SVM model constructed by the first two PCs, a discriminant analysis was conducted on the fermentation method of <italic>suansun</italic>. The samples were randomly divided into a training set (70%) and a testing set (30%), with a discrimination rate of 100%. This indicates that the model is reliable and provides new ideas for the selection of fermentation methods for <italic>suansun</italic>.</p>
<p>The SBSE-GC-MS detection results showed that the main flavor compound categories increased nearly exponentially from natural fermentation day 14, reaching their peak at the fermentation 32&#x202F;day, which is consistent with the changes in the electronic nose. The 27 key flavor compounds showed the most significant response under PWLS treatment, with <italic>p</italic>-cresol content increasing the most during the entire fermentation process, reaching over 600 times. The changes in colony structure during the fermentation process of bamboo shoots were analyzed using 16sRNA, and the results showed that the main dominant bacterial genus for the three fermentation methods were <italic>Lactiplantibacillus, Lactococcus, Weissella,</italic> and <italic>Limosilactobacillus</italic>. The abundance of the absolute dominant bacterial genus <italic>Lactiplantibacillus</italic> during direct fermentation rapidly increased on the 2nd day, reached a peak on fermentation day 14, significantly higher than with natural fermentation, then gradually decreased, reaching its lowest point on fermentation day 32. This indicates that direct fermentation of plant lactobacilli can play an important role in accelerating the maturation of bamboo shoots. However, among the 23 matched pairs where the dominant bacterial genera of the three fermentation methods were significantly positively correlated with key flavor compounds, PWLS accounted for 95.65%, of which 17 key characteristic flavor compounds were significantly positively correlated with <italic>Weissella</italic>. <italic>Weissella</italic> is not only the dominant bacterium in the fermentation of bamboo shoots, but also the main genus of bacteria that produces key flavors in bamboo shoots. There is no statistically significant correlation between <italic>Lactiplantibacillus</italic> and the 27 key flavor compounds. Therefore, using direct injection and inoculating with composite lactic acid bacteria may be an optimal model for achieving commercial production.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec22">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec23">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>JW: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. YL: Software, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Data curation. MQ: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Validation. JG: Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Investigation.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec24">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the Guangxi Forestry Science and Technology Promotion Demonstration Project (Guilin Scientific Research [2022] No. 22) and the Guangxi Forestry Academy of Sciences Basic Research Operating Costs (Linke 202307).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>We thank Alison McGonagle, PhD, from Liwen Bianji (Edanz) (<ext-link xlink:href="http://www.liwenbianji.cn" ext-link-type="uri">www.liwenbianji.cn</ext-link>) for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec25">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec26">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="correction-note" id="sec026">
<title>Correction note</title>
<p>This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the scientific content of the article.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec27">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Botthoulath</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dalmacio</surname> <given-names>I. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elegado</surname> <given-names>F. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Physico-chemical and functional properties of the lao fermented bamboo shoots (Nor Mai Som) inoculated with potential probiotic bacteria, <italic>Pediococcus pentosaceus</italic> BBS1 and <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> BBS13</article-title>. <source>Food Chem. Adv.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>100803</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.focha.2024.100803</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Different lactic acid bacteria strains affecting the flavor profile of fermented jujube juice</article-title>. <source>J. Food Process. Preserv.</source> <volume>43</volume>:<fpage>e14095</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jfpp.14095</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Correlation between microorganisms and flavor of Chinese fermented sour bamboo shoot: roles of <italic>Lactococcus</italic> and <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> in flavor formation</article-title>. <source>Food Biosci.</source> <volume>50</volume>:<fpage>101994</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101994</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Flavor changes and microbial evolution in fermentation liquid of sour bamboo shoots</article-title>. <source>J. Food Compos. Anal.</source> <volume>120</volume>:<fpage>105273</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105273</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choudhury</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sahu</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Value addition to bamboo shoots: a review</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>407</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>414</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13197-011-0379-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23904649</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Darmayanti</surname> <given-names>L. P. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duwipayana</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Putra</surname> <given-names>I. N. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antara</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Preliminary study of fermented pickle of Tabah bamboo shoot (Gigantochloa nigrociliata (Buese) Kurz)</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Biol. Vet. Agric. Food Eng.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>999</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1004</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Najar</surname> <given-names>I. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thakur</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mondal</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>First report on metagenomics and their predictive functional analysis of fermented bamboo shoot food of Tripura, North East India</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>1158411</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1158411</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37125168</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <source>Microbial community flora in Chinese traditional suansun and its influence on the formation of characteristic flavors</source>. <publisher-loc>Nanchang</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Nanchang University</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020a</year>). <article-title>Comparison of microbial communities and physiochemical characteristics of two traditionally fermented vegetables</article-title>. <source>Food Res. Int.</source> <volume>128</volume>:<fpage>108755</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108755</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31955789</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020b</year>). <article-title>Evaluation and comparison of the microbial communities and volatile profiles in homemade suansun from Guangdong and Yunnan provinces in China</article-title>. <source>J. Sci. Food Agric.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>5197</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5206</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.10569</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32530042</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Determination of the volatiles in fermented bamboo shoots by head space &#x2013; solid-phase micro extraction (HS-SPME) with gas chromatography &#x2013; olfactory &#x2013; mass spectrometry (GC-O-MS) and aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA)</article-title>. <source>Anal. Lett.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>1162</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1179</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00032719.2020.1795667</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiao</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Characterization of microbial diversity and important off-odor compounds in fermented <italic>Ma</italic> bamboo shoots (<italic>Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro</italic>)</article-title>. <source>LWT</source> <volume>188</volume>:<fpage>115378</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115378</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of different lactic acid bacteria on nitrite degradation, volatile profiles, and sensory quality in Chinese traditional paocai</article-title>. <source>LWT</source> <volume>147</volume>:<fpage>111597</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111597</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jian</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Revealing the formation mechanisms of key flavor components during the fermentation of bamboo shoots by combining flavoromics and metagenomics</article-title>. <source>Food Res. Int.</source> <volume>198</volume>:<fpage>115361</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115361</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39643345</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Bacterial communities and volatile organic compounds in traditional fermented salt-free bamboo shoots</article-title>. <source>Food Biosci.</source> <volume>50</volume>:<fpage>102006</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fbio.2022.102006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jian</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The potential correlation between microbial communities and flavors in fermented bamboo shoots</article-title>. <source>Food Biosci.</source> <volume>56</volume>:<fpage>103066</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fbio.2023.103066</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40600274</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Discrimination of oolong tea (<italic>Camellia sinensis</italic>) varieties based on feature extraction and selection from aromatic profiles analysed by HS-SPME/GC-MS</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>141</volume>, <fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>265</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.02.128</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23768356</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soe Htet</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Liquor flavour is associated with the physicochemical property and microbial diversity of fermented grains in waxy and non-waxy Sorghum (<italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic>) during fermentation</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>618458</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.618458</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34220729</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Comparing characteristic aroma components of bead-shaped green teas from different regions using headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography&#x2013;mass spectrometry/olfactometry combined with chemometrics</article-title>. <source>Eur. Food Res. Technol.</source> <volume>246</volume>, <fpage>1703</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1714</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00217-020-03514-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Sichuan paocai fermented by mixed-starter culture of lactic acid bacteria</article-title>. <source>Food Sci. Nutr.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>5402</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5409</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/fsn3.1833</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33133542</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qian</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Y.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H.-Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Guangxi sour bamboo shoots: a study on microbial diversity and flavor characteristics across regions</article-title>. <source>J. Food Compos. Anal.</source> <volume>135</volume>:<fpage>106641</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jfca.2024.106641</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Metatranscriptomics unravel the formation mechanism of key flavors during the natural fermentation of suansun, a Chinese traditional fermented bamboo shoot</article-title>. <source>Food Biosci.</source> <volume>57</volume>:<fpage>103436</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fbio.2023.103436</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Raghuvanshi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grayson</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schena</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amanze</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suwintono</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quinn</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Microbial transformations of organically fermented foods</article-title>. <source>Meta</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>165</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/metabo9080165</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31405168</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Romi</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeyaram</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Three-phase succession of autochthonous lactic acid bacteria to reach a stable ecosystem within 7 days of natural bamboo shoot fermentation as revealed by different molecular approaches</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>3372</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3389</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mec.13237</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25963776</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Characteristics of changes in volatile organic compounds and microbial communities during the storage of pickles</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>409</volume>:<fpage>135285</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135285</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36586248</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>J.-K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>H.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X.-C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The formation mechanisms of key flavor substances in stinky tofu brine based on metabolism of aromatic amino acids</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>392</volume>:<fpage>133253</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133253</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35649310</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>J.-K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>L.-W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>L.-Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Y.-Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Characterization of key flavor substances and their microbial sources in traditional sour bamboo shoots</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>437</volume>:<fpage>137858</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137858</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37924763</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thakur</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nanda</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tomar</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of indigenous Lactobacillus species from diverse niches of India</article-title>. <source>Curr. Trends Biotechnol. Pharmacy</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>222</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>227</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.-Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>C.-X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>L.-K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Quality analysis of ultra-fine whole pulp of bamboo shoots (<italic>Chimonobambusa quadrangularis</italic>) fermented by <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> and <italic>Limosilactobacillus reuteri</italic></article-title>. <source>Food Biosci.</source> <volume>52</volume>:<fpage>102458</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102458</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>You</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ibrahim</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Integrated metagenomics and metatranscriptomics analyses reveal the impacts of different Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains on microbial communities and metabolic profiles in pickled bamboo shoots</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>464</volume>:<fpage>141772</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141772</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39503092</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>You</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ibrahim</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Metagenomic analysis of <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> DACN768 inoculation effects on volatile flavor compounds, microbial succession, and flavor metabolic network in suansun</article-title>. <source>Food Res. Int.</source> <volume>199</volume>:<fpage>115382</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115382</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39658173</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blaser</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andrei</surname> <given-names>P. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pierik</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Selmer</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>4-Hydroxyphenylacetate decarboxylases: properties of a novel subclass of glycyl radical enzyme systems</article-title>. <source>Biochemistry</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>9584</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9592</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/bi060840b</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16878993</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>An</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Isolation of lactic acid bacteria from Chinese pickle and evaluation of fermentation characteristics</article-title>. <source>LWT</source> <volume>180</volume>:<fpage>114627</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114627</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Use of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ZJ316 as a starter culture for nitrite degradation, foodborne pathogens inhibition and microbial community modulation in pickled mustard fermentation</article-title>. <source>Food Chem. X</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>100344</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100344</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35669456</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ying</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Comparative analysis of the lignification process of two bamboo shoots stored at room temperature</article-title>. <source>Plan. Theory</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>1399</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants9101399</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33096642</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wittouck</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salvetti</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franz</surname> <given-names>C. M. A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>H. M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mattarelli</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>2782</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2858</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/ijsem.0.004107</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32293557</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>