<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2025.1516740</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>The cultivation conditions of leafy vegetables influence the structures of phyllosphere bacterial communities and ultimately impact the <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth post-harvest</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Culliney</surname> <given-names>Paul</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2921551/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Schmalenberger</surname> <given-names>Achim</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/139850/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>Department of Biological Sciences, University of Limerick</institution>, <addr-line>Limerick</addr-line>, <country>Ireland</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: Natalia Wiktorczyk-Kapischke, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toru&#x0144;, Poland</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: Aurel Maxim, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Romania</p>
<p>Alex Fulano, Kenyatta University, Kenya</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Achim Schmalenberger, <email>achim.schmalenberger@ul.ie</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>30</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1516740</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>24</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>05</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Culliney and Schmalenberger.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Culliney and Schmalenberger</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Cultivation conditions, including plant species, variety, cultivation method, and seasonality, are all at least co-factors of epiphytic <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> growth. Meanwhile, phyllosphere-associated bacteria were found to influence the colonization of invading pathogens. Thus, the main objective of this study was to determine whether cultivation conditions are factors in the development of the bacterial phyllosphere community on leafy vegetables, which consequently correlates positively or negatively with <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth. Indeed, this study revealed that vegetable cultivation conditions are a more significant determinant of phyllosphere development than plant species. Of the identified phyllosphere-associated bacteria, the presence of Pseudomonadaceae had a positive correlation with <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations on all tested produce. Hitherto, <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content appeared to be more critical for <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth on spinach F1 Trumpet. For days 7&#x2013;9 of storage, <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> increased abundance on open field spinach F1 Trumpet were associated with <italic>L. monocytogenes&#x2019;</italic> most significant increase (0.94 log<sub>10</sub> colony-forming unit (cfu) g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>). In contrast, <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content decreased for polytunnel spinach F1 Trumpet, and the corresponding <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations remained unchanged. <italic>Carnobacteriaceae</italic> were present on spinach F1 Trumpet from the polytunnel but not on other spinach products, with higher associated <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth. <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> (genus <italic>Dickeya</italic>) increased for spinach F1 Trumpet polytunnel but decreased for other spinach produce with lower associated <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth. Similarly, polytunnel rocket Esmee had an increasing relative abundance of <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic>, whereas it remained constant for polytunnel rocket Buzz. Compared to summer spinach F1 Trumpet produce, winter produce had significantly greater <italic>Streptococcaceae</italic> content and was correlated with a decrease in <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth. Finally, higher phyllosphere alpha diversity putatively limited <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth. Ultimately, this study revealed that cultivation conditions determine the bacterial phyllosphere community structure, which consequently influences <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>variety</kwd>
<kwd>season</kwd>
<kwd>lactic acid bacteria</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic></kwd>
<kwd><italic>Spinacia oleracea</italic></kwd>
<kwd><italic>Eruca sativa</italic></kwd>
<kwd><italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic></kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="79"/>
<page-count count="19"/>
<word-count count="14228"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Food Microbiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Leafy vegetables such as rocket and spinach are commonly consumed due to their vitamin, mineral, antioxidant, and phytochemical content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Colonna et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">Van der Avoort et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Venu et al., 2019</xref>). To meet the demand for such leafy vegetables, global production of spinach has increased by 218% from 2001 to 2021 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">FAO, 2021</xref>). Polytunnels enable all year-round production of such high-quality leafy vegetables in winter months or in countries where production may not be possible due to challenging weather conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Sagar, 2020</xref>). However, cultivation in polytunnels is also altering environmental conditions not only for plant growth but also for the growth of the plant microbiome.</p>
<p>While the increasing demand for vegetables has resulted in the adoption of cost-effective and fast production methods, less concern is given to the safety of their produce, that is, microbial contamination with foodborne pathogens such as <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Balali et al., 2020</xref>). Potential sources of contamination include irrigation water and manures (re-harvest), as well as the handling of the produce (post-harvest) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Balali et al., 2020</xref>). In terms of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth on spinach and rocket produce, there have been conflicting results from studies with differing experimental and pre-harvest cultivation conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Sant'Ana et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Lokerse et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">S&#x00F6;derqvist et al., 2017b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Ziegler et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Culliney and Schmalenberger, 2020</xref>). However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Culliney and Schmalenberger (2022)</xref> revealed that cultivation conditions, that is, plant species and variety, cultivation method (polytunnel vs. open field), and seasonality of harvest, are at least partly responsible for differing levels of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Culliney and Schmalenberger, 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Foodborne pathogens, such as <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> do not grow in isolation but within a microbial community within the phyllosphere. The phyllosphere refers to the aerial parts of the plant, primarily the surface of the leaves, which harbor diverse and rich communities of bacteria, fungi, viruses, nematodes, and protozoans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Bashir et al., 2022</xref>). Plant species and genotype, as well as abiotic factors, such as geographical location, solar radiation, pollution, and nutrients, and biotic factors, including leaf age and presence of other microorganisms, are all drivers of the development of the phyllosphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Xu et al., 2022</xref>). Although the phyllosphere harbors a highly diverse community, at the phylum level, the phyllospheres of different plant species, even from various geographical locations, exhibit high levels of similarity. They primarily consist of <italic>Pseudomonadota</italic> (<italic>Proteobacteria</italic>), <italic>Actinomycetota</italic> (<italic>Actinobacteria</italic>), <italic>Bacteroidota</italic> (<italic>Bacteroidetes</italic>), and <italic>Bacillota</italic> (<italic>Firmicutes</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Liu et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Phyllosphere-inhabiting microorganisms and their metabolites interact with their environment and may play protective roles against invading opportunistic foodborne pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Saleem, 2021</xref>). A previous study revealed that bacterial isolates from ready-to-eat (RTE) lettuce influence the colonization of <italic>Listeria innocua</italic> in co-cultures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Francis and O&#x2019;Beirne, 2002</xref>). However, a paucity of studies has investigated the <italic>in situ</italic> influence of the food microbiome or vegetable phyllosphere on the <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth. A cultivation-based study did not identify any differences in resident bacteria present between cut leaves of broad-leaved endive associated with high and low levels of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Carlin et al., 1995</xref>). To date, there have been no attempts to correlate the phyllosphere bacteriome of rocket or kale with <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth.</p>
<p>Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are often naturally present as indigenous, spoilage bacteria and negatively impact <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> due to their competitive growth capabilities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">&#x00D8;stergaard et al., 2014</xref>). Additionally, LAB produce organic acids which reduce pH by lowering intracellular dissociation and intracellular leakage through porins or permeases to values beneath the pH at which <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> performs optimally, that is, pH 7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Webb et al., 2022</xref>). Moreover, LAB produce other metabolites or bio-preservative agents such as reuterin, bacteriocins, diacetyl, reutericyclin, organic acids, acetoin, and hydrogen peroxide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Ibrahim et al., 2021</xref>). <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> is a LAB previously isolated from rocket produce, which harbors genes that encode for the production of Coagulin A and the active peptide Pediocin ACH. These can act as anti-listerial agents, thus displaying particular inhibition capacities of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Le Marrec et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Espitia et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Barbosa et al., 2021</xref>). Conversely, several members of the <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> family cause hydrolysis of proteins, which could provide free amino acids likely to stimulate the <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Marshall et al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref79">Zilelidou and Skandamis, 2018</xref>). <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> spp. can also increase nutrient availability, for example, carbon and nitrogen for pathogen colonization by altering ion transport across the plant cell plasma membranes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Hutchison, 1995</xref>). Additionally, <italic>P. putida</italic> has the ability to produce and release plant growth regulators, for example, indole-3-acetic acid, which promotes nutrient leakage and microbial fitness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Brandl and Lindow, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Leveau and Lindow, 2005</xref>). Further research is needed to determine whether a higher diversity of the phyllosphere indigenous bacterial community is related to the reduction of the competitiveness of transient opportunistic pathogenic microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Darlison et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>The objective of the present study was to utilize Illumina-based 16S amplicon sequencing to describe the bacterial composition of leafy vegetable phyllospheres. Different plant species (spinach, rocket, and kale), cultivars (F1 Trumpet vs. F1 Cello; and Buzz vs. Esmee), cultivation methods (polytunnel vs. open field), and seasonality (summer vs. winter spinach) were tested to identify the presence of certain bacteria of importance to <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth. Changes in their relative abundance were correlated with shifts in the abundance of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations. This study hypothesized that differences in the relative abundance of certain phyllosphere-associated bacterial taxa attributed to differing cultivation conditions are essential co-factors responsible for divergent levels of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth. Consequently, the present study aimed to analyze the bacterial community structures of leafy vegetables cultivated differently, including spinach, rocket, and kale.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Spinach, rocket, and kale produce</title>
<p>All spinach, rocket, and kale produce (Caryophyllales for spinach, Brassicales for rocket, and kale, referred here as species) used in this study were cultivated as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Culliney and Schmalenberger (2022)</xref>. A total of 160 samples from <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potential experiments were selected: open field and polytunnel spinach (F1 Trumpet; summer harvest), open field and polytunnel rocket (Buzz), polytunnel spinach (F1 Cello), polytunnel rocket (Esmee), open field spinach (F1 Trumpet; winter harvest). Samples were stored for days 0, 2, and 5 at 7&#x00B0;C and for days 7&#x2013;9 at 12&#x00B0;C for days, where <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> and total bacteria counts (TBCs) were enumerated on cultivation media (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Culliney and Schmalenberger, 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title><italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> content of spinach, rocket, and kale produce</title>
<p>Growth experiments were executed as described in accordance with the European Union (EU) guidance document&#x2019;s guidelines for conducting growth potential studies (European Union Reference Laboratory for <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> (EURL Lm); <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">EURL Lm, 2019</xref>). The rationale behind selecting these guidelines is to provide a robust representation of real-life scenarios involving low-level contaminations with the potential to grow under realistic storage conditions. Each sample consisted of 25&#x202F;g of produce inoculated with 100&#x202F;cfu&#x202F;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> of a three-strain mix of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic>, that is, 959 (vegetable isolate), 1,382 (EURL <italic>Lm</italic> reference strain), and 6,179 (food processing plant isolate). The contents of each were transferred into separate stomacher bags and homogenized in 25&#x202F;mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) using a stomacher (Seward 400, AGB Scientific, Dublin, Ireland) for 120&#x202F;s at a high speed (260&#x202F;rpm). These homogenates were used for all types of microbial analysis.</p>
<p>Growth potentials (log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) calculated from median values were open field spinach (F1 Trumpet; summer harvest)&#x202F;=&#x202F;2.59, polytunnel spinach (F1 Trumpet)&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.40, open field rocket (Buzz)&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.28, polytunnel rocket (Buzz)&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.45, polytunnel rocket (Esmee)&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.23, polytunnel spinach (F1 Cello)&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.84, polytunnel kale (Nero di Toscana)&#x202F;=&#x202F;2.56, and open field spinach (F1 Trumpet; winter harvest)&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.65 as described recently (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Culliney and Schmalenberger, 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>The associated average <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> counts (log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) across the five time points (&#x00B1; the relative increase or decrease from the previous time point) are displayed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Average <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> counts (log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;the relative increase or decrease from the previous time point) over time.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Product</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Day 0</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Day 2</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Day 5</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Day 7</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Day 9</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Open field spinach (F1 Trumpet; summer harvest)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.99</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.31 (+0.32)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.90 (+0.59)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.48 (+0.58)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.58 (+1.10)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Polytunnel spinach (F1 Trumpet)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.94</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.04 (+1.10)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.34 (+0.30)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.33 (&#x2212; 0.01)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.36 (+0.03)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Open field rocket (Buzz)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.89</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.45 (+0.56)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.69 (+0.24)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.14 (+0.45)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.23 (+0.09)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Polytunnel rocket (Buzz)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.91</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.48 (+0.57)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.94 (+0.46)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.45 (+0.51)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.52 (+0.07)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Polytunnel rocket (Esmee)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.94</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.32 (+0.38)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.78 (+0.46)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.89 (+0.11)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.29 (+0.40)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Polytunnel spinach (F1 Cello)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.91</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.77 (+0.86)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.30 (+0.53)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.38 (+0.08)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.88 (+0.50)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Polytunnel kale (Nero di Toscana)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.78 (+0.76)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.55 (+0.77)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.03 (+0.48)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.48 (+0.45)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Open field spinach (F1 Trumpet; winter harvest)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.12</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.69 (+0.57)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.24 (+0.55)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.33 (+0.09)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.76 (+0.43)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Culliney and Schmalenberger (2022)</xref>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>DNA extraction</title>
<p>The remaining homogenate suspensions obtained after microbial analysis were transferred into 50&#x202F;mL conical tubes and centrifuged at 4,500<italic>g</italic> (15&#x202F;min at 4&#x00B0;C). Supernatants were discarded, and the derived pellets were stored at &#x2212;20&#x00B0;C. For DNA extraction, pellets were resuspended in 400&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of PBS, and 100&#x202F;&#x03BC;L was used for DNA extraction with the PowerFood DNA Isolation kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. The quantity and quality of the extracted DNA were determined with the Take3 plate in an Eon plate reader/incubator (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Culliney and Schmalenberger, 2024</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis</title>
<p>All 160 samples were sent to the University of Minnesota Genomics Center (UMGC) for indexing and Illumina MiSeq (San Diego, CA) sequencing. Raw sequencing files were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (National Center for Biotechnology Information [NCBI]) under the BioProject identification [ID] number: PRJNA117723.4. Bioinformatics analysis was performed using QIIME2 2021.11 (<ext-link xlink:href="https://qiime2.org/" ext-link-type="uri">https://qiime2.org/</ext-link>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Bolyen et al., 2019</xref>) as described recently by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Culliney and Schmalenberger (2024)</xref>. The paired-end sequences with quality of each group of 20 samples were demultiplexed and imported with metadata separately via a ManifestPhred33V2 file. This was followed by trimming and truncating (quality filtering at Q20) using the q2-dada2 plugin. Following this, the &#x201C;qiime feature-table merge&#x201D; and &#x201C;qiime feature-table merge-seqs&#x201D; plug-ins to merge feature tables and the representative amplicon sequence variants (ASV) were conducted, so the following group comparisons could be performed:</p>
<p>Comparison 1 (open field vs. polytunnel vs. plant species) consisted of open field spinach (F1 Trumpet), polytunnel spinach (F1 Trumpet), open field rocket (Buzz), and polytunnel rocket (Buzz).</p>
<p>Comparison 2 (variety vs. species) consisted of polytunnel spinach (F1 Trumpet), polytunnel rocket (Buzz), polytunnel rocket (Esmee), polytunnel spinach (F1 Cello), and polytunnel kale (Nero di Toscana).</p>
<p>Comparison 3 (seasonality) included open field spinach (F1 Trumpet; summer harvest) and open field spinach (F1 Trumpet; winter harvest).</p>
<p>Assigning taxonomic information to the ASV sequences was conducted using a pre-trained Na&#x00EF;ve Bayes taxonomic classifier, which was trained on the Silva version 138.99% reference dataset where sequences were trimmed to represent only the region between the 515F/806R primers (V3&#x2013;V4 region) as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Culliney and Schmalenberger, 2025</xref>). Sequences not assigned to a phylum level, chloroplast, and mitochondrial sequences were removed using the filter-table method in the q2-taxa plugin. All subsequent analyses were conducted with both rarefied and unrarefied data. Even sampling depths for use in diversity metrics were for comparison 1: 11,519&#x202F;&#x2192;&#x202F;Retained 921,520 (29.48%) features in 80 (100.00%) samples at the specified sampling depth; for comparison 2: 3,117&#x202F;&#x2192;&#x202F;Retained 240,009 (9.99%) features in 77 (79.38%) samples at the specified sampling depth; and for comparison 3: 15,015&#x202F;&#x2192;&#x202F;Retained 600,600 (40.99%) features in 40 (100.00%) samples at the specified sampling depth. Alpha diversity metrics (observed ASVs, Shannon index, Pielou&#x2019;s evenness, and Faith&#x2019;s Phylogenetic Diversity) and beta diversity metrics (weighted unique fraction metric or UniFrac (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Lozupone et al., 2007</xref>) and Bray&#x2013;Curtis dissimilarity) using q2-diversity were estimated and viewed on Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) Emperor plots. Analysis of Composition of Microbiomes (ANCOM) test in the q2-composition plugin was used to identify differentially abundant features. ANCOM identified individual taxa whose relative abundances are significantly different across groups. Relative abundance was calculated after conversion of the biome tables from QIIME2 to tsv files (phylum and family levels). Pearson&#x2019;s correlation coefficient was determined to measure the strength and direction of the linear association between two variables (i.e., between <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations and the corresponding relative abundance of each of the 20 most abundant families) for all groups over time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Sedgwick, 2012</xref>). Pearson&#x2019;s correlation coefficient from &#x003C;0.10 is a negligible correlation, 0.10&#x2013;0.39 indicates weak correlations, 0.40&#x2013;0.69 represents moderate correlations, while 0.70&#x2013;0.89 indicates strong correlations, with &#x003E;0.90 being very strong (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Schober et al., 2018</xref>). Absolute abundances of bacterial taxa at the family and genus level were estimated by using the total heterotrophic counts published elsewhere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Culliney and Schmalenberger, 2022</xref>). Input, filtered, denoised, merged, non-chimeric reads, as well as chloroplast to total DNA content, are reported in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S1&#x2013;S3</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>RStudio software (Posit, Boston, MA; version 4.1.1) was used for statistical analysis. In situations of normality (Shapiro&#x2013;Wilk test) and homoscedasticity (Levene&#x2019;s), a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare input, filtered, denoised, merged, and non-chimeric reads between groups. The remainder of the statistical analysis for alpha and beta diversity metrics was conducted in QIIME2. For alpha diversity (observed ASVs, Shannon index, Pielou&#x2019;s evenness, and Faith&#x2019;s Phylogenetic Diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Faith, 1992</xref>)), comparisons among groups and pairwise comparisons were conducted through Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis tests. Beta diversity was analyzed through the non-parametric permutation test, permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) (999 permutations) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Anderson, 2017</xref>). Statistical significance was tested at <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x2264;&#x202F;0.05. In situations of normality (Shapiro&#x2013;Wilk test) and homoscedasticity (Levene&#x2019;s), a one-way ANOVA Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) <italic>post hoc</italic> test applying Benjamini&#x2013;Hochberg correction for multiple testing was conducted to compare relative abundances for all alpha diversity metrics and relative abundances across subgroups. In situations of non-normality, the Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis rank sum test, using the kruskal.test function, and Dunn test <italic>post hoc</italic> analysis for multiple pairwise comparisons between groups were conducted, applying the Benjamini&#x2013;Hochberg correction for multiple testing (false discovery rate was set at 10%). In situations of unequal variance, the oneway.test function was employed with var&#x202F;=&#x202F;F, and Games&#x2013;Howell <italic>post hoc</italic> analysis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec8">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Comparison 1 (open field vs. polytunnel vs. plant species)</title>
<p>This section describes how alpha and beta diversities were shaped by the selection of different leafy vegetable plants (spinach and rocket) as well as other cultivation methods (open field and polytunnel) and how diversities evolved with storage. The primary assumption was that both plant species and environment affect alpha and beta diversities. In turn, differently developing phyllosphere communities were expected to affect <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth over time, as well as the succession of the phyllosphere community over time.</p>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>3.1.1</label>
<title>Influence of cultivation method (polytunnel and open field) and plant species (spinach and rocket) on alpha diversity of a <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> inoculated phyllosphere</title>
<p>On average, the richness and diversity for rocket (observed features, Shannon index and Faith&#x2019;s Phylogenetic Diversity) were significantly greater for open field rocket (<italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potential&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.28 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) compared to polytunnel rocket produce (<italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potential&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.45 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>). Pielou&#x2019;s evenness was not significantly different between the open field rocket and polytunnel (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05). For spinach, Pielou&#x2019;s evenness and diversity (Shannon index) were significantly higher for polytunnel spinach (<italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potential&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.40 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) compared to open field spinach (<italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potential&#x202F;=&#x202F;2.59 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>). However, average observed features and Faith&#x2019;s Phylogenetic Diversity values did not differ between spinach produce (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05). Except for Pielou&#x2019;s evenness and Shannon index of polytunnel rocket, no other significant differences over time were observed for all alpha diversity metrics. Significant changes over time were only identified for polytunnel rocket (Shannon index and Pielou&#x2019;s evenness) and open field rocket (Pielou&#x2019;s evenness) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S4</xref>), Rarefaction of sequencing reads did not influence alpha diversity metrics (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S5</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>3.1.2</label>
<title>Influence of cultivation method (polytunnel and open field) and plant species (spinach and rocket) on beta diversity of a <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> inoculated phyllosphere</title>
<p>All four groups, that is, open field rocket, polytunnel rocket, open field spinach, and polytunnel spinach produce, were all significantly different from each other (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.001). When grouped by produce type, spinach and rocket produce were also significantly different (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.001). Furthermore, when grouped by cultivation method, all polytunnel produce vs. all open field bacterial communities were significantly different (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.001). While all four produce groups were significantly different, this was not always the case when compared at individual time points. The bacterial communities of all 5 time points of open field spinach were significantly different compared to polytunnel spinach produce (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.026&#x2013;0.038). The same was observed for polytunnel rocket compared to polytunnel spinach produce (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.029&#x2013;0.035). However, for open field vs. polytunnel rocket, significant differences between their bacterial communities were limited to days 0, 2, 5, and 9 (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.019&#x2013;0.037) and not day 7 (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.057). Bacterial communities of open field rocket and spinach showed significant differences on day 0, 7, and 9 (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.024&#x2013;0.030) but not on day 5 or 7 (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.069&#x2013;0.084). Adjusting the <italic>p</italic>-value significance threshold with Benjamini&#x2013;Hochberg correction did not change the statistical outcome of the tests. A visual representation of the bacterial beta diversity on a PCoA plot showed that communities of polytunnel rocket and spinach, as well as open field spinach and rocket, partially overlapped, while polytunnel rocket and open field rocket, as well as polytunnel spinach and open field spinach, were separated (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Overall, beta diversity analyses highlighted the differences between the bacterial phyllosphere communities at the plant species and environment levels.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Two-dimensional Emperor (PCoA) plots showing beta diversity distances, that is, weighted UniFrac, among the different samples across open field rocket Buzz (red), open field spinach F1 Trumpet (blue), polytunnel rocket Buzz (orange), and polytunnel spinach F1 Trumpet (green) groups with rarefaction applied. Shapes revealed separations over time are day 0&#x202F;=&#x202F;circle, day 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;square, day 5&#x202F;=&#x202F;star, day 7&#x202F;=&#x202F;ring, and day 9&#x202F;=&#x202F;diamond. Letters A-D indicate significant differences.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1516740-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The phyllosphere of open field rocket produce changed significantly over time, that is, from days 0&#x2013;9 and 2&#x2013;9 (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.028 and 0.030). For polytunnel rocket produce changes in phyllosphere structure occurred from days 0&#x2013;9, 2&#x2013;7, and 2&#x2013;9 (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.021&#x2013;0.048). Open field spinach produce demonstrated significant changes in its phyllosphere from days 0&#x2013;9, 2&#x2013;9, and 5&#x2013;9 (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.014&#x2013;0.030). Finally, polytunnel spinach exhibited the most significant changes in its phyllosphere community over time, that is, days 0&#x2013;5, 0&#x2013;7, 0&#x2013;9, 2&#x2013;7, 2&#x2013;9, 5&#x2013;7, and 5&#x2013;9 (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.019&#x2013;0.041). Correcting the <italic>p</italic>-value significance threshold with Benjamini&#x2013;Hochberg correction changed the outcome of only two statistical tests to non-significant, that is, polytunnel spinach produce from days 0&#x2013;7 and polytunnel rocket produce from days 7&#x2013;9. Overall, these findings demonstrate that bacterial phyllosphere communities change substantially during the storage period, even if they do not significantly change at each sampling time.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>3.1.3</label>
<title>Influence of cultivation method (polytunnel and open field) and plant species (spinach and rocket) on phyla and family relative abundances of a <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> inoculated phyllosphere</title>
<p>For all four groups, the three most abundant phyla were <italic>Pseudomonadota</italic>, <italic>Actinomycetota</italic>, and <italic>Bacteroidota</italic>, which comprised 89.64&#x2013;94.82% of the phyllosphere bacterial communities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Over time, the total abundance of these three most abundant phyla ranged for (i) open field rocket from 88.96 to 94.44%, (ii) open field spinach from 92.28 to 96.15%, (iii) polytunnel rocket from 87.71 to 95.02%, and (iv) for polytunnel spinach from 88.21 to 91.26% of total phyla. At the phylum level, cultivation methods appeared to be a more influential determinant of relative bacterial community structure compared to plant species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean relative abundances (%) of the three most abundant phyla of the 16S gene of the open field rocket Buzz, open field spinach F1 Trumpet, polytunnel rocket Buzz, and polytunnel spinach F1 Trumpet groups, with rarefaction applied. All remaining lower abundant phyla are combined in &#x201C;Other.&#x201D; A&#x2013;C indicate significant differences between groups.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1516740-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>A total of 35 families common to all four groups were detected, albeit with some significant differences across groups and low relative abundances (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S6</xref>). Out of the 20 most abundant families of each group, 12 were shared by all four groups with substantially higher relative abundances. Open field rocket and polytunnel rocket produce shared 14 of their 20 most abundant families, four of which were significantly different in relative abundance. Open field rocket and open field spinach produce shared 16 families of their 20 most abundant, eight of which had significantly different relative abundances between the two groups. Open field spinach and polytunnel spinach produce had 16 families of their most abundant 20 in common, nine of which were significantly different. Polytunnel rocket and polytunnel spinach shared 16 out of 20 most abundant families, seven of which were significantly different (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). Of the 15 families that showed differences in relative abundance, eight appeared to group by cultivation type (polytunnel and open field), while only four grouped by plant species. However, when total heterotrophic counts were used to estimate total abundances, the higher total abundance of bacteria in the spinach phyllospheres (open field and polytunnel) resulted in all but one family grouping according to plant species (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S7</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Average relative abundance &#x00B1; the standard error of families present different relative abundances in the phyllosphere of the open field vs. polytunnel and rocket vs. spinach with rarefaction applied. Letters a-c indicate significant differences.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Family</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Rocket</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Spinach</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Rocket</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Spinach</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Open fields</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Open fields</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Polytunnel</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Polytunnel</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Hymenobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.08&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.67<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.05&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.76<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.93&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.32<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.48&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.09<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Rhizobiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.53&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.39<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.96&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.24<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.07&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.39<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.76&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.32<sup>ab</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Sphingobacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.78&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.37<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.26&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.93<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.39&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.47<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.82&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.60<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Microbacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.48&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.33<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.01&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.51<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.37&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.41<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.83&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.60<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.28&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.29<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.79&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.16<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.20&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.21<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.46&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.05<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Caulobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.54&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.05<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.81&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.10<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.79&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.25<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.51&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.30<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Xanthomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.04&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.14<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.65&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.28<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.61&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.37<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.39&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.13<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Nocardiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.85&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.46<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.76&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.00<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.26&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.74<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.11&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.53<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Sphingomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.32&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.65<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.63&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.98<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.77&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.15<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.63&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.48<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Comamonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.75&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.33<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.47&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.13<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.96&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.19<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.83&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.13<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Beijerinckiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.89&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.66<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.67&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.05<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.84&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.91<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.87&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.45<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Micrococcaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.78&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.12<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.45&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.05<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.95&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.56<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.47&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.12<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Nocardioidaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.85&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.18<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.72&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.10<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.71&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.62<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.90&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.14<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Oxalobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.90&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.22<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.94&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.31<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.01&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.15<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.33&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.17<sup>ac</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Exiguobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.52&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.11<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.94&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.28<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.26&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.58<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.68&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.46<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Families listed are present with greater than 2% relative abundance in at least one of the four groups.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Average absolute abundance (log 10, sequence data linked to total cfu counts) of the 20 most abundant families with significantly different abundances in the phyllosphere of the open field vs. polytunnel and rocket vs. spinach with rarefaction applied. Letters a-c indicate significant differences.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Family</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="1">Rocket</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="1">Spinach</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Open fields</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Polytunnel</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Open fields</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Polytunnel</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.42<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.97<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">7.08<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">7.12<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Sphingomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.10<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.44<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">7.12<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.80<sup>bc</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Nocardiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.83<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.70<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.70<sup>bc</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">7.04<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.60<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.10<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.76<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">7.01<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Microbacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.77<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.28<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.80<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.97<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Sphingobacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.54<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.09<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.81<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.78<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Beijerinckiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.05ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.68<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.77<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.51<sup>bc</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Weeksellaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.37<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.10<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.60<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.49<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Rhizobiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.78<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.43<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.43<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.54<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Paenibacillaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">4.40<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">4.17<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.39<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.55<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Caulobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">4.55<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">4.97<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.86<sup>bc</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.64<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Exiguobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">4.53<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.07<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.85<sup>bc</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.61<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Xanthomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.00<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">4.88<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.38<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.20<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Nocardioidaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.28<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.33<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.81<sup>bc</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.48<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Hymenobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.59<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">4.58<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.51<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.57<sup>bc</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Oxalobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.15<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">4.41<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.41<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.98<sup>bc</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Flavobacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.21<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">4.92<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.30<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.99<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Micrococcaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.13<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.48<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.58<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.18<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Comamonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.26<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">4.78<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.11<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.85<sup>bc</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Moraxellaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">4.28<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.72<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.21<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">6.02<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Overall, <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations for all four groups showed common negative correlations with families <italic>Sphingomonadaceae</italic> and <italic>Beijerinckiaceae</italic> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S8&#x2013;S11</xref>). Similarly, only two common positive correlations were identified, namely, <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> and <italic>Xanthomonadaceae</italic>, between all four groups<italic>. L. monocytogenes</italic> populations of open field rocket had a strong positive correlation with three families, whereas a strong to very strong negative correlation was identified with seven families. <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations of polytunnel rocket had a strong positive correlation with five families, and a strong to very strong negative correlation was revealed with seven families. For open field spinach <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations showed a strong to very strong correlation with six families, while strong to very strong negative correlations were identified with only three. Finally, <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations in polytunnel spinach showed a strong positive correlation with four families, and a strong to very strong negative correlation was identified among six families (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Average relative abundance (%&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;standard error) of families (16S ribosomal DNA [rDNA]) of open field, polytunnel, spinach and rocket across days 0, 2, 5, 7, and 9 rarefied with strong or very strong Pearson&#x2019;s correlation coefficient (i.e., the strength and direction of the relationship between that specific family&#x2019;s relative abundances and the corresponding <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> populations over time). Letters a-c indicate significant differences between the groups.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">Day 0</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Day 2</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Day 5</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Day 7</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Day 9</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Pearson&#x2019;s correlation</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="7">Open field rocket</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Sphingomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.94&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.93<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.43&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.26<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.01&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.71<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.06&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.87<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.14&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.59<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.87, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Beijerinckiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.41&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.28<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.25&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.60<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15.03&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.95<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.19&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.08<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.56&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.76<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.73, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.04&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.57<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.01&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.84<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.45&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.58<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.35&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.99<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">29.11&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;6.81<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.80, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Nocardiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.24&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.59<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.36&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.23<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.57&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.54<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.16&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.35<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.93&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.27<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.79, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Rhizobiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.94&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.45<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.47&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.84<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.23&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.70<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.04&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.91<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.95&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.37<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.73, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Hymenobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.06&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.80<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.59&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.39<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.77&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.37<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.16&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.66<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.84&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.47<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.93, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Comamonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.55&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.79<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.16&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.89<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.42&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.46<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.25&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.37<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.35&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.25<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.81, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Oxalobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.64&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.14<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.78&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.27<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.05&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.70<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.99&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.57<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.05&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.37<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.78, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Chthoniobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.17&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.40<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.06&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.26<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.68&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.64<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.35&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.64<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.86&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.47<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.75, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Xanthobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.19&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.25<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.76&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.12<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.93&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.36<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.61&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.27<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.43&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.16<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.92, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="7">Polytunnel rocket</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Sphingomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.03&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.85<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.47&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.66<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.75&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.98<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.63&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.33<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.96&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.13<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.97, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Beijerinckiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.83&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.09<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.69&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.68<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.73&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.37<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.44&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.87<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.49&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.22<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.93, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.46&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.49<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.12&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.73<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.57&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.76<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.12&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.67<sup>bc</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20.91&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.54<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.78, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Microbacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.82&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.91<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.24&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.36<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.97&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.67<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.22&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.44<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.62&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.17<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.99, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Rhizobiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.09&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.15<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.87&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.45<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.68&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.65<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.85&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.80<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.84&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.22<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.88, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Sphingobacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.32&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.14<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.77&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.24<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.99&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.30<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.66&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.03<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.22&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.03<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.70, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.91&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.61<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.81&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.42<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.95&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.32<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.60&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.57<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.75&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.41<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.85, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Nocardioidaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.24&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.78<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.49&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.77<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.58&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.06<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.86&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.87<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.40&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.35<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.71, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Hymenobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.61&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.57<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.37&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.54<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.91&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.48<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.47&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.81<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.31&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.12<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.81, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Moraxellaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.39&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.49<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.42&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.64<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.79&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.49<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.27&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.48<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.73&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.25<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.75, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Caulobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.93&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.36<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.86&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.77<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.73&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.35<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.83&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.41<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.57&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.20<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.84, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Rhodobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.91&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.19<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.21&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.61<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.80&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.47<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.47&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.23<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.41&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.16<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.74, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="7">Open field spinach</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Sphingomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19.87&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.27<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17.07&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.08<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.97&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.06<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.57&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.71<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.67&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.08<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.93, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Beijerinckiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.64&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.03<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.12&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.48<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.97&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.37<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.47&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.18<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.14&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.54<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.81, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Sphingobacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.96&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.21<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.73&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.57<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.78&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.72<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.04&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.66<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.80&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.31<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.99, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weeksellaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.88&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.11<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.99&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.66<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.85&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.91<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.72&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.81<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.11&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.63<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.88, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Xanthomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.04&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.54<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.60&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.98<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.20&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.58<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.04&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.46<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.37&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.57<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.88, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Unknown family</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">1.10&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.36<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">1.74&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.57<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">2.86&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.55<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">5.39&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.73<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">5.68&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.05<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">+0.94, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(<italic>Enterobacterales</italic> order)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Hymenobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.15&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.88<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.61&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.38<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.22&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.66<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.13&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.66<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.11&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.84<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.86, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Flavobacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.08&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.03<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.22&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.07<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.34&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.26<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.74&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.53<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.52&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.03<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.97, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Oxalobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.69&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.51<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.18&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.66<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.89&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.60<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.61&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.70<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.34&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.82<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.84, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="7">Polytunnel spinach</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Sphingomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.74&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.61<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.20&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.79<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.59&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.91<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.65&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.71<sup>bc</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.98&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.77<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.63, moderate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Beijerinckiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.52&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.43<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.21&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.15<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.33&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.63<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.76&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.66<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.50&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.24<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.98, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.19&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.56<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.09&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.71<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.31&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.88<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15.72&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.93<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.67&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.23<sup>bc</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.83, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Microbacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.41&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.66<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.50&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.03<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.68&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.33<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.93&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.68<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.64&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.29<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.77, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.88&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.25<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.97&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.03<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.43&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.44<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.73&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.12<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13.29&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.39<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+0.87, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Weeksellaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.01&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.72<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.05&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.72<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.14&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.50<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.07&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.91<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.31&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.47<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.00, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Unknown family</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">0.52&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.24<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">0.57&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.15<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">2.44&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.77<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">6.76&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.40<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">8.08&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.89<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">+0.83, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">(<italic>Enterobacterales</italic> order)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Oxalobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.37&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.20<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.80&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.20<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.16&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.08<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.69&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.15<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.69&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.15<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.96, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Exiguobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.90&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.86<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.91&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.11<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.43&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.35<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.06&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.72<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.11&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.15<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.90, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Rhodobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.46&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.66<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.06&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.23<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.76&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.24<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.63&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.15<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.56&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.22<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.88, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Sanguibacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.97&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.09<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.94&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.11<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.62&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.19<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.49&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.22<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.01&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.31<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+0.89, strong</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p><italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content was not significantly different between all four groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.277&#x2013;0.849). On average, open field spinach displayed the highest average <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content, that is, 13.42%, followed by open field rocket 12.79%, polytunnel rocket 10.44%, and, finally, polytunnel spinach 9.60% (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S8&#x2013;S11</xref>). Therefore, open field spinach, which displayed the highest growth potential of 2.59 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> was associated with the highest average <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content, compared to spinach grown in a polytunnel setting, which displayed only 1.40 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. Relative abundance of <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content was compared for all four groups across the five different time points: At day 0, open fields spinach and open field rocket were significantly different (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001) and open field spinach and polytunnel spinach were significantly different (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001), remaining comparisons were not significantly different (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.154&#x2013;0.995). However, at days 2, 5, 7, and 9, no groups were significantly different from one another (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.448&#x2013;0.896, 0.161&#x2013;0.984, 0.999, and 0.252&#x2013;0.748). From days 7&#x2013;9, <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content increased for open field rocket from 13.35 to 29.11% and polytunnel rocket from 14.12 to 20.91% (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S8&#x2013;S11</xref>). Open field spinach showed a moderate correlation (+0.66) between <italic>L. monocytogenes and Pseudomonadaceae</italic> compared to the strong positive correlation in polytunnel spinach. Similarly, open field and polytunnel rocket were strongly positively correlated between the two taxa (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S8&#x2013;S11</xref>).</p>
<p>Relative <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> content (of which genus <italic>Dickeya</italic> was the sole genus) of polytunnel spinach produce displayed an increasing trend in relative abundance (3.9&#x2013;13.3%) and strong positive correlation with <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations from days 0&#x2013;9 compared to open field spinach produce which displayed a decreasing trend (12.6&#x2013;5.6%) and a moderate negative correlation with <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> for the same period. The <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> content remained consistently lower for rocket than for spinach. Moreover, the content of <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> was positively correlated with <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> in polytunnel rocket, which had a higher <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potential than open field rocket. Indeed, <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> content of open field rocket correlated moderately negatively with decreasing <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations (4.4&#x2013;4.1%, <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S7&#x2013;S10</xref>).</p>
<p>Polytunnel spinach retained the largest relative content of <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> (order level) (0.31%), followed by open field spinach (0.20%), open field rocket (0.16%), and, finally, polytunnel rocket (0.04%). Only the <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> content of open fields rocket vs. polytunnel rocket and polytunnel spinach vs. polytunnel rocket were significantly different (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.019 and 0.027). Moreover, over time, significant differences were observed only at day 2, where the following comparisons were significantly different (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.007, 0.019, and 0.019): open field rocket and polytunnel rocket; open field rocket and polytunnel spinach; and polytunnel rocket and open field spinach are significantly different. The relative abundance of <italic>Carnobacteriaceae</italic> (family of <italic>Lactobacillales</italic>) was significantly different between open field rocket and polytunnel spinach, as well as open field spinach and polytunnel spinach (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.037 and 0.001), while all remaining group comparisons were not significantly different (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.101&#x2013;0.582). The <italic>Carnobacteriaceae</italic> content was on average 0.26% for polytunnel spinach, but was not at all present in open field spinach. On polytunnel and open field rocket, the relative abundance of <italic>Carnobacteriaceae</italic> was on average 0.01 and 0.02%, respectively.</p>
<p>Although detected and enumerated on <italic>Listeria</italic> selective agar, the <italic>Listeria</italic> genus, belonging to the <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> order, was not detected using NGS on open field spinach or open field rocket produce and was detected on only two of 20 samples belonging to polytunnel rocket produce, and in only one of 20 samples belonging to polytunnel spinach produce.</p>
<p>Overall, the majority of bacterial phyla and families were detected on spinach and rocket in both open fields and polytunnels. However, specific taxa and their change in abundance over time could be correlated with <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Comparison 2 (variety vs. species)</title>
<p>This section describes how their plant hosts shaped alpha and beta diversities at different taxonomic levels, that is, order (Caryophyllales for spinach, Brassicales for rocket and kale, referred here as species) vs. variety (Trumpet and Cello for spinach, Buzz and Esmee for rocket) and how diversity evolved during storage. The primary assumption was that both plant species and variety affect alpha and beta diversities. In turn, differently developing phyllosphere communities were expected to affect <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth over time, as well as the succession of the phyllosphere community over time.</p>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>3.2.1</label>
<title>Influence of spinach and rocket cultivars as well as kale on alpha diversity of a <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> inoculated phyllosphere</title>
<p>Rocket Buzz demonstrated the highest richness and diversity, followed by spinach F1 Trumpet, rocket Esmee, spinach F1 Cello, and, finally, kale Nero di Toscana (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S12</xref>). On average, observed features were all significantly different, with kale being the lowest, while rocket Buzz was the highest at day 5. For Faith&#x2019;s Phylogenetic Diversity, kale Nero di Toscana and spinach F1 Cello were statistically similar; and spinach F1 Trumpet and rocket Esmee were statistically identical (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05). Only spinach F1 Trumpet and rocket Buzz had a significantly higher Shannon index than the remaining leafy vegetables. Spinach F1 Trumpet and rocket Buzz displayed the highest evenness (Pielou&#x2019;s) that was substantially higher than for rocket Esmee, spinach F1 Cello, and kale Nero di Toscana.</p>
<p>Indeed, kale Nero di Toscana, with the lowest diversity, was associated with increased <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> (growth potential&#x202F;=&#x202F;2.56 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), and spinach F1 Cello, with the second-lowest diversity measurements, was associated with the second-highest growth potential, that is, 1.84 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. In contrast, the higher diversity groups spinach F1 Trumpet, rocket Esmee, and rocket Buzz were associated with lower growth potentials of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> (i.e., 1.23&#x2013;1.45 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>). Few significant differences were observed over time for alpha diversity metrics, which were limited to rocket Buzz for Shannon diversity (significantly highest on days 5 and 7) and Pielou&#x2019;s evenness (significantly highest at day 5) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S12</xref>).</p>
<p>The primary observation in this section is that differences in bacterial alpha diversity are related to plant taxonomic relatedness. These, in turn, may limit the growth and potential of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> when diversity is high.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3.2.2</label>
<title>Influence of spinach and rocket cultivars and kale on beta diversity of a <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> inoculated phyllosphere</title>
<p>Based on the PCoA bi-plot, rocket Esmee was more separated on axis two from all other groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Moreover, spinach F1 Cello and spinach F1 Trumpet partially overlapped, while spinach Trumpet also partially overlapped with rocket Buzz. However, significant differences were identified among all bacterial communities (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.002&#x2013;0.036), indicating that bacterial community structures are determined down to the plant variety level. When rocket and spinach varieties were grouped together, respectively, kale and rocket as well as kale and spinach were no longer significantly different (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.140 and 0.059, respectively). However, spinach and rocket remained significantly different (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.003). Adjusting the <italic>p</italic>-value significance threshold with Benjamini&#x2013;Hochberg correction did not influence the outcome of the PERMANOVA tests. Comparisons within a vegetable variety over time were compromised for kale Nero di Toscana and rocket Esmee due to low sequence reads on days one to seven and day one, respectively.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Two-dimensional Emperor (PCoA) plots showing beta diversity distances, that is, weighted UniFrac, among the different samples across polytunnel produce: rocket Esmee (orange), spinach F1 Cello (blue), kale Nero di Toscana (green), rocket Buzz (red) and spinach F1 Trumpet (purple) with rarefaction applied. Shapes revealed separations over time where day 0&#x202F;=&#x202F;circle, day 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;square, day 5&#x202F;=&#x202F;star, day 7&#x202F;=&#x202F;ring, and day 9&#x202F;=&#x202F;diamond. 16 and 7 samples with low bacterial reads were removed for kale Nero di Toscana and rocket Esmee, respectively. Letters (A-E) indicate significant differences.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1516740-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.2.3</label>
<title>Influence of spinach and rocket cultivars and kale on phyla and family relative abundances of a <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> inoculated phyllosphere</title>
<p>For all five groups, the four most abundant phyla were <italic>Pseudomonadota</italic>, <italic>Actinobacteriota</italic>, <italic>Bacteroidota</italic>, and <italic>Bacillota</italic>, which comprised 95.61&#x2013;99.58% of the phyllosphere bacterial communities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Over time, the total abundance of these four most abundant phyla remained consistent across all five groups, ranging from 93.15 to 99.92%.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean relative abundances (%) of the four most abundant phyla of the 16S gene of the polytunnel produce: rocket Esmee, spinach F1 Cello, kale Nero di Toscana, rocket Buzz, and spinach F1 Trumpet, with rarefaction applied. All remaining lower abundant phyla are combined in &#x201C;Other,&#x201D; Letters A to C indicate significant differences between groups.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1516740-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>At the family level, 32 were common to all 5 groups, and their relative abundance was overall significantly affected by the leafy vegetable (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S13</xref>). Of the 20 most abundant families, 11, 3, 8, and 0 families showed significant changes in relative abundance over time for spinach F1 Trumpet, spinach F1 Cello, rocket Buzz, and rocket Esmee, respectively (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S14&#x2013;S17</xref>).</p>
<p>Spinach F1 Cello and Trumpet shared 17 out of the 20 most abundant families, whereas rocket varieties Esmee and Buzz only shared 14 families, of which the relative abundances of 10 were significantly different (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). Since only four (days 7 and 9) kale samples were obtained with a sufficient number of reads for analysis, comparisons at the family level for kale were avoided.</p>
<p>Overall, <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations for both spinach and rocket varieties exhibited only one common negative correlation with the <italic>Sphingomonadaceae</italic> and one common positive correlation with the <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S14&#x2013;S17</xref>)<italic>. L. monocytogenes</italic> populations in spinach F1 Trumpet showed a strong positive correlation with <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic>, while a strong to very strong negative correlation was identified with six other families (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>). <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations of spinach F1 Cello had a strong and very strong positive correlation with <italic>Flavobacteriaceae</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic>, respectively, whereas a strong negative correlation was identified with four families. <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations of rocket Buzz had a strong positive correlation with five families and a strong to very strong negative correlation with seven families. For rocket Esmee, a strong positive correlation with families <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> and <italic>Xanthomonadaceae</italic> and a strong to very strong negative correlation was observed with eight families (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S14&#x2013;S17</xref>).</p>
<p>Spinach F1 Cello had an average higher, although not significant, <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content (19.0%) compared to spinach F1 Trumpet (9.6%). Rocket Esmee had a significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) higher average <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content (28.1%) compared to rocket Buzz (10.8%). However, at the genus level, absolute numbers (based on total heterotrophic counts) of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. are only clearly higher at days 2, 5, and 7 in variety Esmee when compared to Buzz (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S18</xref>). For both spinach varieties and rocket Buzz, <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content appeared to drastically and significantly increase (3.3&#x2013;5.5-fold) over time. <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> content (genus <italic>Dickeya</italic>) of polytunnel spinach F1 Trumpet produce displayed an increasing trend in relative abundance from days 0&#x2013;9 (3.8&#x2013;13.6%) compared to spinach F1 Cello produce, which displayed a decreasing trend (28.5&#x2013;6.4%) for the same period. Moreover, the <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> content (genus <italic>Dickeya</italic>) of polytunnel rocket Buzz from days 0&#x2013;9 remained consistent (1.9&#x2013;2.6%), whereas it increased substantially on rocket Esmee from 1.0 to 6.9%. Spinach F1 Cello had a <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> (order level) content of 0.03% compared to 0.35% for spinach F1 Trumpet. The <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> content of rocket Esmee and rocket Buzz was similar to F1 Cello (0.01 and 0.06%). The average <italic>Carnobacteriaceae</italic> content of spinach F1 Cello (<italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potential&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.84 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) was 0.03% and significantly different compared to 0.26% (0.69 and 0.33% at days 7 and 9, respectively) for spinach F1 Trumpet (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.048). The <italic>Carnobacteriaceae</italic> content of the remaining groups ranged from 0.00 to 0.01%. <italic>Listeria</italic> (genus) content was only 0.01% for rocket Esmee and spinach F1 Cello, and not detected in rocket Buzz or spinach F1 Trumpet. When samples with a low number of reads were included in the analysis, <italic>Listeria</italic> was identified in 14 out of all 20 kale Nero di Toscana samples. In stark contrast, <italic>Listeria</italic> was detected in two of 20 samples in rocket Esmee (0.05 and 0.01%), spinach F1 Cello (0.04 and 0.07%), and rocket Buzz (both 0.01%), and in only one of 20 samples belonging to spinach F1 Trumpet (0.02%). Bacillaceae showed a strong negative correlation with <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth in rocket Esmee, but not in Buzz or both spinach varieties. However, differences between Esmee and Buzz were also present at the genus level of Bacillaceae, with <italic>Bacillus</italic> sp. about four-fold higher in Esmee on days 2, 5, and 7 than in Buzz (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S18</xref>).</p>
<p>Similarly to findings at 3.1.3, the majority of bacterial phyla and families were detected on spinach, rocket, and kale. Similarly, specific taxa and their change in abundance over time appear to be correlated with <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Comparison 3 (seasonality)</title>
<p>This section describes how alpha and beta diversities were shaped by seasonality (winter and summer) in spinach Trumpet and how diversities evolved during storage. The primary assumption was that winter vs. summer production affects alpha and beta diversities. In turn, differently developing phyllosphere communities were expected to affect <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth over time, as well as the succession of the phyllosphere community over time.</p>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>3.3.1</label>
<title>Influence of time of harvest on alpha diversity of a <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> inoculated spinach phyllosphere</title>
<p>All alpha diversity metrics did not significantly change over time (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05). The number of observed features (ASVs) from summer produce (295&#x2013;351) and winter produce (308&#x2013;336) was statistically similar. The same findings were observed for Faith&#x2019;s Phylogenetic Diversity (18.1&#x2013;24.9). In contrast, the Shannon index was on average significantly greater for winter produce (6.2&#x2013;6.8, <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potential&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.65 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), compared to summer produce (5.8&#x2013;6.4, <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potential&#x202F;=&#x202F;2.59 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>). However, these values did not change significantly over time (days 0&#x2013;9) for either group (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05). Evenness was also considerably higher for winter produce (0.74&#x2013;0.81) compared to summer produce (0.72&#x2013;0.77). Compared to comparisons 1 and 3, here the changes of winter to summer produce had a less pronounced effect on alpha diversity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>3.3.2</label>
<title>Influence of growing season on beta diversity of a <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> inoculated spinach phyllosphere</title>
<p>Based on the PCoA plot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>), separations were visually identified between winter and summer groups over time, evident between all data points, as confirmed by PERMAMOVA (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.001). Adjusting the <italic>p</italic>-value significance threshold with Benjamini&#x2013;Hochberg correction did not alter any significances. Separations for each day 0, 2, 5, 7, and 9 (summer vs. winter) were significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.026&#x2013;0.048). A visual separation according to time point within winter and summer produce was also clearly visible (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). For summer produce, statistically significant separations were observed over time for days 0&#x2013;9, 2&#x2013;9, and 5&#x2013;9 (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.022&#x2013;0.032). For winter produce separations days (0&#x2013;9, 2&#x2013;9, 0&#x2013;7, and 2&#x2013;7) were significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.026&#x2013;0.034). However, after applying Benjamini&#x2013;Hochberg correction, none of these results remained significantly different. Overall, when compared to alpha diversity, the beta diversity was affected by seasonality.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Two-dimensional Emperor (PCoA) plots showing beta diversity distances, that is, weighted UniFrac, among the different samples across open field spinach: winter (blue) and summer (red) produce, with rarefaction applied. Shapes revealed separations over time where day 0&#x202F;=&#x202F;circle, day 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;square, day 5&#x202F;=&#x202F;star, day 7&#x202F;=&#x202F;ring, and day 9&#x202F;=&#x202F;diamond. A and B indicate significant differences.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-16-1516740-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>3.3.3</label>
<title>Influence of time of harvest on phyla and family relative abundance of a <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> inoculated spinach phyllosphere</title>
<p>For Winter and Summer produce, the most abundant four phyla were <italic>Pseudomonadota</italic>, <italic>Actinobacteriota</italic>, <italic>Bacteroidota</italic>, and <italic>Bacillota</italic>, which comprised 98.94 and 98.86% of the phyllosphere bacterial communities (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). The only significant difference between summer and winter produce at the phylum level was that the <italic>Bacillota</italic> were significantly more abundant in the summer produce (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). Over time (days 0&#x2013;9), the total abundance of these four most abundant phyla remained consistent for both groups, ranging from 98.50 to 99.62%.</p>
<p>Winter and summer produce shared 31 families (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S19</xref>). However, 20 of those families had significantly different relative abundances between groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). A total of 17 of the most abundant 20 families were shared between both groups, of which eight had significantly different relative abundances, that is, order <italic>Enterobacterales</italic> (family unknown), <italic>Sphingomonadaceae</italic>, <italic>Oxalobacteraceae</italic>, <italic>Rhizobiaceae</italic>, <italic>Caulobacteraceae</italic>, <italic>Nocardioidaceae</italic>, <italic>Rhodanobacteraceae</italic>, and <italic>Nocardiaceae</italic>.</p>
<p>ANCOM revealed 11 differentially abundant families, that is, <italic>Paenibacillaceae</italic>, order <italic>Saccharimonadales</italic> family Unknown, <italic>Myxococcaceae</italic>, <italic>Phormidiaceae</italic>, <italic>Deinococcaceae</italic>, <italic>Rhodobacteraceae</italic>, <italic>Spirosomaceae</italic>, <italic>Moraxellaceae</italic>, <italic>Rhodanobacteraceae</italic>, <italic>Hymenobacteraceae</italic>, and <italic>Nocardioidaceae</italic>, between winter and summer. <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content was not significantly different between the summer and winter produce (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.905) or across all time points from days 0&#x2013;9 (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.075, 0.149, 0.255, 0.051, and 0.527). Similarly, <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> (order level) content was not significantly different between the summer and winter produce (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.322) or across days 0&#x2013;9 (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.387, 0.638, 0.773, 0.767, and 0.314). Although <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> relative abundance was less than 1% for all produce, <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> content was on average higher for winter produce (0.34%), compared to summer produce (0.20%). The relative abundance of <italic>Lactobacillales</italic>, that is, <italic>Lactococcus</italic> genus, remained consistent throughout for winter produce, but for summer produce dropped from 0.52 to 0.22 to 0.03% from days 5&#x2013;9, coinciding with increases in <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth, such levels of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth which were not observed on winter produce. Moreover, in contrast to polytunnel spinach produce (Comparisons 1 and 2), <italic>Carnobacteriaceae</italic> was not present on open field spinach produce from summer or winter produce (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S19</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations for the summer and winter groups showed five common negative correlations with the families <italic>Sphingomonadaceae</italic>, <italic>Microbacteriaceae</italic>, <italic>Beijerinckiaceae</italic>, <italic>Nocardiaceae</italic>, and <italic>Nocardioidaceae.</italic> Seven common positive correlations were identified with families <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic>, <italic>Sphingobacteriaceae</italic>, <italic>Weeksellaceae</italic>, an unknown family (<italic>Enterobacterales</italic> order), <italic>Rhizobiaceae</italic>, <italic>Oxalobacteraceae</italic>, and <italic>Xanthomonadaceae</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S20, S21</xref>). <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations of winter produce had a strong to very strong positive correlation with six families and a strong to very strong negative correlation with five families. <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations in summer produce showed a strong to very strong positive correlation with six families and a strong to very strong negative correlation with four families (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table 5</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S20, S21</xref>). Similar to findings at 3.1.3 and 3.2.3, the majority of bacterial phyla and families were detected on spinach summer and winter produce. Again, specific taxa and their change in abundance over time appear to be correlated with <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth. Although detected and enumerated on <italic>Listeria</italic> selective agar, the <italic>Listeria</italic> genus, belonging to the <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> order, was not detected using NGS on either winter or summer open field spinach produce (F1 Trumpet variety).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Average relative abundance (%&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;standard errors) of families (16S rDNA) of the summer open field spinach variety F1 Trumpet produce across days 0, 2, 5, 7, and 9 rarefied with strong to very strong Pearson&#x2019;s correlation coefficient (i.e., the strength and direction of the relationship between that specific family&#x2019;s relative abundances and the corresponding <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> populations over time). Letters a&#x2013;d indicate significant differences.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">Day 0</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Day 2</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Day 5</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Day 7</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Day 9</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Pearson&#x2019;s correlation</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="7">Winter produce</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Sphingomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.33&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.57<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.64&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.30<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.87&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.84<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.29&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.73<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.98&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.32<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.93, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.35&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.10<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.86&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.20<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.03&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.61<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19.28&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.00<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19.01&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.05<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.89, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Microbacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.77&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.13<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.38&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.62<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.09&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.42<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.47&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.67<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.80&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.56<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.82, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Beijerinckiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20.05&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;5.25<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.57&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.30<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.45&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.09<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.82&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.51<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.04&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.13<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.93, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Sphingobacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.08&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.54<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.90&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.43<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.18&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.48<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.37&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.79<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.10&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.89<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.92, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Nocardiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.51&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.74<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.58&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.19<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.73&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.15<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.64&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.23<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.20&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.67<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.84, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Unknown family</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">1.56&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.71<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">4.07&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.06<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">5.31&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.54<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">9.03&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.53<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">6.61&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.47<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">+0.83, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(<italic>Enterobacterales</italic> order)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Rhizobiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.14&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.11<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.71&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.79<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.49&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.22<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.57&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.32<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.70&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.45<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.82, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Oxalobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.06&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.35<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.40&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.16<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.91&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.36<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.93&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.33<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.82&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.37<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.91, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Nocardioidaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.24&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.17<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.93&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.23<sup>ad</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.71&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.12<sup>acd</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.60&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.32<sup>bcd</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.28&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.24<sup>bc</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.93, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Rhodanobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.57&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.37<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.60&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.39<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.92&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.64<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.77&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.88<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.97&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.07<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.91, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="7">Summer produce</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Sphingomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19.71&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.10<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17.15&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.12<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.99&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.12<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.45&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.59<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.83&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.03<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.95, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Microbacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.27&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.42<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.01&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.98<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.37&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.41<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.31&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.12<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.25&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.19<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.71, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Beijerinckiaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.80&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.02<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.93&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.36<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.93&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.42<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.52&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.30<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.16&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.51<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.82, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Sphingobacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.09&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.23<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.62&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.55<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.80&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.75<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.06&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.64<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.70&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.35<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.99, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Weeksellaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.66&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.00<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.95&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.65<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.95&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.96<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.75&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.76<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.06&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.84<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.89, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Unknown family</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">1.13&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.38<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">1.69&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.57<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">3.00&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.56<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">5.56&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.70<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">5.56&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.82<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">+0.93, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(<italic>Enterobacterales</italic> order)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Oxalobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.59&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.46<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.15&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.61<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.72&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.55<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.70&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.78<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.19&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.71<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.88, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Xanthomonadaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.09&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.58<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.64&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.01<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.17&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.58<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.91&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.43<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.21&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.64<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.84, strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Flavobacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.07&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.01<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.19&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.06<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.32&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.31<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.71&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.49<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.50&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.12<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">+0.98, very strong</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Hymenobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.01&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.88<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.61&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.42<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.31&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.64<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.19&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.67<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.09&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.84<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.86, strong</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec21">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The purpose of this study was to describe the influence of leafy vegetable cultivation conditions (cultivation method, plant species, cultivar, and season of harvest) on the development of the phyllosphere bacteriome and the effect on epiphytic <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth.</p>
<sec id="sec22">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Effects of cultivation conditions (open field vs. polytunnel), plant species (spinach and rocket), and cultivars (varieties)</title>
<p>Previous research assessing the effect of nitrogen fertilizer and leaf mineral content revealed that plant species alone, like spinach and rocket, influence the development of the phyllosphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Darlison et al., 2019</xref>). However, the current study further revealed that the vegetable cultivation method had the strongest influence on the bacterial phyllosphere community structure. At the same time, plant species had a more pronounced effect on the overall abundance of phyllosphere bacteria. Here, polytunnel and open field cultivation of rocket and spinach displayed more similar phyllosphere bacterial communities compared to plant species alone. Additionally, the phyllosphere bacterial communities of various rocket and spinach cultivars were found to be significantly different in the present study. Previous research has identified the presence of microbe-plant variety interactions in field-grown lettuce. Dominated by <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> and <italic>Enterobacteriaceae</italic> families, a clone library of three lettuce cultivars revealed significant differences between the relative abundances of genera belonging to the <italic>Enterobacteriaceae</italic> family, including <italic>Erwinia</italic> and <italic>Enterobacter</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Hunter et al., 2010</xref>). While another study of the microbial diversity and structure of the phyllosphere of Alfalfa (<italic>Medicago sativa L.</italic>) identified significant effects of the season and the site where the plants were cultivated in open fields, no significant differences were detected between the two tested varieties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). While lettuce and alfalfa are bred for cultivation, and both plants are cultivated through a broad range of varieties, only lettuce is bred with the aim of human consumption of the leaves, as is the case for spinach and rocket. One may speculate that the breeding focus of lettuce, spinach, and rocket is primarily on the consumer experience of eating the leaves; thus, different varieties may differ more substantially in their leaf structure than this is the case for other plant varieties that are bred for livestock feeding.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec23">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Correlations between <italic>in situ</italic> phyllosphere taxa and inoculated <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth</title>
<p>A novel aspect of the present study was the identification of the presence or absence of bacteria, and their shifts in relative abundance, which may be of potential importance to the <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth. For example, <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic>, which are of high abundance and are associated with the hydrolysis of proteins into amino acids, can induce the stimulation of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Marshall et al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref79">Zilelidou and Skandamis, 2018</xref>). Contrariwise, <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> that were present in low abundance are commonly associated with decreased <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> survival due to their competitive growth abilities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">&#x00D8;stergaard et al., 2014</xref>). Indeed, the <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth-enhancing <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> species has previously been associated with spinach leaves of neutral pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Babic et al., 1996</xref>). Additionally, as <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> species are pectolytic, their presence is positively correlated with the degradation and spoilage of such leafy vegetables, which increases during storage, as observed in the present study. Exposure to solar active radiation influenced the relative abundance of the <italic>Betaproteobacteria</italic> and <italic>Gammaproteobacteria</italic>, which is the class level of the <italic>Pseudomonadales</italic> order (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Truchado et al., 2017</xref>). Relative abundances of <italic>Gammaproteobacteria</italic> were not significantly different with reductions in cumulative photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) from 4,889 to 3,602&#x202F;&#x03BC;mol&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, but were substantially higher when cumulative PAR was 3,115&#x202F;&#x03BC;mol&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. In the present study, the protection of spinach and rocket produce from PAR by cultivating in a polytunnel setting, compared to an open field, did not lead to significantly higher <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content.</p>
<p>In the present study, <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations of all groups were positively correlated with <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content. In particular, <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content appeared to be most important for <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth on spinach F1 Trumpet produce, especially from day 7 to 9. Relative increases from days 7&#x2013;9 for open field spinach produce were associated with <italic>L. monocytogenes&#x2019;</italic> most significant increase during the same period. Conversely, when <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content decreased from days 7&#x2013;9 for polytunnel spinach, the <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations remained stationary. Indeed, amino acids hydrolyzed from proteins by <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> are localized within the cellular tissue of leafy vegetables (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Koseki and Isobe, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Vacher et al., 2016</xref>). Open field spinach produce is likely exposed to more liquids on leaf surfaces due to wetter outdoor climatic conditions, potentially causing higher leaching of those nutrients for <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> utilization compared to polytunnel produce (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Tukey, 1970</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Comte et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Vacher et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Kyere et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref77">Zhu et al., 2022</xref>). Overall, spinach contained higher total abundances of <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> than rocket. The leaf physiology of rocket, that is, less surface area and fewer stomata (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Maylani et al., 2020</xref>) might have prevented the release of some nutrients, that is, amino acids (hydrolyzed protein) for <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> utilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Culliney and Schmalenberger, 2022</xref>), thus limiting the growth of bacteria more than this is the case for spinach. However, at the genus level, higher numbers of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. on Esmee than on Buzz do not seem to influence the growth potentials of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic>.</p>
<p>Moreover, a higher <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> content was associated with the lower <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potential compared to both rocket Buzz and spinach F1 Trumpet produce. A recent study of a mixed spinach salad containing chicken meat identified low levels of <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> content, consisting of only <italic>Carnobacteriaceae</italic> and <italic>Enterococcaceae</italic>, which increased from 0 to 1% at day 7 of storage at 15&#x00B0;C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">S&#x00F6;derqvist et al., 2017a</xref>). There, the authors did not detect any <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> on plain baby spinach. In another study, storage of romaine lettuce over 14&#x202F;days revealed a significant increase in <italic>Carnobacteriaceae</italic>&#x2019;s relative abundance from 1.93 to 52.26% and a non-significant increase in <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content from 13.38 to 21.20% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Dharmarha et al., 2019</xref>). Both bacteriocin-producing, for example, Divercin AS7 and non-bacteriocin-producing species of Carnobacteria, <italic>C. divergens</italic> and <italic>C. maltaromaticum</italic>, have been demonstrated to be effective <italic>in vitro</italic> at minimizing epithelial cell invasion caused by <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> Scott A (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Pilchov&#x00E1; et al., 2016</xref>) and <italic>Listeria</italic> spp. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Markovi&#x0107; et al., 2022</xref>). <italic>Carnobacteria piscicola LK5</italic> and <italic>2762</italic> strains suppressed the maximum population density reached by <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> in brain heart infusion broth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Buchanan and Bagi, 1997</xref>). However, little of the <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> maximum population density suppression was due to the strain&#x2019;s bacteriocin production. Those authors suggested that the suppression potential of the strain <italic>C. piscicola 2762</italic> was not caused by peroxide, pH depression, or oxygen depletion, but was caused by induced nutrient depletion. In the present study, <italic>Carnobacteriaceae</italic> were absent from open field spinach produce but present in significantly higher quantities on polytunnel spinach produce, particularly at days 7 and 9. This may have also inhibited the growth <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic>, leading to its lower growth potential. Moreover, spinach F1 Cello variety had no <italic>Carnobacteriaceae</italic> present, but significantly higher <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content (+9.43%) compared to spinach F1 Trumpet from the polytunnel setting. Thus, potentially explaining the higher growth potential of the spinach F1 Cello variety. However, albeit a higher <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content (+5.58%), polytunnel spinach F1 Cello may have caused less leaching of nutrients (hydrolyzed amino acids) due to being less exposed to rain and liquid on surface of the leaf, thus resulting in lower <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potential for spinach F1 Cello (1.84 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) compared to open field spinach F1 Trumpet (2.59 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec24">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Effect of cultivation conditions (open field, polytunnel, species, and variety) and bacterial taxa abundance on <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potential</title>
<p>In addition to <italic>Carnobacteriaceae</italic>, polytunnel spinach F1 Trumpet, which displayed a lower growth potential of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic>, showed an increasing trend in <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> content (genus <italic>Dickeya</italic>). In contrast, open field spinach, which was associated with a larger <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potential, exhibited a decreasing trend in <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> content (genus <italic>Dickeya</italic>). Additionally, polytunnel spinach F1 Cello, which had a decreasing trend of <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> content (genus <italic>Dickeya</italic>), was associated with a higher <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potential than polytunnel spinach F1 Trumpet. Similarly, rocket Esmee had an increasing trend in <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> content (genus <italic>Dickeya</italic>), whereas rocket Buzz, with a consistently lower <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> content (genus <italic>Dickeya</italic>), was associated with higher <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> colonization. <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> spp., in particular the genus <italic>Dickeya</italic>, is a necrotroph that is known to cause soft rot, where deterioration of vegetables occurs from the secretion of plant cell wall-degrading enzymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Bellieny-Rabelo et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Wasendorf et al., 2022</xref>). Additionally, <italic>Pectobacterium</italic> spp. are associated with a type VI secretion system, which also targets plant pathogens lacking cognate immunity proteins by secreting bactericidal effectors and further releasing low molecular weight bacteriocins, that is, carocin, pectocin, and carotovoricin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Shyntum et al., 2019</xref>). Moreover, <italic>Pectobacterium</italic>, <italic>Dickeya</italic>, and <italic>Serratia</italic> spp. produce the &#x03B2;-lactam antibiotic carbapenem (1-carbapen-2-em-3-carboxylic acid). However, leafy vegetable isolates of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp., which putatively influenced <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth on spinach in this study, have been found to possess antibiotic resistance genes toward &#x03B2;-lactam antibiotics such as meropenem and colistin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">Yin et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec25">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Factors that affect the <italic>L. monocytogenes in situ</italic> growth</title>
<p>In 2016, <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> was added to the <italic>Enterobacterales</italic> order. Prior to this, only a single <italic>Enterobacteraceae</italic> family existed for that order (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Adeolu et al., 2016</xref>). In the present study, an unknown family from the <italic>Enterobacterales</italic> order was identified, with a relative abundance ranging from 0.00 to 33.46%. While the current study has no particular information on this new taxonomic bacterial group, the <italic>Enterobacteraceae</italic> of the same order possess the ability to produce colicins and microcins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Rebuffat, 2011</xref>). Microcins have proven ineffective against <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic>, but colicins produced with the help of the ColE1 gene are highly effective as an anti-listerial agent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Markovi&#x0107; et al., 2022</xref>). <italic>Enterobacter</italic> spp., particularly <italic>Enterobacter cloacae</italic>, isolated from shredded iceberg lettuce, significantly reduced <italic>L. innocua</italic> colonization due to its nutritional competitiveness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Francis and O&#x2019;Beirne, 2002</xref>).</p>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Darlison et al. (2019)</xref> suggested that the influence of phyllosphere diversity on the proliferation of foodborne pathogens such as <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> should be determined. Indeed, the significantly higher alpha diversity (Shannon index) of produce essentially appears to be correlated with lower <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potentials in the current study. However, the more diverse polytunnel rocket Buzz variety had more <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth than the rocket Esmee variety. Indeed, higher and increasing <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> content of Esmee, compared to the consistently low <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic> content, may be responsible for the 0.22 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> difference between those two growth potentials.</p>
<p>In the current study, seasonality was a significant driver of phyllosphere development in spinach. Bacterial diversity of the phyllosphere of <italic>Typha latifolia</italic> plants was not meaningfully influenced by short-term perturbations in weather conditions, such as rain events, but somewhat affected by seasonal climatic conditions and leaf-associated changes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Stone and Jackson, 2020</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Darlison et al. (2019)</xref> suggested that annual variations resulting from varying weather conditions influenced phyllosphere communities of rocket and spinach. Although they could not rule out the effect of site-specific factors, as the produce was sampled in different parts of the same field over the 2&#x202F;years. The present study accounted for site-specific factors by cultivating from the same location within both field and polytunnel settings, and also observed that weather parameters significantly influenced the spinach phyllosphere. Recently, the spinach phyllosphere has also been shown to be substantially influenced by seasonality (PERMANOVA, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.003) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Ibekwe et al., 2021</xref>). An additional study revealed that the bacterial colonization of lettuce and rocket phyllosphere is also driven, at least in part, by seasonality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Dees et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec26">
<label>4.5</label>
<title>Effects of total abundances of phyllosphere bacteria across plant species</title>
<p>To date, no previous studies have described the kale phyllosphere. Nevertheless, the kale endosphere has been recently studied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">McNees et al., 2020</xref>). Across three different brands of store-purchased kale, Illumina sequencing of their endospheres revealed two common dominating Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) present were <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> and <italic>Enterobacteriaceae</italic>. In the present study, for kale, these, along with <italic>Micrococcaceae</italic> were also dominating families. Kale Nero di Toscana had the most similar content of <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> as spinach F1 Cello. Although it demonstrated higher <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth, due to the lower TBCs of kale (i.e., 2.80&#x2013;4.74 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and lower diversity, compared to rocket and spinach, less inhibition of the <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potentially occurs due to less competition for resources required for growth. Utilization of chloroplast-excluding protocols at the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) stage COMPETE (RInvT primer) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">McManamon et al., 2019</xref>) or BLOCK (pPNA clamp) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Fitzpatrick et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Culliney and Schmalenberger, 2024</xref>) as employed for open field spinach produce in a recent study, and would have been appropriate for rocket Esmee and kale Nero di Toscana. Their chloroplast-to-total DNA content was high, ranging from 58.00 to 97.30% (rocket Esmee) and 92.27 to 99.75% (kale Nero di Toscana), and thus could have prevented the exclusion of the 7 and 16 samples, respectively. Using the NGS approach, <italic>Listeria</italic> content was regularly detected on kale, but rarely occurred for rocket and spinach produce. The high TBCs of spinach and rocket may have contributed to this observation. Moreover, cultivation methods may not have detected cells that were at their viable but not-culturable (VBNC) stage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">M&#x00FC;ller and Ruppel, 2014</xref>). Thus, TBCs for all produce, including kale, may have been underestimated and, therefore, their total DNA content may have been associated with higher actual abundances. For example, a previous study used quantitative PCR (qPCR) and culturable techniques (TSA) to analyze lettuce samples from the same field and revealed that only 0.1&#x2013;8.4% of TBCs were culturable bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Rastogi et al., 2010</xref>). qPCR methods may be used in the future to enumerate TBC for this reason. However, qPCR-based quantifications may potentially overestimate bacterial population densities due to chloroplast co-amplification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Culliney and Schmalenberger, 2022</xref>) and multiple 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene copies per bacterial cell (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Schmalenberger et al., 2001</xref>); hence, cultivation-dependent and independent approaches have biases. Furthermore, primer selection for 16S rRNA gene-based amplicon sequencing may also be responsible for an additional due to primer mismatch, which appears to be the case for <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> 16S with the popular V3&#x2013;V4 primers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec27">
<label>4.6</label>
<title><italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> and <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> with putative contradicting effects on <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth</title>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Ibekwe et al. (2021)</xref> revealed that the four common dominating phyla <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>, <italic>Firmicutes</italic>, <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic>, and <italic>Actinobacteria</italic>, which comprised 66.35% of their phyllosphere, were significantly different from the overall abundance, ranging from 88.21 to 99.92% of those four main phyla for spinach in the present study. Additionally, their Pseudomonadaceae content (0.49&#x2013;11.5%) was, on average, lower than the <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content observed on spinach, rocket, and kale produce in this study. With an overall relative abundance of 35&#x2013;53%, Pseudomonas has been referred to as the most commonly occurring genus in the spinach and rocket phyllospheres, even after being harvested in different seasons (spring and autumn) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Rosberg et al., 2021</xref>). Upon closer inspection of the <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> family&#x2019;s relative abundances, potential seasonal effects exist, especially for spinach. However, in the current study, the relative abundances of winter and summer open field spinach did not show significant differences. However, there was still a large difference of 0.94 log<sub>10</sub> cfu g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> between their <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potentials. LAB are more commonly detected on leafy produce cultivated in spring and summer compared to autumn and winter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Caponigro et al., 2010</xref>); however, the opposite was true in the current study. With a relative abundance of less than 1%, <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> may have been responsible for the significant growth potential difference. The <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> decreased from 0.52 to 0.22 to 0.03% from days 5&#x2013;9 for summer produce, which was correlated with large increments in <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth, which did not occur when <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> remained constant and on average in higher relative abundance for winter produce. More specifically, winter produce with lower <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth had a significantly higher content of the <italic>Lactococcus</italic> genus (<italic>Streptococcaceae</italic> family; <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> order). Indeed, <italic>L. lactis</italic> subsp. <italic>lactis</italic> has been previously isolated from rocket leaves and is known as a bacteriocinogenic strain due to its ability to produce lantibiotic, which is an antimicrobial nisin variant that is highly effective as an anti-listerial agent on food products, including iceberg lettuce (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Franz et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Kruger et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Ho et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">McManamon et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Ho et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>The remainder of phyllosphere-associated bacteria, which showed positive and negative correlations with <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations identified in this study, did not appear to be potentially responsible for the conflicting epiphytic <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth on spinach or rocket leaves. Correlations were determined using Pearson&#x2019;s correlation, which is primarily used for linear relationships between two continuous variables, due to the normal distribution and increasing <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> populations over time. However, a recent study revealed that Pearson&#x2019;s can also be more efficient in testing a monotonic nonlinear relation compared to Spearman&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">van den Heuvel and Zhan, 2022</xref>). Future studies may use Spearman&#x2019;s correlation as it evaluates the monotonic relationship between two continuous variables (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Schober et al., 2018</xref>). Indeed, this approach is most often used for bacterial growth curves, which reach the stationary phase. In either case, such correlations must be interpreted with caution. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref76">Zhao et al. (2021)</xref> revealed that association means that one variable provides information about another, whereas correlation means that two variables show an increasing or decreasing trend. Therefore, correlation implies an association, but not causation. Additionally, due to the absence of absolute numbers upon sequencing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Gloor et al., 2017</xref>), comparing relative abundances could lead to inaccurate conclusions when comparing phyllosphere microbiome over time or when comparing different phyllosphere communities, for example, kale or spinach, which have considerably different absolute cfu data, as relative data reflect a different amount of absolute numbers. Future studies should conduct correlations between absolute cfu data, that is, total bacterial populations and relative abundances from NGS datasets that are converted into absolute values via an additional qPCR step.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec28">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study identified a link between leafy vegetable species, variety, and environmental growth conditions and the bacterial communities present on the leaf surface, that is, <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic>, <italic>Pectobacteriaceae</italic>, and <italic>Lactobacillales</italic>, such as <italic>Streptococcaceae</italic> and <italic>Carnobacteriaceae</italic>. Together, these factors are important in determining the growth potential of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic>. However, the <italic>Pseudomonadaceae</italic> content appeared to be less critical for plant species with specific leaf surface characteristics, such as a narrow leaf surface area and a smaller number of stomata (e.g., rocket). Therefore, future studies should include leaf surface analyses in growth studies of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> on leafy vegetables. Due to the limitations of second-generation sequencing technologies in determining species-level identification of bacteria, a sequencing approach using third-generation amplicon sequencing techniques, as well as true metagenomics approaches, may reveal further insights into the functions of certain bacterial taxa in the phyllosphere and their abilities to aid or retard the <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth.</p>
<p>Advancing aspects of microbial food safety for leafy vegetables may include future selection of varieties that are not only preferred due to their taste and sensory input during consumption but also due to their beneficial natural microbiome. Similarly, one could imagine a future where leafy vegetables are treated with probiotic foliar applications, where beneficial microbes are designed not only to be helpful for digestion but also helpful in suppressing foodborne pathogens.</p>
<p>EURL&#x2019;s guidance document requires three batches for assessment of the growth potential of RTE products. These three batches are recommended to be from different production days. Although based on results from this study, this should be further updated to reflect produce with different seasonality. Moreover, as identified in the present study for spinach and rocket, the presence of certain phyllosphere or microbiome members could provide more in-depth information regarding <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> growth potentials on RTE food products than TBC. Thus, the inclusion of NGS techniques could be considered an essential tool for assessing future challenges.</p>
<p>Microbiologists looking to describe the phyllosphere of kale or rocket (Esmee variety) should consider the use of chloroplast amplification blocking methods. This will reduce the number of samples discarded due to low bacterial reads, as occurred in the present study, thereby providing more detailed descriptions of phyllosphere-associated bacteria.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec29">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/</ext-link>, PRJNA1177234.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec30">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>PC: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft. AS: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec31">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) supported financially this research project (Listeria Challenge Studies, grant number: 17F/244).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>We would like to thank the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) for funding this project (Listeria Challenge Studies, grant number: 17F/244) and our project partners for their valuable feedback.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec32">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec33">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec34">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec35">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1516740/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1516740/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adeolu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alnajar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naushad</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S. Gupta</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Genome-based phylogeny and taxonomy of the &#x2018;<italic>Enterobacteriales</italic>&#x2019;: proposal for <italic>Enterobacterales ord. nov</italic>. divided into the families <italic>Enterobacteriaceae, Erwiniaceae fam. nov</italic>., <italic>Pectobacteriaceae fam. nov</italic>., <italic>Yersiniaceae fam. nov</italic>., <italic>Hafniaceae fam. nov</italic>., <italic>Morganellaceae fam. nov</italic>., and <italic>Budviciaceae fam. nov</italic>.</article-title> <source>Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>5575</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5599</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/ijsem.0.001485</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA)</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Wiley StatsRef: statistics reference online. John Wiley &#x0026; Sons, Ltd</source>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Babic</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Watada</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wergin</surname> <given-names>W. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Changes in microbial populations on fresh cut spinach</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>107</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>119</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0168-1605(96)00969-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8880301</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balali</surname> <given-names>G. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yar</surname> <given-names>D. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Afua Dela</surname> <given-names>V. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adjei-Kusi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Microbial contamination, an increasing threat to the consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables in today&#x2019;s world</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Microbiol.</source> <volume>2020</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2020/3029295</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32565813</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barbosa</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Albano</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Almeida</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nogueira</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teixeira</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Characterization of a <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum R23</italic> isolated from arugula by whole-genome sequencing and its bacteriocin production ability</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health</source> <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>5515</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph18115515</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34063896</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bashir</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>War</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rafiq</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reshi</surname> <given-names>Z. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rashid</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shouche</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Phyllosphere microbiome: diversity and functions</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>254</volume>:<fpage>126888</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2021.126888</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34700185</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bellieny-Rabelo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tanui</surname> <given-names>C. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miguel</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kwenda</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shyntum</surname> <given-names>D. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moleleki</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Transcriptome and comparative genomics analyses reveal new functional insights on key determinants of pathogenesis and interbacterial competition in <italic>Pectobacterium</italic> and <italic>Dickeya</italic> spp</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>85</volume>:<fpage>e02050-18</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02050-18</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bolyen</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rideout</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dillon</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bokulich</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abnet</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Ghalith</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Author correction: reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>37</volume>:<fpage>1091</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41587-019-0252-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31399723</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brandl</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lindow</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Contribution of Indole-3-acetic acid production to the epiphytic fitness of <italic>Erwinia herbicola</italic></article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>3256</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3263</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.64.9.3256-3263.1998</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9726868</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buchanan</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bagi</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Microbial competition: effect of culture conditions on the suppression of <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> Scott a by <italic>Carnobacterium piscicola</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>254</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>261</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/0362-028X-60.3.254</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31195481</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caponigro</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ventura</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chiancone</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amato</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parente</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Piro</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Variation of microbial load and visual quality of ready-to-eat salads by vegetable type, season, processor and retailer</article-title>. <source>Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>1071</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1077</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fm.2010.07.011</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20832687</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carlin</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nguyen-The</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Da Silva</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Factors affecting the growth of <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> on minimally processed fresh endive</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>636</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>646</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2672.1995.tb03110.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7615420</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Colonna</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rouphael</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barbieri</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Pascale</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Nutritional quality of ten leafy vegetables harvested at two light intensities</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>199</volume>, <fpage>702</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>710</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.12.068</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26776027</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Comte</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Colin</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whalen</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gr&#x00FC;nberger</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caliman</surname> <given-names>J.-P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Agricultural practices in oil palm plantations and their impact on hydrological changes, nutrient fluxes and water quality in Indonesia</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Adv. Agron</source>. ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Sparks</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name></person-group>, (Academic Press), <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>71</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>124</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Culliney</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmalenberger</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Growth potential of <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> on refrigerated spinach and rocket leaves in modified atmosphere packaging</article-title>. <source>Food Secur.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>1211</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods9091211</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32882945</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Culliney</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmalenberger</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Cultivation conditions of spinach and rocket influence epiphytic growth of <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic></article-title>. <source>Food Secur.</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>3056</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods11193056</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36230132</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Culliney</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmalenberger</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Bacterial community structure analysis on <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> inoculated spinach leaves is affected by PCR based methods to exclude chloroplast co-amplification</article-title>. <source>bioRxiv</source>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/2024.02.01.578417</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Culliney</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmalenberger</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Bacterial community structure analysis on <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> inoculated spinach leaves is affected by PCR based methods to exclude chloroplast co-amplification</article-title>. <source>Microbe</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>100258</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.microb.2025.100258</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Darlison</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mogren</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosberg</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grud&#x00E9;n</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Minet</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Leaf mineral content govern microbial community structure in the phyllosphere of spinach (<italic>Spinacia oleracea</italic>) and rocket (<italic>Diplotaxis tenuifolia</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>675</volume>, <fpage>501</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>512</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.254</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31030156</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dees</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lys&#x00F8;e</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nordskog</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brurberg</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goodrich-Blair</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Bacterial communities associated with surfaces of leafy greens: shift in composition and decrease in richness over time</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>1530</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1539</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.03470-14</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dharmarha</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guron</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boyer</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niemira</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pruden</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strawn</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Gamma irradiation influences the survival and regrowth of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic-resistance genes on Romaine lettuce</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>710</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.00710</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Espitia</surname> <given-names>P. J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Otoni</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soares</surname> <given-names>N. F. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Ediocin applications in antimicrobial food packaging systems</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Antimicrobial food packaging</source>. ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Barros-Vel&#x00E1;zquez</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group>, vol. <volume>36</volume> (<publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>445</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>454</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">EURL Lm</collab></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source>Technical guidance document for conducting shelf-life studies on <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> in ready-to-eat foods version 3-amended (21/02/2019)</source>. <publisher-loc>Maisons-Alfort, France</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>EURL Listeria monocytogenes, ANSES</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Faith</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity</article-title>. <source>Biol. Conserv.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll2">FAO</collab></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), FAOSTAT, data, production, crops and livestock products. Available online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/TCL" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/TCL</ext-link> (Accessed February 15, 2023).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fitzpatrick</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu-Irving</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Copeland</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guttman</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baltrus</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Chloroplast sequence variation and the efficacy of peptide nucleic acids for blocking host amplification in plant microbiome studies</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>144</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-018-0534-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30121081</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Francis</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x2019;Beirne</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Effects of the indigenous microflora of minimally processed lettuce on the survival and growth of <italic>Listeria innocua</italic></article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Sci. Tech.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>477</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>488</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2621.1998.00199.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Franz</surname> <given-names>C. M.a. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du Toit</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Von Holy</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schillinger</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holzapfel</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Production of nisin-like bacteriocins by <italic>Lactococcus lactis</italic> strains isolated from vegetables</article-title>. <source>J. Basic Microbiol.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>187</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>196</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jobm.3620370307</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gloor</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Macklaim</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pawlowsky-Glahn</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Egozcue</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Microbiome datasets are compositional: and this is not optional</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>2224</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.02224</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>V. T. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Isolation and evaluation of anti-Listeria <italic>Lactococcus lactis</italic> from vegetal sources</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Listeria Monocytogenes</source>. eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Fox</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bierne</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stessl</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group>, (Humana Press), <fpage>243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>257</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>V. T. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bansal</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Characterisation of <italic>Lactococcus lactis</italic> isolates from herbs, fruits and vegetables for use as biopreservatives against <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> in cheese</article-title>. <source>Food Control</source> <volume>85</volume>, <fpage>472</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>483</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.09.036</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hunter</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hand</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pink</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whipps</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bending</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Both leaf properties and microbe-microbe interactions influence within-species variation in bacterial population diversity and structure in the lettuce (<italic>Lactuca species</italic>) Phyllosphere</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>8117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8125</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01321-10</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20952648</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hutchison</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Role of biosurfactant and ion channel-forming activities of syringomycin tranransmembrane ion flux: a model for the mechanism of action in the plant-pathogen interaction</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>610</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>620</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/MPMI-8-0610</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8589416</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ibekwe</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ors</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferreira</surname> <given-names>J. F. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suarez</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Influence of seasonal changes and salinity on spinach phyllosphere bacterial functional assemblage</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>e0252242</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0252242</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34061881</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ibrahim</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayivi</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zimmerman</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Siddiqui</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Altemimi</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fidan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Lactic acid bacteria as antimicrobial agents: food safety and microbial food spoilage prevention</article-title>. <source>Food Secur.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>3131</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods10123131</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34945682</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Koseki</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Isobe</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Growth of <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> on iceberg lettuce and solid media</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>217</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>225</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.11.008</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15862883</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kruger</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barbosa</surname> <given-names>M. D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miranda</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Landgraf</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Destro</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Todorov</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Isolation of bacteriocinogenic strain of <italic>Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis</italic> from rocket salad (<italic>Eruca sativa mill.</italic>) and evidences of production of a variant of nisin with modification in the leader-peptide</article-title>. <source>Food Control</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>467</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>476</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.03.043</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kyere</surname> <given-names>E. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Palmer</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wargent</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fletcher</surname> <given-names>G. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flint</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Colonisation of lettuce by <italic>Listeria Monocytogenes</italic></article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>14</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ijfs.13905</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Le Marrec</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hyronimus</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bressollier</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verneuil</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Urdaci</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Biochemical and genetic characterization of coagulin, a new antilisterial bacteriocin in the pediocin family of bacteriocins, produced by <italic>Bacillus coagulans I4</italic></article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>5213</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5220</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.66.12.5213-5220.2000</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11097892</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leveau</surname> <given-names>J. H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lindow</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Utilization of the plant hormone Indole-3-acetic acid for growth by <italic>Pseudomonas putida</italic> strain 1290</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>2365</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2371</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.71.5.2365-2371.2005</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15870323</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brettell</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Linking the phyllosphere microbiome to plant health</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>841</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>844</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2020.06.003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32576433</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lokerse</surname> <given-names>R. F. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maslowska-Corker</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van De Wardt</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wijtzes</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Growth capacity of <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> in ingredients of ready-to-eat salads</article-title>. <source>Food Control</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>338</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>345</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.07.041</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lozupone</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamady</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelley</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Quantitative and qualitative &#x03B2; diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>1576</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1585</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01996-06</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17220268</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Markovi&#x0107;</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grujovi&#x0107;</surname> <given-names>M. &#x017D;.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kora&#x0107;evi&#x0107;</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nikodijevi&#x0107;</surname> <given-names>D. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Milutinovi&#x0107;</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Semedo-Lemsaddek</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Colicins and microcins produced by <italic>Enterobacteriaceae:</italic> characterization, mode of action, and putative applications</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health</source> <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>11825</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph191811825</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36142096</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marshall</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wells</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farr</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Influence of modified atmosphere packaging on the competitive growth of <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> on precooked chicken</article-title>. <source>Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>303</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>309</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0740-0020(92)80038-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maylani</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuniati</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wardhana</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The effect of leaf surface character on the ability of water hyacinth, <italic>Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms</italic>. to transpire water</article-title>. <source>IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.</source> <volume>902</volume>:<fpage>012070</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1757-899X/902/1/012070</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mcmanamon</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaupper</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scollard</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmalenberger</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Nisin application delays growth of <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> on fresh-cut iceberg lettuce in modified atmosphere packaging, while the bacterial community structure changes within one week of storage</article-title>. <source>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</source> <volume>147</volume>, <fpage>185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>195</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.10.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mcnees</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Law</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moe</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Characterization of endophytic microbial communities in store-bought kale evaluated by different plant tissue homogenization methods</article-title>. <source>Phytobiomes J.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>211</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>216</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PBIOMES-08-19-0046-SC</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>M&#x00FC;ller</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruppel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Progress in cultivation-independent phyllosphere microbiology</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</source> <volume>87</volume>, <fpage>2</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1574-6941.12198</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24003903</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>&#x00D8;stergaard</surname> <given-names>N. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ekl&#x00F6;w</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dalgaard</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Modelling the effect of lactic acid bacteria from starter- and aroma culture on growth of <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> in cottage cheese</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>188</volume>, <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.07.012</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25086348</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pilchov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pilet</surname> <given-names>M.-F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cappelier</surname> <given-names>J.-M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pazlarov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tresse</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Protective effect of <italic>Carnobacterium</italic> spp. against <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> during host cell invasion using in vitro HT29 model</article-title>. <source>Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>88</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2016.00088</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rastogi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tech</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coaker</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leveau</surname> <given-names>J. H. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>A PCR-based toolbox for the culture-independent quantification of total bacterial abundances in plant environments</article-title>. <source>J. Microbiol. Methods</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>132</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mimet.2010.08.006</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20816905</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rebuffat</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Bacteriocins from gram-negative bacteria: a classification?</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Prokaryotic antimicrobial peptides</source>. eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Drider</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rebuffat</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-name>Springer Nature</publisher-name>), New York: <fpage>55</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>72</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rosberg</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Darlison</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mogren</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alsanius</surname> <given-names>B. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Commercial wash of leafy vegetables do not significantly decrease bacterial load but leads to shifts in bacterial species composition</article-title>. <source>Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>94</volume>:<fpage>103667</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fm.2020.103667</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33279090</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sagar</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Exotic and uncommon vegetable production in poly tunnels</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Protected cultivation and smart agriculture</source>. eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Maitra</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaikwad</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shankar</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group>, (<publisher-name>New Delhi: New Dehli Publishers</publisher-name>), <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>146</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>160</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saleem</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Phyllosphere microbiome: plant defense strategies</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Microbiomes and the global climate change</source>. eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Lone</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Malik</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-name>Singapore: Springer Nature</publisher-name>), <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>201</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sant'ana</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barbosa</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Destro</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Landgraf</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franco</surname> <given-names>B. D. G. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Growth potential of <italic>Salmonella</italic> spp. and <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> in nine types of ready-to-eat vegetables stored at variable temperature conditions during shelf-life</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>157</volume>, <fpage>52</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.04.011</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22561064</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schmalenberger</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwieger</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tebbe</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Effect of primers hybridizing to different evolutionarily conserved regions of the small-subunit rRNA gene in PCR-based microbial community analyses and genetic profiling</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>3557</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3563</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.67.8.3557-3563.2001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11472932</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schober</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boer</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwarte</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Correlation coefficients</article-title>. <source>Anesth. Analg.</source> <volume>126</volume>, <fpage>1763</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1768</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sedgwick</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Pearson's correlation coefficient</article-title>. <source>BMJ</source> <volume>345</volume>:<fpage>e4483</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/bmj.e4483</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shyntum</surname> <given-names>D. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nkomo</surname> <given-names>N. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shingange</surname> <given-names>N. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gricia</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bellieny-Rabelo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moleleki</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The impact of type VI secretion system, bacteriocins and antibiotics on bacterial competition of <italic>Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. brasiliense</italic> and the regulation of Carbapenem biosynthesis by Iron and the ferric-uptake regulator</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>02379</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.02379</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31681235</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>S&#x00F6;derqvist</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmed Osman</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wolff</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bertilsson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>V&#x00E5;gsholm</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boqvist</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017a</year>). <article-title>Emerging microbiota during cold storage and temperature abuse of ready-to-eat salad</article-title>. <source>Infect. Ecol. Epidemiol.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>1328963</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/20008686.2017.1328963</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28649305</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>S&#x00F6;derqvist</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lambertz</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>V&#x00E5;gsholm</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fernstr&#x00F6;m</surname> <given-names>L.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alsanius</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mogren</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017b</year>). <article-title>Fate of <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic>, pathogenic <italic>Yersinia enterocolitica</italic>, and <italic>Escherichia coli O157:H7 gfp+</italic> in ready-to-eat salad during cold storage: what is the risk to consumers?</article-title> <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>204</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>212</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-308</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28221975</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stone</surname> <given-names>B. W. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jackson</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Seasonal patterns contribute more towards phyllosphere bacterial community structure than short-term perturbations</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol.</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>146</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>156</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-020-01564-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32737538</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Truchado</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gil</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reboleiro</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodelas</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allende</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Impact of solar radiation exposure on phyllosphere bacterial community of red-pigmented baby leaf lettuce</article-title>. <source>Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>77</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>85</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fm.2017.03.018</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28576376</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tukey</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1970</year>). <article-title>The leaching of substances from plants</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>305</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>324</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.pp.21.060170.001513</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vacher</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hampe</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Port&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sauer</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Compant</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morris</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The phyllosphere: microbial jungle at the plant&#x2013;climate interface</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032238</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Den Heuvel</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Myths about linear and monotonic associations: Pearson&#x2019;s r, spearman&#x2019;s &#x03C1;, and Kendall&#x2019;s &#x03C4;</article-title>. <source>Am. Stat.</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>44</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00031305.2021.2004922</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Der Avoort</surname> <given-names>C. M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Loon</surname> <given-names>L. J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hopman</surname> <given-names>M. T. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verdijk</surname> <given-names>L. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Increasing vegetable intake to obtain the health promoting and ergogenic effects of dietary nitrate</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Clin. Nutr.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>1485</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1489</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41430-018-0140-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29559721</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref70"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Venu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khushbu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santhi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rawson</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sunil</surname> <given-names>C. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sureshkumar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Phytochemical profile and therapeutic properties of leafy vegetables</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Plant and human health, volume 2</source>. ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Munir Ozturk</surname> <given-names>K. R. H.</given-names></name></person-group>, vol. <volume>26</volume> (<publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>627</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>660</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref71"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wasendorf</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schultz</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmitz-Esser</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peters</surname> <given-names>N. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunning Hotopp</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Genome sequences of soft rot-causing <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> isolates from spinach</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Resour. Announc.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>e00701</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e00722</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mra.00701-22</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Webb</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Impact of lactic acid bacteria on the control of <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> in ready-to-eat foods</article-title>. <source>Food Qual. Saf.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/fqsafe/fyac045</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Phyllosphere microorganisms: sources, drivers, and their interactions with plant hosts</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>4860</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4870</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jafc.2c01113</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35435673</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref74"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Diverse antibiotic resistance genes and potential pathogens inhabit in the phyllosphere of fresh vegetables</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>815</volume>:<fpage>152851</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152851</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34990692</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref75"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effects of variety, plant location, and season on the phyllosphere bacterial community structure of alfalfa (<italic>Medicago sativa</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>2023</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms10102023</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref76"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Z.-D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ying</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Association, correlation, and causation among transport variables of PM2.5</article-title>. <source>Front. Phys.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>684104</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphy.2021.684104</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref77"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Q. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>S. Y. D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Impacts of global change on the phyllosphere microbiome</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>234</volume>, <fpage>1977</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1986</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.17928</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34921429</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref78"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ziegler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kent</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stephan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guldimann</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Growth potential of <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> in twelve different types of RTE salads: impact of food matrix, storage temperature and storage time</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>296</volume>, <fpage>83</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.01.016</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30851644</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref79"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zilelidou</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skandamis</surname> <given-names>P. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Growth, detection and virulence of <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> in the presence of other microorganisms: microbial interactions from species to strain level</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>277</volume>, <fpage>10</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.04.011</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29677551</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>