<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2024.1514234</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Soil microbial community and influencing factors of different vegetation restoration types in a typical agricultural pastoral ecotone</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Pei</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2886333/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Hanyu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Lina</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2873164/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Duoping</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Zefeng</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>Zhenhong</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Xingyu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>College of Life Science, Capital Normal University</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Institute of Ecological Conservation and Restoration, Chinese Academy of Forestry</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>State Forestry Administration Dunhuang Desert Ecosystem Location Research Station</institution>, <addr-line>Dunhuang</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>Graduate Department, Chinese Academy of Forestry</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Edited by: Md. Motaher Hossain, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0003">
<p>Reviewed by: Weidong Kong, Capital Normal University, China</p>
<p>Jia Hongtao, Xinjiang Agricultural University, China</p>
<p>Xiaohui Zhao, Xi&#x2019;an University of Technology, China</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Lina Jiang, <email>jianglina@caf.ac.cn</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn0001"><p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>23</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1514234</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>20</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>24</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Huang, Shi, Jiang, Zhu, Zhou, Hou and Ma.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Huang, Shi, Jiang, Zhu, Zhou, Hou and Ma</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Microbial network complexity is an important indicator for assessing the effectiveness of vegetation restoration. However, the response of the microbial network complexity of bacteria and fungi to different vegetation restoration types is unclear. Therefore, in this study, we selected four vegetation restoration types (<italic>Pinus sylvestris</italic> var. <italic>mongholica</italic>, <italic>Larix principis- rupprechtii</italic>, <italic>Populus tomentosa</italic>, and <italic>Ulmus pumila</italic>), while selected the nature grassland as a control, in the Zhangjiakou Tunken Forest Farm, which is a typical agricultural pastoral ecotone in northern China, to investigate the response of soil microbial diversity and network complexity to different vegetation restoration types. Our result showed that the bacterial Shannon and Chao indices of <italic>P. sylvestris</italic> var. <italic>mongholica</italic> were significantly 7.77 and 22.39% higher than those of grassland in the 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm soil layer, respectively. The fungal Chao indices of <italic>U. pumila</italic> were significantly 85.70 and 146.86% higher than those of grassland in the 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm and 40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm soil layer, respectively. Compared to natural grassland, soil microbial networks became more complex in plantation forests restoration types (<italic>P. sylvestris</italic> var. <italic>mongholica</italic>, <italic>L. principis- rupprechtii</italic>, <italic>P. tomentosa</italic>, and <italic>U. pumila</italic>). Microbial network complexity increased with soil carbon and nitrogen. <italic>P. tomentosa</italic> is suitable for planting in the agricultural pastoral ecotone of Zhangjiakou, because of its high soil carbon, nitrogen and microbial network complexity. Bacterial community composition was found to be closely related to soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), while that of fungi was closely related to SOC, clay and silt content. This improvement in microbial complexity enhances the ecological service function of the agricultural pastoral ecotone. These findings offer theoretical basis and technical support for the vegetation restoration of ecologically fragile areas in agricultural pastoral ecotone.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>agricultural pastoral ecotone</kwd>
<kwd>afforestation restoration</kwd>
<kwd>co-occurrence network analysis</kwd>
<kwd>microbial diversity</kwd>
<kwd>network complexity</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="44"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="7699"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Desertification is a major global ecological and environmental problem caused by natural factors (climate change) and human activities (overgrazing and overcultivation), and it results in land degradation in drylands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Yao et al., 2023</xref>). Vegetation restoration is an important strategy to manage land desertification and achieve habitat restoration in drylands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). Vegetation restoration enhances ecosystem nutrient cycling and improves soil quality through plant&#x2013;soil interactions, thereby contributing to effective desertification management. Different vegetation restoration patterns significantly affect the diversity and productivity of vegetation, which in turn affect soil carbon sequestration potential and microbial characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Xu et al., 2011</xref>). As the key components of terrestrial ecosystems, soil microorganisms play an important role in regulating ecological processes, including nutrient cycling, pathogen control, and plant productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Pedrinho et al., 2024</xref>). The increase of microbial diversity develops stable and resilient soil ecosystems, while the decrease of microbial diversity is detrimental to ecosystem sustainability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Wang et al., 2024</xref>). There is thus increasing emphasis in studying soil microbial diversity in different vegetation restoration types for ecological restoration in drylands.</p>
<p>China&#x2019;s agricultural pastoral ecotone is a dryland connecting the eastern farming area and the western grassland pastoral area, which has a fragile ecosystem and serious desertification problems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Li et al., 2022</xref>). Usually, vegetation restoration in the agricultural pastoral ecotone are mostly grassland-based, accompanied by natural and plantation forests and shrubs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Yang et al., 2014</xref>). Currently, studies in agricultural pastoral ecotone have focused on grasslands, farmlands and scrub (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Cui et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Felipe-Lucia et al., 2020</xref>), while few studies have investigated plantation forest, particularly in terms of soil microbial communities. This limits the assessment of the ecological efficacy of these vegetation restoration types from the microbial point of view. It is generally believed that microbial activity is the highest in the top soil layer (0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm), but microorganisms in deeper soil layers still play important roles in nutrient metabolism, energy cycling and soil formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Jiao et al., 2018</xref>). Therefore, the study of microbial diversity in multilayer soils can help to understand the important role of soil microorganisms in the ecological restoration of agricultural pastoral ecotone.</p>
<p>Microbial network analysis is an effective way to understand the structure of soil microbial networks, and it has been widely used by microbial ecologists (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Chen et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Dong et al., 2022</xref>). Different species or taxa are linked together by exchanging matter, energy, and information, which results in complex interactions such as competition and mutually beneficial symbiosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Wang et al., 2023</xref>). These complex interconnections among microorganisms can be represented as co-occurring networks, where microbial taxa act as nodes and their relationships as links (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Liu et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Zhang et al., 2023</xref>). Furthermore, microbial diversity and interactions among taxa may vary over time, space, or environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Xu et al., 2022</xref>). It has been shown that soil microbial diversity positively influences ecosystem functioning indirectly mainly by promoting network complexity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Zhai et al., 2024</xref>). Understanding microbial network complexity is essential for assessing the level of functional recovery in degraded restored ecosystems. However, the effect of different vegetation restoration types on microbial network complexity in the agricultural pastoral ecotone is unknown.</p>
<p>Zhangjiakou is located in northwestern Hebei and belongs to a typical agricultural pastoral ecotone. It is a crucial water source conservation area and ecological security barrier for the capital region of China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Zhou et al., 2021</xref>). Additionally, this area is a major hub for production and living activities, where frequent human activities render the ecological environment sensitive and fragile. It is also an important ecological corridor in the upper reaches of the Beijing&#x2013;Tianjin&#x2013;Hebei Urban Agglomeration, which plays an extremely important ecological service function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Li et al., 2020</xref>). Based on the important ecological service function of Zhangjiakou area and its status as a key ecological conservation area in the upper reaches of Beijing&#x2013;Tianjin&#x2013;Hebei, in this study, we selected four vegetation types [<italic>Pinus sylvestris</italic> var. <italic>mongholica</italic> plantation (ZS), <italic>Larix principis- rupprechtii</italic> plantation (LS), <italic>Populus tomentosa</italic> plantation (PS) and <italic>Ulmus pumila</italic> plantation (YS)] with the same site conditions and similar restoration years in Zhangjiakou Tunken Forest Farm, while selected natural grassland (GL) as a control. This study aimed to investigate the effects of various vegetation restoration types on the diversity of soil microbial communities and the complexity of microbial networks in a typical agricultural pastoral ecotone in Zhangjiakou. We hypothesized that (1) different vegetation restoration types may alter soil nutrient status, with broadleaf forests (PS, YS) having higher nutrient content than coniferous forests (ZS, LS), and coniferous forests having higher nutrient content than natural grassland (GL); (2) changes in soil nutrients content are the key drivers of bacterial and fungal community characteristics under different vegetation restoration types; (3) different vegetation restoration types changes microbial network complexity.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Experimental site</title>
<p>The study area is located in Tunken Forest, Kangbao County, Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, China (114.47&#x00B0;E, 41.54&#x00B0;N), which belongs to a typical agricultural pastoral ecotone. The area has a semi-arid monsoon climate in the north temperate zone. It has high temperature and little rain in summer and is cold and dry in winter. The average annual temperature is 2.1&#x00B0;C, and a frost-free period lasts for 90&#x2013;105&#x202F;days. The average annual precipitation is about 300&#x202F;mm, with rain and heat concentrated in the same season, primarily from July to September. The main afforestation species are ulmus, populus, pinus, and larch. The regional soil is chestnut soil and meadow soil, with medium soil fertility.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Sample collection and pretreatment</title>
<p>In May 2023, natural grassland (GL), larch plantation forest (LS), pinus plantation forest (ZS), populus plantation forest (PS), and ulmus plantation forest (YS) with similar elevation, flat terrain, and basically the same restoration age were selected within the Tunken Forest Farm for the study. The selected sites all had similar soil characteristics prior to afforestation. The plantation forests had fewer understory plants and lower surface biomass than natural grassland (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). Three sample plots (1&#x202F;m&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;1&#x202F;m) were randomly selected in each sample site. The five-point sampling method was used to collect soil samples of 0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm, 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm, and 40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm using a soil auger with an inner diameter of 5&#x202F;cm around the sample points and at the center. Visible matter, such as plant stubs, stones and gravels in the samples, were removed. Then soil samples from the same soil layer were immediately mixed to form a single soil sample. The mixed soil samples were divided into two parts, which were placed into sealed bags and sterilized tubes for microbiological sampling. The soil sample in the sealed bag was air-dried and used to determine soil physical and chemical properties; the soil sample in the sterilized tubes for microbiological sampling was returned to the laboratory with an ice pack and stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C for high-throughput sequencing analysis.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Basic information of the sample site.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Vegetation type</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Altitude/m</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Restoration time/a</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Line spacing/m</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Plant spacing/m</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Average height/m</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Average diameter at breast height/cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Average ground diameter/cm</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Main herbs</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Forest understory surface biomass/g/m<sup>2</sup></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Nature grassland</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1,440</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">45</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Setaria viridis</italic>, <italic>Eragrostis Pilosa, Chloris virgata</italic>, <italic>Taraxacum mongolicum</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">216.62&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;10.24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Larch</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1,435</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">49</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.1&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14.4&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18.2&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.0</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Plantago asiatica</italic>, <italic>Setaria viridis</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">107.15&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;7.62</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Pinus</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1,438</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">42</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14.1&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25.1&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30.6&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;4.2</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Setaria viridis</italic>, <italic>Chloris virgata</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">87.42&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;6.56</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Populus</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1,446</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">48</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3&#x2013;6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.9&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25.6&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;5.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30.5&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;7.3</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Cleistogenes hancei</italic>, <italic>Carex bohemica</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">91.88&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;8.79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Ulmus</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1,440</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1&#x2013;2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.2&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16.1&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">21.6&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Agrimonia pilosa</italic>, <italic>Carex bohemica</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">113.44&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;4.92</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Mean&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;standard deviation, <italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;10. Forest understory surface biomass is the above-ground biomass of understory shrubs and grasses.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Soil property measurements</title>
<p>Soil pH was measured by a pH meter (a 1:2.5 soil/water mixture), soil organic carbon (SOC) was measured by the potassium dichromate volumetric method, total carbon (TC) was measured by the high-temperature scorching method, total nitrogen (TN) was measured by the semi-micro Kjeldahl method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Bao, 2000</xref>), and soil particle size was measured using a Mastersizer 3000 laser particle sizer. Soil particle size grading was based on the American system of soil grain size: clay (&#x003C;2&#x202F;&#x03BC;m), silt (2&#x2013;50&#x202F;&#x03BC;m), and sand (50&#x2013;2000&#x202F;&#x03BC;m) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Chen et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Soil DNA extraction and high-throughput sequencing</title>
<p>Total DNA extraction from 0.5&#x202F;g soil samples was performed according to the FastDNA<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, United States) instructions, and DNA extraction quality was checked using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA concentration and purity were determined using a NanoDrop2000.</p>
<p>PCR was performed on a GeneAmp 9700 PCR system. Primers 338F (5&#x2032;-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3&#x2032;) -806R (5&#x2032;-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3&#x2032;) and ITS1F (5&#x2032;-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3&#x2032;) -ITS2R (5&#x2032;-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3&#x2032;) were used for soil bacterial 16S rRNA genes in the V3-V4 hypervariable regions and soil fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Sun et al., 2017</xref>). Amplification products were detected by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and recovered from the gel using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit, washed with Tris&#x2013;HCl and verified by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Hu et al., 2017</xref>). PCR products were quantified using a QuantiFluorTM-ST fluorometer, and samples were adjusted according to sequencing needs.</p>
<p>Sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform by Shanghai Major Biomedical Technology Company. The high-throughput sequencing data were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (BioProject ID PRJNA1015983, study accession number SRP460000).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Sequence analysis</title>
<p>Sequence analysis was performed using Uparse software (v7.0.1090) to cluster valid data from soil samples. Sequences shorter than 200&#x202F;bp, ambiguous bases, and sequences with an average mass less than 25 were removed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Hu et al., 2017</xref>). Chimeric sequences were removed using USEARCH (v11). Unique sequences &#x003E;97% similarity levels were clustered into an operational taxonomic units (OTU) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Nguyen et al., 2016</xref>). Bacterial and fungal sequences were classified by comparing the representative sequences of OTUs with Silva version 138 16S rRNA and UNITE version 8.0 databases, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Zhou et al., 2020</xref>). Diversity indices Chao and Shannon were calculated using the Qiime (v1.9.1) platform.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Soil physicochemical properties and microbial diversity were analyzed and plotted using R (4.2.1). We used microbial OTU richness as the metrics of, and calculated, the microbial <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>-diversity. Soil physicochemical properties and microbial &#x03B1;-diversity were compared by one-way ANOVA, and significance of differences was compared by the LSD method. The data of soil physicochemical properties and microbial &#x03B1;-diversity are presented as mean values &#x00B1; standard deviation (SD). Beta diversity of soil microbial communities was resolved by principal co-ordinates analysis (PCoA) based on the weighted unifrac distance algorithm, and differences between groups were tested using ANOSIM similarity analysis (number of permutations&#x202F;=&#x202F;999) with the R &#x201C;vegan&#x201D; package. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between microbial community composition and environmental factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Microbial co-occurrence network construction</title>
<p>The construction of microbial co-occurrence networks used with Pearson&#x2019;s correlation coefficients matrix the R &#x201C;WGCNA&#x201D; package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Langfelder and Horvath, 2008</xref>). Pearson&#x2019;s correlation (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.8) and significance values (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01) were used for microbial network building. Topological features of the overall network (e.g., nodes, edges, average degree, modularity, density, average path length and average clustering coefficient) were calculated using the R &#x201C;igraph&#x201D; package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Wang et al., 2023</xref>). To obtain the microbial network complexity index, we calculated the Z-scores for some topological features (nodes, edges, average degree, average clustering coefficient, density and the reciprocal of average path length) of the microbial network individually. The Z-scores for all measured variables were averaged to obtain the complexity index of the microbial network for each locality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Wang et al., 2023</xref>). The co-occurrence networks were plotted using Gephi (0.10.1) software and visualized by the Frucherman Reingold algorithm.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec10">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Soil physicochemical properties</title>
<p>Significant differences were observed in the physicochemical properties (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). Soil pH was slightly alkaline and varied from 8.29 to 8.57. The soil was dominated by sand, followed by silt, and the content of clay particles was the lowest. In 0&#x2013;20, 20&#x2013;40, and 40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm layers, total carbon (TC) in PS was significantly higher than that in GL (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), with increases of 90.23, 86.73, and 109.01%, respectively. In 40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm layer, the TC in YS was significantly higher than that in GL (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), with an increase of 114.15%. In 0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm layer, total nitrogen in PS and YS was significantly higher than that in GL (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), with increases of 41.54 and 60.00%, respectively. In 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm layer, TN in PS and YS was significantly higher than that in GL (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), with increases of 101.35 and 120.27%, respectively. In 40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm layer, TN in the PS and ZS was significantly higher than that in GL (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), with increases of 292.31 and 315.38%, respectively. In 0&#x2013;20, 20&#x2013;40, and 40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm layers, soil organic carbon (SOC) in PS was significantly higher than that in GL (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), with increases of 53.95, 82.61, and 360.00%, respectively. In 0&#x2013;20 and 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm layers, SOC in YS was significantly higher than that in GL (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), with increases of 60.90 and 107.41%, respectively. Therefore, compared with GL, plantation forest increased soil carbon and nitrogen, especially in PS.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Physicochemical properties of the soil of the five vegetation restoration types.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Soil index</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">GL</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">LS</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">PS</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">YS</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">ZS</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">pH</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.32 &#x00B1; 0.09ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.44 &#x00B1; 0.18a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.57 &#x00B1; 0.26a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.29 &#x00B1; 0.08b</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.35 &#x00B1; 0.20a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.43 &#x00B1; 0.14a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.33 &#x00B1; 0.01ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.42 &#x00B1; 0.03a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.53 &#x00B1; 0.08a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.32 &#x00B1; 0.08ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.37 &#x00B1; 0.04a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.44 &#x00B1; 0.13a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.44 &#x00B1; 0.04a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.40 &#x00B1; 0.10a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.40 &#x00B1; 0.34a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">TC (g&#x00B7;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">13.49 &#x00B1; 0.89b</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">13.79 &#x00B1; 5.28b</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">10.88 &#x00B1; 7.62b</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">15.40 &#x00B1; 6.74b</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">17.70 &#x00B1; 8.98ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">12.80 &#x00B1; 4.15b</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">25.67 &#x00B1; 6.01a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">25.75 &#x00B1; 4.65a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">22.74 &#x00B1; 2.83a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">21.94 &#x00B1; 5.85ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">23.62 &#x00B1; 7.61ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">23.30 &#x00B1; 4.39a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">21.19 &#x00B1; 5.97ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">19.79 &#x00B1; 4.31ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">17.95 &#x00B1; 0.92ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">TN (g&#x00B7;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.30 &#x00B1; 0.12c</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.74 &#x00B1; 0.14bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.26 &#x00B1; 0.12b</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.08 &#x00B1; 0.40c</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.53 &#x00B1; 0.45c</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.63 &#x00B1; 0.21ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.84 &#x00B1; 0.28ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.49 &#x00B1; 0.36a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.02 &#x00B1; 0.27a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">2.08 &#x00B1; 0.39a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.63 &#x00B1; 0.08a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.90 &#x00B1; 0.12ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.46 &#x00B1; 0.11bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.24 &#x00B1; 0.45ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.08 &#x00B1; 0.71a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SOC (g&#x00B7;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">11.51 &#x00B1; 0.81c</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">7.42 &#x00B1; 1.17b</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">3.75 &#x00B1; 0.84b</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">10.72 &#x00B1; 3.31c</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.30 &#x00B1; 1.00b</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">9.50 &#x00B1; 4.13ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">17.72 &#x00B1; 3.43ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">13.55 &#x00B1; 3.23a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">17.25 &#x00B1; 6.78a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">18.52 &#x00B1; 2.85a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">15.39 &#x00B1; 0.84a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">8.93 &#x00B1; 0.39b</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">13.25 &#x00B1; 1.67bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">11.03 &#x00B1; 4.64ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">10.17 &#x00B1; 5.96ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Clay content (%)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">5.60 &#x00B1; 0.84c</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">5.07 &#x00B1; 1.72a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">4.53 &#x00B1; 1.21a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">7.62 &#x00B1; 0.81ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">10.22 &#x00B1; 5.68a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">6.37 &#x00B1; 1.77a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">9.12 &#x00B1; 0.79a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">7.60 &#x00B1; 0.52a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">10.20 &#x00B1; 1.17a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">3.67 &#x00B1; 1.53d</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">5.48 &#x00B1; 2.50a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">4.28 &#x00B1; 0.61a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">6.49 &#x00B1; 0.15bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">7.09 &#x00B1; 3.10a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">11.99 &#x00B1; 11.43a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Silt content (%)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">31.24 &#x00B1; 2.59b</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">26.17 &#x00B1; 7.36a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">29.14 &#x00B1; 1.79c</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">34.57 &#x00B1; 4.60ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">39.05 &#x00B1; 6.82a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">34.31 &#x00B1; 2.99bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">41.34 &#x00B1; 2.19a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">40.38 &#x00B1; 3.02a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">46.00 &#x00B1; 2.79a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">31.75 &#x00B1; 3.02b</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">36.77 &#x00B1; 9.54a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">34.60 &#x00B1; 1.07bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">39.31 &#x00B1; 6.62a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">37.80 &#x00B1; 13.87a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">36.11 &#x00B1; 6.53b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Sand content (%)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">63.15 &#x00B1; 3.32a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">68.74 &#x00B1; 9.08a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">66.36 &#x00B1; 1.82a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">57.83 &#x00B1; 5.26ab</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">50.73 &#x00B1; 10.28a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">59.33 &#x00B1; 4.47a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">49.55 &#x00B1; 1.45c</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">52.01 &#x00B1; 3.33a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">43.78 &#x00B1; 3.40a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">64.58 &#x00B1; 2.04a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">57.73 &#x00B1; 8.44a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">61.11 &#x00B1; 0.48a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">54.19 &#x00B1; 6.61bc</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">55.10 &#x00B1; 16.23a</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">51.88 &#x00B1; 17.31a</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Mean&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;standard deviation, <italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;3. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among the different vegetation types for the same soil layer at the 0.05 level. GL, nature grassland; LS, larch; PS, populus; YS, ulmus; ZS, pinus; TC, total carbon; TN, total nitrogen; SOC, soil organic carbon.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Sequencing results of soil samples</title>
<p>A total of 2,636,522 (ranging from 34,619 to 63,468 sequences per sample) and 3,975,388 (ranging from 50,899 to 166,964 sequences per sample) quality sequences of the bacterial 16S rRNA and fungal ITS genes were obtained, respectively. In total, 19,957 bacterial OTUs and 5,957 fungal OTUs were obtained in the five vegetation restoration types.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Alpha diversity of soil microbial communities</title>
<p>The bacterial Shannon of LS and ZS were significantly 7.27 and 7.77% higher than those of GL in the 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm soil layer, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The bacterial Chao indices of LS and ZS were significantly 21.06 and 22.39% higher than those of GL in the 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm soil layer, respectively. The fungal Shannon and Chao indices of PS were significantly 29.47 and 30.17% lower than those of GL in the 0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm soil layer. The fungal Chao indices of YS were significantly 85.70 and 146.86% higher than those of GL in the 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm and 40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm soil layer, respectively. Overall, Shannon and Chao indices decreased with increasing depth. Generally, compared to GL, plantation forests vegetation restoration types increased microbial alpha diversity.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil microbial <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>-diversity changes in five vegetation restoration types. <bold>(A)</bold> Shannon index, <bold>(B)</bold> Chao index. GL, nature grassland; LS, larch; PS, populus; YS, ulmus; ZS, pinus. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among five different vegetation types for the same indicator at the 0.05 level. Bac 0&#x2013;20, bac 20&#x2013;40, bac 40&#x2013;60 represent bacteria in the 0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm, 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm, 40&#x2013;60 soil layer, respectively. Fun 0&#x2013;20, fun 20&#x2013;40, fun 40&#x2013;60 represent fungi in the 0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm, 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm, 40&#x2013;60 soil layer, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1514234-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Analysis of soil microbial community composition</title>
<p>The dominant phylum in the bacterial and fungal communities were generally consistent across the five vegetation restoration types (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Acidobacteriota were the primary bacterial phyla in the examined soil samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>), while Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were the primary fungal phyla (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>). Notably, the abundance of Ascomycota was higher in GL, LS, and YS soils with 69&#x2013;88%, 59&#x2013;64%, and 59&#x2013;77%, respectively, while the abundance of Basidiomycota was higher in PS soils with 59&#x2013;89%. The abundance of dominant phyla of fungi in the surface layer of the ZS and the lower layer of the ZS varied, with the abundance of Ascomycota in the 0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm layer being high with 56%; its abundance in the 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm and 40&#x202F;cm layers was also high. The abundance of Ascomycota was higher in the 0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm soil layer with 56%, while the abundance of Ascomycota was higher in the 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm and 40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm soil layers with 54 and 53%, respectively.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Microbial community composition changes in five different vegetation restoration types. <bold>(A)</bold> Bacteria, <bold>(B)</bold> fungi. GL20, GL40, and GL60 represent the 0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm, 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm, and 40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm soil layer of natural grassland soil, respectively. ZS20, ZS40, and ZS60 represent the 0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm, 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm, and 40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm soil layer of pinus soil, respectively. LS20, LS40, and LS60 represent the 0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm, 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm, and 40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm soil layer of larch soil, respectively. YS20, YS40, and YS60 represent the 0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm, 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm, and 40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm soil layer of ulmus soil, respectively. PS20, PS40, and PS60 represent the 0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm, 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm, and 40&#x2013;60&#x202F;cm soil layer of populus soil, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1514234-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Beta diversity of soil microbial communities</title>
<p>Principal Coordinate Analysis was used to resolve the variability in the composition of soil bacterial and fungal communities in the five vegetation restoration types (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The results demonstrated that, at the phylum level, the first two axes (PC1 and PC2) explained 63.17 and 88.80%, respectively, of the total variance in bacteria and fungi in the vegetation restoration types (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3A</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">B</xref>). By contrast, at the genus level, the first two axes (PC1 and PC2) explained 56.01 and 50.82%, respectively, of the total variation in bacteria and fungi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3C</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">D</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil microbial community <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-diversity in five vegetation restoration types. Principal Coordinate Analysis was calculated on weighted unifrac distance. <bold>(A)</bold> Bacterial phylum level; <bold>(B)</bold> fungal phylum level; <bold>(C)</bold> bacterial genus level; <bold>(D)</bold> fungal genus level. GL, nature grassland; LS, larch; PS, populus; YS, ulmus; ZS, pinus.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1514234-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Tests of intergroup differences using ANOSIM similarity analysis (number of permutations&#x202F;=&#x202F;999) showed that, at the phylum level, no significant difference was found in the composition of soil bacterial communities (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.108) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>), but significant differences were observed in the composition of fungal communities (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.001) among the five patterns (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref>). On the contrary, at the genus level, a significant difference was found in the composition of soil bacterial communities (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.001) and soil fungal communities (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3C</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">D</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Correlation analysis between soil microbial communities and soil environmental factors</title>
<p>In this study, after removing redundant variables, four environmental parameters were selected. The results demonstrated that the microbial community structure was driven by various soil environmental factors. Specifically, SOC (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.003) and TN (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001) significantly influenced the bacterial community <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-diversity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figures 4A</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">C</xref>), while SOC (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.030), clay content (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.004) and silt content (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001) significantly influenced fungal community &#x03B2;-diversity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figures 4B</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">F</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">H</xref>). TN did not affect the fungal community &#x03B2;-diversity (<italic>p</italic> &#x003E; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D</xref>). Clay content and silt content did not affect the bacterial community &#x03B2;-diversity (both <italic>p</italic> &#x003E; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figures 4E</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">G</xref>). Bacterial and fungal community structure was influenced by different environmental factors.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Regression analysis reveals the relationship between microbial community &#x03B2;-diversity on genus level and soil parameters. <bold>(A)</bold> Correlation between soil organic carbon (SOC) and bacterial community &#x03B2;-diversity; <bold>(B)</bold> correlation between soil organic carbon (SOC) and fungal community &#x03B2;-diversity; <bold>(C)</bold> correlation between total nitrogen (TN) and bacterial community &#x03B2;-diversity; <bold>(D)</bold> correlation between total nitrogen (TN) and fungal community &#x03B2;-diversity; <bold>(E)</bold> correlation between clay and bacterial community &#x03B2;-diversity; <bold>(F)</bold> correlation between clay and fungal community &#x03B2;-diversity; <bold>(G)</bold> correlation between silt and bacterial community &#x03B2;-diversity; <bold>(H)</bold> correlation between silt and fungal community &#x03B2;-diversity. GL, nature grassland; LS, larch; PS, populus; YS, ulmus; ZS, pinus.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1514234-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>3.7</label>
<title>Soil microbial community co-occurrence network analysis</title>
<p>The results of the analyses showed that soil bacterial and fungal community networks in various soil layers of different vegetation types exhibited different co-occurrence patterns (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). Among the five vegetation restoration types, the bacterial and fungal network complexity indices of GL were the lowest, with the sum total of each soil layer being &#x2212;0.601 and &#x2212;1.425, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Tables 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">4</xref>). The bacterial network complexity index of PS was the highest (1.108) and the fungal network complexity index of LS was the highest (0.802). Broadleaf forests (PS, YS) having higher bacterial network complexity than coniferous forests (ZS, LS), and coniferous forests having higher bacterial network complexity than natural grassland (GL). This trend is similar to that in soil carbon and nitrogen.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Microbial co-occurrence networks in five different vegetation restoration types at genus level. Each species are represented by nodes, and edges show Pearson&#x2019;s correlation (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.08) and significance values (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01). Co-presence relationships (or positive edges) are colored red, while mutual exclusion relationships (or negative edges) are green. GL, nature grassland; LS, larch; PS, populus; YS, ulmus; ZS, pinus.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1514234-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Parameters of the molecular ecological network of soil bacteria.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Vegetation type</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Soil depth/cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Positive edges (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Negative edges (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Average degree</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Modularity</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Density</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Average path length</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Average clustering coefficient</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Complexity index</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4">GL</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0&#x2013;20</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">55.70</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">44.30</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">10.882</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.86</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.022</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.473</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.877</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.514</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">20&#x2013;40</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">64.39</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">35.61</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">14.172</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.811</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.029</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.348</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.921</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.207</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">40&#x2013;60</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">65.07</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">34.93</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">13.738</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.808</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.029</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.369</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.905</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.293</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">Sum</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">185.16</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">114.84</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">38.792</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.479</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.080</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.190</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.703</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.601</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4">LS</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0&#x2013;20</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">52.65</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">47.35</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">12.444</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.838</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.026</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.480</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.902</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.190</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">20&#x2013;40</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">55.20</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">44.80</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">14.432</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.843</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.030</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.224</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.931</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.116</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">40&#x2013;60</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">61.23</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">38.77</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">12.144</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.851</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.025</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.041</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.864</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.263</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">Sum</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">169.08</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">130.92</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">39.020</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.532</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.081</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.745</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.697</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.338</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4">PS</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0&#x2013;20</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">53.85</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">46.15</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">12.390</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.843</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.026</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.500</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.900</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.303</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">20&#x2013;40</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">59.09</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">40.91</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">19.383</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.708</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.040</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.179</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.919</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.777</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">40&#x2013;60</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">60.22</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">39.78</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">19.234</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.743</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.041</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.534</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.933</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.635</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">Sum</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">173.16</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">126.84</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">51.007</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.294</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.107</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.213</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.752</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.108</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4">YS</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0&#x2013;20</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">55.15</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">44.85</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">11.881</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.854</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.024</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.532</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.854</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.340</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">20&#x2013;40</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">65.28</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">34.72</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">15.743</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.794</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.033</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.237</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.905</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.232</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">40&#x2013;60</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">56.41</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">43.59</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">16.241</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.819</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.034</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.129</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.912</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.377</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">Sum</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">176.84</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">123.16</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">43.865</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.467</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.091</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.898</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.671</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.269</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4">ZS</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0&#x2013;20</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">51.79</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">48.21</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">10.859</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.864</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.022</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.033</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.919</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.317</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">20&#x2013;40</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">56.86</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">43.14</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">16.691</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.804</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.035</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.326</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.804</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.143</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">40&#x2013;60</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">52.58</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">47.42</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">18.613</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.792</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.040</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.198</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.792</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.022</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">Sum</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">161.23</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">138.77</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">46.163</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.460</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.097</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.557</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.515</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.438</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>GL, nature grassland; LS, larch; PS, populus; YS, ulmus; ZS, pinus.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Parameters of the molecular ecological network of soil fungal.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Vegetation type</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Soil depth/cm</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Positive edges (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Negative edges (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Average degree</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Modularity</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Density</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Average path length</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Average clustering coefficient</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Complexity index</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4">GL</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0&#x2013;20</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">82.42</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">17.58</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">23.101</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.697</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.071</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.483</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.880</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.354</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">20&#x2013;40</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">97.48</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.52</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">15.918</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.644</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.073</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.087</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.921</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.778</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">40&#x2013;60</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">98.74</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.26</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">19.636</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.665</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.128</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.164</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.957</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.293</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">Sum</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">278.64</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">21.36</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">58.655</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.006</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.272</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.734</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.758</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;1.425</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4">LS</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0&#x2013;20</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">83.67</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">16.33</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">31.011</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.650</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.084</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.122</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.912</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.603</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">20&#x2013;40</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">96.89</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.11</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">29.425</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.464</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.107</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.263</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.889</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.082</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">40&#x2013;60</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">93.05</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">6.95</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">27.647</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.611</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.098</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.057</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.902</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.117</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">Sum</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">273.61</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">26.39</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">88.083</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.725</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.289</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.442</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.703</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.802</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4">PS</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0&#x2013;20</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">89.50</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">10.50</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">23.993</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.662</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.087</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.060</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.949</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.127</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">20&#x2013;40</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">89.42</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">10.58</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">26.520</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.617</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.108</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.039</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.950</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.248</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">40&#x2013;60</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">86.64</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">13.36</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">24.155</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.684</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.117</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.106</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.949</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">Sum</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">265.56</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">34.44</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">74.668</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.963</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.312</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.205</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.848</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.383</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4">YS</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0&#x2013;20</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">88.22</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">11.78</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">25.526</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.684</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.069</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.225</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.892</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.041</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">20&#x2013;40</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">89.03</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">10.97</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">22.876</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.648</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.068</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.268</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.900</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.203</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">40&#x2013;60</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">92.82</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">7.18</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">28.622</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.586</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.100</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.112</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.901</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.151</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">Sum</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">270.07</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">29.93</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">77.024</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.918</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.237</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.605</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.693</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4">ZS</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0&#x2013;20</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">89.61</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">10.39</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">20.818</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.626</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.057</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.245</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.917</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.173</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">20&#x2013;40</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">86.32</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">13.68</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">24.162</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.689</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.089</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.069</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.925</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">&#x2212;0.052</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">40&#x2013;60</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">95.01</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.99</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">31.749</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.503</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.125</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.052</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.920</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.476</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">Sum</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">270.94</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">29.06</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">76.729</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.818</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.271</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.366</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.762</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.251</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>GL, nature grassland; LS, larch; PS, populus; YS, ulmus; ZS, pinus.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec18">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Effects of vegetation restoration types on soil properties</title>
<p>In this study, compared with natural grassland, after about 50&#x202F;years of vegetation restoration, four plantation forests had a increase of soil nutrients (TC, TN, SOC). Especially, populus had significantly higher TC, TN and SOC than natural grassland in each soil layer (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). From the view of improving soil quality (carbon and nitrogen), populus are the better choices of tree species for plantation forest restoration types in the agricultural pastoral ecotone of Zhangjiakou. Populus are considered the king of the world&#x2019;s fast-growing tree species, with a rapid growth rate and large annual increase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">&#x0141;ukaszkiewicz et al., 2024</xref>). It is able to absorb and store large amounts of carbon dioxide in a relatively short period of time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Bahrian et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Mulyana et al., 2024</xref>). In addition, populus have a symbiotic relationship with certain nitrogen-fixing bacteria that can help them fix more nitrogen, thereby increasing the nitrogen content of the soil and improving its fertility. This study revealed that broadleaf forests (PS, YS) had higher TC than coniferous forests (ZS, LS), and coniferous forests had higher TC than natural grassland (GL). This trend was attributed to the fact that broadleaf had a thicker layer of litter that usually decomposes faster than that in coniferous forests, which, in turn, increases the carbon input to the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Wei et al., 2021</xref>). Previous studies have revealed higher soil carbon accumulation in broadleaf forests than in coniferous forests in northern area, which is similar to the results of our study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Geng et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Wei et al., 2021</xref>). Particle size analysis revealed that the soil in the study area had a higher content of sand particles and a lower content of silt and clay particles, which are more susceptible to erosion and transport by monsoon winds due to their smaller size and lighter mass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Chen et al., 2020</xref>). Compared to grassland, plantation forests play a role in reducing wind speed and slowing down wind erosion. Thus, fine particles carried by the atmosphere are intercepted, which leads to the gradual accumulation of more fine materials in the soil surface layer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Guo et al., 2020</xref>). This phenomenon is reflected in the higher content of clay and powder particles in plantation forests.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Effect of vegetation restoration types on soil microbial community structure</title>
<p>Our results showed that bacterial &#x03B1;-diversity was significantly higher in ZS and LS than that in GL in the 20&#x2013;40&#x202F;cm soil layer. Plantation forests have a large and complex root systems, which provides a comfortable habitat for soil microbial communities. This condition promotes soil microbial massive uptake of soil nutrients and have an increase of microbial &#x03B1;-diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Yang et al., 2020b</xref>). However, fungal &#x03B1;-diversity was significantly lower in PS than that in GL in the 0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm soil layer. The plantation forest vegetation in this study was all monospecific, with low litter diversity in the top soil layer (0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm), which also had a negative impact on microbial &#x03B1;-diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Otsing et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Xu et al., 2022</xref>). Regression analyses showed that SOC and TN were significantly correlated with soil bacterial community composition; SOC, clay content and silt content were significantly correlated with soil fungal community composition. This study revealed that SOC were both significantly correlated with soil bacterial and fungal community composition. Since SOC serves as the primary source of energy and nutrients for soil microorganisms, and different microorganisms have different efficiencies and preferences in utilizing SOC, changes in SOC can significantly influence soil microbial community composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Sokol et al., 2022</xref>). Furthermore, these findings implied that the bacterial community composition was regulated by soil nutrients to a certain extent in the process of vegetation restoration in agricultural pastoral ecotone, while the fungal community structure is mainly regulated by soil texture. This result was similar to findings by Xia et al. that soil texture has a greater effect on fungi than bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Xia et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Effect of vegetation restoration types on microbial co-occurrence network</title>
<p>Our results showed that the microbial network complexity increased with soil nutrients. Overall, the microbial network complexity of GL was lowest in five vegetation types, which is similar to the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Yang et al. (2020a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">2020b)</xref>. A rise in carbon and nitrogen content can increase the number of soil microorganisms, which will lead to the formation of a more complex soil microbial network (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Zhou et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Jiao et al., 2021</xref>). In this study, the complexity of soil microbial network in plantation forest vegetation gradually increased with the improvement in soil nutrient status. The restoration of plantation forest vegetation enhanced microbial community stability, which is important for slowing down soil wind erosion, resisting environmental disturbances, and promoting the cycling of soil nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Wang et al., 2023</xref>). Especially, the bacterial network complexity of PS was highest in five vegetation types. We mentioned above that populus are the better choices of tree species to improve soil quality. Now we do believe that populus are very suitable for planting in the agricultural pastoral ecotone of Zhangjiakou. Complex microbial networks not only enhance plant growth and resilience, but also improve ecosystem stability and sustainability and promote the long-term benefits of environmental restoration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Jagadesh et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>We also found that the modularity index and average path length were higher for bacteria than for fungi. The network modularity index usually characterizes the resistance of the system to external disturbances, with higher modularity indexes being associated with greater resistance to external disturbances (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Deng et al., 2012</xref>). A smaller average path length indicates a closer interaction among network nodes, which also implies a faster diffusion of external disturbances in the microbial network and a more sensitive response to disturbances (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Carpenter et al., 2012</xref>). This observation suggests that bacterial networks are more stable than fungal networks in responding to disturbances, which is consistent with previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Zhao et al., 2019</xref>). Bacteria are able to cope with drought through rapid reproduction, dormancy and metabolic adjustments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Lebre et al., 2017</xref>), while fungi are more dependent on water and moist environments, rendering them susceptible to greater impacts under drought conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Logan et al., 2021</xref>). After drought or other disturbances, bacteria are able to restore ecological functions more quickly and promote ecosystem restoration. In contrast, fungi are slower to recover and may slow down the ecosystem restoration process. In conclusion, more attention should be paid to bacterial network characteristics during dryland vegetation restoration.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec22">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Overall, this study highlights the importance of soil quality, microbial diversity and network complexity in plantation forest and natural grassland in Zhangjiakou Tunken Forest Farm. There is a fact that soil TC content is highest in broadleaf forests, followed by coniferous forests and natural grassland. In addition, we have shown that soil bacteria and fungi had different drivers, and soil organic carbon is a key driver regulating both bacterial and fungal community composition. Compared to natural grassland, soil microbial networks became more complex in plantation forests restoration types (<italic>P. sylvestris</italic> var. <italic>mongholica</italic>, <italic>L. principis- rupprechtii</italic>, <italic>P. tomentosa</italic>, and <italic>U. pumila</italic>), especially the highest bacterial network complexity in <italic>P. tomentosa</italic> soil. Anyway, the improvement of both soil quality and microbial network complexity should be considered when rehabilitating land desertification. Thus, maintaining high levels of soil quality and microbial network complexity sustains the function of ecosystem services in the agricultural pastoral ecotone of China. This will further be greatly beneficial for prevention and control of desertification around the world.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec23">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec24">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>PH: Data curation, Investigation, Software, Writing &#x2013; original draft. HS: Data curation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. DZ: Data curation, Investigation, Software, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. ZZ: Methodology, Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. LJ: Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. ZH: Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. XM: Software, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec25">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by Science and Technology Programme of the Chinese Academy of Forestry (CAFYBB2024ZA008); The master plan project of Changning bamboo sea national nature reserve (2023040014228); National Key Research and Development Programme of the 13th Five-Year Plan, China (2020YFF0305905); Research on Ecological Restoration Technology System for Degraded Grassland in the Damshang Plateau of Hebei Province, China (23107).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec26">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec27">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec28">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bahrian</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Firouzan</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naghdi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hashemi</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Estimation and modeling of the biomass and carbon storage in the stump and root of <italic>Populus deltoides</italic></article-title>. <source>Environ. Challenges</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>100884</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envc.2024.100884</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>S.-D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <source>Soil agrochemical analysis</source>. <edition>3rd</edition> Edn. <publisher-loc>Beijing, China</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>China Agricultural Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carpenter</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arrow</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barrett</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Biggs</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brock</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cr&#x00E9;pin</surname> <given-names>A.-S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>General resilience to cope with extreme events</article-title>. <source>Sustain. For.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>3248</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3259</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su4123248</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.-X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Analysis of soil nutrients and soil particle size in desert grassland medicinal plant habitats</article-title>. <source>J. Northern Agricult.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>62</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2020.06.10</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duoji</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Soil microbial network complexity predicts ecosystem function along elevation gradients on the Tibetan plateau</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>172</volume>:<fpage>108766</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108766</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Responses of soil bacterial communities, enzyme activities, and nutrients to agricultural-to-natural ecosystem conversion in the loess plateau, China</article-title>. <source>J. Soils Sediments</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>1427</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1440</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11368-018-2110-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Molecular ecological network analyses</article-title>. <source>BMC Bioinformatics</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>113</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-13-113</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22646978</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kerfahi</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Soil microbial co-occurrence networks become less connected with soil development in a high Arctic glacier foreland succession</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>813</volume>:<fpage>152565</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152565</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34953844</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Felipe-Lucia</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soliveres</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Penone</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fischer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ammer</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boch</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA</source> <volume>117</volume>, <fpage>28140</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>28149</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.2016210117</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33093203</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Geng</surname> <given-names>Y. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Soil active organic carbon pool of coniferous and broadleaved forests in the mountainous area of Beijing</article-title>. <source>J. Beijing For. Univ.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13332/j.1000-1522.2009.05.015</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pei</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>D.-D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>H.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>M.-M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Response of vegetation index to climate change in the Yellow River Basin and its relationship with water and sand changes</article-title>. <source>Soil Water Conserv. Bull.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7+13</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Bacterial and fungal community structures in loess plateau grasslands with different grazing intensities</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>606</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.00606</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28439265</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jagadesh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dash</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Revealing the hidden world of soil microbes: metagenomic insights into plant, bacteria, and fungi interactions for sustainable agriculture and ecosystem restoration</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>285</volume>:<fpage>127764</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2024.127764</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38805978</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>N. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Soil microbiomes with distinct assemblies through vertical soil profiles drive the cycling of multiple nutrients in reforested ecosystems</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>146</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-018-0526-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30131068</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>An</surname> <given-names>Q. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Depth-related characteristics of soil microbial community along the soil prolile of typical dark coniferous forest in Southeast Tibet</article-title>. <source>Acta Ecol. Sin.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>4864</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4875</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5846/stxb202004291047</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Langfelder</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Horvath</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis</article-title>. <source>BMC Bioinformatics</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>559</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-9-559</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19114008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lebre</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Maayer</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cowan</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Xerotolerant bacteria: surviving through a dry spell</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>296</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro.2017.16</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28316329</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hua</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Q.-W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>W.-X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>X.-L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Differences in soil physico-chemical properties and fertility evaluation of three vegetation restoration types in Northwest Hebei</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol. Environ.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>1540</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1546</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2020.08.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sheng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Characteristics of soil carbon emissions and bacterial community composition in peatlands at different stages of vegetation succession</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>839</volume>:<fpage>156242</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156242</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35643137</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Moso bamboo invasion changes the assembly process and interactive relationship of soil microbial communities in a subtropical broadleaf forest</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manag.</source> <volume>536</volume>:<fpage>120901</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120901</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Logan</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacobson</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacobson</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Fungal communities on standing litter are structured by moisture type and constrain decomposition in a hyper-arid grassland</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>596517</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.596517</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33716999</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>&#x0141;ukaszkiewicz</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>D&#x0142;ugo&#x0144;ski</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fortuna-Antoszkiewicz</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fialov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>The ecological potential of poplars (Populus L.) for City tree planting and management: a preliminary study of Central Poland (Warsaw) and Silesia (Chorz&#x00F3;w)</article-title>. <source>Land</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>593</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/land13050593</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mulyana</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Polg&#x00E1;r</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vityi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Forest carbon modeling in poplar and black locust short rotation coppice plantation in Hungary</article-title>. <source>Jurnal Sylva Lestari</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>324</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>337</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23960/jsl.v12i2.883</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>N. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Warnow</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pop</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A perspective on 16S rRNA operational taxonomic unit clustering using sequence similarity</article-title>. <source>NPJ Biofilms Microb.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>16004</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16008</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/npjbiofilms.2016.4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28721243</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Otsing</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barantal</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anslan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koricheva</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tedersoo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Litter species richness and composition effects on fungal richness and community structure in decomposing foliar and root litter</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>125</volume>, <fpage>328</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>339</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.08.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pedrinho</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mendes</surname> <given-names>L. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Araujo Pereira</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Araujo</surname> <given-names>A. S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vaishnav</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karpouzas</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Soil microbial diversity plays an important role in resisting and restoring degraded ecosystems</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>500</volume>, <fpage>325</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>349</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-024-06489-x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sokol</surname> <given-names>N. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Slessarev</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marschmann</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nicolas</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blazewicz</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brodie</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Life and death in the soil microbiome: how ecological processes influence biogeochemistry</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>415</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>430</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41579-022-00695-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35228712</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Avera</surname> <given-names>B. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strahm</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Badgley</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Soil bacterial and fungal communities show distinct recovery patterns during Forest ecosystem restoration</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>e00966</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e00917</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.00966-17</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28476769</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Erdenebileg</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Aridity and decreasing soil heterogeneity reduce microbial network complexity and stability in the semi-arid grasslands</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Indic.</source> <volume>151</volume>:<fpage>110342</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110342</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pe&#x00F1;uelas</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baquerizo</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Soil microbial biodiversity supports the delivery of multiple ecosystem functions under elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and warming</article-title>. <source>Commun. Earth Environ.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>615</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s43247-024-01767-z</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pei</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Soil aggregation accounts for the mineral soil organic carbon and nitrogen accrual in broadleaved forests as compared to that of coniferous forests in Northeast China: cross-sites and multiple species comparisons</article-title>. <source>Land Degrad. Dev.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>296</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>309</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ldr.3725</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rufty</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Soil microbial diversity and composition: links to soil texture and associated properties</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>149</volume>:<fpage>107953</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107953</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Short-term vegetation restoration enhances the complexity of soil fungal network and decreased the complexity of bacterial network</article-title>. <source>JoF</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>1122</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/jof8111122</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36354889</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>M.-Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Z.-M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Influence of land use and management on soil carbon density in agro-pastoral zone</article-title>. <source>J. Agricult. Eng.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>320</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>325</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2011.07.056</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>An</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020a</year>). <article-title>Plant and soil traits driving soil fungal community due to tree plantation on the loess plateau</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>708</volume>:<fpage>134560</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134560</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31780176</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>An</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020b</year>). <article-title>Comparison of soil microbial community between planted woodland and natural grass vegetation on the loess plateau</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manag.</source> <volume>460</volume>:<fpage>117817</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117817</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.-Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>Y.-B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>Q.-R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Y.-Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Effects of vegetation restoration on soil physical properties in agricultural and pastoral intertwined zones</article-title>. <source>Soil Water Conserv. Bull.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.013</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The Qing-long model: China provides a solution to the karst rocky desertification challenge</article-title>. <source>Acta Ecol. Sin.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>426</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>431</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chnaes.2022.06.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhai</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Soil microbial diversity and network complexity drive the ecosystem multifunctionality of temperate grasslands under changing precipitation</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>906</volume>:<fpage>167217</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167217</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37751844</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.-A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>P.-S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>G.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>G.-D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Characteristics of soil bacterial network in camphor pine plantation forests in the Hulunbeier sand</article-title>. <source>Arid Zone Res.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>905</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>915</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13866/j.azr.2023.06.06</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Changes in litter traits induced by vegetation restoration accelerate litter decomposition in <italic>Robinia pseudoacacia</italic> plantations</article-title>. <source>Land Degrad. Dev.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>179</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>192</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ldr.4136</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of natural vegetative restoration on soil fungal and bacterial communities in bare patches of the southern Taihang Mountains</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>10432</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10441</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ece3.5564</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31624558</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Positive effects of ecological restoration policies on the vegetation dynamics in a typical ecologically vulnerable area of China</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Eng.</source> <volume>159</volume>:<fpage>106087</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106087</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Network analysis reveals the strengthening of microbial interaction in biological soil crust development in the mu us Sandy land, northwestern China</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>144</volume>:<fpage>107782</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107782</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>