<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2024.1405090</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Exploring the potential of <italic>Bacillus</italic> for crop productivity and sustainable solution for combating rice false smut disease</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Pandey</surname> <given-names>Neha</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2696015/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Vaishnav</surname> <given-names>Richa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2696007/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Rajavat</surname> <given-names>Asha Singh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>Arvind Nath</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>Sanjay</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Tripathi</surname> <given-names>Ravi Mani</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>Madan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Shrivastava</surname> <given-names>Neeraj</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/623607/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Amity Institute of Microbial Technology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh</institution>, <addr-line>Noida, Uttar Pradesh</addr-line>, <country>India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>ICAR- Indian Institute of Seed Science</institution>, <addr-line>Maunath Bhanjan, Uttar Pradesh</addr-line>, <country>India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>ICAR- Indian Institute of Vegetable Research</institution>, <addr-line>Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh</addr-line>, <country>India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Amity Institute of Nanotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh</institution>, <addr-line>Noida, Uttar Pradesh</addr-line>, <country>India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>ICAR- Indian Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Garhkhatanga</institution>, <addr-line>Ranchi, Jharkhand</addr-line>, <country>India</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: Anukool Vaishnav, GLA University, India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: Anjney Sharma, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China</p>
<p>Durgesh K. Jaiswal, Graphic Era University, India</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Neeraj Shrivastava, <email>neersar@gmail.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>28</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1405090</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>22</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>06</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2024 Pandey, Vaishnav, Rajavat, Singh, Kumar, Tripathi, Kumar and Shrivastava.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Pandey, Vaishnav, Rajavat, Singh, Kumar, Tripathi, Kumar and Shrivastava</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Rice false smut, which is caused by the soil-borne fungal pathogen <italic>Ustilaginoidea virens</italic> (<italic>U. virens</italic>), is one of the most threatening diseases in most of the rice-growing countries including India that causes 0.5&#x2013;75% yield loss, low seed germination, and a reduction in seed quality. The assessment of yield loss helps to understand the relevance of disease severity and facilitates the implementation of appropriate management strategies. This study aimed to mitigate biotic stress in rice by employing a rhizobacterial-based bioformulation, which possesses diverse capabilities as both a plant growth promoter and a biocontrol agent against <italic>U. virens</italic>. Rhizobacteria were isolated from the soil of the rice rhizospheres from the healthy plant of the false smut affected zone. Furthermore, they were identified as <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains: <italic>B. subtilis</italic> (BR_4), <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> (BU_7), <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> (BU_8), and <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> (KU_7) via sequencing. Isolates were screened for their biocontrol potential against <italic>U. virens</italic> under <italic>in vitro</italic> conditions. The antagonistic study revealed that <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> (KU_7) inhibited <italic>U. virens</italic> the most (44.6%), followed by <italic>B. subtilis</italic> BR_4 (41.4%), <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> BU_7 (39.8%), and <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> BU_8 (43.5%). Various biochemical and plant growth promoting attributes, such as phosphate and Zn solubilization, IAA, ammonium, siderophore, and chitinase production, were also investigated for all the selected isolates. Furthermore, the potential of the isolates was tested in both <italic>in vitro</italic> and field conditions by employing talc-based bioformulation through bio-priming and root treatment. The application of bioformulation revealed a 20% decrease in disease incidence in plants treated with <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> (KU_7), a 60.5% increase in the biological yield, and a 45% increase in the grain yield. This eco-friendly approach not only controlled the disease but also improved the grain quality and reduced the chaffiness.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>
<italic>Bacillus</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>bio-control</kwd>
<kwd>rice false smut</kwd>
<kwd>bio-formulation</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Bacillus vallismortis</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Ustilaginoidea virens</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>PGPR</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="9"/>
<table-count count="6"/>
<equation-count count="7"/>
<ref-count count="93"/>
<page-count count="18"/>
<word-count count="13363"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.), which belongs to the family Poaceae, is one of the highly demanded cereal crops not only in India but also worldwide. India is the first rice-growing country in the world in terms of cultivation area, which is approximately 42.5 million hectares with a production of 152.6 MT (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref79">Surendran et al., 2021</xref>). Most of the world&#x2019;s population is dependent on this cereal crop and consumes it as a staple food after wheat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">FAOSTAT, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref76">Statista, 2023</xref>). India is the second largest producer of rice in the world. In India, Assam, West Bengal, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, and Bihar including Eastern Uttar Pradesh possess approximately 55% of the rice cropping area and contribute to approximately 50% of the total rice production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Mohanty and Yamano, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Devkota et al., 2020</xref>). Approximately 85% of the rice farming system is focused on the Indo-Gagetic plains, with India occupying approximately 76% of this zone, including the state of Uttar Pradesh (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Kumar et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>The rice crop is challenged by various biotic and abiotic factors due to fluctuating environmental conditions in different geographical locations. A major biotic factor affecting rice cultivation is the rice false smut disease, which is one of the most devastating diseases caused by <italic>Ustilaginoidea virens</italic> or <italic>Villosiclava virens</italic> (teleomorph) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Chen et al., 2022</xref>). It severely affects the grain yield and the quality of rice, leading to 2.8&#x2013;81% yield loss depending upon the severity of the infection. The chalkiness of the grains reduces the grain yield, and the infected seeds lose their seed viability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Muniraju, K. M. 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref91">Yong et al., 2018</xref>). The pathogen travels systemically from the roots to the panicle of the rice plant, where it converts rice grains into yellow-green balls that contain mature chlamydospores, as it is primarily present in the soil. <italic>U. virens</italic> infects the stamen specifically, interrupting fertilization and flowering in rice and forming rice false smut balls (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Fan et al., 2020</xref>). These rice false smut ball structures, which are known as pseudosclerotia, serve as an inoculum to spread disease in the neighboring rice plants under favorable climatic conditions, which infect the entire crop and the future crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref82">Tang et al., 2021</xref>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Schematic representation of <bold>(A)</bold> infection cycle of <italic>U. virens</italic> in rice plant leading to false smut and <bold>(B)</bold> mechanisms (direct and indirect) used by PGPRs in controlling disease.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1405090-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To overcome the disease spread, the application of commercially available fungicides (trifloxystrobin with tebuconazole, propiconazole, and kresoxim-methyl) at distinct stages of rice growth, such as the booting stage, the panicle emergence stage, or the pre-flowering stage, is being utilized (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Barnwal et al., 2016</xref>). However, incessant application of fungicides causes resistance in the pathogen against fungicides over a period of duration and persistence in the environment. Fungicides, such as propiconazole, have led to the development of fungicide-resistant <italic>U. virens</italic> strains due to repeated exposure, and also cause environmental pollution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref93">Zhou et al., 2019</xref>). In addition to this, to enhance crop productivity and fulfil the global rice demand, farmers are employing the use of chemical fertilizers to enhance productivity as they are cost-effective and easily available. On the contrary, persistent use of chemical fertilizers decreases the nutritional value of seeds and its quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">Singh et al., 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>To alleviate the excessive use of fungicides and chemical fertilizers, there is a need to adapt to sustainable approaches in agricultural practices. To overcome these challenges, there is a need to use environmentally friendly and sustainable strategies that can serve as a biocontrol agent against the effect of biotic stress on the crop and a biofertilizer to enhance the yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Sharma et al., 2022</xref>). In rice, microorganisms play a vital role in the exchange of plant nutrients and reduce the application of chemicals to a great extent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Jacoby et al., 2017</xref>). The use of microorganisms as bio-inoculants is the most alluring alternative to chemical-based fertilizers as they have a positive impact on plant growth, soil, and the environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Kantachote et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Jaiswal et al., 2022</xref>). The application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can serve as a biocontrol, not only enhancing crop productivity but also aiding in the management of false smut disease.</p>
<p>Beneficial plant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere can influence plant vigor and soil fertility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Gudeta, 2018</xref>). Rhizobacterial species, <italic>Bacillus,</italic> and fungal species, <italic>Trichoderma,</italic> have been widely used as potent biocontrol agents due to their secretion of toxic secondary metabolites that suppress or inhibit the growth of the pathogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Baite et al., 2022</xref>). The application of PGPRs, such as <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Guyasa et al., 2018</xref>), <italic>Serratia</italic> spp. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Nascente et al., 2019</xref>), <italic>Actinomycetes</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Cruz et al., 2015</xref>), and various types of <italic>Bacillus</italic> species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Rais et al., 2018</xref>) on rice crops have been reported in various studies. These rhizospheric microbes can suppress plant pathogens through direct (antimicrobial peptides, production of chitinolytic enzymes, and volatile organic compounds, VOCs) and indirect (competition for nutrients and induction of resistance in the host) mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Shafi et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Kohl et al., 2019</xref>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>).</p>
<p>In the present study, we have employed biocontrol PGPRs under greenhouse and field conditions to investigate the significant increase in disease management and plant agronomic parameters, as well as enhancement in grain quality. The genus <italic>Bacillus,</italic> the members of phylum <italic>Bacillota,</italic> are gram-positive, rod-shaped, aerobic bacteria. Their spore-forming ability enhances their application as bio-stimulants as they can survive in harsh and unfavorable environments and possess PGP traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref87">Vejan et al., 2016</xref>). The study investigates the role of multifarious biocontrol PGP bacteria, including <italic>Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus subtilis,</italic> and <italic>B. vallismortis,</italic> isolated from the rice rhizosphere, in promoting growth, enhancing yield, and suppressing diseases in rice.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Sampling and isolation of bacteria</title>
<p>Rhizospheric soil samples were collected from the five sites, namely, Takari, Dhata, Bhurchuni, Gopalpur, and Bamhrauli villages, of Fatehpur district, Uttar Pradesh, India (25.8500&#x00B0;N; 80.8987&#x00B0;E) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>). Samples were collected in triplicate from the healthy rice rhizosphere during the flowering stage when infection occurred and were pooled together. After the drying and sieving, soil samples were kept in a refrigerator at 4&#x00B0;C for further use. The rhizobacterial strains were isolated on nutrient agar (NA) media, soil extract agar, and kings B medium (HiMedia Ltd., India). By the serial dilution method, 1&#x2009;g of soil was taken and dissolved in 10&#x2009;mL of pre-sterilized distilled water. The dilution factors of 10&#x02C9;<sup>6</sup> to 10&#x02C9;<sup>8</sup> were taken for the isolation of bacteria and spread into nutrient agar, soil extract agar, and kings B medium amended Petri plates. Plates were incubated at 28&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2&#x00B0;C for 24&#x2009;h. Single colonies were picked for obtaining pure culture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Gowsalya et al., 2014</xref>). A total of 135 colonies were picked from the Petri plate during the isolation of bacteria. For long-term preservation, bacteria were grown into Luria Broth (LB), and then 500&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of broth was added into culture tubes. In total, 60% pre-sterilized glycerol was added into 2&#x2009;mL screw top culture tubes. Tubes were previously stored at 4&#x00B0;C and then at 0&#x00B0;C followed by final storage at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Screening of the collected bacterial isolates</title>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.2.1</label>
<title>Based on biocontrol potential</title>
<p>For the preliminary screening of bacteria, all 120 rhizobacterial isolates were tested for the antagonistic activity against the phytopathogen. A dual culture test was performed against the rice false smut causative agent, <italic>U. virens</italic>. The fungal culture was obtained from the plant pathology laboratory of the ICAR-Indian Institute of Seed Science (IISS), Maunath Bhanjan, Uttar Pradesh, India. Strain <italic>Ustilaginoidea virens</italic> (NAIMCC-F-04112) was procured from the National Agriculturally Important Microbial Culture Collection (NAIMCC) of ICAR-National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms, Maunath Bhanjan, Uttar Pradesh, India. To perform a dual culture test, a 5&#x2009;mm disc of freshly grown fungal culture was placed on four sides of a Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) Petri plate, and the bacterial isolate was inoculated at the center of the plate. Plates were incubated at the temperature of 28&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2&#x00B0;C for 10&#x2009;days. Mycelial growth was measured following the method given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Kumar et al. (2012)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Maksimov et al. (2011)</xref>.</p>
<p>The percentage inhibition was calculated using the following formula:</p>
<disp-formula id="E1">
<mml:math id="M1">
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>I</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;percent of growth inhibition, C&#x2009;=&#x2009;diameter of fungal pathogen in control, and T&#x2009;=&#x2009;colony diameter/radial growth of the pathogen in treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.2.2</label>
<title>Assessment of fungal inhibition by scanning electron microscope</title>
<p>A disintegration study of fungus mycelia was carried out using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) along with control. A portion of fungus near the inhibition zone was fixed in a 2.5% glutaraldehyde and incubated at room temperature (RT) for 60&#x2009;min and stored in a freezer (4&#x00B0;C) for 12&#x2009;h. Fungal samples were centrifuged at 5000&#x2009;rpm for the removal of glutaraldehyde. Pallets were washed with 0.1&#x2009;M phosphate buffer with pH 7 and dissolved in 0.1% silver nitrate solution for 1&#x2009;h. Samples were dehydrated by using ethanol (30&#x2013;90%) serially. The final sample was stored at 100% ethanol at 4&#x00B0;C for further study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref84">Torres et al., 2016</xref>). This study was carried out using ZEISS EVO18 SEM with a magnification of X 4,000&#x2013;5,000 X at the Instrumental facility of AIARS (Material and Devices), Amity University, Noida, India (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref88">Von Ardenne, 1985</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Murtey and Ramasamy, 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.2.3</label>
<title>Based on plant growth-promoting traits</title>
<p>PGP traits play a key role in regulating the growth of plants and defense system. PGPRs provide minerals and other key nutrients to plants.</p>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.2.3.1</label>
<title>Phosphate solubilization</title>
<p>Phosphate solubilization was measured using a tricalcium phosphate (TCP) concentration of 3 gL<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> in an agar medium with a pH of 7.4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Pikovskaya, 1948</xref>). A loopful of bacterial isolate was inoculated at the center of the Petri dish. All the plates were incubated at 28&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2&#x00B0;C for 7&#x2009;days. A clear zone around a growing colony indicated phosphate solubilization. The halo zone was measured around the bacterial colony which determined phosphate solubilization activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.2.3.2</label>
<title>Indole acetic acid</title>
<p>To check the qualitative Indole Acetic Acid (IAA) production, isolates were cultivated in Luria Bertani broth supplemented with 100&#x2009;mg/L of L-tryptophan as a precursor. Following 5&#x2009;days of incubation, the cultures were centrifuged at 10,000&#x2009;rpm for 10&#x2009;min. The acquired supernatant was placed in a new tube, and Salkowski&#x2019;s reagent was added in a 2:1 ratio. The solutions were gently mixed and kept at room temperature for 15&#x2013;30&#x2009;min to develop color. For the quantitative estimation (&#x03BC;g/ml), the standard plot of IAA was used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Farzana et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Goswami et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.2.3.3</label>
<title>Siderophore solubilization</title>
<p>Qualitative production of siderophore was determined on Chrome Azurol S (CAS) agar medium. The isolates were spotted onto CAS agar plates and incubated at 28&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2&#x00B0;C for 6&#x2009;days to observe the yellow to orange halo zone around the colony (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Schwyn and Neilands, 1987</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>2.2.3.4</label>
<title>Zinc solubilization</title>
<p>To investigate the zinc solubilization efficiency of isolated cultures, bacterial isolates were spot inoculated in agar plates enriched by 1% Zinc oxide (ZnO) in the medium, which served as a source of insoluble Zn compound. Plates were incubated for 7&#x2009;days at 28&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2&#x00B0;C in the dark condition to observe the transparent halo zone around the colony (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Bunt and Rovira, 1955</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>2.2.3.5</label>
<title>Ammonium production</title>
<p>For the assessment of ammonium production, isolates were incubated in peptone water (10&#x2009;mL) for 48&#x2013;72&#x2009;h at 28&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2&#x00B0;C. After incubation, Nessler&#x2019;s reagent (0.5&#x2009;mL) was added to each tube. The development of rich brown to faint yellow colors was observed as a result of ammonium activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Cappuccino and Sherman, 1992</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>2.2.3.6</label>
<title>Chitinase production</title>
<p>To ascertain the amount of chitinase production test, 3&#x2009;g of powdered chitin was dissolved in 75&#x2009;mL of concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl), and the mixture was then placed on a magnetic stirrer for an hour at room temperature. Subsequently, the solution was diluted with 1,000&#x2009;mL of distilled water and filtered. To keep the colloidal chitin at pH 3.5, the residue was rinsed with distilled water twice. Spot inoculations of bacterial isolates were made in agar media enriched with chitin (0.3%), and the Petri plates were cultured at 28&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2&#x00B0;C for 6&#x2013;7&#x2009;days. Positive enzymatic activity was indicated by the formation of a clear zone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Krithika and Chellaram, 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Furthermore, the remaining biochemical properties, including protease, cellulase, lipase, starch solubilization, urease test, and citrate utilization tests, were performed using the standard protocols as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Cappuccino and Sherman (1992)</xref>. An assessment of the ability to utilize different carbon sources and sugar utilization test was performed by the Hi25 Enterobacteriaceae Identification kit from HiMedia.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Molecular characterization and identification of the isolates</title>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>2.3.1</label>
<title>16S rRNA sequencing</title>
<p>The molecular characterization of selected isolates was performed by 16S rDNA gene sequencing. DNA of freshly grown (48&#x2009;h) bacterial isolates was extracted using a HiPurA&#x00AE; Multi-Sample DNA Purification Kit (MB554) of HiMedia. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) mixture (25&#x2009;&#x03BC;L) was prepared by adding 1&#x2009;&#x03BC;L template DNA and universal primers 27F (5-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3&#x2032;) and 149R (5- CGGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3&#x2032;) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref81">Tan et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Abellan-Schneyder et al., 2021</xref>). PCR cycle condition was performed as follows: 94&#x00B0;C for 3&#x2009;min, 35&#x2009;cycles of 94&#x00B0;C for 30&#x2009;s, 50&#x00B0;C for 30&#x2009;s,72&#x00B0;C for 90/60&#x2009;s; final extension, 72&#x00B0;C for 7&#x2009;min; and final hold at 4&#x00B0;C. The PCR product was resolved in ethidium bromide amended 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized on a gel doc transilluminator (Quantity One, Bio-Rad, USA). Products were purified and used for genetic sequencing. The gene sequencing was outsourced to Eurofins Genomics India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>2.3.2</label>
<title>Identification and phylogenetic analysis</title>
<p>Sequence results were compared using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTn) program on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (<ext-link xlink:href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov</ext-link>), and accession numbers were obtained (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref83">Thompson et al., 1997</xref>). Phylogenetic analysis was conducted using MEGA XI software. The neighbor-joining (NJ) DNA distance technique was used to reconstruct evolutionary history. The evolutionary distances were expressed in base substitutions per site and were calculated using the maximum composite likelihood technique. The analysis involved 14 nucleotide sequences which were taken from the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. A total of 1,000 bootstrap resampling tests were done to determine the branching percentage value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Felsenstein, 1985</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Saitou and Nei, 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Kumar et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref80">Tamura et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Preparation of talc-based bioformulation</title>
<p>A loopful of isolated bacteria [<italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> (BR_4); <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> (BU_7); <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> (BU_8); and <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> (KU_7)] were inoculated in 400&#x2009;mL of pre-sterilized nutrient broth medium. The broth was incubated in a shaker incubator at 150&#x2009;rpm for 72&#x2009;h at 28&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2&#x00B0;C. The broth contained a bacterial load of 9&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10<sup>8</sup>&#x2009;cfu&#x2009;ml<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> after incubating for 3&#x2009;days (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Karthiba et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">Shah et al., 2021</xref>). A total of 1&#x2009;kg of sterilized talc powder (121&#x00B0;C/15 lbs) was amended with 400&#x2009;mL of bacteria-loaded nutrient broth for 1&#x2009;h. Then, 1.5% calcium carbonate was added to maintain the pH to neutral, and 10% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) was added for the stickiness and used as an adhesive element. Bioformulations were air-dried in aseptic conditions and moisture was maintained at 20%. After the drying, bioformulations were stored in a refrigerator at 4&#x00B0;C in a sterilized polythene cover. Before the bio-priming of the seed, the viability of the formulation was checked. A total of 10&#x2009;g of bioformulation was used for the 1&#x2009;kg of seeds biopriming.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Effect of bacterial strains on seed germination</title>
<p>After verifying the antagonistic activity test, further evaluation of the plant growth promotion test was performed in <italic>in vitro</italic> conditions. The seed emergence test was carried out by the standard &#x2018;Ragdoll paper&#x2019; method proposed by the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA 2007). Talc-based bioformulation with a bacterial load of up to 10<sup>6</sup>&#x2013;10<sup>8</sup> was used for the bio-priming of the rice seeds. A total of two hundred seeds with four replications were examined for seed emergence (germination percentage). Seedling root length, shoot length, seedling&#x2019;s fresh weight, and dry weight were taken for the analysis of the vigor index and were taken on the 14<sup>th</sup> day.</p>
<p>The seedling vigor index was calculated by using the formula (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Abdul-Baki and Anderson, 1973</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="E2">
<mml:math id="M2">
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Vigor</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Index</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Seedling</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">length</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mtable columnalign="left">
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">shoot</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">length</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">root</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">length</mml:mi>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">germination</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="E3">
<mml:math id="M3">
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Vigor</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Index</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Seedling</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">dry</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">wt</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">germination</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>After the measurement of seedling length, roots were removed very carefully from the shoot for the root architecture study. The root was floated on the surface of the root scanner machine Epson Expression 12000XL A3 Flatbed Photo Scanner, India. The study was conducted at the fungal study department of ICAR-National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms, Maunath Bhanjan, Uttar Pradesh, India.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Efficacy of isolates under greenhouse conditions</title>
<p>Surface sterilized (5% sodium hypochlorite) seeds treated with <italic>Bacillus</italic> isolates [control, BR_4; BU_7; BU_8; and KU_7] were shown in pots. The plastic pots with a 10&#x2009;kg capacity were filled with sterilized soil and sand in a ratio of 2:1. A total of 10 seeds of each treatment were directly sown in the pots. This experiment is performed in triplicate with three sets. After the seeding pots were filled with distilled water, extra plants were uprooted after the germination on 25&#x2013;28<sup>th</sup> day. Plant height, number of tillers, and other agronomical parameters were recorded following the standard protocol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref85">Unkovigich et al., 2010</xref>). In total, 1,000 seeds weight were taken after the 150&#x2009;days by the full harvest. Furthermore, field trials with the same isolates were conducted consecutively for 2&#x2009;years for further analysis with the same isolates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Field study/trials</title>
<p>Previously, we have conducted seed biopriming techniques to evaluate the isolates in controlled conditions. In field conditions, direct seed sowing is not possible for paddy seeds, thus we have considered the root treatment techniques for further analysis. The evaluation of plant growth promoting (PGP) isolates was carried out by the root treatment technique with the HKR-126 rice cultivar. This cultivar is highly susceptible to the <italic>U. virens</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Experimental plot of various treatments under the field conditions (2019&#x2013;2020) and field layout (RBD) of the treatments in ICAR-IISS, Maunath Bhanjan.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1405090-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The field experiment was conducted consecutively for 2&#x2009;years (2019 and 2020) in the field of ICAR-Indian Institute of Seed Science, Kushmaur, Maunath Bhanjan, Uttar Pradesh, India (25&#x00B0;56&#x2032;30&#x2033;N 83&#x00B0;33&#x2032;40&#x2033;E). The mean of maximum and minimum temperatures in both years were recorded between 36&#x00B0;C and 17&#x00B0;C, from June to October. Annual precipitations were recorded in the range of a maximum of 103.6&#x2009;mm to a minimum of 14&#x2009;mm. Four isolates were taken for the treatment, [C-control versus BR_4-root treatment with <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> (BR_4); BU_7-root treatment with <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> (BU_7); BU_8-root treatment with <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> (BU_8); and KU_7- root treatment with <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> (KU_7)]. For this experiment, 25&#x2009;days old seedlings were taken for root treatment. Bioformulation was taken in the ratio of 10&#x2009;g/L. Seedling roots were soaked overnight to facilitate colonization in the area surrounding the roots. Following that, three replications of seedlings were transplanted into the field. In this experiment, Randomized block design (RBD) was employed. Plot sites measured 1.5 &#x00D7; 3&#x2009;m, with a plant-to-plant and row-to-row spacing of 15 and 20 cm, respectively. Various agronomical parameters were recorded till the harvesting periods, including numbers of tillers and plant height in 60 days after transplanting (DAT), panicle length, flag leaf length, and width on 100 DAT; and finally, biological yield and total grain yield and 1,000 seeds weight were measured after full harvest on 145<sup>th</sup> DAT (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Study of pathogenicity</title>
<sec id="sec22">
<label>2.8.1</label>
<title>Fungal inoculation preparation</title>
<p>For the pathogenicity test, the fungal inoculum of the pathogen was prepared in the laboratory. A 10&#x2009;mm disc of <italic>U. virens</italic> mycelia was inoculated into a 250&#x2009;mL potato sucrose broth medium and kept in a shaker incubator at 150&#x2009;rpm and 28&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2&#x00B0;C for 15&#x2009;days. After the filtration, spores were harvested. Spore counting was performed using the hemocytometer under the compound microscope at a magnification of 40X. After the spore count, desirable dilutions (2&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10<sup>6</sup> spores/ml) were made for future tests. The filtered spore suspension was used as an inoculum (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Bhunjun et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Baite et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec23">
<label>2.8.2</label>
<title>Disease incidence</title>
<p>During the experiment, the disease incidence of all experimental plots (4.5&#x2009;m<sup>2</sup>/replication) was recorded. The observation was taken after the full flowering and seed maturation as the disease incidence occurs after the flowering after 90 DAT.</p>
<p>The percentage of infection data was calculated using the standard formula (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Baite et al., 2020a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">b</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="E4">
<mml:math id="M4">
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Disease</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Incidence</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Number</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">of</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">infected</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">tillers</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Total</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">number</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">of</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">tillers</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec24">
<label>2.9</label>
<title>Evaluation of photosynthetic pigment, protein, and antioxidants</title>
<sec id="sec25">
<label>2.9.1</label>
<title>Estimation of total chlorophyll</title>
<p>For the estimation of total chlorophyll, 0.5&#x2009;g of the fresh leaf sample was crushed and extracted into 10&#x2009;mL of 80% chilled acetone. Samples were centrifuged at 5000 RPM for 10&#x2009;min, and supernatants were taken for the analysis. The absorbances of extracts were observed at 645, 663, and 470&#x2009;nm. Chlorophyll content was calculated using the following formula (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Arnon, 1949</xref>).</p>
<disp-formula id="E5">
<mml:math id="M5">
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Chlorophyll</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>12.7</mml:mn>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mn>663</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2.69</mml:mn>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mn>645</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mtext>;</mml:mtext>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="E6">
<mml:math id="M6">
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Chlorophyll</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>22.9</mml:mn>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mn>645</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4.68</mml:mn>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mn>663</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mtext>;</mml:mtext>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="E7">
<mml:math id="M7">
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Carotenoids</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]">
<mml:mtable columnalign="left">
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1000</mml:mn>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mn>470</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mn>3.27</mml:mn>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Chlorophyll</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Chlorophyll</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>227</mml:mn>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="sec26">
<label>2.9.2</label>
<title>Estimation of proteins</title>
<p>Total Protein Extraction Kit (BCBSP003) (BR Biochem Life Sciences, Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India) was used for total protein quantification. The experiment employed 0.5&#x2009;g of fresh leaf sample, and the absorbance of the sample was measured at A260/A280 nm using Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific-2000C).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec27">
<label>2.9.3</label>
<title>Superoxide dismutase</title>
<p>A total of 1&#x2009;g of leaf sample was frozen and dried in liquid nitrogen to prevent proteolytic activity. The sample was ground in 10&#x2009;mL of extraction buffer containing 0.1&#x2009;M phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, 0.5&#x2009;mM EDTA, and 1&#x2009;mM ascorbic acid. The extract was run through four layers of cheesecloth, and the filtrate was centrifuged for 20&#x2009;min at 15,000&#x2009;rpm. The supernatant was utilized for the analysis of the superoxide dismutase enzyme (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Dhindsa et al., 1981</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec28">
<label>2.9.4</label>
<title>Catalase</title>
<p>Using the standard protocol of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Aebi (1984)</xref>, a catalase assay was performed. The reaction mixture (3&#x2009;mL) contained 0.5&#x2009;mL of 75&#x2009;mM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and 1.5&#x2009;mL of 0.1&#x2009;M phosphate buffer (pH 7). The reaction was started by adding 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of diluted enzyme extract. A UV&#x2013;visible spectrophotometer (Specord Bio-200, Analytik Jena, Germany) was used for the analysis of enzymatic activity. The absorbance was taken at 240&#x2009;nm using the UV spectrophotometer.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec29">
<label>2.10</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The experiments were conducted in triplicates, and the obtained results were expressed in terms of the mean&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;standard deviation. Duncan&#x2019;s multiple range tests (DMRT) were used for the data analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Duncan, 1955</xref>). Field data were analyzed using one-way and two-way ANOVA, where &#x002A;, &#x002A;&#x002A;, and &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A; represent significant and &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A; represents highly significant at <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x2264;&#x2009;0.05, 0.01, 0.001, and 0.0001, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed by using IBM SPSS Statistic 27 software and GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2(263) software.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec30">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec31">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Site selection and isolation of PGPRs</title>
<p>Soil samples were collected during the kharif crop season from the rice fields of Fatehpur districts of Uttar Pradesh, India. During the collection of samples, special care was taken in selecting the rice plants and only those plants that were at the late booting stage, vigorous, and were not affected by any kind of disease were considered. From the collected rhizospheric soil samples, a total of 120 rhizobacterial isolates were selected based on their different colony morphologies, colors, and texture variations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec32">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Screening of PGPRs</title>
<sec id="sec33">
<label>3.2.1</label>
<title>Based on biocontrol potential against <italic>Ustilaginoidea virens</italic></title>
<p>Furthermore, all the selected isolates were tested against <italic>U. virens</italic> to assess the biocontrol properties of the isolates. Based on the dual culture assay, maximum growth inhibition of the false smut pathogen was shown by four isolates (BR_4, BU_7, BU_8, and KU_7), and those isolates were chosen for further study. Isolate KU_7 showed the maximum inhibition zone at 44.6% and BU_7 recorded a minimum of 39.8% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The altered morphology of mycelia was observed around the inhibition zone during biocontrol assay. To eliminate this altered morphology or lethality of bacteria against the fungi, the mycelia were observed under SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope). The results showed that all the bacteria disintegrated the mycelia and disrupted the intact mycelia into pieces (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Rhizobacterial isolates showing antifungal activity against the <italic>U. virens</italic> containing the fungal Inhibition Zone (IZ) with mycelial degradation study using Scanning Electron Microscopy. <bold>(A)</bold> Control (<italic>U. virens</italic>). <bold>(B)</bold> BR_4 <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic>. <bold>(C)</bold> BU_7 <italic>B. licheniformis</italic>. <bold>(D)</bold> <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> BU_8. <bold>(E)</bold> KU_7 <italic>B. vallismortis</italic>. <bold>(F)</bold> Percentage of growth inhibition by the rhizobacteria.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1405090-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec34">
<label>3.2.2</label>
<title>Assessment of plant growth promoting traits</title>
<p>After selecting the potent microbes, we further assessed the plant growth-promoting traits, such as phosphate solubilization efficiency, Indole-3-Acetic Acid (IAA) production, siderophore production, Zn solubilization efficiency, ammonium production, and chitinase production, which are very crucial factors for plant growth and fitness along with soil health. <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref> shows the results of PGP traits along with their effectiveness.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Plant growth promoting traits of isolated rhizospheric bacterial strains.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Strains</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Phosphate assay (mm)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">IAA (&#x03BC;g/mL)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Zn Solubilization</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Siderophore assay</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Ammonium production</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Chitinase assay</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BR_4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BU_7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.1&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.07</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">++</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BU_8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">++</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">++</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">KU_7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.07</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.03</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">++</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>IAA-Indole acetic acid; &#x2212;, no activity; W, weak activity; +, activity; ++, very good activity.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Among all four isolates, BR_4 showed the maximum phosphate solubilization activity on Pikovskaya&#x2019;s agar medium by forming a halo zone around their colonies. The diameter of the halo zone was recorded at 5.3&#x2009;mm (the highest) in BR_4, and the least was recorded in BU_7 at 1.1&#x2009;mm. In the case of Indole-3-Acetic Acid (IAA) production, BR_4 isolate produced 10.5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL, and the minimum was observed in KU_7, which is 1.6&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL. To assess the siderophore production ability, the test was carried out for all the isolates, and three isolates were found to be positive for siderophore production. Among all four isolates, only KU_7 showed Zn solubilization efficiency, which is a very essential component for increasing native Zn availability in soil, which led to increased assimilation of Zn in the host. The selected isolates were also very good chitin solubilizers. In addition to that, we have also performed starch, ammonium utilization, cellulase, lipase, catalase, and urease activity tests. The results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>. After assessing the plant growth-promoting traits, the next phase was to identify the species of bacteria.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Biochemical characterization of isolated rhizospheric bacterial strains.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Strains</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Protease</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Cellulase</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Lipase</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Starch</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Urease</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Citrate</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BR_4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">++</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BU_7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">++</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">++</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BU_8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">++</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">++</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">KU_7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">+</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>&#x2212;, no activity; W, weak activity; +, activity; ++, very good activity.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec35">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Identification of the selected biocontrol PGPRs</title>
<sec id="sec36">
<label>3.3.1</label>
<title>16S rRNA sequencing</title>
<p>With the help of the 16S rRNA sequencing of the FASTA file database, bacterial isolates were identified. Bacterial sequencing data were submitted to the NCBI GenBank to get the accession numbers, BR_4 <italic>B. subtilis</italic> MZ356383, BU_7 <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> MZ350854, BU_8 <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> MZ356392, and BU_7 <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> MZ359961. Based on 16S rDNA sequence analysis, all four isolates were identified as <italic>Bacillus</italic> genera with different species. Percentage homology, sequence lengths, and accession numbers of all four isolates are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Molecular characterizations of bacterial isolates, BLAST results showing sequence length, percentage of homology, and accession number given by NCBI.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Isolate code</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Sequence length (bp)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Query cover (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">E Value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">% of identity</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Sequence Id</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Accession no.</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Post Identification</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BR_4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">694</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">100</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">99.89</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">SUB9806821</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">MZ356383</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BU_7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">898</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">100</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">99.71</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">SUB9806808</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">MZ350854</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<italic>B. licheniformis</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BU_8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">695</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">100</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">99.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">SUB9806827</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">MZ356392</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<italic>B. licheniformis</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">KU_7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">651</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">100</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">97.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">SUB9813921</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">MZ359961</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<italic>B. vallismortis</italic>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec37">
<label>3.3.2</label>
<title>Phylogenetic analysis</title>
<p>Phylogenetic analysis was conducted with MEGA XI software. The analysis involved 14 nucleotide sequences. A total of 1,000 bootstrap resampling tests were done to determine the branching percentage value. The accession numbers of isolates are mentioned in brackets and are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Phylogenetic tree of <italic>B. subtilis</italic> (BR_4), <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> (BU_7 and BU_8), and <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> (KU_7) based on evolutionary neighbor-joining (NJ) relationships.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1405090-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec38">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Effect of bacterial treatment on growth characteristics under <italic>in vitro</italic> condition</title>
<sec id="sec39">
<label>3.4.1</label>
<title>Effect of bioformulation on germination</title>
<p>In this experiment, seeds were bio-primed with bioformulation prepared by using all four selected isolates. To prepare the bioformulation, an efficient carrier, and an inert base were used, i.e., talc powder containing magnesium silicate. It is widely accepted and utilized in the biofertilizer industry. Furthermore, the shelf life of talc-based bioformulation was checked up to 180&#x2009;days. For the viability test and contamination check, bioformulation was tested routinely on every 30th day found. Till 180th days after inoculation (data unpublished).</p>
<p>To verify the effect on seed germination and related physiological parameters in the presence of bacterial isolates, we used bio-primed rice seed with bioformulations having bacterial loads of up to 10<sup>6</sup>&#x2013;10<sup>8</sup>. After the 14<sup>th</sup> day inoculation, we examined the results and observed that all the treatments BU_7, BU_8 (<italic>B. licheniformis</italic>), BR_4 (<italic>B. subtilis</italic>), and KU_7 (<italic>B. vallismortis</italic>) resulted in enhanced physiological parameters such as seed emergence percentage, root length and shoot length, seedling fresh weight, and seedling dry weight, vigor index I, and vigor index II. Seed germination increased by 16% in the treatment KU_7 (98.7), and 15% in the treatment BU_8 (97.67) as compared to the control (82.8). In treatment BU_7, it was recorded by 12% (94.67), and in BR_4, emergence was enhanced by 11% (93.17) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of bacterial inoculation on physiological parameters and vigor of plants.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Treatment</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Germination (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Root length (cm)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Shoot length (cm)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Seedling fresh wt. (mg)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Seedling dry wt. (mg)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Vigor index I</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Vigor index II</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">C</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">82.83&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.29<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.35<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9.2&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.06<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">108.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.58<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">61.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.35<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1369.5<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.1<sup>d</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BR_4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">93.17&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.29<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.55<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11.2&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.35<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">148.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.58<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">101.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.59<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2059.0<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9.5<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BU_7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">94.67&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.29<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.15<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.38<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">170.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.59<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">116.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.60<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2347.7<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11.0<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BU_8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">97.67&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.58<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.12<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.21<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">188.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.55<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">120.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.31<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2643.5<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11.8<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">KU_7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">98.07&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.58<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13.1&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.12<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.21<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">195.2&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.55<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">128.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.31<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2784.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.6<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>a, b, c denotes significant treatments, where (a) is highly significant, (b) is medium significant, and (c) is least significant. Different letters are significantly different by Duncan&#x2019;s multiple range test (DMRT). Values are expressed in means&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;standard deviation (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;5), the significance of ANOVA <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Seeds treated with KU_7 (<italic>B. vallismortis</italic>) showed the maximum root and shoot length, which were observed at 13.1&#x2009;cm and 15.4&#x2009;cm, respectively. The minimum root and shoot length were observed with treatment BR_4 (BR_4) <italic>B. subtilis,</italic> which were observed at 10.9&#x2009;cm and 11.2&#x2009;cm. The uninoculated control root length was recorded as 7.3&#x2009;cm and the shoot length was 9.2&#x2009;cm, which is smaller than all the bio-primed treatments.</p>
<p>After the 14<sup>th</sup> day of treatment, the seeds that emerged in ragdoll paper were safely extracted, and fresh and dry weights were observed in all the treatments. Maximum fresh weight and dry weight were recorded in treatment KU_7, showing 195.2&#x2009;mg and 128.9&#x2009;mg weight, respectively. Control seedling fresh and dry weights were recorded as the least, with 108.6&#x2009;mg for fresh and 61.7&#x2009;mg for dry. All the isolates were higher in all the parameters compared to the control, and among them, KU_7 was found superior to other isolates. Vigor index I (VI-I) and vigor index II (VI-II) were observed in all the treatments. Treatment KU_7 showed high VI-I (2784.4) and VI-II (12.6), while the treatment BR_4 (<italic>B. subtilis</italic>) showed a minimum vigor index, VI-I (2059) and VI-II (9.5). The VI-I and VI-II of control seedlings were recorded the least, with 1369.5 and 5.1, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec40">
<label>3.4.2</label>
<title>Effect of bioformulation under greenhouse conditions</title>
<p>After obtaining promising results in germination experiments, furthermore, to observe the promotional growth effect of bacterial isolates, the pot experiments were performed under controlled environmental conditions in three replications. During the experiment, several attributes, such as root parameters, plant height, the number of tillers, flag leaf length and width, panicle length, and 1,000 seed weight, were recorded.</p>
<p>First, a root architecture study was performed to analyze the effect of bioagents on the root growth and physiological parameters of the root system. For this purpose, roots from 28-day-old rice seedlings were carefully removed from the pot, thoroughly washed with distilled water, and transferred to the root scanner for examination. All the treatments were found to be superior in root parameters as compared to the control root. The results showed that the inoculation of KU_7 (<italic>B. vallismortis</italic>) changed the root architecture of the seedlings and exhibited a significant increase in total root length, number of root tips, total surface area, and root volume as compared to other treatments and control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table 5</xref> shows the comparable representation of all observed root parameters.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Variations study in root system architecture after inoculation of the different bioinoculants (C) Control, (BR_4) <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic>, (BU_7) <italic>B. licheniformis</italic>, (BU_8) <italic>B. licheniformis</italic>, <italic>and</italic> (KU_7) <italic>B. vallismortis.</italic></p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1405090-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of bacterial inoculation on root architecture study.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Treatment</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Total length</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Total Surface Area (cm<sup>2</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Average Diameter (mm)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">No. of Root Tips</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Root Volume (cm<sup>3</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Root length (cm)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Diameter 0.0&#x2013;0.50 (mm)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Diameter 0.50&#x2013;1.00 (mm)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Diameter &#x003E;1.00 (mm)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">C</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">36.85&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;7.16<sup>e</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.23&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.60<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.37&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.02<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">96.00&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;8.72<sup>e</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.02&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.01<sup>e</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7.88&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.96<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.70&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.33<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.23&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.11<sup>e</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BR_4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">78.87&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;10.17<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.50&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.09<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.42&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.06<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">119.33&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;10.97<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.02&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.01<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9.98&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.55<sup>cd</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.54&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.58<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.37&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.29<sup>d</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BU_7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">57.19&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;9.95<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7.57&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.76<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.49&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.04<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">124.33&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;12.42<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.02&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.01<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.81&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.87<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.34&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.12<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.50&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.36<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BU_8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">96.23&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;13.15<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7.66&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.45<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.53&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.10<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">141.00&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;32.05<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.04&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.22<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18.24&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.81<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.29&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.60<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.43&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.36<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">KU_7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">127.74&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;10.30<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7.11&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.26<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.51&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">160.33&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.53<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.14&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.01<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15.71&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.51<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.94&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.33<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.42&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.14<sup>d</sup></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Values are expressed in means&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;standard deviation (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;5), significance of ANOVA <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05. Data represented with different alphabets are significantly different from each other, where (a, b) are highly significant, (c) is medium significant, and (d, e) are least or non-significant.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Furthermore, all other agronomical parameters, including number of tillers, plant height, flag leaf length, panicle length, and 1,000 seed weight, were recorded at different phases of the pot trial study. Full harvesting was carried out on the 145<sup>th</sup> day at the maturation stage.</p>
<p>On the 65th day following the transplant, plant height and number of tillers were observed. In the experiment, the highest plant height was observed at 111.8 cm in treatment KU_7, while the lowest was 105.8 cm in treatment BR_4. The height of the control plant was recorded 95.3 cm. During the tiller count, the treatment KU_7 recorded with the maximum number of tillers (11.0 tiller/plant), whereas the treatment BR_4 with the minimum tillers were observed (9.00 tiller/plant), while the control was recorded 6 tiller/plant.</p>
<p>Plant height, flag leaf length and width were noted after the 60<sup>th</sup> day, during the heading stage. Treatment BU_8 recorded the highest flag leaf length (FLL) and width (FLW), which was recorded at 33.8&#x2009;cm for FLL and 1.9&#x2009;cm for FLW. Control depicted the lowest 24.5&#x2009;cm for FLL and 0.90&#x2009;cm for FLW. Panicle length was taken as thin during the 100th day. A significantly high panicle length was observed in the treatments (KU_7) and (BU_8), which was recorded at 20.1&#x2009;cm and 19.2&#x2009;cm, respectively, while the C-control represented the lowest panicle length of 10.3&#x2009;cm.</p>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="tab6">Table 6</xref> The application of PGPR corresponding to higher 1,000 seeds weight in treatment (KU_7) was recorded as 24.9&#x2009;g/1000 seeds, and the lowest was recorded in treatment with (BR_4) with 22.9&#x2009;g/1000 seeds. Control was recorded at 18.8&#x2009;g/1000 seeds.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of bacterial inoculation on agronomical parameters and 1,000 seeds weight.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Treatment</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Plant height (cm)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">No. of tillers</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Flag leaf length (cm)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Flag leaf width (cm)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Panicle length (cm)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">1,000 seeds (g)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">C</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">95.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.76<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.58<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.47<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.90&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.06<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.42<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.76<sup>d</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BR_4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">105.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.83<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.58<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.25<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.06<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.42<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.81<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BU_7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">106.1&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.84<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.58<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">31.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.38<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.0<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.31<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.49<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BU_8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">109.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.80<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.50<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.10<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.06<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19.2&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.20<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24.1&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.57<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">KU_7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">111.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.80<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.50<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">34.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.10<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.06<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20.1&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.20<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.57<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Values are expressed int means&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;standard deviation (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;5), with significance of ANOVA <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05. a, b are significant treatments, where (a) is highly significant, (b) is medium significant, and (c, d) are non-significant or carrying the least value.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec41">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Biochemical analysis</title>
<sec id="sec42">
<label>3.5.1</label>
<title>Photosynthetic pigments and protein content analysis</title>
<p>The total chlorophyll content of treated seedlings of all the treatments were recorded. The total chlorophyll content was recorded at a maximum of 17.9&#x2009;mg&#x2009;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> fresh weight (FW) of leaves in KU_7 (<italic>B. vallismortis</italic>), and then treatment (BU_8) <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> (9.9&#x2009;mg&#x2009;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) FW were significantly affected (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) by the bio-inoculation in comparison to control (5.9&#x2009;mg&#x2009;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) FW (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6A</xref>). The maximum value of total protein content was observed to be 11.87&#x2009;mg&#x2009;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW in treatment (KU_7) <italic>B. vallismortis,</italic> while minimum was observed in treatment (BR_4) <italic>B. subtilis</italic> (9.37&#x2009;mg&#x2009;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) FW. The rice plant without any treatment (control) has a protein content of 5.17&#x2009;mg&#x2009;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6B</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of treatments on photosynthetic pigment, protein content, and antioxidant enzymes. <bold>(A)</bold> Total chlorophyll (mg/g) FW. <bold>(B)</bold> Total protein(mg/g) FW. <bold>(C)</bold> Superoxide dismutase (SOD) (Unit/mg) protein. <bold>(D)</bold> Catalase (unit/mg) FW. The tests were analyzed using one-way ANOVA where &#x002A;, &#x002A;&#x002A;, and &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A; represent significance and &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A; high significance at <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x2264;&#x2009;0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 and 0.0001, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1405090-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec43">
<label>3.5.2</label>
<title>Evaluation of antioxidant enzyme activity</title>
<p>To assess the stress-responsive parameters or defense-related parameters, catalase and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities were analyzed during the late booting stage. SOD is an important constituent of the antioxidant mechanism against oxidative stress, and the maximum was observed to be 10.40&#x2009;U&#x2009;mg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (protein) in treatment KU_7, and a minimum was observed to be 9.0&#x2009;U&#x2009;mg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (protein) in BR_4. Control plants recorded the least SOD activity, i.e., 6.5&#x2009;U&#x2009;mg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (protein) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6C</xref>). Furthermore, the CAT activity shows a similar pattern, as already shown by the SOD enzyme. The CAT activity was assayed in the experiment, and the maximum was observed in KU_7, i.e., 7.37&#x2009;U&#x2009;mg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW, and the minimum was observed in BR_ 6.28&#x2009;U&#x2009;mg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW. The untreated control was measured at only 5.44&#x2009;U&#x2009;mg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW, which was the least as compared to the treated plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6D</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec44">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Effect of bioinoculants under field conditions</title>
<p>Furthermore, to verify the efficacy of bacterial isolates in the enhancement of rice growth and yield, the field trial was conducted in the Eastern region of Uttar Pradesh during the kharif season (from June to October). Rice seedlings were treated with bacterial isolates in the experimental field by using the standard protocol. Rice was grown for 145&#x2009;days till the maturity phase, then harvested and examined for various growth and yield parameters. This study is based on the results of the 2&#x2009;years of field trials conducted in the years 2019 and 2020 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>).</p>
<p>After 60&#x2009;days of sowing, at the heading stage, the plant height was measured. The data is represented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A</xref>, and it was observed that treatment KU_7 showed the highest height in both trial years 2019 and 2020 with 125.8&#x2009;cm and 126.2&#x2009;cm, respectively. When this was compared with control field plants, it was observed that the height of the KU_7 field plant was 26% higher in 2019 and 28% higher in 2020. Moreover, the lowest height was found in treatment BR_4 with a length of 119.4&#x2009;cm in the year 2019 and 120.1&#x2009;cm in 2020, which was increased by 20% in both years, while control was measured at 99.2&#x2009;cm in the first year (2019) and 98.5&#x2009;cm in the second year (2020) during the experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of root treatment on agronomical parameter of rice under field conditions. <bold>(A)</bold> Plant height (CM). <bold>(B)</bold> Number of tillers /plants. <bold>(C)</bold> Flag leaf length (cm). <bold>(D)</bold> Flag leaf width (cm). The tests were analyzed using Two-way ANOVA where &#x002A;, &#x002A;&#x002A;, and &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A; represent significance and &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A; high significance at p&#x2009;&#x2264;&#x2009;0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 and 0.0001, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1405090-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The number of tillers was counted during the late booting stage of cropping. The data for 2019 and 2020 for tiller numbers were observed to be maximum in treatment KU_7 with 13.3 tillers/hill in 2019 and 12.3 tillers/hill in 2020, which was increased by 48 and 52%, respectively. The lowest number of tillers was recorded in treatment BR_4 with 9.3 tillers/hill in the first year (2019) and 9.7 tillers/hill in the second year (2020), which were increased by 12 and 11.5%, respectively. The tiller count in control was recorded at 8.3 tillers/hill in the first year and 8.7 tillers/hill in the second year (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7B</xref>).</p>
<p>Flag leaf plays a major role in crop production as it aids in the majority of photosynthetic activity, which provides a larger amount of photosynthate to plant for grain filling. The seedlings treated with the (KU_7) observed a significantly high flag leaf length (FLL) and flag leaf width (FLW). FLL was recorded as 36.1&#x2009;cm in the first year and 36.7&#x2009;cm in the second year, which was non-significant with each other in both years but significant when compared with other treatments and control. The lowest FLL was recorded in (BR_4) with 32.0&#x2009;cm for the first year and 32.5&#x2009;cm for the second year, while the control was depicted as 28.6&#x2009;cm in 2019 and 28. 7&#x2009;cm in 2020 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7C</xref>). FLW was recorded as higher in treatment (KU_7) with 1.7&#x2009;cm in 2019 and 1.8&#x2009;cm in 2020. Here, the same pattern was observed, similar to FLL. The graph shows the lower width in treatment (BR_4) with 1.2&#x2009;cm in the first year, and 1.3&#x2009;cm in the second year, while the control was recorded at 1.0&#x2009;cm in both years. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7D</xref>).</p>
<p>The data for 2019 and 2020 showed significantly high panicle length in both years. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8A</xref> indicates the panicle length data, which is the highest for KU_7 with a length of 19.5&#x2009;cm in 2019 and 21.6&#x2009;cm in 2020 and the growth increased by 29 and 46% in 2019 and 2020, respectively. The panicle length of all the treatments was higher as compared to the untreated control plant, which had the lowest panicle length in both years, i.e., 15.1&#x2009;cm and 14.7&#x2009;cm, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8A</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of root treatment on agronomical parameter of rice under field conditions. <bold>(A)</bold> Panicle length. <bold>(B)</bold> 1,000 seeds weight. <bold>(C)</bold> Grain yield. <bold>(D)</bold> Biological yield. The tests were analyzed using Two- way ANOVA where &#x002A;, &#x002A;&#x002A;, and &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A; represent significance and &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A; high significance at p&#x2009;&#x2264;&#x2009;0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 and 0.0001, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1405090-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The application of PGPR by the root application resulted in a corresponding significant increase in 1000 seed weight in treatment KU_7 with 26.93&#x2009;g in 2019 and 28.33&#x2009;g per 1,000 seeds in 2020, which were increased by 31.6 and 38.3%, respectively. The lower weight appeared in treatment (BR_4) with 20.80&#x2009;g in 2019 and 22.87&#x2009;g/1000 seeds in 2020, which were increased by 6.8 and 6.2%, respectively, while the least data were recorded in control with 19.47&#x2009;g in the first year of the experiment and 21.52&#x2009;g/1000 seeds in the second year. All treatments with the PGPRs showed significantly higher seed weight compared to the control in both years of the experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8B</xref>).</p>
<p>Total yield and biological yield were calculated after the harvesting of crops. The two years of field trial data indicated that <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> (KU_7) gave a significantly higher biological yield in both the years 2019 and 2020. Biological yield in the first year was recorded at 7.06&#x2009;kg and in the second year, it significantly increased and was recorded at 7.43&#x2009;kg in KU_7. It increased by 69.71% in (2019) and 51.32% in (2020), which is the highest among all the treatments. In the case of grain yield, it was recorded at 2.63&#x2009;kg in the first-year experiment and 2.82&#x2009;kg in the second year in KU_7. Total grain yield increased by 48.8% in 2019 and 42.4% in 2020 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8C</xref>).</p>
<p>The biological yield was observed to be minimum in treatment with <italic>B. subtilis</italic> (BR_4), in which the biological yield was recorded at 4.46&#x2009;kg in 2019, which was increased by 7%, and 5.46&#x2009;kg in 2020, which was increased by 9.2%. The grain yield was measured to be 2.29&#x2009;kg in 2019 and 2.42&#x2009;kg in 2020. Total grain yield increased by 29 and 22.2%, respectively.</p>
<p>The biological yield and grain yield were recorded as minimum in control plants, i.e., 4.16&#x2009;kg in 2019 and 4.91&#x2009;kg in 2020 and 1.77&#x2009;kg in 2019 and 1.98&#x2009;kg in 2020, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8D</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec45">
<label>3.7</label>
<title>Disease incidence</title>
<p>The field experiment was transplanted into a false smut-infested field, which was highly affected by the rice false smut disease and caused more than 50% yield loss in previous years. A total of 10 plants/replications (total of 30 plants/treatment) were marked for the artificial inoculation of fungal pathogens during the late booting stage. Our isolates showed antagonistic activity against the <italic>U. virens,</italic> which resulted in lower disease incidence found in (KU_7) <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> and <italic>B. subtilis</italic> (BR_4) and was observed between 5 and 10% DSI range. Disease incidence in treatment (BU_8) <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> was recorded at 18%, and higher smut balls were observed in treatment (BU_7) <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> and showed 20% of disease incidence. Control was observed with the highest number of infected panicles and depicted 40% of disease incidence. Control seeds lost their quality and weight. More chaffiness occurred after the final harvest.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec46">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.) is one of the most important crop which is cultivated worldwide. It plays a significant role in global food consumption by people around the world (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref90">Xu et al., 2021</xref>). Due to changes in climatic conditions and geographical location, the crop is challenged by various biotic and abiotic stresses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref86">Vaishnav et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Hussain and Mahmood, 2020</xref>). Among which, one of the main concern is the rice false smut disease caused by <italic>U. virens,</italic> posing a major threat to rice production. Rice false smut leads to major economic losses and poses a threat to global food security as it not only reduces the yield of the crop but also leads to seed sterility, reduction in grain size, and milling quality, affecting productivity in the subsequent season. It affects rice panicles, forming masses of greenish-black spores and produces mycotoxins, which pose health risks to humans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Laha et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Bag et al., 2021</xref>). Taking into consideration the aforementioned perspective, this study utilized biocontrol properties of the Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) to control false smut infection in rice plants through root treatment and their potential role in disease management strategy. The use of microbes is a sustainable way to overcome biotic stress along with maintaining soil health and fitness.</p>
<p>Here, we have employed the rhizospheric bacteria that belong to <italic>Bacillus</italic> species, i.e., <italic>B. licheniformis</italic>, <italic>B. vallismortis,</italic> and <italic>B. subtilis</italic>. These bacteria are isolated from the various regions of Fatehpur, Uttar Pradesh, India, which were severely affected and marked regions of <italic>U. virens</italic> infections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Pandey et al., 2024</xref>) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>). During the sample collection, we carefully observed the field and selected only those plants that were healthy and fit among the infected plants. Furthermore, the isolated bacteria were tested against <italic>U. virens,</italic> and based on their biocontrol potential, the four most potent isolates have been selected and identified as bacillus species. There have been several studies that demonstrated the effective role of <italic>Bacillus</italic>-based bioformulations in mitigating or suppressing biotic stress in rice.</p>
<p><italic>U. virens</italic> is a soil-borne phytopathogen that infects the roots of the rice plant and invades the plant system. The spores of the pathogen travel systemically through the stem of the plant and infect the panicle, leading to yield loss, seed sterility, and reduction in grain quality. Mature spores from the infected panicle fall on the soil during harvest, which serves as an inoculum to infect the rice plants in next season (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Nguyen, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Gupta et al., 2019</xref>). Experiment on biocontrol potential of four potent isolates showed good inhibition by all isolates, and among them, <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> showed the maximum inhibition zone with 44.6% inhibition. This is also confirmed by the SEM analysis of 10&#x2009;days grown dual culture plate. Mycelial disintegration and broken mycelia were clearly visible in all four treatments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Sharma et al., 2019</xref>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The possible reason behind this phenomenon could be the production of chitinase enzyme by these isolates. <italic>Bacillus-</italic>based bioformulation has chitinase production ability and produces various antagonistic secondary metabolites such as antimicrobial peptides, lipopeptides, bacteriocins, polyketides, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that directly inhibit the phytopathogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref92">Zhang et al., 2023</xref>). Our future study will focus on isolating these compounds to elucidate the effect of these metabolites. These metabolites are the key factors for biocontrol activity and the development of resistance against the pathogen. These VOCs, antimicrobial peptides, and other secondary metabolites participate in symbiosis and various signaling pathways related to plant immunity, disease suppression, growth and development.</p>
<p>After selecting the potent biocontrol agents against <italic>U. virens</italic>, increased attention was paid to identifying the major PGP traits, so that the role of isolates in growth promotion and plant fitness can be identified. Most of the PGPR isolates in this study possess most of the plant growth promotion traits that can be directly utilized by the plants, including phosphate solubilization, siderophore solubilization, zinc solubilization, ammonia production, and IAA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Hashem et al., 2019</xref>) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Tables 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">2</xref>). Several studies have been conducted before on plant growth promotion by <italic>Bacillus</italic> isolates and antifungal activities, and based on this, many types of bioformulation are commercially available in the market (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">O&#x2019;Brien, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Rosier et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Jamali et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Kulkova et al., 2023</xref>). In general, these isolates match all the properties of biofertilizers. Previous studies show that <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. actively solubilize the phosphate, solubilize inorganic phosphate to organic form, transfer to the host directly, and show a symbiotic relationship with plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Bulgarelli et al., 2013</xref>). Three of the isolates, <italic>B. subtilis</italic>, <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> (BR_4, BU_7, and BU_8), were found as phosphate solubilizers. All isolates were found to be positive for IAA production, which is an essential signaling molecule that helps the interaction of microbes with the host (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Olanrewaju et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Matsuda et al., 2018</xref>). During the <italic>invitro</italic> PGPR test, all four isolates, namely, <italic>B. subtilis</italic>, <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> (BU_7 and BU_8), and <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> (KU_7), were depicted as, ammonium solubilizers (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<p>Metal ions, such as zinc, play a crucial role in redox reactions in biological systems. Zn is required as a co-factor for enzymes, such as SOD, that are involved in the suppression of ROS. Plants having Zn deficiency has also led to a reduction in photosynthesis and IAA, which ultimately leads to a reduction in crop yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Singh et al., 2022a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">b</xref>). Many <italic>Bacillus</italic> species are reported as zinc solubilizers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Masood et al., 2022</xref>). During this study, only one strain, <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> was found as a zinc solubilizer. Apart from Zn, these PGPR strains are also siderophore producers, which is an essential component for Fe sequestration in plants. Fe aids in the increase of chlorophyll content and chloroplast development in plants, which directly participate in crop yield by increasing the amount of photosynthate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Shahnaz and Manjurul, 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Furthermore, in this study, <italic>Bacillus</italic>-based bioformulation is used to identify the role in growth promotion and to alleviate the biotic stress caused by <italic>U. virens</italic>. <italic>Bacillus</italic> colonizes the rhizosphere of the plant that secretes antagonistic metabolites, which protect the plant through direct and indirect mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref92">Zhang et al., 2023</xref>). These PGPR-based bioformulations are prepared and applied in various ways such as seed treatment, foliar spray, root treatment, and soil drenches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Jaber and Ownley, 2018</xref>). These methods have shown promising results in reducing the disease incidence and severity in both <italic>in vitro</italic> and field conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Kantachote et al., 2016</xref>). In this study, we have used talc-based bioformulation to check the effect of biopriming on seed germination and under field conditions employing the root treatment method after testing it <italic>in vitro</italic>. Previous studies have also reported the use of <italic>B. velengensis</italic> Strain N1 for controlling leaf blight in rice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Sawatphanit et al., 2022</xref>). Comparable studies have employed the use of <italic>T. harzianum</italic>, <italic>T. atroviride</italic>, <italic>B. subtilis,</italic> and <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> in the biocontrol of false smut (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Baite et al., 2022</xref>). Other than these strains, bacterial spp., such as <italic>Bacillus, Streptomyces, and Pseudomonas</italic> and fungal spp., such as <italic>Trichoderma</italic> and <italic>Penicillium,</italic> have been widely used as biofertilizers and biocontrol agents in agriculture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Kasotia et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Lahlali et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>During the pot trials in green house conditions, we have observed the lower disease incidence and growth promotional effect by employing bacterial strains as a treatment. To observe the effect on large-scale and natural field conditions, field trials have been performed. Experimental trials were performed during the kharif crop season (June&#x2013;October), and the field trials were performed consecutively for 2&#x2009;years in 2019 and 2020. Root treatment with <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> (BU_7 and BU_8), <italic>B. subtilis</italic> (BR_4), and <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> (KU_7) strains individually resulted in enhanced agronomical parameters such as number of tillers, plant height, flag leaf length and width, panicle length, grain yield, and 1,000 seeds weight. Biological yield and total yield were also taken after the full harvest. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> represents the overall field parameters that are enhanced by the treatment of each bacterium. In our study, the highest biological and grain yields of 61 and 43% were observed, respectively, with the treatment with <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> (KU_7) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>). Similar results have been reported where treatment with other PGPRs promoted grains yield of 10&#x2013;51% under greenhouse conditions and 4.8&#x2013;9.2% increase in field conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref89">Xiao et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig9">
<label>Figure 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Diagrammatic representation of the overall increase in the agronomical parameters and crop yield using PGPR treatment with <italic>B. subtilis</italic> (BR_4), <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> (BU_7), <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> (BU_8), and <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> (KU_7). The figure depicts the average growth percentage of both years (2019 and 2020).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1405090-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Our isolates showed a higher production of total chlorophyll and total protein content in PGPR-treated plants, which may lead to enhanced crop production and biological yield. After the harvesting, the left paddy straw was used for fodder and other purposes, such as mushroom production and vermicomp<italic>o</italic>st (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). When plants are exposed to biotic stress, they exhibit oxidative damage by producing various types of reactive oxygen species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Padr&#x00F3; et al., 2021</xref>). To protect from oxidative damage, the plant defense system produces some ROS scavenging enzymes, such as catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). SOD and CAT are considered key enzymes for the first line of defense and act as biochemical markers in plants for oxidative damage along with the indication of the start of defense against any stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Gill and Tuteja, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Demidchik, 2015</xref>). These two enzymes critically mitigate the effect of oxidative damage in the cell. The result of this study showed an increased concentration of CAT and SOD as compared to the untreated control. In this study, stress-responsive parameters such as catalase and superOxide Dismutase activity, were checked and found to be enhanced in treated plants as compared to control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
<p>To observe the efficiency of the isolated microbes in field conditions against <italic>U. virens,</italic> we have taken the highly susceptible cultivar HKR126 for the experiment. Disease incidence in this variety was reported up to 68.6% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Kumari and Kumar, 2015</xref>). This variety was also used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Sunder et al. (2005)</xref> in Haryana and resulted in 30&#x2013;87% yield loss and a reduction in seed quality. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Bag et al. (2021)</xref> stated that false smut infection in rice leads to an increase in the formation of false smut balls in the panicle and increases the count of unfilled grains or chaffiness. In this study, less disease incidence was observed in the HKR-126 rice variety, as reported by a previous study. According to the result, disease incidence ranged between 5&#x2013;20% with all four bacterial treatments, while control showed 40% of infected panicles, while previous studies reported 5&#x2013;85% of disease incidence in Tamil Nadu, India (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Baite and Sharma, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref77">Sun et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Despite the potential benefits of <italic>Bacillus</italic>-based bioformulation for rice false smut disease management, the process can be influenced by several other factors, such as environmental conditions, soil composition, formulation composition, and genetic diversity of both plant and the pathogen, and it is crucial to optimize the conditions and application strategies in different agro-ecosystems to obtain the maximum efficacy of the product. Hence, they serve as a valuable tool in ensuring better rice yield and disease management (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Pandey et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>To enhance crop productivity and fulfil the global rice demand, farmers are continuously using chemical fertilizers without knowing the serious consequences in terms of soil and consumer health. Excessive use of chemical fertilizers may cause soil sterility and changes in the physiochemical properties. Continuous use of these fertilizers decrease the nutritional value of seeds, yield, and seed quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">Singh et al., 2014</xref>). Alternatively, rice false smut disease is controlled by the application of commercially available fungicides (trifloxystrobin with tebuconazole, propiconazole, and kresoxim methyl) at distinct stages of rice growth such as the booting stage, the panicle emergence stage, or the pre-flowering stage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Barnwal et al., 2016</xref>). Incessant application of fungicides causes resistance in the pathogen against fungicide over a period of duration and persistence in the environment. Fungicides, such as propiconazole, have led to the development of fungicide-resistant <italic>U. virens</italic> strains due to repeated exposure and cause environmental pollution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref93">Zhou et al., 2019</xref>). This also contributes to increasing the cost of production and soil infertility.</p>
<p>PGPRs as bio-inoculants are the most alluring alternatives to chemical-based fertilizers as they have a positive impact on plant growth, soil, and the environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Kantachote et al., 2016</xref>). The application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) that can serve as a biocontrol will not only enhance crop productivity but will also aid in the management of false smut disease. The present study is the few steps forward towards the microbial sustainable approach. Here, the isolates evaluated the efficacy of root treatment by the PGPR bioformulation, and these isolates possess antifungal activity against the rice false smut pathogen, <italic>U. virens.</italic> These microorganisms can be utilized as biofertilizers for better yield and at the same time protecting the plant from pathogens naturally.</p>
<p>Here, we have examined the effect of isolates on biocontrol and plant growth promotion properties individually. In the next phase, a consortium of potent microbes with different properties will be developed and its role in biocontrol activity along with growth promotion and secondary metabolites production will be assessed. The mechanism of false smut suppression will also be elucidated.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec47">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In modern times, chemical fertilizers and fungicides are being used for crop yield. These chemicals may increase crop productivity but are unable to increase seed quality and, at the same time show deleterious effects on human and soil health. These chemical fertilizers gradually mine the soil fertility and physiochemical properties, thus making the land barren and acidic. In this study, the bacteria identified from the rhizospheric soil were tested against <italic>U. virens</italic>, which causes rice smut disease. All four bacteria that belong to the <italic>Bacillus</italic> genus showed biocontrol activity and plant growth promoting traits, which led to higher rice yield in the pot and under field conditions. Among all isolates, <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>) showed the maximum inhibition of plant pathogens and several plant growth promotion activities. In field trials with <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> isolates, the incidence of rice smut disease was also lower than in other treatments. In this way, we conclude that the <italic>B. vallismortis</italic> species identified in this study help host plants to promote growth and enhance the seed quality naturally including all three isolates. This will also improve the quality of soil health and fitness naturally. The use of bioformulation can improve crop yield and overall productivity, leading to enhanced crop production and addressing the need for global food security. Meanwhile, bioformulations may reduce the need for synthetic fertilizers, which results in an impact on the emission of greenhouse gases and water pollution. Finally, we conclude that these PGPRs are a cost-effective and sustainable approach for rice cultivation.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec48">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary material</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec49">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>NP: Visualization, Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Validation, Software, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Data curation. RV: Software, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Validation. AR: Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. AS: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Visualization, Resources. SK: Project administration, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Visualization, Resources. RT: Validation, Formal analysis, Software, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing MK: Project administration, Resources, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Conceptualization. NS: Resources, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Validation, Supervision, Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Visualization.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec50">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors are thankful to the Director of ICAR-Indian Institute of Seed Science (ICAR-IISS), Maunath Bhanjan, Uttar Pradesh, India for providing the lab facility at ICAR-IISS for the completion of this research work. The authors also acknowledge the support provided by Ajit Varma, Emeritus Scientist and B.C. Das, HOI, AIMT &#x2013; Amity University, for their constant guidance and for providing the lab infrastructure for this research work. This work is partially supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research &#x2013; Human Resource Development Group (CSIR-HRDG), Government of India [Project number-(0121)/20/EMR-II], New Delhi.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec51">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec52">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1405090/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1405090/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abdul-Baki</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1973</year>). <article-title>Vigor determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria 1</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>630</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>633</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300060013x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abellan-Schneyder</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matchado</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reitmeier</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sommer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sewald</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baumbach</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Primer, pipelines, parameters: issues in 16S rRNA gene sequencing</article-title>. <source>mSphere</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>10</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/msphere.01202-20</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aebi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Catalase <italic>in vitro</italic></article-title>. <source>Methods Enzymol.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>126</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arnon</surname> <given-names>D. I.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1949</year>). <article-title>Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in <italic>Beta vulgaris</italic></article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>24</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.24.1.1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bag</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Basak</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bagchi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Masurkar</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ray</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adak</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Consequences of Ustilaginoidea virens infection, causal agent of false smut disease of rice, on production and grain quality of rice</article-title>. <source>J. Cereal Sci.</source> <volume>100</volume>:<fpage>103220</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jcs.2021.103220</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bag</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bashyal</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaman</surname> <given-names>P. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Masurkar</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baite</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Rice: blast, Brown spot and false smut. ICAR-NRRI</article-title>. <source>Dis. National. Import. Field Crops</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>71</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baite</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prabhukarthikeyan</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raghu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Biological control of a fungus Ustilaginoidea virens causing false smut of rice</article-title>. <source>BioControl</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>357</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>363</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10526-022-10148-4</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baite</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raghu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prabhukarthikeyan</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keerthana</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jambhulkar</surname> <given-names>N. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rath</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020a</year>). <article-title>Disease incidence and yield loss in rice due to grain discolouration</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Dis. Protect.</source> <volume>127</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s41348-019-00268-y</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baite</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raghu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prabhukarthikeyan</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mukherjee</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bag</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>JENA</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020b</year>). <article-title>Yield loss assessment in rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic>) due to false smut infection</article-title>. <source>Ind. J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>361</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>364</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.56093/ijas.v90i2.99023</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baite</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Isolation technique and culture conditions of false smut pathogen (Ustilaginoidea virens) on rice</article-title>. <source>Indian Phytopathol.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>50</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barnwal</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of fungicides against false smut of rice</article-title>. <source>Indian Phytopathol.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>602</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>604</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhunjun</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Phillips</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jayawardena</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Promputtha</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hyde</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Importance of molecular data to identify fungal plant pathogens and guidelines for pathogenicity testing based on Koch&#x2019;s postulates</article-title>. <source>Pathogens</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1096</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/pathogens10091096</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34578129</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bulgarelli</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schlaeppi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spaepen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Themaat</surname> <given-names>E. V. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schulze-Lefert</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>807</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>838</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bunt</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rovira</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1955</year>). <article-title>Microbiological studies of some subantarctic soils</article-title>. <source>J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>128</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2389.1955.tb00836.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref15">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cappuccino</surname> <given-names>J.C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sherman</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <source>Microbiology: a laboratory manual</source>, <edition>3rd</edition>. <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Benjamin/Cumming pub. Co</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pei</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Host-induced gene silencing of fungal-specific genes of Ustilaginoidea virens confers effective resistance to rice false smut</article-title>. <source>Plant Biotechnol. J.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>253</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>255</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pbi.13756</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34850522</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cruz</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delfin</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paterno</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Promotion of upland rice growth by actinomycetes under growth room condition</article-title>. <source>Asian Int. J. Life Sci.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Demidchik</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms of oxidative stress in plants: from classical chemistry to cell biology</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>109</volume>, <fpage>212</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>228</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.06.021</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Devkota</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khanda</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beebout</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohapatra</surname> <given-names>B. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singleton</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Puskur</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Assessing alternative crop establishment methods with a sustainability lens in rice production systems of eastern India</article-title>. <source>J. Clean. Prod.</source> <volume>244</volume>:<fpage>118835</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118835</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31969774</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dhindsa</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Plumb-Dhindsa</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thorpe</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Leaf senescence: correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/32.1.93</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duncan</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1955</year>). <article-title>Multiple range and multiple F tests</article-title>. <source>Biometrics</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>P. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The false smut pathogen Ustilaginoidea virens requires rice stamens for false smut ball formation</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>646</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>659</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1462-2920.14881</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31797523</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref23">
<citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab id="coll1">FAOSTAT</collab>
</person-group>, (<year>2021</year>). Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL</ext-link></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farzana</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Radziah</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saad</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kamaruzaman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Growth and storage root development of sweet potato inoculated with rhizobacteria under glasshouse conditions</article-title>. <source>Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>1461</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1466</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Felsenstein</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap</article-title>. <source>Evolution</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>783</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>791</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2408678</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28561359</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gill</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tuteja</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>909</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>930</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goswami</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thakker</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dhandhukia</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Simultaneous detection and quantification of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) produced by rhizobacteria from l-tryptophan (Trp) using HPTLC</article-title>. <source>J. Microbiol. Methods</source> <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mimet.2015.01.001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25573587</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gowsalya</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ponnusami</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sugumaran</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Isolation of bacteria from soil sample for exo-polysaccharide production</article-title>. <source>Int. J. ChemTech Res.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>2925</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2928</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gudeta</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Isolation and characterization of starch degrading rhizobacteria from soil of Jimma University Main campus, Ethiopia</article-title>. <source>Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>788</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>795</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5897/AJMR2018.8873</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paudel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Eco-friendly management of false smut (Ustilaginoidea virens) of rice</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>388</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>396</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20546/ijcmas.2019.811.049</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guyasa</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sadimantara</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khaeruni</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sutariati</surname> <given-names>G. A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Isolation of bacillus spp and pseudomonas fluorescens from upland rice rhizosphere and its potential as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for local upland rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Biosci. Res.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>3231</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3239</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hashem</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tabassum</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abd_Allah</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title><italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic>: a plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress</article-title>. <source>Saudi J. Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>1291</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1297</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31516360</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hussain</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mahmood</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Development of transgenic cotton for combating biotic and abiotic stresses</article-title>. <source>Cott. Product. Agron. Crop Protect. Postharvest Technol.</source>, <fpage>527</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>545</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2_26</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jaber</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ownley</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Can we use entomopathogenic fungi as endophytes for dual biological control of insect pests and plant pathogens?</article-title> <source>Biol. Control</source> <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>36</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.01.018</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jacoby</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peukert</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Succurro</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koprivova</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kopriva</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The role of soil microorganisms in plant mineral nutrition&#x2014;current knowledge and future directions</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>1617</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.01617</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28974956</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jaiswal</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gawande</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soumia</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krishna</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vaishnav</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ade</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol strategies: an eco-smart tool for integrated pest and diseases management</article-title>. <source>BMC Microbiol.</source> <volume>22</volume>:<fpage>324</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12866-022-02744-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36581846</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jamali</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roohi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol potential of <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> RH5 against sheath blight of rice caused by Rhizoctonia solani</article-title>. <source>J. Basic Microbiol.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>268</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>280</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jobm.201900347</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31851769</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kantachote</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nunkaew</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kantha</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chaiprapat</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Biofertilizers from <italic>Rhodopseudomonas palustris</italic> strains to enhance rice yields and reduce methane emissions</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>154</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>161</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.12.015</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Karthiba</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saveetha</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suresh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raguchander</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saravanakumar</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Samiyappan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>PGPR and entomopathogenic fungus bioformulation for the synchronous management of leaf folder pest and sheath blight disease of rice</article-title>. <source>Pest Manag. Sci.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>555</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>564</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.1907</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20069626</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kasotia</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jain</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vaishnav</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaur</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhary</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Soybean growth-promotion by Pseudomonas sp. strain VS1 under salt stress</article-title>. <source>Pak. J. Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>698</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>701</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/pjbs.2012.698.701</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24171253</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kohl</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kolnaar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ravensberg</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Mode of action of microbial biological control agents against plant diseases: relevance beyond efficacy</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>454982</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2019.00845</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krithika</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chellaram</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Isolation, screening, and characterization of chitinase producing bacteria from marine wastes</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>34</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kulkova</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dobrzynski</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kowalczyk</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Belzecki</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kramkowski</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Plant growth promotion using <italic>Bacillus cereu</italic>s</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>24</volume>:<fpage>9759</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms24119759</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37298706</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amaresan</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhagat</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Madhuri</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Isolation and characterization of Trichoderma spp. for antagonistic activity against root rot and foliar pathogens</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Microbiol.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>137</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>144</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12088-011-0205-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23729873</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chhokar</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meena</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kharub</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gill</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tripathi</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Challenges and opportunities in productivity and sustainability of rice cultivation system: a critical review in Indian perspective</article-title>. <source>Cereal Res. Commun.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>573</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>601</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42976-021-00214-5</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stecher</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knyaz</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamura</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>1547</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1549</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msy096</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29722887</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of yield losses and management practices of false smut in rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Indian Phytopathol.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Laha</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sailaja</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srinivas Prasad</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ladhalakshmi</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krishnaveni</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Changes in rice disease scenario in India: an analysis from production oriented survey</article-title>. <source>Tech. Bull.</source> <volume>91</volume>:<fpage>95</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lahlali</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ezrari</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Radouane</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kenfaoui</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Esmaeel</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El Hamss</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Biological control of plant pathogens: a global perspective</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>596</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms10030596</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35336171</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maksimov</surname> <given-names>I. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abizgil&#x2019;dina</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pusenkova</surname> <given-names>L. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as alternative to chemical crop protectors from pathogens</article-title>. <source>Appl. Biochem. Microbiol.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>333</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>345</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1134/S0003683811040090</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref51">
<citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Masood</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Malik</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). Role of rhizobacterial bacilli in zinc solubilization. Microbial biofertilizers and micronutrient availability: The role of zinc in agriculture and human health, <fpage>361</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>377</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-030-76609-2_15</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matsuda</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Handayani</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sasaki</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takechi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takano</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takio</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Production of indoleacetic acid by strains of the epiphytic bacteria Neptunomonas spp. isolated from the red alga Pyropia yezoensis and the seagrass <italic>Zostera marina</italic></article-title>. <source>Arch. Microbiol.</source> <volume>200</volume>, <fpage>255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>265</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00203-017-1439-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29018895</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref53">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mohanty</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamano</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Rice food security in India: emerging challenges and opportunities</article-title>. <source>Fut. Rice Strat. India</source>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-805374-4.00001-4</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Muniraju</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Disease severity and yield losses caused by false smut disease of rice in different rice ecosystems of Karnataka</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>955</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>958</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref55">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Murtey</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramasamy</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Life science sample preparations for scanning electron microscopy</article-title>. <source>Acta Microscop.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>80</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>91</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nascente</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lanna</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Sousa</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chaibub</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Souza</surname> <given-names>A. C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Filippi</surname> <given-names>M. C. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>N fertilizer dose-dependent efficiency of Serratia spp. for improving growth and yield of upland rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Plant Prod.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>217</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>226</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42106-019-00049-5</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref57">
<citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>L. T.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). False smut of Rice: Histological analysis of infection. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/652" ext-link-type="uri">https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/652</ext-link></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref58">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>O&#x2019;Brien</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Biological control of plant diseases</article-title>. <source>Australas. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>293</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>304</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13313-017-0481-4</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Olanrewaju</surname> <given-names>O. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Glick</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Babalola</surname> <given-names>O. O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms of action of plant growth promoting bacteria</article-title>. <source>World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11274-017-2364-9</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref60">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Padr&#x00F3;</surname> <given-names>M. D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caboni</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morin</surname> <given-names>K. A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mercado</surname> <given-names>M. A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olalde-Portugal</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> on antioxidant enzyme activities in tomato grafting</article-title>. <source>Peer J</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>e10984</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7717/peerj.10984</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33763301</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref61">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pandey</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajavat</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vaishnav</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mishra</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Mining of rice rhizobacteria to control false smut and improve plant growth in rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-024-02829-w</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref62">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pikovskaya</surname> <given-names>R. I.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1948</year>). <article-title>Mobilization of phosphorous in soil connection with the vital activity of some microbial species</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Plant Soil</source> <volume>287</volume>, <fpage>77</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>84</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref63">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rais</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shakeel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Malik</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hafeez</surname> <given-names>F. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yasmin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mumtaz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Antagonistic Bacillus spp. reduce blast incidence on rice and increase grain yield under field conditions</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>208</volume>, <fpage>54</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2018.01.009</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29551212</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref64">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rosier</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Medeiros</surname> <given-names>F. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bais</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Defining plant growth promoting rhizobacteria molecular and biochemical networks in beneficial plant-microbe interactions</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>428</volume>, <fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-018-3679-5</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref65">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saitou</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nei</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>406</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>425</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3447015</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref66">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sawatphanit</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sutthisa</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumlung</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Bioformulation development of Bacillus velezensis strain N1 to control rice bacterial leaf blight</article-title>. <source>Trends Sci.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>6315</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.48048/tis.2022.6315</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref67">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schwyn</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neilands</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores</article-title>. <source>Anal. Biochem.</source> <volume>160</volume>, <fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2952030</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref68">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shafi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Bacillus species as versatile weapons for plant pathogens: a review</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>446</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>459</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/13102818.2017.1286950</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref69">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shah</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nazari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Msimbira</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naamala</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lyu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>PGPR in agriculture: a sustainable approach to increasing climate change resilience</article-title>. <source>Front. Sustain. Food Syst.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>667546</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsufs.2021.667546</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref70">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shahnaz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manjurul</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Salinity intrusion and coastal agriculture: adaptation strategies using salt-tolerant plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable food security</article-title>. <source>&#x0420;&#x0435;&#x0433;&#x0438;&#x043E;&#x043D;&#x0430;&#x043B;&#x044C;&#x043D;&#x044B;&#x0435; &#x043F;&#x0440;&#x043E;&#x0431;&#x043B;&#x0435;&#x043C;&#x044B;</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>58</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>61</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref71">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kashyap</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bansal</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaushik</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Isolation and characterization of halotolerant bacilli from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) rhizosphere for plant growth promotion and biocontrol traits</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>153</volume>, <fpage>787</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>800</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-018-1592-7</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref72">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vaishnav</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jain</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Salt-tolerant PGPR strain Priestia endophytica SK1 promotes fenugreek growth under salt stress by inducing nitrogen assimilation and secondary metabolites</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>133</volume>, <fpage>2802</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2813</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jam.15735</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35880391</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref73">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Annapurna</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shrivastava</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Varma</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022a</year>). <article-title>Symbiotic interplay of Piriformospora indica and <italic>Azotobacter chroococcum</italic> augments crop productivity and biofortification of zinc and Iron</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>262</volume>:<fpage>127075</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2022.127075</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35688099</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref74">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ansari</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shukla</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Physiological response of rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.) genotypes to elevated nitrogen applied under field conditions</article-title>. <source>Plant Signal. Behav.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>e29015</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4161/psb.29015</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref75">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kannepalli</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pati</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tripathi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shrivastava</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022b</year>). <article-title>Mechanism of the synergistic impact of Piriformospora indica and Azotobacter chroococcum on Zn and Fe biofortification</article-title>. <source>Curr. Res. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>420</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>427</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.crbiot.2022.09.005</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref76">
<citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab id="coll2">Statista</collab>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). Worldwide production of grain in 2022/23, by type (in million metric tons). Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.statista.com/statistics/263977/world-grain-production-by-type/" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.statista.com/statistics/263977/world-grain-production-by-type/</ext-link></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref77">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tariqjaveed</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Ustilaginoidea virens: insights into an emerging rice pathogen</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>363</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>385</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-phyto-010820-012908</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32364825</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref78">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sunder</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dodan</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mehla</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Effect of different nitrogen levels on brown spot (Drechslera oryzae) of rice and its management through host resistance and fungicides</article-title>. <source>Plant Disease Research Ludhiana</source> <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>111</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref79">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Surendran</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raja</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jayakumar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Subramoniam</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Use of efficient water saving techniques for production of rice in India under climate change scenario: a critical review</article-title>. <source>J. Clean. Prod.</source> <volume>309</volume>:<fpage>127272</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127272</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref80">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tamura</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stecher</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>3022</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3027</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msab120</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33892491</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref81">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>E. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martinez-Romero</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W. X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic and genetic relationships of Mesorhizobium tianshanense and related rhizobia</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>874</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>879</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref82">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tom</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Comprehensive transcriptome profiling reveals abundant long non-coding RNAs associated with development of the rice false smut fungus, Ustilaginoidea virens</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>4998</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5013</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1462-2920.15432</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33587785</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref83">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gibson</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Plewniak</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeanmougin</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Higgins</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>4876</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4882</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/25.24.4876</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9396791</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref84">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Torres</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brandan</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petroselli</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Erra-Balsells</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Audisio</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Antagonistic effects of <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> subsp. subtilis and <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> against <italic>Macrophomina phaseolina</italic>: SEM study of fungal changes and UV-MALDI-TOF MS analysis of their bioactive compounds</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>182</volume>, <fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2015.09.005</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26686611</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref85">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Unkovigich</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baldock</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Forbes</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Variability in harvest index of grain crops and potential significance for carbon accounting: examples from Australian agriculture</article-title>. <source>Adv. Agron.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>219</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05005-4</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref86">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vaishnav</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jain</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kasotia</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaur</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhary</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Molecular mechanism of benign microbe-elicited alleviation of biotic and abiotic stresses for plants</article-title>. <source>Appr. Plant Stress Manag.</source>, <fpage>281</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>295</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-81-322-1620-9_16</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref87">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vejan</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abdullah</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khadiran</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ismail</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nasrulhaq Boyce</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability&#x2014;a review</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>573</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules21050573</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27136521</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref88">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Von Ardenne</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>On the history of scanning electron microscopy, of the electron microprobe, and of early contributions to transmission electron microscopy</article-title>. <source>Electr. Microsc.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-014578-2.50007-2</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref89">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on arsenic accumulation and the growth of rice plants (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Chemosphere</source> <volume>242</volume>:<fpage>125136</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125136</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref90">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The impact of high-temperature stress on rice: challenges and solutions</article-title>. <source>Crop J.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>963</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>976</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cj.2021.02.011</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref91">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yong</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The role of Ustilaginoidea virens sclerotia in increasing incidence of rice false smut disease in the subtropical zone in China</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>150</volume>, <fpage>669</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>677</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-017-1312-8</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref92">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xun</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol mechanisms of Bacillus: improving the efficiency of green agriculture</article-title>. <source>Microb. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>2250</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2263</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1751-7915.14348</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37837627</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref93">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Characterization of propiconazole field-resistant isolates of Ustilaginoidea virens</article-title>. <source>Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.</source> <volume>153</volume>, <fpage>144</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>151</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pestbp.2018.11.013</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30744888</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>