<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2024.1342573</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Identification of novel small molecule inhibitors of twin arginine translocation (Tat) pathway and their effect on the control of <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> in chickens</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name><surname>Deblais</surname> <given-names>Lo&#x00EF;c</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/273987/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name><surname>Drozd</surname> <given-names>Mary</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2584932/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>Anand</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/263976/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Antwi</surname> <given-names>Janet</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Fuchs</surname> <given-names>James</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/629583/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Khupse</surname> <given-names>Rahul</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/939047/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Helmy</surname> <given-names>Yosra A.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Rajashekara</surname> <given-names>Gireesh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/77984/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, OARDC</institution>, <addr-line>Wooster, OH</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln</institution>, <addr-line>Lincoln, NE</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Los Alamos National Laboratory, Bioscience Division, Group B-10: Biosecurity and Public Health</institution>, <addr-line>Los Alamos, NM</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Division of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University</institution>, <addr-line>Columbus, OH</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>College of Pharmacy, University of Findlay</institution>, <addr-line>OH</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0003">
<p>Edited by: Stuart A. Thompson, Augusta University, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0004">
<p>Reviewed by: Fang Liu, University of New South Wales, Australia</p>
<p>Marja-Liisa H&#x00E4;nninen, University of Helsinki, Finland</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Gireesh Rajashekara, <email>rajashekara.2@osu.edu</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn0002">
<p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>These authors have contributed equally to this work</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>17</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1342573</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>22</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>08</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2024 Deblais, Drozd, Kumar, Antwi, Fuchs, Khupse, Helmy and Rajashekara.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Deblais, Drozd, Kumar, Antwi, Fuchs, Khupse, Helmy and Rajashekara</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Control of <italic>Campylobacter</italic> from farm to fork is challenging due to the frequent emergence of antimicrobial-resistant isolates. Furthermore, poultry production systems are known reservoirs of <italic>Campylobacter</italic>. The twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway is a crucial bacterial secretion system that allows <italic>Campylobacter</italic> to colonize the host intestinal tract by using formate as the main source of energy. However, Tat pathway is also a major contributing factor for resistance to copper sulfate (CuSO<sub>4</sub>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Since mammals and chickens do not have proteins or receptors that are homologous to bacterial Tat proteins, identification of small molecule (SM) inhibitors targeting the Tat system would allow the development of safe and effective control methods to mitigate <italic>Campylobacter</italic> in infected or colonized hosts in both pre-harvest and post-harvest. In this study, we screened 11 commercial libraries (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;50,917 SM) for increased susceptibility to CuSO<sub>4</sub> (1&#x2009;mM) in <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176, a human isolate which is widely studied.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Furthermore, we evaluated 177 SM hits (2.5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL and above) that increased the susceptibility to CuSO<sub>4</sub> for the inhibition of formate dehydrogenase (Fdh) activity, a Tat-dependent substrate. Eight Tat-dependent inhibitors (T1&#x2013;T8) were selected for further studies. These selected eight Tat inhibitors cleared all tested <italic>Campylobacter</italic> strains (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;12) at &#x003E;10&#x2009;ng/mL in the presence of 0.5&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub><italic>in vitro</italic>. These selected SMs were non-toxic to colon epithelial (Caco-2) cells when treated with 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL for 24&#x2009;h and completely cleared intracellular <italic>C. jejuni</italic> cells when treated with 0.63&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL of SM for 24&#x2009;h in the presence of 0.5&#x2009;mM of CuSO<sub>4</sub>. Furthermore, 3 and 5-week-old chicks treated with SM candidates for 5&#x2009;days had significantly decreased cecal colonization (up to 1.2 log; <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01) with minimal disruption of microbiota. <italic>In silico</italic> analyses predicted that T7 has better drug-like properties than T2 inhibitor and might target a key amino acid residue (glutamine 165), which is located in the hydrophobic core of TatC protein.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Thus, we have identified novel SM inhibitors of the Tat pathway, which represent a potential strategy to control <italic>C. jejuni</italic> spread on farms.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>
<italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>poultry production system</kwd>
<kwd>twin arginine translocase</kwd>
<kwd>small molecule inhibitor</kwd>
<kwd>microbiome</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="88"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="13037"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Infectious Agents and Disease</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p><italic>Campylobacter</italic> is a leading cause of bacterial foodborne gastroenteritis worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Igwaran and Okoh, 2019</xref>) and a major public health problem. A recent estimate by the CDC indicates that <italic>Campylobacter</italic> is not only among the most common causes of domestically acquired foodborne illnesses in humans (over 845,024 cases per year) but also is among the leading causes of hospitalization (over 8,463 annually) in the United States (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref82">USDA ERS&#x2013;Cost Estimates of Foodborne Illnesses, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Igwaran and Okoh, 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Poultry products represent a key source of human <italic>Campylobacter</italic> infections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Kittl et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref77">Skarp et al., 2016</xref>). <italic>C. jejuni</italic> and <italic>C. coli</italic> densely colonize the intestine of poultry (up to 10<sup>9</sup> bacteria per gram of ceca in chicken) and are the most common species encountered in human infections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Allos, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Newell and Fearnley, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Lee and Newell, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref88">Young et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Facciol&#x00E0; et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Connerton et al., 2018</xref>). Despite extensive intestinal colonization, <italic>Campylobacter</italic> infection produces little or no clinical diseases in poultry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Johnson et al., 2017</xref>). Prevalence studies conducted in Europe and United States have reported <italic>Campylobacter</italic>-positive flocks ranging up to 100% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Newell and Fearnley, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Luangtongkum et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Jorgensen et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref76">Sibanda et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Koutsoumanis et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Kuhn et al., 2020</xref>). Colonized chickens shed <italic>Campylobacter</italic> in their feces until slaughter (up to 10<sup>9</sup>&#x2009;CFU/g of cecum) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Newell and Fearnley, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Luangtongkum et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Jorgensen et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref76">Sibanda et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Koutsoumanis et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Kuhn et al., 2020</xref>), increasing the risk of horizontal transmission of <italic>Campylobacter</italic> to the whole flock and post-harvest contaminations of the meat products (over 50% in average and up to 100%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Logue et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Berrang et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref88">Young et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Guerin et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Hue et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Kaakoush et al., 2015</xref>). The high prevalence of <italic>Campylobacter</italic> in poultry and detection of identical genotypes in both poultry and human isolates support poultry contamination as the predominant route of human infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Allos, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Newell and Fearnley, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Lee and Newell, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref88">Young et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Facciol&#x00E0; et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Connerton et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>On-farm <italic>Campylobacter</italic> control efforts have not been successful in mitigating human <italic>Campylobacter</italic> infections as evidenced by the continuous increase in human infections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Kittl et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref77">Skarp et al., 2016</xref>). Although improving biosecurity has beneficial effects on lowering the overall flock prevalence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Kaakoush et al., 2015</xref>), these measures have not resulted in consistent and predictable outcomes in controlling <italic>Campylobacter</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref85">Wagenaar et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Kaakoush et al., 2015</xref>). In addition, stringent biosecurity measures are cost-prohibitive and hard to maintain and their effectiveness seems to vary with production systems and they do not apply to small farm poultry operations (e.g., backyard chickens) and pet chickens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Koutsoumanis et al., 2020</xref>). Currently, there are no effective competitive exclusion products, vaccines, bacteriocins, bacteriophages, or feed/water additives to exclude <italic>Campylobacter</italic> from chickens under production conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Lin, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Richards et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref83">Vandeputte et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">Quintel et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Hakeem and Lu, 2021</xref>). Furthermore, the widespread use of antibiotics in poultry production has been implicated in the emergence of highly resistant <italic>Campylobacter</italic> strains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref88">Young et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Agyare et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref87">Yang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Andrew Selaledi et al., 2020</xref>). Therefore, there is a critical need for novel anti-<italic>Campylobacter</italic> control strategies that can amend and/or replace on-going efforts and specifically target pathways and novel mechanisms to combat both <italic>Campylobacter</italic> spread and antibiotic resistance.</p>
<p>The transport of proteins from cytoplasm to extra-cytoplasmic locations is critical for bacterial survival, virulence, and stress resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Berks, 2015</xref>). Extra-cytoplasmic protein transport in bacteria most commonly occurs via two major export systems, namely, the general secretory (Sec) pathway and the twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Frain et al., 2019a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">b</xref>). The <italic>Campylobacter</italic> Tat pathway is highly conserved between strains, and the inactivation of the Tat pathway induces a multitude of functional defects in <italic>Campylobacter</italic> including motility, outer membrane permeability, biofilm formation, antibiotic resistance, growth under oxygen-limiting conditions, iron acquisition, and copper homeostasis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Drozd et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Kassem et al., 2011</xref>). Copper is crucial for the survival of pathogenic bacteria in the host and external environment; however, it also exhibits antimicrobial properties at high concentration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Hall et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref79">Stolle et al., 2016</xref>). As a defense mechanism, <italic>C. jejuni</italic> expresses two important proteins for copper homeostasis as follows: (1) CopA a copper transporting P-type ATPase responsible for transporting toxic Cu (I) from cytoplasm to periplasm, (2) CueO, a multicopper oxidase that converts toxic Cu (I) into the less toxic Cu (II) in periplasm and is dependent on the Tat system. Both of these copper homeostasis proteins are essential for copper resistance and avian host colonization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Hall et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref79">Stolle et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Kassem et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Gardner and Olson, 2018</xref>). In addition, the deletion of the <italic>tatC</italic> gene significantly reduced <italic>C. jejuni</italic> persistence in the intestinal tract of chickens and decreased fecal shedding (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Rajashekara et al., 2009</xref>). Previous studies have demonstrated that Tat inhibitors are an effective control method to mitigate <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref84">Vasil et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Massai et al., 2019</xref>) and <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Panahandeh et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bageshwar et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Bl&#x00FC;mmel et al., 2017</xref>). Furthermore, the use of SM has been shown to be effective strategy against multi-drug resistant pathogens (i.e., <italic>Salmonella</italic>, <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>, <italic>Campylobacter</italic>, <italic>Staphylococcus</italic>, <italic>Burkholderia</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, and <italic>Candida</italic>), where conventional antibiotics failed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Hong-Geller and Micheva-Viteva, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Abouelhassan et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">Selin et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Guo et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Deblais et al., 2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Helmy et al., 2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Kathayat et al., 2018</xref>). Since chickens and mammals do not have Tat protein homologs, the inactivation of the Tat pathway using small molecule (SM) inhibitors is a promising approach to discover new antimicrobial agents with no toxicity to eukaryotes as an alternative to conventional <italic>Campylobacter</italic> control methods.</p>
<p>In this study, we used commercially available SM libraries (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;50,917) to identify several, lead SM inhibitors that targeted the Tat-system and had anti-<italic>C. jejuni</italic> activity. Tat-dependent inhibitors were identified by (1) increased <italic>C. jejuni</italic> susceptibility to copper sulfate and (2) reduced <italic>C. jejuni</italic> Fdh activity. Eight potential Tat-dependent inhibitors (T1-T8) exhibited <italic>in vitro</italic> antimicrobial activity against <italic>C. jejuni</italic>. Two inhibitors (T2 and T7) were identified as promising lead compounds with good antimicrobial efficacy against <italic>C. jejuni</italic> in chickens and with minimal impact on the host microbiota. Furthermore, an <italic>in silico</italic> docking study identified that the most promising Tat inhibitor (T7) targets key amino acids in TatC.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Bacterial strains</title>
<p><italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 was the primary model strain used for the selection of the potential Tat-dependent inhibitors by high-throughput screening. <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 is resistant to 0.5 and 1&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 <italic>tatC</italic> knockout mutant (<italic>C. jejuni &#x0394;tatC</italic>) was used to confirm the Tat-dependent inhibitory effect of the selected SM. <italic>C. jejuni &#x0394;tatC</italic> is susceptible to 0.5&#x2009;mM and higher of CuSO<sub>4</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Rajashekara et al., 2009</xref>). The specificity of the Tat-dependent inhibitors was also tested on 11 additional <italic>Campylobacter</italic> strains (<italic>C. coli</italic> ATCC33559 and 10 other <italic>C. jejuni</italic> strains isolated from chickens) and 7 commensal/beneficial bacteria (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). The 1 <italic>C. jejuni</italic> strains (Au-13, Au-20, Au-38, Au-39, Au-47, Au-50, Au-24, Au-32, Au-44, and Au-45) were selected based on their single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-type and percent of prevalence in chickens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Merchant-Patel et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Kumar et al., 2016</xref>). Additional details about the bacterial strains are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Eukaryotic models</title>
<p>Colonic epithelial cells (Caco-2) were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity and the ability of the selected eight SMs to clear intracellular <italic>C. jejuni</italic>. The Caco-2 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC HTB-37; Rockville, MD, United States). For <italic>in-vivo</italic> testing, 3 and 5-week-old White Cronish broiler chickens, obtained from Meyer&#x2019;s hatchery (Polk, OH, USA), were used to validate the anti-<italic>C. jejuni</italic> efficacy (log reduction in cecal content) of the selected four SMs (T1, T2, T7, and T8) in poultry and their impact on the cecal microbiota. Broiler chickens were grown in accordance with The Ohio State University Animal Care and Use Program (accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International) and performed following the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Chickens were fed a standard broiler diet (i.e., broiler starter phase from day 0 to 10; broiler growth phase from day 11 to 25; and broiler finisher phase from day 26 to 42; PNW extension #658) which was obtained from local feed mill at the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC). Chickens and associated rooms were observed at least twice daily to assure that no shortage in feed or side effects occur due to the bacterial inoculation or treatments provided during the experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>SM libraries</title>
<p>A total of 50,917 SMs obtained from 11 libraries were screened in this study. SMs were suspended in 100% DMSO at concentration ranging from 2.5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL to 12.5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL between libraries and stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S2</xref>). These libraries originated from The National Screening Laboratory for the Regional Center of Excellence in Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Disease (NSRB, United States)&#x2014;The New England Regional Center of Excellence for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases (NERC, USA) collection. The NSRB and NERC libraries included FDA-approved bio-active SM, SM used by NIH in recent clinical trials, bio-active screens, and diversified SM synthesized for favorable physico-chemical properties (e.g., solubility, low/no toxicity and increased stability). Details about the origin and concentration of the libraries are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S2</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<title>High-throughput copper sulfate sensitivity assay</title>
<p>Our <italic>in silico</italic> study highlighted that the unique assembly and disassembly feature of Tat system is required for the translocation of several relatively large folded proteins, such as formate dehydrogenase (Fdh) and multi-copper oxidase (CueO) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Rajashekara et al., 2009</xref>). Since CueO function requires the transport of the Tat system, increased susceptibility to copper was used as an indicator during our <italic>in vitro</italic> screen for Tat-specific SM inhibitors. The identification of SM increasing sensitivity of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 to copper sulfate (1&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>, non-lethal dose) was performed using a high-throughput screening in 384 plate formats at NSRB facilities (Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA). Columns 1 to 24 of assay plates were filled with 40&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of MH broth +1&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub> using a Matrix WellMate (Thermo Fisher, United States) automatic plate filler (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Drozd, 2012</xref>). In total, 100&#x2009;nL of SM were transferred to each well using The Institute of Chemistry and Cell Biology (ICCB, USA) Longwood Screen Facility Seiko D-TRAN XM3106-31 PN 4-axis cartesian robot (V&#x0026;P Scientific), which was controlled by SRC-310A Controller/SPEL. Columns 1&#x2013;23 of the assay plates were inoculated with 40&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 normalized at optical density (OD<sub>600</sub>) of 0.16 in fresh MH broth supplemented with 1&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>. Wells in column 24 were filled with 40&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of <italic>C. jejuni &#x0394;tatC</italic> (susceptible to 1&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>) normalized at 0.16 OD<sub>600</sub> in the same conditions. The <italic>&#x0394;tatC</italic> mutant is susceptible to 0.5&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>; however, for screening purpose, we used the stringent 1&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>. Plates were incubated at 42&#x00B0;C for 36&#x2009;h under microaerophilic conditions (85% N<sub>2</sub>, 10% CO<sub>2</sub>, and 5% O<sub>2</sub>). Turbidimetric measurements (OD<sub>600</sub>) were recorded before and after incubation using a Biotek Synergy HT spectrophotometer. The positive and negative controls on each assay plate were used to calculate a Z&#x2019; value for that plate. If the Z&#x2019; value was &#x003E;0, the threshold for defining a compound as positive was set at three standard deviations above the average positive control value. Z&#x2019; is calculated as described in the study mentioned in the reference (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9001">Zhang et al., 1999</xref>): Z&#x2019;&#x2009;=&#x2009;1- (3&#x03C3;neg&#x2009;+&#x2009;3&#x03C3;pos)/(&#x03BC;neg-&#x03BC;pos), where &#x03BC; is the mean and &#x03C3; is the standard deviation. The &#x0394;<italic>tatC</italic> mutant is the positive control mimic, and wild type without drug is the negative control.</p>
<p>Furthermore, validation of the primary assay was performed in a 96-well plate format for the selected 177 SMs with high drug-like properties that significantly increased susceptibility of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> to CuSO<sub>4</sub>. In total, 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> suspension normalized at 0.08 OD<sub>600</sub> in fresh MH broth supplemented with 1&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub> were transferred to each well of a 96-well plate and treated with 6.25&#x2009;&#x03BC;g of SM. A parallel 96-well plate was prepared as described above but without CuSO<sub>4</sub>, to identify SM that did not inhibit the growth of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> in a Tat-specific manner. Plates were incubated at 42&#x00B0;C under microaerophilic conditions for 24&#x2009;h. Turbidimetric measurements were recorded before and after incubation, to remove a potential increase in OD<sub>600</sub> caused by the SM. Only SM inhibiting <italic>C. jejuni</italic> WT growth in the presence of CuSO<sub>4</sub> without inhibiting <italic>C. jejuni</italic> WT growth in the absence of CuSO<sub>4</sub> was selected for further analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<title>Counter screens using the screensaver SM database</title>
<p>Based on previous publicly available bioassay data, the ICCB-longwood/NSRB Screensaver database version v2010.10.29 and v2012.01.26 was used to eliminate SMs that were less likely to target the Tat pathway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref81">Tolopko et al., 2010</xref>). Commercial and pharmaceutical based libraries with known antibacterial applications were cross-referenced with the selected SM. In addition, SMs that had positive effects on eukaryote-based screens were deprioritized because of the absence of eukaryotic homolog Tat system.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<title>Counter-screen using medicinal chemistry software</title>
<p>A series of filters were established to select SM with the optimized drug-like properties. The criteria were based on physicochemical descriptors, potential liabilities (i.e., predicted toxicity), chemical structural diversity, and novelty. ChemDraw suite (CambridgeSoft, PerkinElmer, United States) was used to calculate molecular weight from the simplified molecular-input line-entry system (SMILES) notation. Molecular weights less than 200 Daltons (Da) and more than 550 Da were deprioritized due to the golden triangle measurements for drug-like characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Johnson et al., 2009</xref>). ChemBioFinder (CambridgeSoft, PerkinElmer, United States) was used to identify structural redundancy between the SM and remove highly similar candidates. SciFinder&#x00AE; (Chemical Abstracts Service) was used to deprioritize SM, showing more than 90% similarity with previously investigated drugs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>Formate dehydrogenase inhibition activity assay</title>
<p>Formate is an essential source of energy for <italic>Campylobacter</italic> and plays a role in optimizing the adaptation of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> to the oxygen-limited gastrointestinal tract of the host (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Kassem et al., 2017</xref>). Fdh is translocated by the Tat system in the periplasm, and thus, the inactivation of Tat system results in a reduction of the Fdh activity. Hence, this activity was used as an indicator during our <italic>in vitro</italic> screening procedures, to validate Tat-dependent SM inhibitors of <italic>C. jejuni</italic>. The Fdh inhibition activity assay was performed with the 177 SM with drug-like properties that increased the susceptibility of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> to CuSO<sub>4</sub> (1&#x2009;mM). <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 suspension normalized to 0.08 OD<sub>600</sub> in fresh MH broth was incubated for 24&#x2009;h in microaerophilic condition with 6.25&#x2009;&#x03BC;g of SM. Subsequently, the treated cultures were suspended in an oxygen-restricted solution containing 25&#x2009;mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7) with 1&#x2009;mM benzyl-viologen and 10&#x2009;mM sodium formate. The increase of OD<sub>578</sub>&#x2009;was measured using a SpectraMax Plus 384 absorbance plate reader (Molecular Devices, USA), to monitor the reduction in benzyl viologen, an indicator of Fdh activity. <italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;three replicates per SM. <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 treated with 1% DMSO and <italic>C. jejuni</italic> &#x2206;<italic>tatC</italic>mutant were used as controls. SMs that inhibited at least 30% Fdh activity (which is equivalent to the inhibitory effect of 1&#x2009;mM of azide on FDH activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Davies, 2017</xref>)) compared with the DMSO control were further down selected for analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<title>Activity spectrum of the selected 19 SMs against several <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic>, <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic>, and commensal/beneficial gut bacteria</title>
<p>In total, 19 SMs were selected using CuSO<sub>4</sub> sensitivity and Fdh inhibition assay and further tested on 11 <italic>Campylobacter</italic> strains grown in MH broth supplemented with 0.5&#x2009;mM CuSO4 and treated with 6.25&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL of SM, as described above. A similar experiment was performed with seven commensal/beneficial gut bacteria to determine species specificity of these SMs. In brief, an overnight suspension was normalized at 0.05 OD<sub>600</sub> using the appropriate medium and challenged with 6.25&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL of SM. Details about the strains and their growing conditions are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>. Medium alone and 1% DMSO were used as controls (<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;3 replicates per SM).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<title>Copper sulfate sensitivity dose&#x2013;response assay <italic>in vitro</italic> using the selected 19 SM</title>
<p>A CuSO<sub>4</sub> sensitivity dose&#x2013;response assay was performed to determine the minimal concentration of SM that completely inhibited (MIC) or killed (MBC) <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 in the presence of CuSO<sub>4</sub> (0.5&#x2009;mM). In total, 19 SMs were two-fold serially diluted to obtain a final SM concentration ranging from 6.25 to 0.012&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL. <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 was then treated with a determined concentration of SM, as described in the copper sensitivity assay. The lowest SM concentration that completely inhibited the growth without killing <italic>C. jejuni</italic> in the presence of 0.5 mM CuSO<sub>4</sub> was considered the MIC (no increase in OD<sub>600</sub> over time, but viable cells were recovered on agar plate after challenge). The lowest bactericidal SM concentration was considered the MBC (no increase in OD<sub>600</sub> over time and no viable cells were recovered on agar plate after challenge) (<italic>N</italic> = 3 replicates per SM). A similar copper sulfate sensitivity dose&#x2013;response assay was performed with the eight most potent SMs (T1-T8) against other <italic>Campylobacter</italic> strains (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;11; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>) using methodology described above. However, these SMs were two-fold serially diluted to obtain a final SM concentration ranging from 5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g to 0.0625&#x2009;&#x03BC;g for testing (<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;two independent experiments with four technical replicate for each SM).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<title>Cytotoxicity of the selected eight SM on Caco-2 colon epithelial cells</title>
<p>Cytotoxicity of the eight SMs (T1-T8) was tested on Caco-2 cells at 5, 25, and 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL, as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Kumar et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Deblais et al., 2019</xref>). In brief, a 96-well plate seeded with approximately 1.4 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup> Caco-2 cells/well in MEM medium was challenged with a final SM concentration of 5, 25, and 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL. After 24&#x2009;h of incubation at 37&#x00B0;C in a humidified 5% CO<sub>2</sub> incubator, cytotoxic effects were determined using the PierceTM Lactate Dehydrogenase Cytotoxicity Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cell death was measured based on the production of formazan (chromogenic dye), which can be read at OD<sub>570</sub>. Equal concentrations (5, 25, and 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL) of kanamycin or chloramphenicol, 1% DMSO, and 10X lysis buffer were used as control. The cytotoxicity level was calculated according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions (<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;two independent experiments with three technical replicate for each SM).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>Copper sulfate sensitivity dose&#x2013;response assay in infected Caco-2 colon epithelial cells</title>
<p>The intracellular reduction in <italic>C. jejuni</italic> in the presence of a given SM (T1-T8) and 0.5&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub> were evaluated using Caco-2 cells, as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Kumar et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Deblais et al., 2019</xref>). In brief, cells were infected for 2&#x2009;h using a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100. Infected cells were treated with SM at a final concentration ranging between 5 and 0.315&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL and incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 24&#x2009;h in a humidified 5% CO<sub>2</sub> incubator. Following incubation, cells were washed once with 1X PBS, lysed with 0.1% Triton-100X, serially 10-fold diluted in 1X PBS, and plated on MH agar plate. Plates were incubated in microaerophilic conditions at 42&#x00B0;C for 24&#x2009;h, to determine the intracellular survival. Cells not infected and not treated and cells infected and treated with 1% DMSO were used as controls (<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;two independent experiments with four technical replicate for each SM).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<title>Effect of selected four SMs on <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> persistence in chicken ceca</title>
<p>Four SMs (T1, T2, T7, and T8) were selected from the initial list of eight SMs based on their low MBC in Caco2 cells (&#x003C;5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g SM/ml), low cytotoxicity indexes (&#x003C;20% toxicity at 5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g SM /ml), and their minimal effect on commensal bacterial species (less than two species inhibited by the SM out of the seven strains tested; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). The antimicrobial efficacy of our SM was tested on 5-week-old chickens, to assess the clearance of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> load right before slaughter age. Overall, 5-week-old <italic>Campylobacter</italic>-free, i.e., specific pathogen-free [SPF] chickens were inoculated orally with a mixture of five <italic>C. jejuni</italic> strains (10<sup>5</sup>&#x2009;CFU/chicken, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S3</xref>). Rectal swabs were collected 1&#x2009;day post-inoculation (DPI) to confirm <italic>C. jejuni</italic> colonization (CFU/g of feces) in birds. From 2 DPI to 7 DPI, groups of 4&#x2013;5 chickens were treated orally twice a day with one of the four SMs (T1, T2, T7, or T8; approximately 0.225&#x2009;mg of SM per kg body weight). Details of the treatment groups and the inoculum are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S3</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1"><label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Antimicrobial properties of the eight most potent Tat-dependent inhibitors.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">SM</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2"><italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176<break/><italic>in vitro</italic></th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Growth inhibition at 6.25&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 MBC in Caco2 cells (&#x03BC;g /ml)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">MIC (&#x03BC;g/ml)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">MBC (&#x03BC;g/ml)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>Campylobacter</italic> spp.</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Commensal/beneficial gut bacteria</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">T1</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">0.19</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">0.62</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12/12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0/7</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">0.63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">T2</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">0.01</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">0.62</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12/12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2/7 (Lb and Ef)</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">1.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">T3</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">0.04</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">&#x003E;5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12/12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2/7 (LGG and Ef)</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">T4</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">0.01</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">&#x003E;5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12/12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1/7 (Ef)</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">T5</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">0.01</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">0.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12/12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1/7 (Ef)</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">T6</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">1.25</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">2.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12/12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0/7</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">T7</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">0.02</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">0.16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12/12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1/7 (LGG)</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">2.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">T8</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">0.08</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">0.12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12/12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2/7 (Lb and Ef)</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>MIC: minimal bacteriostatic concentration (&#x03BC;g/ml) in presence of 0.5&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>; MBC: minimal bactericidal concentration (&#x03BC;g/ml) in presence of 0.5&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>; &#x003E;5: the MBC was higher than 5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL. Ef, <italic>Enterococcus faecalis</italic>; Lb, <italic>Levilactobacillus brevis</italic>; LGG, <italic>Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus</italic> GG. Details about the <italic>Campylobacter</italic> and commensal/beneficial strains are displayed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The antimicrobial efficacy of T1, T7, and T8 was also tested on 3-week-old chickens to assess the clearance of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> load in chicken right after inoculation. Overall, 3-week-old <italic>Campylobacter</italic>-free chickens were inoculated orally with a mixture of five <italic>C. jejuni</italic> strains (10<sup>5</sup>&#x2009;CFU/chicken, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S3</xref>). Rectal swabs were collected 1 DPI to confirm the intestinal colonization of the birds by <italic>C. jejuni</italic> (CFU/g of feces). From 2 DPI, chickens were treated orally twice a day for 5&#x2009;days (from 2 DPI to 7 DPI) with one of the SMs (T1, T7, or T8; approximately 0.127&#x2009;mg of SM per kg body weight; n&#x2009;=&#x2009;5&#x2013;6 chicken per group). Details of the treatment groups and the inoculum are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S3</xref>.</p>
<p>For both experiments, <italic>C. jejuni</italic> colonized-chickens treated with 0.0001% DMSO and colonized chickens without additional carrier treatment (non-treated) were used as controls (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;3&#x2013;6 chicken per group). Details of the treatment groups and the inoculum are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S3</xref>. Both 3 and 5-week-old chickens were euthanized at 7 DPI using carbon dioxide gas and ceca (cecal content and the pouch) and were aseptically collected. One of the ceca pairs was immediately stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C for microbiota studies. The other ceca were suspended in 1X PBS, homogenized, serially diluted, plated on MH media supplemented with <italic>Campylobacter</italic> Selective Supplement (CSS) agar plate, and incubated for 48&#x2009;h at 42&#x00B0;C in microaerophilic conditions to determine <italic>C. jejuni</italic> load in the ceca (CFU/g of ceca).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<title>DNA extraction and 16S MiSeq sequencing</title>
<p>All the samples collected during the chicken experiments (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;58) were selected for microbiota analysis. Genomic DNA was extracted from 150 to 200&#x2009;mg of cecal contents using the PureLink Microbiome DNA Purification Kit (Life Technologies, Invitrogen Corp.) and combined with RNAse treatment (10&#x2009;units/h). After quality control with nanodrop, the 16S rRNA V4-V5 variable region was amplified, purified, and sequenced. Amplicon libraries were prepared by using Phusion&#x00AE; High-Fidelity PCR Kit (New England Biolabs Inc., Ipswich, MA, United States), as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Kumar, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Deblais et al., 2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Kumar et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Srivastava et al., 2020</xref>). PCR products were cleaned using AMPure XP PCR (Beckman Coulter Inc., Beverly MA, USA) and were sequenced using Illumina MiSeq 300-base paired-end kit at the Molecular and Cellular Imaging Center.<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn0001">
<sup>1</sup></xref> Sequencing raw data files are publicly available at NCBI Bioproject #PRJNA1023035.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<title>Bioinformatics analysis</title>
<p>Quality control of the raw reads was performed using FastQC (Babraham Bioinformatics, Cambridge, United States). Trimmomatic was used for trimming and removal of NexteraPE-PE adapter sequences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Bolger et al., 2014</xref>). Trimmed reads were processed using QIIME2 v. 2020.11 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Bolyen et al., 2019</xref>). The DADA2 plugin was used to process and check the quality of the reads (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Callahan et al., 2016</xref>). A sequencing depth of 6,600 reads was used for the rarefaction. Taxonomic assignment was performed using QIIME2 and the latest SILVA reference database (version 138.1; 99% homology cut off) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Quast et al., 2013</xref>). The obtained reads were further filtered for eukaryotic, mitochondrial, and chloroplastic genetic signatures.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<title><italic>In silico</italic> docking study of the interactions between the selected compounds and the Tat system</title>
<p>Autodock 4.0 (BIOVIA discovery studio visualizer) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Morris et al., 2009</xref>) was used for docking with a homology model, which was generated using an online platform Phyere 2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Kelley et al., 2015</xref>). Due to the unavailability of the 3D crystal structure of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> TatC, we turned to <italic>Aquifex aeolicus</italic> VF5, which possessed a TatC homolog. The sequence alignment and secondary structure of <italic>A. aeolicus</italic> VF5 closely resemble those of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> TatC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Ramasamy et al., 2013</xref>). Of particular significance, the 3D crystal structure of <italic>A. aeolicus</italic> VF5 is readily accessible in the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 4HTS). Consequently, we opted to utilize this structure for the generation of a homology model and Discovery Studio Visualizer along with Chimera to visualize protein&#x2013;ligand (SM) interaction. Graphical User Interface: AutoDock Tool (ADT) was used for the preparation of pdbqt files for protein and ligand and grid box creation. AutoGrid was employed for the preparation of the grid map, and the grid size was set to 60X60X60 xyz points with grid spacing at 0.375 A. During docking, both protein and ligand were considered as rigid, and the outcomes of docking with 1.0 A in positional root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) were clustered together. The docking pose with most favorable parameters (i.e., lowest energy or binding affinity) was aligned with protein structure and was further analyzed using BIOVIA discovery studio visualizer.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<title>Data analysis</title>
<p>A one-way ANOVA combined with a Tukey&#x2019;s test was used to analyze the difference in the abundance of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> in ceca between treatments. A <italic>p</italic>-value &#x2264;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Alpha diversity was analyzed using Shannon (richness and evenness) and Faith&#x2019;s PD (phylodiversity) indices. The Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis test was used to identify difference in alpha diversity. Based on Bray&#x2013;Curtis distance matrices, permutational multivariate analysis of variances (PERMANOVA) was used to identify difference in beta diversity (unweighted and weighted uniFrac). An analysis of composition of microbes (ANCOM) was used to identify differences in the relative abundance between phylum and species levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Mandal et al., 2015</xref>). A <italic>p</italic>-value &#x2264;0.01 was considered statistically significant. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify potential correlations between the spectrum of activity and antimicrobial efficacy (MIC/MBC) of the selected SM and the microbiota data and the <italic>C. jejuni</italic> load in the chicken ceca. <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref> shows summary of the cutoff selection criteria used in this study, to select the best Tat-dependent SM inhibitors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Ramasamy et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2"><label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Selection criteria used in this study to identify the most potent Tat-dependent SM inhibitors.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Experiment</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Selection criteria</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SM concentration tested</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Tool used</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Measuring method</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number of SM tested</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number of SM selected</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Primary screening &#x2013; CuSO<sub>4</sub> sensitivity assay</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Select SM that inhibited <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 growth only in the presence of sub-lethal dose of CuSO<sub>4</sub> (1&#x2009;mM)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.5 to 12.5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">384-well plate + <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Turbidimetry (cell growth at 600&#x2009;nm)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">50,917</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">679</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Validation of primary screening</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Select SM that inhibited <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 growth only in the presence of sub-lethal dose of CuSO<sub>4</sub> (1&#x2009;mM)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.5 to 12.5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">96-well plate + <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Turbidimetry (cell growth at 600&#x2009;nm)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">679</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">679</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">Counter <italic>in silico</italic> screening</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Eliminate less likely to target the Tat pathway</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">NA</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">ICCB-longwood/NSRB Screensaver database version</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">No known activity against eukaryote hosts</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="3">679</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="3">177</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Select SM with the optimized drug-like properties (MW between 200 and 500 Da)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">NA</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">ChemDraw + Golden triangle measurements</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Lipinski rule of 5<break/>MW (Da)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Eliminate SM with structural similarities higher than 90%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">NA</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">ChemBioFinder + SciFinder</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Structural similarity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">FDH activity inhibition assay</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Select SM that inhibited at least 30% of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 FDH activity</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.25&#x2009;&#x03BC;g</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">384-well plate + <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Turbidimetry (reduction of benzyl viologen at 578&#x2009;nm)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">177</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">CuSO<sub>4</sub> sensitivity dose&#x2013;response assay <italic>in vitro</italic></td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Identify MIC and MBC against <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 in the presence of sub-lethal dose of CuSO<sub>4</sub> (0.5&#x2009;mM)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.012 to 6.25&#x2009;&#x03BC;g</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">96-well plate + <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Turbidimetry (cell growth at 600&#x2009;nm)&#x2009;+&#x2009;cell viability</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="3">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="3">8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Antimicrobial activity of SM on <italic>Campylobacter</italic> strains and commensal /beneficial bacteria</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Select SM that had completely inhibited the growth of the 11 other <italic>Campylobacter</italic> strains in the presence of sub-lethal dose of CuSO<sub>4</sub> (0.5&#x2009;mM)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.25&#x2009;&#x03BC;g</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="2">96-well plate + <italic>Campylobacter</italic> isolates (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;11) or commensal/beneficial bacteria (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;7)</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Turbidimetry (cell growth at 600&#x2009;nm)&#x2009;+&#x2009;cell viability</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Select SM that affected the growth of less than 2/7 commensal/beneficial bacteria in the presence of sub-lethal dose of CuSO<sub>4</sub> (0.5&#x2009;mM)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Cytoxicity of SM on colon epithelial cells</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Select SM that displayed less than 20% cytotoxicity on Caco2 colon epithelial cells treated with 5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5 to 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;g</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">96-well plate + Caco2 colon epithelial cells</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Turbidimetry (production of formazan at 570&#x2009;nm)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">CuSO<sub>4</sub> sensitivity dose&#x2013;response assay in infected colon epithelial cells</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Select SM that have MBC below 5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g against intracellular <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.315 to 5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">96-well plate + infected Caco2 colon epithelial cells</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">cell viability</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Antimicrobial efficacy of the SM on colonized chickens</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Select SM that significantly reduce <italic>C. jejuni</italic> load in ceca, while having no impact on cecal microbiota and body weight</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.127 and 0.225&#x2009;mg of SM per kg body weight for 3- and 5-week-old chickens, respectively</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Colonized 3- and 5- week-old broiler chickens</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Body weight,<break/><italic>C. jejuni</italic> load in ceca, and<break/>cecal microbiota</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Docking study</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Identify storng binding affinity of our SM on Tat proteins</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">NA</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Autodock 4.0</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Binding affinity</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>&#x002A;All microbiology experiment presented above were conducted by growing <italic>C. jejuni</italic> and <italic>C. coli</italic> in MH broth for 24&#x2009;h in microaerophilic condition at 42&#x00B0;C. CuSO<sub>4</sub>: copper sulfate; FDH, Formate dehydrogenase; NA, not applicable; SM, small molecule; MW, molecular weight.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec19">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec20">
<title>The growth of <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 affected by 177 SMs only in the presence of copper sulfate</title>
<p>A total of 50,917 SMs divided into 11 libraries were screened against <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176, to identify potential inhibitors of the Tat system (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S2</xref>). The hits were identified by screening in the presence of 1&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4.</sub> Since CueO contributed to CuSO<sub>4</sub> resistance and its function requires Tat system transport, increased susceptibility to copper was used as an indicator during high-throughput sequencing for Tat-specific SM inhibitors. The growth profile obtained for each SM tested was compared with the growth of the &#x0394;<italic>tatC</italic> mutant (susceptible to 1&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>; no OD<sub>600</sub> increase over time) and <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 (resistant to 1&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>) in the presence of 1&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>. Out of them, 679 SMs completely inhibited the growth of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> in the presence of 1&#x2009;mM copper sulfate after comparison of the turbidimetric values obtained with the <italic>C. jejuni &#x0394;tatC</italic> mutant. The number of SM identified per library was not proportional to the concentration of the libraries (ranging between 2.5 and 12.5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL). However, known bioactive collection (Biomol 4, MSDiscovery 1, Microsource 1, and MIH Clinical Collection 1 and 2) displayed higher hit rate (approximately 3.54%) than commercial libraries (Asinex, Chembridge 3, Chemdiv 4, Enamine 2, Lifechemicals 1, and Maybridge 5; approximately 1.20%), suggesting that each library might be composed of SM with distinct chemical structures (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S2</xref>). The average hit rate across all libraries was 1.33%, which is significantly higher than the optimal hit rate proposed by the NSRB screening guidelines (0.3% or approximately 1 hit/plate) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Drozd, 2012</xref>). Out of the 679 SMs identified, 177 SMs had no predicted bioactivity in eukaryotic cells (i.e., selected SM had no predicted interactions with known eukaryotic targets based on <italic>in silico</italic> counter screens) and followed the Lipinski rule of five based on <italic>in silica</italic> analyses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Lipinski et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Lipinski, 2004</xref>). Among the 177 SMs, 66 SMs had a thiourea group, 46 SM had a benzimidazole group, 38 SM had an acylhydrazone group, and 11 SM had an oxadiazole group. These 177 SMs (107 SM from Asinex, 28 SM from Chembridge, 17 SM from Life chemicals, and 25 SM from Maybridge) were selected for the secondary screen upon resynthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<title>21 SMs increased the susceptibility of <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> to CuSO<sub>4</sub> and reduced FDH activity <italic>in vitro</italic></title>
<p>Of the selected 177 SMs tested, only 33.3% of the SM (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;59/177) reduced at least 30% growth of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> in the presence of 0.5&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub> compared with the DMSO control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>). Twenty-one SM completely inhibited C. jejuni growth, 19 SM reduced the growth of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> by 75 to 99%, and 19 SM reduced the growth of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> between 30 and 75% in the presence of 0.5 mM CuSO<sub>4</sub> compared to the DMSO control. The Fdh inhibition activity assay showed that 56.5% of the SMs (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;100/177) reduced <italic>C. jejuni</italic> Fdh activity by 30 to 100% compared with the DMSO control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>). Overall, 21 SMs that sensitized <italic>C. jejuni</italic> to copper sulfate also displayed a significant reduction in FDH activity (&#x003E;30%), suggesting that these SMs affect the growth of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> in a Tat-dependent manner. These 21 SMs were selected for further testing.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1"><label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Identification of Tat dependent inhibitors in <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176. <bold>(A)</bold> Copper sulfate sensitivity assay. <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 was challenged for 24&#x2009;h with 6.25&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL of SM plus 0.5&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub> in microaerophilic condition. The growth inhibition was determined by measuring the optical density and being compared to the DMSO control. <bold>(B)</bold> Formate Dehydrogenase (FDH) inhibition activity assay. <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 was challenged for 24&#x2009;h with 6.25&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL of SM in microaerophilic condition. The FDH activity was determined by measuring the optical density and being compared to the DMSO control. <italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;3 replicates per group.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1342573-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The inhibitory activity of the 19/21 SM (2 SM could not be resynthesized) was also tested on other <italic>Campylobacter</italic> strains (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;11; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>) and commensal/beneficial gut bacteria (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;7) using a copper sensitivity assay at 0.5&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub> with 6.25&#x2009;&#x03BC;g of SM<sub>,</sub> as mentioned above. Overall, 19 SMs completely inhibited the growth of 12 <italic>Campylobacter</italic> strains in the presence of copper sulfate while having minimal impact on the growth of two commensal/beneficial gut bacteria in a similar growth condition (growth inhibition in the presence of copper sulfate lower than 50% compared with the DMSO control). The selected 19 SMs displayed a very similar spectrum of activity profiles. They completely inhibited the growth of all <italic>Campylobacter</italic> strains tested at 6.25&#x2009;&#x03BC;g. Furthermore, the 19 SMs had no growth effect on <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> Nissle 1917, <italic>Streptococcus bovis, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifidobacterium longum,</italic> and <italic>Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron</italic> at 6.25&#x2009;&#x03BC;g in the presence of 0.5&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>; however, they affected the growth of <italic>Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus</italic> GG (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;13 SM), <italic>Enterococcus faecalis</italic> (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;16 SM), and <italic>Levilactobcillus brevis</italic> (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;2 SM; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<title>Selection of eight most potent Tat-dependent inhibitors</title>
<p>A copper sulfate sensitivity dose&#x2013;response assay was performed <italic>in vitro</italic> on <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 using the selected 19 Tat-dependent inhibitors (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). One SM had an MIC of 3.13&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL; two SMs had MIC at 1.56&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL; three SMs had MIC at 0.78&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL; one SM had MIC at 0.39&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL; two SMs had MIC at 0.19&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL; two SMs had MIC at 0.098&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL; two SMs had MIC at 0.049&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL; three SMs had MIC at 0.024&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL; and one SM had MIC at 0.012&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL in the presence of 0.5&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>. Interestingly, the number of strains affected by the compounds (i.e., spectrum of activity) was not correlated with their antimicrobial efficacy (e.g., MIC and MBC).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2"><label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Copper sulfate sensitivity dose&#x2013;response assay <italic>in vitro</italic>. <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 was challenged for 24&#x2009;h with SM concentration ranging between 0.006 and 6.25&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL in presence of 0.5&#x2009;mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>. A total of 19 compounds were tested. <italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;four replicates per group.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1342573-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Based on the antimicrobial activity (i.e., efficacy and spectrum of activity) and <italic>in silica</italic> data obtained, we selected eight SMs with high drug-like properties, little or no growth effect on commensal/beneficial gut bacteria, and high efficacy against several <italic>Campylobacter</italic> strains (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). Overall, the antimicrobial efficacy of the selected eight SMs was similar across the 12 <italic>Campylobacter</italic> strains tested with MIC values of 0.01&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL and higher, and MBC values of 0.04&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL and higher (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S4, S5</xref>, respectively). In addition, the three-dimensional analysis of the chemical structure of the eight selected SMs showed that T8 and T2, T6 and T1, and T7 and T3 displayed high structural similarities, while T4 and T5 had unique chemical structures (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Furthermore, most of the SMs have sulfur and/or nitrogen-based functional groups (thiourea, imidazole uracil, sulfonamide, thiomorpholine dioxide, phenylurea, pyridine, piperidine, oxadiazole, and quinoline). However, no association was detected between the chemical structure of the SM and their antimicrobial properties.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3"><label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Chemical structure diversity of the eight most potent Tat-dependent inhibitors. The constellation tree was built based on the structure similarity score generated based on 3D Tanimoto scoring method in PubChem (<ext-link xlink:href="https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assay/assay.cgi?p=clustering" ext-link-type="uri">https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assay/assay.cgi?p=clustering</ext-link>). The circled node represents the root of the tree. Each SM is associated with its chemical structure and its PubChem ID.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1342573-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec23">
<title>The eight Tat-dependent inhibitors reduced <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> intracellular population In infected colon epithelial cells with low cytotoxicity level</title>
<p>All SMs completely cleared internalized <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 in Caco-2 cells after 24&#x2009;h of treatments with a concentration of SM ranging from 0.63&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL to 10&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). Most of the SMs displayed low toxicity (at most 10%) to Caco-2 cells when treated with 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL for 24&#x2009;h (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The toxicity values were comparable to the kanamycin and chloramphenicol-treated cells. Only T1 and T8 displayed toxicity level (36 and 33%, respectively) when treated with 25&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL or 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL of SM for 24&#x2009;h; however, T1 and T8 cleared intracellular <italic>C. jejuni</italic> 81&#x2013;176 at 0.63&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL and 5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL, respectively, which represent concentrations up to 80-fold lower compared with ones used for the toxicity assay. Overall, T1, T2, T7, and T8 displayed the most promising antimicrobial properties <italic>in vitro</italic> were selected for further analyses.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4"><label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Dose-dependent cytotoxicity assay of the eight Tat-dependent inhibitors using colon epithelial (Caco-2) cells. Bar: standard deviation; Cm, chloramphenicol; Kn, kanamycin; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; <italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;four replicates per group.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1342573-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec24">
<title>T2 and T7 treatments reduced <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> load in colonized chicken ceca</title>
<p>As a proof of concept, the selected SMs (T1, T2, T7, and T8) were tested on 5-week-old chickens inoculated with a mixture of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> strains (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>), to assess the clearance of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> in chicken right before the slaughter. Following 5&#x2009;days of SM treatment (twice a day, approximately 0.225&#x2009;mg of SM per kg body weight per treatment), colonized chickens treated with T2 displayed a significant reduction (1.2-log) in <italic>C. jejuni</italic> population per gram of cecum compared with the DMSO control group, which harbored approximately 5&#x00D7;10<sup>7</sup> CFU per gram of cecum (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>). Colonized chickens treated with the T7 and T8 groups displayed a 0.5-log reduction in <italic>C. jejuni</italic> population in ceca compared with the DMSO control group (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05), while the T1 treatment did not reduce the abundance of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> in ceca compared with the DMSO group. No significant difference in body weight was recorded between treatment groups before or after 5&#x2009;days of treatment (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S2A</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5"><label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of the four most potent Tat-dependent inhibitors on the persistence of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> in three- and five-week-old chicken ceca and its microbiota. <bold>(A)</bold> <italic>C. jejuni</italic> abundance in five-week-old chicken ceca after SM treatment (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;5&#x2013;4 chickens per group). The <italic>C. jejuni</italic> population in ceca was determined after 5&#x2009;days of treatment with 0.127&#x2009;mg/mL of SM. Each dot represents a chicken. Red bar represents the mean. &#x002A;: significant reduction of the <italic>C. jejuni</italic> population in ceca compared to the DMSO control group (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01). <bold>(B)</bold> <italic>C. jejuni</italic> abundance in three-week-old chicken ceca after SM treatment. The <italic>C. jejuni</italic> population in ceca was determined after 5&#x2009;days of treatment with 0.255&#x2009;mg/mL of SM (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;six to five chickens per group). <bold>(C)</bold> Relative abundance at the phylum level in five-week-old chicken ceca after treatment. <bold>(D)</bold> Relative abundance at the phylum level in three-week-old chicken ceca after treatment. NC: not inoculated not treated chickens; PC: colonized not treated chickens; DMSO, T1, T2, T7, T8: colonized chickens treated with DMSO or one of the selected SM.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1342573-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The antimicrobial activity of T1, T7, and T8 was also tested on 3-week-old chickens inoculated with a cocktail of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> strain (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>), to assess the clearance of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> in young chicken right after inoculation. T2 could not be resynthesized in sufficient quantities and, thus, was not tested on this 3-week-old experiment. Following 5&#x2009;days of SM treatment (approximately 0.127&#x2009;mg of SM per kg body weight per treatment), 3-week-old chickens treated with T7 displayed a significant reduction (0.9-log) in <italic>C. jejuni</italic> population per gram of cecal contents compared with the DMSO-treated group, which harbored approximately 4 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x2009;CFU per gram of cecal contents (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B</xref>). Chickens treated with T1 and T8 harbored similar <italic>C. jejuni</italic> abundance in ceca compared with the DMSO control group. No significant difference in body weight was recorded between treatment groups before or after 5&#x2009;days of treatment (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S2B</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec25">
<title>The SM treatments had minimal impact on the chicken cecal microbiota</title>
<p>The impact of the SM treatments on the cecal microbiota of the 3 and 5-week-old chickens was studied using 16S sequencing. After processing and taxonomic assignment with the SILVA reference database, 682,777 sequences were obtained from the 58 samples studied. Sequencing depth varied between 6,648 and 15,749 reads per sample (mean&#x2009;=&#x2009;9,753 reads per sample). Cecal samples were normalized to 6,600 sequences per sample for the data presented below.</p>
<p>For the 3-week-old chicken experiment, the analysis of the cecal alpha diversity, using Faith&#x2019;s PD and Shannon diversity index, indicated no significant differences between the treatment groups. On the other hand, the DMSO treatment (DMSO, T1, T2, T7, and T8 groups) significantly increased the Shannon index value (approx. 6.3) compared with the colonized, non-treated groups (PC; approx. 5.5; <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.04). The beta diversity analysis demonstrated that the SM treatments (T1, T2, T7, and T8 groups) had minimal impact on the global microbiome composition compared with the DMSO group (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S3A</xref>). Most of the variations were detected between the colonized chickens treated with DMSO (DMSO, T1 and T7 groups) and the chickens that were not treated with DMSO (NC and PC groups; <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01). Additional details concerning the impact of the DMSO and <italic>C. jejuni</italic> colonization on the cecal microbiome at the genus and species levels are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figures S3A&#x2013;C</xref>. Overall, the cecal microbiome was composed of Firmicutes (90&#x2013;99%), followed by Proteobacteria (0.1&#x2013;6.7%), Tenericutes (0.6&#x2013;2.1%), Actinobacteria (0.06&#x2013;1.4%), and Epsilonbacteraeota (0.02&#x2013;0.1%, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5C</xref>). No significant differences were detected at the phylum level between the SM-treated groups (T1, T2, T7, and T8) and the associated control group (DMSO). At the species level, T8 treatment significantly increased GCA-900066225 (11.6-fold), and T7 treatment significantly increased Ruminococcaceae UCG-014 (2.2-fold) compared with the DMSO group (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01).</p>
<p>For the 3-week-old chicken experiment, the analysis of the cecal alpha diversity, using Faith&#x2019;s PD and Shannon diversity index, indicated no significant differences between the treatment groups of (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figures S3D,E</xref>). Similarly, beta diversity analysis, using the weighted uniFrac, confirmed that the SM treatments (T1 and T7 groups; T8 was not included for microbiota study since it did not have positive impact on <italic>C. jejuni</italic> load in the cecum) had minimal impact on the global microbiome composition compared with the DMSO group (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S3F</xref>). Most of the variations were detected between the colonized chickens treated with DMSO (DMSO, T1 and T7 groups) and the chickens not treated with DMSO (NC and PC groups; p&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01). Additional details concerning the impact of DMSO and inoculation of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> on the cecal microbiome at the genus and species levels are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figures S3D&#x2013;F</xref>. Overall, the cecal microbiome was composed of Firmicutes (62&#x2013;82%), followed by Proteobacteria (15&#x2013;35%) and Epsilonbacteraeota (0&#x2013;8%, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5D</xref>). No significant differences were detected at the phylum level between the SM-treated groups (T1 and T7) and the associated control group (DMSO). At the species level, <italic>Caproiciproducens</italic> (6.5-fold and 4.4-fold, respectively) and <italic>Flavonifractor</italic> (1.7-fold) were significantly higher in T1 and T7 groups compared with the DMSO group. <italic>Eubacterium coprostanoligenes</italic> group (8-fold) and <italic>Neglecta timonensis</italic> (only detected in the T7 group at 0.8%) were significantly higher in the T7 group compared with the DMSO group (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec26">
<title>Docking studies predicted that T2 and T7 interact with the TatC protein of the Tat system</title>
<p>TatC subunit is the largest and most important part of Tat system, while Tat A and Tat B are much smaller units. The docking studies were conducted with all Tat subunits; however, TatA and B protein folding could not be predicted with high certainty due to smaller protein size. Therefore, we focused on TatC, which was modeled with a high degree of predictability and well-defined binding pockets, giving repeatable docking results. The <italic>in silico</italic> docking study demonstrated that both active compounds T2 and T7 bind in the same hydrophobic binding pocket associated with the key active residue Glu 165 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). The calculated binding energy for T2 is &#x2212;6.26Kcal/mol, while T7 has a higher binding energy of &#x2212;8.0 Kcal/mol. The T2 thiourea nitrogen forms a hydrogen bond with Ile80, while the phenyl ring forms Pi-Pi stacking interaction with Phe87. Trp85 and Phe87 form Pi-sigma interaction with the T2 pyridine ring and tert-butyl group, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figures 6A</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">C</xref>). In addition, there are several hydrophobic interactions within carbon chains of T2 and Ile80, Ser 77, Ile162, Phe111, Ser107, Ile168, Met166, Gln83, and Ser17. The T7 functional groups (i.e., oxadiazole and phenyl groups) bind to several amino acids that are located inside the hydrophobic core of TatC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6B</xref>). More precisely, all aromatic rings of T7 have &#x03C0;-anion interactions with the key Glu165 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figures 6B</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">D</xref>); the phenylacetamide group has &#x03C0;-alkyl interactions with Val169, &#x03C0;-&#x03C0; interactions with Phe84 and Trp85, and van der Waals interactions with Ile168 and Ser107; the methylthio-phenyl group has &#x03C0;-alkyl interactions with Ile80, Ile162, and Leu81, and van der Waals interactions with Phe111, Ser77, and Phe73. &#x03C0;- &#x03A3; interactions are also detected on the amide and methanethiol groups. Thus, anti-<italic>C. jejuni</italic> activity of both T2 and T7 may be attributed to their binding to hydrophobic pocket in TatC and the interaction with key residues Glu165 and Trp85 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6"><label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p><italic>In silico</italic> docking model between the Tat inhibitors and the TatC system in <italic>C. jejuni</italic>. Binding interactions of the most active small molecule inhibitors with a homology model of TatC from <italic>Aquifex aeolicus</italic>, Compound T2 <bold>(A)</bold>, Compound T7 <bold>(B)</bold>. The compounds bind in the same pocket and the interaction with key residue Glu165 and Trp85 is responsible for Tat C inhibition. The ionizability model for T2 <bold>(C)</bold> and T7 <bold>(D)</bold> of residues in the binding pocket indicates the Pi-anion interactions with Glu165 and Pi-Pi interaction with Trp85. These docking models indicate that TatC inhibition may be responsible for the anti-<italic>C. jejuni</italic> activity of T2 and T7.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1342573-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig7"><label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Role of Tat system in copper (Cu) homeostasis in <italic>C Jejuni</italic>. <italic>C jejuni</italic> employs a Tat complex (Tat-A, B, C) for the transport of proteins from cytoplasm to periplasm. TatC is the core transmembrane component of this complex located in inner membrane (IM), responsible for translocation of folded proteins such as multi-copper oxidase (CueO) and formate dehydrogenase (Fdh) from cytoplasm to periplasm. CueO is critical for oxidation of Cu<sup>+</sup> which are highly toxic as compared to relatively non-toxic Cu<sup>2+</sup> form. Thus, in the presence of TatC inhibitors the transportation of important cytoplasmic proteins such as CueO and Fdh is hampered. This results in increased sensitivity of <italic>C jejuni</italic> to copper. OM and IM, outer and inner membrane, respectively; CueO, copper oxidase; Cu, copper.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-15-1342573-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec27">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The emergence of antibiotic-resistant isolates significantly reduces the antimicrobial efficacy of current control methods which are used to mitigate human campylobacteriosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Kaakoush et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref80">Subbiah et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref87">Yang et al., 2019</xref>). Previous studies showed that the Tat system is highly conserved in <italic>Campylobacter</italic> spp. and is critical for the persistence of <italic>Campylobacter</italic> in the intestinal tract of poultry, a recurrent reservoir for <italic>Campylobacter</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Rajashekara et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Hitchcock et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Hermans et al., 2011</xref>). Additionally, the absence of homologous proteins in chickens and mammals increases the likelihood that the Tat system-based control strategies would avoid damage or unwanted interaction with host cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Kassem and Rajashekara, 2014</xref>). Previous studies demonstrated increased copper sulfate sensitivity and reduced Fdh activity in <italic>Campylobacter</italic> when the Tat system was non-functional; therefore, these two indicators were used to select the compounds that are likely to specifically inhibit the Tat system (hit compounds). A total of 50,917 SMs distributed among 11 &#x201C;commercial&#x201D; or &#x201C;known bioactive&#x201D; libraries provided by ICCB-Longwood version v2010.10.29 and v2012.01.26 were screened. A total of, eight SMs (T1-T8; 10&#x2009;ng/mL and higher) sensitized several <italic>C. jejuni</italic> and <italic>C. coli</italic> isolated from human and poultry to sublethal dose of copper sulfate (0.5&#x2009;mM) <italic>in vitro</italic>, and had minimal to absent toxicity in Caco-2 colon epithelial cells. These initial findings support our hypothesis that the Tat system is a promising target for the development of the anti-<italic>C. jejuni</italic> control method with minimal impact on eukaryotes. Further efforts will validate the molecular target of T2 and T7 to facilitate their uses against <italic>C. jejuni</italic> infections in humans. Distinct chemical backbones were observed among the eight SMs, suggesting that multiple chemical scaffolds can target the Tat system in <italic>C. jejuni</italic> or interact with chaperoning proteins. Most of the SMs were characterized by sulfur and/or nitrogen-containing functional groups (thiourea, imidazole uracil, sulfonamide, thiomorpholine dioxide, phenylurea, pyridine, piperidine, oxadiazole, and quinoline). Furthermore, SM with low molecular weights (&#x003C; 400&#x2009;Da) completely cleared intracellular <italic>C. jejuni</italic> between 0.63&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL and 2.5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL, while SM with high molecular weights (&#x003E; 400&#x2009;Da) completely cleared intracellular <italic>C. jejuni</italic> at 5.0&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL and higher. Therefore, the molecular weights could serve as a selection criterion of SM for testing them in a cell culture setting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">Schuffenhauer et al., 2006</xref>).</p>
<p>This study identified two potential Tat inhibitors (T2 and T7) that significantly reduced the cecal <italic>C. jejuni</italic> load (up to 1.2-log) in colonized chickens after a 5-day treatment twice a day with 0.225&#x2009;mg or 0.127&#x2009;mg of SM per kg body weight per treatment, respectively. Furthermore, the SM treatments did not affect the chicken body weight gain or disturb the cecal microbiota. This preliminary <italic>in vivo</italic> data validated that the Tat system could represent a good target for the development of novel and safe control methods against <italic>C. jejuni</italic>. Future studies will focus on the development of T2 and T7 derivatives with improved antimicrobial efficacy, dosage titration, and testing these compounds in farm-like settings. Similarly, the addition of our SM to the feed will be tested, which is the preferred delivery method in commercial poultry operations. Since the solvent used to deliver the SM to the chickens had a significant impact on the cecal microbiota, future studies will focus on the development of water-soluble T2 and T7 derivatives, optimizing the dosage and bioavailability for these molecules in chicken tissues after treatment.</p>
<p>Differences in antimicrobial efficacy were observed with T7 and T8 between the 3 and 5-week-old chicken experiments. These differences might be due to SM dosage used and/or the microbial composition in chicken ceca. Interestingly, the abundance of the <italic>Eubacterium coprostanoligenes</italic> group was significantly increased in 3-week-old chickens treated with T7 compared with the DMSO-treated chickens. <italic>Eubacterium coprostanoligenes</italic> is an anaerobe genus involved in the reduction of cholesterol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref86">Wei et al., 2020</xref>). However, it was also showed that depletion in the membrane cholesterol was associated with a reduction in <italic>C. jejuni</italic> cytolethal distending toxin-induced pathogenesis and, thus, attenuated the intoxication of host cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Lin et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Lai et al., 2013</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">2015</xref>). Future studies will assess whether this bacterium has anti-<italic>C. jejuni</italic> properties. If true, the combination of our Tat inhibitor T7 with <italic>Eubacterium coprostanoligenes</italic> will also be investigated to mitigate <italic>C. jejuni</italic> in poultry. It was also observed that treating chickens with DMSO, using oral gavage, significantly affected the composition of the chicken ceca microbiota (<italic>Lactobacillus</italic>, <italic>Romboutsia</italic>, <italic>and Enterobacteriaceae</italic>). <italic>Enterobacteriaceae</italic> and <italic>Lactobacillaceae</italic> bacteria are major components of the initial intestinal microbiota and are essential for the installation and proliferation of aerobic sensitive bacteria over time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Lin and Zhang, 2017</xref>). Furthermore, certain <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> isolates have been shown to harbor potential antagonistic properties against <italic>Campylobacter</italic> in chicken (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Dec et al., 2018</xref>). Therefore, the microbiome alterations caused by the DMSO treatment might have enhanced the antimicrobial efficacy of our selected compounds.</p>
<p>The <italic>in silico</italic> docking study demonstrated that our Tat inhibitors T2 and T7 bind with a key amino acid residue, Glu 165, are located in the hydrophobic core of TatC. Glu 165 is conserved as polar glutamine or glutamate across species of bacteria and plays an important role in TatC functioning. Glu 165 forms a hydrogen bonding network with Ser107 and Trp 85, which is important for generating electrochemical gradient for Tat energy function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Rollauer et al., 2012</xref>). Trp 85 forms an important interaction between Tat signal and W85G and suppresses Tat signaling and transportation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Ramasamy et al., 2013</xref>). It is also shown that TatC forms a glove- like shape, and Glu 165 sits in the concave surface, where it can interact with TatA (<xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">Figure 7</xref>). The ionized Glu 165 present in hydrophobic core of concave TatC is important for interactions with TatA. The mutation E165A severely compromises TatC functioning. Thus, our <italic>in silico</italic> data suggest that the binding of T2 and T7 in Glu-165 hydrophobic pocket of TatC might perturb the transport of CueO and Fdh. It is important to mention that the model displayed in this study to assess the binding affinity of our SM to TatC was conducted using the TatC crystal structure from <italic>Aquifex aeolicus</italic>. No crystal structure of other TatC proteins is available to date. Thereby, no predictive docking modeling of our SM with other TatC protein could have been conducted in this study to assess the specific binding of our SM to <italic>C. jejuni</italic> TatC. However, TatC is the most conserved protein of the Tat system across bacteria (i.e., <italic>E. coli</italic>, <italic>Aquiflex aeolicus</italic>, <italic>C. jejuni</italic>, <italic>Thermus thermophilus</italic>, and <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Lee et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Ramasamy et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Patel et al., 2014</xref>). Based on a NCBI Blastp analysis conducted on 01/10/2024, it was found that <italic>C. jejuni</italic> TatC displays at least 98.37 and 93.88% sequence similarity with other <italic>C. jejuni</italic> TatC sequences and <italic>C. coli</italic> TatC sequences (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;100 sequenced tested per species), respectively. These observations support the antimicrobial efficacy of our SM against the <italic>C. jejuni</italic> and <italic>C. coli</italic> strains tested in this study. On the other hand, low sequence similarity was observed between <italic>C. jejuni</italic> TatC and the few TatC obtained from other non-thermophilic <italic>Campylobacter</italic> strains; <italic>Campylobacter fetus</italic> (similarity of 59.43% and above; <italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;14), candidatus <italic>Campylobacter infans</italic> (similarity of 55.95%; <italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;2), <italic>Campylobacter hyointestinalis</italic> (similarity of 61.76% and above; <italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;12) and <italic>Campylobacter upsaliensis</italic> (similarity of 72.02% and above; <italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;48). Future studies will investigate whether our best candidates could be also used against non-thermophilic <italic>Campylobacter in vivo</italic> or if better candidates can be identified from the initial libraries tested in this study. Furthermore, a similarity of 34.55 and 26.73% were observed between TatC obtained from <italic>C. jejuni</italic> and <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> Nissle 1917 and <italic>Bifidobacterium longum</italic>, respectively. To date, no TatC proteins were identified in <italic>L. brevis</italic> and <italic>rhamnosus L.</italic>, <italic>Bifidobacterium adolescentis</italic> and <italic>lactis</italic>, and <italic>Enterococcus faecalis</italic>. These <italic>in silico</italic> results concord with the limited impact of our SM on commensal/beneficial bacteria.</p>
<p>In conclusion, data presented in this study represent a proof of concept that the Tat system represents a good target for the development of novel and safe control methods against <italic>C. jejuni</italic>. We have identified two Tat-dependent inhibitors (T2 and T7) with the potential to become effective control method to mitigate <italic>C. jejuni</italic> in poultry production systems. However, additional efforts are required to improve the antimicrobial efficacy of the Tat compounds before being used to control <italic>C. jejuni</italic> in large-scale poultry production systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec28">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in the NCBI repository, accession number PRJNA1023035.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec29">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The animal study was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IUACUC) protocol n&#x00B0; 2010A00000149-R2-AM1. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec30">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>LD: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. MD: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. AK: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. JA: Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. JF: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. RK: Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. GR: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. YH: Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec31">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The research in GR laboratory is supported by National Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Grant # 2013&#x2013;67018-21240, United States Department of Agriculture; the Poultry CRC, established and supported under the Australian Government&#x2019;s Cooperative Research Centers Program; and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors thank ICCB-L for assistance with high throughput screening. The authors also thank Rosario A. Candelero for the technical support. The authors thank Saranga Wijeratne, Molecular and Cellular Imaging Center, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (<ext-link xlink:href="http://oardc.osu.edu/mcic/" ext-link-type="uri">http://oardc.osu.edu/mcic/</ext-link>), The Ohio State University for providing assistance with bioinformatics.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec32">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec100" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec33">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1342573/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1342573/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.pdf" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn0001">
<p>
<sup>1</sup>
<ext-link xlink:href="https://mcic.osu.edu/" ext-link-type="uri">https://mcic.osu.edu/</ext-link>
</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abouelhassan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garrison</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burch</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Norwood</surname> <given-names>V. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huigens</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Discovery of quinoline small molecules with potent dispersal activity against methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> and <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> biofilms using a scaffold hopping strategy</article-title>. <source>Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>5076</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5080</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.09.009</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25264073</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref2">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Agyare</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boamah</surname> <given-names>V. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zumbi</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Osei</surname> <given-names>F. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Antibiotic use in poultry production and its effects on bacterial resistance</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Antimicrobial resistance&#x2013;a global threat</source>. ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>IntechOpen</publisher-name>)</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Allos</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title><italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> infections: update on emerging issues and trends</article-title>. <source>Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>1201</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1206</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/319760</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11283810</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andrew Selaledi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohammed Hassan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manyelo</surname> <given-names>T. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mabelebele</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The current status of the alternative use to antibiotics in poultry production: an African perspective</article-title>. <source>Antibiot. Basel Switz.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>594</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antibiotics9090594</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32932751</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bageshwar</surname> <given-names>U. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>VerPlank</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baker</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamsanathan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whitaker</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>High throughput screen for <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> twin arginine translocation (tat) inhibitors</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>e0149659</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0149659</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26901445</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berks</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The twin-arginine protein translocation pathway</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Biochem.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>843</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>864</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034251</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berrang</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bailey</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Altekruse</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shaw</surname> <given-names>W. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meinersmann</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Prevalence and numbers of campylobacter on broiler carcasses collected at rehang and postchill in 20 U.S. processing plants</article-title>. <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>1556</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1560</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/0362-028x-70.7.1556</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17685325</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bl&#x00FC;mmel</surname> <given-names>A.-S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drepper</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knapp</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eimer</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Warscheid</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00FC;ller</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Structural features of the TatC membrane protein that determine docking and insertion of a twin-arginine signal peptide</article-title>. <source>J. Biol. Chem.</source> <volume>292</volume>, <fpage>21320</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21329</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M117.812560</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29089385</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bolger</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lohse</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Usadel</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data</article-title>. <source>Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>2114</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2120</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24695404</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bolyen</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rideout</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dillon</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bokulich</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abnet</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Ghalith</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>852</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>857</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31341288</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Callahan</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McMurdie</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosen</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>A. J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holmes</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>581</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>583</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.3869</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27214047</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Connerton</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lafontaine</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x2019;Kane</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghaffar</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cummings</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The effect of the timing of exposure to <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> on the gut microbiome and inflammatory responses of broiler chickens</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>88</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-018-0477-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29753324</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref13">
<citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Davies</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <italic>Characterisation of the reversible formate dehydrogenases of Shewanella</italic>. University of East Anglia. School of Biological Sciences. Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/66856/" ext-link-type="uri">https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/66856/</ext-link> (Accessed September 28, 2023).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deblais</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Helmy</surname> <given-names>Y. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kathayat</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajashekara</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Novel imidazole and Methoxybenzylamine growth inhibitors affecting salmonella cell envelope integrity and its persistence in chickens</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>13381</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-018-31249-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30190570</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deblais</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Helmy</surname> <given-names>Y. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antwi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kathayat</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Acuna</surname> <given-names>U. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Novel narrow spectrum benzyl thiophene sulfonamide derivatives to control campylobacter</article-title>. <source>J. Antibiot. (Tokyo)</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>555</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>565</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41429-019-0168-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30918323</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dec</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nowaczek</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Urban-Chmiel</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>St&#x0119;pie&#x0144;-Py&#x015B;niak</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wernicki</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Probiotic potential of lactobacillus isolates of chicken origin with anti-campylobacter activity</article-title>. <source>J. Vet. Med. Sci.</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>1195</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1203</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1292/jvms.18-0092</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29877314</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref17">
<citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Drozd</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <italic>Campylobacter jejuni survival strategies and counter-attack: an investigation of campylobacter phosphate mediated biofilms and the design of a high-throughput small-molecule screen for TAT inhibition</italic>. The Ohio State University. Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://etd.ohiolink.edu/pg_10?0::NO:10:P10_ETD_SUBID:76976" ext-link-type="uri">https://etd.ohiolink.edu/pg_10?0::NO:10:P10_ETD_SUBID:76976</ext-link> (Accessed April 30, 2018).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Drozd</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gangaiah</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajashekara</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Contribution of TAT system translocated PhoX to <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> phosphate metabolism and resilience to environmental stresses</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>e26336</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0026336</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22028859</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Facciol&#x00E0;</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Riso</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Avventuroso</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Visalli</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delia</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lagan&#x00E0;</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Campylobacter: from microbiology to prevention</article-title>. <source>J. Prev. Med. Hyg.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>E79</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>E92</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28900347</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Frain</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Dijl</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019a</year>). <article-title>Transport of folded proteins by the tat system</article-title>. <source>Protein J.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>377</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>388</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10930-019-09859-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31401776</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Frain</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Dijl</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019b</year>). <article-title>The twin-arginine pathway for protein secretion</article-title>. <source>EcoSal Plus</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>2018</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0040-2018</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31215506</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gardner</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olson</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Interaction of copper toxicity and oxidative stress in <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>200</volume>, <fpage>e00208</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e00218</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.00208-18</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30150230</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guerin</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sir</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sargeant</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waddell</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x2019;Connor</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wills</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The change in prevalence of campylobacter on chicken carcasses during processing: a systematic review</article-title>. <source>Poult. Sci.</source> <volume>89</volume>, <fpage>1070</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1084</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.2009-00213</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20371862</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Identification of a small molecule that simultaneously suppresses virulence and antibiotic resistance of <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic></article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>srep19141</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep19141</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26751736</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hakeem</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Survival and control of campylobacter in poultry production environment</article-title>. <source>Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>5049</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2020.615049</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33585282</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hitchcock</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Butler</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>A multicopper oxidase (Cj1516) and a CopA homologue (Cj1161) are major components of the copper homeostasis system of <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>190</volume>, <fpage>8075</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8085</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.00821-08</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18931123</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Helmy</surname> <given-names>Y. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deblais</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kassem</surname> <given-names>I. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kathayat</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajashekara</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Novel small molecule modulators of quorum sensing in avian pathogenic <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (APEC)</article-title>. <source>Virulence</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>1640</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1657</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/21505594.2018.1528844</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30270715</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Helmy</surname> <given-names>Y. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kathayat</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghanem</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jung</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Closs</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deblais</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Identification and characterization of novel small molecule inhibitors to control <italic>Mycoplasma gallisepticum</italic> infection in chickens</article-title>. <source>Vet. Microbiol.</source> <volume>247</volume>:<fpage>108799</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108799</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32768201</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hermans</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Deun</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Immerseel</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Messens</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heyndrickx</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Colonization factors of <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> in the chicken gut</article-title>. <source>Vet. Res.</source> <volume>42</volume>:<fpage>82</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1297-9716-42-82</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21714866</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hitchcock</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mulholland</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Roles of the twin-arginine translocase and associated chaperones in the biogenesis of the electron transport chains of the human pathogen <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic></article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Read. Engl.</source> <volume>156</volume>, <fpage>2994</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3010</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mic.0.042788-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20688826</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref31">
<citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hong-Geller</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Micheva-Viteva</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <italic>Small Molecule Screens to Identify Inhibitors of Infectious Disease</italic>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hue</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le Bouquin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laisney</surname> <given-names>M.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allain</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lalande</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petetin</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Prevalence of and risk factors for campylobacter spp. contamination of broiler chicken carcasses at the slaughterhouse</article-title>. <source>Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>992</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>999</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fm.2010.06.004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20832676</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Igwaran</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Okoh</surname> <given-names>A. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Human campylobacteriosis: A public health concern of global importance</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>e02814</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02814</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31763476</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dress</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Using the Golden triangle to optimize clearance and oral absorption</article-title>. <source>Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>5560</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5564</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.08.045</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shank</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Current and potential treatments for reducing campylobacter colonization in animal hosts and disease in humans</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>487</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.00487</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jorgensen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ellis-Iversen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rushton</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bull</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bryan</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Influence of season and geography on <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> and <italic>C. coli</italic> subtypes in housed broiler flocks reared in Great Britain</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>3741</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3748</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02444-10</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21460110</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kaakoush</surname> <given-names>N. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casta&#x00F1;o-Rodr&#x00ED;guez</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Man</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Global epidemiology of campylobacter infection</article-title>. <source>Clin. Microbiol. Rev.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>687</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>720</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/CMR.00006-15</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kassem</surname> <given-names>I. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Candelero-Rueda</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Esseili</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajashekara</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Formate simultaneously reduces oxidase activity and enhances respiration in <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic></article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>40117</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep40117</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28091524</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kassem</surname> <given-names>I. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajashekara</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Formate dehydrogenase localization and activity are dependent on an intact twin arginine translocation system (tat) in <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> 81-176</article-title>. <source>Foodborne Pathog. Dis.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>917</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>919</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/fpd.2014.1797</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25268895</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kassem</surname> <given-names>I. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajashekara</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The twin-arginine translocation system: contributions to the pathobiology of <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic></article-title>. <source>Future Microbiol.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1315</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1327</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2217/fmb.11.107</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22082291</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kathayat</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Helmy</surname> <given-names>Y. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deblais</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajashekara</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Novel small molecules affecting cell membrane as potential therapeutics for avian pathogenic <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>15329</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-018-33587-5</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kelley</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mezulis</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yates</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wass</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sternberg</surname> <given-names>M. J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis</article-title>. <source>Nat. Protoc.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>845</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>858</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nprot.2015.053</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25950237</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kittl</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Korczak</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niederer</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baumgartner</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buettner</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Overesch</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Comparison of genotypes and antibiotic resistances of <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> and <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic> on chicken retail meat and at slaughter</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>3875</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3878</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.00493-13</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23584778</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Koutsoumanis</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allende</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alvarez-Ord&#x00F3;&#x00F1;ez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bolton</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bover-Cid</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davies</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Update and review of control options for campylobacter in broilers at primary production</article-title>. <source>EFSA J.</source> <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>e06090</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6090</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32874298</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuhn</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nyg&#x00E5;rd</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guzman-Herrador</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sunde</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rimhanen-Finne</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tr&#x00F6;nnberg</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Campylobacter infections expected to increase due to climate change in northern Europe</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>13874</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-70593-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32807810</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref46">
<citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <italic>Understanding the gut transcriptome responses to lactobacillus probiotics and investigating the impact of nutrition and rotavirus infection on the infant gut microbiome</italic>. The Ohio State University. Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://etd.ohiolink.edu/pg_10?0::NO:10:P10_ETD_SUBID:109268" ext-link-type="uri">https://etd.ohiolink.edu/pg_10?0::NO:10:P10_ETD_SUBID:109268</ext-link> (Accessed December 26, 2017).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drozd</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pina-Mimbela</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Helmy</surname> <given-names>Y. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antwi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Novel anti-campylobacter compounds identified using high throughput screening of a pre-selected enriched small molecules library</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>405</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2016.00405</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27092106</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vlasova</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deblais</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>H.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wijeratne</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kandasamy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Impact of nutrition and rotavirus infection on the infant gut microbiota in a humanized pig model</article-title>. <source>BMC Gastroenterol.</source> <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>93</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12876-018-0810-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29929472</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>C.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>C.-K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hung</surname> <given-names>C.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>C.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>C.-L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Characterization of putative cholesterol recognition/interaction amino acid consensus-like motif of <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> Cytolethal distending toxin C</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>e66202</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0066202</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23762481</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>C.-K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>J.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>C.-S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>C.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>H.-J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Involvement of cholesterol in <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> cytolethal distending toxin-induced pathogenesis</article-title>. <source>Future Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>489</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>501</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2217/fmb.14.119</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref51">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Newell</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Campylobacter in poultry: filling an ecological niche</article-title>. <source>Avian Dis.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1637/7474-111605R.1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16617973</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tullman-Ercek</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Georgiou</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The bacterial twin-arginine translocation pathway</article-title>. <source>Ann. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>373</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>395</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142212</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16756481</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Novel approaches for campylobacter control in poultry</article-title>. <source>Foodborne Pathog. Dis.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>755</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>765</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/fpd.2008.0247</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19425824</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref55">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>C.-D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>C.-K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hsieh</surname> <given-names>J.-T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sing</surname> <given-names>Y.-T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>Y.-C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Cholesterol depletion reduces entry of <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> Cytolethal distending toxin and attenuates intoxication of host cells</article-title>. <source>Infect. Immun.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>3563</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3575</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/IAI.05175-11</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Role of intestinal microbiota and metabolites on gut homeostasis and human diseases</article-title>. <source>BMC Immunol.</source> <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>2</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12865-016-0187-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28061847</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref57">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lipinski</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution</article-title>. <source>Drug Discov. Today Technol.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>337</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>341</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.11.007</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24981612</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref58">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lipinski</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lombardo</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dominy</surname> <given-names>B. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feeney</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings</article-title>. <source>Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0169-409X(00)00129-0</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Logue</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sherwood</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elijah</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olah</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dockter</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>The incidence of campylobacter spp. on processed Turkey from processing plants in the midwestern United States&#x002A;</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>234</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>241</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01969.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref60">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luangtongkum</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morishita</surname> <given-names>T. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ison</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McDermott</surname> <given-names>P. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Effect of conventional and organic production practices on the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of campylobacter spp. in poultry</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>3600</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3607</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.72.5.3600-3607.2006</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16672508</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref61">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mandal</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Treuren</surname> <given-names>W. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eggesb&#x00F8;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peddada</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Analysis of composition of microbiomes: a novel method for studying microbial composition</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol. Health Dis.</source> <volume>26</volume>:<fpage>27663</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3402/mehd.v26.27663</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref62">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Massai</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saleeb</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Doruk</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elofsson</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Forsberg</surname> <given-names>&#x00C5;.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Development, optimization, and validation of a high throughput screening assay for identification of tat and type II secretion inhibitors of <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic></article-title>. <source>Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>250</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2019.00250</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31355152</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref63">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Merchant-Patel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blackall</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Templeton</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Price</surname> <given-names>E. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miflin</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huygens</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Characterisation of chicken <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> isolates using resolution optimised single nucleotide polymorphisms and binary gene markers</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>128</volume>, <fpage>304</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>308</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.09.002</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref64">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morris</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huey</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lindstrom</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanner</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Belew</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goodsell</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility</article-title>. <source>J. Comput. Chem.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>2785</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2791</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jcc.21256</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19399780</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref65">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Newell</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fearnley</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Sources of campylobacter colonization in broiler chickens</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>4343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4351</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.69.8.4343-4351.2003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12902214</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref66">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Panahandeh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maurer</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moser</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>DeLisa</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00FC;ller</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Following the path of a twin-arginine precursor along the TatABC translocase of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Biol. Chem.</source> <volume>283</volume>, <fpage>33267</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33275</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M804225200</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18836181</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref67">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Protein transport by the bacterial tat pathway</article-title>. <source>Biochim. Biophys. Acta</source> <volume>1843</volume>, <fpage>1620</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1628</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.02.013</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref68">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quast</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pruesse</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yilmaz</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gerken</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schweer</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yarza</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>D590</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>D596</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gks1219</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23193283</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref69">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quintel</surname> <given-names>B. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prongay</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rau&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>H.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hendrickson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rhoades</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Vaccine-mediated protection against campylobacter-associated enteric disease</article-title>. <source>Sci. Adv.</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>eaba4511</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/sciadv.aba4511</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32637610</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref70">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rajashekara</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drozd</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gangaiah</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeon</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Functional characterization of the twin-arginine translocation system in <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic></article-title>. <source>Foodborne Pathog. Dis.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>935</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>945</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/fpd.2009.0298</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19799526</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref71">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ramasamy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abrol</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suloway</surname> <given-names>C. J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clemons</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The glove-like structure of the conserved membrane protein TatC provides insight into signal sequence recognition in twin-arginine translocation</article-title>. <source>Structure</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>777</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>788</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.str.2013.03.004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23583035</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref72">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Connerton</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Connerton</surname> <given-names>I. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Phage biocontrol of <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> in chickens does not produce collateral effects on the gut microbiota</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>476</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.00476</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30930877</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref73">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rollauer</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tarry</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Graham</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>J&#x00E4;&#x00E4;skel&#x00E4;inen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>J&#x00E4;ger</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Structure of the TatC core of the twin-arginine protein transport system</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>492</volume>, <fpage>210</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>214</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature11683</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23201679</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref74">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schuffenhauer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Selzer</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ertl</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacoby</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Relationships between molecular complexity, biological activity, and structural diversity</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Inf. Model.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>525</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>535</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ci0503558</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref75">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Selin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stietz</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blanchard</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gehrke</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernard</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>A pipeline for screening small molecules with growth inhibitory activity against <italic>Burkholderia cenocepacia</italic></article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>e0128587</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0128587</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26053039</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref76">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sibanda</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McKenna</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richmond</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ricke</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Callaway</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stratakos</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>A review of the effect of management practices on campylobacter prevalence in poultry farms</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>2002</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.02002</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30197638</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref77">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Skarp</surname> <given-names>C. P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>H&#x00E4;nninen</surname> <given-names>M.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rautelin</surname> <given-names>H. I. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Campylobacteriosis: the role of poultry meat</article-title>. <source>Clin. Microbiol. Infect.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>103</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>109</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmi.2015.11.019</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref78">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deblais</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>H.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miyazaki</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kandasamy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Langel</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Reduced rotavirus vaccine efficacy in protein malnourished human-faecal-microbiota-transplanted gnotobiotic pig model is in part attributed to the gut microbiota</article-title>. <source>Benef. Microbes</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>733</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>751</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3920/BM2019.0139</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33245014</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref79">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stolle</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Br&#x00FC;ser</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The tat substrate CueO is transported in an incomplete folding state&#x002A;</article-title>. <source>J. Biol. Chem.</source> <volume>291</volume>, <fpage>13520</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13528</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M116.729103</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27129241</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref80">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Subbiah</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Call</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Not all antibiotic use practices in food-animal agriculture afford the same risk</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Qual.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>618</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>629</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/jeq2015.06.0297</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27065409</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref81">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tolopko</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sullivan</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Erickson</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wrobel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chiang</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rudnicki</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Screensaver: an open source lab information management system (LIMS) for high throughput screening facilities</article-title>. <source>BMC Bioinformatics</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>260</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-11-260</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20482787</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref82">
<citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">USDA ERS&#x2013;Cost Estimates of Foodborne Illnesses</collab></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/cost-estimates-of-foodborne-illnesses.aspx#.VDW27r4mUfy" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/cost-estimates-of-foodborne-illnesses.aspx#.VDW27r4mUfy</ext-link> (Accessed September 28, 2017).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref83">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vandeputte</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Canessa</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Rysselberghe</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Zutter</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heyndrickx</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Reducing <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> colonization in broiler chickens by in-feed supplementation with hyperimmune egg yolk antibodies</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>8931</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-45380-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31222043</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref84">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vasil</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tomaras</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pritchard</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Identification and evaluation of twin-arginine translocase inhibitors</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>6223</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6234</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.01575-12</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23006747</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref85">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wagenaar</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>French</surname> <given-names>N. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Havelaar</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Preventing campylobacter at the source: why is it so difficult?</article-title> <source>Clin. Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>1600</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1606</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cid/cit555</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24014733</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref86">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Z.-Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>J.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>M.-T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>G.-A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>L.-M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Characterization of dynamic age-dependent changes and driver microbes in primate gut microbiota during host&#x2019;s development and healthy aging via captive crab-eating macaque model</article-title>. <source>bioRxiv</source> <volume>2020</volume>:<fpage>015305</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/2020.03.30.015305</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref87">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feye</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pavlidis</surname> <given-names>H. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kogut</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ashworth, A</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>A historical review on antibiotic resistance of foodborne campylobacter</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1509</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.01509</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31402900</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref88">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Young</surname> <given-names>K. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dirita</surname> <given-names>V. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title><italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic>: molecular biology and pathogenesis</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>665</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>679</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro1718</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref9001">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chung</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oldenburg</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays</article-title>. <source>J. Biomol. Screen.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/108705719900400206</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>