<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1267885</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>The prevalence of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> and the emergence of livestock-associated MRSA CC398 in pig production in eastern China</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Lina</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2429232/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Zhongyi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Zhenyu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Yang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>Xinan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/194527/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Qiuchun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/195808/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Yuanyue</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/482443/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Yangzhou University</institution>, <addr-line>Yangzhou, Jiangsu</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Zoonosis/Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University</institution>, <addr-line>Yangzhou, Jiangsu</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Biological Hazard Factors (Animal Origin) for Agri-food Safety and Quality, Ministry of Agriculture of China, Yangzhou University</institution>, <addr-line>Yangzhou, Jiangsu</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, Yangzhou University</institution>, <addr-line>Yangzhou, Jiangsu</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Edited by: Chunlei Shi, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0003">
<p>Reviewed by: Raphael Niklaus Sieber, State Serum Institute (SSI), Denmark; Silpak Biswas, Calcutta School of Tropical Medicine, India</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Yuanyue Tang, <email>tangyy@yzu.edu.cn</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn0001">
<p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>These authors have contributed equally to this work</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>15</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1267885</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>27</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>07</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2023 Zheng, Jiang, Wang, Li, Jiao, Li and Tang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zheng, Jiang, Wang, Li, Jiao, Li and Tang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Livestock-associated <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (LA-MRSA) has been of increasing concern due to its potential risk to humans. This study investigated the prevalence of MRSA in pig production in Eastern China and determined the genomic characteristics of pig-associated MRSA isolates by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). A total of 1,318 samples were collected from pig farms and pig slaughterhouses, and 150 <italic>S. aureus</italic> were identified, including 63 MRSA isolates and 87 MSSA isolates. MRSA was detected in all pig farms and pig slaughterhouses. The antimicrobial susceptibility test revealed that all MRSA isolates were multidrug-resistant. The WGS and MLST analysis demonstrated that 56 MRSA isolates belonged to clonal complex (CC) 398, and seven MRSA isolates belonged to CC9. All LA-MRSA isolates were absent of phiSa3 phage containing immune evasion cluster (IEC) and possessed an intact <italic>hlb</italic> gene. In addition, genes associated with Panton-Valentine leukocidin, typically indicative of human adaptation, were not detected. The analysis of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) demonstrated that all MRSA isolates contained multiple ARGs. All MRSA isolates had Plthe <italic>mecA</italic> gene and at least one tetracycline resistance gene. Both <italic>tetM</italic> and <italic>tetK</italic> were detected in all MRSA CC398 isolates, while <italic>tetL</italic> was detected in all MRSA CC9 isolates. The phenicol resistance gene <italic>fexA</italic> was detected in 51 MRSA isolates, while the linezolid resistance gene <italic>cfr</italic> was detected in 60 MRSA isolates. The emergence of LA-MRSA CC398 in four pig farms and one slaughterhouse in this study indicates the spread of this clonal complex in the pig production sector in Eastern China. Further investigations are required to understand the potential transmission routes of LA-MRSA CC398 within the pork production chain in China and to assess the potential risks to humans.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>
<italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>LA-MRSA</kwd>
<kwd>pig production</kwd>
<kwd>clonal complex 398</kwd>
<kwd>antibiotic resistance</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="28"/>
<page-count count="7"/>
<word-count count="4956"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (LA-MRSA) is an emerging animal-associated food safety problem in many parts of the world. Particular focus has been on pork production as pigs are universally known as the main reservoir for LA-MRSA. In Europe and North America, LA-MRSA clonal complex (CC) 398 is the predominant CC type, which is associated with the primary pig industry, and is also prevalent in poultry, cattle, sheep, and animal-origin meat products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9003">Larsen et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9007">Sieber et al., 2018</xref>). Meanwhile, occupational exposure during livestock production has been regarded as the critical risk factor for LA-MRSA transmission in humans and the secondary spread to the community (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Aires-De-Sousa, 2017</xref>). A European study demonstrated that 21.5% of LA-MRSA from clinical isolates belonged to CC398 in the Netherlands, while the ratio was around 9.7% in Belgium and Spain, 15.6% in Slovenia, and 16.7% in Demark (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Kinross et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>In China, CC9 is the predominant LA-MRSA CC type in pig production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9009">Zou et al., 2022</xref>). However, LA-MRSA CC398 has already been sporadically reported in several surveillance studies in different provinces in China. A prevalence study has demonstrated that 38% of pig-associated <italic>S. aureus</italic> isolates belonged to LA-MRSA CC398, indicating the emergence of LA-MRSA CC398 in pig production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Cui et al., 2022</xref>). Besides, LA-MRSA CC398 has also been sporadically reported in pork and bulk milk in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Monaco et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Van De Sande-Bruinsma et al., 2015</xref>). This study primarily aimed to investigate the prevalence of MRSA in pig farms and slaughterhouses in Eastern China based on whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis. <italic>S. aureus</italic> isolates were collected from pig farms and slaughterhouses in Eastern China and subjected to WGS and MLST analyses. Since LA-MRSA CC398 has been widely associated with the pig industry and occupational infections in humans, we investigated the phylogenetic relationship of LA-MRSA CC398 isolates from this study to human-associated MRSA CC398 and LA-MRSA CC398 from both China and other countries. The phylogenetic analysis was performed to investigate the emergence and spread of LA-CC398 in the Chinese pig industry.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title><italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> isolation and identification</title>
<p>Samples were collected from 2018 to 2021 at four pig farms in Jiangsu province (farms A to D) and two pig slaughterhouses in Shanghai (slaughterhouses A and B), China. A total of 1,318 samples from pig farms were collected, including 304 fecal samples, 541 anal swab samples, 105 nasal swab samples, and 113 swab samples of gloves (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). A total of 255 samples from two pig slaughterhouses were collected, including 30 samples from pig carcasses before slaughtering, 167 swab samples during the pig slaughtering process, 8 swab samples of the slaughtering floor, and 50 swab samples of knives during the slaughtering process (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). All swab samples were stored in collection tubes containing Cary-Blair agar. Detailed sampling information is provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Prevalence of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> from pig farms.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Source</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Sample size</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">No. of positive</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Prevalence</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">MSSA</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">MRSA</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Faeces</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">304</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">74</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24.34%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">50</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Anal swabs</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">541</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">28</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.18%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Nasal swabs</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">105</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.81%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Gloves</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">113</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.42%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<bold>Total</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>1,063</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>111</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>10.44%</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>50</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>61</bold>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Prevalence of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> from pig slaughterhouses.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Source</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Sample size</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">No. of positive</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Prevalence</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">MSSA</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">MRSA</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Carcass</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.67%</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Bleeding</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.00%</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Scalding</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.00%</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Depilating</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.67%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Evisceration</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.00%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Splitting</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">30.00%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Dressing</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">26</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">30.77%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Washing</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.00%</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chilling</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">23.33%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Floor</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.00%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Knives</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">50</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.00%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">
<bold>Total</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>255</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>39</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>15.29%</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>37</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>2</bold>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>All samples were subjected to <italic>S. aureus</italic> isolation within 24 h, according to the literature previously described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Li et al. (2020)</xref>. Briefly, each swab sample was enriched in 10 mL trypticase soy broth (TSB) with 6.5% NaCl and inoculated overnight at 37&#x00B0;C, 180 rpm. Ten &#x03BC;L enriched aliquots were inoculated on CHROMagar&#x2122; Staph aureus plates (CHROmagar, Paris, France) and incubated overnight at 37&#x00B0;C for the isolation of <italic>S. aureus</italic>. The presumptive <italic>S. aureus</italic> clones were identified by the presence of the <italic>spa</italic> gene, and MRSA was identified by the presence of the <italic>mecA</italic> or <italic>mecC</italic> gene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Tang et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title><italic>Spa</italic> typing</title>
<p>All confirmed <italic>S. aureus</italic> isolates were analysed for <italic>spa</italic> typing (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S2, S3</xref>). <italic>spa</italic> genes were detected with the primers <italic>spa-1113f</italic> and <italic>spa-1514f</italic> by the PCR program according to the previous description (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Harmsen et al., 2003</xref>). The PCR product for each isolate was sequenced by Sanger sequencing (Genscript Biotech Corporation, Nanjing, China). The <italic>spa</italic> type was analysed by the Ridom Spa Server database (<ext-link xlink:href="http://spaserver.ridom.de/" ext-link-type="uri">http://spaserver.ridom.de/</ext-link>, accessed on 4 February 2022).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Antimicrobial susceptibility test for MRSA</title>
<p>Antimicrobial susceptibility of all MRSA isolates was performed by disk diffusion according to the guidelines of the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2020)</xref>. MRSA isolates from overnight TSA plates were resuspended in 0.9% saline to achieve the turbidity of 0.5 McFarland standard. The suspended cultures were evenly spread on the M.H. agar plate, and the antibiotic disk was tightly on the agar surface before being inoculated overnight at 37&#x00B0;C. The diameter of the antibiotic-resistant halo was measured, and results were interpreted according to the CLSI standard. A total of 10 antibiotics (Oxoid&#x2122;, United Kingdom) were included: cefoxitin (FOX, 30 &#x03BC;g), chloramphenicol (C, 30 &#x03BC;g), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 &#x03BC;g), clindamycin (DA, 2 &#x03BC;g), erythromycin (E, 15 &#x03BC;g), gentamicin (C.N., 10 &#x03BC;g), linezolid (LZD, 10 &#x03BC;g), penicillin G (P, 10 units), tetracycline (T.E., 30 &#x03BC;g), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT, 1:19, 25 &#x03BC;g). <italic>S. aureus</italic> ATCC25923 was included for quality control.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Whole genome sequencing of MRSA and comparative genomic analysis</title>
<p>All MRSA isolates were whole genome sequenced (WGS) by the Nova seq6000 (Illumina, the US). Raw reads were trimmed and filtered by the NGSQC toolkit and assembled with <italic>de novo</italic> assembly by SPAdes 3.15.5 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Bankevich et al., 2012</xref>). WGS data were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive database (ENA) with the accession number PRJEB62143. The multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) was obtained by submitting the WGS data of each MRSA isolate to the database (<ext-link xlink:href="https://pubmlst.org/saureus/" ext-link-type="uri">https://pubmlst.org/saureus/</ext-link>, accessed on July 30, 2022). All MRSA isolates were tested for the core genome SNP analysis, and the genetic relationships of MRSA were revealed by the phylogenetic tree. To compare our MRSA CC398 isolates to the isolates from other countries, we downloaded the isolates data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9005">Price et al. (2012)</xref>. The phylogenetic tree of all MRSA isolates in this study and phylogeny was constructed by Parsnp v1.7.4 (<ext-link xlink:href="https://harvest.readthedocs.io/en/latest/content/parsnp.html" ext-link-type="uri">https://harvest.readthedocs.io/en/latest/content/parsnp.html</ext-link>, accessed on August 3, 2022). Antimicrobial resistance genes of MRSA were detected by the ResFinder 4.0 database (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Florensa et al., 2022</xref>). Virulence factors of all MRSA isolates were analysed by BLASTn against the Virulence Factors Database (VFDB) with &#x003E;80% sequencing homology and coverage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Chen et al., 2005</xref>). Genes encoding virulent factors included <italic>scn</italic> encoding staphylococcal complement inhibitor; <italic>chp</italic> encoding chemotaxin inhibitory protein; <italic>sak</italic> encoding staphylokinase; <italic>sea</italic> encoding staphylococcal enterotoxin toxin A; <italic>hlb</italic> encoding &#x03B2;-hemolysin; <italic>lukF-PV</italic> and <italic>lukS-PV</italic> encoding Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL); tsst-1 encoding toxic shock syndrome toxin-1.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec7">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Prevalence of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> in early-stage pig production</title>
<p>A total of 1,318 samples were collected from pig farms and pig slaughterhouses. In total, 11.38% of the samples were positive for <italic>S. aureus</italic>. MRSA was detected in pig samples from all farms and slaughterhouses, and no animal delivery occurred between farms and slaughterhouses (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). MSSA was detected in farm D, slaughterhouse A, and slaughterhouse B (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). In total, 63 MRSA isolates and 77 MSSA isolates were identified. The MLST analysis demonstrated that 56 MRSA isolates belonged to CC398, while 7 MRSA isolates belonged to CC9.</p>
<p><italic>S. aureus</italic> was isolated from 10.44% of the farm samples, including 50 methicillin-susceptible <italic>S. aureus</italic> (MSSA) isolates and 61 MRSA isolates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). The distribution of <italic>S. aureus</italic> in different samples is diverse, including 24.34% from feces, 5.18% from anal swabs, 3.81% from nasal swabs, and 4.42% from gloves for workers (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). At the slaughtering stage, <italic>S. aureus</italic> was isolated from 39 of 225 samples with a prevalence of 15.29%, including 27 MSSA isolates and 2 MRSA isolates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). Samples from splitting and dressing had the highest prevalence of <italic>S. aureus</italic> approximately 30%, followed by swab samples during washing, which had a prevalence of 26.67%. During the chilling step, the prevalence of <italic>S. aureus</italic> was 23.33% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). Other slaughtering processes with <italic>S. aureus</italic> positive included pig carcasses before slaughtering, bleeding, scalding, depilation, and chilling (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). It should be noted that 18% of knives during the slaughtering process were <italic>S. aureus</italic> positive (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Antibiotic resistance of MRSA isolates from pig production</title>
<p>Antibiotic susceptibility tests showed that all MRSA isolates were resistant to cefoxitin and penicillin. Most MRSA isolates were resistant to clindamycin (95.24%) and chloramphenicol (76.19%), while some were resistant to erythromycin (49.21%). Two MRSA isolates showed resistance to gentamicin (3.17%). One MRSA isolate YZU 4385 displayed resistance to linezolid (1.59%), while YZU4403 showed resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.59%) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S4</xref>). A total of 20 multidrug-resistant (MDR) patterns were observed, with the predominant pattern of FOX-C-DA-P-TE, followed by FOX-C-DA-E-P-TE. MDR patterns of each MRSA isolate are illustrated in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S4</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Genomic characterisation of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> isolates from pig farms and pig slaughterhouses</title>
<p>In total, 13 <italic>spa</italic> types were detected in all <italic>S. aureus</italic> isolates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S2, S3</xref>). Most MRSA isolates (71.4%) belonged to <italic>spa</italic> type t034, followed by 11.5% belonging to t899, and 8.2% belonging to t011 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S2</xref>). Eight <italic>spa</italic> types were detected in MSSA isolates, of which <italic>spa</italic> type t286 was predominant with a ratio of 32.2%, followed by <italic>spa</italic> type t571 (26.4%) and t899 (17.2%) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S3</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The phylogenetic tree of MRSA CC398 in terms of the core genome multi-locus sequence type (cgSNP). The filled circle (&#x25CF;) represents the presence of a gene. <sup>a</sup>immune evasion cluster (IEC). <sup>b</sup>the Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1267885-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>MLST analysis showed that MRSA isolates were grouped into two CCs, of which 56 isolates belonged to CC398 and 7 isolates belonged to CC9. MRSA CC398 isolates contained two ST types, of which 55 MRSA isolates belonged to ST398, and one isolate was a new ST type ST8505 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The phylogenetic analysis divided the MRSA CC398 isolates into three clusters with a predominant cluster of 44 MRSA t034/ST398 isolates, 1 t1794/ST398 isolate, and 3 ST398 isolates without <italic>spa</italic> type. MRSA isolates t011/ST398 and t2970/ST398 were grouped into a cluster with all isolates from farm D, while MRSA t529/ST398 were from slaughterhouse A (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The phylogenetic analysis divided MRSA CC9 into two clusters, of which one isolate with t899/ST1378 was detected from pig carcasses in slaughterhouse B, and the other cluster with MRSA t899/ST9 isolates was from farm B and farm D (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Virulence factors were analysed in all MRSA isolates from pig farms and slaughterhouses.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>The phylogenetic tree of MRSA CC9 in terms of the core genome multi-locus sequence type (cgMLST). The filled circle (&#x25CF;) represents the presence of a gene. <sup>a</sup>immune evasion cluster (IEC). <sup>b</sup> the Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1267885-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In total, 11 antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) were detected from 56 MRSA CC398 isolates, while 18 ARGs were detected from 7 MRSA CC9 isolates. All MRSA isolates contain the <italic>mecA</italic> gene encoding the low-affinity penicillin-binding protein PBP 2a. Both <italic>blaZ</italic> encoding &#x03B2;-lactamase and <italic>dfrG</italic> for trimethoprim resistance were presented in 62 out of 63 MRSA isolates. Tetracycline-resistant genes were identified in all MRSA isolates, of which CC398 isolates harboured <italic>tetM</italic>, <italic>tetT</italic>, and <italic>tetK</italic>, while CC9 isolates harboured <italic>tetT</italic> and <italic>tetL</italic>. The <italic>emr(C)</italic> gene for the erythromycin resistance was present in 19 out of 55 MRSA CC398 isolates and all MRSA CC9 isolates, while <italic>emr(B)</italic> was only detected in six CC398 isolates. Aminoglycoside-resistant genes <italic>aadD</italic> and <italic>aadE</italic> were detected in CC9 isolates, while <italic>aac(6&#x2032;)-aph(2&#x2033;)</italic> was detected in all CC9 isolates and one CC398 isolate. The <italic>norA</italic> gene was detected in 43 out of 56 MRSA CC398 isolates and all MRSA CC9 isolates, which were associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in <italic>S. aureus</italic>. The <italic>lsa(B)</italic> gene encoding the ABC transporter for low-level clindamycin resistance was presented in 13 MRSA CC398 isolates. The macrolide-resistant gene <italic>lnu(B)</italic> was detected in 53 MRSA CC398 isolates and 6 MRSA CC9 isolates. Phenicol resistance genes <italic>fexA</italic> were detected in both CC398 and CC9 isolates, while the <italic>cfr</italic> gene was only detected in CC398 isolates.</p>
<p>To evaluate the transmission of MRSA CC398 among countries, we also conducted a core genome-based phylogenetic analysis of the 56 MRSA CC398 isolates and 67 MRSA CC398 isolates from a previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9005">Price et al., 2012</xref>) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). The results showed that the MRSA CC398 isolates were grouped into two clusters with LA-MRSA CC398 isolates from Europe, which were genetically different from CC398 isolates from humans in China. All MRSA CC398 isolates were absent of phiSa3 carrying <italic>chp</italic>, <italic>scn</italic>, and <italic>sak</italic> for human-immune evasion cluster and contained an intact <italic>hlb</italic> gene in this study. Similar to MRSA from other countries, the <italic>tet(M)</italic> gene was present in all MRSA CC398 isolates from this study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figures 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). Besides, <italic>lukF-PV</italic> and <italic>lukS-PV</italic> encoding PVL and <italic>tsst-1</italic> encoding toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 were also absent in all MRSA isolates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec11">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>This study investigated the distribution of MRSA and MSSA from pig farms and slaughterhouses in Eastern China. In total, 11.38% of pig-associated samples were <italic>S. aureus</italic> positive. MRSA was detected in all four pig farms and two pig slaughterhouses, with a prevalence of 10.44% in pig farms and 15.29% in pig slaughterhouses, respectively. Other surveillance studies showed that the occurrence of MRSA in pig production was diverse in different locations in China, which is 49% in Shandong, 45% in Shanghai, 19.4% in Qinghai, and 5.17% in Henan (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Li et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Sun et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Cui et al., 2022</xref>). The prevalence of MRSA in pig production was diverse in Western countries, with 77% in the US, 80% in Denmark, 69.7% in Belgium, and 99.5% in the Netherlands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9001">Cromb&#x00E9; et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9008">Sun et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9002">Dierikx et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9006">Schulz et al., 2019</xref>). In Japan, MRSA was detected among pigs in slaughterhouses, diseased pigs on farms, imported breeding pigs, and farm dust, with a prevalence of 5.2, 3.4, 28.8, and 0.06%, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9004">Ozawa et al., 2022</xref>). This discrepancy in MRSA in pig production suggests the diversity of MRSA distribution across different geographical locations.</p>
<p>WGS analysis has demonstrated that 56 out of 63 MRSA isolates in this study belonged to CC398, whereas only seven of the MRSA isolates belonged to CC9. Remarkably, MRSA CC398 was detected in all pig farms as well as in slaughterhouse A, indicating the widespread dissemination of LA-MRSA CC398 in the pig production sector of Eastern China. A similar study conducted in Qinghai province, China, detected 26 out of 67 MRSA CC398 isolates with <italic>spa</italic> type t011 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Cui et al., 2022</xref>), whereas this study observed the predominant LA-MRSA CC398 with <italic>spa</italic> type t034. In addition to the above observations, it is worth noting that the dominant clone of pig-associated LA-MRSA in China belongs to LA-MRSA CC9. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Li et al. (2017)</xref> conducted a pig-associated MRSA study in four provinces in China, and all 270 MRSA isolates were classified as CC9. Furthermore, a large-scale LA-MRSA study in Shandong, China, revealed that out of 92 MRSA isolates obtained from pig samples, 91 were LA-MRSA CC9, and one isolate was LA-MRSA CC398 through WGS analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Sun et al., 2019</xref>). We further analysed the phylogenetic relationship of MRSA CC398 isolates in this study genome with MRSA CC398 isolates from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9005">Price et al. (2012)</xref>. The results showed that all MRSA CC398 isolates from this study were closely related to the MRSA CC398 isolates from pig samples all over the world (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). This study observed that LA-MRSA CC398 was predominated in pig farms in Eastern China for the first time, and the close phylogenetic relationship of MRSA CC398 isolates in this study indicated an emergency of global MRSA ST398 in domestic pig production.</p>
<p>The multidrug-resistant phenotype of MRSA isolates in this study was similar to that of MRSA strains from livestock and humans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Li et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Cui et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Kruger-Haker et al., 2023</xref>). All isolates were resistant to cefoxitin and tetracycline with the presence of the <italic>mecA</italic> gene, <italic>tet(M)</italic>, <italic>tet(K)</italic>, <italic>tet(L)</italic>, or <italic>tet(T)</italic>, which are correlated to the LA-MRSA CC398 and CC9 antimicrobial characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Kock et al., 2010</xref>). Most isolates were resistant to clindamycin (95.24%) and chloramphenicol (76.19%), which were well matched with the presence of <italic>lnu(B)</italic> and <italic>fexA</italic>. Thirteen LA-MRSA CC398 isolates harboured <italic>lnu(B)</italic> plus <italic>lsa(E)</italic> encoding lincomycin and clindamycin resistance, which was detected in a previous study in the UK (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Kruger-Haker et al., 2023</xref>). The presence of the <italic>fexA</italic> gene in LA-MRSA CC398 was reported for the first time in China, while a previous study demonstrated a low prevalence of <italic>fexA</italic> in CC398 in the UK (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Kruger-Haker et al., 2023</xref>). A previous study demonstrated that the prevalence of <italic>fexA</italic> in MRSA CC9 isolates was 69.1% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Yu et al., 2021</xref>). The phenicol-lincosamide-oxazolidinone-pleuromutilin-streptogramin resistance gene <italic>cfr</italic> was highly prevalent in LA-MRSA CC398 isolates, and one isolate showed resistance to linezolid. Although clindamycin and linezolid are not sanctioned in pig farming, the extensive usage of other antibiotics, such as lincomycin, florfenicol, and tiamulin in food-producing animals can exert selective pressure, thereby fostering the dissemination of the <italic>cfr</italic> gene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Schouls et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Kruger-Haker et al., 2023</xref>). Eight MRSA isolates contained aminoglycoside-resistant gene <italic>aac(6&#x2032;)-aph(2&#x2033;),</italic> and two isolates showed resistance to gentamicin. The emergence and proliferation of these multidrug-resistant isolates in pigs consequently impose a substantial risk upon individuals with sustained contact with livestock.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec12">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study investigated the prevalence of <italic>S. aureus</italic> in pig production in Eastern China. MRSA has been detected in all pig farms and slaughterhouses. The high prevalence of LA-MRSA CC398 in both pig farms and slaughterhouses has provided a significant indication of the emergence and spread of LA-MRSA CC398 in the Chinese pig production industry. The phylogenetic analysis demonstrated a close relationship between LA-MRSA CC398 isolates in this study and isolates from pig samples in other countries, indicating that international trade could be a potential for LA-MRSA CC398 transmission. Further studies are required to comprehensively understand LA-MRSA CC398 in the pig industry and its potential risks to livestock and humans in the context of pork production in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec13">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary material</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec14">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The animal study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Yangzhou University. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec15">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>LZ: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft. ZJ: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft. ZW: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. YL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. XJ: Resources, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. QL: Resources, Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. YT: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec16">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20190883), the University Natural Science Research Project of Jiangsu Province (19KJB230007), and the Foundation of Green Young and Golden Phenix of Yangzhou.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors thank Ruoyun Ji from the Faculty of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Yangzhou University, for the sample collection and technical assistance.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec17">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec100" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec18">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1267885/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1267885/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aires-De-Sousa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> among animals: current overview</article-title>. <source>Clin. Microbiol. Infect.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>373</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>380</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmi.2016.11.002</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27851997</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bankevich</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nurk</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antipov</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gurevich</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dvorkin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kulikov</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing</article-title>. <source>J. Comput. Biol.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>455</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>477</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/cmb.2012.0021</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22506599</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>VFDB: a reference database for bacterial virulence factors</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>D325</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>D328</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gki008</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15608208</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute</collab></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source>Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing</source>: <edition>30th</edition> (<publisher-name>Wayne</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>PA</publisher-loc>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9001"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cromb&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Willems</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dispas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hallin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Denis</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suetens</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among pigs in Belgium</article-title>. <source>Microb. Drug Resist.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>125</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>131</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/mdr.2011.0138</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>New clues about the global MRSA ST398: emergence of MRSA ST398 from pigs in Qinghai China</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>378</volume>:<fpage>109820</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.109820</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35752017</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kalim</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Emergence of livestock-associated MRSA ST398 from bulk tank milk, China</article-title>. <source>J. Antimicrob. Chemother.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>3471</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3474</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dkaa367</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32797238</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9002"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dierikx</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hengeveld</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Veldman</surname> <given-names>K. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Haan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van der Voorde</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dop</surname> <given-names>P. Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Ten years later: still a high prevalence of MRSA in slaughter pigs despite a significant reduction in antimicrobial usage in pigs the Netherlands</article-title>. <source>J. Antimicrob. Chemother</source>. <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>2414</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2418</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dkw190</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Florensa</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaas</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clausen</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aytan-Aktug</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aarestrup</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>ResFinder - an open online resource for identification of antimicrobial resistance genes in next-generation sequencing data and prediction of phenotypes from genotypes</article-title>. <source>Microb. Genom.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>000748</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mgen.0.000748</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35072601</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harmsen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Claus</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Witte</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rothganger</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Claus</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Turnwald</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Typing of methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> in a university hospital setting by using novel software for <italic>spa</italic> repeat determination and database management</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Microbiol.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>5442</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5448</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JCM.41.12.5442-5448.2003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14662923</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kinross</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petersen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skov</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Hauwermeiren</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pantosti</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laurent</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Livestock-associated meticillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (MRSA) among human MRSA isolates, European Union/European economic area countries, 2013</article-title>. <source>Euro Surveill.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>16</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>00696</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.44.16-00696</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29113628</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kock</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Becker</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cookson</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Gemert-Pijnen</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harbarth</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kluytmans</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (MRSA): burden of disease and control challenges in Europe</article-title>. <source>Euro Surveill.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>19688</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2807/ese.15.41.19688-en</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20961515</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kruger-Haker</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hanke</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fiedler</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fessler</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Genomic diversity of methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> CC398 isolates collected from diseased swine in the German national resistance monitoring program GERM-vet from 2007 to 2019</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Spectr.</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>e0077023</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/spectrum.00770-23</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37154741</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9003"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Larsen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petersen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x00F8;rum</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stegger</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Alphen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Valentiner-Branth</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 is an increasing cause of disease in people with no livestock contact in Denmark, 1999 to 2011</article-title>. <source>Euro. Surveill.</source> <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.37.30021</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2807/1560-7917.es.2015.20.37.30021</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ke</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fessler</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwarz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Characterization of pig-associated methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic></article-title>. <source>Vet. Microbiol.</source> <volume>201</volume>, <fpage>183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>187</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.01.017</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28284608</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ingmer</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Identification and molecular characterization of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> and multi-drug resistant MRSA from monkey faeces in China</article-title>. <source>Transbound. Emerg. Dis.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>1382</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1387</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tbed.13450</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31838770</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Monaco</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pedroni</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanchini</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bonomini</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Indelicato</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pantosti</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> responsible for human colonization and infection in an area of Italy with high density of pig farming</article-title>. <source>BMC Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>258</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2334-13-258</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23731504</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9004"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ozawa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Furuya</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akama</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harada</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matsuda</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from pigs in Japan</article-title>. <source>Vet. Microbiol.</source> <volume>273</volume>:<fpage>109523</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetmic.2022.109523</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9005"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Price</surname> <given-names>L. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stegger</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hasman</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aziz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larsen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andersen</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Staphylococcus aureus CC398: host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in Livestock</article-title>. <source>mBio</source> <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>e00305-1</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mbio.00305-11</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schouls</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Veldman</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brouwer</surname> <given-names>M. S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dierikx</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Witteveen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Santen-Verheuvel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title><italic>Cfr</italic> and <italic>fexA</italic> genes in methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> from humans and livestock in the Netherlands</article-title>. <source>Commun. Med.</source> <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>135</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s43856-022-00200-w</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36317053</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9006"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schulz</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boklund</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Toft</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Halasa</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of control measures on the spread of LA-MRSA among Danish pig herds between 2006 and 2015 &#x2013; a simulation study</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>691</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-018-37075-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9007"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sieber</surname> <given-names>R. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skov</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schulz</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Price</surname> <given-names>L. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aarestrup</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Drivers and dynamics of methicillin-resistant livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus CC398 in pigs and humans in Denmark</article-title>. <source>mBio</source>. <volume>9</volume>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mbio.02142-18</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>C. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hulth</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwarz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nilsson</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Genomic analysis of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> along a pork production chain and in the community, Shandong Province, China</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>8</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.03.022</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30959181</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9008"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sreevatsan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davies</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Prevalence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in growing pigs in the USA</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>e0143670</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0143670</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larsen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kjeldgaard</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andersen</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skov</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ingmer</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Methicillin-resistant and -susceptible <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> from retail meat in Denmark</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>249</volume>, <fpage>72</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.03.001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28324679</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van De Sande-Bruinsma</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leverstein Van Hall</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Janssen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagtzaam</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leenders</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Greeff</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Impact of livestock-associated MRSA in a hospital setting</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control</source> <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>11</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13756-015-0053-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25908965</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cienfuegos-Gallet</surname> <given-names>A. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cunningham</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kreiswirth</surname> <given-names>B. N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Molecular evolution and adaptation of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (LA-MRSA) sequence type 9</article-title>. <source>mSystems</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>e0049221</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mSystems.00492-21</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34156294</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9009"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matuszewska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ba</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>A Survey of Chinese pig farms and human healthcare isolates reveals separate human and animal methicillin&#x2010;resistant Staphylococcus aureus populations</article-title>. <source>Adv. Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>2103388</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/advs.202103388</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>