<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1249471</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Responses of soil microbial communities and enzyme activities under nitrogen addition in fluvo-aquic and black soil of North China</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>Sami</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/704923/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Raza</surname> <given-names>Muhammad Mohsin</given-names></name><xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/911501/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Abbas</surname> <given-names>Tanveer</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>Xian</given-names></name><xref rid="aff4" ref-type="aff"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Wei</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Ping</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/705223/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>ORIC, University of Baltistan</institution>, <addr-line>Skardu</addr-line>, <country>Pakistan</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Soil Environment and Chemistry Program, Land Resources Research Institute National Agriculture Research Center, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council</institution>, <addr-line>Islamabad</addr-line>, <country>Pakistan</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Mosaic Fertilizers (Beijing) Co., Ltd</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: Lin Chen, Institute of Soil Science (CAS), China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: Jia Liu, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), China; Jiangbing Xu, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, China</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Ping He, <email>heping02@caas.cn</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>17</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1249471</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>28</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>28</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2023 Ullah, Raza, Abbas, Guan, Zhou and He.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Ullah, Raza, Abbas, Guan, Zhou and He</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>This research investigates the impact of long-term nitrogen (N) addition on fluvo-aquic and black soils in north China, with a focus on soil microbial communities and enzyme activities. In each site, there were three N fertilization treatments, i.e., control, moderate-N, and high-N. Phospholipid Fatty Acid Analysis was employed to analyze the microbial community composition, and enzyme activities related to N, carbon (C), and phosphorus (P) cycling were assessed. The results showed that increasing N fertilization levels led to higher soil organic carbon (SOC) and total N (TN) concentrations, indicating enhanced nutrient availability. N fertilization reduced soil pH across both soils, with a more pronounced acidification effect observed in the black soil. Across both soils, N addition increased maize yield, but the higher crop yield was attained in moderate-N rate compared with high-N rate. Microbial community composition analysis revealed that N fertilization induced shifts in the relative abundances of specific microbial groups. The black soil exhibited pronounced shifts in the microbial groups compared to the fluvo-aquic soil, i.e., decreased fungal abundance and fungi: bacteria ratio in response to N input. In addition, the application of N fertilizer led to an elevated ratio of gram-positive to gram-negative (GP:GN) bacteria, but this effect was observed only in black soil. N fertilization had an impact on the enzyme activities related to C, N, and P cycling in both soil types, but black soil showed more pronounced changes in enzyme activities. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance indicated that soil types rather than N fertilization mediated the response of the soil microbial community and enzyme activities. Partial least square path modeling demonstrated that soil pH was the only key driver impacting soil microbial groups and enzyme activities in both soils. In conclusion, our findings highlighted that N fertilization exerted more pronounced impacts on soil biochemical properties, microbial community composition, and enzyme activities in black soil furthermore, moderate N rate resulted in higher crop productivity over high N rate.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>nitrogen fertilization</kwd>
<kwd>soil microbial community composition</kwd>
<kwd>extracellular enzyme activities</kwd>
<kwd>fluvo-aquic soil</kwd>
<kwd>black soil</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="62"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="9242"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Terrestrial Microbiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>China&#x2019;s agricultural industry is a significant contributor to global food production, boasting a cultivation area that accounts for less than 9% of the world&#x2019;s total but sustains almost 20% of the world&#x2019;s population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Liu et al., 2021</xref>). The remarkable success in agricultural productivity in China can be attributed to the widespread utilization of chemical fertilizers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Ding et al., 2018</xref>). North-central China is predominantly occupied by &#x2018;fluvo-aquic soil&#x2019; and north-east China is dominated by &#x2018;black soil.&#x2019; Both regions hold considerable significance for China&#x2019;s food security as they contribute to the production of more than 22% of the country&#x2019;s total grain output (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Gong et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Xu et al., 2016</xref>). In recent decades, the pursuit of increased agricultural productivity has led to the widespread adoption of intensive fertilization practices in two specific regions of China. However, this excessive use of fertilizers has resulted in significant degradation of soil quality and adverse environmental consequences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Cui et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Xu et al., 2016</xref>). Therefore, the need for a significant transition from higher N rates to optimum or moderate rates for sustainable agricultural development has become increasingly apparent in recent years. This shift is crucial in order to and safeguard the ecological environment and ensure sustainable food security (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Davies and Shen, 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Soil microorganisms have a pronounced impact on the processes of soil organic matter (SOM) formation and decomposition, maintaining productivity, nutrient cycling, and carbon sequestration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Song et al., 2020</xref>). The soil microbial population&#x2019;s role extends to regulating crop production and suppressing diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Van Der Heijden et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Berg, 2009</xref>). Despite their small proportion within the overall soil composition, microorganisms are integral to the cycling of key elements such as carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and sulfur (S). Moreover, soil microbes play a significant role in maintaining soil fertility and quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Wei et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Song et al., 2020</xref>). However, it has been found that unplanned and non-scientific anthropogenic activities, such as fertilization and tillage, exert a notable influence on soil microbial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Ding et al., 2017</xref>), consequently hampering soil ecosystem functioning.</p>
<p>The impact of N fertilizer application on microbial taxa involved in soil nutrient cycling has been well-established (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Fierer et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Ding et al., 2017</xref>). Nevertheless, modifications in soil properties exhibit a strong correlation with changes in microbial community structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Song et al., 2020</xref>). Earlier research has highlighted soil pH as a crucial environmental factor influencing microbial community structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Dai et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Song et al., 2020</xref>). Furthermore, long-term N fertilization-induced alterations in soil carbon and C:N ratios can also impact soil microbial community structures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Dai et al., 2019</xref>). Apart from soil properties, earlier studies have shown that soil microbial populations can be influenced by some other factors, such as tillage system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Hartmann et al., 2015</xref>), crop species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Li et al., 2021</xref>), soil type (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Yu et al., 2019</xref>), and fertilizer regimes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Carey et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Su et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Wang et al., 2018</xref>). Likewise, soil extracellular enzyme activities (EEA) are impacted by soil properties and fertilizer regimes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Wang et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Song et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Soil microorganisms exhibit a remarkable ability to decompose SOM through various EEA, which play a crucial role in breaking down complex compounds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Whitaker et al., 2014</xref>). In other words, all biochemical changes in soil depend on enzyme reactions. Moreover, soil enzyme activity reflects the magnitude and direction of numerous biochemical processes. Consequently, soil EEA is regarded as an essential indicator of soil fertility and soil quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Dick, 1997</xref>). Although application of inorganic fertilizers has been shown to increase enzyme activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Ai et al., 2012</xref>) the effects of chemical N in different soil types on enzyme activities needs further studies. In addition, the interactions between soil biology, physics, chemistry, and EEA in different soil types have not yet been investigated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Burns et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>Therefore, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the N application-induced shifts in soil microbial communities and EEA and their interactions with soil variables, we sampled soil from two long-term field experiments, i.e., fluvo-aquic soil of northcentral China and black soil of northeast China. The present study investigates the impact of fertilization regimes, soil types, and soil properties on soil microbial composition and extracellular enzyme activities associated with C, N, and P acquisition in long-term field experiments with the following objectives: (i) to observe shifts in soil microbial groups and enzyme activities in response to N fertilization; (ii) to identify the impact of N fertilization versus soil types on soil enzymes and microbial communities; and (iii) to identify important soil variables influencing soil enzyme activities and microbial communities. We hypothesize that the application of N fertilization will lead to significant shifts in soil microbial communities and enzyme activities. Both nitrogen fertilization and soil types will have a substantial impact on soil enzymes and microbial communities, resulting in variations in response across different soil types. Through our study, we will identify important soil variables that significantly influence soil enzyme activities and microbial communities, helping us understand the key factors driving these ecological processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Site description</title>
<p>A long-term field trial was established in 2009 at the Dahe Experimental Station, located in Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, North Central China (38&#x00B0;07&#x2032; N and 114&#x00B0;29&#x2032; E). This region is characterized by fluvoaquic soil and exhibits a typical temperate and subhumid continental monsoon climate, with an average annual temperature of 14.3&#x00B0;C and an annual precipitation of 400 mm. Another field trial was also initiated in 2009 in Liufangzi County, Gongzhuling City, Jilin Province, situated in northeastern China (43&#x00B0; 34.86 N and 124&#x00B0; 53.92 E). The study area in Liufangzi County features black soils known as haplic phaeozems (FAO classification) and mollisols (USDA classification). It experiences a temperate and semi-humid continental monsoon climate, with an average annual temperature ranging from 4 to 5&#x00B0;C and an annual precipitation between 500 and 900 mm.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Experimental design</title>
<p>The experimental design employed in both locations was a randomized complete block with four replicates. Each plot size in the fluvo-aquic soil site was 45 m<sup>2</sup> (5 &#x00D7; 9 m), while in the black soil site, it was 40 m<sup>2</sup> (10 &#x00D7; 4 m). In fluvo-aquic soil, three treatments were implemented, namely the control, moderate-N182 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, and high-N225 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. Similarly, in black soils, three treatments were implemented, including a control, moderate-N200 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, and high-N251 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. A total of 24 experimental plots were used, resulting from combining 3 treatments, 4 replications, and 2 sites. In both sites, the moderate-N treatments represented lower N fertilization compared to the general farmer&#x2019;s fertilization rate. On the other hand, the high-N treatments represented the typical fertilization rate used by farmers in north-central (fluvo-aquic soil) and northeast (black soil) China. In treatments, all the N, P, and potassium (K) were applied as a basal application. Urea was used as the source of N fertilizer in this study, and no organic fertilizer was used. Other agricultural practices, such as tillage and pesticide application, remained the same for both the moderate-N fertilization and high-N fertilization treatments. In north-central China, the crop rotation system consisted of winter wheat followed by summer maize, while in northeast China, a summer maize monocropping system was practiced. In September 2018, we sampled soil from both study sites. Typically, five soil cores with a diameter of 2 cm were taken from each experimental plot, reaching a depth of 0&#x2013;20 cm. These cores were combined to form a composite sample. A portion of the composite sample was preserved at a temperature of &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C for subsequent molecular analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>Determination of soil biochemical properties</title>
<p>The concentrations of soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) were determined through dichromate oxidation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Kalembasa and Jenkinson, 1973</xref>) and Kjeldahl digestion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Bottomley et al., 2020</xref>), respectively. The concentration of soil inorganic N, specifically NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#x2212;</sup>N and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>N, was determined by analyzing a 12 g fresh soil sample mixed with a 0.01 mol L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution at a 1:10 ratio. The analysis was conducted using continuous flow analysis with the Foss FlAstar 5,000 instrument from Sweden. The pH of the soil was determined by employing a compound electrode (PE-10, Sartorius, Germany) and utilizing a soil-to-water ratio of 1:2.5. The fumigation extraction method using 0.5 M K<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> was employed to conduct the microbial biomass C (MBC) and microbial biomass N (MBN) analyses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Brookes et al., 1985</xref>), and the results were determined using a total organic C/N analyzer (Multi N/C 3100/HT1300, Analytik Jena AG).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<title>Determination of soil extracellular enzyme activities</title>
<p>Comprehensive details regarding the EEA that are associated with P, N and C cycling are presented in <xref rid="tab1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>. The fluorescence-based protocols as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Ai et al. (2012)</xref> were utilized to determine the activities of extracellular enzymes associated with nitrogen and carbon. The units of measurement used were expressed as nmol h<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. In summary, a quantity of 1 gram of freshly collected soil was subjected to homogenization in 100 milliliters of sterilized water with the aid of a polytron homogenizer. Subsequently, a magnetic stirrer was employed to ensure the homogeneity of the suspension. The experimental procedure involved the introduction of a suspension sample, sterilized water, 200 &#x03BC;M of 4-methylumbelliferyl-linked substrates, and 10 &#x03BC;M of references into the wells of a black 96-well microplate. The microplates were incubated in darkness at a temperature of 25&#x00B0;C for a duration of 4 h while being covered. Following the incubation period, a 10 &#x03BC;l aliquot of a 1 M NaOH solution was promptly introduced into every well of the microplate to stop the enzymatic reaction. The quantification of fluorescence was conducted utilizing a microplate fluorometer (Scientific Fluoroskan Ascent FL, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), with the implementation of 365 nm excitation and 450 nm emission filters.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1"><label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Phospholipid fatty acids used as signature biomarkers.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="7">Microbial groups</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">General bacteria</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Gram + bacteria</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Gram-bacteria</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Fungi</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Saprophytic fungi</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Actinomycetes</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="7">
<bold>PLFA biomarkers</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">14:0, 15:0, 16:0, 17:0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">i14:0, i15:0, i16:0, i17:0, i18:0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16:1 w7c, 17:1 w8c, 18:1 w7c, 18:1 w5c</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18:1 w9c</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16:1 w5c</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18:2 w6c</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16:0 (10Me), 17:0 (10Me), 18:0 (10Me)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<title>Phospholipid fatty acid analysis</title>
<p>The soil microbial community and microbial biomass were assessed using phospholipid fatty acid analysis (PLFA), following the method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Wu et al. (2009)</xref>. In brief, 3 g of freeze-dried soil samples were utilized for PLFA extraction. A chloroform/methanol/citric acid buffer (volume ratio of 1:2:0.8, pH 4.0) was used for the extraction process. The polar lipids were separated from glycolipids and neutral lipids by eluting with acetone and chloroform, respectively, on a silica-bonded phase column. To serve as an internal standard, nonadecanoic acid methy ester (19:0) was added. The polar lipids were further converted to fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) through mild alkaline methanolysis. The resulting dried FAMEs were dissolved in n-hexane and subsequently analyzed and identified using the MIDI Sherlock microbial identification system version 4.5 (MIDI Inc., Newark, DE, USA) and gas chromatography (Agilent N6890). The concentrations of PLFAs were expressed as nmol g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> of dry soil. The total microbial biomass was determined by calculating the sum of all PLFA concentrations (nmol g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), while the relative abundance of each PLFA was determined by its percentage mole abundance in each sample. Various taxonomic groups of microorganisms were identified using specific PLFAs as biomarkers, including bacteria, gram-positive (G+) and gram-negative (G&#x2013;) bacteria, fungi, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), saprophytic fungi, and actinomycetes. <xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref> shows the PLFAs that were used as signatures for each taxonomic group of microorganisms based on fatty acid biomarker data that has already been published (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Ai et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Willers et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Dai et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2"><label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Extracellular enzymes assayed and their enzyme commission number (EC).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Nutrient cycle</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Enzyme</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Abbreviation</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Substrate</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">EC</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">N cycle</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x03B1;-glucosidase</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">AG</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">4-MUB-&#x03B1;-<sub>D</sub>-glucoside</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.2.1.20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><sc>l</sc>-leucine aminopeptidase</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">LAP</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><sub>L</sub>-Leucine-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.4.11.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>N</italic>-acetyl-<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-glucosaminidase</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">NAG</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">4-MUB-<italic>N</italic>-acetyl-<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-<sub>D</sub>-glucosaminide</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.2.1.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C cycle</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-glucosidase</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">BG</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">4-MUB-<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-<sub>D</sub>-glucoside</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.2.1.21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-cellobiosidase</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">BC</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">4-MUB-<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-<sub>D</sub>-cellobioside</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.2.1.91</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x03B2;-xylosidase</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">BX</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">4-MUB-&#x03B2;-<sub>D</sub>-xyloside</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.2.1.37</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">P cycle</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Phosphatase</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">PHOS</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">4-MUB-phosphate</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.1.3.1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<title>Data analyses</title>
<p>To assess the significance of each measured variable, such as soil chemical properties, microbial populations, and enzyme activities a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted. Fisher&#x2019;s least significant difference (LSD) test was used to compare the means of different treatments, with a significance level set at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05. The statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 24. To differentiate the individual contributions of soil types and N fertilization on soil enzyme activities and microbial populations, a permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was performed using Primer software version 6.0. We utilized principal component analysis (PCA) to detect alterations in enzyme activities and microbial community structure following nitrogen (N) addition in two distinct soil types using Conoco 5. To examine the interrelationships between soil properties, enzyme activities, and microbial community composition, we employed a statistical technique called partial least squares path modeling (PLSPM). This approach allows us to visualize and analyze the cause-and-effect relationships among observed and latent variables. In PLSPM, path coefficients represent the direct effects, indicating the direction and strength of the linear relationship between variables. Additionally, indirect effects are considered, which involve the multiplied path coefficients between a predictor and a response variable, considering all possible paths except the direct effects. To validate the estimates of the coefficients of determination (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>) and the path coefficients in our model, we utilized the &#x201C;plspm&#x201D; package in R software version 3.4.4. The validation process involved performing 1,000 bootstraps, which helped assess the stability and reliability of the model estimates.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec9">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec10">
<title>Soil biochemical properties and maize yield</title>
<p>The impact of N fertilization on soil chemical properties and maize yield was investigated in two different soil types: fluvo-aquic soil and black soil (<xref rid="tab3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>). In the fluvo-aquic soil, pH values did not show significant differences among the treatments. However, in the black soil, both moderate-N and high-N treatments resulted in a significant decrease in pH compared to the control. Total N content was significantly higher in the fluvo-aquic soil with both moderate-N and high-N treatments. In the black soil, nitrate nitrogen (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#x2212;</sup>N) levels were significantly increased by both moderate-N and high-N treatments, while Total N, SOC, and MBC content showed slight differences among the treatments. MBN content was significantly impacted by N application in fluvo-aquic soil but not in black soil. Regarding maize yield, the moderate-N treatment resulted in the highest yield in both soil types, followed by the high-N treatment. However, the crop yield was more responsive to N addition in black soil.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3"><label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil biochemical properties and maize yield under N addition in fluvo-aquic and black soil.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">pH</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">TN (g kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#x2212;</sup>N (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>N (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SOC (g kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">C:N</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">MBN (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">MBC (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Yield (kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="10">
<bold>Fluvo-aquic soil</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">CK</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.88</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.15 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.07 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.54</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.90 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.44</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19.63 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">208.88</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5,310</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Moderate-N182</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.79</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.24 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.65 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.79</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20.28 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.39</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33.63 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">271.47</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6,574</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">High-N225</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.80</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.27 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.88 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.29</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20.73 ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.34</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">26.32 ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">256.78</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5,933</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="10">
<bold>One-way ANOVA <italic>p</italic>-values</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">P</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.07</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.55</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.93</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="10">
<bold>Black soil</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">CK</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.01 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.02 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.97 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24.47</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19.76</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">44.76</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">45.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1905 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Moderate-N200</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.87 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.27</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.85 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.52 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">26.66</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20.94</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">49.32</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">34.82</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12,040 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">High-N251</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.19 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19.55 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.59 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">25.58</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19.77</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">55.73</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">23.73</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10,739 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="10">
<bold>One-way ANOVA <italic>p</italic>-values</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">P</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.29</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.58</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.61</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>The data are the means;  <italic>n</italic> = 4. Different letters in a column indicate significant differences among treatments at <italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05 probability level as determined by Fisher&#x2019;s least significant difference (LSD).</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<title>Soil microbial community composition</title>
<p>The impact of nitrogen fertilization on soil microbial communities was assessed in both fluvo-aquic and black soils (<xref rid="tab4" ref-type="table">Table 4</xref>). In the fluvo-aquic soil, there were no significant differences in the abundance of bacteria, fungi, saprophytic fungi, and actinomycetes among the control, moderate-N, and high-N treatments. However, the abundance of AMF showed a significant decrease with an increasing nitrogen fertilization rate. Similarly, in the black soil, the abundance of bacteria did not significantly differ among the control, moderate-N, and high-N treatments. However, the abundance of fungi and AMF significantly decreased with increasing nitrogen fertilization rates. The ratio of Fungi:bacteria (F:B) decreased while the GP:GN ratio increased with N fertilization. PCA was utilized to evaluate the distinct differentiation of microbial community composition across two soil types. PCA demonstrated a clear separation of microbial communities in both fluvo-aquic and black soil (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1A</xref>). To separate the individual impacts of N fertilization and soil types on microbial community composition, we employed PERMANOVA. The outcomes of PERMANOVA revealed that soil type accounted for most of the variation, specifically 42%, in microbial community composition (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2A</xref>). Conversely, N fertilization contributed 14% of the variation.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4"><label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative abundance of the individual PLFAs (mol %) in soil samples from the fluvo-aquic and black soil.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">Bacteria</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Fungi</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SF</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">AMF</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Actino</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GP</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GN</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GP:GN</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">F:B</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="10">
<bold>Fluvo-aquic soil</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Control</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">52.74</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.47</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.08</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.80 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.64</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17.56</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17.42</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Moderate-N182</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">53.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.03</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.64</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.42 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.67</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.95</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.97</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">High-N225</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">53.48</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.07 c</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="10">
<bold>One-way ANOVA <italic>p</italic>-values</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">P</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.26</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.14</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.73</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.56</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.51</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="10">
<bold>Black soil</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Control</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">47.15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.92 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.26</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.97 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.92 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17.57 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.10 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.34 c</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.126 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Moderate-N200</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">46.72</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.65 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.09</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.59 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.91 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.21 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.17 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.50 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.121 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">High-N251</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">46.67</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.42 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.32</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.74 c</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.49 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19.19 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.01 b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.92 a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.095c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="10">
<bold>One-way ANOVA <italic>p</italic>-values</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">P</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.83</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.0001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2264;0.001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Data are the mean,  <italic>n</italic> = 4. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments  at <italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05 probability level as determined by Fisher&#x2019;s least significant difference (LSD). SF = saprophytic fungi, AMF = Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Actino = Actinomycetes, GP = Gram positive bacteria, GN = Gram negative bacteria, F:B = Fungi:Bactrtia ratio.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig position="float" id="fig1"><label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Principle component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition <bold>(A)</bold> and extracellular enzyme activities <bold>(B)</bold> data for the control, moderate-N, and high-N treatments for fluvo-aquic and black soil.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1249471-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig2"><label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) comparing the main and interactive effects of N fertilizer and soil type on the soil microbial community composition <bold>(A)</bold> and extracellular enzyme activities <bold>(B)</bold> at (999 permutations). Asterisks indicate significant differences at &#x002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.01 and &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.001 probability levels.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1249471-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<title>Soil extracellular enzyme activities</title>
<p>The impact of nitrogen fertilization on extracellular enzyme activities was assessed in two soil types. The results suggest that nitrogen fertilization did not have a significant impact on soil enzyme activities except Phosphatase and LAP in fluvo-aquic soil. In contrast, in the black soil, significant differences were observed in several enzyme activities with nitrogen fertilization (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figures 3</xref> <xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">4</xref>; <xref rid="tab5" ref-type="table">Table 5</xref>); for example, BG, BX, and BC activities were significantly impacted by N application. Phosphatase and NAG activities did not show significant differences among the treatments. PCA was utilized to evaluate the distinct changes in EEA across the two soil types. PCA demonstrated clear separation of EEA in both fluvo-aquic soil and black soil (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1B</xref>). The results of PERMANOVA revealed that soil type accounted for the majority of the variation, specifically 56%, in EEA (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2B</xref>). Conversely, N fertilization contributed 11% of the variation. Overall, the results indicate that the influence of nitrogen fertilization on soil enzyme activities varied depending on the soil type.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3"><label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>The data are the means;  <italic>n</italic> = 4. Significantly altered N and P cycling extracellular enzyme activities in fluvo-aquic and black soil. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264;0.05 probability level as determined by Fisher&#x2019;s least significant difference (LSD). Note: Capital letters indicate significance in black soil while small letters indicate significance in fluvo-aquic soil.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1249471-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig4"><label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>The data are the means;  <italic>n</italic> = 4. Significantly altered C cycling extracellular enzyme activities in fluvo-aquic and black soil. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments at P &#x2264; 0.05 probability level as determined by Fisher&#x2019;s least significant difference (LSD). Note: Capital letters indicate significance in black soil while small letters indicate significance in fluvo-aquic soil.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1249471-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5"><label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p><italic>P-</italic>values derived from one-way ANOVA for extracellular enzyme activities in soil samples from the fluvo-aquic and black soil.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">PHOS</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">NAG</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">LAP</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">AG</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">BG</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">BX</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">BC</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fluvo-aquic soil</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2264;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2264;0.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.53</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.91</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.18</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Black soil</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.66</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.84</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2264;0.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2264;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2264;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2264;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2264;0.05</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>For interpretation of abbreviations please refer to <xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>Partial least square path modeling</title>
<p>To investigate the relationships between N fertilization, maize yield, soil properties, soil bacterial and fungal communities, and EEA, a PLSPM analysis was conducted. The findings in fluvo-aquic soils revealed that the addition of N exhibited a significant direct relationship with soil N contents and pH (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5A</xref>). Moreover, soil pH significantly influenced both fungal and bacterial communities. It was observed that soil N contents had a significant direct association with crop yield. Additionally, SOC and soil fungi exhibited a significant relationship with C-cycling enzymes, while no significant relationship was found between soil bacteria and C-cycling enzymes. Notably, C-cycling enzymes displayed a significant direct relationship with N-cycling enzymes. In the context of black soil, the N application exhibited a significant direct association with soil pH and SOC (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5B</xref>). Soil N contents exerted a significant influence on crop yield. Furthermore, soil pH demonstrated a significant direct correlation with soil fungal communities and EEA involved in C cycling, whereas no significant relationship was observed with soil bacterial communities. Importantly, a significant direct relationship was observed between C-cycling enzymes and N-cycling enzymes.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5"><label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Directed graph of the partial least squares path model (PLS-PM) for fluvo-aquic soil <bold>(A)</bold> and black soil <bold>(B)</bold>. Each box represents an observed variable (i.e., measured) or latent variable (i.e., constructs). The loading for N contents and the six enzyme activities that create the latent variables are shown in the dashed rectangle. Path coefficients are calculated after 1,000 bootstraps and reflected in the width of the arrow, with blue and red indicating positive and negative effects, respectively. Dashed arrows show that coefficients did not differ significantly from 0 (<italic>p</italic> &#x2265; 0.05). The model is assessed using the Goodness of Fit (GoF) statistic, and the GoF values were 0.70 and 0.66 in the fluvo-aquic and black soil, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1249471-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussions" id="sec14">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="sec15">
<title>Nitrogen addition impacts on soil biochemical properties and maize yield</title>
<p>The application of N fertilizer impacted soil chemical properties and increased nutrient contents across both soil types (<xref rid="tab3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>). Earlier research has indicated that extended application of nitrogen fertilizers resulted in an enhanced level of SOC, overall N content, and particulate organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Dai et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Yu et al., 2019</xref>). It has been established that N fertilization can directly affect soil physiochemical properties, which in turn can have a significant impact on crop production. In particular, PLSPM indicated that the soil chemical properties were influenced by the addition of N, which in turn had a direct or indirect effect on the yield of maize. The levels of available N, TN, and SOC were identified as significant factors in regulating maize grain yield, either through individual or interactive effects (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5</xref>). A study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Yu et al. (2019)</xref>, found that SOC played a significant role in enhancing crop yields through mediating microbial biomass and soil enzyme activities. The findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Luo et al. (2018)</xref> in a comprehensive meta-analysis indicate that N fertilization can enhance crop production by augmenting SOC and TN levels, as well as biological soil enzyme activity across diverse cropping systems worldwide.</p>
<p>The N fertilization induced changes can have an impact on the soil microbial community, leading to significant modifications in soil microbial characteristics such as total microbial biomass, MBC, and MBN contents. In the present study, divergent responses of MBC were observed in the two soils (<xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>). The divergent responses of MBC to N fertilization in the two soils could be related to differences in their initial microbial communities and nutrient utilization strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Sun et al., 2021</xref>). Some microbial groups are specialized in efficiently utilizing N and other nutrients, while others may rely on different carbon sources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Xu et al., 2021</xref>). Additionally, the initial nutrient status of the soils can also influence microbial responses to N fertilization. If one soil already has a relatively high nutrient content, including nitrogen, the additional nitrogen from the fertilization might not have as pronounced an effect on microbial growth compared to a soil with low initial nutrient levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Chen et al., 2020</xref>). It has been established that the application of N fertilizer results in a significant increase in soil MBN and MBC contents, regardless of soil type (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Yu et al., 2019</xref>). Conversely, in a meta-analysis conducted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Jian et al. (2016)</xref>, it was found that the application of N fertilization resulted in a decrease in MBC content. Results in <xref rid="tab3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref> showed that the application of N fertilization had a greater impact on reducing the pH of black soil compared to fluvo-aquic soil. One potential reason for the greater impact of N fertilization on reducing the pH of black soil compared to fluvo-aquic soil could be related to differences in the buffering capacity of the two soil types. Buffering capacity refers to a soil&#x2019;s ability to resist changes in pH when acidic or alkaline substances are added. Soils with higher buffering capacity can maintain a more stable pH even when external factors, such as fertilizer application, attempt to alter it (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Lopes et al., 2015</xref>). In addition, distinct soil types exhibit distinct initial characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Staley et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Yu et al., 2019</xref>). Consequently, the impact of N fertilization on different soil properties was found to be diverse (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Yu et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>In the present study, the higher N rate resulted in substantial soil acidification in fluvo-aquic soil and black soil. The application of additional N treatments resulted in a reduction in pH levels, irrespective of the soil type, which consequently led to soil acidification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Guo et al., 2010</xref>). The phenomenon of soil acidification has been observed to have significant impacts on the availability of nutrients for plants and the decomposition of soil organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Treseder, 2008</xref>). In order to ensure the preservation of soil quality and mitigate the environmental consequences associated with agriculture, it is imperative to prioritize the reduction of fertilizer rates, specifically N fertilizer. This approach is crucial for maintaining optimal crop productivity in a sustainable manner. In pursuit of this objective, the Chinese government has implemented a comprehensive initiative known as the Zero Growth of Chemical Fertilizer Use by 2020 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Shuqin and Fang, 2018</xref>). The implementation of such initiatives is anticipated to have multiple benefits, including the maintenance of elevated crop productivity levels, improved efficiency in nutrient utilization, and the safeguarding of the environment against the detrimental impacts associated with agricultural practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<title>Soil microbial community composition in response to nitrogen addition</title>
<p>The potential impact of N enrichment on soil ecosystem stability is a topic of concern in ecological research. It is well established that sustaining of soil productivity and ecological equilibrium in agroecosystems is heavily reliant on the abundance and diversity of soil microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Zhou et al., 2017</xref>). Specifically, the reduction in abundance and diversity resulting from N enrichment may have negative consequences for the interactions between above- and below-ground ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Tilman et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Zhou et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>In the present study significant reduction of fungal abundance in response to N addition was witnessed in black soil while no significant shifts were observed in fluvo-aquic soils. The specific shifts in fungal microbial community composition are attributed to ecosystem N status, where N additions have little effect the abundance of fungal communities in fluvo-aquic soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Wang et al., 2018</xref>). The response of fungal microbial communities to N addition can also be influenced by changes in soil pH. N fertilizers can lead to increased soil acidity due to the nitrification process. Fungi generally prefer slightly acidic to neutral pH conditions, and the reduction of pH in black soil might have negatively impacted fungal growth, contributing to the observed decline in their abundance. In addition, Fungi and bacteria often compete for limited resources in the soil. Nitrogen addition could have intensified this competition, affecting fungal communities more severely in black (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Bluhm et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Despite of earlier reports that bacterial growth is more susceptible to low pH compared to fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1002">Pennanen et al., 1999</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1003">Rousk et al., 2010</xref>), our observations did not reveal a significant reduction in bacterial abundance or increase in F:B ratio in plots with lower pH levels (<xref rid="tab4" ref-type="table">Table 4</xref>). The findings of our study indicated the possibility that certain bacterial groups have developed significant adaptations to environmental stressors induced by nitrogen in the study area. Our results revealed that N input consistently decreased F:B ratio across both the soils but particularly in black soil. The study conducted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Strickland and Rousk (2010)</xref> found that the observed responses between the F:B and microbial C:N to N addition were primarily due to the higher biomass C:N of the fungal communities compared to the bacterial communities. This result holds significant implications. Firstly, the microbial C:N ratio can serve as an indicator to determine the relative abundance of fungi over bacteria in a given environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Nannipieri et al., 2003</xref>). Secondly, extracellular enzymes serve as the immediate agents for the decomposition of soil organic matter. These enzymes&#x2019; activities can serve as indicators for soil nutrient cycling, and microbial soil respiration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Jian et al., 2016</xref>). Therefore, the reduction in microbial biomass does not necessarily imply that the addition of N prevents the growth of microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Zhou et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>The application of N fertilizer resulted in a shift in the GP:GN ratio of bacteria (<xref rid="tab4" ref-type="table">Table 4</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Schimel et al. (2007)</xref> demonstrated that within the domain of microorganisms, GP bacteria possess a strong and intricately connected peptidoglycan cell wall, whereas GN bacteria exhibit a single-layer cell wall and an outer membrane. However, earlier research has identified ecological and physiological differences between GP and GN bacteria. The predominant microorganisms that facilitate the decomposition of litter and soil organic matter are GP bacteria and fungi. A significant number of microorganisms that perform specific or limited functions in soil are Gram-negative (GN) bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Schimel, 1995</xref>). According to earlier research, it is believed that GP bacteria possess a greater inherent resistance to environmental stress when compared to GN bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Schimel, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Schimel et al., 2007</xref>). The observed increase in GP:GN appears to be consistent with the increase in soil available N resulting from the N application, as indicated in <xref rid="tab4" ref-type="table">Table 4</xref>. The study conducted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1001">Fanin et al. (2013)</xref> highlights the significance of P-driven stoichiometric control in understanding the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of the GP:GN. In particular, the positive response of the GP:GN ratio has been observed to potentially facilitate the breakdown of recalcitrant SOM and enhance C acquisition by soil microbiota (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Zhou et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<title>Soil enzyme activities in response to nitrogen addition</title>
<p>Soil EEA serves as significant biological indicators of soil biodiversity, ecosystem function, and soil fertility levels by reflecting nutrient cycling activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Sinsabaugh et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Wallenstein and Burns, 2011</xref>). We observed that glycosidases activities (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-cellobiosidase, <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-glucosidase, <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-xylosidase, and <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>-glucosidase) were enhanced following the addition of N (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figures 3</xref>, <xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">4</xref>). A meta-analysis conducted on the effects of N additions on glycosidase activities across various ecosystems showed that anthropogenic N input stimulated the activities of glycosidases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Jian et al., 2016</xref>). In present study, N fertilization plots had enhanced activities of Phosphatase. The production of AP requires elevated levels of N, as noted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Treseder and Vitousek (2001)</xref>. Consequently, the application of nitrogen amendments may have potentially stimulated microbial activity, resulting in increased AP production. Furthermore, the acidification of soil induced by N application could potentially contribute to the mineral soil&#x2019;s phosphorus binding capacity and subsequently decrease the accessibility of phosphorus to microorganisms. In order to fulfill the necessary nutrient requirements for phosphorus, microorganisms have the ability to synthesize a greater quantity of phosphatase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Sinsabaugh et al., 2009</xref>). We further observed that N-treatment plots exhibited an increase in specific enzyme activities while some enzymes activities stay neutral. This suggests that microbial populations carried out a more pronounced enzyme activity in N treated plots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Francioli et al., 2016</xref>). Moreover, it is has been observed that specific extracellular enzyme activities are better indicator of the metabolic status of a microbial community in acquiring C and nutrients, as compared to absolute enzyme activities which only reflect gross microbial activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Raiesi and Beheshti, 2014</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<title>Impact of nitrogen fertilization vs. soil type on microbial community composition and enzyme activities</title>
<p>The findings of our study indicated that the microbial community structure and enzyme activities of soil were primarily influenced by soil type, rather than N fertilization (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figures 2A</xref>, <xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">B</xref>). Earlier research claimed that the primary factor influencing the significant variation in the microbial community composition and enzyme activities on a large scale is geographic location/soil type rather than fertilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>). Additionally, it has been suggested that environmental variables resulting from N fertilization may have a lesser impact on this variation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Chen et al., 2016</xref>). Based on soil sampled across 03 different soil types in China, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Zhang et al. (2021)</xref>, reported that geographical distance explained 61.60% of the variance in microbial community composition, but N fertilization only accounted for 1.52%.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<title>Exploring impacts of N fertilization-driven soil variables with microbial communities and enzyme activities</title>
<p>Nitrogen fertilization impacts soil microbial activity, nitrogen, and carbon dynamics, indicating that soil microbial communities can regulate nitrogen-use efficiency and carbon dynamics efficiency to mitigate resource imbalances (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Mooshammer et al., 2014</xref>). The maintenance of ecosystem sustainability and productivity is heavily influenced by the presence of a suitable community structure and ample diversity of soil microbes, which play a crucial role in regulating various soil biogeochemical processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Schimel, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Strickland and Rousk, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Chaparro et al., 2012</xref>). In the present study, soil bacterial and fungal communities were significantly impacted by soil pH (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5</xref>), which indicated that soil acidification rather than N availability shaped soil fungal and bacterial communities. Earlier studies have indicated a strong correlation between shifts in microbial community composition and soil pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Francioli et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Zhou et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>). Furthermore, soil acidification has been found to have a direct impact on the composition of soil microbial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Dai et al., 2019</xref>). However, on the other hand, it has been reported that N addition-induced changes in soil properties could exert positive (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Zhou et al., 2017</xref>) and neutral (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Turner and Joseph Wright, 2014</xref>) effects on soil microbial communities.</p>
<p>Interestingly, we found that there was a significant positive correlation between C-cycling enzyme activities and N-cycling enzyme activities (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figures 5A</xref>,<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">B</xref>). This result is consistent with the research conducted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Dai et al. (2019)</xref>, which demonstrated that C-cycling enzyme activity has significant relationship with the N-cycling enzymes. The observed phenomenon can be attributed to the impact of low soil C:N ratios on the activities of C-cycling enzymes. This leads to an increase in the degradation of cellulose, lignin, and other carbon sources that are typically challenging to decompose. As a result, there is a subsequent increase in the availability of C and the activities of N-related enzymes. Our study revealed that there was a significant positive relationship between soil pH and the activities of C cycling enzymes (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5B</xref>). Enzymes are sensitive to changes in environmental conditions, including pH. Many C-cycling enzymes have an optimal pH range at which they function most efficiently. When the soil pH falls within the optimal range for these enzymes, their activity is enhanced, leading to increased decomposition and cycling of organic carbon compounds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Puissant et al., 2019</xref>). Soil pH can affect the solubility of minerals, which, in turn, can influence enzyme activity. Some minerals act as cofactors for C-cycling enzymes, and their availability might change with soil pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Sheng et al., 2022</xref>). The results of this study are similar to those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Dai et al. (2019)</xref>, who found a significant correlation between the activity of extracellular c-cycling enzymes and the pH of the soil.</p>
<p>It was further observed that across both soil types, fungal communities were significantly linked to C-cycling enzymes but not N-cycling enzymes (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figures 5A</xref>,<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">B</xref>). Studies have claimed that soil fungal communities dominate SOC turnover and that fungi have a greater impact on soil carbon cycling than bacterial microbes in both acidic and basic soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Xiao et al., 2018</xref>). The relationship between soil carbon cycling enzyme activities and soil fungi is critical for understanding carbon dynamics in terrestrial ecosystems. Soil carbon cycling enzyme activities are closely linked to the decomposition and transformation of organic matter, which affect the storage and release of carbon in the soil. Soil fungi play a key role in this process, as they are major contributors to organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling in soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Xiao et al., 2018</xref>). We further witnessed that C-cycling enzymes were highly linked to SOC (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5A</xref>). SOC represents a reservoir of organic carbon in the soil. As the SOC content increases, it provides a continuous supply of carbon-rich substrates for microbial activity. Increased microbial activity, in turn, leads to higher enzyme production, facilitating further decomposition of organic matter and contributing to the maintenance of higher SOC levels. This creates a positive feedback loop where higher SOC leads to increased enzyme activity, which, in turn, supports the preservation and accumulation of more SOC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Wang et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec20">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In conclusion, this research emphasizes the significant effects of N fertilization on soil properties, microbial communities, enzyme activities, and crop yield in fluvo-aquic and black soils in North China. Increased N fertilization led to improved nutrient availability, but at the same time, a higher N rate led to soil acidification across both soils. Moderate-N fertilization resulted in enhanced crop productivity over high N fertilization across both soil types. Microbial community composition and enzyme activities were influenced by N fertilization, with pronounced changes observed in the black soil. Soil pH was found to be a key driver in regulating soil microbial communities and enzyme activities. In addition, soil type resulted in the maximum variation in microbial communities and enzyme activities compared with N addition. Moreover, it is imperative for Chinese growers to transition from the practice of incorporating excessive quantities of fertilizer to employing minimal or optimal levels of fertilization. The implementation of this practice will not only enable growers to attain elevated crop yields but also avert the detrimental consequences of agriculture, specifically over-fertilization, on the ecosystem.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec21">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>SU: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, writingoriginal draft, and review and editing. MR, TA, and WZ: investigation, data curation, and review. XG: investigation and data curation. PH: conceptualization, funding acquisition, resources, and supervision. All authors reviewed and contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec23">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research was supported by Smart Fertilization Project, the National Key Research and Development Program of China (no. 2016YFD0200101), and CAAS-IPNI Joint Lab for Plant Nutrition Innovation Research.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec24">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec100" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>Thanks to Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agriculture Science for providing PhD Scholarship. This study was a part of PhD thesis.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec25">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1249471/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1249471/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_2.docx" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ai</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Responses of extracellular enzyme activities and microbial community in both the rhizosphere and bulk soil to long-term fertilization practices in a fluvo-aquic soil</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>173&#x2013;174</volume>, <fpage>330</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>338</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.07.020</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Plant&#x2013;microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>11</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-009-2092-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19568745</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bluhm</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eitzinger</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferlian</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bluhm</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schr&#x00F6;ter</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pena</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Deprivation of root-derived resources affects microbial biomass but not community structure in litter and soil</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>e0214233</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0214233</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30921392</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bottomley</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Angle</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weaver</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source>Methods of soil analysis, part 2: Microbiological and biochemical properties</source>. <publisher-loc>Hoboken, New Jersey, United States</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>John Wiley &#x0026; Sons</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brookes</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Landman</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pruden</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jenkinson</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>837</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>842</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(85)90144-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burns</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>DeForest</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marxsen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sinsabaugh</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stromberger</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallenstein</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current knowledge and future directions</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>216</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>234</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carey</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beman</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eviner</surname> <given-names>V. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Malmstrom</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hart</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Soil microbial community structure is unaltered by plant invasion, vegetation clipping, and nitrogen fertilization in experimental semi-arid grasslands</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2015.00466</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chaparro</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sheflin</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manter</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vivanco</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Manipulating the soil microbiome to increase soil health and plant fertility</article-title>. <source>Biol Fertility Soils</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>489</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>499</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-012-0691-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Microbial communities of an arable soil treated for 8 years with organic and inorganic fertilizers</article-title>. <source>Biol Fertility Soils</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>455</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>467</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-016-1089-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Direct and indirect influences of long-term fertilization on microbial carbon and nitrogen cycles in an alpine grassland</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>149</volume>:<fpage>107922</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107922</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>On-farm evaluation of winter wheat yield response to residual soil nitrate-N in North China plain</article-title>. <source>Agron. J.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>1527</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1534</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj2008.0005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Soil C/N and pH together as a comprehensive indicator for evaluating the effects of organic substitution management in subtropical paddy fields after application of high-quality amendments</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>337</volume>, <fpage>1116</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1125</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.023</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Davies</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Reducing the environmental footprint of food and farming with agriculture green development</article-title>. <source>Front. Agric. Sci. Engin.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15302/J-FASE-2019311</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dick</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health</article-title>,&#x201D;in <source>Biol Indicat Soil Health.</source> (<publisher-loc>Wallingford, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CAB International Press</publisher-name>) <fpage>121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>156</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Influence of inorganic fertilizer and organic manure application on fungal communities in a long-term field experiment of Chinese Mollisols</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>114</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>122</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.12.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Improving yield and nitrogen use efficiency through alternative fertilization options for rice in China: a meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res</source> <volume>227</volume>, <fpage>11</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2018.08.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref1001">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fanin</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fromin</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buatois</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>H&#x00E4;ttenschwiler</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>An experimental test of the hypothesis of non&#x2010;homeostatic consumer stoichiometry in a plant littermicrobe system</article-title>. <source>Ecology letters</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>764</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>772</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lauber</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramirez</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zaneveld</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bradford</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Comparative metagenomic, phylogenetic and physiological analyses of soil microbial communities across nitrogen gradients</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1007</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1017</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2011.159</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22134642</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Francioli</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schulz</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lentendu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wubet</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buscot</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reitz</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Mineral vs. organic amendments: microbial community structure, activity and abundance of agriculturally relevant microbes are driven by long-term fertilization strategies</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>1446</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2016.01446</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Long-term manure and fertilizer effects on soil organic matter fractions and microbes under a wheat&#x2013;maize cropping system in northern China</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>149</volume>, <fpage>318</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>324</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.12.010</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>327</volume>, <fpage>1008</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1010</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1182570</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hartmann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frey</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mayer</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00E4;der</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Widmer</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Distinct soil microbial diversity under long-term organic and conventional farming</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>1177</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1194</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2014.210</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25350160</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jian</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mayes</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dzantor</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Soil extracellular enzyme activities, soil carbon and nitrogen storage under nitrogen fertilization: a meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>32</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kalembasa</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jenkinson</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1973</year>). <article-title>A comparative study of titrimetric and gravimetric methods for the determination of organic carbon in soil</article-title>. <source>J. Sci. Food Agric.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>1085</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1090</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.2740240910</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Rhizobacterial communities and crop development in response to long-term tillage practices in maize and soybean fields on the loess plateau of China</article-title>. <source>Catena</source> <volume>202</volume>:<fpage>105319</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2021.105319</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>H.-M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.-R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.-Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jian</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Change in grain production in China and its impacts on spatial supply and demand distributions in recent two decades</article-title>. <source>J. Nat. Resour.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>1413</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1425</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31497/zrzyxb.20210605</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lopes</surname> <given-names>M. I. M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ribeiro Dos Santos</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zuliani Sandrin Camargo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bulbovas</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Giampaoli</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Domingos</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Soil chemical and physical status in semideciduous Atlantic Forest fragments affected by atmospheric deposition in Central-Eastern S&#x00E3;o Paulo state</article-title>. <source>Brazil. iForest Biogeosci. Forestry</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>798</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>808</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3832/ifor1258-007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Friman</surname> <given-names>V.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Organic amendments increase crop yields by improving microbe-mediated soil functioning of agroecosystems: a meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>124</volume>, <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>115</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.06.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mooshammer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wanek</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>H&#x00E4;mmerle</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fuchslueger</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hofhansl</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knoltsch</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Adjustment of microbial nitrogen use efficiency to carbon: nitrogen imbalances regulates soil nitrogen cycling</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>3694</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms4694</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24739236</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nannipieri</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ascher</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ceccherini</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Landi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pietramellara</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Renella</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Microbial diversity and soil functions</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>655</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>670</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1351-0754.2003.0556.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref1002">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pennanen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liski</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x00E5;&#x00E5;th</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kitunen</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Uotila</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Westman</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Structure of the microbial communities in coniferous forest soils in relation to site fertility and stand development stage</article-title>. <source>Microbial Ecology</source>  <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>168</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>179</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Puissant</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goodall</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blaud</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gweon</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The pH optimum of soil exoenzymes adapt to long term changes in soil pH</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>138</volume>:<fpage>107601</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107601</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Raiesi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beheshti</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Soil specific enzyme activity shows more clearly soil responses to paddy rice cultivation than absolute enzyme activity in primary forests of Northwest Iran</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>63</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.10.012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref1003">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rousk</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brookes</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x00E5;&#x00E5;th</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Investigating the mechanisms for the opposing pH relationships of fungal and bacterial growth in soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Biology and Biochemistry</source>. <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>926</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>934</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schimel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Ecosystem consequences of microbial diversity and community structure</article-title>,&#x201D;in <source>Arctic and alpine biodiversity: patterns, causes and ecosystem consequences</source>. (<publisher-loc>Berlin, Germany</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer Press</publisher-name>) <fpage>239</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>254</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schimel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Balser</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallenstein</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>1386</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1394</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/06-0219</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coffin</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Myrold</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kleber</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The important role of enzyme adsorbing capacity of soil minerals in regulating &#x03B2;-glucosidase activity</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>49</volume>:<fpage>e2021GL097556</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2021GL097556</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shuqin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Zero growth of chemical fertilizer and pesticide use: China's objectives, progress and challenges</article-title>. <source>J. Resour. Ecol.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>50</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2018.01.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sinsabaugh</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hill</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Follstad Shah</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>462</volume>, <fpage>795</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>798</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature08632</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20010687</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Combined biochar and nitrogen fertilizer change soil enzyme and microbial activities in a 2-year field trial</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Soil Biol.</source> <volume>99</volume>:<fpage>103212</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejsobi.2020.103212</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Staley</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Breuillin-Sessoms</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaiser</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Venterea</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sadowsky</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Urea amendment decreases microbial diversity and selects for specific nitrifying strains in eight contrasting agricultural soils</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>634</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.00634</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Strickland</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rousk</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Considering fungal: bacterial dominance in soils&#x2013;methods, controls, and ecosystem implications</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>1385</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1395</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.05.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quensen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Long-term balanced fertilization increases the soil microbial functional diversity in a phosphorus-limited paddy soil</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>136</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>150</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mec.13010</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25410123</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Metagenomics reveals taxon-specific responses of the nitrogen-cycling microbial community to long-term nitrogen fertilization</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>156</volume>:<fpage>108214</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108214</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tilman</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knops</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>441</volume>, <fpage>629</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>632</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature04742</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16738658</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Treseder</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen additions and microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of ecosystem studies</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1120</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01230.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18673384</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Treseder</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Effects of soil nutrient availability on investment in acquisition of N and P in Hawaiian rain forests</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>946</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>954</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0946:EOSNAO]2.0.CO;2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joseph Wright</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The response of microbial biomass and hydrolytic enzymes to a decade of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium addition in a lowland tropical rain forest</article-title>. <source>Biogeochemistry</source> <volume>117</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>130</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10533-013-9848-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Der Heijden</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bardgett</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Straalen</surname> <given-names>N. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>296</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>310</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wallenstein</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burns</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Ecology of extracellular enzyme activities and organic matter degradation in soil: a complex community-driven process</article-title>. <source>Methods Soil Enzymol</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssabookser9.c2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mori</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Responses of soil microbial community to continuous experimental nitrogen additions for 13 years in a nitrogen-rich tropical forest</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>121</volume>, <fpage>103</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>112</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.03.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Redmile-Gordon</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shahbaz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Microbial formation and stabilisation of soil organic carbon is regulated by carbon substrate identity and mineral composition</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>414</volume>:<fpage>115762</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115762</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Biogeochemical cycles of key elements in the paddy-rice rhizosphere: microbial mechanisms and coupling processes</article-title>. <source>Rhizosphere</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>100145</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rhisph.2019.100145</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Whitaker</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ostle</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nottingham</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ccahuana</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salinas</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bardgett</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Microbial community composition explains soil respiration responses to changing carbon inputs along an a ndes-to-a mazon elevation gradient</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>1058</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1071</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.12247</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25520527</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Willers</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jansen van Rensburg</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Claassens</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Phospholipid fatty acid profiling of microbial communities&#x2013;a review of interpretations and recent applications</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>119</volume>, <fpage>1207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1218</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jam.12902</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26184497</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brookes</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Effects of different soil weights, storage times and extraction methods on soil phospholipid fatty acid analyses</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>150</volume>, <fpage>171</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>178</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.02.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Soil organic carbon mineralization with fresh organic substrate and inorganic carbon additions in a red soil is controlled by fungal diversity along a pH gradient</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>321</volume>, <fpage>79</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>89</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.02.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Changes in microbial biomass, community composition and diversity, and functioning with soil depth in two alpine ecosystems on the Tibetan plateau</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>459</volume>, <fpage>137</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>153</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-020-04712-z</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pampolino</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Narrowing yield gaps and increasing nutrient use efficiencies using the nutrient expert system for maize in Northeast China</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res</source> <volume>194</volume>, <fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2016.05.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ling</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Responses of soil biological traits and bacterial communities to nitrogen fertilization mediate maize yields across three soil types</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>185</volume>, <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>69</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2018.08.017</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The stronger impact of inorganic nitrogen fertilization on soil bacterial community than organic fertilization in short-term condition</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>382</volume>:<fpage>114752</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114752</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Patterns and mechanisms of responses by soil microbial communities to nitrogen addition</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>115</volume>, <fpage>433</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>441</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.09.015</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>