<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1231978</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effects of tea oil camellia (<italic>Camellia oleifera</italic> Abel.) shell-based organic fertilizers on the physicochemical property and microbial community structure of the rhizosphere soil</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Anxiang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2330750/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Zhongwei</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Dingyun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Shoulu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Wennian</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Nengying</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Xiang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Zhu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Guizhou Academy of Forestry</institution>, <addr-line>Guiyang</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Qianxinan Ecological Environment Monitoring Centre</institution>, <addr-line>Xingyi</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Francisca Su&#x00E1;rez-Estrella, University of Almer&#x00ED;a, Spain</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Nagaraju Yalavarthi, National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms (ICAR), India; Ravinder Kumar, Central Potato Research Institute (ICAR), India; Weiyan Wang, Northwest A&#x0026;F University, China</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Shoulu Yang, <email>yangshoulucsuft@163.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>10</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1231978</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>01</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>24</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2023 Huang, Wang, Yang, Yang, Bai, Wu, Lu and Liu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Huang, Wang, Yang, Yang, Bai, Wu, Lu and Liu</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Soil microorganisms play important roles in promoting soil ecosystem restoration, but much of the current research has been limited to changes in microbial community structure in general, and little is known regarding the soil physicochemical property and microbial community structure. In this study, four organic fertilizers were first prepared based on tea oil camellia shell (TOCS). Our findings indicate that the application of BOFvo increased both total pore volume and BET surface area of the rhizosphere soils, as well there was a remarkable enhancement in total organic matter (TOM), total nitrogen (TN), available nitrogen (AN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), and available potassium (AK) contents of the rhizosphere soils. Meanwhile, in comparison to the CK and CF groups, the utilization of BOFvo led to a substantial increase in both average yield and fruiting rate per plant at maturity, as well resulted in a significant increase in TN and TP contents of tea oil camellia leaves. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the application of TOCS-based organic fertilizers significantly enhances the microbial diversity in the rhizosphere soils with Proteobacteria and Ascomycota being the dominant bacterial and fungal phyla, respectively, and <italic>Rhodanobacter</italic> and <italic>Fusarium</italic> being the dominant bacterial and fungal genus, respectively. Redundancy analysis (RDA) indicates that the physicochemical characteristics of TOCS-based organic fertilizers had a significant impact on the composition and distribution of microbial communities in the rhizosphere soils. This study will facilitate the promotion and application of TOCS-based organic fertilizers, thereby establishing a foundation for the reuse of tea oil camellia waste resources.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>microbial community structure</kwd>
<kwd>organic fertilizer</kwd>
<kwd>rhizosphere soil</kwd>
<kwd>soil porosity</kwd>
<kwd>tea oil camellia shell</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="9"/>
<equation-count count="2"/>
<ref-count count="62"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="9461"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1" sec-type="intro">
<title>1. Introduction</title>
<p>With the expansion of the economy and population, coupled with the acceleration of modern industrialization, there has been a surge in global energy demand (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bela&#x00EF;d et al., 2023</xref>). However, due to the scarcity of non-renewable fossil fuels and the increasingly severe problem of environmental pollution, the development of renewable energy has become a mainstream trend. Biomass accounts for a significant portion of renewable energy sources, and in the near future, it will be the most widely used form of renewable energy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Popp et al., 2021</xref>). As a result, re-searchers have paid increasing attention to the development of alternative fuels and renewable energy sources. In 2019, the social capital invested 7 billion Chinese Yuan (CNY) in the camellia industry development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Zhang J. et al., 2018</xref>). Over the next few years, central financial funds will prioritize supporting the transformation of low-quality camellia forests, and technology research and development for the camellia industry will be included in China&#x2019;s national &#x201C;14th Five-Year Plan&#x201D; for science and technology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Zhu et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Hu et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>In recent decades, significant amounts of chemical fertilizers have been applied to cultivated fields in order to optimize crop yields and prevent global food shortages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Savci, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Sun et al., 2015</xref>). However, the excessive use of traditional chemical fertilizers has significantly impacted the structure of soil microbial community, resulting in nitrogen leaching and compaction, reduced soil organic matter content, and caused other serious degradation that ultimately reduces crop yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Lauber et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Lu et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Huang et al., 2022</xref>). Consequently, it is crucial to implement novel strategies such as the adoption of organic fertilizers to mitigate the adverse effects of prolonged fertilizer application. The sustainable development of agriculture hinges on appropriate fertilization methods that can enhance crop yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chen et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Oladele et al., 2019</xref>). Previous studies have demonstrated that the utilization of organic fertilizer can significantly enhance soil nutrient availability (such as alkaline N, and available P, K, Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn), enzyme activities (such as urease, invertase, catalase, and phosphatase), alter microbial community structure and mitigate soil acidification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Samuel et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Sheoran et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Anyega et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Liu et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Tea oil camellia (<italic>Camellia oleifera</italic> Abel.), a distinctive industrial tree species belonging to the genus <italic>Camellia</italic> of the Theaceae family, is extensively cultivated throughout southern and southeastern Asia. In recent years, China has harvested 2.4 million tons of tea oil camellia fruit from 4.4 million hectares of plantations, resulting in significant amounts of solid wastes such as tea oil camellia shell (TOCS) and tea oil camellia cake (TOCC) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Ye et al., 2020</xref>). However, owing to the dearth of feasible reuse techniques, TOCS and TOCC are predominantly subjected to incineration or landfill disposal. This leads to diverse types of pollution including groundwater and soil contamination along with greenhouse gas emissions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Su et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Qin et al., 2018</xref>). Some previous findings have indicated that TOCS and TOCC consist of hemicellulose, cellulose, polysaccharides, and bioactive compounds, which may possess the potential to produce ethanol, vanillin, and activated carbon, additionally, they also contain a variety of macro and trace elements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Zhang L. X. et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Zhang et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Tang et al., 2021</xref>). Thus, it is postulated that TOCS and TOCC could serve as an appealing source of natural and ecofriendly organic fertilizer derived from plant-based raw materials.</p>
<p>The soil microbial community is believed to play a crucial role in maintaining soil health and suppressing plant diseases through various biological processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Garbeva et al., 2004</xref>). Studies have demonstrated that a reduction in the diversity of soil microorganisms can lead to the emergence of soil-borne plant diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Thirup et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mazzola, 2004</xref>). There is significant interest in monitoring changes to soil microbial community following the application of bio-organic fertilizer. Despite numerous studies on changes in soil microbial community structure, there exists a dearth of research on the formulation of TOCS-based organic fertilizers and their impact on the physicochemical properties and microbial community structure of rhizosphere soil. In terms of fertilization, previous studies have demonstrated that the conversion of TOCS into organic fertilizer through fermentation not only enhances soil nutrition but also addresses issues arising from chemical fertilizer usage and promotes the recycling of renewable resources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Hu et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Yang et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Based on this, the objective of this study was to prepare TOCS-based organic fertilizers and investigate their impact on the soil physicochemical property and microbial community structure in the rhizosphere soil as well as both average yield and fruiting rate per plant at maturity and nutrient contents in tea oil camellia leaves.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>2. Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>2.1. Materials collection</title>
<p>Tea oil camellia shell and TOCC were collected from Ceheng County (with an altitude of 664 m, north latitude of 24&#x00B0;59&#x2032;55.05&#x2032;, and east longitude of 105&#x00B0;47&#x2032;14.05&#x2033;), Qianxinan Prefecture, Guizhou Province, China. Decomposition agents were purchased from South China State Farming Agricultural Technology Development Co. Ltd. (Chengdu, China). Microbial agents were purchased from Shanghai Jiabosen Bioengineering Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Commercial compound fertilizer [CF; total nitrogen (TN) content 20%, total phosphorus (TP) content 10%, and total potassium (TK) content 10%] was purchased from Guizhou Xiyang Industrial Co., LTD (Guiyang, China).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>2.2. Preparation of pre-fermented TOCC</title>
<p>The TOCC underwent a 10-day pre-fermentation process with 3% starter culture and 60% water at 28&#x00B0;C. Upon reaching full mycelial growth, the preparation of pre-fermented TOCC (PTOCC) was subsequently dried for future use.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>2.3. Preparation of TOCS-based organic fertilizers</title>
<p>In this study, four TOCS-based organic fertilizers (labeled as BOF, BOFvo, OFcsc, and OFpd) were prepared used the reported methods with some modifications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Franke-Whittle et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Lu et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chung et al., 2023</xref>). Composting aerobic fermentation experiments were conducted from June to August 2021 at the Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Nanming District, Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, China. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, this study has implemented four treatments, each of which was replicated three times: (1) BOF: 80% of TOCS (partical size &#x2264;5 mm) + 15% of PTOCC (partical size &#x2264;2 mm) + 2.9% of urea (to adjust the initial compost C/N ratio to 32/1) + 0.1% of KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> + 2% of decomposition agent; (2) BOFvo: 80% of TOCS (partical size &#x2264;5 mm) + 15% of PTOCC (partical size &#x2264; 2 mm) + 2.9% of urea + 0.1% of KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> + 2% of decomposition agent, with an addition of 3% microbial agent after complete fermentation of BOF; (3) OFcsc: 80% of TOCS (partical size &#x2264;5 mm) + 15% of TOCC (partical size &#x2264;2 mm) + 2.9% of urea + 0.1% of KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> + 2% of decomposition agent; (4) OFpd: 80% of TOCS (partical size &#x2264;5 mm) + 15% of poultry dung (instead of pre-fermented TOCC to explore the effects of physicochemical properties and microbial communities on organic fertilizers by adding animal manure) + 2.9% of urea + 0.1% of KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> + 2% of decomposition agent. All the raw materials of each treatment were thoroughly mixed and then 50% water was added for moisture control. Subsequently, a plastic film was applied to the surface of each treatment to prevent moisture from evaporating during compost fermentation. The DTSW-2-A digital electronic thermometer (Taian Detu Automation Instrument Co., Ltd., Taian, China) was utilized to measure the temperature of each treatment. Once the temperature exceeded 55&#x00B0;C, the compost piles were turned weekly and left for 1 month until they were fully decomposed.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>The composition of raw materials in TOCS-based organic fertilizers.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Treatments</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="8" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Raw materials contents (%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">TOCS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">TOCC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">PTOCC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Poultry dung</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Urea</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Decomposition agent</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Microbial agent</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BOF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BOFvo</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">OFcsc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">OFpd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="t1fna"><p><sup>a</sup>Incorporation of 3% microbial agents post-complete fermentation of BOF.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS4">
<title>2.4. Physicochemical property analysis of TOCS-based organic fertilizers</title>
<p>After fully decomposition, the physicochemical properties of BOF, BOFvo, OFcsc, and OFpd were analyzed using previously established methods with some modifications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chu and Grogan, 2010</xref>). Briefly, pH values were measured using a PH3110 pH meter (WTW Xylem Inc., Munich, Germany) at a ratio of 1:10 [weight (g)/volume (ml)] for each TOCS-based organic fertilizer compared to distilled water. Total organic matter (TOM) content was determined through the wet oxidation method with some modifications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Nieuwenhuize et al., 1994</xref>). The contents of TN, TP, and TK were quantified using the Agricultural Industry Standard of the People&#x2019;s Republic of China (Organic Fertilizer, NY/T 525-2021). The colony-forming units (CFUs) were quantified using a biological microscope (Shanghai Optical Instrument Factory Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Sieuwerts et al., 2008</xref>). The unfermented TOCS was used as a negative control (CK). Each treatment was repeated three times.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS5">
<title>2.5. Soil sample collection and physicochemical properties analysis</title>
<p>The field trials of four TOCS-based organic fertilizers were conducted in a tea oil camellia forest located in Ceheng County (mean annual precipitation of 1,340.7 mm/a, mean temperature of 19.2&#x00B0;C), Qianxinan Prefecture, Guizhou Province, China. As illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>, in January 2022, a total of 2 kg of TOCC-based organic fertilizers or CF were applied to each tea oil camellia tree by mixing them with the topsoil and backfill at a depth of 10&#x2013;20 cm. The experimental period lasted from January to July 2022, during which, 3 parallel soil samples (6 points per replicate) were collected in July 2022 at a depth of 0&#x2013;20 cm surrounding the lateral roots of each tea oil camellia tree at the fertilization position (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). The soil samples were promptly homogenized, mixed, and preserved in an on-site refrigerator before being expeditiously transported to our laboratory for subsequent analysis. CF was used as a positive control, whereas no application of different TOCS-based organic fertilizers or CF was used as a negative control (CK).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Field trials design as well as soil and leaf samples collection model.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1231978-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The rhizosphere soil porosities of tea oil camellia treated with different TOCC-based organic fertilizers or CF were measured using the micromeritics ASAP 2460 version 3.01 (Micromeritics Instrument Ltd., GA, USA). To gain a comprehensive understanding of soil porosity size distribution, the soil porosity diameters were categorized into five groups: crytopores (0.007&#x2013;0.1 &#x03BC;m), ultramicropores (0.1&#x2013;5 &#x03BC;m), micropores (5&#x2013;30 &#x03BC;m), mesopores (30&#x2013;75 &#x03BC;m), and macropores (&#x003E;75 &#x03BC;m) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cameron and Buchan, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lu et al., 2014</xref>). pH values were measured using a PH3110 pH meter (WTW Xylem Inc., Munich, Germany) at a ratio of 1:10 [weight (g)/volume (ml)] for each soil samples compared to distilled water. TOM content was determined through the wet oxidation method with some modifications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Nieuwenhuize et al., 1994</xref>). The contents of TN, available nitrogen (AN), TP, available phosphorus (AP), TK, and available potassium (AK) were quantified using the Forestry Industry Standard of the People&#x2019;s Republic of China (LY/T1228-2015, LY/T1232-2015, and LY/T1234-2015). Each treatment was repeated for three times.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS6">
<title>2.6. Leaf sample collection and nutrient contents analysis</title>
<p>In July 2022, 3 parallel tea oil camellia leaf samples (6 points per replicate) were collected pre- and post-fertilization for each treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). The leaf samples were promptly homogenized, mixed, and stored in an on-site refrigerator before being expeditiously transported to our laboratory for analysis of their physicochemical properties. After that, the TN, TP, and TK contents of tea oil camellia leaves were quantified according to the assessment standard in LY/T 1271-1999. Each treatment was repeated for three times.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS7">
<title>2.7. Average yield and fruiting rate analysis</title>
<p>In this study, the effects of different TOCS-based organic fertilizers on fruit yields of tea oil camellia were investigated by determining the average yield and fruiting rate of individual plants at the mature stage. Subsequently, 10 tea oil camellia trees treated with different TOCC-based organic fertilizers or CF were selected for each treatment and the average yield and fruiting rate of each individual plant were determined at the mature stage using the following formulas, where m is the weight of each camellia fresh fruits, n is the number of camellia flowers of each individual plant, and N is the number of camellia fresh fruits of each individual plant.</p>
<disp-formula id="S2.Ex1">
<mml:math id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mpadded width="+3.3pt">
<mml:mtext>Average</mml:mtext>
</mml:mpadded>
<mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo>
<mml:mpadded width="+5pt">
<mml:mtext>yield</mml:mtext>
</mml:mpadded>
<mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>kg</mml:mi>
<mml:mo rspace="5.8pt" stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo rspace="5.8pt">=</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mpadded width="+3.3pt">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>&#x22EF;m</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>10</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>10</mml:mn>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mpadded>
<mml:mo rspace="5.8pt">&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="S2.Ex2">
<mml:math id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mpadded width="+5pt">
<mml:mi>Fruiting</mml:mi>
</mml:mpadded>
<mml:mpadded width="+5pt">
<mml:mi>rate</mml:mi>
</mml:mpadded>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
<mml:mo rspace="5.8pt" stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo rspace="5.8pt">=</mml:mo>
<mml:mpadded width="+3.3pt">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>&#x22EF;N</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>10</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>&#x22EF;n</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>10</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mpadded>
<mml:mo rspace="5.8pt">&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS8">
<title>2.8. High-throughput sequencing and data analysis</title>
<p>The genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted from the rhizosphere soil samples (approximately 2.0 g per sample) treated with BOF, BOFvo, OFcsc, and OFpd using a TGuide S96 Magnetic Soil and Stool DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. The DNA quality was assessed by running it on 1% agarose gels prior to its utilization as a template for PCR amplification targeting specific sequencing regions with the corresponding bacterial (341F: 5&#x2032;-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3&#x2032; and 806R: 5&#x2032;-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3&#x2032;) and fungal (ITS2F: 5&#x2032;-GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC-3&#x2032; and ITS2R: 5&#x2032;-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3&#x2032;) primers. The PCR products obtained were subjected to sequencing using Illumina HiSeq&#x2122; 2000 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The resulting raw reads underwent filtration with Trimmomatic v0.33 software, followed by primer sequence identification and removal using Cutadapt 1.9.1 software, resulting in clean reads devoid of primer sequences. Subsequently, Usearch v10 software was employed for overlap stitching of the clean reads, which were then filtered based on length range specific to different regions. Finally, the dada2 method implemented in QIIME2 2020.6 software was employed to eliminate the denoised and chimera sequences, resulting in the acquisition of non-chimeric reads.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS9">
<title>2.9. Statistical analyses</title>
<p>The Vegan package in R language was utilized to analyze the relative abundance of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and characterize soil microorganism diversity by calculating Shannon, ACE, and Chao1 indices. Meanwhile, principal component analysis (PCA) and heatmaps were utilized via the MetaboAnalyst website<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote1">1</xref></sup> to assess dissimilarities among different TOCS-based organic fertilizers treatments. Redundancy analysis (RDA) was employed in CANOCO5.<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote2">2</xref></sup> In addition, the experimental data mentioned in this article were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics software version 20 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) with ANOVA followed by Duncan&#x2019;s LSD test (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3" sec-type="results">
<title>3. Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>3.1. Physicochemical properties of different TOCS-based organic fertilizers</title>
<p>The physicochemical property results of different TOCS-based organic fertilizers are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. Intriguingly, compared to the CK group (unfermented TOCS), BOFvo could significantly increase the contents of TOM, TN, TP, and TK by 115.5, 13,492.6, 3,954.8, and 408.0%, respectively, indicating that incorporating a 3% microbial agent after complete fermentation potential can improve the quality of TOCS-based organic fertilizer.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Physicochemical properties of different TOCS-based organic fertilizers.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Parameters</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">CK (unfermented TOCS)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">BOF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">BOFvo</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">OFcsc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">OFpd</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.02 &#x00B1; 0.02b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.20 &#x00B1; 0.06b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.96 &#x00B1; 0.08b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.34 &#x00B1; 0.09a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.06 &#x00B1; 0.07b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TOM (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.25 &#x00B1; 2.07d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.93 &#x00B1; 1.45b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.49 &#x00B1; 0.81a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33.83 &#x00B1; 1.60d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60.92 &#x00B1; 0.29c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TN (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.027 &#x00B1; 0.008c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.06 &#x00B1; 0.08a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.67 &#x00B1; 0.06b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.10 &#x00B1; 0.06a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.73 &#x00B1; 0.09b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TP (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.073 &#x00B1; 0.004d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.98 &#x00B1; 0.16a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.96 &#x00B1; 0.10c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.95 &#x00B1; 0.08a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.61 &#x00B1; 0.07b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TK (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.89 &#x00B1; 0.011c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.07 &#x00B1; 0.34b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.68 &#x00B1; 0.04a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.25 &#x00B1; 0.37b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.13 &#x00B1; 0.12b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CFU (million/g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00 &#x00B1; 0.00d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.00 &#x00B1; 0.04b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.17 &#x00B1; 0.15a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.01c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.14 &#x00B1; 0.02c</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Different lowercase letters accompanying the values indicate statistically significant variations (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) in physicochemical properties among different TOCS-based organic fertilizers.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>3.2. Physicochemical properties analysis of rhizosphere soils</title>
<p>The impact of different TOCS-based organic fertilizers on the pore characteristics of the rhizosphere soils is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>. Results indicate that, compared to the CK and CF groups, the addition of TOCS-based organic fertilizers did not significantly affect the average pore diameter of rhizosphere soils. However, when compared to the CK and CF groups, the addition of TOCS-based organic fertilizers, particularly with BOFvo treatment, significantly increased both total pore volume and BET surface area of the rhizosphere soils by 41.00, 14.29 and 39.14, 33.33%, respectively.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>Pore characteristics of rhizosphere soils application of different TOCS-based organic fertilizers.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Parameters</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">CF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">BOF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">BOFvo</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">OFcsc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">OFpd</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BET surface area (m<sup>2</sup>/g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.22 &#x00B1; 1.23b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.45 &#x00B1; 2.40b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.88 &#x00B1; 1.08a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.28 &#x00B1; 0.20a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.75 &#x00B1; 2.86a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.14 &#x00B1; 0.95b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total pore volume (cm<sup>3</sup>/g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.001c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.003d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.002b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08 &#x00B1; 0.002a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.001b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.001e</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Average pore diameter (&#x03BC;m)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.02 &#x00B1; 0.60a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.02 &#x00B1; 0.73a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.83 &#x00B1; 0.50a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.30 &#x00B1; 0.61a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.84 &#x00B1; 0.21a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.21 &#x00B1; 0.49a</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Different lowercase letters accompanying the values indicate statistically significant variations (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) in physicochemical properties of rhizosphere soils among different TOCS-based organic fertilizers.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref> demonstrates that, compared to the CK and CF groups, the addition of TOCS-based organic fertilizers enhances the adsorption capacity of rhizosphere soils under identical relative pressure, with BOFvo exhibiting the highest increase followed by BOF, OFpd, and OFcsc. Meanwhile, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref> reveals that, compared to the CK and CF groups, BOFvo significantly improves pore size distribution in the rhizosphere soils. Additionally, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref> illustrates that the soil pore size distribution was primarily within the range of 0.1&#x2013;30 &#x03BC;m, with ultramicropores, micropores, mesopores, and macropores accounting for average pore volume proportions of 48.66, 48.24, 2.29, and 0.63%, respectively. Compared to the CK and CF groups, the addition of TOCS-based organic fertilizers, particularly with BOFvo treatment, BOFvo significantly increased the average pore volume proportions of ultramicropores, microporosity, and mesoporosity in the rhizosphere soils. These findings indicate that the application of BOFvo has a more significant impact on the pore characteristics of the rhizosphere soils.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Isothermal adsorption curve, <bold>(B)</bold> pore size distribution, and <bold>(C)</bold> pore volume distribution.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1231978-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>As presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>, the application of TOCS-based organic fertilizers did not result in a significant alteration of soil pH values. However, compared to the CK group, the application of BOFvo led to a substantial increase in TOM, TN, AN, TP, AP, TK, and AK contents of the rhizosphere soils by 20.7, 187.6, 150.1, 264.7, 67.6, 38.8, and 201.5%, respectively. Notably, compared to CF, there was a remarkable enhancement in TOM, TN, AN, TP, TK, and AK contents of the rhizosphere soils by 35.5, 54.2, 22.1, 158.3, 39.6, and 53.8%, respectively. The results suggest that the utilization of BOFvo has a more pronounced influence on the physicochemical characteristics of the rhizosphere soils.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption><p>Physicochemical properties of the rhizosphere soils application of different TOCS-based organic fertilizers.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Parameters</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">CF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">BOF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">BOFvo</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">OFcsc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">OFpd</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.63 &#x00B1; 0.16a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.57 &#x00B1; 0.05a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.29 &#x00B1; 0.11ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.82 &#x00B1; 0.54a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.36 &#x00B1; 0.17a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.29 &#x00B1; 0.11ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TOM (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35.67 &#x00B1; 3.47b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.78 &#x00B1; 3.68b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.97 &#x00B1; 3.14a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.06 &#x00B1; 2.88a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35.31 &#x00B1; 4.43b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33.67 &#x00B1; 1.44b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TN (g/kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.89 &#x00B1; 0.18d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.66 &#x00B1; 0.08c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.04 &#x00B1; 0.03b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.56 &#x00B1; 0.11a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.11 &#x00B1; 0.11b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.04 &#x00B1; 0.03b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AN (mg/kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90.39 &#x00B1; 13.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">185.20 &#x00B1; 5.01ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">177.77 &#x00B1; 7.71b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">226.05 &#x00B1; 47.62a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">182.34 &#x00B1; 22.81ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">151.10 &#x00B1; 18.73b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TP (g/kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.34 &#x00B1; 0.13c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.48 &#x00B1; 0.04c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.87 &#x00B1; 0.08b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.24 &#x00B1; 0.17a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.87 &#x00B1; 0.11b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.83 &#x00B1; 0.11b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AP (mg/kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.78 &#x00B1; 0.47c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.83 &#x00B1; 0.92a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.82 &#x00B1; 1.01b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.66 &#x00B1; 0.71b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.64 &#x00B1; 0.32bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.15 &#x00B1; 0.61d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TK (g/kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.19 &#x00B1; 1.27b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.07 &#x00B1; 1.23b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.04 &#x00B1; 0.71a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.02 &#x00B1; 1.15a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.08 &#x00B1; 2.19a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.04 &#x00B1; 0.71a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AK (mg/kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.27 &#x00B1; 24.25c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">163.20 &#x00B1; 32.31b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">284.96 &#x00B1; 11.23a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">251.06 &#x00B1; 36.09a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">204.80 &#x00B1; 15.55b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.96 &#x00B1; 7.23c</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Different lowercase letters accompanying the values indicate statistically significant variations (<italic>p</italic> &#x00B1; 0.05) in physicochemical properties of the rhizosphere soils among different TOCS-based organic fertilizers.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>3.3. Nutrient contents analysis of tea oil camellia leaves</title>
<p>As depicted in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>, the application of TOCS-based organic fertilizers had a significant impact on the TN, TP, and TK contents of tea oil camellia leaves compared to CK and CF groups. Significantly, compared to CF, the use of BOFvo resulted in a 40.8 and 186.9% increase in TN and TP contents, respectively, indicating its potential for promoting tea oil camellia growth.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption><p>Nutrient contents analysis of tea oil camellia leaves pre- and post-fertilization under different TOCS-based organic fertilizers treatment.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Parameters</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">CF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">BOF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">BOFvo</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">OFcsc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">OFpd</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TN (g/kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.80 &#x00B1; 1.65b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.52 &#x00B1; 0.46b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.32 &#x00B1; 1.85a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.59 &#x00B1; 1.15a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.14 &#x00B1; 1.40a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.29 &#x00B1; 0.29a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TP (g/kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.70 &#x00B1; 0.57d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.99 &#x00B1; 0.12d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.15 &#x00B1; 0.08b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.84 &#x00B1; 0.16a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.51 &#x00B1; 0.03c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.11 &#x00B1; 0.07d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TK (g/kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.82 &#x00B1; 0.20c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.54 &#x00B1; 2.24b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.06 &#x00B1; 0.51a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.49 &#x00B1; 0.27b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.54 &#x00B1; 0.83a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.14 &#x00B1; 0.24c</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) in nutrient contents of the tea oil camellia leaves among different TOCS-based organic fertilizer treatments.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>3.4. Effect on fruit yields of tea oil camellia</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref>, compared to CK and CF groups, the application of TOCS-based organic fertilizers had a significant impact on the average yield and fruiting rate of individual plant at the mature stage. Significantly, in comparison to CK and CF group, BOFvo treatment resulted in a significant increase of 115.0, 35.4 and 252.8, 128.7% in average yield and fruiting rate, respectively, indicating its potential for enhancing the fruit yields of tea oil camellia.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T6">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption><p>The average yield and fruiting rate of individual plant at the mature stage.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Treatments</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Average yield (kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Fruiting rate (%)</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.42 &#x00B1; 1.08c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.04 &#x00B1; 3.78c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.33 &#x00B1; 0.35b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.09 &#x00B1; 5.26b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BOF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.59 &#x00B1; 1.14ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.36 &#x00B1; 0.64ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BOFvo</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.01 &#x00B1; 1.41a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.69 &#x00B1; 2.32a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">OFcsc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.73 &#x00B1; 0.37b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.33 &#x00B1; 5.23b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">OFpd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.37 &#x00B1; 0.66b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.02 &#x00B1; 9.10c</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Different lowercase letters accompanying the values indicate statistically significant variations (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) in average yield and fruiting rate of individual plant at the mature stage among different TOCS-based organic fertilizers treatment.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS5">
<title>3.5. Sequences data</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">Table 7</xref>, with respect to the sequencing data of bacteria in the rhizosphere soils, after cleaning and quality checking, 79,788, 79,732, 79,991, 79,772, and 79,794 clean reads were generated from CK, BOF, BOFvo, OFcsc, and OFpd treatment, respectively. Analyses of the OTUs revealed that 64,418, 58,466, 58,661, 59,311, and 63,486 OTUs were shared by CK, BOF, BOFvo, OFcsc, and OFpd treatment, respectively. In the meantime, CK, BOF, BOFvo, OFcsc, and OFpd treatments yielded 79,625, 79,828, 74,395, 60,150, and 79,576 clean reads as well as 75,665, 74,843, 64,802, 48,146, and 73,073 OTUs. It is noteworthy that the coverage exceeded over than 99.0%, indicating satisfactory numbers of analyzed OTUs with most bacteria and fungi present in soil samples being detected.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T7">
<label>TABLE 7</label>
<caption><p>Overview of sequencing data of bacteria and fungi in the rhizosphere soils under different TOCS-based organic fertilizer treatment.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Treatment</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="4" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Bacteria</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="4" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Fungi</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Raw reads</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Clean reads</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">OTUs</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Coverage (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Raw reads</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Clean reads</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">OTUs</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Coverage (%)</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80,016</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79,788</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64,418</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79,900</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79,625</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75,665</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99.98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BOF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79,908</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79,732</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58,466</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80,179</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79,828</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74,843</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99.99</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BOFvo</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80,168</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79,991</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58,661</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74,690</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74,395</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64,802</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99.98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">OFcsc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79,974</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79,772</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59,311</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60,229</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60,150</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48,146</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99.99</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">OFpd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79,956</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79,794</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63,486</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79,888</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79,576</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73,073</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99.98</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS6">
<title>3.6. Effects on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere soils</title>
<p>The alpha-diversity of bacterial and fungal communities in the rhizosphere soils was assessed by computing the ACE, Chao1, and Shannon indices. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T8">Table 8</xref> reveals that for bacteria, the Chao1, ACE, and Shannon indices were significantly higher in BOFvo treated soils (exhibiting an increase of 85.1, 78.0, and 12.0%) compared to CK group. For fungi, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T8">Table 8</xref> also shows that, compared with CK group, the Chao1 and ACE indices in BOFvo treatment (increased by 13.1, and 11.1%, respectively) were significantly increased. The results indicate that the incorporation of TOCS-based organic fertilizers, particularly BOFvo, significantly enhances the microbial diversity in the rhizosphere soils.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T8">
<label>TABLE 8</label>
<caption><p>The alpha-diversity indices of bacteria and fungi in the rhizosphere soils under different TOCS-based organic fertilizer treatment.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Treatment</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Bacteria</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Fungi</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Chao1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">ACE</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Shannon</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Chao1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">ACE</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Shannon</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">998.30 &#x00B1; 0.07d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">995.90 &#x00B1; 7.49d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.3 &#x00B1; 0.15b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">557.8 &#x00B1; 8.64c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">568.5 &#x00B1; 5.48b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.3 &#x00B1; 0.99b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BOF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,632.80 &#x00B1; 10.77b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,456.20 &#x00B1; 3.58c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.4 &#x00B1; 0.25a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">627.4 &#x00B1; 6.84b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">628.0 &#x00B1; 6.65a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.4 &#x00B1; 0.65a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BOFvo</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,847.70 &#x00B1; 9.64a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,773.10 &#x00B1; 10.95a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.3 &#x00B1; 0.90a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">631.0 &#x00B1; 3.36b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">631.6 &#x00B1; 3.14a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.1 &#x00B1; 0.58b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">OFcsc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,673.10 &#x00B1; 8.19b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,677.30 &#x00B1; 9.12b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.3 &#x00B1; 0.34a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">558.9 &#x00B1; 8.80c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">630.9 &#x00B1; 9.84a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.2 &#x00B1; 0.75b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">OFpd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,303.00 &#x00B1; 4.23c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,009.50 &#x00B1; 2.77d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.6 &#x00B1; 1.83b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">698.5 &#x00B1; 6.16a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">566.1 &#x00B1; 6.87b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.4 &#x00B1; 0.52b</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Different lowercase letters accompanying the values indicate that diversity and richness indices of bacteria and fungi with significant difference at <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05 among different TOCS-based organic fertilizers.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS7">
<title>3.7. PCA of microbial communities in the rhizosphere soils</title>
<p>To explore the diversity of microbial communities in the rhizosphere soils treated with different TOCS-based organic fertilizers, we conducted PCA at the genus level to evaluate bacterial and fungal diversity. The PCA results for bacterial diversity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>) shows that the five rhizosphere soil samples were distributed across different quadrants based on PC1 accounting for 42.6% and PC2 accounting for 33.1%, indicating large differences in the soil bacterial communities with different TOCS-based organic fertilizers treatments. The bacterial community in the rhizosphere soil treated with BOFvo differed significantly from those treated with CK, BOF, OFpd, and OFcsc. Meanwhile, the results of PCA analysis on fungal diversity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>) reveals that the five rhizosphere soil samples were distributed in different quadrants based on PC1 accounting for 42.4% and PC2 accounting for 28.9%, indicating significant differences in the soil fungal community among various TOCS-based organic fertilizer treatments. Notably, compared to CK, BOF, BOFvo, and OFpd treatments, OFcsc treatment significant differences were observed at the genus level of fungal community in rhizosphere soil. In summary, the application of TOCS-based organic fertilizers exerted a significant influence on the microbial communities in the rhizosphere soil.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Principal component analysis of microbial communities at genus level in the rhizosphere soil. <bold>(A)</bold> PCA of bacterial community at genus level. <bold>(B)</bold> PCA of fungal community at genus level.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1231978-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS8">
<title>3.8. Effects on the microbial relative abundances and community structure in the rhizosphere soils</title>
<p>The impact of TOCS-based organic fertilizers on the relative abundance of bacterial and fungal phyla in the rhizosphere soils was assessed and the results were depicted in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Tables 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS2">2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>. According to the sequencing detected, a total of 30 bacteria (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>) and 15 fungi phyla (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS2">Supplementary Table 2</xref>) were detected and classification in the all rhizosphere soils samples. As shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>, Proteobacteria was identified as the dominant bacterial phyla present in the rhizosphere soils, followed by Acidobacteriota and Actinobacteriota. According to the taxonomic analysis, after BOF treatment, the relative abundances of Verrucomicrobiota, Nitrospirota, Myxococcota, Gemmatimonadota, Cyanobacteria, Chloroflexi, Bacteroidota, and Acidobacteriota in the rhizosphere soils significantly increased. After BOFvo treatment, the relative abundances of Verrucomicrobiota, Planctomycetota, Nitrospirota, Myxococcota, Methylomirabilota, Gemmatimonadota, and Bacteroidota in the rhizosphere soils significantly increased. Meanwhile, OFcsc treatment could significantly increase the relative abundances of Verrucomicrobiota, Proteobacteria, Nitrospirota, Myxococcota, Methylomirabilota, Chloroflexi, Bacteroidota, and Acidobacteriota in the rhizosphere soils. In addition, OFpd treatment significantly increased the relative abundances of Proteobacteria, Patescibacteria, Methylomirabilota, Gemmatimonadota, Cyanobacteria, and Actinobacteriota in the rhizosphere soils. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS2">Supplementary Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref> illustrates that the dominant fungal phylum was Ascomycota in the rhizosphere soils, followed by Basidiomycota, its relative abundance decreased after the addition of BOF, BOFvo, and OFcsc, while increased after the addition of OFpd. The relative abundances of Basidiomycota, Glomeromycota, and Mortierellomycota significantly increased with the BOF and BOFvo treatments. The OFcsc treatment significantly increased the abundances of Basidiomycota and Zoopagomycota, but decreased the abundances of Basidiomycota, Glomeromycota, and Kickxellomycota in the OFpd treatment.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Microbial relative abundances at the phylum level in the rhizosphere soils treated by different TOCS-based organic fertilizers. <bold>(A)</bold> Relative abundances of the bacterial at the phylum level. <bold>(B)</bold> Relative abundances of the fungal at the phylum levels. Different lowercase letters indicate that the relative abundances of fungal and bacteria phylum in the rhizosphere soils with significant difference at <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05 among different TOCS-based organic fertilizers treatment.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1231978-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The correlation between TOCS-based organic fertilizers and the structure of microbial communities was analyzed, with the findings presented in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS3">Supplementary Tables 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS4">4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>. According to the sequencing detected, a total of 466 bacteria (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS3">Supplementary Table 3</xref>) and 532 fungi genera (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS4">Supplementary Table 4</xref>) were detected and classification in all rhizosphere soils samples. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS3">Supplementary Table 3</xref> also illustrates that the most dominant bacterial genus was <italic>Rhodanobacter</italic>, followed by <italic>Acidothermus</italic>, <italic>Sphingomona</italic>s, <italic>Acidibacter</italic>, <italic>Bryobacter</italic>, <italic>Burkholderia_Caballeronia_Paraburkholderia</italic>, and <italic>Candidatus Solibacter</italic>. Meanwhile, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS4">Supplementary Table 4</xref> illustrates that the dominant fungal genus was <italic>Fusarium</italic>, followed by <italic>Leptobacillium</italic>, <italic>Trichoderma</italic>, <italic>Penicillium</italic>, <italic>Saitozyma</italic>, and <italic>Arthrocladium</italic>. As shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS3">Supplementary Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref>, compared to CK group, the abundance of bacterial genera significantly increased the abundance of <italic>Candidatus Solibacter</italic>, <italic>Candidimonas</italic>, <italic>Acidothermus</italic>, <italic>Acidipila Silvibacterium</italic>, <italic>Gemmatimonas</italic>, <italic>Ellin 6067</italic>, <italic>Acidibacter</italic>, and <italic>Chujaibacter</italic> with the BOFvo treatment; <italic>Gemmatimonas</italic>, <italic>Bryobacter</italic>, <italic>Jatrophihabitans</italic>, <italic>Sphingomonas</italic>, <italic>Chujaibacter</italic>, and <italic>Granulicella</italic> with the OFpd treatment; <italic>Candidatus Solibacter</italic>, <italic>Haliangium</italic>, <italic>RB41</italic>, <italic>Ellin 6067</italic>, <italic>Bryobacter</italic>, and <italic>Burkholderia Caballeronia Paraburkholderia</italic> with the BOF treatment; and <italic>Devosia</italic>, <italic>Acidibacter</italic>, <italic>Phenylobacterium</italic>, and <italic>FCPS473</italic> with the OFcsc treatment. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS4">Supplementary Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref> shows that the abundance of fungal genera significantly increased the abundance of <italic>Fusarium</italic>, <italic>Mortierella</italic>, <italic>Saitozyma</italic>, <italic>Staphylotrichum</italic>, and <italic>Rhizophagus</italic> with the BOFvo treatment; <italic>Clitopilus</italic>, <italic>Metarhizium</italic>, <italic>Mortierella</italic>, <italic>Preussia</italic>, <italic>Purpureocillium</italic>, <italic>Cladosporium</italic>, and <italic>Talaromyces</italic> with the BOF treatment; <italic>Condenascus</italic>, <italic>Disculoides, Galerella</italic>, and <italic>Trichoderma</italic> with the OFcsc treatment; and <italic>Arthrocladium</italic>, <italic>Arxotrichum, Penicillium</italic>, and <italic>Talaromyces</italic> in OFpd treatments.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>The heatmap of bacterial and fungal genus abundances in the rhizosphere soils treated by different TOCS-based organic fertilizers. <bold>(A)</bold> Spearman&#x2019;s correlations between the bacterial genera abundances in the rhizosphere soils and different TOCS-based organic fertilizers. <bold>(B)</bold> Spearman&#x2019;s correlations between the fungal genera abundances in the rhizosphere soils and different TOCS-based organic fertilizers.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1231978-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS9">
<title>3.9. Relationship between the physicochemical properties of TOCS-based organic fertilizers and microbial communities of the rhizosphere soils</title>
<p>Redundancy analysis was employed to evaluate the associations between the physicochemical properties of different TOCS-based organic fertilizers and microbial communities (at a phylum level) of the rhizosphere soils. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T9">Table 9</xref> shows that the pore volume (contribution rate 36.6%) and TP (contribution rate 36.4%) had the most significant effect on the bacterial community structure, followed by AP, pH, ultramicropore, surface, and TN. Among of them, pore volume, TP, AP, pH, ultramicropore, and surface significantly affected the bacterial community of the rhizosphere soils. Meanwhile, pore volume, TP, AP, pH, and surface significantly affected the fungal community, with the greatest effect by the surface (contribution rate 72.2%), followed by TK, ultramicropore, AP, TP, and pH, which shows that soil pore structure was the main factor affecting the fungal community of the rhizosphere soils.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T9">
<label>TABLE 9</label>
<caption><p>Redundancy analysis results showing the contribution and statistical significance.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Parameters</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Bacterial</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Fungal</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Contribution rate (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Pseudo-F</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><italic>p</italic>-Value</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Contribution rate (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Pseudo-F</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><italic>p</italic>-Value</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pore volume</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.014</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.028</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.024</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.006</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ultramicropore</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.022</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.060</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Surface</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.046</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.110</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.320</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.146</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.064</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.434</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.064</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Macropore</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.516</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.358</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Micropore</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.664</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.144</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TOM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.702</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Diameter</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.624</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.266</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mesopore</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></table-wrap>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>, the RDA PC1 and PC2 accounted for 92.44% (PC1 = 83.59% and PC2 = 8.85%) and 95.19% (PC1 = 79.30%, PC2 = 15.89%) of the bacteria and fungi total variation, respectively. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6A, B</xref> demonstrate that the physicochemical properties of the rhizosphere soil, including TP, TN, TA, AN, TOM, AK, pore volume, ultramicropore, micropore diameter, and mesopore, have a positive impact on the abundance of bacterial community, such as Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota, Verrucomicrobiota, Myxococcota, and Chloroflexi, conversely, macropore had a positive impact on the abundance of Proteobacteria, Acidobacteriota, and Gemmatimonadota. Meanwhile, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6C, D</xref> show that Basidiomycota, Rozellomycota, Glomeromycota, Kickxellomycota, and Mortierellomycota were positively influenced by TK, TP, TN, AK, AN, AP, pH, TOM, ultramicropore, micropore, pore volume, and surface of the rhizosphere soil, conversely, Chytridiomycota and Ascomycota were primarily affected by the macropore of the rhizosphere soil. Therefore, the RDA results reveal that the physicochemical characteristics of TOCS-based organic fertilizers had a significant impact on the composition and distribution of microbial communities in the rhizosphere soils.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A,B)</bold> Redundancy analysis between the physicochemical properties of TOCS-based organic fertilizers and bacterial community of the rhizosphere soils. <bold>(C,D)</bold> RDA between the physicochemical properties of TOCS-based organic fertilizers and fungal community of the rhizosphere soils.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1231978-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>4. Discussion</title>
<p>Soil microorganisms play a crucial role in promoting the restoration of soil ecosystems. However, current research has mainly focused on changes in microbial community structure, with little attention given to soil physicochemical properties and their relationship with microbial communities. In this study, we prepared four types of TOCS-based organic fertilizers and evaluated their effects on the physicochemical property and microbial community structure of the rhizosphere soils. The by-product of tea oil camellia processing, known as TOCS, is typically discarded or incinerated due to the lack of feasible reuse techniques. As a result, TOCS is primarily disposed of through incineration or landfill methods, leading to various forms of pollution such as groundwater and soil contamination, as well as greenhouse gas emissions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Su et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Qin et al., 2018</xref>). The utilization of TOCS not only enhances its own value but also addresses the issue of environmental pollution caused by it. As a valuable biomass resource, TOCS contains tea saponin, polysaccharides, tannins, as well as protein, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. These components can be composted into an effective organic fertilizer to enhance crop yield and quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Yang et al., 2015</xref>). As a rich waste biomass resource, TOCS contains not only tea saponin, polysaccharide, tannin, but also protein, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and so on, which can be composted into an efficient organic fertilizer to improve crop yield and quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Samuel et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Sheoran et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Anyega et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Liu et al., 2021</xref>). Application of bio-organic fertilizers in farmland can enhance the physical and chemical properties, regulate the composition of soil microbial community, and promote healthy and vigorous crop growth by increasing the richness and uniformity of beneficial microbial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Syed et al., 2021</xref>). In order to mitigate pollution, conserve non-renewable energy resources, and foster ecological civilization, it is imperative to fully leverage TOCS and generate greater value.</p>
<p>Characterizing and quantifying changes in soil pore structure, a critical indicator for understanding the impact of fertilization on soil quality, is essential to determining the effects of organic fertilizers on soil structure and hydraulic properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Lu et al., 2019</xref>). Soil porosity facilitates a range of functions and processes, including nutrient transportation, water and gas storage, as well as microbial activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Kong et al., 2016</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Fan et al. (2020)</xref> discovered that the application of biochar in a wheat-rice rotation soil resulted in decreased porosity, but improved macropores and pore connectivity. Additionally, the geometry of soil pores has been demonstrated to be linked to the diversity and activity of microbial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bhattacharyya et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Yang et al., 2022</xref>). Our findings suggest that the utilization of TOCS-based organic fertilizers can enhance the BET surface area and total pore volume of the rhizosphere soils, which is in line with the outcomes reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Singh et al.&#x2019;s (2021)</xref> investigation, indicating that soil porosity was significantly improved by applying cattle manure. The presence of fine soil particles that fill the larger pores indicates that the interaction between soil particles and macropores in fertilizers plays a crucial role in modifying pore structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Wang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Yang et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>The growth and reproduction of soil microorganisms are significantly influenced by various environmental factors, including but not limited to soil depth, moisture content, organic matter concentration, porosity, oxygen and carbon dioxide levels, as well as soil pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cao et al., 2016</xref>). Fertilization has the potential to enhance soil physical and chemical properties, which in turn can influence microbial community composition and activity, ultimately improving microorganism habitat quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Liu et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). Our findings demonstrate that the application of TOCS-based organic fertilizers did not lead to a significant alteration in soil pH values, however, it exerted a more pronounced influence on the levels of TOM, TN, AN, TP, AP, TK, and AK in the rhizosphere soils, which is in line with the reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Wu et al. (2021)</xref>. Meanwhile, the results of our study also demonstrate that the application of TOCS-based organic fertilizers significantly influenced the nutrient (TN, TP, and TK) levels in tea oil camellia leaves, thereby indicating its potential for promoting tea oil camellia growth to enhance the fruit yields of tea oil camellia. Some previous studies had demonstrated that application of organic fertilizers could improve the fruit quality, nutritional value and yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Marzouk and Kassem, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Khaitov et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Negi et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Organic manures are recognized for their ability to enhance the stability of rhizosphere microbial communities and associated functions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Syed et al., 2021</xref>). Previous researches have demonstrated that organic fertilizers have a positive impact on soil microbial alpha-diversity indices (Shannon, Chao, and ACE), promoting the reproduction and growth of microbial populations while increasing overall diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Ding et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Ji et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Wu et al., 2021</xref>). The findings of our study suggest that the application of TOCS-based organic fertilizers significantly enhances the ACE, Chao1, and Shannon indices, thereby promoting microbial diversity in the rhizosphere soils. Meanwhile, PCA at the genus level also suggests significant impact of application of different TOCS-based organic fertilizers on the soil microbial diversity. This is primarily due to differences substrate utilization in different TOCS-based organic fertilizers. The findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bucher and Lanyon (2005)</xref> demonstrated that the application of dairy manure annually or biennially resulted in distinct soil microbial communities compared to soils without manure or with occasional applications.</p>
<p>Our findings suggest that the application of TOCS-based organic fertilizers significantly enhances the microbial diversity in rhizosphere soils with Proteobacteria and Ascomycota being the dominant bacterial and fungal phyla, respectively, and <italic>Rhodanobacter</italic> and <italic>Fusarium</italic> being the dominant bacterial and fungal genus, respectively. <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> is an evolutionarily, geologically, and environmentally important group of microorganisms. Our findings indicate that <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> is the predominant bacterial phylum in rhizosphere soils treated with TOCS-based organic fertilizers. This aligns with previous studies which have also identified Proteobacteria as the most abundant genus in soil libraries due to its vast morphological, physiological, and metabolic diversity, and crucial role in global nitrogen, sulfur, and carbon cycling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Janssen, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Kersters et al., 2006</xref>). Likewise, despite the fact that Proteobacteria is the most abundant genus in soil and has more validly described species than any other phyla, the functions of most Proteobacteria in soil have yet to be demonstrated. Meanwhile, our findings have also indicated that Ascomycota dominates the rhizosphere soils treated with TOCS-based organic fertilizers. Similar results from previous studies have identified Ascomycota as the predominant fungal phylum in soil systems worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Maestre et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Egidi et al., 2019</xref>). <italic>Rhodanobacter</italic> participates in the soil nitrogen cycle by means of denitrification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Green et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Kostka et al., 2012</xref>). In this study, <italic>Rhodanobacter</italic> was identified as the most dominant bacterial genus, which is consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Wang et al.&#x2019;s (2017)</xref> report that <italic>Rhodanobacter</italic> dominated the bacterial distribution at the genus level in acclimated sludge. However, our findings indicate that the application of TOCS-based organic fertilizers may increase the risk of wilt, blight, rot and canker in plants due to the dominance of <italic>Fusarium</italic>, a habitat for all organisms involved in soil-borne diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Orr and Nelson, 2018</xref>), as the bacterial genus present in the rhizosphere soils treated with such TOCS-based organic fertilizers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S5" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>5. Conclusion</title>
<p>The current study involved the preparation of four organic fertilizers based on TOCS. Our findings provide evidence that the application of TOCS-based organic fertilizers significantly improves soil physicochemical properties and microbial community structure in the rhizosphere soil, as well as nutrient contents in tea oil camellia leaves and average yield and fruiting rate per plant at maturity. In addition, our forthcoming research will concentrate on the long-term sustainability and impact of TOCS-based organic fertilizers on soil fertility, plant health, and ecosystem dynamics. This study will facilitate the promotion and application of TOCS-based organic fertilizers, thereby establishing a foundation for the reuse of tea oil camellia waste resources.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The data presented in the study are deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) repository, accession numbers <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="PRJNA999865">PRJNA999865</ext-link> and <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="PRJNA999913">PRJNA999913</ext-link>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>AH: methodology and writing&#x2014;original draft preparation. ZW: software. DY and WB: validation. NW and XL: investigation. ZL: data curation. AH and SY: writing&#x2014;review and editing and project administration. SY: funding acquisition. All authors had read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="S8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research was funded by Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Province, grant numbers [2021]130 and [2020]4010, and the Rural Industrial Revolution Characteristic Forestry Industry Program of Guizhou Province, grant number [2020]14.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1231978/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1231978/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.XLSX" id="TS1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 1</label>
<caption><p>The relative abundance of bacterial phyla in the rhizosphere soils.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_2.XLSX" id="TS2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 2</label>
<caption><p>The relative abundance of fungal phyla in the rhizosphere soils.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_3.XLSX" id="TS3" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 3</label>
<caption><p>The relative abundance of bacterial genus in the rhizosphere soils.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_4.XLSX" id="TS4" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 4</label>
<caption><p>The relative abundance of fungal genus in the rhizosphere soils.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<fn id="footnote1">
<label>1</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.metaboanalyst.ca">http://www.metaboanalyst.ca</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="footnote2">
<label>2</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.canoco5.com/">http://www.canoco5.com/</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anyega</surname> <given-names>A. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Korir</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beesigamukama</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Changeh</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nkoba</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Subramanian</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Black soldier fly-composted organic fertilizer enhances growth, yield, and nutrient quality of three key vegetable crops in Sub-Saharan Africa.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>:<issue>680312</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.680312</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34149781</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bela&#x00EF;d</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Sarihi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Mestneer</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Balancing climate mitigation and energy security goals amid converging global energy crises: The role of green investments.</article-title> <source><italic>Renew. Energy</italic></source> <volume>205</volume> <fpage>534</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>542</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.083</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhattacharyya</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rabbi</surname> <given-names>S. M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Young</surname> <given-names>I. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dennis</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Soil organic carbon is significantly associated with the pore geometry, microbial diversity and enzyme activity of the macro-aggregates under different land uses.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Total. Environ.</italic></source> <volume>778</volume>:<issue>146286</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146286</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33725601</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bucher</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lanyon</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Evaluating soil management with microbial community-level physiological profiles.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Soil Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>29</volume> <fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.09.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cameron</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buchan</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Porosity and pore size distribution</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Encyclopedia of soil science</italic></source>, <role>ed.</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Lal</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Boca Raton, FL</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CRC Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>1350</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1353</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>S. X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Soil pH, total phosphorus, climate and distance are the major factors influencing microbial activity at a regional spatial scale.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume>:<issue>25815</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep25815</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27170469</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Groenigen</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hungate</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>A keystone microbial enzyme for nitrogen control of soil carbon storage.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Adv.</italic></source> <volume>4</volume>:<issue>eaaq1689</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/sciadv.aaq1689</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30140736</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grogan</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Soil microbial biomass, nutrient availability and nitrogen mineralization potential among vegetation-types in a low arctic tundra landscape.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Soil</italic></source> <volume>329</volume> <fpage>411</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>420</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-009-0167-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chung</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shim</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ravindran</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effect of biochar amendments on the co-composting of food waste and livestock manure.</article-title> <source><italic>Agronomy</italic></source> <volume>13</volume>:<issue>35</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy13010035</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>G. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>W. X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Increased microbial functional diversity under long-term organic and integrated fertilization in a paddy soil.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>102</volume> <fpage>1969</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1982</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-017-8704-8</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29274058</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Egidi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delgado-Baquerizo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Plett</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eldridge</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bardgett</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>A few Ascomycota taxa dominate soil fungal communities worldwide.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Commun.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<issue>2369</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-019-10373-z</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31147554</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>R. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>A. Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Straw-derived biochar mitigates CO<sub>2</sub> emission through changes in soil pore structure in a wheat-rice rotation system.</article-title> <source><italic>Chemosphere</italic></source> <volume>243</volume>:<issue>125329</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125329</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31751926</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Franke-Whittle</surname> <given-names>I. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Confalonieri</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Insam</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schlegelmilch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>K&#x00F6;rner</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Changes in the microbial communities during co-composting of digestates.</article-title> <source><italic>Waste Manage.</italic></source> <volume>34</volume> <fpage>632</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>641</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.009</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24456768</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garbeva</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Veen</surname> <given-names>J. A. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elsas</surname> <given-names>J. D. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Microbial diversity in soil: Selection of microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</italic></source> <volume>42</volume> <fpage>243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>270</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.012604.135455</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15283667</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Green</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prakash</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jasrotia</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Overholt</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cardenas</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hubbard</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Denitrifying bacteria from the genus <italic>Rhodanobacter</italic> dominate bacterial communities in the highly contaminated subsurface of a nuclear legacy waste site.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>78</volume> <fpage>1039</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1047</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.06435-11</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22179233</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>K. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>K. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Th&#x00E9;venon</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Bio-susceptibility of shells of <italic>Camellia oleifera</italic> Abel. fruits to fungi and termites.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. Biodeter. Biodegr.</italic></source> <volume>104</volume> <fpage>219</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>223</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.06.011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>X. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>You</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Study on the application effect of preparing bioorganic fertilizer from tea oil <italic>Camellia</italic> shell.</article-title> <source><italic>Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume> <fpage>135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>137</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Long-term manure applications to increase carbon sequestration and macroaggregate-stabilized carbon.</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Biol. Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>174</volume>:<issue>108827</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108827</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Janssen</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>72</volume> <fpage>1719</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1728</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.72.3.1719-1728.2006</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16517615</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>L. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Z. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>You</surname> <given-names>Z. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of organic substitution for synthetic N fertilizer on soil bacterial diversity and community composition: A 10-year field trial in a tea plantation.</article-title> <source><italic>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</italic></source> <volume>268</volume> <fpage>124</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>132</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2018.09.008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kersters</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Vos</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gillis</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swings</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vandamme</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stackebrandt</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Introduction to the proteobacteria</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>The prokaryotes</italic></source>, <edition>3rd Edn</edition>, <volume>Vol. 5</volume> <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Dwarkin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Falkow</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosenberg</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schleifer</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stackebrandt</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khaitov</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yun</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruziev</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le</surname> <given-names>T. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Umurzokov</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Impact of organic manure on growth, nutrient content and yield of chilli pepper under various temperature environments.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health</italic></source> <volume>16</volume>:<issue>3031</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph16173031</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31438592</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>X. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>S. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>P. Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Study on water holding capacity and pore characteristics of soils based on LF-NMR.</article-title> <source><italic>Acta Pedol. Sin.</italic></source> <volume>53</volume> <fpage>34</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11766/trxb201602220585</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kostka</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Green</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rishishwar</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prakash</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Katz</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mari&#x00F1;o-Ram&#x00ED;rez</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Genome sequences for six <italic>Rhodanobacter</italic> strains, isolated from soils and the terrestrial subsurface, with variable denitrification capabilities.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>194</volume> <fpage>4461</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4462</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.00871-12</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22843592</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lauber</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamady</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>75</volume> <fpage>5111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5120</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.00335-09</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19502440</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mei</surname> <given-names>X. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>W. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bing</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Long-term effect of chemical fertilizer, straw, and manure on soil chemical and biological properties in Northwest China.</article-title> <source><italic>Geoderma</italic></source> <volume>158</volume> <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.029</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shu</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>W. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>W. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z. Z.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Long-term organic fertilizer substitution increases rice yield by improving soil properties and regulating soil bacteria.</article-title> <source><italic>Geoderma</italic></source> <volume>404</volume>:<issue>115287</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115287</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Malik</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>C. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Porosity and pore size distribution of ultisols and correlations to soil iron oxides.</article-title> <source><italic>Catena</italic></source> <volume>123</volume> <fpage>79</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>87</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2014.07.010</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Nano-microscale porosity and pore size distribution in aggregates of paddy soil as affected by long-term mineral and organic fertilization under rice-wheat cropping system.</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Till. Res.</italic></source> <volume>186</volume> <fpage>191</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>199</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2018.10.008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>F. X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Optimization of vegetable waste composting and the exploration of microbial mechanisms related to fungal communities during composting.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Environ. Manage.</italic></source> <volume>319</volume>:<issue>115694</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115694</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35841778</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maestre</surname> <given-names>F. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delgado-Baquerizo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeffries</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eldridge</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ochoa</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gozalo</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Increasing aridity reduces soil microbial diversity and abundance in global drylands.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>112</volume> <fpage>15684</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15689</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1516684112</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26647180</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marzouk</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kassem</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Improving fruit quality, nutritional value and yield of Zaghloul dates by the application of organic and/or mineral fertilizers.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Hortic.</italic></source> <volume>127</volume> <fpage>249</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>254</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2010.10.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mazzola</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Assessment and management of soil microbial community structure for disease suppression.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</italic></source> <volume>42</volume> <fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140408</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15283659</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Negi</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sajwan</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Uniyal</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mishra</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Enhancement in yield and nutritive qualities of strawberry fruits by the application of organic manures and biofertilizers.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Hortic.</italic></source> <volume>283</volume>:<issue>110038</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110038</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nieuwenhuize</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maas</surname> <given-names>Y. E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Middelburg</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Rapid analysis of organic carbon and nitrogen in particulate materials.</article-title> <source><italic>Mar. Chem.</italic></source> <volume>45</volume> <fpage>217</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>224</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0304-4203(94)90005-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oladele</surname> <given-names>S. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adeyemo</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Awodun</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Influence of rice husk biochar and inorganic fertilizer on soil nutrients availability and rain-fed rice yield in two contrasting soils.</article-title> <source><italic>Geoderma</italic></source> <volume>336</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.08.025</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Orr</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>P. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Impacts of soil abiotic attributes on <italic>Fusarium</italic> wilt, focusing on bananas.</article-title> <source><italic>App. Soil Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>132</volume> <fpage>20</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.06.019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Popp</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kov&#x00E1;cs</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ol&#x00E1;h</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Div&#x00E9;ki</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bal&#x00E1;zs</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Bioeconomy: Biomass and biomass-based energy supply and demand.</article-title> <source><italic>New Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>60</volume> <fpage>76</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>84</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nbt.2020.10.004</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33039697</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Cultivation history of <italic>Camellia oleifera</italic> and genetic resources in the Yangtze River Basin.</article-title> <source><italic>Biodivers. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>26</volume> <fpage>384</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>395</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17520/biods.2017254</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34063014</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Samuel</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bungau</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tit</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Melinte</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Purza</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Badea</surname> <given-names>G. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of long term application of organic and mineral fertilizers on soil enzymes.</article-title> <source><italic>Rev. Chim.</italic></source> <volume>69</volume> <fpage>2608</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2612</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37358/RC.18.10.6590</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Savci</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>An agricultural pollutant: Chemical fertilizer.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume> <fpage>77</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>79</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7763/ijesd.2012.v3.191</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sheoran</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kakar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seema</surname> <given-names>K. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Impact of organic and conventional farming practices on soil quality: A global review.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Ecol. Env. Res.</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>951</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>968</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15666/AEER/1701_951968</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sieuwerts</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Bok</surname> <given-names>F. A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mols</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Vos</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Hylckama Vlieg</surname> <given-names>J. E. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>A simple and fast method for determining colony forming units.</article-title> <source><italic>Lett. Appl. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>275</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>278</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02417.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18778376</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Udawatta</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Jonge</surname> <given-names>L. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Katuwal</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>X-ray micro-computed tomography characterized soil pore network as influenced by long-term application of manure and fertilizer.</article-title> <source><italic>Geoderma</italic></source> <volume>385</volume>:<issue>114872</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114872</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shih</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Chemical composition of seed oils in native Taiwanese <italic>Camellia</italic> species.</article-title> <source><italic>Food Chem.</italic></source> <volume>156</volume> <fpage>369</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>373</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.02.016</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24629982</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Bacterial diversity in soils subjected to long-term chemical fertilization can be more stably maintained with the addition of livestock manure than wheat straw.</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Biol. Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>88</volume> <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.05.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Syed</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>T. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lian</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Bio-organic mineral fertilizer for sustainable agriculture: Current trends and future perspectives.</article-title> <source><italic>Minerals</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>1336</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/min11121336</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Comprehensive evaluation on tailor-made deep eutectic solvents (DESs) in extracting tea saponins from seed pomace of <italic>Camellia oleifera</italic> Abel.</article-title> <source><italic>Food Chem.</italic></source> <volume>342</volume>:<issue>128243</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128243</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33069529</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thirup</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johansen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Winding</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Microbial succession in the rhizosphere of live and decomposing barley roots as affected by the antagonistic strain <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> DR54-BN14 or the fungicide imazalil.</article-title> <source><italic>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>383</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>392</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6941.2003.tb01079.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19719670</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>She</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fei</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>S. Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Synergic effects of biochar and polyacrylamide amendments on the mechanical properties of silt loam soil under coastal reclamation in China.</article-title> <source><italic>Catena</italic></source> <volume>182</volume>:<issue>104152</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2019.104152</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Chemoautotrophic denitrification based on ferrous iron oxidation: Reactor performance and sludge characteristics.</article-title> <source><italic>Chem. Eng. J.</italic></source> <volume>313</volume> <fpage>693</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>701</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122686</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31902635</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sha</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of organic fertilizer on soil bacteria in maize fields.</article-title> <source><italic>Land</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<issue>328</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/land10030328</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Pyrolysis temperature affects pore characteristics of rice straw and canola stalk biochars and biochar-amended soils.</article-title> <source><italic>Geoderma</italic></source> <volume>397</volume>:<issue>115097</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115097</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ying</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Soil pore structure changes induced by biochar affect microbial diversity and community structure in an ultisol.</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Till. Res.</italic></source> <volume>224</volume>:<issue>105505</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2022.105505</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Long-term effects of combined application of chemical nitrogen with organic materials on crop yields, soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in fluvo-aquic soil.</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Till. Res.</italic></source> <volume>151</volume> <fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2015.03.008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lei</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Feasibility study on preparing organic fertilizer from tea oil <italic>Camellia</italic> shell.</article-title> <source><italic>China South. Agric. Mach.</italic></source> <volume>50</volume> <fpage>4</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>Z. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ul Haq Muhammad</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>W. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Complementary transcriptome and proteome profiling in the mature seeds of <italic>Camellia oleifera</italic> from Hainan Island.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>15</volume>:<issue>e0226888</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0226888</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32027663</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ying</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Physical and chemical properties of <italic>Camellia oleifera</italic> shell composts with different additives and its maturity evaluation system.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.</italic></source> <volume>27</volume> <fpage>35294</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35302</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-020-09861-3</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32592059</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ying</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of three kinds of nutshell with respect to utilization as culture media.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresources</italic></source> <volume>13</volume> <fpage>7508</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7518</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15376/biores.13.4.7508-7518</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title><italic>Camellia oleifera</italic> shell as an alternative feedstock for furfural production using a high surface acidity solid acid catalyst.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresour. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>249</volume> <fpage>536</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>541</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.061</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29080517</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Organic fertilizer enhances rice growth in severe saline&#x2013;alkali soil by increasing soil bacterial diversity.</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Use Manag.</italic></source> <volume>38</volume> <fpage>964</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>977</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/sum.12711</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>F. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ouyang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>An integrated process to produce ethanol, vanillin, and xylooligosaccharides from <italic>Camellia oleifera</italic> shell.</article-title> <source><italic>Carbohyd. Res.</italic></source> <volume>382</volume> <fpage>52</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.carres.2013.10.007</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24188806</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>