<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1221865</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title><italic>In vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic> antimicrobial activity of the fungal metabolite toluquinol against phytopathogenic bacteria</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Chung</surname> <given-names>Dawoon</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2311531/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>Hoa Thi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1375537/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Nan Hee</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/499179/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Woon-Jong</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Kwon</surname> <given-names>Yong Min</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bae</surname> <given-names>Seung Seob</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>Grace</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>Jin-Cheol</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c002"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/478250/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Microbial Resources, National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea</institution>, <addr-line>Seocheon</addr-line>, <country>Republic of Korea</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Plant Healthcare Research Institute, JAN153 Biotech Incorporated</institution>, <addr-line>Gwangju</addr-line>, <country>Republic of Korea</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Center of Organic Biochemistry, Vietnam Institute of Industrial Chemistry</institution>, <addr-line>Ha Noi</addr-line>, <country>Vietnam</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Maria Jorge Campos, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Portugal</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Norma Margarita De la Fuente Salcido, Technological University of Southeast Guanajuato, Mexico; M. Murali, University of Mysore, India; Maria Da Luz Calado, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Portugal</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x0002A;Correspondence: Grace Choi <email>gchoi&#x00040;mabik.re.kr</email></corresp>
<corresp id="c002">Jin-Cheol Kim <email>kjinc&#x00040;jnu.ac.kr</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>31</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1221865</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>13</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>07</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2023 Chung, Nguyen, Yu, Yu, Kwon, Bae, Choi and Kim.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Chung, Nguyen, Yu, Yu, Kwon, Bae, Choi and Kim</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license> </permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Bacterial plant diseases cause tremendous economic losses worldwide. However, a few effective and sustainable control methods are currently available. To discover novel and effective management approaches, we screened marine fungi for their antibacterial activity against phytopathogenic bacteria <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic>.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>We screened the culture broth of 55 fungal strains isolated from various marine sources (seawater, algae, and sediment) for their <italic>in vitro</italic> antibacterial activity using the broth microdilution method. Then, only the fungal strain (designated UL-Ce9) with higher antibacterial activity <italic>in vitro</italic> was tested in an <italic>in vivo</italic> experiment against tomato bacterial wilt. The active compounds of UL-Ce9 were extracted using ethyl acetate, purified by a series of chromatography, and the structure was elucidated by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Pesticide formulations of toluquinol were prepared as soluble concentrates and wettable powder. The disease control efficacy of toluquinol formulations was evaluated against blight of rice and the bacterial wilt of tomato.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Results and discussion</title>
<p>The culture broth of UL-Ce9 showed high antibacterial activity against <italic>Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Ralstonia solanacearum</italic>, and <italic>Xanthomonas arboricola</italic> pv. <italic>pruni in vitro</italic>, and we selected UL-Ce9 for the <italic>in vivo</italic> test. The UL-Ce9 culture broth completely suppressed the bacterial wilt of tomato at a dilution of 1:5. The phylogenetic analysis identified UL-Ce9 as <italic>Penicillium griseofulvum</italic>, and the antibacterial metabolites were revealed as patulin, gentisyl alcohol, and toluquinol, all of which were associated with the biosynthetic pathway of the mycotoxin patulin. Patulin exhibited the highest antibacterial activity against 16 phytopathogenic bacteria <italic>in vitro</italic>, followed by toluquinol and gentisyl alcohol. As patulin is toxic, we selected toluquinol to investigate its potential use as a pesticide against bacterial plant diseases. Compared with the chemicals currently being applied in agriculture (streptomycin and oxytetracycline), toluquinol formulations exhibited similar and higher control efficacies against bacterial leaf blight of rice and bacterial wilt of tomato, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the antibacterial activity of toluquinol against phytopathogenic bacteria. Our results suggest that toluquinol is a potential candidate for the development of novel and effective pesticides for the management of bacterial plant diseases.</p></sec></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>toluquinol</kwd>
<kwd>patulin</kwd>
<kwd>gentisyl alcohol</kwd>
<kwd>antimicrobial activity</kwd>
<kwd>phytopathogenic bacteria</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Penicillium griseofulvum</italic></kwd>
<kwd>bacterial wilt of tomato</kwd>
<kwd>bacterial leaf blight of rice</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="47"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="8490"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1. Introduction</title>
<p>Phytopathogenicbacteria infect a broad range of plants and cause wilt, spots, tissue rot, blight, cankers, and imbalanced plant growth (Mansfield et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2012</xref>). Approximately 150 bacterial species are associated with plant diseases, and the representative genera include <italic>Acidovorax, Agrobacterium, Burkholderia, Clavibacter, Erwinia, Pectobacterium, Pseudomonas, Ralstonia, Streptomyces, Xanthomonas</italic>, and <italic>Xylella</italic> (Kannan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2015</xref>). For example, <italic>Ralstonia solanacearum</italic>, a causative agent of bacterial wilt of tomato, is one of the most destructive phytopathogenic bacteria worldwide because of its wide geographical distribution and host range (Mansfield et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2012</xref>; Rivera-Zuluaga et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2023</xref>). It is a soil-borne pathogen that infects &#x0007E;200 plant species belonging to more than 50 families. Bacterial diseases in food-producing plants cause a reduction in crop yield and quality and economic losses of at least 1 billion US dollars worldwide annually (Kannan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2015</xref>). <italic>Xanthomonas oryzae</italic> pv. <italic>oryzae</italic>, a causative agent of bacterial leaf blight, is responsible for yield losses of 10%&#x02212;50% (Mansfield et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2012</xref>). Climate change and environmental pollution exacerbate plant diseases caused by phytopathogenic bacteria (Martins et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2018</xref>).</p>
<p>A few effective methods are currently available to manage bacterial plant diseases. Copper-based pesticides are generally used to treat plant diseases, but the application of these compounds has become restricted in many countries, such as those of the EU, owing to environmental concerns (Lamichhane et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2018</xref>). Antibiotics such as streptomycin and oxytetracycline are used to treat bacterial plant diseases. However, antibiotics are relatively expensive, and their long-term and frequent use can lead to the development of antibiotic resistance in plant pathogens (Sundin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>; Sundin and Wang, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2018</xref>). Therefore, the discovery of alternative strategies for controlling phytopathogenic bacteria is imperative (Puigvert et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Marine fungi are relatively unexplored microorganisms for biotechnological applications compared with terrestrial fungi. To adapt to extreme conditions in marine environments such as a wide range of temperatures, hydrostatic pressure, and salinity, marine microorganisms including marine fungi can produce secondary metabolites distinct from their terrestrial counterparts (Xie et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2018</xref>). Marine fungi are important sources of natural compounds with various bioactivities. Several marine fungi have been reported to produce bioactive compounds with antimicrobial, antiviral, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant activities (Ameen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Only a few studies have been performed to identify anti-phytopathogenic compounds in marine fungi. For example, stemphyperylenol and alterperylenol, identified from marine <italic>Alternaria</italic> spp., exhibit antifungal and antibacterial activities against phytopathogens such as <italic>Alternaria brassicicola</italic> and <italic>Clavibacter michiganensis</italic>, respectively (Zhao et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2018</xref>). Pleosporalone B, isolated from marine <italic>Pleosporales</italic> sp. CF09-1, displays antifungal activity against <italic>A. brassicicola</italic> and <italic>Fusarium oxysporum</italic> (Cao et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2019</xref>). In addition, 3-decalinoyltetramic acid derivatives from marine <italic>Fusarium equiseti</italic> D39 inhibit the growth of the phytopathogenic bacterium <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> (Zhao et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2019</xref>). However, antibacterial compounds from marine fungi against phytopathogenic bacteria remain largely unknown.</p>
<p>This study aimed to discover antibacterial compounds from marine fungi to control bacterial plant diseases. We have screened marine fungi for antibacterial activity against phytopathogenic bacteria, and the culture broth of the marine algae-derived strain UL-Ce9 showed high activity <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic>. Antibacterial compounds from UL-Ce9 were identified, and pesticide formulations were prepared using one of the compounds. Finally, the disease control efficacy of the formulations against bacterial wilt of tomato and leaf blight of rice was investigated.</p></sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>2. Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>2.1. Sample collection and fungal isolation</title>
<p>Marine algae were collected from the intertidal region of Ulleungdo, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea (37&#x000B0;27&#x02032;36.24&#x02033;N, 130&#x000B0;51&#x02032;42.69&#x02033;E). Fungi were isolated and cultivated as described previously (Chung et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2021a</xref>). In brief, marine algal samples were cut into segments and grown in potato dextrose agar (PDA; BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) supplemented with 3% sea salt, 0.01% (w/v) ampicillin, and 0.01% (w/v) streptomycin. After cultivation at 20&#x000B0;C for 14 days, fungal isolates were obtained, stored in a 20% glycerol solution at &#x02212;80&#x000B0;C, and deposited in the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.2. Preparation of fungal culture broth</title>
<p>The fungal culture broth was prepared as described previously (Chung et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2021b</xref>). In brief, five agar plugs were obtained from the fungal colonies grown in PDA at 28&#x000B0;C for 5 days using a cork borer and cultured in 100 ml of potato dextrose broth (PDB; BD) at 28&#x000B0;C for 14 days. The cell-free supernatants (fungal culture broth) were collected by passing them through Miracloth (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), followed by 0.22-&#x003BC;m pore size syringe filtration (Corning, New York, USA), and stored at &#x02212;20&#x000B0;C until use.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.3. Preparation of phytopathogenic bacteria</title>
<p>Sixteen phytopathogenic bacteria (<italic>Acidovorax avenae</italic> subsp. <italic>cattleyae, Acidovorax konjaci, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Burkholderia glumae, C. michiganensis</italic> subsp. <italic>michiganensis, Erwinia amylovora, Erwinia pyrifoliae, Pectobacterium carotovorum</italic> subsp. <italic>carotovorum, Pectobacterium chrysanthemi, P. syringae</italic> pv. <italic>actinidiae, P. syringae</italic> pv. <italic>lachrymans, R. solanacearum, Xanthomonas arboricola</italic> pv. <italic>pruni, Xanthomonas axonopodis</italic> pv. <italic>citri, Xanthomonas euvesicatoria</italic>, and <italic>X. oryzae</italic> pv. <italic>oryzae</italic>) were used for antibacterial activity tests <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic> as described in a previous study (Le et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2021</xref>). The bacterial names, related plant diseases, and cultivation conditions are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>. The bacterial strains were cultured in tryptic soy agar (TSA; BD) and tryptic soy broth (TSB; BD) at 30&#x000B0;C unless indicated otherwise.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Phytopathogenic bacteria examined in this study.</p></caption> 
<table frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr style="background-color:#8f9496">
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Bacterial species</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Plant diseases (References)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Incubation temperature (&#x000B0;C)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Incubation periods (day)</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Acidovorax avenae</italic> subsp. <italic>cattleyae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacterial brown spot of orchid (Khamtham and Akarapisan, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2019</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Acidovorax konjaci</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Leaf blight of konjac (Goto, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">1983</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Agrobacterium tumefaciens</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Crown gall tumor (Mansfield et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2012</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Burkholderia glumae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacterial panicle blight (Ortega and Rojas, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2021</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Clavibacter michiganensis</italic> subsp. <italic>michiganensis</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacterial wilt and canker of tomato (Gartemann et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2021</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Erwinia amylovora</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fire blight of apple (Mansfield et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2012</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Erwinia pyrifoliae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fire blight of pear (Rhim et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">1999</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Pectobacterium carotovorum</italic> subsp. <italic>carotovorum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Soft rot of crop plants (Mansfield et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2012</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Pectobacterium chrysanthemi</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Soft rot (Lin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2015</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> pv. <italic>actinidiae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacterial canker (Scortichini et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2012</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> pv. <italic>lachrymans</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Angular leaf spot of cucumber (Harighi, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2007</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Ralstonia solanacearum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacterial wilt of tomato (Mansfield et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2012</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Xanthomonas arboricola</italic> pv. <italic>pruni</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacterial leaf spot of fruit (Lopez-Soriano et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2016</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Xanthomonas axonopodis</italic> pv. <italic>citri</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacterial blight of cassava (Mansfield et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2012</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Xanthomonas euvesicatoria</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacterial leaf spot of tomato and pepper (Dhakal et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2019</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Xanthomonas oryzae</italic> pv. <italic>oryzae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacterial leaf blight of rice (Mansfield et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2012</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.4. Antibacterial activity assay of the culture broth of marine fungi</title>
<p>We isolated 55 marine fungi from various sources (seawater, algae, and sediment) and tested for <italic>in vitro</italic> antibacterial activity using the broth microdilution method as described in a previous study (Nguyen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2018</xref>). Three phytopathogenic bacteria, namely, <italic>A. tumefaciens</italic> (At), <italic>R. solanacearum</italic> (Rs), and <italic>X. arboricola</italic> pv. <italic>pruni</italic> (Xap), were used to examine the antibacterial activity of the fungal filtrates. These bacterial strains were incubated in TSB at 25 or 30&#x000B0;C (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>) at 150 rpm for 1 or 2 days, and the bacterial cultures were diluted to obtain an optical density of 0.1 (ca. 1 &#x000D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml) at 600 nm.</p>
<p>One hundred eighty and 100 &#x003BC;l of TSB containing an individual phytopathogenic bacterium at 1 &#x000D7; 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/ml (except for 1 &#x000D7; 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/ml for <italic>Xanthomonas</italic> spp.) were pipetted into the first and the second well of a 96-well microtiter plate, respectively. Twenty microliters of the fungal culture filtrate was added to the first well to treat the phytopathogenic bacterium with 10% (v/v) fungal broth. Then, 100 &#x003BC;l of the solution in the first well was transferred to the second well by two-fold dilution to make 5% (v/v) fungal broth. One hundred microliters of the solution in the second well was discarded to make a final volume per well of 100 &#x003BC;l. The streptomycin sulfate solution in H<sub>2</sub>O (by serial two-fold dilutions at a range from 0.78 to 100 &#x003BC;g/ml) and 10% PDB were added to TSB containing phytopathogenic bacteria as positive controls for antibacterial activity and microbial growth, respectively. In addition, 10% PDB added to TSB without bacterial inoculation was included as a negative control. After incubation at 30&#x000B0;C for 72 h, bacterial growth was evaluated by the naked eye and a microplate reader (HIDEX; Turku, Finland) at 600 nm. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was defined as the lowest concentration of the culture broth capable of inhibiting bacterial growth. This experiment was performed in triplicate for each sample.</p>
<p>Only the fungal strain showing higher antibacterial activities <italic>in vitro</italic> was selected and examined for <italic>in vivo</italic> antibacterial activity against tomato bacterial wilt caused by Rs. One h after the inoculation of Rs in tomato plants, 20 ml of the diluted fungal culture broth (dilutions: 1:5, 1:15, and 1:45) was applied to the plants by soil drenching. Soil drenching is a common application method for pesticides to treat bacterial wilt caused by a soil-borne pathogen, Rs (Lee et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2012</xref>). The preparation of bacterial inoculum and the rest of the experimental procedures are described in Section 2.8.</p>
<p>Patulin biosynthetic compounds (patulin, gentisyl alcohol, toluquinol, <italic>m</italic>-cresol, <italic>m</italic>-hydroxybenzyl alcohol, <italic>m</italic>-hydroxybenzaldehyde, <italic>m</italic>-hydroxybenzoic acid, gentisyl aldehyde, and gentisic acid) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). To assess the MIC against the phytopathogenic bacteria <italic>in vitro</italic>, stock solutions of all the compounds were prepared at 20 mg/ml using methanol.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.5. Fungal identification</title>
<p>Based on the results of the <italic>in vitro</italic> antimicrobial activity against phytopathogenic bacteria, strain UL-Ce9 was selected for fungal identification because this strain showed higher activity than other fungal strains tested. The isolation of fungal genomic DNA, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), sequencing of genetic markers, and phylogenetic analysis were performed as described in a previous study (Chung et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2021b</xref>). UL-Ce9 conidia were cultured in PDB at 28&#x000B0;C, 150 rpm for 3 days. Genomic DNA was extracted from the harvested, frozen, and ground mycelia using phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) (Sigma-Aldrich). PCR was conducted using the primers Bt2a (5&#x02032;-GGTAACCAAATCGGTGCTGCTTTC-3&#x02032;) and Bt2b (5&#x02032;-ACCCTCAGTGTAGTGACCCTTGGC-3&#x02032;) to amplify the beta-tubulin gene (<italic>benA</italic>) (Visagie et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2014</xref>). The 401 bp-PCR products were purified using a gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and sequenced using the same primers, as described in a previous study (Chung et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2021b</xref>).</p>
<p>For phylogenetic analysis, closely related sequences were identified using the <italic>benA</italic> sequence as a query for a BLAST search in GenBank, aligned, and edited manually using the MEGA 6 software (Tamura et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2011</xref>). The aligned sequences were subjected to neighbor-joining analysis, followed by bootstrapping with 1,000 replicates in MEGA 6.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.6. Extraction and isolation of active compounds from UL-Ce9</title>
<p>To isolate the active compounds from the fungal strain UL-Ce9, the fungus was incubated in 1 L of PDB at 28&#x000B0;C for 14 days and filtered using four layers of sterile cheesecloth. The culture supernatants were partitioned sequentially twice with ethyl acetate (EA, 1 L) and butanol (1 L). Water in the EA extraction solution was removed by adding Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4.</sub> Two organic solvents and one aqueous layer were concentrated to dryness using a rotary evaporator. The antibacterial activities of the individual extracts were examined against Rs, and the extract with the lowest MIC value (highest antibacterial activity) was selected for the next steps to identify antibacterial metabolites.</p>
<p>The EA extract (2.6 g) was subjected to column chromatography in a silica gel column (4.5 cm diameter and 58 cm length, Kiesel gel 60, 230 g, 70&#x02013;230 mesh; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and eluted with CHCl<sub>3</sub>/methanol [9/1 (v/v), 800 ml]. All collected fractions were subjected to thin-layer chromatography (TLC; Kiesel gel 60 GF 254, 0.25 mm layer thickness, Merck) using CHCl<sub>3</sub>/methanol (9/1, v/v) as a developing solvent system. Fractions (F1&#x02013;F6) with similar patterns were pooled and assayed <italic>in vitro</italic> for the growth inhibition of Rs.</p>
<p>The fractions showing antibacterial activity were recombined based on similar TLC patterns and used for TLC bioautography (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2021</xref>). The fractions were separated in a thin-layer plate (Kisel gel 60 GF 254, 0.25 mm layer thickness, Merck) with the developing solvent CHCl<sub>3</sub>/methanol (9/1, v/v). The TLC plate was sterilized using ultraviolet (UV) light and placed on TSA inoculated with Rs (1.0 &#x000D7; 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/ml). After 3 days of incubation at 30&#x000B0;C, the antibacterial activity of the fractions was confirmed.</p>
<p>To isolate the antibacterial compounds (CP<bold>1</bold>, CP<bold>2</bold>, and CP<bold>3</bold>), the fractions were subjected to prep-TLC (Kiesel gel 60 GF 254, 0.5 mm thickness, Merck). The developing solvents CHCl<sub>3</sub>/MeOH (9/1, v/v) and CHCl<sub>3</sub>/MeOH (8/2, v/v) were used to isolate CP<bold>1</bold> and CP<bold>2</bold>, respectively. The purity of the isolated compounds was validated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Waters Corp., Milford, Massachusetts, United States). Compounds CP<bold>1</bold>&#x02013;CP<bold>3</bold> were subjected to HPLC on an Atlantis<sup>&#x000AE;</sup> T3 column (5 &#x003BC;m, 4.6 &#x000D7; 250 mm, Waters Corp.) with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) in water (eluent A) and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile (eluent B) as a mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Detection was performed using a Waters 996 detector set at 254 nm.</p>
<p>To determine the chemical structures of CP<bold>1</bold>&#x02013;CP<bold>3</bold>, <sup>1</sup>H-NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) and <sup>13</sup>C-NMR spectra were measured in methanol-d<sub>4</sub> (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc., Tewksbury, MA, USA) using a Bruker Avance III HD 500 MHz instrument (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.7. Preparation of toluquinol formulations</title>
<p>Two types of formulations, namely, a wettable powder (T-WP) and a soluble concentrate (T-SL), were prepared using toluquinol (also known as methylhydroquinone; Sigma-Aldrich). To prepare T-WP, 20 g of toluquinol suspended in a minimal volume of acetone was combined with 15 g of synthetic hydrated silicon dioxide (white carbon; Rhodia Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., Singapore). After evaporating the acetone in a fume hood, 5 g of CR-100 (a wetting agent; Yoosung Chemical R&#x00026;T Co. Ltd.), 5 g of CR-SDS (a surfactant; Yoosung Chemical R&#x00026;T Co. Ltd.), and 55 g of kaolin (a dispersant) were added. Finally, the mixture was ground using an electric powder grinder. To prepare T-SL, 10 g of toluquinol suspended in 40 ml of ethanol was mixed with 20 g of CR-MC33 (an emulsifier; Yoosung Chemical R&#x00026;T Co. Ltd.) and water to obtain 100 ml of the final product.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.8. Disease control efficacy against bacterial leaf blight of rice</title>
<p>Rice seeds (8 g) were treated with a sterilizer (1:2,000 diluted Sportak EC (Prochloraz 25%), Hankook Samgong, Seoul, Korea) at 30&#x000B0;C for 1 day and soaked in freshwater at 30&#x000B0;C for 4 days. The seeds (5 seeds/pot) were sown in plastic pots (8 cm in diameter and 7 cm in height) and grown under a light regime of 14-h light/10-h dark at 28&#x02013;36&#x000B0;C and 90% relative humidity for 6 weeks.</p>
<p>The causative agent of bacterial leaf blight of rice <italic>X. oryzae</italic> pv. <italic>oryzae</italic> (Xoo) was cultured in TSA at 30&#x000B0;C for 2 days, and the cells were resuspended in 10 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub> solution (pH 7.0). Cell density was measured using a UV spectrophotometer at 600 nm, and the bacterial inoculum suspension was adjusted to 2.0 &#x000D7; 10<sup>7</sup> CFU/ml. One day before the inoculation of Xoo, 20 ml of diluted T-WP (1:1,000, 1:2,000, and 1:4,000 dilutions), T-SL (1:500, 1:1,000, and 1:2,000 dilutions), toluquinol (33.3, 100, and 300 &#x003BC;g/ml), gentisyl alcohol (33.3, 100, and 300 &#x003BC;g/ml), and patulin (33.3, 100, and 300 &#x003BC;g/ml) were applied to the rice by foliar spraying until runoff onto the leaves. Streptomycin sulfate (33.3, 100, and 300 &#x003BC;g/ml) and Tween 20 (500 &#x003BC;g/ml) were used as positive and non-treated controls, respectively.</p>
<p>To infect rice, scissors were dipped in the Xoo suspension and used to cut the tips (3&#x02013;4 cm from the tips) of rice leaves. The rice plants were grown under a light regime of 12-h light/12-h dark at 28&#x02013;36&#x000B0;C and 90% relative humidity. Disease severity (DS) was recorded 14 days after bacterial inoculation (DAI). The experiment included three biological replicates (three leaves per treatment), and the entire experiment was performed twice.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.9. Disease control efficacy against bacterial wilt of tomato</title>
<p>Disease control efficacy against tomato bacterial wilt was examined as described in a previous study (Im et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2020</xref>). Tomato seeds (Seokwang, Farm Hannong Co, Seoul, Republic of Korea) were grown in pots (4.5 cm in diameter) containing horticulture nursery soil (Punong Co., Gyeongju, Republic of Korea) until the tomato plants reached the 4&#x02013;5 true-leaf stage. The plants were then transplanted into pots (7 cm in diameter and 6 cm in height) and grown until the 7&#x02013;8 true-leaf stage.</p>
<p><italic>Ralstonia solanacearum</italic>, the causative agent of bacterial wilt, was cultured in TSA at 30&#x000B0;C for 2 days, and the cells were harvested using sterile water and a cell scraper. The cell density was measured using a UV spectrophotometer at 600 nm, and the bacterial inoculum suspension was adjusted to 1.5 &#x000D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml. One day before the inoculation of Rs, 20 ml of diluted T-WP (1:1,000, 1:2,000, and 1:4,000 dilutions) and T-SL (1:500, 1:1,000, and 1:2,000 dilutions) were applied to the tomato plants by soil drenching. The commercial pesticide Sungbocycline (oxytetracycline calcium alkyltrimethyl ammonium 17%, 1:1,000 dilution in accordance with manufacturer&#x00027;s recommendations; Sungbo Chemicals Co, LTD., Seoul, Republic of Korea) and Tween 20 (250 &#x003BC;g/ml) were used as positive and non-treated controls, respectively.</p>
<p>Twenty milliliters of the Rs suspension were drenched into the soil, and the plants were maintained at 30&#x000B0;C and 95% humidity for 2 weeks. DS was recorded at 9 and 14 DAI. The experiment included three biological replicates (three plants per treatment), and the entire experiment was performed twice.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.10. Evaluation of the disease control efficacy</title>
<p>To evaluate the disease control efficacy against rice leaf blight and tomato bacterial wilt, DS was visually estimated on a 6-point scale (0 = no symptoms, 1 = one leaf partially wilted, 2 = one to two leaves wilted, 3 = two of three leaves wilted, 4 = four or more leaves wilted, and 5 = death of the entire plant) as described in a previous study (Winstead and Kelman, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">1952</xref>). The control efficacy values for the individual plant diseases were calculated as follows:</p>
<disp-formula id="E1"><mml:math id="M1"><mml:mtable columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>%</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.11. Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Experimental data were analyzed using a one-way or two-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey&#x00027;s multiple comparison tests or the Bonferroni post-test (GraphPad Prism 5.0).</p></sec></sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>3. Results</title>
<sec>
<title>3.1. Screening marine fungi for antibacterial activity <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic></title>
<p>The <italic>in vitro</italic> antibacterial activities of the marine fungi were studied against At, Rs, and Xap. Among the tested fungal strains, UL-Ce9 isolated from the marine alga, <italic>Ceramium</italic> sp., exhibited the highest antibacterial activity against At, Rs, and Xap. The MIC value of UL-Ce9 culture broth was 5% (v/v) against all the phytopathogenic bacteria examined.</p>
<p>The culture broth of fungi showing high antibacterial activities <italic>in vitro</italic> was subjected to an <italic>in vivo</italic> antibacterial activity test against the bacterial wilt of tomato. The uninoculated tomato plants did not show any wilting symptoms. In contrast, the tomato plants inoculated with Rs displayed typical wilting symptoms. This indicates that the tomato plants were infected with Rs. Among the marine fungi examined, the culture broth (1:5 dilution) of UL-Ce9 completely suppressed the disease (100% &#x000B1; 0.00 disease control efficacy). Moreover, the disease control efficacies of UL-Ce9 filtrates at dilutions of 1:15 and 1:45 were 83.3 &#x000B1; 2.3% and 76.2 &#x000B1; 3.3%, respectively (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>3.2. Identification of the marine fungal strain UL-Ce9</title>
<p>UL-Ce9 was isolated from the blades of the marine alga <italic>Ceramium</italic> species. The UL-Ce9 &#x003B2;-tubulin gene sequence (deposited in GenBank; accession number OQ559567) showed the highest nucleotide similarity with that of <italic>Penicillium griseofulvum</italic> CMV005F8 (99.75%) and the <italic>P. griseofulvum</italic> type strain CBS 185.27 (99.24%; <italic>E</italic>-values = 0). The UL-Ce9 &#x003B2;-tubulin sequence was also closely related to <italic>Penicillium dipodomyicola</italic> NRRL 13487 with 94.64% sequence similarity (<italic>E</italic>-value = 1e-167). A neighbor-joining phylogenetic analysis using the &#x003B2;-tubulin sequence showed that UL-Ce9 formed a clade with these two <italic>P. griseofulvum</italic> strains, supported by a 100% bootstrap value. Therefore, UL-Ce9 was identified as <italic>P. griseofulvum</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Identification of a marine fungal strain UL-Ce9. The plate picture shows a colony of UL-Ce9 grown on PDA at 25&#x000B0;C for 7 days. A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was generated using &#x003B2;-tubulin sequences of UL-Ce9 and closely related fungal species based on sequence similarity. Numbers at nodes indicate percent bootstrap values from 1,000 replications (values &#x0003C; 50% are not shown). The scale bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions per site.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1221865-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>3.3. Characterization of antibacterial metabolites from <italic>P. griseofulvum</italic> strain UL-Ce9</title>
<p>The antibacterial activities of the EA, butanol, and water extracts of UL-Ce9 were examined against Rs <italic>in vitro</italic>, and the MIC values were 3.9, 7.8, and 250 &#x003BC;g/ml, respectively. As the EA extract showed the highest antibacterial activity, it was used for the isolation, purification, and identification of the antibacterial compounds of <italic>P. griseofulvum</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Isolation and purification of antibacterial metabolites from UL-Ce9. <bold>(A)</bold> The procedure to identify antibacterial metabolites of UL-Ce9. For the extraction of antibacterial compounds from UL-Ce9, ethyl acetate (EA), butanol (BuOH), and water (aqueous) were used. The EA extract was purified by a series of chromatography, and the resulting fractions were tested for their antibacterial activities. A total of six fractions were subjected to prep-TLC, and the obtained three compounds (C1&#x02013;C3) were identified using NMR analysis. <bold>(B)</bold> The purities of C1&#x02013;C3 were validated by HPLC at 254 nm.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1221865-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>More than 81 fractions obtained <italic>via</italic> chromatography were grouped into six fractions (F1&#x02013;F6) based on separation patterns from the TLC analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>). The antibacterial activities of F1 (210 mg), F2 (186 mg), F3 (250 mg), F4 (120 mg), F5 (162 mg), and F6 (250 mg) were assessed against Rs, and the MIC values were 31.2, 3.9, 3.9, 3.9, and 3.9 &#x003BC;g/ml for F1, F2, F3, F4, and F5, respectively. F6 did not show any antibacterial activity against Rs.</p>
<p>Compounds <bold>1</bold> (CP<bold>1</bold>) and <bold>2</bold> (CP<bold>2</bold>) were purified from fractions F13 and F45 by prep-TLC. Active CP<bold>1</bold> and CP<bold>2</bold> displayed one major spot in the TLC analysis, which was detected at an <italic>R</italic><sub><italic>f</italic></sub> value of 0.7 and 0.5, respectively. The purities of CP<bold>1</bold> and CP<bold>2</bold> were validated by HPLC at 254 nm, and the absorption maxima of CP<bold>1</bold> and <bold>2</bold> were observed at 276 and 291 nm, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>).</p>
<p>The liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS) of CP<bold>1</bold> displayed an ion peak [M &#x0002B; H]<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> at <italic>m/z</italic> 155.1, suggesting a molecular formula of C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>5</sub>O<sub>4</sub>, similar to that of patulin. Further evidence was obtained from the two proton signals at &#x003B4; 4.53 (1H, dd, 16.8 and 3.0 Hz, and H-5a) and &#x003B4; 4.34 (1H, dd, 16.8 and 3.0 Hz, and H-5b) in the <sup>1</sup>H-NMR spectrum and the signals of one oxygenated methine at &#x003B4; 87.94 (C-4) in the <sup>13</sup>C-NMR spectrum (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). Two methine protons at &#x003B4; 6.21 (1H, m, and H-2) and &#x003B4; 6.19 (1H, m, and H-6) were attached to a double bond in the <sup>1</sup>H-NMR spectrum, and one carbon showed resonance at &#x003B4; 168.78 (C-1) in the <sup>13</sup>C-NMR spectrum. In the <sup>1</sup>H-NMR spectrum, the singlet signal was observed at &#x003B4; 5.92 (1H and s; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). These data suggest that CP<bold>1</bold> is patulin (Yoo and Park, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">1995</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>NMR data for the antibacterial metabolites of <italic>P. griseofulvum</italic> strain UL-Ce9.</p></caption> 
<table frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr style="background-color:#8f9496">
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Compound</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Carbon</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><sup>1</sup>H</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold><sup>13</sup>C</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Patulin</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">168.78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.21 (m)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">109.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">145.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.92 (s)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">87.94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">5a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.53 (dd, 16.8: 3.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">58.63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">5b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.34 (dd, 16.8: 3.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">58.63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.19 (m)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">109.33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">152.33</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gentisyl alcohol</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">129.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">149.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.61 (d, 8.55)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">116.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.54 (dd, 3.0: 8.55)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">115.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">151.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.75 (d, 2.75)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">115.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.59 (CH2, s)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">61.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">7-OH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.96 (s)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Toluquinol</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">125.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">147.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.84 (dd, 8.60, 2.88)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">117.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.59 (dd, 8.60, 0.46)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">114.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">149.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.53 (dd, 2.88, 0.46)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">118.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.15 (s)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15.4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Chemical structures of antibacterial metabolites identified from UL-Ce9. <bold>(A)</bold> Patulin, <bold>(B)</bold> gentisyl alcohol, and <bold>(C)</bold> toluquinol.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1221865-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The ESI-MS of CP<bold>2</bold> displayed an ion peak [M]<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> at <italic>m/z</italic> 140, suggesting a molecular formula of C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, similar to that of gentisyl alcohol. The <sup>1</sup>H-NMR showed aromatic protons at &#x003B4; 6.61 (1H, d, 8.55, and H-3), 6.54 (1H, dd, 3.0, 8.55, and H-4), and 6.75 (d, 2.75, H-6) and methylene protons at &#x003B4; 4.59 (2H, s, and H-7; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). These data displayed phenolic hydroxyl groups at &#x003B4; 4.96 (s and 7-OH). The presence of an OH group at C-2 and C-5 was confirmed by the fragment ion at <italic>m/z</italic> 122 (100; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). Based on these data, CP<bold>2</bold> was identified as gentisyl alcohol (Ishikawa et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">1986</xref>).</p>
<p>Compound <bold>3</bold> showed one spot in the TLC analysis with an <italic>R</italic><sub><italic>f</italic></sub> value of 0.6 when irradiated with UV light at 254 and 365 nm. CP3 showed the maximum UV absorption at 290 nm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>) by HPLC analysis. The <sup>1</sup>H-NMR showed aromatic protons at &#x003B4; 6.84 (1H, dd, 8.60, 2.88, and H-3), 6.59 (1H, dd, 8.6, 0.46, and H-4), and 6.53 (dd, 2.88, 0.4, and H-6) and a methyl group at &#x003B4; 2.15 (3H, s, and H-7) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). Based on these data, CP<bold>3</bold> was identified as toluquinol (Huang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">1989</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>3.4. <italic>In vitro</italic> antibacterial activity of patulin, gentisyl alcohol, and toluquinol</title>
<p>Because patulin, gentisyl alcohol, and toluquinol are associated with patulin biosynthesis (Puel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2010</xref>), we investigated the antibacterial activities of related metabolites (<italic>m</italic>-cresol, <italic>m</italic>-hydroxybenzyl alcohol, <italic>m</italic>-hydroxybenzaldehyde, <italic>m</italic>-hydroxybenzoic acid, gentisyl aldehyde, and gentisic acid) <italic>in vitro</italic> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>MIC values of patulin, gentisyl alcohol, toluquinol, and other metabolites of the patulin biosynthetic pathway.</p></caption> 
<table frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr style="background-color:#8f9496">
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Phytopathogenic bacteria (abbreviations)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="10"><bold>Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC</bold>, &#x003BC;<bold>g/ml)</bold><sup><bold>&#x0002A;</bold></sup></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr style="background-color:#8f9496">
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Patulin</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Gentisyl alcohol</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Toluquinol</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>m</bold></italic><bold>-cresol</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic><bold>m</bold></italic><bold>-hydroxy benzyl alcohol</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic><bold>m</bold></italic><bold>-hydroxy benzaldehyde</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic><bold>m</bold></italic><bold>-hydroxy benzoic acid</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Gentisyl aldehyde</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Gentisic acid</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Streptomycin sulfate</bold></td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Aac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ak</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.25</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">At</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">100</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bg</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">25.0</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cmm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.5</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ea</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.56</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ep</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">200</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">200</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.56</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pcc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">50.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.5</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">50.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Psa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">200</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.25</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Psl</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">200</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.25</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Rs</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.25</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Xap</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">50.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.5</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Xac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">50.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.5</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Xe</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">25</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Xoo</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003E;200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.13</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN1"><p>Aac, <italic>Acidovorax avenae</italic> subsp. <italic>cattleyae</italic>; Ak, <italic>Acidovorax konjaci</italic>; At, <italic>Agrobacterium tumefaciens</italic>; Bg, <italic>Burkholderia glumae</italic>; Cmm, <italic>Clavibacter michiganensis</italic> subsp. <italic>michiganensis</italic>; Ea, <italic>Erwinia pyrifoliae</italic>; Pcc, <italic>Pectobacterium carotovora</italic> subsp. <italic>carotovora</italic>; Pc, <italic>Pectobacterium chrysanthemi</italic>; Psa, <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> pv. <italic>actinidiae</italic>; Psl, <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> pv. <italic>lachrymans</italic>; Rs, <italic>Ralstonia solanacearum</italic>; Xap, <italic>Xanthomonas arboricola</italic> pv. <italic>pruni</italic>; Xac, <italic>Xanthomonas axonopodis</italic> pv. <italic>citri</italic>; Xe, <italic>Xanthomonas euvesicatoria</italic>; Xoo, <italic>Xanthomonas oryzae</italic> pv. <italic>oryzae</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN2"><p><sup>&#x0002A;</sup>The results from three biological replicates were identical (standard deviation = 0).</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Overall, compared with patulin, gentisyl alcohol, and toluquinol, the other six metabolites exhibited lower antibacterial activities against all phytopathogenic bacteria examined. In particular, the MIC values of <italic>m</italic>-cresol, <italic>m</italic>-hydroxybenzyl alcohol, <italic>m</italic>-hydroxybenzaldehye, <italic>m</italic>-hydroxybenzaldehyde, and gentisic acid were over 200 &#x003BC;g/ml, except 100 &#x003BC;g/ml for <italic>m</italic>-hydroxybenzaldehyde and 12.5 &#x003BC;g/ml for gentisic acid against Xoo. Gentisyl aldehyde showed higher antibacterial activity than those of the other five metabolites, with MIC values similar to those of toluquinol against <italic>B. glumae</italic> (Bg), <italic>Pectobacterium carotovora</italic> subsp. <italic>carotovora</italic> (Pcc), <italic>P. chrysanthemi</italic> (Pc), <italic>P. syringae</italic> pv. <italic>actinidiae</italic> (Psa), and Rs.</p>
<p>Patulin showed the highest antibacterial activities against most phytopathogenic bacteria except <italic>A. avenae</italic> subsp. <italic>cattleyae</italic> (Aac), <italic>A. konjaci</italic> (Ak), Xap, <italic>X</italic>. <italic>euvesicatoria</italic> (Xe), and Xoo. The lowest MIC values (3.13 &#x003BC;g/ml) of patulin were observed against <italic>C</italic>. <italic>michiganensis</italic> subsp. <italic>michiganensis</italic> (Cmm), Rs, and Xoo, followed by Xap (MIC 6.25 &#x003BC;g/ml). The highest antibacterial activity of gentisyl alcohol was observed against Xoo (MIC 3.13 &#x003BC;g/ml). In addition, it showed strong inhibitory effects on the growth of Rs and Xap (MIC 6.25 &#x003BC;g/ml). A metabolite with the highest antibacterial activity against Xoo was toluquinol (0.78 &#x003BC;g/ml). Compared with gentisyl alcohol, toluquinol showed higher activity against nine phytopathogenic bacteria (Ak, At, Pcc, Pc, Psa, Psl, Xap, Xe, and Xoo).</p>
<p>Due to the potentially negative effects of patulin on human health (Pal et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2017</xref>), we prepared two types of pesticide formulations, namely, T-SL and T-WP, using toluquinol to assess the disease control efficacy against bacterial plant diseases.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>3.5. Suppression of bacterial leaf blight of rice by toluquinol</title>
<p>Patulin, gentisyl alcohol, and toluquinol, as well as T-SL and T-WP, were evaluated for their efficacy against rice leaf blight caused by Xoo (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). Overall, all metabolites and formulations effectively suppressed the development of leaf blight of rice, similar to the positive control, streptomycin sulfate, except for gentisyl alcohol at 33.3 &#x003BC;g/ml. Gentisyl alcohol was less effective than patulin to suppress leaf blight of rice at 33.3 &#x003BC;g/ml (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05). There were no differences in the efficacies of different concentrations of each compound/formulation. For example, the efficacies of T-SL were 36.9 &#x000B1; 17.9% and 45.0 &#x000B1; 16.2% at 1:1,000 and 1:500 dilutions, respectively, which were not statistically different (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003E; 0.05). Similarly, T-WP exhibited control efficacies of 47.1 &#x000B1; 10.0% and 56.4 &#x000B1; 9.4% at 1:1,000 and 1:500 dilutions. At 100 &#x003BC;g/ml, the control efficacies of patulin, gentisyl alcohol, and toluquinol were 56.4 &#x000B1; 9.4%, 39.8 &#x000B1; 15.8%, and 45.6 &#x000B1; 5.0%, respectively. Notably, patulin showed phytotoxicity in rice plants at 300 &#x003BC;g/ml, causing leaf desiccation and leaf spots on the leaves 2 days after treatment. These data suggest that toluquinol and its formulations exert strong suppressive effects on leaf blight of rice, similar to the currently used chemical (streptomycin) for disease management.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Suppression of bacterial leaf blight of rice by toluquinol. Control efficacies of patulin (P), gentisyl alcohol (GA), and toluquinol (T) at 33.3, 100, and 300 &#x003BC;g/ml, and two formulations of toluquinol, soluble concentrate (T-SL) and wettable powder (T-WP), at 1:1,000 and 1:500 dilutions were investigated against leaf blight of rice relative to the control, streptomycin sulfate (SS). <bold>(A)</bold> The control efficacies of tested compounds/formulations are presented as the mean &#x000B1; standard deviation from five replicates. <bold>(B)</bold> Rice leaves were treated with each compound/formulation 1 day before inoculation with Xoo. Disease severity was evaluated in comparison with that of the untreated control to calculate control efficacy. &#x0201C;&#x0002A;&#x0201D; and &#x0201C;ns&#x0201D; indicate statistically significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) and non-significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003E; 0.05), respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1221865-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>3.6. Suppression of bacterial wilt of tomato by toluquinol</title>
<p>The disease control efficacy of toluquinol against tomato bacterial wilt caused by Rs was investigated using two toluquinol formulations, T-SL and T-WP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). Overall, both the toluquinol formulations showed higher control efficacies, even at the lowest concentrations, compared with that shown by the positive control, a commercial pesticide Sungbocycline (oxytetracycline), at 9 DAI (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05). At 14 DAI, the control efficacies of the most diluted T-SL (1:2,000) and T-WP (1:4,000) formulations slightly decreased compared with those at 9 DAI, similar to that of Sungbocycline (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003E; 0.05). In contrast, at higher concentrations, T-SL (1:500) and T-WP (1:1,000) completely suppressed the bacterial wilt of tomato (100 &#x000B1; 0.00% efficacy) at both 9 DAI and 14 DAI, whereas the control efficacy of Sungbocycline was 66.7 &#x000B1; 7.2% and 51.11 &#x000B1; 7.7%, respectively. These results suggest that toluquinol suppresses bacterial wilt of tomato more effectively than the currently used pesticides.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>Suppression of bacterial wilt of tomato by toluquinol. The control efficacies of two formulations of toluquinol, soluble concentrate (T-SL) and wettable powder (T-WP), were investigated against bacterial wilt of tomato relative to the control, a commercial pesticide, Sungbocycline (SC). <bold>(A)</bold> The control efficacies of the tested formulations are presented as the mean &#x000B1; standard deviation from three replicates. <bold>(B)</bold> Tomato plants were treated with each formulation at different concentrations 1 day before inoculation with <italic>Ralstonia solanacearum</italic> (plant images taken at 14 DAI). Disease severity was evaluated in comparison with that of the untreated control to calculate control efficacy. &#x0201C;&#x0002A;&#x0201D; and &#x0201C;ns&#x0201D; indicate statistically significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) and non-significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003E; 0.05), respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1221865-g0005.tif"/>
</fig></sec></sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>4. Discussion</title>
<p>This study aimed to identify antibacterial compounds produced by marine fungi that could be used for the development of effective and novel pesticides. We identified three antibacterial fungal metabolites, namely, patulin, gentisyl alcohol, and toluquinol, in the marine alga-derived <italic>P. griseofulvum</italic> strain. These compounds are associated with the biosynthesis of patulin, which is a well-known mycotoxin produced by several species of <italic>Penicillium, Aspergillus, Paecilomyces</italic>, and <italic>Byssochlamys</italic> (Puel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2010</xref>). It has been reported that one of the potential reasons for mycotoxin production in fungi is to suppress phytopathogenic bacteria that share host plants (Venkatesh and Keller, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2019</xref>). For example, the causal agent of the bakanae disease in rice seedlings, <italic>Fusarium fujikuroi</italic>, produces antibacterial mycotoxins such as bikaverin and beauvericin against <italic>R. solanacearum</italic> (Spraker et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Among patulin, gentisyl alcohol, and toluquinol, we observed the highest antibacterial activity against the 16 phytopathogenic bacteria in patulin (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). However, patulin is considered to negatively affect human health (Puel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2010</xref>), and toluquinol showed higher antibacterial activity than gentisyl alcohol. Therefore, we hypothesized that toluquinol might possess greater potential as a candidate for pesticide development than either patulin or gentisyl alcohol.</p>
<p>Toluquinol is also known as methylhydroquinone, 2,5-toluenediol, or 2,5-dihydroxytoluene and is commercially available. Toluquinol has been studied in <italic>P. griseofulvum</italic> (Sekiguchi and Gaucher, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">1977</xref>), <italic>Hydropisphaera erubescens</italic> (Carey and Nari, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">1979</xref>), <italic>Aspergillus clavatus</italic> (current name: <italic>Neosartorya clavata</italic>; Artigot et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2009</xref>), <italic>Penicillium</italic> sp. (Garcia-Caballero et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2013</xref>), and <italic>Aspergillus</italic> sp. (Kim et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2015</xref>). Toluquinol isolated from two marine fungal strains has been reported to suppress angiogenesis. For example, toluquinol from the marine <italic>Penicillium</italic> sp. HL-85-ALS5-R004 strain inhibits the growth of bovine endothelial and human tumor cells (Garcia-Caballero et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2013</xref>). Moreover, toluquinol from the marine algae-derived <italic>Aspergillus</italic> sp. MFA292 strain also inhibits angiogenesis in human endothelial cells (Kim et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2015</xref>). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the antibacterial activity of toluquinol against phytopathogenic bacteria.</p>
<p>Other six metabolites (<italic>m</italic>-cresol, <italic>m</italic>-hydroxybenzyl alcohol, <italic>m</italic>-hydroxybenzaldehyde, <italic>m</italic>-hydroxybenzoic acid, gentisyl aldehyde, and gentisic acid) in the patulin biosynthetic pathway (Artigot et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2009</xref>) showed much lower antibacterial activities than patulin, gentisyl alcohol, and toluquinol (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). In the first step of patulin synthesis, 6-methylsalicylic acid (6MSA) is produced by the condensation of acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA (Puel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2010</xref>). 6MSA is converted to <italic>m</italic>-cresol by 6MSA decarboxylase, followed by the transformation of <italic>m</italic>-cresol into <italic>m</italic>-hydroxybenzyl alcohol or toluquinol by two distinct cytochrome P450 enzymes, namely, CYP619C3 and CYP619C2 (Artigot et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2009</xref>). The enzyme CYP619C2, which is involved in the formation of toluquinol from <italic>m</italic>-cresol, is also responsible for the hydroxylation of <italic>m</italic>-hydroxybenzyl alcohol to yield gentisyl alcohol. Unlike gentisyl alcohol, toluquinol is not metabolized to patulin, suggesting that it is a co-metabolite and not an intermediate of patulin (Puel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2010</xref>).</p>
<p>Toluquinol formulations were prepared as T-SL and T-WP. T-SL is an aqueous solution and more environmentally friendly than other formulations (Chou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2022</xref>). T-WP is a solid formulation suspended in water. T-SL and T-WP are pesticide formulations commonly used to control bacterial plant diseases. Based on our data, we did not observe any differences in the suppressive effects of T-SL and T-WP on the two plant diseases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). This suggests that toluquinol can be formulated as either a T-SL or T-WP with similar control efficacy levels.</p>
<p>In the present study, two representative bacterial plant diseases were selected to evaluate the disease control efficacy of toluquinol: leaf blight of rice and bacterial wilt of tomato. Singh et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">1980</xref>) reported that copper compounds and antibiotics, including streptomycin, are not effective in controlling leaf blight of rice. As toluquinol formulations suppressed these significant bacterial diseases similarly or more effectively than the existing chemicals (streptomycin and oxytetracycline; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>), toluquinol could be a candidate for the development of new pesticides targeting bacterial plant diseases. Future studies should investigate the efficacy of toluquinol under various field conditions using multiple cultivars and against additional bacterial plant diseases.</p></sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>5. Conclusion</title>
<p>In this study, three antibacterial metabolites (patulin, gentisyl alcohol, and toluquinol) against a variety of phytopathogenic bacteria were identified from a marine <italic>P. griseofulvum</italic> strain. Gentisyl alcohol and toluquinol are an intermediate and a co-metabolite of the mycotoxin patulin, respectively. Toluquinol showed higher antibacterial activity against phytopathogenic bacteria <italic>in vitro</italic> than gentisyl alcohol and suppressed bacterial wilt of tomato and leaf blight of rice similarly or more effectively compared with the currently used pesticides. Given that only limited approaches to control bacterial plant diseases are available, toluquinol could be used to develop novel and effective pesticides for crop protection.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OQ559567">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OQ559567</ext-link>.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>DC and HN performed experiments and wrote the manuscript. NY designed the experiments and analyzed the data. W-JY, YK, and SB assisted with the collection of marine samples and fungal identification. GC and J-CK conceived the original study and supervised the project. All authors have read and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.</p></sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was supported by an in-house grant from the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (grant number MABIK 2023M00600).</p>
</sec>

<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>HN, NY, and J-CK were employed by JAN153 Biotech Incorporated.</p>
<p>The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s9">
<title>Publisher&#x00027;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s10">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1221865/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1221865/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.TIF" id="SM1" mimetype="image/tif" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/></sec>
<fn-group>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<fn fn-type="abbr"><p>PDA, potato dextrose agar; PDB, potato dextrose broth; TSA, tryptic soy agar; TSB, tryptic soy broth; At, <italic>Agrobacterium tumefaciens</italic>; Rs, <italic>Ralstonia solanacearum</italic>; Xap, <italic>Xanthomonas arboricola</italic> pv.pruni; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; EA, ethyl acetate; TLC, thin-layer chromatography; UV, ultraviolet; prep-TLC, preparative TLC; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; T-WP, wettable powder; T-SP, soluble concentrate; Xoo, <italic>Xanthomonas oryzae</italic> pv. <italic>oryzae</italic>; DS, disease severity; DAI, days after inoculation; Bg, <italic>Burkholderia glumae</italic>; Pcc, <italic>Pectobacterium</italic> subsp. <italic>carotovora</italic>; Pc, <italic>Pectobacterium chrysanthemi</italic>; Psa, <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> pv. <italic>actinidiae</italic>; Aac, <italic>Acidovorax avenae</italic> subsp. <italic>acttleyae</italic>; Ak, <italic>Acidovorax konjaci</italic>; Xe, <italic>Xanthomonas euvesicatoria</italic>; Cmm, <italic>Clavibacter michiganensis</italic> subsp. <italic>michiganensis</italic>; Psl, <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> pv. <italic>lachrymans</italic>; Ea, <italic>Erwinia pyrifoliae</italic>; Xac, <italic>Xanthomonas axonopodis</italic> pv. <italic>citri</italic>; 6MSA, 6-methylsalicylic acid.</p></fn></fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ameen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>AlNadhari</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Homaidan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Marine microorganisms as an untapped source of bioactive compounds</article-title>. <source>Saudi J. Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>224</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>231</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.09.052</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33424301</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Artigot</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Loiseau</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laffite</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mas-Reguieg</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tadrist</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oswald</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Molecular cloning and functional characterization of two CYP619 cytochrome P450s involved in biosynthesis of patulin in <italic>Aspergillus clavatus</italic></article-title>. <source>Microbiology</source> <volume>155</volume>, <fpage>1738</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1747</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mic.0.024836-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19383676</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Absolute configuration of bioactive azaphilones from the marine-derived fungus <italic>Pleosporales</italic> sp. CF09-1</article-title>. <source>J. Nat. Prod</source>. <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>386</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>392</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jnatprod.8b01030</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30724084</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carey</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1979</year>). <article-title>Metabolites of <italic>Pyrenomycetes</italic> X. Isolation of p-toluquinone and toluquinol from <italic>Nectria erubescens</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Nat. Prod</source>. 42, 231. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/np50002a015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27802390</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chou</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Selection, formulation, and field evaluation of <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> PMB01 for its application to manage tomato bacterial wilt disease</article-title>. <source>Agriculture</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1714</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture12101714</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chung</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kwon</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021a</year>). <article-title>Telomere-to-telomere genome assembly of asparaginase-producing <italic>Trichoderma simmonsii</italic></article-title>. <source>BMC Genom</source>. 22, 830. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-021-08162-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34789157</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chung</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kwon</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021b</year>). <article-title>Characterization of the proteolytic activity of a halophilic <italic>Aspergillus reticulatus</italic> strain SK1-1 isolated from a solar saltern</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>29</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms10010029</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35056479</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dhakal</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dobhal</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alvarez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arif</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic analyses of Xanthomonads causing bacterial leaf spot of tomato and pepper: <italic>Xanthomonas euvesicatoria</italic> revealed homologous populations despite distant geographical distribution</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>462</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms7100462</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31623235</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garcia-Caballero</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mari-Beffa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Canedo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Medina</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quesada</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Toluquinol, a marine fungus metabolite, is a new angiosuppresor that interferes the Akt pathway</article-title>. <source>Biochem. Pharmacol</source>. <volume>85</volume>, <fpage>1727</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1740</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bcp.2013.04.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23603293</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gartemann</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kirchner</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Engemann</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grafen</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eichenlaub</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burger</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title><italic>Clavibacter michiganensis</italic> subsp. <italic>michiganensis</italic>: first steps in the understanding of virulence of a Gram-positive phytopathogenic bacterium</article-title>. <source>J. Biotechnol</source>. <volume>106</volume>, <fpage>179</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>191</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.07.011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14651860</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <source>Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligense</source> subsp. <italic>konjaci</italic> subsp. nov., the causal agent of bacterial leaf blight of konjac (<italic>Amorphophalus konjac Koch</italic>.). <italic>Int. J. Bacteriol</italic>. <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>539</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>545</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/00207713-33-3-539</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harighi</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Angular leaf spot of cucumber caused by <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> pv. <italic>lachrymans</italic> in Kurdistan</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>769</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-91-6-0769A</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30780495</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Putnam</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Werner</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mishra</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whitenack</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Herbicidal metabolites from a soil-dwelling fungus (<italic>Scopulariopis brumptii</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Weed Sci.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>123</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>128</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S004317450005596X</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Im</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Biological control of tomato bacterial wilt by oxydifficidin and difficidin-producing <italic>Bacillus methylotrophicus</italic> DR-08</article-title>. <source>Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.</source> <volume>163</volume>, <fpage>130</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>137</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.11.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31973849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ishikawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morimoto</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamasaki</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Gentisyl alcohol produced by <italic>Penicillium commune</italic>: a potent antioxidant and synergist for tocopherol</article-title>. <source>J. Jpn. Oil Chem. Soc</source>. <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>13</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5650/jos1956.35.903</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kannan</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bastas</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Devi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>&#x0201C;Scientific and economic impact of plant pathogenic bacteria&#x0201D;</article-title> in <source>Sustainable Approaches to Controlling Plant Pathogenic Bacteria</source>, eds R. Kannan, and K. <italic>Bastas</italic> (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), <fpage>369</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>392</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1201/b18892</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35962419</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khamtham</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akarapisan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title><italic>Acidovorax avenae</italic> subsp. <italic>cattleyae</italic> causes bacterial brown spot disease on terrestrial orchid <italic>Habenaria lindleyana</italic> in Thailand</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>31</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>37</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42161-018-0135-6</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jung</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Son</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Toluhydroquinone, the secondary metabolite of marine algae symbiotic microorganism, inhibits angiogenesis in HUVECs</article-title>. <source>Biomed. Pharmacother.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>129</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>139</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biopha.2015.01.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25776491</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lamichhane</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Osdaghi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Behlau</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kohl</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aubertot</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Thirteen decades of antimicrobial copper compounds applied in agriculture. A review</article-title>. <source>Agron. Sustain. Dev</source>. 38, Article 28. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13593-018-0503-9</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Le</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title><italic>Streptomyces</italic> sp. JCK-6131 protects plants against bacterial and fungal diseases via two mechanisms</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci</source>. 12, 726266. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.726266</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34603354</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Chemical pesticides and plant essential oils for disease control of tomato bacterial wilt. <italic>Plant Pathol</italic></article-title>. <source>J</source>. <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>32</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>39</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5423/PPJ.OA.10.2011.0200</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shie</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chern</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title><italic>Pectobacterium chrysanthemi</italic> as the dominant causal agent of bacterial soft rot in <italic>Oncidium</italic> &#x0201C;Grower Ramsey&#x0201D;</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol</source>. <volume>142</volume>, <fpage>331</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>343</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-015-0618-7</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lopez-Soriano</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boyer</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cesbron</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morente</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Penalver</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Palacio-Bielsa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Multilocus variable number of tandem repeat analysis reveals multiple introductions in Spain of <italic>Xanthomonas arboricola</italic> pv. <italic>pruni</italic>, the causal agent of bacterial spot disease of stone fruits and almond</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>e0163729</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0163729</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27669415</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mansfield</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Genin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Magori</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Citovsky</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sriariyanum</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ronald</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Pathol</source>. <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>614</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>629</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22672649</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martins</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Merfa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takita</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Souza</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Persistence in phytophathogenic bacteria: do we know enough?</article-title> <source>Front. Microbiol</source>. 9, 1099. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.01099</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29887856</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yoon</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bae</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Antimicrobial activities of an oxygenated cyclohexanone derivative isolated from <italic>Amphirosellinia nigrospora</italic> JS-1675 against various plant pathogenic bacteria and fungi</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbiol</source>. <volume>126</volume>, <fpage>894</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>904</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jam.14138</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30358043</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ortega</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rojas</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Bacterial panicle blight and <italic>Burkholderia glumae</italic>: from pathogen biology to disease control</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>772</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>778</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-09-20-0401-RVW</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33206007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pal</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ansari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Toxicological effects of patulin mycotoxin on the mammalian system: an overview</article-title>. <source>Toxicol. Res</source>. <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>764</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>771</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/c7tx00138j</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30090541</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Puel</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Galtier</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oswald</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Biosynthesis and toxicological effects of patulin</article-title>. <source>Toxins</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>613</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>631</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/toxins2040613</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22069602</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Puigvert</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sole</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lopez-Garcia</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coll</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deattie</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Type III secretion inhibitors for the management of bacterial plant diseases</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Pathol</source>. <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>20</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>32</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mpp.12736</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30062690</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rhim</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Volksch</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gardan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paulin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Langlotz</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>1999</year>). <article-title><italic>Erwinia pyrifoliae</italic>, an <italic>Erwinia</italic> species different from <italic>Erwinia amylovora</italic>, causes a necrotic disease of Asian pear trees</article-title>. <source>Plant Pathol</source>. <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>514</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>520</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-3059.1999.00376.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11700346</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rivera-Zuluaga</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hiles</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barua</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caldwell</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lyer-Pascuzzi</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Getting to the root of Ralstonia invasion</article-title>. <source>Semin. Cell Dev. Biol</source>. 148&#x02013;<volume>149</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>12</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.12.002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36526528</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scortichini</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marcelletti</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferrante</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petriccione</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title><italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> pv. <italic>actinidiae</italic>: a re-merging, multi-faceted, pandemic pathogen</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Pathol</source>. <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>631</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>640</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00788.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22353258</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sekiguchi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaucher</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1977</year>). <article-title>Conidiogenesis and secondary metabolism in <italic>Penicillium urticae</italic></article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol</source>. <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>147</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>158</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.33.1.147-158.1977</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">836020</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pal</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>Chemical control of bacterial leaf blight of rice</article-title>. <source>Trop. Pest Manage</source>. <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>21</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>25</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09670878009414278</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spraker</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wiemann</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bacile</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Venkatesh</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schumacher</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schroeder</surname> <given-names>F. C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Conserved responses in a war of small molecules between a plant pathogenic bacterium and fungi</article-title>. <source>MBio</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>e00820</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mBio.00820-18</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29789359</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sundin</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Castiblanco</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Bacterial disease management: challenges, experience, innovation and future prospects</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Pathol</source>. <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>1506</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1518</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mpp.12436</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27238249</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sundin</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Antibiotic resistance in plant-pathogenic bacteria. <italic>Annu. Rev</italic></article-title>. <source>Phytopathol</source>. <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>161</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>180</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-045946</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29856934</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tamura</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peterson</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peterson</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stecher</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nei</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Evol</source>. <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>2731</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2739</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msr121</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21546353</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Venkatesh</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keller</surname> <given-names>N. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Mycotoxins in conversation with bacteria and fungi. <italic>Front</italic></article-title>. <source>Microbiol</source>. 10, 403. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.00403</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30941105</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Visagie</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Houbraken</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frisvad</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klaassen</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perrone</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Identification and nomenclature of the genus <italic>Penicillium</italic></article-title>. <source>Stud. Mycol</source>. <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>343</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>71</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.simyco.2014.09.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25505353</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>An evolving technology that integrates classical methods with continuous technological developments: thin-layer chromatography bioautography</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>4647</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules26154647</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34361800</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Winstead</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelman</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1952</year>). <article-title>Inoculation techniques for evaluating resistance to <italic>Pseudomonas solanacearum</italic></article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>628</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>634</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Metabolomic investigations on <italic>Nestrenkonia flava</italic> revealed significant differences between marine and terrestrial actinomycetes</article-title>. <source>Mar. Drug</source>. 16, 356. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/md16100356</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30274334</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yoo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Isolation and properties of antitumor antibiotic YS-1649 from Penicillium sp. strain 1649</article-title>. <source>J. Microbiol. Biotechnol</source>. <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>31</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>35</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Bioactive 3-decalinoyltetramic acids derivatives from a marine-derived strain of the fungus <italic>Fusarium equiseti</italic> D39</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol</source>. 19, 1285. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.01285</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31231352</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Anti-phytopathogenic and cytotoxic activities of crude extracts and secondary metabolites of marine-derived fungi</article-title>. <source>Mar. Drugs</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>36</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/md16010036</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29346329</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>


</back>
</article> 