<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1194871</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Nutrient availability and acid erosion determine the early colonization of limestone by lithobiontic microorganisms</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Jin</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1957933/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Qing</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Fangbing</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Xiangwei</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Yang</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Limin</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Jinan</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff4" ref-type="aff"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>Lingbin</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2018599/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>Lifei</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Germplasm Innovation in Mountainous Region (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences and Institute of Agro-Bioengineering, Guizhou University</institution>, <addr-line>Guiyang, Guizhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>School of Mathematical Sciences, Guizhou Normal University</institution>, <addr-line>Guiyang, Guizhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Institute of Guizhou Mountain Resources, Guizhou Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Guiyang, Guizhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Garden Greening Center of Logistics Management Office, Guizhou University</institution>, <addr-line>Guiyang, Guizhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn id="fn0001" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Muhammad Zahid, The University of Lahore, Pakistan</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn0002" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Brahim Bouizgarne, Universit&#x00E9; Ibn Zohr, Morocco; Carolina Paz Quezada, Universidad Catolica de la Sant&#x00ED;sima Concepci&#x00F3;n, Chile</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Lifei Yu, <email>lfyu@gzu.edu.cn</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>09</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1194871</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>27</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>29</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2023 Chen, Zhao, Li, Zhao, Wang, Zhang, Liu, Yan and Yu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Chen, Zhao, Li, Zhao, Wang, Zhang, Liu, Yan and Yu</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Microorganisms, including the pioneer microorganisms that play a role in the early colonization of rock, are extremely important biological factors in rock deterioration. The interaction of microorganisms with limestone leads to biodeterioration, accelerates soil formation, and plays an important role in the restoration of degraded ecosystems that cannot be ignored. However, the process of microbial colonization of sterile limestone in the early stages of ecological succession is unclear, as are the factors that affect the colonization. Acid erosion (both organic and inorganic), nutrient availability, and water availability are thought to be key factors affecting the colonization of lithobiontic microorganisms.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>In this study, organic acid (Oa), inorganic acid (Ia), inorganic acid&#x2009;+&#x2009;nutrient solution (Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut), nutrient solution (Nut), and rain shade (RS) treatments were applied to sterilized limestone, and the interaction between microorganisms and limestone was investigated using high-throughput sequencing techniques to assess the microorganisms on the limestone after 60&#x2009;days of natural placement.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>The results were as follows: (1) The abundance of fungi was higher than that of bacteria in the early colonization of limestone, and the dominant bacterial phyla were Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteriota, while the dominant fungal phyla were Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Chytridiomycota. (2) Acid erosion and nutrient availability shaped different microbial communities in different ways, with bacteria being more sensitive to the environmental stresses than fungi, and the higher the acidity (Ia and Oa)/nutrient concentration, the greater the differences in microbial communities compared to the control (based on principal coordinate analysis). (3) Fungal communities were highly resistant to environmental stress and competitive, while bacterial communities were highly resilient to environmental stress and stable.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In conclusion, our results indicate that limestone exhibits high bioreceptivity and can be rapidly colonized by microorganisms within 60&#x2009;days in its natural environment, and both nutrient availability and acid erosion of limestone are important determinants of early microbial colonization.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>biodeterioration</kwd>
<kwd>bioreceptivity</kwd>
<kwd>lithobiontic microorganism</kwd>
<kwd>corrosion</kwd>
<kwd>limestone</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn1">2016YFC0502604</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn2">GNYL[2017]009</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn3">YJSKYJJ[2021]079</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn1">13th Five-year National Key Research and Development</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn2">Biology First-class Discipline in Guizhou</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn3">Guizhou Province</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="73"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="8497"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Microbiological Chemistry and Geomicrobiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
<title>1. Introduction</title>
<p>Microbial colonization interferes with the integrity and esthetics of rock minerals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Trov&#x00E3;o et al., 2019</xref>). Worldwide, most lithic artifacts have suffered irreversible biodegradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Abdel Ghany et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Trov&#x00E3;o et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Gambino et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>), for example, the Angkor sandstone monuments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Liu et al., 2018</xref>), the limestone walls of the old cathedral of Coimbra (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Trov&#x00E3;o et al., 2019</xref>), the Chaalis abbey (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Mihajlovski et al., 2017</xref>), and the Feilaifeng limestone statue (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Li et al., 2018</xref>). Southwest China is a typical carbonate area (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Chen et al., 2022</xref>), where politics, economics, and culture are all linked to carbonate rocks. For example, policies in Southwest China are linked to the ecological restoration of areas exhibiting karstic desertification, and most building materials are limestone. The study of the biodeterioration of limestone is therefore of great value. Acids (both organic and inorganic) produced by colonizing biota are known key factors that lead to rock biodegradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Zhang et al., 2019</xref>). Stone relic conservation science aims to slow or even eradicate the biodegradation of lithic relics caused by microorganisms and preserve their integrity. In contrast, according to ecological succession theory, acceleration of the biodeterioration of stones leads to the formation of relatively stable biological communities, promotes biomineralization, and accelerates soil formation. The clarification of the ecological succession process of colonizers and their interactions with the stone matrix is exceptionally important both for the conservation of lithic artifacts and for the promotion of soil formation. Microbial biodeterioration involves a series of processes, including biofilm formation, discoloration, salinization, mechanical damage, permeation, and organic matter production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Scheerer et al., 2009</xref>). The essence of microbial biodeterioration is the action of hydrogen ions from acidic corrosives produced by lithobiontic microorganisms on the rock matrix, resulting in dissolution, complexation, and chelation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Moroni and Pitzurra, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Gadd, 2017a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Li et al., 2018</xref>). The acids produced are mainly organic acids such as oxalic and citric acid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Gadd, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">de Oliveira Mendes et al., 2020</xref>) and inorganic acids, such as HNO<sub>2</sub>, HNO<sub>3</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>, and H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">Warscheid et al., 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Warscheid and Braams, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Moroni and Pitzurra, 2008</xref>). The organisms involved in rock biodeterioration mainly include bacteria, Cyanobacteria, fungi, algae, lichens, and mosses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Scheerer et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Pinheiro et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Zhang et al., 2019</xref>). In recent years, the study of lithobiontic microorganisms has made great progress, from determining the role of single microbial species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Gerrits et al., 2021</xref>) to determining the role of multiple microbial species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Crispim and Gaylarde, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Trov&#x00E3;o et al., 2020</xref>) on rocks, and the study of rock biodeterioration is flourishing. Various organisms on rocks, such as fungi, algae, and lichens, have been extensively reported on, but bacteria and archaea have been relatively less reported on (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Pinheiro et al., 2019</xref>). Regarding fungi, most studies have focused on the biodegradation of limestone caused by fungal strains that can be isolated and cultured (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Trov&#x00E3;o et al., 2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">2021</xref>), while relatively little attention has been paid to other fungal taxa that colonize limestone under natural conditions.</p>
<p>Because of the poor availability of water and organic matter on rocks, pioneer microorganisms colonizing rocks generally have the ability to utilize small amounts of water, inorganic matter, and airborne organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Villa et al., 2016</xref>). In addition, rocks provide little shelter for microorganisms other than the pores and cracks on the rocks, so lithobiontic microorganisms are often exposed to conditions of drastic temperature changes and strong UV light (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Walker and Pace, 2007</xref>). In response to these conditions, lithobiontic microbes often form specific biofilms based on their nutrient and growth requirements to increase their adaptation to extreme environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Gorbushina, 2007</xref>). Compared to microorganisms in other environments, lithobiontic microorganisms are characterized by (1) low taxonomic diversity but high synergistic and metabolic activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Villa et al., 2015</xref>); (2) phylogenetic similarity and high specificity worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Gorbushina and Broughton, 2009</xref>); and (3) pigments, exopolymeric substances, and efficient DNA repair systems that allow survival on the rock (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">G&#x00F3;mez-Silva, 2018</xref>). Rock surface pH, porosity, permeability, mineral composition, texture, geometry, shading, and timing of colonization affect the composition and structure of lithobiontic microbial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Miller et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Brewer and Fierer, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Liu et al., 2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Abdel Ghany et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Chen et al., 2022</xref>). A decrease in rock surface pH is generally regarded as more serious biodeterioration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Pinheiro et al., 2019</xref>). In addition, air is an important factor influencing the structure and composition of lithobiontic microbial communities, especially as air near cities contains organic pollutants that can be a source of energy for microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Mitchell and Gu, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Villa et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Limestone is one of the rock types that are more susceptible to biodeterioration. Softness, brightness, and easy sculptability increase the bioreceptivity of limestone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Miller et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Pinheiro et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Chen et al., 2022</xref>). The inorganic compounds in limestone are good substrates for the growth of various microorganisms, with microorganisms obtaining the required elements by secreting organic acids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">Warscheid et al., 1991</xref>). For example, <italic>Nitrosomonas</italic> spp. can secrete nitric acid and <italic>Thiobacillus</italic> spp. can secrete sulfuric acid, thereby obtaining the necessary chemoenergetic nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Warscheid and Braams, 2000</xref>). Our previous study reported on the microbial taxa (and their functional genetic variations) on carbonate rock under natural conditions with various weathering times (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Chen et al., 2022</xref>). However, it is not clear which microorganisms take the lead in colonizing limestone under natural conditions, or whether acid erosion or nutrient availability promote microbial colonization. Therefore, to understand the effects of acid erosion (organic and inorganic acids), nutrient availability, and rainfall on microbial colonization, we set up a total of five treatments: organic acid (Oa), inorganic acid (Ia), inorganic acid&#x2009;+&#x2009;nutrient solution (Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut), nutrient solution (Nut), and rain shade (RS). We focused on the following questions: what are the early colonizing microbial species on limestone surfaces in the subtropical climate zone? What are the ecological strategies of bacterial and fungal communities during colonization of limestone surfaces? What factors influence the colonization of limestone surfaces by microorganisms? To clarify these questions, we selected sterilized limestone sand-sized grains as the study material and applied different treatments to investigate the colonization patterns of various microbes. Our study provides new insights into the potential conservation of limestone artifacts and the soil-forming role of limestone in karst areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>2. Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>2.1. Experimental design and sample processing</title>
<p>We chose limestone, which is commonly found in southwest China, as the study material. The limestone was purchased from a specialized stone factory and was uniformly processed to a particle size that could pass through a 3-mm but not 1.5-mm sieve. The limestone samples were sterilized in a sterilizer at 180&#x00B0;C for 2&#x2009;h and cooled. Next, 300&#x2009;g were placed in a 100&#x2009;mm&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;95&#x2009;mm&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;55&#x2009;mm plastic grid (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Figure S1</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">H</xref>). Before adding the samples, a sterilized piece of gauze with an approximate pore size of 1&#x2009;mm was placed in each compartment of the grid to prevent leakage of the added samples. In addition, an <italic>in situ</italic> weather station (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Figure S1</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">B</xref>) was installed to observe the meteorological elements such as temperature, humidity, atmospheric pressure, and rainfall at the experimental site (26&#x00B0;25&#x2032;42.65&#x2033;, 106&#x00B0;39&#x2032;59.65&#x2033;), and readings were taken every 10&#x2009;min. The experiment ran from January 15 to March 15, 2022.</p>
<p>To explore the relationship between limestone dissolution and microbial colonization, we set up six groups, i.e., addition of nutrient solution (Nut; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Figure S1</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">G</xref>), addition of organic acid (Oa; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Figure S1</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">D</xref>), addition of inorganic acid (Ia; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Figure S1</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">E</xref>), addition of inorganic acid and nutrient solution (Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Figure S1</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">F</xref>), control (CK; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Figure S1</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">C</xref>), and rain shade (RS; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Figure S1</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">C</xref>) groups. Hoagland&#x2019;s solution is a complex nutrient solution containing large amounts of macronutrients and micronutrients required by a variety of organisms. Therefore, for the Nut group, a concentration gradient was set up involving five nutrient concentrations (40&#x2009;mL each; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>), i.e., 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25&#x2009;mL Hoagland&#x2019;s solution mixed with water (for example, 5&#x2009;mL Hoagland&#x2019;s solution in 35&#x2009;mL water, and so on). The Nut concentrations and ratios were based on previous descriptions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Rajan et al., 2019</xref>). We selected oxalic acid, which is commonly found in rocks undergoing biodeterioration, as the corrosive organic acid for this experiment. For the Oa group, we set up a concentration gradient involving five oxalic acid concentrations (40&#x2009;mL each), i.e., 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6&#x2009;mmol/L. The Oa concentrations were based on the concentrations of 0.3&#x2013;0.7&#x2009;mmol/L in rocks undergoing biodeterioration reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Sheng et al. (1997)</xref>. We selected hydrochloric acid, which is often used as the dissolution acid for carbonate-related experiments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Sun et al., 2010</xref>), as the strong dissolution acid for this experiment. For the Ia group, we set up a concentration gradient involving five hydrochloric acid concentrations (40&#x2009;mL each), i.e., 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6&#x2009;mol/L. For the Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut group, we set up the same concentration gradient of hydrochloric acid as in the Ia group, and after the reaction was completed (after 24&#x2009;h), we added 15&#x2009;mL Hoagland&#x2019;s solution diluted to 40&#x2009;mL with water. For the Nut, Oa, and Ia groups, after 24&#x2009;h, 40&#x2009;mL sterile water was added to give a final volume of 80&#x2009;mL. For the CK and RS groups, 80&#x2009;mL sterile water was used. After each rainfall event, we added an equal amount of sterile water to the RS group based on the amount of rainfall recorded by the weather station. We conducted three replicates of each treatment to give a total of 66 samples.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>2.2. Sampling and assessment of limestone samples</title>
<p>It has been found that fungi grow on modern limestone surfaces after 60&#x2009;days of infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Abdel Ghany et al., 2019</xref>). Therefore, after the limestone samples had been left outdoors for 60&#x2009;days, we scooped them out with a sterile steel spoon and placed them in labeled plastic bags. For high-throughput sequencing, to obtain microorganisms samples for DNA extraction, we added 50&#x2009;g of the limestone samples to about 125&#x2009;mL sterile water, washed them with an ultrasonic cleaner for 15&#x2009;s to ensure that the microorganisms on the limestone were washed into the sterile water, and then passed the solution through a 0.02-&#x03BC;m filter membrane. Next, 50&#x2009;g of the limestone samples was used for pH determination and 50&#x2009;g was converted into powder with a ball mill and passed through a 0.053-mm sieve for X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (to investigate the structure of the limestone samples) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis (to characterize the atomic groups in the limestone samples). The remainder of the limestone samples were passed through a 0.053-mm sieve to obtain the powder remaining on the rock surface, which was placed in plastic bags for physicochemical experiments. We assessed the organic nitrogen (ON) and total carbon (TC) content of the powder samples using an organic elemental analyzer (all the C obtained by the analyzer should represent the TC because most of the samples are carbonate rocks). In addition, we assessed the organic carbon (OC) content of the powder samples using the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-K<sub>2</sub>Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub> heating method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Bao, 2000</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>2.3. DNA extraction and PCR amplification</title>
<p>Total microbial genomic DNA was extracted from the membrane (0.02-&#x03BC;m) samples using an E.Z.N.A.&#x00AE; soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, United States) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. The quality and concentration of DNA were determined using 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis and a NanoDrop&#x00AE; ND-2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Inc., United States). The DNA was then kept at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C prior to further use.</p>
<p>For bacteria, the V3&#x2013;V4 hypervariable regions (468&#x2009;bp) of the 16S rRNA gene were targeted using primer pairs 338F (5&#x2032;-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3&#x2032;) and 806R (5&#x2032;-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3&#x2032;; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Liu et al., 2016</xref>). For fungi, the internal transcribed spacer region (about 300&#x2009;bp) was targeted using primer pairs ITS1F (5&#x2032;-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3&#x2032;) and ITS2R (5&#x2032;-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3&#x2032;; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Adams et al., 2013</xref>). The 16S PCR reaction mixture included 4&#x2009;&#x03BC;L 5&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;Fast Pfu buffer, 2&#x2009;&#x03BC;L 2.5&#x2009;mM dNTPs, 0.8&#x2009;&#x03BC;L each primer (5&#x2009;&#x03BC;M), 0.4&#x2009;&#x03BC;L Fast Pfu polymerase, 10&#x2009;ng template DNA, and ddH<sub>2</sub>O to give a final volume of 20&#x2009;&#x03BC;L. The ITS PCR reaction mixture included 2&#x2009;&#x03BC;L 10&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;buffer, 2&#x2009;&#x03BC;L 2.5&#x2009;mM dNTPs, 0.8&#x2009;&#x03BC;L each primer (5&#x2009;&#x03BC;M), 0.2&#x2009;&#x03BC;L rTaq polymerase, 0.2&#x2009;&#x03BC;L bovine serum albumin, 10&#x2009;ng template DNA, and ddH<sub>2</sub>O to give a final volume of 20&#x2009;&#x03BC;L.</p>
<p>The PCR amplification cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95&#x00B0;C for 3&#x2009;min, denaturing at 95&#x00B0;C for 30&#x2009;s (27&#x2009;cycles for 16S and 35&#x2009;cycles for ITS), annealing at 55&#x00B0;C for 30&#x2009;s, and extension at 72&#x00B0;C for 45&#x2009;s, and single extension at 72&#x00B0;C for 10&#x2009;min, ending at 4&#x00B0;C. All samples were amplified in triplicate. The PCR products were extracted after 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and purified using an AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, United States) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. They were then quantified using a Quantus&#x2122; Fluorometer (Promega, United States). Purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar amounts and paired-end sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform (Illumina, San Diego, United States) according to standard protocols by Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The raw sequencing reads were deposited into the US National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (accession number: PRJNA944278).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<title>2.4. Sequencing data processing and quality control</title>
<p>Raw FASTQ files were de-multiplexed using an in-house perl script, quality-filtered using fastp v0.19.6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Chen et al., 2018</xref>), and merged using FLASH v1.2.7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Mago&#x010D; and Salzberg, 2011</xref>) based on the following criteria: (i) 300-bp reads were truncated at any site with a mean quality score of &#x003C;20 over a 50&#x2009;bp sliding window and truncated reads &#x003C;50&#x2009;bp were discarded, (ii) reads containing ambiguous characters were also discarded, and (iii) only overlapping sequences &#x003E;10&#x2009;bp were assembled according to their overlapping sequence. The maximum mismatch ratio of the overlapping region was set at 0.2. Reads that could not be assembled were discarded. The optimized sequences were then clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using UPARSE v7.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Edgar, 2013</xref>) with a 97% sequence similarity level. The most abundant sequence for each OTU was selected as a representative sequence. The taxonomy of each OTU representative sequence was analyzed using RDP Classifier v2.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Wang et al., 2007</xref>) and 16S and ITS rRNA gene databases (Silva v138 for bacteria and Unite v8.0 for fungi) using a confidence threshold of 0.7.</p>
<p>All sequences classified as chloroplast or mitochondria sequences were removed using the Majorbio Cloud platform (<ext-link xlink:href="https://cloud.majorbio.com" ext-link-type="uri">https://cloud.majorbio.com</ext-link>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Ren et al., 2022</xref>). Next, we selected the OTUs that were detected in &#x2265;2 samples and that accounted for &#x2265;5 occurrences across samples. Thereafter, samples were rarefied to the smallest observed number of reads to normalize for uneven sequencing effort.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<title>2.5. Statistical analyses</title>
<p>All analyses were performed in the R Environment v4.2.2, and all plots were generated using the <italic>ggplot2</italic> package. The sequencing data were transformed to proportions using total-sum scaling (TSS) normalization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">McKnight et al., 2019</xref>); the data were transformed using log10(<italic>x</italic>&#x2009;+&#x2009;<italic>x</italic><sub>0</sub>), where <italic>x</italic> is the original non-zero abundance count data and <italic>x</italic><sub>0</sub>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.1&#x00B7;min(<italic>x</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Sunagawa et al., 2015</xref>). We used the pcoa() function in the <italic>ape</italic> package for unconstrained principal coordinate analysis (PCoA; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Paradis et al., 2004</xref>). Permutational multivariate ANOVA (PerMANOVA) was performed with the adonis() function implemented in the <italic>vegan</italic> package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Dixon, 2003</xref>). We calculated the difference in richness between treatment groups using the aov() function in the <italic>stats</italic> package and the duncan.test() function in the <italic>agricolae</italic> package to perform a <italic>post hoc</italic> test (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Steel and Torrie, 1980</xref>). We performed a two-sample permutation Student&#x2019;s <italic>t</italic>-test (one-tailed; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Herv&#x00E9;, 2022</xref>) using the perm.t.test() function in the <italic>RVAideMemoire</italic> package.</p>
<p>To construct Oa, Ia, Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut, and Nut co-occurrence networks, we selected OTUs that were present in &#x2265;8 of all 15 Ia, Oa, Nut, or Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut samples (each treatment group had five concentration subgroups and three replicates). We then calculated the correlation coefficient <italic>R</italic> and <italic>p value</italic> between pairs of OTUs using the corAndPvalue() function in the <italic>WGCNA</italic> package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Langfelder and Horvath, 2012</xref>), and we identified eligible pairs based on absolute <italic>R</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.75 and <italic>value of p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01. The <italic>igraph</italic> package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Csardi and Nepusz, 2006</xref>) was used for network construction. Regarding the network topology properties, we measured the relative importance of a network node in terms of the information centrality of the node, and used the ratio between the reduced value of the network efficiency after removing any node and the network efficiency of the network without removing any node as the information centrality of that arbitrary node, and we used the information centrality of the largest node in the network as the network vulnerability indicator (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Shang et al., 2021</xref>). We used the glmer() function in the <italic>lme4</italic> package to fit a generalized linear mixed-effect model (GLMM; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bates et al., 2015</xref>), with different treatments as random effects. The glmm.hp.() function in the <italic>glmm.hp</italic> package was used to calculate the relative contribution of multiple environmental factors after performing GLMM based on hierarchical partitioning theory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Lai et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8" sec-type="results">
<title>3. Results</title>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>3.1. Rock properties and climatic conditions</title>
<p>The XRD results after standard mapping comparison indicate that the main phase of our rock samples was carbonatite (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Reig et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Zhang et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">Supplementary Figure S2</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">A</xref>). In addition, the strong absorption peak at point b in the FTIR map was at around 1,419&#x2009;cm, which represents the stretching vibration within [CO<sub>3</sub>]<sup>2&#x2212;</sup>, followed by point c at 875&#x2009;cm and point d at 711&#x2009;cm, which represent the bending vibration within [CO<sub>3</sub>]<sup>2&#x2212;</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Reig et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Shareef et al., 2008</xref>), while point a at 3,444&#x2009;cm was produced by the water absorption of KBr during the production process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Yang et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">Supplementary Figure S2</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">B</xref>). In summary, the XRD and FTIR results indicate that the main component of our sample was calcium carbonate.</p>
<p>Based on the meteorological data obtained from the <italic>in situ</italic> weather station we installed (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">Supplementary Figure S2</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">C</xref>), the mean temperature at our test site during the 60-day period (from 2022-01-15 to 2022-03-15) was 4.56&#x00B0;C (&#x2212;4.7 to 25.5&#x00B0;C), the mean relative humidity was 82.44% (18.30&#x2013;99.90%), the accumulated rainfall was 85.6&#x2009;mm, and the mean atmospheric pressure was 89&#x2009;kPa (87.8&#x2013;90&#x2009;kPa).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<title>3.2. Bacterial and fungal community diversity among treatments</title>
<p>Among the 66 samples (3 RS, 3 CK, 15 Ia, 15 Oa, 15 Nut, and 15 Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut samples), 7,417 distinct fungal OTUs were obtained from 4,020,249 high-quality sequences and 2,754 distinct bacterial OTUs were obtained from 2,665,071 high-quality sequences at a 97% similarity level. After retaining the eligible OTUs (detected in &#x2265;2 samples and accounting for &#x2265;5 occurrences across samples), there were 2,832 fungal OTUs and 529 bacterial OTUs. The sequence count data were normalized based on the minimum value. The diversity indices were then calculated based on these data. The Good&#x2019;s Coverage of the 66 samples varied from 99.43 to 99.80% for bacterial communities, with a mean of 99.65%, and from 98.78 to 99.97% for fungal communities, with a mean of 99.42% (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S2</xref>). The dilution curves (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">Supplementary Figure S3</xref>), theoretical species richness [Chao1 and abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE)], and Good&#x2019;s Coverage showed that after 60&#x2009;days, a certain number of microorganisms had colonized the surface of the limestone sand-sized grains, and the diversity of the fungal communities was higher than that of the bacterial communities.</p>
<p>Regarding the bacterial communities, all Nut concentrations and high Oa concentrations significantly reduced the richness (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figures 1A</xref>,<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">B</xref>), while the Ia and Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut treatments did not significantly alter the richness (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figures 1C</xref>,<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">D</xref>). In addition, RS treatment significantly reduced bacterial richness (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figures 1A</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">D</xref>). Regarding the fungal communities, RS treatment did not significantly change the richness (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figures 1E</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">H</xref>). In addition, compared to CK, all Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut treatments and low Ia concentrations significantly increased the fungal richness (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figures 1G</xref>,<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">H</xref>), while the Nut and Oa treatments did not significantly increase the richness (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figures 1E</xref>,<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">F</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Richness of bacterial <bold>(A&#x2013;D)</bold> and fungal <bold>(E&#x2013;H)</bold> communities under different treatment conditions. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x2009;0.05), and the same lowercase letters indicate no significant differences between groups. RS, rain shade; Nut, nutrient; Oa, organic acid; Ia, inorganic acid; la&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut, inorganic acid&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nutrient; and values after each treatment indicate concentration.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1194871-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Rain shade treatment did not significantly change the evenness of the bacterial or fungal communities (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">Supplementary Figures S4</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">A</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">H</xref>). High Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut treatment significantly reduced the bacterial community evenness (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">Supplementary Figures S4</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">C</xref>,<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">D</xref>), while the other treatments did not significantly change it. In addition, the Nut treatments changed the fungal community evenness (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">Supplementary Figure S4</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">E</xref>), while the other treatments did not.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<title>3.3. Comparison of bacterial and fungal community composition among treatments</title>
<p>The dominant bacterial phyla based on mean relative abundance (&#x003E;1% threshold) among all treatments were Proteobacteria (56.78%), Bacteroidota (32.85%), and Actinobacteriota (8.22%). In contrast, the mean relative abundances of Deinococcota (0.95%), Cyanobacteria (0.42%), Bdellovibrionota (0.40%), Firmicutes (0.15%), Chloroflexi (0.11%), and Patescibacteria (0.05) were&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;1% (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2A</xref>). The top 10 bacterial genera were <italic>Flavobacterium</italic> (22.34%), <italic>Massilia</italic> (19.19%), <italic>Noviherbaspirillum</italic> (6.95%), <italic>Cytophaga</italic> (7.41%), <italic>Cellvibrio</italic> (5.34%) <italic>Caulobacter</italic> (5.46%), <italic>Arthrobacter</italic> (5.27%), <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> (4.34%), and <italic>Brevundimonas</italic> (2.68%; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">Supplementary Figure S5</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">A</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative abundances of phyla under different treatment conditions (<bold>A</bold>: bacteria, <bold>B</bold>: Fungi). RS, rain shade; Nut, nutrient; Oa, organic acid; Ia, inorganic acid; Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut, inorganic acid&#x2009;+&#x2009;nutrient; values after each treatment indicate concentration.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1194871-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The dominant fungal phyla based on mean relative abundance (&#x003E;1% threshold) among all treatments were Ascomycota (57.82%), Basidiomycota (35.58%), and Chytridiomycota (4.45%). In contrast, the mean relative abundance of Mortierellomycota (0.15%) was &#x003C;1% (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2B</xref>). The top six fungal genera were <italic>Epicoccum</italic> (12.67%), <italic>Symmetrospora</italic> (9.37%), <italic>Cladosporium</italic> (9.05%), <italic>Vishniacozyma</italic> (4.62%), <italic>Itersonilia</italic> (4.47%), and <italic>Botrytis</italic> (2.19%; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">Supplementary Figure S5</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">B</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<title>3.4. Differences in microbial communities among treatments</title>
<p>Our PCoA and Adonis tests showed that bacterial and fungal communities exhibited significant separation regarding different Nut, Oa, Ia, and Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut concentrations, and that bacterial communities (0.71&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.47, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.001) differed more than fungal communities (0.44&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.35, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.001) for the treatments (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3</xref>). In addition, UpSet plots showed that most OTUs were shared between the different treatments (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM7">Supplementary Figure S6</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of bacterial <bold>(A&#x2013;D)</bold> and fungal <bold>(E&#x2013;H)</bold> communities under different treatment conditions. RS, rain shade; Nut, nutrient; Oa, organic acid; Ia, inorganic acid; Ia +&#x2009;Nut, inorganic acid&#x2009;+&#x2009;nutrient; and values after each treatment indicate concentration.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1194871-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>We calculated the Bray&#x2013;Curtis dissimilarity distances for bacterial and fungal communities between the treatment groups and the CK group, and the treatment groups and the RS group. For bacteria, there was a significant Nut effect, with the distances significantly increasing with Nut concentration (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S3</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM8">Supplementary Figures S7</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM8">A</xref>,<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM8">B</xref>). However, there were no significant acidity (Oa, Ia, or Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut) effects (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM8">Supplementary Figure S7</xref>). For fungi, there were no significant differences in the Bray&#x2013;Curtis dissimilarity distance among the treatment groups and CK, or the treatment groups and RS (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM9">Supplementary Figure S8</xref>).</p>
<p>In summary, there were significant differences in bacterial and fungal community composition among the groups, but a large proportion was shared. In addition, the bacterial communities were more sensitive to the treatments than the fungal communities, especially regarding Nut concentrations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>3.5. Bacterial and fungal co-occurrence networks</title>
<p>For both fungal and bacterial communities, the proportion of positive correlations (among all correlations) was higher than the proportion of negative correlations in the Oa, Ia, Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut, and Nut networks, while the Nut network had a greater proportion of negative correlations. More negative correlations indicate increased competition between species, which occurred for both fungal and bacterial communities in the Nut treatment group (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM10">Supplementary Figure S9</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S4</xref>).</p>
<p>For the Nut network, strong correlations (<italic>R</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.25) were more common among bacterial OTUs than fungal OTUs, while weak correlations (&#x2212;0.25&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;<italic>R</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.25) were less common among bacterial OTUs than fungal OTUs. For the Oa and Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut networks, the negative correlations were stronger among bacterial OTUs than fungal OTUs, while the positive correlations were weaker among bacterial OTUs than fungal OTUs. For the Ia network, the negative correlations were weaker among bacterial OTUs than fungal OTUs, while the positive correlations were stronger among bacterial OTUs than fungal OTUs (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM10">Supplementary Figure S9</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Bacterial and fungal co-occurrence networks on limestone under different treatment conditions. Large modules with &#x2265;5 nodes are shown in different colors, and smaller modules are shown in gray. RS, rain shade; Nut, nutrient; Oa, organic acid; Ia, inorganic acid; Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut, inorganic acid&#x2009;+&#x2009;nutrient.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1194871-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>When considering the significant correlations for a given threshold (<italic>R</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.75, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01), the number of positive correlation edges was greater than the number of negative correlation edges for both fungal and bacterial communities (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S4</xref>). In addition, the permutation Student&#x2019;s <italic>t</italic>-test showed that the number of nodes was significantly lower in the bacterial networks than the fungal networks, but the edge density (i.e., the ratio of the number of edges to the number of all possible edges) was significantly higher (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S5</xref>). A higher edge density indicates more efficient network information transfer, higher resilience to environmental stress, and easier achievement of dynamic stability. The networks showed that the bacterial communities were more tightly connected, more complex, and more resilient to environmental stress, but less resistant to environmental stress than the fungal communities.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<title>3.6. Relative contribution of environmental factors to microbial richness</title>
<p>Generalized linear mixed-effect models showed that bacterial and fungal richness increased with OC and ON and decreased with TC among the various treatments (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5</xref>). In addition, fungal richness increased with pH, while bacterial richness decreased with pH. To investigate the relative contributions of the above four environmental factors to bacterial and fungal richness, we calculated their contributions after multivariate GLMM modeling based on hierarchical partitioning (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM11">Supplementary Figure S10</xref>). The results showed that OC had the highest relative contribution to bacterial richness, while TC had the highest relative contribution to fungal richness.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Scatter plots of the relationships of log-transformed richness (bacterial: <bold>A&#x2013;E</bold>; fungal: <bold>E&#x2013;H</bold>) with total carbon (TC, %), organic nitrogen (ON, %), organic carbon (OC, %), and pH under various treatment conditions. The trend lines represent the best-fit lines according to generalized linear mixed-effects models (GLMMs).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1194871-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15" sec-type="discussions">
<title>4. Discussion</title>
<sec id="sec16">
<title>4.1. Bacterial and fungal communities on limestone</title>
<p>The bacterial taxa found in this study are similar to those found in previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Miller et al., 2008</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Miller, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Chimienti et al., 2016</xref>), but differ in terms of the dominant taxa. At the phylum level, the dominant bacteria found in this study were Proteobacteria (56.78%), Bacteroidota (32.85%), and Actinobacteriota (8.22%; <xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2A</xref>). Proteobacteria is a key chemolithotroph involved in biotic degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Scheerer et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Miller, 2010</xref>), most taxa of Bacteroidota are halophiles, and Actinobacteriota can lower the pH of rock surfaces and can be used as an indicator of biodeterioration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Scheerer et al., 2009</xref>). The microbial communities on the surfaces of Italian and French limestone tombstones and monasteries were reported to be dominated by Cyanobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Mihajlovski et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Gambino et al., 2021</xref>). The microbial communities on the surfaces of 149 limestone and granite gravestone samples from three continents were reported to be dominated by Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, and Bacteroidetes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Brewer and Fierer, 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>At the phylum level, the dominant fungi found in this study were Ascomycota (57.82%) and Basidiomycota (35.58%; <xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2B</xref>), similar to results from a previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">G&#x00F3;mez-Cornelio et al., 2012</xref>). At the genus level, some of the rock-inhabiting fungal species (belonging to the genera <italic>Cladosporium</italic>, <italic>Epicoccum</italic>, and <italic>Botrytis</italic>) were the same as those found in previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">G&#x00F3;mez-Cornelio et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Trov&#x00E3;o et al., 2020</xref>), while some endemic taxa (such as <italic>Vishniacozyma</italic>, <italic>Itersonilia</italic>, and <italic>Symmetrospora</italic>) were also found (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">Supplementary Figure S5B</xref>). It is worth noting that some species of the genera <italic>Cladosporium</italic>, <italic>Epicoccum</italic>, and <italic>Botrytis</italic> have been found to have a potential for biodeterioration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">G&#x00F3;mez-Cornelio et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Li et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Trov&#x00E3;o et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<title>4.2. Response of bacterial and fungal communities to different treatments</title>
<p>Cyanobacteria are often the first colonizers and first microbes to perform ecosystem functions because their photoautotrophic metabolism is based on the ability to use light to produce energy and organic matter and to collect micronutrients, oxygen, carbon dioxide, and water from the surrounding air (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Pinheiro et al., 2019</xref>). However, the relative abundance of Cyanobacteria in this study was low (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2A</xref>). It is important to note that the above studies all assessed bacterial composition patterns under natural conditions, whereas in this study, Oa and Ia treatments were imposed (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). This led to the interesting phenomenon of inorganic material produced by limestone dissolution allowing Proteobacteria, which depends on chemoenergetic inorganic nutrients, to colonize the limestone surfaces in large numbers (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2A</xref>).</p>
<p>The dominant fungi differ between different climatic conditions, with filamentous fungi dominating in mild and humid environments, and the so-called microcolonial black fungi dominating in arid and semi-arid climates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Sterflinger and Pi&#x00F1;ar, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Selbmann et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Pinheiro et al., 2019</xref>). In our experimental site, which is located in a subtropical climate zone, filamentous fungi such as <italic>Cladosporium</italic> and <italic>Epicoccum</italic> were two of the dominant genera on the limestone surfaces (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">Supplementary Figure S5</xref><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">B</xref>), which is similar to what has been reported previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">G&#x00F3;mez-Cornelio et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Pinheiro et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Trov&#x00E3;o et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Fungi can secrete more Oa than bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Abdel Ghany et al., 2019</xref>) and grow mycelia that can damage rocks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Gaylarde et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Dakal and Cameotra, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Trov&#x00E3;o et al., 2019</xref>). In this study, different concentrations of acids/nutrients shaped the bacterial and fungal communities; the bacterial communities were less resistant to the environmental stresses (different concentrations of acids/nutrients) than the fungal communities, so the abundance of fungi was higher than that of bacteria (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3</xref>). Among the fungal genera found, <italic>Cladosporium</italic> and <italic>Epicoccum</italic> were both filamentous fungi; they may have been dominant because mycelia increase the efficiency of nutrient uptake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Fukasawa et al., 2020</xref>), which can increase the competitiveness of fungi compared to bacteria. Therefore, it is unsurprising that the abundance of fungi was higher than that of bacteria for the acid/nutrient treatments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<title>4.3. Adaptation of limestone lithogenic microorganisms</title>
<p>Typically, fungal communities are more able to persist in arid environments than bacterial communities and are more resistant to drought, while bacterial communities have good resilience under suitable conditions, i.e., they are able to recover rapidly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Barnard et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">de Vries et al., 2018</xref>). The limestone samples were in a chronic water deficit environment, which resulted in higher fungal abundance than bacterial abundance and a higher resistance to environment stress among the fungi compared to the bacteria, which were more resilient to the arid environment than the fungi (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figures 1</xref>, <xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">3</xref>, <xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">4</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S5</xref>). In addition, among the different treatments, Nut decreased bacterial richness (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1A</xref>). Conversely, Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut increased fungal richness (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1H</xref>). We hypothesized that fungi are better adapted to the limestone surface environment and are more competitive than bacteria during the early colonization process. The species richness and evenness of the fungal community were higher than those of the bacterial community after the sterile limestone sand-sized grains were subjected to natural conditions for 60&#x2009;days (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">Supplementary Figure S4</xref>). Oa and Nut might hinder bacterial colonization, while Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut promoted fungal colonization, suggesting that the fungal community might be better adapted to limestone surfaces than bacteria (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>). In addition, we speculate that rainfall may be the main source of bacterial communities on limestone surfaces, while the environment may be the main source of fungal communities (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
<p>Based on our findings, we believe that limestone can be protected from biodeterioration in several ways. First, biodeterioration is the result of a combination of physical and biochemical mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Gadd, 2017b</xref>). Among the biochemical mechanisms, inorganic and organic acids are important influences. As carbonic acid is a very common inorganic acid that is mainly formed when excessively high concentrations of CO<sub>2</sub> in the air dissolve in water (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Gadd, 2017b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Liu et al., 2020</xref>), CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations should be monitored to prevent carbonic acid in rainwater from dissolving limestone. Second, phototrophs such as Cyanobacteria are thought to be an important group of organisms in rock biodeterioration that are able to use photosynthesis to assimilate CO<sub>2</sub> into organic forms for subsequent colonizers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Sand and Bock, 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Crispim et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">V&#x00E1;zquez-Nion et al., 2018</xref>). Therefore, protecting limestone from direct sunlight as much as possible will slow the growth of lithobiontic Cyanobacteria and thus reduce the biodeterioration of the limestone. Third, rainfall, as an important environmental factor, is associated with a variety of biodeterioration processes, such as discoloration, distortions, blackening, and patina formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Liu et al., 2020</xref>). Hence, limestone surfaces should be protected from rainfall to reduce colonization by microorganisms in the rainfall. Fourth, as it has been found that microorganisms cultured from the rinds of biodeteriorated rock surfaces can still cause damage to rocks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">G&#x00F3;mez-Cornelio et al., 2012</xref>), microorganisms growing on limestone rocks undergoing biodeterioration need to be removed to avoid further erosion.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19" sec-type="conclusions">
<title>5. Conclusion</title>
<p>This study investigated microbial colonization of limestone surfaces after 60&#x2009;days of treatment with various Nut, Oa, Ia, Ia&#x2009;+&#x2009;Nut, and Nut concentrations, providing a new perspective on microbial&#x2013;rock interactions. We draw the following three main conclusions. First, fungi and bacteria exhibited different colonization patterns during the 60&#x2009;days that the limestone was left in its natural environment. Fungi were more resistant to environmental stress and able to colonize the limestone surfaces rapidly and in large numbers, showing higher richness and competitiveness, while bacterial communities, although less diverse, were more complex and resilient to environmental stress, with an increased ability to recover rapidly. Second, the rock surface environment (acid erosion and nutrient availability) determined the early colonization by microorganisms, with different concentrations of Nut, Oa, and Ia all shaping the microbial communities in different ways. The higher the acidity (Ia and Oa), the greater the differences (compared to the CK) in microbial communities. The bacteria were less resistant to environmental stress than the fungi, and there was an obvious Nut concentration gradient effect for bacteria. Third, the richness of bacterial and fungal communities were influenced by OC, ON, TC, and pH, with OC being an important determinant of bacterial community richness and TC being an important determinant of fungal community richness. However, this study lacks a quantitative analysis of how limestone surface characteristics such as roughness and porosity affect microbial colonization. In addition, the limestone surface environment changed drastically over time, and this study did not assess the microbial colonization in different periods. Therefore, studies on the ecological succession of microorganisms on limestone surfaces in different periods should be conducted to provide a scientific basis for the conservation of limestone artifacts and early ecological succession in karst areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/</ext-link>, PRJNA944278.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>LYu conceived the project. JC, FL, XZ, QZ, LZ, JL, and LYa collected samples in the field. JC, FL, XZ, YW, and LYan performed data analysis. JC, FL, and XZ performed the experiment. JC and LYu wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the 13th Five-year National Key Research and Development Plan (grant number 2016YFC0502604); the Construction Program of Biology First-class Discipline in Guizhou (grant number GNYL[2017]009); and the Postgraduate Education Innovation Program in Guizhou Province (grant number YJSKYJJ[2021]079).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec100" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>We would like to thank the editors and reviewers for their selfless help.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="sec24" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1194871/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1194871/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.XLSX" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.PNG" id="SM2" mimetype="image/png" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_2.PNG" id="SM3" mimetype="image/png" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_3.PNG" id="SM4" mimetype="image/png" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_4.PNG" id="SM5" mimetype="image/png" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_5.PNG" id="SM6" mimetype="image/png" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_6.PNG" id="SM7" mimetype="image/png" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_7.PNG" id="SM8" mimetype="image/png" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_8.PNG" id="SM9" mimetype="image/png" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_9.PNG" id="SM10" mimetype="image/png" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_10.PNG" id="SM11" mimetype="image/png" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abdel Ghany</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Omar</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elwkeel</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al Abboud</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alawlaqi</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Fungal deterioration of limestone false-door monument</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>e02673</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02673</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>R. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miletto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bruns</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Dispersal in microbes: fungi in indoor air are dominated by outdoor air and show dispersal limitation at short distances</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1262</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1273</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2013.28</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>) <source>Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>China Agriculture Press Co., Ltd</publisher-name></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barnard</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Osborne</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Firestone</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to extreme desiccation and rewetting</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>2229</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2241</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2013.104</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00E4;chler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bolker</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4</article-title>. <source>J. Stat. Softw.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18637/jss.v067.i01</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brewer</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Tales from the tomb: the microbial ecology of exposed rock surfaces</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>958</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>970</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1462-2920.14024</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29235707</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Change in composition and potential functional genes of microbial communities on carbonatite rinds with different weathering times</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>1024672</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.1024672</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36386643</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>i884</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>i890</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30423086</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chimienti</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Piredda</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pepe</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van der Werf</surname> <given-names>I. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sabbatini</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crecchio</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Profile of microbial communities on carbonate stones of the medieval church of san Leonardo di Siponto (Italy) by Illumina-based deep sequencing</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>8537</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8548</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-016-7656-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27283019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Crispim</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaylarde</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Cyanobacteria and biodeterioration of cultural heritage: a review</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-003-1052-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15883863</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Crispim</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaylarde</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaylarde</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neilan</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Deteriogenic cyanobacteria on historic buildings in Brazil detected by culture and molecular techniques</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>239</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>243</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ibiod.2006.03.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Csardi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nepusz</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The igraph software package for complex network research</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Complex Syst.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>1965</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dakal</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cameotra</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Microbially induced deterioration of architectural heritages: routes and mechanisms involved</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Eur.</source> <volume>24</volume>:<fpage>36</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/2190-4715-24-36</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Oliveira Mendes</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murta</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Valadares</surname> <given-names>R. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>da Silveira</surname> <given-names>W. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>da Silva</surname> <given-names>I. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Oxalic acid is more efficient than sulfuric acid for rock phosphate solubilization</article-title>. <source>Miner. Eng.</source> <volume>155</volume>:<fpage>106458</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106458</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Vries</surname> <given-names>F. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Griffiths</surname> <given-names>R. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bailey</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Craig</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Girlanda</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gweon</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Soil bacterial networks are less stable under drought than fungal networks</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>3033</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-018-05516-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30072764</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dixon</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology</article-title>. <source>J. Veg. Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>927</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>930</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edgar</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>996</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>998</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.2604</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23955772</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fukasawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Savoury</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boddy</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Ecological memory and relocation decisions in fungal mycelial networks: responses to quantity and location of new resources</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>380</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>388</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-019-0536-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31628441</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gadd</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Fungal production of citric and oxalic acid: importance in metal speciation, physiology and biogeochemical processes</article-title>. <source>Adv. Microb. Physiol.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60165-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gadd</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017a</year>). <article-title>Fungi, Rocks, and Minerals</article-title>. <source>Elements</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>171</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>176</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2113/gselements.13.3.171</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gadd</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017b</year>). <article-title>Geomicrobiology of the built environment</article-title>. <source>Nat. Microbiol.</source> <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>16275</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.275</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28349976</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gambino</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lepri</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x0160;tov&#x00ED;cek</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghazayarn</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Villa</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gillor</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The tombstones at the monumental cemetery of Milano select for a specialized microbial community</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.</source> <volume>164</volume>:<fpage>105298</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ibiod.2021.105298</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gaylarde</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ribas Silva</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Warscheid</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Microbial impact on building materials: an overview</article-title>. <source>Mater. Struct.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>342</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>352</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02480875</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gerrits</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wirth</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schreiber</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feldmann</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knabe</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schott</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>High-resolution imaging of fungal biofilm-induced olivine weathering</article-title>. <source>ChGeo</source> <volume>559</volume>:<fpage>119902</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119902</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>G&#x00F3;mez-Cornelio</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mendoza-Vega</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaylarde</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reyes-Estebanez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mor&#x00F3;n-R&#x00ED;os</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De la Rosa-Garc&#x00ED;a</surname> <given-names>S. D. C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Succession of fungi colonizing porous and compact limestone exposed to subtropical environments</article-title>. <source>Fungal Biol.</source> <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>1064</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1072</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.funbio.2012.07.010</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23063185</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>G&#x00F3;mez-Silva</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Lithobiontic life: "Atacama rocks are well and alive"</article-title>. <source>Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>1333</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1343</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10482-018-1033-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29392527</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gorbushina</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Life on the rocks</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>1613</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1631</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01301.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gorbushina</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Broughton</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Microbiology of the atmosphere-rock interface: how biological interactions and physical stresses modulate a sophisticated microbial ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>431</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>450</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073349</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19575564</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Herv&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>) RVAideMemoire: Testing and plotting procedures for biostatistics. Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RVAideMemoire" ext-link-type="uri">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RVAideMemoire</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Glmm.Hp: an R package for computing individual effect of predictors in generalized linear mixed models</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Ecol.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1302</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1307</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jpe/rtac096</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Langfelder</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Horvath</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Fast R functions for robust correlations and hierarchical clustering</article-title>. <source>J. Stat. Softw.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18637/jss.v046.i11</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Role of Fungi in the formation of patinas on Feilaifeng limestone, China</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol.</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>352</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>361</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-017-1132-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29307025</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koestler</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Warscheid</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Katayama</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>J.-D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Microbial deterioration and sustainable conservation of stone monuments and buildings</article-title>. <source>Nat. Sustain</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>991</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1004</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41893-020-00602-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Katayama</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>J.-D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Water is a critical factor in evaluating and assessing microbial colonization and destruction of Angkor sandstone monuments</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.</source> <volume>133</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.05.011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Denitrifying sulfide removal process on high-salinity wastewaters in the presence of Halomonas sp</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>1421</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1426</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-015-7039-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26454867</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mago&#x010D;</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salzberg</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>2957</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2963</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21903629</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McKnight</surname> <given-names>D. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huerlimann</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bower</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwarzkopf</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alford</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zenger</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Methods for normalizing microbiome data: an ecological perspective</article-title>. <source>Methods Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>389</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>400</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/2041-210X.13115</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mihajlovski</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gabarre</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seyer</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bousta</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Di Martino</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Bacterial diversity on rock surface of the ruined part of a French historic monument: the Chaalis abbey</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.</source> <volume>120</volume>, <fpage>161</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>169</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.02.019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>A. Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>) Primary bioreceptivity of limestones from the mediterranean basin to phototrophic microorganisms.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>A. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laiz</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dion&#x00ED;sio</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Macedo</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saiz-Jimenez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Growth of phototrophic biofilms from limestone monuments under laboratory conditions</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>860</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>867</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ibiod.2009.04.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>A. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laiz</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonzalez</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dion&#x00ED;sio</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Macedo</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saiz-Jimenez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Reproducing stone monument photosynthetic-based colonization under laboratory conditions</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>405</volume>, <fpage>278</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>285</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.066</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>A. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanmart&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pereira-Pardo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dion&#x00ED;sio</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saiz-Jimenez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Macedo</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Bioreceptivity of building stones: a review</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>426</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.026</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22534363</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>J.-D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Changes in the biofilm microflora of limestone caused by atmospheric pollutants</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>299</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>303</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0964-8305(00)00105-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moroni</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pitzurra</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Biodegradation of atmospheric pollutants by fungi: a crucial point in the corrosion of carbonate building stone</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>391</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>396</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ibiod.2008.03.011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Paradis</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Claude</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strimmer</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>APE: analyses of Phylogenetics and evolution in R language</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>289</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>290</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14734327</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pinheiro</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mesquita</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trov&#x00E3;o</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soares</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tiago</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coelho</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Limestone biodeterioration: a review on the Portuguese cultural heritage scenario</article-title>. <source>J. Cult. Herit.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>275</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>285</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.culher.2018.07.008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rajan</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lada</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>MacDonald</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Advancement in indoor vertical farming for microgreen production</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>1397</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1408</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2019.108100</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reig</surname> <given-names>F. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adelantado</surname> <given-names>J. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moya Moreno</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>FTIR quantitative analysis of calcium carbonate (calcite) and silica (quartz) mixtures using the constant ratio method</article-title>. <source>Talanta</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>811</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>821</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0039-9140(02)00372-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18968811</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Majorbio cloud: a one-stop, comprehensive bioinformatic platform for multiomics analyses</article-title>. <source>iMeta</source> <volume>1</volume>:<fpage>e12</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/imt2.12</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sand</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bock</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Biodeterioration of mineral materials by microorganisms&#x2014;biogenic sulfuric and nitric acid corrosion of concrete and natural stone</article-title>. <source>Geomicrobiol J.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>129</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>138</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01490459109385994</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scheerer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ortega-Morales</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaylarde</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Microbial deterioration of stone monuments--an updated overview</article-title>. <source>Adv. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>139</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0065-2164(08)00805-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Selbmann</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zucconi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Isola</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Onofri</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Rock black fungi: excellence in the extremes, from the Antarctic to space</article-title>. <source>Curr. Genet.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>335</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>345</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00294-014-0457-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25381156</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Identifying influential nodes: a new method based on network efficiency of edge weight updating</article-title>. <source>Chaos</source> <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>033120</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/5.0033197</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33810754</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shareef</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Omer</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garota</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Predicting the chemical composition of gallstones by FTIR spectroscopy</article-title>. <source>Biomed. &#x0026; Pharmacol. J.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sheng</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>The composition characteristics of low-molecular-weight organic acids in soil and their roles on soil material cycling</article-title>. <source>Plant Nutr. Fertil Sci</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>363</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>371</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Steel</surname> <given-names>R. G. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Torrie</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <source>Principles and Procedures of Statistics, A Biometrical Approach</source>. New York: <publisher-name>McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sterflinger</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pi&#x00F1;ar</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Microbial deterioration of cultural heritage and works of art &#x2014; tilting at windmills?</article-title> <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>9637</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9646</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-013-5283-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24100684</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hui</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Effect of particle size in a limestone&#x2013;hydrochloric acid reaction system</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mater.</source> <volume>179</volume>, <fpage>400</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>408</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.018</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sunagawa</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coelho</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chaffron</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kultima</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Labadie</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salazar</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>348</volume>:<fpage>1261359</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.126135</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trov&#x00E3;o</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Portugal</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soares</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paiva</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mesquita</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coelho</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Fungal diversity and distribution across distinct biodeterioration phenomena in limestone walls of the old cathedral of Coimbra, UNESCO world heritage site</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.</source> <volume>142</volume>, <fpage>91</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>102</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ibiod.2019.05.008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trov&#x00E3;o</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soares</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tiago</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Catarino</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Portugal</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gil</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A contribution to understand the Portuguese emblematic An&#x00E7;&#x00E3; limestone bioreceptivity to fungal colonization and biodeterioration</article-title>. <source>J. Cult. Herit.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>305</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>312</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.culher.2021.04.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trov&#x00E3;o</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tiago</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Catarino</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gil</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Portugal</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>In vitro analyses of fungi and dolomitic limestone interactions: bioreceptivity and biodeterioration assessment</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.</source> <volume>155</volume>:<fpage>105107</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ibiod.2020.105107</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>V&#x00E1;zquez-Nion</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prieto</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Influence of the properties of granitic rocks on their bioreceptivity to subaerial phototrophic biofilms</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>610-611</volume>, <fpage>44</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.015</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28802109</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Villa</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stewart</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klapper</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacob</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cappitelli</surname> <given-names>F. J. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Subaerial biofilms on outdoor stone monuments: changing the perspective toward an ecological framework</article-title>. <source>Bioscience</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>294</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/biosci/biw006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Villa</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vasanthakumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cappitelli</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>RNA-based molecular survey of biodiversity of limestone tombstone microbiota in response to atmospheric Sulphur pollution</article-title>. <source>Lett. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>92</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>102</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/lam.12345</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25346247</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pace</surname> <given-names>N. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Endolithic microbial ecosystems</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>331</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>347</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/ANNUREV.MICRO.61.080706.093302</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garrity</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tiedje</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cole</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>5261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5267</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.00062-07</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17586664</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Warscheid</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Braams</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Biodeterioration of stone: a review</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>368</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0964-8305(00)00109-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Warscheid</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oelting</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krumbein</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Physico-chemical aspects of biodeterioration processes on rocks with special regard to organic pollutants</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeterior.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0265-3036(91)90032-M</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Infrared spectra analysis of several common anhydrous carbonate minerals</article-title>. <source>MinPe</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19719/j.cnki.1001-6872.2015.04.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref71"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Katayama</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Someya</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>J.-D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Biochemical reactions and mechanisms involved in the biodeterioration of stone world cultural heritage under the tropical climate conditions</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.</source> <volume>143</volume>:<fpage>104723</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ibiod.2019.104723</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Geng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Microstructural characterization of limestone exposed to heat with XRD, SEM and TG-DSC</article-title>. <source>Mater. Charact.</source> <volume>134</volume>, <fpage>285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>295</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.matchar.2017.11.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>J.-D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Spatial and temporal distributions of microbial diversity under natural conditions on the sandstone stelae of the Beishiku Temple in China</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.</source> <volume>163</volume>:<fpage>105279</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ibiod.2021.105279</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>