<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1131737</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Biocontrol features of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> B-1 against <italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic> in apple fruit</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Zihao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2216541/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Baihui</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2216534/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Cuicui</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2152756/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Shiyu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2216656/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Yuxin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2216483/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Baohua</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/561067/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Caixia</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/523646/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Shandong Engineering Research Center for Environment-Friendly Agricultural Pest Management, Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Applied Mycology, College of Plant Health and Medicine, Qingdao Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Qingdao, Shandong</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Shandong Provincial University Laboratory for Protected Horticulture, Shandong Facility Horticulture Bioengineering Research Center, Weifang University of Science and Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Weifang, Shandong</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Khamis Youssef, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Yasmeen Siddiqui, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia; Ayat F. Hashim, National Research Centre, Egypt; Elhanan Tzipilevich, MIGAL - Galilee Research Institute, Israel</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Caixia Wang, <email>cxwang@qau.edu.cn</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn002"><p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Food Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>02</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1131737</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>26</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>30</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2023 Sun, Hao, Wang, Li, Xu, Li and Wang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Sun, Hao, Wang, Li, Xu, Li and Wang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Apple ring rot caused by <italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic> is an important disease that leads to severe quality deterioration and yield loss at pre-harvest and postharvest stages. Therefore, it is urgent to develop safe and efficient measures to control this disease. The objective of the present study was to investigate the biocontrol features of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> B-1 against <italic>B. dothidea</italic> and explore its mechanism of action utilizing <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic> assays. The results showed that <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 strongly reduced the incidence of apple ring rot and lesion diameter by 41.2 and 90.2%, respectively, in comparison to the control fruit. In addition, the control efficiency of strain B-1 against <italic>B. dothidea</italic> infection depended on its concentration and the interval time. <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 cells showed higher inhibitory activities than its culture filtrates on the mycelial growth and spore germination of <italic>B. dothidea</italic>. Moreover, <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 treatment alleviated electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidation, and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> accumulation in <italic>B. dothidea</italic>-infected apple fruit by increasing antioxidant enzyme activities, including peroxidase, catalase, superoxide dismutase, and ascorbate peroxidase. We also found that strain B-1 treatment enhanced four defense-related enzyme activities and stimulated the accumulation of three disease-resistant substances including phenolics, lignin, and salicylic acid (SA) in apple fruit. In addition, strain B-1 triggered the upregulated expression of defense-related genes such as PR genes (<italic>PR1</italic>, <italic>PR5</italic>, <italic>GLU</italic>, and <italic>CHI</italic>) and two genes involved in the biosynthesis of SA (<italic>SID2</italic> and <italic>PAD4</italic>) to promote the resistance potential in apple fruit. Hence, our results suggest that <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 is a promising strategy against <italic>B. dothidea</italic>, mainly through reducing oxidative damage, activating defense-related enzymes, accumulating disease-resistant substances, and triggering the expression of resistance-correlated genes in apple fruit.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd><italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> B-1</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic></kwd>
<kwd>apple fruit</kwd>
<kwd>oxidative damage</kwd>
<kwd>antioxidant and defense system</kwd>
<kwd>salicylic acid signaling</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="9"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="54"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="8847"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1" sec-type="intro">
<title>1. Introduction</title>
<p><italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic>, the most destructive pathogen of apples, is responsible for preharvest and postharvest ring rot, leading to huge economic losses in apple production. In detail, the fungal pathogen infects twigs, stems, and branches in the field and could survive several years on diseased apple trees (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Tang et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Zhao et al., 2016</xref>). According to the survey by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Guo et al. (2009)</xref>, the incidence of apple trees with ring rot symptoms was more than 77% in the main apple-producing areas of China. Apple fruit infected by <italic>B. dothidea</italic> is usually 10&#x2013;20% each year, though it can reach 70% under favorable conditions for fungal growth, such as wet and humid weather (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Wang and Hou, 2001</xref>).</p>
<p>Currently, the prevention and control of apple diseases caused by fungi are implemented by eliminating the inoculum, spraying the chemical fungicides, and bagging fruit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Zhao et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Huang et al., 2021a</xref>). As the cost of bagging is increasing yearly, the bagless cultivation of apples has become an inevitable trend in China. Nevertheless, <italic>B. dothidea</italic> rot on apple fruit is the main disease that needs to be overcome under the condition of bagless cultivation. Once the apple tissues were infected by <italic>B. dothidea</italic>, the effects of therapeutic fungicides are low, for example, the control efficiency of difenoconazole was only 55%, which is one of the most effective fungicides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Zhang et al., 2010</xref>). Moreover, these chemical fungicides can cause adverse health effects and severe environmental pollution, in addition to fungicide resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Ma et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Fan et al., 2016</xref>). Thus far, many chemical fungicides have been regulated or banned for use in postharvest fruit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Casals et al., 2010</xref>). Thus, it is pressing to seek eco-friendly, effective, and safe products to control <italic>B. dothidea</italic> rot on apple fruit.</p>
<p>Numerous studies and global programs have focused on biological control products as promising alternatives to the traditional fungicides for managing plant diseases in agricultural production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Droby et al., 2016</xref>). In Europe, biological control has been advocated since 2009, and in China, a &#x201C;National research program on reduction in chemical pesticides and fertilizers&#x201D; was launched in 2016. Until now, many microbial antagonists have been developed and commercialized to control plant diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Sharma et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Spadaro and Droby, 2016</xref>). For apple fruit, biological control products have also been applied to reduce postharvest decay, mainly by biocontrol bacteria and yeast. For example, many biocontrol bacteria, including <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp., <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp., and <italic>Streptomyces</italic> spp., were able to reduce fruit postharvest decay (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zhang Q. M. et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Calvo et al., 2017</xref>). In addition, a large number of biocontrol yeasts, such as <italic>Meyerozyma guilliermondii</italic>, <italic>Rhodotorula mucilaginosa</italic>, and <italic>Pichia membranifaciens</italic>, were used to control fruit decay caused by fungi during postharvest storage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Li et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Yan et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Zhang et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Huang et al., 2021b</xref>).</p>
<p>The bacterial species belonging to <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> genera are widely found in nature, which include species causing plant diseases, as well as biocontrol microorganisms, already registered for agricultural biocontrol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">van Lenteren et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aiello et al., 2019</xref>). It was reported that <italic>P. syringae</italic> strains were effective to control fruit postharvest decays caused by various fungal pathogens, including <italic>Penicillium digitatum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Smilanick, 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cirvilleri et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Panebianco et al., 2015</xref>), <italic>Monilinia fructicola</italic>, <italic>Rhizopus stolonifer</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Zhou et al., 1999</xref>), <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>, and <italic>P. expansum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Zhou et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Errampalli and Brubacher, 2006</xref>). It is noteworthy that the strains of <italic>P. syringae</italic>, for example, ESC-10, ESC-11, and 742RS, were developed and commercialized by EcoScience Corporation as biocontrol agents to manage postharvest decays on multiple fruits and even tubers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Williamson et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Al-Mughrabi et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">van Lenteren et al., 2017</xref>). However, whether <italic>P. syringae</italic> could effectively protect apple fruit against <italic>B. dothidea</italic> infection is unknown, and the possible biocontrol mechanisms need to be further explored.</p>
<p>The present study explored the biocontrol bacterial strain <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1, which was isolated from the apple fruit collected from a commercial orchard. The strain B-1 did neither induce necrotic lesions on the fruit of apple, orange, peach, and grape nor did it have effects on the internal fruit appearance. Hence, the aims of the present study were to first investigate the antifungal potential and the efficiency of <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 against <italic>B. dothidea in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic>. Another purpose was to explore the underlying mechanisms of strain B-1 against <italic>B. dothidea</italic>, such as reducing oxidative damage, activating defense-related enzymes, accumulating disease-resistant substances, and triggering the expression of resistance-correlated genes in apple fruit. These results will further enrich our understanding of the action mechanisms of <italic>P. syringae</italic> and provide alternatives for postharvest apple decay caused by <italic>B. dothidea</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>2. Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>2.1. Fruit, <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> B-1, and <italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic></title>
<p>Apple (cv. &#x2018;Fuji&#x2019;) fruit used in this study was collected from the local orchards in Shandong, China. The fruit at a commercial mature stage has not received any postharvest treatment and was kept at 4&#x00B0;C before being used. The apples were disinfected and washed according to the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Sun et al. (2021)</xref>. <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1, isolated from the healthy apple fruit, was preserved in China Center for Culture Collection (M2015813). The bacteria were cultured in nutrient broth (NB) on a shaker at 28&#x00B0;C for 48 h. <italic>B. dothidea</italic> LXS030101, isolated from apple fruit with ring rot symptoms, was characterized by our research team based on morphological observation and molecular identification. The strain was cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) for routine use (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zhang Q. M. et al., 2016</xref>). The conidia of strain LXS030101 was induced with the modified method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Leng et al. (2009)</xref>. The wounded young apple fruit was inoculated with mycelial plugs of <italic>B. dothidea</italic> and incubated under UV light (365 nm) at 25&#x00B0;C. After about 2 weeks, the conidia was produced and collected from the lesion around the inoculation sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>2.2. Efficiency of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> B-1 <italic>in vivo</italic></title>
<p>Each apple fruit was punctured with a borer to make three wounds (5 mm wide and 3 mm deep) at the equatorial region. Then, the strain B-1 suspension at different concentrations (1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup>, 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup>, 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup>, 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>, and 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) was dripped into the wounds. Following 48 h of incubation at 25&#x00B0;C, the conidia suspension of <italic>B. dothidea</italic> (5 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup> spores mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) was added to the treated wounds with the pipette (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Lu et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Huang et al., 2021a</xref>). All fruits were placed into enclosed plastic boxes and stored at 25&#x00B0;C in a relative humidity of about 95%. Thirty fruits were selected as controls and were treated with sterile water and inoculated only with the pathogen suspension. For each treatment, there were three replicates with 10 apple fruits in each replicate. Disease incidence was calculated as the percentage of infected wounds, and the lesion size around the wounds was recorded at 3 and 5 days post-inoculation (dpi).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>2.3. Effect of interval time on the efficiency <italic>in vivo</italic></title>
<p>The effect of interval time after <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 treatment on control efficiency was determined according to the assay mentioned in Section &#x201C;2.2. Efficiency of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> B-1 <italic>in vivo</italic>&#x201D; A volume of 30 &#x03BC;L of strain B-1 suspension at 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> was added into each wound using a pipette. After 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 96 h of incubation at 25&#x00B0;C, respectively, 30 &#x03BC;L of <italic>B. dothidea</italic> spore suspension at 5 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup> spores mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> was inoculated to the treated wound. The fruits were incubated at a relative humidity of about 95% at 25&#x00B0;C for 5 days. The diseased symptoms were observed; the disease incidence and lesion diameter were recorded at 5 dpi. The assay was conducted two times, and there were three replicates with 10 apple fruit in each replicate.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS4">
<title>2.4. <italic>In vitro</italic> inhibitory effect of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> B-1 cells and culture filtrates</title>
<p>Strain B-1 cells were obtained from 2-day-old cultures in NB by centrifuging at 12,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 15 min and re-suspended in distilled water. The culture filtrates were prepared by a 0.22-&#x03BC;m polycarbonate membrane filter (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). For the inhibiting mycelium growth assay, PDA plates were prepared, which contained 10% (v/v) culture filtrates or different concentrations of strain B-1 cells (1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup>, 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup>, 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup>, 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>, and 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). The mycelial plugs (5 mm in diameter) containing <italic>B. dothidea</italic> grown on medium for 3 days were transferred to the PDA plates. After incubating for 5 days at 25&#x00B0;C, the colony diameter of <italic>B. dothidea</italic> was determined and the inhibition rate was calculated. For the spore germination assay, the culture filtrates or different concentrations of strain B-1 cells and the pathogen suspension were dripped into the concavity slides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zhang Q. M. et al., 2016</xref>). Following 12 h of incubation at 25&#x00B0;C, the spore germination was observed using the microscope (DM2500, Leica, German). Conidia were considered germinated when the length of the germ tube was longer than the length of the conidia. For each treatment, sterile distilled water was used as the control. The assays were carried out two times with four replicates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS5">
<title>2.5. Estimation of oxidative damage</title>
<p>Four treatments were performed in apple fruit including control and sterile water; B-1, <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 suspension at 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>; pathogen, <italic>B. dothidea</italic> suspension at 5 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup> spores mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>; B-1 + pathogen, strain B-1 treatment, followed by <italic>B. dothidea</italic> inoculation. Fruit tissues were collected in different treatments at 0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h. To reveal the oxidative damage in apple fruit, electrolyte leakage, malondialdehyde (MDA), and hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) contents were analyzed. For electrolyte leakage, it was measured according to the modified method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Ji et al. (2020)</xref>. A total of 0.5 g of fresh tissues were cut into small pieces and dropped into 10 mL of deionized water. After 1 h incubation at room temperature, the conductivity (C1) was determined by a conductivity meter (DDBJ-350, Inesa, China). The tissue samples were then boiled for 15 min and the conductivity (C2) was measured. The formula (C1/C2) &#x00D7; 100% was used to calculate the electrolyte leakage.</p>
<p>For MDA content, it was conducted with the assay kit (#A003) from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). For the analysis of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> content, 1 g fresh tissues were homogenized with 3 mL of chilled 0.2% trichloroacetic acid (&#x2265;99.0%, Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China), and then centrifuged at 12,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 15 min at 4&#x00B0;C. According to the report of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Wang et al. (2015)</xref>, the supernatant was mixed with 0.1 mmol L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> phosphate buffer and 1 mol L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> potassium iodide (&#x2265;99.0%, Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China), then the absorbance of the reaction system was measured at 390 nm with a spectrophotometer (Philes, T6, China). The units of MDA and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> contents were expressed as mmol in 1 kg of fresh weight (mmol kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS6">
<title>2.6. Determination of antioxidant and defense-related enzyme activities</title>
<p>Apple fruit was treated with <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 or sterile water according to the method described in Section &#x201C;2.5. Estimation of oxidative damage&#x201D; Fruit tissues were collected near the wound at different time points and were ground to powder with liquid nitrogen. For the antioxidant enzymes, activities of catalase (CAT, #A007), peroxidase (POD, #A084), superoxide dismutase (SOD, #A001), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX, #A123) were measured with the assay kits from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). For the defense-related enzymes, the activities of phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL), polyphenoloxidase (PPO), &#x03B2;-1,3-glucanase (GLU), and chitinase (CHI) were assayed referring to the report of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zhang Q. M. et al. (2016)</xref>. The enzyme activity units are expressed on the fresh weight basis as U g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS7">
<title>2.7. Qualification of total phenolics, lignin, and hormone contents</title>
<p>The total phenolics content was measured with the assay kit (#A143) from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). The lignin content was assayed as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Li et al. (2019)</xref>, and the absorbance of the reaction mixture was detected at 280 nm. The lignin content was expressed as A<sub>280</sub> g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> on a fresh weight basis. Quantification of hormones including salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) in apple fruit was analyzed using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit from Jingmei Biotechnology (Yancheng, China). SA and JA contents were expressed as &#x03BC;g kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> and ng kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> on the fresh weight basis, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS8">
<title>2.8. Analysis of gene expression</title>
<p>Fruit tissues were collected near the wounds after being treated with <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 or sterile water at 0, 12, 24, and 48 h. Total RNA was extracted from different tissue samples and the cDNA synthesis was performed using the HiScript 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was conducted as reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Huang et al. (2021a)</xref>, using a Light Cycler<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> 96 PCR Detection System (Roche, Germany). Each reaction consists of at least three biological replicates, with a 25 &#x03BC;L reaction volume. The transcript levels of six genes involved in the defense response and the SA pathway (<italic>MdPR1</italic>, <italic>MdPR5</italic>, <italic>MdGLU</italic>, <italic>MdCHI</italic>, <italic>MdSIT2</italic>, and <italic>MdPAD4</italic>) were analyzed with the 2<sup>&#x2013;&#x0394;&#x0394;CT</sup> method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zhang Q. M. et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Huang et al., 2021a</xref>). Referenced gene <italic>MdEF1a</italic> (elongation factor 1-a) was used to normalize the expression levels of target genes. The primers for the qPCR assay are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Specific primers used for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) to analyze gene expression.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Primer name</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Forward primer 5&#x2019;&#x2192;3&#x2019;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Reverse primer 5&#x2019;&#x2192;3&#x2019;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Annealing temperature (&#x00B0;C)</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>MdEF1</italic>&#x03B1;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ACATTGCCCTGTGGAAGTT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GTCTGACCATCCTTGGAAA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53/56/58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>MdPR1</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GCAGCAGTAGGCGTTGGTCCCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CCAGTGCTCATGGCAAGGTTTT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>MdPR5</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AGCAGCTTCCCTCCTCGGC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CCCAGAAGCGACCAGACC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>MdCHI</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGGAGGATGGGAAAGTGC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GGGTGAGTTGGATGGGTC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>MdGLU</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGCCGTAGGAAACGAAAT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGATGGAGGAAAGGAATT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>MdSID2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TTATACTTCATTCCGCTGCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GCCTCTAATTTTCTTTGTATGCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>MdPAD4</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GCTTCACCGTAAGTTACTCG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CAAGAAACTCGCAACTGTC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS9">
<title>2.9. Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Data analysis was performed using the software SPSS Version 19.0. All the data consisted of at least three replicates and were represented as mean &#x00B1; standard deviation (SD). Statistical differences were conducted by analysis of variance using Duncan&#x2019;s multiple range test at a significance level of 0.05.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3" sec-type="results">
<title>3. Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>3.1. Efficiency of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> B-1 against <italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic> in apple fruit</title>
<p>The biocontrol efficiency of <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 to control <italic>B. dothidea</italic> rot in apple fruit was influenced by its concentrations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>, the control fruit showed rapidly developing brown lesions around the inoculation sites. In contrast, although strain B-1 at 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> did not inhibit fruit decay caused by <italic>B. dothidea</italic> in fruit (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1B, C</xref>), strain B-1 at 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> to 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> all resulted in a decrease in disease incidence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>) and lesion diameter (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>). When the concentrations of strain B-1 were higher (&#x003E;10<sup>8</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), their efficiency against <italic>B. dothidea in vivo</italic> had no significant difference. Following storage for 5 days at 25&#x00B0;C, strain B-1 at 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> reduced the incidence of apple ring rot and lesion diameter by 41.2 and 90.2%, respectively, compared with the control fruit.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Efficiency of <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 against <italic>B. dothidea</italic> in apple fruit. Disease symptoms <bold>(A)</bold> in control and strain B-1 treated fruit at 3 and 5 days post-inoculation (dpi) with <italic>B. dothidea</italic>. Effect of strain B-1 on disease incidence <bold>(B)</bold> and lesion diameter <bold>(C)</bold> in inoculated apple fruit at 3 and 5 dpi. Error bars represent the SD of three replicates. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) within the same panel at the same time point.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1131737-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>3.2. Effect of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> B-1 with different treatment intervals against <italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea in vivo</italic></title>
<p>In comparison to the 0 h treatment, the diameter and incidence of <italic>B. dothidea</italic> rot reduced when the interval time between <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 treatment and the pathogen inoculation was 6 h or longer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). The efficiency of strain B-1 was improved with the extension of interval time from 6 to 24 h. The expansion of decay symptoms was inhibited at the interval time of 24 h, as the incidence of apple ring rot and lesion diameter in strain B-1 treated fruit were reduced by 30.8 and 85.6%, respectively, compared with the 0 h treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). There was no obvious difference in the incidence and lesion size of apple ring rot at the interval time from 24 to 96 h (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2B, C</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Effects of <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 with different inoculation intervals at 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU mL&#x2013;<sup>1</sup> on the disease symptoms <bold>(A)</bold>, lesion diameter <bold>(B)</bold>, and disease incidence <bold>(C)</bold> in inoculated apple fruit at 5 dpi. Error bars represent the SD of three replicates. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) between the different inoculation intervals.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1131737-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>3.3. <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> B-1 inhibited <italic>B. dothidea in vitro</italic></title>
<p><italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> B-1 cells ranging from 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> to 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> and culture filtrates all exhibited inhibitory effects on the mycelial growth of the fungal pathogen at 25&#x00B0;C. When the concentration of strain B-1 cells reached 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>, the mycelial growth of <italic>B. dothidea</italic> was almost completely inhibited. Moreover, strain B-1 culture filtrates showed lower antifungal activity against <italic>B. dothidea</italic> than the bacterial cells at 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>, with 18.28 and 49.64% mycelial growth inhibition, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Effects of <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 cells and culture filtrate on mycelial growth inhibition <bold>(A)</bold> and spore generation <bold>(B)</bold> of <italic>B. dothidea in vitro.</italic> Strain B-1 cells were used at 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup> CFU mL&#x2013;<sup>1</sup> to 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup> CFU mL&#x2013;<sup>1</sup>, and sterile distilled water was used as the control. Each column represents the mean and vertical bars represent the SD of four replicates. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) between the control and the different treatments of strain B-1.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1131737-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The effect of <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 on <italic>B. dothidea</italic> spore germination was also determined by mixing strain B-1 cells or culture filtrates with <italic>B. dothidea</italic> conidia. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>, the spore germination rate decreased as the concentration of strain B-1 cells increased, which indicated that the inhibitory efficiency of strain B-1 cells against the spore germination of <italic>B. dothidea</italic> depended on its concentration. At 12 h of incubation, the germination rate of control reached 88.07%; however, the bacterial cells at 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> showed the lowest germination rate with only 1.23%. Similarly, <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 culture filtrate showed less inhibition on spore germination than its cells ranging from 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> to 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>3.4. <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> B-1 reduced the oxidative damage in apple fruit</title>
<p>To analyze the effect of <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 on oxidative damage in apple fruit, the electrolyte leakage, MDA, and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> contents were determined in four different treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). During the storage, no statistical differences in the three factors were detected between strain B-1 treated fruit and the control. The level of electrolyte leakage rose in the fruit inoculated with <italic>B. dothidea</italic> from 24 h post-inoculation (hpi) and attained the maximum leakage of 97.3% at 120 hpi. However, the level of leakage in strain B-1 plus <italic>B. dothidea</italic>-treated fruit was only 45.7% at 120 hpi, which had no difference compared with the control fruit (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>The electrolyte leakage <bold>(A)</bold>, MDA content <bold>(B)</bold>, and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> content <bold>(C)</bold> in apple fruit with four treatments stored at 25&#x00B0;C. Each data represents the mean &#x00B1; SD of three replicates. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) at the same time point.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1131737-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In the fruit only inoculated with <italic>B. dothidea</italic>, MDA content increased from 24 hpi, which was up to 164.9 and 173.1% more than the control at 96 and 120 hpi, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>). In strain B-1 plus <italic>B. dothidea</italic>-treated fruit, although the MDA content rose from 96 hpi, it was only 16.4 and 31.6% more than the control at 96 and 120 hpi, respectively. Consistent with the level of electrolyte leakage and MDA content, the H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> level sharply increased in <italic>B. dothidea</italic>-inoculated fruit from 48 hpi and reached the highest value of 14.08 mmol kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> at 120 hpi. Nevertheless, in the fruit treated with strain B-1 plus pathogen, the level of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> enhanced slowly and showed no difference compared with the control until 96 hpi, with only 0.90 mmol kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> at 120 hpi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4C</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS5">
<title>3.5. <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> B-1 affected the antioxidant enzyme activities in apple fruit</title>
<p>To reveal the effect of <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 on the apple fruit, the activities of the four antioxidant enzymes were analyzed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). During storage, POD activity in apple fruit varied as time progressed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref>). An ascending tendency of POD activity was observed in fruit treated with <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 from 24 h and the peaked was at 48 h with 2.21-fold higher than the control. POD activity in strain B-1 treated fruit decreased from 72 h; however, it remained higher than the control during the whole storage. The result of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref> showed that CAT activity was affected by <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 treatment. In strain B-1 treated fruit, the activity of CAT began to rapidly increase from 24 h and reached the peak at 48 h of storage, which was more than 2.85-fold higher compared with the control. Then, the enzyme activity in strain B-1 treated fruit decreased until 72 h, but CAT activity quickly rosed again and the second peak was at 96 h, which was 2.41-fold higher than the control.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>The activities of POD <bold>(A)</bold>, CAT <bold>(B)</bold>, SOD <bold>(C)</bold>, and APX <bold>(D)</bold> in apple fruit treated with <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 at 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU mL&#x2013;<sup>1</sup> stored at 25&#x00B0;C. Each data represents the mean &#x00B1; SD of three replicates. Asterisks (&#x002A;) denote a significant difference (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) between the strain B-1 treatment and the control apple fruit at the same time point.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1131737-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In contrast to the control, <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 treatment also increased the activities of SOD and APX in apple fruit during storage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5C, D</xref>). The activity of SOD in fruit treated with strain B-1 rose steadily from 12 h and reached the peak at 72 h with 5.79 U g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>. Although the enzyme activity declined from 96 h, SOD activity induced by strain B-1 was still higher than the control throughout the storage period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5C</xref>). As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5D</xref>, APX activity was induced by stain B-1 from 12 h and peaked at 48 h, which was 2.09-fold higher than the control. Then, the enzyme activity declined rapidly and it even reduced to the control level at 120 h.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS6">
<title>3.6. <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> B-1 induced the defense-related enzyme activities in apple fruit</title>
<p>In addition to an enhancement of antioxidant enzyme activities by <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 treatment, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref> shows that the four defense-related enzyme activities were induced by <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 in apple fruit. For PAL and PPO, the activities increased from 12 h in the fruit treated with strain B-1 and they reached the highest values, 1.57-fold and 2.47-fold higher than the control, respectively. After that, the two enzymes&#x2019; activities induced by strain B-1 decreased quickly, and they were not different from the control at 96 h for PAL and 120 h for PPO, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6A, B</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption><p>The activities of PAL <bold>(A)</bold>, PPO <bold>(B)</bold>, GLU <bold>(C)</bold>, and CHI <bold>(D)</bold> in apple fruit treated with <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 at 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU mL&#x2013;<sup>1</sup> stored at 25&#x00B0;C. Each data represents the mean &#x00B1; SD of three replicates. Asterisks (&#x002A;) denote a significant difference (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) between the strain B-1 treatment and the control apple fruit at the same time point.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1131737-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6C, D</xref> show that GLU and CHI activities were affected by <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 treatment in apple fruit. The GLU activity in fruit treated with strain B-1 showed a sharp increase and peaked at 48 h. Thereafter, the enzyme activity decreased from 72 to 120 h; however, it remained higher than the control during the storage phase (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6C</xref>). The change of CHI activity induced by strain B-1 was similar to GLU activity. The enzyme activity rose within 24 h after strain B-1 treatment and reached the highest level at 72 h. Then, CHI activity declined from 96 h after treatment, and it was still 2.19-fold higher than the control at 120 h (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6D</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS7">
<title>3.7. <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> B-1 promoted the total phenolics, lignin, and hormone content in apple fruit</title>
<p>To get a better insight into the impact of <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 on apple fruit and the mechanisms of induced protection against <italic>B. dothidea</italic>, several metabolites and hormones involved in pathogen resistance were measured. Generally, the contents of total phenolics and lignin contents changed slowly in the control fruit, whereas they were greatly induced in strain B-1 treated fruit. As indicated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7A</xref>, strain B-1 enhanced the accumulation of total phenolics from 24 h (1.31-fold) after treatment during the storage period, and reached the maximum level at 72 h with 1.52-fold higher than the control. In addition, strain B-1 promoted the lignin content from 24 h after treatment compared with the control. Then, the lignin content in strain B-1 treated fruit peaked at 48, with 1.71-fold higher than the control. After that, it decreased only slightly and maintained a higher level throughout the storage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7B</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption><p>The content of total phenolics <bold>(A)</bold> and lignin <bold>(B)</bold> in apple fruit treated with <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 at 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU mL&#x2013;<sup>1</sup> stored at 25&#x00B0;C. Each data represents the mean &#x00B1; SD of three replicates. Asterisks (&#x002A;) denote a significant difference (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) between the strain B-1 treatment and the control apple fruit at the same time point.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1131737-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Regarding plant hormones, the contents of SA and JA were determined, with or without strain B-1 treatment. During the storage, SA and JA levels had no obvious changes in the control fruit (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>). Strain B-1 treatment slightly enhanced the accumulation of JA at 48 h in apple fruit, with a 1.20-fold higher compared with the control. Nevertheless, the result of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8B</xref> illustrated that strain B-1 treatment enhanced the SA levels compared with the control. The content of SA increased from 12 h and continued to accumulate, which was 4.24-fold higher than the control.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption><p>The content of JA <bold>(A)</bold> and SA <bold>(B)</bold> in apple fruit treated with <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 at 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU mL&#x2013;<sup>1</sup> stored at 25&#x00B0;C. Each data represents the mean &#x00B1; SD of three replicates. Asterisks (&#x002A;) denote a significant difference (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) between the strain B-1 treatment and the control apple fruit at the same time point.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1131737-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS8">
<title>3.8. <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> s<italic>yringae</italic> B-1 activated the upregulated expression of PR genes and SA biosynthesis-related genes in apple fruit</title>
<p>Given the increased SA content in strain B-1-treated fruit, we next determined the expressions of genes involved in defense response (<italic>MdGLU</italic> and <italic>MdCHI</italic>) and SA pathway (<italic>MdPR1</italic>, <italic>MdPR5</italic>, <italic>MdSID2</italic>, and <italic>MdPAD4</italic>) by quantitative PCR to reveal the biocontrol mechanism of <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1. <italic>PR1</italic> and <italic>PR5</italic> are widely used molecular markers that correlate with SA signaling activation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zhang Q. M. et al., 2016</xref>). Meanwhile, <italic>SID2</italic> (SA induction deficient 2) and <italic>PAD4</italic> (phytoalexin deficient 4) are the genes related to SA biosynthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Huang et al., 2021b</xref>).</p>
<p>Compared with the control, the transcript level of <italic>MdPR1</italic> in strain B-1 treated fruit upregulated significantly at 12 h, and then reached the maximum at 48 h, which was 27.50-fold higher than that in the control fruit (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9A</xref>). As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9B</xref>, the transcript level of <italic>MdPR5</italic> in fruit treated with strain B-1 peaked the highest at 24 h, with 9.60-fold higher than the control. Similarly, strain B-1 treatment upregulated the expression of <italic>MdSID2</italic> and <italic>MdGLU</italic> at 12&#x2013;48 h, which exhibited similar trends with <italic>MdPR5</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figures 9C, E</xref>). The result of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9F</xref> indicated that the expression of <italic>MdPAD4</italic> was triggered by strain B-1, and its transcript level was 7.63-fold higher than the control at 48 h. For <italic>MdCHI</italic>, compared with the control, the transcript level was activated by strain B-1 and showed 5.15- and 8.28-fold increases at 24 and 48 h, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9D</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption><p>The gene expressions of <italic>MdPR1</italic> <bold>(A)</bold>, <italic>MdPR5</italic> <bold>(B)</bold>, <italic>MdGLU</italic> <bold>(C)</bold>, <italic>MdCHI</italic> <bold>(D)</bold>, <italic>MdSID2</italic> <bold>(E)</bold>, and <italic>MdPAD4</italic> <bold>(F)</bold> in apple fruit treated with <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 at 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU mL&#x2013;<sup>1</sup> stored at 25&#x00B0;C. Each data represents the mean &#x00B1; SD of three biological replicates. Asterisks (&#x002A;) denote a significant difference (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) between the strain B-1 treatment and the control apple fruit at the same time point.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1131737-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>4. Discussion</title>
<p>Biological control is a possible and safe strategy for chemical fungicides to manage the postharvest decay in fruit and tuber (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Droby et al., 2009</xref>). Previous studies indicated that many strains of the <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> genus, including <italic>P. syringae</italic>, are effective in controlling multiple postharvest decays caused by <italic>B. cinerea</italic>, <italic>M. fructigena</italic>, and <italic>P. digitatum</italic> rot (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Zhou et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Panebianco et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aiello et al., 2019</xref>). In this research, we demonstrated for the first time that <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 could effectively control postharvest apple ring rot by reducing the disease incidence and lesion size in fruit during the whole storage. The pretreatment of strain B-1 alone showed no effect on the surface color, weight loss, firmness, or total soluble solids content of apple fruit (data not shown). Given these promising results, we further investigated the possible mechanisms of <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1-induced biocontrol against <italic>B. dothidea</italic>.</p>
<p>Our findings revealed that the ability of <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 to control apple ring rot depended on its concentration, and 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> strain B-1 was its threshold concentration to control <italic>B. dothidea</italic> effectively. This also exists in other antagonists for their control efficiency. For example, <italic>M. guilliermondii</italic> at high concentration has better efficiency against blue mold decay in pear fruit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Yan et al., 2018</xref>). Moreover, we found the time interval between <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 pretreatment and <italic>B. dothidea</italic> infection was another important element for its efficiency <italic>in vivo</italic>. Previous studies also showed that the biocontrol efficiency was closely related to the interval time after antagonist treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Lu et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Huang et al., 2021b</xref>), which aligned with our current finding. Furthermore, <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 showed a protective rather than curative effect to manage apple ring rot, which agreed with the biocontrol effect of <italic>Clavispora lusitaniae</italic> 146 and <italic>Streptomyces</italic> sp. H4, two agents against postharvest green mold and anthracnose, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Perez et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Li et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>The action mechanisms of biocontrol bacteria to manage postharvest decays are complicated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Roc&#x00ED;o et al., 2021</xref>), the understanding of which, however, is pivotal to registering and commercializing a biocontrol product (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Droby et al., 2016</xref>). In this research, we analyzed the antagonist effects of <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 using live cells and culture filtrates. Overall, strain B-1 culture filtrates showed lower but notably inhibitory activity on <italic>B. dothidea</italic> compared with the bacterial cells (&#x2265;10<sup>6</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aiello et al. (2019)</xref> found that <italic>P. synxantha</italic> cells exhibited the best effects to inhibit <italic>M. fructigena</italic> and <italic>M. fructicola</italic> compared to culture filtrates. These data clearly indicated that <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp. functioned by other mechanisms involving the presence of living cells, but not antibiosis. For example, competing for nutrients and space with pathogens is the principal mode of <italic>P. syringae</italic>, an availably commercial agent Bio-Save (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bull et al., 1998</xref>). This mechanism is also true for other antagonistic bacteria <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> and <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> B4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Wallace et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Ye et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>The pathogen&#x2019;s infection could cause oxidative damage, which has a negative impact on the cytomembrane and can be illustrated by the changes in electrolyte leakage and MDA contents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Zhang et al., 2012</xref>). Previous studies demonstrated that the levels of electrolyte leakage or MDA enhanced in plant tissues infected with pathogens, such as in peach fruit infected with <italic>M. fructicola</italic>, and in apple leaves inoculated with <italic>Glomerella cingulata</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zhang Q. M. et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Ji et al., 2020</xref>). Our present research also showed that the levels of electrolyte leakage and MDA increased greatly in apple fruit with only <italic>B. dothidea</italic> infection from 24 to 120 hpi, whereas <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 treatment reduced the electrolyte leakage and MDA contents in fruit after <italic>B. dothidea</italic> inoculation. Therefore, these results indicated antagonists were effective in delaying MDA accumulation and mitigating electrolyte leakage in fruit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zhang Q. M. et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Ji et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition, oxidative damage also can be induced by the excessive production of ROS in cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Glazebrook, 2005</xref>). It has been reported that ROS is a harmful substance produced during pathogens infection and that the levels of ROS correlate with the severity of disease symptoms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Mittler et al., 2004</xref>). In this research, our data indicated that strain B-1 treatment effectively reduced H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> aggregation in response to <italic>B. dothidea</italic> infection. Thus, we speculated that strain B-1 played the antioxidant function, hence alleviating subsequence oxidative damage to apple fruit and conferring resistance to <italic>B. dothidea</italic>. This result agrees with the report of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Ji et al. (2020)</xref> where the authors reported that <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> W10 treatment reduced disease severity and ROS aggregation in nectarine fruit caused by <italic>M. fructicola</italic>.</p>
<p>Various antioxidant enzymes have vital functions in balancing ROS levels and inducing plant resistance responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Mittler et al., 2004</xref>). Numerous studies have demonstrated that the activation of POD, CAT, SOD, and APX participated in the reaction of plant defense (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zhang Q. M. et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Ji et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Huang et al., 2021a</xref>). For example, in loquat fruit, <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> B4 increased the defense reaction against various pathogens, and the activity of POD was greatly higher than the control (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Ye et al., 2021</xref>). In apple fruit, <italic>M. guilliermondii</italic> Y-1 improved three antioxidant enzyme activities and the total antioxidant capacity, thereby correspondingly increasing the fruit resistance to apple ring rot (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Huang et al., 2021b</xref>). This finding revealed that strain B-1 treatment could trigger the activation of the fruit defense response and mitigate its oxidative damage against <italic>B. dothidea</italic> infection.</p>
<p>In addition to the antioxidant enzymes, the defense-related enzymes, secondary metabolites, and host-resistance proteins are all involved in plant disease resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Huang et al., 2021b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>). PAL participates in the biosynthesis of phenolics and lignin in plant tissues, and PPO produces quinines that can inhibit or kill invading pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Mayer, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Romanazzi et al., 2016</xref>). Our results also indicated that <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 treatment activated those two enzymes, which is consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zhang Q. M. et al. (2016)</xref> who reported that PAL and PPO were potentially induced by the antagonist <italic>S. rochei</italic> A-1 in apple fruit. Similarly, those two enzyme activities were also promoted by <italic>Pichia membranifaciens</italic>, which was related to enhancing peach resistance to Rhizopus rot (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Zhang et al., 2020</xref>). In addition, CHI and GLU are other key enzymes involved in plant defense response by disrupting the cell wall structure of pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Romanazzi et al., 2016</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Liu et al. (2021)</xref> stated that the activities and gene expression of both GLU and CHI were upregulated to decrease the lesion diameter of Alternaria rot in pear fruit. In this study, we also indicated here that GLU and CHI were markers of plant defense response, due to their activities and gene expression levels being enhanced and could persist in strain B-1 treated fruit. These data in our research demonstrate that the induced resistance against <italic>B. dothidea</italic> may be the main action mechanism of strain B-1.</p>
<p>Phenolics and lignin are the pivotal metabolic products in the phenylpropanoid metabolic pathway, which can strengthen the structure of wound tissues and effectively prevent the invasion of pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Jiang et al., 2019</xref>). Our results indicated that <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1treatment induced the increase of total phenolics and lignin contents in apple fruit throughout the storage. Our results are also consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Li et al. (2019)</xref>, where they found that &#x03B2;-Aminobutyric acid could stimulate total phenolics and lignin contents against <italic>Gilbertella persicaria</italic> infection in red pitaya fruit. Moreover, MeJA could promote wound healing by activating total phenolics and lignin contents in harvested kiwifruit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Wei et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>In the plant defense system, SA is a critical regulatory signal molecule, and recent research indicated that it participated in the resistance response against <italic>B. dothidea</italic> in apple fruit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Zhao et al., 2020</xref>). In our study, MeJA contents changed slightly after <italic>P. syringae</italic> B-1 treatment in apple fruit; however, SA contents were induced by stain B-1. These results suggested that the SA pathway may play an important role in apple fruit resistance induced by strain B-1. Based on our data, we also found strain B-1 treatment upregulated the transcript levels of <italic>MdPR1</italic> and <italic>MdPR5</italic>, which are the key molecular markers correlating with SA signaling activation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zhang Q. M. et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Huang et al., 2021a</xref>). Furthermore, strain B-1 also activated <italic>MdSID2</italic> and <italic>MdPAD4</italic> expression in apple fruit. <italic>MdSID2</italic> performs a vital role in the aggregation of SA signal, and <italic>MdPAD4</italic> contributes to regulating plant defense against pathogen infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Wiermer et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Zhao et al., 2020</xref>). These findings further exhibited that SA is involved in apple fruit resistance induced by strain B-1, and similar results were also reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Huang et al. (2021a)</xref>. Their research showed that butylated hydroxytoluene effectively controls apple ring rot mainly by activating the SA signaling pathway.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S5" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>5. Conclusion</title>
<p>In our research, a newly isolated <italic>P. syringae</italic> strain B-1 exhibited a strong efficiency against postharvest apple ring rot. Application of strain B-1 suspension at 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> reduced the incidence and lesion diameter of apple ring rot <italic>in vivo</italic>. The investigation of the mode of action demonstrated that strain B-1 not only shows the antifungal ability and activates the defense enzymes but also promotes the accumulation of disease-resistant substances and upregulates the transcript levels of PR genes by activating the SA signaling pathway. These results indicate that <italic>P. syringae</italic> strain B-1 has an enormous potential in controlling <italic>B. dothidea</italic> rot during the storage of apple fruit. Further exploration of the application technologies of strain B-1 is under investigation by our team, such as evaluating the tolerance of strain B-1 to fungicides used on apple fruit and the control efficiency of their combined treatments against <italic>B. dothidea</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>ZS: conceptualization, data curation, and writing&#x2014;original draft. BH: methodology, investigation, and writing&#x2014;original draft. CuW: formal analysis and data curation. SL: methodology and data curation. YX: methodology and investigation. BL: funding acquisition and writing&#x2014;review and editing. CaW: supervision, funding acquisition, and writing&#x2014;review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="S8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the Chinese Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System (No. CARS-27), the National College Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (No. 202210435017), the Graduate Student Innovation Program of Qingdao Agricultural University (No. QNYCX21093), and the Student Innovation Training of Qingdao Agricultural University.</p>
</sec>
<ack><p>We thank Dr. Xiangnan Guan at Oregon Health and Science University for their helpful suggestions and for revising the manuscript.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="S9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aiello</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Restuccia</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stefani</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vitale</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cirvilleri</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Postharvest biocontrol ability of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> synxantha against <italic>Monilinia fructicola</italic> and <italic>Monilinia fructigena</italic> on stone fruit.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>149</volume> <fpage>83</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>89</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.11.020</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al-Mughrabi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vikram</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peters</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Howard</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grant</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barasubiye</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Efficacy of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> in the management of potato tuber diseases in storage.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Control</italic></source> <volume>64</volume>:<issue>315</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.11.011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bull</surname> <given-names>C. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wadsworth</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sorensen</surname> <given-names>K. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takemoto</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Austin</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smilanick</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Syringomycin E produced by biological control agents controls green mold on lemons.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Control</italic></source> <volume>12</volume> <fpage>89</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>95</lpage>. 0622 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/bcon.1998</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Calvo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marco</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blanco</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oria</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Venturini</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Potential of a new strain of <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> BUZ-14 as a biocontrol agent of postharvest fruit diseases.</article-title> <source><italic>Food Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>63</volume> <fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>110</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fm.2016.11.004</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28040156</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Casals</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teixid&#x00F3;</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vi&#x00F1;as</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cambray</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Usall</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Control of <italic>Monilinia</italic> spp. on stone fruit by curing treatments. Part II: The effect of host and <italic>Monilinia</italic> spp. variables on curing efficacy.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>56</volume> <fpage>26</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.11.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>X. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Isolation and characterization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PG12 for the biological control of apple ring rot.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>115</volume> <fpage>113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>121</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.12.021</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cirvilleri</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bonaccorsi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scuderi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scortichini</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Potential biological control activity and genetic diversity of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> pv. <italic>syringae</italic> strains.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Phytopathol.</italic></source> <volume>153</volume> <fpage>654</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>666</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1439-0434.2005.01033.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Droby</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wisniewski</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Macarisin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>52</volume> <fpage>137</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>145</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Droby</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wisniewski</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teixid&#x00F3;</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spadaro</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jijakli</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The science, development, and commercialization of postharvest biocontrol products.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>122</volume> <fpage>22</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>29</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.04.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Errampalli</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brubacher</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Biological and integrated control of postharvest blue mold (<italic>Penicillium expansum</italic>) of apples by <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> and cyprodinil.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Control</italic></source> <volume>36</volume> <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.07.011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Sensitivity of <italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic> from apple to tebuconazole in China.</article-title> <source><italic>Crop Prot.</italic></source> <volume>87</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2016.04.018</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Glazebrook</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</italic></source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>227</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135923</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16078883</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G. X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Investigations on the occurrence and chemical control of <italic>Botryosphaeria</italic> canker of apple in China.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Protect.</italic></source> <volume>35</volume> <fpage>120</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>123</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2009.04.027</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>X. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lian</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021a</year>). <article-title>Butylated hydroxytoluene induced resistance against <italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic> in apple fruit.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>599062</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/FMICB.2020.599062</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33519739</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>X. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lian</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021b</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol efficiency of <italic>Meyerozyma guilliermondii</italic> Y-1 against apple postharvest decay caused by <italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic> and the possible mechanisms of action.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>338</volume>:<issue>108957</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.IJFOODMICRO.2020.108957</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33221041</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Induced resistance in nectarine fruit by <italic>Bacillus licheniformis</italic> W10 for the control of brown rot caused by <italic>Monilinia fructicola</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Food Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>92</volume>:<issue>103558</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fm.2020.103558</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32950152</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>H. L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Benzo-(1, 2, 3)-thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid s-methylester (BTH) promotes tuber wound healing of potato by elevation of phenylpropanoid metabolism.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>153</volume> <fpage>125</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>132</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.03</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leng</surname> <given-names>W. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Method to promote sporulation of <italic>Botryosphaeria berengeriana</italic> f. sp. piricola.</article-title> <source><italic>Acta Phytopathol. Sinica</italic></source> <volume>39</volume> <fpage>536</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>539</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13926/j.cnki.apps.2009.05.017</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36471465</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>F. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Postharvest dipping treatment with BABA induced resistance against rot caused by <italic>Gilbertella persicaria</italic> in red pitaya fruit.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Hortic.</italic></source> <volume>257</volume>:<issue>108713</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108713</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol of postharvest gray and blue mold decay of apples with <italic>Rhodotorula mucilaginosa</italic> and possible mechanisms of action.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>146</volume> <fpage>151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>156</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.02.015</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21402429</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jing</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zang</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol efficacy and possible mechanism of <italic>Streptomyces</italic> sp. H4 against postharvest anthracnose caused by <italic>Colletotrichum fragariae</italic> on strawberry fruit.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>175</volume>:<issue>111401</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.POSTHARVBIO.2020.111401</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Q. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>R. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z. T.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Induction of defense response against Alternaria rot in Zaosu pear fruit by exogenous L-lysine through regulating ROS metabolism and activating defense-related proteins.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>179</volume>:<issue>111567</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.POSTHARVBIO.2021.111567</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title><italic>Rhodosporidium paludigenum</italic> induces resistance and defense-related responses against <italic>Penicillium digitatum</italic> in citrus fruit.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>85</volume> <fpage>196</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>202</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.06.014</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morgan</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Felts</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Michailides</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Sensitivity of <italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic> from California pistachio to tebuconazole.</article-title> <source><italic>Crop Prot.</italic></source> <volume>21</volume> <fpage>829</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>835</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0261-2194(02)00046-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mayer</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Polyphenol oxidases in plants and fungi: Going places? A review.</article-title> <source><italic>Phytochemisry</italic></source> <volume>67</volume> <fpage>2318</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2331</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.08.006</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16973188</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mittler</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vanderauwera</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gollery</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Breusegem</surname> <given-names>F. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Reactive oxygen gene network of plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume> <fpage>490</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>498</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2004.08.009</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15465684</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Panebianco</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vitale</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Polizzi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scala</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cirvilleri</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Enhanced control of postharvest citrus fruit decay by means of the combined use of compatible biocontrol agents.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Control</italic></source> <volume>84</volume> <fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.02.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Perez</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>D&#x00ED;az</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pereyra</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>C&#x00F3;rdoba</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Isas</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sep&#x00FA;lveda</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol features of <italic>Clavispora lusitaniae</italic> against <italic>Penicillium digitatum</italic> on lemons.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>155</volume> <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.05.012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roc&#x00ED;o</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>David</surname> <given-names>F. F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ra&#x00FA;l</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms of action of microbial biocontrol agents against Botrytis cinerea.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Fungi</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<issue>1045</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/JOF7121045</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34947027</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Romanazzi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanzani</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x00ED;nez</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alkan</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Induced resistance to control postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>122</volume> <fpage>82</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.08.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists: A review.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Control</italic></source> <volume>50</volume> <fpage>205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>221</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smilanick</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Virulence on citrus of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> strains that control postharvest green mold of citrus fruit.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Dis.</italic></source> <volume>80</volume>:<issue>1123</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PD-80-1123</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spadaro</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Droby</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Development of biocontrol products for postharvest diseases of fruit: The importance of elucidating the mechanisms of action of yeast antagonists.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Food Sci. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tifs.2015.11.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lian</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saleem</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Improving the biocontrol efficacy of <italic>Meyerozyma guilliermondii</italic> Y-1 with melatonin against postharvest gray mold in apple fruit.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>171</volume>:<issue>111351</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2020.111351</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic and pathogenic analyses show that the causal agent of apple ring rot in China is <italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Dis.</italic></source> <volume>96</volume> <fpage>486</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>496</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-08-11-0635</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30727432</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van Lenteren</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bolckmans</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>K&#x00F6;hl</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ravensberg</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Urbaneja</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: Plenty of new opportunities.</article-title> <source><italic>BioControl</italic></source> <volume>63</volume> <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10526-017-9801-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wallace</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hirkala</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Postharvest biological control of blue mold of apple by <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> fluorescens during commercial storage and potential modes of action.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>133</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.07.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Causes of serious occurrence of apple fruit ring rot in 2000 and its control countermeasures (in Chinese).</article-title> <source><italic>Hebei Fruits</italic></source> <volume>1</volume> <fpage>22</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19440/j.cnki.1006-9402.2001.01.015</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>W. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The effect of exogenous salicylic acid on antioxidant activity, bioactive compounds and antioxidant system in apricot fruit.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Hortic.</italic></source> <volume>181</volume> <fpage>113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>120</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2014.10.055</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>X. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Methyl jasmonate promotes wound healing by activation of phenylpropanoid metabolism in harvested kiwifruit.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>175</volume>:<issue>111472</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.POSTHARVBIO.2021.111472</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wiermer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feys</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parker</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Plant immunity: The EDS1 regulatory node.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>383</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>389</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2005.05.010</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15939664</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Williamson</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guzm&#x00E1;n</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anas</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sutton</surname> <given-names>T. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> strain ESC-11 for biocontrol of crown rot and anthracnose of banana.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Control</italic></source> <volume>46</volume> <fpage>279</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>286</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.05.016</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Apaliya</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Control of postharvest blue mold decay in pears by <italic>Meyerozyma guilliermondii</italic> and it&#x2019;s effects on the protein expression profile of pears.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>136</volume> <fpage>124</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>131</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.10.016</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>W. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol potential of a broad-spectrum antifungal strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B4 for postharvest loquat fruit storage.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>174</volume>:<issue>111439</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.POSTHARVBIO.2020.111439</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Curative effects of six systemic fungicides on tumor development on apple branches caused by <italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic> (in Chinese).</article-title> <source><italic>J. Fruit Sci.</italic></source> <volume>27</volume> <fpage>1029</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1031</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.2010.06.012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Q. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Salicylic acid inhibits the postharvest decay of goji berry (<italic>Lycium barbarum</italic> L.) by modulating the antioxidant system and phenylpropanoid metabolites.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>178</volume>:<issue>111558</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.POSTHARVBIO.2021.111558</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oh</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baldwin</surname> <given-names>I. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Galis</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Alternative oxidase in resistance to biotic stresses: Nicotiana attenuate AOX contributes to resistance to a pathogen and a piercing-sucking insect but not <italic>Manduca sexta</italic> larvae.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>160</volume> <fpage>1453</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1467</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/41694006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yong</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title><italic>Streptomyces rochei</italic> A-1 induces resistance and defense-related responses against <italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic> in apple fruit during storage.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>115</volume> <fpage>30</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.12.013</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dhanasekaran</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Postharvest biological control of Rhizopus rot and the mechanisms involved in induced disease resistance of peaches by <italic>Pichia membranefaciens</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>163</volume>:<issue>111146</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2020.111146</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>W. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Salicylic acid confers enhanced resistance to <italic>Glomerella</italic> leaf spot in apple.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>106</volume> <fpage>64</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>72</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.04.047</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27139585</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Induced resistance in nectarine fruit by <italic>Bacillus licheniformis</italic> W10 for the control of brown rot caused by <italic>Monilinia fructicola</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Food Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>92</volume>:<issue>103558</issue>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Seasonal dynamics of <italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic> infections and symptom development on apple fruits and shoots in China.</article-title> <source><italic>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</italic></source> <volume>146</volume> <fpage>507</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>518</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-016-0935-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schaneider</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Postharvest control of blue mold and gray mold on apples using isolates of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Can. J. Plant Pathol.</italic></source> <volume>23</volume> <fpage>246</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>252</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/07060660109506937</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Northover</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schneider</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Biological control of postharvest diseases of peach with phyllosphere isolates of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Can. J. Plant Pathol.</italic></source> <volume>21</volume> <fpage>375</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>381</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/07060669909501174</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
