<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1129614</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effects of rice blast biocontrol strain <italic>Pseudomonas alcaliphila</italic> Ej2 on the endophytic microbiome and proteome of rice under salt stress</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname>
<given-names>Qingchao</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref rid="fn0003" ref-type="author-notes"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/878136/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Man</surname>
<given-names>Xiaowu</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref rid="fn0003" ref-type="author-notes"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Zeyang</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhuang</surname>
<given-names>Lubo</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Hanmeng</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff4" ref-type="aff"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Sha</surname>
<given-names>Yuexia</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1913654/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Institute of Plant Protection, Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Yinchuan</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Tree Breeding by Molecular Design, Beijing Forestry University</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Institute of Plant Protection, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Department of Plant Pathology, MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn id="fn0001" fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Lin Chen, Chinese Academy of Forestry, China</p></fn>
<fn id="fn0002" fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Kuleshwar Prasad Sahu, GD Goenka University, India; Dharmendra Kumar, Central Potato Research Institute (ICAR), India</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Yuexia Sha, <email>yuexiasha@126.com</email></corresp>
<fn id="fn0003" fn-type="equal"><p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>These authors have contributed equally to this work</p></fn>
<fn id="fn0004" fn-type="other"><p>This article was submitted to Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>07</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1129614</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>22</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>13</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2023 Zeng, Man, Huang, Zhuang, Yang and Sha.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zeng, Man, Huang, Zhuang, Yang and Sha</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Soil salinity is a prevalent environmental stress in agricultural production. Microbial inoculants could effectively help plants to alleviate salt stress. However, there is little knowledge of the biocontrol strain <italic>Pseudomonas alcaliphila</italic> Ej2 mechanisms aiding rice plants to reduce the adverse effects caused by salt stress.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>We performed integrated field and greenhouse experiments, microbial community profiling, and rice proteomic analysis to systematically investigate the Ej2 mechanism of action.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>The results displayed that biocontrol strain Ej2 increased shoot/root length and fresh/dry weight compared with control under salt stress. Meanwhile, strain Ej2 has the ability to control rice blast disease and promote rice growth. Furthermore, the microbial community analysis revealed that the alpha-diversity of Ej2-inoculated plants was higher than the control plants, expect the Shannon index of the bacterial microbiome and the Ej2-inoculated samples clustered and separated from the control samples based on beta-diversity analysis. Importantly, the enriched and specific OTUs after Ej2 inoculation at the genus level were <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Flavobacterium</italic>, and <italic>Bacillus</italic>. Moreover, we observed that Ej2 inoculation influenced the rice proteomic profile, including metabolism, plant-pathogen interactions, and biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids. These results provide comprehensive evidence that Ej2 inoculation induced the rice endophytic microbiome and proteomic profiles to promote plant growth under salt stress.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Understanding the biocontrol strain effects on the endophytic microbiome and rice proteomics will help us better understand the complex interactions between plants and microorganisms under salt stress. Furthermore, unraveling the mechanisms underlying salt tolerance will help us more efficiently ameliorate saline soils.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>rice</kwd>
<kwd>salt stress</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Pseudomonas</italic></kwd>
<kwd>endophytic</kwd>
<kwd>microbiome</kwd>
<kwd>proteomic</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="65"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="9695"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Climate change, a very important ongoing topic, has affected our planet in different ways. Crop productivity is affected by climate change, with serious implications for food security (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Vaishnav et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Nawaz et al., 2020</xref>). Among them, soil salinity is one of the current major and widespread agricultural challenges that hinder global food security (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Mukhopadhyay et al., 2021</xref>). An almost 70% yield loss has been reported in cereal crops, such as rice, wheat, and maize, due to soil salinity and sodicity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Rajendran et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Nawaz et al., 2020</xref>). Moreover, 20% of total cultivated and 33% of irrigated agricultural lands worldwide are afflicted by soil high salinity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Shrivastava and Kumar, 2015</xref>). Several strategies, including plant genetic engineering and the utilization of plant growth-promoting bacteria, have been investigated and implemented to decrease the adverse effects caused by high salinity on plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Vaishnav et al., 2019</xref>). Although effective, plant genetic engineering is time-consuming and cost-intensive. The application of beneficial microorganisms represented a useful approach to increase salt tolerance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Berg, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Vaishnav et al., 2019</xref>). Most bacterial genera, including <italic>Agrobacterium</italic>, <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, and <italic>Rhizobium</italic>, have frequently been reported to improve plant salt tolerance. <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> increased plant growth, yield, and leaf chlorophyll content under salt stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Vimal et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Nawaz et al., 2020</xref>). Meanwhile, <italic>Bacillus</italic> could promote proline biosynthesis in pepper plants under osmotic stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Sziderics et al., 2007</xref>). To improve the tolerance and increase the yield of crop exposed to salinity stress, it is necessary to determine the underlying acclimatization and tolerance mechanisms.</p>
<p>Plants hosts a plethora of microorganisms, the plant microbiota (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Vogel et al., 2022</xref>). There is increasing evidence indicating that the microbiome impacts host performance, such as plant growth promotion, nutrient uptake, increased abiotic stress tolerance, and pathogen growth inhibition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Cadot et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Schmitz et al., 2022</xref>). More evidence indicates that the plant microbiome is shifting upon biotic and abiotic influences such as pathogen infection and salt and drought stresses. Importantly, wheat plants infected by pathogens could recruit beneficial microbes to protect the plants and maintain plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Kusstatscher et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Yuan et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Liu et al., 2021a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Li et al., 2022</xref>). Meanwhile, the key plant growth-promoting bacteria of garlic such as <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> could promote plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Zhuang et al., 2021</xref>). Furthermore, <italic>Sphingomonas</italic> and <italic>Microcoleus</italic> as the predominant genera in salt-treated rhizosphere soils as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria might enhance salt tolerance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Xu et al., 2020</xref>). Moreover, organic fertilizers altered the plant microbiome and promote the enrichment of beneficial microorganisms. For example, bacteriophages could control pathogens and they do not alter the existing rhizosphere microbiome and enrich bacterial species to inhibit pathogen growth and virulence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Wang X. et al., 2019</xref>). Meanwhile, bio-organic fertilizers promote <italic>Ralstonia solanacearum</italic> suppression, inducing changes in community composition rather than only through the abundance of the introduced strains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Deng et al., 2022</xref>). Microorganisms play a vital role in protecting plants against multiple environmental stresses. Importantly, bacterial inoculation has limited success in the field, partially due to the inoculants being outcompeted by the native microbial communities in plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">French et al., 2021</xref>). Although the mechanism of action of individual microorganisms has been investigated thoroughly, their impact on plant endophytic microbiome composition is still not fully explored.</p>
<p>Plants can also cope with different stress conditions. Plants have a highly coordinated immune system in which different physiological mechanisms are involved in signaling cascades and induce stress tolerance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Vaishnav et al., 2019</xref>). Salt stress tolerance mechanisms are highly complex, and pathways are coordinately linked (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Culligan et al., 2012</xref>). Importantly, plant-associated microbes have key roles contributing to plant survival under stress conditions. The beneficial effects evoked by endophytes are osmotic adjustment, detoxification, phytohormone regulation, and nutrient acquisition, alleviating salt stress negative effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Vaishnav et al., 2019</xref>). For example, bacterial ACC deaminase activity reduced the host plants&#x2019; salinity-induced oxidative and osmotic damage. Specifically, <italic>P. migulae</italic> 8R6 can produce ACC deaminase and ameliorate salt stress in tomato (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Ali et al., 2014</xref>). Meanwhile, <italic>P. pseudoalcaligenes</italic> inoculation induces glycine betaine accumulation, which improves salinity tolerance in rice plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Jha et al., 2011</xref>). At the same time, the microbes induce plant stress resistance by enhancing antioxidant enzymes activity and other non-enzymatic antioxidants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Gururani et al., 2013</xref>). Salt and bacterial inoculation in canola increased photosynthesis, antioxidative processes, transportation across membranes, and pathogenesis-related proteins, according to a proteome analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Cheng et al., 2012</xref>). Furthermore, the bacterial associations increased nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) and decreased sodium accumulation under salinity. Stress-responsive genes include dehydration-responsive element binding protein, ethylene-responsive factor, high-affinity K<sup>+</sup> transporter, and pyrroline-5-carboxylase synthetase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Vaishnav et al., 2019</xref>). During salt stress, plants accumulate stress-responsive proteins to combat the adverse effects of osmotic and ionic stress. However, there is little knowledges of how the <italic>Pseudomonas alcaliphila</italic> strain Ej2 help rice plants alleviate salt stress.</p>
<p>Rice is a model crop used in research for saline-alkali land improvement. High soil salinity reduces plant yield and thus causes major economic losses. It is important to understand rice responses to salt stress comprehensively. In this study, we isolated the endophytic <italic>P. alcaliphila</italic> Ej2 from rice leaves. This strain inhibited <italic>Magnaporthe oryzae</italic> growth and promoted rice growth under salt stress. This objective of this study was to investigate the <italic>P. alcaliphila</italic> mechanism of action on rice growth and yield enhancement under salt stress. To address these questions, we used metabarcoding sequencing and proteomic analysis to determine how strain Ej2 affects the endophytic microbiome and protein expression in rice under salt stress. We aimed to address (1) the endophytic microbiome taxonomic differences between inoculated and control plants; (2) how Ej2 inoculation affects the protein expression in rice roots under salt stress. Understanding the effects of the Ej2 biocontrol strain on rice endophytic microbiome and proteome will help us to better understand the complex interactions between plants and microorganisms under salt stress. Furthermore, elucidating the mechanisms underlying salt tolerance in plants will aid the more efficient saline soil amelioration.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Strains and growth conditions</title>
<p>The strain <italic>Pseudomonas alcaliphila</italic> Ej2 and pathogens <italic>Fusarium solani</italic> N18-1-2, <italic>F. moniliforme</italic> N19-2-2, <italic>F. oxysporum</italic> f.sp. <italic>niveum</italic> M8, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides ZDP21, Alternaria alternata f.sp. mali BJ-A5, <italic>A. alternata</italic> BJ-ST24, and <italic>M. oryzae</italic> P131 were used in this study. The biocontrol strain Ej2 was isolated from rice leaf (Ninggeng No. 48) which collected from Pingluo, Ningxia (38.26&#x2013;38.91&#x00B0;N, 105.53&#x2013;106.52&#x00B0;E) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Sha et al., 2021</xref>). All the pathogen were donated by China Agricultural University and Institute of Plant Protection, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences. They were stored at the Institute of Plant Protection, Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Yinchuan, China. The bacterial and fungal strains were cultured in King&#x2019;s B (KB, Proteose peptone No.3, 10&#x2009;g/L; K<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub>, 1.5&#x2009;g/L; MgSO<sub>4</sub>&#x00B7;7H<sub>2</sub>O, 1.5&#x2009;g/L; glucose, 20&#x2009;g/L; and agar, 18&#x2009;g/L) and potato dextrose agar (PDA, potato 200&#x2009;g/L; glucose 20&#x2009;g/L; and agar, 18&#x2009;g/L) plate, respectively. Then, the fungal strains incubated at 30&#x00B0;C for 5&#x2013;7 days and the bacterial strain grown at 28&#x00B0;C for 24&#x2009;h (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Zhao et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Liu et al., 2021b</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Strain identification</title>
<p>Bacterial strains Ej2 were identified based on their 16S rRNA gene sequences. Firstly, the overnight cultures of Ej2 were harvested in a microcentrifuge tube at 13,000&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;g for 2&#x2009;min. Then, the total DNA of Ej2 was extracted using DNA extraction kit based on the instruction (Accurate, Hunan, China). The 16S rDNA sequence was amplified using the universal primer 27F (5&#x2032;-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3&#x2032;) and 1492R (5&#x2032;-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3&#x2032;) primers (Shanghai Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Zhao et al., 2019</xref>). All PCR reactions were performed in 5&#x2009;&#x03BC;l of 10&#x00D7; Taq buffer, 4&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of 2.5&#x2009;mM dNTPs, 1&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of each primer (10&#x2009;&#x03BC;M), 2&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of bacteria DNA, 0.5&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of Taq DNA polymerase, and ddH2O to a 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;L final volume. Thermo cycler conditions were 5&#x2009;min at 95&#x00B0;C; 30&#x2009;cycles of 95&#x00B0;C for 30&#x2009;s, 55&#x00B0;C for 30&#x2009;s, and 72&#x00B0;C for 90&#x2009;s; 72&#x00B0;C for 10&#x2009;min. The PCR products were sequenced by Majorbio Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China. BLAST was performed with the resulting sequences against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. Then, the homologous sequences were downloaded from NCBI database. Next, the highly homologous sequences were selected for multiple sequence alignment using CLUSTAL X in the MEGA 7.0 software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Kumar et al., 2016</xref>). A phylogenetic tree was constructed <italic>via</italic> a Neighbor-Joining (NJ) approach, with 1,000 replicate Bootstrap analyzes used to calculate node support (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref001">Chen et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>Antifungal assays</title>
<p>The dual culture technique was used to detect Ej2 antagonistic activities toward pathogenic fungi. The pathogens were cultured on PDA medium for 5&#x2013;7&#x2009;days, and then a 10&#x2009;mm mycelial plug was placed in the center of a fresh PDA plate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Liu et al., 2021b</xref>). The tested bacteria were streaked around the fungal plug and cultured at 28&#x00B0;C for 5&#x2009;days to examine potential antagonistic effects. Three replicates were performed for the assay. Plates that were only inoculated with pathogenic fungi served as negative controls. The antagonistic effect was assessed by measuring the inhibition zones and colony diameters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Liu et al., 2021b</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<title>Evaluation of biocontrol efficacy of Ej2 under greenhouse and field condition</title>
<p>The Ej2 strain biocontrol efficacy was tested using spray inoculation on rice cultivar G19 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref002">Sha et al., 2020</xref>). Rice seeds were surface sterilized with 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 30&#x2009;min and were subsequently washed with autoclaved distilled water five times. For inoculum preparation, a single Ej2 colony grown on KB medium in plates was transferred to 5&#x2009;ml&#x2009;KB broth and incubated at 30&#x00B0;C on a shaker (200&#x2009;rpm) for 24&#x2009;h. The grown culture was harvested by centrifuging at 5000&#x2009;rpm for 5&#x2009;min at 4&#x00B0;C, and the cell pellets were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to obtain an optical density of ~1.0 at 600&#x2009;nm (~1.0&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL). For the greenhouse experiments, after 20&#x2009;days of the plantation, the rice plants were inoculated with 50&#x2009;ml (1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml) by leaf-spraying, tricyclazole (75% WP, 1:1000 dilution), and sterile water used as a positive and negative control. Then, 20&#x2009;ml of <italic>M. oryzae</italic> suspension (1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup> conidia/mL) was spray inoculated on the rice plants after 24&#x2009;h. The experiment was performed in 4 replicates per treatment, with 90 seedlings per replicate. The disease incidence and severity were investigated at 7&#x2009;days after inoculation.</p>
<p>The effects of the bacterial strain Ej2 on rice growth under salt stress were investigated in a controlled environment using rice cultivar Ningjing No.61. Field soil was brought to the greenhouse, mixed with nutrient soil (3:1 ratio), and used as the planting soil. The field soil physicochemical characteristics were: pH&#x2009;=&#x2009;8.5; Phosphorus 5.5&#x2009;mg/kg; Organic matter 5.7&#x2009;g/kg; total nitrogen 0.5&#x2009;g/kg. The bacterial Ej2 strain inoculation was performed by soaking the sterilized rice seeds in a bacterial suspension (1.0&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL) for 6&#x2009;h, while for the control treatment, seeds were soaked in autoclaved distilled water. Meanwhile, the seeds were dried under a clean bench. Then, the seeds soaked in 5&#x2009;mL, 0.2% NaCI concentration, were germinated in Petri dishes for 48&#x2009;h at 28&#x00B0;C. Subsequently, six seeds were sown in each plastic pot filled with soil. 25&#x2009;days after sowing, the plants were uprooted. All samples were kept in cold conditions, transferred to the lab, and stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C before DNA extraction.</p>
<p>The field experiments were performed during the 2020 growing season in the main rice production fields in Lingwu (106.18 E, 37.59&#x2009;N) and Wuzhong (106.14 E, 37.94&#x2009;N) in Ningxia province, northwest China. The two sites are in a temperate continental climate zone. The average altitude is 1,133&#x2009;m. The rice cultivars used were the same as those planted by local farmers, Qiuyou 88 and Jinggu No. 8. The field was separated into four plots, and each plot had an area of 600 m<sup>2</sup>. The Ej2 strain (&#x003E;1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup> CFU/mL, 7,500&#x2009;mL added in 2400&#x2009;L water for every hectare), tricyclazole (75% WP, 1200&#x2009;g added in 750&#x2009;L water for every hectare), and water were applied in the tillering, booting, and rupturing stage. The leaf and stem disease index of rice blast were calculated at tillering and maturity stage. The rice yield was investigated at the maturity stage. The experiment was performed with 4 replicates per treatment. The rice blast incidence and severity were quantified at the stem or leaf using a 0&#x2013;9 scale, as reported previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref002">Sha et al., 2020</xref>). The disease index (DI) was calculated according to the following formulae: Disease index&#x2009;=&#x2009;[&#x2211;(Rating&#x00D7;the number of diseased leaves rated)/The total number of leaves &#x00D7; Highest rating] &#x00D7; 100. Disease incidence (%)&#x2009;=&#x2009;(Total number of diseased leaves/total number of investigated leaves) &#x00D7; 100. Moreover, the plant height, panicle weight, and thousand kernel weight were measured at the maturity stage for control and inoculation plants.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<title>DNA extraction and amplicon sequencing</title>
<p>The rice roots were thoroughly washed under distilled water. Then, the root samples were rinsed with 75% ethanol for 3&#x2009;min. This procedure was repeated three times, and then the roots were finally washed five times with sterile water. The last wash water was inoculated on a nutrient agar plate and incubated for 48&#x2009;h at 37&#x00B0;C. No viable colonies formed, which indicated that the disinfection procedure was efficient (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Liu et al., 2021a</xref>). The roots were placed in liquid nitrogen and ground to a fine powder for DNA extraction. DNA was extracted using the Fast DNA&#x2122; SPIN Kit (MP Biomedicals) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. DNA concentration and quality were determined using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, United States).</p>
<p>The universal primers 799F/1193R and ITS1F/ITS2R were used to amplify the 16S and ITS genes to analyze the bacterial and fungal community (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Gardes and Bruns, 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Caporaso et al., 2011</xref>). The PCR reaction was performed in 20&#x2009;&#x03BC;L volume, containing 0.8&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of both primers (5&#x2009;M), 10&#x2009;ng of template DNA, 4&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of 5&#x00D7; TransStart FastPfu Buffer and 0.4&#x2009;&#x03BC;l TransStart FastPfu DNA polymerase (TransGen, Beijing). Amplification was carried out with the following cycling conditions: 3&#x2009;min initial denaturation at 95&#x00B0;C, followed by 27&#x2009;cycles of 95&#x00B0;C for 30&#x2009;s, 55&#x00B0;C for 30&#x2009;s, and 72&#x00B0;C for 45&#x2009;s, with a final 10&#x2009;min elongation at 72&#x00B0;C. The PCR products were quantified using QuantiFluor&#x2122;-ST (Promega, United States) and then diluted to reach an equal concentration. The library quality was assessed on the Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Scientific) and Agilent Bioanalyzer 2,100 system. The libraries were indexed using the TruSeq DNA Sample Prep Kits for Illumina. They were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform at Majorbio Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, Beijing), and 250 paired-end reads were generated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<title>Protein extraction, digestion, and TMT labeling</title>
<p>The rice root samples were ground into a fine powder in liquid nitrogen. Subsequently, the powder was suspended in a lysis buffer (1% sodium deoxycholate, 8&#x2009;M urea) containing an appropriate protease inhibitor. The mixture was allowed to settle at 4&#x00B0;C for 30&#x2009;min, during which the sample was vortexed every 5&#x2009;min and was subsequently treated by ultrasound at 40&#x2009;kHz and 40&#x2009;W for 2&#x2009;min. After centrifugation at 16,000&#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> at 4&#x00B0;C for 30&#x2009;min, the protein supernatant concentration was determined by the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method using BCA protein Assay Kit (Pierce, Thermo, United States). Protein quantification was performed according to the kit protocol.</p>
<p>100 &#x03BC;g of protein sample was taken, and the volume was replenished to 90 &#x03BC;l adding the lysate. Tris-(2-carboxyethyl)-phosphine (TCEP) (10&#x2009;mM) was added, and the mixture was incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 1&#x2009;h. Then, iodoacetamide (40&#x2009;mM) was added, and the mixture was incubated at room temperature in the dark for 40&#x2009;min. Prechilled acetone (<italic>v</italic>:<italic>v</italic> =&#x2009;6:1) was subsequently added and incubated for 4&#x2009;h at-20&#x00B0;C before centrifugation at 10,000&#x2009;g for 20&#x2009;min. The pellet was re-suspended with 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;l riethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB, 50&#x2009;mM) buffer. All collected proteins were transferred to a new tube, and trypsin digestion with a substrate ration of 1:50 (w/w) was performed at 37&#x00B0;C overnight, according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions.</p>
<p>The digested peptides were labeled with a TMT reagent kit according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions for TMT labeling (Thermo Fisher, United States). After tagging, the TMT-labeled samples were pooled and analyzed with a Thermo Scientific Vanquish F UHPLC system connected to a Q-Exactive hybrid quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, United States). The TMT-tagged peptides were mixed and fractionated into fractions by ACQUITY Ultra Performance liquid chromatography (Waters, United States) with ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 &#x03BC;m, 2.1&#x2009;mm &#x00D7; 150&#x2009;mm, Waters, United States) to increase proteomic depth. Briefly, peptides were separated first with an elution gradient (phase B: 5&#x2009;mM ammonium hydroxide solution containing 80% acetonitrile, pH&#x2009;=&#x2009;10) over 48&#x2009;min at a flowrate of 200 &#x03BC;L/min. 20 fractions were collected from each sample, and were subsequently pooled, resulting in 10 total fractions per sample.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>LC&#x2013;MS/MS analysis</title>
<p>Labeled peptides were analyzed by nano-flow liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry performed on a 9RKFSG2_NCS-3500R system (Thermo Fisher, United States) connected to a Q Exactive Plus Quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, United States) through a nanoelectrospray ion source. Briefly, the C18 reversed-phase column (75 &#x03BC;m &#x00D7; 25&#x2009;cm, Thermo Fisher, United States) was equilibrated with solvent A (A: 2% formic acid with 0.1% formic acid) and solvent B (B: 80% ACN with 0.1% formic acid). The peptides were eluted using the following gradient: 0&#x2013;4&#x2009;min, 0&#x2013;5% B; 4&#x2013;66&#x2009;min, 5&#x2013;23% B; 66&#x2013;80&#x2009;min, 23&#x2013;29% B; 80&#x2013;89&#x2009;min, 29&#x2013;38% B; 89&#x2013;91&#x2009;min, 38&#x2013;48% B; 91&#x2013;92&#x2009;min, 48&#x2013;100% B; 92&#x2013;105&#x2009;min, 100% B; 105&#x2013;106&#x2009;min, 100&#x2013;0% B) at a flow rate of 300&#x2009;nL/min. The Q Exactive Plus was operated in the data-dependent acquisition mode (DDA) to automatically switch between full scan MS and MS/MS acquisition. The full scan MS spectra (m/z 350&#x2013;1,300) were acquired in the Orbitrap with 70,000 resolution. The automatic gain control (AGC) target was set 3e6, and the maximum fill time was 20&#x2009;ms. Then, the top 20 precursor ions with the highest intensity were selected into collision cells for fragmentation by higher-energy collision dissociation (HCD). The MS/MS resolution was set at 35000 (at 100&#x2009;m/z), the automatic gain control (AGC) target at 1e5, the maximum fill time at 50&#x2009;ms, and dynamic exclusion was 18&#x2009;s.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Raw sequences were split according to their unique barcodes and trimmed of the adaptors and primer sequences using a proprietary script from the sequencing provider. Firstly, the paired-end reads were combined by the FLASH software (version 1.2.11) to obtain full-length sequences with default parameters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Magoc and Salzberg, 2011</xref>). The resulting sequences were processed using VSEARCH (version 11.0.667) and QIIME (version 1.9.1) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Caporaso et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Zgadzaj et al., 2016</xref>). Quality control (fastq_maxee_rate&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.01), singleton and chimera removal were performed for the resulting sequences. The sequence reads were then clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a 97% similarity level using the UPARSE pipeline. Representative sequences were classified using the BLAST algorithm with SILVA v.13.2 and UNITE v8.0 reference databases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Quast et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Nilsson et al., 2019</xref>). Mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA sequences and OTUs with a total relative abundance of &#x003C;0.00001 in all samples were discarded. For the fungal community, only OTUs annotated at kingdom level were retained for analysis.</p>
<p>The significant differences were assessed with one-way ANOVA in GraphPad Prism 8. The OTU table was rarefied to reads (the lowest number was 25,273 and 62,294 for the bacterial and fungal community, respectively) for alpha-diversity and was normalized using the cumulative sum scaling (CSS) method for beta-diversity analysis. Both alpha-diversity and beta-diversity were calculated with the QIIME software. Permutational multivariate ANOVA (PERMANOVA) statistical tests were performed using the R package, vegan, with the adonis function having 1,000 permutations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Xiong et al., 2021</xref>). The Venn diagram was analyzed using the OECloud tools<xref rid="fn0005" ref-type="fn"><sup>1</sup></xref> to analyze common and specific OTUs for control and treated samples. Using the STAMP software, Welch&#x2019;s test calculated the significance of differences between control and treated samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Parks et al., 2014</xref>). Differential abundance analysis was performed using EdgeR&#x2019;s generalized linear model (GLM) approach. The differential OTUs with false discovery rate-corrected <italic>p</italic>-values &#x003C;0.05 were identified as indicator OTUs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Robinson et al., 2010</xref>).</p>
<p>The RAW data files were analyzed using Proteome Discoverer (Thermo Scientific, Version 2.2) (Against the Mus_musculus database,<xref rid="fn0006" ref-type="fn"><sup>2</sup></xref> Assembly Version GRCm38, 67,856&#x2009;s). The MS/MS search criteria were as follows: Mass tolerance of 10&#x2009;ppm for MS and 0.02&#x2009;Da for MS/MS tolerance, trypsin as the enzyme allowing up to two internal trypsin cleavage sites missed, cysteine carbamidomethylation, the TMT of N-terminus and lysine side chains of peptides as fixed modifications, and methionine oxidation as dynamic modifications, respectively. The peptide identification false discovery rate (FDR) was set at FDR&#x2009;&#x2264;&#x2009;0.01. A minimum of one unique peptide identification was used to support protein identification.</p>
<p>A total of 6,353 proteins expressed were identified in the rice root proteome in this study. The fold change (&#x003E;1.2 or&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.83) and <italic>value of p</italic> &#x003C;&#x2009;0.05 thresholds were used to identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). All identified proteins were annotated using GO<xref rid="fn0007" ref-type="fn"><sup>3</sup></xref><sup>,</sup><xref rid="fn0008" ref-type="fn"><sup>4</sup></xref> and the KEGG pathway<xref rid="fn0009" ref-type="fn"><sup>5</sup></xref>. Then, DEPs were further used for GO and KEGG enrichment analysis. The proteomics data were analyzed on the online Majorbio Cloud Platform<xref rid="fn0010" ref-type="fn"><sup>6</sup></xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec12">
<title>The <italic>Pseudomonas alcaliphila</italic> Ej2 strain is a potential biocontrol agent for <italic>Magnaporthe oryzae</italic></title>
<p>The strain Ej2 was isolated from rice leaves and displayed obvious inhibition to <italic>Magnaporthe oryzae</italic> on petri dish assays (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1A</xref>). Meantime, the results showed that Ej2 exhibited broad-spectrum antagonistic activities (<xref rid="SM3" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). Furthermore, the potential biological control abilities of Ej2 on rice blast disease were assessed in greenhouse experiments and field trials. We observed that Ej2 significantly decreased rice blast severity in pot experiments than leaves treated with water (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1B</xref>, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x2009;0.01). In field trials, the rice leaf and stem blast disease indices in Ej2-treated plants were significantly reduced at Lingwu and Wuzhong sites compared to the control (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x2009;0.01, <xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1D</xref>). In addition, we observed that the biocontrol efficiency in the Wuzhong field trial was higher compared to Lingwu. Thus, strain Ej2 showed excellent biocontrol efficiency in the field. Moreover, the growth-promoting traits of Ej2 were also examined. Rice yield attributes (the weight of panicle and thousand kernel weight) were significantly affected by Ej2 inoculation. However, the effect on plant height was not significant (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figures 1E</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">G</xref>). The above results showed that the strain Ej2 was a potential biocontrol candidate for the suppression of <italic>M. oryzae</italic>. Based on 16S rDNA sequence alignments, Ej2 exhibited a high similarity with <italic>P. alcaliphila</italic>. A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on closely related 16S rDNA sequences. The results showed that Ej2 was most closely related to <italic>P. alcaliphila</italic> (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1C</xref>). Therefore, strain Ej2 was identified as <italic>P. alcaliphila</italic> (16S rDNA accession number: MN756644.1).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>The general characteristics and growth-promoting traits of strain Ej2. <bold>(A)</bold> Inhibition of hyphal growth of <italic>Magnaporthe oryzae</italic> by strain Ej2. Left: <italic>M. oryzae</italic> CK. Right: <italic>M. oryzae</italic> at the presence of strain Ej2. The photograph was taken 5&#x2009;days after inoculation. <bold>(B)</bold> Effect of strain Ej2 on rice blast disease index in the greenhouse experiment. <bold>(C)</bold> Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA sequences obtained by the NJ method with 1,000 replicates. <bold>(D)</bold> Effect of strain Ej2 on rice leaf and stem blast disease index in a field trial. Rice yield attributes of Ej2-inoculated and control rice plants for <bold>(E)</bold> plant height, <bold>(F)</bold> weight panicle, and <bold>(G)</bold> thousand kernel weight. Each value represents the mean of four replicates &#x00B1; standard error (SE). The significance test was performed based on a t-test using Prism 9. &#x002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x2009;0.05, &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x2009;0.01.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1129614-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>Effects of strain Ej2 inoculation on the growth of rice plants under salt stress conditions</title>
<p>Different plant growth characteristics, mainly the seed germination, emergence rate, root length, shoot height, and root fresh and dry weight, were recorded compared to the control. In terms of seed germination, the results showed that the germination rate was improved compared to the control under different NaCl concentrations. Only the germination at NaCl concentration below 0.2% was significantly increased between Ej2-inoculated and control rice plants (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2A</xref>). The seed germination responses were fitted and could be calculated by the regression equation <italic>Y</italic> =&#x2009;&#x2212;54.67X&#x2009;+&#x2009;97.09 (<italic>R<sup>2</sup></italic> =&#x2009;86.83) and <italic>Y</italic> =&#x2009;&#x2212;51.69X&#x2009;+&#x2009;91.71 (<italic>R<sup>2</sup></italic> =&#x2009;85.32%) for Ej2 inoculation and control (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2B</xref>). The progressive NaCl concentration increase leads to a reduction in seed germination. Similar results were obtained for the emergence rate (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S1A</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>The rice growth-promoting capacity of strain Ej2 under different NaCI concentrations. <bold>(A)</bold> Rice seed germination after Ej2 inoculation and the control under different NaCI concentrations. <bold>(B)</bold> Correlation analysis between seed germination and different NaCI concentration in Ej2-inoculated and control plants. Effect of strain Ej2 on plant growth attributes <bold>(C)</bold> root length and <bold>(D)</bold> shoot height. Each value represents the mean of four replicates &#x00B1; standard error (SE). The significance test was performed based on a t-test using Prism 9. &#x002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x2009;0.05, &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x2009;0.01.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1129614-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Strain Ej2 inoculation improved root length and shoot height at all levels of salt stress compared to the control. The Ej2 inoculation increased root length as compared to the control by 6.22%, 16.45, 5.13%, 6.51%, 13.30%, 15.33%, and 24.82% at 0, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, and 0.35% NaCl concentration, respectively (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2C</xref>). However, no significant differences in root length between Ej2 inoculation and control under salt stress were observed. Similarly, shoot height followed a similar trend as root length. The Ej2-inoculated plants exhibited an improvement in shoot height by 20.40%, 8.35%, 4.27%, 1.03%, 22.24%, 23.55%, and 24.43%, compared to control plants after 20&#x2009;days later (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2D</xref>). Notably, in control plants, the root fresh weight decreased with increasing NaCl concentrations, while in Ej2-inoculated plants, there was a noticeable enhancement of root fresh weight by 0.55, 6.61, 5.16, 4.33, 2.07, 2.85, and 5.07%, respectively, compared to control plants. The root dry weight was increased by 23.87% in Ej2-inoculated plants under 0.1% NaCl concentration compared to the control plants (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figures S1B,C</xref>). Furthermore, leaf water content was improved in the Ej2-inoculated plants compared to control plants under different NaCl concentrations. The maximum differences were observed in Ej2-inoculated plants treated with 0.15% NaCl (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S1D</xref>). These results indicated that strain Ej2 enabled the inoculated rice plants to grow better under salt stress compared to the control rice plants. Thus, strain Ej2 is a potent bioinoculants candidate to promote plant growth under saline conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<title>Microbiome structure alterations between control and Ej2 inoculation rice plants</title>
<p>Bacterial and fungal microbiomes associated with rice roots were characterized by metabarcoding rDNA sequencing. Paired-end sequencing, after quality control, resulted in 667,275 and 844,120 high-quality reads. Sequences from each sample ranged from 50,510 to 153,032 and 70,231 to 172,381, with an average of 111,212 and 140,686 for the bacterial and fungal microbiome, respectively. Based on 97% similarity, these sequences were clustered into 1,533 and 158 OTUs for bacterial and fungal microbiomes.</p>
<p>Alpha-diversity of root endophytes was measured by the Shannon and Observed OTUs indices. The Ej2-inoculated plants exhibited a higher alpha-diversity compared to the control plants, expect for the Shannon index of the bacterial microbiome. However, no differences between control and Ej2-inoculated plants were observed in the bacterial and fungal microbiome alpha-diversity (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figures 3A</xref>,<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">B</xref>). Furthermore, the NMDS revealed that the Ej2-inoculated samples clustered and separated from the control samples (<italic>R<sup>2</sup></italic> =&#x2009;37.19% and <italic>R<sup>2</sup></italic> =&#x2009;39.50%, <italic>p</italic> =&#x2009;0.1, <xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figures 3C</xref>,<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">D</xref>). Based on the OTU classification, Gammaproteobacteria (47.12%), Alphaproteobacteria (43.54%), Bacteroidetes (4.85%), Actinobacteria (2.90%), and Firmicutes (1.23) were the dominant phyla in the root bacterial endophytic community of Ej2-inoculated and control samples. In comparison, Sordariomycetes (20.58%) and Dothideomycetes (19.59%) were the dominant classes of the fungal endophytic community (<xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figures S2A,B</xref>). The dominant genera of the bacterial microbiome included <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Hydrogenophaga</italic>, <italic>Devosia</italic>, <italic>Mesorhizobium</italic>, and <italic>Shinella</italic>, while <italic>Preussia</italic>, <italic>Fusarium</italic>, <italic>Podospora</italic>, <italic>Olpidium</italic>, and <italic>Schizothecium</italic> were the dominant genera for the fungal community. Compared with the control, strain Ej2 inoculation resulted in a significant enrichment in Alphaproteobacteria, while the control plants were enriched in Gammaproteobacteria and Dothideomycetes (Welch&#x2019;s test, <xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figures S2C,D</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Influence of Ej2 on rice root bacterial and fungal community. The alpha-diversity index was based on the bacterial <bold>(A)</bold> and fungal <bold>(B)</bold> endophytic community in the control and Ej2-inoculation. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordinations of bacterial <bold>(C)</bold> and fungal <bold>(D)</bold> communities across all root samples. Volcano plot illustrating the enriched OTUs in the bacterial <bold>(E)</bold> and fungal <bold>(F)</bold> microbiome in the control and Ej2-inoculated samples. Venn diagrams showing the shared and specific OTUs of bacterial <bold>(G)</bold> and fungal <bold>(H)</bold> microbiomes in the control and Ej2-inoculated samples.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1129614-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To examine the effect of Ej2 inoculation on bacterial and fungal communities under salt stress, we identified specific and significantly enriched OTUs in control and Ej2-inoculated plants. The Ej2-inoculated and control plants possessed 13 and 17 enriched bacterial microbiome OTUs, while there was no enriched fungal microbiome OTUs (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figures 3E</xref>,<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">F</xref>). Interestingly, Ej2-inoculated plants possessed more specific bacterial and fungal microbiome OTUs than the control plants (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figures 3G</xref>,<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">H</xref>). Furthermore, we analyzed the microbial compositions of enriched and specific OTUs to obtain a detailed overview of the Ej2 inoculation effects. The enriched OTUs after Ej2 inoculation were annotated as <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Flavobacterium</italic>, <italic>Bauldia</italic>, <italic>Mesorhizobium</italic>, <italic>Devosia</italic>, <italic>Raoultella</italic>, <italic>Actinoplanes</italic>, <italic>Yeosuana</italic>, and <italic>Mariniflexile</italic> and the enriched OTUs of the control belonged to <italic>Leucobacter</italic>, <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Sphingosinicella</italic>, <italic>Devosia</italic>, <italic>Sphingobium</italic>, <italic>Methyloversatilis</italic>, <italic>Hydrogenophaga</italic>, <italic>Kerstersia</italic>, <italic>Kribbella</italic>, and <italic>Comamonas</italic> at the genus level (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S2</xref>). Notably, specific OTUs after Ej2 inoculation were affiliated with <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Flavobacterium</italic>, and <italic>Bacillus</italic> at the genus level. These results suggested that the Ej2 inoculation significantly affects the root endophytic microbiome composition.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<title>Proteome profile of rice roots inoculated with strain Ej2 in response to salt stress</title>
<p>A proteomic approach was used to identify the proteins related to salt tolerance in rice roots inoculated with Ej2 under salt stress. Firstly, the PCA analysis showed that the two groups of samples could be clearly separated. The two main coordinates explained 73.70% of the variation, with PC1 accounting for 43.10%, and PC2 for 30.60% of the total variation (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4A</xref>). Then, we identified the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) for Ej2-inoculated and control plants. A total of 116 differentially expressed proteins were identified between the control and Ej2-inoculated plants, including 78 upregulated and 38 downregulated proteins. Volcano plots were generated to visualize the distribution of protein expression variation (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4C</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Proteomic profile of rice roots inoculated with strain Ej2 in response to salt stress. <bold>(A)</bold> Principal component analysis of the Ej2-treated and control group under salt stress. <bold>(B)</bold> GO enrichment analysis of all differentially expressed proteins between the control and Ej2 inoculation group. &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x2009;0.001, &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x2009;0.01. <bold>(C)</bold> Identification of differentially expressed proteins between control and Ej2-inoculated rice plants. Red points represent downregulated proteins, blue represent upregulated proteins, and nosing gray represents unchanged proteins. <bold>(D)</bold> KEGG enrichment analysis of all differentially expressed proteins between the control and Ej2 inoculation group. Only the top 20 pathways are displayed.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1129614-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To better understand the biological process altered by Ej2 inoculation under salt stress, the differentially abundant proteins were functionally classified using GO annotation. In the biological process, gene ontology, sucrose catabolic, photosystem II stabilization, oligosaccharide catabolic, disaccharide catabolic, protein binding, response to brassinosteroid, protein refolding, regulation of photosynthesis, light reaction, sucrose metabolic, benzene-containing compound metabolic, regulation of growth, and regulation of generation of precursor metabolites and energy were notably enriched. Only cytoplasmic stress granule was significantly enriched in the cellular component gene ontology. In the molecular functions, gene ontology, calcium ion binding, unfolded protein binding, alpha-amylase activity, calcium-dependent phospholipid binding, and RNA helicase activity were enriched dramatically (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4B</xref>). In addition to the functional GO annotation, KEGG pathway analysis was also conducted on the significant DEPs, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the proteomic profile after Ej2 inoculation under salt stress. Most pathways related to metabolism included thiamine, propanoate, phenylalanine, carbon, butanoate, and alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism, plant-pathogen interactions, biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids; protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum, RNA transport, nucleotide excision repair, and homologous recombination. Only the spliceosome pathway was significantly enriched (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4D</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16" sec-type="discussions">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In the present study, the <italic>P. alcaliphila</italic> Ej2 strain was isolated from rice leaves and assayed for its biocontrol and plant-growth-promoting properties under salt stress. Strain Ej2 exhibited significant properties in terms of disease control, rice growth promotion, and regulating the structure of the rice endophytic microbiome and protein expression. These findings provide comprehensive evidence that strain Ej2 contributes to salt stress alleviation in rice plants. Unraveling the mechanisms underlying salt tolerance in plants will improve our capacity to achieve a more efficient way to ameliorate salinity stress.</p>
<sec id="sec17">
<title>Ej2 is a potential biocontrol and plant growth-promoting strain for rice</title>
<p>Using antagonistic microorganisms or microbe-derived bioactive compounds to control plant diseases is a suitable alternative and sustainable method of plant protection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Chakraborty et al., 2021</xref>). Microorganisms such as <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp., <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp., and <italic>Streptomyces</italic> spp., have been identified as biocontrol agents to control rice blast (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Wu et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Chaiharn et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Zhou et al., 2021a</xref>). However, the major challenge when selecting biocontrol agents that appear effective in <italic>in vitro</italic> experiments is that they might not be effective in controlling plant diseases in field conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Law et al., 2017</xref>). In the present study, strain Ej2 showed a stronger antagonistic effect to rice blast in greenhouse and field experiments. While the efficacy of Ej2 in different experimental site displayed discrepancy, and the prevention effect of Ej2 in Wuzhong was better than in the Lingwu site (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1D</xref>). The efficacy of biocontrol agents is affected by the soil&#x2019;s organic matter, pH, and moisture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Law et al., 2017</xref>). Because of the variations of environmental conditions in different locations, the biocontrol agent performance might show variation in the field experiments. Moreover, the formulation and application method can also affect the outcomes of field experiments. A seed coating treatment consisting of <italic>Paenibacillus alvei</italic> K-165 xanthan gum and talc was the most effective in reducing disease symptoms compared to other treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Schoina et al., 2011</xref>). The promotion effect of biocontrol strain <italic>Bacillus tequilensis</italic> JN-369 was highest when the concentration of JN-369 suspensions reached 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Zhou et al., 2021b</xref>). The appropriate application methods, therefore, play a vital role in the success of biocontrol agents in the field. As a result, we need to confirm the biocontrol efficacy of Ej2 under different treatments in the future.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<title>Impact of the biocontrol agent on the endophytic community for salt tolerance improvement</title>
<p>Plant sustain enormous diverse communities of microorganisms, the plant microbiome, important for plant health and robustness and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Mendes et al., 2013</xref>). There is an increasing recognition that plant stress tolerance relates to their associated microbiome. For example, upon <italic>Diaporthe citri</italic> infection, the phyllosphere microbiome shifted and was enriched with beneficial microbes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Li et al., 2022</xref>). The salinity-induced changes in rhizosphere microbial communities tend to promote <italic>Hibiscus hamabo</italic> germination and growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Yuan et al., 2019</xref>). Drought triggered a compartment-specific restructuring of rice root microbiota, with endosphere communities displaying a more pronounced response than rhizosphere communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Santos-Medellin et al., 2017</xref>). Studies focusing on synthetic microbial communities have emerged, driven by the great application potential to provide sustainable agriculture solutions. For example, five bacterial strains isolated from the root of the desert plant could protect, as synthetic bacterial communities, tomato plants growing in high salinity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Vorholt et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Schmitz et al., 2022</xref>). Moreover, organic fertilizers supplemented with the biocontrol strain <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> W19 improved resistance against plant pathogens due to their impacts on the resident soil microbiome structure and function, specifically increasing <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> species. Furthermore, <italic>B. velezensis</italic> stimulated the resident rhizosphere bacterium <italic>P. stutzeri</italic> through metabolic interactions, and the two-species consortium helped plants alleviate salt stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Tao et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Sun et al., 2022</xref>). Microbial products could suppress potato scab disease, increase the yield, and increase the relative abundance of taxa representing beneficial bacteria such as <italic>Agrobacterium</italic>, <italic>Bacillus</italic>, and <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>. Furthermore, the microbial product amount applied significantly influenced the diversity and bacterial community (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Wang Z. S. et al., 2019</xref>). Finally, the bacterial and fungal communities were significantly altered after applying bio-organic fertilizers in cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt and decline disease of bayberry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Tian et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Ren et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Only selected soil microbiome members may move from soils to the plant and form complex co-associations with plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Xiong et al., 2021</xref>). A previous report found that Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Gemmatimonadetes was dominant in saline soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Canfora et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Kadam and Chuan, 2016</xref>). In our study, we identified Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes as the dominant classes (<xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S2</xref>). They showed remarkable convergence at the phylum level and lower taxonomic ranks with differences among soil and plant. Furthermore, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes was positively, and Acidobacteria was negatively correlated with salinity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Canfora et al., 2014</xref>). The OTUs annotated as Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria showed a high-salinity niche preference (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Zhang et al., 2019</xref>). Our results revealed that the Ej2 inoculation significantly enriched Alphaproteobacteria, while the control plants were enriched in Gammaproteobacteria (<xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S2</xref>). Thus, the differences are potentially caused by plant compartment niches. Based on the enriched and specific OTUs results, we found that the enriched OTUs belonging to <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> and <italic>Flavobacterium</italic> at the genus level (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3</xref>). The <italic>Flavobacterium</italic> probably plays an important role in salt tolerance for plants. But this needs to be confirmed in the further study. Network analysis and synthetic community experiments have identified some key taxa that play a central role in the microbiome&#x2019;s structure and function, such as <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, <italic>Rhizobium</italic>, and <italic>Flavobacterium</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Xiong et al., 2021</xref>). In addition, <italic>B. velezensis</italic> JC-K3 significantly altered the diversity and abundance of endophytic microorganisms in wheat, increasing the diversity of bacterial communities in the leaves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Ji et al., 2021</xref>). Similarly, we found that the inoculation increased the diversity in our study (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<title>The biocontrol strain help plants to alleviate salt stress</title>
<p>Plants are multi-cellular organisms that cope with various environmental stresses by producing and accumulating diverse functional compounds (proline, glycine betaine, phenolic, flavonoids and glutathione), and enzymatic antioxidants (peroxidase and catalase), which mitigate the oxidative damage caused by high salinity. Furthermore, many studies have documented that microbes have beneficial activities such as reducing pathogenesis, stimulating plant growth, and alleviating abiotic stresses. Significant differences were observed in inoculated plants&#x2019; antioxidant enzymes (ascorbate peroxidase, catalase and peroxidase), proline content, and total antioxidative capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Fan et al., 2020</xref>). For example, the expression of salt stress-responsive genes related to proline biosynthesis was upregulated in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> after short-term treatment with <italic>Enterobacter</italic> sp. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Kim et al., 2014</xref>). In addition, several salinity-responsive marker genes, such as <italic>AtRSA1</italic>, involved in detoxifying reactive oxygen species, and <italic>AtWRKY8</italic> and <italic>AtVQ9</italic>, involved in maintaining ion homeostasis, were increased (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Sukweenadhi et al., 2015</xref>). <italic>Alcaligenes faecalis</italic> emits hexanedioic acid and butanoic and induces plant salt tolerance through reprogramming the auxin and gibberellin pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Bhattacharyya et al., 2015</xref>). In addition, proteomic analysis revealed that the expression levels of diverse proteins involved in photosynthesis, antioxidative processes, transportation across membranes, and pathogenesis-related responses were altered in the presence of microbes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Cheng et al., 2012</xref>). <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> helped canola plants endure salinity through the enrichment of proteins related to energy metabolism and cell division, especially related to amino acid metabolism and the tricarboxylic acid cycle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Banaei-Asl et al., 2015</xref>). In our study, we only found that the spliceosome pathway was significantly enriched. However, other biological process gene ontologies such as sucrose catabolic, regulation of photosynthesis, sucrose metabolic, benzene-containing compound metabolic, regulation of growth, and regulation of generation of precursor metabolites and energy were notably enriched (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figures 4B</xref>,<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">D</xref>). Elucidating the mechanisms of Ej2 underlying salt tolerance in plants will help us to develop more efficient products for saline soil amelioration.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The amplicon data presented in the study are deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository, accession number PRJNA904920 and the mass spectrometry proteomics data presented in this study are deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium (<ext-link xlink:href="http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org" ext-link-type="uri">http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org</ext-link>), accession number PXD039112.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>YS and QZ designed the experiment. QZ, XM, and LZ analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. YS, ZH, and HY performed the filed experiments and collected samples. QZ, XM, ZH, LZ, HY, and YS approved the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation Project of Ningxia (2020AAC03317), the Key Research and Development Program of Ningxia (2022BBF02031), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M660508), and the Young Top-notch Talent Training Project of Ningxia.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec100" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="sec24" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1129614/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1129614/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.TIF" id="SM1" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><label>Supplementary Figure S1</label><caption><p>Plant growth-promoting activities of Ej2 at different concentrations of NaCl. <bold>(A)</bold> Emergence rate, <bold>(B)</bold> relative water content of the leaf, <bold>(C)</bold> fresh root weight, and <bold>(D)</bold> dry rot weight. The significance test was performed based on a t-test using Prism 9. &#x002A;: <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, &#x002A;&#x002A;: <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_2.TIF" id="SM2" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><label>Supplementary Figure S2</label><caption><p>Relative abundance of the dominant bacterial <bold>(A)</bold> and fungal <bold>(B)</bold> taxa in control and treatment samples. Differential abundance analysis of bacterial <bold>(C)</bold> and fungal <bold>(D)</bold> OTUs in control and Ej2-inoculated samples. Welch&#x2019;s test was performed to calculate the significance of differences at the phylum and class levels.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.XLS" id="SM3" mimetype="application/vnd.ms-excel" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><label>Supplementary Table S1</label><caption><p>In vitro antifungal activity of Ej2 against various phytopathogens on PDA plates.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_2.XLSX" id="SM4" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><label>Supplementary Table S2</label><caption><p>Comparison of enriched OTUs between the control and Ej2 inoculation.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Charles</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Glick</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Amelioration of high salinity stress damage by plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes that contain acc deaminase</article-title>. <source>Plant. Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>160</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>167</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.04.003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24769617</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Banaei-Asl</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bandehagh</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Uliaei</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farajzadeh</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salzata</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mustafa</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Proteomic analysis of canola root inoculated with bacteria under salt stress</article-title>. <source>J. Proteom.</source> <volume>124</volume>, <fpage>88</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>111</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jprot.2015.04.009</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25896739</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Plant-microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biot.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>11</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-009-2092-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19568745</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhattacharyya</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Volatile compounds from <italic>Alcaligenes faecalis</italic> JBCS1294 confer salt tolerance in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> through the auxin and gibberellin pathways and differential modulation of gene expression in root and shoot tissues</article-title>. <source>Plant Growth Regul.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>297</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>306</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10725-014-9953-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cadot</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bigalke</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walser</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jander</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Erb</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Specific and conserved patterns of microbiota-structuring by maize benzoxazinoids in the field</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>103</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-021-01049-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33962687</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Canfora</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bacci</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pinzari</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lo Papa</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dazzi</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benedetti</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Salinity and bacterial diversity: to what extent does the concentration of salt affect the bacterial Community in a Saline Soil?</article-title> <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>e106662</fpage>:<fpage>e106662</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0106662</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25188357</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caporaso</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Justin Kuczynski</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jesse Stombaugh</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kyle Bittinger</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bushman</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costello</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>335</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>336</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.f.303</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20383131</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caporaso</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lauber</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walters</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg-Lyons</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lozupone</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Turnbaugh</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>4516</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4522</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1000080107</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20534432</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chaiharn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Theantana</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pathom-aree</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of biocontrol activities of streptomyces spp. against rice blast disease fungi</article-title>. <source>Pathogens</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>126</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/pathogens9020126</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32075342</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chakraborty</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mahmud</surname> <given-names>N. U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rahman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Islam</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Biological and biorational management of blast diseases in cereals caused by <italic>Magnaporthe oryzae</italic></article-title>. <source>Crit. Rev. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>994</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1022</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/07388551.2021.1898325</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34006149</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref001"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>X. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Isolation and characterization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PG12 for the biological control of apple ring rot</article-title>. <source>Postharvest Biol. Tec.</source> <volume>115</volume>, <fpage>113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>121</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Woody</surname> <given-names>O. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McConkey</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Glick</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Combined effects of the plant growth-promoting bacterium <italic>Pseudomonas putida</italic> uw4 and salinity stress on the <italic>Brassica napus</italic> proteome</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>263</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.10.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Culligan</surname> <given-names>E. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sleator</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marchesi</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hill</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Functional metagenomics reveals novel salt tolerance loci from the human gut microbiome</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1916</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1925</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2012.38</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22534607</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>C. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>B. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Bio-organic soil amendment promotes the suppression of ralstonia solanacearum by inducing changes in the functionality and composition of rhizosphere bacterial communities</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>235</volume>, <fpage>1558</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1574</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.18221</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35569105</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Subramanian</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Plant endophytes promote growth and alleviate salt stress in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic></article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>12740</fpage>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-69713-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32728116</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>French</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaplan</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lyer-Pascuzzi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakatsu</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Enders</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Emerging strategies for precision microbiome management in diverse agroecosystems</article-title>. <source>Nat. Plants</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>256</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>267</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41477-020-00830-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33686226</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gardes</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bruns</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes&#x2013;application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>118</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294x.1993.tb00005.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8180733</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gururani</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Upadhyaya</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baskar</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Venkatesh</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nookaraju</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance abiotic stress tolerance in solanum tuberosum through inducing changes in the expression of ros-scavenging enzymes and improved photosynthetic performance</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Growth Regul.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>245</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>258</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00344-012-9292-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jha</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Subramanian</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Combination of endophytic and rhizospheric plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in <italic>Oryza sativa</italic> shows higher accumulation of osmoprotectant against saline stress</article-title>. <source>Acta Physiol. Plant.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>797</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>802</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11738-010-0604-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Q. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z. Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> jc-k3 on endophytic bacterial and fungal diversity in wheat under salt stress</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>802054</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.802054</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34987493</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kadam</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chuan</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Erratum to: rectocutaneous fistula with transmigration of the suture: a rare delayed complication of vault fixation with the sacrospinous ligament</article-title>. <source>Int. Urogynecol. J.</source> <volume>27</volume>:<fpage>505</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00192-016-2952-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26811110</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jang</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oh</surname> <given-names>B. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chae</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Alleviation of salt stress by <italic>Enterobacter</italic> sp. EJ01 in tomato and arabidopsis is accompanied by up-regulation of conserved salinity responsive factors in plants</article-title>. <source>Mol. Cells</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>117</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14348/molcells.2014.2239</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24598995</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stecher</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamura</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>1870</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1874</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msw054</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27004904</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kusstatscher</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zachow</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harms</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maier</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eigner</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Microbiome-driven identification of microbial indicators for postharvest diseases of sugar beets</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>112</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-019-0728-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31391094</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Law</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ser</surname> <given-names>H. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chuah</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pusparajah</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The potential of <italic>Streptomyces</italic> as biocontrol agents against the rice blast fungus, <italic>Magnaporthe oryzae</italic> (<italic>Pyricularia oryzae</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>3</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.00003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28144236</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Z. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The phyllosphere microbiome shifts toward combating melanose pathogen</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>56</fpage>:<fpage>56</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-022-01234-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35366955</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carvalhais</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Percy</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schenk</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021a</year>). <article-title>Evidence for the plant recruitment of beneficial microbes to suppress soil-borne pathogens</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>229</volume>, <fpage>2873</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2885</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.17057</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33131088</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Q. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yalimaimaiti</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021b</year>). <article-title>Comprehensive genomic analysis of <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> al7 reveals its biocontrol potential against <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt of cotton</article-title>. <source>Mol. Gen. Genomics.</source> <volume>296</volume>, <fpage>1287</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1298</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00438-021-01816-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34553246</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Magoc</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salzberg</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>2957</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2963</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21903629</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mendes</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garbeva</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raaijmakers</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Rev.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>634</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>663</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1574-6976.12028</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23790204</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mukhopadhyay</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sarkar</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bolan</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Soil salinity under climate change: challenges for sustainable agriculture and food security</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manag.</source> <volume>280</volume>:<fpage>111736</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111736</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33298389</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nawaz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shahbaz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asadullah</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Imran</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marghoob</surname> <given-names>M. U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Imtiaz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Potential of salt tolerant PGPR in growth and yield augmentation of wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.) under saline conditions</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>2019</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.02019</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33117299</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nilsson</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larsson</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>A. F. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bengtsson-Palme</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeppesen</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schigel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>D259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>D264</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gky1022</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30371820</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parks</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tyson</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hugenholtz</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beiko</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>3123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3124</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25061070</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quast</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pruesse</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yilmaz</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gerken</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schweer</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yarza</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>D590</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>D596</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gks1219</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23193283</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rajendran</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tester</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Quantifying the three main components of salinity tolerance in cereals</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>237</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>249</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01916.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19054352</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of two kinds of fertilizers on growth and rhizosphere soil properties of bayberry with decline disease</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>2386</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants10112386</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34834750</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McCarthy</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smyth</surname> <given-names>G. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Edge R: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>139</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>140</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19910308</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Santos-Medellin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liechty</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sundaresan</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Drought stress results in a compartment-specific restructuring of the rice root-associated microbiomes</article-title>. <source>MBio</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>e00764</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mBio.00764-17</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28720730</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schmitz</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Z. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schneijderberg</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Roij</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pijnenburg</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Synthetic bacterial community derived from a desert rhizosphere confers salt stress resilience to tomato in the presence of a soil microbiome</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>1907</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1920</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-022-01238-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35444261</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schoina</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stringlis</surname> <given-names>I. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pantelides</surname> <given-names>I. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tjamos</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paplomatas</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of application methods and biocontrol efficacy of paenibacillus alvei strain k-165, against the cotton black root rot pathogen thielaviopsis basicola</article-title>. <source>Biol. Control</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>68</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.04.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sha</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Screening of antagonistic microorganisms against <italic>Magnaporthe oryzae</italic></article-title>. <source>Ningxia J. Agri. Fores. Sci. Tech.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1002-204x.2021.04.008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref002"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sha</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Q. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sui</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Screening and application of bacillus strains isolated from nonrhizospheric rice soil for the biocontrol of rice blast</article-title>. <source>Plant Pathology J.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>231</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>243</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shrivastava</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Soil salinity: a serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation</article-title>. <source>Saudi J. Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>131</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25737642</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sukweenadhi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koh</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title><italic>Paenibacillus yonginensis</italic> dcy84(t) induces changes in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> gene expression against aluminum, drought, and salt stress</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>172</volume>, <fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2015.01.007</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25721473</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hesselberg-Thomsen</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>D. Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title><italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> stimulates resident rhizosphere <italic>Pseudomonas stutzeri</italic> for plant health through metabolic interactions</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>774</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>787</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-021-01125-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34593997</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sziderics</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rasche</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trognitz</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sessitsch</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilhelm</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Bacterial endophytes contribute to abiotic stress adaptation in pepper plants (<italic>Capsicum annuum</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Microbiol.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>1195</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1202</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/W07-082</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18026213</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Z. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Bio-organic fertilizers stimulate indigenous soil pseudomonas populations to enhance plant disease suppression</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>137</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-020-00892-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32962766</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Z. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>K. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on soil microbiome against <italic>Verticillium dahliae</italic></article-title>. <source>Int. J. Agric. Biol.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>923</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>931</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17957/IJAB/15.0187</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vaishnav</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shukla</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhary</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Endophytic bacteria in plant salt stress tolerance: current and future prospects</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Growth Regul.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>650</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>668</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00344-018-9880-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vimal</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effect of salt tolerant <italic>Bacillus</italic> sp. and <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. on wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.) growth under soil salinity: a comparative study</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>7462</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4081/mr.2018.7462</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vogel</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Potthoff</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schafer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barandun</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vorholt</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Author correction: protective role of the <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> leaf microbiota against a bacterial pathogen</article-title>. <source>Nat. Microbiol.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>338</fpage>:<fpage>338</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41564-022-01058-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34992265</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vorholt</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vogel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carlstrom</surname> <given-names>C. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muller</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Establishing causality: opportunities of synthetic communities for plant microbiome research</article-title>. <source>Cell Host Microbe.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>142</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>155</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chom.2017.07.004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28799900</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhuang</surname> <given-names>L. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L. X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>A rhizosphere-derived consortium of <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> and <italic>Trichoderma harzianum</italic> suppresses common scab of potato and increases yield</article-title>. <source>Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>645</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>653</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.csbj.2019.05.003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31193738</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jousset</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Phage combination therapies for bacterial wilt disease in tomato</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>1513</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1520</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41587-019-0328-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31792408</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>G. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khaskheli</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Identification of <italic>Pseudomonas mosselii</italic> BS011 gene clusters required for suppression of rice blast fungus <italic>Magnaporthe oryzae</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>282</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.04.016</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29704539</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Host selection shapes crop microbiome assembly and network complexity</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>229</volume>, <fpage>1091</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1104</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.16890</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32852792</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ci</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>L. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Influence of salt stress on the rhizosphere soil bacterial community structure and growth performance of groundnut (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L)</article-title>. <source>Int. Microbiol.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>453</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>465</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10123-020-00118-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31933013</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Y. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brunel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Kleunen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>Z. X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Salinity-induced changes in the rhizosphere microbiome improve salt tolerance of <italic>Hibiscus hamabo</italic></article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>443</volume>, <fpage>525</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>537</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-019-04258-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zgadzaj</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garrido-Oter</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koprivova</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schulze-Lefert</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Radutoiu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Root nodule symbiosis in <italic>Lotus japonicus</italic> drives the establishment of distinctive rhizosphere, root, and nodule bacterial communities</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</source> <volume>113</volume>, <fpage>E7996</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>E8005</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1616564113</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27864511</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Salinity is a key determinant for soil microbial communities in a desert ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Msystems</source> <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>e00225</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mSystems.00225-18</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30801023</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L. Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title><italic>In silico</italic> and genetic analyses of cyclic lipopeptide synthetic gene clusters in <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. 11K1</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>544</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.00544</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30941113</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021a</year>). <article-title>Efficacy of plant growth-promoting bacteria <italic>Bacillus cereus</italic> YN917 for biocontrol of rice blast</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>684888</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.684888</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34354684</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021b</year>). <article-title>Efficacy of <italic>Bacillus tequilensis</italic> strain JN-369 to biocontrol of rice blast and enhance rice growth</article-title>. <source>Biol. Control</source> <volume>160</volume>:<fpage>104652</fpage>:<fpage>104652</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104652</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhuang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Synthetic community with six <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> strains screened from garlic rhizosphere microbiome promotes plant growth</article-title>. <source>Microb. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>488</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>502</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1751-7915.13640</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32762153</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn0005"><p><sup>1</sup><ext-link xlink:href="https://cloud.oebiotch.cn" ext-link-type="uri">https://cloud.oebiotch.cn</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="fn0006"><p><sup>2</sup><ext-link xlink:href="http://asia.ensembl.org/Mus_musculus/Info/Index" ext-link-type="uri">http://asia.ensembl.org/Mus_musculus/Info/Index</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="fn0007"><p><sup>3</sup><ext-link xlink:href="http://www.blast2go.com/b2ghome" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.blast2go.com/b2ghome</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="fn0008"><p><sup>4</sup><ext-link xlink:href="http://geneontology.org/" ext-link-type="uri">http://geneontology.org/</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="fn0009"><p><sup>5</sup><ext-link xlink:href="http://www.genome.jp/kegg/" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.genome.jp/kegg/</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="fn0010"><p><sup>6</sup><ext-link xlink:href="http://www.majorbio.com" ext-link-type="uri">www.majorbio.com</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>
