<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1127606</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Divergent endophytic viromes and phage genome repertoires among banana (<italic>Musa</italic>) species</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aghdam</surname>
<given-names>Shiva A.</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lahowetz</surname>
<given-names>Rachel M.</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>Amanda M. V.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/588714/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University</institution>, <addr-line>Lubbock, TX</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn id="fn0001" fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Ashish Srivastava, Amity University, India</p></fn>
<fn id="fn0002" fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Aditya Kulshreshtha, Texas A&#x0026;M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Weslaco, United States; Niti B. Jadeja, University of Virginia, United States</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Amanda M. V. Brown, <email>amanda.mv.brown@ttu.edu</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>09</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1127606</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>19</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>02</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2023 Aghdam, Lahowetz and Brown.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Aghdam, Lahowetz and Brown</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Viruses generally cause disease, but some viruses may be beneficial as resident regulators of their hosts or host microbiomes. Plant-associated viruses can help plants survive by increasing stress tolerance or regulating endophytic communities. The goal of this study was to characterize endophytic virus communities in banana and plantain (<italic>Musa</italic> spp.) genotypes, including cultivated and wild species, to assess virome repertoires and detect novel viruses.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>DNA viral communities were characterized by shotgun sequencing of an enriched endosphere extract from leaves and roots or corm of 7 distinct <italic>Musa</italic> genotypes (<italic>M. balbisiana</italic>, Thai Black, <italic>M. textilis</italic>, <italic>M. sikkimensis</italic>, Dwarf Cavendish, Williams Hybrid, and FHIA-25 Hybrid).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Results showed abundant virus-like contigs up to 108,191 bp long with higher relative abundance in leaves than roots. Analyses predicted 733 phage species in 51 families, with little overlap in phage communities among plants. Phage diversity was higher in roots and in diploid wild hosts. <italic>Ackermanniviridae</italic> and <italic>Rhizobium phage</italic> were generally the most abundant taxa. A <italic>Rhizobium</italic> RR1-like phage related to a phage of an endophytic tumor-causing rhizobium was found, bearing a holin gene and a partial Shiga-like toxin gene, raising interest in its potential to regulate endophytic Rhizobiaceae. <italic>Klebsiella</italic> phages were of interest for possible protection against Fusarium wilt, and other phages were predicted with potential to regulate <italic>Erwinia</italic>, <italic>Pectobacterium</italic>, and <italic>Ralstonia</italic>-associated diseases. Although abundant phage-containing contigs were functionally annotated, revealing 1,038 predicted viral protein domains, gene repertoires showed high divergence from database sequences, suggesting novel phages in these banana cultivars. Plant DNA viruses included 56 species of <italic>Badnavirus</italic> and 26 additional non-<italic>Musa</italic> plant viruses with distributions that suggested a mixture of resident and transient plant DNA viruses in these samples.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Together, the disparate viral communities in these plants from a shared environment suggest hosts drive the composition of these virus communities. This study forms a first step in understanding the endophytic virome in this globally important food crop, which is currently threatened by fungal, bacterial, and viral diseases.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>viral community</kwd>
<kwd>bacteriophage</kwd>
<kwd>endogenous virus</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Musa</italic></kwd>
<kwd>diversity</kwd>
<kwd>microbiome</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="105"/>
<page-count count="17"/>
<word-count count="12341"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Pathogenic plant viruses have received much attention; however, some viruses can play important beneficial roles. For example, various DNA and RNA viruses appear to help plants survive restrictive environmental conditions and increase biotic and abiotic stress tolerance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref85">Schoelz and Stewart, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref87">Seo and Kweon, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Pratama et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref89">Siddique, 2020</xref>). Moreover, interactions between viruses, microbes, and hosts can create complex dynamics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Knief et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref97">Van Belleghem et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref79">Rodriguez et al., 2019</xref>) in which viruses may serve as resident regulators impacting hosts or their endophytic populations to alter net secondary metabolite biosynthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref80">Roossinck et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref87">Seo and Kweon, 2019</xref>). Using whole-genome shotgun genomics (WGS) can reveal hidden viral diversity within plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Forero-Junco et al., 2021</xref>). However, most endophyte WGS studies focus on bacterial or fungal communities, with limited analysis of DNA viruses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Regalado et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Akinola et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref90">Soto-Giron et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Fadiji et al., 2021a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">b</xref>).</p>
<p>Among plant virome communities, bacteriophage (hereafter phage) communities may be the least studied but most impactful on host biology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Dion et al., 2020</xref>). Phages may impact hosts by controlling bacterial diseases or modifying beneficial bacterial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Buttimer et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Koskella and Taylor, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Morella et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Koskella, 2019</xref>). Using phages as a therapy against pathogenic bacteria has been widely explored (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref93">Tian et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Addy et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Murthi et al., 2021</xref>), with some studies indicating plant bacterial diseases may be efficiently controlled by phages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Koskella and Taylor, 2018</xref>). For example, onion leaf blight caused by <italic>Xanthomonas axonopodis</italic> pv. <italic>allii</italic> showed a 50% reduction in disease severity when phages were applied weekly or biweekly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Lang et al., 2007</xref>). Peach bacterial spot caused by <italic>X. campestris</italic> pv. <italic>pruni</italic> was controlled by spraying trees with phages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref84">Saccardi et al., 1993</xref>). Impacts of phages on beneficial bacteria in animal guts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Federici et al., 2021</xref>) and in soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Kuzyakov and Mason-Jones, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Blazanin and Turner, 2021</xref>) are well-established, but few studies have examined phage effects within plant microbiomes, although at least one study has shown that phages can alter phyllosphere diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Morella et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Plant dsDNA viruses, many of which alternate between circulating infectious virions and integrated endogenous virus elements (EVEs), are also inadequately studied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Gayral et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Flynn and Moreau, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref95">Tripathi et al., 2019</xref>). Some EVEs can be activated and lead to systemic infection of the host when the plants are stressed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Muller et al., 2021</xref>), while others are &#x2018;molecular fossils&#x2019; in domesticated plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Jones et al., 1999</xref>). Latent plant viruses can benefit host plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Pag&#x00E1;n et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref95">Tripathi et al., 2019</xref>) by contributing to plant virus resistance through induction of transcriptional or post-transcriptional gene silencing of homologous sequences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Harper et al., 2002</xref>). The genomes of bitter orange (<italic>Poncirus trifoliata</italic>), potato (<italic>Solanum tuberosum</italic>), rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic>), tomato (<italic>Lycopersicon</italic> sp.), petunia (<italic>Petunia</italic> sp.), tobacco (<italic>Nicotiana</italic> sp.), and banana (<italic>Musa</italic> spp.) have been shown to harbor such integrates. Banana streak Obino l&#x2019;Ewai virus has severely hindered international banana (<italic>Musa</italic> spp.) breeding programs, as new hybrids become infected through the integrated viruses from the wild <italic>M. balbisiana</italic> (BB genotype; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Geering et al., 2005</xref>). Insertion of a badnavirus promoter next to an endogenous plant gene may change its transcription levels and alter the tissue specificity of expression, hindering banana breeding programs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Matzke et al., 2004</xref>).</p>
<p>Banana and plantain (<italic>Musa</italic> spp.) are a model group for which natural endophytic viromes have not been well-characterized. Banana is an important food staple and commercial product in over 130 countries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">FAO, 2016</xref>). While common pathogenic viruses, such as banana streak virus (BSV), banana bunchy top virus (BBTV), and banana bract mosaic virus (BBrMV) have been studied extensively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Dale, 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Bateson and Dale, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Lockhart, 1995</xref>), natural viral community variance is not well understood. Although plant tissue and cultivar shape microbiomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Hirsch and Mauchline, 2012</xref>), the host impact on plant viromes is less clear (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Koskella and Taylor, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Harrison and Griffin, 2020</xref>). Furthermore, domestication appears to deplete bacterial and fungal microbiomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref100">Xue et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">K&#x00F6;berl et al., 2017</xref>), but its impacts on banana viromes are unknown.</p>
<p>The current study examined DNA viruses co-collected with enriched microbiomes from <italic>Musa</italic> spp. grown in sympatry, to assess the impacts of hosts on viral communities. Comparing viromes from endophytic tissues of both roots and leaves of wild <italic>Musa</italic> diploid genotypes (<italic>Musa balbisiana, Musa textilis</italic>, and <italic>Musa sikkimensis</italic>) and domesticated triploid genotypes (Dwarf Cavendish, Williams Hybrid, and FHIA-25 Hybrid), we identified putative phages and endogenous viral elements, illuminating distinct community profiles and predicted numerous potentially novel DNA viruses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Sample collection</title>
<p>To compare endophytic virus-like sequences to estimate viral communities from different banana (<italic>Musa</italic> spp.) genotypes, seven cultivars and species of banana were collected from a farm in Homestead, Florida (<xref rid="tab1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>). While some plants at the farm appeared to have low-level symptoms suggesting the presence of Black sigatoka (<italic>Mycosphaerella fijiensis</italic>) disease, the farm used standard intermittent control measures to limit this and other pathogens. Collected plants used in this study appeared to be symptom-free before, during, and after collection. To assess the differences in viruses present in above-ground and below-ground tissues, two samples were taken from each plant: one from the leaves and another from the root or corm of the same plant. Plant samples were first washed in tap water for 10&#x2009;min to remove any loose material. Then tissues were surface-sterilized (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref77">Refaei et al., 2011</xref>) by immersing them for 1&#x2009;min in 70% ethanol, then for 3&#x2009;min in 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution, followed by 1&#x2009;min in 70% ethanol and finally rinsed three times with sterile distilled water.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Banana (<italic>Musa</italic> spp.) sampled in this study, showing species or cultivar name, genotype, tissues sampled, and domestication status.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Sample name</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Tissue</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Species</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Cultivar</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">A/B genotype</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Type</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">WHL</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Leaf</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>Musa acuminata</italic></td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Williams Hybrid</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">AAA</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Domesticated</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">WHC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Corm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">DCL</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Leaf</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>Musa acuminata</italic></td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Dwarf Cavendish</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">AAA</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Domesticated</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">DCR</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Root</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MBL</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Leaf</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>Musa balbisiana</italic></td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>Musa balbisiana</italic></td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">BB</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Wild</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MBR</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Root</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BBL</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Leaf</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>Musa balbisiana</italic></td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Thai Black</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">BB</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Wild</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BBC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Corm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">FHL</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Leaf</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>Musa acuminata</italic></td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">FHIA-25 Hybrid</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">AAB</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Domesticated</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">FHC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Corm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MTL</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Leaf</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>Musa textilis</italic></td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>Musa textilis</italic></td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">N/A</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Wild</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MTC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Corm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MSL</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Leaf</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>Musa sikkimensis</italic></td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2"><italic>Musa sikkimensis</italic></td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">N/A</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Wild</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MSR</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Root</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Culture-free enrichment for microbial endophytes and their viromes</title>
<p>To reduce sequence yield of non-target plant genomes while obtaining microbial endophytes and potentially their associated viruses, we used a culture-free filtration and density gradient method previously used for soybean (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Ikeda et al., 2009</xref>). One of the goals here was to examine for the first time whether this method could recover plant and endophyte DNA viromes while recovering cellular endophytic microbiota. Briefly, the method used 100&#x2009;g of each plant sample, which was homogenized in a sterilized blender in 400&#x2009;mL of ice-cold &#x201C;BCE&#x201D; buffer (50&#x2009;mM Tris&#x2013;HCl pH 7.5, 1% Triton X-100, 2&#x2009;mM 2-mercaptoethanol). To preserve cell and DNA integrity, all steps were performed at 4&#x00B0;C. Resulting homogenate was filtered through a UV-sterilized Miracloth (EMD Millipore) rayon-polyester mesh, then centrifuged for 5&#x2009;min at 500xg. Flow-through was transferred to sterile tubes and centrifuged for 20&#x2009;min at 5,000&#x00D7; g. Resulting supernatant was discarded and pellets were resuspended in 50&#x2009;mL of BCE. This slurry was then filtered through a UV-sterilized Kimwipe (Kimberly-Clark) and the filtrate was centrifuged for 10&#x2009;min at 5,000&#x00D7; g. Resulting supernatants were discarded and pellets were resuspended in 35&#x2009;mL of BCE. This Kimwipe filtration was repeated. Final pellets were resuspended in 6&#x2009;mL of 50&#x2009;mM Tris&#x2013;HCl (pH 7.5). Each 1&#x2009;mL aliquot was pipetted over 4&#x2009;mL of Nycodenz&#x00AE; (3.2&#x2009;g of Nycodenz&#x00AE;&#x2009;+&#x2009;4&#x2009;mL of 50&#x2009;mM Tris&#x2013;HCl, pH 7.5), then gradients were centrifuged for 40&#x2009;min at 5,000&#x00D7; g to collect a layer of microbial cells at the interface. While this method may result in pelleting of free viral particles; our goal was to see whether virome members such as phages associated with bacteria or viruses associated with plants/fungi may be retained in this microbiome layer.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>DNA extraction, Illumina library preparation, and sequencing</title>
<p>DNA was isolated from the enriched microbial layers using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit from QIAGEN (Valencia, CA) following the manufacturer&#x2019;s directions. DNA quantity and quality were assessed on the Nanodrop spectrophotometer. Shotgun metagenomic libraries were prepared from ~0.5 to 1&#x2009;&#x03BC;g of DNA with the QIAseq FX 96 DNA Library Kit (Valencia, CA). Libraries were checked for quality on the TapeStation 2200 (Agilent) then normalized and pooled for sequencing. Sequencing was performed at the Center for Biotechnology and Genomics (CGB) at Texas Tech University and Genewiz, Inc. (NJ) with Illumina paired-end reads of 105 and 150&#x2009;bp, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<title>Quality filtering, assembly, and initial blast to virus databases</title>
<p>Paired-end read overlaps were merged using PEAR v0.9.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref102">Zhang et al., 2014</xref>), then Trimmomatic v0.38 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Bolger et al., 2014</xref>) was used to trim and filter reads prior to assembly with metaSPAdes in the SPAdes software v3.13.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Bankevich et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Nurk et al., 2017</xref>), with read-error correction and using kmers 21, 33, 45, 59, 73, and 99. Assembly statistics were calculated using QUAST v5.0. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Gurevich et al., 2013</xref>). Initial classification of taxa was performed by using DIAMOND v2.0.9 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Buchfink et al., 2014</xref>) blastx on assembled contigs against the NCBI nr database (accessed December 2020) with options sensitive, minimum e-value 1e-05, block size 16 and single chunk used for the seed index. Reads were mapped to the taxon-annotated contigs using BWA-MEM to assess relative abundances and normalized for relative average genome sizes among groups (e.g., banana haploid genome 523 Mbp, fungi 40 Mbp, bacteria/archaea 4 Mbp, viruses 60 kbp). All contigs were then searched for virus-like regions using a more sensitive custom two-part blastn approach, as follows. First, to generate a custom viral nucleotide blast database consisting of 3,250,606 viral sequences, all viral sequences on NCBI were downloaded (db date 02 January 2020) to generate a custom viral nucleotide blast database consisting of 3,250,606 viral sequences. Then, assembled contigs were analyzed against this custom virus database with blastn in BLAST+ v2.10.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Camacho et al., 2009</xref>) with the following parameters: e-value cutoff 10, maximum target sequences 500, keeping all blastn hits for the next step. Fasta sequences for all initial blastn hits were trimmed to only the hit regions using samtools faidx (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Li et al., 2009</xref>), and resulting virus-like regions were subjected to a second blast to the full NCBI nucleotide database (nt) with e-value cutoff 0.01 and maximum target sequences 20, saving only contigs with top bitscore matching virus, phage, or prophage/provirus in the taxonomic field or elsewhere in the text of the blast hit.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<title>Refined virus identification, classification, trimming of host regions, and deduplication</title>
<p>To more sensitively and rigorously search for viruses, we employed recently validated virus identification pipelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Gregory et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Pratama et al., 2021</xref>), using assembled contigs as input and performing an initial virus scan using VirSorter2 v.2.2.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref82">Roux et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Guo et al., 2021</xref>), then assessing quality and completeness of the VirSorter2 outputs using CheckV (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Nayfach et al., 2021</xref>), trimming any host DNA before repeating VirSorter2 with modified parameters. For the initial VirSorter2, we used a loose cutoff of 0.5 for maximal sensitivity with minimal length 500&#x2009;bp, and limited the search to dsDNA and ssDNA phage. CheckV analysis of VirSorter2 outputs used minimal score cutoff of 0.5. Resulting viral contigs were run in VirSorter2 with a minimum score of 0.9 to detect more confident contigs, using parameters --seqname-suffix-off and --viral-gene-enrich-off. Next, potential duplications in the form of populations of similar viral fragments were removed using the deduplication program dRep (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Olm et al., 2017</xref>) with parameters -con 10 and -sa 0.95. Dereplicated contigs were then taxonomically classified by two methods shown recently to give slightly different results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Lee et al., 2022</xref>): vConTACT2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Bin Jang et al., 2019</xref>) which uses a distance-based hierarchical clustering; and Genome Detective Virus Tool (GDV) v.2.52 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref98">Vilsker et al., 2019</xref>). GDV virus annotations were classified to higher taxonomic levels by referencing NCBI taxonomy databases (&#x201C;fullnamelineage.dmp&#x201D; downloaded April 2023).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<title>Viral abundance, community overlap, and diversity analysis</title>
<p>The relative abundance of each predicted virus in each sample was estimated based on kmer coverage of each contig matched to a virus in blast or with vConTACT2 or Genome Detective Virus Tool (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 1</xref>), modified by the following equation: C&#x2009;=&#x2009;(C<sub>K</sub> R)/(R &#x2212; K&#x2009;+&#x2009;1), where C is absolute coverage, C<sub>K</sub> is kmer coverage estimated by metaSPAdes, K is the length of kmers used in metaSPAdes, and R is read length. Before analysis of diversity, alpha rarefaction curves were generated from total reads not mapped to <italic>Musa</italic> spp. (i.e., from reads derived from the microbiome fraction). For samples with sufficient data based on asymptote in rarefaction curves, data were then normalized to adjust for differences in sequencing effort among samples as follows: (a) for phages, this normalization was performed by scaling each sample&#x2019;s coverage per contig to the highest sample read count from reads that were not mapped to <italic>Musa</italic> spp., under the premise that phage abundance should be linked to microbiome abundance rather than plant DNA (see right column in <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 2</xref>), or (b) for endogenous viruses, this normalization was scaled to the coverage to the highest sample read count from reads that mapped to <italic>Musa</italic> spp. (see second to right column in <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 2</xref>), under the premise that endogenous virus abundance should be linked to host plant DNA levels. Relative abundances were plotted as heatmaps. Viral community overlap among samples was depicted with the proportional Venn drawing tool nVenn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">P&#x00E9;rez-Silva et al., 2018</xref>). Alpha diversity analysis was performed in R to assess Shannon diversity with the Hutcheson <italic>t</italic>-test using &#x201C;ecolTest&#x201D; v. 0.0.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Hutcheson, 1970</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref101">Zar, 2010</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>Annotation and analysis of complete or fragmented phages and prophages</title>
<p>Basic initial gene annotation of virus-like contigs identified either by the two-part blast beginning with the virus database or by the DIAMOND blast described above were annotating in Prokka v.1.14.6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref86">Seemann, 2014</xref>) using the parameter&#x2014;kingdom Viruses. Prokka uses Prodigal for <italic>ab initio</italic> gene prediction, HMMER3 for protein family profiles, and BLAST+ for comparative annotation. A more refined virus-specific gene annotation was performed on the output viral contigs from the VirSorter2-dRep-GDV pipeline. This functional annotation used the DRAM-v software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref88">Shaffer et al., 2020</xref>) using the parameter -min_contig_size 1,000.</p>
<p>A small subset of longer contigs were examined for orthologs and gene synteny as follows. Annotated viral gene orthologs were determined using Roary v3.13.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">Page et al., 2015</xref>) on gff outputs from Prokka, with parameters -e for codon-aware alignment in PRANK (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">L&#x00F6;ytynoja, 2014</xref>) and -i 50 to detect distant orthologs. Annotated contigs were then imported into Geneious Prime v2020.0.4 (Biomatters, Ltd), and subjected to between-sample assembly using the Geneious <italic>de novo</italic> assembler with default parameters. Resulting contigs were analyzed using the online platform PHASTER (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref103">Zhou et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Arndt et al., 2016</xref>). Output phage/prophage were re-analyzed with DIAMOND blastx to predict taxonomy and function of phage-like regions. For the two longest genes in these phages, phylogenetic analysis was performed. First, blastn to the nt database at NCBI was used to find and download homologous genes. These homologs were then aligned in Geneious with CLUSTAL Omega, and phylogenetic analysis was performed using maximum likelihood (ML) phylogeny reconstruction was performed in RAxML v4.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref510">Stamatakis, 2014</xref>) using the GTR Gamma nucleotide model, with rate heterogeneity alpha estimated, and with rapid bootstrapping and search for the best-scoring ML tree (&#x2212;f a -x 1) assessing bootstrap support from 1,000 replicates. Annotated phage or prophage regions were then compared for synteny and similarity to the most similar full-length sequences available in GenBank using Easyfig v2.2.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref91">Sullivan et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec11">
<title>Sequence output and metagenomic assembly statistics</title>
<p>After overlap merging, filtering, and trimming, the total enriched microbiome layers yielded a total of ~576 million high-quality reads from 14 samples (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 2</xref>), with a range between 13 and 84 million reads per sample. Metagenomic assemblies from these reads produced a total of ~5 million contigs, with between ~4,000 and&#x2009;~300,000 contigs per sample with assembly N50s of 670 to 9,897 per sample (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 2</xref>). Rarefaction curves indicated sufficient sampling of microbiomes for each genotype, except for leaves of Williams Hybrid, which appeared undersampled and did not have detectable viruses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<title>Taxonomic composition of the enriched banana microbiome and its DNA viral community</title>
<p>Initial taxonomic classification of the enriched microbiome layers, using DIAMOND blastx and controlling for average genome sizes showed these microbiomes had very few plant or fungal genomes (0.11 and 0.28%, respectively) compared to bacterial and viral genomes (92.4% and 7.2%, respectively) on average. There were consistently higher relative levels of predicted virus matches in leaves than in roots (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>) and plant genotypes differed slightly in these proportions. Notably, 20.5% of all reads before normalizing for genome sizes could not be assigned to any taxonomic group, even at the kingdom level. It is unknown if these reads contain additional undescribed viruses.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Relative proportion of reads from extracted <italic>Musa</italic> microbiome layers that mapped to plant, fungi, bacteria and archaea, and viruses, controlling for differences in average genome sizes and showing reads mapped to contigs that could not be classified to any taxon. Average genome sizes used: banana haploid genome 523 Mbp, fungi 40 Mbp, bacteria/archaea 4 Mbp, viruses 60 kbp. Samples: BBC and BBL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa balbisiana</italic> Thai Black corm and leaf, DCR and DCL&#x2009;=&#x2009;Dwarf Cavendish root, and leaf, FHC and FHL&#x2009;=&#x2009;FHIA-25 corm and leaf, MBR and MBL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa balbisiana</italic> root and leaf, MSR and MSL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa sikkimensis</italic> root and leaf, MTC and MTL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa textilis</italic> corm and leaf, WHC and WHL&#x2009;=&#x2009;Williams Hybrid corm and leaf.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1127606-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The results of the two-step blastn of assembled contigs to viral databases showed 864 contigs with highest blast hits to viruses, comprising ~1.13 Mbp of assembled sequence length with maximum contig length 53,615&#x2009;bp (<xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>). Among these, 156 contigs matched phage and 708 contigs matched plant DNA viruses of the family Caulimoviridae, which likely comprise both endogenous (i.e., integrated) sequences such as endogenous pararetroviruses, and episomal (i.e., nonintegrated) viruses. In total, read counts across all samples (non-normalized across samples) at the order level mostly matched Ortervirales (95.16% of reads) which are a broad group containing almost all dsDNA viruses that replicate through an RNA intermediate, followed by Caudovirales (4.8% of reads) which are tailed bacteriophages, and Tubulavirales (0.02% of reads).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p><italic>Musa</italic> samples and their endophytic virus-like sequences matches, showing numbers of contigs resulting from using two different virus detection pipelines (i.e., a blastn-based pipeline and more sensitive pipeline using the software VirSorter2 with vConTACT2 and GDV).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Sample ID</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">No. of contigs matching putative phage by blastn</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">No. of contigs matching putative endogenous viruses by blastn</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">No. of contigs matching putative phage by vConTACT2&#x2009;+&#x2009;GDV pipeline</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Sum of contig lengths matching viruses by vConTACT2&#x2009;+&#x2009;GDV pipeline</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BBC</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">55</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">21</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">68</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3,404,449</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BBL</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">124</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">123</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1,641,355</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">DCR</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">32</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">67</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2,173,216</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">DCL</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">66</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">FHC</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">81</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5,222,084</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">FHL</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">103</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">948,983</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MBR</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">61</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">77</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2,022,359</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MBL</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">112</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2,094,866</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MSR</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">31</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">621,307</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MSL</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">45</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">28</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">174,439</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MTC</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">156</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4,703,559</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MTL</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">80</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">831,313</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">WHC</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">32</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">32,827</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">WHL</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Total</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">156</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">708</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">733</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23,870,757</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Samples: BBC and BBL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa balbisiana</italic> Thai Black corm and leaf, DCR and DCL&#x2009;=&#x2009;Dwarf Cavendish root, and leaf, FHC and FHL&#x2009;=&#x2009;FHIA-25 corm and leaf, MBR and MBL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa balbisiana</italic> root and leaf, MSR and MSL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa sikkimensis</italic> root and leaf, MTC and MTL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa textilis</italic> corm and leaf, WHC and WHL&#x2009;=&#x2009;Williams Hybrid corm and leaf.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>By comparison, the more sensitive viral detection pipeline using VirSorter2, vConTACT2, and GDV viral prediction pipelines yielded significantly more candidate viruses (<xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref> and compare <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Tables 1</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">3</xref>), with ~23.870 Mbp of contigs containing predicted viruses, comprising 733 predicted phages. vConTACT2 clustering was able to taxonomically assign 22.51% of the contigs, whereas GDV was able to taxonomically assign 94.27% of viral contigs. Compared to the blastn pipeline, this more sensitive pipeline resulted in identifying more long contigs, with an average of maximum contig lengths across samples of 51,312&#x2009;bp (maximum 108,191&#x2009;bp for sample BBC) with an average of the median contig lengths of 6,713&#x2009;bp (maximum 16,828 for sample FHC). The sample WHC had notably shorter contigs than others (maximum 4,552&#x2009;bp, median 807&#x2009;bp).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>Candidate phage detected with family-level and genus-level abundances</title>
<p>After normalizing for relative numbers of reads, phage abundances at the family level varied among sampled genotypes and tissues (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2</xref>). Predicted phages from the GDV pipeline were classified to 51 families, with the most common classification, at ~30% abundance, being &#x201C;unclassified Caudoviricetes.&#x201D; The next most abundant group was family <italic>Ackermannviridae</italic> (~27% abundance), followed by <italic>Peduoviridae</italic> (15.7%), and <italic>Autographiviridae</italic>, <italic>Perisivirus</italic>, <italic>Naomviridae</italic>, <italic>Stephanstirmvirinae</italic>, and <italic>Casjensviridae</italic> (at 6%, 4.2%, 3.9%, 2%, and 1.7% abundances, respectively). Among <italic>Musa</italic> genotypes and tissues, the pattern of phage abundance at the family level was variable (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2</xref>), with Williams Hybrid roots (WHC) having a larger proportion of unassigned viruses than the others, FHIA-25 Hybrid leaves (FHL) having a larger portion of <italic>Kalamavirales</italic>, <italic>M. balbisiana</italic> Thai Black roots (BBC) having a larger portion of <italic>Aguilavirus</italic>, and MBR, MSR, and MTL having larger proportions of <italic>Casjensviridae</italic>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Relative abundance of putative phages detected from microbiomes of <italic>Musa</italic> genotypes and tissues, classified to the family level using GDV Tool, calculated after normalizing read coverage among samples. For ease of visualization, arrows are used to point to the most abundant groups, including unclassified Caudoviricetes, and the five most abundant virus families across samples. Samples on the x-axis: BBC and BBL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa balbisiana</italic> Thai Black corm and leaf, DCR and DCL&#x2009;=&#x2009;Dwarf Cavendish root, and leaf, FHC and FHL&#x2009;=&#x2009;FHIA-25 corm and leaf, MBR and MBL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa balbisiana</italic> root and leaf, MSR and MSL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa sikkimensis</italic> root and leaf, MTC and MTL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa textilis</italic> corm and leaf, WHC and WHL&#x2009;=&#x2009;Williams Hybrid corm and leaf.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1127606-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>At the genus-level, predicted phage presence/absence and abundances from the GDV pipeline differed among samples, with most phage genera being unique to each sample. Overall, the most abundant phage genera were <italic>Rhizobium phage</italic>, <italic>Vhulanivirus</italic>, <italic>Salmonella phage</italic>, <italic>Brucella phage</italic>, <italic>Noahvirus</italic>, <italic>Rhodovulum phage</italic>, <italic>Eganvirus</italic>, <italic>Peduovirus</italic>, and <italic>Nanhaivirus</italic>. No genera were universally shared among all samples, but those most commonly found across samples included <italic>Salmonella phage</italic>, <italic>Rhizobium phage</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas phage</italic>, <italic>Ochrobactrum phage</italic>, and <italic>Rhodovulum phage</italic>. In roots, the most abundant phages were <italic>Salmonella phage</italic>, <italic>Rhizobium phage</italic>, <italic>Peduovirus</italic>, <italic>Quadragintavirus</italic>, <italic>Yersinia phage</italic>, <italic>Brunovirus</italic>, <italic>Eganvirus</italic>, and <italic>Klebsiella phage</italic>. In leaves, the most abundant phages were <italic>Rhizobium phage</italic>, <italic>Vhulanivirus</italic>, <italic>Brucella phage</italic>, and <italic>Noahvirus</italic>. Overall phage taxa identification and abundances were similar for the blastn and GDV approaches except that the blastn method failed to detect about one- to two-thirds of the phages detected with GDV (<xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>; <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 1</xref>).</p>
<p>Phage genera abundances plotted as a clustered heatmap scaled across rows (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3</xref>) showed sets of 6 to 20 phages (numbered boxes 1 to 16 in <xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3</xref>) which clustered together with high abundance (columns of dark boxes in heatmap). These sets of phages at higher abundance showed limited overlap across genotypes and tissues, i.e., most samples had unique patterns in highly abundant phages.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Relative abundance of putative phages detected from microbiomes of <italic>Musa</italic> samples classified to the genus level using GDV Tool, calculated after normalizing read coverage among samples. Heatmap has been scaled across rows and clustered by similar rows to reveal similarities in abundance patterns among sets of phage and host plant. Heatmap color: light to dark represents lowest to highest abundance. Boxes enclose 16 predominant abundance clusters. Samples on the x-axis: BBC and BBL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa balbisiana</italic> Thai Black corm and leaf, DCR and DCL&#x2009;=&#x2009;Dwarf Cavendish root, and leaf, FHC and FHL&#x2009;=&#x2009;FHIA-25 corm and leaf, MBR and MBL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa balbisiana</italic> root and leaf, MSR and MSL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa sikkimensis</italic> root and leaf, MTC and MTL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa textilis</italic> corm and leaf.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1127606-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<title>Shared and unique phage communities</title>
<p>Comparing predicted phages at the lowest taxonomic level (species or isolate) across <italic>Musa</italic> genotypes, showed that most predicted phages were unique to each plant genotype with only a few occurring in more than one plant host (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4</xref>). The specific predicted phages that were universal to all sampled <italic>Musa</italic> genotypes were <italic>Rhodovulum phage</italic> RS1, <italic>Stenotrophomonas phage</italic> S1, <italic>Ochrobactrum phage</italic> POA1180, <italic>Brunovirus</italic> SEN34, <italic>Salmonella phage</italic> 118,970 sal3, and unassigned phages, whereas predicted phages that were nearly universal among <italic>Musa</italic> genotypes included <italic>Rhizobium phage</italic> RR1-B, <italic>Rhizobium phage</italic> RR1-A, <italic>Rhizobium phage</italic> 16&#x2013;3, <italic>Pectobacterium phage</italic> ZF40, <italic>Felsduovirus</italic> RE2010, <italic>Aguilavirus</italic> mEp043, <italic>Vhulanivirus</italic> Shpa, <italic>Nanhaivirus</italic> D5C, <italic>Eganvirus</italic> PsP3, and <italic>Yersinia phage</italic> P37. There were 36 phages that were uniquely shared among sets of diploid genotypes (BB, MB, MT, MS), but we did not detect any uniquely shared phages among triploids (FH, DC; <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 1</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Putative phage community overlap at the lowest taxonomic-levels (species or isolates) within the endosphere microbiomes of 6 <italic>Musa</italic> genotypes, combining leaf and root tissues for each genotype, shown as a proportional Venn diagram, with each <italic>Musa</italic> genotype depicted with a separate color. Numbers in circles indicate numbers of shared phages between <italic>Musa</italic> genotypes or phages unique to a genotype, while numbers in parentheses within circles indicate numbers of shared or unshared orthologous genes among phages in each circle.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1127606-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Diversity analysis showed that diploid <italic>Musa</italic> plants (genotypes BB and other diploids) had higher phage alpha diversity compared to triploid (domesticated) <italic>Musa</italic> plants (genotypes AAA and AAB): Shannon diversity (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01, Hutcheson <italic>t</italic>-test) ranging from 4.9 (diploid plants) to 4.5 (triploid plants). Furthermore, statistical analyses showed that root tissues had significantly higher alpha diversity than leaf tissues: Shannon diversity (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01, Hutcheson <italic>t</italic>-test) ranging from 6.5 (root samples) to 4.4 (leaf samples).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<title>Phage gene repertoire and protein family domain abundance</title>
<p>Using the less-sensitive blastn pipeline and annotating genes with prokka, among contigs with strong blast similarity to viruses, many (52.7%) contained no predicted genes, either because candidate open reading frames did not pass similarity filters of the prokka software or because contigs were too short (e.g., 63.8% of contigs were&#x2009;&#x003C;1,000&#x2009;bp). Nevertheless, prokka annotation resulted in 887 predicted genes among these contigs. Of these, 733 (82.6%) were annotated as &#x201C;hypothetical protein.&#x201D; Phage gene orthologs, analyzed in Roary, showed a similar pattern, with most orthologous gene clusters being unique to individual <italic>Musa</italic> genotypes. Using the contigs identified with the VirSorter2-vConTACT2-GDV pipeline, far more contigs could be annotated with virus genes or virus-like protein coding motifs (pfam) using the DRAMv software (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 4</xref>), resulting in 1,038 unique pfam domains across samples with ~400 to 600 unique viral pfams in most samples. There were up to 1,901 contigs per sample with predicted viral pfam domains. The most abundant of these genes or pfam domains, normalizing among samples and accounting for read coverage were: phage portal protein, Integrase core domain, Phage integrase family, Baseplate J-like protein, ABC transporter, Helix-turn-helix domain, Phage capsid family, Phage virion morphogenesis family, Transposase, and Caudovirus prohead serine protease. Comparing relative abundances of phage pfam domains across samples (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5</xref>) showed no particular pattern across <italic>Musa</italic> genotypes or tissue types; however, assemblages of pfams did show some clustering within samples (e.g., MBR, MBL, MTC, and FHC had numerous abundant phage tail proteins in common, compared with other samples).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>Relative abundances of predicted phage protein domains (pfams) for the 150 most abundant pfams detected from <italic>Musa</italic> samples microbiomes using the DRAMv software. Heatmap color: light to dark represents lowest to highest abundance. Samples on the x-axis: BBC and BBL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa balbisiana</italic> Thai Black corm and leaf, DCR and DCL&#x2009;=&#x2009;Dwarf Cavendish root, and leaf, FHC and FHL&#x2009;=&#x2009;FHIA-25 corm and leaf, MBR and MBL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa balbisiana</italic> root and leaf, MSR and MSL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa sikkimensis</italic> root and leaf, MTC and MTL&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>Musa textilis</italic> corm and leaf.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1127606-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<title>Synteny and phylogenetic analysis of several predicted phages</title>
<p>To assess predicted phage synteny for several of the most common and well-characterized phages, 8 predicted phage or prophage regions detected by both the GDV pipeline and PHASTER were analyzed compared to references in a gene-by-gene manner and with phylogenetics. These predicted phages ranged from 12.1 to 49.3&#x2009;kb, with 16 to 56 predicted genes, with two of these phage regions classified as &#x201C;intact,&#x201D; 4 as &#x201C;incomplete,&#x201D; and 2 as &#x201C;questionable&#x201D; in PHASTER. Comparative synteny analysis with closest reference sequences from GenBank is shown in <xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6</xref> and phylogenetic analysis of the two longest predicted genes from each of these 8 phages is shown in <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figures 1</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">15</xref>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p>Annotated PHASTER-predicted phages or prophages from <italic>Musa</italic> microbiomes compared to similar full-length reference sequences from GenBank, showing synteny and tblastx similarity (in grayscale bands) between predicted proteins of known (blue arrow) or unknown (yellow arrow) function, showing proteins that were analyzed phylogenetically (purple arrow) in <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figures 1</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">15</xref>. <bold>(A)</bold> Predicted phages 56 and 68 aligned to <italic>Rhizobium</italic> phage RR1-B. <bold>(B)</bold> Predicted phages 114 and phage 88 aligned to <italic>Agrobacterium</italic> phage Atu ph08. <bold>(C)</bold> Predicted phage 113 aligned to <italic>Klebsiella</italic> phage KMI6. <bold>(D)</bold> Predicted phage 116 aligned to <italic>Shinella</italic> sp. phage HZN7. <bold>(E)</bold> Predicted &#x201C;FHC phage&#x201D; aligned to <italic>Pseudomonas monteillii</italic> plasmid pSTW0522-72-1.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1127606-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Intact predicted &#x201C;Phage 56&#x201D; from samples BBC and MTC, and incomplete &#x201C;Phage 68&#x201D; from samples FHL and FHC were most similar to <italic>Rhizobium</italic> phage RR1-B (NCBI accession JF74315.1; <xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6A</xref>), with moderately high synteny conservation, and higher blastx identity to one another than to the reference sequence. Notable genes present in these <italic>Musa</italic> microbiome phages that were not present in the reference phage (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 5</xref>) include genes encoding an ISL3 family transposase, a partial Shiga-like toxin 2 subunit A (63 amino acids long, with 66% identity to prophage Shiga-like toxin sequences integrated into <italic>Agrobacterium</italic> species), and a holin. Phylogenetic analysis of the DNA methyltransferase/methylase N-4/N-6 gene showed these predicted phages to be most closely related to <italic>Rhizobium skierniewicense</italic> and <italic>Agrobacterium</italic> sp. AGB01 in a well-supported clade with other <italic>Agrobacterium</italic>/<italic>Rhizobium</italic> spp. <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>, which was nested between clades comprised <italic>Agrobacterium vitis</italic> and <italic>Agrobacterium leguminosarum</italic>. Phylogenetic analysis of the &#x201C;Phage 68&#x201D; C-5 cytosine specific DNA methylase gene showed a similar pattern to that of the DNA methytransferase gene described above, whereas the &#x201C;Phage 56&#x201D; DNA primase gene clustered with <italic>Rhizobium straminoryzae</italic> phage/plasmid sequences and other <italic>Rhizobium</italic> spp. (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figures 2</xref>, <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">3</xref>).</p>
<p>Incomplete predicted &#x201C;Phage 114&#x201D; from sample BBC and &#x201C;Phage 88&#x201D; from samples BBC and MBR were most similar to the flanking ends of <italic>Agrobacterium</italic> phage Atu ph08 (NCBI accession MF403009.1), with relatively high synteny (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6B</xref>). Notable genes present in these phages that were absent in the reference phage (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 5</xref>) include a DNA adenine methyltransferase gene, a CzcR-like response regulator gene, and an endolysin gene. Phylogenetic analysis showed a &#x2018;Phage 88&#x2019; gene annotated as encoding an integrase arm-type DNA binding domain protein clustered closely with an undescribed Proteobacteria bacterium within a clade of <italic>Agrobacterium tumefaciens</italic> (<italic>=A. radiobacter</italic>) complex while its gene for a UvrB/UvrC motif containing protein clustered similarly (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figures 4</xref>, <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">5</xref>). Similarly, genes from &#x201C;Phage 114&#x201D; annotated as hypothetical proteins clustered with <italic>A. tumefaciens</italic> and other <italic>Agrobacterium</italic>, including <italic>Agrobacterium salinitolerans</italic> (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figures 8</xref>, <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">9</xref>).</p>
<p>A very long phage-like region denoted as &#x201C;questionable,&#x201D; denoted here as &#x201C;Phage 113&#x201D; from sample MTC, had high gene conservation and synteny conservation to <italic>Klebsiella</italic> phage KMI6 (NCBI accession MN101220.1; <xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6C</xref>). There were few genes that differed substantially between this phage and the reference, except annotated gene 12 in &#x201C;Phage 113&#x201D; (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 5</xref>) encoding a putative tail fiber protein which appeared to be absent in the reference. Phylogenetic analysis of two putative internal core protein genes indicated clustering with a clade containing a variety of <italic>Klebsiella</italic> phages, <italic>Escherichia</italic> phages, and undescribed <italic>Caudovirales</italic> sp. with high bootstrap support but large sequence divergence (i.e., long branch lengths; <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figures 6</xref>, <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">7</xref>).</p>
<p>Incomplete &#x201C;Phage 116,&#x201D; from sample MTC, was most similar to a prophage of <italic>Shinella</italic> sp. HZN7 (NCBI accession CP015736.1), but with a middle segment of uniquely missing and different genes and some regions with highly diverged (low blastx identity) genes (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6D</xref>). Genes present in this phage that were absent in the reference (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 5</xref>) included a conserved transposable phage protein gene, a host-nuclease inhibitor protein &#x201C;gam&#x201D; gene, and a putative DNA ends-protecting protein. Phylogenetic analysis of a gene for a peptidoglycan-binding domain protein and a gene for a transposase C-terminal domain-containing protein showed this phage to be closest to <italic>Shinella</italic> sp. phage HZN7, with very weak bootstrap support for various sister clades (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figures 10</xref>, <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">11</xref>).</p>
<p>Intact &#x201C;Phage FHC&#x201D; from sample FHC, which assembled as one complete contig, was most similar to <italic>Pseudomonas monteillii</italic> plasmid pSTW0522-72-1 (NCBI accession AP022474.1) with very high gene content similarity (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6E</xref>). Phylogenetic analysis of the predicted phage tail tape measure protein gene and a hypothetical protein gene showed a strongly supported cluster with <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. WS 5027, within clades containing <italic>P. monteillii</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic>, and <italic>Pseudomonas alloputida</italic> (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figures 14</xref>, <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">15</xref>).</p>
<p>Finally, predicted &#x201C;Phage DCR,&#x201D; which was assembled as one large contig and was denoted as &#x201C;questionable,&#x201D; had no significantly similar full-length reference match, and so could not be analyzed with Easyfig. Nevertheless, this predicted phage had 17 of 19 predicted genes matching phage-like proteins. Phylogenetic analyses of genes for a phage tail tape measure protein and a head maturation protease showed strong bootstrap support for clustering with <italic>A. tumefaciens</italic> (=<italic>A. radiobacter</italic>) and <italic>Rhizobium tropici</italic>, and <italic>Rhizobium metallidurans</italic> and <italic>Rhizobium pusense</italic>, respectively. However, the branch lengths were quite long, suggesting significant sequence divergence in both cases (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figures 12</xref>, <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">13</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<title>Plant DNA viruses or endogenous viral elements detected</title>
<p>The contigs matching endogenous viruses included both short and long contigs, many of which had high blastn similarity to references in NCBI databases (<xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 6</xref>). For example, the maximum length of a contig that matched endogenous viruses was 37,479&#x2009;bp, whereas 41 of these endogenous virus-like contigs were&#x2009;&#x003E;3,000&#x2009;bp, 41.6% of contigs were&#x2009;&#x003E;900&#x2009;bp, and 90% of contigs were&#x2009;&#x003E;300&#x2009;bp. Blast hit regions were relatively long, with 81.9% of hits being &#x003E;300&#x2009;bp and 112 hits being &#x003E;900&#x2009;bp. Nucleotide identities for hit regions were variable, with 55.5% of hit regions being &#x003E;95% identity and 34% of hits being &#x003E;98% identity. Among matches to reference endogenous viruses annotated as &#x201C;complete,&#x201D; 39% of the matching contigs showed 100% coverage (i.e., indicating the contig included the complete endogenous virus genome; see <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 6</xref>, which includes sequences) and inspection of predicted ORFs in Geneious showed full, intact predicted genes. The sum of read coverage of predicted endogenous viruses (<xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>) was quite high (40,481 X) despite low levels of banana genomic DNA in these enriched microbiome layers (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>). Endogenous virus-like reads, calculated across all banana genotypes (<xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">Figure 7</xref>; <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 7</xref>), were mostly from the order Ortervirales, with most matches to family Caulimoviridae, in the genus <italic>Badnavirus</italic>. Among <italic>Badnavirus</italic> matches, 56 species were identified. In total, 42.13% of reads matched the broad group of badnaviruses denoted endogenous banana streak viruses (eBSVs). Seventeen distinct species of eBSVs were identified from across sampled <italic>Musa</italic> genotypes. The most abundant <italic>Badnavirus</italic> species were <italic>Banana streak virus</italic> (BSV; 60.97% of eBSVs reads) and <italic>Banana streak MY virus</italic> (BSMYV; 22.42% of eBSVs reads). Other eBSVs were detected at less than 5% read coverage. Additionally, 14 species matched other <italic>Musa</italic>-group endogenous badnaviruses (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6</xref>; <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 7</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption><p>Abundance of putative endogenous viruses in 12 <italic>Musa</italic> samples from leaf and corm tissues, based on blastn hits to assembly contigs shown as a heatmap of coverage, shown in color legend, after normalization to control for differences in reads across samples.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1127606-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Other non-<italic>Musa</italic> plant viruses detected include 26 additional <italic>Badnavirus</italic> species, including several that were present in multiple samples, such as <italic>Grapevine Roditis leaf discoloration-associated virus</italic>, <italic>Taro bacilliform CH virus</italic>, <italic>Piper yellow mottle virus</italic>, <italic>Sugarcane bacilliform virus</italic>, and <italic>Sugarcane bacilliform Guadeloupe A virus</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<title>Shared and unique viral species from banana endogenous communities</title>
<p>Analyses of predicted endogenous plant virus diversity among samples showed that only <italic>Banana streak virus</italic> was universal to all root and leaf samples for all <italic>Musa</italic> genotypes. Overall, 71.68% of endogenous plant virus reads were from leaf samples, from which 17 species were unique to leaf tissues, whereas 9 species were unique to root samples. Comparing <italic>Musa</italic> genotypes, 17 endogenous viruses were unique to Thai Black roots (BBC), while 3 viruses were unique to <italic>M. balbisiana</italic> roots (MBR). Among BB genotypes (MBR and BBC) only 3 viruses where shared. Also, 14 viruses were unique to <italic>M. textilis</italic> roots (MTC), 3 viruses were unique to <italic>Musa sikkimensis</italic> root (MSR), 6 viruses were unique to Dwarf Cavendish roots (DCR; AAA genotype), and 4 viruses unique to FHIA-25 Hybrid roots (FHC; AAB genotype; <xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">Figure 7</xref>; <xref rid="SM4" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table 7</xref>).</p>
<p>Several candidate viruses were exclusively detected from diploid (wild) genotypes (BB/MB, <italic>M. textilis</italic>, and <italic>M. sikkimensis</italic>; <xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">Figure 7</xref>): <italic>Banana streak Brazilian B virus</italic>, <italic>Banana streak CA virus</italic>, <italic>Banana streak UA virus</italic>, <italic>Banana streak UI virus</italic>, and <italic>Banana streak UL virus</italic>. Some viruses were exclusively detected from diploids and FHIA-25 (AAB genotype) samples: <italic>Banana streak GF virus</italic>, <italic>Banana streak IM virus</italic>, <italic>Banana streak MY virus</italic>, <italic>Banana streak OL virus</italic>, <italic>Banana streak virus acuminata Yunnan</italic>, and <italic>Banana streak VN virus</italic>. Other viruses were found exclusively in Dwarf Cavendish (AAA genotype): <italic>Banana streak Uganda B virus</italic>, <italic>Banana streak Uganda E virus</italic>, <italic>Banana streak Uganda G virus</italic>, <italic>Banana streak Uganda H virus</italic>, and <italic>Banana streak Uganda virus C</italic>.</p>
<p>Diversity analyses of candidate endogenous viruses showed that diploid (wild) plants had higher alpha diversity compared to triploid domesticated (AAA and AAB) plants: Shannon diversity (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01, Hutcheson <italic>t</italic>-test) ranged from 3.32 for triploid plants to 4.02 for diploid plants. Furthermore, statistical analyses showed that leaf tissues had higher alpha diversity than root tissues. Shannon diversity (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01, Hutcheson <italic>t</italic>-test) ranged from 3.9 (leaf samples) to 3.4 (root samples). The same pattern and similar statistically significant differences were found after removing <italic>Banana streak virus</italic> which occurs in every plant and tissue and is therefore more likely incorporated into the banana genome.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19" sec-type="discussions">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>We compared endophytic virus-like sequences from sympatric banana plants including wild diploid and domesticated triploid varieties as a critical first step toward assessing how these viromes may impact microbiomes. Results revealed numerous novels or highly divergent predicted phages and dsDNA viruses or endogenous viral elements (EVEs) with generally non-overlapping community structures despite the shared environments of these plants, suggesting hosts drive the composition of these DNA virus communities.</p>
<p>Comparing phage communities between banana genotypes demonstrated clear differences at the phage family-, genus-, and species/isolate-levels, suggesting an influence of plant host history (wild diploid vs. domesticated triploid), as expected given previous studies of domesticated vs. wild relative microbiomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Liu et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Mertens et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Nakkeeran et al., 2021</xref>). The lack of overall lower-level taxonomic overlap among <italic>Musa</italic> plants grown together in the small-scale farm suggests that these endophytic phages either do not easily transfer among plants or that plant hosts control or limit their communities. Furthermore, data showed a pattern of phage communities unique to each plant (shown in <xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3</xref>) suggesting possible &#x201C;phage consortia&#x201D; may be able to infect or persist within these endospheres. If these distinct endosphere phageomes persist in healthy plants over the long term, presumably actively infecting endophytic bacteria. Despite our efforts to functionally annotate these phage communities and the great diversity of predicted pfam domains, the resulting lists of pfams provided limited insight: most pfams represent standard viral components. However, and the clustering of several samples (<italic>M. balbisiana</italic>, <italic>M. textilis</italic>, and FHIA-25 Hybrid) in their abundance profiles for many phage tail components raises interest in the possible activity of these phage. Further work will be essential to explore these possibilities as part of a broader investigation of the impact of endophytic phages on the plant microbiome&#x2019;s contribution to disease resistance.</p>
<p>Plant tissue and genotype influenced the composition of predicted phage communities, as expected based on studies of bacterial endophyte communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Lundberg et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Liu et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Maheshwari and Annapurna, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Fitzpatrick et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Afzal et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Mertens et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Nakkeeran et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref99">Wippel et al., 2021</xref>). For example, even though there were higher relative levels of viruses in leaves than roots, these virus blast hits were predominantly endogenous plant viruses, with few phage or prophage hits. This result is consistent with roots being primary sites of bacterial colonization, with leaves hosting a subset of root-colonizing microbiota (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Fitzpatrick et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref99">Wippel et al., 2021</xref>). However, several predicted phage phages appeared to be unique to leaf tissues, for example, <italic>Burkholderia</italic> phage DC1. Its host, members of the <italic>Burkholderia cepacia</italic> complex, are important intracellular endophytes that are often integral to plants, conferring key protective benefits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Pan et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Mendes et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Mercado-Blanco and Lugtenberg, 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>In the endophytic microbiome of <italic>Musa</italic> spp., we found predicted phage or prophage sequences that were diverged from those of reference phage, suggesting that these phages may be unique to bacterial endophytes or pathogens of banana. Among the abundant and widely shared phages identified in these <italic>Musa</italic> samples, several resembled <italic>Rhizobium</italic> phage RR1-A and RR1-B, which are temperate phages first characterized from deep subseafloor sediments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Engelhardt et al., 2013</xref>), but also found associated with the rhizosphere of plants, such as <italic>Agave americana</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref83">Ru&#x00ED;z-Valdiviezo et al., 2017</xref>). Phylogenetic comparisons suggested that this phage may be related to phage infecting <italic>R. skierniewicense</italic>, an endophytic tumor-causing rhizobium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">Pulawska et al., 2012</xref>). We found two diverged variants of this phage, one in diploids <italic>M. balbisiana</italic> and <italic>M. textilis</italic> (denoted &#x201C;Phage 56&#x201D;) and the other in the triploid FHIA-25 Hybrid (denoted &#x201C;Phage 68&#x201D;), with higher sequence similarity between these contigs than to the reference, suggesting possible <italic>Musa</italic>-specific variants and possible phylodiversification of this phage or its bacterial host. Detection of such RR1 &#x201C;predatory&#x201D; lysogenic phages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Engelhardt et al., 2013</xref>) in <italic>Musa</italic> spp. combined with our detection of an additional a holin gene and a partial Shiga-like toxin gene in these phages raises interest in their capacity to regulate Rhizobiaceae in the endophytic microbiome.</p>
<p>Another widely observed group of predicted phage in these <italic>Musa</italic> samples matched <italic>Klebsiella</italic> phage, targeting <italic>Klebsiella</italic> bacteria which are a focus for their plant growth promoting properties. Although initial blast similarity suggested the numerous <italic>Klebsiella</italic> phages in these <italic>Musa</italic> microbiomes were most similar to prophage in clinically important <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Bleriot et al., 2020</xref>), the sequences were quite diverged from known clinical and agricultural strains in GenBank, likely reflecting distinct phage variants. Diverse <italic>Klebsiella</italic> strains including strains of <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> are nitrogen-fixing diazotrophs which colonize plants well, especially monocots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Dong et al., 2003</xref>). Many strains promote plant growth and some have been shown to be protective against diseases such as Fusarium wilt in banana (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Nakkeeran et al., 2021</xref>). Together, these findings raise interest in the novel <italic>Klebsiella</italic> phage variants found in this study. As with the RR1-like sequences, the divergence among <italic>Klebsiella</italic> phage-like sequences among our sampled <italic>Musa</italic> plants suggest <italic>Musa</italic>-specific variants and possible phylodiversification in these hosts.</p>
<p>A predicted phage found only in the <italic>M. textilis</italic> microbiome distantly matched a phage from the nicotine-degrading alphaproteobacterial strain <italic>Shinella</italic> sp. HZN7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Ma et al., 2014</xref>). <italic>Shinella</italic> species have been found as endophytes in several studies and are remarkable for their diverse biosynthetic properties supported by large genomes (~7.35 Mbp), including electroproducing endophytes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">Qiu et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Ling et al., 2022</xref>). The additional transposable phage protein gene detected here may suggest this is a transposable phage with the ability to rearrange host genomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref94">Toussaint and Rice, 2017</xref>), while the other extra genes (a host-nuclease inhibitor protein &#x2018;gam&#x2019; gene and a DNA ends protecting protein) which protect the phage against host RecBCD-driven degradation suggest this could be a formidable regulator of its host endophytes.</p>
<p><italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp. are common in endophytic microbiomes, conferring a wide range of plant-beneficial traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Nakkeeran et al., 2021</xref>), hence, our discovery of an intact phage-like region matching a plasmid from <italic>Pseudomonas monteillii</italic> (an environmental and human pathogenic species) or <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. WS 5027 (a psychrophilic species initially found in milk; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Maier et al., 2020</xref>) was of interest. Curiously, this predicted phage/plasmid was only found in the FHIA-25 Hybrid banana, suggesting specificity of this phage&#x2019;s host. We also detected at lower coverage, a <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> phage KNP-like sequence. This sequence matched a cluster of phages of interest for their potentially important role in regulating plant-specific <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Nowicki et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>The discovery of two fragments matching phage Atu_ph08 from the plant pathogen <italic>Agrobacterium tumefaciens</italic> (=<italic>A. radiobacter</italic>) in Thai Black <italic>M. balbisiana</italic> is of interest due to recent evidence suggesting that these novel T7-like phages may be lysogenic and could regulate pathogenic <italic>Agrobacterium</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Attai and Brown, 2019</xref>). However, our seqeunces from banana lacked the large helicase gene found in the Atu_ph08 phage: it is unclear whether this indicates assembly artifacts due to repeat elements or diversity among metagenomic variants, or whether these prophage regions have lost the helicase and are degrading. Another candidate <italic>A. radiobacter</italic> phage, &#x201C;Phage DCR&#x201D; from Dwarf Cavendish, was too diverged from reference sequences in GenBank to comparatively analyze gene synteny, and may represent another novel host-specific virus or prophage.</p>
<p>We also found predicted phages with potential to regulate <italic>Erwinia</italic>-, <italic>Pectobacterium</italic>-, and <italic>Ralstonia</italic>-associated diseases which have been reported as the most devastating bacterial diseases of banana worldwide, after <italic>Xanthomonas</italic> wilt (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Blomme et al., 2017</xref>). We found a match to <italic>Erwinia</italic> phage EtG, which clusters with Enterobacteriales phages of wide host ranges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref92">Thompson et al., 2019</xref>), and a match to the <italic>Pectobacterium</italic> phage ZF40, hosts of which cause Enterobacteraceae derived soft rot diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Czajkowski, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Comeau et al., 2017</xref>). We also found low levels of <italic>Ralstonia</italic> phage in <italic>M. sikkimensis</italic> and Thai Black roots, which is important given previous studies that showed phages isolated from banana soils may control <italic>R. solanacearum</italic>, causing devastating banana Moko disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref76">Ram&#x00ED;rez et al., 2020</xref>) and similarly, phages appear effective in controlling <italic>Ralstonia syzygii</italic> sub sp. <italic>celebesensis (Rsc)</italic>, causing banana blood disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Murthi et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>In particular, our results showing a large proportion of the reads from sequencing the bacterial microbiome layer were unclassified even at kingdom level supports the hypothesis that there may be many undescribed DNA viruses in <italic>Musa</italic> tissues. Consistent with this result, the most abundant phages were &#x201C;uncharacterized Caudoviricetes&#x201D; and a majority of blast-detected phage-like regions could not be annotated to known genes, although GDV performed somewhat better at function prediction than the simple prokka/DIAMOND approaches. Furthermore, we suspect that our Nycodenz enrichment protocol, which was developed for isolating bacteria may not be optimal for phage particles, some of which we speculate may be lost in the pellet, further reducing the measured abundance and diversity of phage in our study. Together, these arguments all point to hidden undiscovered phage diversity in the <italic>Musa</italic> endosphere. This is on the one hand surprising, given the challenges of phage transmission one might imagine within the confines of plant tissues. Although metagenomic virus detection workflows are improving (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Bin Jang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref81">Roux et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref98">Vilsker et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Pratama et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref96">Turner et al., 2021</xref>), MAG approaches are still less often used for detecting phage communities compared to bacterial communities, and sequence databases for phage genes still lag behind that of bacterial genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Dion et al., 2020</xref>). Although we found the VirSorter2-vConTACT2-GDV pipeline to be several times more sensitive at detective viruses than our initial blastn-based pipeline, we note that vConTACT2 was somewhat poorer at taxonomic classification than GDV, as has been reported by others (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref104">Zhu et al., 2022</xref>). This performance difference is likely due to an abundance of short contigs in our samples.</p>
<p>Although detection of dsDNA plant viruses was not the primary goal of this study, given the methods used to enrich microbial cells, we found a surprising proportion of reads (e.g., at a total of &#x003E;40,000 &#x00D7; coverage) and assembled contigs (e.g., 708 distinct taxa) matched plant DNA viruses, including both predicted intact plant viruses and fragmented or degrading viral fragments. This result was more surprising, given the tiny relative number of copies of <italic>Musa</italic> genomic DNA in our data. Unlike the diversity of phage, which was higher in root tissues, plant viruses were richer in leaves, and unlike the largely non-overlapping phage communities among genotypes, abundant plant viruses tended to be shared across all tissues and <italic>Musa</italic> genotypes. This is likely because these DNA plant viruses, such as the banana streak viruses, largely occur as endogenous, replicating forms universally integrated into <italic>Musa</italic> genomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Geering et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Gayral et al., 2008</xref>). The high coverage and abundance of these in our data, despite limited host DNA levels, is consistent with their high copy number in the host DNA. In addition, we found differences among genotypes: diploids had more diverse DNA plant virus communities than triploids, with many unshared viruses, including numerous non-streak and non-<italic>Musa</italic> viruses, suggesting a mixture of resident and transient DNA viruses in these samples. These findings are important because cultivars of commercial banana (triploid <italic>M. acuminata</italic>) are susceptible to infection by a broad range of badnaviruses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Harper et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Geering et al., 2005</xref>), impacting breeding programs as viral DNA integrated into the nuclear genome of <italic>M. balbisiana</italic> (BB genotype) spreads (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Geering et al., 2005</xref>) leading to systemic infection when the plants are stressed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Muller et al., 2021</xref>). Insertion of a badnavirus promoter next to an endogenous plant gene may change transcription levels and alter tissue specificity of expression and give rise to infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Matzke et al., 2004</xref>). Yet, most EVEs are thought to be &#x201C;viral molecular fossils&#x201D; in wild plant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Jones et al., 1999</xref>), with some latent plant viruses potentially providing a benefit to wild host plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Pag&#x00E1;n et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref95">Tripathi et al., 2019</xref>). Given our findings of differences in EVEs and other relatively abundant non-streak disease-causing dsDNA viruses in these <italic>Musa</italic> plants (e.g., Grapevine Roditis leaf discoloration-associated virus, Fig badnavirus 1, Taro bacilliform CH virus, Yacon necrotic mottle virus, and Dioscorea bacilliform RT virus), we propose future focused work to improve enrichment protocols, including target capture, to economically assay the diversity of these plant DNA viruses.</p>
<p>In conclusion, our results contribute to the small but growing collection of studies that characterize DNA virus communities within plants, a first step toward examining how endophytic viruses may regulate plant microbiomes. While we found several predicted viruses with similarity to known pathogens, most predicted virus-like sequences did not closely match pathogens. Furthermore, the sampled plants appeared healthy, raising questions about the potential for some of these viruses to be neutral or perhaps beneficial under some conditions. This study successfully characterized putative endophytic viromes from sympatric banana plants, showing differences among host tissues and genotypes with largely non-overlapping viromes, suggesting plant hosts drive or limit viral community structure. Future studies with long-read approaches should better-uncover longer regions to help distinguish active virions from integrated prophages or endogenous plant dsDNA viruses. Importantly, our data suggest that a Nycodenz-based microbiome enrichment method should make such long-read sequencing approaches more cost-effective for <italic>in planta</italic> virus community analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in NCBI BioProject PRJNA837781, BioSamples SAMN28230877 to SAMN28230890.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>AB led the sample collection and sequencing. SA and RL developed and ran bioinformatic analyses pipelines. SA and AB drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research was funded by graduate funding support to SA through the Texas Tech Association of Biologists, Tech ASM, the TTU Graduate Student Research Award, Biology Graduate Summer Research Award, and the Helen DeVitt Jones Graduate Fellowship.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec100" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>We thank Tammy Laberge for assistance with sample collection and undergraduate researchers Colton Eaton, Kimberly Morales, and others in the Brown Lab for assisting with microbiome isolation and enrichment, Simrandeep Singh and Sydney Pittignano for assistance with code, and the Center for Biotechnology and Genomics at Texas Tech University for use of the TapeStation. We also thank reviewers for invaluable suggestions for improving our analyses.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="sec24" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1127606/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1127606/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material id="SM1"><label>SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE S1</label><caption><p>List of detected putative phage and endogenous species from each sample, non-normalized and normalized read counts.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material id="SM2"><label>SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE S4</label><caption><p>Predicted genes and protein motifs (pfams) using the DRAM-v software.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material id="SM3"><label>SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE S6</label><caption><p>List of putative endogenous plant viruses detected from <italic>Musa</italic> spp. with taxonomic data and associated NCBI metadata.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.zip" id="SM4" mimetype="application/zip" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Addy</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azizi</surname> <given-names>N. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mihardjo</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Detection of bacterial wilt pathogen and isolation of its bacteriophage from banana in Lumajang area, Indonesia</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Agron.</source> <volume>2016</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2016/5164846</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Afzal</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shinwari</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sikandar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shahzad</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Plant beneficial endophytic bacteria: mechanisms, diversity, host range and genetic determinants</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>221</volume>, <fpage>36</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2019.02.001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30825940</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Akinola</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayangbenro</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Babalola</surname> <given-names>O. O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The immense functional attributes of maize rhizosphere microbiome: a shotgun sequencing approach</article-title>. <source>Agriculture</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture11020118</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arndt</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grant</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marcu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sajed</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pon</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>W16</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>W21</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkw387</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27141966</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Attai</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>P. J. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Isolation and characterization T4-and T7-like phages that infect the bacterial plant pathogen <italic>agrobacterium tumefaciens</italic></article-title>. <source>Viruses</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/v11060528</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31181591</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bankevich</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nurk</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antipov</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gurevich</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dvorkin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kulikov</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing</article-title>. <source>J. Comput. Biol.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>455</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>477</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/cmb.2012.0021</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bateson</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dale</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Banana bract mosaic virus: characterisation using potyvirus specific degenerate PCR primers</article-title>. <source>Arch. Virol.</source> <volume>140</volume>, <fpage>515</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>527</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF01718428</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7733824</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bin Jang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bolduc</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zablocki</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuhn</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roux</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adriaenssens</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Taxonomic assignment of uncultivated prokaryotic virus genomes is enabled by gene-sharing networks</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>632</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>639</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41587-019-0100-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31061483</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blazanin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>P. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Community context matters for bacteria-phage ecology and evolution</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>3119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3128</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-021-01012-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34127803</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bleriot</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trastoy</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blasco</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fern&#x00E1;ndez-Cuenca</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ambroa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fern&#x00E1;ndez-Garc&#x00ED;a</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Genomic analysis of 40 prophages located in the genomes of 16 carbapenemase-producing clinical strains of <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic></article-title>. <source>Microb. Genomics</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mgen.0.000369</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32375972</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blomme</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dita</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacobsen</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vicente</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Molina</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ocimati</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Bacterial diseases of bananas and enset: current state of knowledge and integrated approaches toward sustainable management</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.01290</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28785275</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bolger</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lohse</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Usadel</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>2114</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2120</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24695404</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buchfink</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huson</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.3176</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25402007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buttimer</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McAuliffe</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ross</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hill</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x2019;Mahony</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coffey</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Bacteriophages and bacterial plant diseases</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.00034</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28163700</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Camacho</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coulouris</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Avagyan</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Papadopoulos</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bealer</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>BLAST+: architecture and applications</article-title>. <source>BMC Bioinformatics</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-10-421</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Comeau</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Douglas</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Langille</surname> <given-names>M. G. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Microbiome helper: a custom and streamlined workflow for Microbiome Research</article-title>. <source>mSystems</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>e00127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e00116</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mSystems.00127-16</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28066818</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Czajkowski</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Bacteriophages of soft rot Enterobacteriaceae&#x2014;a minireview</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Lett.</source> <volume>363</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femsle/fnv230</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26626879</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dale</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Banana bunchy top: an economically important tropical plant virus disease</article-title>. <source>Adv. Virus Res.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>325</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60321-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dion</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oechslin</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moineau</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Phage diversity, genomics and phylogeny</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>125</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>138</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41579-019-0311-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iniguez</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Triplett</surname> <given-names>E. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Quantitative assessments of the host range and strain specificity of endophytic colonization by <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> 342</article-title>. <source>Plant and Soil</source> <volume>257</volume>, <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1026242814060</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Engelhardt</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sahlberg</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cypionka</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Engelen</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Biogeography of Rhizobium radiobacter and distribution of associated temperate phages in deep subseafloor sediments</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>199</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>209</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2012.92</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22855213</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fadiji</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayangbenro</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Babalola</surname> <given-names>O. O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021a</year>). <article-title>Shotgun metagenomics reveals the functional diversity of root-associated endophytic microbiomes in maize plant</article-title>. <source>Curr. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>25</volume>:<fpage>100195</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cpb.2021.100195</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fadiji</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayangbenro</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Babalola</surname> <given-names>O. O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021b</year>). <article-title>Unveiling the putative functional genes present in root-associated endophytic microbiome from maize plant using the shotgun approach</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>339</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>351</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13353-021-00611-w</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">FAO</collab></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source>All about bananas: Things you should know about the tropical fruit</source>. <publisher-name>Rome Food Agric. Organ</publisher-name>. <publisher-loc>United Nations, FAO</publisher-loc>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Federici</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nobs</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elinav</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Phages and their potential to modulate the microbiome and immunity</article-title>. <source>Cell. Mol. Immunol.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>889</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>904</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41423-020-00532-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32901128</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fitzpatrick</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Copeland</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guttman</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kotanen</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>M. T. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Assembly and ecological function of the root microbiome across angiosperm plant species</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</source> <volume>115</volume>, <fpage>E1157</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>E1165</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1717617115</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29358405</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Flynn</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moreau</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Assessing the diversity of endogenous viruses throughout ant genomes</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>e01139</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.01139</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Forero-Junco</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alanin</surname> <given-names>K. W. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Djurhuus</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kot</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gobbi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hansen</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). Viruses roam the wheat phyllosphere bioRxiv [Preprint], 1&#x2013;11.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gayral</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noa-Carrazana</surname> <given-names>J.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lescot</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lheureux</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lockhart</surname> <given-names>B. E. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matsumoto</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>A single Banana streak virus integration event in the Banana genome as the origin of infectious endogenous Pararetrovirus</article-title>. <source>J. Virol.</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>6697</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6710</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jvi.00212-08</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18417582</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Geering</surname> <given-names>A. D. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olszewski</surname> <given-names>N. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harper</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lockhart</surname> <given-names>B. E. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hull</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Banana contains a diverse array of endogenous badnaviruses</article-title>. <source>J. Gen. Virol.</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>511</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>520</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/vir.0.80261-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15659772</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gregory</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zayed</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Concei&#x00E7;&#x00E3;o-Neto</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Temperton</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bolduc</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alberti</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Marine DNA viral macro- and micro-diversity from pole to pole</article-title>. <source>Cells</source> <volume>177</volume>, <fpage>1109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1123.e14</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.040</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31031001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bolduc</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zayed</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Varsani</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dominguez-huerta</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delmont</surname> <given-names>T. O.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>VirSorter2: a multi-classifier, expert-guided approach to detect diverse DNA and RNA viruses</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-020-00990-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gurevich</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saveliev</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vyahhi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tesler</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>1072</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1075</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23422339</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harper</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hull</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lockhart</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olszewski</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Viral sequences integrated into plant genomes</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>136</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.120301.105642</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harrison</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Griffin</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The diversity and distribution of endophytes across biomes, plant phylogeny and host tissues: how far have we come and where do we go from here?</article-title> <source>Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>2107</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2123</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1462-2920.14968</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32115818</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hirsch</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mauchline</surname> <given-names>T. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Who&#x2019;s who in the plant root microbiome?</article-title> <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>961</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>962</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt.2387</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23051815</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hutcheson</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1970</year>). <article-title>A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula</article-title>. <source>J. Theor. Biol.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>154</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0022-5193(70)90124-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5493290</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ikeda</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaneko</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Okubo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rallos</surname> <given-names>L. E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eda</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mitsui</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Development of a bacterial cell enrichment method and its application to the community analysis in soybean stems</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>703</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>714</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-009-9566-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19662454</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamilton</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Voinnet</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maule</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baulcombe</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>RNA-DNA interactions and DNA methylation in post-transcriptional gene silencing</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>2291</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2301</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.11.12.2291</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10590159</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Knief</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delmotte</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chaffron</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stark</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Innerebner</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wassmann</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1378</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1390</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2011.192</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22189496</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>K&#x00F6;berl</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dita</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martinuz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Staver</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Members of Gammaproteobacteria as indicator species of healthy banana plants on fusarium wilt-infested fields in Central America</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep45318</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28345666</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Koskella</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>New approaches to characterizing bacteria&#x2013;phage interactions in microbial communities and microbiomes</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol. Rep.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1758-2229.12706</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30431224</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Koskella</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>T. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Multifaceted impacts of bacteriophages in the plant microbiome</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>361</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>380</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-045858</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29958076</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuzyakov</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mason-Jones</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Viruses in soil: Nano-scale undead drivers of microbial life, biogeochemical turnover and ecosystem functions</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>127</volume>, <fpage>305</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>317</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.09.032</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lang</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gent</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwartz</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Management of Xanthomonas leaf blight of onion with bacteriophages and a plant activator</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>871</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>878</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-91-7-0871</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>C. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zoqratt</surname> <given-names>M. Z. H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Phipps</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barr</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lal</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayub</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The gut virome in two indigenous populations from Malaysia</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1824</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1810</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-022-05656-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35115615</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Handsaker</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wysoker</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fennell</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Homer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>2078</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2079</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19505943</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ling</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Isolation, identification and characteristic analysis of plant endophyte Electrogenic Bacteria <italic>Shinella zoogloeoides</italic> SHE10</article-title>. <source>Curr. Microbiol.</source> <volume>79</volume>:<fpage>268</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00284-022-02964-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35881250</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carvalhais</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crawford</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dennis</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pieterse</surname> <given-names>C. M. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Inner plant values: diversity, colonization and benefits from endophytic bacteria</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.02552</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29312235</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lockhart</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <source>Banana streak Badnavirus infection in Musa: epidemiology, diagnosis and control</source>. <publisher-loc>Taipei, Taiwan</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>ASPAC Food Fertilizer Technology Center</publisher-name>. <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>L&#x00F6;ytynoja</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Phylogeny-aware alignment with PRANK</article-title>. <source>Methods Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>1079</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>170</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-1-62703-646-7_10</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lundberg</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lebeis</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paredes</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yourstone</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gehring</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Malfatti</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Defining the core <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> root microbiome</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>488</volume>, <fpage>86</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature11237</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22859206</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Isolation, transposon mutagenesis, and characterization of the novel nicotine-degrading strain Shinella sp. HZN7</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>2625</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2636</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-013-5207-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24026891</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Maheshwari</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Annapurna</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (Eds.). (<year>2017</year>). <source>Endophytes: Crop productivity and protection. Vol. 2.</source> <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maier</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huptas</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>von Neubeck</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scherer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wenning</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x00FC;cking</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Genetic organization of the aprX-lipA2 operon affects the proteolytic potential of Pseudomonas species in Milk</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.01190</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32587583</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matzke</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gregor</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mette</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aufsatz</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kanno</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jakowitsch</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Endogenous pararetroviruses of allotetraploid Nicotiana tabacum and its diploid progenitors, N. sylvestris and N. tomentosiformis</article-title>. <source>Biol. J. Linn. Soc.</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>627</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>638</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00347.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mendes</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pizzirani-Kleiner</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Araujo</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raaijmakers</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Diversity of cultivated endophytic bacteria from sugarcane: genetic and biochemical characterization of <italic>Burkholderia cepacia</italic> complex isolates</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>7259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7267</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01222-07</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17905875</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mercado-Blanco</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lugtenberg</surname> <given-names>B. J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Biotechnological applications of bacterial endophytes</article-title>. <source>Curr. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>60</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>75</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2174/22115501113026660038</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mertens</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bawin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abeele</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kallow</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vu</surname> <given-names>D. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le</surname> <given-names>L. T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Genetic diversity and structure of <italic>Musa balbisiana</italic> populations in Vietnam and its implications for the conservation of banana crop wild relatives</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>e0253255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e0253222</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0253255</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34161368</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morella</surname> <given-names>N. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gomez</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leung</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koskella</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The impact of bacteriophages on phyllosphere bacterial abundance and composition</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>2025</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2038</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mec.14542</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29457297</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Muller</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunwell</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daymond</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allainguillaume</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Identification and distribution of novel badnaviral sequences integrated in the genome of cacao (<italic>Theobroma cacao</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>8270</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8213</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-021-87690-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33859254</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Murthi</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Safni</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lisnawita</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Isolation and selection specific bacteriophage from banana in north Sumatera to biologically control <italic>Ralstonia syzygii</italic> sub sp. celebesensis in vitro</article-title>. <source>IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci.</source> <volume>782</volume>:<fpage>042018</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/782/4/042018</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nakkeeran</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajamanickam</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saravanan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vanthana</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soorianathasundaram</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Bacterial endophytome-mediated resistance in banana for the management of fusarium wilt</article-title>. <source>3 Biotech</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>267</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>213</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13205-021-02833-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34017673</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nayfach</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Camargo</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schulz</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eloe-Fadrosh</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roux</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kyrpides</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>578</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>585</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41587-020-00774-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33349699</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nowicki</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walkowiak-Nowicka</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zemleduch-Barylska</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mleczko</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fr&#x0105;ckowiak</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nowaczyk</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Complete genome sequences of two novel autographiviruses infecting a bacterium from the <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> group</article-title>. <source>Arch. Virol.</source> <volume>162</volume>, <fpage>2907</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2911</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00705-017-3419-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28551853</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nurk</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meleshko</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Korobeynikov</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pevzner</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>MetaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler</article-title>. <source>Genome Res.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>824</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>834</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.213959.116</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28298430</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Olm</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>C. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brooks</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Banfield</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>DRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>2864</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2868</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2017.126</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28742071</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pag&#x00E1;n</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Jara</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moreno-Letelier</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodelo-Urrego</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fraile</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pi&#x00F1;ero</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Effect of biodiversity changes in disease risk: exploring disease emergence in a plant-virus system</article-title>. <source>PLoS Pathog.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>e1002796</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1002796</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22792068</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Page</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cummins</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hunt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>V. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reuter</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holden</surname> <given-names>M. T. G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>3691</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3693</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26198102</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rademan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kunert</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hastings</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Ultrastructural studies on the colonization of banana tissue and fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 4 by the endophytic bacterium <italic>Burkholderia cepacia</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Phytopathol.</source> <volume>145</volume>, <fpage>479</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>486</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1439-0434.1997.tb00354.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref71"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>P&#x00E9;rez-Silva</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Araujo-Voces</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quesada</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>nVenn: Generalized, quasi-proportional Venn and Euler diagrams</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>2322</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2324</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/bty109</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29949954</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pratama</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bolduc</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zayed</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>Z. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vik</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Expanding standards in viromics: in silico evaluation of dsDNA viral genome identification, classification, and auxiliary metabolic gene curation</article-title>. <source>PeerJ</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>e11447</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e11430</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7717/peerj.11447</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34178438</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pratama</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Terpstra</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Oliveria</surname> <given-names>A. L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salles</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The role of rhizosphere bacteriophages in plant health</article-title>. <source>Trends Microbiol.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>709</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>718</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tim.2020.04.005</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32417229</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref74"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pulawska</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Willems</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sobiczewski</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title><italic>Rhizobium skierniewicense</italic> sp. nov., isolated from tumours on chrysanthemum and cherry plum</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>895</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>899</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/ijs.0.032532-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21642489</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref75"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The complete genome sequence of the nicotine-degrading bacterium Shinella sp. HZN7</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>2</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2016.01348</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27625640</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref76"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ram&#x00ED;rez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neuman</surname> <given-names>B. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ram&#x00ED;rez</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Bacteriophages as promising agents for the biological control of Moko disease (<italic>Ralstonia solanacearum</italic>) of banana</article-title>. <source>Biol. Control</source> <volume>149</volume>:<fpage>104238</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104238</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref77"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Refaei</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sakayaroj</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santhanam</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Endophytic fungi from Rafflesia cantleyi: species diversity and antimicrobial activity</article-title>. <source>Mycosphere</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>429</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>447</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref78"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Regalado</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lundberg</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deusch</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kersten</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karasov</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poersch</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Combining whole-genome shotgun sequencing and rRNA gene amplicon analyses to improve detection of microbe&#x2013;microbe interaction networks in plant leaves</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>2116</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2130</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-020-0665-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32405027</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref79"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rodriguez</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rothballer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chowdhury</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nussbaumer</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gutjahr</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Falter-Braun</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Systems biology of plant-microbiome interactions</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>804</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>821</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.molp.2019.05.006</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31128275</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref80"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roossinck</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roumagnac</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Plant virus metagenomics: advances in virus discovery</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>716</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>727</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-12-14-0356-RVW</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26056847</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref81"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roux</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adriaenssens</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dutilh</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koonin</surname> <given-names>E. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kropinski</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krupovic</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Minimum information about an uncultivated virus genome (MIUVIG)</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt.4306</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30556814</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref82"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roux</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Enault</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hurwitz</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sullivan</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>VirSorter: mining viral signal from microbial genomic data</article-title>. <source>PeerJ</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>e985</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e920</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7717/peerj.985</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26038737</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref83"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ru&#x00ED;z-Valdiviezo</surname> <given-names>V. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rogel-Hernandez</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guerrero</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rinc&#x00F3;n-Molina</surname> <given-names>C. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garc&#x00ED;a-Perez</surname> <given-names>L. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guti&#x00E9;rrez-Miceli</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Complete genome sequence of a novel nonnodulating Rhizobium species isolated from <italic>Agave americana</italic> L. rhizosphere</article-title>. <source>Genome Announc.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>e01280&#x2013;17</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/genomeA.01280-17</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29146860</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref84"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saccardi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gambin</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zaccardelli</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barone</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mazzucchi</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title><italic>Xanthomonas campestris</italic> pv. Pruni control trials with phage treatments on peaches in the orchard</article-title>. <source>Phytopathol. Mediterr.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>206</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>210</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref85"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schoelz</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stewart</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The role of viruses in the phytobiome</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Virol.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>111</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-virology-092917-043421</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30048220</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref86"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Seemann</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>2068</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2069</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24642063</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref87"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Seo</surname> <given-names>S. U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kweon</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Virome&#x2013;host interactions in intestinal health and disease</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Virol.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>63</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.coviro.2019.06.003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31295677</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref88"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shaffer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Borton</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McGivern</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zayed</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>La Rosa</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Solden</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>8883</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8900</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkaa621</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32766782</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref89"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Siddique</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Viruses of endophytic and pathogenic forest fungi</article-title>. <source>Virus Genes</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>407</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>416</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11262-020-01763-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32388614</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref90"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soto-Giron</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schott</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tahmin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ishoey</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mincer</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The edible plant microbiome represents a diverse genetic reservoir with functional potential in the human host</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>24017</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24014</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-021-03334-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34911987</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref510"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stamatakis</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1312</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1313</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref91"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sullivan</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petty</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beatson</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Easyfig: A genome comparison visualizer</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>1009</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1010</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21278367</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref92"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casjens</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grose</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Genomic comparison of 60 completely sequenced bacteriophages that infect Erwinia and/or Pantoea bacteria</article-title>. <source>Virology</source> <volume>535</volume>, <fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.virol.2019.06.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref93"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>B. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>K. Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Metagenomic insights into communities, functions of endophytes, and their associates with infection by root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, in tomato roots</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep17087</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26603211</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref94"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Toussaint</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rice</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Transposable phages, DNA reorganization and transfer</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Microbiol.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>88</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mib.2017.04.009</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28551392</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref95"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tripathi</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ntui</surname> <given-names>V. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ron</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muiruri</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Britt</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tripathi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>CRISPR/Cas9 editing of endogenous banana streak virus in the B genome of Musa spp. overcomes a major challenge in banana breeding</article-title>. <source>Commun. Biol.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s42003-019-0288-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30729184</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref96"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kropinski</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adriaenssens</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A roadmap for genome-based phage taxonomy</article-title>. <source>Viruses</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/v13030506</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33803862</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref97"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Belleghem</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>D&#x0105;browska</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vaneechoutte</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barr</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bollyky</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Interactions between bacteriophage, bacteria, and the mammalian immune system</article-title>. <source>Viruses</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>10</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/v11010010</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30585199</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref98"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vilsker</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moosa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nooij</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fonseca</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghysens</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dumon</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Genome detective: an automated system for virus identification from high-throughput sequencing data</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>871</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>873</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/bty695</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30124794</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref99"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wippel</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zgadzaj</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kiel</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Host preference and invasiveness of commensal bacteria in the Lotus and Arabidopsis root microbiota</article-title>. <source>Nat. Microbiol.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1150</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1162</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41564-021-00941-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34312531</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref100"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Penton</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Manipulating the banana rhizosphere microbiome for biological control of Panama disease</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep11124</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26242751</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref101"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zar</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <source>Biostatistical Analysis</source>. 5th edn. <publisher-name>Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall/Pearson</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref102"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kobert</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flouri</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stamatakis</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina paired-end reAd mergeR</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>614</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>620</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btt593</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24142950</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref103"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dennis</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wishart</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>PHAST: a fast phage search tool</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>W347</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>W352</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkr485</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21672955</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref104"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Phage family classification under Caudoviricetes: a review of current tools using the latest ICTV classification framework</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>1032186</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.1032186</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36590402</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
