<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1091755</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Impact of sterilization and chemical fertilizer on the microbiota of oil palm seedlings</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>Joyce Yoon Mei</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2008808/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>Li Sim</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ibrahim</surname> <given-names>Julia</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Teh</surname> <given-names>Chee Keng</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Goh</surname> <given-names>Kian Mau</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c002"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/179936/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Biotechnology &#x0026; Breeding Department, Sime Darby Plantation Technology Centre Sdn. Bhd., Serdang</institution>, <addr-line>Selangor</addr-line>, <country>Malaysia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai</institution>, <addr-line>Johor</addr-line>, <country>Malaysia</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Ling Kui, Harvard Medical School, United States</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Geok Yuan Annie Tan, University of Malaya, Malaysia; Nur Hazlin Hazrin-Chong, National University of Malaysia, Malaysia</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Joyce Yoon Mei Ding, <email>joyce.ding.yoonmei@simedarbyplantation.com</email></corresp>
<corresp id="c002">Kian Mau Goh, <email>gohkianmau@utm.my</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn002"><p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>These authors have contributed equally to this work</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>27</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1091755</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>07</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>11</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2023 Ding, Ho, Ibrahim, Teh and Goh.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Ding, Ho, Ibrahim, Teh and Goh</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Soil nutrients and microbiota are known as essential components for healthy plant growth and crop productivity. However, limited studies have been conducted on the importance of soil microbiota in the early growth of oil palm seedlings (<italic>Elaeis guineensis</italic> Jacq.) under the influence of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) compound fertilizer (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium). In this study, we analyzed the root microbial community associated with seedlings grown under normal and sterilized soil conditions to ascertain the microbial strains potentially associated with soil, plant health and chemical fertilizer efficiency. Oil palm seedlings were grown under four treatments: (i) fertilized normal soil (+FN), (ii) unfertilized normal soil (&#x2212;FN), (iii) fertilized sterilized soil (+FS) and (iv) unfertilized sterilized soil (&#x2212;FS). Our findings revealed that chemical fertilizer promoted the growth of the copiotrophs Pseudomonadota and Bacteroidota in the control +FN, which are known to degrade complex polysaccharides. After autoclaving, the soil macronutrient content did not change, but soil sterilization reduced microbial diversity in the +FS and &#x2212;FS treatments and altered the soil microbiota composition. Sterilized soil with a depleted microbial population adversely affected crop growth, which was exacerbated by fertilizer use. In the rhizosphere and rhizoplane compartments, a total of 412 and 868 amplicon sequence variances (ASVs) were found depleted in the +FS and &#x2212;FS treatments, respectively. Several genera were identified in the ASVs with diminished abundance, including <italic>Humibacter</italic>, <italic>Microbacterium</italic>, <italic>Mycobacterium</italic>, 1921-2, HSB OF53-F07, <italic>Mucilaginibacter</italic>, <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Paenibacillus</italic>, and several unclassified genera, suggesting their possible roles in promoting the plant growth of oil palm seedlings. Soil sterilization might remove these beneficial microbes from the bulk soil pool, affecting the colonization ability in the rhizocompartments as well as their role in nutrient transformation. Therefore, this study provides useful insights concerning the benefits of a soil microbiome survey before making fertilizer recommendations.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>plant-microbe interaction</kwd>
<kwd>soil metagenome</kwd>
<kwd>soil microbiome</kwd>
<kwd>rhizocompartments</kwd>
<kwd>plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="10"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="53"/>
<page-count count="17"/>
<word-count count="8775"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Microbial Symbioses</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1" sec-type="intro">
<title>1. Introduction</title>
<p>Oil palm is a perennial crop with a productive life of around 25 years. To maintain its growth and fruit production, oil palm requires a large amount of nutrients from the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Corley and Tinker, 2016</xref>). The depletion of soil nutrients over time fosters a dependency on chemical fertilizer. In Malaysia, the cost of fertilizer accounts for as high as 85% of the total production cost (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Goh, 2005</xref>). To ensure the right balance of soil nutrients, an oil palm fertilizer recommendation system has been implemented as a general guideline (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Goh, 2005</xref>). This system assists agronomists in resolving nutrient deficiencies in palm trees. However, pronounced differences have been found between the input amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) applied in manuring and the output amount of NPK removed when the fruits were being harvested and carried away from the field (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Tiemann et al., 2018</xref>). This unnecessary large insurance margin of fertilizer in oil palm can be attributed to the loss of nutrients due to leaching, inefficient nitrogen uptake by palms, poor nutrient retention in soil, nutrients&#x2019; antagonistic effect between fertilizers and other factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Formaglio et al., 2020</xref>). In addition, multiple factors threaten the long-term sustainability of the oil palm industry, including ever-increasing fertilizer costs, the depletion of resources, labor shortages for multiple rounds of fertilizer applications and environmental concerns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Goh and Rolf, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Woittiez et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Recent advancements in agriculture have led to the development of microbial-based biofertilisers that utilize plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to promote overall plant growth and crop yield with a less adverse impact on the environment. A study on oil palm seedlings showed that microbial-based biofertilisers may improve plant nutrient uptake and soil nutrient retention, eventually reducing chemical fertilizer use (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajeng et al., 2020</xref>). The area of PGPR living in the soil surrounding the plant roots is known as the rhizosphere; whereas the soil directly on the root surface is known as the rhizoplane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Carvalhais et al., 2013</xref>). The interaction of PGPR with plants and their effectiveness in plant growth promotion and yield productivity were reported in rice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Edwards et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Zhang et al., 2019</xref>), wheat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Akitomo et al., 2016</xref>), grapevine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">C&#x00E1;tia et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Wu et al., 2020</xref>), soybean (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Han et al., 2020</xref>) and sugar beet (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">V&#x00ED;ctor et al., 2019</xref>). The biological roles of PGPR include nitrogen fixation, the solubilisation of mineral phosphate or potassium, an increase in host resistance against pathogens, an increase in the host&#x2019;s ability to withstand biotic and abiotic stresses, and generating essential compounds or macromolecules such as siderophores, indoleacetic acid (IAA), enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC-deaminase), hormones and others (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Yaish et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Li et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Rodriguez et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Romano et al., 2020</xref>). The well-studied PGPR genera include <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Azospirillum</italic>, <italic>Azotobacter</italic>, <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Burkholderia</italic>, <italic>Enterobacter</italic>, <italic>Rhizobium</italic>, <italic>Erwinia</italic>, <italic>Flavobacterium</italic> and many more (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Compant et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>While plant&#x2013;microbe interactions at the plant-soil interface have been shown to be crucial to nutrient acquisition and other benefits, little is known about how microbial interactions affect fertilizer uptake and nutrient exchange throughout the development of oil palm plants. Furthermore, palm growth is also influenced by biotic and abiotic factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Woittiez et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Goh et al., 2020</xref>), making it challenging to assess the sole effect of microbial activity associated with palm fruit yields. It was found that the sterilization of soil could improve plant growth performance by removing soil-borne pathogens from the soil, resulting in a random and natural recolonisation of beneficial microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Zhang et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Li et al., 2019</xref>). However, the effects of sterilization on a &#x201C;healthy soil microbiome,&#x201D; microbial recovery and plant health has not been studied for oil palm. Thus, we designed an experiment to observe the effect of soil sterilization and NPK fertilization on the profile of microbial communities across bulk soil and rhizocompartments (the rhizosphere and rhizoplane) associated with the vegetative growth of oil palm seedlings. The microbial resilience theory proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Allison and Martiny (2008)</xref> states that changes in the microbial communities due to disturbances may directly affect ecosystem processes. Based on this concept, we hypothesized that oil palm seedlings may recruit a functional group of microbes from the surrounding soil onto their root-associated compartments to improve palm growth and development under soil sterilization and fertilization. By understanding the interactions between plants, microbes and chemical fertilizer, an effective biofertiliser can be developed to complement chemical fertilizer applications in the oil palm industry.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>2. Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>2.1. Experimental soil</title>
<p>The soil used in this study was collected from an oil palm plantation field located at Banting Estate, Malaysia (2&#x00B0;47&#x2032;3&#x2033;N, 101&#x00B0;27&#x2032;55&#x2033;E). According to USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) soil taxonomy, the soil was classified as a loamy clay texture (26% sand, 31% silt, and 42% clay). After mixing, a portion of the collected soil samples was autoclaved thrice (at 121&#x00B0;C, 15 psi, 45 min for each cycle) to generate an initially pre-sterilized soil. The soil kept in the sealed bags was allowed to cool overnight between each set of autoclaving processes. Pre-sterilized soils were used in order to eliminate microbial communities indigenous to the soil. A complete elimination was confirmed by the absence of colonies on the nutrient agar after 48 h of incubation using spread plate technique.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>2.2. Experimental design</title>
<p>A total of 80 germinated oil palm commercial seeds (<italic>Deli Dura</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>AVROS Pisifera</italic>) were obtained from the Oil Palm Breeding Unit, Sime Darby Plantation Research Sdn. Bhd., Malaysia. These full-sib seeds were derived from a fresh fruit bunch to achieve genetic uniformity. The seeds that qualify for sowing must have a radicle and plumule of approximately 1 cm in length. Each seed was sowed in a polybag (25 cm &#x00D7; 30 cm) filled with an equal weight of either normal or pre-sterilized soils. Seedlings were subjected to four treatments including (i) fertilized normal soil (+FN), (ii) unfertilized normal soil (&#x2212;FN), (iii) fertilized sterilized soil (+FS), and (iv) unfertilized sterilized soil (&#x2212;FS), in a complete randomized designed trial with 20 replicates per treatment. The abbreviations +F referred to the polybags applied with fertilizer, while &#x2212;F referred to the fertilizer-free polybags, either using natural normal soil (N) or pre-sterilized soil (S). Under the normal commercial practice, oil palm seedlings were raised in the main nursery for 12 months, supplemented with compound fertilizer. Hence, the +FN control was served as a positive control to compare against other treatments in this study. The seedlings were raised in an open space nursery owned by Sime Darby Plantation near Banting. Each polybag was placed on top of a concrete slab to prevent the roots from penetrating the earth. After 6 weeks of sowing, the granular compound fertilizer N-P-K-Mg (14:13:9:2.5:trace elements, CCM Fertilizers Sdn. Bhd., Malaysia) was introduced into these seedlings according to the fertilizer schedule and dosage stated in the Sime Darby Plantation&#x2019;s standard agriculture reference manual (unpublished). The complete fertilizer application throughout the 8 month trial was 100 g of granular NPK fertilizer per polybag. Upon the treatment effects were observed on these palms, a destructive sampling was conducted using 10 randomly selected seedlings from each treatment. Plant height, the number of developed fronds and total dry biomass were recorded accordingly.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>2.3. Segregation of microbiota in bulk soil and rhizocompartments</title>
<p>In each treatment, five randomly selected seedlings were subjected to soil&#x2013;root washing to segregate the rhizocompartment. Each oil palm seedling was carefully excavated from the polybag. Loose bulk soil from each seedling was collected and preserved individually at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C. The exposed root was vigorously shaken to remove the loosely adhering soil for collecting the rhizosphere microbiome. Soil bound firmly on the root was treated as rhizoplane. Rhizosphere and rhizoplane pellets from the same seedling were obtained by repeated chemical washings and centrifugations as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Wieland et al. (2001)</xref>. In total, we performed five replications across three compartments (bulk soil, the rhizosphere and rhizoplane) for +FN control, &#x2212;FN, +FS, and &#x2212;FS treatments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS4">
<title>2.4. DNA extraction and amplicon sequencing</title>
<p>Total genomic DNA extractions for each sample were performed using FastDNA&#x2122; Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedical, USA) following the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol. The quality and quantity of the extracted DNA were measured using agarose gel electrophoresis and Qubit spectrometer (Invitrogen, USA). The V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene were amplified using primer 341F and 806R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bates et al., 2011</xref>). Five replicates of all treatments except the +FN control in rhizoplane (only four replicates due to a problem with one sample) were sequenced individually using paired-end (2 bp &#x00D7; 250 bp) protocol on an Illumina HiSeq platform (Illumina, USA). This has accounted to a total of 59 samples.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS5">
<title>2.5. Bioinformatics and statistical analyses</title>
<p>Paired-end reads merging, assigning, trimming, and quality filtering were performed using DADA2 pipeline v1.8, from an open source R package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Callahan et al., 2016</xref>). All the parameters set were by default. Primer-trimmed sequences with more than 200 bp without ambiguous base calls were quality filtered using the &#x201C;filterAndTrim&#x201D; function in the same pipeline. Subsequently, the estimated error rate was learned and calculated using the machine learning algorithm implemented in DADA2 from the subsampled reads. Forward and reverse sequences were merged to obtain amplicon sequence variant (ASV). Chimeric sequences were eliminated, resulting in a sequence length ranging from 400 to 450 nucleotides. Taxonomic classification of each ASV was annotated using SILVA reference database (SILVA 138 release) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Quast et al., 2013</xref>). After removing chloroplast and mitochondria, we further removed trace sequences of microbial read singleton, doubleton, and retained only ASVs with more than 10 reads in at least 60% of samples (<italic>n</italic> = 5), for each treatment independently. Sequencing data were rarefied to the lowest number of reads observed in a single sample, that is 23,124 reads.</p>
<p>Statistical analyses were conducted using R version 4.2.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">R Core Team, 2020</xref>). To compare between treatments, significant differences in the soil, plant nutrient and alpha diversity were evaluated with non-parametric Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis test and followed by <italic>post hoc</italic> comparisons conducted in pairwise Wilcoxon tests (<italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C; 0.05). The alpha&#x2013;diversity were represented by Chao1 richness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chao, 1984</xref>) and Shannon index (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Shannon, 1948</xref>). The treatment effect on the overall soil&#x2013;root microbiome composition was assessed using permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) with the &#x201C;adonis2&#x201D; function, and the treatment centroids was calculated using betadisper, both from the community ecology R &#x201C;vegan&#x201D; package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Oksanen et al., 2019</xref>). To visualize the microbial composition differences, unconstrained principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was analyzed using the R package &#x201C;phyloseq&#x201D; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Paul and Susan, 2013</xref>) and plotted with &#x201C;ggplot2&#x201D; function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Wickham, 2016</xref>). We performed a differential abundance DESeq2 analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Love et al., 2014</xref>) to identify the ASVs that were significantly varied in rhizocompartments across treatments by comparing to +FN control. The significant value was reported at adjusted <italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C; 0.01 with abundance in log2 fold change greater than 2. Heatmap of the relative abundance of archaea was generated by R &#x201C;pheatmap&#x201D; package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Kolde, 2019</xref>). The resulting sequencing data are publicly available at NCBI SRA under Bioproject <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="PRJNA818730">PRJNA818730</ext-link>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS6">
<title>2.6. Physicochemical analyses of soil and plant samples</title>
<p>With the same subset of 59 samples, we performed soil and plant chemical analyses. Bulk soils were collected for physicochemical analysis. The soil samples were oven-dried at 70&#x00B0;C, ground and subsequently sieved to pass through a 5 mm sieve. These soil samples were then analyzed for pH, carbon/nitrogen ratio (C/N ratio), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), available phosphorus (AP), exchangeable cations included potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and electrical conductivity (EC). The plant samples were also analyzed separately with TN, TP, K, Mg and Ca. Using an elemental analyser, soil and plant samples were analyzed for total C and N by the dry combustion method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Matejovic, 1993</xref>). Total phosphorus was determined by the vanadate-molybdate method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Tandon et al., 1968</xref>) using a spectrophotometer at 425 nm. Cations including K, Ca, and Mg were extracted using 1 M ammonium acetate (NH<sub>4</sub>OAc) calibrated at pH 7 followed by inductively coupled plasma (Perkin Elmer, USA) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">David, 1960</xref>). The EC of the soil was measured by mixing soil and water at a 1:2 ratio (w/v), and then using a conductivity meter (Mettler Toledo, USA) to determine the EC of the resulting mixture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Heiniger et al., 2003</xref>). All the analyses were completed by Espek Research and Advisory Services (ERAS) laboratory, based on the M.S 678 (soil) method outlined by the Standard and Industrial Research Institute of Malaysia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Malaysian Standard [MS], 1980</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3" sec-type="results">
<title>3. Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>3.1. Seedling growth responses to the presence of fertilizer in normal and pre-sterilized soils</title>
<p>Seedlings grown in normal soils (+FN and &#x2212;FN) appeared to be healthy after 8 months of planting; however, seedlings grown in pre-sterilized soils (+FS and &#x2212;FS) were stunted despite fertilizer being applied to the +FS treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>). Distinctive plant height, the number of leaves and total biomass were observed for each treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2A&#x2013;C</xref>). The control +FN seedlings were significantly taller and heavier, with a mean of 94.5 cm and 590 g, as compared with seedlings grown in normal unfertilized soil (&#x2212;FN) with a mean of 48.9 cm and 148 g (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). Seedlings in both +FN and &#x2212;FN had an average leaf count of 13 and 10, respectively, with lanceolate, bifurcate and pinnae observed and recorded. In general, seedlings that were grown in the &#x2212;FN treatment displayed slower growth compared to the +FN control. On the other hand, seedlings that were grown in the pre-sterilized soils (&#x2212;FS and +FS) had stunted growth with a short plant height, remaining within the range of 18&#x2013;33 cm, and an average total biomass of 20 g. Furthermore, the leaf development of these seedlings stopped at month five after sowing, without any pinnae observed.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Oil palm seedling&#x2019;s phenotype after 8 months planting for <bold>(A)</bold> +FS treatment and <bold>(B)</bold> +FN control. Replication of each treatment is in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1091755-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Fertilizer application in the normal soil significantly affect <bold>(A)</bold> plant height, <bold>(B)</bold> number of leaves, and <bold>(C)</bold> total dry biomass. Besides, sterilization significantly impacted the plants grown in +FS and &#x2013;FS soil compared to +FN soil while no significant difference observed among the sterilized soil seedlings. Asterisk indicate significant differences among treatments using Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis test and adjusted with <italic>post hoc</italic> pairwise Wilcoxon test, where &#x002A;&#x002A; denotes <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01, &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;denotes <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001 and ns denotes non-significant. <italic>n</italic> = 10. +FN, fertilized normal soil; &#x2013;FN, unfertilized normal soil; +FS, fertilized sterilized soil; &#x2013;FS, unfertilized sterilized soil.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1091755-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>3.2. Treatment effect on chemical properties in normal and pre-sterilized soils</title>
<p>In order to ensure autoclaving did not alter the soil chemistry, the pH and nutrient contents of the soil were measured before and after autoclaving. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, the pH, macronutrient and micronutrient content in normal and pre-sterilized soils did not differ significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x003E; 0.05). After 8 months, the effect of fertilizer application on the soil nutrient content was remarkable, where TP, AP, K and Mg showed at least a two-fold increase with the treatment +FN and +FS treatments compared to the unfertilized counterpart soils of &#x2212;FN and &#x2212;FS (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). Moreover, the chemical fertilizer raised the EC slightly to 75 &#x03BC;S/cm in the +FN control, whereas a sharp increase in the EC of 336 &#x03BC;S/cm took place in the +FS treatment.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Effect of autoclaving on the initial soil properties and effect of treatments on soil properties after 8 months of planting.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Parameters</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Normal soil</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Pre-sterilized soil</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5" style="background-color: #dcdcdc;"><bold>Before treatment</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">4.1 &#x00B1; 0.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">3.9 &#x00B1; 0.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Electrical conductivity (&#x03BC;S/cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">76.67 &#x00B1; 24.22<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">70.0 &#x00B1; 12.65<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5" style="background-color: #dcdcdc;"><bold>Soil nutrient concentration</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C/N ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">34.16 &#x00B1; 55.05<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">11.67 &#x00B1; 5.24<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total nitrogen (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">0.19 &#x00B1; 0.08<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">0.22 &#x00B1; 0.04<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total phosphorus (mg/L)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">389.67 &#x00B1; 111.85<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">387 &#x00B1; 48.54<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Available phosphorus (mg/L)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">43.33 &#x00B1; 38.10<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">48 &#x00B1; 17.93<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potassium (cmol/kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">0.49 &#x00B1; 0.20<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">0.41 &#x00B1; 0.17<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Magnesium (cmol/kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">0.78 &#x00B1; 0.31<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">0.74 &#x00B1; 0.25<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Calcium (cmol/kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">2.01 &#x00B1; 0.64<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">1.62 &#x00B1; 0.45<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>Parameters</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>+FN</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>&#x2212;FN</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>+FS</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>&#x2212;FS</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5" style="background-color: #dcdcdc;"><bold>Treatments</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.4 &#x00B1; 0.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.2 &#x00B1; 0.1<sup>a,b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.0 &#x00B1; 0.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.2 &#x00B1; 0.1<sup>a,b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Electrical conductivity (&#x03BC;S/cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75.0 &#x00B1; 5.77<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.5 &#x00B1; 5.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">336 &#x00B1; 70.21<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.5 &#x00B1; 5.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5" style="background-color: #dcdcdc;"><bold>Soil nutrient concentration</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C/N ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.0 &#x00B1; 9.03<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.6 &#x00B1; 10.31<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.8 &#x00B1; 3.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.0 &#x00B1; 5.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total nitrogen (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.25 &#x00B1; 0.06<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24 &#x00B1; 0.08<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26 &#x00B1; 0.02<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.27 &#x00B1; 0.06<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total phosphorus (mg/L)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">930.8 &#x00B1; 409.96<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">328.00 &#x00B1; 36.36<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">845.0 &#x00B1; 438.58<sup>a,b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">290.6 &#x00B1; 51.34<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Available phosphorus (mg/L)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">146.6 &#x00B1; 34.59<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74.6 &#x00B1; 49.39<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">208.4 &#x00B1; 157.47<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75.6 &#x00B1; 65.19<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potassium (cmol/kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.66 &#x00B1; 0.15<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.27 &#x00B1; 0.02<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>d</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.82 &#x00B1; 0.21<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.35 &#x00B1; 0.05<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Magnesium (cmol/kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.91 &#x00B1; 0.47<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.53 &#x00B1; 0.05<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.49 &#x00B1; 0.91<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63 &#x00B1; 0.15<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Calcium (cmol/kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.90 &#x00B1; 0.42<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.49 &#x00B1; 0.34<sup>a,b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.63 &#x00B1; 0.47<sup>a,b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.06 &#x00B1; 0.28<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="t1fna"><p><sup>a,b,c,d</sup>Indicate significant differences according to Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis test (p &#x003C; 0.05). Values are presented as mean value &#x00B1; SDs (n = 5).+FN, fertilized normal soil; &#x2212;FN, unfertilized normal soil; +FS, fertilized sterilized soil; &#x2212;FS, unfertilized sterilized soil.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>3.3. Treatment effect on plant nutrient content in normal and pre-sterilized soils</title>
<p>The effect of the fertilizer treatment on the plant nutrient content was examined after 8 months of planting (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). As a result of the low plant biomass obtained with the pre-sterilized soil treatment, plant nutrient analysis was not possible for the +FS and &#x2212;FS treatments. Therefore, only the +FN and &#x2212;FN treatments were analyzed in this study. The TN content was not significantly different between these two treatments; however, the parameters of TP, K, Mg and Ca content were significantly lower in the &#x2212;FN treatment.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Effect of different treatments on the plant nutrient concentration after 8 months of planting.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;" colspan="5">Treatments</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Parameter</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">+FN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">&#x2212;FN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">+FS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">&#x2212;FS</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5" style="background-color: #dcdcdc;"><bold>Plant nutrients concentration</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total nitrogen (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.53 &#x00B1; 0.14<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.70 &#x00B1; 0.07<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">na</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">na</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total phosphorus (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.36 &#x00B1; 0.10<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.21 &#x00B1; 0.03<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">na</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">na</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potassium (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.88 &#x00B1; 0.65<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.11 &#x00B1; 0.12<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">na</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">na</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Magnesium (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.42 &#x00B1; 0.08<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.31 &#x00B1; 0.02<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">na</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">na</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Calcium (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.59 &#x00B1; 0.10<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43 &#x00B1; 0.05<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">na</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">na</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="t2fna"><p><sup>a,b</sup>Indicate significant differences according to Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis test (p &#x003C; 0.05). Values are presented as mean value &#x00B1; SDs (n = 5). na, data not available.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>3.4. Effect of fertilizer and sterilization on root-soil-microbiota diversity</title>
<sec id="S3.SS4.SSS1">
<title>3.4.1. Alpha and beta diversity</title>
<p>We used the Chao1 index to measure species richness and the Shannon index to measure the diversity of the species in our study. Statistical testing showed no difference was found with the Chao1 richness estimator for the treatments and the +FN control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). Overall, the rhizosphere had the highest richness (Chao1: 2,715&#x2013;3,055) followed by the rhizoplane (2,085&#x2013;3,041) and bulk soil (1,492&#x2013;2,818). The Chao1 index estimates missing taxa in a community, giving more weight to low-abundance taxa, and measures species richness. The Shannon index was used to explore the prokaryotic diversity of the oil palm seedlings, which showed the difference between the control and treatments within three main compartments. In each compartment, the Shannon index for the +FN control was slightly lower than that of the &#x2212;FN treatment, but this difference is not statistically significant except for in the rhizoplane (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>). On the other hand, lower diversity (Shannon) was found in the bulk soil, rhizosphere and rhizoplane of the +FS and &#x2212;FS treatments compared to the +FN control, which indicates that a reduction in microbiota diversity happened across all compartments in pre-sterilized soils. Lower microbial diversity in the soil&#x2013;root compartments reflects an uneven prokaryotic population in the pre-sterilized soil.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Chao1 microbial richness were not affected by soil sterilization nor fertilizer. <bold>(B)</bold> Shannon index indicates the reduction of the microbial diversity in pre-sterilized soil system (+FS, &#x2013;FS). Asterisk (&#x002A;) indicate significant differences among treatments using Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis test and adjusted with <italic>post hoc</italic> pairwise Wilcoxon test, with &#x002A;denotes padj &#x003C; 0.05 and ns denotes non-significant. <italic>n</italic> = 5.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1091755-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Unconstrained principle coordinate analysis based on the Bray&#x2013;Curtis distance metric was performed to test for dissimilarities in the microbial composition among treatments. Using PERMANOVA, it was demonstrated that there was a clear, significant separation between the microbiota of the treated and +FN control samples, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref> (<italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C; 0.001, <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.6358 and Pseudo-F = 7.45). Seedlings from the &#x2212;FS and +FS treatments were clearly isolated and shifted to the right, and this treatment effect was confirmed with a significant result in the PERMANOVA (<italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C; 0.001, <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.4000 and Pseudo-F = 17.20). Furthermore, the statistical test indicated that compartments had distinct microbiota compositions (<italic>p</italic>-values &#x003C; 0.001, <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.1230 and Pseudo-F = 7.93), and the interaction between the treatments and compartments also showed a significant difference (<italic>p</italic>-values &#x003C; 0.001, <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.1128 and Pseudo-F = 2.52). The homogeneity of group dispersions (PERMDISP) was significant (Pseudo-F = 3.6284 and <italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C; 0.05), indicating that the differences observed in the model were at least partially driven by within-group ASV variation.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Overall model of unconstrained PCoA with Bray&#x2013;Curtis distance showed that the soil microbiota were clustered accordingly to treatments (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001, PERMANOVA by adonis2).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1091755-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4.SSS2">
<title>3.4.2. Taxonomic microbial profile changes</title>
<p>The results generated 3,393 prokaryotic ASVs, as well as a total of 2,043,191 high-quality sequence reads with an average of 34,630 reads per sample. These ASVs were assigned to 27 phyla, 53 classes, 109 orders, 152 families and 255 genera. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref> shows that there were five dominant bacterial phyla (Pseudomonadota, Acidobacteriota, Actinomycetota, Chloroflexota, and Bacteroidota) and one archaeal phylum (Crenarchaeota) found in the bulk soil, rhizosphere and rhizoplane compartments, accounting for &#x003E; 80% of the prokaryotic profile. In the bulk soil and rhizosphere, bacterial communities exhibited similar taxonomic compositions, whereas they exhibited slight variations in the rhizoplane. Specifically, Crenarchaeota were present in both the bulk soil and rhizosphere, but only an average of 4% was found in the rhizoplane. The result also showed that the abundance of Bacillota increased twofold when closer to the oil palm root rhizoplane in all treatments.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>Average relative abundance of prokaryotic phyla and orders that are more than 1% abundance. Replication <italic>n</italic> = 5 for each niche and soil treatment. <bold>(A)</bold>&#x2013;phylum level; <bold>(B)</bold>&#x2013;order level.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1091755-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>A breakdown of microbial communities at the order level mainly included Acidobacteriales, Rhizobiales, Xanthomonadales, Ktedonobacteriales, Nitrosotaleales, and Frankiales, accounting for 32&#x2013;52% of the total number of bacterial communities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref>). Simultaneously, the number of unclassified bacteria found in the various compartments in this study was as high as 35%. Like the phyla level, the bulk soil and rhizosphere demonstrated a similar order composition, with the rhizoplane exhibiting slight variations. For example, the rhizoplane compartment showed increases in Enterobacteriales and Burkholderiales (phylum Pseudomonadota), as well as Bacillales (phylum Bacillota), and decreases in Nitrosotaleales (phylum Crenarchaeota) and Bryobacterales (phylum Acidobacteriota) across treatments compared with the bulk soil and rhizosphere.</p>
<p>The treatment effect of pre-sterilized soils (+FS and &#x2212;FS) on the microbial composition was significant in the three different compartments of bulk soil, rhizosphere and rhizoplane. Compared to the +FN control, the relative abundances of Chitinophagales (phylum Bacteroidota), Micropepsales (phylum Pseudomonadota), Burkholderiales (phylum Pseudomonadota) and Alicyclobacillales (phylum Bacillota) were significantly increased, but those of the Ktedonobacteriales (phylum Chloroflexota), Rhizobiales (phylum Pseudomonadota) and Frankiales (phylum Actinomycetota) were significantly decreased in the three compartments.</p>
<p>The chemical fertilizer impacted the soil&#x2013;root microbial communities to a certain extent. The application of fertilizer in both normal and sterilized soil significantly decreased the relative abundances of Nitrosotaleales (phylum Crenarchaeota), Ktedonobateriales (phylum Chloroflexota) and increased those of Xanthomonadales (phylum Pseudomonadota), Burkholderiales (phylum Pseudomonadota), Chitinophagales (phylum Bacteroidota) and Micrarchaeales (phylum Micrarchaeota). Specifically, soil sterilization and NPK fertilizer application had an interactive effect on the relative abundances of Xanthomonadales, Enterobacteriales, Chitinophagales and Burkholderiales in the three compartments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4.SSS3">
<title>3.4.3. Enrichment effect of specific taxa among treatments</title>
<p>Even though bacterial communities in the rhizocompartments originate from the bulk soil, our results indicated that the treatment effect introduced to the soil earlier caused varying degrees of significant differences in the microbial community structure. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>, different treatments significantly enriched or significantly depleted ASVs in comparison with the +FN control. Compared to the microbial communities of the +FN control, those of &#x2212;FN/+FS/&#x2212;FS soil recorded a total of 123/372/677 significantly enriched ASVs, and 372/412/868 significantly depleted ASVs, respectively. The &#x2212;FN treatment showed a smaller difference in bacterial community structure and composition than the +FN control since fertilizer was the only factor involved. Out of the total 123 enriched ASVs, the bulk soil, rhizosphere and rhizoplane accounted for 2, 53 and 68 enriched ASVs in the &#x2212;FN treatment relative to the +FN control (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>). Among the 372 significant depleted ASVs in the &#x2212;FN treatment, the rhizosphere contributed the highest number of depleted ASVs (175), followed by the rhizoplane (166) and bulk soil (31) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 4</xref>). Based on the enrichment&#x2013;depletion plot, the &#x2212;FN treatment showed multiple depletions of ASVs coming from the phyla of Acidobacteriota, Actinomycetota, Bacteroidota, Bacillota, Patescibacteria, and Pseudomonadota; meanwhile, multiple enrichments of ASVs were mainly from unclassified genus in the phyla of Chloroflexota and Pseudomonadota compared to the +FN control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 6A</xref>). In addition, there was a substantial enrichment of archaeal ASVs from Thermoplasmatota and Crenarchaeota in the rhizosphere.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>Enriched and depleted ASVs in relative to +FN control.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Enriched ASV</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;">Treatments</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>Compartments</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>Compared to control</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>&#x2212;FN</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>+FS</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>&#x2212;FS</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bulk soil</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">+FN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">121</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">175</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Rhizosphere</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">+FN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">197</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">333</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Rhizoplane</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">+FN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">169</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">123</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">372</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">677</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 1</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 2</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 3</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>Depleted ASV</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>Treatments</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>Compartments</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>Compared to control</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>&#x2212;FS</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>+FS</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="color:#ffffff;background-color: #7f8080;"><bold>&#x2212;FS</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bulk soil</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">+FN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">283</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">599</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Rhizosphere</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">+FN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">175</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">134</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Rhizoplane</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">+FN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">166</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">135</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">372</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">412</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">868</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 4</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 5</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 6</xref></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Differential abundance analysis was performed with DESeq2 at significant padj &#x003C; 0.01. Values were presented as number of ASVs being enriched and depleted in relative to +FN control. Enriched ASVs was depicted as fold change &#x003E; 0, while depleted ASVs was depicted as fold change &#x003C; 0. Details of the ASVs may refer to the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Tables 1</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">6</xref>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption><p>Differential abundance plots showing the significant log2 fold changes of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) for <bold>(A)</bold> &#x2013;FN, <bold>(B)</bold> +FS, and <bold>(C)</bold> &#x2013;FS relative to control +FN. ASV taxonomic assignments were performed at the genus level whenever possible with respective phyla named behind it. Log2 fold change &#x003C; 0 is depleted ASVs relative to +FN; log2 fold change &#x003E; 0 is enriched ASVs relative to +FN. Assessed using DESeq2 at significant padj &#x003C; 0.01.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1091755-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Compared to the +FN control, pre-sterilized soils +FS and &#x2212;FS resulted in greater differences in the bacterial community structure (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). The application of chemical fertilizer in the &#x2212;FS treatments enhanced the enrichment of ASVs in pre-sterilized bulk soils by 126, in the rhizosphere by 197 and in the rhizoplane by 54 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 2</xref>); however, it depleted the number of ASVs in the pre-sterilized bulk soil by 283, in the rhizosphere by 48 and in the rhizoplane by 81 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 5</xref>). Several unclassified genera from the phyla Acidobacteriota, Chloroflexota, Pseudomonadota, Crenarchaeota and Thermoplasmatota were depleted in the +FS bulk soil; meanwhile, <italic>Chujaibacter</italic>, <italic>Castellaniella</italic>, and <italic>Rhodanobater</italic> from the class Gammaproteobacteria were significantly enriched in the rhizocompartment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 6B</xref>). It was found that the &#x2212;FS treatment exhibited the highest enrichment and depletion of ASVs among treatments, with 176 enriched in the bulk soil, 333 enriched in the rhizosphere and 169 enriched in the rhizoplane (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 3</xref>); meanwhile, 599 were depleted in the bulk soil, 134 were depleted in the rhizosphere, and 135 were depleted in the rhizoplane (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 6</xref>). From the enrichment&#x2013;depletion plot in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 6C</xref>, several unclassified genera from the phyla Acidobacteriota, Crenarchaeota, Chloroflexota and Pseudomonadota were depleted in the &#x2212;FS bulk soil, and a few unclassified genera from the phylum Pseudomonadota were enriched in the rhizocompartment. From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figures 6B, C</xref>, it can be seen that both +FS and &#x2212;FS treatments exhibited similar depletion pattern in the genera in the rhizocompartment, which were <italic>Acidothermus</italic>, <italic>Humibacter</italic>, <italic>Microbacterium</italic>, <italic>Mycobacterium</italic> (phylum Actinomycetota), 1921-2, HSB OF53-F07 (phylum Chloroflexota), <italic>Mucilaginibacter</italic> (phylum Bacteroidota), <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Paenibacillus</italic> (phylum Bacillota) and a few unclassified genera from the phyla Crenararchaeoata, Thermoplasmatota and RCP2-54.</p>
<p>An additional analysis of the archaeal community was performed by plotting a heatmap of the relative abundance of archaea (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 7</xref>). According to the heatmap analysis, the normal soil samples clustered differently compared to the pre-sterilized soil samples. It was found that Crenarchaeota- and Thermoplasmatota-affiliated ASVs were most prevalent in normal soil (&#x2212;FN) and normal fertilized soil (+FN), while Micrarchaeota-affiliated ASVs were most prevalent in pre-sterilized fertilized soil (+FS) and <italic>Candidatus Nitrosotalea</italic> (phylum Crenarchaeota) was most prevalent in pre-sterilized soil (&#x2212;FS). This is in accordance with our analysis of differential abundances.</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption><p>Heatmap of the relative abundances of archaeal ASVs. Vertical columns show treatments found in each compartment and horizontal rows represent ASVs. Rows are clustered in accordance with the relative abundance within that treatment. Z-score with the scale bar shows the gradient of color saturation representing the relative abundance of the organisms.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1091755-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>4. Discussion</title>
<sec id="S4.SS1">
<title>4.1. Effect of soil sterilization and fertilization on microbiota and growth of seedlings</title>
<p>In this study, both +FS- and &#x2212;FS-treated oil palm seedlings without pinnae suffered severely, whereas &#x2212;FN seedlings grew slower than +FN control seedlings. Interestingly, despite similar environmental conditions and the same amount of NPK granules being supplied, palm growth in +FS was markedly different from that in +FN. Our results showed that the autoclave did not significantly change the soil macronutrient content. However, a few studies suggested that heat sterilization increased soil nutrient availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Mahmood et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Oruru et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Li et al., 2019</xref>). As reported in the oil palm soil fertility classification guidelines by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Goh and Rolf (2003)</xref>, the soil macronutrients (NPK concentration) applied in our study were at the optimum level for oil palm growth before and after 8 months of planting. Therefore, the nutrient availability of N, P and K was not the limiting factor causing stunted growth in both +FS and &#x2212;FS treatments. We observed a high accumulation of soil nutrient content such as K, Ca and Mg cations, resulting from the release of compound fertilizer in the +FS treatment relative to the +FN control. This was evidenced by the two-fold increase in the soil EC value in the +FS treatment. A high EC value can affect plant nutrient availability and soil microorganism activity. A previous study showed that osmotic pressure primarily caused by excess K, Mg, Ca, Na and Cl ions, may affect microbial activity or even suppress the growth of certain microbes by drying or lysing their cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Yan et al., 2015</xref>). Although the sterilization process eliminated indigenous microbes from the soil, living microbes re-established themselves in polybags during seedling cultivation in the pre-sterilized soil. However, the microbial diversity in the +FS treatment remained low compared to the +FN control. The acquisition of this new microbial community in pre-sterilized soil was a random natural incidence which may result from irrigation, rain, human activity or insect activity. The results suggest that the stunted palm growth in the +FS treatment could be due to this excessive accumulation of soluble salts in the root zone that hindered the plant roots from withdrawing water from the surrounding soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Sogoni et al., 2021</xref>), thus limiting plant nutrient uptake and affecting the microbial assemblage around the root zone at the end of the planting.</p>
<p>Salts and nutrients released from compound fertilizer were readily absorbed by the plant, as evidenced by the high amount of total dry biomass and optimal soil K, Ca and Mg cations in the +FN control. Although compound fertilizer had a significant impact on plant growth, PCoA and taxonomy plots revealed that the microbiota in the normal soil +FN control and &#x2212;FN treatment differed slightly. This is similar to the results previously reported in woodland soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Karki et al., 2021</xref>), where a low pH and low nutrient status in &#x2212;FN favored the growth of oligotrophs such as Acidobacteriota, whereas fertilizer inputs increased the relative abundance of copiotroph in the +FN control, such as Bacteroidota and Pseudomonadota (formerly known as Proteobacteria), which prefer nutrient-rich conditions for growth. Copiotrophic bacteria are specialized in degrading complex polysaccharides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Spring et al., 2015</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Nakayama et al. (2021)</xref> reported that microbial species of Pseudomonadota and Bacteroidota that shared a similar niche in forest soil could perform net nitrogen nitrification and mineralisation. Similarly, the phosphorus (P) applied via fertilization was quickly fixed into a stable form in the soil, requiring the help of phosphate solubilising bacteria to release the fixed P into a plant usable form. In this study, the +FN control was found to have high abundances of bacteria from the genera <italic>Rhizobium</italic> and <italic>Enterobacter</italic>, which may function as potential P solubilisers. Altogether, this suggests that the fertilizer provision in the +FN control altered the function of indigenous soil microbes toward improved nutrient acquisition or nutrient transformation for better plant growth. However, further validation is needed by checking the function of these native soil microbes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS2">
<title>4.2. Disrupted bulk soil microbiome led to imbalance in rhizospheric colonization</title>
<p>By the end of the study, microorganisms had built up in the pre-sterilized soil. Despite this, PCoA and PERMANOVA tests revealed a newly established soil microbiota in the &#x2212;FS and +FS treatments that were distinct from the original indigenous microbiota found in &#x2212;FN and +FN. Soil sterilization, regardless of the presence of fertilizer, also caused a reduction in microbial diversity across the bulk soil and rhizocompartments. Pre-sterilization may have reduced the number of native soil microbes, which may have influenced the stunted seedling growth observed in the palms under the &#x2212;FS and +FS treatments. Several studies have shown that soil sterilization can eliminate soil-borne pathogens and promote changes in soil microbe communities that lead to improved plant growth and increased beneficial microbes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Mahmood et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Zhang et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Li et al., 2019</xref>). However, in our experiment, the soil used did not contain <italic>Ganoderma boninense</italic>, a fungal pathogen that infects oil palm trees in South East Asia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Jeffery Daim et al., 2015</xref>) (ITS data not shown). The benefits of soil sterilization, specifically the elimination of soil-borne pathogens, were therefore not applicable to this experiment.</p>
<p>A study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Oruru et al. (2018)</xref> on cowpeas found that plants grown in non-sterilized soil performed better than those that were grown in pre-sterilized soil. The findings suggest that early root colonization of mycorrhizae or beneficial microbes from the bulk soil is critical for maintaining plant and soil health. Therefore, we speculate that the pre-sterilized soil in our experiment may have eliminated functional microbes that were necessary for colonizing oil palm seedlings&#x2019; roots during the early stages of growth and development (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 8</xref>). This is evidenced by a high number of depleted bulk soil ASVs in the &#x2212;FS (599) and +FS (283) treatments compared to the &#x2212;FN treatment (31) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). Despite the fact that plant roots can regulate the diversity and abundance of the rhizospheric soil microbiome via root exudate secretion, the depletion of microbial sources in the pre-sterilized bulk soil system can disrupt the microbial network and cause some degree of stress to the plant. As a result, the plant may not be able to maintain its health through rhizosphere recruitment. This finding has also been reported in various crop studies where changes in the composition of the bulk soil microbiome significantly affected the root-associated rhizosphere and rhizoplane microbial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Edwards et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Liu et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Zhang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Han et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption><p>Plausible mechanism of bulk soil microbial community changes that lead to imbalance rhizospheric assemblage and plant fitness. Oil palm seedlings grow as vigorous and healthy when fertilizer is supplemented to the seedlings in normal soil. After soil sterilization, the bulk soil microbial community is altered. The acquisition of this new microbial community in pre-sterilized soil was a random natural incidence which may result from irrigation, rain, human activity, or insect activity.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-14-1091755-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>A significant number of enriched ASVs were found in the soil&#x2013;root compartments of both the &#x2212;FS and +FS treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). Among the enriched ASVs were <italic>Rhodanobacter</italic>, <italic>Roseiarcus</italic>, <italic>Chujaibacter</italic>, <italic>Acidibacter</italic>, <italic>Alicyclobacillus</italic>, <italic>Bryobacter</italic>, and <italic>Occallatibacter</italic>. None of these are pathogenic toward plants. The enrichment of these species may be attributed to the &#x201C;priority effect,&#x201D; which occurs when an early-arriving microbial community competes for space and resources at the plant roots, thereby preventing the establishment of a late-arriving community (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Debray et al., 2022</xref>). Similarly, the &#x2212;FN treatment did not detect any of the plant pathogenic bacteria that cause disease in economically important crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mansfield et al., 2012</xref>), including <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> pathovars, <italic>Ralstonia solanacearum</italic>, <italic>Agrobacterium tumefaciens</italic>, <italic>Xanthomonas oryzae</italic> pv. <italic>oryzae</italic>, and <italic>Erwinia amylovora</italic>.</p>
<p>In addition to the bacterial community, soil archaeal communities were significantly affected in all of the treatments. Crenarchaeota, and Thermoplasmatota were the predominant archaeal phyla in the &#x2212;FN and +FN treatments. These phyla are associated with nitrogen cycling (Nitrosopumilaceae, Nitrososphaeraceae, and Nitrosotaleaceae) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Wan et al., 2021</xref>), and carbon metabolism (Marine Group I) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Swan et al., 2014</xref>). Intriguingly, a noticeable reduction in Nitrosotaleaceae (<italic>Candidatus Nitrosotalea</italic>) and Nitrososphaeraceae was observed in pre-sterilized rhizosphere soil. This may be due to competitive interactions with bacterial nitrogen nitrifiers, particularly since <italic>Nitrospira</italic> abundance was approximately four times higher in the +FS and &#x2212;FS treatments. While some clades in archaeal Crenarchaeota contribute significantly to nitrification and carbon cycling, we cannot conclude that enriched or depleted archaeal-associated ASVs are exclusively related to the health of oil palm seedlings.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S5" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>5. Conclusion</title>
<p>In conclusion, this study profiled changes to the microbial community of oil palm seedlings grown in normal and pre-sterilized soils, and how these soils interacted with compound NPK fertilizer. Collectively, our results show that the NPK compound fertilizer enhanced the growth of plants in normal soil (+FN), and at the same time, enriched the copiotrophic bacteria Pseudomonadota and Bacteroidota to degrade complex polysaccharides. Microbiota diversity was significantly reduced in the +FS and &#x2212;FS treatments compared to the +FN control. Furthermore, soil sterilization and NPK fertilizer application had an interactive effect which negatively affected the growth and microbiome composition of the oil palm seedlings by depleting the ASVs belonging to <italic>Humibacter</italic>, <italic>Microbacterium</italic>, <italic>Mycobacterium</italic>, 1921-2, HSB OF53-F07, <italic>Mucilaginibacter</italic>, <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Paenibacillus</italic>, and several unclassified genera. While oil palm seedlings can recruit microbiota into the root-associated compartment, soil sterilization disrupts the bulk soil microbiota balance by removing beneficial microbes. This loss of ASVs in the rhizocompartment could have a significant effect on plant fitness and soil microbiome stability. A further study is recommended to unveil the function of microbes associated with chemical fertilizer under normal soil conditions and the mechanisms of microbe&#x2013;microbe interactions in influencing soil quality and plant growth.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA818730">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA818730</ext-link>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>LH conceived and designed the research. JD, LH, and JI performed the experiments. JI and CT managed the project and resources. JD performed DNA extraction, analyzed sequencing data, and data visualization. JD, LH, and KG wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="S8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research was funded by the Sime Darby Plantation R&#x0026;D Centre. KG acknowledged QuickWin grant 4J549 and Malaysia Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) 5F241 and 5F245 with the reference code FRGS/1/2019/STG03/UTM/02/1 and FRGS/1/2019/STG04/UTM/02/4, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<ack><p>We would like to thank Sime Darby Plantation Technology Centre (SDPTC), QuickWin and FRGS for the funding, Oil Palm Breeding Unit for providing the seeds, colleagues from SDPTC Tan Bee Aik, Noor Azizah Musa, Muhammad Suffian Sunid, Nuha Hassim for helpful discussions and inputs, Ong Ai Ling for help with the bioinformatics pipeline, and Yeap Wan Chin for critically reading the manuscript.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="S9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1091755/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1091755/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.pdf" id="FS1" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_2.xlsx" id="TS1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<fn fn-type="abbr">
<p>PGPR, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria; ASV, amplicon sequence variant; +FN, fertilized normal soil (+FN); &#x2212; FN, unfertilized normal soil; +FS, fertilized sterilized soil (+FS); &#x2212; FS, unfertilized sterilized soil.</p></fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ajeng</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abdullah</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Malek</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chew</surname> <given-names>K. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>Y.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ling</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The effects of biofertilizers on growth, soil fertility, and nutrients uptake of oil palm (<italic>Elaeis guineensis</italic>) under greenhouse conditions.</article-title> <source><italic>Processes</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>1681</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/pr8121681</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Akitomo</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suzanne</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peter</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ulrike</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosangela</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amanda</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Microbiome and exudates of the root and rhizosphere of <italic>Brachypodium distachyon</italic>, a model for wheat.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<issue>e0164533</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0164533</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27727301</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Allison</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martiny</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>105</volume> (<issue>Suppl. 1</issue>), <fpage>11512</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11519</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0801925105</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18695234</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg-Lyons</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caporaso</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walters</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Examining the global distribution of dominant archaeal populations in soil.</article-title> <source><italic>ISME J.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume> <fpage>908</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>917</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2010.171</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21085198</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Callahan</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McMurdie</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosen</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>A. J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holmes</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Methods</italic></source> <volume>13</volume> <fpage>581</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>583</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.3869</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27214047</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carvalhais</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dennis</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fedoseyenko</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kierul</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Becker</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Linking plant nutritional status to plant-microbe interactions.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>e68555</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0068555</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23874669</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>C&#x00E1;tia</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Diogo</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Susana</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miguel</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Concei&#x00E7;&#x00E3;o</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ana</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Unravelling the diversity of grapevine microbiome.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>e85622</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0085622</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24454903</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chao</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population.</article-title> <source><italic>Scand. J. Stat.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume> <fpage>265</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>270</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Compant</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Samad</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Faist</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sessitsch</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Adv. Res.</italic></source> <volume>19</volume> <fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.004</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31341667</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Corley</surname> <given-names>R. H. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tinker</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source><italic>The oil palm.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>David</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1960</year>). <article-title>The determination of exchangeable sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium in soils by atomic-absorption spectrophotometry.</article-title> <source><italic>Analyst</italic></source> <volume>85</volume> <fpage>495</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>503</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/AN9608500495</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Debray</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herbert</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jaffe</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crits-Christoph</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Power</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koskella</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Priority effects in microbiome assembly.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>20</volume> <fpage>109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>121</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41579-021-00604-w</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34453137</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santos-Medell&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lurie</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Podishetty</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhatnagar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>112</volume> <fpage>E911</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>E920</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1414592112</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25605935</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Formaglio</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Veldkamp</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tjoa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Corre</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Herbicide weed control increases nutrient leaching compared to mechanical weeding in a large-scale oil palm plantation.</article-title> <source><italic>Biogeosciences</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>5243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5262</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-17-5243-2020</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goh</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Fertilizer recommendation systems for oil palm: Estimating the fertilizer rates</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Proceedings of the MOSTA best practices workshops 2004: Agronomy and crop management</italic></source>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Soon</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pau</surname> <given-names>T. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Malaysia</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Malaysian Oil Scientists&#x2019; and Technologists&#x2019; Association</publisher-name>), <fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>268</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goh</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rolf</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Oil palm: Management for large and sustainable yields</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>General oil palm nutrition</italic></source>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Fairhurst</surname> <given-names>T. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rolf</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Peachtree Corners</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>International Plant Nutrition Institute</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goh</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muhammad</surname> <given-names>Z. H. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goh</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayub</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adeline</surname> <given-names>S. Y. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Determining soil microbial communities and their influence on <italic>Ganoderma</italic> disease incidences in oil palm (<italic>Elaeis guineensis</italic>) via high-throughput sequencing.</article-title> <source><italic>Biology</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>424</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/biology9120424</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33260913</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Variation in rhizosphere microbial communities and its association with the symbiotic efficiency of rhizobia in soybean.</article-title> <source><italic>ISME J.</italic></source> <volume>14</volume> <fpage>1915</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1928</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-020-0648-9</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32336748</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heiniger</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McBride</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clay</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Using soil electrical conductivity to improve nutrient management.</article-title> <source><italic>Agron. J.</italic></source> <volume>95</volume> <fpage>508</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>519</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj2003.5080</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jeffery Daim</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ooi</surname> <given-names>T. E. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ithnin</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohd Yusof</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kulaveerasingam</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abdul Majid</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Comparative proteomic analysis of oil palm leaves infected with <italic>Ganoderma boninense</italic> revealed changes in proteins involved in photosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and immunity and defense.</article-title> <source><italic>Electrophoresis</italic></source> <volume>36</volume> <fpage>1699</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1710</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/elps.201400608</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25930948</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Karki</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shange</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ankumah</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McElhenney</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Idehen</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poudel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Comparative assessment of soil health indicators in response to woodland and silvopasture land use systems.</article-title> <source><italic>Agrofor. Syst.</italic></source> <volume>95</volume> <fpage>227</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>240</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10457-020-00577-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kolde</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source><italic>pheatmap: Pretty heatmaps. R package version 1.0.12.</italic></source> Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>DiLegge</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Minas</surname> <given-names>I. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamm</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manter</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vivanco</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Soil sterilization leads to re-colonization of a healthier rhizosphere microbiome.</article-title> <source><italic>Rhizosphere</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>:<issue>100176</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rhisph.2019.100176</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hewezi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lebeis</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pantalone</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grewal</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Staton</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Soil indigenous microbiome and plant genotypes cooperatively modify soybean rhizosphere microbiome assembly.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>19</volume>:<issue>201</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12866-019-1572-x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31477026</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Love</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huber</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anders</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.</article-title> <source><italic>Genome Biol.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume>:<issue>550</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25516281</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mahmood</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mehnaz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fleischmann</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hashmi</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iqbal</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Soil sterilization effects on root growth and formation of rhizosheaths in wheat seedlings.</article-title> <source><italic>Pedobiologia</italic></source> <volume>57</volume> <fpage>123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>130</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pedobi.2013.12.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>Malaysian Standard [MS]</collab> (<year>1980</year>). <source><italic>MS 678&#x2013;Recommended methods for soil chemical analysis: Part I&#x2013;V.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Shah Alam</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Standards and Industrial Research Institute of Malaysia</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mansfield</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Genin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Magori</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Citovsky</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sriariyanum</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ronald</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Plant Pathol.</italic></source> <volume>13</volume> <fpage>614</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>629</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22672649</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matejovic</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Determination of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen in soils by automated elemental analysis (dry combustion method).</article-title> <source><italic>Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.</italic></source> <volume>24</volume> <fpage>2213</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2222</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00103629309368950</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nakayama</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Imamura</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tatsumi</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taniguchi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tateno</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Microbial functions and soil nitrogen mineralisation processes in the soil of a cool temperate forest in northern Japan.</article-title> <source><italic>Biogeochemistry</italic></source> <volume>155</volume> <fpage>359</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>379</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10533-021-00830-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oksanen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blanchet</surname> <given-names>F. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Friendly</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kindt</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Legendre</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McGlinn</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source><italic>vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2.5-6.</italic></source></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oruru</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Njeru</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pasquet</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Runo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Response of a wild-type and modern cowpea cultivars to arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation in sterilized and non-sterilized soil.</article-title> <source><italic>J Plant Nutr.</italic></source> <volume>41</volume> <fpage>90</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01904167.2017.1381728</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Paul</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Susan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>e61217</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0061217</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23630581</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quast</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pruesse</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yilmaz</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gerken</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schweer</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yarza</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>41</volume> <fpage>D590</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>D596</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gks1219</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23193283</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>R Core Team</collab> (<year>2020</year>). <source><italic>R: A language and environment for statistical computing.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Vienna</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rodriguez</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rothballer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chowdhury</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nussbaumer</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gutjahr</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Falter-Braun</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Systems biology of plant-microbiome interactions.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Plant</italic></source> <volume>12</volume> <fpage>804</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>821</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.molp.2019.05.006</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31128275</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Romano</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ventorino</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pepe</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effectiveness of plant beneficial microbes: Overview of the methodological approaches for the assessment of root colonization and persistence.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>6</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.00006</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32076431</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shannon</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1948</year>). <article-title>A mathematical theory of communication.</article-title> <source><italic>Bell Syst. Tech. J.</italic></source> <volume>27</volume> <fpage>379</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>423</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sogoni</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jimoh</surname> <given-names>M. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kambizi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laubscher</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The impact of salt stress on plant growth, mineral composition, and antioxidant activity in <italic>Tetragonia decumbens</italic> mill.: An underutilized edible halophyte in South Africa.</article-title> <source><italic>Horticulturae</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<issue>140</issue>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spring</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scheuner</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x00F6;ker</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klenk</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>A taxonomic framework for emerging groups of ecologically important marine gammaproteobacteria based on the reconstruction of evolutionary relationships using genome-scale data.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume>:<issue>281</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2015.00281</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25914684</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Swan</surname> <given-names>B. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chaffin</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martinez-Garcia</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morrison</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Field</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poulton</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Genomic and metabolic diversity of marine group I thaumarchaeota in the mesopelagic of two subtropical gyres.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>e95380</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0095380</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24743558</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tandon</surname> <given-names>H. L. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cescas</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tyner</surname> <given-names>E. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1968</year>). <article-title>An acid-free vanadate-molybdate reagent for the determination of total phosphorus in soils.</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.</italic></source> <volume>32</volume> <fpage>48</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1968.03615995003200010012x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tiemann</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Donough</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>H&#x00E4;rdter</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Norton</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Chapter four - feeding the palm: A review of oil palm nutrition</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Advances in agronomy</italic></source>, <role>ed.</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Sparks</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Cambridge, MA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>243</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>V&#x00ED;ctor</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Juan</surname> <given-names>P.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Viviane</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vittorio</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mattias</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daniel</surname> <given-names>R.-B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Pathogen-induced activation of disease-suppressive functions in the endophytic root microbiome.</article-title> <source><italic>Science</italic></source> <volume>366</volume> <fpage>606</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>612</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aaw9285</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31672892</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Shift in archaeal community along a soil profile in coastal wheat-maize rotation fields of different reclamation ages.</article-title> <source><italic>Land Degrad. Dev.</italic></source> <volume>32</volume> <fpage>4162</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4173</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ldr.4022</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wickham</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source><italic>ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer-Verlag</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wieland</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neumann</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Backhaus</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Variation of microbial communities in soil, rhizosphere, and rhizoplane in response to crop species, soil type, and crop development.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>67</volume> <fpage>5849</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5854</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Woittiez</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Wijk</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Slingerland</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Noordwijk</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Giller</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Yield gaps in oil palm: A quantitative review of contributing factors.</article-title> <source><italic>Eur. J. Agron.</italic></source> <volume>83</volume> <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2016.11.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Increased organic fertilizer application and reduced chemical fertilizer application affect the soil properties and bacterial communities of grape rhizosphere soil.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<issue>9568</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-66648-9</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32533037</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yaish</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Lawati</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jana</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vishwas Patankar</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Glick</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Impact of soil salinity on the structure of the bacterial endophytic community identified from the roots of caliph medic (<italic>Medicago truncatula</italic>).</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>e0159007</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0159007</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27391592</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marschner</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zuo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Influence of salinity and water content on soil microorganisms.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume> <fpage>316</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>323</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.11.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.-X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title><italic>NRT1.1B</italic> is associated with root microbiota composition and nitrogen use in field-grown rice.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>37</volume> <fpage>676</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>684</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41587-019-0104-4</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31036930</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effects of Soil Sterilization on growth of <italic>Angelica sinensis</italic> plant and soil microbial populations in a continuous mono-cropping soil.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Agric. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>18</volume> <fpage>458</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>463</lpage>.</citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>