<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1065823</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Relationship between gut microbiota and Chinook salmon (<italic>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</italic>) health and growth performance in freshwater recirculating aquaculture systems</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Ruixiang</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/813545/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Symonds</surname>
<given-names>Jane E.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/530240/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname>
<given-names>Seumas P.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/676165/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Steiner</surname>
<given-names>Konstanze</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/897655/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Carter</surname>
<given-names>Chris G.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bowman</surname>
<given-names>John P.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff4" ref-type="aff"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/247403/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nowak</surname>
<given-names>Barbara F.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="c002" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/318422/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania</institution>, <addr-line>Newnham, TAS</addr-line>, <country>Australia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Cawthron Institute</institution>, <addr-line>Nelson</addr-line>, <country>New Zealand</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania</institution>, <addr-line>Hobart, TAS</addr-line>, <country>Australia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Centre for Food Safety and Innovation, Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture</institution>, <addr-line>Hobart, TAS</addr-line>, <country>Australia</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn id="fn0001" fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Alexander Eiler, University of Oslo, Norway</p></fn>
<fn id="fn0002" fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Jessica M. Rieder, University of Bern, Switzerland; David P&#x00E9;rez-Pascual, Institut Pasteur, France</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Ruixiang Zhao, &#x02709; <email>ruixiang.zhao@utas.edu.au</email></corresp>
<corresp id="c002">Barbara F. Nowak, &#x02709; <email>b.nowak@utas.edu.au</email></corresp>
<fn id="fn0003" fn-type="other"><p>This article was submitted to Aquatic Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>07</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1065823</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>10</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>06</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2023 Zhao, Symonds, Walker, Steiner, Carter, Bowman and Nowak.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zhao, Symonds, Walker, Steiner, Carter, Bowman and Nowak</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Gut microbiota play important roles in fish health and growth performance and the microbiome in fish has been shown to be a biomarker for stress. In this study, we surveyed the change of Chinook salmon (<italic>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</italic>) gut and water microbiota in freshwater recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) for 7 months and evaluated how gut microbial communities were influenced by fish health and growth performance. The gut microbial diversity significantly increased in parallel with the growth of the fish. The dominant gut microbiota shifted from a predominance of <italic>Firmicutes</italic> to <italic>Proteobacteria,</italic> while <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> constantly dominated the water microbiota. <italic>Photobacterium</italic> sp. was persistently the major gut microbial community member during the whole experiment and was identified as the core gut microbiota for freshwater farmed Chinook salmon. No significant variation in gut microbial diversity and composition was observed among fish with different growth performance. At the end of the trial, 36 out of 78 fish had fluid in their swim bladders. These fish had gut microbiomes containing elevated proportions of <italic>Enterococcus, Stenotrophomonas</italic>, <italic>Aeromonas,</italic> and <italic>Raoultella</italic>. Our study supports the growing body of knowledge about the beneficial microbiota associated with modern salmon aquaculture systems and provides additional information on possible links between dysbiosis and gut microbiota for Chinook salmon.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Chinook salmon</kwd>
<kwd>gut microbiota</kwd>
<kwd>swim bladder</kwd>
<kwd>recirculating aquaculture system</kwd>
<kwd>growth performance</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn1">CAWX1606</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn1">New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE)</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn2">University of Tasmania, Australia</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn3">Cawthron Institute, New Zealand</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="8"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="2"/>
<ref-count count="97"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="12629"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1.</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The gut microbial communities have been studied in over 145 species of fish (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref76">Sullam et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Llewellyn et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Perry et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Nikouli et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Luna et al., 2022</xref>) suggesting their important role in fish, including synthesizing digestive enzymes, producing vitamins, and enhancing the maturation of the intestine-related immune system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref91">Yukgehnaish et al., 2020</xref>). In marine fish, gut microbial communities are primarily dominated by four bacterial phyla, <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>, <italic>Firmicutes</italic>, <italic>Fusobacteria</italic>, and <italic>Actinobacteria</italic>, while at the species and strain level, there is significant diversity, resulting from fish species differences and inter-individual variability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref01">Egerton et al., 2018</xref>). Aquaculture now supplies over 45% of fish-based food products worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Longo et al., 2019</xref>) and the interest in the gut microbiota of salmonids is accelerating due to their significant economic importance in aquaculture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Minich et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Nguyen et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref95">Zhao et al., 2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref96">2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Steiner et al., 2021</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">2022</xref>). The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is also an important site for infections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref88">Xiong et al., 2019</xref>) and in that respect the GI microbiome is a potential biomarker for stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Perry et al., 2020</xref>). Therefore, a better understanding of the host-microbiota interactions is essential to maintain fish health in the long term (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Gauthier et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>An imbalance or disorder in the types and numbers of gut microbiota taxa present in the GI tract may lead to gut dysbiosis, which can impact host health. Gut dysbiosis can be categorized into three types: a loss of beneficial microorganisms, an expansion of pathobionts or potentially problematic microorganisms, or a reduction in microbial diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Petersen and Round, 2014</xref>). A loss of beneficial microorganisms and a reduction in microbial diversity can inhibit nutrient absorption and impact growth performance, thus reducing aquaculture productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref79">Vargas-Albores et al., 2021</xref>). For example, <italic>Pseudomonas plecoglossicida</italic> infection causes an irreversible dysbiosis in the gut microbiota of large yellow croaker (<italic>Larimichthys crocea</italic>), resulting in a disease-like gut bacterial community and increasing mortality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Li C. et al., 2020</xref>). The overgrowth of gut opportunistic bacteria (<italic>Vibrio</italic>, <italic>Aeromonas</italic>, and <italic>Shewanella</italic>) and the depression of beneficial bacteria (<italic>Cetobacterium</italic>) in diseased Crucian Carp (<italic>Carassius auratus</italic>) are found to be associated with the occurrence of the &#x201C;red-operculum&#x201D; disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Li et al., 2017</xref>). Additionally, haemorrhagic septicaemia in farmed Chinese sturgeon (<italic>Acipenser sinensis</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Di et al., 2018</xref>) and yersiniosis in farmed rainbow trout <italic>(Oncorhynchus mykiss)</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Mes&#x00ED;as et al., 2019</xref>) are all suggested to be correlated with dysbiosis. However, it is still unclear if changes in the gut microbiota are a cause or result of these diseases. Gut microbiota composition data has been used to identify biomarker taxa potentially enabling diagnosis of changes in the health status of Atlantic salmon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Bozzi et al., 2021</xref>). They found the dominance of an unclassified <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> genus in the gut of healthy farmed Atlantic salmon might be correlated with defending against pathogens and promoting growth performance and suggested to use this distinct mollicute taxon as a biomarker to monitor the health status of farmed salmonids in real-time <italic>via</italic> non-invasive sampling procedures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Bozzi et al., 2021</xref>). The presence of <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> sp. has also been reported in healthy farmed Chinook salmon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref95">Zhao et al., 2020</xref>). Whether aquaculture farm managers can obtain useful information by monitoring the relative abundance of the <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> sp. is actually feasible let alone feasible requires much further investigation. Fundamentally there is the possibility other bacterial taxa can supplant this taxon and have a similar role (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Klakegg et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Microbial relationships have been studied in various models that operate at different scales, such as linear correlation models between different taxa through co-occurrence networks of the major microbial community members (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Poudel et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Ganz et al., 2017</xref>). Based on co-occurrence networks, alignment-based (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Faisal et al., 2014</xref>) and alignment-free (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref83">Wang J. et al., 2018</xref>) methods have been developed to demonstrate the relationship alteration between different conditions, such as health and disease. However, these strategies are unable to quantify the alterations of relationships between key microbes, especially <italic>in vivo</italic>. Targeting the exact species that contribute to the community variation, along with the quantification of certain microbial relationships, could enhance the prediction of dysbiosis and the diagnosis of diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Liu Z. et al., 2021</xref>). Such information could help fish farmers trying to pinpoint issues associated with poor fish performance in farms especially where there is limited evidence of infections. Furthermore, investigations into diets where the objective is to maximize beneficial bacterial populations may also have clearer and impactful outcomes.</p>
<p>The development of the 16S rRNA gene-based approach with next-generation sequencing technology has contributed to culture-independent assessments of the composition and diversity of gut microbiota (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Ghanbari et al., 2015</xref>). Although the attention to the gut microbiota of aquatic animals has increased, the understanding of the gut microbiota of farmed Chinook salmon has lagged behind that of farmed Atlantic salmon. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Ciric et al. (2019)</xref> surveyed the mid-gut microbiome of farmed Chinook salmon in New Zealand and showed that about 80% of them experiencing thermal stress in summer had gut microbiota dominated by <italic>Vibrio</italic> or other <italic>Vibrionaceae</italic> taxa. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref95">Zhao et al. (2020)</xref> found that microbial richness and diversity were higher in freshwater farmed Chinook salmon than in those farmed in marine farms, and fish age showed significant effects on the composition of gut microbiota in both freshwater and saltwater habitats compared to water temperature and farming location. For salmon raised in saltwater recirculation aquaculture systems (RAS), the gut microbial communities partially overlapped with the ambient environment, including water and feed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Steiner et al., 2021</xref>). More recently, the distinct domination of <italic>Photobacterium</italic> spp. was observed in the hindgut of freshwater farmed Chinook salmon with high fecal scores (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref96">Zhao et al., 2021</xref>). However, this study mainly assessed microbial composition and diversity. Investigating the alteration in microbial relationships can be used to evaluate how bacterial characteristics change in response to specific health outcomes. Currently, the association between gut microbiota and Chinook salmon health as well as growth performance remains poorly defined.</p>
<p>We evaluated the association between gut microbiota and fish health as well as the growth performance of farmed Chinook salmon, raised in freshwater recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS). To track the gut microbiota changes, we surveyed the microbial communities in Chinook salmon digesta in parallel to measures of fish growth and health for 7 months after transfer from the hatchery. We investigated the salmon gut microbial composition and diversity to understand the potential for gut dysbiosis and its association with fish growth performance. Further, we investigated the relationship alterations in abundant microbiota between fish at different sampling time points, growth performance phenotypes and health statuses. The main aim was to provide a more comprehensive picture of the gut microbiota of freshwater Chinook salmon under relatively stable culture conditions and discover critical microbiota associated with fish health and growth performance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2.</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1.</label>
<title>Experimental design and fish management</title>
<p>A total of 3,159 all-female juvenile Chinook salmon provided by Mount Cook Alpine Salmon (MCAS) were reared in freshwater RAS at the Finfish Research Centre (FRC) at the Cawthron Aquaculture Park (CAP), Glenduan, New Zealand. The schematic design and detailed information on the experimental system can be found in our previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref96">Zhao et al., 2021</xref>). Two RAS set-ups comprising 9 tanks designed by Fresh by Design (Moss Vale, New South Wales, Australia) were involved in the present project and each RAS was supplied with fresh water from the local town water supply that had been carbon filtered to remove any residual chlorine. All experimental fish were from a May 2018 stock hatched at the Clearwater Hatchery (Mount Cook Alpine Salmon, New Zealand). In August 2018, they were transferred to the FRC. The experimental fish in the FRC were kept in holding tanks at 15&#x00B0;C for a period of 21 to 24&#x2009;days before the trial started and were then evenly distributed into trial tanks (8,000&#x2009;l) recirculated with UV-treated freshwater at 17&#x00B0;C. The maximum density was kept below 25&#x2009;kg/m<sup>3</sup> throughout the experimental period. The schematic of the trial design and timeline are shown in <xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>. The fish were hand-fed daily with 4&#x2009;mm then 6&#x2009;mm freshwater diets manufactured specifically for the trial by Ridley Corporation Ltd. (Melbourne, Australia) (crude protein 42.2%, total fat 23.0%, ash 10.0%, moisture 6.2%, carbohydrate 18.6% and energy 22.28&#x2009;kJ/g).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The schematic of the experiment design and timeline. FRC: Finfish Research Centre. Fish from the holding tanks and 17&#x00B0;C trial tanks (green) were included in this study and fish from the 13&#x00B0;C trial tanks (gray) were not used in this study. Six fish per tank were collected and assessed in September 2018 and December 2018. Ten fish per tank were collected and assessed in March 2019. Salmon with empty guts determined by X-radiography were removed and only visually healthy salmon were kept for further assessments based on growth, condition and absence of deformity or external damage (54 fish from September 2018, 30 fish from December 2018, and 78 fish from March 2019). Three water samples of 500&#x2009;ml each from the same region of each tank were collected along with the digesta samples at three sampling-time points (September 2018, December 2018, and March 2019).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1065823-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2.</label>
<title>Fish handling and health assessments</title>
<p>Prior to transfer to the FRC, each fish was tagged with a unique passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag (HID Global, EM4305 684,230, 12&#x2009;mm glass tags) at Clearwater Hatchery (MCAS). The PIT tag number was scanned into the computer using a microchip tag reader (Avid-Power TracKer VI, Avid Identification Systems, Inc. CA, United States) and used in all data collections to identify the fish and to link data collections together. During the experiment, six fish per tank were collected and assessed at two sampling time points: September 2018 and December 2018. Ten fish per tank were collected and assessed in March 2019. All sampled fish were X-rayed using an Atomscope HFX90V EX9025V portable X-ray Unit (DLC Australia Pty Ltd., Melbourne, Australia) and images were obtained using a Canon CXDI 410C Wireless Cesium Amorphous Silicon digital radiographic receptor (DLC Australia Pty Ltd., Melbourne, Australia). After removing the salmon with empty guts (X-rayed imaging), only visually healthy salmon were kept for further analysis based on growth, condition and absence of deformity or external damage (final sample size: 54 fish from September 2018, 30 fish from December 2018, and 78 fish from March 2019). Before each assessment, fish were anesthetized with 15&#x2009;ppm AQUI-S for handling (AQUI-S&#x00AE; Aquatic Anesthetic, New Zealand). All fish performance profiles (weight, fork length, and condition factor) were recorded at the time of handling (<xref rid="tab1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>) and health profiles (histology, swim bladder status, blood plasma biochemistry and hematology) of 37 fish were recorded at the last assessment (March 2019) (<xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Growth performance profiles of experimental fish at three sampling timepoints (assessments).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">September 2018</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">December 2018</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">March 2019</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Number of fish (n)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">54</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Weight (g)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">165.48&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;32.21</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">461.70&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;62.05</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">780.01&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;146.98&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fork length (mm)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">222.80&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;11.67</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">296.53&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;11.48</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">349.71&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;19.27&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SGR (w/day%)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.52&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.19</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.33&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.23</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.54&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.11&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fulton&#x2019;s <italic>CF</italic> (K)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.48&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.11</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.76&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.11</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.81&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.15&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot><p>SGR, specific growth rate; CF, condition factor.</p> <p>Values are represented means&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;SEM (standard error of the mean). All results of three sampling time-point groups (September 2018, December 2018 and March 2019) are statistically significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05), indicated with an asterisk.</p></table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Growth performance, plasma biochemistry, and hematology profiles of fish with different swim bladder statuses, sampled in March 2019.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">Abnormal swim bladders</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Normal swim bladders</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Number of fish (n)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fish weight (g)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">773.94&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;125.41</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">775.50&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;174.22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fork length (mm)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">350.35&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;18.35</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">351.90&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;22.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fulton&#x2019;s <italic>CF</italic> (K)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.79&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.12</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.75&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SGR (w/day%)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.41&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.42&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">FS</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.18&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.29</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.60&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Mucous density (n/mm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">134.65&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;33.68</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">170.78&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;57.76</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Total protein (g/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">36.06&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;5.37</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">38.70&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;3.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Albumin (g/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">
<bold>15.88&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.35</bold>
</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">
<bold>17.30&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.55</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Globulin (g/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">20.24&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;3.44</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">21.50&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.91</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Alkaline Phosphatase (IU/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">
<bold>15.94&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;5.26</bold>
</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">
<bold>22.55&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;4.16</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Aspartate aminotransferase (IU/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">
<bold>222.71&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;69.69</bold>
</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">
<bold>325.55&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;110.98</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Chloride (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">140.35&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;9.37</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">139.40&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;4.94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cholesterol (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">
<bold>6.28&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.44</bold>
</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">
<bold>9.08&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.31</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Creatine phosphokinase (IU/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2527.53&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;3439.96</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2513.95&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;3930.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Glutamate dehydrogenase (IU/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">
<bold>73.15&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;26.3</bold>
</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">
<bold>133.15&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;40.73</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Potassium (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.65&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.55</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.93&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.77</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Urea (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">
<bold>0.84&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.25</bold>
</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">
<bold>1.20&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.58</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Phosphate (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.29&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.38</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.43&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Triglycerides (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.25&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.94</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.32&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.68</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Glucose (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.10&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.86</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.66&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.97</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cortisol (nmol/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">178.78&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;173.92</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">213.25&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;116.59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hemoglobin (g/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">100.00&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;9.36</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">97.05&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;11.86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">White blood cell count (10<sup>9</sup>/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">19.92&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;8.38</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">19.69&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;6.17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Lymphocytes Absolute (10<sup>9</sup>/L)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">19.38&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;8.33</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">19.26&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;6.18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hematocrit (%)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">36.76&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.26</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">38.23&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;3.01</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Abnormal swim bladders, fish with fluid in their swim bladders; Normal swim bladders, fish with no fluid in their swim bladders; SGR, specific growth rate; FS, fecal score. Values are represented means&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;SEM (standard error of the mean). Statistically significant results (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) are shown in bold.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Fish health was determined based on blood biochemistry and hematology variables, GI tract mucous cell density, and fluid accumulation in their swim bladders. To evaluate the correlation with blood biochemistry and hematology, a total of 19 blood variables (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>) were measured based on the method outlined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Casanovas et al. (2021)</xref>. Blood samples were collected (without anti-coagulant) from the caudal vein immediately following euthanasia and plasma samples were obtained from fresh peripheral blood samples after centrifugation (12,045&#x2009;r/min for 8&#x2009;min). Plasma samples (500&#x2009;&#x03BC;l) were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and sent frozen on dry ice to an International Accreditation New Zealand (IANZ<xref rid="fn0004" ref-type="fn"><sup>1</sup></xref>) accredited commercial laboratory (Gribbles Veterinary, Christchurch, New Zealand) for a targeted and quantitative analysis of all biochemistry and hematology analyzes as per International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC<xref rid="fn0005" ref-type="fn"><sup>2</sup></xref>) recommendations.</p>
<p>To evaluate the association with mucous cell density, hindgut samples were processed using standard protocols for histology and embedded in paraffin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Minich et al., 2020</xref>). Sections of 4&#x2009;&#x03BC;m were cut and one section was used for each fish. The sections were stained with Alcian Blue/ Periodic Acid &#x2013; Schiff (AB/PAS) at pH 2.5 to quantify mucous cells in the section under a bright field light microscope (Leica DM1000, Hamburg, Germany). Intestinal mucous cells of Chinook salmon collected from March 2019 were counted using established methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Pittman et al., 2011</xref>), and the results were normalized per surface area. After removing poor-quality histology samples, 39 out of 78 fish at the final assessment were divided into 2 clusters (high mucous density fish (HMDF) with a mean density of 220.44&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;34.70 /mm<sup>2</sup> and low mucous density fish (LMDF) with a mean density of 126.75&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;25.65 /mm<sup>2</sup>) by using k-mean cluster analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">MacQueen, 1967</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Table 2</xref>).</p>
<p>To evaluate the correlation with digestive status, the fecal score (FS) system designed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref93">Zarkasi et al. (2016)</xref> for farmed Tasmanian Atlantic salmon was applied to monitor feces (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref96">Zhao et al., 2021</xref>). This ordered categorical score system (1 to 5, with 5 representing an absence of fecal matter) was used for digestive status comparison based on visual properties. To investigate the association between the gut microbiota and fecal scores, we categorized the fish from March 2019 into four groups (FS1, FS2, FS3, and FS4) based on their FS values.</p>
<p>A swim bladder assessment was conducted at the last sampling event. Fish were carefully dissected and viscera removed to reveal the intact inflated swim bladder. The presence or absence of fluid in the swim bladder was then recorded for each fish.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.3.</label>
<title>Fish growth performance phenotype identification</title>
<p>To evaluate the association between growth performance and the gut microbiota, we sampled 78 fish at the final assessment and clustered them based on condition factor (K) and specific growth rate (SGR) by using k-mean cluster analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">MacQueen, 1967</xref>). The K of individual fish was calculated based on the method referred to by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Fulton (1911)</xref> using the following equation:</p>
<disp-formula id="E1"><mml:math id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p><italic>W</italic> =&#x2009;wet weight (g)</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p><italic>L</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;fork length (cm)</p>
</list-item>
</list>
<p>The SGR (w/day%) of individual fish was calculated based on the method referred to by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Koskela et al. (1997)</xref> using the following equation:</p>
<disp-formula id="E2"><mml:math id="M2"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lnWf</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lnWi</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>lnWf&#x2009;=&#x2009;the natural logarithm of the final weight</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>lnWi&#x2009;=&#x2009;the natural logarithm of the initial weight</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p><italic>t</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;time (days) between lnWf and lnWi</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.4.</label>
<title>Sample collection for microbiota analysis</title>
<p>Digesta samples (less than 0.6&#x2009;ml) were collected directly from the hindgut of Chinook salmon at three sampling points (September 2018, December 2018, and March 2019). Fish were individually captured from tanks <italic>via</italic> scoop net, euthanised <italic>via</italic> anesthetic overdose with 80&#x2009;ppm AQUI-S for 7&#x2009;min (AQUI-S&#x00AE; Aquatic Anesthetic, New Zealand). Digesta samples were placed into cryogenic screw cap tubes and immediately snapped frozen with liquid nitrogen. Tubes were transferred on dry ice and stored in the &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C freezer at the Cawthron laboratory (Nelson, New Zealand). Between each fish sampling, the surgical tools were cleaned and sterilized with bleach and then 70% (v/v) ethanol to minimize contamination. Three water samples of 500&#x2009;ml each from the same region of each tank were collected along with the digesta samples. Samples were subsequently filtered using 0.22&#x2009;&#x03BC;M membrane filters (mixtures of cellulose acetate and cellulose nitrate) (MerckMillipore, United States). Filters were frozen and stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C until the bacterial DNA was extracted.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.5.</label>
<title>DNA extraction and 16S rRNA sequencing</title>
<p>Bacterial DNA was extracted directly from digesta and filter samples using the NucleoSpin Soil kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany) based on the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. A NanoPhotometer&#x00AE; NP80 spectrophotometer (Implen, Munich, Germany) was used to measure the DNA concentration. Extracted DNA was stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C until future analysis.</p>
<p>To evaluate the bacterial DNA, 2&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;300&#x2009;bp pair-ended amplicon sequencing of the V1-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene was performed using the MiSeq Illumina platform by the Ramaciotti Centre for Genomics (RCG, Kensington, NSW, Australia). The bacterial universal primers 27F (5&#x2032; AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG 3&#x2032;) and 519R (5&#x2019; GWA TTA CCG CGG CKG CTG 3&#x2032;) included a 12-base Golay barcode as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Caporaso et al. (2012)</xref> were used for conducting the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Each step of the molecular analyzes (DNA extraction, PCR, and sequencing library preparation) was performed with sequential workflows to ensure no cross-contamination. The PCR thermocycling conditions were 95&#x00B0;C for 10&#x2009;min, followed by 40&#x2009;cycles of 95&#x00B0;C for 30&#x2009;s, 48&#x00B0;C for 30&#x2009;s, 72&#x00B0;C for 1&#x2009;min, and a final extension of 72&#x00B0;C for 7&#x2009;min. The sequencing data were then trimmed by removing the primer, bar code, and adapter regions using internally developed algorithms by RCG. Pair-ends sequences were joined with the default settings using FASTQ-join (version 1.1.2) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Aronesty, 2011</xref>) following trimming, sequences merging, and chimera filtering. Sequences were sorted by individuals and filtered by removing the low-quality reads.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.6.</label>
<title>Water and gut microbiota community profiling</title>
<p>Taxonomic analyzes of sequence reads were further processed in the Seed 2 pipeline (Seed v.2.1) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref80">V&#x011B;trovsk&#x00FD; et al., 2018</xref>). Sequence alignment, denoising, chimera check, and clustering were carried out by using a set of Seed 2 external programs (USEARCH/ v 7.0.1090, MAFFT v 7.215, MOTHUR v1.34.4). The sequences for each cluster were then sorted by length and clustered with a 3% divergence cut-off to define operational taxonomic units (OTU) from centroids. Clusters with fewer than two reads and reads with lengths less than 100&#x2009;bp were excluded, followed by further clustering at a 3% divergence level using USEARCH to optimize the final consensus sequences accurately and define OTUs. OTUs were classified against the Silva non-redundant 16S rRNA database (SILVA SSU 138, 16 December 2019).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.7.</label>
<title>Microbial diversity and composition analyzes</title>
<p>OTU reads were centered log-ratio transformed, and a resemblance matrix was created by calculating the Euclidean distance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Gloor and Reid, 2016</xref>). Only relatively high abundance OTUs of which reads make up at least 0.01% in the total dataset were included in diversity analyzes. The microbial diversity was analyzed using PRIMER version 7 with PERMANOVA+ (Primer-E, Ivybridge, United Kingdom). Microbial communities were categorized based on different factors such as sample type, sampling time points, intestinal mucous cell density, swim bladder status, growth performance phenotype, health status and fecal score. Alpha diversity was determined from tabulated sequence data including observed OTU counts and the Shannon diversity index. The analysis of beta diversity was visualized with Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Gower, 1966</xref>), Non-metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling (nMDS) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Kruskal, 1964</xref>), and Canonical Analysis of Principal Coordinates (CAP) plots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Anderson and Willis, 2003</xref>). CAP and PERMANOVA analyzes were performed using default settings with 999 permutations. The correlations between microbial diversity and FCR, K, and mucous cell density were evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Benesty et al., 2009</xref>). The significance of alpha diversity was calculated using a Welch&#x2019;s t-test and a one-way ANOVA test (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref90">Yuen, 1974</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Howell, 2012</xref>). The multiple pair-wise comparisons of beta diversity were further analyzed using permutation multivariate analysis (PERMANOVA) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Anderson, 2014</xref>) in PRIMER v7. A differential abundance analysis was conducted to measure the relative abundance variations in abundant OTUs (&#x003E; 0.01% total reads) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Gloor et al., 2017</xref>). The Welch&#x2019;s t-test and the Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis H test were used for measuring the significance of parametric (i.e., fish weight and fork length) and non-parametric data (i.e., microbial richness, diversity, and fecal score) respectively. The significance values were considered significantly different when <italic>p&#x2009;&#x003C;</italic> 0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.8.</label>
<title>Profile monitoring for microbial relationship alteration analysis</title>
<p>The PM2RA framework designed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Liu Z. et al. (2021)</xref> for the human microbiome was applied for evaluating the dysbiosis of the Chinook salmon gut microbiome.<xref rid="fn0006" ref-type="fn"><sup>3</sup></xref> PM2RA analysis projects the abundance data of two or more taxa under two conditions into the same space <italic>via</italic> Hoteling&#x2019;s <italic>T</italic><sup>2</sup> statistics and compares the difference in the distribution of T<sup>2</sup> statistics to represent the relationship alternation (RA) between two conditions. A scoring scheme called profile monitoring (PM) score is specifically designed to quantify RA involving two or more taxa (sub-community) under different conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Liu Z. et al., 2021</xref>). The more the sub-community alters, the larger the PM score is. In our study, digesta samples that showed significant changes in microbial diversity and composition were subsampled for PM2RA analysis. Furthermore, only abundant OTUs comprising sequences making up &#x003E;0.01% of the total sequences and detected in higher than 10% of datasets were filtered for the PM2RA analysis. For output visualization, a RA network in which edges denote the corresponding PM score was built by using an open-source software platform Cytoscape.<xref rid="fn0007" ref-type="fn"><sup>4</sup></xref></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11" sec-type="results">
<label>3.</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>3.1.</label>
<title>Fish health and growth performance</title>
<p>Overall, all experimental salmon sampled for this study were presumed to be healthy based on their external appearance. However, a subgroup (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;36 out of 78 fish) was found fluid in their swim bladder at the final sampling time point (March 2019). Detailed growth performance, plasma biochemistry and hematology profiles are shown in <xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref> for individuals with and without fluid in their swim bladders. After removing poor-quality measurements with missing values, 37 fish with blood biochemistry and hematology profiles were assigned to two clusters by using <italic>k</italic>-mean cluster analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">MacQueen, 1967</xref>). One group of 27 fish with a mean of 87% blood variables within the normal ranges established by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Casanovas et al. (2021)</xref> for freshwater salmon were clustered into group A, while another group of 10 fish with a mean of 76% blood variables in the normal ranges were clustered into group B (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>). For relative growth performance, the fish were assigned to two growth performance phenotypes, including 36 high-performing fish (HPF) with relatively higher SGR and K, and 42 low-performing fish (LPF) with relatively lower SGR and K (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Table 2</xref>). Furthermore, based on intestinal mucous cell density, 11 fish were identified as having high mucosal densities (with a mean density of 220.44&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;34.70 /mm<sup>2</sup>) while 28 fish were identified as having low densities (with a mean density of 126.75&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;25.65 /mm<sup>2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Table 2</xref>). Fish were categorized into two groups based on plasma biochemistry and hematological data, with group A having most blood variables close to reference levels (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;27) as defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Casanovas et al. (2021)</xref>, while 10 fish were categorized as having a higher proportion of the measures outside reference value ranges (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>). Most fish produced feces with low fecal scores [FS1 (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;27) and FS2 (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;40)] while seven fish had a FS of 3 and only two fish produced pseudofeces (FS 4). Both pseudofeces-producing fish had fluid in their swim bladders.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>3.2.</label>
<title>Microbiome characterization</title>
<p>For the gut microbiota data analysis, a total of 6,215,963 effective reads (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">Supplementary Table 3</xref>) were obtained from digesta samples after filtering singletons and reads assigned to chloroplasts, mitochondria, unassigned bacteria, eukaryotes, and archaea. With the same quality filtration process, we obtained 564,978 effective reads (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">Supplementary Table 4</xref>) for the water microbiota. This contributed to an average of 38,370 reads for digesta samples and 8,188 reads for water samples. Overall, 1876 OTUs from the digesta and 2,325 OTUs from the water were clustered using a similarity threshold of 97%. The raw sequencing data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">Supplementary Table 5</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>3.3.</label>
<title>Chinook salmon gut microbiota at different time points</title>
<p>Digesta samples were collected from the same cohort of fish at multiple time points, which allowed us to determine how the gut bacterial microbiome changed over time. The fish with fluid in their swim bladders were not included in the gut microbiota analysis. At the phylum level (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2A</xref>), <italic>Firmicutes</italic> and <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> contributed the most reads across all sampling time points (88.43%). <italic>Firmicutes</italic> was predominant in September 2018 (61.66%) and December 2018 (53.80%), while <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> was more dominant in March 2019 (60.25%). Other abundant phyla (&#x2265; 1%) were <italic>Actinobacteria</italic>, <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic>, <italic>Fusobacteria,</italic> and <italic>Spirochaetes</italic>. At the order level (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2B</xref>), the gut microbiota was dominated by <italic>Bacillales</italic> and <italic>Clostridiales</italic> at early stages (56.08% in September 2018 and 47.48% in December 2018), while the relative abundance of <italic>Vibrionales</italic> (31.83%), <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> (12.32%) and <italic>Enterobacteriales</italic> (9.66%) were significantly increased by the end of sampling (March 2019). Taken together, <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> was the most diverse phylum mainly dominated by <italic>Vibrionales</italic> (40.25%) (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3A</xref>). <italic>Firmicutes</italic> was dominated by <italic>Bacillales</italic> (39.65%), <italic>Clostridiales</italic> (34.54%), and <italic>Lactobacillales</italic> (22.75%), <italic>Corynebacteriales</italic> (45.85%), and <italic>Flavobacteriales</italic> (48.15%) were the most abundant orders in <italic>Actinobacteria</italic> and <italic>Bacteroidetes,</italic> respectively (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3B</xref>). The differential abundance analysis of the top 10 abundant genera in each sampling time point revealed that <italic>Clostridium</italic> was the most abundant genus at the beginning of the trial (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4</xref>). However, it became less dominant over time although the relative abundance change was not statistically significant <italic>(p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.192). The relative abundance of <italic>Photobacterium</italic> increased significantly from 18.89 to 24.38% (<italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.008) and it became the most abundant genus by the end of sampling. The relative abundance of <italic>Enterococcus</italic>, <italic>Serratia, Staphylococcus,</italic> and <italic>Stenotrophomonas</italic>, were all lower than 1% at the beginning but had significantly increased to 5.33, 5.03, 5.77, and 2.13%, respectively, by the end of sampling. Other abundant genera with significant increases were <italic>Aeromonas</italic> and <italic>Acinetobacter</italic>. In contrast, <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Oceanobacillus</italic>, <italic>Corynebacterium</italic>, <italic>Geobacillus</italic>, <italic>Paraclostridium, Sporosarcina, Romboutsia</italic>, <italic>Anaerosalibacter</italic>, and <italic>Pelomonas</italic> significantly declined by the end of the sampling.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative abundance (%) of bacterial phyla and orders in the Chinook salmon gut and rearing water during the different sampling time points. <bold>(A)</bold> Gut microbial composition at the phylum level. <bold>(B)</bold> Gut microbial composition at the order level. <bold>(C)</bold> Water microbial composition at the phylum level. <bold>(D)</bold> Water microbial composition at the order level. Only phyla and orders that are present at relative abundance &#x003E;1% in at least one sample are shown.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1065823-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>The taxonomic domination of bacterial orders in the Chinook salmon gut <bold>(A)</bold> and rearing water <bold>(B)</bold> during the whole experiment. Only phyla and orders that are present at relative abundance &#x003E;1% in at least one sample are shown. The size of the central dot represents the relative abundance of each phylum and order, of which larger dots indicate a higher relative abundance and vice versa.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1065823-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative abundance (%) of bacterial genera in the gut of freshwater Chinook salmon of the different sampling time points (September 2018, December 2018, and March 2019). Only the top 10 abundant genera in at least one sample from each sampling time point are shown. &#x002A;&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>p</italic> value less than 0.05, &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>p</italic> value less than 0.01, and &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>p</italic> value less than 0.001.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1065823-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Shannon diversity analysis showed a decrease in gut microbial diversity from September 2018 to December 2018 (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.054). However, the diversity significantly increased in March 2019 (<italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.002) (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5A</xref>). For beta diversity, the nMDS and CAP scatter plots illustrated that the Chinook salmon gut microbiota varied between the time points (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figures 5C</xref>,<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">D</xref>) and the PERMANOVA test indicated these changes were significant (Pseudo-<italic>F</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;6.538, <italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.001).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Alpha and beta diversity of gut and water microbiota during three sampling time points (September 2018, December 2018, and March 2019). <bold>(A)</bold> Shannon diversity of Chinook salmon gut microbiota and rearing water microbiota. The Shannon diversity of water microbiota was significantly higher than that of the gut microbiota regardless of the time points (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.001). Additionally, between time-points groups, the Shannon diversity of water microbiota significantly increased from September 2018 to December 2018 (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.001) but was stable from December 2018 to March 2019 (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.799). For the gut microbiota, a decrease in the Shannon diversity from September 2018 to December 2018 (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.054). However, the diversity significantly increased in March 2019 (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.002). <bold>(B)</bold> Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plot shows that the water samples were highly distinguishable from digesta samples, and three different water clusters represented water sampled from different time points. <bold>(C)</bold> Non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) plot. <bold>(D)</bold> Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) plot illustrate that the Chinook salmon gut microbiota varied between sampling time-point groups. &#x002A;&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>p</italic> value less than 0.05, &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>p</italic> value less than 0.01, and &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>p</italic> value less than 0.001.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1065823-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3.4.</label>
<title>Microbial differences between water and gut microbiota</title>
<p>To understand how microbial communities differ between the host and environment, we first assessed the diversity and composition of water microbiota. In contrast to the gut microbiota, the Shannon diversity of water microbiota was significantly higher regardless of the time points (<italic>p&#x2009;&#x003C;</italic> 0.001) (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5A</xref>). The Shannon diversity significantly increased from September 2018 to December 2018 (<italic>p&#x2009;&#x003C;</italic> 0.001) but was stable from December 2018 to March 2019 (<italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.799) (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5A</xref>). For microbial similarity, PCoA plots showed that the water samples were highly distinguishable from digesta samples, and three different clusters represented water sampled from different time points (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5B</xref>). PERMANOVA test further confirmed the variation statistically (Pseudo-<italic>F</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;77.447, <italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.001). For water microbial composition, the community was mainly composed of <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> (an average of 53.69%) and <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic> (an average of 29.29%) (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2C</xref>). In contrast to the gut microbiota, the relative abundance of <italic>Firmicutes</italic> (an average of 0.45%) was much lower (&#x003C; 1%). Due to the presence of many unclassified bacteria (relative abundance higher than 50% at the family level), we only further analyzed the composition to the order level (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2D</xref>). The relative abundance of <italic>Vibrionales</italic> was comparatively lower in the water (an average of 1.73% among three sampling time points) compared to that in the gut (an average of 20.26% among three sampling time points).</p>
<p>To understand the variance of OTUs between water and digesta, we assessed the top abundant OTUs (with reads &#x003E;0.01%). Venn diagram illustrated that 20 OTUs were shared between digesta and water samples (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6A</xref>). One hundred nineteen OTUs were only detected in the digesta and 583 OTUs were only detected in the water. We further compared the OTUs from water and digesta samples across the three sampling time points. Ultimately, only 4 OTUs (<italic>Photobacterium piscicola</italic>, <italic>Brevinema</italic> sp., <italic>Photobacterium</italic> sp., and <italic>Acinetobacter</italic> sp.) were shared overall (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6B</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Venn diagram shows the shared and unique OTUs between the gut and water microbiota. <bold>(A)</bold> The common and unique OTUs between the gut and water microbiota. Overall, a total of 722 abundant OTUs (&#x003E; 0.01% total reads) were collected between water and digesta, with 583 and 119 being unique to water and digesta, respectively, in addition to 20 being detected within both groups. <bold>(B)</bold> The shared and unique OTUs between the gut and water microbiota based on sampling time points. In September 2018, a total of 378 abundant OTUs were collected between water (69&#x2009;W) and digesta (69D), with 300 and 63 being unique to water and digesta, respectively, and 15 being detected within both groups. In December 2018, a total of 504 abundant OTUs were collected between water (82&#x2009;W) and digesta (82D), with 444 and 47 being unique to water and digesta, respectively, and 13 being detected within both groups. In March 2019, a total of 593 abundant OTUs were collected between water (98&#x2009;W) and digesta (98D), with 539 and 39 being unique to water and digesta, respectively, and 15 being detected within both groups.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1065823-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.5.</label>
<title>Core gut microbiota identification</title>
<p>To understand the core gut microbiota of freshwater farmed Chinook salmon, we selected the gut-derived OTUs of which prevalence was higher than 75% and relative abundance was higher than 1% independently at each sampling timepoint. Two OTUs were identified from the September 2018 cohort, followed by three OTUs from December 2019 cohort and one OTUs from March 2019 cohort (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">Supplementary Table 6</xref>). Taken together, we identified one OTU (OTU000018) that was assigned to the genus <italic>Photobacterium</italic> as the core gut microbiota for freshwater Chinook salmon. OTU000018 was the most abundant OTU, predominating at all time points, making up 56.68% of total reads. Notably, the predominance of OTU000018 increased during the experiment although the change was marginally significant (<italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.021).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>3.6.</label>
<title>Correlation between microbiota and fish health</title>
<p>To evaluate how the gut microbiota may be related to salmon health and growth, we first investigated the relationship between intestinal mucous cell density and gut microbial diversity. No significant difference was found for either alpha (<italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.510) or beta diversities (Pseudo-<italic>F</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;1.347, <italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.156) between the two mucous cell density groups. Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between Shannon diversity and mucous cell density using Pearson&#x2019;s <italic>R</italic> analysis (<italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.382). We also found no significant differences in alpha (<italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.196) and beta diversities (Pseudo-<italic>F</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;1.477, <italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.066) between fish groups possessing different plasma biochemistry range values.</p>
<p>Additionally, we assessed how the gut microbiota was correlated with swim bladder fluid accumulation. In terms of alpha diversity, a reduced Shannon diversity was observed in the fecal microbiome of fish with swim bladders containing fluid (<italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.006). The analysis of beta diversity showed that the gut microbial communities were significantly different in the fish with fluid accumulated their swim bladders (Pseudo-<italic>F</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;5.191, <italic>p&#x2009;&#x003C;</italic> 0.001).</p>
<p>For taxonomic analysis, the composition of abundant gut microbiota (&#x003E; 0.01% of total reads) of fish with different swim bladder conditions was analyzed by differential abundance analysis at the genus level. Bacteria assigned to <italic>Enterococcus</italic> (<italic>p&#x2009;&#x003C;</italic> 0.001), <italic>Serratia</italic> (<italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.014) and <italic>Aeromonas</italic> (<italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.0183) were more abundant in the fish with fluid in their swim bladders. The genera <italic>Raoultella</italic> and <italic>Stenotrophomonas</italic> were not detected during the sampling in December 2018. Fish with the two different swim bladder conditions shared 30 OTUs and 16 genera (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM7">Supplementary Table 7</xref>) and 15 OTUs and 7 genera were only detected in the fish with normal swim bladders. Fish with fluid in their swim bladders had 17 OTUs and 6 genera that were not found in fish with normal swim bladders.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>3.7.</label>
<title>Correlation between microbiota and fecal score and fish growth performance</title>
<p>The Shannon diversity was reduced from FS1 to FS3 (<italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.025) but increased from FS3 to FS4 (<italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.005). However, no significant difference was observed among these FS groups in terms of beta diversity (Pseudo-<italic>F</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.931, <italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.448). The gut microbiota of FS4 and the microbiota of surrounding water substantially overlapped in both terms of alpha (<italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.083) and beta diversity (Pseudo-<italic>F</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;5.744, <italic>p&#x2009;=</italic> 0.094). Additionally, no differences were evident in alpha (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.454) and beta diversity (Pseudo-<italic>F</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.924, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.495) between the two growth performance groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>3.8.</label>
<title>Profile monitoring for microbial relationship alteration in digesta regarding different factors</title>
<p>Comparing microbial profiles under different growth and health statuses using the PM2RA method provided additional insights into the salmon gut microbial interactions including those associated with possible dysbiosis (e.g., fish with abnormal swim bladders). First, we evaluated the RA in the microbiota between salmon sampled at different time points. Between the fish collected in September 2018 and December 2018, 11 hub genera with significant abundance changes (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) were found to be involved in the RA network (<xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">Figure 7A</xref>). The top three genera with the largest degrees of topology were <italic>Clostridium</italic>, <italic>Streptococcus,</italic> and <italic>Geobacillus</italic>. Between the fish collected in December 2018 and March 2019, a RA network containing nine hub genera with significant abundance changes (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) was observed (<xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">Figure 7B</xref>). <italic>Photobacterium</italic>, <italic>Brevinema</italic>, <italic>Staphylococcus,</italic> and <italic>Acinetobacter</italic> had high interconnectedness. However, the RAs between bacteria assigned to <italic>Clostridium</italic> and <italic>Photobacterium</italic> were not significantly changed, and taxa related to these two genera were different. The highest PM score related to <italic>Clostridium</italic> was observed between OTU006782 assigned to <italic>Clostridium</italic> and OTU000596 assigned to <italic>Streptococcus</italic> (PM&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.964) (<xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">Figure 7A</xref>). The highest PM score related to <italic>Photobacterium</italic> was observed between OTU000018 assigned to <italic>Photobacterium</italic> and D2000577 assigned to <italic>Bacillus</italic> (PM&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.965) (<xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">Figure 7B</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>The gut microbial relationship alteration (RA) network for Chinook salmon based on sampling time points. <bold>(A)</bold> The RA network for Chinook salmon feces collected in September 2018 and December 2018. <italic>Clostridium</italic>, <italic>Streptococcus</italic>, and <italic>Geobacillus</italic> were the top three genera with the largest degrees of topology. <bold>(B)</bold> The RA network for Chinook salmon feces collected in December 2018 and March 2019. <italic>Photobacterium</italic>, <italic>Brevinema</italic>, <italic>Staphylococcus</italic> were the top three genera with the largest degrees of topology. The color and size of nodes represent the degree of topology in the network, and the edge width is proportional to the value of PM scores.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1065823-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Next, we assessed the RA in the microbiota between salmon with and without fluid in their swim bladders. Sixteen hub genera were involved in the RA network (<xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">Figure 8</xref>). <italic>Photobacterium</italic>, <italic>Enterococcus,</italic> and <italic>Stenotrophomonas</italic> were the top three genera with the largest degrees of topology (<xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">Figure 8</xref>). Specifically, OTUs assigned to <italic>Enterococcus</italic> and <italic>Photobacterium</italic> were the active OTUs with the largest degrees of topology, followed by OTUs assigned to <italic>Stenotrophomonas</italic> and <italic>Brevinema</italic>. The RA between OTUs assigned to <italic>Photobacterium</italic> (OTU000018) and <italic>Enterococcus</italic> (D2000471) (PM&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.886) and OTUs assigned to <italic>Photobacterium</italic> (OTU000018) and <italic>Stenotrophomonas</italic> (OTU000600) (PM&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.73) changed significantly.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>The gut microbial relationship alteration (RA) network for Chinook salmon based on swim bladder status (fluid present&#x2009;=&#x2009;36, no fluid&#x2009;=&#x2009;42). <italic>Photobacterium</italic>, <italic>Enterococcus</italic>, and <italic>Stenotrophomonas</italic> were the top three genera with the largest degrees of topology. The colour and size of nodes represent the degree of topology in the network, and the edge width is proportional to the value of PM scores.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1065823-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20" sec-type="discussions">
<label>4.</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="sec21">
<label>4.1.</label>
<title>Overall gut microbiota of freshwater farmed Chinook salmon</title>
<p>For freshwater farmed Chinook salmon, their gut microbial composition at the phylum level was consistent with other freshwater teleosts, such as carp (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Eichmiller et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Luo et al., 2022</xref>), yellow catfish (<italic>Pelteobagrus fulvidraco</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Li et al., 2014</xref>), and zebrafish (<italic>Danio rerio</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">Roeselers et al., 2011</xref>). In general, <italic>Firmicutes</italic> and <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> were most abundant, followed by <italic>Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Fusobacteria,</italic> and <italic>Spirochaetes</italic>. The dominance of <italic>Firmicutes</italic> and <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> was also observed in previous studies of other salmonids sampled over a range of conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Ingerslev et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref92">Zarkasi et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Gajardo et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Llewellyn et al., 2016</xref>). As an extension of our previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref96">Zhao et al., 2021</xref>), we tracked Chinook salmon gut microbiota changes in a freshwater RAS at 17&#x00B0;C over time and found that the most abundant phyla changed with fish growth from <italic>Firmicutes</italic> to <italic>Proteobacteria,</italic> although the taxonomic distribution of the overall microbiota was stable. This result suggests that the composition of gut microbiota and predominant microbial taxa changed with Chinook salmon development as indicated previously for both farmed and wild salmon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Llewellyn et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref95">Zhao et al., 2020</xref>). The volume of the fish intestine increases during the host&#x2019;s development (from early to adult stages), which may contribute to a more extensive and stable habitat for diverse microbial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref89">Yan et al., 2012</xref>). Additionally, a greater volume of digesta due to an increased intestinal capacity could contribute to a more stable community structure but this also depends on gut residence time which can vary significantly. This effect on gut communities has been noted in previous publications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref94">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Piazzon et al., 2019</xref>). For Chinook salmon, this has also been previously observed where older fish gut community structure diverges from that associated with younger fish (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref95">Zhao et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Compared to previous studies on the gut microbiota of salmon sampled from natural environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Hovda et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Llewellyn et al., 2016</xref>), our study suggests that fish age plays a major role in affecting the gut microbial community when rearing the fish in a relatively stable environment (freshwater RAS). The variation in the gut microbial composition and diversity at different sampling time points suggests a clear correlation to the normal microbial succession, which has been reported in human (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Martino et al., 2022</xref>) and other aquatic animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref87">Xiong et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref85">Xiao et al., 2021</xref>). It has been demonstrated that human gut microbiota changes can be deliberately modified across time, which differs from the human genome that is encoded at birth and cannot be altered during life (at least with current technology) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Martino et al., 2022</xref>). A recent study on gut microbiota interactions in zebrafish indicates that the increasing gut microbial stability is determined by the development of the immune system and the greater stability of nutrient absorption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref86">Xiao et al., 2022</xref>). Furthermore, the change of feeding habit, including the use of probiotics, is also shown to affect the fish gut microbiota, especially at the early life stages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Deng et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref79">Vargas-Albores et al., 2021</xref>). However, the mechanism of probiotics colonization is still unclear as it is affected by fish physiology and genetic backgrounds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Merrifield et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Ciric et al., 2019</xref>). A study on farmed post-smolt Chinook salmon shows that although the salmon is fed with a well-known probiotic strain (<italic>Pediococcus acidilactici</italic> strain MA 18/5&#x2009;M), the strain is not able to colonize the gut and quickly declines when salmon are not actively consuming the probiotic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Ciric et al., 2019</xref>). By understudying the process of gut microbiota change during life stages, we may better understand how to manage the gut microbiota over time and in relation to fish health. The variation in microbiota with sampling-time points may be attributed to the host maturation that could involve more extensive microbial interactions within the intestine and between the host and the environment. Extensive histological and other functional analyzes are needed to evaluate the relationship between microbial transformation and GI tract development.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<label>4.2.</label>
<title>Chinook salmon gut microbiota significantly differed from water microbiota</title>
<p>We found that gut microbiota composition was significantly different from that of water microbiota with only 4 OTUs (two assigned to <italic>Photobacterium</italic>, one assigned to <italic>Brevinema</italic> and one assigned to <italic>Acinetobacter</italic>) shared overall during three sampling points. Based on earlier studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref76">Sullam et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref84">Wong and Rawls, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Liu Q. et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref96">Zhao et al., 2021</xref>), we hypothesized that Chinook salmon harbors a relatively stable gut microbiota that is distinguishable from environmental microbiota. Although <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> dominated both communities, the microbial composition was different at the order level. Consistent with previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref95">Zhao et al., 2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref96">2021</xref>), we detected high abundance of <italic>Clostridiales</italic>, <italic>Bacilli</italic>, <italic>Lactobacilli</italic>, and <italic>Corynebacteriales</italic> bacteria in the gut. A typical characteristic of all these bacterial orders is their preference for an anaerobic environment like that found in fish intestines, suggesting that most bacteria detected in fish guts represent symbionts and commensals instead of a passive collection of water bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref76">Sullam et al., 2012</xref>). It should be noted that some of these genera, such as <italic>Geobacillus</italic>, are feed-associated based on their thermophilic growth temperature requirements that range from 35 to 75&#x00B0;C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref93">Zarkasi et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Karlsen et al., 2022</xref>). Additionally, the gut microbial communities detected in our study mainly represent the allochthonous microbiota, which are passing through the lumen with food and digesta (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Romero et al., 2014</xref>). Several studies have investigated the autochthonous microbial communities that have successfully colonized the fish intestine and demonstrate these populations are involved in host-environment microbial interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Kononova et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Nyholm et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec23">
<label>4.3.</label>
<title>The core gut microbiota for freshwater Chinook salmon</title>
<p>The core gut microbiota for fish has been determined in many studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Kokou et al., 2019</xref>), including Chinook salmon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref95">Zhao et al., 2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref96">2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Steiner et al., 2021</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">2022</xref>). However, the core microbial communities can vary due to different fish species, sampling points, and screening criteria. Regardless of health and growth variation, we detected a distinct dominance of <italic>Photobacterium</italic> spp. in the Chinook salmon gut. <italic>Photobacterium</italic> was also the only genus that occurred at the three sampling time points in our study. This is consistent with other studies demonstrating <italic>Photobacterium</italic> as one of the common members of fish intestinal microflora (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Gajardo et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Llewellyn et al., 2016</xref>). Persistent high FS values have been proposed to be indicative of fish with a GI microbiome imbalance, possible dysbiosis and/or association with poor feeding rates (related as reduced weight gain) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref93">Zarkasi et al., 2016</xref>). We hypothesized that the high microbial diversity in FS4 may be related to a high proportion of water in the gut since the water microbial community had a relatively higher alpha diversity. We found that bacteria assigned to <italic>Clostridium</italic> were more predominant in September 2018, while bacteria assigned to <italic>Photobacterium</italic> were more predominant in December 2018 and March 2019. Taken together, our results indicate that <italic>Photobacterium</italic> sp. may be a native intestinal bacterium for farmed Chinook salmon when the salmon are reared in freshwater with higher abundance occurring in older fish. More studies are needed to investigate the characteristics of <italic>Photobacterium</italic> since it could closely interact with the host and other abundant gut community members and thus may play a key role in host performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">Steiner et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec24">
<label>4.4.</label>
<title>Interactions between gut microbiota, salmon health, and growth performance</title>
<p>Although we included only apparently healthy fish based on their external appearance, almost half of the salmon sampled in March 2019 (36 out of 78) had fluid in their swim bladders. Besides inflammatory reactions, fluid accumulation is one of the main swim bladder disorders in fish and it has been encountered in ornamental fish, such as koi carp (<italic>Cyprinus carpio</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Sirri et al., 2020</xref>). Physostomous fish like Chinook salmon have their swim bladders connected to the foregut, more specifically with the esophagus and stomach <italic>via</italic> a short pneumatic duct (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Sado et al., 2020</xref>). Physostomous fish need to refill their swim bladder periodically by swallowing air at the surface, which permits the gas to enter into or be released through the alimentary canal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">Stewart and Hughes, 2014</xref>). Due to the specific anatomic structure of the pneumatic duct, microorganisms in the digestive tract can potentially enter the duct and migrate into the swim bladder (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Sirri et al., 2020</xref>). By detecting a reduced microbial diversity, a different microbial composition, and the presence of opportunistic pathogens, we suspected that a potential dysbiosis occurred in Chinook salmon with fluid in their swim bladders. A recent study showed that farmed rainbow trout in a freshwater RAS shared their gut microbiota with swim bladder-associated microbiota (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref81">Villasante et al., 2019</xref>). The core swim bladder-associated bacteria identified for rainbow trout, including <italic>Photobacterium</italic>, <italic>Clostridium</italic>, <italic>Bacillus,</italic> and <italic>Streptococcus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref81">Villasante et al., 2019</xref>), were also detected predominantly in the GI tract in this study. Swim bladder microbiota was not analyzed in our study, so the connection between dysbiosis and fluid in the swim bladder is only hypothesized. Future studies are recommended to further investigate the mechanism of swim bladder fluid accumulation and the interaction between microbial communities in the gut and the swim bladder in Chinook salmon.</p>
<p>The gut microbiota of Chinook salmon with fluid in their swim bladder showed a high relative abundance of <italic>Enterococcus</italic>. For the aquaculture industry, some species of <italic>Enterococcus</italic> is often regarded as a potential probiotic that can be added to aquafeed because of its high tolerance to acidic pH, adherence to the GI tract, immune-modulatory activity, and antagonistic activity to entero-pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Akbari et al., 2021</xref>). However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Timur (2019)</xref> demonstrated that <italic>E. casseliflavus</italic> was correlated with diseased juvenile meagre (<italic>Argyrosomus regius</italic>) from inland-based facilities and the related syndromes were reobserved when a recovered isolate was injected intraperitoneally. Due to the high relative abundance of <italic>Enterococcus</italic> observed in our experimental fish, we hypothesize that the occurrence of <italic>Enterococcus</italic> was associated with potential gut dysbiosis and might potentially impact the functioning of the swim bladder in farmed Chinook salmon.</p>
<p>There was a high relative abundance of <italic>Aeromonas</italic> spp. in fish with fluid in their swim bladders. Many species within the genus <italic>Aeromonas</italic> have been implicated in mortality, resulting in losses estimated in millions of dollars and increasing cost of fish production to the aquaculture industry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Fe&#x010D;kaninov&#x00E1; et al., 2017</xref>). <italic>A. sobria</italic> has been reported to cause Motile <italic>Aeromonas</italic> Septicemia (MAS) in zebrafish (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Pullium et al., 1999</xref>) and striped catfish (<italic>Pangasianodon hypophthalmus</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Le et al., 2018</xref>); <italic>A. rivipollensis</italic> has been isolated from wild nutria (<italic>Myocastor coypus</italic>) and is regarded as a potential zoonotic pathogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Park et al., 2018</xref>); <italic>A. veronii</italic> is known to have virulence factors capable of causing freshwater fish diarrhea and ulcer syndrome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Serrano et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Li T. et al., 2020</xref>). Particularly, <italic>A. hydrophila</italic> has been associated with swim bladder infections in wild freshwater fish (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref77">Teskered&#x017E;i&#x0107; et al., 2000</xref>) and has been associated with gastric dilation and air sacculitis (GDAS) in Chinook salmon farmed in the marine environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Lumsden et al., 2002</xref>). Referring to previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Lumsden et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Forgan and Forster, 2007a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">b</xref>), it is possible that the diet retention properties may have been an issue in this trial and could have led to swim bladder fluid accumulation, even though the trial was in freshwater.</p>
<p>High relative abundance of genera <italic>Stenotrophomonas</italic> and <italic>Raoultella</italic> was detected in the fish with abnormal swim bladders. Previous studies revealed the correlation of <italic>S. maltophilia</italic> with multidrug resistance in diseased yellowtail (<italic>Seriola quinqueradiata</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Furushita et al., 2005</xref>) and bacterial infections in freshwater ornamental fish (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Musa et al., 2008</xref>). <italic>R. ornithinolytica</italic> can convert histidine to histamine, which leads to scombroid poisoning in humans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Hwang et al., 2020</xref>). However, there is limited information on the pathology of <italic>Raoultella</italic> in commercial fish. The decreasing abundance of <italic>Photobacterium</italic> and the increasing abundance of <italic>Enterococcus</italic> and <italic>Stenotrophomonas</italic> may indicate an antagonistic relationship between these taxa.</p>
<p>Microorganisms are essential for the development and differentiation of mucous cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bates et al., 2006</xref>). Our study indicates that microbial diversity is not correlated to GI tract mucous cell density. This result is in contrast to a recent finding that elevated GI mucous cell numbers were positively correlated with gut microbial richness in juvenile Atlantic salmon collected from freshwater hatcheries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Minich et al., 2020</xref>). Since abiotic factors, such as diet, temperature, and salinity, were fully controlled in this study, we suspect that biotic factors, such as fish species and development stage, may affect intestinal mucous cell density. Fish infected by specific pathogens can have different gut microbial communities, which should be considered when interpreting results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref82">Wang C. et al., 2018</xref>). Several studies have evaluated host&#x2013;microbe interactions by using germ-free and gnotobiotic models (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Darnaud et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">P&#x00E9;rez-Pascual et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Luna et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Renu et al., 2022</xref>), but detailed mechanisms of how the fish microbiota interact with mucosal surfaces need to be further investigated.</p>
<p>Although 16S rRNA gene sequencing has enlarged the understanding of microorganisms in humans, mammals and fish, its low taxonomic resolution is a limitation. It is not as informative or powerful for identifying the bacteria at species- or strain-specific levels. All OTUs were identified based on the Silva non-redundant 16S rRNA database and more advanced sequencing technologies should undergo further verification of their taxonomical definition, such as the species level. For example, we detected a high relative abundance of bacteria assigned to <italic>Serratia</italic> and <italic>Brevinema</italic>, but it was not possible to link specific bacterial species to Chinook salmon performance. Likewise, over 50% of the reads in water samples could not be identified to the genus level. Therefore, although the analysis of relative abundance and microbial relationship alterations <italic>via</italic> 16S rRNA sequencing can provide insights for pathogen targeting, more studies are needed to better understand the pathogenicity of these versatile microorganisms and elaborate efficient and accurate measures to distinguish harmful and beneficial probiotic strains.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec25" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5.</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In conclusion, our results indicated that <italic>Photobacterium</italic> spp. was the core gut microbiota for freshwater farmed Chinook salmon and its interaction with other microbes was important for fish health management. The gross analyzes of microbial relationship alterations and relative abundance changes indicated that genera <italic>Enterococcus</italic>, <italic>Aeromonas</italic> and <italic>Stenotrophomonas</italic> were associated with the presence of fluid in the swim bladder of Chinook salmon. Our findings increase the knowledge of the temporal dynamics of the gut microbe in farmed fish and help the industry utilize the gut microbiota as a potential health indicator for modern aquaculture. Advanced sequencing techniques, histological and microbiological measurements, and a more in-depth understanding of resident gut microbiota and their properties are strongly recommended to differentiate beneficial and harmful bacterial strains.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec26" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The data is deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession code SRP348807 (PRJNA 781774).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec27">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The animal study was reviewed and approved by University of Tasmania Animal Ethics Committee.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec28">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>JS, SW, KS, BN, JB, CC, and RZ: conceptualization and methodology. RZ and JB: data curation and formal analysis and investigation. JS, SW, KS, BN, JB, and CC: resources, writing&#x2013;review, and editing. RZ: writing&#x2013;original draft preparation. JS, SW, and KS: funding acquisition. JS, BN, JB, and CC: project administration. BN, JB, and CC: supervision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec29" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) Efficient Salmon research program [CAWX1606] and is a collaboration between the University of Tasmania, Australia and the Cawthron Institute, New Zealand.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec100" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>We would like to express our gratitude to all the scientists, technicians, and industry partners who contributed to this project, especially the hard work and expertise of staff in the Cawthron Institute&#x2019;s Finfish Research Centre (Chaya Bandaranayake, Chris Chamberlain, Chris Ensor, Nick Hearn, Liam van den Heuvel, Gareth Nicholson, and Michael Scott). We also wish to thank Xingyin Liu and Kai Mi from the Nanjing Medical University for providing expert advice on the PM2RA analysis, and Ian Hunt from the University of Tasmania for helping with the statistical analysis.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="sec31" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1065823/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1065823/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.xlsx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_2.xlsx" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_3.xlsx" id="SM3" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_4.xlsx" id="SM4" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_5.xlsx" id="SM5" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_6.xlsx" id="SM6" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_7.xlsx" id="SM7" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Akbari</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shekrabi</surname> <given-names>S. P. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soltani</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mehrgan</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of potential probiotic <italic>enterococcus casseliflavus</italic> (EC-001) on growth performance, immunity, and resistance to <italic>Aeromonas hydrophila</italic> infection in common carp (<italic>Cyprinus carpio</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Probiot. Antimicrob. Proteins</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1316</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1325</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12602-021-09771-x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group>, (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA)</article-title>. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Willis</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>511</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>525</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0511:CAOPCA]2.0.CO;2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aronesty</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group>, (<year>2011</year>). <source>Command-line tools for processing biological sequencing data</source>. Available at:  <ext-link xlink:href="https://github.com/ExpressionAnalysis/ea-utils" ext-link-type="uri">https://github.com/ExpressionAnalysis/ea-utils</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mittge</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuhlman</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baden</surname> <given-names>K. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheesman</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guillemin</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Distinct signals from the microbiota promote different aspects of zebrafish gut differentiation</article-title>. <source>Dev. Biol.</source> <volume>297</volume>, <fpage>374</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>386</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.05.006</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16781702</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Benesty</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Pearson Correlation Coefficient</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source>Noise Reduction in Speech Processing. Springer Topics in Signal Processing. Vol 2</source>. <publisher-loc>Berlin, Heidelberg</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bozzi</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rasmussen</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Car&#x00F8;e</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sveier</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nord&#x00F8;y</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gilbert</surname> <given-names>M. T. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Salmon gut microbiota correlates with disease infection status: potential for monitoring health in farmed animals</article-title>. <source>Anim. Microb.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s42523-021-00096-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caporaso</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lauber</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walters</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg-Lyons</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huntley</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1621</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1624</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2012.8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22402401</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Casanovas</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnston</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnston</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Symonds</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Comparative assessment of blood biochemistry and haematology normal ranges between Chinook salmon (<italic>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</italic>) from seawater and freshwater farms</article-title>. <source>Aquaculture</source> <volume>537</volume>:<fpage>736464</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736464</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ciric</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waite</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Draper</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Characterization of mid-intestinal microbiota of farmed Chinook salmon using 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding</article-title>. <source>Archiv. Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>577</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>587</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2298/ABS190402040C</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Darnaud</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Vadder</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bogeat</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boucinha</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bulteau</surname> <given-names>A.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bunescu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A standardized gnotobiotic mouse model harboring a minimal 15-member mouse gut microbiota recapitulates SOPF/SPF phenotypes</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-021-26963-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kokou</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eding</surname> <given-names>E. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verdegem</surname> <given-names>M. C. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Impact of early-life rearing history on gut microbiome succession and performance of <italic>Nile tilapia</italic></article-title>. <source>Anim. Microb.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s42523-021-00145-w</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Di</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Isolation and identification of pathogens causing haemorrhagic septicaemia in cultured Chinese sturgeon (<italic>Acipenser sinensis</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Aquac. Res.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>3624</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3633</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/are.13830</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref01"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Egerton</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Culloty</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whooley</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stanton</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ross</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The gut microbiota of marine fish</article-title>. <source>Front Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>873</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.00873</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eichmiller</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamilton</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Staley</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sadowsky</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sorensen</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Environment shapes the fecal microbiome of invasive carp species</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>44</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-016-0190-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Faisal</surname> <given-names>F. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Milenkovi&#x0107;</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group>, (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Global network alignment in the context of aging</article-title>, Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics, pp. <fpage>580</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fe&#x010D;kaninov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ko&#x0161;&#x010D;ov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mudro&#x0148;ov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Popelka</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Toropilov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The use of probiotic bacteria against <italic>Aeromonas</italic> infections in salmonid aquaculture</article-title>. <source>Aquaculture</source> <volume>469</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.11.042</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Forgan</surname> <given-names>L. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Forster</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007a</year>). <article-title>Development and physiology of gastric dilation air sacculitis in Chinook salmon, <italic>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</italic> (Walbaum)</article-title>. <source>J. Fish Dis.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>459</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>469</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00832.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17640249</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Forgan</surname> <given-names>L. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Forster</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007b</year>). <article-title>Effects of potential mediators of an intestinal brake mechanism on gut motility in Chinook salmon (<italic>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Toxicol. Pharmacol.</source> <volume>146</volume>, <fpage>343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>347</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cbpc.2007.04.007</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17500043</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fulton</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1911</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>The sovereignty of the sea</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source>Length-weight relationship, condition factors and indices of maturity sexual: bibliographical reminders, interpretations, remarks and applications</source>. (<publisher-loc>Edinburgh and London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Scientific Paper Oceanographic Research Center</publisher-name>), <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>143</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>171</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Furushita</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Okamoto</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maeda</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shiba</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Isolation of multidrug-resistant <italic>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</italic> from cultured yellowtail (<italic>Seriola quinqueradiata</italic>) from a marine fish farm</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>5598</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5600</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.71.9.5598-5600.2005</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16151156</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gajardo</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodiles</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kortner</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krogdahl</surname> <given-names>&#x00C5;.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bakke</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Merrifield</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A high-resolution map of the gut microbiota in Atlantic salmon (<italic>Salmo salar</italic>): a basis for comparative gut microbial research</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>30893</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep30893</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27485205</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ganz</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Doroud</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Firl</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hird</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eisen</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boyce</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Community-level differences in the microbiome of healthy wild mallards and those infected by influenza a viruses</article-title>. <source>MSystems</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>e00188</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e00116</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mSystems.00188-16</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gauthier</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lavoie</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Charette</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Derome</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group>, (<year>2019</year>). <source>Host-microbiota interactions and their importance in promoting growth and resistance to opportunistic diseases in salmonids, microbial communities in aquaculture ecosystems</source>. <publisher-loc>Berlin</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghanbari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kneifel</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Domig</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>A new view of the fish gut microbiome: advances from next-generation sequencing</article-title>. <source>Aquaculture</source> <volume>448</volume>, <fpage>464</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>475</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.06.033</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gloor</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Macklaim</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pawlowsky-Glahn</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Egozcue</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Microbiome datasets are compositional: and this is not optional</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>2224</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.02224</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29187837</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gloor</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Compositional analysis: a valid approach to analyze microbiome high-throughput sequencing data</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Microbiol.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>692</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>703</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/cjm-2015-0821</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27314511</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Serrano</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santos</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garc&#x00ED;a-L&#x00F3;pez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Otero</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Virulence markers in <italic>Aeromonas hydrophila</italic> and <italic>Aeromonas veronii</italic> biovar <italic>sobria</italic> isolates from freshwater fish and from a diarrhoea case</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>93</volume>, <fpage>414</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>419</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01705.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12174039</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gower</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1966</year>). <article-title>Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis</article-title>. <source>Biometrika</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>325</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>338</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/biomet/53.3-4.325</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hovda</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fontanillas</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McGurk</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Obach</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosnes</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Seasonal variations in the intestinal microbiota of farmed Atlantic salmon (<italic>Salmo salar</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Aquac. Res.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>154</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>159</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02805.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Howell</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <source>Statistical Methods for Psychology</source> <publisher-name>Duxbury</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hwang</surname> <given-names>C.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kung</surname> <given-names>H.-F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>Y.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>P. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tseng</surname> <given-names>D. I.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Histamine fish poisoning and histamine production by <italic>Raoultella ornithinolytica</italic> in milkfish surimi</article-title>. <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>874</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>880</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-19-385</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32330935</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ingerslev</surname> <given-names>H.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>von Gersdorff J&#x00F8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strube</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larsen</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dalsgaard</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boye</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The development of the gut microbiota in rainbow trout (<italic>Oncorhynchus mykiss</italic>) is affected by first feeding and diet type</article-title>. <source>Aquaculture</source> <volume>424-425</volume>, <fpage>24</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.12.032</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Karlsen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tzimorotas</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robertsen</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kirste</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bogevik</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rud</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Feed microbiome: confounding factor affecting fish gut microbiome studies</article-title>. <source>ISME Commun.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s43705-022-00096-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Klakegg</surname> <given-names>&#x00D8;.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salonius</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nilsen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>F&#x00FC;lberth</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x00F8;rum</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Enhanced growth and decreased mortality in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) after probiotic bath</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>129</volume>, <fpage>146</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>160</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jam.14649</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32227437</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kokou</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sasson</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Friedman</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eyal</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ovadia</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harpaz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Core gut microbial communities are maintained by beneficial interactions and strain variability in fish</article-title>. <source>Nat. Microbiol.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>2456</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2465</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41564-019-0560-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31548685</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kononova</surname> <given-names>S. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zinchenko</surname> <given-names>D. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muranova</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Belova</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miroshnikov</surname> <given-names>A. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Intestinal microbiota of salmonids and its changes upon introduction of soy proteins to fish feed</article-title>. <source>Aquac. Int.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>475</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>496</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10499-019-00341-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Koskela</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pirhonen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jobling</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Feed intake, growth rate and body composition of juvenile Baltic salmon exposed to different constant temperatures</article-title>. <source>Aquac. Int.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>351</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>360</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1018316224253</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kruskal</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1964</year>). <article-title>Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method</article-title>. <source>Psychometrika</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>129</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02289694</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Le</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>T. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vo</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Doan</surname> <given-names>V. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>H. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Protective effects of bacteriophages against <italic>Aeromonas hydrophila</italic> causing motile Aeromonas septicemia (MAS) in striped catfish</article-title>. <source>Antibiotics</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>16</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antibiotics7010016</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29495337</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gatesoupe</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>She</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Bacterial signatures of &#x201C;red-operculum&#x201D; disease in the gut of crucian carp (<italic>Carassius auratus</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>510</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>521</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-017-0967-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28364130</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Comparative study on gastrointestinal microbiota of eight fish species with different feeding habits</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>117</volume>, <fpage>1750</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1760</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jam.12663</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25294734</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raza</surname> <given-names>S. H. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title><italic>Aeromonas veronii</italic> infection in commercial freshwater fish: a potential threat to public health</article-title>. <source>Animals</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>608</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani10040608</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32252334</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Immune and gut bacterial successions of large yellow croaker (<italic>Larimichthys crocea</italic>) during <italic>pseudomonas plecoglossicida</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>Fish Shellfish Immunol.</source> <volume>99</volume>, <fpage>176</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>183</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fsi.2020.01.063</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32018034</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Connection between the gut microbiota of largemouth bass (<italic>Micropterus salmoides</italic>) and microbiota of the pond culture environment</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>1770</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms9081770</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34442849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>PM2RA: a framework for detecting and quantifying relationship alterations in microbial community</article-title>. <source>Genom. Proteom. Bioinform.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>154</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>167</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gpb.2020.07.005</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33581337</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Llewellyn</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McGinnity</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dionne</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Letourneau</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thonier</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carvalho</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The biogeography of the Atlantic salmon (<italic>Salmo salar</italic>) gut microbiome</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>1280</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1284</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2015.189</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26517698</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Longo</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clark</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>York</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jorgenson</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Aquaculture and the displacement of fisheries captures</article-title>. <source>Conserv. Biol.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>832</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>841</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/cobi.13295</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30719749</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lumsden</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clark</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hawthorn</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Minamikawa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fenwick</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haycock</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Gastric dilation and air sacculitis in farmed Chinook salmon, <italic>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</italic> (Walbaum)</article-title>. <source>J. Fish Dis.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>163</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2761.2002.00346.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luna</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quero</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kokou</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kormas</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Time to integrate biotechnological approaches into fish gut microbiome research</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>127</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.copbio.2021.07.018</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34365079</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>An</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Comparative analysis of the gut microbiota in bighead carp under different culture patterns</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbial.</source> <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>1357</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1369</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jam.15248</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>MacQueen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group>, (<year>1967</year>). <article-title>Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations</article-title>, Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Oakland, CA, USA.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martino</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dilmore</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burcham</surname> <given-names>Z. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Metcalf</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeste</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Microbiota succession throughout life from the cradle to the grave</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>707</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>720</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41579-022-00768-z</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Merrifield</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dimitroglou</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Foey</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davies</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baker</surname> <given-names>R. T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x00F8;gwald</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The current status and future focus of probiotic and prebiotic applications for salmonids</article-title>. <source>Aquaculture</source> <volume>302</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.02.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mes&#x00ED;as</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vargas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cueva</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manchego</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sandoval</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Pathogenicity of a <italic>Yersinia ruckeri</italic> strain from an outbreak of yersiniosis in rainbow trout (<italic>Oncorhynchus mykiss</italic>) from Huaraz, Peru</article-title>. <source>Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Per&#x00FA; (RIVEP).</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>387</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>403</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15381/rivep.v30i1.15695</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Minich</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poore</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jantawongsri</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnston</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bowie</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bowman</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Microbial ecology of Atlantic salmon (<italic>Salmo salar</italic>) hatcheries: impacts of the built environment on fish mucosal microbiota</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>86</volume>:<fpage>e00411-20</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.00411-20</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32303543</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Musa</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shaharom</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wee</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Surveillance of bacteria species in diseased freshwater ornamental fish from aquarium shop</article-title>. <source>World Appl. Sci. J.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>903</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>905</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>C. D. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amoroso</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ventura</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Minich</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elizur</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Atlantic Salmon (<italic>Salmo salar</italic> L., 1758) gut microbiota profile correlates with flesh pigmentation: cause or effect?</article-title> <source>Mar. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>786</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>804</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10126-019-09939-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nikouli</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meziti</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smeti</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antonopoulou</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mente</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kormas</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Gut microbiota of five sympatrically farmed marine fish species in the Aegean Sea</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol.</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>460</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>470</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-020-01580-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32840670</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nyholm</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Odriozola</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bideguren</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aizpurua</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alberdi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Gut microbiota differences between paired intestinal wall and digesta samples in three small species of fish</article-title>. <source>Peerj.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>e12992</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7717/peerj.12992</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35223211</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Son</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yoon</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeong</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Complete genome sequence of <italic>Aeromonas rivipollensis</italic> KN-mc-11N1, isolated from a wild nutria (<italic>Myocastor coypus</italic>) in South Korea</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Res. Announc.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>e00907</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e00918</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/MRA.00907-18</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>P&#x00E9;rez-Pascual</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vendrell-Fern&#x00E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Audrain</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernal-Bayard</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pati&#x00F1;o-Navarrete</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petit</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Gnotobiotic rainbow trout (<italic>Oncorhynchus mykiss</italic>) model reveals endogenous bacteria that protect against Flavobacterium columnare infection</article-title>. <source>PLoS Pathog.</source> <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>e1009302</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1009302</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33513205</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Perry</surname> <given-names>W. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lindsay</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Payne</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brodie</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kazlauskaite</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The role of the gut microbiome in sustainable teleost aquaculture</article-title>. <source>Proc. R. Soc. B</source> <volume>287</volume>:<fpage>20200184</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspb.2020.0184</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32372688</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petersen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Round</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Defining dysbiosis and its influence on host immunity and disease</article-title>. <source>Cell. Microbiol.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>1024</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1033</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/cmi.12308</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24798552</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Piazzon</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naya-Catal&#x00E0;</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sim&#x00F3;-Mirabet</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Picard-S&#x00E1;nchez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roig</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Calduch-Giner</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Sex, age, and bacteria: how the intestinal microbiota is modulated in a protandrous hermaphrodite fish</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>2512</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.02512</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31736931</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pittman</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sourd</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ravn&#x00F8;y</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Espeland</surname> <given-names>&#x00D8;.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fiksdal</surname> <given-names>I. U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Novel method for quantifying salmonid mucous cells</article-title>. <source>J. Fish Dis.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>931</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>936</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2761.2011.01308.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22004586</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Poudel</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jumpponen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schlatter</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paulitz</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gardener</surname> <given-names>B. B. M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kinkel</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Microbiome networks: a systems framework for identifying candidate microbial assemblages for disease management</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>106</volume>, <fpage>1083</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1096</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-02-16-0058-FI</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27482625</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pullium</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dillehay</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Webb</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>High mortality in zebrafish (<italic>Danio rerio</italic>)</article-title>. <source>J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>80</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Renu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deblais</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Patil</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schrock</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kathayat</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Gut microbiota of obese children influences inflammatory mucosal immune pathways in the respiratory tract to influenza virus infection: optimization of an ideal duration of microbial colonization in a Gnotobiotic pig model</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Spectr.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>e02674</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e02621</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/spectrum.02674-21</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roeselers</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mittge</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stephens</surname> <given-names>W. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parichy</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cavanaugh</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guillemin</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Evidence for a core gut microbiota in the zebrafish</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>1595</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1608</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2011.38</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21472014</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Romero</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ring&#x00F8;</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Merrifield</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The gut microbiota of fish aquaculture nutrition</article-title>. <source>Gut Health Prob. Preb.</source>, <fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>100</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/9781118897263.ch4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref71"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sado</surname> <given-names>R. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Souza</surname> <given-names>F. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Behr</surname> <given-names>E. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mocha</surname> <given-names>P. R. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baldisserotto</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source>Anatomy of Teleosts and elasmobranchs, biology and physiology of freshwater neotropical fish</source>. <publisher-loc>Amsterdam</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>, pp. <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sirri</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mandrioli</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zamparo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Errani</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Volpe</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tura</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Swim bladder disorders in koi carp (<italic>Cyprinus carpio</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Animals</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1974</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani10111974</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33126455</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Steiner</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heasman</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laroche</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pochon</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Preece</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bowman</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The microbiome of Chinook salmon (<italic>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</italic>) in a recirculation aquaculture system</article-title>. <source>Aquaculture</source> <volume>534</volume>:<fpage>736227</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.736227</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref74"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Steiner</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laroche</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Symonds</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effects of water temperature on the gut microbiome and physiology of Chinook salmon (<italic>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</italic>) reared in a freshwater recirculating system</article-title>. <source>Aquaculture</source> <volume>560</volume>:<fpage>738529</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738529</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref75"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stewart</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hughes</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Swim bladder function and buoyancy control in pink snapper (<italic>Pagrus auratus</italic>) and mulloway (<italic>Argyrosomus japonicus</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Fish Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>335</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>346</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10695-013-9846-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23979722</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref76"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sullam</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Essinger</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lozupone</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x2019;Connor</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosen</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Environmental and ecological factors that shape the gut bacterial communities of fish: a meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>3363</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3378</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05552.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22486918</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref77"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Teskered&#x017E;i&#x0107;</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strunjak-Perovic</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x010C;o&#x017E;-Rakovac</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title><italic>Aeromonas hydrophila</italic> isolated from wild freshwater fish in Croatia</article-title>. <source>Vet. Res. Commun.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>371</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>377</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref78"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Timur</surname> <given-names>G. U. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Streptococcal infection caused by <italic>enterococcus casseliflavus</italic> in cultured meagre (<italic>Argyrosomus regius</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Israeli Journal of Aquaculture-Bamidgeh.</source> <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>20961</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.46989/001c.20961</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref79"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vargas-Albores</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x00ED;nez-C&#x00F3;rdova</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hern&#x00E1;ndez-Mendoza</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cicala</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lago-Lest&#x00F3;n</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x00ED;nez-Porchas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Therapeutic modulation of fish gut microbiota, a feasible strategy for aquaculture?</article-title> <source>Aquaculture</source> <volume>544</volume>:<fpage>737050</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737050</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref80"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>V&#x011B;trovsk&#x00FD;</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baldrian</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morais</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>SEED 2: a user-friendly platform for amplicon high-throughput sequencing data analyses</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>2292</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2294</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/bty071</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29452334</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref81"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Villasante</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ram&#x00ED;rez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodr&#x00ED;guez</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Catal&#x00E1;n</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>D&#x00ED;az</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rojas</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>In-depth analysis of swim bladder-associated microbiota in rainbow trout (<italic>Oncorhynchus mykiss</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>8974</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-45451-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31221992</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref82"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Intestinal microbiota of healthy and unhealthy Atlantic salmon <italic>Salmo salar</italic> L. in a recirculating aquaculture system</article-title>. <source>J. Oceanol. Limnol.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>414</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>426</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00343-017-6203-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref83"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>du</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Dysbiosis of maternal and neonatal microbiota associated with gestational diabetes mellitus</article-title>. <source>Gut</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>1614</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1625</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/gutjnl-2018-315988</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29760169</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref84"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rawls</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Intestinal microbiota composition in fishes is influenced by host ecology and environment</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>3100</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3102</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05646.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22916346</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref85"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Host development overwhelms environmental dispersal in governing the ecological succession of zebrafish gut microbiota</article-title>. <source>NPJ Biofilms Microb.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41522-020-00176-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref86"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Interactions and stability of gut microbiota in zebrafish increase with host development</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Spectr.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>e01696</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e01621</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/spectrum.01696-21</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref87"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Comparable ecological processes govern the temporal succession of gut bacteria and microeukaryotes as shrimp aged</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol.</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>935</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>945</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-020-01533-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32494840</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref88"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>J.-B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nie</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Current understanding on the roles of gut microbiota in fish disease and immunity</article-title>. <source>Zool. Res.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>70</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2018.069</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref89"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Der Gast</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Bacterial community assembly and turnover within the intestines of developing zebrafish</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>e30603</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0030603</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22276219</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref90"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yuen</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1974</year>). <article-title>The two-sample trimmed t for unequal population variances</article-title>. <source>Biometrika</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>165</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>170</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/biomet/61.1.165</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref91"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yukgehnaish</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sivachandran</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marimuthu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arshad</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paray</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Gut microbiota metagenomics in aquaculture: factors influencing gut microbiome and its physiological role in fish</article-title>. <source>Rev. Aquac.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1903</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1927</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/raq.12416</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref92"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zarkasi</surname> <given-names>K. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abell</surname> <given-names>G. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neuman</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hatje</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamplin</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Pyrosequencing-based characterization of gastrointestinal bacteria of atlantic salmon (<italic>Salmo salar</italic> L.) within a commercial mariculture system</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>117</volume>, <fpage>18</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jam.12514</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24698479</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref93"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zarkasi</surname> <given-names>K. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abell</surname> <given-names>G. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamplin</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Glencross</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bowman</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Atlantic salmon (<italic>Salmo salar</italic> L.) gastrointestinal microbial community dynamics in relation to digesta properties and diet</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>589</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>603</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-015-0728-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26780099</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref94"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Refaey</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Host age affects the development of southern catfish gut bacterial community divergent from that in the food and rearing water</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>495</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.00495</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29616008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref95"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Symonds</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Steiner</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carter</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bowman</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Salinity and fish age affect the gut microbiota of farmed Chinook salmon (<italic>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Aquaculture</source> <volume>528</volume>:<fpage>735539</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735539</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref96"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Symonds</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Steiner</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carter</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bowman</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of feed ration and temperature on Chinook salmon (<italic>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</italic>) microbiota in freshwater recirculating aquaculture systems</article-title>. <source>Aquaculture</source> <volume>543</volume>:<fpage>736965</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736965</pub-id></citation></ref></ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn0004"><p><sup>1</sup><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.ianz.govt.nz/" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.ianz.govt.nz/</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="fn0005"><p><sup>2</sup><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.ifcc.org/" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.ifcc.org/</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="fn0006"><p><sup>3</sup><ext-link xlink:href="http://www.pm2ra-xingyinliulab.cn/" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.pm2ra-xingyinliulab.cn/</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="fn0007"><p><sup>4</sup><ext-link xlink:href="https://cytoscape.org/" ext-link-type="uri">https://cytoscape.org/</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>