Front. Microbiol. Frontiers in Microbiology Front. Microbiol. 1664-302X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.875831 Microbiology Correction Corrigendum: Evasion of Plant Innate Defense Response by Salmonella on Lettuce Johnson Nicholas 1 2 Litt Pushpinder K. 3 Kniel Kalmia E. 3 * Bais Harsh 1 2 * 1Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States 2Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States 3Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States

Edited and reviewed by: Max Teplitski, University of Florida, United States

 *Correspondence: Kalmia E. Kniel kniel@udel.edu Harsh Bais hbais@udel.edu; bais@dbi.udel.edu

This article was submitted to Food Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology

 30 05 2022 2022 13 875831 14 02 2022 07 03 2022 Copyright © 2022 Johnson, Litt, Kniel and Bais. 2022 Johnson, Litt, Kniel and Bais

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on Evasion of Plant Innate Defense Response by Salmonella on Lettuce by Johnson, N., Litt, P. K., Kniel, K. E., and Bais, H. (2020). Front. Microbiol. 11:500. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00500 S. enterica L. monocytogenes T3SS stomata innate defense response food safety pattern triggered immunity hormonal response

In the original article, there was an error. The method section in our manuscript for describing statistical analysis was not adequately worded to reflect the statistical analysis performed for the data set. The following describes the statistical analysis performed with the data sets. A correction has been made to Materials and Methods, Statistical Analysis:

“All the experiments were repeated in triplicate per treatment. Bacterial populations, recovered at each sampling point, were converted to log10 CFU/g or MPN/g and mean values of the three replicates obtained. The limit of detection was 1 log CFU/g. Stomatal width at each time point was captured with confocal microscopy and measured using ImageJ. Data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance to determine the effect of treatments, student's t-test was performed to compare the means of bacterial populations, stomatal width, and relative gene expression over time by using JMP (JMP v.14 software; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) at a significance level of P < 0.05.”

In addition, the Flagellin mutant (fljB) used in the study is incorrectly referred as fliB. This has been corrected throughout.

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.