<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.869538</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Dose-dependent impact of enrofloxacin on broiler chicken gut resistome is mitigated by synbiotic application</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Temmerman</surname> <given-names>Robin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1000311/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Ghanbari</surname> <given-names>Mahdi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1137936/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Antonissen</surname> <given-names>Gunther</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/733079/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Schatzmayr</surname> <given-names>Gerd</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1250038/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Duchateau</surname> <given-names>Luc</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/710311/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Haesebrouck</surname> <given-names>Freddy</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/79276/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Garmyn</surname> <given-names>An</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Devreese</surname> <given-names>Mathias</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Pathobiology, Pharmacology and Zoological Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University</institution>, <addr-line>Merelbeke</addr-line>, <country>Belgium</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>DSM - BIOMIN Research Center</institution>, <addr-line>Tulln</addr-line>, <country>Austria</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Biometrics Research Center, Ghent University</institution>, <addr-line>Merelbeke</addr-line>, <country>Belgium</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Ziad Daoud, Central Michigan University, United States</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Hui Zhang, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences (JAAS), China; Dipak Kathayat, Cornell University, United States</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Mahdi Ghanbari, <email>mahdi.ghanbari@dsm.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>These authors share first authorship</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>04</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>869538</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>04</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>08</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2022 Temmerman, Ghanbari, Antonissen, Schatzmayr, Duchateau, Haesebrouck, Garmyn and Devreese.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Temmerman, Ghanbari, Antonissen, Schatzmayr, Duchateau, Haesebrouck, Garmyn and Devreese</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Fluoroquinolone agents are considered critical for human medicine by the World Health Organization (WHO). However, they are often used for the treatment of avian colibacillosis in poultry production, creating considerable concern regarding the potential spread of fluoroquinolone resistance genes from commensals to pathogens. Therefore, there is a need to understand the impact of fluoroquinolone application on the reservoir of ARGs in poultry gut and devise means to circumvent potential resistome expansion. Building upon a recent dose optimization effort, we used shotgun metagenomics to investigate the time-course change in the cecal microbiome and resistome of broiler chickens receiving an optimized dosage [12.5 mg/kg body weight (bw)/day], with or without synbiotic supplementation (PoultryStar<sup>&#x00AE;</sup>, BIOMIN GmbH), and a high dosage of enrofloxacin (50 mg/kg bw/day). Compared to the high dose treatment, the low (optimized) dose of enrofloxacin caused the most significant perturbations in the cecal microbiota and resistome of the broiler chickens, demonstrated by a lower cecal microbiota diversity while substantially increasing the antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) resistome diversity. Withdrawal of antibiotics resulted in a pronounced reduction in ARG diversity. Chickens receiving the synbiotic treatment had the lowest diversity and number of enriched ARGs, suggesting an alleviating impact on the burden of the gut resistome. Some Proteobacteria were significantly increased in the cecal metagenome of chickens receiving enrofloxacin and showed a positive association with increased ARG burden. Differential abundance (DA) analysis revealed a significant increase in the abundance of ARGs encoding resistance to macrolides-lincosamides-streptogramins (MLS), aminoglycosides, and tetracyclines over the period of enrofloxacin application, with the optimized dosage application resulting in a twofold higher number of affected ARG compared to high dosage application. Our results provide novel insights into the dose-dependent effects of clinically important enrofloxacin application in shaping the broiler gut resistome, which was mitigated by a synbiotic application. The contribution to ameliorating the adverse effects of antimicrobial agents, that is, lowering the spread of antimicrobial resistance genes, on the poultry and potentially other livestock gastrointestinal microbiomes and resistomes merits further study.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>broiler chicken</kwd>
<kwd>enrofloxacin</kwd>
<kwd>gut resistome</kwd>
<kwd>gut microbiome</kwd>
<kwd>synbiotic</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100007229</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="8"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="76"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="9411"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) accounts for an annual death toll of approximately 700,000 people and is a major threat to global health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">World Health Organisation (WHO), 2014</xref>). There is a general consensus that the alarming levels of AMR are strongly related to the overuse and misuse of antimicrobial agents in human and animal medicine, as well as in agriculture and livestock production systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Anomaly, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chantziaras et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Raboisson et al., 2020</xref>), where antimicrobial use is projected to increase further due to the growth of human and livestock populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Van Boeckel et al., 2015</xref>). Fluoroquinolones are of critical importance in human medicine for the treatment of <italic>Campylobacter</italic>, <italic>Salmonella</italic>, and <italic>Shigella</italic> infections. These infections are zoonotic and limited therapeutic options are available (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">WHO Advisory Group on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (AGISAR), 2019</xref>). Due to their crucial status and the development of AMR in human medicine, fluoroquinolone use in the veterinary sector is under scrutiny. In the broiler industry, fluoroquinolone chemotherapeutics such as enrofloxacin are still frequently administered via drinking water for the treatment of colibacillosis (an infection that is caused by the enigmatic avian pathogenic <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>) in Europe and Asia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Persoons et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Joosten et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Roth et al., 2019b</xref>), which creates a considerable concern regarding the potential spread of fluoroquinolone resistance genes from commensal bacteria found in livestock to pathogenic organisms in humans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Dheilly et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Gregova and Kmet, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Temmerman et al., 2021</xref>). However, there is limited published information on the impact of enrofloxacin treatment on the poultry gut microbiome and, more importantly, no information on the development of resistome [the reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs)] in poultry gut, leaving a considerable knowledge gap that limits the thorough evaluation and optimization of such critically important antibiotics in broiler production. In fact, the judicious use of antibiotics is extremely important to preserve the efficacy of antimicrobials while mitigating resistance development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">World Health Organization (WHO), 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Foditsch et al., 2019</xref>). Using the 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing approach, previous studies have shown that treatment with enrofloxacin causes significant shifts in intestinal microbiota of chickens while hindering recovery from <italic>Salmonella</italic> Typhimurium and selecting for fluoroquinolone resistance in coliforms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Li et al., 2017a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Ma et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>With regard to the use of enrofloxacin in the poultry sector, the European Medicines Agency&#x2019;s Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products urged to revise the currently approved dose of 10 mg/kg bw/day (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">European Medicines Agency, 2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2021</xref>), considering the development of resistance, as well as the notoriously large inter-animal variability in drinking behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Soraci et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Ferran and Roques, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Ferran et al., 2020</xref>), which can lead to both under- (treatment failure and resistance selection) and overexposure (adverse effects) in animals. In our recent efforts to optimize the dose of enrofloxacin for the treatment of colibacillosis in broiler chickens, using a novel drinking behavior pharmacokinetic (DBPK) model, we found a dosage of 12.5 mg/kg per day to be efficacious in treating colibacillosis caused by strains without acquired resistance mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Temmerman et al., 2021</xref>). However, <italic>in vivo</italic> evaluation of such optimized doses in broiler chickens is still lacking. The impact of other antimicrobials on the residential microbiota in broilers has been investigated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Xiong et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Luiken et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Turcotte et al., 2020</xref>), showing a range of effects, including reduction of overall diversity of the bacterial communities, microbiome metabolic shifts, increasing gut susceptibility to colonization, and stimulation of the development of AMR. In medical research, there are indications that alternatives to antibiotics, including dietary prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics (products that combine the simultaneous and potentially synergistic use of pre- and probiotics) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Gibson et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Markowiak and &#x015A;li&#x017C;ewska, 2017</xref>) can reverse the perturbations induced by antimicrobial administration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Korpela et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abd El-Hack et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Building on our previous findings, we performed a shotgun metagenomics analysis to provide insights into the effects of enrofloxacin treatment on the broiler cecal microbiome and antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG) reservoir (resistome), applied at the optimized (12.5 mg/kg bw/day, OPT group) or high dose (50 mg/kg bw/day, HIGH group). Given the importance of studying the potential means to circumvent resistome expansion, we also evaluated the change in the cecal microbiome and resistome of broiler chickens supplemented with a synbiotic in conjunction with the administration of enrofloxacin (OPT_PS group). The findings of this study have important implications for poultry production and public health, as there is little research on the effects of therapeutic doses of enrofloxacin and synbiotics in conjugation with the application of enrofloxacin on the gut microbiome and resistome.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>Animals and experimental design</title>
<p>The animal trial was reviewed and approved by the ethical committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Bioscience Engineering of Ghent University (EC 2020-016). The care and treatment of the birds were in full compliance with the national and European legislation concerning animal welfare (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">European Commission., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Royal Decree., 2013</xref>). Throughout the study, feed and drinking water were provided <italic>ad libitum</italic>.</p>
<p>Eighty-four healthy 1-day-old male broiler chicks (Ross 308), with similar body weights (bws) of approximately 55 g were randomly allocated to one of four treatments [<italic>n</italic> = 7 cages (3 chickens each) per treatment]: (1) standard commercial feed (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, Farm mash 1&#x0026;2, Versele-Laga, Deinze, Belgium) for 37 days (control group), 2) antibiotic-treated group 1 [OPT, 12.5 mg/kg bw/day Baytril<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> 10% oral solution (Bayer, Diegem, Belgium) consecutively via drinking water from day 21 to day 23 of age], (3) antibiotic-treated group 2 (HIGH, 50 mg/kg bw/day Baytril<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> 10% oral solution consecutively via drinking water from day 21 to day 23 of age), and (4) synbiotic supplemented group (OPT_PS), in which chickens received the commercial feed supplemented with a synbiotic product (PoultryStar<sup>&#x00AE;</sup>, BIOMIN GmbH, Austria) during their lifetime, in conjunction with receiving enrofloxacin at a dose of 12.5 mg/kg bw/day via drinking water from day 21 to day 23 of age. The age of the birds was selected to reflect the real commercial setting and scenario for antimicrobial use, since colibacillosis frequently occurs in the second half of the broiler growing period. Additionally, the 3-day treatment duration was in compliance with the label of Baytril. The synbiotic supplement was composed of 2 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/g multi-species probiotic: <italic>Enterococcus faecium</italic> (1.20 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/g), <italic>Bifidobacterium animalis</italic> (6 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup> CFU/g), <italic>Lactobacillus salivarius</italic> (2 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup> CFU/g), and prebiotic inulin. The amount of mL enrofloxacin that needed to be added in the drinking water was calculated using the following formula (Equation 1) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Temmerman et al., 2021</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="S2.E1"><label>(1)</label><mml:math id="M1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mtable rowspacing="0pt"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="center"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo rspace="7.5pt">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo rspace="7.5pt">&#x002A;</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo rspace="7.5pt">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo rspace="7.5pt">&#x002A;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mo>&#x002A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="center"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mn>&#x2005;24</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mpadded width="+5pt"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:math></disp-formula>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Composition of the broiler diet (Farm mash 1&#x0026;2, Versele-Laga).</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Composition</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wheat, soya feed (produced from genetically modified soya), maize, wheat gluten feed, palm oil, calcium carbonate, sunflower seed feed, maize gluten feed, beet molasses, monocalcium phosphate, sodium chloride, sodium bicarbonate<hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Analytical constituents</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Crude protein 18.0%, crude fat 5.0%, crude ash 5.5%, crude fiber 3.0%, lysine 0.97%, methionine 0.45%, calcium 0.95%, phosphorus 0.53%, sodium 0.10%<hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Additives/kg</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Nutritional additives</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">3a672a vitamin A 10000 IU, 3a671 vitamin D3 2500 IU, 3a700 Vitamin E (all-rac-alpha-tocopheryl acetate) 80 mg, 3b103 iron (ferrous sulfate, monohydrate) 50 mg, 3b202 iodine (calcium iodate, anhydrous) 2.14 mg, 3b405 copper (cupric sulfate, pentahydrate) 10 mg, 3b502 manganese (manganous oxide) 75 mg, 3b603 zinc (zinc oxide) 70 mg, 3b802 selenium (coated granulated sodium selenite) 0.30 mg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Zoo technical additives</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">4a1617 endo-1,4-&#x03B2;-xylanase (EC 3.2.1.8) 1050 EPU, 4a16 6-phytase (EC 3.1.3.26) 250 FTU</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Technological additives</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Antioxidants</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Coccidiostats and histomonostats</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">E763 lasalocid sodium 125 mg</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>Cecal sampling, DNA extraction, library preparation and sequencing</title>
<p>Immediately before (day 20) and after enrofloxacin treatment (day 24), and 2 weeks after antibiotic withdrawal (day 37), one bird per replicate was sacrificed and digesta samples from the cecum were collected in Eppendorf cups, immediately snap frozen (liquid N2), and stored at &#x2212;20&#x00B0;C. The animals were euthanized with pentobarbital IV (sodium pentobarbital 20%, Kela, Hoogstraten, Belgium) dosed at approximately 100 mg/kg.</p>
<p>DNA was extracted using the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit (Qiagen, Antwerp, Belgium), which as shown in our recent studies, has minimum effects on the microbial community structure and promising results in terms of the DNA integrity for chicken cecum samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Wegl et al., 2021</xref>). The purity of the DNA was assessed by evaluating the 260/280 and 260/230 absorbances using NanoDrop<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> (ND-1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Merelbeke, Belgium), while Quantus<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> (Promega, Leiden, The Netherlands) was used to estimate the DNA concentration. Finally, DNA integrity was visually validated by gel electrophoresis. The DNA was sent to LGC Genomics GmbH, Berlin, Germany, where paired-end sequencing libraries were constructed using the Illumina Nextera XT Library Preparation Kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) followed by sequencing on the Illumina NextSeq 500 platform using high-output chemistry (2 &#x00D7; 150 bp) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>Sequenced data processing and statistical analysis</title>
<p>After demultiplexing and adaptor trimming (trimmomatic v. 0.39) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bolger et al., 2014</xref>) taxonomic profiles of the demultiplexed reads and taxa relative abundance estimates were generated using Kraken2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Wood et al., 2019</xref>) and Bracken (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Lu et al., 2017</xref>), with kraken2 confidence set to 0.05 and bracken threshold to t &#x2212;10. The abundances of ARGs were quantified by mapping the reads against the hand-curated AMR database MEGARes v2.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Doster et al., 2020</xref>) using USEARCH (v10) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Edgar, 2010</xref>). In MEGARes 2.0, the nodes of the acyclic hierarchical ontology included four antimicrobial compound types, 57 classes, 220 mechanisms of resistance, and 1,345 gene groups that classified the 7,868 accessions. High confidence matches to the sequence in the MEGARes database were obtained by considering the entire coverage of the query reads against ARG genes with an identity threshold of 90% (parameters were set as &#x201C;-usearch-global -id 0.9, maxaccepts 1, threads 50&#x201D;) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ghanbari et al., 2019</xref>). The variance explained by each variable included in the trial was quantified by omnibus testing on Bray&#x2013;Curtis dissimilarity matrices from metagenome data, using PERMANOVA with the adonis function in the R package Vegan (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Dixon, 2003</xref>). Ordination was performed with log-transformed normalized reads on two dimensions with the &#x201C;prcomp&#x201D; ordinate function from the package &#x201C;stats&#x201D; v3.6.2 and visualized using the &#x201C;fviz_pca&#x201D; function from the &#x201C;factoextra&#x201D; function from the FaceFacefactoextra package v1.0.7.</p>
<p>Linear regression analysis was performed considering random differences between the treatment groups at the first sampling (for the control and enrofloxacin treatments) as covariate terms in the model if the richness (the number of unique taxa) and inverse Simpson diversity (the number and relative abundance of unique taxa) were affected by the different treatments. The Inverse Simpson diversity index was selected due to its biological interpretation aspect and since it does not tend to be as affected by sampling effort as other diversity indexes. The Mann&#x2013;Whitney test was used for statistical comparisons between the pairs of groups at each sampling time point. Log-fold changes in abundance (of taxa and ARGs) between groups were determined by a negative binomial generalized linear model using DESeq2 version 1.26.0. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Love et al., 2014</xref>) in R, considering the statistical significance at BH-corrected <italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.10. In all statistical analyses, the cage was considered as the experimental unit.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>Synbiotic administration resulted in a significantly higher body weight in broiler chicken</title>
<p>The average weights per treatment group (7 animals per group, 28 in total) and associated variability at the end of the animal trial are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>. The broiler weight ranges at day 37 were 1.25&#x2013;1.95, 1.37&#x2013;2.20, 1.25&#x2013;2.00, and 1.58&#x2013;2.00 kg for the control, HIGH, OPT, and OPT_PS groups, respectively. The corresponding averages are 1.59, 1.82, 1.54, and 1.83 kg, respectively. Chickens that received the highest enrofloxacin dose (HIGH group) and the optimized enrofloxacin dose supplemented with the synbiotic (OPT_PS group) had higher average weights at 37 days of age when compared to the control group, although only the chickens in the OPT with synbiotic supplementation (OPT_PS) group showed a much higher homogeneity in weight gain and a significant difference in weight group (<italic>p</italic> = 0.034, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Interestingly, the difference between the optimized dosing (OPT) and OPT_PS was statistically significant (<italic>p</italic> = 0.026), suggesting an important role of synbiotic application in restoring physiological balance after perturbation by antibiotics and, consequently, improving the weight gain.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Box plot of the final body weight distribution of broiler chickens in different groups at 37 days of age. Control group (CONTROL); higher dose (HIGH): 50 mg/kg bw/day enrofloxacin; optimized dosing (OPT): 12.5 mg/kg bw/day enrofloxacin; optimized dosing with synbiotic supplementation (OPT_PS): 12.5 mg/kg bw/day enrofloxacin administration with synbiotic supplementation). FDR-corrected <italic>p</italic>-value from the Mann&#x2013;Whitney statistical analysis is shown (&#x002A;<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-869538-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>Enrofloxacin and synbiotic applications were significantly associated with microbiota and resistome profiles variation in broiler chicken</title>
<p>Shotgun metagenomics of the 84 cecum samples generated over 600 million paired-end sequence reads with a mean number of eight million reads per sample (see <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary File 1</xref>, which contains detailed information on the samples, including library size). On average, 23% of the reads per sample were classified to the species level using Kraken2 with a confidence threshold of 5%. Using the MEGARes v2.0 database with a 90% gene cut-off fraction, 1,281,069 reads were aligned to 1,000 antimicrobial resistance genes across treatments. Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) statistical analysis calculated on Bray&#x2013;Curtis dissimilarity matrices from metagenome data showed that the age of the birds (sampling time points: days 20, 24, and 37) was the largest driver of variation in both cecum microbiota and ARG resistome profiles, with antibiotic and synbiotic application capturing less variation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>). In line with this, principal component analysis (PCA) revealed a clear separation of the sample based on the day of sampling (age) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2B,C</xref>). Regarding the effect of antibiotic administration on global diversity, the lower, optimized dosage of enrofloxacin (OPT) resulted in a higher variation compared to the higher dosage (HIGH) on the composition and structure of the taxonomical (Adonis R2, 5.9% vs. 3.6%) and the ARG resistome profiles (Adonis R2, 3.9% vs. 3.1%) in broiler chickens. Synbiotic application (OPT_PS) significantly explained 3.1 and 4.6% of the variation (Adonis R2) of the cecum microbiota and ARG resistome profiles, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> PERMANOVA shows that the animal age had the largest effect on variation for both measurement types followed by the low/optimized dosage of enrofloxacin application. Stratified tests (Enro-HIGH/OPT (LOW), Synbiotic) consider only samples within the indicated category. Stars show FDR-corrected statistical significance (FDR &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.01). Variance is estimated for each feature independently, except for &#x201C;All,&#x201D; for which all metadata are included in the model. <bold>(B)</bold> Principle component analysis showing the changes in taxonomical and <bold>(C)</bold> ARG resistome profiles due to the effect of age. Ellipses indicate 95% confidence intervals of around centroids of the groupings with treatments as factor.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-869538-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Further, pairwise <italic>post hoc</italic> comparisons<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote1">1</xref></sup> showed a significant difference in the profiles of the relative abundance of taxa and ARGs (with the exception of the optimized dosage effect on the taxa profiles) between the enrofloxacin (both HIGH and OPT) and control treatment at day 24 of sampling. No significant differences were seen for the sample taken at day 20 or for those taken 2 weeks after the withdrawal of enrofloxacin at day 37 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>), indicating the resilience of the bacterial communities carrying ARGs from antibiotic perturbation. On the other hand, OPT_PS showed a significant difference with the control groups in the relative abundance of taxonomy (with the exception of day 20) and resistome profiles at days 20 and 37 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). On day 24, immediately after an optimized dosage of enrofloxacin was applied in combination with the synbiotic product, the microbiota and ARG resistome profiles of the samples clearly diverged from the control group (<italic>P</italic> = 0,006), suggesting a synergistic effect on the chicken cecal metagenome (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Pairwise comparisons for permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) using bray-cutis distance matrices.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Sums of Sqs</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Mean Sqs</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">F-Model</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">R2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic>-value</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>q</italic>-value<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fns1">&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DAY_20CONTROL VS. DAY_20HIGH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Microbiota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.041</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.041</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.794</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.062</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.583</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.631</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="center">Resistome</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.012</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.012</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.589</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.047</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.905</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.905</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DAY_20CONTROL VS. DAY_20OPT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Microbiota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.094</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.094</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.508</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.112</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.127</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.186</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="center">Resistome</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.023</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.023</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.265</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.095</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.239</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.258</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DAY_20CONTROL VS. DAY_20OPT_PS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Microbiota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.066</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.066</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.259</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.095</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.236</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.311</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="center">Resistome</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.037</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.037</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.562</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.115</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.085</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.098</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DAY_24CONTROL VS. DAY_24HIGH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Microbiota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.109</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.109</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.598</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.178</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.005</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.026</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="center">Resistome</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.043</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.043</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.988</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.249</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.005</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.009</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DAY_24CONTROL VS. DAY_24OPT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Microbiota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.087</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.087</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.456</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.108</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.146</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.209</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="center">Resistome</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.034</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.034</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.277</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.159</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.003</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.007</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DAY_24CONTROL VS. DAY_24OPT_PS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Microbiota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.090</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.090</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.472</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.171</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.006</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.026</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="center">Resistome</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.042</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.042</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.810</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.286</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.003</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.007</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DAY_37CONTROL VS. DAY_37HIGH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Microbiota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.032</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.032</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.707</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.056</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.740</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.763</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="center">Resistome</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.031</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.031</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.639</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.120</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.090</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.101</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DAY_37CONTROL VS. DAY_37OPT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Microbiota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.028</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.028</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.569</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.045</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.897</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.897</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="center">Resistome</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.014</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.014</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.024</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.079</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.444</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.457</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DAY_37CONTROL VS. DAY_37OPT_PS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Microbiota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.048</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.048</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.104</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.084</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.324</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.381</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/><td valign="top" align="center">Resistome</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.032</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.032</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.942</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.197</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.012</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.017</bold></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="t2fns1"><p>&#x002A;FDR-corrected P-value. Bold values denote statistical significance.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>Enrofloxacin application resulted in a lower cecal microbiota diversity while substantially increasing antibiotic resistance gene resistome diversity</title>
<p>Linear regression analysis, taking into account the random differences between the high and optimized doses of enrofloxacin with control treatments on day 20, revealed a significant association of enrofloxacin application with the reduction of the microbiota Observed index from days 20 to day 24 (HIGH vs. control coefficient estimate day 24 = &#x2212;41.143 with P = 2.55e<sup>&#x2013;05</sup>, OPT vs. control coefficient estimate day 24 = &#x2212;33.857 with <italic>P</italic> = 0.000414, and OPT_PS vs. control observed index coefficient estimate day 24 = &#x2212;41.857 with <italic>P</italic> = 1.91e<sup>&#x2013;05</sup>). Two weeks after the withdrawal of the antibiotic, although the microbial community richness recovered to some extent (HIGH vs. control CE day 37 = &#x2212;26.429 with <italic>P</italic> = 0.00507, OPT vs. control EC day 37 = &#x2212;26.000 with <italic>P</italic> = 0.005795, and OPT_PS vs. control CE day 37 = &#x2212;20.143, with <italic>P</italic> = 0.030770), the cecum microbiota Observed index was still significantly lower in all groups than in the control. For OPT_PS at day 20, the observed index for the cecum microbiota was higher compared to those in the control (187 &#x00B1; 9 vs. 183 &#x00B1; 6), although the difference was not statistically significant.</p>
<p>Calculation of the Inverse Simpson diversity index revealed that while the cecum microbiota diversity in the animals in the control group increased (not significantly) from day 20 (inverse Simpson 11.248 &#x00B1; 1.819) to day 24 of age (12.842 &#x00B1; 2.617), for the broiler chickens receiving the HIGH and OPT dosage, there was either no change (HIGH group, IS 12.048 &#x00B1; 4.256&#x2013;12.210 &#x00B1; 4.0189) or a reduction (not significant; OPT group, IS 11.909 &#x00B1; 3.059&#x2013;10.536 &#x00B1; 3.024) in microbial diversity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). For OPT_PS, the reduction in diversity was less pronounced (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). At day 20 of age, OPT_PS showed generally higher diversity compared to the control (IS 12.960 &#x00B1; 3.259 vs. 11.248 &#x00B1; 1.819, respectively). While the withdrawal of enrofloxacin application did not seem to have a large impact on the recovery of the diversity for the animals in the HIGH and OPT_PS groups, it resulted in a significant increase in the cecum microbiota diversity in the optimized dosage group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Diversity analysis (based on Inverse Simpson index) of the <bold>(A)</bold> microbial taxa and <bold>(B)</bold> ARGs in chicken cecal metagenome. FDR-corrected <italic>p</italic>-value from the Mann&#x2013;Whitney statistical analysis is shown. &#x002A;<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01, respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-869538-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>A significant association of enrofloxacin application with the change in the diversity of ARGs was revealed [linear regression analysis, <italic>F</italic><sub>(11, 72)</sub> = 2.258, <italic>p</italic> = 0.02016 with an R2 of 0.26]. Over the course of the enrofloxacin application, that is, days 21&#x2013;23, the diversity of ARGs in the cecum metagenome of the birds receiving enrofloxacin significantly increased (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), regardless of dosage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>). While OPT_PS had the lowest ARG diversity at day 20, the application of the optimized dosage of enrofloxacin on the top of the synbiotic supplement resulted in the largest increase (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) on the diversity of ARGs from days 20 to 24 compared to all other treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>). Yet, the cecum ARG diversity of birds in the OPT group (17.393 &#x00B1; 0.727) at day 20 was significantly higher than that in the control (16.477 &#x00B1; 1.651, <italic>P</italic> = 0.620), HIGH (16.176 &#x00B1; 1.412, <italic>P</italic> = 0.097), and OPT_PS (16.089 &#x00B1; 0.617, <italic>P</italic> = 0.011) groups, suggesting an alleviation effect of synbiotic application on the expansion of broiler cecal resistome (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>). Withdrawal of antibiotic application resulted in a pronounced reduction in ARG diversity, with OPT_PS showing significantly lower diversity of ARGs compared to the control group (<italic>P</italic> = 0.011) at day 37 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>Proteobacteria were significantly affected by the enrofloxacin application and are associated with an increased antibiotic resistance genes burden</title>
<p>Taxonomic profiling of the cecum samples in terms of the most abundant microbial phyla and species over the course of the study is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>. In total, 1,573 different microbial species were observed, of which species belonging to Firmicutes, followed by species belonging to Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria, were the most dominant members of the cecal microbiota (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>The 10 most abundant taxa in the bacterial communities at the phylum <bold>(A)</bold> and species <bold>(B)</bold> level, according to Kraken2 analysis.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-869538-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Differential abundance (DA) analysis of the species-level taxonomic assignments using the DESeq2 tool revealed a significant effect of enrofloxacin application on shaping the cecal microbiota over the course of antibiotic application. Among the different groups of the impacted taxa, species belonging to the Proteobacteria phylum were among the most affected taxa due to enrofloxacin application followed by species from Firmicutes and Actinobacteria (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Data 1</xref>). In fact, over the course of the enrofloxacin application (days 21&#x2013;23), both high and optimized dose application resulted in a significant (FDR-corrected <italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C; 10%) increase in the abundance of 17 proteobacterial species, while significantly reducing the abundance of 15 proteobacterial species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Data 1</xref>). Two weeks after the last day of antibiotic application, the number of affected microbial species belonging to the Proteobacteria decreased, with only four and five species showing a significantly higher abundance in the HIGH and OPT groups compared to the control, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Data 1</xref>). Synbiotic application significantly (FDR-corrected <italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C; 10%) reduced the abundance of 15 proteobacterial species, including <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> and <italic>Campylobacter</italic> spp., on day 20 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Data 1</xref>). Interestingly, the OPT_PS group, showed a lower number of significantly increased Proteobacteria species compared to the OPT group (11 vs. 17, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Data 1</xref>). Furthermore, with regard to the Firmicutes phylum, while species from the <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>, <italic>Bacillus</italic>, and <italic>Anaerobutyricum</italic> showed a significant increase (FDR-corrected <italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C; 10%) in the cecum microbiota of chickens in OPT_PS compared to the control, several microbial pathogenic species such as <italic>Enterococcus cecorum</italic>, <italic>Enterococcus hirae</italic>, and <italic>Enterococcus gallinarum</italic> were significantly decreased (FDR-corrected <italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C; 10%) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Data 1</xref>). At day 37, 2 weeks after the withdrawal of antibiotics, the highest number of significantly decreased Proteobacteria was observed in the broiler chickens in OPT_PS (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>Impact of synbiotic and/or enrofloxacin application on differential abundances of microbiota. The bar plot shows the number of affected taxa <bold>(A)</bold> and Proteobacterial members (either increased or decreased) <bold>(B)</bold> based on differential abundance analysis in the chicken cecum.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-869538-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Antibiotic resistome profiling of the cecal metagenome showed that, regardless of antibiotic medication, all samples harbored a diverse range of ARGs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6A</xref>). Genes encoding MLS (mean = 29.64 &#x00B1; 0.045 across all samples) and tetracycline (Mean = 27.70 &#x00B1; 0,051 across all samples) resistance were the most predominant classes of ARGs to which the reads were aligned, followed by oxazolidinone and aminoglycoside resistance genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6A</xref>). Correlation analysis showed that among the different dominant groups of the microbial phyla, Proteobacteria had the highest positive correlation (Spearman correlation, <italic>R</italic> = 0.7, <italic>P</italic> = 3.1e<sup>&#x2013;13</sup>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6B</xref>) with the diversity of ARGs in the cecal metagenome of the broiler chickens (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7B</xref>), with Actinobacteria showing a weak positive correlation (Spearman correlation <italic>R</italic> = 0.29, <italic>P</italic> = 0.0085) and Firmicutes showing a strong negative correlation (Spearman correlation <italic>R</italic> = &#x2212;0.6, <italic>P</italic> = 1.2e<sup>&#x2013;10</sup>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Relative abundances of the top 10 classes of ARGs in the cecum digesta of medicated and non-medicated broiler chickens at different time points. <bold>(B)</bold> Scatterplots showing a strong Spearman&#x2019;s rho correlation coefficient (R) between the ARG resistome load and the abundance of Proteobacteria in broiler chicken cecum metagenome samples.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-869538-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption><p>Significant (<italic>q</italic> &#x003C; 0.10) log-fold changes in the abundances of ARG hits in <bold>(A)</bold> samples from OPT_PS taken at day 20, <bold>(B)</bold> samples from High group taken at day 24, <bold>(C)</bold> samples from OPT group taken at day 24, and <bold>(D)</bold> samples from OPT_PS group taken at day 24.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-869538-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In line with the observation that several members of Proteobacteria significantly increased in the cecal metagenome of broiler chickens receiving enrofloxacin, DA analysis revealed a significant increase in the abundance of ARGs encoding resistance to antibiotics belonging to different classes of antibiotics (mainly MLS, aminoglycosides, and tetracyclines) in these two groups from days 20 to 24, with the optimized dosage application resulting in a twofold higher number of DA ARGs compared to high dose application (32 DA ARGs vs. 17 DA ARGs, respectively; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Data 1</xref>). Examples of the increased ARGs in the samples from the HIGH and OPT treatments taken at day 24 include <italic>cat</italic> and <italic>catA</italic> (encoding chloramphenicol acetyltransferases), <italic>ermB</italic> (encoding 23S rRNA methyl-transferases), and MLS23S (macrolide-resistant 23S rRNA mutation) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7B,C</xref>). The most strongly diminished ARGs were the <italic>asmA</italic> (multi-drug RND efflux regulator) and <italic>ptsL</italic> (fosfomycin target mutation) genes, with an approximately &#x2212;6 log2 fold change (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7B,C</xref>). Other decreased genes included those encoding <italic>gyrA</italic>, <italic>pbp2</italic> (Penicillin binding protein2), and <italic>CTX</italic> (class A beta-lactamases), as well as <italic>tetA</italic>, <italic>tetBP</italic>, and <italic>tet32</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7B,C</xref>). Withdrawal of antibiotic administration seems to result in the recovery of ARG resistome to the same level as the control group, as there were almost no DA ARGs in the cecum metagenomes of broiler chickens between the high/optimized dosage and those in the control group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>). For the samples taken from the OPT_PS group at day 20, where only synbiotic products were applied, the abundance of 13 ARGs was significantly lower than that in the control group, with three ARGs showing a significantly higher abundance in the chicken cecum metagenomes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7A</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Data 1</xref>). At day 24, for OPT_PS, an alleviating effect of synbiotic application on the ARG burden was observed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7D</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Data 1</xref>). Fifty-three ARGs (vs. 32 ARGs in OPT) were significantly lower in abundance in this group than in the control group, and only 13 genes (vs. 32 ARGs in OPT), mainly belonging to tetracycline resistance, showed significantly higher abundance compared to the control group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7D</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Data 1</xref>). No DA ARGs were found in the animals in this group at day 37 compared to the control group.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption><p>Impact of synbiotic and/or enrofloxacin application on differential abundances of ARGs. The bar plot shows the number of significantly affected ARGs (either increased or decreased) based on differential abundance analysis in broiler chicken cecum metagenomes.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-869538-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In this study, we characterized the impact of the critically important fluoroquinolone enrofloxacin following a lower, optimized (12.5 mg/kg bw/day) or high dosage (50 mg/kg bw/day) and its withdrawal on the broiler chicken cecal microbiota and associated resistome by applying shotgun metagenomics. In addition, as a unique aspect of our study, the effect of synbiotic administration in conjunction with the application of enrofloxacin on the cecal microbiota and its ARG reservoir was characterized.</p>
<p>Regarding the gallinaceous cecal microbiota, our study found Firmicutes abundance levels of approximately 80&#x2013;90% on the three sample days (prior and post enrofloxacin treatment). This is in agreement with the previous observation that Firmicutes are the dominant group of microbial taxa in cecal microbiota over the 6-week lifespan of broilers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Oakley et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Oakley and Kogut, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Shang et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Wegl et al., 2021</xref>). While Firmicutes bacteria are important members of both mammals and birds, there is inter-species variation. For example, the relative abundance of the Firmicutes phylum in the human cecum was comparable to that in broilers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Sun et al., 2019</xref>). However, in piglets, the dominance of Firmicutes was much less clear and was rivaled by the phylum Bacteriodetes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ghanbari et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Tan et al., 2019</xref>). Because of the similar basic composition of the cecal microbiota when compared with humans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Rychlik, 2020</xref>), the chicken cecum and residential microbiota can potentially function as a model for investigating microbiome and associated resistome dynamics in humans following different interventions, when validated with functional microbiome comparisons.</p>
<p>We report a significant dose-dependent impact of enrofloxacin application, with a high dose of the antibiotic causing a much higher perturbation of the diversity, structure, and composition of the cecal microbiota. This can be explained by the stronger bactericidal action of high-dose enrofloxacin compared to the lower dose. In line with this, it has been previously reported that enrofloxacin applied at a dose of 100 mg/kg bw completely eradicated <italic>Salmonella</italic> Typhimurium from chicken gut digesta immediately after administration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Li et al., 2017b</xref>) and was shown to have a significant effect on the chicken fecal and cecal microbiota structure evaluated by 16S amplicon sequencing in two independent studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Li et al., 2017a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Ma et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Similar to previous observations in broiler chickens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Morales-Barrera et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Li et al., 2017a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Ma et al., 2020</xref>), the Proteobacteria phylum was the most affected taxa by enrofloxacin application in the current study. The observed increase in the abundance of several Proteobacteria members in the medicated animals in the present study might be due to the potential of these taxa to carry ARGs. This is in accordance with previous reports that ARGs are more enriched in Proteobacteria and this phylum expands following antimicrobial treatment, thereby increasing the ARG burden (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Young and Schmidt, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Antonopoulos et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Hu et al., 2016</xref>). Indeed, we observed a significant short-term expansion in the diversity and structure of ARG reservoirs in the cecum of the enrofloxacin-treated chickens, which was mitigated by the synbiotic supplementation in the group of chickens receiving the optimized dosage of enrofloxacin concomitantly with the synbiotic product. We believe that this beneficial effect can in fact be explained through ecological effects of the synbiotic supplement on the microbiome, such as its pronounced effect against strains that likely carry the expanded ARGs in the cecal microbiota. This is supported by the observation that, by day 20 of sampling, where all animals but those in the synbiotic group (OPT_PS) received no synbiotic supplement, a significant inhibition of several important pathobionts belonging to Proteobacteria, such as <italic>E. coli</italic> and <italic>Campylobacter</italic> spp., was observed in the cecal microbiota of the OPT_PS group. Furthermore, some other important pathobionts that may carry genes encoding acquired resistance to &#x03B2;-lactams and aminoglycoside antibiotics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Li et al., 2017a</xref>) and have potential negative impacts on chicken gut integrity, such as <italic>Enterococcus cecorum</italic>, <italic>Enterococcus hirae</italic>, and <italic>Enterococcus gallinarum</italic>, showed a lower abundance in the cecal microbiota of the OPT_PS group when they were receiving the optimized dosage of enrofloxacin (i.e., days 21&#x2013;23) on the top of the synbiotic product. Such antagonistic effects have been previously observed and reported for the synbiotic product used in the current study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Ghareeb et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Luoma et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Roth et al., 2019a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Shanmugasundaram et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Deng et al., 2020</xref>), which can explain the significantly higher bw gain of the OPT_PS group compared to the control. Interestingly, animals subjected to a HIGH dose of enrofloxacin (50 mg/kg bw/day) also achieved higher weights compared to the OPT dosage and control groups. Since fluoroquinolones are concentration-dependent antimicrobial agents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Levison and Levison, 2009</xref>), a possible explanation could be a stronger bactericidal action following the higher dose and subsequent larger shift in the microbiota, leading to a more pronounced growth promotion effect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Feighner and Dashkevicz, 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Butaye et al., 2003</xref>).</p>
<p>These findings raise the possibility that synbiotic-associated resistome expansion mitigation constitutes a unique observation stemming from our experimental design or the supplemented synbiotic product we utilized. Next, we aimed to determine whether other synbiotic studies reflected our findings. To our knowledge, there are no additional publicly available datasets displaying shotgun metagenomic data from the gastrointestinal microbiome of concomitantly synbiotic- and antibiotic-supplemented in either human or livestock species. However, in a recent study, probiotic colonization was associated with a reduced ARG load in endoscopic samples from 10 healthy individuals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Montassier et al., 2021</xref>). In contrast, the probiotic mix containing 11 strains from the <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>, <italic>Bifidobacterium</italic>, <italic>Streptococcus</italic>, and <italic>Lactococcus</italic> genera exacerbated the antibiotic-mediated resistome expansion in the lower gastrointestinal tract mucosa collected from 21 individuals. This observation may be due to the delay on microbiome recovery from antibiotics caused by probiotics, which consequently allowed for the expansion of species that likely carry the ARGs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Montassier et al., 2021</xref>). Additional studies are required to determine the effects of concomitant antibiotic and synbiotic application on the gut resistome.</p>
<p>Biodiversity analysis of the resistome results revealed the presence of a diverse range of resistance genes in the cecal microbiome of broiler chickens, even in the absence of antimicrobial pressure. However, there were substantial qualitative and quantitative differences between the cecal resistome investigated in this study and the results obtained from studies in pigs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ghanbari et al., 2019</xref>), commercial feedlot cattle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Doster et al., 2018</xref>), poultry in other parts of the world (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Guo et al., 2018</xref>), human feces (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Pal et al., 2016</xref>), and environmental samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Pal et al., 2016</xref>). This finding corroborates the assertion that ARGs are not randomly distributed in diverse environments but are the result of different selective pressures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Xiong et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ghanbari et al., 2019</xref>). The extent to which different enrofloxacin dosages affect resistance development in broiler chickens needs to be determined. We observed a detectable increase in the diversity and abundance of resistance genes, mainly macrolide resistance genes encoding rRNA methylases, followed by tetracycline resistance determinants in the cecum resistome of the chickens receiving the optimized dosage of enrofloxacin (i.e., 10 mg/kg bw/day), which was even higher than the observed increase (mainly tetracycline resistance determinants) in high-dose treated animals, although the gut resistome mainly recovered 2 weeks after cessation of treatment. Such collateral effects of antibiotic application (i.e., enrichment of ARGs not conferring resistance to the administered agent) have been observed before for fluoroquinolone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Sanders et al., 1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Tolun et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Macesic et al., 2014</xref>), oxytetracycline (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ghanbari et al., 2019</xref>), chlortetracycline, sulfamethazine, and penicillin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Looft et al., 2012</xref>) antibiotics, highlighting the need to carefully examine the patterns of multiple drug resistance that may occur simultaneously. While several enriched ARGs in the enrofloxacin-treated groups are based on resistance mutations of a chromosomal gene [e.g., A16S (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Prammananan et al., 1998</xref>), MLS 23S rRNA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Sugiyama et al., 2017</xref>), <italic>tet16S</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Ross et al., 1998</xref>)], the majority of enriched genes [<italic>ermB</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Leclercq, 2002</xref>), <italic>cat</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Shaw, 1983</xref>), <italic>catA</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Shaw, 1983</xref>), <italic>ileS</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Brown et al., 2003</xref>), <italic>sat</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Shaw et al., 1993</xref>), <italic>tetW/O/32</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Connell et al., 2003</xref>), <italic>ant6</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Shaw et al., 1993</xref>), <italic>aph2-prime</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Shaw et al., 1993</xref>), and <italic>dfrF</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Gleckman et al., 1981</xref>)] are associated with mobile genetic elements, potentially explaining the observed collateral effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Looft et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ghanbari et al., 2019</xref>). A high dose of enrofloxacin is likely to provide a sufficient concentration of the active drug in the intestinal contents. This potentially results in stronger bactericidal activity, effectively killing many (susceptible) commensals that likely harbor a variety of intrinsic and acquired ARGs. Consistent with our findings, three rounds of 7-day treatment alternated with 7-day withdrawal of enrofloxacin at a high dose (100 mg/kg bw) was effective in treating <italic>Salmonella</italic> Typhimurium infection while selecting for less resistance in both <italic>Salmonella</italic> Typhimurium and coliforms in chickens, compared to either PK/PD optimized (4 mg/kg bw) or 0.1 mg/kg/bw (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Li et al., 2017b</xref>). Further trials and experiments are required to confirm these observations by looking beyond metagenomics-based resistome profiling i.e., at effects on ARG expression and by showing that enriched ARGs can be horizontally transferred to other commensals or pathogens and confer phenotypic resistance. In fact, a recently reported study showed that only around 60% of ARGs identified in broiler gut microbiota were expressed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Wang et al., 2020</xref>) when an integrated approach shotgun metagenomics and metatranscriptomics was used.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S5" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In this study, we investigated the impact of synbiotics and clinically important fluoroquinolones on the cecal reservoir of ARGs in broiler chickens by applying a shotgun metagenomic sequencing approach. Our results provide novel insights into the dose-dependent effects of enrofloxacin application on shaping the broiler gut resistome, which was mitigated by a synbiotic application. The contribution to ameliorating the adverse effects of antibiotics, that is, lowering the spread of antimicrobial resistance genes, in poultry and other livestock gastrointestinal tracts merits further studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/</ext-link>, <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="PRJNA761967">PRJNA761967</ext-link>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S7">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Bioscience Engineering of Ghent University.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S8">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>RT, MG, GA, LD, and MD designed the study. MG, GA, GS, FH, AG, and MD supervised the experiments. RT, MG, and GA performed the experiments. RT and MG analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript. All authors read, revised, and approved the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="S9" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research was supported by the Special Research Fund of Ghent University (grant no. BOF17/STA/014).</p>
</sec>
<ack><p>We thank Nikolaus Grabner, Andreas Koestelbauer, and Gertrude Wegl for their outstanding technical and analytical assistance.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="S10" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>MG and GS are employed by DSM Animal Nutrition &#x0026; Health. DSM Animal Nutrition &#x0026; Health is involved in natural feed additive development and research on natural alternatives to in-feed medication in livestock production. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S12" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.869538/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.869538/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.xlsx" id="DS1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<fn id="footnote1">
<label>1</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://rdrr.io/github/GuillemSalazar/EcolUtils/man/adonis.pair.html">https://rdrr.io/github/GuillemSalazar/EcolUtils/man/adonis.pair.html</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abd El-Hack</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Saadony</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shafi</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qattan</surname> <given-names>S. Y. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Batiha</surname> <given-names>G. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khafaga</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Probiotics in poultry feed: a comprehensive review.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr.</italic></source> <volume>104</volume> <fpage>1835</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1850</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jpn.13454</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32996177</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anomaly</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Harm to others: the social cost of antibiotics in agriculture.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Agric. Environ. Ethics</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>423</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>435</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10806-009-9160-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Antonopoulos</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huse</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morrison</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sogin</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Young</surname> <given-names>V. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Reproducible community dynamics of the gastrointestinal microbiota following antibiotic perturbation.</article-title> <source><italic>Infect. Immun.</italic></source> <volume>77</volume> <fpage>2367</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2375</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/IAI.01520-08</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19307217</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bolger</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lohse</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Usadel</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioinformatics</italic></source> <volume>30</volume> <fpage>2114</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2120</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTU170</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24695404</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gentry</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Becker</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ingraham</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holmes</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stanhope</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Horizontal transfer of drug-resistant aminoacyl-transfer-RNA synthetases of anthrax and gram-positive pathogens.</article-title> <source><italic>EMBO Rep.</italic></source> <volume>4</volume> <fpage>692</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>698</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/sj.embor.embor881</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12792655</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Butaye</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Devriese</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haesebrouck</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Antimicrobial growth promoters used in animal feed: Effects of less well known antibiotics on gram-positive bacteria.</article-title> <source><italic>Clin. Microbiol. Rev.</italic></source> <volume>16</volume> <fpage>175</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>188</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/CMR.16.2.175-188.2003</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12692092</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chantziaras</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boyen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Callens</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dewulf</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Correlation between veterinary antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals: a report on seven countries.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Antimicrob. Chemother.</italic></source> <volume>69</volume> <fpage>827</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>834</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dkt443</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24216767</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Connell</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tracz</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nierhaus</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Ribosomal Protection Proteins and Their Mechanism of Tetracycline Resistance.</article-title> <source><italic>Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>3675</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3681</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.47.12.3675-3681.2003</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14638464</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dittoe</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pavilidis</surname> <given-names>H. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chaney</surname> <given-names>W. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ricke</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Current Perspectives and Potential of Probiotics to Limit Foodborne Campylobacter in Poultry.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>0</volume>:<fpage>2989</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/FMICB.2020.583429</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33414767</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dheilly</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le Devendec</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mourand</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bouder</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jouy</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kempf</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Resistance gene transfer during treatments for experimental avian colibacillosis.</article-title> <source><italic>Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.</italic></source> <volume>56</volume> <fpage>189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>196</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.05617-11</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21986830</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dixon</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Veg. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>14</volume> <fpage>927</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>930</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/J.1654-1103.2003.TB02228.X</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Doster</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lakin</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dean</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wolfe</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Young</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boucher</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>MEGARes 2.0: a database for classification of antimicrobial drug, biocide and metal resistance determinants in metagenomic sequence data.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>48</volume> <fpage>D561</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>D569</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/NAR/GKZ1010</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31722416</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Doster</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rovira</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noyes</surname> <given-names>N. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burgess</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weinroth</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>1715</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.01715</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30105011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edgar</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioinformatics</italic></source> <volume>26</volume> <fpage>2460</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2461</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20709691</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>European Commission.</collab> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.</article-title> <source><italic>Off. J. Eur. Union</italic> L</source> <volume>276</volume> <fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>79</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>European Medicines Agency</collab> (<year>2018</year>). <source><italic>Questions and answers on use of enrofloxacin-containing veterinary medicines administered via drinking water to chickens and turkeys.</italic></source> Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.ema.europa.eu/contact">www.ema.europa.eu/contact</ext-link> <comment>(accessed November 29, 2019)</comment></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>European Medicines Agency</collab> (<year>2021</year>). <source><italic>Reflection paper on dose review and adjustment of established veterinary antibiotics in the context summary of product characteristic (SPC) harmonisation.</italic></source> Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/dose-review-adjustment-established-veterinary-antibiotics-context-summary-product-characteristic-spc">https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/dose-review-adjustment-established-veterinary-antibiotics-context-summary-product-characteristic-spc</ext-link> <comment>(accessed April 12, 2021)</comment></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feighner</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dashkevicz</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Subtherapeutic levels of antibiotics in poultry feeds and their effects on weight gain, feed efficiency, and bacterial cholyltaurine hydrolase activity.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>53</volume>:<fpage>331</fpage>. Available online at: /pmc/articles/PMC203661/?report=abstract <comment>(accessed July 14, 2021)</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.53.2.331-336.1987</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3566269</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferran</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacroix</surname> <given-names>M. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bousquet-M&#x00E9;lou</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duhil</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roques</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Levers to improve antibiotic treatment of lambs via drinking water in sheep fattening houses: the example of the sulfadimethoxine/trimethoprim combination.</article-title> <source><italic>Antibiotics</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>561</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antibiotics9090561</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32878175</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferran</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roques</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Can oral group medication be improved to reduce antimicrobial use?</article-title> <source><italic>Vet. Rec.</italic></source> <volume>185</volume> <fpage>402</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>404</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/vr.l5656</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31582488</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Foditsch</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>R. V. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Siler</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Altier</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Warnick</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of treatment with enrofloxacin or tulathromycin on fecal microbiota composition and genetic function of dairy calves.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>e0219635</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0219635</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31825967</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghanbari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klose</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crispie</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cotter</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The dynamics of the antibiotic resistome in the feces of freshly weaned pigs following therapeutic administration of oxytetracycline.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-40496-8</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30858509</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghareeb</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Awad</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohnl</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Porta</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Biarn&#x00E9;s</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x00F6;hm</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Evaluating the efficacy of an avian-specific probiotic to reduce the colonization of Campylobacter jejuni in broiler chickens.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>91</volume> <fpage>1825</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1832</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.2012-02168</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22802174</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gibson</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Probert</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Loo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van, Rastall</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roberfroid</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: updating the concept of prebiotics.</article-title> <source><italic>Nutr. Res. Rev.</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>275</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1079/nrr200479</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19079930</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gleckman</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blagg</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joubert</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Trimethoprim: mechanisms of action, antimicrobial activity, bacterial resistance, pharmacokinetics, adverse reactions, and therapeutic indications.</article-title> <source><italic>Pharmacother. J. Hum. Pharmacol. Drug Ther.</italic></source> <volume>1</volume> <fpage>14</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/j.1875-9114.1981.tb03548.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6985448</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gregova</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kmet</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Antibiotic resistance and virulence of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> strains isolated from animal rendering plant.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Reports</italic></source> <volume>101</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-72851-5</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33051473</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stedtfeld</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hedman</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eisenberg</surname> <given-names>J. N. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trueba</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Antibiotic resistome associated with small-scale poultry production in rural ecuador.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Sci. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>52</volume> <fpage>8165</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8172</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.est.8b01667</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29944836</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The bacterial mobile resistome transfer network connecting the animal and human microbiomes.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>82</volume> <fpage>6672</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6681</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01802-16</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27613679</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Joosten</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sarrazin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Gompel</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luiken</surname> <given-names>R. E. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mevius</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wagenaar</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Quantitative and qualitative analysis of antimicrobial usage at farm and flock level on 181 broiler farms in nine European countries.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Antimicrob. Chemother.</italic></source> <volume>74</volume> <fpage>798</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>806</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dky498</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30649428</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Korpela</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salonen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Veps&#x00E4;l&#x00E4;inen</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suomalainen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kolmeder</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Varjosalo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Probiotic supplementation restores normal microbiota composition and function in antibiotic-treated and in caesarean-born infants.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiome</italic></source> <volume>6</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-018-0567-4</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30326954</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leclercq</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides: nature of the resistance elements and their clinical implications.</article-title> <source><italic>Clin. Infect. Dis.</italic></source> <volume>34</volume> <fpage>482</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>492</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/324626</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11797175</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levison</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levison</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Antibacterial Agents.</article-title> <source><italic>Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am.</italic></source> <volume>23</volume> <fpage>791</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>815</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.idc.2009.06.008</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19909885</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shabbir</surname> <given-names>M. A. B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017a</year>). <article-title>Microbial shifts in the intestinal microbiota of <italic>salmonella</italic> infected chickens in response to enrofloxacin.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>0</volume>:<fpage>1711</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/FMICB.2017.01711</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28943868</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shabbir</surname> <given-names>M. A. B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017b</year>). <article-title>The effects of different enrofloxacin dosages on clinical efficacy and resistance development in chickens experimentally infected with <italic>Salmonella</italic> Typhimurium.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Reports</italic></source> <volume>71</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-12294-7</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28916830</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Looft</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>H. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bayles</surname> <given-names>D. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alt</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stedtfeld</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>In-feed antibiotic effects on the swine intestinal microbiome.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>109</volume> <fpage>1691</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1696</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/PNAS.1120238109</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22307632</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Love</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huber</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anders</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.</article-title> <source><italic>Genome Biol.</italic></source> <volume>1512</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/S13059-014-0550-8</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25516281</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Breitwieser</surname> <given-names>F. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thielen</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salzberg</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Bracken: estimating species abundance in metagenomics data.</article-title> <source><italic>PeerJ Comput. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>e104</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7717/PEERJ-CS.104</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luiken</surname> <given-names>R. E. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Gompel</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Munk</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sarrazin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joosten</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dorado-Garc&#x00ED;a</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Associations between antimicrobial use and the faecal resistome on broiler farms from nine European countries.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Antimicrob. Chemother.</italic></source> <volume>74</volume> <fpage>2596</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2604</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dkz235</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31199864</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luoma</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Markazi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shanmugasundaram</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murugesan</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohnl</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Selvaraj</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effect of synbiotic supplementation on layer production and cecal <italic>Salmonella</italic> load during a <italic>Salmonella</italic> challenge.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>96</volume> <fpage>4208</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4216</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pex251</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29053828</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mei</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lei</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Enrofloxacin shifts intestinal microbiota and metabolic profiling and hinders recovery from <italic>salmonella enterica</italic> subsp. enterica serovar typhimurium infection in neonatal chickens.</article-title> <source><italic>mSphere</italic></source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>20</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/msphere.00725-20</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32907952</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Macesic</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morrissey</surname> <given-names>C. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spencer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peleg</surname> <given-names>A. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Changing microbial epidemiology in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: increasing resistance over a 9-year period.</article-title> <source><italic>Transpl. Infect. Dis.</italic></source> <volume>16</volume> <fpage>887</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>896</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tid.12298</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25298044</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Markowiak</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x015A;li&#x017C;ewska</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health.</article-title> <source><italic>Nutrients</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>9091021</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/NU9091021</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28914794</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Montassier</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vald&#x00E9;s-Mas</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Batard</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zmora</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dori-Bachash</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suez</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Probiotics impact the antibiotic resistance gene reservoir along the human GI tract in a person-specific and antibiotic-dependent manner.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>2021</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41564-021-00920-0</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34226711</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morales-Barrera</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Calhoun</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lobato-Tapia</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lucca</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prado-Rebolledo</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hernandez-Velasco</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Risks involved in the use of enrofloxacin for <italic>Salmonella</italic> enteritidis or <italic>Salmonella</italic> heidelberg in commercial poultry.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Vet. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>72</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2016.00072</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27630995</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oakley</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kogut</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Spatial and temporal changes in the broiler chicken cecal and fecal microbiomes and correlations of bacterial taxa with cytokine gene expression.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Vet. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>11</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2016.00011</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26925404</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oakley</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lillehoj</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kogut</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>W. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maurer</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pedroso</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The chicken gastrointestinal microbiome.</article-title> <source><italic>FEMS Microbiol. Lett.</italic></source> <volume>360</volume> <fpage>100</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>112</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1574-6968.12608</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25263745</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pal</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bengtsson-Palme</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kristiansson</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larsson</surname> <given-names>D. G. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The structure and diversity of human, animal and environmental resistomes.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiome</italic></source> <volume>41</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/S40168-016-0199-5</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27717408</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Persoons</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dewulf</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smet</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herman</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heyndrickx</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Antimicrobial use in Belgian broiler production.</article-title> <source><italic>Prev. Vet. Med.</italic></source> <volume>105</volume> <fpage>320</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>325</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.02.020</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22459488</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prammananan</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sander</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frischkorn</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Onyi</surname> <given-names>G. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>A single 16S ribosomal RNA substitution is responsible for resistance to amikacin and other 2-deoxystreptamine aminoglycosides in Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium chelonae.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Infect. Dis.</italic></source> <volume>177</volume> <fpage>1573</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1581</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/515328</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9607835</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Raboisson</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferchiou</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sans</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lhermie</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dervill&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The economics of antimicrobial resistance in veterinary medicine: Optimizing societal benefits through mesoeconomic approaches from public and private perspectives.</article-title> <source><italic>One Heal.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>100145</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100145</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33117866</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ross</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eady</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cove</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cunliffe</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>16S rRNA mutation associated with tetracycline resistance in a gram- positive bacterium.</article-title> <source><italic>Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.</italic></source> <volume>42</volume> <fpage>1702</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1705</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.42.7.1702</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9661007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roth</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>K&#x00E4;sbohrer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mayrhofer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zitz</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hofacre</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Domig</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019b</year>). <article-title>The application of antibiotics in broiler production and the resulting antibiotic resistance in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>: a global overview.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>98</volume> <fpage>1791</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1804</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pey539</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30544256</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roth</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hofacre</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zitz</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mathis</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moder</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Doupovec</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019a</year>). <article-title>Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in broilers challenged with a multi-resistant E. coli strain and received ampicillin, an organic acid-based feed additive or a synbiotic preparation.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>98</volume> <fpage>2598</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2607</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pez004</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30690607</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>Royal Decree.</collab> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Belgian Royal Decree of 29 May 2013 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.</article-title> <source><italic>Belg. Staatsbl.</italic></source> <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>2013</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rychlik</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Composition and function of chicken gut microbiota.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim.</italic></source> <volume>103</volume>:<fpage>103</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ANI10010103</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31936291</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sanders</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanders</surname> <given-names>W. E.</given-names> <suffix>Jr.</suffix></name> <name><surname>Goering</surname> <given-names>R. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Werner</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Selection of multiple antibiotic resistance by quinolones, beta-lactams, and aminoglycosides with special reference to cross-resistance between unrelated drug classes.</article-title> <source><italic>Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.</italic></source> <volume>26</volume>:<fpage>797</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.26.6.797</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6098219</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oakley</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>W. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Chicken gut microbiota: Importance and detection technology.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Vet. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>254</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2018.00254</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30406117</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shanmugasundaram</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mortada</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cosby</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Applegate</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Syed</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Synbiotic supplementation to decrease <italic>Salmonella</italic> colonization in the intestine and carcass contamination in broiler birds.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>e0223577</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0223577</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31600299</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shaw</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rather</surname> <given-names>P. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hare</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Molecular genetics of aminoglycoside resistance genes and familial relationships of the aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiol. Rev.</italic></source> <volume>57</volume> <fpage>138</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>163</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mr.57.1.138-163.1993</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8385262</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shaw</surname> <given-names>W. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase: Enzymology and molecular biology.</article-title> <source><italic>Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>14</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3109/10409238309102789</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6340955</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soraci</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amanto</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tapia</surname> <given-names>M. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de la Torre</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Toutain</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Exposure variability of fosfomycin administered to pigs in food or water: Impact of social rank.</article-title> <source><italic>Res. Vet. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>96</volume> <fpage>153</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>159</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.12.003</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24388282</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sugiyama</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yoshida</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ueki</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tanabe</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manaka</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hiramatsu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>In vitro antibacterial activity of &#x03B1;-methoxyimino acylide derivatives against macrolide-resistant pathogens and mutation analysis in 23S rRNA.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Antibiot.</italic></source> <volume>70</volume> <fpage>264</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>271</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ja.2016.148</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28074049</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Cecal gut microbiota and metabolites might contribute to the severity of acute myocardial ischemia by impacting the intestinal permeability, oxidative stress, and energy metabolism.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1745</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.01745</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31428065</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Changes in cecal microbiota community of suckling piglets infected with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>219868</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0219868</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31310635</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Temmerman</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pelligand</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schelstraete</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antonissen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garmyn</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Devreese</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Enrofloxacin dose optimization for the treatment of colibacillosis in broiler chickens using a drinking behaviour pharmacokinetic model.</article-title> <source><italic>Antibiotics</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>604</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antibiotics10050604</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34069540</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tolun</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>K&#x00FC;&#x00E7;&#x00FC;kbasmaci</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tor&#x00FC;mk&#x00FC;ney-Akbulut</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Catal</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ang-Kucuker</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ang</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Relationship between ciprofloxacin resistance and extended-spectrum &#x03B2;-lactamase production in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> and <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> strains.</article-title> <source><italic>Clin. Microbiol. Infect.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume> <fpage>72</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>75</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/J.1469-0691.2004.00723.X</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14706090</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turcotte</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thibodeau</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quessy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Topp</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beauchamp</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fravalo</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Impacts of short-term antibiotic withdrawal and long-term judicious antibiotic use on resistance gene abundance and cecal microbiota composition on commercial broiler chicken farms in qu&#x00E9;bec.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Vet. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>0</volume>:<fpage>1067</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/FVETS.2020.547181</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33409294</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Boeckel</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brower</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gilbert</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grenfell</surname> <given-names>B. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levin</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</italic></source> <volume>112</volume> <fpage>5649</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5654</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1503141112</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25792457</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Integrated metagenomic and metatranscriptomic profiling reveals differentially expressed resistomes in human, chicken, and pig gut microbiomes.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Int.</italic></source> <volume>138</volume>:<fpage>105649</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envint.2020.105649</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32200314</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wegl</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grabner</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>K&#x00F6;stelbauer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klose</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghanbari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Toward best practice in livestock microbiota research: a comprehensive comparison of sample storage and dna extraction strategies.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>322</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/FMICB.2021.627539</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33708184</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B71"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>WHO Advisory Group on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (AGISAR)</collab> (<year>2019</year>). <source><italic>Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine 6th Re.vision 2018. Ranking of medically important antimicrobials for risk management of antimicrobial resistance due to non-human use.</italic></source> Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/312266/9789241515528-eng.pdf?ua=1">https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/312266/9789241515528-eng.pdf?ua=1</ext-link> <comment>(accessed December 19, 2019)</comment>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Langmead</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2.</article-title> <source><italic>Gen. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>201</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/S13059-019-1891-0</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31779668</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B73"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>World Health Organisation (WHO)</collab> (<year>2014</year>). <source><italic>Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance 2014.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Geneva</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>World Health Organisation</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B74"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>World Health Organization (WHO)</collab> (<year>2015</year>). <source><italic>Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Geneva</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>World Health Organisation</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B75"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Antibiotic-mediated changes in the fecal microbiome of broiler chickens define the incidence of antibiotic resistance genes.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiome</italic></source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>34</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-018-0419-2</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29439741</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B76"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Young</surname> <given-names>V. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Antibiotic-associated diarrhea accompanied by large-scale alterations in the composition of the fecal microbiota.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Clin. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>42</volume> <fpage>1203</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1206</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JCM.42.3.1203-1206.2004</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15004076</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
