<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.857493</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Identification and Characterization of Potato Zebra Chip Resistance Among Wild <italic>Solanum</italic> Species</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Mora</surname> <given-names>Victoria</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ramasamy</surname> <given-names>Manikandan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1318654/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Damaj</surname> <given-names>Mona B.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Irigoyen</surname> <given-names>Sonia</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/742657/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ancona</surname> <given-names>Veronica</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/479252/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Avila</surname> <given-names>Carlos A.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/742671/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Vales</surname> <given-names>Maria Isabel</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1316573/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ibanez</surname> <given-names>Freddy</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1414409/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Mandadi</surname> <given-names>Kranthi K.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/274257/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Texas A&#x00026;M AgriLife Research and Extension Center</institution>, <addr-line>Weslaco</addr-line>, <addr-line>TX</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Agriculture, Agribusiness, and Environmental Sciences, Texas A&#x00026;M University-Kingsville</institution>, <addr-line>Weslaco, TX</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&#x00026;M University</institution>, <addr-line>College Station, TX</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Department of Entomology, Texas A&#x00026;M University</institution>, <addr-line>College Station, TX</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>Department of Plant Pathology &#x00026; Microbiology, Texas A&#x00026;M University</institution>, <addr-line>College Station, TX</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff6"><sup>6</sup><institution>Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture, Texas A&#x00026;M AgriLife</institution>, <addr-line>College Station, TX</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Xiangming Xu, National Institute of Agricultural Botany (NIAB), United Kingdom</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Assunta Bertaccini, University of Bologna, Italy; Maria Julissa Ek-Ramos, Autonomous University of Nuevo Le&#x000F3;n, Mexico; Xuefeng Wang, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), China</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x0002A;Correspondence: Kranthi K. Mandadi <email>kkmandadi&#x00040;tamu.edu</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001"><p>This article was submitted to Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn002"><p>&#x02020;These authors have contributed equally to this work</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>27</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>857493</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>18</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>16</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2022 Mora, Ramasamy, Damaj, Irigoyen, Ancona, Avila, Vales, Ibanez and Mandadi.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Mora, Ramasamy, Damaj, Irigoyen, Ancona, Avila, Vales, Ibanez and Mandadi</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Potato zebra chip (ZC) disease, associated with the uncultured phloem-limited bacterium, <italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum (<italic>C</italic>Lso), is transmitted by the potato psyllid <italic>Bactericera cockerelli</italic>. Potato ZC disease poses a significant threat to potato production worldwide. Current management practices mainly rely on the control of the psyllid to limit the spread of <italic>C</italic>Lso. The present study investigated new sources of ZC resistance among wild <italic>Solanum</italic> species. A taxonomically diverse collection of tuber-bearing <italic>Solanum</italic> species was screened; one ZC-resistant accession and three ZC-tolerant accessions were identified among the 52 screened accessions. Further characterization of the resistant accession showed that the resistance was primarily associated with antibiosis effects due to differences in leaf trichome density and morphology of the wild accession, which could limit the psyllid feeding and oviposition. This germplasm offers a good resource for further understanding ZC and psyllid resistance mechanisms, contributing to potato breeding efforts to develop ZC resistance cultivars. Alternatively, it could be used as a potential trap crop to manage psyllid and control ZC disease.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd><italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum</kwd>
<kwd>Fastidious bacteria</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Bactericera cockerelli</italic></kwd>
<kwd>zebra chip (ZC)</kwd>
<kwd>wild accessions</kwd>
<kwd>resistant traits</kwd>
<kwd>antibiosis</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="53"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="7818"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Potato (<italic>Solanum tuberosum</italic> L.) is cultivated in over 160 countries and is rated as the fourth most important staple food crop after wheat, corn, and rice. It is a rich source of carbohydrates and provides other essential nutrients, such as dietary fiber, vitamins, minerals, protein, and antioxidants (Dahal et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2019</xref>). Based on its global consumption, nutritional benefits, tonnage production, and cash value, the global production was estimated at &#x0007E;395 metric tons in 2019. Its importance in the United States was at 3.94 billion (Faostat, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2020</xref>; USDA, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2020</xref>). However, increasing the incidence of biotic (diseases and pests) as well as abiotic (drought, heat, and salinity) stresses limit potato production (Savary et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Since its identification in 1994 in Mexico and in 2000 in the United States, the zebra chip (ZC) disease of potato has spread into several commercial potato-growing regions of Central America, Australia, New Zealand, Northern Africa, and the Middle East (Munyaneza et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2007</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2009a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2010</xref>; Tahzima et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">2014</xref>; Mawassi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2018</xref>; Mora et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2021</xref>) and recently in Spain (Portal, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2017</xref>). ZC disease could result in potato yield losses of up to 94% (Greenway, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2014</xref>). The disease is associated with the uncultured phloem-limited bacterium <italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum (<italic>C</italic>Lso) and vectored by the potato psyllid <italic>Bactericera cockerelli</italic> &#x00160;ulc (Hemiptera: Triozidae) (Munyaneza, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2012</xref>; Nwugo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2017</xref>; Mora et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2021</xref>). Typical foliar symptoms of ZC-affected plants include purplish discoloration/chlorosis of young leaves, upward rolling of top leaves, presence of axillary buds, presence of aerial tubers, wilting, stunted growth, and ultimately plant death. ZC symptoms in tubers are associated with the synthesis and accumulation of phenolic compounds, reducing sugars and defense enzymes (Navarre et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2009</xref>; Wallis et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2012</xref>), giving chips a bitter taste and a dark brown striped, zebra-like appearance when fried (Munyaneza, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2012</xref>), ultimately causing the entire tubers to become unmarketable (Mora et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2021</xref>). If left uncontrolled, ZC disease can become one of the potato&#x00027;s economically significant diseases.</p>
<p>Current ZC management strategies rely on controlling the psyllid vector, involving insecticides (Guenthner et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2012</xref>; Greenway, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2014</xref>; Greenway and Rondon, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2018</xref>) and the possibility of increased insecticide resistance. Recently, resistance to neonicotinoid-based insecticides has been reported in Texas potato psyllids, which threatens future control of this insect (Prager et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2013</xref>; Szczepaniec et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2019</xref>). The primary mode of acquisition and spreading of <italic>C</italic>Lso is by psyllids feeding on <italic>C</italic>Lso-infected plants and then on healthy plants transferring <italic>C</italic>Lso (Munyaneza et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2009b</xref>; Buchman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2011</xref>). Hence, identifying novel genetic resistance and tolerance to <italic>C</italic>Lso or the psyllid can be valuable components of ZC&#x00027;s integrated pest/diseases management. Previous studies have reported variations in the psyllid preference for the wild potato species, namely, <italic>Solanum bulbocastanum, Solanum habrochaites</italic>, and <italic>Solanum Verrucosum</italic>, and the breeding clones, namely, <italic>Solanum berthaultii</italic> and <italic>Solanum tuberosum</italic> (Butler et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2011</xref>; Cooper and Bamberg, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2014</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2016</xref>; Diaz-Montano et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2014</xref>; Levy and Tamborindeguy, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2014</xref>). Variations in the tolerance response to <italic>C</italic>Lso have also been noted among various <italic>Solanum</italic> breeding clones (Prager et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2013</xref>; Rashidi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2017</xref>; Vigue, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">2018</xref>; Fife et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2020</xref>; Vigue et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">2020</xref>).</p>
<p>A 2015 taxonomic and genetic study established a <italic>Solanum</italic> section <italic>Petota</italic> panel of tuber-bearing relatives of cultivated potatoes, representing a genetic resource of broadly diverse germplasm of highly regarded agronomic traits and tuber size (Hawkes, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">1990</xref>; Spooner and Castillo, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">1997</xref>; Hardigan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2015</xref>). In this study, screening and identification of new ZC-resistant and -tolerant germplasm in the <italic>Solanum</italic> sect. <italic>Petota</italic> panels were performed. The ZC resistance of one accession (<italic>S. berthaultii</italic>) could be attributed to modifications in leaf trichome shape and density, affecting potato psyllid fecundity and survival.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Plant Materials, Propagation, and Maintenance</title>
<p>Plant material consisted of 52 wild potato accessions grown from true potato seeds obtained from the U.S. National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS) in Wisconsin, USA. The introductions belong to the <italic>Solanum</italic> sect. <italic>Petota</italic> diversity panel (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">Supplementary Table 1</xref>). This panel represents the germplasm of tuber-bearing <italic>Solanum</italic> species exhibiting morphological variations (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>) (Hardigan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2015</xref>). <italic>Solanum tuberosum</italic> L. var. Atlantic (chip processing market class) was used as a susceptible control in all experiments and was initially propagated from certified disease-free seed tubers. For <italic>in vitro</italic> germination and propagation, the <italic>Solanum</italic> botanical seeds were pretreated with 10% (w/v) gibberellic acid (GA3) overnight in a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube to break dormancy and enhance seed germination. Furthermore, seeds were surface sterilized in 70% (v/v) ethanol for 3 min and then with 10% (v/v) bleach and 2% (v/v) Tween<sup>&#x000AE;</sup> 20 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 10 min, followed by rinsing four times with sterile water. Sterilized seeds were placed on a sterile wetted Whatman&#x02122; paper inside a sterile 100 &#x000D7; 25 mm Petri dish and kept at 22&#x000B0;C in the dark for 1 week. Germinated seeds were grown on Murashige and Skoog (Murashige and Skoog, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">1962</xref>) solid media supplemented with pre-made MS vitamins (Caisson Labs, North Logan, Utah, USA), 2% sucrose (w/v), and 2 g/L of Gelrite&#x02122; (Research Products International, Mt. Prospect, IL, USA), pH 5.8. When plants were 4 weeks old (about 8 cm tall), micropropagation was done using internode cutting as explants; sub-culturing every 4 weeks was necessary to increase plant material for each wild potato accession for screening against ZC. All explants were maintained in a temperature-controlled growth chamber at 22&#x000B0;C under 14-h light/10-h dark photoperiod.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Psyllid Maintenance</title>
<p>Potato psyllid (<italic>Bactericera cockerelli</italic> &#x00160;ulc.) colonies consisted of <italic>C</italic>Lso-free (<italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x02212;</sup>) and <italic>C</italic>Lso-positive (<italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>) haplotype B, which were obtained and reared for several generations at Texas A&#x00026;M AgriLife Research and Extension Center in Weslaco in 60 &#x000D7; 60 &#x000D7; 60 cm nylon mesh cages (Bugdorm, BioQuip Products Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA). Psyllid colonies were reared and maintained on potato plants (Atlantic) and periodically diagnosed for the presence of <italic>C</italic>Lso (&#x0003E;90% <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>) and the absence of <italic>C</italic>Lso (<italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x02212;</sup>) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using genomic DNA isolated from adult psyllids (Sengoda et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2014</xref>) and primers specific to the 16s rDNA of <italic>C</italic>Lso (OA2-F and OI2c-R) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">Supplementary Table 2</xref>) (French-Monar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2010</xref>). PCR conditions were given as follows: one denaturing cycle at 95&#x000B0;C for 30 s; 35 cycles each at 95&#x000B0;C for 30 s, 68&#x000B0;C for 30 s, and 68&#x000B0;C for 2 min; and a final extension cycle at 68&#x000B0;C for 5 min. PCR amplicons were separated by electrophoresis on a 1.0% (w/v) agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 &#x003BC;g/ml).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Screening of Wild <italic>Solanum</italic> Sect. <italic>Petota</italic> Accessions for ZC Resistance</title>
<p>For primary screening, 52 wild potato accessions were grown in a professional growth mix (Berger BM6 All-Purpose mix, pH 5.4&#x02013;6.2) in 2.84-l pots at 22&#x000B0;C under 14-h light/10-h dark photoperiod and 50% relative humidity in controlled growth chambers. No choice feeding was performed on 4-week-old plants by inoculating each plant with 20 <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> psyllids enclosed into two separate organza drawstring bags (10 psyllids/bag), which were tied to the second and third fully expanded leaves (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Figure 2B</xref>), with four replicates of inoculated plants per accession. The bags and psyllids were removed from plants 1 week after placement. Phenotypic evaluations of foliar ZC disease symptoms were done at 14, 21, and 28 days post-inoculation (dpis) in an environment-controlled growth chamber. Foliar symptoms were evaluated and rated based on a scale of 1&#x02013;3, where 1 = being resistant (no symptoms), 2 = moderately susceptible (some symptoms), and 3 = highly susceptible (severe symptoms and morbidity) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Figures 2C</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">3</xref>). Chip frying and ZC scoring were performed as described in other studies (Henne et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2010</xref>; Harrison et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2019</xref>).</p>
<p>A second screening of the ZC resistant and moderately susceptible accessions chosen from the primary screening and a screening of the single seed lines from true potato seeds were done using 1-month-old plants. To increase quantity, all plants were vegetatively propagated by tissue culture and were planted in modified enclosed transparent 32 oz. plastic cups. No choice feeding was performed by releasing five <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> psyllids (presence of <italic>C</italic>Lso was confirmed by PCR diagnostics) into each enclosed cup containing two plants in a professional growth mix Berger BM6 All-Purpose mix, pH 5.4&#x02013;6.2, with two cups per accession. <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x02212;</sup> psyllid (absence of <italic>C</italic>Lso was confirmed by PCR diagnostics) challenged and non-challenged plants were used as negative controls (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Figure 2A</xref>). Phenotypic evaluations of inoculated plants consisted of assessing foliar symptoms of ZC at 14, 21, and 28 dpi. At 7 dpi, the soil was drenched with Admire Pro (Bayer Crop Science, Germany) to kill all psyllids in enclosed cups and prevent further plant damage. Leaf tissue was collected at 21 and 28 dpi, with 3&#x02013;4 leaves from the top, middle, and bottom of each plant, cut into pieces with a single edge blade, and pooled to produce four replicates before freezing in liquid nitrogen (VWR Reinforced 2 ml Bead Mill Tubes, Radnor, PA, USA). Tissues were lyophilized before genomic DNA extraction for PCR and quantitative PCR (qPCR) analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Molecular Diagnostics for <italic>C</italic>Lso Detection and Quantification</title>
<p>Genomic DNA was extracted from leaf tissue using a modified protocol as previously published (Edwards et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">1991</xref>). For the detection of <italic>C</italic>Lso in tissues collected from wild potato accessions and Atlantic control, conventional PCR was performed on a ProFlex&#x02122; PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) in a total reaction volume of 20 &#x003BC;l, using 150 ng of DNA, 0.5 &#x003BC;M of each target-specific primer, 10 &#x003BC;l of AccuStart Tough Mix (Quantabio, Beverly, MA, USA), 0.5 &#x003BC;l of 50 &#x000D7; loading dye, and 6.6 &#x003BC;l of nuclease-free water (Ambion, Life Technologies, Austin, TX, USA). For initial conventional (gel) PCR analysis, a primer pair, OI2C-F and OA2-R, was used to specifically amplify <italic>C</italic>Lso 16S rDNA (Levy et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2011</xref>). The potato <italic>Ribosomal Protein L2(RPL2)</italic>-specific primers RPL2-F and RPL2-R were used to amplify an endogenous reference gene (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">Supplementary Table 2</xref>) (Avila et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2012</xref>). PCR conditions were given as follows: one denaturing cycle at 95&#x000B0;C for 30 s; 28 cycles each at 95&#x000B0;C for 30 s, 50&#x000B0;C for 30 s, and 68&#x000B0;C for 2 min; and a final extension cycle at 68&#x000B0;C for 5 min. PCR amplicons were separated by electrophoresis on a 1.0% (w/v) agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 &#x003BC;g/ml).</p>
<p>The <italic>C</italic>Lso relative titer was quantified in tissues collected from wild potato accessions and Atlantic control using quantitative PCR (qPCR) in a CFX384&#x02122; Real-Time System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) in a total reaction of 10 &#x003BC;l, using 50 ng of DNA, 0.4 &#x003BC;M of each target-specific primer, and 5 &#x003BC;l of i<italic>Taq</italic>&#x02122; Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Three biological replicates were used with two technical replicates. Lso-F and HLB-R primers (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">Supplementary Table 2</xref>) were used to specifically amplify <italic>C</italic>Lso 16S rDNA, while Sotu-RPL2-F and Sotu-RPL2-R primers (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">Supplementary Table 2</xref>) were used for the amplification of an endogenous reference gene, <italic>RPL2</italic> (Levy et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2011</xref>; Irigoyen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2020</xref>). PCR conditions were given as follows: one denaturing cycle at 95&#x000B0;C for 3 min; 40 two-step cycles each at 95&#x000B0;C for 15 s and at 55&#x000B0;C for 30 s; and a final melting curve of 65&#x02013;95&#x000B0;C for 55 s. The results were analyzed and recorded as C<sub>T</sub> (threshold cycle) values, which were normalized against the C<sub>T</sub> values of the potato <italic>RPL2</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">Supplementary Table 2</xref>) for quantification using the comparative C<sub>T</sub> method (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x00394;&#x00394;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Zu&#x000F1;iga et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2020</xref>). The Student&#x00027;s <italic>t</italic>-test was used to determine statistically significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x02264; 0.05 or 0.01) differences between the controls and treatments.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Host Selection and Olfactometer Assays</title>
<p>The olfactory host-preference assays of <italic>B. cockerelli</italic> adults (<italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x02212;</sup>), reared and maintained on Atlantic potato plants, were conducted using 2-month-old <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 and Atlantic plants and a Y-tube olfactometer (35 cm long &#x000D7; 2.5 cm diameter). Twenty <italic>B. cockerelli</italic> adults per set of plants (<italic>n</italic> = 10 sets of plants, <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 and Atlantic plants) were collected into plastic vials for 16 h before initiating the behavioral assays to promote insect host choice. The Y-tube was connected to a 2-port Humidified Air Delivery system (ARS, Gainesville, FL, USA). The air was filtered through an activated carbon filter (16 cm, ARS). Airflow of each arm (bifurcated at a 45 angle) was set up at a constant rate of 10 L/min, leading into two separated sealed cylindrical glass chambers (15 cm diameter, 35 cm high) that contained individual plants, <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 or Atlantic, as odor sources. The Y-tube was placed at a 30&#x000B0; angle from the surface and adult psyllids were released at the end of the tube. To examine the insect olfactory behavior, observations were recorded by counting the number of psyllids at each arm&#x00027;s terminal end (set threshold = 4 cm) every 15 min for a 60-min period. All others were considered as a non-responding group. All measurements were conducted between 2 and 4 p.m. Central Standard Time (CST) at ambient temperature (21&#x000B0;C) and under constant light (&#x0007E;250 &#x003BC;mol/m<sup>2</sup> s).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Survival and Oviposition of <italic>B. cockerelli</italic> on <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 and Atlantic Plants</title>
<p>The survival of <italic>B. cockerelli</italic> adults (<italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x02212;</sup>) on 2-month-old <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 and Atlantic plants (<italic>n</italic> = 10 plants; 10 psyllids/plant) was evaluated to record the surviving insects every day for 7 days. To examine the oviposition of <italic>B. cockerelli</italic> on <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 and Atlantic plants, a non-choice assay was performed on insect-proof mesh cages (30 &#x000D7; 30 &#x000D7; 30 cm). Before the assay was initiated, couples (female and male psyllids) were allowed to mate for 4 h in a 1.7-ml tube and subsequently transferred onto plants (<italic>n</italic> = 10 plants; 10 psyllids/plant). After 7 days, adult psyllids were removed, and the total number of eggs was recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Trichome Evaluation of <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927</title>
<p>One-month-old <italic>in vitro</italic> culture plants of ZC-resistant single seed line 10 of <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 accession and Atlantic control were hardened for 1 month in the growth mix. Three 2-mm diameter disks were excised from one leaflet of the second and third fully expanded leaves from two plants of each of <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927-resistant line 10 and Atlantic control, using a 2-mm sampling tool (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA), and observed at 60 &#x000D7; on an Olympus BX51 stereomicroscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Leaflet disks were evaluated for leaf trichome shape and density based on two biological samplings and 12 technical replications. Trichome density was calculated as the number of trichomes per mm<sup>2</sup> leaf area on both the adaxial and abaxial leaflet surfaces.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Data Analysis and Statistics</title>
<p>The data analysis, statistics, and graphs were displayed as described in the figure legends using the Microsoft Excel software (version 2009). The Student&#x00027;s <italic>t</italic>-test was used to determine statistically significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x02264; 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001) differences in <italic>C</italic>Lso titer and oviposition between control and treatment. The Chi-square (&#x003C7;<sup>2</sup>) test was used to compare the number of potato psyllids responding to plant odor sources using a Y-tube olfactometer. The survival of potato psyllids was estimated using the Kaplan&#x02013;Meier survival analysis using the RStudio environment (Allaire, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2011</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>ZC Resistance Exists Among the Wild <italic>Solanum</italic> Sect. <italic>Petota</italic> Collection</title>
<p>Primary screening of 52 wild potato accessions was performed from the <italic>Solanum</italic> sect. <italic>Petota</italic> collection (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">Supplementary Table 1</xref>) to identify potential lines with resistance and tolerance to <italic>C</italic>Lso or the psyllid. Multiple <italic>in vitro</italic> propagated plants of each accession were hardened in pots for 2 months, followed by exposure to <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> psyllids. Foliar symptoms of ZC were then observed every 7 days for up to 4 weeks (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplemental Figure 2A, B</xref>) and rated based on a scale of 1&#x02013;3, where 1 = being resistant (no symptoms), 2 = moderately susceptible (some symptoms), and 3 = highly susceptible (severe symptoms and morbidity) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Figure 2C</xref>). Several of the 52 accessions were susceptible and moderately susceptible, showing some upward leaf rolling, chlorosis, and plant stunting, but they grew new leaves at 21&#x02013;28 dpi. Interestingly, one diploid accession <italic>Solanum berthaultii</italic> Hawkes (<italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927), sourced initially from Bolivia, seemed resistant with no visible ZC symptoms. The nine accessions (one resistant and eight moderately susceptible) were selected, and the challenges with <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> psyllids were repeated using 1-month-old plants grown in terrariums (enclosed cups). In addition to phenotypic observation for ZC symptoms, the relative <italic>C</italic>Lso titers were estimated at 28 dpi when <italic>C</italic>Lso could be sufficiently detected. The single resistant accession, <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927, reproducibly showed no visible symptoms and continued to grow after 28 dpi with a severity index of 1, compared with the susceptible Atlantic control that displayed severe symptoms and died at 28 dpi (severity index 3). Three accessions, namely, <italic>Sk</italic>-PI498359, <italic>So</italic>-PI498130, and <italic>Sr</italic>-PI310953, again showed reproducible ZC symptoms with a severity index scale of 2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>). The remaining five accessions displayed variable symptoms and died at 28 dpi, with a severity index of 3. In this experiment, both conventional and quantitative PCR confirmed the presence or absence of <italic>C</italic>Lso (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1B,C</xref>). The resistant accession <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 and the three moderately susceptible accessions (i.e., <italic>Sk</italic>-PI498359, <italic>So</italic>-PI498130, and <italic>Sr</italic>-PI310953) displayed <italic>C</italic>Lso titers of 6.05% and 52.44&#x02013;119.36%, respectively, relative to that of the Atlantic control (set to 100%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>). Further comparative studies were carried on with the resistant (<italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927) and highly susceptible control (Atlantic) plants.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Phenotypic evaluation and <italic>C</italic>Lso quantification of ZC resistant and tolerant wild <italic>Solanum</italic> accessions. A no-choice psyllid feeding assay was performed by releasing five <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> psyllids on two plants (1-month-old) in a professional growth mix per enclosed cup in an environment-controlled growth chamber. (<bold>A</bold>) The top panel shows representative photos of non-challenged accessions, and the bottom panel representative photos of <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> challenged accessions at 28 dpi [1, Atlantic control, severity index (SI) = 3. 2; <italic>S. berthaultii PI310927</italic>, SI = 1; 3, <italic>S. kurtzianum</italic> PI498359, SI = 2; 4, <italic>S. okadae</italic> PI498130, SI = 2. 5; and <italic>S. raphanifolium</italic> PI310953, SI = 2). (<bold>B</bold>) Detection of <italic>C</italic>Lso by PCR amplification of <italic>C</italic>Lso 16s rDNA in leaf tissues of the resistant accession (<italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927) and the three tolerant accessions (<italic>Sk</italic>-PI498359, <italic>So</italic>-PI498130, and <italic>Sr</italic>-PI310953) at 28 days post-inoculation (dpi). The potato <italic>RPL2</italic> endogenous gene was used as the PCR control. (<bold>C</bold>) Relative quantification of <italic>C</italic>Lso titers of the accessions at 28 dpi by qPCR. Relative <italic>C</italic>Lso titers were calculated from three biological replicates; error bars represent the mean <italic>C</italic>Lso titer &#x000B1; standard error of the mean. The <italic>p</italic>-values were calculated by Student&#x00027;s <italic>t</italic>-test relative to the infected control. &#x0002A;, &#x0002A;&#x0002A;<italic>P</italic> &#x02264; 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-857493-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title><italic>Sb-PI310927</italic> Is ZC Resistant</title>
<p>The ZC resistance trait of <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 was confirmed by repeating the ZC challenges, using 2-month-old plants under greenhouse conditions, and evaluating the ZC tuber symptoms. Typically, <italic>C</italic>Lso-psyllid feeding for the brief period of the challenge (&#x0007E;7 days) causes the inoculated lower leaves to wilt, while the newly emerging (upper) non-inoculated leaves remain asymptomatic. In contrast, <italic>C</italic>Lso&#x0002B; psyllids induce symptoms associated with ZC on new upper non-inoculated leaves ranging from leaf wilting, upward curling, and chlorosis/necrosis. They can also lead to severe stunting of the plants (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">Supplementary Figure 4</xref>). <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 plants consistently showed no visual ZC foliar symptoms with a severity index of 1 when challenged with <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> or <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x02212;</sup> psyllids. However, the susceptible Atlantic variety displayed typical ZC foliar symptoms with a severity index of 3 when infected with <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> psyllids at 28 dpi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>). Freshly cut tubers and fried chips of <italic>C</italic>Lso-infected <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 accession showed no brown discoloration, whereas Atlantic displayed characteristic ZC tuber symptoms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>). Furthermore, molecular diagnostic analyses by qPCR and conventional PCR indicated that <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 had a very low relative <italic>C</italic>Lso titer of 4.87% compared with Atlantic plants (<italic>C</italic>Lso titer set to 100%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2D,E</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>ZC resistance trait evaluation of the <italic>Solanum berthaultii</italic> accession PI310927. (<bold>A</bold>) Two-month-old <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 accession and Atlantic control plants in pots were randomized and challenged with <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> and <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x02212;</sup> psyllids inside cages under greenhouse conditions. (<bold>B, C</bold>) The above-ground phenotype of 4-week-old <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 accession and Atlantic plants and their corresponding tuber and fried chip phenotypes. (<bold>D</bold>) Detection of <italic>C</italic>Lso by PCR amplification of <italic>C</italic>Lso 16s rDNA in leaf tissues of <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 accession and Atlantic at 28 dpi. The potato <italic>RPL2</italic> endogenous gene was used as the PCR control (NC, negative control; PC, positive control). (<bold>E</bold>) Relative quantification of <italic>C</italic>Lso titer of <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 accession and Atlantic control plants at 28 dpi by qPCR. Relative <italic>C</italic>Lso titers were calculated from three biological replicates; error bars represent &#x000B1; standard error of the mean. The <italic>p</italic>-values were calculated by Student&#x00027;s <italic>t</italic>-test relative to the infected control. &#x0002A;&#x0002A;<italic>P</italic> &#x02264; 0.01.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-857493-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Segregation of ZC Resistance Among True Seed Progeny of <italic>Sb-PI310927</italic></title>
<p>All screening was conducted using <italic>in vitro</italic> micro-propagated plants from a true seed sourced from the USDA-ARS germplasm bank. As with most wild germplasm collections, <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 true seeds could be heterozygous and pooled from multiple plants during germplasm maintenance, thus having the potential for segregating alleles (Bamberg and Del Rio, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2020</xref>). To determine if there would be any segregation of the ZC-resistant trait of <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 among true seed progeny and to recover a stable resistant line for further studies, 10 true botanical seeds of <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 were germinated and multiplied individually by micropropagation. The ZC resistance trait of the 10 single seed lines was then evaluated following no-choice challenges with <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>, <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x02212;</sup>, or no psyllids under growth chamber conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). At 21 dpi, the susceptible Atlantic control showed characteristic ZC symptoms with high titers of <italic>C</italic>Lso transmission, whereas almost all <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 lines did not show any ZC symptoms. However, conventional PCR revealed that only &#x0007E;50% of <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 single seed lines were negative for <italic>C</italic>Lso (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>). Further confirmation by quantitative PCR showed that six <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 single seed lines (&#x00023;3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 10) were <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x02212;</sup> or had undetectable levels of <italic>C</italic>Lso. Three lines (&#x00023;2, 6, and 9) showed low to moderate levels of <italic>C</italic>Lso compared with Atlantic control (<italic>C</italic>Lso titer set to 100%). We also noted some segregation in plant height among the 10 lines, which can be observed even among unchallenged (healthy) plants. Together, these results suggest some degree of segregating alleles among the true seed pools of these wild accessions possible for multiple traits (Bamberg and Del Rio, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2020</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>ZC resistance trait evaluation of single seed lines of <italic>Solanum berthaultii</italic> accession PI310927. (<bold>A</bold>) Photos of representative lines 1&#x02013;10 of <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 and Atlantic controls following challenge with <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> psyllids at 28 dpi. (<bold>B</bold>) Detection of <italic>C</italic>Lso by PCR amplification of <italic>C</italic>Lso 16s rDNA in leaf tissues of 10 single seed lines of <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 accession and Atlantic (AT) control plants challenged with <italic>C</italic>Lso<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> psyllids or no psyllids at 28 dpi. Controls included a positive control, <italic>C</italic>Lso-infected Atlantic, a negative control, healthy Atlantic (H), and water (W). (<bold>C</bold>) Relative quantification of <italic>C</italic>Lso titers of the single seed lines and Atlantic (AT) at 28 dpi by qPCR. Relative <italic>C</italic>Lso titers were calculated from three biological replicates; error bars represent &#x000B1; standard error of the mean. The <italic>p</italic>-values were calculated by Student&#x00027;s <italic>t</italic>-test relative to the infected control. &#x0002A;&#x0002A;<italic>P</italic> &#x02264; 0.01.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-857493-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Host Preference, Fecundity, and Survival of the Psyllids on Sb-PI310927</title>
<p>The following two possible mechanisms explain the ZC resistance trait of <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927: (i) resistance to the psyllid either by antixenosis or antibiosis effects and (ii) immune gene-mediated resistance to the bacteria or the insect. Although not mutually exclusive, we first explored if there were antixenosis or antibiosis effects. For this, we evaluated whether there was a host preference between <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 line&#x00023;10 and Atlantic plants equidistantly placed in an olfactometer-based choice assay (<italic>n</italic> = 10 plants; 20 psyllids/plant). Of the total psyllids analyzed in the experiment (20 psyllids &#x000D7; 10 plants = 200 psyllids), the majority (76%) of them responded within 60 min after the assay was initiated, i.e., reached a 4-cm set threshold distance in the arms toward the plant odor sources (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>). However, no significant differences in host-selection were found between <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 and Atlantic odor sources at the sampling points tested (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>; 15 min: &#x003C7;<sup>2</sup> = 0.053, <italic>df</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> = 0.82; 30 min: &#x003C7;<sup>2</sup> = 0.644, <italic>df</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> = 0.42; 45 min: &#x003C7;<sup>2</sup> = 0.65, <italic>df</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> = 0.42; and 60 min: &#x003C7;<sup>2</sup> = 0.118, <italic>df</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> = 0.73).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Olfactometer, oviposition, and survival evaluations of <italic>Bactericera cockerelli</italic> adults on <italic>Solanum berthaultii</italic> PI310927. <bold>(A)</bold> Olfactometer (Y-tube) behavioral response of potato psyllid adults to plant volatiles under stable conditions observed every 15 min for a maximum of 60 min. Bar graphs represent the overall mean percentages of adults choosing either odor source &#x000B1; standard deviation (<italic>n</italic> = 10). <bold>(B)</bold> Potato psyllid&#x00027;s behavioral response to <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 and susceptible Atlantic (control). Bar graphs represent the mean percentages of adults &#x000B1; standard deviation (<italic>n</italic> = 10). <bold>(C)</bold> Female psyllids oviposition at day 7 in no-choice assays using whole plants. Bar graphs represent the mean number of oviposited eggs per replicate &#x000B1; standard deviation (<italic>n</italic> = 10); the <italic>p</italic>-value was calculated by Student&#x00027;s <italic>t</italic>-test relative to the Atlantic control, <sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>P</italic> &#x02264; 0.0001. <bold>(D)</bold> Survival analysis of potato psyllid adults (<italic>n</italic> = 10) for 7 days showed significant psyllids mortality after exposure to <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 when compared with Atlantic plants. The <italic>p-</italic>value was calculated by the Kaplan&#x02013;Meier analysis, <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.0001. SD, standard deviation; ns, no significance.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-857493-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>As there were no differences in host preference, we next evaluated if there were any adverse effects on oviposition, hatching, and survival of psyllids using no-choice assays with 2-month-old <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 line&#x00023;10 and Atlantic plants (<italic>n</italic> = 10 plants; 10 psyllids/plant). The results showed a significant reduction (<italic>F</italic> = 113.68, <italic>df</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001) in the number of oviposited eggs after 7 days on <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 when compared with Atlantic plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4C</xref>). The few oviposited eggs on <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 were also defective in hatching. Furthermore, survival analysis showed that adult psyllids on <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 had a significantly (Kaplan Meier analysis, <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.0001) lowered probability of survival beyond day 3 when compared with Atlantic plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4D</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Leaf Trichome Density and Morphological Differences of <italic>Sb-PI310927</italic></title>
<p>Lastly, in our experiments, we observed that the leaves of <italic>S. berthaultii</italic> were &#x0201C;sticky,&#x0201D; and the movement of psyllids appeared to be impaired (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5C</xref>). Hence, under a microscope, we examined the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of 1-month-old Sb-PI310927 line &#x00023;10. <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 leaves had a more significant number of trichomes, and they appear longer than those of Atlantic leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5A,B</xref>). The number of trichomes was significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01) higher in <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 than in Atlantic leaves on both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5A,B</xref>). It is possible that the observed reduced fecundity and survival of psyllids effects on <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 could be associated with the increased trichome density and the presence of glandular trichomes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5C,D</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>Evaluation of leaf trichomes on <italic>Solanum berthaultii</italic> PI310927 and Atlantic. (<bold>A</bold>) Microscopic evaluation of shape and density of trichomes on the abaxial and adaxial surfaces of leaves of <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 line 10 and Atlantic controls. (<bold>B</bold>) Estimation of trichome density on the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces of <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 and Atlantic controls. Errors bars represent the mean number of trichomes per mm<sup>2</sup> &#x000B1; standard error of the mean (<italic>n</italic> = 12). The <italic>p</italic>-values were calculated by Student&#x00027;s <italic>t</italic>-test relative to the Atlantic control. &#x0002A; <italic>P</italic> &#x02264; 0.01; &#x0002A;&#x0002A; <italic>P</italic> &#x02264; 0.001. (<bold>C</bold>) Dead psyllids on abaxial and adaxial leaf surfaces of <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 plants using non-choice assays. (<bold>D</bold>) Proposed mechanism of negative effects of <italic>Sb-</italic>PI310927 on potato psyllid.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-857493-g0005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Zebra chip, a devastating potato disease worldwide, is complex due to its association with the phloem-limited and uncultured <italic>C</italic>Lso and the potato psyllid vector. Using chemical measures has helped control the psyllid population, but it is associated with high costs and positive selection for insecticide resistance (Szczepaniec et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2019</xref>). In the present study, new sources of ZC resistance were identified among a wild collection of tuber-bearing <italic>Solanum</italic> spp. (<italic>Solanum</italic> sect. <italic>Petota</italic>) (Hardigan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2015</xref>). This panel is a taxonomically well-characterized and diverse collection to mine for valuable traits (Hardigan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2015</xref>).</p>
<p>Following the screening, phenotypic evaluations, and quantitation of <italic>C</italic>Lso titers of 52 accessions infected with <italic>C</italic>Lso carrying psyllids, we identified one ZC-resistant accession, <italic>S. berthaultii</italic> PI310927, and three ZC moderately tolerant accessions, namely, <italic>Solanum kurtzianum</italic> PI498359, <italic>Solanum okadae</italic> PI498130, and <italic>Solanum raphanifolium</italic> PI310953. Phenotypically, although the three ZC-tolerant wild <italic>Solanum</italic> accessions (<italic>S. kurtzianum</italic> PI498359, <italic>S. okadae</italic> PI498130, and <italic>S. raphanifolium</italic> PI310953) showed some ZC foliar symptoms at 28 dpi, they were able to tolerate and survive <italic>C</italic>Lso. In contrast, the susceptible Atlantic control plants showed severe symptoms, wilting, and eventual death. There are some commonalities among the three tolerant and one resistant accessions. They were all sourced from countries that are relatively closer to the South American continent (Hardigan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2015</xref>). The four species are diploids and belong to the same species, clade 4, as described by Spooner and Castillo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">1997</xref>). Several of these accessions were also previously reported to be tolerant to other potato pests, including green peach aphid, potato aphid, Colorado potato beetle, potato flea beetle, and potato leafhopper (Flanders et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">1992</xref>).</p>
<p>The <italic>S. berthaultii</italic> PI310927 is a highly promising candidate among the ZC-resistant lines. Characterization of resistance among the <italic>S. berthaultii</italic> PI310927 true seeds showed a low-to-moderate level of transmission of <italic>C</italic>Lso among true seed progeny, indicating the presence of heterozygosity or allelic variation among the true seed progeny, which is expected from wild germplasm where traits and alleles are not fixed. Potato breeding efforts with hybrids that incorporated <italic>S. berthaultii</italic> as one of the parents reported variable levels of tolerance to <italic>C</italic>Lso, likely caused due to the heterogeneity of the progeny (Butler et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2011</xref>; Prager et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2013</xref>; Rashidi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2017</xref>). Our results suggest that natural allelic variations present among the true seed progenies of wild germplasm can impact trait phenotypes and underscore the need to evaluate multiple seed progeny independently propagated.</p>
<p>Importantly, we were able to recover several true seed lines of <italic>S. berthaultii</italic> PI310927 (&#x00023;3, 4, 5,7, 8, and 10) that showed no ZC symptoms and detectable <italic>C</italic>Lso, when compared with the Atlantic control (100%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3B,C</xref>). Further characterization of the resistant single seed line &#x00023;10 showed no differences in psyllid preference to odor sources of <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 and Atlantic plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4A,B</xref>). However, we found greater leaf trichome density that may cause the negative impacts observed on psyllid fecundity and survival (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4C,D</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5A&#x02013;D</xref>). Previous studies on other wild potato relatives and hybrids suggested similar effects of the glandular trichomes against several potato pests (Tingey and Gibson, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">1978</xref>; Tingey and Laubengayer, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">1981</xref>; Yencho and Tingey, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">1994</xref>; Malakar and Tingey, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2000</xref>; Butler et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2011</xref>; Diaz-Montano et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2014</xref>; Rubio-Covarrubias et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2017</xref>). Additionally, specific secondary metabolites produced by glandular trichomes were reported to influence host selection (Prager et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2018</xref>). Further investigation into potential chemical signatures or metabolites synthesized by the <italic>S. berthaultii</italic> PI310927 glandular trichomes may bring new insights into the mechanisms of the observed ZC and psyllid resistance.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In this study, screening 52 tuber-bearing wild <italic>Solanum</italic> species resulted in identifying a ZC resistant and several tolerant accessions. The resistant <italic>S. berthaultii</italic> accession has dense glandular leaf trichomes. This foliar structural modification could be responsible for much of the observed ZC resistance. We suggest the <italic>S. berthaultii</italic> as a promising source for ZC/psyllid resistance that can be further studied to understand insect resistance mechanisms and incorporated into the potato production system as a trap crop for psyllid or breeding new potato cultivars.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>KM conceived the project and supervised the study. KM, FI, CA, VA, and MV designed the experiments and interpreted the results. VM, MR, MD, and SI conducted the experiments, analyzed the data, and prepared the manuscript. All authors contributed to the editing and review of the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was supported in part by funds from Texas A&#x00026;M AgriLife Research Insect-Vectored Disease Seed Grant (124185-96210) and the Texas A&#x00026;M AgriLife Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture, USDA-NIFA (HATCH 1023984) to KM and USDA-NIFA (2019-03814) to MIV. We thank Jesse Schartner and John Bamberg (U.S. Potato Genebank, NRSP-6, Sturgeon Bay, WI) for providing the <italic>Solanum</italic> accessions. We also thank the technical assistance of Denise Rossi, Ashley Jacques, Briana Jacques, and Renesh Bedre (Texas A&#x00026;M AgriLife Research).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer XW is currently organizing a Research Topic with the author KM.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s9">
<title>Publisher&#x00027;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s10">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.857493/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.857493/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Presentation_1.pdf" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Morphological diversity among the tuber-bearing <italic>Solanum</italic> section <italic>Petota</italic> species.</p></caption> </supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Presentation_1.pdf" id="SM2" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Phenotypic evaluation of zebra chip (ZC) disease symptoms in wild <italic>Solanum</italic> section <italic>Petota</italic> accessions. Screening of accessions was done using a no-choice feeding assay and <italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum-carrying psyllids in the soil in modified cups (<bold>A</bold>) and pots (<bold>B</bold>) inside cages. (<bold>C</bold>) ZC severity index (SI) scale (1, resistant; 2, moderately susceptible; 3, highly susceptible).</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Presentation_1.pdf" id="SM3" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Preliminary screening of <italic>Solanum</italic> section <italic>Petota</italic> accessions for resistance or tolerance to zebra chip disease, with a no-choice feeding assay with <italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum-carrying psyllids. Morphological differences in ZC symptoms of 28-day-old <italic>Solanum</italic> sect. <italic>Petota</italic> accessions.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Presentation_1.pdf" id="SM4" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>The phenotypes of 4-week-old Atlantic and <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 accession zebra chip disease, with a no-choice feeding assay with <italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum-carrying psyllids. Morphological differences in ZC symptoms (leaf curling and wilting) of Atlantic (28-day-old) (<bold>A</bold>) and <italic>Sb</italic>-PI310927 (<bold>B</bold>) are shown. A closeup of ZC symptoms is shown in the inset box.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.docx" id="SM5" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 1</label>
<caption><p>List of the <italic>Solanum</italic> species and accessions screened for zebra chip resistance.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.docx" id="SM6" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 2</label>
<caption><p>List of primers used in this study.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Allaire</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>&#x0201C;RStudio: Integrated development environment for R,&#x0201D;</article-title> in <source>The R User Conference</source> (Coventry: University of Warwick). Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.r-project.org/conferences/useR-2011/abstracts/180111-allairejj.pdf">https://www.r-project.org/conferences/useR-2011/abstracts/180111-allairejj.pdf</ext-link></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Avila</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ar&#x000E9;valo-Soliz</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Navarre</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Howe</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Loss of function of fatty acid desaturase 7 in tomato enhances basal aphid resistance in a salicylate-dependent manner</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>158</volume>, <fpage>2028</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2041</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.111.191262</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22291202</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bamberg</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Del Rio</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Assessing under-estimation of genetic diversity within wild potato (<italic>Solanum</italic>) species populations</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Pot. Res.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>547</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>553</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12230-020-09802-3</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buchman</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heilman</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Munyaneza</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Effects of liberibacter-infective <italic>Bactericera cockerelli</italic> (Hemiptera: Triozidae) density on zebra chip potato disease incidence, potato yield, and tuber processing quality</article-title>. <source>J. Econ. Entom.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>1783</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1792</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1603/EC11146</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22299337</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Butler</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonzalez</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manjunath</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Novy</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Behavioral responses of adult potato psyllid, <italic>Bactericera cockerelli</italic> (Hemiptera: Triozidae), to potato germplasm and transmission of <italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter psyllaurous</article-title>. <source>J. Crop Protect.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1233</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1238</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2011.05.006</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cooper</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bamberg</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Variation in <italic>Bactericera cockerelli</italic> (Hemiptera: Triozidae) oviposition, survival, and development on <italic>Solanum bulbocastanum</italic> germplasm</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Pot. Res.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>532</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>537</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12230-014-9384-x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cooper</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bamberg</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Variation in susceptibility to potato psyllid, <italic>Bactericera cockerelli</italic> (Hemiptera: Triozidae), among <italic>Solanum verrucosum</italic> germplasm accessions</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Pot. Res.</source> <volume>93</volume>, <fpage>386</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>391</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12230-016-9512-x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dahal</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.-Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tai</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Creelman</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bizimungu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Improving potato stress tolerance and tuber yield under a climate change scenario&#x02013;a current overview</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>563</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2019.00563</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31139199</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Diaz-Montano</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vindiola</surname> <given-names>B. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Novy</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trumble</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Resistance of selected potato genotypes to the potato psyllid (Hemiptera: Triozidae)</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Pot. Res.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>363</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>367</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12230-013-9356-6</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnstone</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>1349</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/19.6.1349</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2030957</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Faostat</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source>FAOSTAT [Online]</source>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/&#x00023;data/QC">http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/&#x00023;data/QC</ext-link> (accessed May 04, 2020).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fife</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cruzado</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rashed</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Novy</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wenninger</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Potato psyllid (Hemiptera: Triozidae) behavior on three potato genotypes with tolerance to &#x02018;<italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum&#x02019;</article-title>. <source>J. Insect Sci.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>15</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jisesa/ieaa020</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32294181</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Flanders</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hawkes</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Radcliffe</surname> <given-names>E. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lauer</surname> <given-names>F. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Insect resistance in potatoes: sources, evolutionary relationships, morphological and chemical defenses, and ecogeographical associations</article-title>. <source>Euphytica</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>83</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>111</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00026800</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>French-Monar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Patton Iii</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Douglas</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abad</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schuster</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallace</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>First report of &#x0201C;<italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum&#x0201D; on field tomatoes in The United States</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>481</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>481</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-94-4-0481A</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30754480</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Greenway</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Economic impact of zebra chip control costs on grower returns in seven US states</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Potato Res.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>714</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>719</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12230-014-9404-x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Greenway</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rondon</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Economic impacts of zebra chip in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Pot. Res.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>362</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>367</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12230-018-9636-2</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guenthner</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goolsby</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Greenway</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Use and cost of insecticides to control potato psyllids and zebra chip on potatoes</article-title>. <source>Southwestern Entomol.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>263</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>270</lpage>, 268. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3958/059.037.0302</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hardigan</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bamberg</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buell</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Douches</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Taxonomy and genetic differentiation among wild and cultivated germplasm of <italic>Solanum</italic> sect. <italic>Petota</italic></article-title>. <source>Plant Genome</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3835/plantgenome2014.06.0025</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33228289</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harrison</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamborindeguy</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scheuring</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herrera</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Badillo-Vargas</surname> <given-names>I. E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Differences in Zebra Chip severity between &#x02018;<italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum&#x02019; haplotypes in Texas</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Pot. Res.</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>86</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>93</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12230-018-9692-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35354405</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hawkes</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <source>The Potato: Evolution, Biodiversity and Genetic Resources</source>. Belhaven Press.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Henne</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Workneh</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Price</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pasche</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gudmestad</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Characterization and epidemiological significance of potato plants grown from seed tubers affected by zebra chip disease</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>659</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>665</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-94-6-0659</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30754310</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Irigoyen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramasamy</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pant</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niraula</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bedre</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gurung</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Plant hairy roots enable high throughput identification of antimicrobials against <italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter spp</article-title>. <source>Nature Comm.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-020-19631-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33199718</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levy</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ravindran</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gross</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamborindeguy</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pierson</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Translocation of <italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum, the zebra chip pathogen, in potato and tomato</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>1285</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1291</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-04-11-0121</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21770778</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levy</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamborindeguy</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title><italic>Solanum habrochaites</italic>, a potential source of resistance against <italic>Bactericera cockerelli</italic> (Hemiptera: Triozidae) and &#x0201C;<italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum&#x0201D;</article-title>. <source>J. Econ. Entom.</source> <volume>107</volume>, <fpage>1187</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1193</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1603/EC13295</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25026681</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Malakar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tingey</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Glandular trichomes of <italic>Solanum berthaultii</italic> and its hybrids with potato deter oviposition and impair growth of potato tuber moth</article-title>. <source>Entomol. Exp. Appl.</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>249</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>257</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1570-7458.2000.00627.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mawassi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dror</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bar-Joseph</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Piasezky</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sj&#x000F6;lund</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levitzky</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>&#x02018;<italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum&#x02019; is tightly associated with carrot yellows symptoms in Israel and transmitted by the prevalent psyllid vector <italic>Bactericera trigonica</italic></article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>1056</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1066</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-10-17-0348-R</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29663849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mora</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramasamy</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Damaj</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Irigoyen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ancona</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ibanez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Potato zebra chip: an overview of the disease, control strategies and prospects</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>700663</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.700663</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34367101</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Munyaneza</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crosslin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Upton</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Association of Bactericera cockerelli (Homoptera: Psyllidae) with &#x0201C;zebra chip,&#x0201D; a new potato disease in southwestern United States and Mexico</article-title>. <source>J. Econ. Entom.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>656</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>663</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[656:AOBCHP]2.0.CO;2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17598522</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Munyaneza</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fisher</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sengoda</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garczynski</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nissinen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lemmetty</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>First report of &#x0201C;<italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum&#x0201D; associated with psyllid-affected carrots in Europe</article-title>. <source>Plant Disease</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>639</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-94-5-0639A</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30754456</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Munyaneza</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sengoda</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crosslin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garzon-Tiznado</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cardenas-Valenzuela</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009a</year>). <article-title>First report of &#x0201C;<italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum&#x0201D; in tomato plants in Mexico</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>93</volume>, <fpage>1076</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1076</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-93-10-1076A</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30754366</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Munyaneza</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Zebra chip disease of potato: biology, epidemiology, and management</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Potato Res.</source> <volume>89</volume>, <fpage>329</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>350</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12230-012-9262-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23268582</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Munyaneza</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crosslin</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buchman</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009b</year>). <article-title>Seasonal occurrence and abundance of the potato psyllid, <italic>Bactericera cockerelli</italic>, in south central Washington</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Pot. Res.</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>513</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12230-009-9108-9</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Murashige</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skoog</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1962</year>). <article-title>A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Plant.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>473</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>497</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Navarre</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shakya</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holden</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crosslin</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>LC-MS analysis of phenolic compounds in tubers showing zebra chip symptoms</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Pot. Res</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>88</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>95</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12230-008-9060-0</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nwugo</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sengoda</surname> <given-names>V. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Characterization of physiological and molecular processes associated with potato response to zebra chip disease</article-title>. <source>Hortic. Res.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/hortres.2017.69</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29238599</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Portal</surname> <given-names>U. P. H. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <source>Pest Alert: Zebra Chip Disease of Potato</source>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://planthealthportal.defra.gov.uk/pests-and-diseases/high-profile-pests-and-diseases/zebra-chip-disease-of-potato/">https://planthealthportal.defra.gov.uk/pests-and-diseases/high-profile-pests-and-diseases/zebra-chip-disease-of-potato/</ext-link></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prager</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallis</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Novy</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trumble</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Examining the potential role of foliar chemistry in imparting potato germplasm tolerance to potato psyllid, green peach aphid, and zebra chip disease</article-title>. <source>J. Econ. Entom.</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>327</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>336</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jee/tox255</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29186612</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prager</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vindiola</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kund</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Byrne</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trumble</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Considerations for the use of neonicotinoid pesticides in management of <italic>Bactericera cockerelli</italic> (&#x00160;ulk)(Hemiptera: Triozidae)</article-title>. <source>Journal of Crop Protection</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>84</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>91</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2013.08.001</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rashidi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Novy</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallis</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rashed</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Characterization of host plant resistance to zebra chip disease from species-derived potato genotypes and the identification of new sources of zebra chip resistance</article-title>. <source>PLOS ONE</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>e0183283</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0183283</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28832618</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rubio-Covarrubias</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cadena-Hinojosa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prager</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallis</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trumble</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Characterization of the tolerance against zebra chip disease in tubers of advanced potato lines from Mexico</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Potato Res.</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>342</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>356</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12230-017-9570-8</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Savary</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Willocquet</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pethybridge</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Esker</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcroberts</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops</article-title>. <source>Nat. Ecol. Evol</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>430</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>439</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30718852</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sengoda</surname> <given-names>V. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cooper</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swisher</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henne</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Munyaneza</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Latent period and transmission of &#x0201C;<italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum&#x0201D; by the potato psyllid <italic>Bactericera cockerelli</italic> (Hemiptera: Triozidae)</article-title>. <italic>PLoS ONE</italic> 9, e93475. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0093475</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24682175</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spooner</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Castillo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Reexamination of series relationships of South American wild potatoes (Solanaceae: <italic>Solanum</italic> sect. Petota): evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Bot.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>671</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>685</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2445904</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21708620</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Szczepaniec</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Varela</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kiani</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paetzold</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rush</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Incidence of resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides in <italic>Bactericera cockerelli</italic> across Southwest US</article-title>. <source>Crop Protect.</source> <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>188</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>195</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2018.11.001</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tahzima</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maes</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Achbani</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swisher</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Munyaneza</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Jonghe</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>First report of &#x02018;<italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter solanacearum&#x02019; on carrot in Africa</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>1426</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-05-14-0509-PDN</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30704004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tingey</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gibson</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>Feeding and mobility of the potato leafhopper impaired by glandular trichomes of <italic>Solanum berthaultii</italic> and <italic>S. polyadenium</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Econ. Entom.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>856</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>858</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jee/71.6.856</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tingey</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laubengayer</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Defense against the green peach aphid and potato leafhopper by glandular trichomes of <italic>Solanum berthaultii</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Econ. Entom.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>721</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>725</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jee/74.6.721</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>USDA</collab></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source>Potatoes 2019 Summary [Online]</source>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.nass.usda.gov">https://www.nass.usda.gov</ext-link>&#x0203A;reports&#x0203A;pots0919 (accessed July 02, 2020).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vigue</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <source>Identification of Zebra Chip Tolerant Diploid and Tetraploid Potato Genotypes with Good Processing Quality</source>. <publisher-loc>College Station, TX</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Texas A&#x00026;M University</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vigue</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scheuring</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koym</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rush</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Workneh</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamborindeguy</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Identification of tetraploid potato clones with good processing quality among genotypes with reduced zebra chip disease symptomatology</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Pot. Res.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>565</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>579</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12230-020-09804-1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wallis</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Civerolo</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Zebra chip-diseased potato tubers are characterized by increased levels of host phenolics, amino acids, and defense-related proteins</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>66</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>72</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pmpp.2012.02.001</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yencho</surname> <given-names>G. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tingey</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Glandular trichomes of <italic>Solanum berthaultii</italic> alter host preference of the Colorado potato beetle, <italic>Leptinotarsa decemlineata</italic></article-title>. <source>Entomol. Exp. Appl.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>217</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>225</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1570-7458.1994.tb00750.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zu&#x000F1;iga</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peacock</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mccollum</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Irigoyen</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tec-Campos</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Linking metabolic phenotypes to pathogenic traits among &#x0201C;<italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter asiaticus&#x0201D; and its hosts</article-title>. <source>NPJ Syst. Biol. Appl.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>12</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41540-020-00142-w</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32753656</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list> 
</back>
</article>