<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.838698</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title><italic>Escherichia coli</italic> BW25113 Competent Cells Prepared Using a Simple Chemical Method Have Unmatched Transformation and Cloning Efficiencies</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Yuqing</given-names></name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Qiaoli</given-names></name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Min</given-names></name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Rui</given-names></name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Huaiwei</given-names></name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/960586/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Xun</surname><given-names>Luying</given-names></name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/73617/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Xia</surname><given-names>Yongzhen</given-names></name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/643714/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University</institution>, <addr-line>Qingdao</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Institute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University</institution>, <addr-line>Qingdao</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University</institution>, <addr-line>Pullman, WA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn id="fn0001" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Ning-Yi Zhou, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn0002" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Qing Hong, Nanjing Agricultural University, China; Xinqing Zhao, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Luying Xun, <email>luying_xun@vetmed.edu.edu</email> Yongzhen Xia, <email>xiayongzhen2002@sdu.edu.cn</email></corresp>
<fn id="fn0003" fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Microbiotechnology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>24</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>838698</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>18</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>01</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2022 Yang, Yu, Wang, Zhao, Liu, Xun and Xia.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Yang, Yu, Wang, Zhao, Liu, Xun and Xia</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p><italic>Escherichia coli recA</italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup> strains are usually used for cloning to prevent insert instability <italic>via</italic> RecA-dependent recombination. Here, we report that <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 (<italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup>) competent cells prepared by using a previously reported transformation and storage solution (TSS) had 100-fold or higher transformation efficiency than the commonly used <italic>E. coli</italic> cloning strains, including XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;. The cloning success rates with <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 were 440 to 1,267-fold higher than those with <italic>E. coli</italic> XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; when several inserts were assembled into four vectors by using a simple DNA assembly method. The difference was in part due to RecA, as the <italic>recA</italic> deletion in <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 reduced the transformation efficiency by 16 folds and cloning success rate by about 10 folds. However, the transformation efficiency and the cloning success rate of the <italic>recA</italic> deletion mutant of <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 are still 12- and &#x003E;48-fold higher than those of <italic>E. coli</italic> XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;, which is a commonly used cloning strain. The cloned inserts with different lengths of homologous sequences were assembled into four vectors and transformed into <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113, and they were stably maintained in BW25113. Thus, we recommend using <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 for efficient cloning and DNA assembly.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>transformation</kwd>
<kwd>competent cells</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Escherichia coli</italic></kwd>
<kwd>recA</kwd>
<kwd>cloning</kwd>
<kwd>recombination</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn1">31870085</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn1">91951202</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn1">31961133015</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn1">Natural Science Foundation of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001809</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="8"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="66"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="8623"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>DNA cloning is a common technique used in biological research, such as constructing CRISPR vectors and plasmids encoding metabolic pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Ellis et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Sanjana et al., 2014</xref>). The conventional method relies on DNA digestion by restriction enzymes and re-ligation by T4 DNA ligase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Cohen et al., 1973</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Smolke, 2009</xref>). Recently, seamless cloning methods have gained adaptation to meet the requirements of higher efficiency, fidelity, and modularity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Kosuri and Church, 2014</xref>). DNA fragments with homology ends or ends that can be recognized by a phage recombinase are generated and assembled either <italic>in vivo</italic> or <italic>in vitro</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Fu et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Chao et al., 2015</xref>). For <italic>in vivo</italic> methods, these DNA fragments are joined in host cells, such as <italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic> or <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>. When <italic>E. coli</italic> is used, it usually overexpresses a bacteriophage recombination system to join DNA fragments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">House et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Wang et al., 2016</xref>). For <italic>in vitro</italic> methods, DNA fragments are treated with enzymes to join DNA fragments. The <italic>in vitro</italic> methods are widely used for routine cloning, and <italic>in vivo</italic> methods that often require longer homologous ends are more useful in the assembly of large plasmids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Zhu et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Jeong et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Zhang et al., 2012</xref>). We have developed a &#x201C;T5 exonuclease DNA assembly&#x201D; (TEDA) method that combines <italic>in vitro</italic> digestion by 5&#x2032;-3&#x2032; exonuclease with the rest recombination inside <italic>E. coli</italic> to join homology ends with high efficiency for routine cloning at low cost, and the method works better with chemically prepared competent cells than with electroporation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Xia et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>E. coli</italic> K-12 derivatives with a defective <italic>recA</italic> (<italic>recA1</italic>) that is defective in recombination are often used for cloning (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Bullock, 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Anton and Raleigh, 2016</xref>). DH5&#x03B1; is engineered to enable blue white screening for the &#x03B2;-galactosidase (LacZ) activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Hanahan, 1983</xref>). XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; with all restriction systems being removed is often used to clone methylated DNA especially from eukaryotes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Bullock, 1987</xref>). JM109 is considered as a better choice to clone repetitive DNA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Yanischperron et al., 1985</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Metcalf and Wanner, 1993</xref>). Stbl2 is a derivative of JM109 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Trinh et al., 1994</xref>), and Stbl3 is a hybrid strain of <italic>E. coli</italic> K-12 and <italic>E. coli</italic> B; both are developed to clone direct repeats, retroviral sequences, and tandem array genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Al-Allaf et al., 2013</xref>). Derivatives from other <italic>E. coli</italic> strains are also used. Mach1, derived from <italic>E. coli</italic> W, is a fast-growing <italic>recA</italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup> strain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Green and Sambrook, 2018</xref>). The commonly used <italic>E. coli recA</italic><sup>+</sup> strain is BL21(DE3) for the expression of recombinant proteins. Although BL21(DE3) is <italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup>, its transformation efficiency (TE) is much lower than commonly used cloning strains derived from K-12 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Chan et al., 2013</xref>). Clearly, <italic>E. coli</italic> K-12 <italic>recA</italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup> strains are the common cloning <italic>E. coli</italic> strains.</p>
<p>The common cloning <italic>E. coli</italic> strains often contain additional mutations to benefit cloning. The mutation of the <italic>hsdR</italic> or <italic>hsdS</italic> gene prevents the unmethylated DNA from being degraded (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Sain and Murray, 1980</xref>). The <italic>endA</italic> mutation avoids random degradation of DNA by endonuclease I after cell lysis, improving both the quantity and quality of plasmid extraction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Lin, 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Altermark et al., 2007</xref>). DeoR regulates cells&#x2019; ability to continuously synthesize deoxyribose, whose mutation increases cells&#x2019; ability to absorb large plasmid DNA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Hanahan et al., 1991</xref>). The <italic>galE</italic> mutation reduces the interference from lipopolysaccharide for DNA uptake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">van Die et al., 1984</xref>). FhuA serves as the receptor for phages T5, T1, &#x03C6;80, and UC-1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Hantke and Braun, 1975</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">1978</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Carmel and Coulton, 1991</xref>), and its deletion protects cells from phages infection especially during library construction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Bonhivers et al., 1998</xref>). The mutation of these genes is commonly employed for constructing cloning strains.</p>
<p>The <italic>recA</italic> gene in almost all <italic>E. coli</italic> cloning strains is inactivated to increase plasmid stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Clark, 1973</xref>). RecA is the core component of homologous recombination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Maraboeuf et al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Kowalczykowski, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Morimatsu and Kowalczykowski, 2014</xref>), and it catalyzes intermolecular recombination to generate dimers that lead to plasmid loss without selection pressure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Summers et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Standley et al., 2019</xref>). Low copy number plasmid is relatively stable in <italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup> strains, but high copy number plasmids easily form multimers and generate plasmid-free cells without selection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Herman-Antosiewicz and Wegrzyn, 1999</xref>). With selection pressure, the subpopulation with dimers in <italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup> cells is confined due to the reduced growth for cells with plasmid dimers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Summers et al., 2010</xref>). Other concerns related to RecA are homologous recombination events within a plasmid or between a plasmid and the chromosome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Sambrook et al., 2017</xref>). Although these are valid concerns, direct evidence on their effects on cloning has not been reported.</p>
<p>We report here that <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113, a K-12 derivative with a <italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup> and <italic>hsdR<sup>&#x2212;</sup></italic> genotype and the parent of the Keio collection of single-gene knockouts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Baba et al., 2006</xref>), had &#x003E;100-fold higher TE than the commonly used cloning <italic>E. coli</italic> hosts when intact pBluescript SK- (pSK-) was chemically transformed by using a single step method of the transformation and storage solution (TSS). The cloning success rates with BW25113 were 440 to 1,267-fold higher than those with XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; when various inserts were assembled into 4 vectors by the TEDA method. The cloned inserts with different lengths of homologous sequences were stable in BW25113. Our results promote the reconsideration of using the <italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup> strain <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 for DNA assembly in synthetic biology with significantly increased success rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Strains and Plasmids</title>
<p>The strains used in this study were listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>. All mutants in this research were obtained according to the Wanner&#x2019;s method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Datsenko and Wanner, 2000</xref>). All strains were cultured at 37&#x00B0;C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium with appropriate antibiotics. Ampicillin, spectinomycin, gentamycin (Gm), chloramphenicol, and kanamycin (Kan) were used at 100, 50, 10, 25, and 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/ml, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Enzymes and Reagents</title>
<p>Phusion DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher, United States) was used to amply DNA fragments. PrimeSTAR GXL DNA Polymerase (Takara, Japan) was used to amply DNA fragments whose length are larger than 10&#x2009;kb. Trans 5&#x2009;K and 1&#x2009;kb DNA markers (TransGen Biotech, Beijing) were used to measure the size of DNA fragments in agarose gel electrophoresis. Gel extraction kit (Omega, United States), Plasmid extraction mini Kit (Omega, United States), and TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (TianGen, China) were used to purify DNA fragments. All oligos were synthesized by Beijing Genomics Institute. Magnesium chloride, manganese chloride, PEG8000, PEG3350, and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (US), and the rest reagents were purchased from Sangon Biotech (China).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>Procedures for Competent Cells Preparation and Transformation</title>
<p>To prepare competent cells, a fresh single colony was normally inoculated into 4-mL LB medium and incubated at 37&#x00B0;C overnight. Then, 1% culture was transferred to 50&#x2009;ml fresh LB medium and cultured at 37&#x00B0;C until OD<sub>600</sub> around 0.5 to prepare competent cells for the TSS method and at 20&#x00B0;C to prepare competent cells for the Hanahan and Inoue methods. The growth was stopped by incubating on ice for 10&#x2009;min. Cells were harvested by centrifuging at 4&#x00B0;C, 4000&#x2009;<italic>g</italic>&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10&#x2009;min, for the preparation of competent cells with different methods.</p>
<p>The TSS method was modified from two references (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Chung et al., 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Parrish et al., 2004</xref>). Briefly, the harvested cells were resuspended in 1&#x2009;ml of the TSS buffer (LB-HCl pH&#x2009;=&#x2009;6.1, 10% PEG3350, 5% DMSO, 10% Glycerol, 10&#x2009;mM MgSO<sub>4</sub>, and 10&#x2009;mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>), and chilled on ice for 10&#x2009;min. This mixture was aliquoted into 30&#x2009;&#x03BC;l per tube. The preparation steps of competent cells were mainly adopted from the study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Chung et al. (1989)</xref>. In the transformation step, 5&#x2009;&#x03BC;l of 5&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;KCM (0.5&#x2009;M KCl, 150&#x2009;mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>, and 250&#x2009;mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>) was mixed with DNA and ddH<sub>2</sub>O to total 25&#x2009;&#x03BC;l mixture. The mixture was gently mixed with 25&#x2009;&#x03BC;l competent cells and incubated on ice for 30&#x2009;min. A total of 250&#x2009;&#x03BC;l fresh LB medium was added for cell recovery at 37&#x00B0;C for 1&#x2009;h. Recovered cultures were spread into the LB plate with the indicated antibiotic. KCM was reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Parrish et al. (2004)</xref>.</p>
<p>For the Inoue method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Green and Sambrook, 2020</xref>), the harvested cells were washed with 20&#x2009;ml of the Inoue buffer (55&#x2009;mM MnCl<sub>2</sub>, 15&#x2009;mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>, 250&#x2009;mM KCl, and 10&#x2009;mM PIPES pH&#x2009;=&#x2009;6.7) and finally resuspended in 1&#x2009;ml of the Inoue buffer. Then, 75&#x2009;&#x03BC;l DMSO was added, and the mixture was incubated on ice for 10&#x2009;min. The cell mixture was aliquoted into 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;l/tube and could be stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C.</p>
<p>For the Hanahan method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Green and Sambrook, 2018</xref>), the harvested cells were washed with the CCMB80 buffer (80&#x2009;mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>, 20&#x2009;mM MnCl<sub>2</sub>, 10&#x2009;mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 10% Glycerol, and 10&#x2009;mM Potassium acetate buffer pH&#x2009;=&#x2009;7.0) and finally resuspended in 1&#x2009;ml CCMB80 buffer. The cell mixture was aliquoted into 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;l/tube and could be stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C before use.</p>
<p>The transformation procedures used with the Inoue and the Hanahan method were similar. A 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;l of competent cells was thawed on ice and mixed with DNA solution. The mixture was incubated on ice for 30&#x2009;min before heat shock at 42&#x00B0;C for 90&#x2009;s. After heat shock, 900&#x2009;&#x03BC;l of fresh LB was added for cell recovery at 37&#x00B0;C for 1&#x2009;h. Recovered cultures were spread into the LB plate with the indicated antibiotic.</p>
<p>All solutions were autoclaved and used under an ice-cold condition. All operations were performed on ice. The cells were gently resuspended in different buffers. The supernatant after centrifugation was cleanly and quickly pipetted off. The prepared competent cells could be stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C before use.</p>
<p>The TEs were tested by transforming 0.2&#x2009;ng intact pBluescript SK- into the testing competent cells. The number of recovery colonies was counted and normalized to 1&#x2009;&#x03BC;g of the plasmid DNA.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<title>The Preparation of Vectors and Inserts for DNA Assembly</title>
<p>The plasmids and primers used in this study are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S1</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S2</xref>, respectively. The TEDA method was used for plasmid constructions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Xia et al., 2019</xref>). Competent cells of defined strains prepared with different methods were used to transform either intact plasmids or DNA cloning mixtures.</p>
<p>Plasmids with artificial homologous characteristics were generated to check for their stability in <italic>E. coli recA</italic><sup>+</sup> strains. To construct plasmids with homology to <italic>E. coli</italic> genome, a 3,000-bp fragment was amplified from BW25113 genomic DNA near the <italic>rapA</italic> gene. The DNA fragment was assembled into plasmids with different replicons.</p>
<p>Direct repeats (DR) were introduced into plasmids through DNA assembly of four DNA fragments. The 5&#x2032; end of Kan-resistant gene (5&#x2019;Kan), the intact Gm resistant gene (Gm), and the 3&#x2032; end of Kan-resistant gene (3&#x2019;Kan) were assembled in pCL1920. Gm was inserted into the open reading frame (ORF) of Kan-resistant gene between 135 and 136&#x2009;bp. A defined length of 300&#x2009;bp from 136 to 435&#x2009;bp of Kan ORF was amplified and inserted before Gm, so that a homologous recombination with the DRs will restore Kan resistance.</p>
<p>Inserts of short and long highly tandem repeats were introduced into plasmids through DNA assembly. For short repeats, 41-bp Tac promoter repeat (TR41) was used. The Tac promoter repeats have been assembled together to promote eGFP expression in a list of plasmids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Li et al., 2012</xref>). Fragments harboring 1, 4, 6, or 8 TR41 with an eGFP gene were amplified from corresponding plasmids and cloned into pCL1920. For medium-sized repeats, 300-bp from the C-terminal of eGFP was amplified and inserted after the gene in pCL1920::Pkat-eGFP to generate pCL1920::2TR300 with two repeats and pCL1920::3TR300 with three repeats. The interspace between the three TR regions was 104 and 67&#x2009;bp. For long repeats, a defined 1-kb fragment containing Pkat-eGFP (TR1000) from pCL1920::Pkat-eGFP was amplified and inserted next to the TR1000 region to produce pCL1920::2TR1000 with two tandem repeats and pCL1920::3TR1000 with three tandem repeats. The interspace between the three tandem repeats regions was 65 and 67&#x2009;bp. For testing, the inserts harboring tandem repeats were amplified and cloned back into the original pCL1920 plasmid by transforming indicated competent cells.</p>
<p>The TEDA method was used to assemble DNA fragments into various vectors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Xia et al., 2019</xref>). The <italic>egfp</italic> gene under the control of Pkat promoter (Pkat-eGFP) with 20-bp homology ends to SmaI-pSK was used, as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Xia et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<title>The Screening for Positive Colonies and the Stability of Plasmid in Cells</title>
<p>The phenotype was used for initial screening to obtain the positive cloning rates (positive colonies/total colonies). Colonies producing eGFP were green. Further, 20 colonies were checked by using colony PCR. Ten plasmids from the positive colonies were extracted and checked through agarose gel electrophoresis and DNA sequencing (TsingKe BioTech, China).</p>
<p>The stability of plasmids with homology characteristics was initially checked for positive cloning rates. The stability of these plasmids was then tested. Five colonies were randomly picked and cultured in LB medium with appropriate antibiotics. The cultures were continuously transferred into fresh LB medium once reached the stationary phase. After three transfers, the plasmids were extracted and checked by using agarose gel electrophoresis and DNA sequencing.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>BW25113 Has a Significantly Higher TE Than Commonly Used <italic>E. coli</italic> Strains</title>
<p>The <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 cells were made into competent cells by using three commonly used chemical methods: the Hanahan, Inoue, and TSS methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Chung et al., 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Parrish et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Green and Sambrook, 2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">2020</xref>). The TSS method gave the highest TE when pSK- was transformed, and its TE was 21- and 71-fold higher than those of the Hanahan and Inoue methods, respectively (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1A</xref>). When the <italic>E. coli</italic> XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; competent cells were prepared by the three methods, the TEs were similar with overlapping error bars (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1A</xref>). The TE values of <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 were higher than those of <italic>E. coli</italic> XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; by 217, 8.1, and 4.6 folds when prepared using the TSS, Hanahan, and Inoue methods, respectively (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1A</xref>). The TSS method is a simple method, in which the harvested <italic>E. coli</italic> cells are resuspended in TSS, stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C, and used for transformation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Chung et al., 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Parrish et al., 2004</xref>). The TSS method was then selected to prepare competent cells of BW25113 and several commonly used cloning <italic>E. coli</italic> strains. The TE of BW25113 was 102-, 202-, 164-, 263-, 279-, and 370-fold higher than that of Omnimax, XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;, Stbl3, DH5&#x03B1;, Mach1, and Stbl2, respectively (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1B</xref>). The commonly used hosts had similar TEs with differences being &#x003C;4 folds (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1B</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The TEs of <italic>E. coli</italic> strains. <bold>(A)</bold> The TEs of competent cells prepared with three different methods for two <italic>E. coli</italic> strains. <bold>(B)</bold> The TEs of competent cells prepared with TSS for seven <italic>E. coli</italic> strains. BW25113, Omnimax, XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;, Stbl3, DH5&#x03B1;, Mach1, and Stbl2. Data are averages of three samples with standard deviations (error bars). Unpaired t-tests were performed (&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01; &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.001; and &#x201C;ns&#x201D;&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05). &#x201C;ns&#x201D; means &#x201C;not significant.&#x201D; The numbers before (&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;) represent the difference by folds.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-838698-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<title><italic>E. coli recA</italic><sup>+</sup> Strains Have Much Higher TEs and Viable Cell Counts on Agar Plates Than the Corresponding <italic>recA</italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup> Strains</title>
<p>Since <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 is a <italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup> strain, the effect of RecA was tested. The <italic>recA</italic> deletion mutant of <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113, BW&#x0394;recA, had a TE of 17-fold less than that of BW25113 (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2A</xref>). For comparison, <italic>hsdR</italic> was firstly deleted in MG1655 (MG&#x0394;hsdR), as BW25113 is <italic>hsdR</italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup>. Further deletion of <italic>recA</italic> in MG1655 &#x0394;hsdR (MG&#x0394;hsdR-recA) reduced TE by 15 folds (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2A</xref>). The <italic>recA</italic> deletion mutants grew slightly slower than their parental strains (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figures S1A&#x2013;C</xref>). The reductions in TE were recovered by complementing RecA in BW&#x0394;recA (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2B</xref>). When <italic>E. coli</italic> XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; was complemented with <italic>recA</italic> (XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;/recA), its TE increased by 3 folds (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2B</xref>), but the growth was not increased (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1D</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>The deletion of <italic>recA</italic> affects TE and cell viability. <bold>(A)</bold> The TEs of competent cells prepared with TSS for three strains and their <italic>recA</italic> mutants. <bold>(B)</bold> The TEs was recovered by complementing the RecA function in the <italic>recA</italic> mutant of BW25113 and XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;. <bold>(C)</bold> The transformant colonies of <italic>recA</italic> mutants and their parent wild-type strains formed on LB plates with the Amp antibiotic after recovering in LB medium for 0 to 60&#x2009;min. <bold>(D)</bold> Total colonies of <italic>recA</italic> mutants and their parent wild-type strains formed on LB plates without antibiotic after recovering in LB medium for 0 to 60&#x2009;min. Intact pSK- was used for transformation. Unpaired t-tests were performed (&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01 and &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.001). The numbers before (&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;) represent the difference by folds. Data are averages of three samples with standard deviations (error bars).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-838698-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>After transformation, the transformants and total live cells in the recovery cultures were determined <italic>via</italic> counting colonies on agar plates with or without the selective antibiotic. At 0&#x2009;min of recovery, the transformant colonies and total colonies were 17-fold and 12-fold lower for BW&#x0394;recA than those of BW25113, and 13-fold and 11-fold lower for MG1655&#x0394;hsdR-&#x0394;recA than those of MG1655&#x0394;hsdR (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figures 2C</xref>,<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">D</xref>). After 60&#x2009;min of recovery, the number of colonies increased but the trend was the same (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figures 2C</xref>,<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">D</xref>). Although all cells were collected at the same OD<sub>600</sub> for competent cells preparation, the wild type with recA had significantly more recovered colonies than their recA mutants on agar plates.</p>
<p>We further tested the number of live cells that formed colonies on LB plates when <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113, BW&#x0394;recA, XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;/vector, and XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;/recA grew in LB to OD<sub>600</sub> of 0.5. BW&#x0394;recA had 5-fold less live cell counts than BW25113, and XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;/vector had 4.6-fold less live cell counts than XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;/recA (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3A</xref>). Further, the total live cell counts in the recovery culture after transformation had an 11-fold difference between BW25113 and BW&#x0394;recA and only a 4-fold difference between XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;/vector and XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;/recA (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3B</xref>). The results indicate that the number of BW&#x0394;recA cells that can form colonies is further reduced after competent cells preparation, storage, and transformation; however, the number of XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; cells is not further reduced. Our results show that the reduced live cells in the <italic>recA</italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup> strains competent cells contribute to the reduced TE. Further, the change of G160 into Asp160 of RecA (the <italic>recA1</italic> mutant) in XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; reduced its viability and TE, but the effect was less severe than the <italic>recA</italic> deletion.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>The changes of recovered total colonies for four strains before competent cells preparation and after transformation. <bold>(A)</bold> Total colonies of <italic>recA</italic> mutants and their parent wild-type strains formed on LB plates without antibiotics after they were cultured until their OD<sub>600nm</sub> reached at 0.5. <bold>(B)</bold> Total colonies of <italic>recA</italic> mutants and their parent wild-type strains formed on LB plates without antibiotics after recovering in LB medium for 60&#x2009;min. Unpaired t-tests were performed (&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x2009;= <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.001). The numbers before (&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;) represent the difference by folds. Data are averages of three samples with standard deviations (error bars).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-838698-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<title>The Effects of Other Gene Deletions on TE and Growth of <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113</title>
<p>The common cloning <italic>E. coli</italic> hosts also contain other inactivated genes, including <italic>endA</italic>, <italic>fhuA</italic>, <italic>deoR</italic>, and <italic>galE</italic>, to benefit cloning (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">van Die et al., 1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Hanahan et al., 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Lin, 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Bonhivers et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Altermark et al., 2007</xref>). Mutants with multiple deletions in <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113, including BW3KD (&#x0394;endA, &#x0394;fhuA, and &#x0394;deoR), BW3KG (&#x0394;endA, &#x0394;fhuA, and &#x0394;galE) and BW4K (&#x0394;endA, &#x0394;fhuA, &#x0394;galE, and &#x0394;deoR), were generated. These gene deletions did not affect cell growth (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4A</xref>). BW3KD had a similar TE to that of BW25113, and other two mutants with <italic>galE</italic> deletion had TE reduction by about 2 folds (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4B</xref>). Thus, the inactivation of these genes is not the reason for the significantly increased TE in BW25113 over the commonly used <italic>E. coli</italic> hosts (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1B</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>The effect of gene deletion of the growth and TE of <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113. <bold>(A)</bold> The growth curves of BW25113, BW3KD, BW3KG, and BW4K. The latter two are commercially available cloning strains. <bold>(B)</bold> TEs of these strains. Unpaired t-tests were performed (&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.001). The numbers before (&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;) represent the difference by folds. The &#x201C;ns&#x201D; shown in the figure means the <italic>p</italic> value is higher than 0.05. The numbers before (&#x002A;&#x002A;) represent the difference by folds. Data are averages of three samples with standard deviations (error bars).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-838698-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<title><italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 Has a Significantly Higher Cloning Efficiency Than BW&#x0394;recA and XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;</title>
<p>A 2.4-kb fragment carrying the gentamicin resistance gene (Gm<sup>r</sup>) in the middle of the kanamycin resistant gene (Kan<sup>r</sup>) with a 300-bp direct repeat and a 3-kb fragment from BW25113 chromosome were separately ensembled into four plasmids: pBluescript SK- (pSK-), pCL1920, pBR332, and pBBR1MCS-5 (pMCS5; <xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figures 5A</xref>,<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">B</xref>). The assembled constructs were transformed into <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113, BW&#x0394;recA, and XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;. The cloning efficiency was defined as the total number of colonies (transformants) recovered on selective agar plates. The cloning efficiency with BW25113 was about 7- to 13-fold higher than those with BW&#x0394;recA and 440- to 1,267-fold higher than those with XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figures 5A</xref>,<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">B</xref>). When 20 or more colonies were checked by PCR, positive cloning rates were all higher than 90% (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S3</xref>). Thus, the cloning efficiencies are positively correlated with the TEs.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>The cloning efficiency by using <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113, BW&#x0394;recA, and XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; as competent cells. <bold>(A)</bold> Artificial DNA fragment containing 300-bp direct repeats was assembled into plasmids with different replicons. <bold>(B)</bold> A 3&#x2009;kb-DNA fragment homologous to <italic>E. coli</italic> chromosome was cloned into plasmids with different replicons. The assembled DNA constructs by using TEDA were transformed into the competent cells of three <italic>E. coli</italic> strains prepared with TSS and plated with antibiotic selection. The total colonies (transformants) were counted. The correct constructs were tested by PCR and the positive rates were all higher than 90% (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S3</xref>). Data are averages of three samples with standard deviations (error bars). Unpaired t-tests were performed (&#x002A;&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05; &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x2009;=&#x2009;p&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01; and &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x2009;=&#x2009;<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.001). Data are averages of three samples with standard deviations (error bars). The positive rates were reported in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S3</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-838698-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>The Effect of RecA on Insert Stability Is Not Observed</title>
<p>Intermolecular recombination between copies of the plasmid renders dimerization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Boe and Tolker-Nielsen, 1997</xref>). When pSK- was extracted from BW25113 and BW&#x0394;recA and analyzed through gel electrophoresis, the two bright bands were the supercoiled and relaxed forms of pSK- isolated from BW25113 and BW&#x0394;recA (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6</xref>, lanes 3 and 4), and the faint bands on top were the dimer form of pSK<sup>&#x2212;</sup> from BW25113 (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6</xref>, lane 3). The results indicate that a small fraction of the high copy number plasmid pSK- is in the dimer form in BW25113 but not in BW&#x0394;recA. Dimerization was not observed with the medium copy number plasmids pBR322 and pMCS5 and the low copy number plasmid pCL1920 in both BW25113 and BW&#x0394;recA (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>The screen of plasmids multimerization with different replicons in <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 and <italic>E. coli</italic> BW&#x0394;recA. The top two lines on the gel showed the plasmids that were transformed into either BW25113 (BW) or BW&#x0394;recA (<italic>recA</italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup>). Note: The two lower bands in Lanes 3 and 4 are the relaxed form and supercoiled form of pBluescipt SK- monomer; the faint bands on top of Lane 3 are the dimer forms.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-838698-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To test whether recombination occurred between direct repeats on plasmids, the four plasmids carrying Gm<sup>r</sup> inserted in the middle of Kan<sup>r</sup> with the 300-bp direct repeats in BW25113 and BW&#x0394;recA were analyzed (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5A</xref>). When recombination occurred between the direct repeats, the antibiotic resistance would be altered from Kan<sup>&#x2212;</sup>/Gm<sup>+</sup> into Kan<sup>+</sup>/Gm<sup>&#x2212;</sup> (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5A</xref>). Three transformant colonies were randomly selected and cultured in LB without antibiotics. After 3 transfers (&#x003E;60 generations), no Kan<sup>+</sup> colonies were obtained, and the plasmids were the same <italic>via</italic> gel electrophoresis analysis (<xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">Figure 7A</xref>); the plasmid yields from 3&#x2009;ml of overnight cultures were also similar (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S4</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>The stability of plasmids with homology features after extended culturing for 3 transfers. Three transformants were randomly selected from plates and cultured in LB medium for 3 transfers, representing about 60 generations. The plasmids were then extracted and checked <italic>via</italic> gel electrophoresis. <bold>(A)</bold> NKan-Gm-CKan-300&#x2009;bp was assembled into four vectors. <bold>(B)</bold> HR300 was assembled into four vectors. Lanes 1&#x2013;3 in each figure represent plasmids extracted from three cultures before 3 transfers, and lanes 4&#x2013;6 in each figure represent plasmids extracted from three cultures after 3 transfers. Lane 1&#x2013;2 and 4&#x2013;5 represent plasmids extracted from strain BW25113, and Lane 3 and 6 represent plasmids extracted from strain XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-838698-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To check whether recombination occurred between the identical fragments on plasmids and the chromosome, a 3,000-bp DNA sequence from the genome of BW25113 was amplified and assembled into the four plasmids (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5B</xref>). Three transformant colonies were randomly selected and cultured in LB with the proper antibiotics. After 3 transfers, the plasmids were extracted and analyzed by electrophoresis, no plasmid loss was observed (<xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">Figure 7B</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S4</xref>).</p>
<p>To check whether homologous recombination occurred among tandem repeats on plasmids, the repeats with unit length at 41-, 300-, and 1,000-bp were assayed. First, the 4, 6, and 8 tandem repeats of the 41-bp tac promoter, Ptac (TR41), with the eGFP gene were amplified and assembled into pCL1920, and the assembly of a single Ptac before eGFP was assembled into pCL1920 (pCL1920::1tac-eGFP) as the control (<xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">Figure 8A</xref>). The 300-bp tandem repeats and 1,000&#x2009;bp tandem repeats were generated by using the plasmid pCL1920::Pkat-eGFP as the backbone (<xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">Figures 8B</xref>,<xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">C</xref>). The 2 and 3 tandem repeats at length of 300&#x2009;bp and 1,000&#x2009;bp were reassembled with pCL1920, and the assembly of single unit of the repeats was used as the control (<xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">Figures 8B</xref>,<xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">C</xref>). The presence of tandem repeats with all three lengths did not change the assembly efficiency for both BW25113 and BW&#x0394;recA (<xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">Figures 8A</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">C</xref>). The positive rates for the assembly of all tandem repeats were higher than 90% for both strains, except the assembly of three units of TR1000. The positive rates were 80% in BW&#x0394;recA and 50% in BW25113; however, 11-fold more transformant colonies were obtained with BW25113. All these constructed plasmids with highly tandem repeats including the one with 3&#x2009;units of TR1000 repeats could be stably maintained in cells of BW25113 without apparent recombination or plasmid loss after three transfers in LB with antibiotic selection (<xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">Figure 8D</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S4</xref>). Collectively, these results suggest that these plasmids with homologous features were successfully maintained in the <italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup> BW25113.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>The cloning of plasmids with TRs at different lengths in <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113. <bold>(A)</bold> DNA fragments containing an eGFP gene under the control of 1, 4, 6, and 8&#x2009;units of the 41-bp Ptac was assembled into pCL1920. <bold>(B)</bold> DNA fragments containing 1, 2, or 3&#x2009;units of the 300-bp TRs (TR300), derived from the C-terminal eGFP gene, were assembled into pCL1920. <bold>(C)</bold> DNA fragments containing 1, 2, or 3&#x2009;units of the 1,000-bp TRs (TR1000), included the Pkat and eGFP, were assembled into pCL1920. The constructs were transformed into <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 and BW25113&#x0394;recA, and the total transformant colonies on LB plates with antibiotic selection were counted. Unpaired t-tests were performed (&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x2009;=&#x2009;p&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.001). The numbers before (&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;) represent the difference by folds. Data are averages of three samples with standard deviations (error bars). <bold>(D)</bold> Gel electrophoresis of pCL1920::8Tac-eGFP, 3TR-300&#x2009;bp, and 3TR-of 1,000&#x2009;bp. Lanes 1&#x2013;3 in each figure represent plasmids extracted from the three cultures before 3 transfers, and lanes 4&#x2013;6 in each figure represent plasmids extracted from the three cultures after 3 transfers. Lane 1&#x2013;2 and 4&#x2013;5 represent plasmids extracted from BW25113, and Lane 3 and 6 represent plasmids extracted from the strain BW&#x0394;recA.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-838698-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14" sec-type="discussions">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Our results support the use of the TSS method to prepare <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 and its <italic>recA</italic> deletion mutant BW&#x0394;recA cells for cloning and DNA assembly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Xia et al., 2015</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">2019</xref>). The choice of host strains is heavily relying on their availability. During our investigation on the complete pathway of the recombination of short-homologous ends in <italic>E. coli</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Yang et al., 2021</xref>), we noticed <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 may be efficient in cloning and DNA assembly. The significantly higher TE and cloning efficiency of <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 over commonly used <italic>E. coli</italic> strains are beyond our expectations (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figures 1</xref>, <xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">5</xref>). Even its <italic>recA</italic> deletion mutant BW&#x0394;recA is significantly better, with its TE and cloning efficiency being 12- and &#x003E;44-fold higher than those of <italic>E. coli</italic> XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figures 2</xref>, <xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">5</xref>). The difference is enhanced by using the TSS method over the Hanahan and Inoue methods (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>). However, the Hanahan and Inoue methods are usually better in preparing competent cells than the TSS methods for commonly used <italic>E. coli</italic> hosts, such as <italic>E. coli</italic> XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Hanahan et al., 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Xia et al., 2019</xref>). Competent cells prepared with the Hanahan and Inoue methods may reach the TEs of 10<sup>9</sup>&#x2009;CFU/&#x03BC;g DNA with supercoiled plasmids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Inoue et al., 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Hengen, 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Xia et al., 2019</xref>), but both methods are normally kept the TEs at 10<sup>8</sup>&#x2009;CFU/&#x03BC;g DNA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Green and Sambrook, 2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">2020</xref>). The TSS method is also commonly used because of its simplicity, in which the harvested cells are resuspended in TSS, stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C, and used for transformation, but its TS is around 10<sup>7</sup>&#x2009;CFU/&#x03BC;g DNA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Chung et al., 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Parrish et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Xia et al., 2019</xref>). In our hands, the commonly used <italic>E. coli</italic> cloning strain XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; had TEs around 10<sup>7</sup>&#x2009;CFU/&#x03BC;g DNA by using the three methods (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1A</xref>), and <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 had TE higher than 10<sup>9</sup>&#x2009;CFU/&#x03BC;g DNA (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1A</xref>). Although electroporation can reach up to 10<sup>10</sup>&#x2009;CFU/&#x03BC;g DNA with supercoiled plasmids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Dower et al., 1988</xref>), it is not frequently used with the <italic>in vitro</italic> methods. The limitation is related to arching when the assembled DNA is directly used in large volumes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Sambrook et al., 2017</xref>). To prevent arching, either the assembled DNA is purified or a small volume is directly used in electroporation. The DNA loss during purification or small volumes may lead to low cloning efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Tan and Yiap, 2009</xref>). Since both <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 and BW&#x0394;recA are widely available (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Baba et al., 2006</xref>), their chemically prepared competent cells by using the TSS method may be the better choices to be used with the <italic>in vitro</italic> methods for efficient cloning or DNA assembly.</p>
<p><italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 displays at least 100-fold higher TE than commonly used <italic>E. coli</italic> cloning strains (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1B</xref>). RecA is a major factor contributing to the high TE and cloning efficiency in <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figures 1</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">3</xref>, <xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">5</xref>, <xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">8</xref>), as its deletion reduced TE of BW&#x0394;recA by 16 folds (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2A</xref>), which is still 6-, 12-, 10-, 16-, 17-, and 23-fold higher than that of Omnimax, XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;, Stbl3, DH5&#x03B1;, Mach1, and Stbl2, respectively (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figures 1B</xref>, <xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">2A</xref>). Therefore, RecA accounts for about half of the increased TE in <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113. The <italic>recA</italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup> has been reported to reduce the mutant&#x2019;s growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Cox et al., 2008</xref>), but the decreases for both BW25113 and MG1655 were minor (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figures S1A,B</xref>). The reduced TE in <italic>recA</italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup> strains is likely due to the reduced abilities of the <italic>recA</italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup> strains to form colonies on LB plates. The <italic>recA</italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup> strains had about 5-fold fewer colonies on LB plates than the <italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup> strains when they grew to the same OD<sub>600nm</sub> (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3A</xref>). The colonies of the <italic>recA</italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup> strains were further reduced to 17-fold and 13-fold fewer than that of the corresponding <italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup> strains (BW25113 and MG1655) after competent cell preparation, storage, and transformation (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2C</xref>). <italic>E. coli</italic> XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; contains <italic>recA</italic>1 that has a point mutation changing Gly160 to Asp160 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Bullock, 1987</xref>). <italic>E. coli recA1</italic> mutants are defective in recombination, as the RecA1 protein binds to single-stranded DNA but cannot carry out the ATP-dependent strand exchange reaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Clark and Margulies, 1965</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Muench and Bryant, 1990</xref>). <italic>E. coli</italic> XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;/<italic>recA</italic> only increased TE and the total colony counts by about 3&#x2013;4 folds over XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figures 2B</xref>, <xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">3B</xref>). The reduced increase is likely due to the interference of RecA1 in <italic>E. coli</italic> XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;/<italic>recA</italic>. Our results show a positive correlation between the TEs and the total live cells that are able to form colonies on LB plates after transformation. The reduced colony numbers of the <italic>recA</italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup> strains could be due to the presence of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in agar plates from autoclaving (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Tanaka et al., 2014</xref>), which damages DNA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Hong et al., 2019</xref>). RecA is the core component of bacterial DNA homologous recombination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Kowalczykowski, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Morimatsu and Kowalczykowski, 2014</xref>), participating in DNA damage repair (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Li and Heyer, 2008</xref>). Hence, RecA enhances cell survival in the presence of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. The mechanism warrants further investigation.</p>
<p>Other intentionally inactivated genes, such as <italic>galE</italic>, may contribute to the reduced TE but have little effect (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4B</xref>). <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 may represent a good host for cloning for its intrinsic high TE when prepared with the TSS method (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figures 1</xref>, <xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">2</xref>). <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 had 5-fold higher TE than MG&#x0394;hsdR, which is the <italic>hsdR</italic> deletion strain of <italic>E. coli</italic> MG1655 (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2A</xref>). Only few differences exist on their genomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Grenier et al., 2014</xref>). MG&#x0394;hsdR contains mutations in some phosphotransferase systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Grenier et al., 2014</xref>), and BW25113 contains a mutation in the YjjP membrane protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Grenier et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Price et al., 2016</xref>), which is related to the transport of succinate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Fukui et al., 2017</xref>). There are also some differences in mobile elements between MG&#x0394;hsdR and BW25113, which may affect the stability of DNA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Darmon and Leach, 2014</xref>). These mutations do not affect the growth of the two strains in LB (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figures S1A,B</xref>). It is unclear which difference determines their TEs. Further study is needed to reveal the mutations that affect the TEs of these strains.</p>
<p>Although it is believed that the RecA-dependent recombination affects plasmid stability, clear evidence is only related to the dimer formation with high copy number plasmids, which leads to plasmid loss without selection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Herman-Antosiewicz and Wegrzyn, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Summers et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Standley et al., 2019</xref>). We also observed dimers with plasmids harbor pUC18 ori, but the plasmids were stably maintained with selection (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figures 6</xref>, <xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">7</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S4</xref>). When the monomer and dimer mixture isolated from BW25113 was transformed into BW&#x0394;recA or XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019;, only monomers were recovered, possibly due to RecF that is known to resolve dimers back to monomers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Summers and Sherratt, 1984</xref>). Further, <italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup> significantly increased the cloning efficiency (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figures 5</xref>, <xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">8</xref>) but did not affect the stability of inserts with tandem repeats of various size and a 3-kb host DNA (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figures 5</xref>, <xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">7</xref>, <xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">8</xref>). Considering the rate of RecA-dependent homologous recombination in <italic>E. coli</italic> is very low, occurring at approximately 10<sup>&#x2212;5</sup> per cell generation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Lovett et al., 2002</xref>), the effect of RecA on cloned inserts may be tolerated. Indeed, the <italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup> <italic>E. coli</italic> BL21(DE3) is routinely used in protein overexpression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Chan et al., 2013</xref>), and <italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup> K-12 derivatives are widely used in metabolic engineering (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Cui et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Badri et al., 2021</xref>). Hence, the effect of RecA on insert stability will not affect the cloned inserts in most cases, especially when homologous regions are small or not present (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Lovett et al., 2002</xref>).</p>
<p>In summary, <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113, a <italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup> strain, is &#x003E;100-fold more efficient for transformation than the commonly used <italic>E. coli recA</italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup> cloning strains when the competent cells are prepared with the TSS method (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1B</xref>). The difference in cloning efficiency between BW25113 and XL1-Blue MRF&#x2019; is more dramatic, higher than 440 folds (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5</xref>). RecA plays a major role in the increased TE and cloning efficiency (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figures 2</xref>, <xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">5</xref>). The deletion of <italic>recA</italic> significantly reduces the fitness of the <italic>recA</italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup> strains, as they form less colonies than their corresponding <italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup> strains on LB plates at the same OD<sub>600nm</sub>. Since we did not observe apparent insert instability with several homologous features in different vectors (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figures 5</xref>, <xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">7</xref>, <xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">8</xref>), <italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 and other <italic>recA</italic><sup>+</sup> strains may be reconsidered for use in cloning for significantly increased success rates, especially when the inserts have none or minimal homologous features. When recA becomes a real concern, the <italic>recA</italic> mutant <italic>E. coli</italic> BW&#x0394;recA can be used, as it is still significantly more efficient in cloning and DNA assembly than the commonly used cloning strains. BW25113 and its single-gene deletion mutants are readily available (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Baba et al., 2006</xref>). They may be used to increase the cloning success rates in DNA assembly.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Material</bold></xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>YY acquired and analyzed the data. QY contributed to the preparation of competent cells. YY and MW contributed to the gene deletion and plasmid construction. YY and RZ contributed to the test of plasmid instability in RecA<sup>+</sup> cells. YX, LX, and HL conceptualized this project and supervised the overall experiments. YY, YX, and HL prepared the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec41" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>We appreciated supports by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (31870085, 91951202, and 31961133015), the funding by the State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, and Qilu Youth Scholar Startup Funding of SDU (to YX).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.838698/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.838698/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.pdf" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al-Allaf</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tolmachov</surname> <given-names>O. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zambetti</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tchetchelnitski</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mehmet</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Remarkable stability of an instability-prone lentiviral vector plasmid in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> Stbl3. 3</article-title>. <source>Biotech</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13205-012-0070-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28324350</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Altermark</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niiranen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Willassen</surname> <given-names>N. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smalas</surname> <given-names>A. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moe</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Comparative studies of endonuclease I from cold-adapted <italic>Vibrio salmonicida</italic> and <italic>Mesophilic vibrio</italic> cholerae</article-title>. <source>FEBS J.</source> <volume>274</volume>, <fpage>252</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>263</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05580.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17222185</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anton</surname> <given-names>B. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raleigh</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Complete genome sequence of NEB 5-alpha, a derivative of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K-12 DH5 alpha</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Resour. Announc.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>e01245</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e01216</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/genomeA.01245-16</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27834703</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baba</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ara</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hasegawa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Okumura</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baba</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Construction of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection</article-title>. <source>Mol. Syst. Biol.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>2006.0008</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/msb4100050</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16738554</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Badri</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Awofiranye</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Datta</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>W. Q.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Complete biosynthesis of a sulfated chondroitin in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1389</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-021-21692-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33654100</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boe</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tolker-Nielsen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Plasmid stability: comments on the dimer catastrophe hypothesis</article-title>. <source>Mol. Microbiol.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>247</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>253</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2151579.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9044259</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bonhivers</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Plan&#x00E7;on</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghazi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boulanger</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>le Maire</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lambert</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>FhuA, an <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> outer membrane protein with a dual function of transporter and channel which mediates the transport of phage DNA</article-title>. <source>Biochimie</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>363</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>369</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0300-9084(00)80004-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9782377</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bullock</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>XL1-blue: a high efficiency plasmid transforming recA <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> strain with beta-galactosidase selection</article-title>. <source>BioTecchniques</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>376</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>379</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carmel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coulton</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Internal deletions in the FhuA receptor of Escherichia coli K-12 define domains of ligand interactions</article-title>. <source>J. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>173</volume>, <fpage>4394</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4403</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jb.173.14.4394-4403.1991</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2066336</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>W. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lane</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gan</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>A comparison and optimization of methods and factors affecting the transformation of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>. <source>Biosci. Rep.</source> <volume>33</volume>:<fpage>e00086</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1042/BSR20130098</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24229075</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chao</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Y. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Recent advances in DNA assembly technologies</article-title>. <source>FEMS Yeast Res.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1567-1364.12171</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24903193</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chung</surname> <given-names>C. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niemela</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>One-step preparation of competent <italic>Escherichia-coli</italic> - transformation and storage of bacterial-cells in the same solution</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>2172</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2175</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.86.7.2172</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2648393</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clark</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1973</year>). <article-title>Recombination deficient mutants of <italic>E. coli</italic> and other bacteria</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Genet.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.ge.07.120173.000435</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clark</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Margulies</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1965</year>). <article-title>Isolation and characterization of recombination-deficient mutants of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K12</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>451</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>459</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.53.2.451</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14294081</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>A. C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boyer</surname> <given-names>H. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Helling</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1973</year>). <article-title>Construction of biologically functional bacterial plasmids in vitro</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>3240</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3244</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.70.11.3240</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">4594039</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cox</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chitteni-Pattu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Inman</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cox</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Defective dissociation of a "slow" recA mutant proteinimparts an <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> growth defect</article-title>. <source>J. Biol. Chem.</source> <volume>283</volume>, <fpage>24909</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24921</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M803934200</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18603529</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vigouroux</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rousset</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Varet</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khanna</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bikard</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>A CRISPRi screen in <italic>E. coli</italic> reveals sequence-specific toxicity of dCas9</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>1912</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-018-04209-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29765036</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Darmon</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leach</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Bacterial genome instability</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/MMBR.00035-13</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24600039</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Datsenko</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wanner</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K-12 using PCR products</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>6640</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6645</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.120163297</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10829079</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dower</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ragsdale</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>High efficiency transformation of <italic>E. coli</italic> by high voltage electroporation</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>6127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6145</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/16.13.6127</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3041370</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ellis</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adie</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baldwin</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>DNA assembly for synthetic biology: from parts to pathways and beyond</article-title>. <source>Integr. Biol.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>118</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/c0ib00070a</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21246151</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wehr</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hauge</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Rapid one-step recombinational cloning</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>36</volume>:<fpage>e54</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkn167</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18424799</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fukui</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nanatani</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hara</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamakami</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yahagi</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chinen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title><italic>Escherichia coli</italic> yjjPB genes encode a succinate transporter important for succinate production</article-title>. <source>Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>1837</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1844</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09168451.2017.1345612</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28673128</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Green</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sambrook</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The hanahan method for preparation and transformation of competent <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>: high-efficiency transformation</article-title>. <source>Cold Spring Harb Protoc</source> <volume>2018</volume>:<fpage>pdb.prot101188</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/pdb.prot101188</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Green</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sambrook</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The Inoue method for preparation and transformation of competent <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>: "Ultracompetent" cells</article-title>. <source>Cold Spring Harb Protoc</source> <volume>2020</volume>:<fpage>101196</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/pdb.prot101196</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32482900</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grenier</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matteau</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baby</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodrigue</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Complete genome sequence of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> BW25113</article-title>. <source>Genome Announc.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>1038</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1401038</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/genomeA.01038-14</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hanahan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Studies on transformation of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> with plasmids</article-title>. <source>J. Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>166</volume>, <fpage>557</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>580</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80284-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hanahan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jessee</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bloom</surname> <given-names>F. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Plasmid transformation of <italic>Escherichia-coli</italic> and other bacteria</article-title>. <source>Methods Enzymol.</source> <volume>204</volume>, <fpage>63</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>113</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0076-6879(91)04006-A</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hantke</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Braun</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1975</year>). <article-title>Membrane receptor dependent iron transport in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>. <source>FEBS Lett.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>305</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0014-5793(75)80771-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1089064</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hantke</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Braun</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>Functional interaction of the tonA/tonB receptor system in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>135</volume>, <fpage>190</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>197</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.135.1.190-197.1978</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">353030</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hengen</surname> <given-names>P. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Methods and reagents - preparing ultra-competent <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>. <source>Trends Biochem. Sci.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0968-0004(96)80187-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8851666</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Herman-Antosiewicz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wegrzyn</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Regulation of copy number and stability of phage lambda derived pTC lambda 1 plasmid in the light of the dimer/multimer catastrophe hypothesis</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Lett.</source> <volume>176</volume>, <fpage>489</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>493</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0378-1097(99)00278-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10427732</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>Y. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drlica</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Post-stress bacterial cell death mediated by reactive oxygen species</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</source> <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>10064</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10071</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1901730116</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30948634</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>House</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mortimer</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kahn</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>New recombination methods for <italic>Sinorhizobium meliloti</italic> genetics</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>2806</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2815</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/Aem.70.5.2806-2815.2004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15128536</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Inoue</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nojima</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Okayama</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>High-efficiency transformation of <italic>Escherichia-coli</italic> with plasmids</article-title>. <source>Gene</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>28</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0378-1119(90)90336-P</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jeong</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yim</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ryu</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seen</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>One-step sequence- and ligation-independent cloning as a rapid and versatile cloning method for functional genomics studies</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>5440</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5443</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/Aem.00844-12</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22610439</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kosuri</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Church</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Large-scale de novo DNA synthesis: technologies and applications</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>499</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>507</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/Nmeth.2918</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24781323</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kowalczykowski</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Initiation of genetic recombination and recombination-dependent replication</article-title>. <source>Trends Biochem. Sci.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>156</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>165</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0968-0004(00)01569-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10754547</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heyer</surname> <given-names>W. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance</article-title>. <source>Cell Res.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>99</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>113</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/cr.2008.1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18166982</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Geng</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Q. F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>A strategy of gene overexpression based on tandem repetitive promoters in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>. <source>Microb. Cell Factories</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>19</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1475-2859-11-19</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22305426</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Endonuclease A degrades chromosomal and plasmid DNA of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> present in most preparations of single stranded DNA from phagemids</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. Repub. China B Life Sci.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lovett</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hurley</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sutera</surname> <given-names>V. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aubuchon</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lebedeva</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Crossing over between regions of limited homology in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>: RecA-dependent and RecA-independent pathways</article-title>. <source>Genetics</source> <volume>160</volume>, <fpage>851</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>859</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/genetics/160.3.851</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11901106</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maraboeuf</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Voloshin</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>CameriniOtero</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takahashi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>The central aromatic residue in loop L2 of RecA interacts with DNA. Quenching of the fluorescence of a tryptophan reporter inserted in L2 upon binding to DNA</article-title>. <source>J. Biol. Chem.</source> <volume>270</volume>, <fpage>30927</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30932</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.270.52.30927</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8537348</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Metcalf</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wanner</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Construction of new beta-glucuronidase cassettes for making transcriptional fusions and their use with new methods for allele replacement</article-title>. <source>Gene</source> <volume>129</volume>, <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0378-1119(93)90691-u</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8335256</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morimatsu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kowalczykowski</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>RecQ helicase and RecJ nuclease provide complementary functions to resect DNA for homologous recombination</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>E5133</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>E5142</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1420009111</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25411316</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Muench</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bryant</surname> <given-names>F. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>An obligatory pH-mediated isomerization on the [Asn-160]recA protein-promoted DNA strand exchange reaction pathway</article-title>. <source>J. Biol. Chem.</source> <volume>265</volume>, <fpage>11560</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11566</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0021-9258(19)38434-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2142155</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parrish</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Limjindaporn</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hines</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Finley</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>High-throughput cloning of <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> ORFs by in vivo recombination in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Proteome Res.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>582</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>586</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/pr0341134</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Price</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wetmore</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deutschbauer</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arkin</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A comparison of the costs and benefits of bacterial gene expression</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>e00086</fpage>, <fpage>e0164314</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0164314</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27711251</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sain</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murray</surname> <given-names>N. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>The hsd (host specificity) genes of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12</article-title>. <source>Mol. Gen. Genet.</source> <volume>180</volume>, <fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00267350</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6255295</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sambrook</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fritsch</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maniatis</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <source>Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual</source>. <publisher-loc>New York, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sanjana</surname> <given-names>N. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shalem</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>783</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>784</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.3047</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25075903</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smolke</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Building outside of the box: iGEM and the BioBricks foundation</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>1099</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1102</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt1209-1099</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20010584</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Standley</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Million-Weaver</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alexander</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shuai</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Camps</surname> <given-names>M. J. O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Genetic control of ColE1 plasmid stability that is independent of plasmid copy number regulation</article-title>. <source>Curr. Genet.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>179</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>192</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00294-018-0858-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29909438</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Summers</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beton</surname> <given-names>C. W. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Withers</surname> <given-names>H. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Multicopy plasmid instability: the dimer catastrophe hypothesis</article-title>. <source>Mol. Microbiol.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1031</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1038</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01648.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8361350</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Summers</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sherratt</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Multimerization of high copy number plasmids causes instability: ColE 1 encodes a determinant essential for plasmid monomerization and stability</article-title>. <source>Cell</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>1097</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1103</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0092-8674(84)90060-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6323019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yiap</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>DNA, RNA, and protein extraction: the past and the present</article-title>. <source>J. Biomed. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>2009</volume>:<fpage>574398</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2009/574398</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20011662</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tanaka</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kawasaki</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daimon</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kitagawa</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamamoto</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamaki</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>A hidden pitfall in the preparation of agar media undermines microorganism cultivability</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>7659</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7666</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/Aem.02741-14</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25281372</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trinh</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jessee</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bloom</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hirsch</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>STBL2: an Escherichia coli strain for the stable propagation of retroviral clones and direct repeat sequences</article-title>. <source>Focus</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>78</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van Die</surname> <given-names>I. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zuidweg</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bergmans</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoekstra</surname> <given-names>W. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Transformability of galE variants derived from uropathogenic <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> strains</article-title>. <source>J. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>158</volume>, <fpage>760</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>761</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.158.2.760-761.1984</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6373734</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>R. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bian</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>RecET direct cloning and red alpha beta recombineering of biosynthetic gene clusters, large operons or single genes for heterologous expression</article-title>. <source>Nat. Protoc.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1175</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1190</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nprot.2016.054</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27254463</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>New insights into the QuikChange process guide the use of Phusion DNA polymerase for site-directed mutagenesis</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>43</volume>:<fpage>e12</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gku1189</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25399421</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>T5 exonuclease-dependent assembly offers a low-cost method for efficient cloning and site-directed mutagenesis</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>47</volume>:<fpage>e15</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gky1169</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30462336</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>T. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Q. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xun</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>Y. Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The pathway of recombining short homologous ends in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> revealed by the genetic study</article-title>. <source>Mol. Microbiol.</source> <volume>115</volume>, <fpage>1309</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1322</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mmi.14677</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33372330</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yanischperron</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vieira</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Messing</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors</article-title>. <source>Gene</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>103</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>119</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0378-1119(85)90120-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2985470</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Werling</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edelmann</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>SLiCE: a novel bacterial cell extract-based DNA cloning method</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>e55</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkr1288</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22241772</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>B. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>E. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Freeman</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>In-fusion (TM) assembly: seamless engineering of multidomain fusion proteins, modular vectors, and mutations</article-title>. <source>BioTechniques</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>354</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>359</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2144/000112536</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>