<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.1071351</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Rcs phosphorelay affects the sensitivity of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> to plantaricin BM-1 by regulating biofilm formation</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bian</surname><given-names>Zheng</given-names></name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Wenbo</given-names></name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>Junhua</given-names></name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/179923/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Hao</surname><given-names>Yanling</given-names></name>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/442313/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Linshu</given-names></name>
<xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1059832/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>Yuanhong</given-names></name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1213656/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Hongxing</given-names></name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Beijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Beijing Key Laboratory of Agricultural Product Detection and Control of Spoilage Organisms and Pesticide Residue, Beijing Engineering Technology Research Center of Food Safety Immune Rapid Detection, College of Food Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Agriculture</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Nutrition and Health, Key Laboratory of Functional Dairy, Co-constructed by Ministry of Education and Beijing Government, China Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Animal Science and Technology College, Beijing University of Agriculture</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn id="fn0001" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Huaxi Yi, Ocean University of China, China</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn0002" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Ping Li, Zhejiang Gongshang University, China; Shumei Wang, Harbin University, China; Tongjie Liu, Ocean University of China, China</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Yuanhong Xie, <email>xieyuanh@163.com</email>; Hongxing Zhang, <email>hxzhang51@163.com</email></corresp>
<fn id="fn0003" fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Food Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>24</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1071351</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>23</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>10</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2022 Bian, Liu, Jin, Hao, Jiang, Xie and Zhang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Bian, Liu, Jin, Hao, Jiang, Xie and Zhang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p><bold>Introduction:</bold> Plantaricin BM-1 is a class IIa bacteriocin produced by <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> BM-1 that exerts significant antibacterial activity against many foodborne bacteria. Studies have shown that class IIa bacteriocins inhibit Gram-positive bacteria <italic>via</italic> the mannose phosphotransferase system; however, their mechanism of action against Gram-negative bacteria remains unknown. In this study, we explored the mechanism through which the Rcs phosphorelay affects the sensitivity of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K12 cells to plantaricin BM-1.</p>
<p><bold>Methods and Results:</bold> The minimum inhibitory concentrations of plantaricin BM-1 against <italic>E. coli</italic> K12, <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 (<italic>rcsC</italic> mutant), <italic>E. coli</italic> JW2204 (<italic>rcsD</italic> mutant), and <italic>E. coli</italic> JW2205 (<italic>rcsB</italic> mutant) were 1.25, 0.59, 1.31, and 1.22&#x2009;mg/ml, respectively. Growth curves showed that <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 sensitivity to plantaricin BM-1 increased to the same level as that of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 after complementation. Meanwhile, scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy revealed that, under the action of plantaricin BM-1, the appearance of <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 cells did not significantly differ from that of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 cells; however, cell contents were significantly reduced and plasmolysis and shrinkage were observed at both ends. Crystal violet staining and laser scanning confocal microscopy showed that biofilm formation was significantly reduced after <italic>rcsC</italic> mutation, while proteomic analysis identified 382 upregulated and 260 downregulated proteins in <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917. In particular, <italic>rcsC</italic> mutation was found to affect the expression of proteins related to biofilm formation, with growth curve assays showing that the deletion of these proteins increased <italic>E. coli</italic> sensitivity to plantaricin BM-1.</p>
<p><bold>Discussion:</bold> Consequently, we speculated that the Rcs phosphorelay may regulate the sensitivity of <italic>E. coli</italic> to plantaricin BM-1 by affecting biofilm formation. This finding of class IIa bacteriocin against Gram-negative bacteria mechanism provides new insights.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>bacteriocins</kwd>
<kwd>Rcs Phosphorelay</kwd>
<kwd>proteome</kwd>
<kwd>biofilm</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Escherichia coli</italic></kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn1">KM201810020016</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn1">Beijing Municipal Commission of Education<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100002888</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="8"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="45"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="7475"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Bacteriocins are a class of peptides or proteins that are synthesized by ribosomes and usually exert bactericidal activity against species which are closely related to the producer bacterium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Klaenhammer, 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Simons et al., 2020</xref>). In recent years, an increasing number of bacteriocins have been used for food production and storage, and several bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have shown good bacteriostatic activity against foodborne bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). Pediocin PA-1 is a bacteriocin produced by LAB that exhibits extremely strong bacteriostatic activity against <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> and is considered to be a natural food biological preservative due to its high bacteriostatic activity and low toxicity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Rodriguez et al., 2002</xref>).</p>
<p>Known bacteriocins can be divided into three main categories according to their heat resistance and size: class I, class II, and class III (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Alvarez-Sieiro et al., 2016</xref>). Class II bacteriocins are small, thermostable, non-modified, and less than 10&#x2009;kDa in size. Class IIa bacteriocins are broad-spectrum antibacterial agents of 36&#x2013;49 amino acids in length that are particularly effective against <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> and typically consist of two domains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Fregeau Gallagher et al., 1997</xref>). The first domain contains a highly conserved cationic N-terminal region of cations, with the amino acid sequence, YGNGV/L, whereas the second domain includes the poorly conserved C-terminal region with a hairpin or functionally equivalent helix-hinge-helix structures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Kjos et al., 2011</xref>). Previous studies have suggested that the class IIa bacteriocins target receptor in Gram-positive bacteria is the sugar transporter mannose phosphotransferase system (Man-PTS), which is comprised four components: IIA, IIB, IIC, and IID. Studies have demonstrated that only the IIC and IID membrane localization components are required for bacteriocin sensitivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Diep et al., 2007</xref>). However, it has also been reported that class IIa bacteriocins do not target Man-PTS in Gram-negative bacteria. Therefore, the role of class IIa bacteriocin in Gram-negative bacteria mechanism requires further exploration.</p>
<p>Two-component systems (TCS) is versatile transmembrane signaling solutions that typically consist of a membrane-embedded sensor histidine kinase (HK) and a cytoplasmic response regulator (RR; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Delhaye et al., 2019</xref>). The sensor HK responds to environmental signals and converts external stimuli into adaptive signals through the autophosphorylation of conserved histidine residues. The phosphate group bound by the HK histidine residue is subsequently transferred to a specific aspartate residue on the cognate RR for activation <italic>via</italic> a phosphotransfer reaction during which unphosphorylated HK acts as a phosphatase by removing phosphoryl groups from RR, thus maintaining a balance between active and inactive states (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">West and Stock, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Logre et al., 2020</xref>). The His-Asp-His-Asp phosphorelay is a more complicated version of two-component (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">West and Stock, 2001</xref>). Unlike a typical HK-RR two-component system, the Rcs phosphorelay has three core components: RcsC (HK), RcsB (RR), and RcsD (an intermediate inner membrane phosphorelay protein; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Cho et al., 2014</xref>). The Rcs phosphorelay controls the expression of several genes, including periplasmic quality control, biofilm formation, toxicity, and motility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Majdalani and Gottesman, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Clarke, 2010</xref>), and has been reported to protect <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> from TseH toxicity by regulating mechanisms such as capsular synthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Hersch et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> BM-1 isolated from traditionally fermented Chinese meat products can produce plantaricin BM-1, a novel class IIa bacteriocin that exerts significant bacteriostatic activity against many foodborne bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Zhang et al., 2013</xref>). Previously, we found that the loss of the BasS/BasR TCS affects the sensitivity of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 to plantaricin BM-1 and this loss affects the PhoQ-PhoP, BasS-BasR, and Rcs phosphorelay regulatory networks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Liu et al., 2022</xref>). However, the effects of Rcs phosphorelay in the sensitivity of <italic>E. coli</italic> to bacteriocins remain unknown. Here, we investigated the regulatory role of the Rcs phosphorelay in the sensitivity of <italic>E. coli</italic> to plantaricin BM-1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Preparation of plantaricin BM-1</title>
<p>Plantaricin BM-1 was prepared as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Zhang et al., 2013</xref>). <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> BM-1 was cultured in de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) broth at 37&#x00B0;C for 12&#x2009;h. The supernatant was collected by centrifugation (4&#x00B0;C, 10,000&#x2009;rpm) and stirred overnight at 4&#x00B0;C for ammonium sulfate precipitation. After the precipitate had been solubilized, plantaricin BM-1 was purified using dialysis, desalting, and cation exchange before being freeze-dried. The freeze-dried powder was redissolved in 0.22&#x2009;&#x03BC;m filtration membrane and stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Strains and culture conditions</title>
<p>The bacterial strains used in this study are listed in <xref rid="tab1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>. <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> strains and <italic>L. plantarum</italic> BM-1 were cultured at 37&#x00B0;C with aeration at 180&#x2009;rpm, Luria-Bertani (LB) broth and MRS broth were used, respectively.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Strains used in this study.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Strains and plasmids</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Characteristics</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Source</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char="."><italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K12</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Wild-type <italic>E. coli</italic> strain BW25113</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Laboratory preservation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char="."><italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;"><italic>Escherichia coli</italic> BW25113 with <italic>rcsC</italic> deletion</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Keio collection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char="."><italic>E. coli</italic> JW2204</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;"><italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 with <italic>rcsD</italic> deletion</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Keio collection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char="."><italic>E. coli</italic> JW2205</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;"><italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 with <italic>rcsB</italic> deletion</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Keio collection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char="."><italic>L. plantarum</italic> BM-1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;"><italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> BM-1, producing plantaricin BM-1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Laboratory preservation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">pKD46</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Plasmid containing the lambda Red system, L-arabinose inducible</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">BioVector NTCC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char="."><italic>E. coli</italic> ReJW5917</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;"><italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 with <italic>rcsC</italic> complemented</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">This study</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char="."><italic>E. coli</italic> JW5431</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;"><italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 with <italic>gutQ</italic> deletion</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Keio collection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char="."><italic>E. coli</italic> JW0820</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;"><italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 with <italic>bssR</italic> deletion</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Keio collection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char="."><italic>E. coli</italic> JW1504</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;"><italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 with <italic>lsrK</italic> deletion</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Keio collection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char="."><italic>E. coli</italic> JW0389</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;"><italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 with <italic>phoB</italic> deletion</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Keio collection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char="."><italic>E. coli</italic> JW2366</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;"><italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 with <italic>evgA</italic> deletion</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Keio collection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char="."><italic>E. coli</italic> JW2367</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;"><italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 with <italic>evgS</italic> deletion</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Keio collection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char="."><italic>E. coli</italic> JW5437</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;"><italic>E. coli</italic> BW25113 with <italic>rpoS</italic> deletion</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Keio collection</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>Minimal inhibitory concentration determination</title>
<p>Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined as described previously, with some modifications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Chen et al., 2021</xref>). Briefly, <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 was pre-cultured in LB broth for 12&#x2009;h until log phase, diluted to 10<sup>4</sup>&#x2009;CFU/ml, and added to 96-well plates at 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;l per well. Plantaricin BM-1 was quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, China), diluted two-fold, and added to a 96-well plate containing 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;l of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 per well. After mixing, the 96-well plate was incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 12&#x2009;h and the optical density (OD) at 600&#x2009;nm (OD600) was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plate reader (ELX808, BioTek, VT, United States). The lowest concentration of plantaricin BM-1 able to inhibit the growth of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12, JW5917, JW2204, and JW2205 (i.e., no increase in OD600) was recorded as the MIC. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<title>Construction of an <italic>rcsC</italic>-complemented mutant of mutant of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> JW5917</title>
<p>Complementary <italic>rcsC</italic> mutants of <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 were performed according to the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Juhas and Ajioka (2016)</xref>. Briefly, pKD46 plasmids were transformed into competent <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 using 0.1&#x2009;mol/ml cold CaCl<sub>2</sub> and homologous recombinase expression was induced by incubation with 0.50&#x2009;mg/ml&#x2009;L-arabinose in LB broth at 30&#x00B0;C. The following primers were used to amplify <italic>rcsC</italic> gene fragment from <italic>E. coli</italic> K12: <italic>rcsC</italic>-F (5&#x2032;-3&#x2032;) TGA GGC GGA GCT TCG CCC CTG TTA GTG CTC TGG CTG TTG and <italic>rcsC</italic>-R (5&#x2032;-3&#x2032;) CGC ATT TGC GGA ATA GGC AGA ATC TGC GAT GAT GAA GC (homology underlined). After transfection into competent <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 cells, the cells were incubated in 900&#x2009;&#x03BC;l of LB broth at 37&#x00B0;C for 2&#x2009;h, diluted with saline, plated on LB agar, and incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 12&#x2009;h. Single recombinant ReJW5917 colonies were verified using <italic>rcsC</italic>-F/R primers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<title>Bacterial growth assays</title>
<p>Wild-type <italic>E. coli</italic> K12, JW5917, JW2204, JW2205, and ReJW5917 (3.00 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL) were cultured in LB broth with or without plantaricin BM-1 (2&#x00D7; MIC of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12) at 37&#x00B0;C for 12&#x2009;h. Bacterial suspensions were collected every 2 h, cells were performed using plate colony counting method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Masuda and Tomioka, 1978</xref>), and the average results of the three experiments were plotted. All experiments consisted of three replications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<title>Electron microscopy</title>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>Scanning electron microscopy</title>
<p>Wild-type <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 and JW5917 (3.00 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL) were cultured in LB broth at 37&#x00B0;C for 12&#x2009;h with or without plantaricin BM-1 (2&#x00D7; MIC of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12). The sample processing method has been modified based on the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Luo et al. (2021)</xref>. The bacterial suspension was then centrifuged at 6,000&#x2009;&#x00D7;<italic>g</italic> for 10&#x2009;min. After the supernatant was removed, the cells were cleaned three times with 0.10&#x2009;M phosphate-buffered brine (PBS) buffer (pH 7.2) to remove the residual BM-1, fixation solution (2.50% glutaraldehyde) was added, and the cells were fixed overnight. After washing with PBS for 4 times within 20&#x2009;min, the cells were gradually dehydrated with different concentrations of ethanol, and then replaced in replacement solution (100% acetone) for 20&#x2009;min. Then washed with 100% tert-butanol for 3 times and freeze-dried for 2&#x2009;h. Finally, the cells were electrically treated and sprayed with 80&#x2009;nm gold powder, and imaged using Scanning electron microscopy (SEM; SU8100, Hitachi, Japan).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<title>Transmission electron microscopy</title>
<p>Prior to Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), cell strains were pretreated using the same methods as for SEM. Cell samples embedded in white resin capsules were then cut into ultra-thin slices (50&#x2013;90&#x2009;nm). The sections were then fixed on copper mesh and stained with lead citrate and uranyl acetate, respectively. After drying, the sections were observed by TEM HT7800 (Hitachi, Japan).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<title>Biofilm determination</title>
<sec id="sec12">
<title>Crystal violet staining assay</title>
<p>To determine the regulatory mechanism of <italic>rcsC</italic> mutants on plantaricin BM-1 and biofilm formation, the experimental method of crystal violet staining is modified on the experimental method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Luo et al. (2021)</xref>. <italic>E. coli</italic> K12, JW5917, and ReJW5917 were grown to log phase in LB broth, cells were centrifuged at 4,000&#x2009;&#x00D7;<italic>g</italic> for 15&#x2009;min at 4&#x00B0;C and serially diluted to 3.00 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/ml. A 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;l aliquot of the bacterial suspension was added to a 96-well plate with fresh LB broth as a negative control. After incubation at 37&#x00B0;C for 24&#x2009;h, the unadsorbed <italic>E. coli</italic> was discarded and the 96-well plates were rinsed with PBS for 3 times. Next, 200&#x2009;&#x03BC;l of methanol solution was added to each well to fix the biofilm for 15&#x2009;min at room temperature and the methanol was carefully aspirated. After the plate had been dried at room temperature, added 200&#x2009;&#x03BC;l of 0.1% crystal violet and incubated for 15&#x2009;min at room temperature, then excess crystal violet was removed by washing the cells with PBS. After the plate had been dried at room temperature, added 200&#x2009;&#x03BC;l aliquot of 33% glacial acetic acid and incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 30&#x2009;min. The absorbance at 590&#x2009;nm was measured using an ELISA plate reader (ELX808, BioTek, VT, United States). The experiments were repeated three times, with five replicates per group.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>Laser scanning confocal microscopy</title>
<p>To verify the results of the crystal violet experiments and confirm the effects of RcsC mutation on biofilm formation, Laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) experiments were performed. <italic>E. coli</italic> K12, JW5917, and ReJW5917 were grown to log phase in LB broth and serially diluted to 3.00 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/ml. After the strains had been cultured in LB broth for 24&#x2009;h on confocal dishes, they were gently washed with PBS three times and stained with 4&#x2032;,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) at a final concentration of 0.20&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/ml. Excess dye was removed by washing with PBS after shaking at room temperature for 30&#x2009;min. Cells were observed using a LSM880 Airyscan (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<title>Proteomic analysis</title>
<p>To screen for differentially expressed proteins between wild-type <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 and mutant strains, quantitative proteomic analysis was performed using a 4D label-free. <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 and <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 (3.00 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/ml) were incubated in LB broth at 37&#x00B0;C for 12&#x2009;h without plantaricin BM-1. After centrifuge, bacterial samples were collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The samples were placed on ice in the frozen state and treated with protein cracking buffer (8&#x2009;M urea, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, protease inhibitor). The supernatant of the protein was obtained by ultrasound on the ice for 2&#x2009;min, cracking for 30&#x2009;min, and centrifugation for 30&#x2009;min at 12,000&#x2009;&#x00D7;<italic>g</italic>. The concentration of the extracted protein was determined using the Pierce BCA protein assay kit (No.23225, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, United States) and verified using Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Iodoacetamide was used for reductive alkylation of protein samples that met the standard, and an equal amount of protein was taken from each sample for Trypsin/P trypsin digestion. Each sample was separated using a ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) NanoElute system (Bruker Corporation, MA, United States) with a nanoliter flow rate of buffer A (0.10% formic acid aqueous solution) and buffer B (0.10% formate acetonitrile solution). Nanoscale high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-separated samples were subjected to data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mass spectrometry using a timsTOF Pro mass spectrometer (Bruker Corporation). Three biological replicates were used per sample. Liquid chromatography&#x2013;tandem mass spectrometry data were matched using MaxQuant 2.0.3.1 software and the UniProt-taxonomy <italic>E. coli</italic> (strain K12) [83333] unique.fasta database with the results filtering parameter was Peptide FDR&#x2009;&#x2264;&#x2009;0.01. Only contains at least one unique peptide protein were quantified. Differentially expressed proteins were identified based on a fold change of &#x003E;1.20 or&#x2009;&#x003C;0.83 between treatments and <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were used to identify the functional subclasses and metabolic pathways related to the differentially expressed proteins.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<title>Sensitivity analysis of biofilm-related genes regulated by RcsC mutation to plantaricin BM-1</title>
<p><italic>Escherichia coli</italic> JW5431, JW0820, JW1504, JW0389, JW5689, JW0665, and JW5437 strains with an initial concentration of 3.00 log10 CFU/ml were grown in LB broth at 37&#x00B0;C for 12&#x2009;h with or without plantaricin BM-1 (2&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;MIC for <italic>E. coli</italic> K12). Bacterial suspensions were collected every 2 h, cells were performed using plate colony counting method, and the average results of the three experiments were plotted. All experiments consisted of three replications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<title>Statistical analysis method</title>
<p>The statistical analysis method was consistent with that used in previous studies of our laboratory. All experiments were performed in triplicate, data were presented as the mean&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;SD, and the analysis of variance was used to compare viable cell counts between the growth curves of <italic>E. coli</italic> treated with and without plantaricin BM-1 at a significance level of 0.05 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Liu et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec18">
<title>Plantaricin BM-1 MIC determination</title>
<p>We determined the MIC of plantaricin BM-1 in different <italic>E. coli</italic> strains by culturing the strains with different concentrations of plantaricin BM-1 at 37&#x00B0;C for 12&#x2009;h and measuring the OD600. The MIC values of plantaricin BM-1 against <italic>E. coli</italic> K12, JW5917, JW2204, and JW2205 were 1.25, 0.59, 1.31, and 1.22&#x2009;mg/ml, respectively. We found that <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 (<italic>rcsC</italic> mutant) were significantly less sensitive to plantaricin BM-1 than wild-type <italic>E. coli</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<title>Construction and confirmation of <italic>rcsC</italic>-complementary strains</title>
<p>To construct an <italic>rcsC</italic>-complementary <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 strain, a 3,076&#x2009;bp <italic>rcsC</italic> gene fragment was amplified from the <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 genome using PCR with the <italic>rcsC</italic>-F/R primer pair and then the kanamycin resistance gene in <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 was replaced by red homologous recombination. Successful complementation was confirmed through PCR analysis of genomic DNA extracted from <italic>E. coli</italic> K12, <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917, and the complementary <italic>E. coli</italic> ReJW5917 strain using <italic>rcsC</italic>-F/R primers. A 3,076&#x2009;bp product was amplified from both <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 and the complementary ReJW5917 strain, but no amplified band was detected in <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>). Sequencing results revealed that the same <italic>rcsC</italic> gene fragment was amplified from <italic>E. coli</italic> ReJW5917 and <italic>E. coli</italic> K12, proving that <italic>E. coli</italic> ReJW5917 had been constructed successfully.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Validation of the structure of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> ReJW5917. PCR products were detected using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. Lane M represents the 5,000&#x2009;bp DNA marker. Lane 1 contains the PCR product from <italic>E. coli</italic> K12. Lane 2 contains the PCR product from <italic>E. coli</italic> ReJW5917. Lane 3 contains the PCR product from <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-1071351-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<title>Effect of plantaricin BM-1 on the growth of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></title>
<p>To determine the effect of plantaricin BM-1 on <italic>E. coli</italic> K12, JW5917, JW2204, JW2205, and ReJW5917 strains growth, growth curves were measured with and without plantaricin BM-1 treatment (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2</xref>). No significant differences in growth rate were observed for <italic>E. coli</italic> K12, JW5917, JW2204, and JW2205, which reached similar growth levels of 9.36, 9.38, 9.30, and 9.19 log10 CFU/ml, respectively, within 12&#x2009;h. After plantaricin BM-1 was treated, all strains showed slow growth, and the number of viable bacteria decreased at 12&#x2009;h. The viable count of wild-type <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 at 12&#x2009;h was 7.88 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/ml, indicating relatively low sensitivity to plantaricin BM-1. Although <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 and K12 had the same growth rates at 0&#x2013;2&#x2009;h, <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 had a significantly lower growth rate after 2&#x2009;h and the number of viable bacteria after 12&#x2009;h was only 6.33 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/ml, which was significantly lower than that of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05), indicating relatively high sensitivity to plantaricin BM-1. <italic>E. coli</italic> JW2204 and JW2205 had slightly lower growth rates than <italic>E. coli</italic> K12, but their viable counts at 12&#x2009;h did not differ significantly compared to <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 (7.46 and 7.48 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/ml, respectively). The growth curves of <italic>E. coli</italic> ReJW5917 and <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 were closely resembled, indicating that their susceptibility had recovered to the same level as wild-type strains. Together, these findings indicate that only the RcsC mutation in the Rcs phosphorelay affects the sensitivity of <italic>E. coli</italic> to plantaricin BM-1.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of plantaricin BM-1 on the growth of wild-type <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 and mutant <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917, JW2204, JW2205, and ReJW5917 (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-1071351-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<title>Effect and comparison of plantaricin BM-1 on morphology of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K12 and JW5917</title>
<p>The morphological changes of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 and JW5917 before and after treatment with <italic>p</italic>lantaricin BM-1 were observed by SEM (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3</xref>) and TEM (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4</xref>). In the absence of plantaricin BM-1, SEM revealed no significant differences in morphology between <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 and K12, which both had short, rod-shaped cells with smooth surfaces (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figures 3A</xref>,<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">B</xref>). After treatment with plantaricin BM-1, both <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 and K12 showed some small changes, with individual cells becoming more folded and concave at both ends, but with no significant difference in cell morphology between the two strains (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figures 3C</xref>,<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">D</xref>). TEM showed that in the absence of plantaricin BM-1, <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 cells were uniform and full, whereas <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 cell content was slightly decreased (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figures 4A</xref>,<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">B</xref>). After plantaricin BM-1 was treated, the content of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 cells did not change significantly, but individual cells showed slight shrinkage at both ends, whereas the content of <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 cells was significantly reduced and cells displayed obvious plasmolysis and shrinkage at both ends (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figures 4C</xref>,<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">D</xref>). Therefore, the deletion of <italic>rcsC</italic> gene can reduce the resistance of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 to plantaricin BM-1.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>SEM images of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K12 and JW5917 strains treated with <bold>(C,D)</bold> and without <bold>(A,B)</bold> plantaricin BM-1 (magnification: 30,000&#x00D7;).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-1071351-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>TEM images of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K12 and JW5917 treated with <bold>(C,D)</bold> and without <bold>(A,B)</bold> plantaricin BM-1 (magnification: 10,000&#x00D7;).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-1071351-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<title>Effect of <italic>rcsC</italic> mutant JW5917 on biofilm formation</title>
<p>To evaluate the effect of the <italic>rcsC</italic> mutant on <italic>E. coli</italic> biofilm formation, we performed crystal violet staining. As shown in <xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5</xref>, biofilm formation was significantly reduced in <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 by over 50%, whereas biofilm formation in <italic>E. coli</italic> ReJW5917 recovered to the same level as in <italic>E. coli</italic> K12. These findings were confirmed using LSCM (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6</xref>), which verified that the biofilm content of <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 was significantly lower than that of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 and ReJW5917.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p><italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K12, <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917, and <italic>E. coli</italic> ReJW5917 biofilm formation. Biofilm formation detected by absorbance at 590&#x2009;nm using crystal violet staining. <sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup>, significance at <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x2264;&#x2009;0.01.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-1071351-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>LSCM of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K12, <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917, and <italic>E. coli</italic> ReJW5917. <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold> represent <italic>E. coli</italic> K12, <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917, and <italic>E. coli</italic> ReJW5917, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-1071351-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec23">
<title>Proteomic analysis</title>
<p>To determine the potential mechanisms through which <italic>rcsC</italic> deletion affects plantaricin BM-1 sensitivity in <italic>E. coli</italic>, we detected differentially expressed proteins in different strains. When the changed protein expression fold was 1.20, 2,260 differential proteins were identified (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05, <xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">Figure 7</xref>). The expression of 642 proteins was altered between <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 and K12, including 382 upregulated and 260 downregulated proteins (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). Subcellular localization analysis of differentially expressed proteins revealed that 94.03% were located in the cytoplasm, with plasma membrane proteins accounting for just 5.13% of all differentially expressed proteins, and extracellular proteins accounting for just 0.84%.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Changes in the proteome of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K12 following RcsC deletion. Volcano plots of the 2,260 identified proteins are shown. Red dots represent proteins with fold change values &#x003E; 1.20. Blue dots represent proteins with fold change values &#x003C; 0.83 (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-1071351-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>GO functional annotation statistics for differential proteins clarifies the biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions that proteins are involved in at the functional level. GO functional annotation of the differentially expressed proteins revealed that 539 were labeled as biological processes (BP), among which 82.56% were related to cellular processes and 69.39% were related to metabolic processes (<xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>). In particular, these differentially expressed proteins were significantly enriched for metabolic processes (GO:0008152), cellular processes (GO:0009987), responses to stimuli (GO:0050896), biological regulation (GO:0065007), and localization (GO:0051179). In terms of cellular components (CC), proteins were significantly enriched for protein-containing complexes (GO:0032991) and cellular anatomical entities (GO:0110165). Proteins related to molecular function (MF) were significantly enriched for transporter activity (GO:0005215), catalytic activity (GO:0003824), and binding (GO:0005488).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>GO categories of differentially expressed proteins in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> JW5917.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Term type</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">GO term</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GO ID</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">JW5917 vs. K12 down percent</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">JW5917 vs. K12 up percent</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Immune system process</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0002376</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Carbon utilization</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0015976</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological regulation</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0065007</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">27/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Metabolic process</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0008152</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">173/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">201/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Intraspecies interaction</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0051703</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Multi-organism process</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0051704</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Locomotion</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0040011</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Reproductive process</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0022414</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Sulfur utilization</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0006791</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cellular process</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0009987</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">194/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">251/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Developmental process</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0032502</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Interspecies interaction</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0044419</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Localization</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0051179</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">41/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">56/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological adhesion</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0022610</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Viral process</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0016032</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Detoxification</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0098754</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Signaling</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0023052</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Nitrogen utilization</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0019740</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Biological process</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Response to stimulus</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0050896</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">57/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">97/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cellular component</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Protein-containing complex</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0032991</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">55/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">48/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cellular component</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cellular anatomical entity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0110165</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">197/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">270/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Translation regulator activity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0045182</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Transcription regulator activity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0140110</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">21/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Structural molecule activity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0005198</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">ATP-Dependent activity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0140657</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cytoskeletal motor activity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0003774</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular adaptor activity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0060090</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Protein folding chaperone</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0044183</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular carrier activity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0140104</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Antioxidant activity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0016209</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Transporter activity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0005215</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">41/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">34/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function regulator</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0098772</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Small molecule sensor activity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0140299</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Binding</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0005488</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">179/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">227/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular transducer activity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0060089</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3/382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Molecular function</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Catalytic activity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">GO:0003824</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">183/260</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">264/382</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Next, we performed KEGG functional annotation to verify the functional classification of pathways and the functional roles of the differentially expressed proteins. Crystal violet staining and LSCM revealed that the biofilm content was significantly reduced in <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917. KEGG and GO analyses screened 17 proteins related to biofilm formation, including 10 downregulated and 7 upregulated proteins (<xref rid="tab3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>). In particular, arabinose 5-phosphate isomerase (GutQ), biofilm regulator (BssR), phosphate regulon transcriptional regulatory protein (PhoB), and autoinducer-2 kinase (LsrK) are directly related to biofilm formation, while the N-acetylglucosamine-specific EIICBA component (NagE), maltodextrin phosphorylase (MalP), and RNA polymerase sigma factor (RpoS) can indirectly regulate biofilm formation through pathway regulation or signal responses.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Differentially expressed proteins related to biofilm formation in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> JW5917.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Accession number</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Description</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Fold change</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>P</italic>-value</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Protein</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P30855</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Sensor histidine kinase</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.75</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.007079</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">EvgS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P0ACZ4</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">DNA-binding transcriptional activator</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.6979</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.008196</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">EvgA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P17115</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Arabinose 5-phosphate isomerase</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.7687</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.01128</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">GutQ</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P13445</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">RNA polymerase sigma factor</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.742</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.000532</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">RpoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P0AAY1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Biofilm regulator</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.5295</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.021</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">BssR</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P77432</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Autoinducer-2 kinase</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.7856</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.000475</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">LsrK</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P0AFJ5</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Phosphate regulon transcriptional regulatory protein</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.251</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.03157</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">PhoB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P76237</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Probable diguanylate cyclase</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.783</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.007179</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">DgcJ</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P0A9Q1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Aerobic respiration control protein</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.242</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.005906</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">ArcA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P09323</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">N-acetylglucosamine-specific EIICBA component</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.638</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.001929</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">NagE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P04128</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Type-1 fimbrial protein</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.3523</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.037</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">FimA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P69913</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Carbon storage regulator</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.3423</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.3935</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">CsrA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P0AEV1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Regulator of RpoS</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.253</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.001616</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">RssB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P45578</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">S-ribosylhomocysteine lyase</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.283</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.000602</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">LuxS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P00490</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Maltodextrin phosphorylase</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.6347</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.0004</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">MalP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P0ACJ8</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">cAMP-activated global transcriptional regulator</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">1.274</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.01337</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Crp</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">P0A9E5</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Fumarate and nitrate reduction regulatory protein</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.8142</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">0.03268</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00B1;">Fnr</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec24">
<title>Effects of biofilm-related gene mutations on the sensitivity of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> to plantaricin BM-1</title>
<p>The effect of plantaricin BM-1 on the growth of <italic>gutQ</italic>, <italic>bssR</italic>, <italic>phoB</italic>, <italic>lsrK</italic>, <italic>nagE</italic>, <italic>malP</italic>, and <italic>rpoS E. coli</italic> mutants was assessed by generating standard growth curves (<xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">Figure 8</xref>). The number of viable <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5431 cells was slightly lower (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) than that of other mutants, possibly due to a decrease in activity caused by long-term storage. Under the treatment of plantaricin BM-1, <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5431, JW0820, JW0389, JW1504, and JW5437 grew slowly for the first 12&#x2009;h and the viable cell count only reached 5.00 log<sub>10</sub> or 6.00 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/ml, which was significantly lower than that of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). However, the sensitivity of <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5689 and JW0665 to plantaricin BM-1 did not differ significantly compared to <italic>E. coli</italic> K12, possibly because not all the proteins associated with biofilm synthesis are associated with sensitivity to plantaricin BM-1. Taken together, these findings suggest that the Rcs phosphorelay could affect the sensitivity of <italic>E. coli</italic> to plantaricin BM-1 by regulating the expression of GutQ, BssR, PhoB, LsrK, and RpoS.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of plantaricin BM-1 on the growth of wild-type <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K12, mutant <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5431, JW0820, JW0389, JW1504, JW5689, JW0665, and JW5437 strains (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-13-1071351-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec25" sec-type="discussions">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The Rcs phosphorelay is one of the most complex TCSs in <italic>E. coli</italic> K12, with three core components: RcsC, RcsB, and RcsD. This system was originally described as a regulator of colanic acid synthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Gottesman and Stout, 1991</xref>); however, recent research has shown that the Rcs phosphorelay system also plays a role in acid resistance, cell division, motility, and biofilm formation. The Rcs phosphorelay can be activated by several conditions, including osmotic and acid shock, desiccation, and the perturbation of cell envelope integrity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Francez-Charlot et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Clarke, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Wall et al., 2018</xref>). In addition, studies have shown that the sensitivity of the Rcs phosphorelay system to lysozyme increases when it is blocked genetically and that the Rcs phosphorelay system can be induced by lysozyme, and encodes two lysozyme inhibitors, Ivy and MliC. The sensitivity of lysozyme can be alleviated by complementation with Ivy and MliC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Callewaert et al., 2009</xref>). Previously, we found that approximately 80% of the genes identified as members of the ampicillin regulon in <italic>E. coli</italic> treated with bactericidal levels of ampicillin are also regulated by the Rcs phosphorelay (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Kaldalu et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Huang et al., 2006</xref>). We also found that the deletion of the BasS/R TCS markedly increased sensitivity to plantaricin BM-1. TCSs, such as BasS/R, the Rcs phosphorelay, and PhoQ/P, are often thought to be related to the synthesis and modification of cell surface polysaccharides. Indeed, the absence of BasS/R has been shown to cause abnormal changes in the regulatory networks that exist between these systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Liu et al., 2022</xref> and our unpublished observations). Although the deletion of RcsC in the Rcs phosphorelay significantly increases the sensitivity of <italic>E. coli</italic> to plantaricin BM-1, the mechanism is unclear. In this study, we found that biofilm formation was significantly reduced in <italic>E. coli</italic> JW5917 compared to <italic>E. coli</italic> K12, with proteomic analysis further revealing that the differentially expressed proteins between these strains were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm and were directly or indirectly involved in biofilm formation. Moreover, we found that the deletion of genes encoding GutQ, BssR, PhoB, LsrK, and RpoS significantly increased the sensitivity of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 to plantaricin BM-1.</p>
<p>Biofilms are organized bacterial populations encapsulated in a bacterial extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix that can adhere to each other on biotic or abiotic surfaces (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Rather et al., 2021</xref>). EPS mainly consists of polysaccharides, but other biomolecules like proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids are also present in EPS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Cortes et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Gupta et al., 2016</xref>). Studies have shown that biofilm formation contributes toward the development of antibiotic resistance and the formation of persistent cells that are responsible for untreatable microbial infections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Pang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Rather et al., 2021</xref>). Previous studies have found that TCSs can achieve antibiotic resistance by regulating biofilm formation. For instance, the GacS/A TCS can participate in the formation of <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> biofilms and confer resistance to aminoglycosides, such as amikacin and gentamicin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Brinkman et al., 2001</xref>). In addition, GacS/A is active in biofilms formed by <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> and confers resistance to antibiotics such as vancomycin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Fridman et al., 2013</xref>). In this study, we found that arabinose 5-phosphate isomerase (GutQ), a precursor of the cell envelope lipopolysaccharide component 2-keto-3-deoxy-octulosonate (KDO) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Lim and Cohen, 1966</xref>), was downregulated by 0.76-fold in the rcsC mutant. It has been reported that GutQ is involved in biofilm formation, with mutants lacking <italic>gutQ</italic> showing a marked reduction in biofilm formation and increased <italic>gutQ</italic> expression increasing biofilm formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Herzberg et al., 2006</xref>). GutQ expression also correlates negatively with the expression of YdgG, which can affect resistance to various antimicrobials, including crystal violet and streptomycin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Herzberg et al., 2006</xref>). BssR is a biofilm regulator that is transcribed during biofilm formation and can regulate biofilm formation through signal secretion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Ren et al., 2004</xref>). LsrK, a kinase that can phosphorylate the quorum-sensing auto-inducible molecule AI-2, was also downregulated by 0.78-fold in the <italic>rcsC</italic> mutant. Interestingly, the <italic>lsrK</italic> mutant had a different biofilm structure compared to the wild-type and LsrK has been reported to regulate the expression of biofilm-related genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Li et al., 2007</xref>). Studies have also shown that LsrK may be a potential drug target for solving antibiotic resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Linciano et al., 2020</xref>); therefore, our findings may provide insights into the use of plantaricin BM-1 as a target in Gram-negative bacteria. Similarly, phosphate regulon transcriptional regulatory protein (PhoB), a dual transcriptional regulator that activates the expression of Pho regulators in response to environmental phosphate, was upregulated by 1.25-fold in our proteomics analysis. Studies have shown that <italic>E. coli</italic> PhoB can be activated under unrestricted phosphate conditions to inhibit biofilm formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Grillo-Puertas et al., 2016</xref>). As the passive response regulator of the PhoR/B TCS, PhoB remains active by default and requires the interference of environmental signals to shut down the system. However, our proteomic analyses revealed no significant changes in PhoR expression. RNA polymerase factor sigma (RpoS) is an RNA polymerase subunit that acts as a master regulator of the general stress response in <italic>E. coli</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Hengge-Aronis, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Weber et al., 2005</xref>) and is regulated at the levels of protein degradation, transcription, translation, and activity. Studies have shown that <italic>rpoS</italic> regulates the formation of <italic>E. coli</italic> cell membranes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Adnan et al., 2010</xref>) and that high <italic>rpoS</italic> expression inhibits <italic>E. coli</italic> biofilm formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Corona-Izquierdo and Membrillo-Hernandez, 2002</xref>). Moreover, it has been reported that <italic>rpoS</italic> is significantly upregulated after treatment with ampicillin and mitomycin C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Dapa et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Mohiuddin et al., 2022</xref>), consistent with our findings after treatment with plantaricin BM-1.</p>
<p>In summary, our study demonstrates that decreased Rcs phosphorelay expression can increase the sensitivity of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 to plantaricin BM-1. However, we found that the sensitivity of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 to plantaricin BM-1 was not altered after RcsB and RcsD deletion, which may indicate that biofilm formation is only reduced after <italic>rcsC</italic> mutation. Thus, RcsC may can control the effect of the Rcs phosphorelay on biofilm formation. Another possibility is that because RcsC itself contains both His and Asp., the mechanism regulating the sensitivity of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 to plantaricin BM-1 may be completed through this His-Asp process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Wall et al., 2018</xref>). In conclusion, mutations in the Rcs phosphorelay resulted in significantly reduced biofilm formation in <italic>E. coli</italic>, resulting in reduced cell resistance to stress and affecting the sensitivity of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 to plantaricin BM-1. In future studies, we will attempt to construct an <italic>rcsCDB</italic> three-gene mutant to further verify the mechanism through which the Rcs phosphorelay regulates the sensitivity of <italic>E. coli</italic> K12 to plantaricin BM-1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec26" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: <ext-link xlink:href="http://www.proteomexchange.org/" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.proteomexchange.org/</ext-link>, PXD037354.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec27">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>ZB conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, and analyzed the data. WL analyzed the data. JJ, LJ, and YH contributed materials. HZ conceptualization and methodology. YX conceived and designed the experiments. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec28" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the Research project of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (KM201810020016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec100" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>We would like to thank Editage (<ext-link xlink:href="http://www.editage.cn" ext-link-type="uri">www.editage.cn</ext-link>) for English language editing.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adnan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morton</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hadi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Contribution of rpoS and bolA genes in biofilm formation in Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655</article-title>. <source>Mol. Cell. Biochem.</source> <volume>342</volume>, <fpage>207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>213</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11010-010-0485-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20480211</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alvarez-Sieiro</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montalban-Lopez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuipers</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria: extending the family</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>2939</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2951</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-016-7343-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26860942</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brinkman</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Macfarlane</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Warrener</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hancock</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Evolutionary relationships among virulence-associated histidine kinases</article-title>. <source>Infect. Immun.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>5207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5211</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/IAI.69.8.5207-5211.2001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11447209</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Callewaert</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vanoirbeek</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lurquin</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Michiels</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aertsen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The Rcs two-component system regulates expression of lysozyme inhibitors and is induced by exposure to lysozyme</article-title>. <source>J. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>191</volume>, <fpage>1979</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1981</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.01549-08</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19136591</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>YbfA regulates the sensitivity of Escherichia coli K12 to Plantaricin BM-1 via the BasS/BasR two-component regulatory system</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>659198</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.659198</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34484135</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Szewczyk</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pesavento</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zietek</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Banzhaf</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roszczenko</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Detecting envelope stress by monitoring beta-barrel assembly</article-title>. <source>Cell</source> <volume>159</volume>, <fpage>1652</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1664</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.045</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25525882</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clarke</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The Rcs phosphorelay: more than just a two-component pathway</article-title>. <source>Future Microbiol.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>1173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1184</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2217/fmb.10.83</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20722597</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Corona-Izquierdo</surname> <given-names>F. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Membrillo-Hernandez</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>A mutation in rpoS enhances biofilm formation in Escherichia coli during exponential phase of growth</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Lett.</source> <volume>211</volume>, <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>110</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11210.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12052558</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cortes</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bonilla</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sinisterra</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Biofilm formation, control and novel strategies for eradication</article-title>. <source>Sci. Against Microbiol. Pathog. Commun. Curr. Res. Technol. Adv.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>896</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>905</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dapa</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fleurier</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bredeche</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matic</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The SOS and RpoS regulons contribute to bacterial cell robustness to genotoxic stress by synergistically regulating DNA polymerase pol II</article-title>. <source>Genetics</source> <volume>206</volume>, <fpage>1349</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1360</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.116.199471</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28468910</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Delhaye</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Collet</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laloux</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>A Fly on the Wall: how stress response systems can sense and respond to damage to peptidoglycan</article-title>. <source>Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>380</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2019.00380</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31799211</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Diep</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skaugen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salehian</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nes</surname> <given-names>I. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Common mechanisms of target cell recognition and immunity for class II bacteriocins</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>2384</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2389</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0608775104</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17284603</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Francez-Charlot</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laugel</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Gemert</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dubarry</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wiorowski</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Castanie-Cornet</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>RcsCDB his-asp phosphorelay system negatively regulates the flhDC operon in Escherichia coli</article-title>. <source>Mol. Microbiol.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>823</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>832</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03601.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12864862</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fregeau Gallagher</surname> <given-names>N. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sailer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niemczura</surname> <given-names>W. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakashima</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stiles</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vederas</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Three-dimensional structure of leucocin a in trifluoroethanol and dodecylphosphocholine micelles: spatial location of residues critical for biological activity in type IIa bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria</article-title>. <source>Biochemistry</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>15062</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15072</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/bi971263h</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9398233</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fridman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muzamal</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hunter</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Siu</surname> <given-names>K. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Golemi-Kotra</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Two unique phosphorylation-driven signaling pathways crosstalk in Staphylococcus aureus to modulate the cell-wall charge: Stk1/Stp1 meets GraSR</article-title>. <source>Biochemistry</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>7975</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7986</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/bi401177n</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24102310</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gottesman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stout</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Regulation of capsular polysaccharide synthesis in Escherichia coli K12</article-title>. <source>Mol. Microbiol.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>1599</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1606</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb01906.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1943696</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grillo-Puertas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rintoul</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rapisarda</surname> <given-names>V. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>PhoB activation in non-limiting phosphate condition by the maintenance of high polyphosphate levels in the stationary phase inhibits biofilm formation in Escherichia coli</article-title>. <source>Microbiology</source> <volume>162</volume>, <fpage>1000</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1008</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mic.0.000281</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27023099</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sarkar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhattacharjee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tribedi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Biofilm, pathogenesis and prevention--a journey to break the wall: a review</article-title>. <source>Arch. Microbiol.</source> <volume>198</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00203-015-1148-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hengge-Aronis</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Signal transduction and regulatory mechanisms involved in control of the sigma(S) (RpoS) subunit of RNA polymerase</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>373</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>395</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/MMBR.66.3.373-395.2002</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12208995</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hersch</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Watanabe</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stietz</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manera</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kamal</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burkinshaw</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Envelope stress responses defend against type six secretion system attacks independently of immunity proteins</article-title>. <source>Nat. Microbiol.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>706</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>714</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41564-020-0672-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32094588</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Herzberg</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaye</surname> <given-names>I. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peti</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>T. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>YdgG (TqsA) controls biofilm formation in Escherichia coli K-12 through autoinducer 2 transport</article-title>. <source>J. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>188</volume>, <fpage>587</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>598</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.188.2.587-598.2006</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16385049</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferrieres</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clarke</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The role of the Rcs phosphorelay in Enterobacteriaceae</article-title>. <source>Res. Microbiol.</source> <volume>157</volume>, <fpage>206</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>212</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.resmic.2005.11.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Juhas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ajioka</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Lambda red recombinase-mediated integration of the high molecular weight DNA into the Escherichia coli chromosome</article-title>. <source>Microb. Cell Fact.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>172</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12934-016-0571-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27716307</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kaldalu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mei</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Killing by ampicillin and ofloxacin induces overlapping changes in Escherichia coli transcription profile</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>890</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>896</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.48.3.890-896.2004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14982780</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kjos</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Borrero</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Opsata</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Birri</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cintas</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Target recognition, resistance, immunity and genome mining of class II bacteriocins from gram-positive bacteria</article-title>. <source>Microbiology</source> <volume>157</volume>, <fpage>3256</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3267</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mic.0.052571-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21980118</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Klaenhammer</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria</article-title>. <source>Biochimie</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>337</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>349</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0300-9084(88)90206-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Attila</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>T. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Valdes</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bentley</surname> <given-names>W. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli is signaled by AI-2/LsrR: effects on small RNA and biofilm architecture</article-title>. <source>J. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>189</volume>, <fpage>6011</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6020</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.00014-07</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17557827</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1966</year>). <article-title>D-Phosphoarabinoisomerase and d-Ribulokinase in Escherichia coli</article-title>. <source>J. Biol. Chem.</source> <volume>241</volume>, <fpage>4304</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4315</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0021-9258(18)99723-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5332197</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Linciano</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cavalloro</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martino</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kirchmair</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Listro</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rossi</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Tackling antimicrobial resistance with small molecules targeting LsrK: challenges and opportunities</article-title>. <source>J. Med. Chem.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>15243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15257</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01282</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33152241</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>BasS/BasR two-component system affects the sensitivity of Escherichia coli to Plantaricin BM-1 by regulating the tricarboxylic acid cycle</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>874789</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.874789</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35495665</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Logre</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Denamur</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mammeri</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Contribution to Carbapenem resistance and fitness cost of DcuS/DcuR, RcsC/RcsB, and YehU/YehT two-component systems in CTX-M-15-producing Escherichia coli</article-title>. <source>Microb. Drug Resist.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>349</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>352</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/mdr.2019.0027</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31596659</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x00FC;</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Antibacterial mechanisms of bacteriocin BM1157 against Escherichia coli and Cronobacter sakazakii</article-title>. <source>Food Control</source> <volume>123</volume>:<fpage>107730</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107730</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Majdalani</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gottesman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The Rcs phosphorelay: a complex signal transduction system</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>379</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>405</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.micro.59.050405.101230</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16153174</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Masuda</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tomioka</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>Quantitative assessment of bactericidal activities of beta-lactam antibiotics by agar plate method</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>587</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>595</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.14.4.587</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">102246</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mohiuddin</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Massahi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Orman</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>High-throughput screening of a promoter library reveals new Persister mechanisms in Escherichia Coli</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Spectr.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>e0225321</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/spectrum.02253-21</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35196813</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raudonis</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Glick</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Adv.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>177</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>192</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.013</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30500353</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rather</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mandal</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Microbial biofilm: formation, architecture, antibiotic resistance, and control strategies</article-title>. <source>Braz. J. Microbiol.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>1701</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1718</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42770-021-00624-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34558029</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bedzyk</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>T. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Gene expression in Escherichia coli biofilms</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>515</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>524</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-003-1517-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rodriguez</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martinez</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kok</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Pediocin PA-1, a wide-spectrum bacteriocin from lactic acid bacteria</article-title>. <source>Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>91</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>121</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10408690290825475</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11934133</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Simons</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alhanout</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duval</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Bacteriocins, antimicrobial peptides from bacterial origin: overview of their biology and their impact against multidrug-resistant bacteria</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>639</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms8050639</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32349409</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wall</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Majdalani</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gottesman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The complex Rcs regulatory Cascade</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>139</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-micro-090817-062640</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29897834</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Polen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heuveling</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wendisch</surname> <given-names>V. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hengge</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide analysis of the general stress response network in Escherichia coli: sigmaS-dependent genes, promoters, and sigma factor selectivity</article-title>. <source>J. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>187</volume>, <fpage>1591</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1603</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.187.5.1591-1603.2005</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15716429</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>West</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stock</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Histidine kinases and response regulator proteins in two-component signaling systems</article-title>. <source>Trends Biochem. Sci.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>369</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>376</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0968-0004(01)01852-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Purification and characterization of lactobacillus plantarum-derived bacteriocin with activity against Staphylococcus argenteus planktonic cells and biofilm</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci.</source> <volume>87</volume>, <fpage>2718</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2731</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1750-3841.16148</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35470896</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Isolation and partial characterization of a bacteriocin produced by lactobacillus plantarum BM-1 isolated from a traditionally fermented Chinese meat product</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Immunol.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>746</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>755</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1348-0421.12091</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24033418</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>