<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.735767</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effects of N Fertilization During Cultivation and <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> Inoculation at Ensiling on Chemical Composition and Bacterial Community of Mulberry Silage</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Ping</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1283368/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>You</surname> <given-names>Minghong</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>Zhouhe</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Yongxiang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zuo</surname> <given-names>Chunyan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Man</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Honglin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Xu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Chao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>College of Animal Science, Guizhou University</institution>, <addr-line>Guiyang</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Grass and Forage Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Grassland Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Chengdu</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Sericultural Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Nanchong</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Xiaoke Hu, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Ebrahim Hadavi, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Iran; Dimitrios Tsaltas, Cyprus University of Technology, Cyprus; Qing Zhang, South China Agricultural University, China</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Ping Li, <email>lpyzm@sina.cn</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Microbiotechnology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>07</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>735767</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>03</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>20</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2021 Li, You, Du, Lu, Zuo, Zhao, Wang, Yan and Chen.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Li, You, Du, Lu, Zuo, Zhao, Wang, Yan and Chen</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>As unconventional forage source, mulberry (<italic>Morus alba</italic> L.) has been cultivated to alleviate animal feed shortages. This study aimed to investigate the effects of N fertilization during cultivation and <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> inoculation at ensiling on the chemical composition and bacterial community of mulberry silage. Mulberry was separately cultivated under two N fertilization rates (N1, 390 kg/ha/year; N2, 485 kg/ha/year) in 2016&#x2013;2019, harvested on 30 April (the first-cut) and 15 June (the second-cut) in 2019, and then chopped for producing small bag silage. The silage was treated without (control) or with <italic>L. plantarum</italic> (LP, a recommended application rate of 10<sup>5</sup> cfu/g on fresh matter basis). After storage of 60 days in dark room at ambient temperature, silage was sampled for analysis of chemical and microbial compositions. Higher (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) final pH value and acetic acid content and lower (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) lactic acid content were found in silage of mulberry under N2 fertilization, resulting in more dry matter loss than that under N1 fertilization. Compared with control, inoculation of LP at ensiling increased (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) lactic acid content and decreased (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) final pH value, acetic acid and propionic acid contents of silage, by advancing the dominance of <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> and reducing the abundance of <italic>Enterococcus</italic> and <italic>Enterobacter</italic>. In particular, inoculation of LP at ensiling decreased (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) dry matter loss and butyric acid content of first-cut silage. In conclusion, inoculation of LP at ensiling could reduce the undesirable effects from high N fertilization rate during cultivation on silage quality of mulberry harvested at different growing seasons.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>mulberry</kwd>
<kwd>N fertilization</kwd>
<kwd>silage</kwd>
<kwd>high throughput sequencing</kwd>
<kwd>bacterial community</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="3"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="30"/>
<page-count count="8"/>
<word-count count="6391"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="S1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Mulberry (<italic>Morus alba</italic> L.) is traditionally cultivated for the silkworm production industry in the world (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">S&#x00E1;nchez, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Zhou et al., 2014</xref>). In past decades, mulberry has been used as an unconventional feed in ruminant and non-ruminant production systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Garc&#x00ED;a and Mart&#x00ED;n Mart&#x00ED;n, 2017</xref>), due to its high digestibility, crude protein content and energy and low cell wall content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Kabi and Bareeba, 2008</xref>). In addition, mulberry contains no anti-nutritional factors or toxic compounds (such as tannins or saponins that occur in many legume forages) and high levels of bioactive compounds (such as polysaccharides, polyphenol, and essential amino acids) in leaves and young stems, which are beneficial to animal and subsequently human health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Wang et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Zhao et al., 2015</xref>). However, how to best preserve the nutrients of mulberry at growing seasons is a concerned issue.</p>
<p>Agricultural practices influence field performance, nutritional components and inherent/epiphytic microbial population of forage at harvest, subsequently determining the ensiling process and silage quality. In particular, high N fertilization rate in high-yield cultivation system increases buffer capacity and/or decreases water soluble carbohydrates of crops, which reconstructs bacterial community and increases final pH value and ammonia-N ratio of total N in grass silage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Tremblay et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">King et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Jahanzad et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Lv et al., 2017</xref>). A study from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Namihira et al. (2010)</xref> also indicated that tropical-grass silage fermentation pattern and quality resulted from the differences in microbial communities between the different N fertilization levels. Thus, effects of N fertilization rates during cultivation on silage fermentation and bacterial community of mulberry is worth exploring.</p>
<p>Next generation sequencing could provide a detailed picture of microbial community of silage. Studies from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">He et al. (2019)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Wang et al. (2019)</xref> have described the bacterial community of mulberry leaf silage. However, short sequences with a relatively low taxonomical resolution have limited the classification of microorganisms in the community to the genus level (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Amir et al., 2013</xref>). Recently, the third generation PacBio single-molecule, real-time (SMRT) sequencing was used to depict the bacterial community composition of ryegrass and oat silages, due to its increased sensitivities and accuracy of classification to species level (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Yan et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Du et al., 2021</xref>). It is helpful to apply the PacBio SMRT sequencing to better explore the bacterial community composition and species diversity of mulberry silage.</p>
<p>In addition, additives were used in production of mulberry silage, mainly including lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculants (<italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> or <italic>Lactobacillus casei</italic>), sucrose, cellulase, propionic acid, and gallic acid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">He et al., 2019</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Wang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Zhang et al., 2019</xref>). However, little information is on additive-treated silage of mulberry under different N fertilization rates. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to investigate the interactive effects of N fertilization during cultivation and LAB inoculation at ensiling on the chemical and microbial compositions of mulberry silage. Inoculation of <italic>L. plantarum</italic> at ensiling is widely used in preservation of silage nutrients, because it could compensate undesirable effects from agricultural practice in silage production. We supposed that (1) high N fertilization rate during cultivation exerted a negative effect on preservation of silage nutrients; (2) <italic>L. plantarum</italic> inoculation at ensiling enhanced the fermentation of mulberry silage by shifting bacterial community.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>Experiment Site and Forage Cultivation</title>
<p>Six filed plots (3 m &#x00D7; 5 m) were designed to cultivate mulberry (Chuansisang No. 1) at the experimental base (E 106&#x00B0;12&#x2032;, N 31&#x00B0;11&#x2032;; altitude, 280 m) of Sericultural Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchong, China, in 2016. The soil is featured by pH of 7.5, organic matter of 42.8 g/kg, available N of 178.8 g/kg, available K of 163.7 g/kg and available P of 11.9 g/kg. Mulberry plant density was 105,000 plants/ha. In March of 2017&#x223C;2019, three of the plots were fertilized with N1 (N:P:K = 390:500:132, kg/ha/year), and the others were fertilizer with N2 (N:P:K = 485:500:132, kg/ha/year). Urea, calcium magnesium phosphate, and potassium sulfate were used as N, P, and K fertilizers. N and K fertilizers were separately divided into four equal portions; the first portion was fertilized after sprouting of mulberry, and the other portions were fertilized equally after the first-, second-, and third-harvests of mulberry; there was no fertilization after the fourth harvest of mulberry. P fertilizer was divided into two equal portions, and separately applied after the second- and fourth-harvests of mulberry. Irrigation was timely conducted when no rain occurred for more than 2 weeks. Each plot was weeded manually in time after each harvest of mulberry forage. The fresh yield of mulberry in 2017&#x2013;2019 was 74.45&#x2013;84.93 t/hm<sup>2</sup>, with stem-to-leaf ratios of 0.55&#x2013;0.72. The first 2 year-data on field performance and chemical components of forage mulberry was partly reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Wang et al. (2020)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>Silage Preparation</title>
<p>Mulberry from each plot was harvested on 30 April (the first-cut) and 15 June (the second-cut), 29 July (the third-cut), and 29 September (the fourth-cut) in 2017&#x2013;2019, respectively. Preliminary data (not shown in article) in 2017&#x2013;2018 illustrated that good fermentation occurred to the second- and third-cut mulberry silages. In 2019, thus, the first-cut and second-cut mulberry in each plot was chopped to a length of 1.0&#x2013;2.0 cm, and randomly divided into 2 equal portions for additive treatments. The ensiling materials were treated with no additive as control (CK) or with <italic>L. plantarum</italic> [LP, a recommended application rate of 10<sup>5</sup> cfu/g on fresh matter (FM) basis, isolated from natural fermented-silage in our laboratory]. Each silo bag contained approximately 1 kg (FM) of forage mulberry, and a total of 24 silo bags (2 cut &#x00D7; 2 N fertilization &#x00D7; 2 treatments &#x00D7; 3 replicates) were sealed under the anaerobic condition, stored at room temperature for 60 days, and then sampled for chemical and microbial analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>Chemical Composition Analysis</title>
<p>Each sample of 20 g was mixed with 180 mL sterile water, mixed homogeneously for 1 min in a laboratory juicer, and then filtered through four layers of cheesecloth. The filtrate was subjected to centrifugation (4500 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic>, 15 min, 4&#x00B0;C). The supernatant was used to measure pH, ammonia-N, and organic acid. The pH was determined by pH meter. Ammonia nitrogen (NH<sub>3</sub>-N) was determined by the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Broderick and Kang (1980)</xref>. Lactic, acetic, propionic, and butyric acids were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Li et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Each sample of about 300 g was dried at 65&#x00B0;C to a constant weight to determine dry matter (DM) content, and then ground through 0.20 mm sieve for analysis of crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and water carbohydrate (WSC). CP was determined by the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">AOAC (1990)</xref>. Both NDF and ADF were determined using an ANKOM 2000 fiber analyzer (ANKOM Technology, Fairport, NY, United States) by the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Van Soest et al. (1991)</xref>. WSC was determined by the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">McDonald et al. (1991)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS4">
<title>Microbial Composition Analysis</title>
<p>Microbial population in each sample was determined by the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Cai et al. (1999)</xref>. In brief, each sample of 10 g was mixed with 90 mL sterile saline, shaken for 30 min and then filtered through sterile gauze. Serial dilutions were produced. Both MRS agar and nutrient agar medium from Land Bridge Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China were incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 48&#x2013;72 h, to separately count LAB and aerobic bacteria. Enterobacteria was counted on Violet Red Bile (HBO116-5, Qingdao Hope Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) incubated at 30&#x00B0;C for 36 h. Yeasts were numbered on malt extract agar with 1.5 mg/L Tetracycline (CM173, Land Bridge Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), incubated at 28&#x00B0;C for 48 h. Yeasts were distinguished from molds based on colony appearance and cell morphology. Counts of LAB, aerobic bacteria, enterobacteria and yeasts of each silage sample were estimated as log<sub>10</sub> cfu/g of FM.</p>
<p>The silage bacterial community analysis based on third generation sequencing technology was described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen et al. (2020)</xref>. The total DNA from each sample was extracted by Mag-MK Bacterial Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). DNA after purification was diluted to 1 ng/mL using sterile water. The full-length 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene was amplified using specific primer (27F and 1514R) with barcode (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Yan et al., 2019</xref>). The PCR reaction was carried out with TransStart<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> FastPfu DNA Polymerase (TransGen Biotech). PCR products were mixed at the equal density ratio and purified with QIAquick<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN). Libraries were generated using SMRTbellTM Template Prep Kit (PacBio) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s recommendations, assessed on the Qubit<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and FEMTO Pulse system, and then sequenced on the PacBio Sequel platform. The raw sequences were processed as the procedure stated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Yan et al. (2019)</xref>. Sequences analysis was performed by Uparse software (Uparse v7.0.1001)<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote1">1</xref></sup>. Sequences with &#x2265;97% similarity were assigned to the same operational taxonomic unit (OTU). SSUrRNA Database of Silva Database<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote2">2</xref></sup> was used to annotate taxonomic Information of each representative sequence. After normalization of OTUs abundance information, the alpha diversity indices in each sample were calculated with QIIME (Version 1.9.1) and displayed with R software (Version 2.15.3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS5">
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>Factorial analysis of variance was applied to the results with N fertilization (N) during cultivation and additive (A) at ensiling and their interaction (N &#x00D7; A) with harvest-cut as a random effect, in the General Line Model of SPSS (SPSS 25.0 program SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). Differences were considered significant only when the probability level was lower than 0.05 (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results|discussion" id="S3">
<title>Results and Discussion</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>Chemical Composition and Microbial Population of Fresh Mulberry</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, high N fertilization rate increased slightly the WSC, CP, NDF, and ADF contents of mulberry. This indicated that high N fertilization facilitated the accumulations of nutritional components of mulberry. Moreover, the chemical composition of mulberry changed between two harvest cuts. Similar situation was found and explained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Garc&#x00ED;a and Mart&#x00ED;n Mart&#x00ED;n (2017)</xref> who reported that high temperature and more light in summer advances the maturity of mulberry with more accumulation of photosynthetic products than in spring. Theoretically, the WSC concentration (&#x003E;3% DM) of mulberry was sufficient for initiating LAB propagation and subsequent lactic acid fermentation during ensiling. In the present study, however, relatively high buffer capacity (257&#x223C;352 mEq/kg DM) and distributions of aerobic bacteria (6.17&#x223C;7.26 log<sub>10</sub> cfu/g FM), enterobacteria (4.28&#x223C;5.69 log<sub>10</sub> cfu/g FM), and yeasts (3.63&#x223C;4.85 log<sub>10</sub> cfu/g FM) on fresh mulberry may limit the rate and extent of lactic acid fermentation during ensiling. Thus, fast-increasing dominance of LAB may be effective for producing high-quality mulberry silage.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Chemical composition and microbial population of fresh forage mulberry.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Forage source</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>N</italic> level<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn1">&#x2020;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">DM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">WSC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NDF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ADF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Buffer capacity</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">LAB</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Aerobic bacteria</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Enterobacteria</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Yeasts</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="4"><hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3"><hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">g/kg FW</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="4">g/kg DM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">mEq/kg DM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">log 10 cfu/g FM</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">First cut</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">N1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">231.0 &#x00B1; 1.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">68.7 &#x00B1; 4.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">389 &#x00B1; 31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">193 &#x00B1; 12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">158.2 &#x00B1; 1.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">341.06 &#x00B1; 6.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">N2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">244.0 &#x00B1; 2.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78.0 &#x00B1; 3.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">400 &#x00B1; 43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">214 &#x00B1; 14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">165.5 &#x00B1; 2.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">352.31 &#x00B1; 4.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Second cut</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">N1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">265.5 &#x00B1; 2.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55.2 &#x00B1; 2.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">438 &#x00B1; 29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">231 &#x00B1; 13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">181.5 &#x00B1; 2.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">275.22 &#x00B1; 5.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">N2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">286.4 &#x00B1; 1.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60.9 &#x00B1; 5.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">445 &#x00B1; 31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">249 &#x00B1; 15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">193.9 &#x00B1; 2.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">286.37 &#x00B1; 6.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SEM</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>P</italic>-value</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.021</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.038</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.452</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.016</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn1"><p><italic>&#x2020;Application rate of N fertilization during cultivation was N1 (390 kg/ha/year) and N2 (485 kg/ha/year). ADF, acid detergent fiber expressed inclusive of residual ash; AN, ammonia-N; CP, crude protein; DM, dry matter, FW, fresh weight; NDF, neutral detergent fiber assayed with a heat stable amylase and expressed inclusive of residual ash; SEM, standard of error mean; TN, total nitrogen; WSC, water soluble carbohydrates.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>Chemical Composition of Mulberry Silage</title>
<p>The chemical composition of mulberry silage is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. High N fertilization rate during cultivation increased CP content of second-cut mulberry silage by 9.16&#x223C;10.89% in relative to low N fertilization. Similar situation was observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Macome et al. (2017)</xref> who reported that the high N fertilization rate during cultivation increased CP content of ryegrass silage by 32&#x223C;63%. However, high N fertilization during cultivation increased DM loss by 7.89&#x223C;46.08% for first-cut silage and 17.08&#x223C;53.20% for second-cut silage. We speculated that heavy presence of microorganisms such aerobic bacteria, enterobacteria, and yeasts (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>) on the fresh mulberry under high N fertilization respired dramatically at early stage of ensiling for a carbon release in form of CO<sub>2</sub>, resulting in an increase in DM loss. Some LAB strains were applied in producing mulberry leaf silage, e.g., <italic>L. plantarum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Zhang et al., 2019</xref>). Under high N fertilization rate, however, inoculation of LP at ensiling increased residual WSC content of silage by 8.23&#x2013;11.47%. Furthermore, inoculation of LP at ensiling reduced DM loss of silage. These confirmed that inoculation of LP at ensiling was helpful to preserve nutrients of mulberry silage.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Chemical composition of paper mulberry silage.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N level<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2a">&#x2020;</xref> (N)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Additive<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2b">&#x2021;</xref> (A)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">DM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">DM loss</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">WSC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NDF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ADF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">LA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">PA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">BA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Final</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="8"><hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">g/kg FW</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">g/kg DM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="8">g/kg DM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">pH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">g/kg TN</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>First cut</bold></td>
<td valign="top" colspan="13"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">227c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.1ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.7e</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">147.7b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">398c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">205c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.7ef</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.0b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.9a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.80b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">160.8ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">LP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">231c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.7c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.5d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">150.4b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">401c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">204c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.0c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.1d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.9b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.59c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">142.1b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">234c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.5a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.0e</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">141.5b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">407bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">228bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.7f</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.9a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.9a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.0a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.04a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">181.5a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">LP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">246c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.7bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.6d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">150.4b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.1bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">229bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.4de</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.9cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.2d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.5b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.65c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">174.3a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><bold>Second cut</bold></td>
<td valign="top" colspan="12"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">271b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.1bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.0c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">153.3b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">458a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">243ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.9c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.3a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.4bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.82b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">112.7c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">LP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">272b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.3c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.1b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">156.1b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">465a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">243ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.7a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.9cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.36d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.5c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">291a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.9b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.9c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">170.7a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">445ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">256a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.2d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.1a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.1bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.90ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">113.2c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">LP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">294a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.1bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.6a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">170.4a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">454a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">251ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.4b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.5bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.41d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">114.5c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SEM</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><bold>Significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" colspan="12"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><italic>N</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.086</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.024</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.926</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.006</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.018</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.023</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.007</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2">A</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.611</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.052</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.123</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.548</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.834</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.056</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2">N &#x00D7; A</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.121</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.145</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.099</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.461</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.929</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.836</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.051</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.259</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.099</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.168</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.168</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn2a"><p><italic>&#x2020;Application rate of N fertilization during cultivation was N1 (390 kg/ha/year) and N2 (485 kg/ha/year).</italic></p></fn>
<fn id="tfn2b"><p><italic>&#x2021;Silages treated without (CK) or with <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> (LP).</italic></p></fn>
<fn id="tfn2c"><p><italic>AA, acetic acid; ADF, acid detergent fiber expressed inclusive of residual ash; AN, ammonia-N; BA, butyric acid; CP, crude protein; DM, dry matter; FW, fresh weight; LA, lactic acid; ND, no detected; NDF, neutral detergent fiber assayed with a heat stable amylase and expressed inclusive of residual ash; SEM, standard of error mean; TN, total nitrogen; WSC, water soluble carbohydrates; PA, propionic acid.</italic></p></fn>
<fn id="tfn2d"><p><italic>Values with different letters in the same column are significantly different (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Under high N fertilization, silage also exhibited higher levels of final pH, ammonia-N and acetic acid and lower level of lactic acid than that under low N fertilization (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). Similar results were from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Namihira et al. (2010)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Lv et al. (2017)</xref> who reported that final pH value, lactic acid concentration and ammonia-N ratio of total N were increased in silages of tropical-grass at high N fertilization rates. However, there was little effect of N fertilization on the fermentation degree of perennial ryegrass (<italic>Lolium perenne</italic> cv. Gandalf), Italian ryegrass (<italic>Lolium multiflorum</italic> cv. Prospect), tall fescue (<italic>Festuca arundinacea</italic> cv. Fuego), cocksfoot (orchardgrass, <italic>Dactylis glomerata</italic> cv. Pizza), timothy (<italic>Phleum pratense</italic> cv. Erecta), and corn silages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Lawrence et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">King et al., 2013</xref>). The inconsistence in silage fermentation parameters under different N fertilizations is difficult to explain.</p>
<p>The first-cut silage showed a high level of butyric acid, accompanied by acetic acid formation. Butyric acid is an indicator of undesirable silage fermentation, as it may result in nutrient loss and low feed intake by ruminants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">McDonald et al., 1991</xref>). The most common (natural) way of inhibiting butyric acid fermentation is the promotion of lactic acid-dominant fermentation to reduce the pH or increasing the DM of material to be ensiled (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Namihira et al., 2010</xref>). <italic>L. plantarum</italic>, as an important LAB for silage fermentation, is mainly responsible for the simultaneous accumulation of lactate and generally inhibiting the butyrate production of silage. Inoculation of LP at ensiling decreased butyric acid of mulberry silage by 30.77&#x2013;50.00%. Similar result was observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Zhang et al. (2019)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>Microbial Composition of Mulberry Silage</title>
<p>The fermentation of mulberry silage is determined by microbes during ensiling. According to studies from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">He et al. (2019)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Wang et al. (2019)</xref>, LAB and yeasts were predominant populations, and other undesirable microorganisms decreased below the detection limit (&#x003C;2.0 log cfu/g FM) at the final stage of fermentation in high-moist (&#x003E;75%) mulberry leaf silage. In the present study, however, mulberry silage exhibited relatively high counts of enterobacteria, aerobic bacteria, and yeasts (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>), which suggested that the fermentation of mulberry silage is incomplete. However, inoculation of LP at ensiling reduced aerobic bacteria population.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Microbial population of silage treated without (CK) or with <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> (LP). Application of N fertilizations during cultivation was N1 (390 kg/ha/year) and N2 (485 kg/ha/year). Bar in each column represented standard error of mean.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-735767-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Microbial community could reflect the silage quality. In this study, the species diversity and bacterial community composition of LP-inoculated silage of mulberry under different N fertilization rates were reported by the PacBio SMRT sequencing technology for the first time. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>, the coverage of &#x003E;0.97 indicated that most of bacteria were detected in silage. We observed that the alpha-diversity varied among silage samples. A high number (97&#x223C;421) of observed species was found in second-cut silages. A study from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Carvalho-Estrada et al. (2020)</xref> demonstrated that silage pH is determinant factor affecting bacterial community composition. The pH value of 4.36&#x223C;5.04 in mulberry silage mass was relatively high, which did not exert an inhibitory effect on the growth of most bacteria during ensiling. High N fertilization rate increased bacterial diversity index of Shannon and richness index of ACE, which confirmed that relatively high buffer capacity also promote the growth of most bacteria in mulberry silage. Inoculation of LP at ensiling reduced bacterial alpha-diversity indices of mulberry silage. This was in accordance with the results from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">He et al. (2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Wang et al. (2019)</xref>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Zhang et al. (2019)</xref> who reported that the quick pH decline from acid production at the early stage of ensiling accelerated the disappearance of undesirable microorganisms in LAB-inoculated mulberry silage, resulting in a lower bacterial alpha-diversity as compared with control silage.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>Bacterial alpha-diversity indices of forage mulberry silage.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N level<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn3a">&#x2020;</xref> (N)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Additive<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn3b">&#x2021;</xref> (A)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Clean reads</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Observed species</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Shannon</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Chao 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Coverage</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><bold>First cut</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5286</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.998</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">LP</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7063</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.998</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6619</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.997</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">LP</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6539</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.997</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><bold>Second cut</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5753</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">125</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">166.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.984</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">LP</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6091</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">140.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.987</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6442</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">421</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1267.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.985</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">LP</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5926</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">244</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">594.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.974</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SEM</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">23</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn3a"><p><italic>&#x2020;Application of N fertilizations during cultivation was N1 (390 kg/ha/year) and N2 (485 kg/ha/year).</italic></p></fn>
<fn id="tfn3b"><p><italic>&#x2021;Silages treated without (CK) or with <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> (LP).</italic></p></fn>
<fn id="tfn3c"><p><italic>SEM, standard of error mean.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In the present study, <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> (20.32&#x223C;85.27%), <italic>Enterococcus</italic> (0.72&#x223C;34.41%), and <italic>Enterobacter</italic> (2.62&#x223C;24.93%) were the first three genera in mulberry silage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Wang et al. (2019)</xref> reported that the major genera in mulberry silage were <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>, followed by <italic>Exiguobacterium</italic> and <italic>Acinetobacter</italic>, with a total relative abundance of &#x003E;30%. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">He et al. (2020)</xref> found that <italic>Clostridium</italic> (21.1%), <italic>Kosakonia</italic> (38.3%), and <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> (8.9%) were heavily distributed in mulberry silage. We speculated that differences in the first three dominances of bacterial genera in mulberry silage were determined by ensiling materials, storage period or sampling time in different climate regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Carvalho-Estrada et al., 2020</xref>). As reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Zhang et al. (2019)</xref>, inoculation of LP at ensiling of mulberry increased the dominance of <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> by 7.39&#x223C;96.99%. However, <italic>Enterobacter</italic> was also heavily distributed in silage, especially for silage of second-cut mulberry under low N fertilization rate, with relative abundance of 23.22&#x223C;34.41%. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Du et al. (2021)</xref> reported that <italic>Enterobacter</italic> and <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> determined fermentation quality of natural fermented-paper mulberry silage. Additives such as gallic acid, sucrose and exogenous LAB could shift the main microbes from <italic>Enterobacter</italic> to <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Wang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">He et al., 2020</xref>). And, a study from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Cai et al. (1999)</xref> showed that inoculation of homo-fermentative LAB at ensiling promote the disappearance of <italic>Enterobacter</italic> species at the early stage and reduction of <italic>Lactobacillus buchneri</italic> dominance at the late stage of ensiling, resulting in lower acetic acid content of silage relative to control. <italic>Enterococcus</italic> species just occurred at initial stage, and competed out by more acid-resistant LAB at late stage of fermentation in well-preserved silage. Therefore, the high proportion (22.27&#x223C;24.39%) of <italic>Enterococcus</italic> species indicates incomplete-fermentation in silage of second-cut mulberry under low N fertilization rate.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Relative abundance of top five genera <bold>(A)</bold> and species <bold>(B)</bold> in silage treated without (CK) or with <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> (LP). Application of N fertilizations during cultivation was N1 (390 kg/ha/year) and N2 (485 kg/ha/year).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-735767-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>A good correlation between silage fermentation parameters and relative abundance of main microbial species was found in previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Du et al., 2021</xref>). In the present study, there existed significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) correlations between relative abundance of <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> and chemical compositions of silage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). Positive correlation (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) in silage was found between DM content and relative abundances of <italic>Enterococcus</italic> and <italic>Enterobacter</italic>. This indicated low moisture in silage mass facilitated the growth of <italic>Enterococcus</italic> and <italic>Enterobacter</italic>, and an incomplete fermentation occurred in the first-cut silage. Under low N fertilization rate, <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> species accounted for a small proportion (&#x003C;50%) in control silage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). It was generally recognized that the increased dominance of <italic>L. plantarum</italic> facilitated the production of lactic acid and the reduction of acetic acid, resulting in a low pH and ammonia-N and/or butyric acid content. Thus, inoculation of LP at ensiling resulted in the increased dominance of <italic>L. plantarum</italic> in silage by 8.78&#x223C;163.41%. Similar situation was also observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Fija&#x0142;kowska et al. (2020)</xref> who reported a high proportion of <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> species in total bacteria was in LAB-inoculated grass silage. In this study, <italic>L. buchneri</italic> as a hetero-fermentative LAB promoted WSC consumption and acetic acid production to increase pH and ammonia-N levels of silage. An opposite trend occurred to <italic>Lactobacillus mellis</italic> in mulberry silage.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Spearman correlation between chemical compositions and relative abundances of top five genera and species in silage. &#x002A;<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-735767-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="S4">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>High N fertilization rate during high-density cultivation stimulated accumulation of acetic acid and reduction of lactic acid in mulberry silage, with high pH and ammonia-N levels. SMRT result showed that <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>, <italic>Enterobacter</italic>, and <italic>Enterococcus</italic> were the main bacterial genera in mulberry silage. Inoculation of LP at ensiling enhanced silage fermentation through increasing lactic acid content and decreasing final pH value and acetic acid content. In addition, inoculation of LP at ensiling reduced species diversity and reconstituted bacterial community composition of mulberry silage. Generally, our research confirmed that LP as a microbial additive exhibited high potential for producing and stabilizing high-quality silage of mulberry under different N fertilizations.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="S5">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="S7">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="S8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was financially supported by the Sichuan Program for Key Research and Development (2019YFN0022) and Guizhou Talent Base of Grassland Ecological Animal Husbandry (RCJD2018-13).</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amir</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeisel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zuk</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elgart</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stern</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shamir</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>High-resolution microbial community reconstruction by integrating short reads from multiple 16S rRNA regions.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>41</volume>:<issue>e205</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkt1070</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24214960</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>AOAC</collab> (<year>1990</year>). <source><italic>Official Methods of Analysis.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Arlington</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Association of Official Analytical Chemists</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Broderick</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media<sup>1</sup>.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Dairy Sci.</italic></source> <volume>63</volume> <fpage>64</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>75</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82888-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benno</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ogawa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumai</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage crops on fermentation characteristics and aerobic deterioration of silage.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Dairy Sci.</italic></source> <volume>82</volume> <fpage>520</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>526</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75263-X</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carvalho-Estrada</surname> <given-names>P. D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fernandes</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Da Silva</surname> <given-names>&#x00C9;B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tizioto</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paziani</surname> <given-names>S. D. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effects of hybrid, kernel maturity, and storage period on the bacterial community in high-moisture and rehydrated corn grain silages.</article-title> <source><italic>Syst. Appl. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>43</volume>:<issue>126131</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.syapm.2020.126131</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32866836</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>You</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effect of wet sea buckthorn pomace utilized as an additive on silage fermentation profile and bacterial community composition of alfalfa.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresource Technol.</italic></source> <volume>314</volume>:<issue>123773</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123773</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32645569</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Exploring microbial community structure and metabolic gene clusters during silage fermentation of paper mulberry, a high-protein woody plant.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim. Feed Sci. Tech.</italic></source> <volume>275</volume>:<issue>114766</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114766</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fija&#x0142;kowska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Przemieniecki</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Purwin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lipi&#x0144;ski</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kurowski</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karwowska</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The effect of an additive containing three <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> species on the fermentation pattern and microbiological status of silage.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Sci. Food. Agr.</italic></source> <volume>100</volume> <fpage>1174</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1184</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.10126</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31696525</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Garc&#x00ED;a</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x00ED;n Mart&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Biomass yield and nutrient content of a tropical mulberry forage bank: effects of season, harvest frequency and fertilization rate.</article-title> <source><italic>Grass Forage Sci.</italic></source> <volume>72</volume> <fpage>248</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>260</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gfs.12227</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Gallic acid influencing fermentation quality, nitrogen distribution and bacterial community of high-moisture mulberry leaves and stylo silage.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresource Technol.</italic></source> <volume>295</volume>:<issue>122255</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122255</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31639626</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effect of cellulase and <italic>Lactobacillus casei</italic> on ensiling characteristics, chemical composition, antioxidant activity, and digestibility of mulberry leaf silage.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Dairy Sci.</italic></source> <volume>102</volume> <fpage>9919</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9931</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2019-16468</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31447142</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jahanzad</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sadeghpour</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hosseini</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barker</surname> <given-names>A. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hashemi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zandvakili</surname> <given-names>O. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Silage yield and nutritive value of millet&#x2013;soybean intercrops as influenced by nitrogen application.</article-title> <source><italic>Agron. J.</italic></source> <volume>106</volume> <fpage>1993</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2000</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj13.0542</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kabi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bareeba</surname> <given-names>F. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Herbage biomass production and nutritive value of mulberry (<italic>Morus alba</italic>) and Calliandra calothyrsus harvested at different cutting frequencies.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim. Feed Sci. Tech.</italic></source> <volume>140</volume> <fpage>178</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>190</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.02.011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>King</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McEniry</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x2019;Kiely</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Silage fermentation characteristics of grass species grown under two nitrogen fertilizer inputs and harvested at advancing maturity in the spring growth.</article-title> <source><italic>Grassl. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>59</volume> <fpage>30</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/grs.12011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lawrence</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ketterings</surname> <given-names>Q. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cherney</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Effect of nitrogen application on yield and quality of silage corn after forage legume-grass.</article-title> <source><italic>Agron. J.</italic></source> <volume>100</volume> <fpage>73</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>79</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj2007.0071</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Silage fermentation and bacterial community of bur clover, annual ryegrass and their mixtures prepared with microbial inoculant and chemical additive.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim. Feed Sci. Tech.</italic></source> <volume>247</volume> <fpage>285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>293</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.11.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Sabagh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Obitsu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sugino</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kurokawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kawamura</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and harvesting stage on photosynthetic pigments and phytol contents of Italian ryegrass silage.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim. Sci. J.</italic></source> <volume>88</volume> <fpage>1513</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1522</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/asj.12810</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28436168</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Macome</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pellikaan</surname> <given-names>W. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schonewille</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bannink</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Laar</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hendriks</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title><italic>In vitro</italic> rumen gas and methane production of grass silages differing in plant maturity and nitrogen fertilisation, compared to <italic>in vivo</italic> enteric methane production.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim. Feed Sci. Tech.</italic></source> <volume>230</volume> <fpage>96</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>102</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.04.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McDonald</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henderson</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heron</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <source><italic>The Biochemistry of Silage.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Marlow</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Chalcombe Publications</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Namihira</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shinzato</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akamine</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maekawa</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matsui</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Influence of nitrogen fertilization on tropical-grass silage assessed by ensiling process monitoring using chemical and microbial community analyses.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Appl. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>108</volume> <fpage>1954</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1965</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04591.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19912430</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>S&#x00E1;nchez</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Mulberry: an exceptional forage available almost worldwide.</article-title> <source><italic>World Anim. Rev.</italic></source> <volume>93</volume> <fpage>36</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tremblay</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x00E9;langer</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drapeau</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen fertilizer application and developmental stage affect silage quality of timothy (<italic>Phleum pratense</italic> L.).</article-title> <source><italic>Grass Forage Sci.</italic></source> <volume>60</volume> <fpage>337</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>355</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2494.2005.00483.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Soest</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Dairy Sci.</italic></source> <volume>74</volume> <fpage>3583</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3597</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zuo</surname> <given-names>Y. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The influence of high planting density herbal cultivating on yield and quality of whole-plant mulberry (<italic>Morus alba</italic> L.).</article-title> <source><italic>Pratacult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>37</volume> <fpage>952</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>962</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2019-0445</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bo</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Nutrient composition, polyphenolic contents, and in situ protein degradation kinetics of leaves from three mulberry species.</article-title> <source><italic>Livest. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>146</volume> <fpage>203</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.livsci.2012.03.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The bacterial community and fermentation quality of mulberry (<italic>Morus alba</italic>) leaf silage with or without <italic>Lactobacillus casei</italic> and sucrose.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresource Technol.</italic></source> <volume>293</volume>:<issue>122059</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122059</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31476563</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Microbial community and fermentation characteristic of Italian ryegrass silage prepared with corn stover and lactic acid bacteria.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresource Technol.</italic></source> <volume>279</volume> <fpage>166</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>173</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.107</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30721817</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Fermentation quality and aerobic stability of mulberry silage prepared with lactic acid bacteria and propionic acid.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim. Sci. J.</italic></source> <volume>90</volume> <fpage>513</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>522</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/asj.13181</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30773737</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effects of mulberry (<italic>Morus alba</italic> L.) leaf polysaccharides on growth performance, diarrhea, blood parameters, and gut microbiota of early-weanling pigs.</article-title> <source><italic>Livest. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>177</volume> <fpage>88</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.livsci.2015.03.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Effect of ensiled mulberry leaves and sun-dried mulberry fruit pomace on finishing steer growth performance, blood biochemical parameters, and carcass characteristics.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>e85406</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0085406</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24427304</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<glossary>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<def-list id="DL1">
<def-item><term>AA</term><def><p>acetic acid</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>ADF</term><def><p>acid detergent fiber expressed inclusive of residual ash</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>aNDF</term><def><p>neutral detergent fiber assayed with a heat-stable amylase and expressed inclusive of residual ash</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>BA</term><def><p>butyric acid</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>CK</term><def><p>control</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>CP</term><def><p>crude protein</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>DM</term><def><p>dry matter</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>FM</term><def><p>fresh matter</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>FW</term><def><p>fresh weight</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>LA</term><def><p>lactic acid</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>LAB</term><def><p>lactic acid bacteria</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>LP</term><def><p><italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic></p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>NGS</term><def><p>next generation sequencing</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>OTU</term><def><p>operational taxonomic unit</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>PA</term><def><p>propionic acid</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>SEM</term><def><p>standard error of mean</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>WSC</term><def><p>water soluble carbohydrates.</p></def></def-item>
</def-list>
</glossary>
<fn-group>
<fn id="footnote1">
<label>1</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://drive5.com/uparse/">http://drive5.com/uparse/</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="footnote2">
<label>2</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.arb-silva.de/">https://www.arb-silva.de/</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>