<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.729244</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Sheltering Role of Well-Decayed Conifer Logs for Forest Floor Fungi in Long-Term Polluted Boreal Forests</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Mikryukov</surname> <given-names>Vladimir S.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/977869/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Dulya</surname> <given-names>Olesya V.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bergman</surname> <given-names>Igor E.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lihodeevskiy</surname> <given-names>Georgiy A.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Loginova</surname> <given-names>Anzhelika D.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Tedersoo</surname> <given-names>Leho</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/437119/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Yekaterinburg</addr-line>, <country>Russia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Botany, Chair of Mycology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Tartu</addr-line>, <country>Estonia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Ural State Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Yekaterinburg</addr-line>, <country>Russia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Mycology and Microbiology Center, University of Tartu</institution>, <addr-line>Tartu</addr-line>, <country>Estonia</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Yongchun Li, Zhejiang A&#x0026;F University, China</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Samantha Chandranath Karunarathna, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China; Bing Yang, Sichuan Academy of Giant Panda, China; Muhammad Fahad Sardar, Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), China</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Vladimir S. Mikryukov, <email>vmikryukov@gmail.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn002"><p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>ORCID: Vladimir S. Mikryukov, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2786-2690">orcid.org/0000-0003-2786-2690</ext-link>; Olesya V. Dulya, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7185-8659">orcid.org/0000-0002-7185-8659</ext-link>; Igor E. Bergman, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5587-3840">orcid.org/0000-0002-5587-3840</ext-link>; Georgiy A. Lihodeevskiy, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2616-5199">orcid.org/0000-0003-2616-5199</ext-link>; Leho Tedersoo, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1635-1249">orcid.org/0000-0002-1635-1249</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Terrestrial Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>06</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>729244</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>22</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>14</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2021 Mikryukov, Dulya, Bergman, Lihodeevskiy, Loginova and Tedersoo.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Mikryukov, Dulya, Bergman, Lihodeevskiy, Loginova and Tedersoo</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Coarse woody debris (CWD) provides food and shelter to a large proportion of forest biota and is considered vital for biodiversity during periods of harsh weather. However, its importance in long-term stressed ecosystems remains largely unknown. In this work, we explored the contribution of CWD to fungal diversity along the gradient of boreal forest degradation caused by 77 years of heavy industrial emissions. We analyzed the diversity and composition of fungi in 270 samples of well-decayed <italic>Picea abies</italic> and <italic>Abies sibirica</italic> logs, as well as forest litter both adjacent to and distant from the logs. Compared with forest litter, the wood had higher water content and possessed substantially lower concentrations of heavy metals, which suggests its potential favorability for biota in polluted areas. The pollution-induced loss of fungal diversity in forest litter reached 34% and was stronger in the microhabitats not influenced by CWD. Meanwhile, wood fungal communities lost less than 10% of their total richness and even increased in alpha diversity. These processes led to the diversity and compositional convergence of fungal communities from different microhabitats and substrates in polluted areas. Despite this, the importance of wood and CWD-influenced microhabitats for fungal diversity maintenance was low. Apart from wood-associated fungi, the taxa whose diversity increased in the wood of polluted areas were ectomycorrhizal fungi and eurytopic soil saprotrophs (Mucoromycota, Mortierellomycota, Eurotiomycetes, and Helotiales) that easily tolerate highly toxic litter. Within the majority of pollution-sensitive soil saprotrophic groups, only terricolous Tricholomataceae benefit from CWD as microrefugia. Upon considering the ecological variability within low-rank taxa, the importance of decayed logs as safe sites can be high for certain soil-inhabiting fungal groups in polluted areas.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>coarse woody debris</kwd>
<kwd>diversity maintenance</kwd>
<kwd>environmental pollution</kwd>
<kwd>fungi</kwd>
<kwd>heavy metal</kwd>
<kwd>metabarcoding</kwd>
<kwd>soil</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Russian Foundation for Basic Research<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100002261</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="9"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="106"/>
<page-count count="19"/>
<word-count count="14186"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>In natural unmanaged boreal forests, coarse woody debris (CWD) accounts for substantially more than 50% of forest floor detritus mass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Grier and Logan, 1977</xref>). It is essential for highly diverse saproxylic biota (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Lassauce et al., 2011</xref>) and provides food, shelter, and opportunities for reproduction among other ecological guilds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Harmon et al., 1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Tedersoo et al., 2003</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Koch et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Fukasawa, 2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2016</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Stokland et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Dittrich et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Checko et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>Fungi are among the principal decomposers and inhabitants of deadwood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Stokland et al., 2012</xref>). Until the latest stages of decay, the CWD fungal community is dominated by mycelial wood decomposers accompanied by fungicolous species and yeasts foraging on the products of wood degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baldrian et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">M&#x00E4;kip&#x00E4;&#x00E4; et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Lepinay et al., 2021</xref>). Root symbionts and endophytes, predatory fungi, as well as endo- and ectosymbionts of saproxylic arthropods, are revealed in wood through the course of decomposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Lindahl et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">Tedersoo et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Fukasawa, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Ottosson, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Ottosson et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Birkemoe et al., 2018</xref>). Upon approaching soil humus in structure and chemical composition, CWD becomes more and more inhabited by saprotrophic soil fungi as well as soil animals and plant roots accompanied by their fungal symbionts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Stokland et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Persson et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">M&#x00E4;kip&#x00E4;&#x00E4; et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">Vorobeichik et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Influencing the surroundings directly (e.g., due to water retention, shadowing, and leaching) and indirectly (e.g., through the extended mycelium of wood decomposers and activity of wood-dwelling animals), CWD pieces produce around them specific microhabitats essential for certain soil dwellers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Boddy and Watkinson, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Kim et al., 2008</xref>) and ameliorate moisture and temperature fluctuations, creating &#x201C;safety islands&#x201D; for forest floor biota during periods of extreme weather (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Graham, 1925</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Jaeger, 1980</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Boddy, 1983</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Maser and Trappe, 1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Maser et al., 1988</xref>). CWD buffering capability against environmental extremes makes it important for forest biodiversity after tree clearings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Goldin and Hutchinson, 2014</xref>) and suggests its vitality in long-term stressed ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Harmon et al., 1986</xref>). For example, it was shown that CWD ameliorates soil acidification in broad-leaved forests subjected to acid precipitation, thereby favoring mollusks in the surrounding forest litter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Kappes et al., 2007</xref>).</p>
<p>Forests adjacent to large industrial enterprises represent the ecosystems suffering severe long-term stress (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). They are characterized by altered soil pH and extremely high concentrations of metals in the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Dudka and Adriano, 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Kozlov et al., 2009</xref>). Due to the toxic effect of metals aggravated by high soil acidity, soil fungi and bacteria decline in abundance and diversity close to the sources of pollution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Chen et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Mikryukov et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">B&#x00E9;rard et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Mikryukov and Dulya, 2017</xref>), while earthworms, enchytraeids, mollusks, and millipedes are almost absent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bengtsson et al., 1983</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Spurgeon and Hopkin, 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">Vorobeichik, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">Vorobeichik et al., 2020</xref>). It is reasonable to consider any potential &#x201C;safety island&#x201D; mitigating pollution load on biota, maintaining its diversity and functioning, and facilitating its restoration after the load cessation. To our knowledge, there is only one work encountering CWD microrefugial role for soil dwellers, namely, earthworms, in such a strongly damaged ecosystem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">Vorobeichik et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Spruce-fir forests located 1, 2, and 4 km upwind from a large copper smelter in the Central Ural almost completely lack herbaceous layer (the photos are taken at the end of July). Before the smelter was launched 80 years ago, they had been similar to the unaffected forest 30 km from the smelter.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-729244-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To fill this informational gap, we performed the study in one of the best-studied heavily polluted ecosystems in the southern taiga forests of the Urals, which have been affected by a large copper smelter for over 80 years, emitting acid gases and dust with sorbed metals. The smelter annual emissions comprised 150&#x2013;225 Mt up to 1990, leading to a substantial increase of metal content in adjacent soil and biota. Despite the gradual decrease of the emissions to 2&#x2013;3 Mt/year, soil pollution levels remain the same (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">Vorobeichik and Kaigorodova, 2017</xref>). Within the first 2&#x2013;4 km from the chimneys, concentrations of acid-soluble forms of Cu, Pb, Cd, and Zn in soil organic horizons far exceed 3,000, 1,900, 15, and 600 &#x03BC;g/g, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">Vorobeichik and Pishchulin, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">Vorobeichik and Kaigorodova, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Mikryukov et al., 2020</xref>). These levels 5&#x2013; to 100-fold outreach regional values, registered in the same forests 20&#x2013;30 km from the smelter. Metal toxicity (enhanced in acidified soil) almost eliminated the herbaceous layer, intensified tree dieback (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B99">Vorobeichik and Khantemirova, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">Vorobeichik et al., 2014</xref>), and strongly reduced the diversity of soil and forest floor invertebrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">Vorobeichik and Bergman, 2020</xref>), fungi, and bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Mikryukov and Dulya, 2018</xref>). In these areas, fungi of the soil organic horizons decreased in species number by about 30% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Mikryukov and Dulya, 2017</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Mikryukov et al., 2020</xref>), demonstrating lower pollution vulnerability than many other studied taxa (arthropods, worms, mollusks, and plants) and raising the question about the potential microrefugia maintaining their diversity. CWD at the latest decomposition stages principally suitable for many soil fungal species and less permeable for pollutants than soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Dulya et al., 2019</xref>) is a perfect candidate for the role of such microrefugia.</p>
<p>This work evaluates the role of CWD for fungal diversity maintenance in spruce-fir forests suffering from long-term industrial pollution. We assume that CWD acts as a microrefugium for soil-inhabiting fungi in polluted areas. It is also hypothesized that the hospitality of forest litter shadowed by CWD is higher than that of litter located far from CWD and increases in polluted areas. The mechanisms of a pollution-induced increase of CWD and its surrounding hospitality can include changes in the microhabitat preferences of particular fungal groups toward CWD and CWD-shadowed forest litter with increasing levels of pollution.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>Sampling</title>
<p>The study was conducted in spruce-fir forests (<italic>Abieto-Piceetum oxalidozum</italic>) surrounding the Middle Ural copper smelter (Revda town, Sverdlovsk Oblast, Russia), which has been operating since 1940. The material was collected in three areas: unpolluted (UP), moderately polluted (MP), and HP areas located 30, 4, and 1&#x2013;2 km upwind from the smelter, respectively (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 1A</xref>). The areas are as similar as possible in terms of biotope and soil characteristics (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>); however, they differ strongly in the degree of ecosystem damage caused by pollution (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). To consider forest spatial variability, three sites (2,817&#x2013;17,153 m<sup>2</sup> and 100&#x2013;800 m from each other) were established within each area in September 2017. All autochthonous downed fir (<italic>Abies sibirica</italic> Ledeb.) and spruce [<italic>Picea abies</italic> (L.) H. Karst.] logs of the fourth and fifth decay classes [as per <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Storozhenko (1990)</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS2">Supplementary Table 2</xref>] were considered for sampling. In each of the nine sites, we randomly selected 10 logs of at least 10-cm base diameter that were in contact with the ground and undamaged by large animals.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Wood and forest litter characteristics in unpolluted (UP), moderately polluted (MP), and heavily polluted (HP) areas.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Parameter</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">Wood<hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">Forest litter close to CWD<hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">Forest litter far from CWD<hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">UP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">MP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">UP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">MP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">UP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">MP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HP area</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of fir/spruce logs</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19/11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12/18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18/12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Moss coverage, % of observed area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90.17 &#x00B1; 12.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.83 &#x00B1; 25.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.07 &#x00B1; 29.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of logs with herbs/tree seedlings</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21/5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16/19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0/18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Circumference, cm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">68.50 &#x00B1; 22.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">68.83 &#x00B1; 18.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63.07 &#x00B1; 28.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Residence time, years</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.80 &#x00B1; 12.47b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40.9 &#x00B1; 13.14a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.33 &#x00B1; 11.54a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">R<sub>P</sub>, J/cm<sup>3</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.77 &#x00B1; 2.03a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.52 &#x00B1; 2.14b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.13 &#x00B1; 2.21ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Submergence,%</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.14 &#x00B1; 18.67b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.19 &#x00B1; 15.92a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.13 &#x00B1; 19.29a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Moss coverage, %</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90.17 &#x00B1; 12.21a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">68.97 &#x00B1; 22.72b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.07 &#x00B1; 29.97b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Moisture content</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.76 &#x00B1; 1.14b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.82 &#x00B1; 1.09b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.05 &#x00B1; 0.86a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.21 &#x00B1; 0.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.14 &#x00B1; 0.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.03 &#x00B1; 0.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.95 &#x00B1; 0.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.95 &#x00B1; 0.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.86 &#x00B1; 0.47</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ash content, %</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.23 &#x00B1; 1.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.52 &#x00B1; 0.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.66 &#x00B1; 0.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.46 &#x00B1; 7.47a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.84 &#x00B1; 3.45b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.56 &#x00B1; 5.58a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.77 &#x00B1; 8.33a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.43 &#x00B1; 5.43b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.99 &#x00B1; 8.69a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hydrolytic acidity, mkM/100 g</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52.05 &#x00B1; 14.41b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.63 &#x00B1; 16.06ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.41 &#x00B1; 11.38a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.66 &#x00B1; 7.72c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.03 &#x00B1; 6.70b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65.72 &#x00B1; 6.24a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.16 &#x00B1; 9.31c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56.73 &#x00B1; 6.49b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65.66 &#x00B1; 7.04a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.62&#x2013;5.73a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.77&#x2013;5.1ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.54&#x2013;4.81b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.94&#x2013;6.35a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.58&#x2013;5.38b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.32&#x2013;5.33b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.95&#x2013;6.65a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.56&#x2013;5.45b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.43&#x2013;5.53c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, mg/100 g</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.78 &#x00B1; 5.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.03 &#x00B1; 7.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.71 &#x00B1; 15.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.06 &#x00B1; 9.80b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.34 &#x00B1; 5.19b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">77.62 &#x00B1; 23.67a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.43 &#x00B1; 8.78b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.03 &#x00B1; 3.72b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.27 &#x00B1; 22.15a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total nitrogen, %</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.31 &#x00B1; 0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.22 &#x00B1; 0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.29 &#x00B1; 0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.63 &#x00B1; 0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.68 &#x00B1; 0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.61 &#x00B1; 0.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.54 &#x00B1; 0.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.69 &#x00B1; 0.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.58 &#x00B1; 0.27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify" colspan="10"><bold>Concentrations of acid-soluble metal forms, &#x03BC;g/g</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cu</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.32 &#x00B1; 3.74c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.02 &#x00B1; 41.39b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">188.13 &#x00B1; 161.52a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.50 &#x00B1; 6.63c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">929.80 &#x00B1; 402.51b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,406.89 &#x00B1; 904.42a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.80 &#x00B1; 6.17c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">959.42 &#x00B1; 306.07b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,405.10 &#x00B1; 883.93a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Zn</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48.24 &#x00B1; 14.23c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">125.90 &#x00B1; 56.44b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">240.68 &#x00B1; 140.54a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">232.94 &#x00B1; 95.50b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">574.85 &#x00B1; 193.29a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">554.55 &#x00B1; 179.37a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">193.00 &#x00B1; 78.53b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">560.38 &#x00B1; 226.88a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">537.28 &#x00B1; 217.76a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.53 &#x00B1; 0.20c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.06 &#x00B1; 1.01b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.27 &#x00B1; 2.45a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.12 &#x00B1; 0.66b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.73 &#x00B1; 3.53a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.63 &#x00B1; 4.13a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.92 &#x00B1; 0.45b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.19 &#x00B1; 4.12a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.04 &#x00B1; 4.88a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.81 &#x00B1; 2.31c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.55 &#x00B1; 18.71b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">67.69 &#x00B1; 58.34a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.92 &#x00B1; 20.19c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,013.41 &#x00B1; 307.84b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,959.55 &#x00B1; 625.77a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.19 &#x00B1; 14.97c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,031.18 &#x00B1; 276.62b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,945.26 &#x00B1; 651.70a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fe</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.00 &#x00B1; 49.17b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.22 &#x00B1; 59.69b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">191.82 &#x00B1; 188.68a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">985.39 &#x00B1; 380.89b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,708.40 &#x00B1; 946.31b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5,856.60 &#x00B1; 3,463.11a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,232.81 &#x00B1; 784.95b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,894.29 &#x00B1; 889.79b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5,919.21 &#x00B1; 4,261.33a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify" colspan="10"><bold>Concentrations of exchangeable metal forms, &#x03BC;g/g</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cu</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.91 &#x00B1; 0.71c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.94 &#x00B1; 6.01b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.37 &#x00B1; 24.95a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.68 &#x00B1; 0.19c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.55 &#x00B1; 11.70b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">128.26 &#x00B1; 74.66a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.64 &#x00B1; 0.18c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.37 &#x00B1; 10.52b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">134.13 &#x00B1; 96.83a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Zn</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.61 &#x00B1; 8.84c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75.21 &#x00B1; 34.03b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">137.78 &#x00B1; 88.23a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.48 &#x00B1; 11.98b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">203.07 &#x00B1; 48.23a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">264.57 &#x00B1; 78.57a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.85 &#x00B1; 10.14b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">195.98 &#x00B1; 58.37a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">240.55 &#x00B1; 72.23a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.40 &#x00B1; 0.20c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.17 &#x00B1; 1.13b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.13 &#x00B1; 2.77b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.81 &#x00B1; 0.26b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.85 &#x00B1; 2.06a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.29 &#x00B1; 3.59a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.74 &#x00B1; 0.25b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.53 &#x00B1; 2.25a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.26 &#x00B1; 3.04a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.86 &#x00B1; 0.31c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.78 &#x00B1; 2.09b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.47 &#x00B1; 8.10a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.78 &#x00B1; 0.29c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.03 &#x00B1; 9.35b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.14 &#x00B1; 26.02a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.81 &#x00B1; 0.31c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.38 &#x00B1; 8.71b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54.88 &#x00B1; 30.72a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fe</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.35 &#x00B1; 2.84b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.45 &#x00B1; 5.21b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.45 &#x00B1; 21.70a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.91 &#x00B1; 0.93c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.33 &#x00B1; 20.88b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.02 &#x00B1; 91.89a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.23 &#x00B1; 2.55c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.51 &#x00B1; 26.39b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">103.72 &#x00B1; 95.63a</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>Mean values and standard deviations are shown; minimal and maximal values are provided for pH; <italic>n</italic> = 30 samples. Different letters depict statistically significantly different mean values between areas for a particular substrate (Tukey&#x2019;s test, &#x03B1; = 0.05). CWD, coarse woody debris.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>We measured the length of each sampled log with a laser distance measurer Disto A3 (Leica Geosystems, St. Gallen, Switzerland). The circumference of the top and base (right above the root collar, if present) was measured using a measuring tape with an accuracy of 0.5 cm. Wood resistance to penetration was measured using a dynamic penetrometer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Larjavaara and Muller-Landau, 2010</xref>); the time of tree death was determined through dendrochronological cross-dating; and taxonomic identification was performed through the microscopic inspection of resin canals and wood structure [for details, see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Dulya et al. (2019)</xref>].</p>
<p>On each log, we marked three sampling points more than 1 m apart from each other (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 1B</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS3">Supplementary Table 3</xref>). Within a 15-cm distance from the log, CWD-influenced litter subsamples were collected near each point and pooled. From 1.5 to 15 m from these logs and any other CWD, we collected and pooled three subsamples of CWD-uninfluenced litter (the distance between subsamples was equal to the distance between CWD-influenced subsamples). According to the sampling protocol, loose recently fallen plant debris (OL layer) was gently removed from the sampling point, and approximately 10 g of material was collected from the OF (partly decomposed fragmented material) and OH (well-humified) litter layers using a sterile plastic container. At each marked point on the logs, a disk was cut out with a chainsaw, and 10 g of wood fragments was extracted from each disk with bleach-sterilized forceps and pooled in a sterile plastic container. The samples from each microhabitat type were kept cool and then frozen within 2&#x2013;8 h for genetic analysis. At the same sampling points, composite samples of 45&#x2013;780 g of wood or litter were collected for chemical analyses. In further statistical analyses, wood, as well as the CWD-influenced and CWD-uninfluenced litter collected from/near the same log, was treated as belonging to the same sampling plot.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>Physical and Chemical Analyses</title>
<p>In the laboratory, samples intended for chemical analyses were weighed, dried at 65&#x00B0;C for 4 days, and reweighed to determine gravimetric moisture content (MC). Air-dried samples were ground and sieved through 2-mm sieves (MF 10 basic; IKA, Staufen, Germany). Acid-soluble and exchangeable forms of the main metallic pollutants (Cu, Pb, Cd, and Zn) were extracted with 20 ml of 5% HNO<sub>3</sub> and 0.05 N of CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions, respectively, from 1 g of each sample. After 1 h of shaking and 24-h incubation at room temperature, the extracts were filtered through a paper filter with 8- to 12-mm pore size (Melior XXI, Moscow, Russia). Metal concentrations were measured with an atomic-absorption spectrometer AAS Vario 6 (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany) following the USEPA Method 7000B (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">USEPA, 2007</xref>). Concentrations of P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> (extracted with 0.2 N of HCl) were analyzed with a PE-5400v spectrophotometer (Ecros, Saint Petersburg, Russia). The pH of the wood in distilled water extract (1:25) was measured after 5 min shaking using an inoLab 740 ionometer (WTW, Weilheim, Germany). Total Kjeldahl nitrogen content was measured in 0.5 g of forest litter and 1 g of wood using digestion and distillation units DK 20 and UDK 139 (VELP Scientifica, Usmate Velate, Italy). Ash content (fraction of dehydrated sample) was measured after combustion at 600&#x00B0;C for 6 h in a laboratory furnace (PM-16, Elektropribor, Saint Petersburg, Russia).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>Molecular Analyses</title>
<p>Each frozen sample destined for genetic analysis was tightly enclosed with sterile 4 &#x00D7; 4 gauze dressing and lyophilized. About 6&#x2013;10 g of air-dried samples was homogenized using coffee grinders sterilized with bleach and UV radiation after each sample. DNA was extracted from sterile-weighted 90- to 105 mg of aliquots using NucleoSpin Soil Kit (MACHEREY-NAGEL, D&#x00FC;ren, Germany). The homogenization of aliquots in lysis buffer (SL1, 50 &#x03BC;l of Enhancer SX) was conducted using a Precellys 24 homogenizer (Bertin Instruments, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France) at 4,000 rpm for 30 s.</p>
<p>We amplified the internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) of rRNA using a two-step PCR protocol following the &#x201C;16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation&#x201D; protocol (Part #15044223 Rev. B, Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States). The primary amplification was done using the primers fITS7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Ihrmark et al., 2012</xref>) and ITS4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B104">White et al., 1990</xref>) with added Illumina adapter overhang nucleotide sequences. The amplicons from the primary PCR were diluted 1:10 in sterile, nuclease-free water; and a second PCR was set up to add the Illumina flow cell adaptors and sample-specific Nextera XT (Illumina) indices. PCR was performed using Tersus high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia). Amplicons were purified and normalized using the SequalPrep Normalization Plate Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). All samples were pooled in equimolar amounts, and the size distribution of amplicons was assessed by high-throughput capillary gel electrophoresis (Fragment Analyzer System, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States). Sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq platform in paired-end mode using a MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (600 cycles) at Evrogen (Moscow, Russia).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS4">
<title>Bioinformatics Processing and Sequence Identification</title>
<p>Sequencing libraries were demultiplexed using bcl2fastq v2.17.1.14 (Illumina). Primer sequences were trimmed from paired Illumina sequences using cutadapt v.3.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Martin, 2011</xref>); reads lacking an identifiable primer sequence were discarded. Low-quality reads were filtered out based on the maximum number of expected errors [maxEE &#x003E; 3; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Edgar and Flyvbjerg (2015)</xref>] using VSEARCH v.2.15.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Rognes et al., 2016</xref>). Correction of sequencing errors, paired-end assembly of the forward- and reverse-sequenced reads, and chimera removal using the consensus method were performed with DADA2 v.1.18.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Callahan et al., 2016</xref>). Denoised sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using SWARM v.3.0.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Mah&#x00E9; et al., 2021</xref>), with the local clustering threshold (<italic>d</italic>) equal to 5 nucleotides. Average within-OTU sequence similarity was 98.3% (Q1 = 97.7, Q3 = 99.2), which is in range with the empirically derived estimates for species hypotheses based on ITS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">K&#x00F5;ljalg et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">L&#x00FC;cking et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Tedersoo et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>All denoised sequences were taxonomically identified against the curated reference database UNITE v.8.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Nilsson et al., 2019</xref>) using the hybrid approach of AMPtk v.1.4.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Palmer et al., 2018</xref>), as follows. Taxonomic assignments were obtained using two methods: global alignment with VSEARCH and a <italic>k</italic>-mer-based SINTAX classifier (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Edgar, 2016</xref>). SINTAX results were used if taxa displayed a sequence similarity of &#x003C;97% to the reference database. If sequence similarity was &#x003E;97%, the result with the finest taxonomic annotation was retained. Post-clustering curation of the OTU table was performed using LULU v.0.1.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Fr&#x00F8;slev et al., 2017</xref>). All steps of the bioinformatics analysis workflow were managed with Snakemake v.5.31.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">M&#x00F6;lder et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS5">
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>Operational taxonomic unit counts with taxonomic assignments and associated sample metadata were handled with phyloseq package v.1.32.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">McMurdie and Holmes, 2013</xref>) of R v.4.0.5 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">R Core Team, 2021</xref>). Data were visualized with ggplot2 v.3.3.3 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B105">Wickham, 2016</xref>). Sankey diagrams were constructed using ggalluvial v.0.12.3 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Brunson, 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>To account for unequal sequencing depths, we rarefied the data to a depth of 7,689 sequences per sample. Thus, three samples with lower number of reads were excluded from the analyses. For the assessment of community alpha diversity, we used OTU richness (<italic>S</italic>) and effective number of OTUs (<italic>Se</italic>) in a sample (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Jost, 2006</xref>). As implemented in metagMisc package v.0.0.4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Mikryukov, 2018</xref>), rarefaction was performed 1,000 times; and <italic>S</italic> and <italic>Se</italic> were averaged over the iterations. To avoid index switching artifacts (assignment of reads to incorrect samples during sequencing), prior dissimilarity analysis, we removed the OTUs with a relative abundance of less than 0.25% from each sample (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Clavel et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>To estimate community dissimilarity, we used Simpson&#x2019;s index, which is robust to the difference in species richness between communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Chao et al., 2006</xref>). It has an upper limit of one (samples have no OTUs in common) and a lower limit of zero (assemblages are nested &#x2013; all OTUs from the smaller community are present in a larger community). Ordination was performed with principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) using vegan v.2.5-7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Oksanen et al., 2020</xref>). To examine the differences in community composition, we used non-parametric permutational multivariate analysis of variance [PERMANOVA, 10,000 permutations; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Anderson (2001)</xref>]. In the test for the difference in community compositions between the substrates, permutations were constrained within an area. The similarity of litter and wood samples in environmental parameters was illustrated with principal component analysis (PCA) using FactoMineR package v.2.4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">L&#x00EA; et al., 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>To compare group means of diversity, similarity, and environmental variables, we used a hierarchical linear model with the substrate, microhabitat type, and pollution area as fixed effects and sampling plot as a random effect (nested within area) to consider the non-independence of individual samples. Concentrations of heavy metals were log-transformed before the analysis. <italic>p</italic>-Values were adjusted for multiple testing by false discovery rate (FDR) correction. The analysis was performed using lme4 v.1.1-26 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bates et al., 2015</xref>). ANOVA and Tukey&#x2019;s multiple comparison <italic>post hoc</italic> test were conducted using the packages car v.3.0-10 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Fox and Weisberg, 2019</xref>) and multcomp v.1.4-16 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Hothorn et al., 2008</xref>). To reveal pollution-induced changes in OTU richness, we used Cohen&#x2019;s <italic>d</italic> effect size (standardized mean difference) and effsize package v.0.8.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">Torchiano, 2016</xref>). Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare CWD-influenced and CWD-uninfluenced litter samples in the numbers of fungal OTUs. Functional annotation of ectomycorrhizal (EcM) taxa was performed using the FungalTraits database v.1.3 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">P&#x00F5;lme et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>Coarse Woody Debris and Forest Litter Parameters</title>
<p>The ratio of sampled fir and spruce CWD within each area mirrored tree stand composition (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>). Metal concentrations in wood from polluted areas (HP and MP) were significantly higher than in the UP area. CWD from the HP area possessed significantly more P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> but less moisture and lower moss cover. Herbaceous vegetation, mainly represented by <italic>Circaea alpina</italic>, <italic>Linnaea borealis</italic>, <italic>Myosotis sylvatica</italic>, <italic>Oxalis acetosella</italic>, and <italic>Stellaria holostea</italic>, densely covered two-thirds of logs in the UP area but half of the logs in the MP area. Herbs were not observed on the CWD in the HP area, though tree seedlings occupied most logs in both polluted areas (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<p>Litter samples of polluted forests were more acidic (&#x0394;pH = 0.99) and had higher metal and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> concentrations than UP forests (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The highest ash content in the UP forest litter illustrates its highest mineralization degree. Within each area, heavy metal concentrations in wood were significantly lower than in forest litter, e.g., by four, 20, and 12 times for Cu in UP, MP, and HP areas, respectively. Wood samples were more acidic, less mineralized, and more saturated with water and possessed six times lower nitrogen content than forest litter (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<p>Litter close to CWD was moister, slightly but significantly more acidic, and more saturated with Zn and Cd than the litter collected distant from CWD (<italic>F</italic><sub>1</sub>,<sub>87</sub> &#x003E; 6.08, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.02). Differences between the substrates and microhabitats are reflected with the samples ordination along two PCA axis in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>PCA ordination of wood samples collected from fir CWD (filled circles) and spruce CWD (empty circles) and forest litter samples collected close to CWD (triangles) and far from CWD (squares) in the areas with different levels of industrial pollution (green, UP area; blue, MP; red, HP). Arrows denote the relative contribution of each variable to principal components. The percentage on each axis describes the amount of variance explained by principal components. PCA, principal component analysis; CWD, coarse woody debris; UP, unpolluted; MP, moderately polluted; HP, heavily polluted.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-729244-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>Pollution Effect on Forest Litter Fungal Diversity</title>
<p>Illumina sequencing revealed 7,854 fungal OTUs (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Appendix 1</xref>), of which 6,960 (88.6%) were found in litter and 3,908 (49.8%) in wood. The most abundant and diverse phyla were Ascomycota (48.1% of OTUs and 41.4% of reads), Basidiomycota (37.1 and 54.4%), Mortierellomycota (2.3 and 1.5%), and Mucoromycota (1.5 and 0.5%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). Other phyla and unclassified fungi comprised 11.0% of OTUs and 1.9% of reads. These five fungal groups were 1.1&#x2013;3.2 times less diverse in wood than in forest litter.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>The diversity and abundance of fungal target groups in different substrates and microhabitats in unpolluted (UP), moderately polluted (MP), and heavily polluted (HP) areas.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fungal group</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">Wood<hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">Forest litter close to CWD<hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">Forest litter far from CWD<hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">UP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">MP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">UP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">MP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">UP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">MP area</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HP area</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="10"><bold>Total number of OTUs</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Basidiomycota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">609</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">586</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">629</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,274</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,075</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">956</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,291</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,085</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">915</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ascomycota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">833</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">712</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">776</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,885</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,436</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,277</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,888</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,368</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,159</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mortierellomycota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">104</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mucoromycota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Other phyla</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">105</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">312</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">248</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">255</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">328</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">244</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">231</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">All phyla</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,631</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,477</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,561</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3,620</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,884</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,593</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3,637</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,811</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,403</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">EcM fungi</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">117</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">306</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">297</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">272</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">333</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">313</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">286</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="10"><bold>OTU richness per sample</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Basidiomycota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.1 &#x00B1; 19.4b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.2 &#x00B1; 19.4ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75.4 &#x00B1; 18.2a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">152.3 &#x00B1; 28.3a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">144.1 &#x00B1; 22.4ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">130.5 &#x00B1; 21.2b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">148.3 &#x00B1; 19.7a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">141.4 &#x00B1; 26.6b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">118.9 &#x00B1; 20.8b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ascomycota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.8 &#x00B1; 33.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86.4 &#x00B1; 31.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">104.9 &#x00B1; 26.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">314.1 &#x00B1; 48.6a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">260.0 &#x00B1; 49.0b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">230.8 &#x00B1; 45.5b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">316.7 &#x00B1; 35.8a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">235.8 &#x00B1; 42.9b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">204.8 &#x00B1; 43.5c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mortierellomycota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.7 &#x00B1; 4.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.3 &#x00B1; 4.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.6 &#x00B1; 3.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.8 &#x00B1; 5.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.8 &#x00B1; 4.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.9 &#x00B1; 3.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.3 &#x00B1; 6.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.9 &#x00B1; 3.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.2 &#x00B1; 3.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mucoromycota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7 &#x00B1; 1.9b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.2 &#x00B1; 6.2a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.5 &#x00B1; 1.7ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.1 &#x00B1; 3.1b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.7 &#x00B1; 2.5ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.1 &#x00B1; 3.7a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.2 &#x00B1; 2.4b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.9 &#x00B1; 2.9ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.8 &#x00B1; 3.6a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Other phyla</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.5 &#x00B1; 5.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.5 &#x00B1; 3.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.9 &#x00B1; 2.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.6 &#x00B1; 10.9a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.6 &#x00B1; 6.9b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.7 &#x00B1; 9.6b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.4 &#x00B1; 11.8a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.4 &#x00B1; 7.7b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.4 &#x00B1; 7.1b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">All phyla</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">171.8 &#x00B1; 59.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">175.7 &#x00B1; 56.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">199.4 &#x00B1; 46.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">524.8 &#x00B1; 80.6a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">455.1 &#x00B1; 69b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">415.0 &#x00B1; 68.5b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">523.0 &#x00B1; 60.1a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">425.3 &#x00B1; 68b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">372.2 &#x00B1; 61.9c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">EcM fungi</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.6 &#x00B1; 4.6b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.3 &#x00B1; 5.6a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.9 &#x00B1; 4.8a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35.1 &#x00B1; 7.9b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.8 &#x00B1; 10.0a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.4 &#x00B1; 8.6a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.0 &#x00B1; 8.8b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.2 &#x00B1; 11.1a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.7 &#x00B1; 9.3ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="10"><bold>Relative abundance, %</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Basidiomycota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74.3 &#x00B1; 20.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65.0 &#x00B1; 21.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.6 &#x00B1; 19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.2 &#x00B1; 10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52.1 &#x00B1; 12.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52.7 &#x00B1; 10.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33.3 &#x00B1; 11.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48.0 &#x00B1; 13.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49.8 &#x00B1; 10.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ascomycota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.5 &#x00B1; 20.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.4 &#x00B1; 19.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.5 &#x00B1; 15.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.5 &#x00B1; 10.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.0 &#x00B1; 13.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.8 &#x00B1; 10.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.8 &#x00B1; 12.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.0 &#x00B1; 12.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.1 &#x00B1; 11.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mortierellomycota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5 &#x00B1; 0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9 &#x00B1; 0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1 &#x00B1; 1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8 &#x00B1; 1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.2 &#x00B1; 1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.8 &#x00B1; 1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8 &#x00B1; 1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.5 &#x00B1; 1.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.1 &#x00B1; 2.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mucoromycota</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2 &#x00B1; 0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1 &#x00B1; 3.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1 &#x00B1; 5.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2 &#x00B1; 0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3 &#x00B1; 0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5 &#x00B1; 0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2 &#x00B1; 0.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4 &#x00B1; 0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.8 &#x00B1; 2.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Other phyla</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5 &#x00B1; 0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6 &#x00B1; 0.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6 &#x00B1; 0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.3 &#x00B1; 1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.4 &#x00B1; 0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.2 &#x00B1; 2.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.0 &#x00B1; 2.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.0 &#x00B1; 1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.1 &#x00B1; 5.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">EcM fungi</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3 &#x00B1; 1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.5 &#x00B1; 8.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.7 &#x00B1; 16.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.5 &#x00B1; 9.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.6 &#x00B1; 14.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.2 &#x00B1; 14.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.7 &#x00B1; 7.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.1 &#x00B1; 13.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.2 &#x00B1; 10.9</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>Mean &#x00B1; SD are shown, <italic>n</italic> = 29 samples per area. Different letters depict a statistically significant difference of mean values between areas for a particular substrate revealed with Tukey&#x2019;s test (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). CWD, coarse woody debris.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The total number of OTUs was lower by 17.5% in the MP area and 22.2% in the HP area than in the UP area. The decrease of OTU total number in CWD-uninfluenced forest litter of the MP and HP areas was the strongest of all substrates (22.7 and 33.9%, respectively). OTU richness of four fungal groups declined in polluted areas by 16.0&#x2013;38.6%, while Mucoromycota increased by 2.6&#x2013;7.7%.</p>
<p>In CWD-uninfluenced litter, <italic>S</italic> and <italic>Se</italic> were lower in MP area (by 18.7 and 31.3%, respectively) and in HP area (by 28.8 and 52.7%, respectively) than in the UP territory (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). Basidiomycota and Ascomycota <italic>S</italic> decreased by 4.7&#x2013;35.3% in polluted areas. Mucoromycota <italic>S</italic> was stimulated by pollution by 40.5 and 61.9% in MP and HP areas, respectively, while Mortierellomycota gained 3.5% of <italic>S</italic> in MP area and lost 6.4% in HP area. Other phyla together with unclassified fungi lost 33.0 and 30.2% of <italic>S</italic> in the MP and HP areas, respectively. <italic>Se</italic> response to pollution was similar to <italic>S</italic> for all target groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>). In accordance with these results, <italic>S</italic> and <italic>Se</italic> of most target groups in litter were negatively affected by acidity, P content, and Cu content (&#x2212;0.74 &#x003C; &#x03B2; &#x003C; &#x2212;0.28; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS4">Supplementary Table 4</xref>). In contrast, Mucoromycota <italic>S</italic> and <italic>Se</italic> were positively influenced by litter acidity and Cu concentrations (0.33 &#x003C; &#x03B2; &#x003C; 0.49), while Mortierellomycota were not responsive to any of the predictors.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Pollution-induced changes in <bold>(A)</bold> OTU richness and <bold>(B)</bold> effective number of OTUs in MP (circles) and HP area (squares) within three types of forest detritus (L, CWD-uninfluenced litter CWD; L<sub>W</sub>, CWD-influenced litter; W, wood). The negative effect size indicates a pollution-induced decrease of fungal diversity compared with the UP area, positive effect size &#x2013; diversity increase. Median and 95% CI are shown. OTU, operational taxonomic unit; MP, moderately polluted; HP, heavily polluted; CWD, coarse woody debris; UP, unpolluted.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-729244-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Based on pollution-induced changes of total OTU number in CWD-uninfluenced forest litter, lower-level taxa were tested for their vulnerability to pollution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). Glomeromycota and Olpidiomycota lost most OTUs in polluted areas, while Chytridiomycota diversity decreased by approximately 40%. Of species-rich Ascomycota and Basidiomycota taxa, the most vulnerable (i.e., reduced in diversity by more than half) were Botryosphaeriales, Pleosporales, Tubeufiales, Glomerellales, Microascales, Xylariales, Orbiliomycetes, Agaricaceae, Bolbitiaceae, Clavariaceae, Tricholomataceae, Auriculariales, Agaricostilbomycetes, and Pucciniomycetes. Less vulnerable taxa, which lost 50&#x2013;20% of OTUs in polluted areas, included Capnodiales, Dothideales, Venturiales, Chaetothyriales, Helotiales, Rhytismatales, Thelebolales, Chaetosphaeriales, Diaporthales, Hypocreales, Sordariales, Pezizomycetes, Lecanoromycetes, Inocybaceae, Marasmioid clade, Pluteaceae, Psathyrellaceae, Cantharellales, Sebacinales, Thelephorales, Cystofilobasidiales, Tremellales, Cystobasidiomycetes, and Microbotryomycetes. Conversely, Microthyriales, Saccharomycetes, Entolomataceae, Strophariaceae, Atheliales, Hymenochaetales, and Polyporales lost &#x003C;18% of OTUs. Mucorales, Umbelopsidales, Eurotiales, Cortinariaceae, Boletales, Russulales, Trechisporales, and Rozellomycota increased in OTU total number by 3.1&#x2013;54.8% in MP area and by 0.1&#x2013;48.9% in HP area. The changes of alpha diversity at lower taxonomic levels were quite similar to the changes revealed for the total OTU richness (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS2">Supplementary Figure 2</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Total OTU number of fungal taxa in the litter collected far from CWD in unpolluted (UP), moderately polluted (MP), and heavily polluted (HP) areas (<italic>n</italic> = 29 samples per area). OTU, operational taxonomic unit; CWD, coarse woody debris.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-729244-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The total OTU number of EcM fungi in CWD-uninfluenced litter decreased by 6.0 and 14.1% in MP and HP areas, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>); meanwhile, they increased in alpha diversity by 22.2 and 12.7% and in relative abundance by 2.4 and 2.9 times, exceeding 35% of fungal reads in the litter of the HP area. EcM lineages observed in the litter differed in the sensitivity to pollution. The most notable (2.2&#x2013;84.4 times) abundance increase in both polluted areas was characteristic of /<italic>boletus</italic>, /<italic>pseudotomentella</italic>, /<italic>endogone</italic>, /<italic>hygrophorus</italic>, /<italic>amphinema-tylospora</italic>, /<italic>suillus-rhizopogon</italic>, /<italic>laccaria</italic>, and /<italic>russula-lactarius</italic> EcM fungal lineages. The abundance of /<italic>paxillus-gyrodon</italic> and /<italic>piloderma</italic> remained unchanged in the MP area and increased in the HP area by 5.1 and 3.0 times, respectively, while /<italic>otidea</italic> abundance increased in the MP area 10.8-fold and remained unchanged in HP area. The /<italic>hydnotrya</italic>, /<italic>tuber-helvella</italic>, /<italic>sebacina</italic>, /<italic>amanita</italic>, and /<italic>inocybe</italic> EcM fungal lineages were relatively non-sensitive to pollution (from 0.7-fold decline to 1.9-fold increase). The most sensitive EcM fungal lineages included /<italic>tomentellopsis</italic>, /<italic>tomentella-thelephora</italic>, /<italic>tricholoma</italic>, /<italic>wilcoxina</italic>, /<italic>rhodoscypha</italic>, /<italic>clavulina</italic>, and /<italic>tarzetta</italic>, which declined 20&#x2013;90% in the MP area and 33&#x2013;100% in the HP area.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>Fungal Diversity and Its Maintenance in Wood</title>
<p>The overall OTU richness in the wood from the MP and HP areas was 9.4 and 4.3% lower than in the UP forests. Depending on the fungal group, pollution had no effect or strongly positively affected <italic>S</italic> and <italic>Se</italic> in wood (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS3">Supplementary Figure 3</xref>). As a result, the ratio of alpha diversity between wood and litter samples significantly increased in the gradient of pollution for all fungi, Ascomycota, and Basidiomycota (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref>). The fungal compositional dissimilarity between wood and forest litter decreased in the pollution gradient (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6A</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS5">Supplementary Tables 5</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS6">6</xref>), though it remained significant in all groups.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>The ratio of OTU numbers revealed in <bold>(A)</bold> wood and <bold>(B)</bold> CWD-influenced litter samples to CWD-uninfluenced litter samples in the areas with different levels of pollution. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences of mean values between areas, revealed with Tukey&#x2019;s test (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, <italic>n</italic> = 29; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS6">Supplementary Table 6</xref>). A few outliers in Mucoromycota are not shown due to clipping of the <italic>y</italic>-axis at the top for readability (however, the analysis was performed on the full dataset). OTU, operational taxonomic unit; CWD, coarse woody debris.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-729244-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption><p>Compositional dissimilarity of fungal communities of CWD-uninfluenced litter from <bold>(A)</bold> wood and <bold>(B)</bold> CWD-influenced litter in the areas with different levels of pollution (green, UP area; blue, MP area; red, HP area). Filled circles denote fir wood; empty circles, spruce wood; squares, forest litter far from CWD; triangles, forest litter close to CWD. Average dissimilarity values with 95% CI are shown next to each ordination diagram: filled dots indicate statistically significant compositional divergence between microhabitats within an area (PERMANOVA test, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). Different letters indicate significant differences of within-area dissimilarity between the areas (Tukey&#x2019;s test, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). CWD, coarse woody debris; UP, unpolluted; MP, moderately polluted; HP, heavily polluted.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-729244-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Of OTU-rich taxa, total OTU richness of Sordariales, Pleosporales, and Glomeromycota decreased in the wood of polluted areas by more than 50% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>), whereas Pluteaceae, Tricholomataceae, Thelephorales, Chaetosphaeriales, Venturiales, Orbiliomycetes, and Chytridiomycota decreased by 50&#x2013;25%. A slightly detrimental effect of pollution on OTU number was observed for Auriculariales, Cantharellales, Polyporales, Saccharomycetes, Capnodiales, Thelebolales, Hypocreales, and Mortierellomycota. Richness of Cortinariaceae, Strophariaceae, Atheliales, Boletales, Hymenochaetales, Russulales, Sebacinales, Trechisporales, Tremellales, Dacrymycetes, Microbotryomycetes, Lecanoromycetes, Chaetothyriales, Eurotiales, Helotiales, and Rozellomycota was increased by pollution.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption><p>Total OTU number of fungal taxa in the wood from unpolluted (UP), moderately polluted (MP), and heavily polluted (HP) areas (<italic>n</italic> = 29 samples per area). OTU, operational taxonomic unit.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-729244-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In all areas, wood harbored 2.5&#x2013;3.7 times less EcM OTUs than forest litter (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). EcM total OTU number increased in the wood of the MP area by 28.8% and in the HP area by 8.8%. EcM <italic>S</italic> increased more than twice, while <italic>Se</italic> remained unchanged, showing higher dominance of communities in polluted areas (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). This guild increased in the relative abundance in polluted wood (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>), leading to a decreased ratio of their abundance between litter and wood from 9.8 in the UP area to 4.0 and 2.3 in the MP and HP areas, respectively. Accordingly, EcM fungal compositional dissimilarity between wood and litter declined with the increasing pollution and became non-significant in polluted areas in contrast to other target groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8A</xref>). The /<italic>boletus</italic>, /<italic>amphinema-tylospora</italic>, /<italic>pseudotomentella</italic>, /<italic>laccaria</italic>, /<italic>paxillus-gyrodon</italic>, /<italic>piloderma</italic>, and /<italic>russula-lactarius</italic> lineages, which showed high tolerance to pollution in the litter, also increased in abundance in polluted wood by 1.7&#x2013;54.3 times (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8C</xref>). Moderately tolerant to pollution, /<italic>inocybe</italic>, <italic>/amanita</italic>, /<italic>sebacina</italic>, <italic>/otidea</italic>, and /<italic>cortinarius</italic> also increased in polluted wood 2.8- to 83.4-fold. Of EcM fungal lineages negatively responding to polluted litter, /<italic>clavulina</italic>, /<italic>genea-humaria</italic>, /<italic>pachyphloeus-amylascus</italic>, /<italic>tomentellopsis</italic>, and /<italic>tricholoma</italic> suffered a 54&#x2013;100% abundance decrease in polluted wood. Of the pollution-sensitive lineages, /<italic>wilcoxina</italic> increased in abundance in wood of the MP and HP areas by 10.0 and 8.4 times, respectively, while /<italic>tomentella-thelephora</italic> abundance was comparable with UP values. Notably, the sensitive lineages increased in abundance in dead wood due to certain pollution-tolerant species, such as <italic>Thelephora terrestris</italic> and <italic>Trichophaea</italic> spp.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption><p>Compositional dissimilarity of EcM fungi from the areas with different levels of industrial pollution (green, UP area; blue, MP area; red, HP area). Filled circles in <bold>(A,C)</bold> denote fir wood; empty circles, spruce wood. Triangles in <bold>(B,D)</bold> denote CWD-influenced litter. CWD-uninfluenced litter is shown with squares. Average dissimilarity values with 95% CI are shown next to ordination diagrams in <bold>(A,B)</bold> filled dots indicate statistically significant compositional divergence between microhabitats within an area (PERMANOVA test, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05); different letters indicate significant effect of area on dissimilarity (Tukey&#x2019;s test, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). The arrows indicate the increase in EcM lineage relative abundance toward an area and a substrate. EcM, ectomycorrhizal; UP, unpolluted; MP, moderately polluted; HP, heavily polluted; CWD, coarse woody debris.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-729244-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Based on the difference of OTU occurrences between CWD-uninfluenced litter and wood, a few taxa significantly changed substrate preferences in polluted areas. Chytridiomycota, Dothideales (mainly due to Dothioraceae and Dothideaceae), Pezizales, Lecanoromycetes, Phacidiales, Mucoraceae, and Tricholomataceae became more frequent in wood; while Microthyriales, Strigulales, Chaetosphaeriales, Chaetomiaceae, Aspergillaceae, Piskurozymaceae, Boletales, Hydnangiaceae, and Physalacriaceae shifted toward forest litter (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS7">Supplementary Table 7</xref>).</p>
<p>Fungal alpha diversity was weakly influenced by within-area physicochemical variability of the substrates (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS8">Supplementary Table 8</xref>). In the UP area, only litter pH significantly negatively affected <italic>S</italic> of all fungi, Mortierellomycota, and the group &#x201C;other phyla&#x201D; (<italic>B</italic> = &#x2212;89.8, <italic>B</italic> = &#x2212;9.0, <italic>B</italic> = &#x2212;19.7, respectively); Mucoromycota diversity negatively responded to litter moisture (<italic>B</italic> = &#x2212;4.71 and <italic>B</italic> = &#x2212;2.4 for <italic>S</italic> and <italic>Se</italic>, respectively) in HP area; and Mortierellomycota <italic>S</italic> positively responded to N concentration in wood of the MP area (<italic>B</italic> = 20.4, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>Diversity Maintenance in Forest Litter Shadowed by Coarse Woody Debris</title>
<p>In the UP area, the total number of OTUs close to CWD was 0.5% (17 OTUs) lower than far from CWD due to all groups except for Mortierellomycota and Mucoromycota (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). In polluted areas, CWD-influenced microhabitats&#x2019; contribution to fungal diversity in litter increased for most target groups, though remained unchanged for Mortierellomycota and decreased for Mucoromycota. As a result, CWD shadows harbored 2.6 and 7.9% more fungal OTUs in the MP and HP areas, respectively. Notably, the total number of EcM fungal OTUs in polluted areas remained higher in CWD-free litter. However, this difference decreased in the pollution gradient from 8.1% in the UP area to 4.9% in the HP area.</p>
<p>At the level of alpha diversity, CWD-influenced litter samples harbored higher <italic>S</italic> (<italic>Z</italic> = 0.32, <italic>n</italic> = 87, <italic>p</italic> = 0.003), which was ascribed to all Basidiomycota, Ascomycota, Mortierellomycota, and Mucoromycota (<italic>Z</italic> &#x003E; 0.23, <italic>n</italic> = 87, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.03; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS9">Supplementary Table 9</xref>). EcM fungal <italic>S</italic> was comparable between the microhabitats (<italic>Z</italic> = 0.004, <italic>n</italic> = 87, <italic>p</italic> = 0.97). Pollution-induced decrease of <italic>S</italic> and <italic>Se</italic> in CWD-influenced litter was less pronounced than in CWD-uninfluenced litter: 13.3% for <italic>S</italic> and 20.3% for <italic>Se</italic> in the MP area, and 20.9% for <italic>S</italic> and 37.4% for <italic>Se</italic> in the HP area. Therefore, the relative hospitability of CWD-shadowed microhabitats tended to increase in the gradient of pollution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref>). However, the effect of area type on the diversity ratio was non-significant, formally rejecting our third hypothesis.</p>
<p>In the UP area, most fungal groups (except Mucoromycota) significantly differed in composition between the CWD-influenced and CWD-uninfluenced litter (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6B</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8B, D</xref>). In the MP area, only Ascomycota and Mortierellomycota contributed to the compositional differences between the microhabitats. None of the groups differed compositionally between the two microhabitats in the HP area.</p>
<p>At low taxonomic levels, pollution-induced changes of total OTU richness and alpha diversity in CWD-influenced forest litter resembled the patterns observed in CWD-uninfluenced forest litter (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS4">Supplementary Figure 4</xref>). The exception was a smaller (compared with CWD-uninfluenced microhabitats) decrease in the diversity of Agaricaceae, Psathyrellaceae, Helotiales, Eurotiomycetes, and Mucorales and primarily wood-associated taxa from Tremellomycetes, Lecanoromycetes, Dothideales, Capnodiales, and Xylariales.</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption><p>Total OTU number of fungal taxa in the litter collected close to CWD in unpolluted (UP), moderately polluted (MP), and heavily polluted (HP) areas (<italic>n</italic> = 29 samples per area). OTU, operational taxonomic unit; CWD, coarse woody debris.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-729244-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The test for pollution-induced changes in microhabitat preferences of OTUs inhabiting the UP and polluted areas showed that only Crepidotaceae became significantly more frequent in the localities close to CWD in the HP area (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS7">Supplementary Table 7</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="S4.SS1">
<title>Fungal Diversity in Litter</title>
<p>The fungal diversity in forest litter decreased in the gradient of pollution, which corroborates the results of soil fungi research in the vicinity of this and other similar enterprises (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Liao and Xie, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">Wang et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Blagodatskaya et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Hui et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">B&#x00E9;rard et al., 2014</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Chen et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Mikryukov and Dulya, 2017</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">2018</xref>). In addition to heavy metal toxicity, the nearly complete elimination of herbaceous vegetation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Trubina, 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">2020</xref>) likely played an essential role in the impoverishment of fungal communities, which was exemplified by the substantial loss of biotrophic and saprotrophic species associated with herbaceous plants and their litter. In concordance with previous results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Baldrian, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Torres-Cruz et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Mikryukov et al., 2020</xref>), eurytopic soil saprobes (e.g., Mortierellomycota, Mucoromycota, Eurotiomycetes, and Helotiales) exhibited high tolerance to soil pollution with heavy metals. Unexpectedly, EcM fungi increased in diversity and doubled in relative abundance in polluted litter. Notably, Agaricomycetes representatives are primarily responsible for this effect, while EcM Pezizomycetes (except for <italic>Tuber</italic> spp., <italic>Hydnotrya</italic> spp., and <italic>Otidea leporina</italic>) are as sensitive to pollution as most saprotrophic representatives of this class. The pollution-induced stimulation of EcM fungi supports previous findings of increased EcM abundance in the upper soil horizons of the studied polluted areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">Veselkin, 2004</xref>).</p>
<p>We found subtle but systematic differences between abiotic parameters in CWD-shadowed and CWD-free litter. Subtle differences in pH, microclimate, and the proportion of plant detritus fractions between CWD-shadowed and CWD-free microhabitats were previously shown in coniferous, beech, and eucalypt forests and proved to be influential for mollusks, invertebrates, and microbial biomass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Marra and Edmonds, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Evans et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Spears et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Kappes et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Goldin and Hutchinson, 2015</xref>). CWD-shadowed litter harbored a distinct composition and higher alpha diversity of fungal communities. However, these results must be treated with caution because lichenized and wood-decomposing fungi, yeasts known from xylophagous arthropods&#x2019; frass, as well as the parasites of lichens, polypores, and myxomycetes, were more frequently identified in CWD-shadowed litter than those far from CWD, implying that mycelium, propagules, and dead remnants raining down from wood have a strong positive influence on nearby soil biodiversity estimates. The direct link between fungal communities in wood and underlying litter was also confirmed by a 20% lower compositional dissimilarity between wood and litter samples collected from the same sampling plot when compared with samples collected from different sampling plots (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS10">Supplementary Table 10</xref>).</p>
<p>Along with pollution load, the contribution of CWD-shadowed microhabitats to litter fungal diversity increased. Mucoromycota, Mortierellomycota, and most soil saprotrophic orders from Eurotiomycetes and Leotiomycetes possessed higher average numbers of OTUs in the CWD-influenced litter of all areas. With the &#x201C;fungal&#x201D; rain from CWD, these pollution-tolerant groups could lead to an overestimation of the capacity of CWD-shadowed litter to maintain fungal gamma and alpha diversity in polluted areas. The expansion of pollution-tolerant EcM and saprotrophic fungi also explains the pollution-induced compositional convergence of communities from CWD-influenced and CWD-uninfluenced microhabitats. Additionally, the leaf and root pathogens and symbionts of herbaceous plants, which were more frequent in CWD-free microsites in UP forests, contributed to the compositional and diversity differences between the microhabitats in those areas. The decline of this group, which was caused by the toxicity-induced elimination of potential hosts in polluted areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Trubina, 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">2020</xref>), may have led to the convergence of these two microhabitat types.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS2">
<title>Fungal Diversity in Coarse Woody Debris</title>
<p>Notably, there were two to three times more fungal OTUs in the forest litter than in wood. This proportion corresponds to the results obtained from a similar sampling scheme (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">M&#x00E4;kip&#x00E4;&#x00E4; et al., 2017</xref>). The distinct composition of wood fungal communities and the diversity gap between wood and litter indicate that the unintentional influx of DNA from the outside into a piece of CWD is very limited at this decomposition stage.</p>
<p>Considering the low saturation of wood with heavy metals and its high water-holding capacity, we predicted that the impoverishment of fungal communities in CWD would be lower than in HP forest litter. Conversely, the fungal alpha diversity in wood from the moderately polluted area was similar to that of the unpolluted area and increased in HP forests, leading to a higher proportion of forest floor fungal diversity being supported by CWD. One of the primary factors of wood dwellers&#x2019; welfare is the availability of woody debris as forage or habitat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Heilmann-Clausen and Christensen, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">B&#x00E4;ssler et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Josefsson et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Runnel and L&#x00F5;hmus, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Runnel et al., 2021</xref>). Therefore, the increased tree dieback and treefall caused by pollution close to the smelter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">Vorobeichik et al., 2014</xref>) could promote fungal diversity in wood. This effect can hardly be neutralized by the observed levels of toxicity in wood. According to metal-tolerance tests, fungi can withstand more than 25 &#x03BC;g/g of water-soluble copper salts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Englander and Corden, 1971</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Colpaert and Van Assche, 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Daniel and Nilsson, 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B106">Woodward and De Groot, 1999</xref>). According to the results of chemical analyses, in the heavily polluted area, only one-third of wood samples with 26.6&#x2013;87.6 &#x03BC;g/g of exchangeable copper forms (which include water-soluble forms) could exceed this threshold, while 90% of forest litter samples contained 28.0&#x2013;422.0 &#x03BC;g/g of exchangeable copper compounds.</p>
<p>The pollution-induced convergence of fungal diversity and composition between forest litter and wood provide indirect evidence of CWD sheltering soil fungi in polluted areas. However, in addition to typical wood dwellers, the taxa that did not decrease (or even increased) in diversity and relative abundance in polluted wood were the eurytopic soil saprobes and EcM fungi that tolerate polluted soil. Decayed wood can hardly be vital for these groups close to the smelter.</p>
<p>By contrast, saprotrophic Agaricomycetes suffered from a heavy pollution-induced diversity decline in forest litter (as was shown in this and previous works for southern taiga and pre-forest-steppe pine-birch forests; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Mikryukov et al., 2020</xref>). Therefore, the revealed significant repartition of surviving Tricholomataceae OTUs between wood and forest litter may indicate that CWD can serve as one of the last harbors for this vulnerable group in polluted environments. We focused on saprotrophic members of this taxon and, by using publicly available data on fruiting body observations, classified 88 OTUs annotated to the species level by substrate specialization into terricolous, wood-dwelling, and wood-terricolous species (fruiting on soil, wood, or both substrates, respectively; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS11">Supplementary Table 11</xref>). The former and latter groups significantly repartitioned toward the wood in the heavily polluted area (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS5">Supplementary Figure 5</xref>) due to the disproportionate decrease in occurrence within polluted litter and wood. This indicates a sheltering function of CWD in inhospitable environments, even for species considered terricolous. Thus, a peculiar delimitation of species based on substrate requirements provided the opportunity to discern the importance of CWD for non-wood-dwelling fungi. It would be informative to perform a similar analysis of multispecies groups, which repartitioned toward wood under pollution effects (i.e., Pezizomycetes and Lecanoromycetes).</p>
<p>Some of these findings contribute to knowledge about the ecological requirements of poorly studied fungal groups. For instance, we registered Archaeorhizomycetes in a large number of CWD pieces (including in the HP area), which supports their single observation in wood by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Rajala et al. (2011)</xref> and verifies that Archaeorhizomycetes tend to inhabit acidic and organic-rich substrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Pinto-Figueroa et al., 2019</xref>). Many <italic>Mortierella</italic> OTUs were abundant and frequent in wood. Of these, <italic>Mortierella gemmifera</italic>, <italic>Mortierella pulchella</italic>, and <italic>Mortierella humilis</italic> have already been found in well-decayed Norway spruce CWD (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baldrian et al., 2016</xref>). Here, we show that for <italic>Mortierella fimbricystis</italic>, <italic>M. gemmifera</italic>, <italic>Mortierella jenkinii</italic>, and <italic>M. pulchella</italic>, wood can be preferential and thus a potentially important substrate in dark coniferous forests (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS6">Supplementary Figure 6</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS3">
<title>Limitations</title>
<p>This work has two obvious limitations regarding replication. First, our work was performed in the vicinity of a single copper smelter and may not be indicative of other heavy metal pollution sources in boreal and temperate forests. However, the patterns of forest litter fungal response to industrial pollution revealed in our previous work in the southern taiga near the Middle Ural copper smelter and birch-pine forests near the Karabash copper smelter (Southern Urals, pre-forest-steppe subzone) are largely similar (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Mikryukov et al., 2020</xref>). Second, our study plots were geographically aggregated to the source of pollution by distance, which limits their statistical independence and adds an area effect that confounds the pollution effect.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S5" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Our results confirm the vital role of coniferous CWD for boreal forest biodiversity by showing that one-third of terrestrial fungal richness resides in decaying wood. We also found that CWD-shadowed litter has specific physicochemical parameters and may hold a higher number of species than the litter in CWD-free localities. The fraction of species harbored by wood substantially increased in the pollution gradient, which formally verifies the hypothesis that CWD &#x2013; which is less impregnated with toxicants than forest litter &#x2013; acts as microrefugium for forest floor fungi. However, our substantive analysis showed that both litter and woody debris are invaded by pollution-tolerant litter dwellers in polluted areas, thereby causing an overestimation of the role of CWD as a microrefugium. The repartitioning of pollution-sensitive fungal orders and families from highly toxic litter to wood appeared to be the most promising tool for CWD importance assessment. However, species&#x2019; substrate preferences must be considered to achieve valid inferences. An important implication of the present work is that CWD will hardly provide propagules to facilitate soil fungal community regeneration following toxic load cessation. Thus, the influx of propagules from unpolluted areas through forest corridors must be provided.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Material</xref>. DNA sequences recovered in this study were deposited in NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession numbers SRR14752847 &#x2013; SRR14753115 (BioProject PRJNA735619, Study ID SRP323118, BioSample IDs SAMN19591351 &#x2013; SAMN19591619). OTU sequences and their occurrences were deposited in a publicly accessible repository at PlutoF platform (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://plutof.ut.ee/">https://plutof.ut.ee/</ext-link>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>VM and OD designed the study and performed the statistical analyses. VM, OD, and IB collected the samples. OD and AL performed the chemical analysis and functionally annotated Tricholomataceae OTUs. GL performed the molecular-genetic analysis. OD, VM, and LT wrote the manuscript with input from other authors. All authors contributed to manuscript revision and read and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="pudiscl1">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="S8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research with grants 18-29-05042 and 19-04-00921, and the State Assignment of the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (contract AAAA-A19-119031890088-4).</p></sec>
<ack>
<p>We thank Evgenii Vorobeichik for helpful discussions, Makar Modrov for assistance in the sample collection, Vladimir Kukarskih for the help with dendrochronological cross-dating of CWD, Anton Schepetkin and Tatyana Gabershtein for the assistance in chemical analysis, Tatiana Ivlieva for sample sequencing, and Liis Tiirmann and Peter Kowalski for proofreading the manuscript. Rarefaction analysis was performed using the &#x201C;Uran&#x201D; supercomputer at the Krasovskii Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics (IMM UB RAS).</p>
</ack>
<sec id="S10" sec-type="supplementary material">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.729244/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.729244/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_2.PDF" id="FS1" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Areas with different levels of pollution from the smelter (UP, unpolluted area; MP, moderately polluted; HP, heavily polluted). Dots indicate sites with 10 sampling plots each. <bold>(B)</bold> The scheme of a sampling plot; w<sub>1</sub>&#x2013;w<sub>3</sub> depict wood sampling points, L<sub><italic>w1</italic></sub>&#x2013; L<sub><italic>w3</italic></sub>, forest litter sampling points in CWD-influenced microhabitats, L<sub>1</sub>&#x2013;L<sub>3</sub>, forest litter sampling points in CWD-uninfluenced microhabitats. In the upper right corner of the picture, five dots on a woodblock denote the spots from which wood was collected.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_2.PDF" id="FS2" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>The average number of fungal OTUs in the litter collected far from CWD in unpolluted (UP), moderately polluted (MP), and heavily polluted (HP) areas (<italic>n</italic> = 29 samples per area).</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_2.PDF" id="FS3" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>The average number of fungal OTUs in the wood in unpolluted (UP), moderately polluted (MP), and heavily polluted (HP) areas (<italic>n</italic> = 29 samples per area).</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_2.PDF" id="FS4" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>The average number of fungal OTUs in the litter collected close to CWD in unpolluted (UP), moderately polluted (MP), and heavily polluted (HP) areas (<italic>n</italic> = 29 samples per area).</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_2.PDF" id="FS5" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>The proportion of occurrence of saprotrophic Tricholomataceae OTUs with different substrate specialization (T, terricolous; WT, wood-terricolous; W, wood-dwelling) in the wood in polluted areas. Comparisons of <bold>(A)</bold> OTU sets inhabiting UP (green) and MP (blue) areas and <bold>(B)</bold> OTU sets inhabiting UP (green) and HP (red) areas. Asterisks denote a significant difference in the fraction of OTUs occurrences in wood between two areas (GLMM, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_2.PDF" id="FS6" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 6</label>
<caption><p>The occurrence of <italic>Mortierella</italic> species in wood, CWD-influenced, and CWD-uninfluenced forest litter.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_3.xlsx" id="TS1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Soil and vegetation characteristics in the studied areas. Means &#x00B1; standard deviations are shown for stand density.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_3.xlsx" id="TS2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Storozhenko&#x2019;s classification system of downed CWD.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_3.xlsx" id="TS3" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Sample list with SRA accession numbers.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_3.xlsx" id="TS4" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 4</label>
<caption><p>Relationship between fungal alpha diversity and environmental parameters along the pollution gradient.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_3.xlsx" id="TS5" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 5</label>
<caption><p>The fungal compositional dissimilarity between different substrates (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>).</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_3.xlsx" id="TS6" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 6</label>
<caption><p>The effect of area and sampling locality on Simpson&#x2019;s abundance-based dissimilarity of fungal communities between microhabitats (forest litter close to CWD and far from CWD).</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_3.xlsx" id="TS7" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 7</label>
<caption><p>Occurrence of fungal OTUs in different substrates.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_3.xlsx" id="TS8" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 8</label>
<caption><p>Relationship between fungal alpha diversity and environmental parameters within each pollution area and substrate type.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_3.xlsx" id="TS9" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 9</label>
<caption><p>The effect of area on the fungal OTU richness between the substrates or microhabitats.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_3.xlsx" id="TS10" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 10</label>
<caption><p>Average Simpson&#x2019;s dissimilarity between wood and forest litter samples collected from different and similar sampling plots.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_3.xlsx" id="TS11" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 11</label>
<caption><p>Occurrence of Tricholomataceae OTUs with different substrate specialization (defined based on literature data) in wood and forest litter.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.ZIP" id="SM1" mimetype="application/zip" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Appendix 1</label>
<caption><p>Sequences of the fungal ITS2 OTUs observed in the current study (FASTA format).</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance.</article-title> <source><italic>Austral Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>26</volume> <fpage>32</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baldrian</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Effect of heavy metals on saprotrophic soil fungi</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Soil Heavy Metals</italic></source>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Varma</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sherameti</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Heidelberg</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>263</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>279</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-642-02436-8_12</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baldrian</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zr&#x016F;stov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tl&#x00E1;skal</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davidov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Merhautov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vr&#x0161;ka</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Fungi associated with decomposing deadwood in a natural beech-dominated forest.</article-title> <source><italic>Fungal Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>23</volume> <fpage>109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>122</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.funeco.2016.07.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>B&#x00E4;ssler</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00FC;ller</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dziock</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brandl</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Effects of resource availability and climate on the diversity of wood-decaying fungi.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>98</volume> <fpage>822</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>832</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01669.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00E4;chler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bolker</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Stat. Softw.</italic></source> <volume>67</volume>:<issue>48</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18637/jss.v067.i01</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bengtsson</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nordstrom</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rundgren</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Population-density and tissue metal concentration of lumbricids in forest soils near a brass mill.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Pollut.</italic></source> <volume>30</volume> <fpage>87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>108</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0143-1471(83)90007-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>B&#x00E9;rard</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Capowiez</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mombo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schreck</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dumat</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deola</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Soil microbial respiration and PICT responses to an industrial and historic lead pollution: a field study.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.</italic></source> <volume>23</volume> <fpage>4271</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4281</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-015-5089-z</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26233741</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>B&#x00E9;rard</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mazzia</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sappin-Didier</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Capowiez</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Capowiez</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Use of the MicroResp<sup>TM</sup> method to assess pollution-induced community tolerance in the context of metal soil contamination.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecol. Indic.</italic></source> <volume>40</volume> <fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.12.024</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Birkemoe</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacobsen</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sverdrup-Thygeson</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Biedermann</surname> <given-names>P. H. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Insect-fungus interactions in dead wood systems</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Saproxylic Insects. Zoological Monographs</italic></source>, <role>ed.</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Ulyshen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-75937-1_</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blagodatskaya</surname> <given-names>E. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pampura</surname> <given-names>T. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bogomolova</surname> <given-names>I. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koptsik</surname> <given-names>G. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lukina</surname> <given-names>N. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Effect of emissions from a copper-nickel Smelter on soil microbial communities in forest biogeocenoses of the Kola Peninsula.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Bull.</italic></source> <volume>35</volume> <fpage>202</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>210</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1134/S1062359008020155</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boddy</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Microclimate and moisture dynamics of wood decomposing in terrestrial ecosystems.</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Biol. Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume> <fpage>149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>157</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(83)90096-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boddy</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Watkinson</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Wood decomposition, higher fungi, and their role in nutrient redistribution.</article-title> <source><italic>Can. J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>73</volume> <fpage>1377</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1383</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/b95-400</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33356898</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brunson</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>ggalluvial: layered grammar for alluvial plots.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Open Source Softw.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume>:<issue>2017</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21105/joss.02017</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Callahan</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcmurdie</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosen</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>A. J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holmes</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Methods</italic></source> <volume>13</volume>:<issue>581</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/Nmeth.3869</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27214047</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chao</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chazdon</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Colwell</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Abundance-based similarity indices and their estimation when there are unseen species in samples.</article-title> <source><italic>Biometrics</italic></source> <volume>62</volume> <fpage>361</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>371</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00489.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16918900</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Checko</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jaroszewicz</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olejniczak</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kwiatkowska-Falinska</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The importance of coarse woody debris for vascular plants in temperate mixed deciduous forests.</article-title> <source><italic>Can. J. Forest Res.</italic></source> <volume>45</volume> <fpage>1154</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1163</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/cjfr-2014-0473</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33356898</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Heavy metal pollution decreases microbial abundance, diversity and activity within particle-size fractions of a paddy soil.</article-title> <source><italic>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>87</volume> <fpage>164</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>181</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1574-6941.12212</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24020402</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clavel</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reitmeier</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hitch</surname> <given-names>T. C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Treichel</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fikas</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hausmann</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Handling of spurious sequences affects the outcome of high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon profiling.</article-title> <source><italic>Res. Sq.</italic></source> [preprint]. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21203/rs.3.rs-117421/v1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Colpaert</surname> <given-names>J. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Assche</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Heavy metal tolerance in some ectomycorrhizal fungi.</article-title> <source><italic>Funct. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>1</volume> <fpage>415</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>421</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2389799</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Daniel</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nilsson</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Studies on preservative tolerant <italic>Phialophora</italic> species.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. Biodeterior.</italic></source> <volume>24</volume> <fpage>327</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>335</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0265-3036(88)90018-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dittrich</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacob</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bade</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leuschner</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hauck</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The significance of deadwood for total bryophyte, lichen, and vascular plant diversity in an old-growth spruce forest.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>215</volume> <fpage>1123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1137</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11258-014-0371-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dudka</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adriano</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Environmental impacts of metal ore mining and processing: a review.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Environ. Qual.</italic></source> <volume>26</volume> <fpage>590</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>602</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600030003x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dulya</surname> <given-names>O. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bergman</surname> <given-names>I. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kukarskih</surname> <given-names>V. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vorobeichik</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smirnov</surname> <given-names>G. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mikryukov</surname> <given-names>V. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Pollution-induced slowdown of coarse woody debris decomposition differs between two coniferous tree species.</article-title> <source><italic>For. Ecol. Manage.</italic></source> <volume>448</volume> <fpage>312</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>320</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2019.06.026</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edgar</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>SINTAX: a simple non-Bayesian taxonomy classifier for 16S and ITS sequences.</article-title> <source><italic>bioRxiv</italic> [Preprint]</source>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/074161</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edgar</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flyvbjerg</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Error filtering, pair assembly and error correction for next-generation sequencing reads.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioinformatics</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>3476</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3482</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btv401</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26139637</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Englander</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Corden</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1971</year>). <article-title>Stimulation of mycelial growth of <italic>Endothia parasitica</italic> by heavy metals.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>1012</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1016</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clinton</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frampton</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>The influence of logs on the spatial distribution of litter-dwelling invertebrates and forest floor processes in New Zealand forests.</article-title> <source><italic>For. Ecol. Manage.</italic></source> <volume>184</volume> <fpage>251</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>262</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00158-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fox</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weisberg</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source><italic>An R Companion to Applied Regression.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Los Angeles</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>SAGE</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fr&#x00F8;slev</surname> <given-names>T. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kj&#x00F8;ller</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bruun</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ejrn&#x00E6;s</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brunbjerg</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pietroni</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Algorithm for post-clustering curation of DNA amplicon data yields reliable biodiversity estimates.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Commun.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>1188</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-017-01312-x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29084957</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fukasawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Effects of wood decomposer fungi on tree seedling establishment on coarse woody debris.</article-title> <source><italic>For. Ecol. Manage.</italic></source> <volume>266</volume> <fpage>232</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>238</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.027</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fukasawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Seedling regeneration on decayed pine logs after the deforestation events caused by pine wilt disease.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. For. Res.</italic></source> <volume>59</volume> <fpage>191</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>198</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15287/afr.2016.572</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fukasawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Ecological impacts of fungal wood decay types: a review of current knowledge and future research directions.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecol. Res.</italic></source> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1440-1703.12260</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goldin</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hutchinson</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Coarse woody debris reduces the rate of moisture loss from surface soils of cleared temperate Australian woodlands.</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Res.</italic></source> <volume>52</volume> <fpage>637</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>644</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/SR13337</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goldin</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hutchinson</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Thermal refugia in cleared temperate Australian woodlands: coarse woody debris moderate extreme surface soil temperatures.</article-title> <source><italic>Agric. For. Meteorol.</italic></source> <volume>214&#x2013;215</volume> <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.07.011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Graham</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1925</year>). <article-title>The felled tree trunk as an ecological unit.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecology</italic></source> <volume>6</volume> <fpage>397</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>411</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1929106</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grier</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Logan</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1977</year>). <article-title>Old-growth <italic>Pseudotsuga menziesii</italic> communities of a Western Oregon watershed: biomass distribution and production budgets.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecol. Monogr.</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>373</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>400</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1942174</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harmon</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franklin</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swanson</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sollins</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gregory</surname> <given-names>S. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lattin</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems.</article-title> <source><italic>Adv. Ecol. Res.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume> <fpage>133</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>302</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60121-X</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heilmann-Clausen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Christensen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Fungal diversity on decaying beech logs - implications for sustainable forestry.</article-title> <source><italic>Biodivers. Conserv.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume> <fpage>953</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>973</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1022825809503</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hothorn</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bretz</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Westfall</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.</article-title> <source><italic>Biom. J.</italic></source> <volume>50</volume> <fpage>346</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>363</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hui</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kurola</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mikola</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Romantschuk</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Lead (Pb) contamination alters richness and diversity of the fungal, but not the bacterial community in pine forest soil.</article-title> <source><italic>Boreal Environ. Res.</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ihrmark</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x00F6;deker</surname> <given-names>I. T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cruz-Martinez</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Friberg</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kubartova</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schenck</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>New primers to amplify the fungal ITS2 region &#x2013; evaluation by 454-sequencing of artificial and natural communities.</article-title> <source><italic>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>82</volume> <fpage>666</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>677</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01437.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22738186</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jaeger</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>Microhabitats of a terrestrial forest salamander.</article-title> <source><italic>Copeia</italic></source> <volume>1980</volume> <fpage>265</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>268</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1444003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Josefsson</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olsson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x00D6;stlund</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Linking forest history and conservation efforts: long-term impact of low-intensity timber harvest on forest structure and wood-inhabiting fungi in northern Sweden.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Conserv.</italic></source> <volume>143</volume> <fpage>1803</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1811</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.035</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jost</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Entropy and diversity.</article-title> <source><italic>Oikos</italic></source> <volume>113</volume> <fpage>363</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>375</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kappes</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Catalano</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Topp</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Coarse woody debris ameliorates chemical and biotic soil parameters of acidified broad-leaved forests.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Soil Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>36</volume> <fpage>190</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>198</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.02.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Fixation and leaching characteristics of Douglas fir treated with CCA-C.</article-title> <source><italic>For. Prod. J.</italic></source> <volume>58</volume> <fpage>73</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Koch</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grigg</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gordon</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Majer</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Arthropods in coarse woody debris in jarrah forest and rehabilitated bauxite mines in Western Australia.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>67</volume>:<issue>106</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/forest/2009087</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>K&#x00F5;ljalg</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nilsson</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abarenkov</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tedersoo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>A. F. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bahram</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>5271</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5277</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mec.12481</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24112409</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kozlov</surname> <given-names>M. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zvereva</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zverev</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <source><italic>Impacts of Point Polluters on Ferrestrial Biota.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Larjavaara</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muller-Landau</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Comparison of decay classification, knife test, and two penetrometers for estimating wood density of coarse woody debris.</article-title> <source><italic>Can. J. For. Res.</italic></source> <volume>40</volume> <fpage>2313</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2321</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/X10-170</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33356898</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lassauce</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paillet</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jactel</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bouget</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Deadwood as a surrogate for forest biodiversity: meta-analysis of correlations between deadwood volume and species richness of saproxylic organisms.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecol. Indic.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume> <fpage>1027</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1039</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.02.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>L&#x00EA;</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Josse</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Husson</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Stat. Softw.</italic></source> <volume>25</volume>:<issue>18</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18637/jss.v025.i01</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lepinay</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jir&#x00E1;ska</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tl&#x00E1;skal</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brabcov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vr&#x0161;ka</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baldrian</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Successional development of fungal communities associated with decomposing deadwood in a natural mixed temperate forest.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Fungi</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<issue>412</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/jof7060412</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34070657</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Effect of heavy metals on substrate utilization pattern, biomass, and activity of microbial communities in a reclaimed mining wasteland of red soil area.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.</italic></source> <volume>66</volume> <fpage>217</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>223</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.12.013</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16488009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lindahl</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stenlid</surname> <given-names>J.a.N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olsson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Finlay</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Translocation of <sup>32</sup>P between interacting mycelia of a wood-decomposing fungus and ectomycorrhizal fungi in microcosm systems.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>144</volume> <fpage>183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>193</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00502.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>L&#x00FC;cking</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aime</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robbertse</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ariyawansa</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aoki</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Unambiguous identification of fungi: where do we stand and how accurate and precise is fungal DNA barcoding?</article-title> <source><italic>IMA Fungus</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>14</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s43008-020-00033-z</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32714773</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mah&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Czech</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stamatakis</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quince</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Vargas</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunthorn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Swarm v3: towards tera-scale amplicon clustering.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioinformatics</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>btab493</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btab493</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34244702</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>M&#x00E4;kip&#x00E4;&#x00E4;</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajala</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schigel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rinne</surname> <given-names>K. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pennanen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abrego</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Interactions between soil and dead wood-inhabiting fungal communities during the decay of Norway spruce logs.</article-title> <source><italic>ISME J</italic>.</source> <volume>11</volume> <fpage>1964</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1974</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2017.57</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28430188</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marra</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edmonds</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Effects of coarse woody debris and soil depth on the density and diversity of soil invertebrates on clearcut and forested sites on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Entomol.</italic></source> <volume>27</volume> <fpage>1111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1124</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/ee/27.5.1111</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads.</article-title> <source><italic>EMBnet J.</italic></source> <volume>2011</volume>:<issue>3</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14806/ej.17.1.200</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maser</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cline</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cormack</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trappe</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hansen</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>What we know about large trees that fall to the forest floor</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>From the Forest to the Sea: A Story of Fallen Trees</italic></source>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Maser</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tarrant</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trappe</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franklin</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>USDA</publisher-name>), <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maser</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trappe</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <source><italic>The Seen and Unseen World of the Fallen Tree.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Portland, OR</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Pacific Northwest Research Station</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McMurdie</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holmes</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data.</article-title> <source><italic>PLos One</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>e61217</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0061217</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23630581</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mikryukov</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>metagMisc: an R package for metagenomic analysis.</article-title> <source><italic>Zenodo</italic></source> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5281/zenodo.1172500</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mikryukov</surname> <given-names>V. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dulya</surname> <given-names>O. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Contamination-induced transformation of bacterial and fungal communities in spruce-fir and birch forest litter.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Soil Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>114</volume> <fpage>111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>122</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.03.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mikryukov</surname> <given-names>V. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dulya</surname> <given-names>O. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Fungal communities in organic and mineral soil horizons in an industrially polluted boreal forest.</article-title> <source><italic>Biodiversity</italic></source> <volume>19</volume> <fpage>161</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>171</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14888386.2018.1500307</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mikryukov</surname> <given-names>V. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dulya</surname> <given-names>O. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Modorov</surname> <given-names>M. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic signature of fungal response to long-term chemical pollution.</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Biol. Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>140</volume>:<issue>107644</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107644</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mikryukov</surname> <given-names>V. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dulya</surname> <given-names>O. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vorobeichik</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Diversity and spatial structure of soil fungi and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in forest litter contaminated with copper smelter emissions.</article-title> <source><italic>Water Air Soil Pollut.</italic></source> <volume>226</volume>:<issue>114</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11270-014-2244-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>M&#x00F6;lder</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jablonski</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Letcher</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tomkins-Tinch</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sochat</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake.</article-title> <source><italic>F1000Res</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<issue>33</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12688/f1000research.29032.2</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34035898</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nilsson</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larsson</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>A. F. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bengtsson-Palme</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeppesen</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schigel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>D259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>D264</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gky1022</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30371820</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B71"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oksanen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blanchet</surname> <given-names>F. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Friendly</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kindt</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Legendre</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcglinn</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source><italic>vegan: Community Ecology Package.</italic> R package</source>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan</ext-link> <comment>(accessed November 28, 2020)</comment>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ottosson</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <source><italic>Succession of Wood-Inhabiting Fungal Communities. Diversity and Species Interactions During the Decomposition of Norway spruce</italic>. Ph.D. thesis</source>. <publisher-loc>Uppsala</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ottosson</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kubartova</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>J&#x00F6;nsson</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lindhe</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stenlid</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Diverse ecological roles within fungal communities in decomposing logs of <italic>Picea abies</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>91</volume>:<issue>fiv012</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femsec/fiv012</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25764460</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B74"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Palmer</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jusino</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Banik</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lindner</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Non-biological synthetic spike-in controls and the AMPtk software pipeline improve mycobiome data.</article-title> <source><italic>PeerJ</italic></source> <volume>6</volume>:<issue>e4925</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7717/peerj.4925</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29868296</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B75"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Persson</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lenoir</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vegerfors</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Which macroarthropods prefer tree stumps over soil and litter substrates?</article-title> <source><italic>For. Ecol. Manage.</italic></source> <volume>290</volume> <fpage>30</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B76"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pinto-Figueroa</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seddon</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yashiro</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buri</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niculita-Hirzel</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Der Meer</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Archaeorhizomycetes spatial distribution in soils along wide elevational and environmental gradients reveal co-abundance patterns with other fungal saprobes and potential weathering capacities.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<issue>656</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.00656</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31019495</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B77"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>P&#x00F5;lme</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abarenkov</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henrik Nilsson</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lindahl</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clemmensen</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kauserud</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>FungalTraits: a user-friendly traits database of fungi and fungus-like stramenopiles.</article-title> <source><italic>Fungal Divers.</italic></source> <volume>105</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13225-020-00466-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B78"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>R Core Team</collab> (<year>2021</year>). <source><italic>R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Vienna, Wien</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B79"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rajala</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peltoniemi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hantula</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00E4;kip&#x00E4;&#x00E4;</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pennanen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>RNA reveals a succession of active fungi during the decay of Norway spruce logs.</article-title> <source><italic>Fungal Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>4</volume> <fpage>437</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>448</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.funeco.2011.05.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B80"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rognes</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flouri</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nichols</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quince</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mah&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics.</article-title> <source><italic>PeerJ</italic></source> <volume>4</volume>:<issue>e2584</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7717/peerj.2584</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27781170</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B81"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Runnel</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x00F5;hmus</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Deadwood-rich managed forests provide insights into the old-forest association of wood-inhabiting fungi.</article-title> <source><italic>Fungal Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>27</volume> <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>167</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.funeco.2016.09.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B82"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Runnel</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drenkhan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adamson</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x00F5;hmus</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosenvald</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosenvald</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The factors and scales shaping fungal assemblages in fallen spruce trunks: a DNA metabarcoding study.</article-title> <source><italic>For. Ecol. Manage.</italic></source> <volume>495</volume>:<issue>119381</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119381</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B83"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spears</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holub</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harmon</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lajtha</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>The influence of decomposing logs on soil biology and nutrient cycling in an old-growth mixed coniferous forest in Oregon, U.S.A.</article-title> <source><italic>Can. J. For. Res.</italic></source> <volume>33</volume> <fpage>2193</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2201</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/x03-148</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33356898</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B84"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spurgeon</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hopkin</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Effects of metal-contaminated soils on the growth, sexual development, and early cocoon production of the earthworm <italic>Eisenia fetida</italic>, with particular reference to Zinc.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.</italic></source> <volume>35</volume> <fpage>86</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>95</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/eesa.1996.0085</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8930509</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B85"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stokland</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Siitonen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jonsson</surname> <given-names>B. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <source><italic>Biodiversity in Dead Wood.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B86"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Storozhenko</surname> <given-names>V. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>The dating of downed spruce decomposition [in Russian].</article-title> <source><italic>Russ. J. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>66</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>69</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B87"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tedersoo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anslan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bahram</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drenkhan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pritsch</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buegger</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Regional-scale in-depth analysis of soil fungal diversity reveals strong pH and plant species effects in Northern Europe.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>1953</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.01953</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33013735</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B88"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tedersoo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>K&#x00F5;ljalg</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hallenberg</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larsson</surname> <given-names>K.-H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Fine scale distribution of ectomycorrhizal fungi and roots across substrate layers including coarse woody debris in a mixed forest.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>159</volume> <fpage>153</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>165</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00792.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33873690</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B89"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tedersoo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suvi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jairus</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>K&#x00F5;ljalg</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Forest microsite effects on community composition of ectomycorrhizal fungi on seedlings of <italic>Picea abies</italic> and <italic>Betula pendula</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume> <fpage>1189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1201</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01535.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18266759</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B90"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Torchiano</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effsize&#x2013;a package for efficient effect size computation.</article-title> <source><italic>Zenodo</italic></source> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5281/zenodo.196082</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B91"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Torres-Cruz</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hesse</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuske</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Porras-Alfaro</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Presence and distribution of heavy metal tolerant fungi in surface soils of a temperate pine forest.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Soil Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>131</volume> <fpage>66</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.08.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B92"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trubina</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Species richness and resilience of forest communities: combined effects of short-term disturbance and long-term pollution.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>201</volume> <fpage>339</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>350</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11258-008-9558-z</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B93"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trubina</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Vulnerability to copper smelter emissions in species of the herb-dwarf shrub layer: role of differences in the type of diaspore dispersal.</article-title> <source><italic>Russ. J. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>51</volume> <fpage>107</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>117</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1134/S1067413620020125</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B94"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>USEPA</collab> (<year>2007</year>). <source><italic>Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods (SW</italic>&#x2013;<italic>846)</italic> URL</source>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.epa.gov/hw-sw846/sw-846-test-method-7000b-flame-atomic-absorption-spectrophotometry">https://www.epa.gov/hw-sw846/sw-846-test-method-7000b-flame-atomic-absorption-spectrophotometry</ext-link> <comment>(accessed June 22, 2021)</comment>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B95"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Veselkin</surname> <given-names>D. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Influence of heavy metal and SO<sub>2</sub> pollution on ectomycorrhizas of <italic>Picea obovata</italic> and <italic>Abies sibirica</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Mycol. Phytopathol.</italic></source> <volume>38</volume> <fpage>20</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B96"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vorobeichik</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Populations of earthworms (Lumbricidae) in forests of the middle urals in conditions of pollution by discharge from copper works.</article-title> <source><italic>Russ. J. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>29</volume> <fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>91</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B97"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vorobeichik</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bergman</surname> <given-names>I. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Bait-lamina test in the assessment of polluted soils: choice of exposure duration.</article-title> <source><italic>Russ. J. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>51</volume> <fpage>430</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>439</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1134/S1067413620050136</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B98"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vorobeichik</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaigorodova</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Long-term dynamics of heavy metals in the upper horizons of soils in the region of a copper smelter impacts during the period of reduced emission.</article-title> <source><italic>Eurasian Soil Sci.</italic></source> <volume>50</volume> <fpage>977</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>990</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1134/S1064229317080130</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B99"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vorobeichik</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khantemirova</surname> <given-names>E. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Reaction of forest phytocenoses to technogenic pollution&#x2013;Dose-effect dependences.</article-title> <source><italic>Russ. J. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>25</volume> <fpage>171</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B100"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vorobeichik</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pishchulin</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Effect of trees on the decomposition rate of cellulose in soils under industrial pollution.</article-title> <source><italic>Eurasian Soil Sci.</italic></source> <volume>44</volume> <fpage>547</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>560</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1134/S1064229311050140</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B101"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vorobeichik</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ermakov</surname> <given-names>A. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nesterkova</surname> <given-names>D. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grebennikov</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Coarse woody debris as microhabitats of soil macrofauna in polluted areas.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Bull.</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>96</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1134/S1062359020010173</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B102"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vorobeichik</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trubina</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khantemirova</surname> <given-names>E. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bergman</surname> <given-names>I. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Long-term dynamic of forest vegetation after reduction of copper smelter emissions.</article-title> <source><italic>Russ. J. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>45</volume> <fpage>498</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>507</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1134/S1067413614060150</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B103"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The influence of soil heavy metals pollution on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity, and community composition near a copper smelter.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.</italic></source> <volume>67</volume> <fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.03.007</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16828162</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B104"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bruns</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications</italic></source>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Innis</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gelfand</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sninsky</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>315</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>322</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B105"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wickham</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source><italic>ggplot2: Elegant Graphics For Data Analysis</italic></source>, <edition>2nd Edn</edition>. <publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer International Publishing</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B106"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Woodward</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Groot</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Tolerance of <italic>Wolfiporia cocos</italic> isolates to copper in agar media.</article-title> <source><italic>For. Prod. J.</italic></source> <volume>49</volume> <fpage>87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>.</citation></ref>
</ref-list></back>
</article>
