<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.658113</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Whole Genome Sequence of <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> Strain GUMT319: A Potential Biocontrol Agent Against Tobacco Black Shank Disease</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>Haixia</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1086723/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Mo</surname> <given-names>Weidi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Shui</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Huanhuan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Lijuan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Zuoyi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c002"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Guizhou University</institution>, <addr-line>Guiyang</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Guiyang</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>College of Tobacco Science, Guizhou University</institution>, <addr-line>Guiyang</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Guizhou Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biotechnology, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Guiyang</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Amin Uddin Mridha, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Khaled Abbas El-Tarabily, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates; Orlando Borras-Hidalgo, Qilu University of Technology, China</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Lijuan Peng, <email>296430006@qq.com</email></corresp>
<corresp id="c002">Zuoyi Liu, <email>gzliuzuoyi@163.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>06</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>658113</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>25</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>25</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2021 Ding, Mo, Yu, Cheng, Peng and Liu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Ding, Mo, Yu, Cheng, Peng and Liu</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p><italic>Phytophthora nicotianae</italic> causes black shank, a serious soil-borne disease, in tobacco. In this study, the <italic>Bacillus</italic> strain GUMT319 was isolated from the rhizosphere of healthy tobacco plants grown in a field in Guizhou with a high incidence of tobacco black shank. Genome sequencing revealed that GUMT319 contained a single circular chromosome 3,940,023 bp in length, with 4,053 predicted genes and an average GC content of 46.6%. Based on phylogenomic analyses, GUMT319 was designated as <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic>. The genome of GUMT319 contained more than 60 genes and 13 gene clusters that have previously been found to be active in antifungal mechanisms, biofilm formation, and chemotaxis motility. Additionally, confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy showed that GUMT319 formed a spatially organized biofilm <italic>in vivo</italic>. In addition, lauric acid negatively regulated biofilm formation. This is the first study to report that nicotine in tobacco root exudates was a chemoattractant for biocontrol <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains. In this study, we identified new interactions between beneficial microorganisms and tobacco roots in the rhizosphere. Moreover, dual culture tests <italic>in vitro</italic> showed that GUMT319 inhibited the growth of <italic>P. nicotianae</italic> and also displayed inhibitory effects against eight other plant pathogens, namely, <italic>Colletotrichum scovillei</italic>, <italic>Colletotrichum capsici</italic>, <italic>Fusarium carminascens</italic>, <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic>, <italic>Alternaria alternata</italic>, <italic>Phomopsis</italic> sp., <italic>Phyllosticta sorghina</italic>, and <italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic>. Furthermore, GUMT319 exhibited &#x003E; 70% control efficiency against tobacco black shank in field experiments conducted in 2018&#x2013;2020. Thus, GUMT319 was more effective in controlling the incidence of tobacco black shank than other treatments including fungicide application. Overall, these results suggested that GUMT319 (<italic>B. velezensis</italic>) could be used as a potential biocontrol agent against tobacco black shank.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>tobacco black shank</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic></kwd>
<kwd>biocontrol</kwd>
<kwd>genome sequencing</kwd>
<kwd>antifungal</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">China Postdoctoral Science Foundation<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100002858</named-content></contract-sponsor><contract-sponsor id="cn002">Guizhou Education Department Youth Science and Technology Talents Growth Project<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100013055</named-content></contract-sponsor><contract-sponsor id="cn003">China Tobacco Guizhou Industrial<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100008921</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="40"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="0"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Tobacco black shank, caused by the fungal pathogen <italic>Phytophthora nicotianae</italic>, is a serious disease of flue-cured tobacco, which is an economically important crop in Guizhou, China. The severity of tobacco black shank continues to increase each year, causing significant economic losses. In the field, tobacco black shank affects the stem base (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Han et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Guo et al., 2020</xref>) and the chemical fungicide metalaxyl is generally used for disease control. However, this practice is not conducive to the development of sustainable tobacco agriculture, as it creates an excessive dependence on chemical agents, leaves fungicide residues, and causes environmental pollution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Han et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Guo et al., 2020</xref>). As an alternative, biological control agents (BCAs) offer safe alternative methods for controlling tobacco black shank (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Zhang et al., 2017a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Srikhong et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Biocontrol has proved to be a promising strategy for the management of many plant diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chowdhury et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Han et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zhang et al., 2017c</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fan et al., 2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Mao et al., 2020</xref>). Numerous BCAs have been studied, but only a limited number of strains, such as those of <italic>Bacillus</italic> species, have been commercially developed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chowdhury et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fan et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Ye et al., 2020</xref>). <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. are ubiquitous bacteria widely distributed in natural environments, especially in the rhizosphere and plant roots. They are also excellent candidates for BCAs since they produce heat- and desiccation-resistant endospores that are easily stored and transported as stable products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Weng et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fan et al., 2018</xref>). However, the use of BCAs remains a challenge since their effect in the field is frequently inconsistent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Weng et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. employ a number of mechanisms in their effective biocontrol of pathogens, such as antagonism, systemic resistance induction, and plant growth promotion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chowdhury et al., 2015</xref>). In previous studies, <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains exhibited biological activity against various plant pathogens by producing different types of antimicrobial compounds, such as cell wall-degrading enzymes and non-ribosomally synthesized antibiotics, as well as secondary metabolites that trigger induced systemic resistance (ISR), thus protecting the plants against pathogen attack (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chowdhury et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fan et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Yan et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Successful root colonization of BCAs is the key to effective biocontrol and is considered to be the main factor responsible for consistent performance in the field (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Weng et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Xu et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et al., 2014</xref>). Root colonization is divided into two steps: chemotaxis toward the root and subsequent biofilm formation on the root surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Zhang et al., 2017b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Feng et al., 2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2019</xref>). <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. colonize the roots of many plant species and form a biofilm, which contributes to their biocontrol efficacy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Gao et al., 2015a</xref>). Chemotaxis-mediated response to root exudates enhances the colonization and beneficial effects of plant growth-promoting <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Feng et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> is an important member of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), which are known to enhance plant growth and control soil-borne diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chowdhury et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fan et al., 2018</xref>). <italic>B. velezensis</italic> FZB42 was the first strain to be sequenced (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chen et al., 2007</xref>). It was initially identified as a <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> strain, but was later recognized as a <italic>B. velezensis</italic> strain and as a model of gram-positive plant growth-promoting and biocontrol rhizobacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fan et al., 2018</xref>). Approximately 130 whole genome sequences of <italic>B. velezensis</italic> have been deposited in GenBank to date. <italic>B. velezensis</italic> strains have their own specific genomic characteristics, because these strains reside in different host plants and environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Wang et al., 2019</xref>). For instance, <italic>B. velezensis</italic> SQR9 isolated from the cucumber rhizosphere has been used as a BCA against fungal pathogens, mainly because of its ability to trigger ISR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Borriss et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Wu et al., 2018</xref>), while <italic>B. velezensis</italic> HAB-2 isolated from cotton has been used as a biological pesticide against bacterial pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Xu et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, we isolated <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 from the rhizosphere of healthy tobacco plants growing in high-incidence tobacco black shank fields in Guizhou, China. Previous research has shown that GUMT319 produces enzymes with biocontrol activity, such as proteases, cellulases, siderophores, and phosphatases, and inhibits the mycelial growth of <italic>P. nicotianae in vitro</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Luo et al., 2019</xref>). Here, we aimed to investigate the biocontrol effects of GUMT319 in the field and to gain insights into the underlying mechanisms. Genome sequencing of GUMT319 revealed the presence of genes involved in plant growth promotion, biofilm formation, chemotaxis, and antifungal activity. In addition, confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy analyses of the GUMT319 strain labeled with green fluorescent protein (GFP) revealed its patterns of tobacco root colonization. Overall, this study highlights the excellent potential of GUMT319 as a BCA against the tobacco black shank disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>Strains and Culture Conditions</title>
<p><italic>Bacillus</italic> strain GUMT319 was grown at 37&#x00B0;C in Luria&#x2013;Bertani medium (LB). The GFP-labeled GUMT319 (GUMT319-gfp) was maintained in LB supplemented with 10 mg/mL tetracycline. The fungal pathogens used in this study included <italic>P. nicotianae</italic>, <italic>Colletotrichum scovillei</italic>, <italic>Colletotrichum capsici</italic>, <italic>Fusarium carminascens</italic>, <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic>, <italic>Alternaria alternata</italic>, <italic>Phomopsis</italic> spp., <italic>Phyllosticta sorghina</italic>, and <italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic>. These were maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium at the Department of Plant Pathology, Guizhou University. To store these pathogens, hyphae were sampled from the growing zone of mycelia in agar disks (1 cm diameter), and they were mixed with 15% glycerol and stored in a 4&#x00B0;C freezer.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis</title>
<p>A single bacterial colony was inoculated in 5 mL of LB broth and grown for 12 h at 37&#x00B0;C with agitation at 200 rpm. Then, 2 mL of the bacterial culture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 1 min, and bacterial genomic DNA was isolated using an Ezup Column Bacteria Genomic DNA Purification Kit [Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., China], in accordance with the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol. Subsequently, <italic>16S rRNA</italic> and <italic>gyrA</italic> genes were amplified by PCR using sequence-specific primers: 27F (5&#x2032;-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3&#x2032;) and 1492R (5&#x2032;-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3&#x2032;) for amplifying approximately 1,400 bp of the <italic>16S rRNA</italic> gene and <italic>gyrA</italic>-F (5&#x2032;-CAGTCAGGAAATGCGTACGTCCTT-3&#x2032;) and <italic>gyrA</italic>-R (5&#x2032;-CAAGGTAATGCTCCAGGCATTGCT-3&#x2032;) for amplifying approximately 1,000 bp of the <italic>gyrA</italic> gene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Chen et al., 2016</xref>). Each 25-&#x03BC;L PCR mixture contained 1 unit of Pfu DNA Polymerase (Sangon Biotech), 1 &#x00D7; PCR buffer, 1 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 100 &#x03BC;M dNTPs, 1 &#x03BC;M of each primer, 50 ng of genomic DNA template, and ultrapure water. PCR was performed using the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95&#x00B0;C for 10 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94&#x00B0;C for 30 s, annealing at 56&#x00B0;C for 30 s, and extension at 72&#x00B0;C for 90 s, with a final extension at 72&#x00B0;C for 10 min. The PCR products were sequenced at Sangon Biotech. Sequences of the <italic>16S rRNA</italic> and <italic>gyrA</italic> gene fragments were searched in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nucleotide database using Blastn to determine the closest taxonomic relatives. Subsequently, phylogenetic analysis of <italic>16S rRNA</italic> and <italic>gyrA</italic> gene sequences was performed in MEGA 6.0 using the maximum likelihood method to estimate the evolutionary position of GUMT319 relative to other <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>Genome Sequencing and Annotation</title>
<p>The genomic DNA of GUMT319 was sequenced at Beijing Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. using an Illumina PE150 system and PacBio RSII high-throughput sequencing technology. Low-quality reads were filtered using SMRT Link v5.0.1, and the filtered reads were assembled into one contig without gaps. The complete genome sequence of GUMT319 was annotated using the Prokaryotic Genomes Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) at NCBI, and gene functions were predicted using five databases, namely, Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG), Non-Redundant (NR) protein sequences, and Swiss-Prot, based on whole genome Blast search (<italic>E</italic>-value &#x003C; 1e-5; minimal alignment length &#x003E; 40%) against each database.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS4">
<title>Construction of GFP-Labeled GUMT319</title>
<p>The <italic>GFP</italic> plasmid pGFP78, an <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>&#x2013;<italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> shuttle vector containing the 78 promoter-controlled <italic>GFP</italic> gene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zhang et al., 2017c</xref>), was electroporated into electrocompetent cells of strain GUMT319, as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Zhang et al., 2012</xref>). Briefly, the cells were grown in liquid LB medium at 37&#x00B0;C and were harvested during the exponential growth phase by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4&#x00B0;C. The harvested cells were washed five times with an equal volume of cold electroporation buffer containing 0.5 M sorbitol, 0.5 M mannitol, and 10% glycerol (pH 7.0). Subsequently, 100 &#x03BC;L of competent cells were electroporated on ice with 1 mg of pGFP78 DNA using a 1.8-kV electric shock. After electroporation, the cell suspension was diluted with 900 &#x03BC;L of LB medium and incubated at 37&#x00B0;C on an agitator at 120 rpm for 3 h to allow the expression of antibiotic resistance markers. The cell suspension was then spread on LB agar medium supplemented with tetracycline (10 mg/mL). The GFP-labeled cells were selected for tetracycline for three generations, and this was confirmed by fluorescence microscopy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Gao et al., 2015b</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS5">
<title>Plant Material and Growth Conditions</title>
<p>Seeds of tobacco (<italic>Nicotiana tabacum</italic>) cultivar Yunyan 87, native to China, were surface-sterilized by soaking in 2% sodium hypochlorite for 15 min and then washed thoroughly with distilled water. The sterilized seeds were sown in axenic tissue culture bottles containing vermiculite, and seedlings grew for 15&#x2013;20 days in a growth chamber at 25&#x00B0;C day/20&#x00B0;C night temperature and a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod. Then, seedlings were aseptically transplanted into 250-mL flasks (one seedling per flask) containing 100 mL sterile liquid 25% sucrose-free Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium, which was renewed every other day during the growth period. The hydroponic system was placed on an agitator and gently shaken at 50 rpm for 2 h each day. Before inoculating the MS medium with <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319-gfp, 100-&#x03BC;L aliquots of the MS medium were sampled from each flask and spread onto solid LB medium to verify the absence of contamination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Han et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS6">
<title>Root Colonization Assay</title>
<p>To perform the root colonization assay, GUMT319-gfp was grown overnight in liquid LB medium and was subsequently resuspended in sterile double-distilled water. Roots of tobacco plants were inoculated with 100 mL of GUMT319-gfp (OD<sub>600</sub> = 0.5) <italic>via</italic> drench application for 2 h; 10 replicates were performed. The plants were then transferred to fresh MS medium and cultivated for an additional 2 days without agitation. Roots were rinsed with sterile double-distilled water. To visualize colonization by GUMT319-gfp and GUMT319, at least 20 root tips were observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM), as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Weng et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS7">
<title>Collection and Analysis of Root Exudates</title>
<p>Seeds of tobacco cultivar Yunyan 87 and pepper cultivar Dangwu were germinated, and the seedlings were grown for approximately 15&#x2013;20 days in MS medium, as described above. Before starting the collection of root exudates, plant roots were washed with sterile double-distilled water to avoid contamination from the nutrient solution. The plants were then transferred to a flask, with the roots submerged in sterile water, and the flasks were placed in a growth chamber for 24 h at 25&#x00B0;C and a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod, with gentle agitation (50 rpm). The root exudates collected were filtered through a 0.45-&#x03BC;m membrane and lyophilized. The freeze-dried powder of tobacco root exudates was dissolved in ethanol and concentrated 50-fold. To ensure that the root exudates were free from contamination, 100 &#x03BC;L of the filtered root exudate was plated on LB agar medium, and the plates were incubated at 30&#x00B0;C for 24 h.</p>
<p>GC-TOF-MS (Nanjing Zoonbio Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) was performed to qualitatively analyze the freeze-dried root exudates using an Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph system coupled with a Pegasus HT time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Chroma TOF 4.3X software (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI, United States) and the LECO-Fiehn Rtx5 database were used to extract raw peaks, data baseline filtering, and calibration of the baseline, peak alignment, deconvolution analysis, peak identification, and integration of the peak area. Both the mass spectrum match and retention index match were considered during metabolite identification.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS8">
<title>Motility Assay</title>
<p><italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 was grown in LB broth until reaching an OD<sub>600</sub> of 0.8. Subsequently, 10 mL of the culture was centrifuged. The cell pellet was washed twice with distilled water and resuspended in 100 &#x03BC;L. Then, 15 mL of LB (0.7% agar) medium was poured into a Petri dish (90 mm diameter), and a 5-&#x03BC;L drop of concentrated bacterial culture was dispensed at the center of the dish. The Petri dish was incubated at 37&#x00B0;C, and the appearance of the bacterial zone was observed after 12 h (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">de Weert et al., 2002</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS9">
<title>Chemotaxis Assay</title>
<p><italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 was grown and harvested as described above. Then, 15 mL of LB (0.7% agar) medium with the 50-fold concentrated root exudates (or 200 &#x03BC;M different composition of root exudates) was poured into a 90-mm-diameter Petri dish. A 5-&#x03BC;L drop of concentrated bacterial culture was added to the center of the dish and incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 12 h to check for the appearance of the bacterial zone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">de Weert et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Weng et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS10">
<title>Biofilm Formation Assay</title>
<p>The biofilm formation efficiency of <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 was quantified using the microtiter plate test. Briefly, GUMT319 was grown in 5 mL of LB broth at 37&#x00B0;C until reaching an OD<sub>600</sub> value of 0.8. Each well of a sterile 12-well PVC microtiter plate was filled with 2 mL of LB broth and 4 &#x03BC;L of bacterial suspension; 2 mL of LB broth with the 50-fold concentrated root exudate (or 200 &#x03BC;M different composition of root exudates) and 4 &#x03BC;L of bacterial suspension were considered as one treatment. Wells containing only 2 mL of LB broth were used as negative controls. The microtiter plates were incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 3 days without agitation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Weng et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS11">
<title>Fungal Growth Inhibition Assays</title>
<p>The effect of GUMT319 on hyphal growth was tested using the dual culture method. Interaction experiments were performed using PDA and LB media. An agar plug (0.5 cm diameter) of actively growing fungi was placed at the center of a PDA plate and incubated for 1 day. GUMT319 was then inoculated at two points, each at a distance of 2 cm from the plug, and plates were photographed after 7 days (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Li et al., 2014</xref>). This experiment was conducted for five replicates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS12">
<title>Determination of Disease Control Efficacy Under Field Conditions</title>
<p>To determine the disease control efficacy of GUMT319 under field conditions, experiments were conducted during 2018&#x2013;2020 in a field naturally infested with tobacco black shank disease. The experimental field was located in Meitan, Zunyi (107&#x00B0;41&#x2032;N, 27&#x00B0;47&#x2032;E), Guizhou, China. Roots taken from tobacco seedlings of cultivar Yunyan 87 were soaked in GUMT319 suspension (10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL) for 1 h and then transplanted. During growth, each tobacco plant was irrigated with 100 mL of GUMT319 suspension (10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL) at 7, 14, and 21 days post-transplantation, and the disease index was measured at 50 and 60 days post-transplantation. Due to frequent rain during the growing season, the GUMT319 suspension was applied more often when appropriate. At 21 days post-transplantation, tobacco plants that had been irrigated with 100 mL of 1:400 of 58% metalaxyl manganese zinc WP (Haixun Agri-Biotech Co., Ltd., Shandong, China) and 1:700 of 10<sup>10</sup> CFU/g <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. (Green Conway WP, Sino Green Agri-Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) were used as controls, and plants irrigated with water were designated as blank controls. In 2018 and 2019, the field experiments were performed in an approximately 0.1-ha demonstration area. Tobacco plants were planted in randomized blocks and each block contained 100 plants. Each of the four treatments was replicated four times. In 2020, the field experiments were performed on an approximately 0.67-ha demonstration area and each treatment contained over 2,000 plants. The appearance of tobacco black shank disease symptoms and the cumulative number of infected plants were recorded at 45 days post-transplantation.</p>
<p>The disease incidence was calculated as the percentage of diseased plants relative to the total number of plants growing in each block; evaluation took place when the disease emerged. Disease severity was scored on a scale of 0&#x2013;9, as follows: 0, no symptoms; 1, less than one-third of the total leaves wilted; 3, one-third to one-half of the total leaves wilted; 5, one-half to two-thirds of the total leaves wilted; 7, more than two-thirds of total leaves wilted; and 9, plant dead. The disease index was calculated using the following equation:</p>
<disp-formula id="S2.Ex1">
<label>(1)</label>
<mml:math id="E1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x00A0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi/>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>9</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>9</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>a</italic>, <italic>b</italic>, <italic>c</italic>, <italic>d</italic>, <italic>e</italic>, and <italic>f</italic> are the number of plants in each disease category.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS13">
<title>Data Analysis</title>
<p>Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS v.24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). Mean values of the control and treatment groups were compared using Duncan&#x2019;s new multiple range test at a significance level of 5% (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). All percentage data were subjected to arc-sine transformation before statistical analysis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>Identification of Strain GUMT319</title>
<p>The GUMT319 strain was deposited in the China Center for Type Culture Collection (CCTCC Accession No.: M <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="2018871">2018871</ext-link>). Strain GUMT319 was previously classified as <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Luo et al., 2019</xref>). Here, phylogenetic analysis of <italic>16S rRNA</italic> and <italic>gyrA</italic> sequences using the maximum likelihood method placed GUMT319 in a well-supported cluster with <italic>B. velezensis</italic> FZB42 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>). BLASTn analysis of <italic>16S rRNA</italic> and <italic>gyrA</italic> sequences amplified from GUMT319 returned a match to the reference strain <italic>B. velezensis</italic> FZB42, with &#x003E;99% identity. Annotation using the NR protein database indicated that sequences amplified from GUMT319 were most similar to sequences of <italic>B. velezensis</italic> and <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>). Thus, taking into account the <italic>16S rRNA</italic> and <italic>gyrA</italic> gene sequences as well as the whole genome sequence comparisons, GUMT319 was identified as a <italic>B. velezensis</italic> strain.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Identification of <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> strain GUMT319. <bold>(A)</bold> Phylogenetic tree based on the nucleotide sequences of <italic>16S rRNA</italic> and <italic>gyrA</italic> genes. <bold>(B)</bold> Non-redundant (NR) protein database annotation.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-12-658113-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title><italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 Genome Sequencing and Analysis</title>
<p>To investigate the biocontrol mechanisms of <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 and its application for sustainable agriculture, its complete genome sequence was determined. The <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 genome consisted of a single circular chromosome 3,940,023 bp in length, with an average GC content of 46.6% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>), and did not harbor any plasmids. The whole genome of GUMT319 was predicted to contain 4,053 protein-coding genes covering 90.0% of the genome, with an average gene length of 875 bp, as well as 27 rRNAs and 86 tRNAs. Principal features of the genomes of <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 and model strains, <italic>B. velezensis</italic> FZB42 and SQR9, are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chen et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Zhang et al., 2015</xref>). We performed a collinearity analysis to further compare the genomic similarities and differences between the genome of GUMT319 and those of FZB42 and SQR9 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). The results showed that the GUMT319 genome displayed different synteny to those of the other strains. GUMT319 showed the highest synteny with <italic>B. velezensis</italic> FZB42, indicating that their evolutionary stages were the closest, and their genomes were closely related. Amino acid sequence similarity searches against various databases with an E-value threshold of 1e-5 revealed that 3,915 (96.6%), 3,874 (95.6%), 3,293 (81.2%), 2,884 (71.2%), and 2,623 (64.7%) protein-coding genes showed matches in the NR, KEGG, Swiss-Prot, COG, and GO databases, respectively. Abnormal hyphae of plant pathogens were reported in dual cultures with GUMT319, which could be due to the production of secondary metabolites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Luo et al., 2019</xref>). Bioinformatics analyses showed that the GUMT319 genome contained 13 putative gene clusters involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites with potential antimicrobial activities (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>), most of which were conserved in all <italic>B. velezensis</italic> strains (bacilysin, surfactin, macrolactin, fengycin, bacillaene, difficidin, and terpene; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Grady et al., 2019</xref>). Among these gene clusters, five encoded non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs), four encoded trans-acyl transferase polyketide synthetases (transAT-PKSs), and one encoded type III polyketide synthetase (T3PKS), while two clusters were involved in terpene biosynthesis, and one cluster was involved in lantipeptide biosynthesis (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). In contrast, the clusters predicted to produce lantipeptide had not typically been found in other <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Genomic features of <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> strains GUMT319, SQR9, and FZB42.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Strains</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">GUMT319</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SQR9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">FZB42</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Location of isolation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Tobacco rhizosphere</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Cucumber rhizosphere</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Sugar beet rhizosphere</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Genome size (bp)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3,940,023</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,117,023</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3,918,596</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">GC content (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. of protein-coding genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,053</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3,902</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3,687</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Percent coding region</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">89.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">89.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">88.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. of rRNA genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. of tRNA genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">88</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. of phage-associated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">671</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">218</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NCBI Accession No.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NZ_CP068563</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NZ_CP006890</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NC_009725</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Antimicrobial gene clusters present in <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Predicted product</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Enzyme complex</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Genome location</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cluster 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lantipeptide</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM000192-GM000216</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cluster 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Surfactin</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">nrps</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM000316-GM000362</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cluster 3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Unknown</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Otherks</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM000931-GM000977</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cluster 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Terpene</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM001059-GM001083</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cluster 5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Macrolactin</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transatpks</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM001461-GM001509</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cluster 6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacillaene</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transatpks; nrps</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM001737-GM001789</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cluster 7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fengycin (iturin)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transatpks; nrps</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM001911-GM001981</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cluster 8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Terpene</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM002014-GM002037</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cluster 9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Unknown</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">t3pks</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM002126-GM002183</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cluster 10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Difficidin (polyketide)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transatpks</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM002319-GM002375</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cluster 11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteriocin</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">nrps</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM003069-GM003138</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cluster 12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Surfactin (cyclic lipopeptide)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">nrps</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM003432-GM003473</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cluster 13</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacilysin</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM003703-GM003751</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></table-wrap>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Circular genome map of <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319. The scale is shown in the outermost circle. The second and third circles indicate genes in forward and reverse orientations, respectively. The outer to inner rings represent forward and reverse DNA sequences of protein-coding genes annotated according to COG, KEGG, and GO databases and ncRNA. The 10th circle shows the GC content, and the 11th circle shows the GC skew in green and purple.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-12-658113-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Collinearity analysis of <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 and <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. chromosomes.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-12-658113-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>Analysis of GUMT319 Genes Involved in Plant Root Colonization</title>
<p>When <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 was grown in liquid culture without agitation, it formed robust pellicles at the liquid&#x2013;air interface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Luo et al., 2019</xref>). The genome of <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 contained a complete set of genes implicated in biofilm formation, including 15 genes belonging to the exopolysaccharide (EPS) operon <italic>epsA-O</italic> and <italic>tapA-sipW-tasA</italic> operon, which are required for the production of EPS and TasA fibers, which hold chains of cells together in bundles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chen et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Gao et al., 2015a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Al-Ali et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 displayed a robust swarming phenotype (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 2</xref>), and the protein encoded by <italic>swrA</italic> was essential for swarming. The genome of <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 contained a complete set of genes implicated in chemotaxis and motility, including six MCPS genes, 25 flagellin gene clusters, and nine chemotaxis protein genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Liu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). A previous study shows that GUMT319 produces siderophores, which facilitate rhizosphere competition and growth promotion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gu et al., 2020</xref>). The genome of <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 contained genes involved in siderophore biosynthesis, such as <italic>dhbB</italic>, <italic>dhbE</italic>, <italic>dhbF</italic>, and <italic>entC</italic>. GUMT319 also contained master global transcriptional regulators, such as AbrB and Spo0A, as well as the quorum-sensing regulators LuxS/AI-2 and ComA/ComP, which regulate biofilm formation, chemotaxis, and root colonization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Comella and Grossman, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Weng et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Yan et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Xiong et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>List of root colonization-associated genes identified in the GUMT319 genome.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Colonization traits</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gene ID</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gene name</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Function</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chemotaxis and motility</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM001681</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>cheA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chemotaxis protein, sensor kinase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM001680</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>cheB</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chemotaxis response regulator protein, glutaminase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM001683</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>cheC</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chemotaxis protein, CheY-P-specific phosphatase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM002228</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>cheR</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chemotaxis protein methyltransferase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM001423</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>cheV</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chemotaxis protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM001682</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>cheW</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chemotaxis protein, purine-binding protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM001671</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>cheY</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chemotaxis protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM003009</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>tlpB</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM003010</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>mcpA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM003011</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>tlpA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM003012</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>mcpB</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM000730</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>yfmS</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM001414</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>mcpC</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM001382</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>motA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Flagellar motor protein, chemotaxis protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM001381</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>motB</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Flagellar motor protein, chemotaxis protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM001655&#x2013;GM001679</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>fla</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Flagellin gene clusters, flagellar biosynthesis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM003455</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>swrA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Swarming motility protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Biofilm</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM000044</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>abrB</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transition state regulatory protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM002412</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>spo0A</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stage 0 sporulation protein A, quorum sensing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM002455</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>tapA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Amyloid fiber anchoring and assembly protein, biofilm formation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM002454</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sipW</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Signal peptidase, biofilm formation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM002453</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>tasA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spore coat-associated protein, biofilm formation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM002452</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sinR</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HTH-type transcriptional regulator, master regulator for biofilm formation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM002451</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sinI</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Anti-repressor of <italic>sinR</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM003356&#x2013;GM003370</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>epsA-O</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Polysaccharide biosynthesis protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Siderophores</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM003092</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>entC</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Biosynthesis of siderophore group non-ribosomal peptides</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM003091</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>dhbE</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Siderophore group non-ribosomal peptide synthetase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM003090</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>dhbB</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Biosynthesis of siderophore group non-ribosomal peptides</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM003089</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>dhbF</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Siderophore group non-ribosomal peptide synthetase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Quorum sensing</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM002966</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>luxS</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Quorum-sensing autoinducer 2 (AI-2) synthesis protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM003062</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>comA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Two-component transcriptional regulator, quorum sensing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319_GM003063</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>comP</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sensor histidine kinase, quorum sensing</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>Root Colonization</title>
<p>Root colonization of the rhizosphere by antagonistic bacteria is a prerequisite for effective biological control (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et al., 2014</xref>). In this study, we investigated the colonization of healthy tobacco and pepper seedling roots by <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319. After 2 days of incubation in the hydroponic system, root colonization by <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 and GUMT319-gfp was investigated using SEM and a CLSM. The SEM images showed that GUMT319 cells were rod-shaped (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4A,C</xref>). Additionally, a complex biofilm structure consisting of GUMT319 cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4C</xref>) and GUMT319-gfp cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4D</xref>) was formed on the tobacco root surface, and colonization occurred preferentially in the elongation region of tobacco roots (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). We also found that GUMT319 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>) and GUMT319-gfp (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>) could colonize pepper roots, although to a much lesser extent than in tobacco roots (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Root colonization assay of <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319. <bold>(A)</bold> Scanning electron microscope (SEM, HITACHI S-3400N) images of pepper seedling roots colonized by strain GUMT319. <bold>(B)</bold> Confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM, Olympus FV10i) images of pepper seedling roots colonized by GUMT319-gfp. <bold>(C)</bold> SEM images of tobacco seedling roots colonized by strain GUMT319. <bold>(D)</bold> Confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) images of tobacco seedling roots colonized by GUMT319-gfp. The green fluorescence signal depicts live cells colonizing the tobacco roots.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-12-658113-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS5">
<title>Chemotactic Response to Root Exudates and Biofilm Formation</title>
<p>Root exudates are known to play an important role in plant&#x2013;microbe interaction in the rhizosphere. The different compositions of root exudates from different plants are directly related to the chemotaxis reaction, biofilm formation, and colonizing behavior of bacterial strains originating from the respective rhizosphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Zhang et al., 2014</xref>). We wanted to identify the different components of the root exudates that mediate the interaction between biocontrol <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. and plant roots, which influenced their root colonization. To this end, root exudates from tobacco and pepper plants were collected and analyzed. Qualitative analyses of the freeze-dried tobacco and pepper root exudates were performed by GC-TOF-MS, and 248 peaks (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 2</xref>) were detected, including amino acids, organic acids, and others (data not shown). Here, some organic acids (cinnamic acid, fumaric acid, phthalic acid, benzoic acid, and lauric acid) and nicotine were selected as the targets for evaluation of their roles on <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Zhang et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Feng et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ma et al., 2018</xref>). Cinnamic acid, fumaric acid, and benzoic acid were detected both in tobacco and pepper root exudates. Phthalic acid and nicotine were found only in tobacco root exudates and lauric acid was found only in pepper root exudates.</p>
<p>To investigate the cause of root colonization by <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319, the chemotactic reaction and biofilm formation response of GUMT319 to two root exudates and six components were determined. After the 12-h incubation period, the LB (0.7% agar) plate was almost fully covered by GUMT319 cells (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 2</xref>), indicating that GUMT319 was highly proficient in swarming. We measured the chemotaxis activity of strain GUMT319 using tobacco root exudates, pepper root exudates, organic acids (cinnamic acid, fumaric acid, phthalic acid, benzoic acid, and lauric acid), and nicotine as attractants. The root exudates induced a positive chemotactic response in <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319, and cells showed faster migration toward all the attractants than toward the control after a 6-h incubation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). The biofilm formation activity of strain GUMT319 was also examined using the qualitative biofilm experiment with tobacco root exudates, pepper root exudates, organic acids (cinnamic acid, fumaric acid, phthalic acid, benzoic acid, and lauric acid), and nicotine as attractants. The results showed that only lauric acid could be involved in the negative regulation of biofilm formation. No obvious difference was observed in biofilm formation among other treatments conducted with or without root exudates. The pellicles formed by GUMT319 were similar in all other groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>Chemotactic response of <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 to root exudates.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-12-658113-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption><p>Biofilm formation assay of <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-12-658113-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS6">
<title>Antagonistic Effects of GUMT319 on Plant Pathogens <italic>in vitro</italic></title>
<p>In this study, it was found that GUMT319 displayed strong antagonistic activity against <italic>P. nicotianae</italic>, <italic>C. scovillei</italic>, <italic>C. capsici</italic>, <italic>F. carminascens</italic>, <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic>, <italic>A. alternata</italic>, <italic>Phomopsis</italic> sp., <italic>P. sorghina</italic>, and <italic>E. turcicum</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Table 2</xref>), indicating that <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 was effective against a relatively broad spectrum of oomycetes and ascomycetes.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption><p>Antagonistic activity of <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 against nine plant pathogens in dual-culture test.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-12-658113-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS7">
<title>Effects of GUMT319 on Tobacco Black Shank in Field Experiments</title>
<p>We further investigated the efficiency of control of GUMT319 on tobacco black shank in field experiments. In those conducted in 2018, the disease incidence of tobacco plants treated with sterile water was 20.48%, while the disease incidence of plants treated independently with GUMT319 suspension, 58% metalaxyl manganese zinc WP, and Green Conway WP decreased, having control efficacy on tobacco black shank of 77.15, 76.43, and 65.59%, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). Tobacco plants treated with strain GUMT319 showed the lowest disease incidence, with a control efficiency significantly higher than those treated with Green Conway WP. In the 2019 field experiments, the disease incidence of tobacco plants treated with water was 15.42%, while the control efficacy on tobacco black shank of those plants treated independently with GUMT319, 58% metalaxyl manganese zinc WP, and Green Conway WP were 71.97, 71.59, and 66.47%, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). In the 2020 field experiments, the disease incidence of tobacco plants treated with water reached 79.09%, while the control efficacy on tobacco black shank of those plants treated independently with GUMT319, 58% metalaxyl manganese zinc WP, and Green Conway WP were 79.54, 76.98, and 62.31%, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 4</xref>). Thus, the control effect of GUMT319 suspension was significantly higher than that of 58% metalaxyl manganese zinc WP and Green Conway WP (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), suggesting that GUMT319 could be used as a potential BCA for tobacco black shank.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption><p>Control efficacy of strain GUMT319 against tobacco black shank in the field.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treatments</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">2018<hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">2019<hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">2020<hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Disease incidence (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Disease index</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control efficacy (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Disease incidence (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Disease index</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control efficacy (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Disease incidence (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Disease index</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control efficacy (%)</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Water (control)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.48 &#x00B1; 1.52a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.93 &#x00B1; 0.24a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.42 &#x00B1; 0.44a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.14 &#x00B1; 0.09a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79.09 &#x00B1; 0.48a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.57 &#x00B1; 0.13a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">GUMT319</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.26 &#x00B1; 0.63b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.17 &#x00B1; 0.18c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">77.15 &#x00B1; 2.60a(A)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.17 &#x00B1; 0.81b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.48 &#x00B1; 0.15b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">70.97 &#x00B1; 2.98a(A)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.66 &#x00B1; 0.16d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.01 &#x00B1; 0.04d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79.54 &#x00B1; 0.18a(A)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">58% metalaxyl manganese zinc WP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.16 &#x00B1; 0.92b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.20 &#x00B1; 0.13c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">76.43 &#x00B1; 3.48a(A)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.63 &#x00B1; 0.39b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.45 &#x00B1; 0.08b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">71.59 &#x00B1; 1.60a(A)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.61 &#x00B1; 0.43c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.51 &#x00B1; 0.11c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">76.98 &#x00B1; 0.54b(B)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Green Conway WP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.65 &#x00B1; 2.86b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.76 &#x00B1; 0.14b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65.59 &#x00B1; 2.78b(A)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.95 &#x00B1; 0.22b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.71 &#x00B1; 0.07b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.47 &#x00B1; 1.37a(A)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.68 &#x00B1; 0.37b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.39 &#x00B1; 0.08b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.31 &#x00B1; 0.43c(C)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic>The data are means &#x00B1; SDs. The different lowercase and uppercase letters in the same column indicate significant difference at the P &#x003C; 0.05 and P &#x003C; 0.1 levels, respectively, using Duncan&#x2019;s new multiple range test. All percentage data were subjected to arc-sine transformation before statistical analysis.</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The tobacco black shank control efficiency of several <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains, such as <italic>B. subtilis</italic> Tpb55 and <italic>B. velezensis</italic> Ba168, has been tested previously. Tobacco black shank, caused by <italic>P. nicotianae</italic>, is destructive to almost all flue-cured tobacco cultivars and is widespread in many tobacco-growing countries. <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains represent a promising strategy for the management of this soil-borne disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Han et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Zhang et al., 2017a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Srikhong et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Guo et al., 2020</xref>). In this study, we identified another <italic>B. velezensis</italic> isolate, GUMT319, from a healthy tobacco rhizosphere in the fields in Guizhou with a high incidence of tobacco black shank. The control efficiency of GUMT319 against tobacco black shank was greater than 70% in field experiments conducted in Meitan in 2018&#x2013;2020, which was significantly higher than that obtained using other treatments including fungicide application (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 4</xref>). Hence, GUMT319 could potentially be used as a BCA for tobacco black shank in Guizhou.</p>
<p>GUMT319 was previously identified as a <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> strain; however, <italic>16S rRNA</italic> and <italic>gyrA</italic> sequences and whole genome sequence comparisons in the current study revealed that GUMT319 is a <italic>B. velezensis</italic> strain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Similarly, SQR9 and FZB42, which were previously classified as <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> strains, are now recognized as <italic>B. velezensis</italic> strains and considered as the model strains for gram-positive plant growth-promoting and biocontrol rhizobacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chen et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Zhang et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fan et al., 2018</xref>). We support the theory that many strains currently classified as <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> are actually <italic>B. velezensis</italic>.</p>
<p>In this study, we identified and classified <italic>B. velezensis</italic> strain GUMT319 based on genomic data generated using second- and third-generation sequencing technologies. Strain GUMT319 contained a single circular chromosome 3,940,023 bp in length, with 4,053 predicted genes and an average GC content of 46.6% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). The genome of GUMT319 is smaller than that of SQR9 (4,117,023 bp) but comparable to that of FZB42 (3,918,596 bp). The three strains were identical in terms of the number of protein-coding genes but differed in the number and size of prophage regions as well as gene clusters encoding secondary metabolites. The majority of genes unique to GUMT319 (i.e., absent in SQR9 and FZB42) were phage related (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>).</p>
<p>The ability of <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 to efficiently colonize the surface of tobacco roots was a prerequisite for biocontrol. Many beneficial bacteria form biofilms on plant roots, which play an important role in their antagonistic activities and biocontrol efficacy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chen et al., 2013</xref>). Rhizosphere competence of bacteria is associated with their ability to form sessile, multicellular communities (biofilms) and their chemotaxis motility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Niu et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Liu et al., 2020</xref>). The genome of GUMT319 contains more than 60 genes and 13 putative gene clusters related to secondary metabolites, which have previously been described as being involved in biofilm formation, chemotaxis motility, growth promotion, and antifungal activity (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Tables 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>B. velezensis</italic> has been widely researched because of its potential to produce bacteriostatic secondary metabolites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fan et al., 2018</xref>). <italic>B. velezensis</italic> strain GUMT319 has been reported to produce cell wall-degrading enzymes such as proteases, cellulases, and phosphatases as well as siderophores, which facilitate rhizosphere competition and plant growth promotion and show strong inhibitory activity against <italic>P. nicotianae</italic> as well as eight other plant pathogens <italic>in vitro</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Luo et al., 2019</xref>). The GUMT319 genome contained 13 putative gene clusters that were expected to participate in antimicrobial production, including bacilysin, surfactin, macrolactin, fengycin, bacillaene, difficidin, and terpene (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Grady et al., 2019</xref>); the majority of these gene clusters are conserved in all <italic>B. velezensis</italic> strains. However, clusters predicted to produce lantipeptides were not typical in other <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 3</xref>). Lantipeptides are ribosomally synthesized peptides that are extensively post-translationally modified. It is suggested that lantipeptides are the antimicrobial compounds produced by gram-positive bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Grady et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>The ability of <italic>Bacillus</italic> to colonize plant roots and proliferate in the rhizosphere is important for stable, long-lasting disease prevention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Han et al., 2016</xref>). To examine the ability of GUMT319 to colonize plant roots, we labeled the strain with GFP. In the present study, GUMT319 and GUMT319-gfp colonized the surface of tobacco roots, forming microcolonies and complex biofilm structures. The root elongation zone was colonized to a greater extent than other areas of the root. We also found that GUMT319 and GUMT319-gfp could colonize on pepper roots, but lesser than that on tobacco roots (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). As a signal to attract or repel microbes, the root exudates serve as a carbon source for soil microorganisms. In addition, they play significant roles in chemotaxis, biofilm formation, and colonization of <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains on plant roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Feng et al., 2018</xref>). The composition of root exudates is closely related to plant species, soil environment, climate factors, microorganisms, nutritional status, etc. Among them, plant species is the most important (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Zhang et al., 2014</xref>). Therefore, we speculated that some substances in tobacco root exudates (not pepper) play a key role. The root exudates from tobacco and pepper plants were collected and analyzed using GC-TOF-MS (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 3</xref>). It was found that organic acids were the most represented class of compounds in both plants. Hence, some organic acids (cinnamic acid, fumaric acid, phthalic acid, benzoic acid, and lauric acid) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Zhang et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Feng et al., 2018</xref>) and nicotine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ma et al., 2018</xref>) were selected as targets for the evaluation of their roles on <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319. Cinnamic acid, fumaric acid, and benzoic acid were detected both in tobacco and pepper root exudates, phthalic acid and nicotine in tobacco root exudates, and lauric acid only in pepper root exudates.</p>
<p>In this study, in tobacco root exudates, pepper root exudates, organic acids (cinnamic acid, fumaric acid, phthalic acid, benzoic acid, and lauric acid), and nicotine as attractants, it was found that GUMT319 moved faster toward all root exudates than toward the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). Lauric acid could be involved in the negative regulation of biofilm formation. There was no obvious difference among other treatments conducted with or without root exudates in biofilm formation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). Compared with other root-secreted compounds, it was first reported that nicotine in the root exudates of tobacco was a chemoattractant for <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319. Previous research shows that nicotine from tobacco root exudates has the ability to enhance chemotaxis, growth, biocontrol efficiency, and colonization by <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> NXHG29 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ma et al., 2018</xref>). However, we do not know how <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 recognizes nicotine and regulates chemotaxis and root colonization.</p>
<p>Overall, this study showed that the beneficial function of GUMT319 in controlling tobacco black shank disease is through its ability to inhibit the mycelial growth of plant pathogens and to successfully colonize tobacco roots. Hence, <italic>B. velezensis</italic> GUMT319 could be used as a potential BCA against tobacco black shank.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S5">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/</ext-link>, <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="CP068563">CP068563</ext-link>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>HD, LP, and ZL designed the research and wrote the manuscript. HD, WM, SY, HC, and LP performed all the experiments. HD and WM analyzed the data. All authors reviewed the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure">
<p><bold>Funding.</bold> This work was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2020M683658XB), the Development Project of Young Scientific and Technological Talents of Guizhou Province (Grant No. QJH-KY[2018]101), and the Science and Technology Project of Zunyi, Guizhou Tobacco Company (Grant No. 201706).</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ack>
<p>We gratefully acknowledge Prof. Yong Wang for useful discussions about this article.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="S9" sec-type="supplementary material">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.658113/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.658113/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.docx" id="FS1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al-Ali</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deravel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krier</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x00E9;chet</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ongena</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacques</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Biofilm formation is determinant in tomato rhizosphere colonization by <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> FZB42.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.</italic></source> <volume>25</volume> <fpage>29910</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>29920</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-017-0469-1</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29063401</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Borriss</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Danchin</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harwood</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00E9;digue</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rocha</surname> <given-names>E. P. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sekowska</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title><italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic>, the model Gram-positive bacterium: 20 years of annotation refinement.</article-title> <source><italic>Microb. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume> <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1751-7915.13043</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29280348</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Isolation and characterization of <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> PG12 for the biological control of apple ring rot.</article-title> <source><italic>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>115</volume> <fpage>113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>121</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.12.021</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koumoutsi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eisenreich</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schneider</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heinemeyer</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequence of the plant growth&#x2013;promoting bacterium <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> FZB42.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>25</volume> <fpage>1007</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1014</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt1325</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17704766</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kolter</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Losick</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol of tomato wilt disease by <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> isolates from natural environments depends on conserved genes mediating biofilm formation.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume> <fpage>848</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>864</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02860.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22934631</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chowdhury</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hartmann</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Borriss</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol mechanism by root-associated <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> FZB42 &#x2013; a review.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume>:<issue>780</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2015.00780</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26284057</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Comella</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grossman</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Conservation of genes and processes controlled by the quorum response in bacteria: characterization of genes controlled by the quorum-sensing transcription factor ComA in <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>57</volume> <fpage>1159</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1174</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04749.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16091051</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Weert</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vermeiren</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mulders</surname> <given-names>I. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuiper</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hendrickx</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bloemberg</surname> <given-names>G. V.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Flagella-driven chemotaxis towards exudate components is an important trait for tomato root colonization by <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume> <fpage>1173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1180</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.11.1173</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12423023</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title><italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> FZB42 in 2018: the gram-positive model strain for plant growth promotion and biocontrol.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>2491</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.02491</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30386322</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Identification of chemotaxis compounds in root exudates and their sensing chemoreceptors in plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> SQR9.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Plant-Microbe Inter.</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>995</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1005</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/MPMI-01-18-0003-R</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29714096</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krell</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Recognition of dominant attractants by key chemoreceptors mediates recruitment of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>21</volume> <fpage>402</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>415</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1462-2920.14472</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30421582</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Foulston</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Losick</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015a</year>). <article-title>Alternative modes of biofilm formation by plant-associated <italic>Bacillus cereus</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>MicrobiologyOpen</italic></source> <volume>4</volume> <fpage>452</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>464</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mbo3.251</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25828975</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Greenwich</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015b</year>). <article-title>The bacterial tyrosine kinase activator TkmA contributes to biofilm formation largely independently of the cognate kinase PtkA in <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>197</volume> <fpage>3421</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3432</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.00438-15</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26283769</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grady</surname> <given-names>E. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>MacDonald</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weselowski</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McDowell</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Solomon</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Characterization and complete genome analysis of the surfactin-producing, plant-protecting bacterium <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> 9D-6.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>19</volume>:<issue>5</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12866-018-1380-8</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30621587</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Friman</surname> <given-names>V. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Competition for iron drives phytopathogen control by natural rhizosphere microbiomes.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume> <fpage>1002</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1010</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41564-020-0719-8</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32393858</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol of tobacco black shank disease (<italic>Phytophthora nicotianae</italic>) by <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> Ba168.</article-title> <source><italic>Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>165</volume>:<issue>104523</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.01.004</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32359551</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>You</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol potential of antagonist <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> Tpb55 against tobacco black shank.</article-title> <source><italic>Biocontrol</italic></source> <volume>61</volume> <fpage>195</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10526-015-9705-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Responses of beneficial <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> SQR9 to different soilborne fungal pathogens through the alteration of antifungal compounds production.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume>:<issue>636</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2014.00636</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25484880</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Induced root-secreted d-galactose functions as a chemoattractant and enhances the biofilm formation of <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> SQR9 in an McpA-dependent manner.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>104</volume> <fpage>785</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>797</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-019-10265-8</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31813049</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vivanco</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Enhanced rhizosphere colonization of beneficial <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> SQR9 by pathogen infection.</article-title> <source><italic>FEMS Microbiol. Lett.</italic></source> <volume>353</volume> <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1574-6968.12406</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24612247</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Screening and field control effect of biological control <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains against tobacco black shank.</article-title> <source><italic>Guizhou Agric. Sci. North. Hort.</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>T. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X. K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effect of nicotine from tobacco root exudates on chemotaxis, growth, biocontrol efficiency, and colonization by <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> NXHG29.</article-title> <source><italic>Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek</italic></source> <volume>111</volume> <fpage>1237</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1257</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10482-018-1035-7</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29397489</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Pepper growth promotion and Fusarium wilt biocontrol by <italic>Trichoderma hamatum</italic> MHT1134.</article-title> <source><italic>Biocontrol Sci. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>30</volume> <fpage>1228</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1243</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09583157.2020.1803212</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paulson</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kolter</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Simplified and representative bacterial community of maize roots.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>114</volume> <fpage>E2450</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>E2459</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Srikhong</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lertmongkonthum</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sowanpreecha</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rerngsamran</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Bacillus sp. strain M10 as a potential biocontrol agent protecting chili pepper and tomato fruits from anthracnose disease caused by <italic>Colletotrichum capsici</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Biocontrol</italic></source> <volume>63</volume> <fpage>833</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>842</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10526-018-9902-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Complete genome sequencing of <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> WRN014, and comparison with genome sequences of other <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> strains.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>29</volume> <fpage>794</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>808</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4014/jmb.1901.01040</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31030454</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Enhanced root colonization and biocontrol activity of <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> SQR9 by <italic>abrB</italic> gene disruption.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>97</volume> <fpage>8823</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8830</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-012-4572-4</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23196984</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Exploring elicitors of the beneficial rhizobacterium <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> SQR9 to induce plant systemic resistance and their interactions with plant signaling pathways.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>560</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>567</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/mpmi-11-17-0273-r</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29309236</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Quorum sensing signal autoinducer-2 promotes root colonization of <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> SQR9 by affecting biofilm formation and motility.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>104</volume> <fpage>7177</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7185</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-020-10713-w</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32621125</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yaseen</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Comparative genomics analysis provides new strategies for bacteriostatic ability of <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> HAB-2.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>594079</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.594079</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33281792</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Contribution of bacillomycin D in <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> SQR9 to antifungal activity and biofilm formation.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>79</volume> <fpage>808</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>815</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02645-12</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23160135</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lian</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Antifungal activity of lipopeptides from <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> MG3 against <italic>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</italic> in loquat fruits.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Control</italic></source> <volume>146</volume>:<issue>104281</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104281</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The <italic>comer</italic> gene plays an important role in biofilm formation and sporulation in both <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> and <italic>Bacillus cereus</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<issue>1025</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2016.01025</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27446060</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A predatory myxobacterium controls cucumber <italic>Fusarium</italic> wilt by regulating the soil microbial community.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiome</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>49</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-020-00824-x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32252828</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017a</year>). <article-title>Integrated control of tobacco black shank by combined use of riboflavin and <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> strain Tpb55.</article-title> <source><italic>Biocontrol</italic></source> <volume>62</volume> <fpage>835</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>845</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10526-017-9849-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>A mimicking-of-DNA-methylation-patterns pipeline for overcoming the restriction barrier of bacteria.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS Genet.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>e1002987</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1002987</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23028379</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Effects of different plant root exudates and their organic acid components on chemotaxis, biofilm formation and colonization by beneficial rhizosphere-associated bacterial strains.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Soil</italic></source> <volume>374</volume> <fpage>689</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>700</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-013-1915-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Whole transcriptomic analysis of the plant-beneficial rhizobacterium <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> SQR9 during enhanced biofilm formation regulated by maize root exudates.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Genomics</italic></source> <volume>16</volume>:<issue>685</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-015-1825-5</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26346121</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vivanco</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017b</year>). <article-title>The unseen rhizosphere root-soil-microbe interactions for crop production.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Opin. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>37</volume> <fpage>8</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mib.2017.03.008</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28433932</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017c</year>). <article-title>Screening and characterization of endophytic <italic>Bacillus</italic> for biocontrol of grapevine downy mildew.</article-title> <source><italic>Crop Prot.</italic></source> <volume>96</volume> <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>179</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2017.02.018</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list></back>
</article>
