<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.02687</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Biofilm Formation by <italic>ica</italic>-Negative Ocular Isolates of <italic>Staphylococcus haemolyticus</italic></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Panda</surname> <given-names>Sasmita</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/441590/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>Durg Vijai</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/115020/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>Infectious Disease Biology, Institute of Life Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Bhubaneswar</addr-line>, <country>India</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Sara Mar&#x00ED;a Soto, ISGlobal-University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Dezemona Petrelli, University of Camerino, Italy; Luiza Pinheiro, Universidade Estadual Paulista &#x201C;J&#x00FA;lio de Mesquita Filho&#x201D; (UNESP), Brazil</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Durg Vijai Singh, <email>durg_singh@yahoo.co.in</email>; <email>singhdv@ils.res.in</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Infectious Diseases, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>14</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>2687</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>10</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>22</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2018</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2018 Panda and Singh.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Panda and Singh</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p><italic>Staphylococcus haemolyticus</italic> is the second most frequently isolated CoNS from ocular infections and human blood cultures. In this study, we examined 18 ocular <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates for their capacity to form biofilm and conducted detachment assay to determine the composition of the biofilm matrix and involvement of various elements in cell lysis. PCR identified the presence of biofilm-associated genes, and <italic>ica</italic> operon and CLSM visualized the components of the biofilm matrix. We found that PIA-independent biofilm formation is the characteristic feature of <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates, irrespective of the sources of isolation, and protein or DNA or both are the major components of the biofilm matrix. Cell lysis enabling DNA release was an essential step for biofilm attachment during the initial stages of biofilm development. The <italic>srtA</italic> transcript expression study indicates its role in the early stages of biofilm development. We found the presence of antibiotic resistance genes in the eDNA and gDNA thus suggesting the possible role of biofilm in horizontal gene transfer of antibiotic resistance determinants. The overall study indicates that <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> formed the biofilm comprising of protein or DNA or both and <italic>srtA</italic> play a role in the initial development of biofilm.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>biofilm</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Staphylococcus haemolyticus</italic></kwd>
<kwd>extracellular DNA</kwd>
<kwd>proteins</kwd>
<kwd>autolysis</kwd>
<kwd>sortase A</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">SR/SO/HS-0203/2012</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Science and Engineering Research Board<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001843</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="44"/>
<page-count count="9"/>
<word-count count="0"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec><title>Introduction</title>
<p><italic>Staphylococcus haemolyticus</italic> is the second most frequently isolated pathogen from ocular infections and blood cultures among the coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Takeuchi et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Makki et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Becker et al., 2014</xref>). This organism is implicated in hospital-acquired infections occurring through implanted medical devices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mehta and Kumari, 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Mack et al., 2006</xref>) and exhibits the highest level of multidrug resistance including hetero-resistance to glycopeptides thereby limiting the therapeutic options (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fredheim et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Czekaj et al., 2015</xref>). Biofilms formed by <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> further advance its ability to escape the host defense besides rendering antimicrobial resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Krzyminska et al., 2015</xref>). Hence, to study the mechanism underlying the biofilm formation in <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> is warranted.</p>
<p>The ability to form biofilm is considered as one of the most important virulence factor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Mack et al., 2006</xref>) that has a role to play in various medical implants related chronic infections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Barbieri et al., 2015</xref>). Biofilm formation in <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> is a two-step process. (i) Initial attachment mediated by many factors like cell wall anchored surface proteins (i.e., Fbe, Bhp) and cell wall lytic enzyme autolysin E (AltE) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Heilmann et al., 1997</xref>) and (ii) accumulation phase involving cell proliferation and intercellular adhesion. Both Fbe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cucarella et al., 2001</xref>) and AtlE (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Heilmann et al., 1997</xref>) bind to the host factors fibrinogen and vitronectin and Bhp contributes to primary attachment as well as in intracellular adhesion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Davis et al., 2001</xref>). The role of accumulation-associated protein (Aap), independently or in association with polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) in biofilm formation was also established (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Hussain et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Klingenberg et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Rohde et al., 2005</xref>). The PIA synthesized by <italic>icaRADBC</italic>-encoded protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Heilmann et al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Mack et al., 1996</xref>), is neither essential nor necessary component for the CoNS biofilm formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Kogan et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Frank and Patel, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fredheim et al., 2009</xref>). DNA, RNA, proteins, and polysaccharides other than PIA could be crucial components of extracellular matrix (ECM) in CoNS biofilm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Hanssen et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sadovskaya et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Tormo et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Qin et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fredheim et al., 2009</xref>).</p>
<p>Unlike <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> and <italic>S. epidermidis</italic>, no much information is available about the virulence of <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> particularly in the context of ocular infections. The involvement of genes in cell lysis and extracellular DNA (eDNA) release (i.e., <italic>cidABC</italic>, <italic>lrgAB</italic>) and the role of quorum sensing genes and global regulators that are known to participate in biofilm formation in <italic>S. aureus</italic> and <italic>S. epidermidis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Rice et al., 2007</xref>) is not well studied in <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic>. Moreover, the role of eDNA in the exchange of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) via horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is also not clear. Cell surface proteins such as fibrinogen binding protein (<italic>fbp</italic>), elastin binding protein (<italic>ebp</italic>), and collagen binding protein (<italic>cbp</italic>) are known to contribute to the <italic>S. aureus</italic> biofilm phenotype (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Foster and Hook, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">O&#x2019;Neill et al., 2008</xref>). These cell surface proteins contain a C-terminal LPXTG motif recognized by sortase A (<italic>srtA</italic>) which facilitates their adhesion to the cell wall (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">O&#x2019;Neill et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cascioferro et al., 2015</xref>). Biofilm formation and its propagation is a very well-regulated process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">O&#x2019;Toole et al., 2000</xref>). Autolysis and adhesion of surface-associated proteins mediated by <italic>cidA</italic> and <italic>srtA</italic> are crucial for biofilm formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Rice et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cascioferro et al., 2015</xref>). No report showed the temporal role of these processes and genetic components in <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> biofilm formation of isolates from ocular infections.</p>
<p>We had a cohort of 18 ocular isolates of <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> and were examined for their capacity to form biofilm and for its composition. Also, we looked for the presence of genetic determinants associated with biofilm formation and ARGs in eDNA. Besides, the effect of autolysis and adhesion of surface-associated proteins was examined to ascertain the role of these processes in biofilm development.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec><title>Ethics Statement</title>
<p>The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of LV Prasad Eye Institute (LEC/08/110/2009) approved the study, and the data were analyzed anonymously and reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Bacterial Strains</title>
<p>Eighteen non-duplicate <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> strains isolated from patients with a variety of ocular infections at LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India, during 2007&#x2013;2011 and characterized previously following the standard methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Panda et al., 2014</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2016</xref>) were included in the study. These isolates were from patients with microbial keratitis (<italic>n</italic> = 8), nasolacrimal duct obstruction (<italic>n</italic> = 1), blepharitis (<italic>n</italic> = 1), and keratoconjunctivitis (<italic>n</italic> = 1). Also, seven strains were isolated from the asymptomatic healthy conjunctiva. The 16S rDNA sequencing and amplification of species-specific <italic>nuc</italic> gene confirmed the identity of isolates as <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Panda et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Quantitative Assay of Biofilm</title>
<p>The capacity of biofilm formed by <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> was determined by the method modified by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fredheim et al. (2009)</xref>. Briefly, after diluting bacterial cultures to absorbance 0.05 OD at 595 nm, 200 &#x03BC;l of diluted cultures were added to 96 well polystyrene plates (COSTAR; Sigma) and were allowed to grow for 24 h at 37&#x00B0;C statically. The planktonic cells were removed by inverting the plate on the paper towel and washed the plates once with 1&#x00D7; PBS and then stained with 125 &#x03BC;l of 0.1% crystal violet for 15 min at room temperature. The bound dye was dissolved in the ethanol-acetone mixture (70:30) and recorded the absorbance at 540 nm (Thermo Scientific Varioskan, United States). We performed the biofilm assay in a single run of four wells in biological triplicates. Isolates were considered biofilm positive if the strain had an OD of &#x2265;0.25. Biofilm forming capacities of all isolates were determined in TSB/BHIB, TSB/BHIB with 1% glucose (TSB<sub><italic>glu</italic></sub>/BHIB<sub><italic>glu</italic></sub>) and also in TSB/BHIB with 3% NaCl (TSB<sub><italic>NaCl</italic></sub>/BHIB<sub><italic>NaCl</italic></sub>). We used <italic>S. epidermidis</italic> ATCC 35984 as a positive control for PIA production and biofilm formation in all the experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Biofilm Estimation</title>
<p>Diluted bacterial cultures grown in TSB<sub><italic>glu</italic></sub> were added to 8 well-chambered slides (Nunc) and allowed to grow statically at 37&#x00B0;C for 24 h. The chambers were inverted, washed with 1&#x00D7; PBS and stained with Acridine Orange (Sigma; 0.02%) for 15 min in the dark at room temperature. The cells were fixed using 10% neutral formalin, kept in the dark for 30 min, then sealed by the coverslip and collected the images by Leica TCS SP5 confocal scanning system (Leica Microsystem, Mannheim, Germany). Excitation at 488 nm detected the fluorescence of Acridine Orange and emission with a 500&#x2013;530 nm bandpass filter. The z-stacks were collected at 1 &#x03BC;m intervals and exported as.tif files from Leica LAS AF (version 1.8.2) software and imported into the ImageJ (version 1.41) program (USNIH, Bethesda, MD, United States). PHILIP program analyzed the randomly selected five different fields for imaging and quantification of the mean thickness of biofilm.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Detachment Assay of Biofilm</title>
<p>We performed detachment assays to determine the components of biofilm matrix by the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fredheim et al. (2009)</xref> using reagent and enzymes (i) 40 mM NaIO<sub>4</sub> (Sigma; S1878), (ii) 0.1 mg/ml proteinase K (Sigma; P2308), and (iii) 0.5 mg/ml DNase I (Sigma; DN25). Diluted bacterial isolates were seeded to 96 well polystyrene plates (COSTAR; Sigma) and were allowed to grow for 24 h at 37&#x00B0;C under static condition. Then the above reagents were added to individual wells at 0 and 24 h. After incubation, the biofilm was disrupted by mixing and remaining adhered cells were quantified by crystal violet staining by the method described above. <italic>S. epidermidis</italic> ATCC 35984, known to produce PIA dependent polysaccharide matrix, was used as a control.</p>
<p>We performed the detachment assay in duplicate wells in three biological replicates by the method described above (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fredheim et al., 2009</xref>). The percent detachment was calculated from the average difference between the treated wells and the control wells and divided the results into three categories: (i) no detachment (&#x003C;10%), (ii) intermediate detachment (10&#x2013;50%), and (iii) strong detachment (>50%). <italic>S. epidermidis</italic> ATCC 35984 and SHN65 grown for 24 h on 8 well-chambered slides were subjected to NaIO<sub>4</sub>, proteinase K, and DNase I treatment and allowed to grow for another 24 h at 37&#x00B0;C. Then stained the adherent biofilm comprised of polysaccharides, eDNA, and protein grown in chamber slides with wheat germ agglutinin-Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate (Invitrogen; 1 &#x03BC;g/ml), DAPI (Sigma; 5 &#x03BC;g/ml) and sypro ruby (Invitrogen; 1&#x00D7;) and collected the images by CLSM. WGA-Alexa Fluor 488 and sypro ruby fluorescence detected by excitation at 488 nm, and emission was collected with a 510&#x2013;570 nm and 600&#x2013;700 nm bandpass filter, respectively. Excitation at 405 nm detected DAPI fluorescence and emission collected with a 410&#x2013;475 nm bandpass filter. The z-stacks were collected at 1 &#x03BC;m intervals and exported as.tif files from Leica LAS AF (version 1.8.2) software.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Time Point Inhibition Assay</title>
<p>We added Proteinase K and DNase I to the wells containing <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> SHN65 and SH1965 and <italic>S. epidermidis</italic> ATCC 35984 at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h to see the effect on biofilm formation. All wells were incubated for a total of 24 h at 37&#x00B0;C under static condition and the wells treated at 24 h were further allowed for another 12 h after the addition of the reagents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Effect of Inhibitor on Biofilm Formation</title>
<p>We determined the inhibitory effect of Sodium polyanethole sulphonate (PAS) on autolysis by the method described earlier (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Rice et al., 2007</xref>). PAS (0.5 mg/ml) was added to the respective wells at different time points and incubated for a total of 24 h, and the biofilm was allowed to grow for further 12 h after addition of PAS and estimated by the method described above.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Extraction of Extracellular DNA and Quantification</title>
<p>Extracellular DNA was extracted by the method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Rice et al. (2007)</xref>. Briefly, 100 &#x03BC;l of filter-sterilized supernatant from each isolate was transferred into a chilled tube containing 300 &#x03BC;l of TE buffer and extracted once with an equal volume of phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) by centrifuging at 18,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 20 min at 4&#x00B0;C. The supernatant was further extracted once with an equal volume of chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (24:1). The aqueous phase of each sample was then mixed with 3 volume of ice-cold 100% ethanol and 1/10 volume of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.2) and stored at &#x2212;20&#x00B0;C. The next day, the ethanol precipitated DNA was collected by centrifugation for 20 min at 4&#x00B0;C and 18,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic>, washed with ice-cold 70% ethanol, air dried, and dissolved in 30 &#x03BC;l of nuclease-free water.</p>
<p>The extracted eDNA was diluted 10 times (1:9) using nuclease-free water and used as a template. PCR mixture contained: 4 &#x03BC;l of 5&#x00D7; PCR buffer, 1 &#x03BC;l of 25 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 2 &#x03BC;l each of dNTPs (Promega, Madison, WI, United States), 2 &#x03BC;l each of forward and reverse primer (5 pmol/&#x03BC;l) (GCC Biotech, New Delhi), 0.25 &#x03BC;l of 5 U/&#x03BC;l Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, United States), 1 &#x03BC;l of diluted eDNA, and 7.75 &#x03BC;l of nuclease-free water. The PCR was programmed as follows: initial denaturation at 94&#x00B0;C for 2 min, followed by 25 cycles consisting of denaturation at 94&#x00B0;C for 30 s, annealing at 52&#x00B0;C for 30 s, extension at 72&#x00B0;C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72&#x00B0;C for 5 min. PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel, stained with EtBr and photographed using a gel documentation system (Bio-Rad, United States). The images were analyzed using ImageJ software and the eDNA quantified by amplifying 16S rDNA, 23S rDNA, and <italic>gyrA</italic> genes, and taking into account the ratio of released eDNA and biomass of the isolate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>PCR Assays</title>
<p>PCR determined the presence of <italic>icaA</italic> and <italic>icaD</italic> genes by the method described earlier (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Arciola et al., 2001</xref>). We used <italic>S. epidermidis</italic> ATCC 35984 as a positive control for <italic>icaA</italic> and <italic>icaD</italic> detection. Also, PCR was used to determine the presence of antibiotic resistance genes among <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Panda et al., 2016</xref>). Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref> showed the cyclic conditions of PCR and primers used for the detection of biofilm-associated gene and amplification of ARG. The amplicons of <italic>cidA</italic>, <italic>cidB</italic>, <italic>lrgB</italic>, <italic>sigB</italic>, <italic>mgrA</italic>, <italic>lytR</italic>, <italic>lytS</italic>, <italic>ebpS</italic>, <italic>fbp</italic>, <italic>agrA</italic>, <italic>agrB</italic>, <italic>luxS</italic>, and <italic>srtA</italic> genes were sequenced and submitted to GenBank database under accession numbers <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="KU518895">KU518895</ext-link>&#x2013;<ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="KU518907">KU518907</ext-link>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>RT-PCR Assays</title>
<p>To determine the expression of biofilm-associated genes, the aliquots of 4-h grown culture in TSB<sub>glu</sub> diluted to an absorbance of 0.05 OD at 595 nm were seeded into 35 mm Petri plate (Tarson) and incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 4 h under static condition. The adherent cells were scraped using ice chilled resuspension buffer (50 mM Tris&#x2013;HCl, 10 mM EDTA, 500 mM NaCl, pH 8.0) and centrifuged at 18,000 <italic>g</italic> for 5 min at 4&#x00B0;C. The pellet was used to isolate RNA using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, United States) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions, and synthesized cDNA using 500 ng RNA and SuperScript VILO cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen, United States). The cDNA was diluted 30 times with nuclease-free water (1:29), and 1 &#x03BC;l of cDNA was used as a template in RT-PCR. The cyclic conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94&#x00B0;C for 2 min followed by 25 cycles consists of denaturation at 94&#x00B0;C for 30 s, annealing at 52&#x00B0;C for 30 s, and extension at 72&#x00B0;C for 30 s. The final extension was at 72&#x00B0;C for 5 min. Similarly, RT-PCR determined the expression of <italic>srtA</italic> in the biofilm of SHN65 grown for 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h. Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref> shows the list of primers used in the expression study for biofilm-associated genes.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<sec><title>Quantitative Estimation of Biofilm Formation</title>
<p>In this study, we checked the isolates for their ability to form biofilm in different media, instead for examining the differences in the rate of biofilm development. We found all the ocular <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates belonging to the infected eye, and healthy conjunctiva formed a biofilm on polystyrene microtiter plates. The capacity of biofilm formation by strains varied with media used (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A</xref>). In general, all the strains efficiently formed biofilms in both media TSB<sub>glu</sub> and BHIB<sub>glu</sub>. However, one strain from the infected eye (SH1965) and two isolates from healthy conjunctiva (SHN66 and SHN75) formed better biofilm in TSB<sub>NaCl</sub> and BHIB, respectively. Isolate SHN65 formed the highest biofilm among the strains tested. The biofilm forming capacity of the isolates was further quantified by estimating the mean thickness of the biofilm formed in TSB<sub>glu</sub> by CLSM (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1B</xref>). Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref> showed the representative CLSM images of the biofilm by all the ocular isolates.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Quantification of biofilm formed by <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates in 24 h <bold>(A)</bold> crystal violet assay using TSB and BHIB with or without supplementation, <bold>(B)</bold> CLSM analysis represented as mean thickness of biofilm-induced in TSB<sub><italic>glu</italic></sub>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-09-02687-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Composition of the Biofilm Matrix</title>
<p>All isolates of <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> showed decreased capacity to form biofilm in the presence of proteinase K and/or DNase I when added at the initial point of inoculation in both TSB<sub>glu</sub> (Supplementary Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S2A,B</xref>) and BHIB<sub>glu</sub> (Supplementary Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S2C,D</xref>). These observations thus indicate the role of proteins and eDNA in biofilm development. We then performed detachment assay to see the effect of NaIO<sub>4</sub>, proteinase K and DNase I on mature biofilm in both the media TSB<sub>glu</sub> (Supplementary Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S3A&#x2013;C</xref>) and BHIB<sub>glu</sub> (Supplementary Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S3D&#x2013;F</xref>). The extent of detachment of biofilm was media independent. We found that 17 of 18 ocular <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates showed detachment after treatment with proteinase K, and 14 isolates each after treatment with DNase I, and NaIO<sub>4</sub>, respectively. We noticed that none of the strains showed strong detachment (50&#x2013;90%) upon NaIO<sub>4</sub> treatment. However, 11 isolates showed moderate (10&#x2013;50%), and three strains showed low level (0&#x2013;10%) of detachment, respectively. While studying the effect of proteinase K and DNase I on biofilm detachment, we found 17 isolates showing intermediate and 13 strong detachment, respectively (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). The positive control <italic>S. epidermidis</italic> ATCC 35984 displayed strong detachment upon NaIO<sub>4</sub> treatment. Therefore, we selected the best biofilm forming strain SHN65 for the further study.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Percent detachment of preformed biofilms obtained with 18 ocular <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates after treatment with NaIO<sub>4</sub>, proteinase K or DNase I.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-09-02687-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging of the biofilm formed by ATCC 35984 and SHN65 indicates that the ECM of ATCC 35984 is predominantly composed of polysaccharides which stained green in our assay; whereas, ECM of SHN65 which took both red and blue stains represent protein and DNA as principal components (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A</xref>). CLSM imaging of the detachment assay also inferred that ECM of ATCC 35984 contains polysaccharides and SHN65 contain protein and DNA (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3B</xref>). The thickness of the biofilm formed by ATCC 35984 reduced upon NaIO<sub>4</sub> treatment whereas no reduction was observed upon Proteinase K and DNase I treatment. On the contrary, the biofilm thickness of SHN65 decreased after treatment with proteinase K and DNase I and was unaffected by NaIO<sub>4</sub> treatment (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3B</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>The figure shows the orthogonal views of CLSM images. <bold>(A)</bold> Biofilms formed by ATCC 35984 and SHN65 in the presence of proteinase K and DNase I, and <bold>(B)</bold> Detachment of preformed biofilms by adding NaIO<sub>4</sub>, proteinase K, and DNase I. Acquired the z-stacks of each chamber by CLSM with a Leica TCS SP5 confocal scanning system (Leica Microsystem, Mannheim, Germany) 63&#x00D7; oil objective lens.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-09-02687-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Biofilm Inhibition Studies</title>
<p>Time point inhibition studies using proteinase K and DNase I determined the components of the biofilm matrix at different stages of biofilm development in <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> strains SHN65 and SH1965. The addition of proteinase K (Supplementary Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S4A,C</xref>) and DNase I Supplementary Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S4B,D</xref>) at all time points diminished the cell adherence without showing any significant effect on bacterial growth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Temporal Effect of Autolysis on Biofilm Formation</title>
<p>We used sodium PAS, a known chemical inhibitor of cell lysis which does not affect the growth of the bacteria at different time points of biofilm development. PAS added at 0&#x2013;3 h of time points drastically reduced the biomass of the adherent cells of <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> SHN65 (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4A,B</xref>). However, no effect was observed on adherent biomass of positive control <italic>S. epidermidis</italic> ATCC 35984 (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4A,B</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>The effect of Sodium Polyanethole Sulphonate (PAS) on biofilm formation by <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> strain SHN65 and <italic>S. epidermidis</italic> strain ATCC 35984 at different time points. <bold>(A)</bold> Normalized values of biofilm formed by strains after PAS treatment. <bold>(B)</bold> Images of wells of the microtiter plate stained with crystal violet. T: Treated, C: Control. Mean values from three independent experiments are shown, and error bars represent the SEM.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-09-02687-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>PCR Assays</title>
<p>Although all the ocular isolates produced biofilm, none carried the <italic>icaA</italic> or <italic>icaD</italic> genes, irrespective of the sources of isolation. All isolates carried the genes encoding cell surface attachment proteins (<italic>ebpS</italic>, <italic>cbp</italic>, <italic>fbp</italic>, and <italic>srtA</italic>), quorum sensing (<italic>agrA</italic>, <italic>agrB</italic>, <italic>agrD</italic>, and <italic>luxS</italic>), eDNA release (<italic>cidA</italic>, <italic>cidB</italic>, <italic>lrgA</italic>, <italic>lrgB</italic>, <italic>lytS</italic>, <italic>lytR</italic>, and <italic>atlE</italic>), and global regulators (<italic>sarA</italic>, <italic>mgrA</italic>, and <italic>sigB</italic> and <italic>araC/xylS</italic>) (data not shown). These isolates also showed positive results for <italic>mphC</italic>, <italic>ermC</italic>, <italic>msrA</italic>, <italic>aac6&#x2032;-aph2&#x2033;</italic>, <italic>ant4&#x2032;</italic>, <italic>aph3&#x2032;</italic>, <italic>tetK</italic>, <italic>dfrG</italic>, <italic>blaZ</italic>, <italic>mecA</italic>, <italic>cat:pC223</italic>, <italic>sat</italic>, <italic>lnuA</italic> genes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>RT-PCR Assays</title>
<p>The expression study of biofilm-associated genes showed that majority isolates expressed genes associated with cell surface attachment, quorum sensing, eDNA release, and global regulation. We then correlated the expression of the genes associated with eDNA release and cell surface attachment proteins with the extent of detachment upon addition of DNase I and proteinase K, respectively. There was a good association between <italic>cidA</italic>, and <italic>cidB</italic> expression and detachment upon DNase I treatment. Similarly the expression of <italic>fbp</italic>, <italic>ebpS</italic>, <italic>cbp</italic>, and <italic>srtA</italic> genes showed an association with higher detachment upon proteinase K treatment among the strains (Supplementary Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S5A,B</xref>). The expression of <italic>atl</italic> associated with higher detachment upon both DNase I and proteinase K treatment. We did not look for the association of expression of quorum sensing genes, and global regulators with biofilm component as these play a role in both eDNA and protein-rich biofilms. The expression of <italic>srtA</italic> was elevated at early time points of biofilm formation (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>Results of RT-PCR obtained with <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> strain SHN65 showing the expression of <italic>srtA</italic> at different time points in biofilm formation. Lane B. Negative control without template.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-09-02687-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>PCR Assay of eDNA From Biofilm Matrix</title>
<p>The eDNA present in the mature biofilm of 18 ocular <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates and determined by RT-PCR is shown in Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S6A</xref>. In comparison to other strains, two of the isolates, SHN65 and SH314 produced more eDNA (Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S6B</xref>). Upon using eDNA as a template for PCR, these isolates showed positive results for <italic>mphC</italic>, <italic>ermC</italic>, <italic>msrA</italic>, <italic>aac6&#x2032;-aph2&#x2033;</italic>, <italic>ant4</italic>&#x2032;, <italic>aph3&#x2032;</italic>, <italic>tetK</italic>, <italic>dfrG</italic>, <italic>blaZ</italic>, <italic>mecA</italic>, <italic>cat:pC223</italic>, <italic>sat</italic>, <italic>lnuA</italic> genes (Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S7</xref>). These findings thus indicate that ARGs released in eDNA can act as a source for the transmission of ARGs.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Discussion</title>
<p>Our study demonstrated that all ocular isolates of <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic>, from both infected eyes and asymptomatically healthy conjunctiva, were able to form biofilm. This observation is similar to those who also reported that both clinically significant and contaminant isolates of <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> collected from human blood could form biofilm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Silva et al., 2013</xref>). One of the <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> from healthy conjunctiva (SHN65) formed better biofilm and was comparable to that of the positive control strain of <italic>S. epidermidis</italic> ATCC 35984, but the composition of the matrix was different. We found that both TSB<sub>glu</sub> and BHIB<sub>glu</sub> are better media for the production of biofilm compared to that of TSB<sub>NaCl</sub> and BHIB<sub>NaCl</sub>, except for one isolate (SH1965) that induced better biofilm in TSB<sub>NaCl</sub>. This finding is similar to those workers who also demonstrated that majority <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates produced better biofilm in TSB<sub>glu</sub> than in TSB<sub>NaCl</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fredheim et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Barros et al., 2015</xref>). These observations thus suggest that TSB<sub>glu</sub> and BHIB<sub>glu</sub> are a better medium to study the biofilm development and inhibition studies.</p>
<p>We found that none of the strains showed >50% detachment when treated with NaIO<sub>4</sub>. Nine isolates showed >50% detachment upon treatment with proteinase K and six isolates with DNase I, respectively. However, four strains did not show any detachment upon NaIO<sub>4</sub> or DNase I treatment. This finding thus suggests that either the protein or eDNA or both are the primary component of the biofilm matrix in most of the isolates. Moreover, NaIO<sub>4</sub> induced biofilm disruption in 14 strains suggesting the presence of hitherto unknown &#x03B2; 1, 6-linked polysaccharides that could be part of the biofilm matrix, a finding similar to those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fredheim et al. (2009)</xref>. Analysis of CLSM images of best biofilm forming strain SHN65 showed a significant reduction in biomass upon treatment with proteinase K and DNase I. This observation thus indicates that the primary component of biofilm matrix consists of both protein and eDNA. The results of this study are similar to those workers who also demonstrated the functional relevance of proteins and eDNA in biofilm among <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Beenken et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fredheim et al., 2009</xref>).</p>
<p>Polyanethole sulphonate is known to reduce the eDNA release and biofilm adherence in <italic>S. aureus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Rice et al., 2007</xref>). In this study, we observed that PAS within the first 4 h decreased the capacity of the biofilm to adhere on to the surface of microtiter wells. This step is a crucial step in biofilm development. However, the addition of PAS at the later time points did not have any effect on the biofilm development. This observation thus indicates that the accumulation of eDNA in the biofilm matrix during the early stages of biofilm formation is sufficient to allow the adherence throughout the process of biofilm development. The inhibition of biofilm formation by DNase I and proteinase K throughout the process indicate that DNA and proteins are the major components of ECM. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Mann et al. (2009)</xref> also reported the inhibitory effect of PAS, DNase I and proteinase K on biofilm development in <italic>S. aureus</italic>.</p>
<p>Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin-dependent pathway has been described playing an essential role in biofilm development among <italic>S. aureus</italic> and <italic>S. epidermidis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Arciola et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gad et al., 2009</xref>). However, none of the isolates used in this study were positive for <italic>icaA</italic> or <italic>icaD</italic> genes indicating that the formation of biofilm in <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> is PIA-independent. This observation corroborates the finding of other workers who also showed no role or least role of the <italic>ica</italic> operon in biofilm formation in <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fredheim et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Silva et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Barros et al., 2015</xref>). The PIA-independent biofilm formation in other staphylococci such as <italic>S. aureus</italic>, <italic>S. epidermidis</italic>, <italic>Staphylococcus lugdunensis</italic> was also occasionally reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Fitzpatrick et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Frank and Patel, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Qin et al., 2007</xref>). Based on the results of this study, we hypothesized that PIA-independent pathways might play a significant role in biofilm formation among ocular isolates of <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic>. Several studies have shown the role of the <italic>ica</italic> genes as virulence factors in staphylococcal infections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Rooijakkers et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">O&#x2019;Gara, 2007</xref>) and also used as a tool to differentiate between virulent and non-virulent isolates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Namvar et al., 2013</xref>). In this study, we found all <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates, irrespective of sources of isolation, lack <italic>icaA</italic> and <italic>icaD</italic> genes indicating that there may be other factor(s) responsible for virulence in infected eye isolates. Also, the presence of <italic>ica</italic> genes cannot be used as marker to differentiate virulent and non-virulent isolates.</p>
<p>We then examined the presence of other biofilm-associated genes among <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic>. PCR results showed the presence of <italic>srtA</italic>, <italic>atl</italic>, <italic>fbp</italic>, <italic>cbp</italic>, and <italic>ebpS</italic> genes among all the isolates irrespective of the extent and type of biofilm formation by the isolates. These findings are similar to those workers who also reported the presence of <italic>atl</italic> and <italic>fbp</italic> genes in non-biofilm forming isolates of <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Barros et al., 2015</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Li et al. (2012)</xref> also reported the presence of genes encoding cell surface proteins such as fibrinogen binding protein, collagen binding protein and clumping factor in both biofilm-positive and -negative isolates of <italic>S. aureus</italic>. Several workers showed that <italic>cidABC</italic> and <italic>lrgAB</italic> operon, and the LytSR two-component system has a role to play in cell lysis and death, eDNA release and biofilm development in <italic>S. aureus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Rice et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Ranjit et al., 2011</xref>). The presence of <italic>cidABC</italic>, <italic>lrgAB</italic>, and <italic>LytSR</italic> genes among all <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates indicate their possible role in biofilm formation. All the genes, alone or in combination, were reported playing roles in the formation of biofilm among <italic>S. aureus</italic> and <italic>S. epidermidis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Beenken et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Rice et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Periasamy et al., 2012</xref>). Also, <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> strains used in the study carried quorum sensing genes (<italic>agrA</italic>, <italic>agrB</italic>, <italic>agrD</italic>, and <italic>luxS</italic>) and global regulators (<italic>sarA</italic>, <italic>mgrA</italic>, and <italic>sigB</italic>, and <italic>araC/xylS</italic>); therefore, their role in biofilm development cannot be ruled out in <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates.</p>
<p>However, the omnipresence of these biofilm associated genes among all isolates irrespective of the type of biofilm produced clearly indicates that the level of gene expression might play a role in dictating the extent and structure of biofilm. All ocular isolates, except one isolate, expressed <italic>cidABC</italic>, <italic>lrgAB</italic>, <italic>LytSR</italic>, <italic>agrA</italic>, <italic>agrB</italic>, <italic>agrD</italic>, and <italic>luxS</italic>, <italic>sarA</italic>, <italic>mgrA</italic>, and <italic>sigB</italic> and <italic>araC/xylS</italic> genes, 14 isolates showed expression of <italic>atl</italic>, and 16 strains showed expression of <italic>mgrA</italic> indicating their probable role in biofilm formation and development. We found a good correlation between expression of <italic>cidA</italic>, and <italic>cidB</italic> with eDNA component and <italic>efb</italic>, <italic>ebp</italic>, <italic>cbp</italic>, and <italic>srtA</italic> genes with protein component indicating their role in determining biofilm structure. However, mutational studies need to be performed to confirm the above finding. To our knowledge, this is the first report which depicts the presence and expression of <italic>cidABC</italic> and <italic>lrgAB</italic>, quorum sensing genes and global regulators among <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates. The abundance of <italic>srtA</italic> transcript during early time points thus suggests that Sortase A has a role to play during initial stages of the biofilm formation and development.</p>
<p>Several workers reported that eDNA is a structural component of biofilm matrix produced by <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic>, <italic>S. aureus</italic>, <italic>S. epidermidis</italic>, and <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Rice et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fredheim et al., 2009</xref>). Also, in the present study, we found that a majority of <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates released DNA indicating that eDNA could be one of the major components of the biofilm matrix. Besides being a structural component of the biofilm matrix, eDNA is also demonstrated playing a pivotal role in mediating HGT in bacteria, e.g., <italic>Haloferax volcanii</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chimileski et al., 2014</xref>). To decipher the role of eDNA, if any, in HGT, we examined the presence of ARGs in eDNA of <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic>. The eDNA released by <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> strains showed the presence of <italic>mphC</italic>, <italic>ermC</italic>, <italic>msrA</italic>, <italic>aac6&#x2032;-aph2&#x2033;</italic>, <italic>ant4&#x2032;</italic>, <italic>aph3&#x2032;</italic>, <italic>tetK</italic>, <italic>dfrG</italic>, <italic>blaZ</italic>, <italic>mecA</italic>, <italic>cat:pC223</italic>, <italic>sat</italic>, <italic>lnuA</italic> genes. The most prevalent ARGs in eDNA was <italic>blaZ</italic> followed by <italic>mecA</italic> and <italic>aac6&#x2032;-aph2&#x2033;</italic>. These ARGs were also amplified from the cell lysates used as a template from the respective <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Panda et al., 2016</xref>). The presence of ARGs in eDNA biofilm matrix thus suggests that eDNA might have a role to play in HGT; however, this phenomenon needs to be validated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In conclusion, this study shows that PIA-independent biofilm formation is a standard feature of <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates, irrespective of the sources of isolation. To our knowledge, this is the first report depicting the presence and expression of biofilm-associated genes, quorum sensing genes, and global regulators among <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic>. These finding further indicates that either the protein or DNA or both are the primary component of the biofilm matrix in most of the isolates. The presence of antibiotic resistance genes in eDNA suggests their possible role in HGT of antibiotic-resistant determinants. Cell lysis enabling DNA release was an essential step for biofilm attachment during the initial stages of biofilm development. The eDNA and protein remain a vital matrix component throughout the process of biofilm maturation. The expression of <italic>srtA</italic> transcript decreases with the biofilm age indicating its role in the early stages of biofilm development. Studies on the temporal and stochastic expression of biofilm-associated genes, the release of eDNA and composition of proteins in biofilm matrix are warranted to understand the mechanism involved in <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> biofilm development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>SP and DVS conceived the experiments. SP conducted the experiments. SP and DVS analyzed the results. SP and DVS wrote the paper. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conflict of Interest Statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure">
<p><bold>Funding.</bold> This study was supported by the Science and Engineering Research Board, New Delhi with grant no. SR/SO/HS-0203/2012 to DVS. This study was also supported by fund-contributor the Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi to the Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ack>
<p>SP gratefully acknowledges the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi for providing a Senior Research Fellowship. The authors thank Dr. Savitri Sharma of the Microbiology Centre, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India, for providing <italic>S. haemolyticus</italic> isolates used in this study. A part of this work was presented as a poster at the 7th ASM Conference on Biofilms, Chicago, IL, United States, from October 24&#x2013;29, 2015.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary material">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02687/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02687/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.pdf" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arciola</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baldassarri</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montanaro</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Presence of <italic>icaA</italic> and <italic>icaD</italic> genes and slime production in a collection of staphylococcal strains from catheter-associated infections.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Clin. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>39</volume> <fpage>2151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2156</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JCM.39.6.2151-2156.2001</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11376050</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barbieri</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pesce</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franchelli</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baldelli</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Maria</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marchese</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of staphylococci causing breast peri-implant infections in oncologic patients.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume>:<issue>26</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12866-015-0368-x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25888077</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barros</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lemos</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Souto-Padr&#x00F3;n</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Giambiagi-deMarval</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of biofilm formation in <italic>Staphylococcus haemolyticus</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>70</volume> <fpage>829</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>834</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00284-015-0794-x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25724344</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Becker</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heilmann</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peters</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Coagulase-negative staphylococci.</article-title> <source><italic>Clin. Microbiol. Rev.</italic></source> <volume>27</volume> <fpage>870</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>926</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/CMR.0010913</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beenken</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunman</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McAleese</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Macapagal</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murphy</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Projan</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Global gene expression in <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> biofilms.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>186</volume> <fpage>4665</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4684</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.186.14.4665-4684.2004</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15231800</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cascioferro</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raffa</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maggio</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raimondi</surname> <given-names>M. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schillaci</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daidone</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Sortase A inhibitors: recent advances and future perspectives.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Med. Chem.</italic></source> <volume>58</volume> <fpage>9108</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9123</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00779</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26280844</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chimileski</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franklin</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Papke</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Biofilms formed by the archaeon <italic>Haloferax volcanii</italic> exhibit cellular differentiation and social motility, and facilitate horizontal gene transfer.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Biol.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>:<issue>65</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12915-014-0065-5</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25124934</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cucarella</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Solano</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Valle</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amorena</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lasa</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Penades</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Bap, a <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> surface protein involved in biofilm formation.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>183</volume> <fpage>2888</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2896</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.183.9.2888-2896.2001</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11292810</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Czekaj</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ciszewski</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Szewczyk</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title><italic>Staphylococcus haemolyticus</italic> &#x2013; an emerging threat in the twilight of the antibiotics age.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiology</italic></source> <volume>161</volume> <fpage>2061</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2068</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mic.0.000178</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26363644</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gurusiddappa</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McCrea</surname> <given-names>K. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perkins</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hook</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>SdrG, a fibrinogen-binding bacterial adhesin of the microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules subfamily from <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic>, targets the thrombin cleavage site in the Beta chain.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Biol. Chem.</italic></source> <volume>276</volume> <fpage>27799</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27805</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M103873200</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11371571</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fitzpatrick</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Humphreys</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x2019;Gara</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Evidence for <italic>icaADBC</italic>-independent biofilm development mechanism in methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> clinical isolates.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Clin. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>1973</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1976</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JCM.43.4.1973-1976.2005</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15815035</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Foster</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hook</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Surface protein adhesins of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume> <fpage>484</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>488</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0966-842X(98)01400-0</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10036727</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Frank</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Poly-<italic>N</italic>-acetylglucosamine is not a major component of the extracellular matrix in biofilms formed by <italic>icaADBC</italic>-positive <italic>Staphylococcus lugdunensis</italic> isolates.</article-title> <source><italic>Infect. Immun.</italic></source> <volume>75</volume> <fpage>4728</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4742</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/IAI.00640-07</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17635864</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fredheim</surname> <given-names>E. G. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klingenberg</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rohde</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frankenberger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaustad</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fl&#x00E6;gstad</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Biofilm formation by <italic>Staphylococcus haemolyticus</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Clin. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>1172</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1180</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JCM.01891-08</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19144798</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gad</surname> <given-names>G. F. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Feky</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Rehewy</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hassan</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abolella</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Baky</surname> <given-names>R. M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Detection of <italic>icaA</italic>, <italic>icaD</italic> genes and biofilm production by <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> and <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> isolated from urinary tract catheterized patients.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Infect. Dev. Ctries.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume> <fpage>342</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>351</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3855/jidc.241</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19759503</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hanssen</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kjeldsen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sollid</surname> <given-names>J. U. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Local variants of staphylococcal cassette chromosome <italic>mec</italic> in sporadic methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci: evidence of horizontal gene transfer?</article-title> <source><italic>Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.</italic></source> <volume>48</volume> <fpage>285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>296</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.48.1.285-296.2004</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14693553</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heilmann</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hussain</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peters</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gotz</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Evidence for autolysin-mediated primary attachment of <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> to a polystyrene surface.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>24</volume> <fpage>1013</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1024</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4101774.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9220008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heilmann</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schweitzer</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gerke</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vanittanakom</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mack</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gotz</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Molecular basis of intercellular adhesion in the biofilm-forming <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>20</volume> <fpage>1083</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1091</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02548.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8809760</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hussain</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herrmann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>von Eiff</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perdreau-Remington</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peters</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>A 140-kilodalton extracellular protein is essential for the accumulation of <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> strains on surfaces.</article-title> <source><italic>Infect. Immun.</italic></source> <volume>65</volume> <fpage>519</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>524</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9009307</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Klingenberg</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sundsfjord</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ronnestad</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mikalsen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaustad</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flaegstad</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Phenotypic and genotypic aminoglycoside resistance in blood culture isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci from a single neonatal intensive care unit, 1989&#x2013;2000.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Antimicrob. Chemother.</italic></source> <volume>54</volume> <fpage>889</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>896</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dkh453</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15471996</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kogan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sadovskaya</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chaignon</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chokr</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jabbouri</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Biofilms of clinical strains of <italic>Staphylococcus</italic> that do not contain polysaccharide intercellular adhesin.</article-title> <source><italic>FEMS Microbiol. Lett.</italic></source> <volume>255</volume> <fpage>11</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6968.2005.00043.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16436056</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krzyminska</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Szczuka</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dudzinskam</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaznowaski</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Virulence and the presence of aminoglycoside resistance genes of <italic>Staphylococcus haemolyticus</italic> strains isolated from clinical specimens.</article-title> <source><italic>Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek</italic></source> <volume>107</volume> <fpage>857</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>868</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10482-015-0378-6</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25586730</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Analysis of biofilm formation and associated gene detection in <italic>Staphylococcus</italic> isolates from bovine mastitis.</article-title> <source><italic>Afr. J. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume> <fpage>2113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2118</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5897/AJB11.081</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mack</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fischer</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krokotsch</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leopold</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hartmann</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Egge</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>The intercellular adhesin involved in biofilm accumulation of <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> is a linear beta-1, 6-linked glucosaminoglycan: purification and structural analysis.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>178</volume> <fpage>175</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>183</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jb.178.1.175-183.1996</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8550413</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mack</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rohde</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>L. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davies</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Horstkotte</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knobloch</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Biofilm formation in medical device-related infection.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Artif. Organs</italic></source> <volume>29</volume> <fpage>343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>359</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/039139880602900404</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Makki</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duggirala</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kenchappa</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garg</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) other than <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> isolated from ocular infections.</article-title> <source><italic>Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>52</volume> <fpage>9018</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9022</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1167/iovs.11-7777</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22025577</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mann</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rice</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boles</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Endres</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ranjit</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chandramohan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Modulation of eDNA release and degradation affects <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> biofilm maturation.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>4</volume>:<issue>e5822</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0005822</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19513119</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mehta</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Multi-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus haemolyticus</italic> in a neonatal unit in New Delhi.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Trop. Paediatr.</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02724936.1997.11747857</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9176572</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Namvar</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asghari</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ezzatifar</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azizi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lari</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Detection of the intracellular adhesin gene cluster (ica) in clinical <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> isolates.</article-title> <source><italic>GMS Hyg. Infect. Control</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>Doc03</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3205/dgkh000203</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23967389</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>O&#x2019;Gara</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title><italic>ica</italic> and beyond: biofilm mechanisms and regulation in <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> and <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>FEMS Microbiol. Lett.</italic></source> <volume>270</volume> <fpage>179</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>188</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00688</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17419768</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>O&#x2019;Neill</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pozzi</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Houston</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Humphreys</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Loughman</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>A novel <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> biofilm phenotype mediated by the fibronectin-binding proteins, FnBPA and FnBPB.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>190</volume> <fpage>3835</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3850</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.00167-08</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18375547</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>O&#x2019;Toole</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaplan</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kolter</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Biofilm formation as microbial development.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>54</volume> <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>79</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.49</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Panda</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhury</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>D. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Development and evaluation of hexaplex PCR for rapid detection of methicillin, cadmium/zinc, and antiseptic-resistant staphylococci, with simultaneous identification of PVL-positive and -negative <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> and coagulase-negative staphylococci.</article-title> <source><italic>FEMS Microbiol. Lett.</italic></source> <volume>352</volume> <fpage>114</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>122</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1574-6968.12383</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24417390</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Panda</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>D. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Multidrug-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus haemolyticus</italic> isolates from the infected eye and healthy conjunctiva.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume> <fpage>154</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>159</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jgar.2016.05.006</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27530859</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Periasamy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joo</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duong</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bach</surname> <given-names>T. H. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>V. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chatterjee</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>How <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> biofilms develop their characteristic structure.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>109</volume> <fpage>1281</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1286</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1115006109</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22232686</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Molin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Formation, and properties of in vitro biofilms of <italic>ica</italic>-negative <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> clinical isolates.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Med. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>56</volume> <fpage>83</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/jmm.0.46799-0</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17172522</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ranjit</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Endres</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bayles</surname> <given-names>K. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title><italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> CidA and LrgA proteins exhibit holin-like properties.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>193</volume> <fpage>2468</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2476</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.01545-10</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21421752</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rice</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mann</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Endres</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weiss</surname> <given-names>E. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cassat</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smeltzer</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The <italic>cidA</italic> murein hydrolase regulator contributes to DNA release and biofilm development in <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>104</volume> <fpage>8113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8118</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0610226104</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17452642</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rohde</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burdelski</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bartscht</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hussain</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buck</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Horstkotte</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Induction of <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> biofilm formation via proteolytic processing of the accumulation-associated protein by staphylococcal and host proteases.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>55</volume> <fpage>1883</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1895</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04515.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15752207</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rooijakkers</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Kessel</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Strijp</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Staphylococcal innate immune evasion.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume> <fpage>596</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>601</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tim.2005.10.002</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16242332</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sadovskaya</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vinogradov</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flahaut</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kogan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jabbouri</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Extracellular carbohydrate-containing polymers of a model biofilm-producing strain, <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> RP62A.</article-title> <source><italic>Infect. Immun.</italic></source> <volume>73</volume> <fpage>3007</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3017</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/IAI.73.5.3007-3017.2005</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15845508</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>P. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cruz</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keim</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Paula</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carvalho</surname> <given-names>B. T. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coelho</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The antimicrobial susceptibility, biofilm formation and genotypic profiles of <italic>Staphylococcus haemolyticus</italic> from bloodstream infections.</article-title> <source><italic>Mem&#x00F3;rias Do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz</italic></source> <volume>108</volume> <fpage>812</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>813</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/0074-0276108062013022</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24037208</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takeuchi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Watanabe</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baba</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuzawa</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ito</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morimoto</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Whole-genome sequencing of <italic>Staphylococcus haemolyticus</italic> uncovers the extreme plasticity of its genome and the evolution of human-colonizing staphylococcal species.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>187</volume> <fpage>7292</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7308</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.187.21.7292-7308.2005</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16237012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tormo</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knecht</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gotz</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lasa</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Penades</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Bap-dependent biofilm formation by pathogenic species of <italic>Staphylococcus</italic>: evidence of horizontal gene transfer?</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiology</italic></source> <volume>151</volume> <fpage>2465</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2475</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mic.0.27865-0</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16000737</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>