<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.00448</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Optimized Co-extraction and Quantification of DNA From Enteric Pathogens in Surface Water Samples Near Produce Fields in California</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Cooley</surname> <given-names>Michael B.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/139649/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Carychao</surname> <given-names>Diana</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/535754/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Gorski</surname> <given-names>Lisa</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/121496/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>Produce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture</institution>, <addr-line>Albany, CA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: George S. Bullerjahn, Bowling Green State University, United States</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Marcello Trevisani, Universit&#x000E0; di Bologna, Italy; Peter Bergholz, North Dakota State University, United States</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x0002A;Correspondence: Michael B. Cooley <email>michael.cooley&#x00040;ars.usda.gov</email></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Aquatic Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>13</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>448</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>28</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>27</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2018</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2018 Cooley, Carychao and Gorski.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Cooley, Carychao and Gorski</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract><p>Pathogen contamination of surface water is a health hazard in agricultural environments primarily due to the potential for contamination of crops. Furthermore, pathogen levels in surface water are often unreported or under reported due to difficulty with culture of the bacteria. The pathogens are often present, but require resuscitation, making quantification difficult. Frequently, this leads to the use of quantitative PCR targeted to genes unique to the pathogens. However, multiple pathogen types are commonly in the same water sample, both gram &#x0002B; and gram &#x02013;, leading to problems with DNA extraction. With Shiga toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (STEC), <italic>Salmonella enterica</italic> and <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> as target, a method was optimized to co-extract all three and quantify the level of each using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Multiplexed target genes in STEC were virulence genes, shiga toxin 2 (<italic>stx</italic>2) and hemolysin (<italic>ehx</italic>). Likewise, multiplexed targets in Listeria and Salmonella were the virulence genes listeriolysin (<italic>hly</italic>) and invasion protein A (<italic>inv</italic>A). Water samples were processed using microbiological techniques for each of the pathogens and duplicate water samples were quantified by ddPCR. A significant correlation was found between culture and ddPCR results indicating detection primarily of culturable cells by ddPCR. Average virulence gene levels were 923, 23 k, 69 and 152 copies per sample for <italic>stx</italic>2, <italic>ehx, hly</italic> and <italic>inv</italic>A, respectively. Additionally, <italic>stx</italic>2, <italic>ehx</italic> and <italic>inv</italic> levels were significantly correlated (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05, <italic>R</italic> &#x0003D; 0.34) with generic <italic>E. coli</italic> MPN levels in the duplicate samples. Indirect quantification with ddPCR will improve understanding of prevalence of the pathogens and may reduce risks associated with contaminated surface water.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>droplet digital PCR</kwd>
<kwd>surface water</kwd>
<kwd>pathogen</kwd>
<kwd>gram positive</kwd>
<kwd>gram negative</kwd>
<kwd>quantification</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">5325-42000-050-00D</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn002">224-11-2044</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Agricultural Research Service<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100007917</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">U.S. Food and Drug Administration<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100000038</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="6"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="35"/>
<page-count count="9"/>
<word-count count="6385"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Vegetables are a common source of foodborne illness in the United States and elsewhere, primarily because several produce varieties are consumed raw. In fact, nearly half of the outbreak-associated foodborne illnesses in the United States are leafy vegetables and, additionally, many sporadic illnesses are linked to produce (Crowe et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2015</xref>; Henao et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2015</xref>). Produce can become contaminated at any point in the production chain, yet pre-harvest contamination is prevalent and difficult to prevent, as evidenced by the 2006 spinach outbreak and subsequent outbreaks (Anonymous, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2006</xref>; Allerberger, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2009</xref>). Surface water, such as rivers, lakes and ponds can provide a reservoir for the pathogens (Hanning et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2009</xref>; Lynch et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2009</xref>; Oliveira et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2011</xref>). The water can become contaminated from a variety of sources such as exposure to wildlife, sewage, and agricultural runoff from animal operations (Gagliardi and Karns, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2000</xref>; Walters et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2011</xref>). In turn, wildlife can become contaminated through exposure to contaminated water, with subsequent deposit of pathogens via feces onto fields (Fenlon, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">1985</xref>; Kirk et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2002</xref>; Jay et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2007</xref>; Gorski et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2013</xref>).</p>
<p>The majority of bacterial foodborne illnesses and recalls associated with produce are due to Shiga toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (STEC) and <italic>Salmonella enterica</italic> (Crowe et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2015</xref>). Additionally, <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> contamination of produce recently has led to several high profile outbreaks (Doell, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2010</xref>; Anonymous, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2011</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2013</xref>). During a survey of several public watersheds in the central coastal California to determine the prevalence of STEC, <italic>Salmonella</italic>, and <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic>, we recognized the need for pathogen quantification. High incidence at select locations suggests high levels of contamination, yet the actual contamination levels in the watersheds are not reported (Cooley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2014</xref>). Since enteric bacteria in the watersheds experience various levels of stress, most will not produce colonies without resuscitation leading to an under-estimation of pathogen levels (Buerger et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2012</xref>). Typical resuscitation (enrichment) will produce an unknown number of cell divisions depending on the cell physiology, making direct plating unsuitable for quantification. Quantification methods are available which utilize enrichment and Most Probable Number (MPN) determination by either culture methods or PCR methods (Mcegan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2013</xref>; Orlofsky et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2015</xref>; Benami et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2016</xref>). However these methods are labor intensive, especially if a large number of samples is involved. Quantitative PCR (QPCR) targeted to virulence genes is a more rapid method (Parsons et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2016</xref>; Shridhar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2016</xref>; Yergeau et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2016</xref>; Weber et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2017</xref>). Furthermore, a new type of QPCR, called droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is more efficient and less sensitive to PCR inhibitors (Racki et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2014</xref>; Verhaegen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2016</xref>).</p>
<p>The survey mentioned above discovered hundreds of samples positive for STEC, <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> or <italic>S. enterica</italic>, as previously reported. The microbiological methods used during this survey are very sensitive to the presence of the pathogens, i.e., dual and parallel isolation methods have improved prevalence (Pritchard and Donnelly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">1999</xref>; Gorski et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2011</xref>) and, in the case of STEC, sensitivity is less than 10 cells per sample (Cooley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2014</xref>). If ddPCR is sufficiently sensitive, pathogen presence from ddPCR should correlate to prevalence data already reported from these samples. Nevertheless, QPCR data representative of each pathogen level in a sample requires efficient extraction and amplification of DNA from each of the pathogens. However, the DNA of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic>, like most gram positive organisms, is difficult to extract with the same efficiency as gram negative organisms (Krakat et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2017</xref>). This problem impacts not only QPCR of pathogens but also several other quantification methods, such as metagenomics, where samples are known to include a host of unknown organisms and probably both gram &#x0002B; and gram &#x02013;bacteria. Consequently, we include a study of several extraction methods using spiked samples in an attempt to achieve a balanced extraction from these complex samples.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Summary of swab sampling techniques and locations</title>
<p>Sampling sites in Monterey County in California were selected on the basis of ease of access and have been sampled repeatedly in the last 12 years using Moore swabs (see below), deployed for 24 h at the sites in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref> (Cooley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2007</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2014</xref>). Sites were grouped into regions based on watershed when possible. Carr Lake is likely impacted by seepage from septic systems of Salinas. Conversely, upstream regions (Gabilan Creek, Alisal Creek and the upper portion of the Salinas River are animal-impacted as they were exposed, to a great extent, by wildlife in riparian areas, and runoff from cattle ranches (primarily cow-calf operations).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Maps of sampling sites and watersheds in Monterey County, including; <bold>(A)</bold>, sampling sites near the city of Salinas and <bold>(B)</bold>, sampling sites near King City. The waterways are marked as redlines. The sampling sites are labeled with a letter corresponding to the watershed to which they have been assigned and a number to differentiate between sites within that watershed. A, Alisal Creek; C, Carr Lake; G, Gabilan Creek; S, Salinas River, X, extraneous (no designated watershed).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-09-00448-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Microbiology methods</title>
<p>At 2-week intervals over 10-months (12/15&#x02013;9/16), duplicate Moore swabs (cut cheesecloth, gathered and tethered on a single fishing line) were deployed for 24 h at the above sample sites. Swabs were placed into Whirl-Pak bags (Nasco), kept on ice during transport and one of the duplicate swabs for each location was frozen at &#x02212;80&#x000B0;C. For the remaining swab, 500 mL of sterile water was added to each bag, followed by vigorous shaking by hand for 20 s to recover a representative sample of the sediment. From the swab eluate, 100 mL was removed for <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> isolation, and 100 mL was removed for generic <italic>E. coli</italic> quantification. Most probable number (MPN) quantification of generic <italic>E. coli</italic> was determined by the Colilert QuantiTray 2000 method according to the manufacturer&#x00027;s recommendations (Idexx Laboratories). To the swab and remaining eluate in the Whirl-Pak bag, 30 mL of 10X Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) was added, and the bag was incubated with shaking at 200 RPM at 25&#x000B0;C for 2 h, then 42&#x000B0;C for 8 h. The TSB-enriched cultures were used for STEC and Salmonella isolations. O157 STEC and non-O157 STEC were isolated by methods published previously (Cooley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013</xref>). Briefly, genomic DNA was heat-released from TSB enrichment and QPCR was performed using a multiplexed primer set to detect all shiga toxin (<italic>stx</italic>) types. The QPCR-positive TSB-enriched cultures were streaked onto CHROMagar O157 media plates (DRG International) and isolated, mauve, <italic>E. coli</italic>-like colonies were selected for a second round of QPCR using the same <italic>stx</italic> multiplex primer set. In a parallel procedure, TSB-enriched culture was subjected to Immuno Magnetic Separation (IMS) with anti-O157 antibody (Invitrogen/Dynal), and the IMS beads were spread on two types of media; modified sheep blood agar (mSBA), novabiocin and tellurite Rainbow agar (NT-RA) (Biolog) (Cooley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013</xref>). All plates were incubated at 37&#x000B0;C for 24 h. Suspected O157:H7 colonies were selected on the basis of colony color, and were analyzed by PCR for the presence of the O157 O-antigen synthesis (<italic>rfb</italic>E) and intimin (<italic>eae</italic>) genes (Cooley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2007</xref>). Similarly, non-O157 <italic>E. coli</italic>-like colonies were selected from NT-RA (red colonies) and mSBA (blue colonies that showed hemolytic activity) and confirmed by real-time PCR using the <italic>stx</italic> multiplex primer set described above.</p>
<p>The same TSB enriched culture was also used for Salmonella isolation in two parallel procedures (Kalchayanand et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2009</xref>). Portions of the TSB-enriched culture was either subject to IMS with anti-Salmonella antibody (Dynal, Invitrogen) followed by Rappaport- Vasilliadis Soya Peptone Broth (RVS, Oxoid, Remel) or plated onto Modified Semi-solid Rappaport Vasilliadis (MSRV) medium. Colonies from both RVS and MSRV were streaked onto Xylose Desoxycholate agar (XLD, Difco, Becton Dickinson-BBL). Isolated black colonies on XLD were picked and were confirmed as Salmonella by PCR for the <italic>inv</italic>A gene (Gorski et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2011</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2013</xref>).</p>
<p>Enrichment and isolation of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> was performed as described previously (Cooley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2014</xref>). Swab aliquots were enriched with Buffered Listeria Enrichment Broth Base (BLEB, Difco) for 18 h at 30&#x000B0;C and subsequently subjected to IMS with anti-Listeria antibody (Dynal, Invitrogen), with two parallel methods used to detect <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> from the beads. Aliquots of re-suspended beads were inoculated into Fraser Broth and incubated at 37&#x000B0;C. Isolated blackened media colonies were sub-cultured onto Brilliance Listeria Agar plate (Oxoid, Remel). A separate aliquot of the re-suspended beads was plated onto Brilliance Listeria Agar and incubated for 2 days at 37&#x000B0;C. Isolated blue colonies surrounded by clearing were picked and streaked onto Modified Oxford Agar (MOX). Bluish-white colonies from MOX and Brilliance were selected for detection of the <italic>hly</italic>A gene by PCR (Cooley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2014</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>TAQman primer design method</title>
<p>Examination of the published sequences of <italic>stx</italic>2 and <italic>ehx</italic> variants in STECs in GenBank revealed conserved regions for designing PCR primers and probes. Likewise, Salmonella and Listeria sequences for <italic>inv</italic>A and <italic>hly</italic> were examined for conserved regions, respectively. Probes for Salmonella and Listeria were designed with an internal Nova quencher to allow for smaller probe sequence and lower base fluorescence (BioSearch). Restriction patterns were also considered to eliminate those regions where the restriction site HindIII was located within the amplicons. Likewise a unique region of the plasmid pHCred (Takara Corp) was selected as internal control (IC) within the coding region of the fluorescent protein from sea anemone <italic>Heteractis crispa</italic>. All primers and probes were examined to minimize internal hairpin and dimer formations with itself and other members of the multiplex. Primer length and/or position were also adjusted to allow optimal amplification with 60&#x000B0;C annealing temperature for all multiplex sets. Sequence of the selected primers and probes are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>. Multiplex sets were constructed as STEC (<italic>stx</italic>2 and <italic>ehx</italic>), Sal/Lm (<italic>inv</italic>A and <italic>hly</italic>), IC (<italic>stx</italic>2, IC). Primer and probe sequences were BLASTN at NCBI to ensure they are unique to their respective targets.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Primers and probes.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Multiplex</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Name</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Sequence</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">STEC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stx2 forward</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GGACCACATCGGTGTCTGTTATT</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stx2 reverse</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CCCTCGTATATCCACAGCAAAAT</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stx2 probe</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HEX-CCACACCCCACCGGCAGT-BHQ1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ehx forward</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TTATCGACAACAGCTGCAAGTG</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ehx reverse</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GCTTAGCTCGCTCAAATTTATCTG</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;">
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ehx probe</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">FAM-CGGCTGTTATGCTGGCTATCAGTCCTCTT-BHQ1</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sal/Lm</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">InvA forward</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GGCGGTGGGTTTTGTTGTCTTCTCTATTGTCA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">InvA reverse</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CTGTTTACCGGGCATACCATCCAGAGAAAATC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">InvA probe</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">FAM-CGACTTCCG-Nova<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref>-CGACRCGTTCTGAACCTTTGGTAA-BHQ1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hly forward</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ACCAGCATCTCCGCCTGCAAGTCCTAAG</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hly reverse</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CTTTTCTTGGCGGCACATTTGTCACTGC</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;">
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hly probe</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HEX-CCAATCGAA-Nova-AAGAAACACGCGGATGAAATCGATA-BHQ1</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Internal Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">IC forward</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AACGTGATGGCCCTGAAGGT</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">IC reverse</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CTGGCCTCGTACAGCTCGAA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">IC probe</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">FAM-ACTCGTCCTTCTTCTTCCGCAGCATCT-BHQ1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN1"><label>a</label><p><italic>Black Hole Quencher 1 (BioSearch)</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN2"><label>b</label><p><italic>Nova, internal quencher (BioSearch)</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>DNA extraction procedure</title>
<p>Duplicate frozen swabs, mentioned above, were thawed in 190 mL sterile water. Representative samples of the sediments in the swabs were recovered by agitation (1 min vigorous agitation by hand). Liquid was moved into sterile conical tubes and centrifuged (Sorvall) swinging bucket rotor (4,700 RPM) for 10 min at room temp. The pellet was weighed and 2&#x02013;3 gm was extracted using the DNeasy PowerMax Soil Kit (MoBio Corp) following the manufacture&#x00027;s protocol. For extractions from samples potentially containing Listeria, different pre-treatments prior to the original PowerSoil Kit protocol were used, including lysozyme (Sigma, 10&#x02013;70 mg/mL), mutanolysin (Sigma, 250 U/mL), lysostaphin (Sigma, 40 U/mL) with extended incubations at 37&#x000B0;C (1&#x02013;3 h), beadbeating (garnet or glass beads, 1 min full power (BioSpec Mini-8), sonication (2 min at power level 4, 10 s pulses, Virtis Virsonic 550 with CV4 20 KHz converter and microprobe (3 mm). Sonication was performed in a SterilGARD III biosafety cabinet (Baker Co.). Extraction optimization and sensitivity testing was done by spiking <italic>E. coli</italic> O157 (RM1484), <italic>S. enterica</italic> (RM7323) and <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> (RM2194) into swab pellets. Number of spiked cells was determined by plate count. Purified DNA was quantified using Nanodrop (ThermoFisher).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>ddPCR procedure</title>
<p>Droplets for Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR, BioRad) were created following the manufacture&#x00027;s protocol for 20 &#x003BC;L reactions using 10 &#x003BC;L BioRad&#x00027;s Supermix for Probes, 2 &#x003BC;L primer (0.3 &#x003BC;M) and probe (0.2 &#x003BC;M) (10X mix), up to 1 &#x003BC;g DNA, 1 &#x003BC;L internal control (1 fg/&#x003BC;L, pHCred, Takara), 1.2 &#x003BC;L MgCl<sub>2</sub> (25 mM stock), 0.2 &#x003BC;L HindIII (20 U/&#x003BC;L). Droplets were created with Droplet Generation Oil for Probes in the QX200 droplet generator (BioRad), then transferred to a 96 well PCR plate and amplified in a thermal cycler 5 min at 95&#x000B0;C, 45 cycles at 95&#x000B0;C for 30 s and 60&#x000B0;C for 90 s, then 5 min at 72&#x000B0;C, 5 min at 98&#x000B0;C, 4&#x000B0;C overnight. Pathogen genomic DNA with their respective target gene(s) was spiked into reactions containing 100&#x02013;1000 ng sediment DNA. A single copy of the target gene is expected within these genomes. Sediment samples used for these spiking experiments were previously shown to be negative for pathogen(s) using the culture method described above. Droplets were processed with the QX-200 Droplet reader and the QuantaSoft software version 1.7.4 (BioRad) using the Rare Event Detection procedure.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Confidence interval for predicted template levels was computed by QuantaSoft (BioRad) using Poisson distribution statistics. In most cases the threshold fluorescence level for positive droplet detection was automatically determined by a proprietary algorithm within QuantaSoft. Manual threshold was determined as necessary using automatic settings within duplicate or control wells as per BioRad Best Practices Guidelines. Correlations between ddPCR results (pathogen presence or absence) and culture results used the Dice Coefficient in AddinSoft XLSTAT Base version 2018. One Way ANOVA was used to determine the significance between log<sub>10</sub> transformed ddPCR results and both sample watersheds and sample seasons. Pearson Product Moment was used for correlation analysis between log<sub>10</sub> transformed ddPCR results and log<sub>10</sub> transformed 5 day prior precipitation totals and log<sub>10</sub> transformed generic <italic>E. coli</italic> MPN values. Both One Way ANOVA and Pearson Product Moment were from SigmaPlot version 11.0</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Internal control development</title>
<p>Since sensitivity of pathogen detection is dependent on the amount of swab DNA added to the reactions, initial studies looked at the effect of non-target DNA levels on the ability to detect IC and the O157 strain RM1484 with <italic>stx</italic>2 as target. Non-target DNA added to these reactions came from swabs, the duplicate of which had previously been shown to contain no detectable pathogen using microbiological methods. The culture methods (&#x0003C;10 cells/swab for STEC) are very sensitive. Nevertheless, these swabs may contain very low levels of the targeted pathogen. Spiked reactions included 1 fg IC molecules or 10 pg of RM1484 for the <italic>stx</italic>2 target (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). At both 100 ng and 1 &#x003BC;g non-target swab DNA per reaction, ddPCR could detect all the spiked <italic>stx</italic>2 genes (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). In contrast, only a fraction (29%) of spiked IC was detectable. Neither IC nor <italic>stx</italic>2 was detected without the corresponding DNA spike, indicating the absence of <italic>stx</italic>2 in this swab DNA and the absence of IC in swab and RM1484 DNAs. One microgram of DNA is the upper limit on the amount of DNA per 20 &#x003BC;l ddPCR reaction recommended by BioRad. All future ddPCR reactions will be at the 1 &#x003BC;g DNA level and produced in triplicate.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Representative ddPCR display of multiplexed <italic>stx</italic>2, IC amplifications. Most droplets displayed basal fluorescence of 750 and 4,500 units for the <italic>stx</italic>2 and IC reactions, respectively. Threshold levels are marked in pink and those droplets above these levels are considered positive for the respective amplicon; green, <italic>stx</italic>2 positive, blue, IC positive.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-09-00448-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>The effect of DNA levels on IC and <italic>stx</italic>2 detection.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Reaction</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>IC spike<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>a</sup></xref></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>O157 spike<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN4"><sup>b</sup></xref></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Total DNA<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN5"><sup>c</sup></xref></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>IC exp<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN6"><sup>d</sup></xref></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>stx</italic>2 exp<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN7"><sup>e</sup></xref></bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100 ng</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2126</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100 ng</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2720</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">276</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100 ng</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">276</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2126</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100 ng</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2795</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 &#x003BC;g</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2126</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 &#x003BC;g</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2740</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">276</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 &#x003BC;g</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">276</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2126</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 &#x003BC;g</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2705</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN3"><label>a</label><p><italic>IC spike level (molecules per reaction) based on known MW of the pHCred plasmid</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN4"><label>b</label><p><italic>E. coli O157 (RM1484) genomic DNA, number of molecules/reaction, based on 5.1 &#x000D7; 10<sup>6</sup> bp</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN5"><label>c</label><p><italic>DNA per reaction, primarily sediment DNA from a pathogen-negative sample</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN6"><label>d</label><p><italic>IC template levels per reaction as detected by ddPCR, average of four experiments</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN7"><label>e</label><p><italic>stx2 template levels per reaction as detected by ddPCR, average of four experiments</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>DNA extraction optimization</title>
<p>As a further test of the sensitivity of the ddPCR protocol, all three pathogens were spiked into sediment pellets recovered from swab samples previously shown to be negative for these pathogens. Cells were spiked at 10<sup>4</sup> CFU per pellet and DNA was extracted following the basic MoBio protocol. Sensitivity demonstrated by the ddPCR reactions ranged from 0.4 (<italic>ehx</italic>) to 0.015 (<italic>hly</italic>) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). Amplification of IC was the same as above and did not show PCR inhibition as factor in these reactions (data not shown). Nevertheless, the relative insensitivity of the PCR reactions and/or poor recovery of DNA from the spiked cells was indicated. Poor DNA recovery was especially indicated for Listeria (<italic>hly</italic>) since preliminary experiments with spiked <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> DNA did not indicate a <italic>hly</italic> reduction (data not shown). Advice from MoBio and literature review indicated several DNA extraction remedies. However, all of these remedies were adapted from extraction protocols on pure culture; very different from extraction of DNA from 10<sup>4</sup> cells from sediment. Nevertheless, each of these implemented protocol changes was an improvement over the basic MoBio method (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). However, only including sonication in the method brought <italic>hly</italic> detection near to the level of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> cells inoculated into the pellet.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Extraction method improvements.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Method</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Spiked cell detection<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN8"><sup>a</sup></xref> (%)</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>stx</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>ehx</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>invA</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>hly</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MoBio Basic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B; Lysozyme</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B; Enzyme mix<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN9"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B; Beadbeat (BB)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">133</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B; Enzyme mix &#x0002B; BB</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">118</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">160</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B; Sonication</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">101</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN8"><label>a</label><p><italic>STEC, Salmonella and Listeria were spiked into culture-minus swab samples at 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/swab and subsequently DNA was extracted by the methods listed. The spike was detected by ddPCR using the virulence gene indicated. Each number is the average of 3 reactions</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN9"><label>b</label><p><italic>Enzyme mix included lysozyme, mutanolysin and lysostaphin</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Sensitivity of the ddPCR procedure</title>
<p>The sonication/extraction method described above was subsequently used with a series of swab pellets spiked with different pathogen levels. Target genes were quantified in these DNAs to indicate the sensitivity of the ddPCR reactions (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>). The ddPCR method was sensitive to spiked cells to the lowest level tested, 10 cells per swab of each pathogen. The lowest fraction detectable was 5 Listeria cells (<italic>hly</italic>). All other targeted genes were detected at the spiked level (10 cells). Higher spiking levels were also detected at or close to the spiked level, with the exception of the Salmonella 1,000- and 100-cell spikes, detected at 380 and 45 <italic>inv</italic> genes, respectively. Without the spiked pathogens, the targeted genes were not detected in the swab pellets, indicating that DNA from the indigenous microflora in the pellets was not interfering with the method, even at low pathogen levels.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p>Sensitivity test using final sonication method.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Target gene</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Fraction of spiked cells quantified by ddPCR<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN10"><sup>a</sup></xref> (SE)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN11"><sup>b</sup></xref></bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>1,000 cells</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>100 cells</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>10 cells</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>No cells</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>stx</italic>2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.92(0.13)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.98(0.04)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.05(0.25)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0(0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ehx</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.05(0.08)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.15(0.23)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.51(0.19)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0(0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>inv</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.38(0.01)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.45(0.05)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.01(0.42)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0(0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>hly</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.99(0.07)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.95(0.12)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.48(0.05)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0(0)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN10"><label>a</label><p><italic>Cells of RM1484, RM7323 and RM2194 were spiked together into swab pellets at the indicated cell levels, DNA extracted and quantified by ddPCR for the indicated genes. Quantifications are the average of 6 independent extractions and ddPCR reactions</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN11"><label>b</label><p><italic>SE, Standard Error</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Comparison of ddPCR and incidence in swabs</title>
<p>Using the above optimized DNA extraction technique, 36 swabs were processed and the DNA used for ddPCR with the two multiplex primer sets to detect virulence genes in STEC, Listeria and Salmonella. Presence or absence of the target virulence genes from the 36 reactions were compared with microbiological results from the duplicate swabs (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>). Best correlation was found with <italic>inv</italic> amplification (Dice 87.7%). Nevertheless, all virulence genes significantly correlated with their respective culture results. The range of quantification for individual genes varied considerably between samples, with the greatest template variation (0&#x02013;753 k) and least correlation (Dice 75%) occurring with the gene <italic>ehx</italic>. Remarkably, there were no differences between pathogen levels and sample watersheds (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>) or sample season (winter, spring, summer, or fall) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">6</xref>). Also, pathogen levels were not correlated with rain levels (5 day prior). However, <italic>stx</italic>2, <italic>ehx</italic>, and <italic>inv</italic> levels were significantly correlated with generic <italic>E. coli</italic> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption><p>Quantification of environmental pathogens in Moore swabs by ddPCR.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Organism</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Target gene</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Culture positive</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>PCR positive</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Ave template level (range)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Dice similarity coefficient<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN12"><sup>a</sup></xref> (%)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Correlation to generic <italic>E. coli</italic></bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Shiga toxin-producing <italic>E. coli</italic> (STEC)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>stx</italic>2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19/36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21/36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">923 (0&#x02013;20 k)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic> &#x0003D; 0.04, <italic>R</italic> &#x0003D; 0.34</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;">
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ehx</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19/36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29/36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23 k (0&#x02013;753 k)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic> &#x0003D; 0.03, <italic>R</italic> &#x0003D; 0.38</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Listeria</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>hly</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22/36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21/36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69 (0&#x02013;362)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic> &#x0003D; 0.09, <italic>R</italic> &#x0003D; 0.29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Salmonella</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>inv</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27/36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30/36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">152 (0&#x02013;517)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic> &#x0003D; 0.03, <italic>R</italic> &#x0003D; 0.36</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN12"><label>a</label><p><italic>Comparing ddPCR positive and culture positive samples</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption><p>ddPCR quantification in individual Moore swabs.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Sample</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Sample location<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN13"><sup>a</sup></xref></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Sample date</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><italic><bold>Template levels per swab</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>5 days rain<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN14"><sup>b</sup></xref></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>generic <italic>E. coli MPN/swab</italic></bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>stx</italic>2</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>ehx</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>hly</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>inv</italic>A</bold></th>
<th/>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2569</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12/28/15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">171</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,286</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2611</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1/13/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">160</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">374</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">77,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2628</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1/26/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">839</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2634</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1/26/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">111</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21,560</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2656</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2/10/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">575</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,129</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2657</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2/10/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">123</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12,319</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2683</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2/26/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">479</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2713</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/8/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">336</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10,126</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">249</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">517</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">572,660</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2717</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/8/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">717</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,995</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,156,880</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2746</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/22/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">248</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">331</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">137</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">128</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13,640</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2753</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">C3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/22/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">279</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">237</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">146</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,599,400</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2755</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">C5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/22/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">767</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">185</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">175</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,694,220</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2768</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4/6/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7,554</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2796</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4/20/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">108</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">101</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,400</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2798</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4/20/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">126</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">109</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">110,880</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2800</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4/20/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">104</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">104</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26,400</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2852</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5/18/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">387</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">571</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">306</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91,080</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2853</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5/18/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">145</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">456</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">362</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">870</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">697,180</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2872</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6/1/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">165</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60,500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2877</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6/1/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">166</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42,460</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2879</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6/1/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">185</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">149</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">298</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">144,540</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2898</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6/15/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">194</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">296</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16,280</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2906</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6/15/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100,100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2945</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7/6/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">239</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,260</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2947</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">X2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7/6/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">155</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">265</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8,459</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2949</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7/6/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3372</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">145</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">289</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">447,700</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN2950</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7/6/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">127</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">278</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9,020</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN3022</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8/16/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">189</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44,220</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN3026</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8/16/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35,200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN3046</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8/30/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6382</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13,851</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,647,260</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN3049</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8/30/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">210</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">256</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">110,880</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN3050</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">X3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8/30/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29,040</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN3068</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9/13/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">411</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28,381</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">373</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">572,660</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN3069</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9/13/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3428</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8,041</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">119</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">257,180</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN3091</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9/27/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20309</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7,53,492</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">106</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5,323,120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FN3095</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">X3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9/27/16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21,849</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN13"><label>a</label><p><italic>Refer to sample site designation in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref></italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN14"><label>b</label><p><italic>Cumulated precipitation 5 days prior to sampling (University of California, Integrated Pest Management Weather Database)</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Pathogen level in moving water is very dynamic. This has been well established and does need quantification to demonstrate it. Previous and repeated sampling in the Salinas region has shown that even samples collected a few seconds apart at the same location can show the presence or absence of the pathogen (Cooley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2007</xref>). With a sufficiently large number of samples, incidence data can help to define the level of contamination. Nevertheless, quantification does a better job of describing the nature of this environment, since each data point describes the level of contamination in that sample. Multiple samples are still needed, but there is a real benefit with quantification to those who develop models and risk assessments.</p>
<p>Quantification based on DNA comes with a few assumptions. One assumes complete extraction from the sample with sufficient purity for amplification. With environment samples this not always the case. The samples are often complex, containing unknown organisms. How is it that a single extraction procedure can portend to achieve a uniform and balanced extraction? In the process of establishing this ddPCR procedure it was found that Listeria DNA was poorly extracted, quite probably due to the stronger cell wall, compared to gram&#x02013;bacteria (Krakat et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2017</xref>). Optimization was eventually achieved by sonication. Sonication shears the DNA but did not interfere with our TaqMan assay, probably due to the small size of the amplicons. This is evident by sensitivity to the target genes at (or close to) 10 cells per swab (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>). This research also investigated other methods including enzymatic digestion with 3 enzymes and bead beating. Other methods may still be possible with further research.</p>
<p>Since one purpose of this research is to develop ddPCR as a method to quantify the level of virulence genes in surface water and the high likelihood of PCR inhibitors in these samples (Tsai and Olson, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">1992</xref>), it was necessary to first validate an internal PCR control (IC). The IC control selected was the gene HCred. HCred is a gene coding the red fluorescent protein from the sea anemone <italic>Heteractis crispa</italic> which is a gene not expected in these samples. With the samples in this research we have yet to find IC where is was not spiked into the reaction. Additionally, experience with ddPCR has shown a substantial insensitivity to PCR inhibitors (Singh et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2017</xref>), and also we have yet to find any sample with sufficient PCR inhibition to interfere with ddPCR.</p>
<p>Sensitivity of this assay is highly dependent on the amount of DNA added to the reaction. Unfortunately, the amount of DNA recovered from the sediment from one swab is usually so large that even 1 &#x003BC;g is but a small sampling. All the assays were in triplicate (3 &#x003BC;g total), nevertheless, if the target pathogen is very rare in the swab, it is easy to get a negative result from ddPCR and a positive from culture, despite the sensitivity of the ddPCR reaction.</p>
<p>Another assumption is that the DNA extracted from the sample is coming from the pathogen. This is especially an issue for <italic>stx</italic>2 since it has been shown to be present in phage. A percentage of the DNA may originate as phage or even naked DNA. Additionally, the copy number of the target genes may be greater than one per genome. Both of these issues would lead to over-estimation of number of pathogens present in the sample. Nevertheless, significant correlation was displayed between culture and ddPCR results (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>) indicating that a significant portion of virulence genes detected are coming from viable (and culturable) cells. It is noteworthy that the Dice coefficient, exhibited by <italic>ehx</italic> amplification and STEC culture results, was substantially smaller than with the other 3 virulence genes. It is very possible that non-STEC <italic>E. coli</italic> are present in these samples, many of which may contain the <italic>ehx</italic> gene. As such, <italic>ehx</italic> may be a comparatively weak indicator of STEC levels.</p>
<p>Reliance on incidence information in the past may have led to incorrect assumptions regarding the prevalence or spread of pathogens in the Salinas region. Previously, we had shown a strong seasonality of STEC incidence and presumably this is due to rainfall, since rainfall is greatest during the winter and early spring when STEC incidence is highest (Cooley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013</xref>). Likewise, both Listeria and Salmonella showed similar seasonality, though the effect with Salmonella was slight (Cooley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2014</xref>). With the current research, target gene levels from winter/spring were statistically similar to those from summer/fall. Likewise, larger rainfall totals 5 day prior to the sample date failed to correlate to samples with elevated virulence gene levels. Also, sample sites which had previously been reported with high incidence for STEC (G1, G2, G3, and G4), Listeria (G2, G3) and Salmonella (G2, S3) were not statistically higher for the respective target genes compared other sample locations (Cooley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2014</xref>). It would seem that assumptions made from incidence data will have to be re-visited with quantification data. Nevertheless, the number of samples processed by ddPCR in this research is substantially smaller in comparison to previous surveys. It may be necessary to process many more samples before reliable comparisons can be made.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>MC designed and executed the experiments, wrote the manuscript. DC executed the experiments; LG executed Listeria and Salmonella extraction experiments.</p>
<sec>
<title>Conflict of interest statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack><p>This work was supported by funds from Agricultural Research Service CRIS project 5325-42000-050-00D and grant &#x00023;224-11-2044 from the Food and Drug Administration.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Allerberger</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Incidence and microbiology of salad-borne disease</article-title>, in <source>CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources</source> <volume>Vol. 4</volume>, (<publisher-loc>Wallingford, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CABI Publishing</publisher-name>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>13</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Anonymous</collab></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Ongoing multistate outbreak of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> serotype O157:H7 infections associated with consumption of fresh spinach&#x02013;United States, September 2006</article-title>. <source>MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>1045</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1046</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Anonymous</collab></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <source>Environmental Assessment: Factors Potentially Contributing to the Contamination of Fresh Whole Cantaloupe Implicated in a Multi-State Outbreak of Listeriosis</source>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171114022308/https://www.fda.gov/Food/RecallsOutbreaksEmergencies/Outbreaks/ucm276247.htm">http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171114022308/https://www.fda.gov/Food/RecallsOutbreaksEmergencies/Outbreaks/ucm276247.htm</ext-link> (accessed May 3, 2018)</citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Anonymous</collab></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Vital signs: <italic>Listeria</italic> illnesses, deaths, and outbreaks-United States, 2009-2011</article-title>. <source>Morb. Motal. Wkly. Rep.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>448</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>452</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Benami</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Busgang</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gillor</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gross</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Quantification and risks associated with bacterial aerosols near domestic greywater-treatment systems</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>562</volume>, <fpage>344</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>352</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.200</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27100014</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buerger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spoering</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gavrish</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leslin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ling</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Epstein</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Microbial scout hypothesis, stochastic exit from dormancy, and the nature of slow growers</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>3221</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3228</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.07307-11</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22367083</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cooley</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jay-Russell</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Atwill</surname> <given-names>E. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carychao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qui&#x000F1;ones</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Development of a robust method for isolation of Shiga Toxin-Positive <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (STEC) from fecal, plant, soil and water samples from a leafy greens production region in California</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>e65716</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0065716</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23762414</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cooley</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qui&#x000F1;ones</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oryang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mandrell</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gorski</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Prevalence of shiga toxin producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>, Salmonella enterica, and <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> at public access watershed sites in a California Central Coast agricultural region</article-title>. <source>Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</source> <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>30</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2014.00030</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24624367</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cooley</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carychao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crawford-Miksza</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jay</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rose</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Incidence and tracking of escherichia coli O157:H7 in a major produce production region in California</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>e1159</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0001159</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18174909</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Crowe</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mahon</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vieira</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gould</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Vital signs: multistate foodborne outbreaks-United States, 2010-2014</article-title>. <source>Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>1221</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1225</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15585/mmwr.mm6443a4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26540483</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Doell</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <source>5 Listeria Deaths in Texas: 4 linked to Celery at Now-Closed plant DailyFinance.com</source>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2010/10/21/5-listeria-deaths-linked-to-celery-texas-shuts-down-plant/">http://www.dailyfinance.com/2010/10/21/5-listeria-deaths-linked-to-celery-texas-shuts-down-plant/</ext-link> (Accessed November 27, 2012).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fenlon</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Wild birds and silage as reservoirs of <italic>Listeria</italic> in the agricultural environment</article-title>. <source>J. App. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>537</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>543</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2672.1985.tb03357.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3938452</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gagliardi</surname> <given-names>J. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karns</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Leaching of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> O157:H7 in diverse soils under various agricultural management practices</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>877</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>883</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.66.3.877-883.2000</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10698745</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gorski</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jay-Russell</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bengson</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Govoni</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Diversity of pulsed field gel electrophoresis pulsotypes, serovars and antibiotic resistance among <italic>Salmonella</italic> isolates from wild amphibians and reptiles in the California Central Coast</article-title>. <source>Foodborne Pathog. Dis.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>540</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>548</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/fpd.2012.1372</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23577627</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gorski</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parker</surname> <given-names>C. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cooley</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jay-Russell</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gordus</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Prevalence, distribution, and diversity of salmonella enterica in a major produce region of california</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>2734</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2748</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02321-10</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21378057</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hanning</surname> <given-names>I. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nutt</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ricke</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Salmonellosis outbreaks in the United States due to fresh produce: sources and potential intervention measures</article-title>. <source>Foodborne Pathog. Dis.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>635</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>648</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/fpd.2008.0232</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19580447</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Henao</surname> <given-names>O. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>T. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vugia</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Griffin</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Foodborne diseases active surveillance network-&#x02212;2 decades of achievements, 1996&#x02013;2015</article-title>. <source>Emerg. Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>1529</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1536</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3201/eid2109.150581</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26292181</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jay</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cooley</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carychao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wiscomb</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sweitzer</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crawford-Miksza</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title><italic>Escherichia coli</italic> O157:H7 in feral swine near spinach fields and cattle, Central California Coast</article-title>. <source>Emerg. Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1908</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1911</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3201/eid1312.070763</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18258044</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kalchayanand</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brichta-Harhay</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arthur</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bosilevac</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guerini</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wheeler</surname> <given-names>T. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Prevalence rates of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> O157:H7 and Salmonella at different sampling sites on cattle hides at a feedlot and processing plant</article-title>. <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>1267</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1271</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/0362-028X-72.6.1267</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19610338</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kirk</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holmberg</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeffrey</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Prevalence of <italic>Salmonella</italic> spp in selected birds captured on California dairies</article-title>. <source>J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.</source> <volume>220</volume>, <fpage>359</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>362</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2460/javma.2002.220.359</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11829269</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krakat</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anjum</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Demirel</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schr&#x000F6;der</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Methodological flaws introduce strong bias into molecular analysis of microbial populations</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>122</volume>, <fpage>364</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>377</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jam.13365</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27914209</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tauxe</surname> <given-names>R. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hedberg</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The growing burden of foodborne outbreaks due to contaminated fresh prodjuce: risks and opportunities</article-title>. <source>Epidemiol. Infect.</source> <volume>137</volume>, <fpage>307</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>315</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0950268808001969</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19200406</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mcegan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mootian</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goodridge</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schaffner</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Danyluk</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Predicting Salmonella populations from biological, chemical, and physical indicators in Florida surface waters</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>4094</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4105</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.00777-13</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23624476</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oliveira</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Usall</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vi&#x000F1;as</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Solsona</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abadias</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Transfer of <italic>Listeria innocua</italic> from contaminated compost and irrigation water to lettuce leaves</article-title>. <source>Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>590</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>596</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fm.2010.11.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21356469</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Orlofsky</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benami</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gross</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dutt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gillor</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Rapid MPN-Qpcr screening for pathogens in air, soil, water, and agricultural produce</article-title>. <source>Water Air Soil Pollut.</source> <volume>226</volume>:<fpage>303</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11270-015-2560-x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parsons</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zelyas</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berenger</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chui</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Detection, characterization, and typing of shiga toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>478</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2016.00478</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27148176</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pritchard</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Donnelly</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Combined secondary enrichment of primary enrichment broths increases Listeria detection</article-title>. <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>532</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>535</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/0362-028X-62.5.532</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10340676</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Racki</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morisset</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gutierrez-Aguirre</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ravnikar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>One-step RT-droplet digital PCR: a breakthrough in the quantification of waterborne RNA viruses</article-title>. <source>Anal. Bioanal. Chem.</source> <volume>406</volume>, <fpage>661</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>667</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00216-013-7476-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24276251</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shridhar</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noll</surname> <given-names>L. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>An</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cernicchiaro</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Renter</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Multiplex quantitative PCR assays for the detection and quantification of the six major non-O157 <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> serogroups in cattle feces</article-title>. <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>66</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>74</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-319</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26735031</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sithebe</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Enitan</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bux</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stenstr&#x000F6;m</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Comparison of droplet digital PCR and quantitative PCR for the detection of Salmonella and its application for river sediments</article-title>. <source>J. Water Health</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>505</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>508</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2166/wh.2017.259</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28771147</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tsai</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olson</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Rapid method for separation of bacterial DNA from humic substances in sediments for polymerase chain reaction</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>2292</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2295</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1386212</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Verhaegen</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Reu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Zutter</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verstraete</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heyndrickx</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Coillie</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Comparison of droplet digital PCR and qPCR for the quantification of shiga toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in bovine feces</article-title>. <source>Toxins</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>157</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/toxins8050157</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27213452</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walters</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thebo</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boehm</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Impact of urbanization and agriculture on the occurrence of bacterial pathogens and <italic>stx</italic> genes in coastal waterbodies of central California</article-title>. <source>Water Res.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>1752</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1762</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.032</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21168181</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>N. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hjulsager</surname> <given-names>C. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jorsal</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haugegaard</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hansen</surname> <given-names>C. F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Comparison of bacterial culture and qPCR testing of rectal and pen floor samples as diagnostic approaches to detect enterotoxic <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in nursery pigs</article-title>. <source>Prev. Vet. Med.</source> <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>61</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>67</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28622793</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yergeau</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Masson</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elias</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Madey</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Comparison of methods to identify pathogens and associated virulence functional genes in biosolids from two different wastewater treatment facilities in Canada</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>e0153554</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0153554</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27089040</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
