<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.02109</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Modeling the Effect of Modified Atmospheres on Conidial Germination of Fungi from Dairy Foods</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Nguyen Van Long</surname> <given-names>Nicolas</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/444831/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Vasseur</surname> <given-names>Val&#x000E9;rie</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/490098/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Couvert</surname> <given-names>Olivier</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/97828/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Coroller</surname> <given-names>Louis</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/35884/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Burlot</surname> <given-names>Marion</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/472527/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Rigalma</surname> <given-names>Karim</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/484263/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Mounier</surname> <given-names>J&#x000E9;r&#x000F4;me</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/452036/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Laboratoire Universitaire de Biodiversit&#x000E9; et Ecologie Microbienne, IBSAM, ESIAB, Universit&#x000E9; de Brest, EA 3882</institution>, <addr-line>Plouzan&#x000E9;</addr-line>, <country>France</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Laboratoire Universitaire de Biodiversit&#x000E9; et Ecologie Microbienne, IBSAM, UMT Spore Risk, ESIAB, Universit&#x000E9; de Brest, EA 3882</institution>, <addr-line>Quimper</addr-line>, <country>France</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Fausto Gardini, Universit&#x000E0; di Bologna, Italy</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Maria Gougouli, Perrotis College and American Farm School, Greece; Valentina Bernini, Universit&#x000E0; degli Studi di Parma, Italy</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x0002A;Correspondence: J&#x000E9;r&#x000F4;me Mounier <email>jerome.mounier&#x00040;univ-brest.fr</email></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Food Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>31</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>8</volume>
<elocation-id>2109</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>12</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>16</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2017 Nguyen Van Long, Vasseur, Couvert, Coroller, Burlot, Rigalma and Mounier.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Nguyen Van Long, Vasseur, Couvert, Coroller, Burlot, Rigalma and Mounier</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) is commonly applied to extend food shelf-life. Despite growth of a wide variety of fungal contaminants has been previously studied in relation to modified-atmospheres, few studies aimed at quantifying the effects of dioxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) partial pressures on conidial germination in solid agar medium. In the present study, an original culture method was developed, allowing microscopic monitoring of conidial germination under modified-atmospheres in static conditions. An asymmetric model was utilized to describe germination kinetics of <italic>Paecilomyces niveus, Mucor lanceolatus, Penicillium brevicompactum, Penicillium expansum</italic>, and <italic>Penicillium roquefoti</italic>, using two main parameters, i.e., median germination time (&#x003C4;) and maximum germination percentage (<italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub>). These two parameters were subsequently modeled as a function of O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure ranging from 0 to 21% and CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure ranging from 0.03 to 70% (8 tested levels for both O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>). Modified atmospheres with residual O<sub>2</sub> or CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressures below 1% and up to 70%, respectively, were not sufficient to totally inhibit conidial germination,. However, O<sub>2</sub> levels &#x0003C; 1% or CO<sub>2</sub> levels &#x0003E; 20% significantly increased &#x003C4; and/or reduced <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub>, depending on the fungal species. Overall, the present method and results are of interest for predictive mycology applied to fungal spoilage of MAP food products.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>predictive mycology</kwd>
<kwd>carbon dioxide increase</kwd>
<kwd>dioxygen reduction</kwd>
<kwd>modified atmosphere</kwd>
<kwd>dairy foods</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Minist&#x000E8;re de l&#x00027;Education Nationale, de l&#x00027;Enseignement Sup&#x000E9;rieur et de la Recherche<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100004793</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="4"/>
<ref-count count="39"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="7846"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Food spoilage by fungi leads to important economic losses and can raise safety issues in the case where fungal spoilers are mycotoxin-producers (Legan, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">1993</xref>; Garcia et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2009</xref>). Asexual spores (conidia) are mainly responsible for accidental contaminations of food products as they are produced at high numbers and easily dispersed by airflows (Rosas et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">1993</xref>; Wyatt et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2013</xref>). As the conidial germination precedes growth on food, thus delaying or preventing this developmental stage can help to extend food shelf-life. On the other hand, fungal development in foods can be controlled by different abiotic factors (also called hurdle technologies) which can be combined or not. These abiotic factors include food intrinsic factors, mainly water activity (<italic>a</italic><sub><italic>w</italic></sub>), pH, redox potential, available nutrients and antimicrobial substances, and extrinsic factors, mainly temperature and gaseous composition (Huis in&#x00027;t Veld, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">1996</xref>). Modification of the gaseous composition in food packaging headspace, with the aim to extend its shelf life, is a widespread practice which encompasses controlled-atmosphere storage (CAS) and modified-atmosphere packaging (MAP) (Caleb et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2012</xref>). CAS is generally used for large batches of fruits or vegetables stored in rooms where the gas mixture is continuously controlled and renewed (Littlefield et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">1966</xref>; Yackel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">1971</xref>). In contrast, MAP involves an initial modification of the headspace composition within the packaging of individual products without any further control during storage (Ooraikul, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2003</xref>). In both methods, atmosphere modifications consist mainly in reduction of dioxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) or increase of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) partial pressures as compared to atmospheric air composition. These modifications contribute to reduce the physico-chemical and microbiological deteriorations of the packaged food (Chaix et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2015</xref>).</p>
<p>Predictive modeling (predictive mycology) can be applied to quantify the influence of hurdle technologies on fungal development and mycotoxin production in food products (Leistner and Gorris, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">1995</xref>; Dantigny et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2005a</xref>). In predictive mycology, the use of Gamma-type models, assuming multiplicative effects of the different factors, provide cardinal values which are relevant for food safety management systems (Dagnas and Membr&#x000E9;, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2013</xref>). To date, cardinal models were successfully used to describe effects of temperature, water activity and pH on conidial germination and radial growth (Dagnas and Membr&#x000E9;, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2013</xref>). Since modified-atmospheres are commonly used as a food preservation technology (McMillin, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2008</xref>), measuring the respective effects of O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> is required to apply the Gamma concept (Zwietering et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">1993</xref>) for CAS and MAP foods.</p>
<p>In this perspective, the present study attempted to provide an experimental set up which allows conidial germination monitoring on solid medium kept under modified-atmospheres as well as mathematical models describing O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> effects on the conidial germination kinetics of five fungal species which are encountered in dairy foods, namely <italic>Paecilomyces niveus, Mucor lanceolatus, Penicillium brevicompactum, Penicillium expansum</italic>, and <italic>Penicillium roqueforti</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Culture medium</title>
<p>The culture medium used throughout the experiments was PDA supplemented with 10.13% (w/w) glycerol to reach 0.980 <italic>a</italic><sub><italic>w</italic></sub>. Citric acid monohydrate (0.1 M) and sodium phosphate dibasic (0.2 M) solutions (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Louis, MO, USA) (3/2, v/v) were also used to buffer the culture medium at pH 4.2. Agar medium pH was measured after autoclaving and solidification of three samples of each culture medium batch, using a pH surface-electrode (SF 113, VWR, Radnor, PA, USA) with an accuracy of 0.01 pH unit. The <italic>a</italic><sub><italic>w</italic></sub> was also verified on three samples of each culture medium batch at 20&#x000B0;C using a Tunable Diode Laser <italic>a</italic><sub><italic>w</italic></sub>-meter (TDL Aqualab, Decagon Devices, Pullman, WA, USA) calibrated using sodium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Louis, MO, USA) solutions of known <italic>a</italic><sub><italic>w</italic></sub> provided by the manufacturer with an accuracy of 0.005 <italic>a</italic><sub><italic>w</italic></sub> unit.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Fungal strains and conidial production</title>
<p>Fungal strains used in the present study were obtained from the Universit&#x000E9; de Bretagne Occidentale Culture Collection (UBOCC, Plouzan&#x000E9;, France). <italic>P. niveus</italic> UBOCC-A-11024 was isolated from cow milk, <italic>M. lanceolatus</italic> UBOCC-A-109153 was isolated from cheese while <italic>P. brevicompactum</italic> UBOCC-A-110007, <italic>P. expansum</italic> UBOCC-A-110032 and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic> UBOCC-A-113022 were isolated from soft, fresh and Roquefort cheeses, respectively. Stock cultures were routinely cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA, Difco, Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) at 25&#x000B0;C. Conidia suspensions of the five fungal species were obtained as previously described (Nguyen Van Long et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2017</xref>). Briefly, conidia were harvested from cultures incubated for 10 days at 25&#x000B0;C on PDA medium at 0.980 <italic>a</italic><sub><italic>w</italic></sub> and pH 4.2. Conidial concentrations were determined using a haemocytometer (Malassez, Preciss, Paris, France) and standardized at 1.10<sup>5</sup> conidia/mL in glycerol (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) solutions adjusted to 0.980 <italic>a</italic><sub><italic>w</italic></sub> and pH 4.2 prior to further use.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Gas mixtures</title>
<p>Gas mixtures were prepared by dilution of pressurized air into diving cylinders (15L-cylinder twin valve, Aqualung, Carros, France). For O<sub>2</sub> adjustment, pressurized air was diluted with N<sub>2</sub> (Alphagaz2 Azote, Air Liquide S.A, Paris, France) in order to obtain eight different mixtures with O<sub>2</sub> partial pressures ranging from 0 to 21% (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). A 0%-O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure was obtained using O<sub>2</sub> absorber sachets (ATCO V30002, Laboratoires Standa, Caen, France) while a 21%-O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure was obtained with air. For CO<sub>2</sub> adjustment, pressurized air was diluted with CO<sub>2</sub> (Alphagaz 1 dioxyde de carbone, Air Liquide S.A, Paris, France) in order to obtain eight different mixtures with CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure ranging from atmospheric partial pressure (i.e., 0.04%) to 70%, with O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure kept at 5% by completing the mixtures with N<sub>2</sub> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). After preparation, the gas composition of the different mixtures was controlled using a headspace gas analyzer equipped with a Zirconial/dual beam infrared sensor (Checkmate 3, Dansensor, Ringsted, Denmark) with an accuracy of 0.01 and 0.8% for O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> measurements, respectively.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Mean values &#x000B1; standard deviation of dioxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) or carbon dioxyde (CO<sub>2</sub>) partial pressures (%) measured in three replicates of modified-atmosphere culture devices containing PDA plates inoculated with <italic>Paecilomyces niveus</italic> UBOCC-A-11024, <italic>Mucor lanceolatus</italic> UBOCC-A-109153, <italic>Penicillium brevicompactum</italic> UBOCC-A-110007, <italic>Penicillium expansum</italic> UBOCC-A-110032 or <italic>Penicillium roqueforti</italic> UBOCC-A-113022, depending on targeted partial pressures (at 25&#x000B0;C) and maximum tested duration of experiments.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Gas tested</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Targeted partial pressure (%)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Mean &#x000B1; standard deviation of measured partial pressure (%)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Maximum duration tested (h)</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">O<sub>2</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00 &#x000B1; 0.00<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;720</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.36 &#x000B1; 0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.61 &#x000B1; 0.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.87 &#x000B1; 0.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.18 &#x000B1; 0.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.00<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.10 &#x000B1; 0.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.34 &#x000B1; 0.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.32 &#x000B1; 0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.22</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left">CO<sub>2</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01 &#x000B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.31 &#x000B1; 1.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.34 &#x000B1; 1.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.39 &#x000B1; 1.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65.32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">40.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39.55 &#x000B1; 1.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">82.62</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49.25 &#x000B1; 1.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">172.17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">60.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.48 &#x000B1; 2.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.67</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">70.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.00 &#x000B1; 1.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">148.50</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>When O<sub>2</sub> was the studied factor, CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure was below 0.04%. When CO<sub>2</sub> was the studied factor, O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure was at 5%</italic>.</p>
<fn id="TN1">
<label>(&#x0002A;)</label>
<p><italic> O<sub>2</sub> absorber included</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN2">
<label>(&#x0002A;&#x0002A;)</label>
<p><italic>Both conditions (5.00% O<sub>2</sub> or 0.00% CO<sub>2</sub>) correspond to the same experiment</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conidial germination assessment under modified-atmospheres</title>
<sec>
<title>Modified-atmosphere culture device</title>
<p>To evaluate effects of O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressures on conidial germination, a simple device was developed. This device was designed to allow germination assessment in solid culture medium under modified-atmosphere injected at the start of the experiment. Moreover, this device allowed to maintain a constant gas composition within the incubation time and the gaseous composition was controlled each time spore germination was assessed. It consisted of a rectangular plastic bag made from bioriented polyester film (Biaxer 55XX, Wipak, Bomlitz, Germany) with high oxygen barrier (oxygen permeability &#x0003C;3 cm<sup>3</sup>.m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>.d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>.bar<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> measured at 23&#x000B0;C and 50% relative humidity) equipped with two PVC non-return valves (03-325, Carmo A.S, Esperg&#x000E6;rde, Denmark), as described in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>. To prepare plastic bags, a 420 &#x000D7; 600-mm rectangle of plastic film was first folded in half lengthwise (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A</xref>) prior to sealing of two adjacent sides using a manual thermosealer (BS600, Tecnimodern automation, Saint-Germain-Laval, France). Secondly, two circular holes (5 mm diameter) were punched into opposite corners of the bag. A valve was then fixed on each hole with PVC glue (Carmo Seal, Carmo A.S, Esperg&#x000E6;rde, Denmark) (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1B</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Experimental device developed to monitor conidial germination on solid agar medium under modified atmosphere. See Material and Methods&#x00027; section for details. <bold>(A)</bold> Lengthwise folding of high oxygen barrier film. <bold>(B)</bold> Thermosealing, fixation of non-return PVC valves and placement of inoculated plates. Successive steps of <bold>(C)</bold> vacuum (<inline-graphic xlink:href="fmicb-08-02109-i0001.tif"/>) and <bold>(D)</bold> filling (<inline-graphic xlink:href="fmicb-08-02109-i0002.tif"/>) with the gas mixture. Vacuum steps are performed with a downstream gaseous composition measurement (<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>). <bold>(E)</bold> Isolation of the non-return valves by thermosealing prior to incubation. <bold>(F)</bold> Isolation of a dish and gaseous composition measurement (<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>). <bold>(G)</bold> Extraction of the isolated dish for germination assessment.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-08-02109-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Inoculation and setting of gas composition</title>
<p>For each studied fungal species and gas mixture, a batch of five 55-mm diameter Petri dishes (Gosselin, Hazebrouck, France) was inoculated in three independent replicates. For each condition, a second batch was also inoculated in three independent replicates 10 h following inoculation of the first batch. The use of a second batch allowed the monitoring of conidial germination at any incubation time, including periods outside working hours. Conidia were surface-plated on 10 mL of PDA with 36 &#x003BC;L of a 1.10<sup>5</sup> conidia/mL suspension in order to obtain &#x0007E;1 conidium/mm<sup>2</sup> of culture medium. Immediately after inoculation, Petri dishes were aligned in the bag prior to sticking the Petri dish top lid to the bag inner side with double-sided tape (10 &#x000D7; 10 mm). The bag was sealed and connected to a vacuum pump (to accelerate the complete filling of the bags) and to the gas mixture cylinder through the respective valves (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1C</xref>). Expelled gas composition was continuously measured downstream of the vacuum pump. Using this set-up, three successive steps of vacuum treatment (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1C</xref>) and filling with the desired gas mixture (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1D</xref>) were performed, i.e., until injected and expelled gas had similar composition. During gas filling steps, bags were allowed to swell until the top lid (taped to the inner side of the bag) opened, enabling Petri dishes headspaces to be flushed with the injected gas (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1D</xref>). At the end of gas filling steps, bags were deflated to atmospheric pressure (final bag volume of 1.19 L) and valves isolated from the system using thermosealing (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1E</xref>). Finally, bags were incubated at 25&#x000B0;C (KB 240, Binder GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conidial germination assessment</title>
<p>Prior to conidial germination assessment, one Petri dish was isolated from the other by thermosealing (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1F</xref>). The gaseous composition of the isolated bag section was measured by inserting the gas analyzer needle through a foam septum (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1F</xref>). After removing the plate from the bag, the remaining packed Petri dishes were immediately put back into the incubator for further assessments (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1G</xref>). Conidia germination was examined directly onto the agar plate using phase-contrast microscopy (BX51 microscope, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) as previously described (Nguyen Van Long et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2017</xref>). A minimum of 100 conidia was counted for each agar plate to determine the percentage of germinated conidia as a function of time. Conidia were considered germinated when germ tube length was greater or equal to that of swollen conidia (Dantigny et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2006</xref>). Conidial germination assessment began after an incubation time ranging from 7.5 to 172 h and was performed at time intervals depending on the fungal species and gaseous composition.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Data modeling and statistical analysis</title>
<sec>
<title>Conidial germination kinetic modeling</title>
<p>Kinetic of germinated conidia percentage <italic>P</italic><sub>(<italic>t</italic>)</sub> (%) as a function of incubation time <italic>t</italic> (h) was modeled using a primary asymmetric model Equation (1) (Dantigny et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2011</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="E1"><label>(1)</label><mml:math id="M1"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo class="qopname">max</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x000B7;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> (%) is the maximum percentage of germinated conidia. The median germination time &#x003C4; (h) is the time when <italic>P</italic> equals half of <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub>. The parameter <italic>d</italic> (without unity) is a shape parameter. The model was fitted by minimizing the sum of squares of the residuals (<italic>lsqcurvefit function</italic>, Matlab 2014 The Mathworks Inc., USA). The 95% confidence intervals were calculated using <italic>nlparci function</italic> from Matlab Statistic Toolbox (Matlab R2016, The Mathworks, Natick, USA). The determination coefficient (r<sup>2</sup>) and the root mean square error (RMSE) were calculated to evaluate fitting performances.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Modeling the effect of O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure on germination kinetic parameters</title>
<p>The median germination time &#x003C4; (h) was modeled as a function of O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure [O<sub>2</sub>] (%) with Equation (2):</p>
<disp-formula id="E2"><label>(2)</label><mml:math id="M2"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x000B7;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where &#x003C4;<sub><italic>atm</italic></sub> (h) is the value of &#x003C4; under O<sub>2</sub> atmospheric partial pressure (i.e., 20.9 %) and [<italic>O</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> (%) is the O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure at which &#x003C4; is twice as long as &#x003C4;<sub><italic>atm</italic></sub>. In addition, <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> (%) was modeled as a function of [O<sub>2</sub>] (%) with Equation (3):</p>
<disp-formula id="E3"><label>(3)</label><mml:math id="M3"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>max</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x000A0;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>max</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x022C5;</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x000A0;</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x000A0;</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy='false'>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy='false'>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy='false'>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy='false'>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>maxatm</italic></sub> (%) is the <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> value under atmospheric partial pressure of O<sub>2</sub> and [<italic>O</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> (%) is the O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure at which <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> is half of <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>maxatm</italic></sub>. The models were fitted by minimizing the sum of squares of the residuals as described in the previous section.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Modeling the effect of CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure on germination kinetic parameters</title>
<p>The reciprocal of the median germination time &#x003C4;<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) was modeled as a function of CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure [CO<sub>2</sub>] (%) with a model based on a reparameterized Monod-type Equation (4) (Dantigny et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2005b</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="E4"><label>(4)</label><mml:math id="M4"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>&#x02003;&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x000B7;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x000B7;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x000B7;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x000B7;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x000B7;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x000B7;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> (h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) is the value of &#x003C4;<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> under atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>], [<italic>CO</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> (%) is the CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure at which &#x003C4;<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> is half of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> and [<italic>CO</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub><italic>MI</italic></sub> (%) is the CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure at which &#x003C4;<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> is equal to zero, namely the minimal inhibitory CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure. In addition, the <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> parameter was modeled as a function of [CO<sub>2</sub>] (%) with Equation (4) where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> is substituted by <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>maxatm</italic></sub> (%) which is the value of <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> under atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>], [<italic>CO</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> (%) is the CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure at which <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> is half of <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>maxatm</italic></sub> and [<italic>CO</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub><italic>MI</italic></sub> (%) is the CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure at which <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> is equal to zero.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Validation of the modified-atmosphere culture device</title>
<p>The modified-atmosphere culture device developed in the present work allowed simultaneous measurements of the gaseous composition in Petri dish headspace and conidial germination assessment on solid medium. Whatever the tested conditions, gas composition remained stable throughout all experiments as shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>. Concerning atmospheres with reduced O<sub>2</sub> partial pressures, the targeted partial pressures could be maintained up to 75.5 h without oxygen absorber or up to 30 days using the ATCO V30002 oxygen absorber (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). For O<sub>2</sub> partial pressures below 1%, slight differences were observed between targeted and measured partial pressures. Concerning MAP with increased CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressures, each targeted CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure was also accurately obtained and maintained for incubation times up to 172.2 h (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Modeling of conidial germination kinetics</title>
<p>Conidia were able to germinate in all studied conditions within the incubation time (i.e., 30 days), except at 0% O<sub>2</sub> (Supplementary Tables <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">2</xref>). Hence, germination kinetics were obtained for seven different O<sub>2</sub> partial pressures and seven different CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressures for each tested species. As illustrated in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>, conidial germination kinetics had a sigmoidal shape and was modeled by Equation (1). At a O<sub>2</sub> level of 0%, <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> was considered to be 0% and &#x003C4; longer than the incubation time while <italic>d</italic> was not estimated. Independently of the fungal species, germination was the fastest under atmospheric conditions whereas germination was the slowest at 0.36% O<sub>2</sub> or 69.00% CO<sub>2</sub> (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). Reduction of O<sub>2</sub> or increase of CO<sub>2</sub> below or above atmospheric pressure respectively increased &#x003C4; values. They ranged between 18.22 and 47.88 h, 10.29 and 20.12 h, 18.61 and 130.69 h, 13.80 and 38.56 h and 16.78 and 30.53 h for <italic>P. niveus, M. lanceolatus, P. brevicompactum, P. expansum</italic>, and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic>, respectively. Moreover, O<sub>2</sub> reduction or CO<sub>2</sub> increase decreased <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> values as low as 37.05% for <italic>P. brevicompactum</italic> and 30.66% for <italic>P. roqueforti</italic>, whereas <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> of other species remained unaffected. The <italic>d</italic> parameter was estimated at 12.15 &#x000B1; 3.09, 12.87 &#x000B1; 3.61, 12.27 &#x000B1; 3.61, 10.07 &#x000B1; 3.44, 12.90 &#x000B1; 4.78 for <italic>P. niveus, M. lanceolatus, P. brevicompactum, P. expansum</italic>, and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic>, respectively. As low variations of <italic>d</italic> were observed, this parameter was not modeled as a function of gaseous composition.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Conidial germination kinetics of <italic>Paecilomyces niveus</italic> UBOCC-A-11024 <bold>(A)</bold>, <italic>Mucor lanceolatus</italic> UBOCC-A-109153 <bold>(B)</bold>, <italic>Penicillium brevicompactum</italic> UBOCC-A-110007 <bold>(C)</bold>, <italic>Penicillium expansum</italic> UBOCC-A-110032 <bold>(D)</bold> and <italic>Penicillium roqueforti</italic> UBOCC-A-113022 <bold>(E)</bold> on PDA (pH 4.2, 0.980 <italic>a</italic><sub><italic>w</italic></sub>) at 25&#x000B0;C under atmospheric air i.e., 21% O<sub>2</sub> and 0.03% CO<sub>2</sub> (black), 0.36% O<sub>2</sub> and 0.03% CO<sub>2</sub> (red) or 69% CO<sub>2</sub> and 5% O<sub>2</sub> (blue). Circles represent observed germination percentages (%) and solid lines are obtained from the Equation (1) model.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-08-02109-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Modeling the effects of oxygen and carbon dioxide on conidial germination</title>
<sec>
<title>Modeling the effect of oxygen partial pressure on median germination time &#x003C4;</title>
<p>The median germination time (&#x003C4;) remained stable at O<sub>2</sub> partial pressures above a certain threshold dependent of the studied fungal species while it dramatically increased at low O<sub>2</sub> partial pressures (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). The model Equation (2) successfully described this effect for the five tested species and provided two parameters, namely the median germination time under atmospheric oxygen partial pressure (&#x003C4;<sub><italic>atm</italic></sub>) and the O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure at which &#x003C4; is twice as long as &#x003C4;<sub><italic>atm</italic></sub> ([<italic>O</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub>) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). Regarding &#x003C4;<sub><italic>atm</italic></sub>, it varied between 10.41 and 17.87 h, depending on the fungal species. <italic>M. lanceolatus</italic> conidia (&#x003C4;<sub><italic>atm</italic></sub> &#x0003D; 10.41 &#x000B1; 0.08 h) and <italic>P. expansum</italic> conidia (&#x003C4;<sub><italic>atm</italic></sub> &#x0003D; 11.70 &#x000B1; 0.65 h) germinated more rapidly than the other tested species under atmospheric conditions. Indeed, <italic>P. niveus, P. brevicompactum</italic> and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic> conidia had median germination times of &#x0007E;17 h, with 17.87 &#x000B1; 0.86 h, 17.76 &#x000B1; 0.29 h and 17.39 &#x000B1; 0.56 h, respectively. Regarding [<italic>O</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub>, an O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure lower than 1% was necessary to double &#x003C4; for all studied species. Indeed, the highest values of [<italic>O</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> were estimated at O<sub>2</sub> levels of 0.75 &#x000B1; 0.08%, 0.60 &#x000B1; 0.06%, and 0.52 &#x000B1; 0.02% for <italic>P. expansum, P. niveus</italic> and <italic>P. brevicompactum</italic>, respectively. For <italic>P. roqueforti</italic> and <italic>M</italic>. lanceolatus, the estimated values of [<italic>O</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> (0.07 &#x000B1; 0.02% O<sub>2</sub> and 0.03 &#x000B1; 0.01% O<sub>2</sub>, respectively) were below the lowest partial pressures tested without using oxygen absorber.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Influence of O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure (%) in headspace on the median germination time &#x003C4; (h) and maximum germination percentage <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> (%) of <italic>Paecilomyces niveus</italic> UBOCC-A-11024 <bold>(A,F)</bold>, <italic>Mucor lanceolatus</italic> UBOCC-A-109153 <bold>(B,G)</bold>, <italic>Penicillium brevicompactum</italic> UBOCC-A-110007 <bold>(C,H)</bold>, <italic>Penicillium expansum</italic> UBOCC-A-110032 <bold>(D,I)</bold> and <italic>Penicillium roqueforti</italic> UBOCC-A-113022 <bold>(E,J)</bold> on PDA medium (pH 4.2, 0.980 <italic>a</italic><sub><italic>w</italic></sub>) at 25&#x000B0;C. Observed parameters (open circle), model fitted with Equation (2) <bold>(A&#x02013;E</bold>, solid line) or Equation (3) <bold>(F&#x02013;J</bold>, solid line).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-08-02109-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Secondary model parameters &#x000B1; standard deviation obtained by fitting Equation (2) to median germination times &#x003C4; (h) or Equation (3) to maximum germination percentages <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> (%) of <italic>Paecilomyces niveus</italic> UBOCC-A-11024, <italic>Mucor lanceolatus</italic> UBOCC-A-109153, <italic>Penicillium brevicompactum</italic> UBOCC-A-110007, <italic>Penicillium expansum</italic> UBOCC-A-110032 and <italic>Penicillium roqueforti</italic> UBOCC-A-113022 as a function of O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure in headspace (%).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Fungal species</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Parameters describing the effect of O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure on <italic>&#x003C4;</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Parameters describing the effect of O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure on <italic>P<sub><italic>max</italic></sub></italic></bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold><italic>&#x003C4;<sub><italic>atm</italic></sub> (h)</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>[<italic>O<sub>2</sub></italic>]<italic><sub>50</sub> (%)</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>r</italic><sup>2</sup></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>RMSE</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>P<sub><italic>maxatm</italic></sub> (%)</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>[<italic>O<sub>2</sub></italic>]<italic><sub>50</sub> (%)</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>r</italic><sup>2</sup></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>RMSE</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>P. niveus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">17.87 &#x000B1; 0.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.60 &#x000B1; 0.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>M. lanceolatus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10.41 &#x000B1; 0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.03 &#x000B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>P. brevicompactum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">17.76 &#x000B1; 0.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.52 &#x000B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.1 &#x000B1; 5.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.25 &#x000B1; 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>P. expansum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11.70 &#x000B1; 0.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.75 &#x000B1; 0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>P. roqueforti</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">17.39 &#x000B1; 0.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x000B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99.2 &#x000B1; 5.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.32 &#x000B1; 0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>The parameters &#x003C4;<sub>atm</sub> (h) and P<sub>maxatm</sub> are the values of &#x003C4; or P<sub>max</sub> respectively in atmospheric conditions and the parameter [O<sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> (%) is the O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure at which &#x003C4; is twice as long as &#x003C4;<sub>atm</sub> or P<sub>max</sub> is half of P<sub>maxatm</sub>. The accuracy of the model was evaluated using the root mean square error (RMSE) and the determination coefficient r<sup>2</sup>. (&#x02013;) Model not adjusted</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Modeling the effect of oxygen partial pressure on maximum percentage of germination P<sub>max</sub></title>
<p>The effect of O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure on the maximum percentage of germination (<italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub>) varied according to the tested fungal species (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3F&#x02013;J</xref>). For <italic>P. niveus, M. lanceolatus</italic> and <italic>P. expansum, P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> did not vary between 0.25 and 21% O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure while it was prevented at 0% O<sub>2</sub> level (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3F,G,I</xref>). Given this binary effect, the effect of O<sub>2</sub> on <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> was not described by Equation (3) for these species (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). For <italic>P. brevicompactum</italic> and <italic>P. roqueforti, P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> remained unaffected at O<sub>2</sub> partial pressures above 0.75 and 0.5% respectively, followed by an important decrease in <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> below these thresholds (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3H,J</xref>). Our model Equation (3) successfully described this effect for both species(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>) and allowed us to determine the maximum germination percentage under atmospheric O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure (<italic>P</italic><sub><italic>maxatm</italic></sub>) and the O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure at which <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> is half of <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>maxatm</italic></sub> ([<italic>O</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub>). <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>maxatm</italic></sub> and [<italic>O</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> were estimated to be 100% for both species and, 0.25 &#x000B1; 0.10% and 0.32 &#x000B1; 0.09% O<sub>2</sub>, for <italic>P. brevicompactum</italic> and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic>, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Modeling the effect of carbon dioxide partial pressure on reciprocal of median germination time &#x003C4;<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></title>
<p>The reciprocal of median germination times (&#x003C4;<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) decreased when CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure increased from 0 to 70% (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). The model Equation (4) described this effect for the five tested species (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>) and provided three parameters, namely the reciprocal of median germination time under atmospheric partial pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>), the CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure at which &#x003C4;<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> is half of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> ([C<italic>O</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub>) and the minimal inhibitory partial pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> ([<italic>CO</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub><italic>MI</italic></sub>)<sub>.</sub> Regarding the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter, it ranged between 0.0951 h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (namely 10.51 h) and 0.0535 h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (namely 18.69 h), depending on the fungal species. <italic>M. lanceolatus</italic> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> &#x0003D; 0.0951 &#x000B1; 0.0019 h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) and <italic>P. expansum</italic> conidia (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> &#x0003D; 0.0719 &#x000B1; 0.0013 h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) germinated faster than those of the other tested species. Indeed, <italic>P. brevicompactum, P. niveus</italic> and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic> conidia had a median generation time &#x0003E; 16 h with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.0535 &#x000B1; 0.0014 h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, 0.0553 &#x000B1; 0.0011 h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> and 0.0599 &#x000B1; 0.0015 h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, respectively. Regarding the parameter [C<italic>O</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub>, a CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure above 20% was necessary to double the median germination time. Indeed, [C<italic>O</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> values were estimated at 20.54 &#x000B1; 1.35% CO<sub>2</sub>, 53.65 &#x000B1; 1.57% CO<sub>2</sub> and 67.54 &#x000B1; 2.74% CO<sub>2</sub> for <italic>P. brevicompactum, P. expansum</italic> and <italic>M. lanceolatus</italic>, respectively. <italic>P. roqueforti</italic> [C<italic>O</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> value (92.01 &#x000B1; 12.90% CO<sub>2</sub>) was higher than the highest tested partial pressure (i.e., 70%). Regarding the parameter [<italic>CO</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub><italic>MI</italic></sub>, none of the tested CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure reduced &#x003C4;<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> to 0 h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. Indeed, [<italic>CO</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub><italic>MI</italic></sub> estimated values were higher than 100% i.e., 102.79 &#x000B1; 14.25%, 104.90 &#x000B1; 8.14% and 124.36 &#x000B1; 21.10% CO<sub>2</sub> for <italic>P. brevicompactum, P. expansum</italic> and <italic>M. lanceolatus</italic>, respectively. For <italic>P. roqueforti</italic> and <italic>P. niveus</italic>, [<italic>CO</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub><italic>MI</italic></sub> values higher than 10<sup>4</sup> % CO<sub>2</sub> were estimated.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Influence of CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure (%) in headspace on the reciprocal of median germination time &#x003C4;<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (<italic>h</italic><sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) and maximum germination percentage <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> (%) of <italic>Paecilomyces niveus</italic> UBOCC-A-11024 <bold>(A,F)</bold>, <italic>Mucor lanceolatus</italic> UBOCC-A-109153 <bold>(B,G)</bold>, <italic>Penicillium brevicompactum</italic> UBOCC-A-110007 <bold>(C,H)</bold>, <italic>Penicillium expansum</italic> UBOCC-A-110032 <bold>(D,I)</bold> and <italic>Penicillium roqueforti</italic> UBOCC-A-113022 <bold>(E,J)</bold> on PDA medium (pH 4.2, 0.980 <italic>a</italic><sub><italic>w</italic></sub>) at 25&#x000B0;C. Observed parameters (open circle), model fitted with Equation (4) (solid line).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-08-02109-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Secondary model parameters &#x000B1; standard deviation obtained by fitting Equation (4) to reciprocal of median germination times &#x003C4;<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) or maximum germination percentages <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> (%) of <italic>Paecilomyces niveus</italic> UBOCC-A-11024, <italic>Mucor lanceolatus</italic> UBOCC-A-109153, <italic>Penicillium brevicompactum</italic> UBOCC-A-110007, <italic>Penicillium expansum</italic> UBOCC-A-110032 and <italic>Penicillium roqueforti</italic> UBOCC-A-113022 as a function of CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure in headspace.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Fungal species</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="5" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Parameters describing the effect of CO</bold><sub><bold>2</bold></sub> <bold>partial pressure on median germination time (</bold>&#x003C4;<bold>)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="5" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Parameters describing the effect of CO</bold><sub><bold>2</bold></sub> <bold>partial pressure on maximal germination percentage (P</bold><sub><bold><italic><bold>max</bold></italic></bold></sub><bold>)</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><inline-formula><mml:math id="M15"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>(h)</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>[<italic>CO</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> <italic>(%)</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>[<italic>CO</italic><sub>2</sub>]<italic><sub><italic>MI</italic></sub> (%)</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>r</italic><sup>2</sup></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>RMSE</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>P<sub><italic>maxatm</italic></sub> (%)</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>[<italic>CO</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> <italic>(%)</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>[<italic>CO</italic><sub>2</sub>]<italic><sub><italic>MI</italic></sub> (%)</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>r</italic><sup>2</sup></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>RMSE</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>P. niveus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0553 &#x000B1; 0.0011</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">349.71 &#x000B1; 734.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;10<sup>4</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>M. lanceolatus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0951 &#x000B1; 0.0019</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">67.54 &#x000B1; 2.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">124.36 &#x000B1; 21.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.004</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>P. brevicompactum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0535 &#x000B1; 0.0014</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.54 &#x000B1; 1.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">102.79 &#x000B1; 14.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.6 &#x000B1; 0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">67.88 &#x000B1; 0.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">68.24 &#x000B1; 0.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.68</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>P. expansum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0719 &#x000B1; 0.0013</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53.65 &#x000B1; 1.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">104.90 &#x000B1; 8.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>P. roqueforti</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0599 &#x000B1; 0.0015</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.01 &#x000B1; 12.90</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;10<sup>4</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.003</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.8 &#x000B1; 2.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.80 &#x000B1; 9.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.18 &#x000B1; 15.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.89</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>The parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle class="text"><mml:mtext class="textit" mathvariant="italic">1</mml:mtext></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> (h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) and P<sub>maxatm</sub> are the respective values of &#x003C4;<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> and P<sub>max</sub> in atmosphere. The parameter [CO<sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> (%) is the CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure at which &#x003C4;<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> half of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle class="text"><mml:mtext class="textit" mathvariant="italic">1</mml:mtext></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> or P<sub>max</sub> is half of P<sub>maxatm</sub>. The parameter [CO<sub>2</sub>]<sub>MI</sub> (%) is the CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure at which &#x003C4;<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> or P<sub>max</sub> &#x0003D; 0. The accuracy of the model was evaluated using the root mean square error (RMSE) and the determination coefficient r<sup>2</sup>. (&#x02013;) Model not adjusted</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Modeling the effect of carbon dioxide partial pressure on maximum percentage of germination P<sub>max</sub></title>
<p>The effect of O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure on the maximum percentage of germination (<italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub>) varied according to the studied fungal species (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4F&#x02013;J</xref>). As already observed for O<sub>2</sub>, <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> of <italic>P. niveus, M. lanceolatus</italic> and <italic>P. expansum</italic> were not affected by any of the tested CO<sub>2</sub> levels and had a constant value close to 100% (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4F,G,I</xref>). Therefore, the CO<sub>2</sub> effect on <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> could not be modeled. For <italic>P. brevicompactum</italic> and <italic>P. roqueforti, P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> parameter remained constant at CO<sub>2</sub> levels below 50 and 40% respectively followed by a decrease at the highest CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressures (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4H,J</xref>). Using our model Equation (4), we could estimate <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>maxatm</italic></sub> (maximum germination percentage under atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure), [C<italic>O</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> (CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure at which <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> is half of <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>maxatm</italic></sub>) and [<italic>CO</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub><italic>MI</italic></sub> (minimal inhibitory CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure) for the latter species as shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>. Regarding <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>maxatm</italic></sub>, more than 98% of <italic>P. brevicompactum</italic> and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic> conidia germinated under atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). Regarding both [C<italic>O</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> and [<italic>CO</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub><italic>MI</italic></sub> parameters, the inhibition of 50 % or 100 % of the inoculated conidia required an increase in CO<sub>2</sub> level up to 67.88 &#x000B1; 0.35% CO<sub>2</sub> and 84.80 &#x000B1; 9.98% CO<sub>2</sub> and, 68.24 &#x000B1; 0.88% CO<sub>2</sub> and 92.18 &#x000B1; 15.71% CO<sub>2</sub> for <italic>P. brevicompactum</italic> and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic>, respectively. It is worth mentioning that these values were not within the CO<sub>2</sub> levels evaluated in the present study.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The present work aimed at modeling the respective effects of O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure on the conidial germination kinetic of five fungal species encountered in dairy foods. To the best of our knowledge, this the first time that conidial germination under modified atmosphere is assessed on solid medium using phase-contrast microscopy. Indeed, previous studies were performed in liquid media (Nguyen Van Long and Dantigny, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2016</xref>). Even though PDA cannot be considered as a food matrix, it is more representative of solid foods which are usually contaminated on their surfaces by conidia which are exposed to the gas headspace of the package. The method and experimental device developed in the present study can be considered as representative of MAP as well as CAS because gas composition was set up before package sealing and remained constant throughout germination kinetic assessment with O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure down to 0.36 &#x000B1; 0.05% and up to 69.00 &#x000B1; 1.76%, respectively. In addition, the fact that each plate was packed individually allowed gas composition measurements throughout the experiment without modifying the headspace gas composition of other incubated Petri dishes. Indeed, a static gas composition must be maintained to accurately model O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> effects using Gamma-type models.</p>
<p>However, in real foods under MAP, the gas composition can vary during storage and depends on gas transfer between the food itself, the packaging headspace and the storage environment (Chaix et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2015</xref>). Indeed, gas transfer between the food and the packaging headspace depends on abiotic (gas solubilization, diffusion, and subsequent chemical reactions) and biotic factors (microbial respiration/fermentation and food respiration in the case of respiring products) while transfer between the packaging headspace and the storage environment mainly depends on the gas permeability of the packaging material (Chaix et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2015</xref>). In future work, such transfer could also be taken into account with different culture devices based on the present method, i.e., compartmentalized bag made from high oxygen barrier plastic film.</p>
<p>To our best knowledge, the models describing the effects of O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure on conidial germination parameters (Equations 2&#x02013;4) were applied for the first time in the present work. Despite an accurate fitting of the models to the observed data (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>), the <italic>r</italic><sup>2</sup> and RMSE values were not as good as expected in certain cases (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). For example, when modeling <italic>P. roqueforti</italic> germination as a function of the O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure, <italic>r</italic><sup>2</sup> values of 0.45 and 0.68 were obtained for the models describing &#x003C4; and <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> parameters, respectively. These values were mainly due to the asymptotic shape of the curve, especially for data obtained at O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure below 1%. However, the models presented in our study were still relevant as they could be used as part of a gamma-concept-based approach to take into account O<sub>2</sub> and/or CO<sub>2</sub> effects as multiplicative factors (Zwietering et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">1993</xref>). In this perspective, it would be of interest to investigate their interaction with other environmental factors, as previously shown for CO<sub>2</sub> and <italic>a</italic><sub><italic>w</italic></sub> (Samapundo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2007</xref>). In addition, it is worth mentioning that these models (Equations 2&#x02013;4) provide biologically meaningful parameters (median germination time &#x003C4; and maximum germination percentage <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub>) which can then be compared and biologically interpreted. For example, an increase of the &#x003C4; value (as described by Equation (2) will reflect a delay in conidial germination (fungistatic effect) while a decrease of the <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> value (as described by Equation (3) will reflect an inhibition of the germination of certain conidia within a population. Concerning the <italic>d</italic> parameter, predictions of conidial germination will be facilitated by the use of constant <italic>d</italic> values, namely the mean values estimated for each fungal species. Indeed, no significant correlation was observed between <italic>d</italic> and the headspace gaseous composition in the present study.</p>
<p>As other strictly aerobic microorganisms, food spoilage molds have an absolute requirement of O<sub>2</sub> to produce adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP) <italic>via</italic> the oxidative phosphorylation pathway (Bailey-Serres and Chang, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2005</xref>), although a wide diversity of molds are able to grow under reduced O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure as low as 1% (Nguyen Van Long and Dantigny, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2016</xref>). As expected, none of the five tested fungi were able to germinate under strict anaerobic conditions despite a high tolerance to O<sub>2</sub> reduction (down to 0.36%) was observed for certain fungal species. The highest tolerance was exhibited by <italic>M. lanceolatus</italic> and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic> with [O<sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> values lower than the lowest tested O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure. Consistent with these results, the growth of <italic>Mucor ambigus</italic> on Koji agar and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic> on wheat extract agar was reported at O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure of 0.10% (Yanai et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">1980</xref>) and 0.14% (Magan and Lacey, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">1984</xref>), respectively. Previous studies also reported growth of <italic>Byssochlamys nivea</italic> (teleomorph of <italic>P. niveus</italic>) on cheddar cheese (Taniwaki et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2001</xref>), <italic>P. brevicompactum</italic> on Czapek agar (Yang and Lucas, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">1970</xref>) and <italic>P. expansum</italic> on apple puree agar medium (Baert et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2007</xref>) at O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure as low as 1%, which is a higher value than that observed in the present work.</p>
<p>Interestingly, all the aforementioned publications studied radial growth as a biological response even though spores were used as an inoculum. In this case, it could be ambiguous to determine precisely whether O<sub>2</sub> reduction affected successively conidial germination and radial growth or only one specific developmental stage. As the O<sub>2</sub> limits described in the present study are in the same order of magnitude as previously reported for radial growth, it can be hypothesized that delays in radial growth caused by low O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure principally result from significant delays in the germination process. To test whether hyphal elongation is specifically affected by oxygen reduction, further experiments should be performed with conidia pre-incubated under atmospheric condition (until full germination) followed by incubation under modified-atmosphere. In addition, a better understanding of the high tolerance to low O<sub>2</sub> level displayed by filamentous fungi will require further investigation of their oxygen sensing mechanisms. Indeed, direct and indirect oxygen reduction sensors were extensively studied in plant cells (Bailey-Serres and Chang, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2005</xref>; Bailey-Serres et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2012</xref>), animal cells (Bruick, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2003</xref>) and yeasts (Kwast et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">1998</xref>; Poyton, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">1999</xref>) but not in filamentous fungi.</p>
<p>In the literature, it is generally reported that fungal growth is reduced but rarely inhibited at CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure ranging from 50 to 90% (Nguyen Van Long and Dantigny, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2016</xref>). This is consistent with our results as the five tested fungi were able to germinate at 70% CO<sub>2</sub> despite a delay and/or a reduction of the maximum germination percentage was observed depending on the fungal species. It is also worth mentioning that [C<italic>O</italic><sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> and [CO<sub>2</sub>]<sub>MI</sub> values higher than 100% were estimated for <italic>P. niveus</italic> and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic>. Such hyperbaric CO<sub>2</sub> pressure cannot be obtained with our modified-atmosphere culture device. Therefore, these values should be taken with caution as they are model projections (Equations 2&#x02013;4) and thus, could not be validated. Nonetheless, the highest CO<sub>2</sub> tolerance was exhibited by <italic>P. niveus</italic> and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic> with the highest [CO<sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub> (estimated CO<sub>2</sub> level to double the median germination time) and [CO<sub>2</sub>]<sub>MI</sub> (estimated CO<sub>2</sub> level to prevent conidial germination) values. Consistent with these results, growth of <italic>B. nivea</italic> (teleomorph of <italic>P. niveus</italic>) on PDA and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic> on Czapek yeast extract agar was reported at CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure up to 80% (with O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure set at 20%) (Taniwaki et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2010</xref>) and 99% (O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure 1%) (Nielsen and Rios, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2000</xref>), respectively but was not tested at higher partial pressures. Previous studies also reported growth of <italic>M. plumbeus</italic> on PDA (Taniwaki et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2010</xref>), <italic>P. brevicompactum</italic> on Czapek agar (Yang and Lucas, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">1970</xref>) and <italic>P. expansum</italic> on apple (Moodley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2002</xref>) at CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure ranging between 80 and 95% (in presence of residual O<sub>2</sub>), which are higher values than the maximum CO<sub>2</sub> level tested in the present study. Taken together, the present results confirmed that in the presence of 5% O<sub>2</sub>, a CO<sub>2</sub> level up to 70% was not sufficient to prevent conidial germination of the tested fungi. As discussed above for O<sub>2</sub>, it can be hypothesized that delays in radial growth reported in the aforementioned studies also mainly resulted from delayed germination. Interestingly, ([CO<sub>2</sub>]<sub>50</sub>) or ([CO<sub>2</sub>]<sub>MI</sub>) were often estimated above 100%, suggesting that pressurized CO<sub>2</sub> would be required to obtain the corresponding effects. High-pressure carbon dioxide (HPCD) is currently used as an alternative to thermal inactivation of microorganisms for increasing the shelf life of heat-sensitive foods (Garcia-Gonzalez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2007</xref>). In the case of HPCD, the bactericidal effect of CO<sub>2</sub> was extensively studied and identified as resulting from a combination of interactions between dissolved CO<sub>2</sub> and the plasma membrane, inhibition of enzymatic reactions through internal pH modifications and carboxylation/decarboxylation reactions, and modifications of osmotic regulation through intracellular electrolyte precipitation (Garcia-Gonzalez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2007</xref>). Similar mechanisms may be involved at atmospheric pressure (e.g., in MAP and CAS). In the case of conidia, it would be interesting to investigate whether the cell wall composition (Sewall et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">1990</xref>; Latg&#x000E9; and Beauvais, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2014</xref>) or the high intracellular content of compatible solutes (Wyatt et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2013</xref>) contribute to the important tolerance to increased CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure as observed in the present work.</p>
<p>Interestingly, for <italic>P. brevicompactum</italic> and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic>, we observed that both <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> and &#x003C4; parameters were simultaneously affected by O<sub>2</sub> reduction or CO<sub>2</sub> increase. Indeed, half of the inoculated <italic>P. brevicompactum</italic> and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic> conidia were still able to germinate at 0.25% and 0.32% O<sub>2</sub>, respectively, with median germination times 6 and 3.5-fold longer than under atmospheric conditions. Similarly, half of the inoculated <italic>P. brevicompactum</italic> and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic> conidia remained able to germinate at 67.88% and 84.80% CO<sub>2</sub>, respectively, with median germination times 8.8 or 1.9-fold longer than under atmospheric conditions. This result shows that a sub-population among the conidial population is less susceptible to O<sub>2</sub> reduction or CO<sub>2</sub> increase despite their germination time is longer. Consequently, it can be hypothesized that tolerance to MAP could be related to heterogeneity among conidia population. A similar hypothesis was previously made to explain the high tolerance of <italic>Zygosaccharomyces bailii</italic> to weak-acid preservatives (Stratford et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2014</xref>). Overall, these results suggest that accurate prediction of conidial germination in foods could be impaired given that such an heterogeneity exists within conidial population and that mold spoilage generally arises from a single conidia (Burgain et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2013</xref>).</p>
<p>As a conclusion, the present study confirmed that a modified atmosphere, consisting of O<sub>2</sub> or CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure higher than 1 and 70%, respectively, was not sufficient to prevent conidial germination of the five studied fungal species, all of which are frequently encountered as food spoilers or, in the case of <italic>M. lanceolatus</italic> and <italic>P. roqueforti</italic>, utilized as cheese ripening cultures. As part of the hurdle technology, O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> hurdle effects should be combined together as well as with other biotic and abiotic factors to prevent fungal spoilage. The effect of combined factors on mold development can then be predicted with gamma-type models assuming multiplicative effects of the different hurdles. In this perspective, the developed culture device and predictive models of this study could be of interest for food mycologist and industrials to describe O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> level effects on conidial germination.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>NN, VV, and KR designed the experiments and prepared the manuscript. NN and MB performed the experiments. OC, LC, and NN computed the modeling. JM led the research.</p>
<sec>
<title>Conflict of interest statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack><p>The authors are grateful to Antoine Cassel from Wipak for generously providing Biaxer plastic film and Riwanon Lem&#x000E9;e-Michel from Laboratoires Standa for generously providing oxygen absorbers.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s6">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02109/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02109/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.XLSX" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table2.XLSX" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baert</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Devlieghere</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flyps</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oosterlinck</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajkovi&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Influence of storage conditions of apples on growth and patulin production by <italic>Penicillium expansum</italic></article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>119</volume>, <fpage>170</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>181</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.061</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17900726</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bailey-Serres</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Sensing and signalling in response to oxygen deprivation in plants and other organisms</article-title>. <source>Ann. Bot.</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>507</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>518</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mci206</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16051633</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bailey-Serres</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fukao</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gibbs</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holdsworth</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Licausi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Making sense of low oxygen sensing</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>129</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>138</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2011.12.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22280796</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bruick</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Oxygen sensing in the hypoxic response pathway: regulation of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor</article-title>. <source>Genes Dev.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>2614</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2623</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gad.1145503</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14597660</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burgain</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bensoussan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dantigny</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effect of inoculum size and water activity on the time to visible growth of <italic>Penicillium chrysogenum</italic> colony</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>163</volume>, <fpage>180</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>183</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.02.021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23562694</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caleb</surname> <given-names>O. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mahajan</surname> <given-names>P. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Said</surname> <given-names>F. A.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Opara</surname> <given-names>U. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Modified atmosphere packaging technology of fresh and fresh-cut produce and the microbial consequences&#x02014;a review</article-title>. <source>Food Bioprocess Technol.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>303</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>329</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11947-012-0932-4</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chaix</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Couvert</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guillaume</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gontard</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guillard</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Predictive microbiology coupled with gas (O<sub>2</sub>/C<sub>O2</sub>) transfer in food/packaging systems: how to develop an efficient decision support tool for food packaging dimensioning</article-title>. <source>Rev. Food Sci. F</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>21</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1541-4337.12117</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dagnas</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Membr&#x000E9;</surname> <given-names>J.-M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Predicting and preventing mold spoilage of food products</article-title>. <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>538</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>551</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-349</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23462093</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dantigny</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bensoussan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vasseur</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lebrihi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buchet</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ismaili-Alaoui</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Standardisation of methods for assessing mould germination: a workshop report</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>286</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>291</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.12.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16673468</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dantigny</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guilmart</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bensoussan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005a</year>). <article-title>Basis of predictive mycology</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>187</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>196</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.10.013</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15854704</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dantigny</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guilmart</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Radoi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bensoussan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zwietering</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005b</year>). <article-title>Modelling the effect of ethanol on growth rate of food spoilage moulds</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>261</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>269</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.07.008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15698687</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dantigny</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nanguy</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Judet</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bensoussan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>A new model for germination of fungi</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>146</volume>, <fpage>176</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>181</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.02.022</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21396731</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramos</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanchis</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Predicting mycotoxins in foods: a review</article-title>. <source>Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>757</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>769</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fm.2009.05.014</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19835759</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garcia-Gonzalez</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Geeraerd</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spilimbergo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elst</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Ginneken</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Debevere</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>High pressure carbon dioxide inactivation of microorganisms in foods: the past, the present and the future</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>117</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>28</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.018</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17475355</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huis in&#x00027;t Veld</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Microbial and biochemical spoilage of foods: an overview</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0168-1605(96)01139-7</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kwast</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burke</surname> <given-names>P. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poyton</surname> <given-names>R. O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Oxygen sensing and the transcriptional regulation of oxygen-responsive genes in yeast</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Biol.</source> <volume>201</volume>, <fpage>1177</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1195</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9510529</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Latg&#x000E9;</surname> <given-names>J.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beauvais</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Functional duality of the cell wall</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Microbiol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>111</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>117</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mib.2014.05.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24937317</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Legan</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Mould spoilage of bread: the problem and some solutions</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeter. Biodegr.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>53</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0964-8305(93)90038-4</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leistner</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gorris</surname> <given-names>L. G. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Food preservation by hurdle technology</article-title>. <source>Trend Food Sci. Trend Food Sci.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0924-2244(00)88941-4</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Littlefield</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wankier</surname> <given-names>B. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salunkhe</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McGill</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1966</year>). <article-title>Fungistatic effects of controlled atmospheres</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>579</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>581</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5951331</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Magan</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacey</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Effects of gas composition and water activity on growth of field and storage fungi and their interactions</article-title>. <source>Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>305</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>314</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0007-1536(84)80074-1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McMillin</surname> <given-names>K. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Where is MAP Going?</article-title> <source>Meat Sci.</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>43</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>65</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.028</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22063169</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moodley</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Govinden</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Odhav</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>The effect of modified atmospheres and packaging on patulin production in apples</article-title>. <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>867</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>871</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/0362-028X-65.5.867</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12030304</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nguyen Van Long</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dantigny</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Fungal contamination in packaged foods</article-title>, in <source>Antimicrobial Food Packaging</source>, ed <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Barros-Vel&#x000E1;zquez</surname></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>San Diego, CA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>45</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>63</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nguyen Van Long</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vasseur</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coroller</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dantigny</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le Panse</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weill</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Temperature, water activity and pH during conidia production affect the physiological state and germination time of <italic>Penicillium</italic> species</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>241</volume>, <fpage>151</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>160</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.10.022</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27780083</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>P. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rios</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Inhibition of fungal growth on bread by volatile components from spices and herbs, and the possible application in active packaging, with special emphasis on mustard essential oil</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>219</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>229</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00343-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11016611</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ooraikul</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP)</article-title>, in <source>Food Preservation Techniques</source>, eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Zeuthen</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x000F8;gh-S&#x000F8;rensen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Boca Raton, FL</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CRC Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>338</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>359</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Poyton</surname> <given-names>R. O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Models for oxygen sensing in yeast: implications for oxygen-regulated gene expression in higher eucaryotes</article-title>. <source>Respir. Physiol.</source> <volume>115</volume>, <fpage>119</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>133</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0034-5687(99)00028-6</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10385027</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rosas</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Calderon</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ulloa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacey</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Abundance of airborne <italic>Penicillium</italic> CFU in relation to urbanization in Mexico City</article-title>. <source>App. Environ. Microb.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>2648</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2652</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8368852</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Samapundo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Meulenaer</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Atukwase</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Debevere</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Devlieghere</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The influence of modified atmospheres and their interaction with water activity on the radial growth and fumonisin B1 production of <italic>Fusarium verticillioides</italic> and F</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>114</volume>, <fpage>160</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>167</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.09.005</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sewall</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mims</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Timberlake</surname> <given-names>W. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Conidium differentiation in <italic>Aspergillus nidulans</italic> wild-type and wet-white (wetA) mutant strains</article-title>. <source>Dev. Biol.</source> <volume>138</volume>, <fpage>499</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>508</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0012-1606(90)90215-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2180753</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stratford</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Steels</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nebe-von-Caron</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Avery</surname> <given-names>S. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Novodvorska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Archer</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Population heterogeneity and dynamics in starter culture and lag phase adaptation of the spoilage yeast <italic>Zygosaccharomyces bailii</italic> to weak acid preservatives</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>181</volume>, <fpage>40</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>47</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.04.017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24813627</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Taniwaki</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hocking</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pitt</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fleet</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Growth of fungi and mycotoxin production on cheese under modified atmospheres</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>125</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>133</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00487-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11545212</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Taniwaki</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hocking</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pitt</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fleet</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Growth and mycotoxin production by fungi in atmospheres containing 80% carbon dioxide and 20% oxygen</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>218</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>225</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.08.030</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20864200</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wyatt</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>W&#x000F6;sten</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dijksterhuis</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Fungal spores for dispersion in space and time</article-title>. <source>Adv. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>85</volume>, <fpage>43</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>91</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-407672-3.00002-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23942148</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yackel</surname> <given-names>W. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>A. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Steinberg</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1971</year>). <article-title>Effect of controlled atmosphere on growth of mold on synthetic media and fruit</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>513</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>516</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5167097</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yanai</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>I</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kojo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>The effects of low-oxygen atmospheres on the growth of fungi</article-title>. <source>J. JPN Soc. Food Sci.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>20</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>24</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3136/nskkk1962.27.20</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lucas</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1970</year>). <article-title>Effects of N2-O2 and CO2-O2 tensions on growth of fungi isolated from damaged flue-cured tobacco</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>271</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>277</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5461786</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zwietering</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wijtzes</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rombouts</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Riet</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>A decision support system for prediction of microbial spoilage in foods</article-title>. <source>J. Industr. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>324</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>329</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF01584209</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure"><p><bold>Funding.</bold> This project was supported by the French Dairy Interbranch Organization (CNIEL) and the French Ministry of National Education, Higher Education and Research.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>