<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2016.02075</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Spread of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> Strains with Multiple Fungicide Resistance in German Horticulture</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Rupp</surname> <given-names>Sabrina</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/386423/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>Roland W. S.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Rieger</surname> <given-names>Daniel</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Detzel</surname> <given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/398050/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>Matthias</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/159524/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Biology, University of Kaiserslautern</institution> <country>Kaiserslautern, Germany</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Esteburg Fruit Research and Advisory Centre</institution> <country>Jork, Germany</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Department of Food Science, Aarhus University</institution> <country>&#x000C5;rslev, Denmark</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Belchim Crop Protection</institution> <country>Burgdorf, Germany</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>N&#x000FC;PA GmbH</institution> <country>Karlsruhe, Germany</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Sabine Fillinger, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, France</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Stefania Pollastro, University of Bari, Italy; Bart Fraaije, Rothamsted Research, UK</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x0002A;Correspondence: Matthias Hahn <email>hahn&#x00040;biologie.uni-kl.de</email></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>03</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>7</volume>
<elocation-id>2075</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>03</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2016</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>08</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2016</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2017 Rupp, Weber, Rieger, Detzel and Hahn.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Rupp, Weber, Rieger, Detzel and Hahn</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p><italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> is a major plant pathogen, causing gray mold rot in a variety of cultures. Repeated fungicide applications are common but have resulted in the development of fungal populations with resistance to one or more fungicides. In this study, we have monitored fungicide resistance frequencies and the occurrence of multiple resistance in <italic>Botrytis</italic> isolates from raspberries, strawberries, grapes, stone fruits and ornamental flowers in Germany in 2010 to 2015. High frequencies of resistance to all classes of botryticides was common in all cultures, and isolates with multiple fungicide resistance represented a major part of the populations. A monitoring in a raspberry field over six seasons revealed a continuous increase in resistance frequencies and the emergence of multiresistant <italic>Botrytis</italic> strains. In a cherry orchard and a vineyard, evidence of the immigration of multiresistant strains from the outside was obtained. Inoculation experiments with fungicide-treated leaves in the laboratory and with strawberry plants cultivated in the greenhouse or outdoors revealed a nearly complete loss of fungicide efficacy against multiresistant strains. <italic>B. cinerea</italic> field strains carrying multiple resistance mutations against all classes of site-specific fungicides were found to show similar fitness as sensitive field strains under laboratory conditions, based on their vegetative growth, reproduction, stress resistance, virulence and competitiveness in mixed infection experiments. Our data indicate an alarming increase in the occurrence of multiresistance in <italic>B. cinerea</italic> populations from different cultures, which presents a major threat to the chemical control of gray mold.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd><italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic></kwd>
<kwd>fitness</kwd>
<kwd>fungicide resistance</kwd>
<kwd>Germany</kwd>
<kwd>multiple resistance</kwd>
<kwd>ornamental flowers</kwd>
<kwd>raspberry</kwd>
<kwd>strawberry</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">FKZ 2814705711</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Bundesministerium f&#x000FC;r Ern&#x000E4;hrung und Landwirtschaft<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100005908</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="36"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="7755"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Gray mold is a destructive fungal disease of a wide range of fruit, vegetable and ornamental crops. Infections are usually initiated by conidia. They may or may not enter a state of latency before an aggressive necrotrophic rot breaks out, soon followed by the production of a dense gray lawn of new conidia. Formerly thought to be caused by one species called <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> Pers.:Fr., gray mold is now known to be due to a complex of cryptic species (Walker et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2011</xref>; Plesken et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2015a</xref>). In addition, the core species of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> can be separated into genetically more or less distinct groups (N and S) which were shown to be enriched differentially in response to fungicide treatments (Leroch et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2013</xref>; Plesken et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2015a</xref>).</p>
<p>In many horticultural crops, gray mold is the most serious of all fungal diseases, and repeated fungicide sprays are necessary to control the pathogen especially in mild and humid climates. Due to the lack of registered broad-spectrum compounds, chemical control of <italic>Botrytis</italic> spp. almost solely relies on fungicides with specific modes of action. In German strawberry production, which is representative of many other European countries, the following fungicide groups are in current use against <italic>Botrytis</italic>: Quinone-outside inhibitors (QoI) such as azoxystrobin, trifloxystrobin or pyraclostrobin; succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHI) such as boscalid or the recently registered fluopyram; anilinopyrimidines (e.g., cyprodinil, pyrimethanil, mepanipyrim); phenylpyrroles (fludioxonil); and hydroxyanilides (fenhexamid). Other fungicide groups such as dicarboximides (iprodione) or methyl benzimidazole carbamates (benomyl, thiophanate-methyl) have been discontinued in 2009 or the mid-1970s, respectively, although iprodione continues to be used in several vegetable and ornamental crops. The above mentioned fungicides are used against <italic>Botrytis</italic> at variable frequencies in different crops. Strawberries and raspberries are among the most intensively treated crops. Resistance to individual botryticides has been reported in Germany and other countries since the 1970s, affecting all major fungicide classes (Leroux et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2002</xref>; Hahn, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2014</xref>). In the past 5 years, increasing frequencies of <italic>Botrytis</italic> strains with multiple fungicide resistance (MR strains) have been reported in different parts of the world especially from strawberries (Amiri et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2013</xref>; Fern&#x000E1;ndez-Ortu&#x000F1;o et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2015</xref>), but also from raspberries (Weber, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2011</xref>; Plesken et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2015a</xref>), grapes (De Miccolis Angelini et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2014</xref>; Panebianco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2015</xref>) and tomatoes (Konstantinou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2015</xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, we have traced the development of fungicide resistance in <italic>Botrytis</italic> isolates obtained in 2010 to 2015 from different host plants in Germany that have been regularly treated with fungicides. In addition to high average resistance frequencies, we found increasing proportions over time of isolates with simultaneous resistance to several or even all fungicides. These MR strains failed to be controlled by any of the fungicides used against them in detached-leaf and potted-plant experiments. Genetic and phenotypic analyses of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> MR strains indicated that they are not significantly impaired in their growth, reproduction and infection performance compared to sensitive field strains. The relevance of these results to practical horticultural production is discussed.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Isolation and cultivation of <italic>Botrytis</italic> strains</title>
<p><italic>Botrytis</italic> strains were isolated from infected plant tissue by streaking out conidia onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) augmented with 200 mg penicillin G and 200 mg streptomycin sulfate L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (Weber and Hahn, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2011</xref>) or HA agar (10 g malt extract, 4 g glucose, 4 g yeast extract, 15 g agar per liter, pH 5.5) augmented with 5 mg tannic acid L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, to inhibit growth of several contaminating fungi. Purified strains were cultivated on HA, and subjected to long-term storage by freezing to &#x02212;80&#x000B0;C.</p>
<p>Growth tests of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> strains were performed on agar plates containing either HA or Gamborg GB5 minimal medium containing 25 mM glucose as described by Plesken et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2015b</xref>). For determination of radial growth, three 10 &#x003BC;L droplets containing 10<sup>5</sup> conidia mL<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> were applied to the center of a 9 cm agar plate, and incubated for 72 h before evaluation of the colony diameter.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Fungicide sensitivity assays</title>
<p>Fungicide sensitivity assays were performed by analysing germination and growth of conidia on agar plates containing discriminatory fungicide concentrations. Because these assays were started in 2010 and performed in two different labs, prior to the decision for a joint publication, two fungicide resistance assays were used. The method of Weber and Hahn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2011</xref>) was used for <italic>Botrytis</italic> isolates collected in Northern Germany, whereas all other isolates were examined according to Leroch et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2013</xref>). Quantitative evaluation of fungicide resistance levels was performed as described by Leroch et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2013</xref>). Active ingredients were obtained by using single-compound fungicides, as follows: fenhexamid from Teldor (Bayer CropScience, Monheim, Germany); trifloxystrobin from Flint (Bayer) or azoxystrobin from Ortiva (Syngenta, Basel, Switzerland); boscalid from Cantus (BASF, Limburgerhof, Germany); cyprodinil from Chorus (Syngenta); fludioxonil from Saphire (Syngenta); iprodione from Rovral WG (BASF) and thiophanate-methyl from Cercobin FL (BASF). The SDHI compound fluopyram was also sometimes tested but data are not reported here because this compound was not registered until the 2015 season (Weber et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2015</xref>).</p>
<p>For <italic>in planta</italic> assays, commercial fungicides were prepared as stock solutions in EtOH (1 mg mL<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) and adjusted to the recommended doses in water. For inoculation experiments of freshly detached tomato leaves, these were sprayed with fungicides (or water in the controls) to leaf wetness, and dried in a sterile air flow cabinet. After inoculation with 20 &#x003BC;l droplets of spore suspension (10<sup>5</sup> conidia mL<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in GB5 medium with 25 mM glucose), leaves were incubated in a moist chamber and checked for lesion development after 72 h.</p>
<p>For the greenhouse and outdoor inoculation experiments, strawberry plants (cv. Sonata) were raised in pots (9 cm diameter) filled with TKS1 peat-based substrate (Floragard, Oldenburg, Germany). The pots were placed in trays and watered by drop irrigation. After 6 weeks, plants carrying immature fruits were treated twice at an interval of 7&#x02013;9 days with &#x0007E;5 mL fungicide solution per plant using a hand-held spray bottle, each time followed 24 h later by spray inoculation with 1 mL of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> spore suspension (3 &#x000D7; 10<sup>5</sup> conidia mL<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) per plant. Fungicide applications were conducted with Teldor&#x000AE; (2 g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>; active ingredient fenhexamid), Signum&#x000AE; (1.8 g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>; boscalid &#x0002B; pyraclostrobin) or Switch&#x000AE; (1 g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>; cyprodinil &#x0002B; fludioxonil). Inoculation was performed with the fully sensitive <italic>B. cinerea</italic> strain B05.10 or the multiresistant strain MR-S4 (<bold>Table 2</bold>). Each experimental variant including unsprayed inoculated and unsprayed uninoculated controls comprised six plants placed at random. Fruits were harvested 5&#x02013;17 days after the first inoculation. Rotting fruit were collected at harvest and again after incubation in a humid chamber for up to 1 week. From sporulating lesions of all infected fruits, conidia were recovered and tested on agar plates with discriminatory fungicide concentrations for their resistance against fenhexamid, a QoI fungicide (azoxystrobin or trifloxystrobin), boscalid, cyprodinil and fludioxonil. Isolates with resistance patterns that differed from the inoculated strain were considered as immigrated contaminant strains, and excluded from evaluation of the specific infection rate.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Fitness assays</title>
<p>Competitive infection assays with apples were performed as follows: Apples (cv. Golden Delicious) were surface-sterilized by submersion for 5 min in a 1% sodium hypochlorite solution, rinsed three times with sterile water, and dried in a sterile air-flow cabinet. Fruits were wounded at two or four equidistant sites above the fruit equator by removing the peel with a sterile 6 mm diameter stainless steel cork borer. Wounds were inoculated with 20 &#x003BC;L of a conidial suspension of <italic>B. cinerea</italic>. The suspension was prepared by adjusting conidia suspended in GB5 medium containing 25 mM glucose to a concentration of 2 &#x000D7; 10<sup>5</sup> mL<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, and mixing either with the suspension of another <italic>B. cinerea</italic> strain or with medium alone (controls). Inoculated apples were incubated in moist plastic boxes for 7 days. Subsequently, the fruit was divided into two or four pieces, and from each side a tangential cut was made in order to expose the rotten area to the air and to promote sporulation. Spores were then collected and the spore suspension was transferred onto HA agar plates supplemented either with 10 ppm fenhexamid to distinguish between sensitive and MR strains, or with 0.2 ppm or 1 ppm fludioxonil to distinguish between strains with or without partial fludioxonil resistance due to the MDR1(h) efflux mechanism.</p>
<p>Sclerotium formation was induced by incubation of HA plates with mycelium-containing agar plaques for 4 weeks at 15&#x000B0;C in the dark. Viability of sclerotia was tested by storing the plates for 8 months at 10&#x02013;14&#x000B0;C, followed by transfer of five individual sclerotia per strain onto a fresh HA agar plate and incubation at room temperature. After 3 days, development of mycelium from the sclerotia was checked.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>DNA manipulations</title>
<p>For determination of fungicide resistance mutations of selected <italic>B. cinerea</italic> isolates, total DNA was isolated as described by Leroch et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2013</xref>). Mutations were identified by amplification of target gene fragments, followed by either sequencing or primer-induced restriction analysis (PIRA)-PCR (Haliassos et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">1989</xref>) to identify specific mutations. The F412S mutations in <italic>erg27</italic>, the G143A mutation in <italic>cytB</italic>, the H272R and the H272Y mutations in <italic>sdhB</italic>, the E198A mutation in <italic>tubA</italic>, and the &#x00394;<italic>L497</italic> mutation in <italic>mrr1</italic> were identified by PIRA-PCR, using the primers and enzymes shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>. Restriction enzymes were purchased from NEB Biolabs (Frankfurt, Germany). Mutations in <italic>bos1</italic> conferring iprodione resistance were identified by pyrosequencing (Grabke and Stammler, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2015</xref>). All other mutations were identified by sequencing.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Primers used in this study</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Name</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Sequence (5&#x02032;&#x02013;3&#x02032;)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Amplicon length</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Gene (mutation<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>References</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BpsID_137F</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GCAGATGAGGCGGATGATAG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">137/112 bp<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">BC1G_07159/Bcin09g02270</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Plesken et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2015a</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BpsID_273R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TCCACCCAAGCATCATCTTC</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BcinN-in-F</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GCGACCTCATCGTTCTTTCAC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">182 bp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>mrr1</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Plesken et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2015a</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BcinN-in-R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GGCTCTCGATGAGCTGTTTC</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mrr1-spez-F</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TATCGGTCTTGCAGTCCGC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">141 bp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>mrr1</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Leroch et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2013</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mrr1-spez-R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TTCCGTACCCCGATCTTCGGAA</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">erg27F412SP745F</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GTGTTGGTATTTATCTACAGATTGATAT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">125 bp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>erg27</italic> (F412S<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN4"><sup>&#x0002A;1</sup></xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">This work</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">erg27_1410R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ACATCGTCGGGAGATAATGC</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Seq_erg27_fw</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GTACCGCCACTTATTCCG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">950 bp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>erg27</italic> (F412I)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">This work</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Seq_erg27_rev</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GCGTTCTTTCCCACTAGC</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Seq_erg27_I63</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CAGGCGCAAACAGGTGATAC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1425 bp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>erg27</italic> (T63I)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">This work</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Seq_erg27_rev</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GCGTTCTTTCCCACTAGC</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Qo13ext</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GGTATAACCCGACGGGGTTATAGAATAG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">560 bp<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>cytB</italic> (G143A<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN5"><sup>&#x0002A;2</sup></xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Samuel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2011</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Qo14ext</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AACCATCTCCATCCACCATACCTACAAA</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272R-fw</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GGCAGCTTTGGATAACAGCATGAGTTTGTACAGATGGC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">120 bp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sdhB</italic> (H272R<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN6"><sup>&#x0002A;3</sup></xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Veloukas et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2011</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272-univ-rev</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GCCATTTCCTTCTTAATCTCCGC</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272Y-fwfw</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GGCAGCTTTGGATAACAGCATGAGTTTGTACAGATAT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">120 bp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sdhB</italic> (H272Y<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN7"><sup>&#x0002A;4</sup></xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Veloukas et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2011</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272-univ-rev</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GCCATTTCCTTCTTAATCTCCGC</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mrr1_spez_F</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TATCGGTCTTGCAGTCCGC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">442 bp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>mrr1</italic> (&#x00394;L497<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN8"><sup>&#x0002A;5</sup></xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Leroch et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2013</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mrr1-Pira</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CCACCACAATCTTGGATCATTGGGATCAGAACCTGC</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PIRA-Tub1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GCCTCGTTATCGATACAGAAGATC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">132 bp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>tubA</italic> (E198A<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN9"><sup>&#x0002A;6</sup></xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Plesken et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2015a</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PIRA-Tub2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TATGATGGCTACCTTCTCCGTC</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BF2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CAACGTTATGGCACAAAATCTCA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">849 bp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>bos1</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ma et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2007</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BR2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AAGTTTCTGGCCATGGTGTTCA</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN1">
<label>&#x0002A;</label>
<p><italic>Fungicide resistance mutation detected</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN2">
<label>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</label>
<p><italic>Amplicon sizes for B. cinerea and B. pseudocinerea, respectively</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN3">
<label>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</label>
<p><italic>Amplicon size if no intron is present</italic>.</p>
</fn>
<p><italic>The following enzymes were used for digestion of the PCR fragments to detect the indicated mutation</italic>:</p>
<fn id="TN4">
<label>&#x0002A;1</label>
<p><italic>EcoRV</italic>;</p></fn>
<fn id="TN5">
<label>&#x0002A;2</label>
<p><italic>SatI</italic>;</p></fn>
<fn id="TN6">
<label>&#x0002A;3</label>
<p><italic>HhaI</italic>;</p></fn>
<fn id="TN7">
<label>&#x0002A;4</label>
<p><italic>EcoRV</italic>;</p></fn>
<fn id="TN8">
<label>&#x0002A;5</label>
<p><italic>HpyCH4V</italic>;</p></fn>
<fn id="TN9">
<label>&#x0002A;6</label>
<p><italic>BglII</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistics</title>
<p>For statistical analysis of the results, a two-sided unpaired <italic>t</italic>-test was performed (Prism 5 for Windows, Version 5.01).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Multiple fungicide resistance in <italic>Botrytis</italic> strains from different cultures</title>
<p>Gray mold isolates from a variety of host plants were collected and analyzed for their sensitivity or resistance to the main classes of site-specific fungicides with activity against <italic>Botrytis</italic>. Our assays permitted the detection of medium and/or high resistance to all fungicides tested, including the five registered fungicide classes QoI (azoxystrobin or trifloxystrobin), boscalid, fenhexamid, cyprodinil and fludioxonil. In the following, strains with medium and high resistance were rated as resistant. Strains simultaneously resistant to four or all five registered fungicides are referred to as MR (multiresistant) strains.</p>
<p><bold>Raspberries</bold> receive repeated fungicide sprays against <italic>Botrytis</italic> during flowering. Plants are kept either as annual crops or cultivated for 10 years or more, thereby permitting long-term surveys of fungicide resistance development. One such field was planted in 2002 and examined in 2010&#x02013;2015. In 2010 resistance frequencies were below 10% for fenhexamid and fludioxonil and between 15 and 55% for the other fungicides. In the following years, resistance frequencies steadily increased to more than 85% for all fungicides except for benzimidazoles, resulting in an almost completely resistant population (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). In line with this development, strains with 5-fold resistance to all registered fungicide classes were first recorded at harvest 2012 when they comprised 15% of the population, and their share rose dramatically to 87% in 2015 (data not shown). Similar trends were seen in two other raspberry fields (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref>). <bold>Strawberries</bold> are grown in Germany in different cultivation forms for 2 to 3 years. Frequent fungicide treatments are carried out during the flowering period, and high resistance frequencies are common in these fields (Weber, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2011</xref>; Leroch et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2013</xref>). The data shown here are from isolates obtained in the 2013 seasons in six fields in Western and Southern Germany, which had all received four or more sprays with site-specific fungicides. Resistance frequencies approached 100% for all five classes of current <italic>Botrytis</italic> fungicides (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref>). Everbearing strawberries with an extended harvest period from mid-summer to autumn are increasingly being cultivated in Germany for local or regional sale. These cultures are usually sprayed weekly against gray mold, raising an enormous selection pressure on the pathogen. <italic>Botrytis</italic> isolates from a field with everbearing strawberries in Southern Germany in 2014, treated for 8 weeks alternately with cyprodinil &#x0002B; fludioxonil or with fenhexamid, showed very high resistance frequencies. In an untreated plot within the same field, somewhat lower resistance frequencies were observed (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). Isolates from other fields of everbearing strawberries in Northern Germany also showed very high resistance levels, a high proportion of strains possessing 5-fold resistance to all fungicides registered against <italic>Botrytis</italic> (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Changes in frequencies of resistance of <italic><bold>B. cinerea</bold></italic> isolates to seven fungicides over 6 years in a raspberry field in Northern Germany</bold>. Fen, fenhexamid; QoI, trifloxystrobin; Bos, boscalid; Cyp, cyprodinil; Flu, fludioxonil; Ipr, iprodione; Ben, thiophanate-methyl.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-07-02075-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Resistance frequencies of <italic><bold>B. cinerea</bold></italic> isolates from a field of everbearing strawberries in Southern Germany (2014) after eight fungicide treatments, and an untreated control plot</bold>. Significant differences are indicated at <sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05, <sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup><italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01, and <sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup><italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001. Fen, fenhexamid; QoI, azoxystrobin; Bos, boscalid; Cyp, cyprodinil; Flu, fludioxonil. 4R, 5R, Strains with four or five resistances, respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-07-02075-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In the Wine Road Region of Germany, gray mold isolates from <bold>grapevine berries</bold> have been previously found to show moderate resistance frequencies to the registered fungicides (Leroch et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2011</xref>). A survey of isolates harvested in 2011 and 2014 revealed that resistance mainly occurred against QoI, whereas no or rather low levels of resistance existed against the other registered fungicides. Remarkably, the proportion of boscalid resistant isolates had increased from 4 to 35% between 2001 and 2014, probably due to the increased use of this fungicide (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref>). None of the grapevine isolates had accumulated resistance to more than three registered fungicides. To test whether a transfer of MR strains from heavily treated strawberry fields into vineyards could occur, we analyzed a vineyard and an adjacent strawberry field in a fruit growing region in Southern Germany. Resistance frequencies in the strawberry and the grapevine populations were similar and much higher than resistance frequencies observed in the German Wine Road region (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Resistance frequencies of <italic><bold>B. cinerea</bold></italic> isolates from a vineyard and a neighboring strawberry field in Southern Germany (2014)</bold>. Abbreviations are as in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>. <sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup><italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-07-02075-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In Germany, gray mold on <bold>stone fruit</bold> such as cherries and plums is less important than brown rot caused by <italic>Monilinia</italic> spp., and fungicide sprays are less frequent than in soft fruit fields. A long-term survey of a commercial cherry orchard conducted for 6 consecutive years revealed almost no resistance of any of the tested isolates in 2010. In 2011, a sudden increase in resistant isolates and the appearance of MR isolates was observed, which suggested their immigration from another field (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). The elevated resistance levels were largely maintained during subsequent years except for a transient decrease in 2014. Isolates obtained from four other cherry orchards in 2012, 2013, and 2014 showed intermediate to high resistance levels, and between 7 and 33% of strains were resistant to all five registered fungicides (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref>). Isolates from a plum orchard in the same region sampled in 2012 showed high resistance frequencies, with 40% of all isolates being 5-fold resistant (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref>). We also obtained a low number of isolates from tree seedlings raised in a tree nursery in Northern Germany, all of which belonged to the MR type (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Changes in fungicide resistance frequencies in <italic><bold>B. cinerea</bold></italic> isolates over 6 years in a sweet cherry orchard in Northern Germany</bold>. Abbreviations are as in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-07-02075-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p><italic>Botrytis</italic> isolates from <bold>ornamental flowers</bold> were obtained from greenhouses at 50 different sites in Eastern and Southern Germany. Frequencies of fungicide resistance were highly variable (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">S2</xref>). Isolates with 4-fold or 5-fold resistance to current fungicides were recovered from 17 sites. The average fungicide resistance frequencies of flower isolates ranged from 20% against fludioxonil to 75% against QoI (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). Resistance to benzimidazoles was also very common, even though this fungicide has not been in use for many years. Genetic characterization with species-specific PCR primers (Plesken et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2015a</xref>) revealed eight isolates to belong to <italic>B. pseudocinerea</italic>; six of them were sensitive to all fungicides and two were resistant only to benzimidazoles. Isolates belonging to <italic>B. cinerea</italic> groups N and S showed a random distribution, with no evidence of any host preference or differences in fungicide resistance frequencies (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">S2</xref>). In glasshouses for which no fungicide treatments were reported, MR strains were observed at similar frequencies as in the treated locations (data not shown).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p><bold>Average resistance frequencies of <italic><bold>Botrytis</bold></italic> isolates from ornamental flowers from 50 sites (cf. Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">S2</xref>)</bold>. Abbreviations are as in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-07-02075-g0005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Genetic and phenotypic characterization of MR strains</title>
<p>For detailed genetic and phenotypic analysis, 19 MR strains (10 of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> group S and 9 of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> group N) were selected from different fields. Most of these strains were also resistant against iprodione and carbendazim (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). Nine MR strains were able to grow on 1 ppm fludioxonil due the &#x00394;L497 deletion mutation in <italic>mrr1</italic> conferring the MDR1h phenotype; the other MR strains grew on 0.2 ppm due to uncharacterized MDR1-related mutations (Leroch et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2013</xref>). Twenty sensitive strains served as controls, 10 each of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> N and <italic>B. cinerea</italic> S. Analysis of the target genes of the fungicides (except cyprodinil, for which the target site is unknown) revealed common mutations for boscalid (<italic>sdhB</italic>: H272R; H272Y), fenhexamid (<italic>erg27</italic>: F412S, F412I, and T63I), fludioxonil (intermediate resistance due to MDR1h-related mutation &#x00394;L497; Leroch et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2013</xref>), QoI fungicides (<italic>cytB</italic>: G143A), iprodione (<italic>bos1</italic>: I365N, I365S, and V368F/Q369H) and benzimidazoles (<italic>tubA</italic>: E198A and F200Y) (Hahn, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2014</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Resistance mutations and fungicide resistance patterns of multiresistant <italic><bold>B. cinerea</bold></italic> strains</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Strain<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN10"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="6" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Amino acid substitution</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="7" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Resistance</bold><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN11"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="left"><italic><bold>erg27</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><italic><bold>cytB</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><italic><bold>sdhB</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><italic><bold>mrr1</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><italic><bold>bos1</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><italic><bold>tubA</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Fen</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>QoI</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Bos</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Cyp</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Flu</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Ipr</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Car</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-S1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x00394;L497</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">V368F/Q369H</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E198A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000B1;<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN12"><sup>1</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-S2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x00394;L497</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">I365N</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E198A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000B1;<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN12"><sup>1</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-S3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">T63I</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x00394;L497</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">I365N</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E198A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000B1;<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN12"><sup>1</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-S4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x00394;L497</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">I365N</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E198A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000B1;<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN12"><sup>1</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-S7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x00394;L497</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">I365N</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E198A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000B1;<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN12"><sup>1</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-S9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x00394;L497</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">V368F/Q369H</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E198A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000B1;<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN12"><sup>1</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-S11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x00394;L497</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">I365S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E198A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000B1;<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN12"><sup>1</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-S14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x00394;L497</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">V368F/Q369H</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E198A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000B1;<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN12"><sup>1</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-S19</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">n.a.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">V368F/Q369H</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E198A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000B1;<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN13"><sup>2</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-S29</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">n.a.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">I365N</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E198A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000B1;<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN13"><sup>2</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-N1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412I</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272Y</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">I365S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-N2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412I</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272Y</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">n.a.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">I365S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000B1;<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN13"><sup>2</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-N5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-N6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E198A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-N7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272Y</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">n.a.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">I365N</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E198A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000B1;<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN13"><sup>2</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-N8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272Y</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">n.a.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">I365N</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E198A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000B1;<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN13"><sup>2</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-N9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F200Y</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-N10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">n.a.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">I365N</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E198A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000B1;<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN13"><sup>2</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR-N11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F412S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H272R</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN10">
<label>&#x0002A;</label>
<p><italic>Strains MR-Sx belong to B. cinerea group S, strains MR-Nx belong to B. cinerea group N</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN11">
<label>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</label>
<p><italic>Resistance was determined by growth on agar plates containing 5 ppm fenhexamid, 25 ppm azoxystrobin, 7.5 ppm boscalid, 16 ppm cyprodinil, either 0.2 or 1 ppm fludioxonil, 25 ppm iprodione and 5 ppm carbendazim. n.a., not analyzed</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN12">
<label>1</label>
<p><italic>Growth on 1 ppm fludioxonil (MDR1h)</italic>;</p></fn>
<fn id="TN13">
<label>2</label>
<p><italic>Growth on 0.2 ppm fludioxonil (MDR1)</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>For each of the 19 strains shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref> and for 20 sensitive strains, vegetative growth, sporulation, and infection behavior was compared (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>). Radial growth and sporulation efficiency on HA medium were similar for MR and sensitive strains. In the presence of high salt concentrations (1 M NaCl), growth of MR and sensitive strains was inhibited to a similar extent. Unexpectedly, 10 mM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> inhibited sensitive strains significantly more strongly than MR strains. Sclerotia were formed by MR and sensitive strains in variable numbers. To compare the viability of sclerotia, two batches of five sclerotia of each of 19 MR strains listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>, 18 sensitive strains were incubated for 8 months at 10&#x02013;14&#x000B0;C and then tested for survival. All 370 sclerotia, except one sclerotium from an MR strain, germinated and formed a mycelium. When infection tests were performed on detached tomato leaves, average lesion diameters of MR strains were slightly but significantly smaller than those induced by sensitive strains (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6D</xref>). In contrast, lesion formation and sporulation efficiency on inoculated apples were indistinguishable between MR and sensitive strains (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6E</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p><bold>Growth and infection behavior of <italic><bold>B. cinerea</bold></italic> MR and sensitive field strains</bold>. Mean values of 19 MR isolates and 20 sensitive isolates are shown. <bold>(A)</bold> Radial growth on malt extract medium. <bold>(B,C)</bold> Inhibition of radial growth in the presence of 1 M NaCl <bold>(B)</bold> or 10 mM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> <bold>(C)</bold>. <bold>(D)</bold> Lesion development on detached tomato leaves. <bold>(E)</bold> Sporulation efficiency on malt extract agar. Growth and infection assays <bold>(A&#x02013;D)</bold> were evaluated after 72 h, sporulation after 14 d. Significant differences at <sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup><italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01 are indicated.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-07-02075-g0006.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Results of mixed inoculation experiments with MR and sensitive <italic><bold>B. cinerea</bold></italic> strains on wounded apple</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Mixture</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Selection</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Spore germination on selective medium [%]</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Exp. 1</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Exp. 2</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Exp. 3</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mean</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR&#x0002B;MDR1: Sensitive</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fen (10 ppm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72.3&#x000B1;21.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR&#x0002B;MDR1h: Sensitive-S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fen (10 ppm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">76.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80.1&#x000B1;18.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR&#x0002B;MDR1: MR</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Flu (0.2 ppm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.9&#x000B1;38.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MR&#x0002B;MDR1h: MR</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Flu (1 ppm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">68.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64.3&#x000B1;5.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>The following strain mixtures (three strains each) were used: MR&#x0002B;MDR1 (B. cinerea N): MR-N7, MR-N8, MR-N10. MR&#x0002B;MDR1h (B. cinerea S): MR-S4, MR-S9, MR-S14. Sensitive (B. cinerea N): Nsens4, Nsens5, Nsens13. Sensitive-S (B. cinerea S): Ssens1, Ssens2, Ssens3. MR: MR-N1, MR-N5, MR-N11. To each wound, 20 &#x003BC;l of 2 &#x000D7; 10<sup>5</sup> spores/ml were applied, containing a mixture of six (three plus three) B. cinerea strains</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Mixed-inoculation experiments with pairs of sensitive and MR strains of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> on apples</title>
<p>For evaluation of their competitiveness during infection, wounded apples were inoculated with mixtures of three MR and three sensitive strains. We also compared MR strains with and without the MDR1 or MDR1h phenotypes to evaluate the effects of the efflux-based fludioxonil resistance on competitiveness. Conidia recovered from sporulating apple tissue were tested for sensitivity or resistance to a diagnostic fungicide (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). In all experiments, MR strains were at least as competitive as the sensitive strains. Comparison of strain mixtures with and without MDR1 and MDR1h revealed no clear competitive advantage for either group of strains.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Inoculation experiments to evaluate fungicide efficacy against <italic>Botrytis</italic> MR strains</title>
<p>To estimate the loss of efficacy of fungicides against strains with resistance mutations, inoculation experiments of fungicide-treated host tissues were performed. In a laboratory experiment, detached tomato leaves were treated with fungicides and subsequently inoculated with either a sensitive or an MR strain of <italic>B. cinerea</italic>. While all strains induced large expanding lesions in unsprayed leaf tissue after 72 h (not shown), the sensitive strains were almost completely inhibited by all fungicides even at a 1:10 dilution of the recommended dose. In contrast, the MR strains produced almost normal lesions in the presence of fenhexamid and boscalid, but were strongly inhibited by recommended doses of fludioxonil and cyprodinil. In the presence of cyprodinil and/or fludioxonil at 1:10 dilution, MR strains but not the sensitive strains were able to cause lesions (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Infection of fungicide-treated tomato leaves with sensitive and MR strains of <italic><bold>B. cinerea</bold></italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN14"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="10" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Frequency of lesion formation [%]</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Fen</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Bos</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Flu</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Cyp</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Flu</bold>&#x0002B;<bold>Cyp</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Full</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>1:10</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Full</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>1:10</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Full</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>1:10</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Full</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>1:10</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Full</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>1:10</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left">MR</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.3 (&#x000B1;37.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.7 (&#x000B1;27.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.6 (&#x000B1;22.9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.3 (&#x000B1;37.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.6 (&#x000B1;22.9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.8 (&#x000B1;13.8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.6 (&#x000B1;22.9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.2 (&#x000B1;27.6)</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left">Sens</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.3 (&#x000B1;27.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.3 (&#x000B1;27.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN14">
<label>&#x0002A;</label>
<p><italic>Leaves were sprayed with fungicides at recommended doses (full) and 1:10 dilutions and then inoculated with six MR strains (MR-N5, MR-N10, MR-N11, MR-S3, MR-S4, MR-S7) or five sensitive strains (S-N8, S-N9, S-N11, S-S4, S-S10), each with two or three replications. Infections were rated as successful when expanding lesions were observed after 72 h. Standard deviations are shown in parentheses</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The efficacy of fungicide treatments against a sensitive and an MR (MDR1h) strain was also tested with potted strawberry plants cultivated in a greenhouse (2014) and outdoors (2015). In these experiments, plants bearing immature fruits were sprayed with fungicides and subsequently inoculated. To identify the strains, conidia isolated from rotting fruit were tested for their fungicide resistance profiles. Strawberries inoculated with the sensitive strain were infected not only by this strain but also by strains with one or more resistances in 59% and 90% of fruits in the 2014 and 2015 experiments, respectively. In contrast, infections of strawberries inoculated with the MR-S4 strain were caused in &#x0003E;80% (2014) and &#x0003E;90% (2015) of the cases by this strain. After subtracting the infections caused by non-inoculated strains, the differential fungicide efficacies against the sensitive and the MR <italic>B. cinerea</italic> strain were evident in both experiments. Treatments with fenhexamid, boscalid &#x0002B; pyraclostrobin or cyprodinil &#x0002B; fludioxonil led to a significant or complete suppression of gray mold rot. In contrast, none of the three fungicides provided any protection against infection by the MR strain in either experiment (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption><p><bold>Infection rate on strawberries grown in the greenhouse (2014) or outdoor (2015) due to inoculation by a sensitive (S, dashed bars) or a multiresistant (MR, filled bars) <italic><bold>B. cinerea</bold></italic> strain after treatment with Teldor (Tel; fenhexamid), Signum (Sig; boscalid &#x0002B; pyraclostrobin), Switch (Swi; cyprodinil &#x0002B; fludioxonil), or a water control (ctrl)</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-07-02075-g0007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In a survey covering six successive growing seasons we observed high and increasing levels of resistance in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> to all currently used botryticides. These data confirm and extend earlier observations of German <italic>Botrytis</italic> populations from vineyards, strawberries, raspberries and other soft fruits (Leroch et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2011</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2013</xref>; Weber, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2011</xref>). Furthermore, during the past 5 years we have also recorded increasing frequencies of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> strains harboring multiple resistance to most or even all of the currently used fungicides in German horticulture. Similar trends of the accumulation of multiple resistance in <italic>B. cinerea</italic> have been recently reported for strawberries in Greece, the Southeastern USA and China (Amiri et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2013</xref>; Fern&#x000E1;ndez-Ortu&#x000F1;o et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2015</xref>; Konstantinou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2015</xref>; Yin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2015</xref>), blueberries in the Western USA (Saito et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2016</xref>), grapes in Italy (De Miccolis Angelini et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2014</xref>; Panebianco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2015</xref>), tomatoes in Greece and China (Konstantinou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2015</xref>; Liu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2016</xref>), and ginseng in China (Lu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2016</xref>). In this study, we show that multiple resistance is widely distributed in different cultures in Germany, including stone fruits, tree seedlings and ornamental flowers where they have not been reported before. Long-term monitorings in three raspberry fields and a cherry orchard, and comparisons of fields sampled in different years revealed a dramatic increase in the abundance of multiresistant strains on a local as well as national scale. Considering that there were several fields in which resistance frequencies for all fungicides approached 100%, the situation in Germany appears to be at least as dramatic as reports for individual cultures from other countries.</p>
<p>Individual farmers differ strongly in the intensity of their fungicide use, and we have obtained circumstantial evidence that MR strains are most frequent in fields which have been subjected to high fungicide spray intensities for many years (Weber, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2011</xref>; Weber and Entrop, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2011</xref>). For all strawberry and raspberry fields described here, we know from growers&#x00027; records that five or more applications of <italic>Botrytis</italic> fungicides were made annually. In a separate study, we have found that fields restricted to three to four applications generally harbor a lower proportion of strains with resistance to individual fungicides as well as multiple resistance, whereas few if any resistant strains are found in untreated plots (Plesken et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2015a</xref>; Weber, unpublished data). For all other cultures, details of the spraying history were incomplete or lacking altogether, making it impossible to draw correlations between the intensity of treatments and resistance frequencies.</p>
<p>If MR strains of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> are selectively favored by the repeated use of fungicides, how do they reach these intensively treated fields? The first possible explanation is a stepwise accumulation of resistances over time. Our long-term monitoring data in raspberry fields point to this possibility because the first strains with 5-fold multiple resistance were not detected until the third year of our annual survey, but increased in frequency rapidly thereafter. There is evidence that certain strains are particularly competent at developing fungicide resistance because strains with 5-fold resistance to all registered fungicide classes were significantly more likely than non-MR strains to possess resistance to fungicides long phased out, such as benzimidazoles and iprodione (Weber, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2011</xref>). Based on similar observations of non-random accumulation of resistances in individual strains, this phenomenon has been proposed to be due to &#x0201C;selection by association&#x0201D; (Hu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2016</xref>). A second explanation of the appearance of MR strains is their immigration from other fields. On a transnational scale there is evidence that strains with a special form of efflux-mediated resistance in <italic>B. cinerea</italic> (the so-called MDR2 phenotype) have originated in French vineyards and then migrated to Germany (Mernke et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2011</xref>). Our present work has provided evidence for the immigration of MR strains into an established cherry orchard and a vineyard. In the latter case, a nearby strawberry field was the likely source, whereas in the case of the cherry orchard the origin of the MR strains remains unclear. A third possibility is the introduction of MR strains into the fields with nursery plants. We have obtained evidence that the canes of raspberry nursery plants often harbor infections by MR strains of <italic>B. cinerea</italic>, and that these can spread to adjacent fields within one growing season (Weber and Entrop, unpublished data). Nurseries over-using the same fungicide classes that are subsequently deployed by the farmers in their production fields could act as efficient propagators of fungicide resistance.</p>
<p>Ornamental flowers in Germany are usually cultivated in greenhouses where the growing conditions, sensitivity to gray mold infection and the frequencies of sprays against <italic>Botrytis</italic> are very diverse. Consequently, strains ranging from completely sensitive to multiresistant were isolated. The abundance of MR strains of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> appeared to be inversely related to the abundance of the sibling species <italic>B. pseudocinerea</italic>, which is unable to develop resistance to most fungicides and is more prominently found in situations where fungicide use is absent or restricted (Plesken et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2015a</xref>).</p>
<p>Genetic analysis of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> MR strains revealed the commonly found resistance mutations in the target genes of fenhexamid, QoI fungicides, boscalid and cyprodinil. In MR strains of the MDR1h phenotype, the &#x00394;L497 triplet deletion in <italic>mrr1</italic> was found, consistent with previous reports (Leroch et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2013</xref>; Fern&#x000E1;ndez-Ortu&#x000F1;o et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2015</xref>). There was a high diversity of combinations of resistance mutations in German MR isolates, akin to the situation in the United States (Fern&#x000E1;ndez-Ortu&#x000F1;o et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2015</xref>). These and similar fungicide resistance mutations have sometimes been reported to impair the fitness of <italic>Botrytis</italic> isolates in the case of fenhexamid (Billard et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2012</xref>), boscalid (Lal&#x000E8;ve et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2013</xref>; Veloukas et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2014</xref>) and iprodione (Leroux et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2002</xref>) whereas in other studies no fitness reductions were found (Bardas et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2008</xref>; Fern&#x000E1;ndez-Ortu&#x000F1;o et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013</xref>; Amiri et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2014</xref>; Veloukas et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2014</xref>). The availability of strains with simultaneous resistance to most or all of these fungicides provided the opportunity to analyse their combined effects on fitness by performing phenotypic comparisons of MR and sensitive field strains. Our results from laboratory experiments do not provide evidence of any loss of fitness caused by multiple resistance, including the MDR1(h) phenotype. To the contrary, MR strains appeared even more tolerant to oxidative stress. In mixed inoculation experiments, the MR strains were slightly more competitive than the sensitive strains in the absence of selection. In similar studies, MR strains had shown no differences in growth, sporulation and infection, but were significantly impaired in their competitive ability in the absence of fungicide selection pressure (Fern&#x000E1;ndez-Ortu&#x000F1;o et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2015</xref>; Chen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2016</xref>). Owing to the use of different strains, the data from these studies are not directly comparable. However, in general terms we may conclude that <italic>B. cinerea</italic> MR strains have maintained a remarkable fitness, as also indicated by their high abundance in many fields.</p>
<p>Another controversial issue is the effect of fungicide resistance on the performance of the respective fungicides in the field. Our experiments, especially those involving inoculated potted strawberries under conditions approximating the field situation, clearly indicated a nearly complete loss of efficacy of all fungicide groups. The detached-leaf assays confirmed this for fenhexamid, QoI and boscalid, whereas a residual activity was measured for fludioxonil and cyprodinil. This finding correlates with the nature of the efflux-based mechanism underlying the MDR1(h) phenotype of fludioxonil and cyprodinil resistance gives rise to lower resistance factors than most target site mutations (Kretschmer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2009</xref>; Hahn, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Our main conclusions are that MR strains are likely to possess a high fitness in the field and that they are essentially immune to sprays with any of the current botryticides, with the possible exception of the recently released fluopyram (Weber et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2015</xref>). This has obvious implications for practical horticultural production. For example, MR strains directly undermine any attempt to manage fungicide resistance by alternating between different fungicide classes in successive sprays, as advocated by the fungicide resistance action committee (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.frac.info/">http://www.frac.info/</ext-link>). To a certain extent, the problem may have been made worse by the registration of fungicide combination products as botryticides. Products featuring a QoI compound are particularly critical, given that QoI resistance due to the G143A mutation is the most widespread of all types of resistance in <italic>Botrytis</italic> (Weber, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2011</xref>) and other fungi (Gisi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2002</xref>). It is conceivable that the over-use of fungicides against <italic>Botrytis</italic> might actually give a poorer control of gray mold, via the selection of MR strains that are unaffected by any fungicide, than the more modest use of 3&#x02013;4 sprays at flowering. Fungicide resistance tests should be made available to farmers so that they are able to track the resistance status of the <italic>Botrytis</italic> populations in their fields.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>RW, DR, and PD designed research; SR, DR, PD, and RW performed research; SR, RW, and MH analyzed data; MH and RW wrote the paper.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by funds of the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture based on a decision of the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany via the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food under the innovation support program (FKZ 2814705711).</p>
<sec>
<title>Conflict of interest statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack><p>We thank Andreas Kortekamp, Cecilia Plesken, Sibylle Rumsey, Patrick Drelow, Thomas M&#x000FC;ller, and Stefanie Kutz for collecting <italic>Botrytis</italic> field isolates, Gerd Stammler for help with sequencing resistance mutations, and Klaus Klug for assistance with the outdoor experiment.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s7">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02075/full#supplementary-material">http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02075/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table2.docx" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amiri</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heath</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peres</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Phenotypic characterization of multifungicide resistance in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates from strawberry fields in Florida</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>393</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>401</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-08-12-0748-RE</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amiri</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heath</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peres</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Resistance to fluopyram, fluxapyroxad, and penthiopyrad in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> from strawberry</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>532</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>539</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-07-13-0753-RE</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bardas</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Myresiotis</surname> <given-names>C. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Stability and fitness of anilinopyrimidine-resistant strains of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic></article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>443</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>450</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-98-4-0443</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18944193</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Billard</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fillinger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leroux</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lachaise</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beffa</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Debieu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Strong resistance to the fungicide fenhexamid entails a fitness cost in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>, as shown by comparisons of isogenic strains</article-title>. <source>Pest. Manag. Sci.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>684</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>691</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.2312</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22045588</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schnabel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Fitness and competitive ability of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates with resistance to multiple chemical classes of fungicides</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>106</volume>, <fpage>997</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1005</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-02-16-0061-R</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27161219</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De Miccolis Angelini</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rotolo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Masiello</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gerin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pollastro</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Faretra</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Occurrence of fungicide resistance in populations of <italic>Botryotinia fuckeliana</italic> (<italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>) on table grape and strawberry in southern Italy</article-title>. <source>Pest Manag. Sci.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>1785</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1796</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.3711</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24338954</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fern&#x000E1;ndez-Ortu&#x000F1;o</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>F. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schnabel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Resistance to cyprodinil and lack of fludioxonil resistance in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates from strawberry in North and South Carolina</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>81</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>85</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-06-12-0539-RE</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fern&#x000E1;ndez-Ortu&#x000F1;o</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grabke</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schnabel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Independent emergence of resistance to seven chemical classes of fungicides in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic></article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>424</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>432</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-06-14-0161-R</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25317841</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gisi</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sierotzki</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cook</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McCaffery</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms influencing the evolution of resistance to Qo inhibitor fungicides</article-title>. <source>Pest Manag. Sci.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>859</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>867</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.565</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12233175</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grabke</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stammler</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>A <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> population from a single strawberry field in Germany has a complex fungicide resistance pattern</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>99</volume>, <fpage>1078</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1086</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-07-14-0710-RE</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The rising threat of fungicide resistance in plant pathogenic fungi: <italic>Botrytis</italic> as a case study</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Biol.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>133</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>141</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12154-014-0113-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25320647</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Haliassos</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chomel</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grandjouan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kruh</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaplan</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kitzis</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Detection of minority point mutations by modified PCR technique: a new approach for a sensitive diagnosis of tumor-progression markers</article-title>. <source>Nucl. Acids Res.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>8093</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8099</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/17.20.8093</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2573037</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>M.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cox</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schnabel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Resistance to increasing chemical classes of fungicides by virtue of &#x0201C;selection by association&#x0201D; in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic></article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>106</volume>, <fpage>1513</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1520</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-04-16-0161-R</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27503370</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Konstantinou</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Veloukas</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Menexes</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Population structure, fungicide resistance profile, and sdhB mutation frequency of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> from strawberry and greenhouse-grown tomato in Greece</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>99</volume>, <fpage>240</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>248</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-04-14-0373-RE</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kretschmer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mosbach</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fillinger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mernke</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Fungicide-driven evolution and molecular basis of multidrug resistance in field populations of the grey mould fungus <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic></article-title>. <source>PLoS Pathog.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>e1000696</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1000696</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20019793</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lal&#x000E8;ve</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gamet</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Debieu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Toquin</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fillinger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Site-directed mutagenesis of the P225, N230 and H272 residues of succinate dehydrogenase subunit B from <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> highlights different roles in enzyme activity and inhibitor binding</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>2253</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2266</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1462-2920.12282</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24119086</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kretschmer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Fungicide resistance phenotypes of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates from commercial vineyards in South West Germany</article-title>. <source>J. Phytopathol.</source> <volume>159</volume>, <fpage>63</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>65</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1439-0434.2010.01719.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Plesken</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kauff</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scalliet</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Gray mold populations in German strawberry fields are resistant to multiple fungicides and dominated by a novel clade closely related to <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic></article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>159</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>167</lpage> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.02655-12</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23087030</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leroux</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fritz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Debieu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Albertini</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lanen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bach</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms of resistance to fungicides in field strains of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic></article-title>. <source>Pest Manag. Sci.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>876</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>888</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.566</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12233177</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Che</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Multiple-fungicide resistance to carbendazim, diethofencarb, procymidone, and pyrimethanil in field isolates of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> from tomato in Henan Province, China</article-title>. <source>Crop Protect.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>56</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>61</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2016.02.012</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Characterization of resistance to multiple fungicides in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> populations from Asian ginseng in northeastern China</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>144</volume>, <fpage>467</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>476</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-015-0786-5</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Michailides</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Sequence variation in the two-component histidine kinase gene of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> associated with resistance to dicarboximide fungicides</article-title>. <source>Pest. Biochem. Physiol.</source> <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>300</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>306</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pestbp.2007.01.005</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mernke</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dahm</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A.-S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lal&#x000E8;ve</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fillinger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Two promoter rearrangements in a drug efflux transporter gene are responsible for the appearance and spread of multidrug resistance phenotype MDR2 in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates in French and German vineyards</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>1176</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1183</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-02-11-0046</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21679037</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Panebianco</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Castello</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cirvilleri</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perrone</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Epifani</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferrara</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Detection of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> field isolates with multiple fungicide resistance from table grape in Sicily</article-title>. <source>Crop Protect.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>65</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>73</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2015.07.010</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Plesken</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>R. W. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rupp</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015a</year>). <article-title><italic>Botrytis pseudocinerea</italic> is a significant pathogen of several crop plants but susceptible to displacement by fungicide-resistant <italic>B. cinerea</italic> strains</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>7048</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>7056</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01719-15</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26231644</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Plesken</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Westrich</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015b</year>). <article-title>Genetic and phenotypic characterization of <italic>Botrytis calthae</italic></article-title>. <source>Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>128</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>134</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppa.12240</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saito</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Michailides</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Fungicide resistance profiling in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> populations from blueberry in California and Washington and their impact on control of gray mold</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>2087</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2093</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-02-16-0229-RE</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Samuel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Papayiannis</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Veloukas</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of the incidence of the G143A mutation and <italic>cytB</italic> intron presence in the cytochrome bc-1 gene conferring QoI resistance in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> populations from several hosts</article-title>. <source>Pest Manag. Sci.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>1029</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1036</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.2226</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21702077</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Veloukas</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kalogeropoulou</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Markoglou</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Fitness and competitive ability of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> field isolates with dual resistance to SDHI and QoI fungicides, associated with several <italic>sdhB</italic> and the <italic>cytb</italic> G143A mutations</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>347</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>356</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-07-13-0208-R</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24168041</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Veloukas</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Detection and molecular characterization of boscalid-resistant <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates from strawberry</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>1302</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1307</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-04-11-0317</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gatier</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Confais</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martinho</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Viaud</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le P&#x000EA;cheur</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title><italic>Botrytis pseudocinerea</italic>, a new cryptic species causing gray mold in French vineyards in sympatry with <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic></article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>1433</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1445</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-04-11-0104</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21830954</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>R. W. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Resistance of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> to multiple fungicides in Northern German small-fruit production</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>1263</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1269</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-03-11-0209</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>R. W. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Entrop</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Multiple fungicide resistance in <italic>Botrytis</italic>: a growing problem in German soft-fruit production</article-title>, in <source>Fungicides, Book 2</source>, ed <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Thajuddin</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Rijeka</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Intech Publishing</publisher-name>), <fpage>45</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>60</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>R. W. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Entrop</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goertz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mehl</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Status of sensitivity of Northern German <italic>Botrytis</italic> populations to the new SDHI fungicide fluopyram prior to its release as a commercial fungicide</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Dis. Protect.</source> <volume>122</volume>, <fpage>81</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>90</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF03356535</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>R. W. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>A rapid and simple method for determining fungicide resistance in <italic>Botrytis</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Plant Dis. Protect.</source> <volume>118</volume>, <fpage>17</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>25</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF03356376</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamada</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Multiple resistance to QoIs and other classes of fungicides in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> populations from strawberry in Zhejiang Province, China</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>141</volume>, <fpage>169</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>177</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-014-0535-1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>