AUTHOR=Yang Dan , Yin Xinyao , Li Qian , Wang Xin , Gou Junqiang , Liu Mengmeng , Peng Xinman , Xu Zhuxing , Yang Xiao , Jia Wenyan , Tang Haiwen , Zhang Qiuli , Yang Feng , Wang Xiaofeng , Wang Rui TITLE=Machine learning integration identifying an eight-gene diagnostic signature for acute mountain sickness JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine VOLUME=Volume 12 - 2025 YEAR=2025 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1688025 DOI=10.3389/fmed.2025.1688025 ISSN=2296-858X ABSTRACT=BackgroundAcute mountain sickness (AMS) is highly prevalent at high altitudes, with estimated incidence rates ranging from 25 to 90%. However, current AMS diagnosis primarily relies on self-reported questionnaires, highlighting the need for reliable biomarkers. Thus, we aimed to establish a diagnostic model for AMS.MethodsWe applied scRNA-seq (n = 10) and bulk RNA-seq (n = 192) to identify AMS-associated genes. Then, we constructed AMS diagnostic model by machine learning. We also assessed the expression levels of AMS-related gene signatures using Quantitative PCR. Finally, we explored the mechanism of AMS-associated signatures by epigenetic analyses and KEGG pathway enrichment.ResultsWe analyzed cellular heterogeneity through scRNA-seq data, revealing significant enrichment of myeloid (MD) and platelet (PLT) cells during AMS progression. Subsequently, we identified 526 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with the progression of AMS using pseudobulk differential expression analysis on the MD and PLT subsets between the AMS and control groups. We further screened for AMS-associated genes using bulk RNA-seq based differential analysis and WGNCA. Finally, we screened 12 AMS-related genes using scRNA-seq and bulk-RNA-seq data. These genes were utilized as features across 113 distinct combinations of machine learning models to develop an AMS diagnostic model. The model of Stepglm[both] + NaiveBayes (ATP6V0C, BCL2A1, CD52, CSTA, GZMA, HINT1, PFDN5, and RNF11) demonstrated optimal diagnostic accuracy. It obtained an AUC of 0.948 on the training cohort (n = 160) and maintained robust performance on external validation cohorts, with AUCs of 0.818 (GSE103940 = 22) and 0.760 (GSE75665 = 10). Using qPCR, we confirmed that the mRNA levels of the model genes were aligned with the transcriptome data (p < 0.05). Based on the epigenetic analyses, we found the AMS signatures might regulate by the histone and m6A methylation. Furthermore, pathway analysis revealed significant enrichment of these signature genes in immune-related signaling pathways and oxidative stress (adjusted p < 0.05).ConclusionUsing machine learning, we identified and validated a minimal blood biomarker signature for AMS diagnosis. This approach offered a practical approach for the early detection of AMS, especially in resource-limited populations residing in high-altitude regions.