<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<?covid-19-tdm?>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Med.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Medicine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Med.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-858X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmed.2023.1137136</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Medicine</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Construction and validation of a deterioration model for elderly COVID-19 Sub-variant BA.2 patients</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Yinyan</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref><uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1956708/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Benjie</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref><uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2227282/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Jingjing</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref><uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/964122/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Yudi</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Huazheng</given-names></name><xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref><uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1222658/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Zhangwei</given-names></name><xref rid="aff4" ref-type="aff"><sup>4</sup></xref><xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref><xref rid="fn0001" ref-type="author-notes"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Bi</surname> <given-names>Yong</given-names></name><xref rid="aff5" ref-type="aff"><sup>5</sup></xref><xref rid="aff6" ref-type="aff"><sup>6</sup></xref><xref rid="c002" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref><xref rid="fn0001" ref-type="author-notes"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref><uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/664375/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Neurology, Translational Research Institute of Brain and Brain-Like Intelligence, Shanghai Fourth People&#x2019;s Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University School of Medicine</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Shanghai Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Brain Functional Modulation</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Monash Suzhou Research Institute, Suzhou Industrial Park</institution>, <addr-line>Suzhou Jiangsu</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Medical Department, Shanghai Fourth People&#x2019;s Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Siences</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff6"><sup>6</sup><institution>Translational Research Institute of Brain and Brain-Like Intelligence, Shanghai Fourth People&#x2019;s Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University School of Medicine</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn id="fn0002" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Reza Lashgari, Shahid Beheshti University, Iran</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn0003" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Keng Siang Lee, King&#x2019;s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; Pengyue Zhao, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, China</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Zhangwei Yang, <email>shsyyzw@sina.com</email></corresp>
<corresp id="c002">Yong Bi, <email>drbiyong@126.com</email></corresp>
<fn id="fn0001" fn-type="equal">
<p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>These authors have contributed equally to this work</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn0004" fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Infectious Diseases: Pathogenesis and Therapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>13</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>1137136</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>04</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>24</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2023 Wu, Xiao, Xiao, Han, Liang, Yang and Bi.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wu, Xiao, Xiao, Han, Liang, Yang and Bi</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Rationale</title>
<p>COVID-19 pandemic has imposed tremendous stress and burden on the economy and society worldwide. There is an urgent demand to find a new model to estimate the deterioration of patients inflicted by Omicron variants.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Objective</title>
<p>This study aims to develop a model to predict the deterioration of elderly patients inflicted by Omicron Sub-variant BA.2.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>COVID-19 patients were randomly divided into the training and the validation cohorts. Both Lasso and Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify prediction factors, which were then selected to build a deterioration model in the training cohort. This model was validated in the validation cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Measurements and main results</title>
<p>The deterioration model of COVID-19 was constructed with five indices, including C-reactive protein, neutrophil count/lymphocyte count (NLR), albumin/globulin ratio (A/G), international normalized ratio (INR), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) showed that this model displayed a high accuracy in predicting deterioration, which was 0.85 in the training cohort and 0.85 in the validation cohort. The nomogram provided an easy way to calculate the possibility of deterioration, and the decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve analysis (CICA)showed good clinical net profit using this model.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The model we constructed can identify and predict the risk of deterioration (requirement for ventilatory support or death) in elderly patients and it is clinically practical, which will facilitate medical decision making and allocating medical resources to those with critical conditions.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>coronavirus</kwd>
<kwd>COVID-19</kwd>
<kwd>deterioration model</kwd>
<kwd>prognosis</kwd>
<kwd>prediction</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="27"/>
<page-count count="9"/>
<word-count count="5111"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec5000" sec-type="highlights">
<title>Highlights</title>
<p>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Emerging SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.2 threatens patients&#x2019; lives all over the world.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>A new model to estimate the risk of deterioration for patients inflicted by Omicron variants was built using a combination of blood biomarkers.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>The model we constructed can identify and predict the risk of deteriorationin of elderly patients and it is clinically practical.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has continued to overwhelm healthcare systems worldwide. The outbreak of Omicron sub-variant BA.2 in Shanghai in March 2022 has resulted in heavy medical burden to the healthcare system and economy recession (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>). Due to the effective vaccination and variation of the virus, clinical characteristics of Omicron inflicted patients are totally different from those who were infected by COVID 19 when it broke out in Wuhan in 2020 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>). Effective triage of patients presenting to the hospital for risk of progressive deterioration is crucial to inform clinical decision making and to facilitate effective resource allocation, including hospital beds, critical care resources, and targeted drug therapies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>). Since the majority of Omicron sub-variant BA.2 patients show mild symptoms and a low mortality rate, early identification of subgroups of patients at a high risk of death or deterioration and requiring ventilation enables precise delivery of treatments.</p>
<p>Many multivariable clinical prognostic models for patients with COVID-19 have been developed to predict adverse outcomes, such as mortality or clinical deterioration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4 ref5 ref6 ref7">4&#x2013;7</xref>). The deterioration model developed by the International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infections Consortium Coronavirus Clinical Characterization Consortium (ISARIC4C) study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>) has combined 11 predictors to predict clinical deterioration and achieved a good clinical utility (c-statistic&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.77), but the population included both confirmed and suspected COVID-19 patients and the missing data in the study led to the difficulty in integrating important variables into the model, such as D-dimer, which may cause the negligence of the clinical characteristics. Fang et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>) established a prognostic model based on 10 variables, which achieved a good prognostic value (AUC&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.89), but it did not include patients aged &#x2265;89, and it had a decent percentage of missing data. COVID-GRAM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>) established a deterioration model which included 1,590 Chinese patients and combined 10 indicators to build an online free risk calculator, which had a good prognostic value (AUC&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.88), but the mean age of the included population was 48.9&#x2009;years, and it was based on the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020 in Wuhan, China. The end-stage liver disease (MELD)(7) score model included 4,213 COVID-19 confirmed patients, but the model was also based on data collected during the outbreak of COVID-19 in 2020. Due to the difference in multiple respects between the two outbreaks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>), there is a surging demand to build a new model to estimate the risk of deterioration for patients inflicted by Omicron variants.</p>
<p>In the present study, a large cohort of COVID-19 patients with confirmed Omicron variant BA2.2 was utilized to develop a prognostic model for in-hospital clinical deterioration (requirement for ventilatory support or death) and its efficacy was validated in a separate cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7" sec-type="methods">
<title>Methods</title>
<sec id="sec8">
<title>Study population</title>
<p>This research represented a single-center, retrospective study on COVID-19 patients admitted to Shanghai Fourth People&#x2019;s Hospital affiliated to Tongji University between 22nd March and 17th June, 2022. During this time, COVID-19 patients were transferred to our hospital which was utilized exclusively to admit patients who had a positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of Omicron sub-variant BA.2. Patients of different severity were all admitted for treatment in order to reduce negative conversion time of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection was based on the Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (9th version) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>). The inclusion criteria included: patients were over 65&#x2009;years old, and were admitted to the hospital for positive COVID-19 for the first time, and all the regarding data were obtained within the first 24&#x2009;h in the hospital, and they reached the final endpoints during the hospitalization (death, requirement of ventilatory support, or discharged).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>Outcome</title>
<p>A composite primary outcome of in-hospital clinical deterioration, comprising initiation of ventilatory support (non-invasive ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation) and death.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<title>Predictors</title>
<p>Electronic medical records (EMRs) were used to collect patients&#x2019; characteristics, including clinical features, symptoms, comorbidities, laboratory findings, treatments (including antiviral or anti-inflammatory drugs), and outcomes (discharged or death or requirement of ventilatory support), by following the standardized approach to each variable definition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>). All information was documented on a standardized record form.</p>
<p>Those variables were divided into routinely available and laboratory ones. Routinely available predictors included age, gender, comorbidities which were defined on the basis of the modified Charlson comorbidity index (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>). Laboratory measurements included C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte count, platelets (PLT), hemoglobin (HB), RDW-CV (red blood cell distribution width-coefficient variation), Red blood cell count (RBC), Albumin (ALB), Albumin/globulin (A/G), creatinine (Crea), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin (TBIL), &#x03B3;-glutamyltransferase (GGT), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), prothrombin time (PT), thrombin time (TT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), Fibrinogen (FIB), international normalized ratio (INR). Only the first results of measured predictors within 24&#x2009;h of admission were included. These predictors were selected on the basis of literature describing their close association with COVID-19 prognosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>). Predictors were excluded if they had incomplete information in order to minimize the deviation of the regression coefficient.</p>
<p>This study was conducted by complying with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The associated Ethics Committee of Shanghai Fourth People&#x2019;s Hospital approved the study and waived the need for informed consent. The methodology of the study followed the guidelines for transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prediction or diagnosis (TRIPOD) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<sec id="sec12">
<title>Prediction model development</title>
<p>All patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort and a validation cohort (7:3). The predictive model and nomogram were constructed in the training cohort based on baseline characteristics as well as results of the first laboratory tests after admission, and they were then validated in the validation cohort.</p>
<p>Feature selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression method with the R package &#x201C;glmnet&#x201D; to identify the relative importance of each feature. Those important predictors were then entered into the logistic stepwise regression analysis to minimize the variable range. Finally, the coefficients of the logistic regression model were used to construct the prediction model using R &#x201C;glm&#x201D; function. After that, the R &#x201C;rms&#x201D; package was used to build the Nomograms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>).</p>
<p>A common problem should be taken into consideration when comparing laboratory data between institutions is that laboratory values are highly dependent on the methodologies used, and data normalization is needed. In general, results of laboratory tests have normal ranges that enclose 95% of values in a healthy population. When the laboratory values were beyond the testing ability of the lower or upper values of the normal range, we recommended to use the laboratory&#x2019;s upper or lower limits as the value input.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>Model performance assessment</title>
<p>Performance of nomograms was evaluated using discrimination [the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC)], calibration (calibration plots), and clinical applicability [decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve analysis (CICA)] in R. During the internal validation of the nomogram, the total score of each patient in the testing cohort and their corresponding progression probability were calculated according to the established nomogram. Clinical utility was analyzed using the decision curve analysis and clinical impact curve analysis in the R &#x201C;rmda&#x201D; package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>). It was used to measure the net benefit using the prediction model in clinical practice which were compared between the treat-all and the treat-none modes. The concept of net benefit can be hard to understand, it could be interpreted as a hypothetical scenario where the prognostic index was used to decide whether a patient needed to be treated. All analyses were done in R (version 4.1.2).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<p>The selection process of the study population was illustrated in <xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>. A total of 1,830 patients with COVID-19 were enrolled and 575 excluded due to their age younger than 65. Baseline characteristics between the training cohort and the validation cohort were shown in <xref rid="tab1" ref-type="table">Tables 1</xref>, <xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">2</xref>. The average time from PCR confirmation to admission was 2&#x2009;days. Nearly half of them had hypertension (49.5%). The majority of these elderly patients showed mild to moderate symptoms, with a small proportion of them having severe and critical symptoms. Most patients received the Paxlovid (84.5%) and anticoagulation (71.0%) treatments. The proportion of deterioration rate was 11.6%. No difference was observed in above variables between the training cohort and the validation cohort.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Flowchart of the study showing the recruitment process and data analysis as well as modeling.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmed-10-1137136-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Clinical characteristics of the training and the testing cohorts.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Total (<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;1,255)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Training cohort (<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;885)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Testing cohort (<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;370)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Age,median(IQR),yr</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">82(73,89)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">82(73,88)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">82(73,89)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.37</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Sex, <italic>M</italic>, <italic>n</italic>(%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">514(40.9%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">365(41.2%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">149(40.3)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PCR confirmation to hospital admission median (IQR),d</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2(1,5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2(1,5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3(1,5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="5">Comorbidity, <italic>n</italic>(%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Hypertension</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">622(49.5%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">421(47.6%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">201(54.3%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.034</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Diabetes mellitus</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">276(22.0%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">181(20.5%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">95(25.7%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Atrial fibrillation</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">68(0.1%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">47(5.3%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21(5.7%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.90</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Myocardia infarcion</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18(1.4%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14(1.6%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4(1.1%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.67</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Parkinson disease</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">29(2.3%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20(2.3%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9(2.4%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">dementia</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">78(6.2%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">53(6.0%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">25(6.8%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ischemic stroke/TIA</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">260(20.7%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">173(19.5%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">87(23.5%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Peripheral atrial disease</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10(0.8%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7(8.0%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3(8.0%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="5">Severity-A, <italic>n</italic>(%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">No symptom</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">49(3.9%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35(4.0%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14(3.8%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Mild</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">561(44.7%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">399(45.1%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">162(43.8%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.72</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Median</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">511(40.7%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">353(39.9%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">158(42.7%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Severe</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">102(8.13%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75(8.5%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">27(7.3%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.56</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Critical</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">28(2.23%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19(2.1%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9(2.4%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="5">Treatment, <italic>n</italic>(%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Paxlovid</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1,021(84.5%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">717(84.1%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">304(85.6%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Anticoagulation</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">863(71.0%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">616(72.2%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">247(69.6%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Antibacterial drugs</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">359(29.7%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">250(29.3%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">109(30.7%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.68</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Traditional Chinese medicines</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">717(59.4%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">50(59.0%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">214(60.3%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.72</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Steroid</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">147(12.2%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">100(11.7%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">47(13.2%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="5">Outcome, <italic>n</italic> (%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ventilation support /death</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">146(11.6%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">101(11.4%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">45(12.2%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.78</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Continuous variables of skewed distribution were showed as median [interquartile range, IQR] and compared with Mann&#x2013;Whitney test, categorical variables were presented as numbers (percentage) and compared by the chi-square test. Definition of abbreviations: IQR&#x2009;=&#x2009;interquartile range; Severity-A&#x2009;=&#x2009;severity on admission. TIA, transit ischemic stroke.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Laboratory findings at study entry.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Total (<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;1,255)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Training cohort (<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;855)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Testing cohort (<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;370)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="5">Routin blood tests</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Whiet cell count (3.5&#x2013;9.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.13(3.97,6.78)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.15(4.01,6.75)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.04(3.86,6.89)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Neutrophils (1.8&#x2013;6.3)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.20(3.97,6.78)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.18(2.25,4.59)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.35(2.22,4.64)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Lymphocytes (1.1&#x2013;3.2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.19(0.85,1.61)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.21(0.87,1.66)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.14(0.80,1.53)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">NLR</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.59(1.65,4.60)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.52(1.61,4.47)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.85(1.82,4.94)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Monocytes (0.1&#x2013;0.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.43(0.32,0.57)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.43(0.32,0.56)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.43(0.32,0.57)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Platelets (125&#x2013;350)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">167.0<break/>(131.0,214.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">169.0(133.0,215.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">161.0(125.0,202.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">hemoglobin (115&#x2013;150)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">124 (110,134)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">125(110,134)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">123(112,135)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.89</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">RDW-CV (11-16)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.40(13.90,14.20)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.40(12.90,14.20)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.50(12.90,14.20)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.93</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">RBC (3.8&#x2013;5.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.13(3.69,4.51)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.12(3.68,4.51)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.15(3.71,4.51)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.68</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="5">Inflammatory marker</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">CRP (0-6&#x2009;mg/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.49(3.66,31.87)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.16(3.38,31.68)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.04(4.50,32.00)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">IL-6(&#x003C;6.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">34.66(17.21,132.30)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">36.47(17.47&#xFF0C;132.3)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33.03(16.38&#xFF0C;127.83)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">procaicltonin (&#x003C;0.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.02(0.02,0.08)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.023(0.02,0.078)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.022(0.02,0.087)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="5">Coagulation test</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">D-dimmer (&#x003C;0.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.70(0.40,1.40)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.70(0.40,1.43)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.69(0.41,1.2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.97</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PT (9.4&#x2013;12.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.30(10.70,12.10)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.30(10.60,12.10)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.20(10.70,12.00)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.90</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">TT (13&#x2013;21)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.30(13.50,15.20)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.3(13.55,15.25)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.3(13.50,15.10)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">APTT<break/>(23.5&#x2013;40.7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">29.60(27.70,31.80)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">29.60(27.70,31.70)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">29.65(27.70,32.00)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">FIB (2&#x2013;5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.12(3.70,4.57)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.13(3.69,4.59)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.11(3.75,4.55)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.77</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">INR</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.03(0.97,1.10)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.03(0.96,1.10)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.02(0.97,1.09)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="5">Renal and liver function</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Albumin (40&#x2013;55)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">38.47(35.52,41.15)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">38.45(35.46,41.12)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">38.58(35.84,41.27)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.61</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">A/G (1.2&#x2013;2.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.70(1.45,1.95)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.71(1.45,1.97)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.69(1.45,1.93)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">TBIL (&#x003C;23)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.07(8.22,15.52)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.13(8.19,15.47)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.93(8.28,15.56)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.77</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">GGT (10&#x2013;60)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20.96(15.34,31.08)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20.81(15.28,32.03)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21.40(15.42,29.59)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">ALT (9&#x2013;50)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15.77(11.33,23.97)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15.83(11.33,24.21)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15.67(11.46,23.47)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">AST (15&#x2013;40)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24.43(19.35,32.57)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24.52(19.48,32.57)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24.32(19.06,32.53)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.47</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">BUN (3.6&#x2013;9.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.02(4.69,8.07)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.96(4.68,8.10)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.165(4.75,8.045)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Cr (57&#x2013;111)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">62.50(50.90,80.30)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">62.40(50.10,80.40)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">62.55(52.70,80.10)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">GFR (90&#x2013;120)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">96.00(74.00,120.00)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">97.0(74.0,121.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.50(73.0,118.75)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.34</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Continuous variables of skewed distribution were showed as median [interquartile range, IQR] and compared with Mann&#x2013;Whitney test. CRP,C-reactive protein; IL-6,Interleukin-6; WBC,white blood cell count; NLR, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; RDW-CV, red blood cell distribution width-coefficient variation; RBC, Red blood cell count; A/G, Albumin/globulin; Crea, creatinine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TBIL,total bilirubin; GGT, &#x03B3;-glutamyltransferase; GFR, golomeruar filtration rate; PT, prothrombin time; TT, thrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; FIB, Fibrinogen; INR,international normalized ratio Reference ranges for each blood measurement are included in parentheses. All cell counts are &#x00D7;10<sup>9</sup>/L.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<sec id="sec15">
<title>Model development and internal validation</title>
<p>A total of 44 features were collected from each patient in the training cohort which consisted of 855 patients and 29 continuous variables entered for LASSO regression analysis (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figures 2A</xref>,<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">B</xref>). The remaining 8 important variables were then registered with the Logistic regression for deeper selection. Results of 855 patients in the training cohort showed that CRP, A/G, NLR, INR, BUN were predictive factors for clinical deterioration of COVID-19 (<xref rid="tab3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>). Prediction models were then built using the coefficients form the above results.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Construction of prediction nomogram in patients with COVID-19. <bold>(A)</bold> LASSO coefficient profiles (y-axis) of the 45 features. The lower x-axis indicated the log lamda, the top x-axis has the average numbers of predictors. <bold>(B)</bold> Identification of the optimal penalization coefficient (&#x03BB;) in the LASSO model was performed <italic>via</italic> 3-fold cross validation based on minimum criteria. <bold>(C)</bold> Nomogram predicting the deteriorated COVID-19 probability in patients with COVID-19 infection was plotted. <bold>(D)</bold> Decision curve compares the net clinical benefits of three scenarios in predicting the deteriorated COVID-19 probability: treat- all (red line), treat- none (horizontal solid black line), and screen based on the nomogram (red line). <bold>(E)</bold> Clinical impact curve of the nomogram plot the number of COVID-19 patients classified as high risk (red line), and the number of cases classified high risk with deterioration at each high risk threshold (blue line). CRP, C-reactive protein; NLR, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; A/G: Albumin/globulin; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; INR: international normalized ratio; CI, confidence interval.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmed-10-1137136-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Final multivariable model in training dataset.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x03B2; coefficients (95%CI)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Odds ratio (95%CI)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">CRP</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.0097(0.0053,0.01)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.0098(1.0054,1.01)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x003C;0.001&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">A/G</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.85(&#x2212;2.62,1.08)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.158(0.073,0.34)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x003C;0.001&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">NLR</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.061(0.015, 0.11)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.06(1.02, 1.11)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.0102&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">INR</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.54(0.58,2.51)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.69(1.79,12.24)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.0016&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BUN</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.072(0.033, 0.11)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.07 (1.03, 1.12)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.0003&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>CRP, C-reactive protein; NLR, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; A/G: Albumin/globulin; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; INR: international normalized ratio; CI, confidence interval. &#x002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01, &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The predictive nomogram that integrated 5 selected features for the prediction of in-hospital clinical deterioration in the training cohort was shown in <xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2C</xref>. The AUC of the nomogram was 0.85, which showed a good capability of discriminating individuals with clinical deterioration from stable COVID-19 patients (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3C</xref>). Furthermore, the nomogram showed a superior overall net benefit within the wide and practical ranges of threshold probabilities evidenced by the DCA and CICA results (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figures 2D</xref>,<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">E</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Calibration curve (top) and Receiver operating characteristic curves (bottom) of the nomogram. The calibration curve shows the locally estimated (solid line) smoothed observed probability versus estimated probability of deterioration events. The diagonal line (dashed line) shows ideal calibration. <bold>(A)</bold> training cohort, <bold>(B)</bold> testing cohort. The Receiver operating characteristic curves (red line) shows the performance to distinguish individuals with deteriorated COVID-19 from stable COVID-19 in the training cohort <bold>(C)</bold> and testing cohort <bold>(D)</bold>. AUC, area under the curve.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmed-10-1137136-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The internal testing cohort included 370 patients (see <xref rid="tab1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>). The AUC was 0.85 in predicting the deterioration rate (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3D</xref>), indicating a good performance in differentiating the risk of progression in confirmed COVID-19 patients. When ventilation support or death was separately analyszed, the AUC of them was 0.8397 and 0.8355, respectively (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figures 4A</xref>,<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">B</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>The Receiver operating characteristic curves (red line) shows the performance to distinguish individuals who needed ventilatory support <bold>(A)</bold> or those who died <bold>(B)</bold> using the five indicators.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmed-10-1137136-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<title>Calibration of the training cohort and testing cohort</title>
<p>The calibration plot for in-hospital clinical deterioration probability showed a good agreement between the prediction by nomograms and actual observation in the training cohort (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3A</xref>) and validation cohort (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3B</xref>), respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17" sec-type="discussions">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In the present study, a prediction model on the outbreak of Omicron sub-variant BA.2 in Shanghai was built using clinical data from our hospital. It was found that high levels of CRP, NLR, INR, BUN, and decreased A/G at admission were significantly correlated with the probability of clinical deterioration. Using these 5 factors, an effective prognostic nomogram was constructed, which had a significantly high sensitivity and specificity to identify individuals with a high risk of deterioration. DCA and CICA further demonstrated the superiority of our nomogram evidenced by the net clinical benefit, which is invaluable for individualized assessment of in-hospital deterioration. To our best knowledge, this study is the first to build such a prediction model targeting the Omicron sub-variant BA.2. Other available models are based on clinical information of alpha or delta variant breaking out in 2020 or 2021.</p>
<p>From the baseline data, it can be seen that even the elderly in Shanghai showed mild to moderate symptoms although Omicron sub-variant BA.2 is so contagious. The deterioration rate is quite low, which is different from the outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan in 2020 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>). This might be attributed to the free vaccination among the public and strict quarantine policies in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>).</p>
<p>In the present study, continuous variables were used to build the prediction model, rather than categorical variables which are not always reliable and highly dependent on self-awareness. In contrast, laboratory tests are relatively accurate and readily available. High levels of CRP, NLR, INR, BUN, and low level of A/G are positively correlated with the deterioration rate. Compared with previous prediction models where age is always considered a major factor that influences the progression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>), our model did not take age into account. This is due to the observed characteristics in our study and a previous one (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>), all patients were the elderly aged 65 or older. Initially, 1,830 patients were admitted to our hospital, but nearly all of the endpoint events occurred in elderly patients (age&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;65&#x2009;years), only 3 patients had clinical deterioration among 575 patients younger than 65. In order to minimize the bias, we decided to focus on the elderly patients. Besides, age&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;65 is considered to be at highest risk for severe COVID-19 associated illness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>). In this elderly population, age is not an important factor that contributes to the endpoint events.</p>
<p>According to the previous research, the mechanism of COVID-19 infection is associated with inflammatory cytokine storm, oxidative stress, disseminated intravascular coagulation and distribution of ACE2 along the vascular endothelium, which lead to the multisystem dysfunction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>). Correlations between high levels of CRP and NLR and disease progression have been proven in many trials (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>), which have shown that Omicron BA.2 induces an inflammatory process evidenced by the activation of neutrophils and lymphocytes as well as the release of IL-6, CRP, and other inflammatory factors. INR is an index that reflects the functional status of the coagulation system. Increased INR values were significantly associated with COVID-19 severity and mortality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>). BUN reflects the function of the kidney, which has been validated as a significant risk factor of the disease severity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>). The reduced albumin-globulin ratio has been found to be a risk factor of COVID-19 severity in patients with cancer (28), and of great diagnostic significance in predicting the progression to severe disease states (29), which is consistent with our results.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<title>Strengths and limitations</title>
<p>Our study has a number of strengths: first, a large sample size and sufficient patients&#x2019; information guarantees the credibility of our conclusion. All of the included variables had no missing values and all the endpoints were collected during the study period. After the last confirmed COVID-19 patient was discharged, the hospital was closed for full disinfection. Second, our model is a practical quantitative prediction tool based on 5 features which are commonly used and easily obtained from routine blood tests. The performance of our nomogram is efficient for clinical practice. Third, the first-hand information of the Omicron outbreak in Shanghai in 2022 was of great practical use for medical practitioners in other countries where Omicron sub-variant BA.2 prevails.</p>
<p>The study also has a number of limitations. As a retrospective cohort study, we did not collect all the predictors that had been reported to be related to the progression of the disease, such as BMI, pro-BNP. Different clinical approaches were adopted at the early and late stages of this outbreak, full conformity to the recommended treatments is not guaranteed at different stages. Second, this is a single-centre study, and validation was performed in the same setting as the training cohort, an external validation would be much better to prove the effectiveness of the model. Furthermore, the construction of the model was based on hospitalized patients, our conclusion can not be extrapolated to the general population, but needs to be adjusted based on the different population characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19" sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In summary, our data suggest that our nomogram can predict the risk of deterioration (requirement for ventilatory support or death) in elderly patients and it is clinically practical, which will facilitate medical decision making and allocating medical resources to those with critical conditions in order to reduce mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the associated Ethics Committee of Shanghai Fourth People&#x2019;s Hospital approved the study and waived the need for informed consent. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>YB, YW, and ZY designed the initial concept. YB, YW, BX, JX, YH, HL, and ZY participated in acquisition and interpretation of data. YW and ZY performed the statistical analysis. YW, HL, and YB wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec100" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>The authors thank all the patients and their families for their contribution to the study.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention</collab></person-group> <article-title>Weekly. Tracking the Epidemic</article-title> (<year>2022</year>). <comment>Available at: </comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://weekly.chinacdc.cn/news/TrackingtheEpidemic.htm" ext-link-type="uri">https://weekly.chinacdc.cn/news/TrackingtheEpidemic.htm</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yamasoba</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kimura</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nasser</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morioka</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nao</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ito</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron BA.2 spike</article-title>. <source>Cells</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>185</volume>:<fpage>2103</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2115.e19</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.035</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35568035</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiatao</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shufang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rong</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhihong</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xueru</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiongya</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>ACP risk grade: a simple mortality index for patients with confirmed or suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 disease (COVID-19) during the early stage of outbreak in Wuhan, China</article-title>. (<year>2020</year>). <comment>Available at: </comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.20.20025510v1" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.20.20025510v1</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>RK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harrison</surname> <given-names>EM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Docherty</surname> <given-names>AB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Smeden</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Development and validation of the ISARIC 4C deterioration model for adults hospitalised with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. <italic>Lancet</italic></article-title>. <source>Respir Med</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>349</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30559-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33444539</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pius</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buchan</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carson</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drake</surname> <given-names>TM</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO clinical characterisation protocol: development and validation of the 4C mortality score</article-title>. <source>BMJ</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>370</volume>:<fpage>m3339</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/bmj.m3339</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>GB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prytherch</surname> <given-names>DR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meredith</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>PE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Featherstone</surname> <given-names>PI</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The ability of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to discriminate patients at risk of early cardiac arrest, unanticipated intensive care unit admission, and death</article-title>. <source>Resuscitation</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>84</volume>:<fpage>465</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.016</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23295778</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wynants</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Calster</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Collins</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Riley</surname> <given-names>RD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heinze</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schuit</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal</article-title>. <source>BMJ</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>369</volume>:<fpage>m1328</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/bmj.m1328</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wolff</surname> <given-names>RF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moons</surname> <given-names>KGM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Riley</surname> <given-names>RD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whiting</surname> <given-names>PF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Westwood</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Collins</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>PROBAST: a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies</article-title>. <source>Ann Intern Med</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>170</volume>:<fpage>51</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7326/M18-1376</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll2">General Office of the National Health Commission</collab></person-group>. <article-title>Office of National Administration of traditional Chinese medicine. Diagnosis and treatment protocol for COVID-19 (Trial version 9)</article-title> (<year>2022</year>). <comment>Available at: </comment><ext-link xlink:href="http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7653p/202203/b74ade1ba4494583805a3d2e40093d88/files/ef09aa4070244620b010951b088b8a27.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7653p/202203/b74ade1ba4494583805a3d2e40093d88/files/ef09aa4070244620b010951b088b8a27.pdf</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ebell</surname> <given-names>MH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lennon</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tarn</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mainous</surname><given-names>AG</given-names> <suffix>3rd</suffix></name> <name><surname>Zgierska</surname> <given-names>AE</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Development and validation of the COVID-no lab and COVID simple lab risk scores for prognosis in 6 US health systems</article-title>. <source>J Am Board Family Med</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>34</volume>:<fpage>S127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3122/jabfm.2021.S1.200464</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33622827</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Charlson</surname> <given-names>ME</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pompei</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ales</surname> <given-names>KL</given-names></name> <name><surname>MacKenzie</surname> <given-names>CR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation</article-title>. <source>J Chronic Dis</source>. (<year>1987</year>) <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>373</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3558716</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marin</surname> <given-names>BG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aghagoli</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lavine</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marin</surname> <given-names>BG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aghagoli</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lavine</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Predictors of COVID-19 severity: a literature review</article-title>. <source>Rev Med Virol</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/rmv.2146</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Collins</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reitsma</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Altman</surname> <given-names>DG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moons</surname> <given-names>KGM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reitsma</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Altman</surname> <given-names>DG</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement</article-title>. <source>BMJ</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>350</volume>:<fpage>g7594</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/bmj.g7594</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Iasonos</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schrag</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raj</surname> <given-names>GV</given-names></name> <name><surname>Panageas</surname> <given-names>KS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis</article-title>. <source>J Clin Oncol</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>26</volume>:<fpage>1364</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9791</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18323559</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vickers</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elkin</surname> <given-names>EB</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models</article-title>. <source>Med Decis Mak</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>26</volume>:<fpage>565</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0272989X06295361</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17099194</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China</article-title>. <source>JAMA</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>323</volume>:<fpage>1061</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jama.2020.1585</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32031570</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fiolet</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kherabi</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>MacDonald</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghosn</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peiffer-Smadja</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Comparing COVID-19 vaccines for their characteristics, efficacy and effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern: a narrative review</article-title>. <source>Clin Microbiol Infect</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<fpage>202</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmi.2021.10.005</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34715347</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Talic</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shah</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wild</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gasevic</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maharaj</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ademi</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and covid-19 mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>BMJ</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>375</volume>:<fpage>e068302</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/bmj-2021-068302</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>An</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Characteristic of 523 COVID-19 in Henan Province and a death prediction model</article-title>. <source>Front Public Health</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>475</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpubh.2020.00475</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33014973</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Identification and validation of a novel clinical signature to predict the prognosis in confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 patients</article-title>. <source>Clin Infect Dis</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>3154</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cid/ciaa793</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32556293</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Prediction for progression risk in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: the CALL score</article-title>. <source>Clin Infect Dis</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>1393</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cid/ciaa414</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32271369</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smilowitz</surname> <given-names>NR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kunichoff</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garshick</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shah</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pillinger</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hochman</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>C-reactive protein and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19</article-title>. <source>Eur Heart J</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>42</volume>:<fpage>2270</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1103</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33448289</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Dysregulation of immune response in patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China</article-title>. <source>Clin Infect Dis</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>762</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cid/ciaa248</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32161940</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zinellu</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paliogiannis</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carru</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zinellu</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paliogiannis</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carru</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>INR and COVID-19 severity and mortality: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression</article-title>. <source>Adv Med Sci</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>66</volume>:<fpage>372</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.advms.2021.07.009</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34315012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><label>25.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>YY</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>BC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Clinical, radiological, and laboratory characteristics and risk factors for severity and mortality of 289 hospitalized COVID-19 patients</article-title>. <source>Allergy</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>76</volume>:<fpage>533</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/all.14496</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32662525</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><label>26.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with COVID-19 disease severity in patients with cancer in Wuhan, China: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study</article-title>. <source>Lancet Oncol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>893</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>903</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30309-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32479790</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><label>27.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feketea</surname> <given-names>GM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vlacha</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The diagnostic significance of usual biochemical parameters in coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19): albumin to globulin ratio and CRP to albumin ratio</article-title>. <source>Front. Med.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>566591</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmed.2020.566591</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>