Front. Med. Frontiers in Medicine Front. Med. 2296-858X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fmed.2022.840030 Medicine Review Novel Potential Biomarkers for Retinopathy of Prematurity Tan Wei 1 2 Li Bingyan 1 2 Wang Zicong 1 2 Zou Jingling 1 2 Jia Yang 3 Yoshida Shigeo 4 Zhou Yedi 1 2 * 1Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China 2Hunan Clinical Research Center of Ophthalmic Disease, Changsha, China 3Department of Pediatrics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China 4Department of Ophthalmology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan

Edited by: Xiaoyan Ding, Sun Yat-sen University, China

Reviewed by: Ye Liu, Zhejiang University, China; Wencui Wan, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China

 *Correspondence: Yedi Zhou zhouyedi@csu.edu.cn

This article was submitted to Ophthalmology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine

 02 02 2022 2022 9 840030 20 12 2021 12 01 2022 Copyright © 2022 Tan, Li, Wang, Zou, Jia, Yoshida and Zhou. 2022 Tan, Li, Wang, Zou, Jia, Yoshida and Zhou

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is the main risk factor for vision-threatening disease in premature infants with low birth weight. An accumulating number of independent studies have focused on ROP pathogenesis and have demonstrated that laser photocoagulation therapy and/or anti-VEGF treatment are effective. However, early diagnosis of ROP is still critical. At present, the main method of ROP screening is based on binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy. However, the judgment of whether ROP occurs and whether treatment is necessary depends largely on ophthalmologists with a great deal of experience. Therefore, it is essential to develop a simple, accurate and effective diagnostic method. This review describes recent findings on novel biomarkers for the prediction, diagnosis and prognosis of ROP patients. The novel biomarkers were separated into the following categories: metabolites, cytokines and growth factors, non-coding RNAs, iconography, gut microbiota, oxidative stress biomarkers, and others. Biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity are urgently needed for the clinical applications of ROP. In addition, using non-invasive or minimally invasive methods to obtain samples is also important. Our review provides an overview of potential biomarkers of ROP.

 biomarker retinopathy of prematurity metabolites cytokines and growth factors non-coding RNAs gut microbiota oxidative stress biomarkers iconography Changsha Science and Technology Project10.13039/501100019054 Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University10.13039/501100012476 Introduction

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a major cause of vision loss and blindness in children worldwide (1–3). As perinatal oxygen metabolism disorder causes hypoxia-ischemia, the compensatory secretion of pathological angiogenic factors and then the formation of retinal neovascularization contributes to abnormal retinal blood vessel development and even tractional retinal detachment (4–6). Preterm infants have immature retinal tissue, shorter axial lengths and thicker corneas and are more likely to suffer from ROP (7, 8). Epidemiological studies have shown that the incidence of premature newborns is approximately 10%, and infants with lower birth weight and gestational age have a higher incidence and severity of ROP. A total of 65.8% of preterm infants with a birth weight of <1,251 g suffer from ROP to a certain degree; 81.6% of infants with a birth weight of <1,000 g suffer from ROP (9, 10). However, ROP is a largely preventable disease. Reducing the incidence of blindness is related to high-quality newborn care, a comprehensive ROP screening program, and experienced ROP ophthalmologists (11). Laser photocoagulation combined with intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs after early detection is effective (12–14).

At present, ROP screening is based on birth weight and gestational age. Binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO) bedside examination, as well as wide-field fundus imaging system, are widely applied for ROP screening (15, 16). Recently, telemedicine and artificial intelligence-based ROP screening are considered to be more suitable in remote areas that are lack trained ophthalmologists (16–18). However, these screening methods have not been widely implemented, and the judgment of whether the therapeutic treatment is required for ROP infants mainly depends on the clinical experiences of the ophthalmologists (19–21). Furthermore, the molecular diagnostic methods and diagnostic criteria of ROP have not yet been clarified. A balance between the accurate identification of newborns with ROP that need therapy and a reduction in workload is required to save resources and avoid the unnecessary inspection of prematurity (22).

Biomarkers are indicators that are defined as objective measurements and evaluations that are used to evaluate normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, and responses to intervention or exposure (23). Biomarkers are mainly divided into seven categories, including diagnosis, monitoring, drug efficacy/response, prediction, prognosis, safety and susceptibility/risk biomarkers (23, 24). Blood is easy to obtain, and blood draw is a relatively non-invasive method (25). Some diseases have been distinguished using blood-based biomarkers, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) for breast cancer (26, 27) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) for lung cancer (28, 29). In addition to blood biomarkers, biomarkers from urine, feces and cerebrospinal fluid can be used to identify diseases. One such biomarker in the spinal fluid is myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4), which are used to identify neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (30). In the field of ophthalmology, imaging findings and artificial intelligence analysis have been used as biomarkers for prediction and therapy response of choroidal diseases (31–33), and intraretinal cysts can be used for the prognosis of neovascular age-related macular (AMD) disease (34). Our review provides an overview of biomarkers in ROP and summarized in Figure 1.

Novel potential biomarkers for ROP, including metabolites, cytokines and growth factors, ncRNAs, iconography, gut microbiota, oxidative stress biomarkers and others.

 Candidates of Novel Potential Biomarkers Metabolites

ROP is related to hypoxia and nutrient deprivation in the maturation of retinal blood vessels, and regulation of retinal metabolism can prevent pathological angiogenesis. Recent research on the metabolic changes of ROP shows that metabolites can serve as biomarkers (35). Metabolomics affects cell physiology by regulating the genome, epigenome, transcriptome, and proteome (36). A study on targeted blood metabolomics in premature neonates showed that elevated levels of malonyl carnitine (C3DC) and glycine in the blood are promising biomarkers for prediction but cannot judge severity (37). Another plasma metabolomics study on treatment-requiring ROP indicated that altered metabolites may be used as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, including the majority of altered amino acids and their derivatives (38). Further targeted metabolomics research found that plasma citrulline, arginine and aminoadipate were increased in patients with ROP, but creatine was reduced. They are all potential biomarkers (39). The oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) model is an animal model that has been widely used in the study of retinal neovascular diseases and is similar to the pathological process of ROP (40, 41). By analyzing the plasma from an OIR rat model, Lu et al. found that proline and “arginine and proline metabolism” pathways are potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of ROP (42). A prospective study by Nilsson et al. analyzed the changes in serum sphingolipidome in very preterm infants and concluded that a low concentration of sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling lipid is strongly related to severe ROP (43). Lower levels of the ω-6 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid arachidonic acid (AA) are closely related to the development of ROP and is beneficial for the prediction of ROP (44). Table 1 summarizes these metabolism biomarkers.

Metabolites as potential biomarkers for ROP patients.

Sample source Method Potential biomarker Correlation
Infant-blood Targeted metabolomic C3DC and glycine Elevated levels of C3DC and glycine in premature infants are promising biomarkers for ROP prediction, not for severity (37).
Infant-plasma Untargeted metabolomics analysis altered metabolites Altered metabolites may be used as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, especially altered amino acids and their derivatives (38).
Infant-plasma Targeted metabolomics analysis citrulline, arginine,aminoadipate and creatine Citrulline, arginine and aminoadipate in patients with ROP were increased, while creatine was reduced (39).
OIR rat-plasma Untargeted metabolomics analysis proline and “arginine and proline metabolism” pathways Proline and “arginine and proline metabolism” pathways are potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of ROP (42).
Infant-serum Lipid analysis sphingosine-1-phosphate Low levels of the sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling lipid is strongly related to severe ROP (43).
Infant-serum Lipid analysis AA Low levels of AA are closely related to the development of ROP and benefit prediction (44).
Cytokines and Growth Factors

The immune-inflammatory environment before and after delivery of preterm infants may be a crucial factor leading to the progression of ROP (45). Various inflammatory cytokines and chemokines have been extensively investigated, and changes in their levels may be potential candidates for novel biomarkers of ROP. A study indicated that the increase in inflammatory factors (interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8) and angiogenic mediators (endoglin, endostatin and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP)-2) in amniotic fluid is related to the occurrence and development of ROP. The use of these biomarkers in combination with prenatal factors can establish a prenatal prediction pattern of ROP (46). Another similar study suggested that an increase in IL-6 in umbilical cord plasma can predict ROP severity, and the elevated concentration of C5a can be used to assess whether laser treatment is required. Furthermore, the combined application is more accurate in the prediction of ROP development (45). In umbilical cord serum, elevated levels of IL-7, monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), macrophage inflammatory protein 1α (MIP-1α) and MIP-1β contribute to predicting the risk of ROP, while MIP-1β is related to ROP severity (47). High levels of VEGF-Receptor 1, IL-8, matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), erythropoietin (EPO), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) are related to a risk factor for prethreshold ROP in the first three postnatal weeks (48). A similar study showed that IL-6 is significantly increased and IL-17 is decreased on Days 0–3 after birth. On Days 7–21, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) were significantly reduced. IL-18, CRP and NT-4 concentrations were changed in both time periods (49). On Day 28, elevated concentrations of IL-6, TNF-α, TNF-R1/-R2, and IL-8 were related to the risk of ROP (48), and decreased serum levels of EPO was determined to be an independent factor for ROP prediction (50). In the tears of severe ROP, MMP-9 is elevated. Moreover, in the ROP vitreous, MMP9, complement factor H (CFH), C3, C4, IL-1ra, VEGF and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are also increased (51). VEGF is elevated, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) is reduced in the cord blood of ROP patients. Serum IL-33 and endocan could be predictive biomarkers for severe ROP. These serum concentrations were higher and then significantly reduced after laser treatment (52). VEGF, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), IL-10 and IL-12 are elevated in the aqueous humor of ROP patients, and higher levels of VEGF and MIP-1β are independently associated with ROP retreatment (53). At birth, infants with proliferative ROP have a low level of serum IL-5. Ten to 14 days after birth, babies without ROP have higher levels of serum BDNF and RANTES than infants with proliferative ROP (54). At 24 h after birth, the levels of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-α) were increased in children who received ROP therapeutic treatment. However, the concentration of IL-6 was negatively correlated with IGF-1 in ROP infants of 5–8 weeks after birth (55).

IGF-1 is the primary factor involved in the growth of fetal tissues. Under normal circumstances, sufficient levels of serum IGF-1 are required for VEGF-stimulated retinal angiogenesis, but premature delivery causes a sudden decrease in serum IGF-1 levels (56, 57). Clinical studies in the United States (56) and Europe (58) have shown that a low concentration of IGF-1 is related to the subsequent progression of severe ROP, so it is a risk predictor. The early return of IGF-1 to normal levels in premature infants can prevent ROP (59). The critical time for the detection of serum IGF-1 is in the third week after delivery (57). Visfatin is an adipocytokine that has a similar to insulin function and IGF-1 level, and it could be considered to be a predictor of ROP (60). Serum VEGF levels at birth are reduced in premature newborns who develop ROP later and may be an ROP predictor (61). VEGF and stromal cell-derived factor 1α (SDF-1α) are elevated in the vitreous of stage 4 ROP (62). Among the proangiogenic factors in infant tears, angiogenin/VEGF can be used as a potential non-invasive screening biomarker for ROP (63). However, Woo et al. found that inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL12, IFN-γ, and TNF-α) and growth factors (IGF-1 and VEGF) in cord blood samples may not predict ROP (64). Lymphocyte count is negatively correlated with ROP and may have an independent predictive value. However, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is not an independent predictor of ROP (65). Table 2 summarizes the cytokine and growth factor biomarkers.

Cytokines and growth factors as potential biomarkers for ROP patients.

Sample source Method Potential biomarker Correlation
Infant-amniotic fluid ELISA IL-6, IL-8, endoglin, endostatin and IGFBP-2 Inflammatory factors (IL-6 and IL-8) and angiogenic mediators (endoglin, endostatin and IGFBP-2) in amniotic fluid are related to the occurrence and development of ROP (46).
Infant-plasma ELISA IL-6 and C5a High IL-6 levels predict ROP severity, while elevated concentrations of C5a assess whether laser treatment is required. The combined application is more accurate in predicting ROP development (45).
Infant-serum multiplex protein arrays IL-7, MCP-1, MIP-1α and MIP-1β Elevated levels of IL-7, MCP-1, MIP-1α and MIP-1β contribute to prediction of the risk of ROP, and MIP-1β is related to ROP severity (47).
Infant-blood meso scale discovery multiplex platform and microplate detection platform VEGF-R1, IL-8, MMP-9, EPO, TNF-α and bFGF High levels of VEGF-R1, IL-8, MMP-9, EPO, TNF-α and bFGF are related to a risk factor for prethreshold ROP in the first three postnatal weeks. On Day 28, elevated concentrations of IL-6, TNF-α, TNF-R1/-R2, IL-8 are still related to the risk (48).
Infant-blood Multiplex Luminex assay IL-6, IL-17, TGF-β, BDNF, RANTES, IL-18, CRP and NT-4 IL-6 is significantly increased and IL-17 is decreased on Days 0–3 after birth. On Days 7–21, TGF-β, BDNF, and RANTES are significantly reduced. IL-18, CRP and NT-4 were changed in both time periods (49).
Infant-serum ELISA EPO On Day 28, decreased serum levels of EPO were determined to be independent factors for ROP prediction (50).
Infant-vitreous and tear multiplex bead arrays MMP9, CFH, C3, C4, IL-1ra, VEGF and G-CSF In tears of severe ROP, MMP-9 is elevated. In the ROP vitreous, MMP9, CFH, C3, C4, IL-1ra, VEGF and G-CSF are also increased (51).
Infant-blood ELISA VEGF, IGF-1, IL-33 and endocan VEGF is elevated and IGF-1 is reduced in cord blood of ROP patients. Serum IL-33 and endocan could be predictive biomarkers for severe ROP (52).
Infant-aqueous humor multiplex bead assay VEGF, IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-12 and MIP-1β VEGF, IFN-γ, IL-10 and IL-12 in ROP patients are elevated, and higher levels of VEGF and MIP-1β are independently associated with ROP retreatment (53).
Infant-serum multiplex immunoassay IL-5, BDNF and RANTES Infants at birth with proliferative ROP have a low level of serum IL-5. Ten to 14 days after birth, babies without ROP have higher levels of serum BDNF and RANTES than infants with proliferative ROP (54).
Infant-blood human Luminex xMAP assay IL-6, TNF-α and IGF-1 At 24 h after birth, the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α are both increased in children who received ROP treatment, while the concentration of IL-6 is negatively correlated with IGF-1 between 5–8 weeks after birth (55).
Infant-serum ELISA and IGF binding protein-blocked radioimmunoassay IGF-1 A low concentration of IGF-1 is related to the subsequent progression of severe ROP, so it is a risk predictor (56, 58). In addition, the early return of IGF-1 to normal levels in premature infants can prevent ROP (59). The critical time for the detection of serum IGF-1 is in the third week after delivery (57).
Infant-blood Enzyme immunoassay IGF-1 and Visfatin Visfatin is an adipocytokine that has a similar to insulin function and IGF-1 level, and could be considered a predictor of ROP (60).
Infant-blood ELISA VEGF Serum VEGF levels are reduced in premature newborns who develop ROP, and may be a predictor of ROP (61).
Infant-vitreous ELISA VEGF and SDF-1α VEGF and SDF-1α are elevated in the vitreous of stage 4 ROP (62).
Infant-tear fluid multiplex ELISA Angiogenin and VEGF Among the pro-angiogenic factors in the tears of infants, angiogenin/VEGF may be a potential non-invasive screening biomarker for ROP (63).
Infant-blood ABX Pentra DF120/USA biochemical analyzer Lymphocyte count Lymphocyte count is negatively correlated with ROP and may be an independent predictor (65).
Non-coding RNA

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are a type of RNA that does not encode proteins (66). However, they can still affect normal gene expression and participate in physiological and pathological processes through various mechanisms (67–69). Types of ncRNAs include long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), and microRNAs (miRNAs), etc. (70). CircRNA is a single-stranded closed circular ncRNA. Compared to other RNAs, it has a longer half-life, better stability and increased resistance to RNase R, making it a potential biomarker and therapeutic target (71–73). In fact, the expression and function of various circRNAs have been indicated in different cancers (74) and ocular diseases (75). Based on an OIR mouse model, Liu et al. found that the expression of cZNF609 in the retina was largely reduced during the vascular occlusion phase and significantly increased during the neovascularization phase. It combines with miR-615-5p as a miRNA sponge to regulate the gene expression of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (76). MiRNAs are small ncRNAs that can influence gene expression by influencing transcription, translation and epigenetics (77). At present, most studies on miRNAs and ROP are derived from research in animal models (78, 79). Metin et al. (80) performed the first clinical study. Through the analysis of 13 cases of ROP and 15 cases of premature infants without ROP, they found that miR-23a and miR-200b-3p were significantly elevated in premature infants with ROP, while miR-27b-3p and miR-214-3p were reduced. These altered miRNAs could be considered as possible biomarkers of ROP (80). Furthermore, there are some related transcriptomics and bioinformatics analyses that can also provide novel for ncRNA as ROP biomarkers (81–83).

 Oxidative Stress Biomarkers

ROP is a neonatal disease that is associated with oxidative stress. When a premature baby is born, it suddenly changes from a very low oxygen intrauterine environment to an artificial hyperoxia treatment environment. Due to an insufficient antioxidant protection capacity, it is in a state of oxidative stress, and the retina is particularly sensitive to oxidative stress (84, 85). The glutathione status of red blood cells is an indicator of oxidative stress in preterm infants, and it aids in the early identification of children at risk of ROP (86). The acrolein-lysine adduct was elevated in the premature infant group with active retinopathy compared with the preterm group without retinopathy (87).

The levels of 8-hydroxy 2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and malondialdehyde (MDA) are significantly higher in the blood and urine of ROP patients than in non-ROP patients. Based on this correlation, they could be used as screening indicators for ROP (88). In umbilical cord plasma, elevated levels of the oxidative stress biomarker MDA and reduced levels of the micronutrient vitamin A in infants are independent predictors of ROP (89). Other studies also recognized that total oxidative status (TOS) and MDA are satisfactory markers of oxidative stress, which is increased in the ROP group (90). Peroxidant antioxidant balance (PAB) contributes to the incidence of ROP, and the severity of ROP increases with PAB (91).

 Gut Microbiome

Although the human intestine is far from the eye, ophthalmological diseases are related to the regulation of systemic immunity. Emerging investigations into changes in the gut microbiota have been reported with a focus on uveitis (92, 93) and AMD (94, 95), and the concept of the gut-retina axis has emerged (94, 96). The maternal gut microbiota plays a key role in the health of infants (97). We can screen out differentially expressed gut microbes and explore the potential biomarkers of ROP. Such biomarkers could have important clinical significance and application value for the preliminary screening of certain concealed and difficult-to-diagnose ROPs. Westaway et al. suggested that preterm birth-related diseases are associated with the gut microbiome and that α-diversity in ROP infants was significantly reduced (98). Other studies proposed that Enterobacteriaceae species are enriched a few weeks before the diagnosis of ROP, while amino acid synthesis is more abundant in the non-ROP group (99, 100). Changes in the intestinal flora are promising targets for prevention and therapy in ROP patients. Such changes are closely related to metabolites. Therefore, it might be effective to utilize beneficial bacteria or produce antibodies against pathogenic bacteria to prevent or treat ROP in infants.

 Iconography

In some remote regions, telemedicine technology with a digital fundus camera has been used for the screening and diagnosis of ROP (101). The swept-source optical coherence tomography imaging is used to determine the choroidal vascularity index (CVI), which is more sensitive than subfoveal choroidal thickness in assessing related choroidal structural changes in premature infants with a history of ROP. A decrease in CVI indicates impaired choroidal vascular function (102).

 Other Biomarkers

There is significant thrombocytopenia in the blood samples of infants with treatment-requiring ROP, and this could be a predictor of disease progression (103). Platelet mass index is a reliable monitoring indicator for the prognosis of ROP in very premature newborns (104). The percentage of fetal hemoglobin after birth is negatively correlated with the severity of ROP (105). The complete blood count, including low concentrations of hemoglobin, can be a simple screening indicator for ROP; this is especially true for the mean corpuscular hemoglobin (106). Mutations in a Wnt signaling receptor protein (FZD4) gene may be an indicator of ROP (107). High levels of neonatal hemoglobin A1C are a feasible biomarker for proliferative ROP, and low levels of A1C are a feasible biomarker for non-proliferative ROP (108). Elevated plasma E-selection levels and recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) are independent risk predictors for the progression of ROP (109–111). The serine protease HTRA-1 is the basis of protection against preeclampsia-mediated ROP and prevents the occurrence of diseases (112). An increase in the concentration of lactate and a low value for the perfusion index may be early parameters that can be used to predict ROP (113). The lack of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) at 4 weeks after birth may be related to non-proliferative ROP (114). The increase in urinary N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in the early stage of preterm infants (<30 weeks of gestational age) and the NT-proBNP/creatinine ratio can identify the risk of severe ROP (115, 116). However, the changes in NT-proBNP disappear in more mature infants (117). Cluster analysis showed that an early increase in the levels of Parkinson disease protein 7 (PARK7), vimentin, myeloperoxidase (MPO), CD69, and NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO) in plasma is related to a decrease in ROP risk. However, lower levels of tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 4 (TNFRSF4) and higher levels of HER2 and galanin could predict the progression of ROP (118). In addition, a meta-analysis suggested that polymorphisms in the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) I/D may be a genetic biomarker of an increased risk of ROP (119). The mean blur rate (MBR) was higher in OIR rats than in the control group, and it was significantly correlated with avascular area/total retinal area (%AVA) and retinal VEGF, therefore, MBR could be used to assess the severity of OIR (120).

 Comparison of Different Detection Methods

Although various biomarkers are associated with ROP, whether their different detection methods are easy and fast is an important part of determining the feasibility of their final application in premature infants. Premature infants are fragile, and thus, it is highly important to avoid invasive operations, such as obtaining aqueous humor. Less invasive examinations, such as blood tests, are reliable sources of biomarkers, and most of the potential biomarkers we summarized above are also obtained from blood. In addition to collecting plasma or serum, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) could be obtained during the blood examination. PBMCs are an essential part of the immune system. They are related to inflammatory cells and can release a large number of paracrine factors (121–124). They are potentially an important source of biomarkers that are related to cytokines and growth factors. In addition, saliva has been used to determine the level of melatonin in premature infants. No significant difference in the level of melatonin between serum and saliva has been demonstrated, and a high degree of correlation was observed (125). Perhaps these findings can provide new ideas for exploring biomarkers. It is convenient to collect urine. Urine is rich in metabolites and can reflect the total imbalance of all biochemical pathways in the body (126). It is worth further exploring the value of such non-invasive, pain-free and easy-to-obtain samples as potential monitoring, diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in ROP.

 Conclusion

All over the world, the incidence of ROP is increasing in countries that have the technology to save premature infants (127, 128). If patients can be diagnosed in a timely manner, an effective treatment could restore vision. However, regrettably, the diagnosis of ROP depends on pediatric ophthalmologists with a great deal of clinical experience, and this diagnosis has a high degree of subjectivity and variability (129). It is easy to ignore abnormal conditions of the eyes because infants are unable to speak, but it could eventually lead to irreversible vision loss in some cases. Therefore, it is believed that the discovery of effective ROP biomarkers is very important. Reliable and easily available biomarkers will provide considerable information on diseases and aid in the development of new effective therapies (130). With the development of emerging laboratory medical technologies, microfluidic chips (131), proteomics (132) and single-cell technologies (133), also contribute to the exploration of biomarkers, which also deserve to be further revealed in ROP studies. In this review, we summarized several strong potential biomarkers including metabolites, cytokines and growth factors, ncRNAs, gut microbiota, iconography, oxidative stress biomarkers, etc. Since newborns are fragile, these markers should preferably be found in non-invasive and easily accessible samples, such as blood, urine and feces. Those studies and methods might contribute to the identification of effective biomarkers that shed light to the prediction and treatment of ROP.

 Author Contributions

YZ contributed to the conceptualization, design, and outline of this review. WT prepared the draft of the manuscript with tables and figures. BL, ZW, and JZ contributed to the literature search. YJ and SY contributed to the revision and editing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

 Funding

This work was supported by Changsha Science and Technology Project (kq1907075) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (No. 2021zzts1056).

 Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

 Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

The authors would like to thank Prof. Yun Li for important advice regarding the manuscript.

 References Kim SJ Port AD Swan R Campbell JP Chan RVP Chiang MF. Retinopathy of prematurity: a review of risk factors and their clinical significance. Surv Ophthalmol. (2018) 63:618–37. 10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.04.00229679617 Solebo AL Teoh L Rahi J. Epidemiology of blindness in children. Arch Dis Child. (2017) 102:853–7. 10.1136/archdischild-2016-31053228465303 Good WV. Retinopathy of prematurity incidence in children. Ophthalmology. (2020) 127:S82–3. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.11.02632200830 GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators Vision Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. (2021) 9:e144–60. 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-733275949 Hellström A Smith LE Dammann O. Retinopathy of prematurity. Lancet. (2013) 382:1445–57. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60178-623782686 Patel CK Carreras E Henderson RH Wong SC Berg S. Evolving outcomes of surgery for retinal detachment in retinopathy of prematurity: the need for a national service in the United Kingdom: an audit of surgery for acute tractional retinal detachment complicating ROP in the UK. Eye. (2021). 10.1038/s41433-021-01679-8. [Epub ahead of print].34290441 Fierson WM. Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics. (2018) 142:e20183061. 10.1542/peds.2018-306130478242 Kardaras D Papageorgiou E Gaitana K Grivea I Dimitriou VA Androudi S . The association between retinopathy of prematurity and ocular growth. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2019) 60:98–106. 10.1167/iovs.18-2477630640977 Palmer EA Flynn JT Hardy RJ Phelps DL Phillips CL Schaffer DB . Incidence and early course of retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmology. (2020) 127:S84–96. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.01.03432200831 Goldenberg RL Culhane JF Iams JD Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. (2008) 371:75–84. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-418177778 Adams GGW. ROP in Asia. Eye. (2020) 34:607–8. 10.1038/s41433-019-0620-y31582794 Daruich A Bremond-Gignac D Behar-Cohen F Kermorvant E. [Retinopathy of prematurity: from prevention to treatment]. Med Sci. (2020) 36:900–7. 10.1051/medsci/202016333026333 Laveti V Balakrishnan D Rani PK Mohamed A Jalali S. Prospective clinical study of two different treatment regimens of combined laser photocoagulation and intravitreal bevacizumab for retinopathy of prematurity: the Indian Twin Cities ROP study (ITCROPS) database report number 9. Int Ophthalmol. (2020) 40:3539–45. 10.1007/s10792-020-01543-w32776299 Sen P Wu WC Chandra P Vinekar A Manchegowda PT Bhende P. Retinopathy of prematurity treatment: Asian perspectives. Eye. (2020) 34:632–42. 10.1038/s41433-019-0643-431664193 Wu C Petersen RA VanderVeen DK. RetCam imaging for retinopathy of prematurity screening. J AAPOS. (2006) 10:107–11. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2005.11.01916828505 Yonekawa Y Thomas BJ Thanos A Todorich B Drenser KA Trese MT . The cutting edge of retinopathy of prematurity care: expanding the boundaries of diagnosis and treatment. Retina. (2017) 37:2208–25. 10.1097/IAE.000000000000171928541957 Scruggs BA Chan RVP Kalpathy-Cramer J Chiang MF Campbell JP. Artificial intelligence in retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis. Transl Vis Sci Technol. (2020) 9:5. 10.1167/tvst.9.2.532704411 Patel TP Aaberg MT Paulus YM Lieu P Dedania VS Qian CX . Smartphone-based fundus photography for screening of plus-disease retinopathy of prematurity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2019) 257:2579–85. 10.1007/s00417-019-04470-431501929 Chawla D Deorari A. Retinopathy of prematurity prevention, screening and treatment programmes: progress in India. Semin Perinatol. (2019) 43:344–7. 10.1053/j.semperi.2019.05.00631174875 Yu TY Donovan T Armfield N Gole GA. Retinopathy of prematurity: the high cost of screening regional and remote infants. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2018) 46:645–51. 10.1111/ceo.1316029369477 Quinn GE Vinekar A. The role of retinal photography and telemedicine in ROP screening. Semin Perinatol. (2019) 43:367–74. 10.1053/j.semperi.2019.05.01031153621 Mgharbil E Raffa LH Alessa S Alamri A. Screening premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. (2020) 40:87–93. 10.5144/0256-4947.2020.8732241163 Califf RM. Biomarker definitions and their applications. Exp Biol Med. (2018) 243:213–21. 10.1177/153537021775008829405771 Pitkänen A Ekolle Ndode-Ekane X Lapinlampi N Puhakka N. Epilepsy biomarkers - toward etiology and pathology specificity. Neurobiol Dis. (2019) 123:42–58. 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.05.00729782966 Best MG Wesseling P Wurdinger T. Tumor-educated platelets as a noninvasive biomarker source for cancer detection and progression monitoring. Cancer Res. (2018) 78:3407–12. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-088729921699 Dieci MV Miglietta F Griguolo G Guarneri V. Biomarkers for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: beyond hormone receptors. Cancer Treat Rev. (2020) 88:102064. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.10206432622272 Loibl S Gianni L. HER2-positive breast cancer. Lancet. (2017) 389:2415–29. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32417-527939064 Sigismund S Avanzato D Lanzetti L. Emerging functions of the EGFR in cancer. Mol Oncol. (2018) 12:3–20. 10.1002/1878-0261.1215529124875 Hastings K Yu HA Wei W Sanchez-Vega F DeVeaux M Choi J . EGFR mutation subtypes and response to immune checkpoint blockade treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. (2019) 30:1311–20. 10.1093/annonc/mdz14131086949 Thoman ME McKarns SC. Metabolomic profiling in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder biomarker discovery. Metabolites. (2020) 10:374. 10.3390/metabo1009037432961928 Schmidt-Erfurth U Waldstein SM Klimscha S Sadeghipour A Hu X Gerendas BS . Prediction of individual disease conversion in early amd using artificial intelligence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2018) 59:3199–208. 10.1167/iovs.18-2410629971444 Waldstein SM Vogl WD Bogunovic H Sadeghipour A Riedl S Schmidt-Erfurth U. Characterization of drusen and hyperreflective foci as biomarkers for disease progression in age-related macular degeneration using artificial intelligence in optical coherence tomography. JAMA Ophthalmol. (2020) 138:740–7. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.137632379287 Pichi F Aggarwal K Neri P Salvetti P Lembo A Nucci P . Choroidal biomarkers. Indian J Ophthalmol. (2018) 66:1716–26. 10.4103/ijo.IJO_893_1830451172 Ritter M Simader C Bolz M Deák GG Mayr-Sponer U Sayegh R . Intraretinal cysts are the most relevant prognostic biomarker in neovascular age-related macular degeneration independent of the therapeutic strategy. Br J Ophthalmol. (2014) 98:1629–35. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-30518625079064 Tomita Y Usui-Ouchi A Nilsson AK Yang J Ko M Hellström A . Metabolism in retinopathy of prematurity. Life. (2021) 11:1119. 10.3390/life1111111934832995 Rinschen MM Ivanisevic J Giera M Siuzdak G. Identification of bioactive metabolites using activity metabolomics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2019) 20:353–67. 10.1038/s41580-019-0108-430814649 Yang Y Wu Z Li S Yang M Xiao X Lian C . targeted blood metabolomic study on retinopathy of prematurity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2020) 61:12. 10.1167/iovs.61.2.1232049343 Zhou Y Xu Y Zhang X Zhao P Gong X He M . Plasma metabolites in treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity: potential biomarkers identified by metabolomics. Exp Eye Res. (2020) 199:108198. 10.1016/j.exer.2020.10819832828955 Zhou Y Xu Y Zhang X Huang Q Tan W Yang Y . Plasma levels of amino acids and derivatives in retinopathy of prematurity. Int J Med Sci. (2021) 18:3581–7. 10.7150/ijms.6360334522185 Connor KM Krah NM Dennison RJ Aderman CM Chen J Guerin KI . Quantification of oxygen-induced retinopathy in the mouse: a model of vessel loss, vessel regrowth and pathological angiogenesis. Nat Protoc. (2009) 4:1565–73. 10.1038/nprot.2009.18719816419 Vähätupa M Järvinen TAH Uusitalo-Järvinen H. Exploration of oxygen-induced retinopathy model to discover new therapeutic drug targets in retinopathies. Front Pharmacol. (2020) 11:873. 10.3389/fphar.2020.0087332595503 Lu F Liu Y Guo Y Gao Y Piao Y Tan S . Metabolomic changes of blood plasma associated with two phases of rat OIR. Exp Eye Res. (2020) 190:107855. 10.1016/j.exer.2019.10785531669404 Nilsson AK Andersson MX Sjöbom U Hellgren G Lundgren P Pivodic A . Sphingolipidomics of serum in extremely preterm infants: association between low sphingosine-1-phosphate levels and severe retinopathy of prematurity. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. (2021) 1866:158939. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2021.15893933862236 Löfqvist CA Najm S Hellgren G Engström E Sävman K Nilsson AK . Association of retinopathy of prematurity with low levels of arachidonic acid: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. (2018) 136:271–7. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.665829423508 Park YJ Woo SJ Kim YM Hong S Lee YE Park KH. Immune and inflammatory proteins in cord blood as predictive biomarkers of retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2019) 60:3813–20. 10.1167/iovs.19-2725831525777 Woo SJ Park JY Hong S Kim YM Park YH Lee YE . Inflammatory and angiogenic mediators in amniotic fluid are associated with the development of retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2020) 61:42. 10.1167/iovs.61.5.4232446247 Yu H Yuan L Zou Y Peng L Wang Y Li T . Serum concentrations of cytokines in infants with retinopathy of prematurity. Apmis. (2014) 122:818–23. 10.1111/apm.1222324479831 Holm M Morken TS Fichorova RN VanderVeen DK Allred EN Dammann O . Systemic inflammation-associated proteins and retinopathy of prematurity in infants born before the 28th week of gestation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2017) 58:6419–28. 10.1167/iovs.17-2193129260199 Sood BG Madan A Saha S Schendel D Thorsen P Skogstrand K . Perinatal systemic inflammatory response syndrome and retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatr Res. (2010) 67:394–400. 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181d01a3620032809 Yang X Ze B Dai Y Zhu L Chen C. The alteration and significance of erythropoietin serum levels in preterm infants with retinopathy of prematurity. Am J Perinatol. (2017) 34:1020–5. 10.1055/s-0037-160148628395368 Rathi S Jalali S Patnaik S Shahulhameed S Musada GR Balakrishnan D . Abnormal complement activation and inflammation in the pathogenesis of retinopathy of prematurity. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:1868. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.0186829312345 Cakir U Tayman C Yucel C Ozdemir O. Can IL-33 and endocan be new markers for retinopathy of prematurity? Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. (2019) 22:41–8. 10.2174/138620732266619032512024430914019 Lyu J Zhang Q Jin H Xu Y Chen C Ji X . Aqueous cytokine levels associated with severity of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity and treatment response to ranibizumab. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2018) 256:1469–77. 10.1007/s00417-018-4034-529948178 Hellgren G Willett K Engstrom E Thorsen P Hougaard DM Jacobsson B . Proliferative retinopathy is associated with impaired increase in BDNF and RANTES expression levels after preterm birth. Neonatology. (2010) 98:409–18. 10.1159/00031777921063127 Hellgren G Löfqvist C Hansen-Pupp I Gram M Smith LE Ley D . Increased postnatal concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines are associated with reduced IGF-I levels and retinopathy of prematurity. Growth Horm IGF Res. (2018) 39:19–24. 10.1016/j.ghir.2017.11.00629274846 Jensen AK Ying GS Huang J Quinn GE Binenbaum G. Postnatal serum insulin-like growth factor I and retinopathy of. prematurity. Retina. (2017) 37:867–72. 10.1097/IAE.000000000000124732838611 Pérez-Muñuzuri A Fernández-Lorenzo JR Couce-Pico ML Blanco-Teijeiro MJ Fraga-Bermúdez JM. Serum levels of IGF1 are a useful predictor of retinopathy of prematurity. Acta Paediatr. (2010) 99:519–25. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01677.x20085549 Hellström A Engström E Hård AL Albertsson-Wikland K Carlsson B Niklasson A . Postnatal serum insulin-like growth factor I deficiency is associated with retinopathy of prematurity and other complications of premature birth. Pediatrics. (2003) 112:1016–20. 10.1542/peds.112.5.101614595040 Hellstrom A Perruzzi C Ju M Engstrom E Hard AL Liu JL . Low IGF-I suppresses VEGF-survival signaling in retinal endothelial cells: direct correlation with clinical retinopathy of prematurity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2001) 98:5804–8. 10.1073/pnas.10111399811331770 Cekmez F Canpolat FE Çetinkaya M Pirgon O Aydinoz S Ceylan OM . IGF-I and visfatin levels in retinopathy of prematurity. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. (2012) 49:120–4. 10.3928/01913913-20110531-0121634360 Yenice O Cerman E Ashour A Firat R Haklar G Sirikci O . Serum erythropoietin, insulin-like growth factor 1, and vascular endothelial growth factor in etiopathogenesis of retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. (2013) 44:549–54. 10.3928/23258160-20131105-0524221462 Sonmez K Drenser KA Capone A Trese MT. Vitreous levels of stromal cell-derived factor 1 and vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmology. (2008) 115:1065–70. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.05018031819 Vinekar A Nair AP Sinha S Vaidya T Chakrabarty K Shetty R . Tear fluid angiogenic factors: potential noninvasive biomarkers for retinopathy of prematurity screening in preterm infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2021) 62:2. 10.1167/iovs.62.3.233646290 Woo SJ Park KH Lee SY Ahn SJ Ahn J Park KH . The relationship between cord blood cytokine levels and perinatal factors and retinopathy of prematurity: a gestational age-matched case-control study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2013) 54:3434–9. 10.1167/iovs.13-1183723633656 Kurtul BE Kabatas EU Zenciroglu A Ozer PA Ertugrul GT Beken S . Serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in retinopathy of prematurity. J AAPOS. (2015) 19:327–31. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.04.00826239207 Liu Y Liu X Lin C Jia X Zhu H Song J . Non-coding RNAs regulate alternative splicing in cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2021) 40:11. 10.1186/s13046-020-01798-233407694 Mattick JS Makunin IV. Non-coding RNA. Hum Mol Genet. (2006) 15:R17–29. 10.1093/hmg/ddl04616651366 Matsui M Corey DR. Non-coding RNAs as drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. (2017) 16:167–79. 10.1038/nrd.2016.11727444227 Panni S Lovering RC Porras P Orchard S. Non-coding RNA regulatory networks. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. (2020) 1863:194417. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2019.19441731493559 Filardi T Catanzaro G Mardente S Zicari A Santangelo C Lenzi A . Non-coding RNA: role in gestational diabetes pathophysiology and complications. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21:4020. 10.3390/ijms2111402032512799 Jeck WR Sharpless NE. Detecting and characterizing circular RNAs. Nat Biotechnol. (2014) 32:453–61. 10.1038/nbt.289024811520 Memczak S Jens M Elefsinioti A Torti F Krueger J Rybak A . Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature. (2013) 495:333–8. 10.1038/nature1192823446348 Zhou WY Cai ZR Liu J Wang DS Ju HQ Xu RH. Circular RNA: metabolism, functions and interactions with proteins. Mol Cancer. (2020) 19:172. 10.1186/s12943-020-01286-333317550 Lei B Tian Z Fan W Ni B. Circular RNA: a novel biomarker and therapeutic target for human cancers. Int J Med Sci. (2019) 16:292–301. 10.7150/ijms.2804730745810 Zhang C Hu J Yu Y. CircRNA is a rising star in researches of ocular diseases. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2020) 8:850. 10.3389/fcell.2020.0085033015046 Liu C Yao MD Li CP Shan K Yang H Wang JJ . Silencing of circular RNA-ZNF609 ameliorates vascular endothelial dysfunction. Theranostics. (2017) 7:2863–77. 10.7150/thno.1935328824721 Chen L Heikkinen L Wang C Yang Y Sun H Wong G. Trends in the development of miRNA bioinformatics tools. Brief Bioinform. (2019) 20:1836–52. 10.1093/bib/bby05429982332 Chen XK Ouyang LJ Yin ZQ Xia YY Chen XR Shi H . Effects of microRNA-29a on retinopathy of prematurity by targeting AGT in a mouse model. Am J Transl Res. (2017) 9:791–801.28337307 Fan YY Liu CH Wu AL Chen HC Hsueh YJ Chen KJ . MicroRNA-126 inhibits pathological retinal neovascularization via suppressing vascular endothelial growth factor expression in a rat model of retinopathy of prematurity. Eur J Pharmacol. (2021) 900:174035. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.17403533727052 Metin T Dinç E Görür A Erdogan S Ertekin S Sari AA . Evaluation of the plasma microRNA levels in stage 3 premature retinopathy with plus disease: preliminary study. Eye. (2018) 32:415–20. 10.1038/eye.2017.19328960215 Zhao R Qian L Jiang L. Identification of retinopathy of prematurity related miRNAs in hyperoxia-induced neonatal rats by deep sequencing. Int J Mol Sci. (2014) 16:840–56. 10.3390/ijms1601084025561234 Cao M Zhang L Wang JH Zeng H Peng Y Zou J . Identifying circRNA-associated-ceRNA networks in retinal neovascularization in mice. Int J Med Sci. (2019) 16:1356–65. 10.7150/ijms.3514931692917 Peng Y Zou J Wang JH Zeng H Tan W Yoshida S . Small RNA sequencing reveals transfer RNA-derived small RNA expression profiles in retinal neovascularization. Int J Med Sci. (2020) 17:1713–22. 10.7150/ijms.4620932714074 Graziosi A Perrotta M Russo D Gasparroni G D'Egidio C Marinelli B . Oxidative stress markers and the retinopathy of prematurity. J Clin Med. (2020) 9:2711. 10.3390/jcm909271132825796 Stone WL Shah D Hollinger SM. Retinopathy of prematurity: an oxidative stress neonatal disease. Front Biosci. (2016) 21:165–77. 10.2741/438226709767 Oziebło-Kupczyk M Bakunowicz-Lazarczyk A Dzienis K Skrzydlewska E Szczepański M Waszkiewiczz E. [The estimation of selected parameters in antioxidant system in red blood cells in ROP screening of premature infants]. Klin Oczna. (2006) 108:413–5. Tsukahara H Jiang MZ Ohta N Sato S Tamura S Hiraoka M . Oxidative stress in neonates: evaluation using specific biomarkers. Life Sci. (2004) 75:933–8. 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.01.02515193953 Ates O Alp HH Caner I Yildirim A Tastekin A Kocer I . Oxidative DNA damage in retinopathy of prematurity. Eur J Ophthalmol. (2009) 19:80–5. 10.1177/11206721090190011219123153 Agrawal G Dutta S Prasad R Dogra MR. Fetal oxidative stress, micronutrient deficiency and risk of retinopathy of prematurity: a nested case-control study. Eur J Pediatr. (2021) 180:1487–96. 10.1007/s00431-020-03896-x33410943 Banjac L Banjac G Kotur-Stevuljević J Spasojević-Kalimanovska V Gojković T Bogavac-Stanojević N . Pro-oxidants and antioxidants in retinopathy of prematurity. Acta Clin Croat. (2018) 57:458–63. 10.20471/acc.2018.57.03.0831168178 Boskabadi H Marefat M Maamouri G Abrishami M Abrishami M Shoeibi N . Evaluation of pro-oxidant antioxidant balance in retinopathy of prematurity. Eye. (2021) 36:148–52. 10.1038/s41433-021-01465-633649574 Jayasudha R Kalyana Chakravarthy S Sai Prashanthi G Sharma S Tyagi M Shivaji S. Implicating dysbiosis of the gut fungal microbiome in uveitis, an inflammatory disease of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2019) 60:1384–93. 10.1167/iovs.18-2642630938773 Horai R Caspi RR. Microbiome and autoimmune uveitis. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:232. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.0023230837991 Rowan S Jiang S Korem T Szymanski J Chang ML Szelog J . Involvement of a gut-retina axis in protection against dietary glycemia-induced age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2017) 114:E4472–e81. 10.1073/pnas.170230211428507131 Rowan S Taylor A. Gut microbiota modify risk for dietary glycemia-induced age-related macular degeneration. Gut Microbes. (2018) 9:452–7. 10.1080/19490976.2018.143524729431583 Rinninella E Mele MC Merendino N Cintoni M Anselmi G Caporossi A . The role of diet, micronutrients and the gut microbiota in age-related macular degeneration: new perspectives from the gut?retina axis. Nutrients. (2018) 10:1677. 10.3390/nu1011167730400586 Nyangahu DD Jaspan HB. Influence of maternal microbiota during pregnancy on infant immunity. Clin Exp Immunol. (2019) 198:47–56. 10.1111/cei.1333131121057 Westaway JAF Huerlimann R Kandasamy Y Miller CM Norton R Staunton KM . The bacterial gut microbiome of probiotic-treated very-preterm infants: changes from admission to discharge. Pediatr Res. (2021). 10.1038/s41390-021-01888-7. [Epub ahead of print].34887526 Mammas IN Spandidos DA. Retinopathy of prematurity and neonatal gut microbiome: an interview with professor dimitra skondra, associate professor of ophthalmology and vitreoretinal surgeon at the university of chicago (USA). Exp Ther Med. (2020) 20:294. 10.3892/etm.2020.942433209138 Skondra D Rodriguez SH Sharma A Gilbert J Andrews B Claud EC. The early gut microbiome could protect against severe retinopathy of prematurity. J aapos. (2020) 24:236–8. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.03.01032707176 Chan-Ling T Gole GA Quinn GE Adamson SJ Darlow BA. Pathophysiology, screening and treatment of ROP: a multi-disciplinary perspective. Prog Retin Eye Res. (2018) 62:77–119. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.00228958885 Lavric A Tekavcic Pompe M Markelj S Ding J Mahajan S Khandelwal N . Choroidal structural changes in preterm children with and without retinopathy of prematurity. Acta Ophthalmol. (2019). 10.1111/aos.1432434785405 Parrozzani R Nacci EB Bini S Marchione G Salvadori S Nardo D . Severe retinopathy of prematurity is associated with early post-natal low platelet count. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:891. 10.1038/s41598-020-79535-033441659 Korkmaz L Baştug O Özdemir A Korkut S Karaca Ç Akin MA . Platelet mass index can be a reliable marker in predicting the prognosis of retinopathy of prematurity in very preterm infants. Pediatr Neonatol. (2018) 59:455–63. 10.1016/j.pedneo.2017.11.00129223489 Stutchfield CJ Jain A Odd D Williams C Markham R. Foetal haemoglobin, blood transfusion, and retinopathy of prematurity in very preterm infants: a pilot prospective cohort study. Eye. (2017) 31:1451–5. 10.1038/eye.2017.7628548651 Akyüz Ünsal A Key Ö Güler D Kurt Omurlu I Anik A Demirci B . Can complete blood count parameters predict retinopathy of prematurity? Turk J Ophthalmol. (2020) 50:87–93. 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2019.4531333620667 Dailey WA Gryc W Garg PG Drenser KA. Frizzled-4 variations associated with retinopathy and intrauterine growth retardation: a potential marker for prematurity and retinopathy. Ophthalmology. (2015) 122:1917–23. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.05.03626119001 Movsas TZ Muthusamy A. Feasibility of neonatal haemoglobin A1C as a biomarker for retinopathy of prematurity. Biomarkers. (2020) 25:468–73. 10.1080/1354750X.2020.178357332552079 Pieh C Krüger M Lagrèze WA Gimpel C Buschbeck C Zirrgiebel U . Plasma sE-selectin in premature infants: a possible surrogate marker of retinopathy of prematurity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2010) 51:3709–13. 10.1167/iovs.09-472320181841 Suk KK Dunbar JA Liu A Daher NS Leng CK Leng JK . Human recombinant erythropoietin and the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity: a multiple regression model. J AAPOS. (2008) 12:233–8. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.08.00918589385 Manzoni P Memo L Mostert M Gallo E Guardione R Maestri A . Use of erythropoietin is associated with threshold retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in preterm ELBW neonates: a retrospective, cohort study from two large tertiary NICUs in Italy. Early Hum Dev. (2014) 90:S29–33. 10.1016/S0378-3782(14)50009-625220123 Owen LA Shirer K Collazo SA Szczotka K Baker S Wood B . The serine protease HTRA-1 is a biomarker for ROP and mediates retinal neovascularization. Front Mol Neurosci. (2020) 13:605918. 10.3389/fnmol.2020.60591833281553 Tuten A Dincer E Topcuoglu S Sancak S Akar S Hakyemez Toptan H . Serum lactate levels and perfusion index: are these prognostic factors on mortality and morbidity in very low-birth weight infants? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2017) 30:1092–5. 10.1080/14767058.2016.120501927364570 Movsas TZ Paneth N Gewolb IH Lu Q Cavey G Muthusamy A. The postnatal presence of human chorionic gonadotropin in preterm infants and its potential inverse association with retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatr Res. (2020) 87:558–63. 10.1038/s41390-019-0580-831537012 Czernik C Metze B Müller C Müller B Bührer C. Urinary N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide predicts severe retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics. (2011) 128:e545–9. 10.1542/peds.2011-060321824875 Bührer C Erdeve Ö van Kaam A Berger A Lechner E Bar-Oz B . N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide urinary concentrations and retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatr Res. (2017) 82:958–63. 10.1038/pr.2017.17928738027 Berrington JE Clarke P Embleton ND Ewer AK Geethanath R Gupta S . Retinopathy of prematurity screening at ≥30 weeks: urinary NTpro-BNP performance. Acta Paediatr. (2018) 107:1722–5. 10.1111/apa.1435429617052 Markasz L Olsson KW Holmström G Sindelar R. Cluster analysis of early postnatal biochemical markers may predict development of retinopathy of prematurity. Transl Vis Sci Technol. (2020) 9:14. 10.1167/tvst.9.13.1433344058 Gohari M Dastgheib SA Noorishadkam M Lookzadeh MH Mirjalili SR Akbarian-Bafghi MJ . Association of eNOS and ACE polymorphisms with retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. (2020) 39:334–45. 10.1080/15513815.2019.165237831437068 Matsumoto T Saito Y Itokawa T Shiba T Oba MS Takahashi H . Retinal VEGF levels correlate with ocular circulation measured by a laser speckle-micro system in an oxygen-induced retinopathy rat model. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2017) 255:1981–90. 10.1007/s00417-017-3756-028791491 Becker PS Suck G Nowakowska P Ullrich E Seifried E Bader P . Selection and expansion of natural killer cells for NK cell-based immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2016) 65:477–84. 10.1007/s00262-016-1792-y26810567 Chanput W Mes JJ Wichers HJ. THP-1 cell line: an in vitro cell model for immune modulation approach. Int Immunopharmacol. (2014) 23:37–45. 10.1016/j.intimp.2014.08.00225130606 Beer L Mildner M Gyöngyösi M Ankersmit HJ. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell secretome for tissue repair. Apoptosis. (2016) 21:1336–53. 10.1007/s10495-016-1292-827696124 Xiao D Ling KHJ Custodio J Majeed SR Tarnowski T. Quantitation of intracellular triphosphate metabolites of antiretroviral agents in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and corresponding cell count determinations: review of current methods and challenges. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. (2018) 14:781–802. 10.1080/17425255.2018.150055230010446 Bagci S Mueller A Reinsberg J Heep A Bartmann P Franz AR. Saliva as a valid alternative in monitoring melatonin concentrations in newborn infants. Early Hum Dev. (2009) 85:595–8. 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.06.00319616389 Khamis MM Adamko DJ El-Aneed A. Mass spectrometric based approaches in urine metabolomics and biomarker discovery. Mass Spectrom Rev. (2017) 36:115–34. 10.1002/mas.2145525881008 Hartnett ME Penn JS. Mechanisms and management of retinopathy of prematurity. N Engl J Med. (2012) 367:2515–26. 10.1056/NEJMra120812923268666 Reich ES. Pre-term births on the rise. Nature. (2012) 485:20. 10.1038/485020a22552070 Brown JM Campbell JP Beers A Chang K Ostmo S Chan RVP . Automated diagnosis of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity using deep convolutional neural networks. JAMA Ophthalmol. (2018) 136:803–10. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.193431559701 Kaštelan S Orešković I Bišćan F Kaštelan H Gverović Antunica A. Inflammatory and angiogenic biomarkers in diabetic retinopathy. Biochem Med (Zagreb). (2020) 30:030502. 10.11613/BM.2020.03050232774120 Hosokawa K. Biomarker analysis on a power-free microfluidic chip driven by degassed poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Sci. (2021) 37:399–406. 10.2116/analsci.20SCR0433162420 Sobsey CA Ibrahim S Richard VR Gaspar V Mitsa G Lacasse V . Targeted and untargeted proteomics approaches in biomarker development. Proteomics. (2020) 20:e1900029. 10.1002/pmic.20190002931729135 Gohil SH Iorgulescu JB Braun DA Keskin DB Livak KJ. Applying high-dimensional single-cell technologies to the analysis of cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2021) 18:244–56. 10.1038/s41571-020-00449-x33277626