<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Med.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Medicine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Med.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-858X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmed.2021.781206</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Medicine</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Intimal Arteritis and Microvascular Inflammation Are Associated With Inferior Kidney Graft Outcome, Regardless of Donor-Specific Antibodies</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Novotny</surname> <given-names>Marek</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1283187/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Hruba</surname> <given-names>Petra</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/368040/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Kment</surname> <given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Voska</surname> <given-names>Ludek</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Kabrtova</surname> <given-names>Katerina</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Slavcev</surname> <given-names>Antonij</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1317881/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Viklicky</surname> <given-names>Ondrej</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1438896/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Nephrology, Transplant Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine</institution>, <addr-line>Prague</addr-line>, <country>Czechia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Institute of Physiology, First Medical Faculty, Charles University</institution>, <addr-line>Prague</addr-line>, <country>Czechia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Transplant Laboratory, Transplant Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine</institution>, <addr-line>Prague</addr-line>, <country>Czechia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Department of Clinical and Transplant Pathology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine</institution>, <addr-line>Prague</addr-line>, <country>Czechia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>Department of Immunogenetics, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine</institution>, <addr-line>Prague</addr-line>, <country>Czechia</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Minnie M. Sarwal, University of California, San Francisco, United States</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Farsad Alexander Eskandary, Medical University of Vienna, Austria; Lin-Lin Li, Henan Provincial People&#x00027;s Hospital, China</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x0002A;Correspondence: Ondrej Viklicky <email>ondrej.viklicky&#x00040;ikem.cz</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001"><p>This article was submitted to Nephrology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>08</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>8</volume>
<elocation-id>781206</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>22</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>03</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2021 Novotny, Hruba, Kment, Voska, Kabrtova, Slavcev and Viklicky.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Novotny, Hruba, Kment, Voska, Kabrtova, Slavcev and Viklicky</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license></permissions>
<abstract><p><bold>Background:</bold> The prognostic role of intimal arteritis of kidney allografts in donor-specific antibody negative (DSA&#x02013;) antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) remains unclear.</p>
<p><bold>Methods:</bold> Seventy-two out of 881 patients who had undergone kidney transplantation from 2014 to 2017 exhibited intimal arteritis in biopsies performed during the first 12 months. In 26 DSA negative cases, the intimal arteritis was accompanied by tubulointerstitial inflammation as part of T cell-mediated vascular rejection (TCMRV, <italic>N</italic> = 26); intimal arteritis along with microvascular inflammation occurred in 29 DSA negative (ABMRV/DSA&#x02013;) and 19 DSA positive cases (ABMRV, DSA&#x0002B;, <italic>N</italic> = 17). In 60 (83%) patients with intimal arteritis, the surveillance biopsies after antirejection therapy were performed. Hundred and two patients with non-vascular ABMR with DSA (ABMR/DSA&#x0002B;, <italic>N</italic> = 55) and without DSA (ABMR/DSA&#x02013;, <italic>N</italic> = 47) served as controls. Time to transplant glomerulopathy (TG) and graft failure were the study endpoints.</p>
<p><bold>Results:</bold> Transplant glomerulopathy -free survival at 36 months was 100% in TCMRV, 85% in ABMR/DSA&#x02013;, 65% in ABMRV/DSA-, 54% in ABMR/DSA&#x0002B; and 31% in ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B; (log rank <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001). Death-censored graft survival at 36 months was 98% in ABMR/DSA-, 96% in TCMRV, 86% in ABMRV/DSA&#x02013;, 79% in ABMR/DSA&#x0002B;, and 64% in ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B; group (log rank <italic>p</italic> = 0.001). In surveillance biopsies, the resolution of rejection was found in 19 (90%) TCMRV, 14 (58%) ABMRV/DSA&#x02013;, and only 4 (27%) ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B; patients (<italic>p</italic> = 0.006). In the multivariable model, intimal arteritis as part of ABMR represented a significant risk for TG development (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2&#x02013;3.8; <italic>p</italic> = 0.012) regardless of DSA status but not for graft failure at 36 months.</p>
<p><bold>Conclusions:</bold> Intimal arteritis as part of ABMR represented a risk for early development of TG regardless of the presence or absence of DSA. Intimal arteritis in DSA positive ABMR represented the high-risk phenotype.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>antibody-mediated rejection</kwd>
<kwd>intimal arteritis</kwd>
<kwd>kidney transplantation</kwd>
<kwd>vascular rejection</kwd>
<kwd>rejection diagnostics</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="22"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="5288"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) represents a major obstacle in achieving long-term graft function and survival (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>). Its diagnosis is based on histology and detection of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). Overlapping phenotypes and cases with incomplete manifestation represent a considerable part of diagnoses in clinical practice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>).</p>
<p>Intimal arteritis, i.e., v-lesion defined by Banff histological criteria, is a morphologic feature of vascular rejection. It represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge as it is involved in histologic criteria of both T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and ABMR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). Although, previously intimal arteritis was recognized as the rejection phenotype often resistant to steroid treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>), more recently, the association of intimal arteritis with DSA was described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>). Lefaucheur et al. revealed a detrimental impact of intimal arteritis associated with DSA on graft prognosis exceeding other rejection phenotypes, and thus any grade of intimal arteritis has been included in the Banff classification as a histologic feature of ABMR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>).</p>
<p>Almost half of the patients with histological features of ABMR in DSA negative patients do not fit the current Banff classification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>). Intimal arteritis is frequently present in both TCMR and ABMR occurring early after kidney transplantation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>). Although a negative prognostic role of DSA in ABMRV has been well-documented (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>), the outcome of ABMRV in DSA negative patients remains poorly understood. Therefore, in this study, we compared the outcome of intimal arteritis as part of both T cell-mediated vascular rejection (TCMRV) and antibody-mediated vascular rejection (ABMRV) with ABMR without intimal arteritis in patients with and without DSA in terms of premature graft loss and transplant glomerulopathy (TG) development.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Study Design and Population</title>
<p>In this single center retrospective observational cohort study, we evaluated the outcome and clinical relevance of intimal arteritis in the early posttransplant biopsies performed within 12 months from January 2014 to December 2017. For comparison, we retrospectively reviewed medical records of 881 patients who had undergone kidney transplantation at the same time to identify those with histologic features of ABMR in early biopsies and enrolled them for further investigation. Data collection was finalized in January 2021 when all the study subjects reached a 3-year follow-up. Demographics of the study cohort are given in <bold>Table 2</bold> and the enrollment is described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>. All patients signed the informed consent with case or surveillance biopsies and medical data assessment, and the local Ethical Board approved the study under No.: 15-265191A.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Study flowchart. &#x0002A; Including parainfectious changes, tubulointerstitial inflammation in the presence of BKV, and suspected recurrence of glomerulonephritis.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmed-08-781206-g0001.tif"/>
</fig></sec>
<sec>
<title>Histopathology and the Definition of Rejection Phenotype Categories</title>
<p>Kidney allograft biopsies were performed using a percutaneous ultrasound-guided 16G biopsy needle. Diagnoses of acute rejection were established at a median time 70 days after transplantation by for-cause biopsies in 120 (69%) of patients. Fifty-two (31%) rejections were found in protocol biopsies at the third month after transplantation.</p>
<p>Biopsy samples were assessed for Banff scored lesions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>) as glomerulitis (g), peritubular capillaritis (ptc), transplant glomerulopathy (cg), intimal arteritis (v), interstitial inflammation (i), tubulitis (t), mesangial matrix increase (mm), vascular intimal fibrosis (cv), arteriolar hyaline thickening (ah), interstitial fibrosis (ci), or tubular atrophy (ct). The microvascular inflammation (MVI) score was defined as the sum of glomerular (g) and peritubular capillary inflammation (ptc). Immunofluorescence detection of C4d was performed in all cases.</p>
<p>Patients with glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis, intimal arteritis, and/or TG were divided into five groups (TCMRV <italic>N</italic> = 26, ABMRV/DSA&#x02013; <italic>N</italic> = 29, ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B; <italic>N</italic> = 17, ABMR/DSA&#x02013; <italic>N</italic> = 47, ABMR/DSA&#x0002B; <italic>N</italic> = 55) according to the histopathological finding and presence or absence of DSA (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Definition of the rejection phenotype groups.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>g</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>ptc</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>v</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>I</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>t</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>C4d</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>DSA</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TCMRV</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02265;0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02265;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Neg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ABMRV/DSA&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02265;0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02265;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Neg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02265;0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02265;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Pos</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ABMR/DSA&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02265;0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Neg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ABMR/DSA&#x0002B;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02265;0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Pos</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN2"><label>&#x0002A;</label><p><italic>In presence of tubulointerstitial inflammation ptc alone was not evaluated as ABMR criterion</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>T cell-mediated vascular rejection was characterized by intimal arteritis and tubulointerstitial inflammation (TI) in the absence of glomerulitis of rejection origin, C4d, and DSA. ABMRV included features of MVI and C4d (positive or negative) in addition to v-lesion. Patients were further divided according to their DSA status as ABMRV/DSA&#x02013; when DSA were negative and ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B; when DSA were positive. ABMR, defined by the presence of MVI and C4d (positive or negative), were further divided according to DSA status as described above (ABMR/DSA&#x02013;, ABMR/DSA&#x0002B;). Four phenotypes fulfilling criterion 1 (histologic evidence of acute tissue injury) and 2 (evidence of recent antibody interaction with endothelium) of Banff ABMR definition were called histologic ABMR groups.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Anti-HLA Antibody Testing</title>
<p>Identification of circulating donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) was performed by Luminex bead-based assay (One Lambda Inc., Canoga Park, CA, USA). Class I A, B, and class II DR antibodies were evaluated for specificity in all recipients before transplantation. Class II DP and DQ antibodies were evaluated for specificity after transplantation because donors&#x00027; HLA DP or DQ typing was not available at the time of transplantation. DSA positivity at the time of transplantation was revealed in 14 (82%) of the patients with ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B; and 47 (86%) of them with ABMR/DSA&#x0002B;. In the rest of the patients from these phenotype categories, DSA was detected at the time of diagnostic biopsy.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Immunosuppressive Treatment</title>
<p>Patients received maintenance immunosuppression based on tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. All patients received induction treatment. Patients at low risk (<italic>N</italic> = 73) received basiliximab whereas those at high risks, such as retransplants and patients with anti-HLA antibodies or DSA, received rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) (<italic>N</italic> = 49). Patients with DSA positivity (&#x0003C;5,000 MFI) at transplant had undergone plasma exchange (PE) prior to transplantation and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) as additional treatment (<italic>N</italic> = 52). The later described multivariable Cox regression model was adjusted based on induction immunosuppression to eliminate confounding variables.</p>
<p>Patients with rejection were treated by steroid pulses [18 (69%) TCMVR; 8 (28%) ABMRV/DSA&#x02013;; 1 (6%) ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B;; 37 (79%) ABMR/DSA-; 17 (31%) ABMR/DSA&#x0002B;] or rATG [7 (27%) TCMRV; 15 (52%) ABMRV/DSA&#x02013;; 3 (18%) ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B;; 2 (4%) ABMR/DSA&#x02013;, none of ABMR/DSA&#x0002B;] and/or plasmapheresis/IVIG [1 (4%) TCMRV; 6 (21%) ABMRV/DSA-; 13 (77%) ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B;; 5 (11%) ABMR/DSA&#x02013;; 33 (60%) ABMR/DSA&#x0002B;]. Altogether, eight patients were not treated mostly due to concomitant infectious complications.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Surveillance and Subsequent Biopsies</title>
<p>Altogether, 124 patients from the whole cohort underwent at least one biopsy after the diagnostic examination. All patients who experienced intimal arteritis in early biopsies were eligible for surveillance biopsy at 3 months after the first biopsy. After obtaining written informed consent, 60 out of the 72 patients (83%) who experienced intimal arteritis underwent the surveillance biopsy. Patients from ABMR/DSA&#x02013; and ABMR/DSA&#x0002B; groups underwent subsequent biopsies either at the time of center protocol biopsy at the third month or when clinically indicated due to graft function worsening or proteinuria.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical Analyses</title>
<p>Continuous variables were expressed as median and range. Categorical variables were expressed as <italic>n</italic> and percentage of the total. Categorical Banff histologic scores were expressed as count per category. The Chi-square, ANOVA, Kruskal&#x02013;Wallis, and Wilcoxon tests were used for hypothesis testing when appropriate. <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Survival analyses were performed with the Kaplan&#x02013;Meier method using the log-rank test. To identify factors associated with death-censored graft failure and the development of TG, univariable Cox regression was created. For the multivariable model, all variables with <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.1 were selected, and only variables without missing data were included. Data analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 22 (SPSS, Inc. Chicago, IL), R Studio 4.0.3. (2020-10-10), and GraphPad Prism5 (Graph Pad, San Diego, CA).</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Demographics and Clinical Characteristics</title>
<p>In 174 patients, five different rejection phenotypes were identified: 26 TCMRV, 29 ABMRV/DSA&#x02013;, 17 ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B;, 47 ABMR/DSA&#x02013;, and 55 ABMR/DSA&#x0002B; (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). Diabetes, ischemic nephropathy, and glomerulonephritis were the most common original diseases. DSA&#x02013; phenotypes were more common after the first transplantation. DSA positive phenotypes were more frequent in retransplantation. Peak PRA was significantly higher in DSA positive groups. Cohort demographics are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Overview of the baseline characteristics of all rejection phenotype groups.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Total</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>TCMRV</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>ABMRV/DSA&#x02013;</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B;</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>ABMR/DSA-</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>ABMR/DSA&#x0002B;</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>P</italic>-value</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>N</italic> &#x0003D; 174</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>N</italic> &#x0003D; 26</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>N</italic> &#x0003D; 29</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>N</italic> &#x0003D; 17</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>N</italic> &#x0003D; 47</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>N</italic> &#x0003D; 55</bold></th>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Age, yr</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53 (21&#x02013;81)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54 (23&#x02013;70)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56 (23&#x02013;81)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49 (25&#x02013;78)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56 (21&#x02013;71)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48 (23&#x02013;78)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.121</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Gender (female)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62 (36)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8 (31)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11 (38)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5 (29)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15 (32)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23 (42)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.768</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Dialysis vintage, m</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26 (0&#x02013;263)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20 (0&#x02013;263)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25 (0&#x02013;118)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32 (0&#x02013;131)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21 (0&#x02013;128)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38 (0&#x02013;139)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.046</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>PRA max, %</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7 (0&#x02013;100)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 (0&#x02013;69)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 (0&#x02013;22)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34 (0&#x02013;100)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3 (0&#x02013;98)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32 (0&#x02013;100)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.001</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>HLA mismatch</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3 (0&#x02013;6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4 (1&#x02013;6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3 (0&#x02013;6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4 (2&#x02013;6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3 (0&#x02013;6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3 (1&#x02013;6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>1st transplantation</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">123 (71)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24 (92)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27 (93)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8 (47)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45 (96)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19 (35)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.001</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>DSA at Tx</bold>, <italic><bold>n</bold></italic> <bold>(%)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61 (35)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14 (82)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47 (86)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.756<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DSA class I, <italic>n</italic> (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23 (13)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3 (18)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20 (36)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.148<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DSA class II, <italic>n</italic> (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28 (16)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8 (46)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20 (36)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.720<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DSA both classes, <italic>n</italic> (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21 (12)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6 (36)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15 (28)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.525<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FACS T at biopsy</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">104/19 (18)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14/2 (14)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26/3 (12)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14/3 (21)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32/10 (31)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.001</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FACS B at biopsy</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">104/31 (29)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14/1 (7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14/8 (57)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18/1 (5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32/21 (65)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.001</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Cold ischemia, h</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14 (0.3&#x02013;24)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13 (0.3&#x02013;21)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13 (0.3&#x02013;20)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16 (0.5&#x02013;23)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14 (0.5&#x02013;23)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15 (0.6&#x02013;24)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Deceased donor</bold>, <italic><bold>n</bold></italic> <bold>(%)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">146 (84)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17 (65)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23 (79)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15 (88)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39 (83)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52 (95)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.018</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>CKD diagnosis</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.039</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Diabetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23 (13)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3 (12)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6 (21)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 (12)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11 (23)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (2)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vascular &#x0002B; TIN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41 (24)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10 (39)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8 (28)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5 (29)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6 (13)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12 (22)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Glomerulonephritis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50 (29)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4 (15)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5 (17)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5 (29)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14 (30)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22 (40)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hereditary nephropathy</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35 (20)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6 (23)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5 (17)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8 (17)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15 (27)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Other</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25 (14)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3 (12)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5 (17)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4 (24)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8 (17)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5 (9)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Induction therapy</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.001</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Basiliximab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73 (42)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17 (65)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22 (76)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 (12)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28 (60)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4 (7)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">rATG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49 (28)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8 (31)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7 (24)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7 (41)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15 (32)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12 (22)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">rATG, PE, IVIG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52 (30)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8 (47)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4 (8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39 (71)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Maintenance IS</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Tac/MMf/steroids</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">163 (94)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25 (96)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25 (86)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15 (88)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44 (94)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54 (98)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.058</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Time of diagnosis, d</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">70 (2&#x02013;357)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74 (3&#x02013;204)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30 (5&#x02013;357)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24 (7&#x02013;351)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80 (2&#x02013;301)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61 (5&#x02013;323)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.976</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>For&#x02013;cause biopsy</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">120 (69)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17 (65)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25 (86)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16 (94)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26 (55)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36 (66)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.009</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Treatment of rejection</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.001</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Methylprednisolone</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18 (69)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8 (28)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37 (79)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17 (31)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">rATG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7 (27)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15 (52)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3 (18)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 (4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PE, IVIG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6 (21)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13 (76)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5 (11)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33 (60)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3 (6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5 (9)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN1"><label>&#x0002A;</label><p><italic>Comparing ABMR/DSA&#x0002B; and ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B; rejection phenotypes</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Surveillance Biopsies</title>
<p>Surveillance biopsies at 3 months after vascular rejection diagnosis were performed in 21 out of 26 patients (81%) with TCMRV, 24 out of 29 (83%) patients with DSA negative ABMRV, 15 out of 17 (88%) patients with DSA positive ABMRV. At case biopsy, DSA negative patients with ABMRV did not differ from DSA positive ABMRV patients in any of the histologic scores, indicating acute inflammation (g, ptc, i, t, v). The only significant difference was the intensity of C4d (<italic>p</italic> = 0.003). Surveillance biopsies revealed the resolution of rejection in 19 (90%) TCMRV cases, 14 (58%) ABMRV/DSA- cases, and only four (27%) ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B; cases (<italic>p</italic> = 0.006). When comparing case and surveillance biopsies, patients with TCMRV had significantly improved i, t, and v scores, and DSA&#x02013; patients with ABMRV had significantly improved in g, ptc, i, t, and v scores; however, in DSA&#x0002B; ABMRV cases, only the v-score had improved (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>The development of Banff score between diagnostic (dg biopsy) and rebiopsies in a subgroup of patients with consented rebiopsies. <bold>(A)</bold> TCMRV (<italic>n</italic> = 21) <bold>(B)</bold> ABMRV DSA&#x02013; (<italic>n</italic> = 22) and <bold>(C)</bold> ABMRV DSA&#x0002B; (<italic>n</italic> = 15). Differences were calculated by Wilcoxon matched-paired signed rank test. &#x0002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05, &#x0002A;&#x0002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01, and &#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmed-08-781206-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Comparison of Banff scores between diagnostic and surveillance biopsies for patients with intimal arteritis.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>TCMRV</bold></th>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>ABMRV/DSA&#x02013;</bold></th>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B;</bold></th>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Diagnostic biopsy</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Rebiopsy</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>P</italic>&#x02013;value</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Diagnostic biopsy</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Rebiopsy</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>P</italic>&#x02013;value</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Diagnostic biopsy</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Rebiopsy</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>P</italic>-value</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">g</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25/1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18/0/1/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.655</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7/7/9/6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15/5/1/1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.001</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6/7/3/1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7/1/5/2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.566</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ptc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24/1/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19/0/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.000</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14/3/10/2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20/2/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.015</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11/1/5/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11/0/4/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.705</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">i</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12/9/3/2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14/4/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.005</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14/3/8/4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19/2/1/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.021</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10/3/4/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13/2/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.045</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">t</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11/4/4/7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11/5/1/1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.010</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6/8/6/9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16/2/1/3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.018</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9/3/1/4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10/4/1/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.075</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ti</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11/9/4/2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13/4/1/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.020</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/8/13/5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14/3/4/1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.028</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6/4/3/4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5/6/1/3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.928</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0/19/6/1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18/0/1/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.001</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0/20/9/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20/2/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.001</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0/14/2/1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12/3/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.003</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ci</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7/19/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/15/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.705</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5/20/3/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5/11/6/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.405</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6/11/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/11/1/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.102</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ct</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4/21/1/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0/19/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.000</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1/24/3/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/13/6/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.480</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0/17/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0/14/1/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.317</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">cg</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25/1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19/0/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.317</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26/1/2/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16/4/2/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.180</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15/2/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8/4/2/1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.015</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">cv</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/16/5/2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2/12/3/3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.000</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5/12/9/2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1/15/3/2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.439</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/6/6/2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4/5/5/1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.565</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ah</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1/21/4/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/10/5/1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.739</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/17/8/1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/14/5/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.527</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4/6/7/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1/9/5/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.608</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C4d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20/5/0/1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN4"><sup>&#x00023;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16/4/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.366</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20/6/2/1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18/3/1/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.317</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5/2/2/8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4/4/3/4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.336</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">IF/TA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7/17/1/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/15/0/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.527</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5/20/3/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5/11/6/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.405</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6/10/1/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3/11/1/0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.257</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Differences were calculated by the Wilcoxon matched&#x02013;paired signed&#x02013;rank test</italic>.</p>
<fn id="TN3"><label>&#x0002A;</label><p><italic>Suspicious for recurrence of the original disease</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN4"><label>&#x00023;</label><p><italic>ABO incompatible transplantation, assumption of accommodation</italic>.</p></fn>
<p><italic>Bold P-values represent statistic significance below 0.05</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Development of TG</title>
<p>Significant differences between ABMR rejection phenotypes were found when we studied the development of the TG. For cause and surveillance, biopsies at the 3-year follow-up were included in the analysis. Estimate of the cumulative proportion of patients without TG (TG-free survival) at 36 months was 100% in TCMRV, 85% in ABMR/DSA-, 65% in ABMRV/DSA&#x02013;, 54% in ABMR/DSA&#x0002B;, and 31% ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B; (log rank <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001). Pairwise comparisons showed a significantly longer time to TG in the TCMRV group than in other groups (log rank <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05). Interestingly, DSA&#x02013; ABMRV patients had a significantly shorter time to TG development than DSA&#x02013; ABMR patients (mean for survival time without TG was 26 and 32 months, respectively) (log rank <italic>p</italic> = 0.035) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Kaplan&#x02013;Meier analysis of TG-free interval according to rejection phenotype.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmed-08-781206-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Cox regression models were performed to identify risk factors for the development of TG in patients with histologic ABMR. Risk factors identified in the univariable analysis were included in the multivariable model (retransplantation status, DSA positivity, rATG therapy, rATG &#x0002B; PE/IVIG therapy, intimal arteritis at case biopsy, and C4d positivity). Multivariable model adjusted for the variables mentioned above found intimal arteritis to be associated with TG development (HR 2.1, <italic>p</italic> = 0.01) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p>Cox regression assessing risk factors of development of transplant glomerulopathy (No. of events is 52) in histologic ABMR rejection categories (ABMR/DSA&#x02013;, ABMR/DSA&#x0002B;, ABMRV/DSA&#x02013;, ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B;).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Variable</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Univariable analysis</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic>&#x02013;value</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Variable</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Univariable analysis</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic>&#x02013;value</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>HR (95% CI)</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>HR (95% CI)</bold></td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>ABMRV/DSA&#x02013;</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.0 (0.5&#x02013;2.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.972</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Basiliximab</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4 (0.2&#x02013;0.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.002</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B;</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7 (1.4&#x02013;5.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.004</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>rATG&#x000B1;PE/IVIG</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.8 (1.4&#x02013;5.5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.002</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>ABMR/DSA&#x02013;</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3 (0.1&#x02013;0.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.001</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Diagnostic biopsy</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>ABMR/DSA&#x0002B;</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6 (1.0&#x02013;2.8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.076</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">g&#x0003E;0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.0 (0.5&#x02013;2.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.937</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Donor (living)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5 (0.2&#x02013;1.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.179</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ptc&#x0003E;0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.4 (0.8&#x02013;2.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.256</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>PRA&#x0003E;20%</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2 (0.7&#x02013;2.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.508</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">i&#x0003E;0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.8 (0.4&#x02013;1.5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.445</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>DSA positivity</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7 (1.5&#x02013;4.8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.001</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">t&#x0003E;0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3 (0.7&#x02013;2.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.351</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>HLA mm&#x0003E;3</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.4 (0.8&#x02013;2.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.244</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ti&#x0003E;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9 (0.5&#x02013;1.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.642</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>HD vintage&#x0003E;</bold> <bold>3y</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9 (0.5&#x02013;1.5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.609</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">v&#x0003E;0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7 (1.0&#x02013;2.9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.064</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>CKD diagnosis</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">ci&#x0003E;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2 (0.4&#x02013;3.9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.727</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Diabetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2 (0.6&#x02013;2.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.588</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ct&#x0003E;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2 (0.4&#x02013;3.9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.727</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vascular</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1 (0.6&#x02013;2.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.692</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">cg&#x0003E;0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Glomerulonefritis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7 (0.4&#x02013;1.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.277</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">cv&#x0003E;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.0 (0.6&#x02013;1.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.947</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hereditary</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1 (0.6&#x02013;2.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.826</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ah&#x0003E;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1 (0.6&#x02013;1.9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.724</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Other</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1 (0.5&#x02013;2.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.822</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IF/TA&#x0003E;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6 (0.6&#x02013;4.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.388</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Retransplantation</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8 (1.0&#x02013;3.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.040</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">C4d&#x0003E;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7 (1.0&#x02013;3.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.068</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Multivariable analysis</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Multivariable</bold></td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>HR (95% CI)</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>HR (95% CI)</bold></td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Retransplantation</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.8 (0.4&#x02013;1.5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.395</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>rATG</bold> <bold>&#x000B1;</bold> <bold>PE/IVIG</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.4 (1.0&#x02013;5.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.055</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>DSA positivity</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.1 (1.0&#x02013;4.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.064</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>v&#x0003E;0</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,1 (1.2&#x02013;3.8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.012</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>C4d&#x0003E;1</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2 (0.6&#x02013;2.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.614</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Bold P-values represent statistic significance below 0.05</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap></sec>
<sec>
<title>Kidney Graft Survival</title>
<p>The graft survival was significantly impaired in DSA&#x0002B; patients with intimal arteritis as a part of ABMR compared with others (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). Death-censored kidney graft survival at 36 months was 96% in TCMRV, 98% in ABMR/DSA&#x02013;, 86% in ABMRV/DSA&#x02013;, 79% in ABMR/DSA&#x0002B;, and 64% in the ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B; group (log rank <italic>p</italic> = 0.001). Interestingly, DSA&#x02013; patients with intimal arteritis as part of ABMR experienced similar graft survival as DSA&#x0002B; patients with ABMR (<italic>p</italic> = 0.507).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Death-censored graft survival according to rejection phenotype.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmed-08-781206-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Cox regression assessing risk factors for graft failure in ABMR revealed PRA &#x0003E; 20% (HR 4.4, <italic>p</italic> = 0.001), DSA positivity (HR 3.9, <italic>p</italic> = 0.007), retransplantation (HR 4.0, <italic>p</italic> = 0.002), induction with ATG and ATG with additional PE, IVIG (HR 4.1, <italic>p</italic> = 0.021), and C4d positivity (HR 2.5, <italic>p</italic> = 0.041) in the univariable analysis (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>). None of these variables were found to be significant in the multivariable model.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption><p>Cox regression assessing risk factors of graft failure (No. of events 23) in histologic ABMR rejection categories (ABMR/DSA&#x02013;, ABMR/DSA&#x0002B;, ABMRV/DSA&#x02013;, and ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B;).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Variable</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Univariable analysis</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic>&#x02013;value</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Variable</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Univariable analysis</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic>&#x02013;value</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>HR (95% CI)</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>HR (95% CI)</bold></td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>ABMRV/DSA&#x02013;</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9 (0.3&#x02013;2.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.864</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Basiliximab</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2 (0.1&#x02013;0.8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.021</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>ABMRV/DSA&#x0002B;</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.3 (1.3&#x02013;8.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.011</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>rATG&#x000B1;PE/IVIG</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.1 (1.2&#x02013;14.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.021</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>ABMR/DSA&#x02013;</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1 (0.0&#x02013;0.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.020</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Diagnostic biopsy</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>ABMR/DSA&#x0002B;</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7 (0.8&#x02013;4.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.192</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">g&#x0003E;0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6 (0.2&#x02013;1.5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.294</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Donor (living)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3 (0.0&#x02013;2.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.239</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ptc&#x0003E;0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6 (0.7&#x02013;3.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.295</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>PRA&#x0003E;20%</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.4 (1.8&#x02013;10.8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.001</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">i&#x0003E;0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5 (0.6&#x02013;3.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.400</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>DSA positivity</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.9 (1.4&#x02013;10.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.007</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">t&#x0003E;0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3 (0.6&#x02013;3.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.574</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>HLA mm&#x0003E;3</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5 (0.7&#x02013;3.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.334</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ti&#x0003E;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3 (0.6&#x02013;3.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.527</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>HD vintage&#x0003E;</bold> <bold>3y</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1 (0.5&#x02013;2.5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.871</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">v&#x0003E;0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9 (0.9&#x02013;4.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>CKD diagnosis</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">ci&#x0003E;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9 (0.1&#x02013;6.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.918</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Diabetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.04 (0.0&#x02013;7.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.221</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ct&#x0003E;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9 (0.1&#x02013;6.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.918</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vascular</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8 (0.7&#x02013;4.5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.185</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">cg&#x0003E;0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.04 (0.0&#x02013;20.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.314</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Glomerulonefritis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3 (0.5&#x02013;3.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.570</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">cv&#x0003E;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9 (0.8&#x02013;4.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.145</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hereditary</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9 (0.3&#x02013;2.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.792</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ah&#x0003E;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5 (0.7&#x02013;3.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.312</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Other</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.0 (0.3&#x02013;3.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.943</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IF/TA&#x0003E;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7 (0.4&#x02013;7.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.441</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Retransplantation</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.0 (1.7&#x02013;9.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.002</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">C4d&#x0003E;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.5 (1.0&#x02013;6.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.041</bold></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Bold P-values represent statistic significance below 0.05</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Intimal arteritis, a diagnostic feature of vascular rejection, is a frequent histological finding in kidney allografts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>). In this study, we found that intimal arteritis as part of histologic ABMR represents a risk for early development of TG regardless of the presence or absence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies. Therefore, a poor outcome of this phenotype is anticipated. On the other hand, we found that intimal arteritis as part of TCMR has a favorable kidney graft outcome when standard antirejection therapy is applied. Similar to our data, molecular assessment of kidney allografts revealed the early occurrence of isolated intimal arteritis of benign origin after transplantation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>).</p>
<p>Previously, vascular rejection, i.e., intimal arteritis, was characterized by a high rate of steroid-resistance and poor kidney allograft outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). Just recently, the intimal arteritis was shown to be associated with DSA with the detrimental impact of this rejection phenotype on graft survival and was accepted as a diagnostic criterion for ABMR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>).</p>
<p>Interestingly, in DSA&#x02013; patients with intimal arteritis as part of histologic ABMR, the occurrence of TG was higher than in DSA&#x02013; patients without intimal arteritis despite histologic ABMR. TG is a frequent morphological finding in chronic antibody mediated rejection, and thus, those patients are at the highest risk for premature kidney allograft loss (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>).</p>
<p>In our study, the outcome of DSA negative patients with intimal arteritis along with MVI was similar to DSA&#x0002B; patients with MVI, but without intimal arteritis. One of the possible explanations for this phenomenon is the hypothetical presence of non-HLA antibodies. The association of both MVI and intimal arteritis with anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies has been discussed for more than a decade (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). Besides anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies, Delville et al. described the association of MVI and intimal arteritis with broader autoimmune reactivity measured <italic>in vitro</italic> by renal microvascular endothelial cells crossmatch assay (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). Very recently, NK cells were found to trigger MVI when a mismatch between donor HLA I and recipient inhibitory killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor was present (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>). This missing self- hypothesis may explain poor outcomes of DSA negative patients with microvascular inflammation. Whether such mechanisms are involved in intimal arteritis as well remains unclear.</p>
<p>Intimal arteritis as part of DSA&#x02013; ABMR has not been entirely studied. A higher prevalence of AT1R positivity was found along with intimal arteritis. DSA&#x02013; patients with AT1R positivity lost their grafts prematurely (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>). On the other hand, a good prognosis of DSA negative patients with antibody mediated rejection histology was found (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>). Graft survival of DSA negative patients with intimal arteritis was not specifically addressed in either of these studies.</p>
<p>There is a lack of studies dealing with graft outcomes in different phenotypes of vascular rejection, especially DSA&#x02013; histologic ABMR with intimal arteritis, since the major Banff classification update in 2013 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>). Rabant et al. analyzed the outcome of patients with early isolated v-lesions and found better outcomes than in other phenotypes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>). Shimizu et al. observed similar outcomes in patients with intimal arteritis as part of both TCMR and ABMR; however, the study cohort was limited to 31 patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>). Wu et al. compared the outcome of patients with intimal arteritis, classified both according to the grade of intimal arteritis and Banff classification and found that the grade plays a more important role than the Banff category (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>). Salazar et al. reported nine out of 10 graft failures in patients with v-lesions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>). Patient numbers in all the mentioned studies above are small, which limits their conclusions. It is important to note that the repeated updates of Banff classifications on ABMR make the interpretation of former studies problematic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>).</p>
<p>Limitations of our study were a short follow-up period which confined the number of study endpoints, and above all, we were not able to demonstrate the significant impact of vascular rejection in the absence of DSA on graft survival. The incomplete number of surveillance biopsies in the control groups was limiting direct comparison of all rejection phenotypes. The study did not involve the evaluation of non-HLA antibodies or transcriptomic data.</p>
<p>In conclusion, intimal arteritis along with MVI was found to represent a risk for the early development of TG regardless of the presence or absence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies. Therefore, it is likely that this phenotype reflects the presence of harmful endothelial injury of different origin than humoral alloimmunity.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s5">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The data analyzed in this study is subject to the following licenses/restrictions: Data are stored as medical records of Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to Department of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine.</p></sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Ethics Statement</title>
<p>The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethical Board of Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine approved the study under No.: 15-265191A. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.</p></sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>MN: data gathering and processing and manuscript writing. PH: serum and sample storage and assessment and data processing. MK and LV: assessment of histological slides. KK and AS: HLA typing and anti-HLA antibodies evaluation. OV: manuscript writing and supervising. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was supported by the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic MZO 00023001 and by the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic under grants NV19-06-00031 and NU21-06-00021.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s9">
<title>Publisher&#x00027;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p></sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parajuli</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aziz</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garg</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Panzer</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joachim</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muth</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Histopathological characteristics and causes of kidney graft failure in the current era of immunosuppression</article-title>. <source>World J Trans.</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>123</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>33</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5500/wjt.v9.i6.123</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31750089</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Loupy</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haas</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roufosse</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naesens</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adam</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Afrouzian</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>The Banff 2019. Kidney Meeting Report (I): updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell&#x02013; and antibody-mediated rejection</article-title>. <source>Am J Transplant.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>2318</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>31</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ajt.15898</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32463180</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Madill-Thomsen</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perkowska-Ptasi&#x00144;ska</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x000F6;hmig</surname> <given-names>GA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eskandary</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Einecke</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Discrepancy analysis comparing molecular and histology diagnoses in kidney transplant biopsies</article-title>. <source>Am J Transplant.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>1341</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>50</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ajt.15752</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31846554</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hsu</surname> <given-names>AC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arbus</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noriega</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huber</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Renal allograft biopsy: a satisfactory adjunct for predicting renal function after graft rejection</article-title>. <source>Clin Nephrol.</source> (<year>1976</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>260</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">776479</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lefaucheur</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Loupy</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vernerey</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duong-Van-Huyen</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suberbielle</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anglicheau</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Antibody-mediated vascular rejection of kidney allografts: a population-based study</article-title>. <source>Lancet.</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>381</volume>:<fpage>313</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61265-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23711439</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Haas</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sis</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Racusen</surname> <given-names>LC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Solez</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Glotz</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Colvin</surname> <given-names>RB</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Banff 2013 meeting report: Inclusion of C4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection and antibody-associated arterial lesions</article-title>. <source>Am J Transplant.</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>272</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>83</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ajt.12590</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24472190</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Senev</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coemans</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lerut</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Sandt</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dani&#x000EB;ls</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuypers</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Histological picture of antibody-mediated rejection without donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies: clinical presentation and implications for outcome</article-title>. <source>Am J Transplant.</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>763</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>80</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ajt.15074</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30107078</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Novotny</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hruba</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vichova</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maluskova</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Honsova</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Viklicky</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Isolated v-lesion represents a benign phenotype of vascular rejection of the kidney allograft &#x02013; a retrospective study</article-title>. <source>Transplant Int.</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>1153</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>63</lpage> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tri.13286</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29855106</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Teo</surname> <given-names>RZC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Russ</surname> <given-names>GR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>WH</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Cell-mediated and humoral acute vascular rejection and graft loss: a registry study</article-title>. <source>Nephrology.</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>147</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>55</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nep.12577</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26243593</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rabant</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boullenger</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gnemmi</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pell&#x000E9;</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Glowacki</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hertig</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Isolated v-lesion in kidney transplant recipients: characteristics, association with DSA, and histological follow-up</article-title>. <source>Am J Transplant.</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>972</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>81</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ajt.14617</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29206350</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Salazar</surname> <given-names>IDR</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x000F3;pez</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Halloran</surname> <given-names>PF</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Reassessing the significance of intimal arteritis in kidney transplant biopsy specimens</article-title>. <source>J Am Soc Nephrol.</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>26</volume>:<fpage>3190</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1681/ASN.2014111064</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25918035</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wohlfahrtova</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hruba</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klema</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Novotny</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krejcik</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stranecky</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Early isolated V-lesion may not truly represent rejection of the kidney allograft</article-title>. <source>Clin Sci.</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>132</volume>:<fpage>2269</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>84</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1042/CS20180745</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30287520</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nickeleit</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vamvakas</surname> <given-names>EC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pascual</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poletti</surname> <given-names>BJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Colvin</surname> <given-names>RB</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The prognostic significance of specific arterial lesions in acute renal allograft rejection</article-title>. <source>J Am Soc Nephrol.</source> (<year>1998</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>1301</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1681/ASN.V971301</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9644642</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Loupy</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aubert</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name> <name><surname>Orandi</surname> <given-names>BJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naesens</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bouatou</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raynaud</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Prediction system for risk of allograft loss in patients receiving kidney transplants: international derivation and validation study</article-title>. <source>BMJ.</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>366</volume>:<fpage>l4923</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/bmj.l4923</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31530561</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dragun</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Br&#x000E4;sen</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sch&#x000F6;nemann</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fritsche</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Budde</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neumayer</surname> <given-names>H-H</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Patients with steroid refractory acute vascular rejection develop agonistic antibodies targeting angiotensin II type 1 receptor</article-title>. <source>Transplant Proc.</source> (<year>2003</year>) <volume>35</volume>:<fpage>2104</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0041-1345(03)00680-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14529856</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dragun</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x000FC;ller</surname> <given-names>DN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Br&#x000E4;sen</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fritsche</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nieminen-Kelh&#x000E4;</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dechend</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Angiotensin II type 1-receptor activating antibodies in renal-allograft rejection</article-title>. <source>N Engl J Med.</source> (<year>2005</year>) <volume>352</volume>:<fpage>558</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>69</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJMoa035717</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15892197</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Delville</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lamarth&#x000E9;e</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pagie</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>See</surname> <given-names>SB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rabant</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burger</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Early acute microvascular kidney transplant rejection in the absence of anti-HLA antibodies is associated with preformed IgG antibodies against diverse glomerular endothelial cell antigens</article-title>. <source>J Am Soc Nephrol.</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<fpage>692</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>709</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1681/ASN.2018080868</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30850439</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Koenig</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mar&#x000E7;ais</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barba</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mathias</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sicard</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Missing self triggers NK cell-mediated chronic vascular rejection of solid organ transplants</article-title>. <source>Nat Commun.</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>5350</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-019-13113-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31767837</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lefaucheur</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Viglietti</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bouatou</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Philippe</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pievani</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aubert</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Non-HLA agonistic anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies induce a distinctive phenotype of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients</article-title>. <source>Kidney Int.</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>96</volume>:<fpage>189</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>201</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.kint.2019.01.030</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31005275</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shimizu</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ishida</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hayakawa</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shibahara</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tanabe</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Clinical and pathological analyses of cases of acute vascular rejection after kidney transplantation</article-title>. <source>Transplant Proc.</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>49</volume>:<fpage>2251</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.09.046</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29198655</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Budde</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neumayer</surname> <given-names>H-H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rudolph</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The relationship of the severity and category of acute rejection with intimal arteritis defined in banff classification to clinical outcomes</article-title>. <source>Transplantation.</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>99</volume>:<fpage>e105</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/TP.0000000000000640</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25719260</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lamarche</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>C&#x000F4;t&#x000E9;</surname> <given-names>J-M</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x000E9;n&#x000E9;cal</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cardinal</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Efficacy of acute cellular rejection treatment according to banff score in kidney transplant recipients</article-title>. <source>Transplant Direct.</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>e115</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/TXD.0000000000000626</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27990480</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list> 
</back>
</article>