<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Mater.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Materials</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Mater.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-8016</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1752439</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmats.2026.1752439</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Experimental study on chemical compatibility of polymer amended bentonite subjected to inorganic salt solutions</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Shen et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2026.1752439">10.3389/fmats.2026.1752439</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>Shengqiang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3244156"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Wenbin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname>
<given-names>Nian</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3290919"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<institution>School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Nanjing Vocational Institute of Transport Technology</institution>, <city>Nanjing</city>, <country country="CN">China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001">
<label>&#x2a;</label>Correspondence: Nian Qi, <email xlink:href="mailto:Qi_nian529@126.com">Qi_nian529@126.com</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-02-20">
<day>20</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1752439</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>23</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>30</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>02</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2026 Shen, Zhang and Qi.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Shen, Zhang and Qi</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-02-20">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>This study aims to improve the chemical stability and engineering performance of bentonite slurry used in slurry trench cutoff walls, which often suffers from reduced swelling and permeability when exposed to saline environments. To address this, five superabsorbent polymers-polyanionic cellulose (PAC), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), carboxymethyl starch sodium (CMS), xanthan gum (XG), and sodium polyacrylamide (Na-PAM), were evaluated as additives to enhance unamended bentonite (CB). Key performance indicators including swell index, Marsh viscosity, filtrate loss, and hydraulic conductivity were systematically measured in CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions (0&#x2013;100 mM). Results show that XG-amended bentonite (XB) significantly outperforms CB, achieving higher swell index (24.2 vs. 15.9 mL/2 g) and liquid limit (403% vs. 267%), while maintaining low filtrate loss and acceptable viscosity under saline conditions. Hydraulic conductivity tests indicate a 75.3% reduction in permeability for XB filter cakes compared to CB. Additionally, polymer performance varies with cation type, with Pb<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> causing more severe degradation than Ca<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> due to pH effects. The study demonstrates that polymer amendments, particularly XG, can effectively enhance bentonite performance in saline environments, providing practical guidance for the design and construction of durable slurry trench cutoff walls.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>chemical compatibility</kwd>
<kwd>hydraulic conductivity</kwd>
<kwd>polymer-amended bentonite</kwd>
<kwd>slurry trench walls</kwd>
<kwd>xanthan gum</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (Grant No. 22KJB560021), the Scientific Research Fund Project of Nanjing Vocational Institute of Transport Technology (Grant No. JZ2206), and the Research Initiation Program for High-Level Talents at Nanjing Vocational Institute of Transport Technology (Grant No. JG2530).</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="13"/>
<table-count count="7"/>
<equation-count count="5"/>
<ref-count count="41"/>
<page-count count="00"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Environmental Degradation of Materials</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Environmental protection and groundwater management are critical concerns in modern construction, particularly in contaminated sites where the risk of hazardous materials leaching into surrounding ecosystems is high (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">de Carvalho Balaban et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Balaganesh et al., 2023</xref>). One common solution to mitigate this risk is the use of slurry trench cutoff walls, which are designed to control the movement of contaminated groundwater (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Sharma and Reddy, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Wu et al., 2020</xref>). Traditionally, various materials and methods have been employed for these barriers, with bentonite slurry emerging as one of the most effective options due to its ability to form a low-permeability barrier (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Philip, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Opdyke and Evans, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Li et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Li et al., 2017</xref>). However, past and current practices in slurry trench construction face significant challenges, including issues related to the stability of the slurry during installation, long-term performance under varying environmental conditions, and the cost-effectiveness of the materials involved (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Tong et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Evans et al., 2024</xref>). These challenges have led engineers to continually seek improvements in the formulation of the slurry and the methods of application. Bentonite slurry is widely used in constructing these cutoff walls, particularly because it stabilizes trench walls during excavation and creates a uniform barrier with low hydraulic conductivity (&#x3c;10<sup>&#x2212;9</sup> m/s) through self-weight consolidation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Ryan et al., 2022</xref>). This barrier effectively restricts the migration of contaminants by blocking pathways for groundwater flow. However, despite its extensive application, the performance of bentonite slurry, both during construction and over time, remains a central concern for engineers, particularly because it plays a crucial role in environmental containment. Understanding its long-term performance under changing environmental conditions, including exposure to saline or high-ionic-strength solutions, is critical for ensuring the durability and effectiveness of slurry trench cutoff walls (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ashmawy et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Di Maio, 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Rout and Singh, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Jia-Kai et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>The primary functions of bentonite slurry in slurry trench cutoff walls include: (1) the formation of a filter cake less than 3 mm thick that traps fine bentonite particles within the pore spaces of native soils, creating a low-permeability barrier (&#x3c;10<sup>&#x2212;12</sup>&#x2013;10<sup>&#x2212;9</sup> m/s) that prevents fluid movement; and (2) providing lateral hydraulic resistance to maintain trench wall stability during excavation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Li et al., 2021a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Evans et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Evans and Ruffing, 2025</xref>). To ensure proper construction and long-term functionality, the slurry must possess specific rheological properties, such as Marsh viscosity (40&#x2013;45 s), filtrate loss (&#x3c;25 mL), pH (6.5&#x2013;10.0), and density (1.05&#x2013;1.10 g/cm<sup>3</sup>), as outlined in ASTM D5891 and APIRP13B-1 standards (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Du et al., 2021</xref>). These properties guarantee the formation of stable filter cakes and ensure the uniformity of backfills, both of which are essential for maintaining barrier integrity over time.</p>
<p>Despite the widespread use of bentonite slurry in environmental containment, challenges remain regarding its long-term performance in the face of changing environmental conditions. Research has shown that bentonite filter cakes exhibit low hydraulic conductivity in tap water, as measured by the modified fluid loss test (MFL) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Du et al., 2021</xref>). However, when exposed to concentrated ionic solutions (e.g., &#x3e;300 mM), the hydraulic conductivity of bentonite increases significantly, more than tenfold compared to tap water (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Liu et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Setz et al., 2017</xref>). This presents a significant challenge, as bentonite&#x2019;s hydraulic properties can deteriorate in real-world conditions where contaminants often have high ionic strength. Current research has focused on modifying bentonite with various additives to enhance its chemical compatibility and maintain its low hydraulic conductivity even in concentrated solutions. To address these challenges, polymers have emerged as an effective solution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Di Emidio et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Pandey et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Li et al., 2021b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Fu et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Syed Masoodhu et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Masoodhu et al., 2025</xref>). Polymers such as carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), sodium polyacrylate, and xanthan gum are increasingly used to modify the properties of bentonite in saline or high-ionic-strength environments. These polymers enhance the swelling behavior of bentonite by providing additional stability to the clay structure, even when exposed to ionic solutions. The presence of polymers helps to maintain the bentonite&#x2019;s capacity to form a stable filter cake and reduce permeability in saline environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Tian et al., 2019</xref>). For example, polymers like CMC can increase the viscosity of the slurry, helping it to resist the dispersion of bentonite particles in saline solutions and maintain the required structural integrity during the construction process. These modifications have shown promise in improving the hydraulic performance of bentonite in contaminated environments. However, the literature reveals that existing polymer-modified bentonites often lack comprehensive studies on their long-term hydraulic performance and chemical stability in highly contaminated solutions, such as those containing calcium chloride (CaCl<sub>2</sub>) and lead nitrate [Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]. Moreover, many studies have focused on individual polymer types without direct comparisons, leaving a gap in our understanding of which polymer(s) provide the most durable and effective enhancements to bentonite slurry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Mazzieri et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>This study aims to address these gaps by evaluating the fundamental properties and hydraulic performance of polymer-enhanced bentonite filter cakes, specifically in the presence of calcium chloride (CaCl<sub>2</sub>) solutions. We selected five commonly used industry-standard polymers-Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC), Sodium Polyacrylate (Na-PAM), Polyanionic Cellulose (PAC), Carboxymethyl Starch (CMS), and Xanthan Gum (XG), which are known to improve the chemical compatibility of bentonite in aqueous solutions. The primary objective is to assess the effect of these polymers on bentonite&#x2019;s swelling capacity, specific gravity, liquid limit, and hydraulic conductivity under conditions simulating contaminated environments. Among the polymers tested, xanthan gum (XG) was identified as the most promising additive, and subsequent investigations will focus on its impact on the long-term performance of bentonite filter cakes. Specifically, this study will evaluate the construction workability of xanthan gum-modified bentonite slurry, the hydraulic conductivity of modified filter cakes in contaminated liquid environments, and the chemical compatibility of the filter cakes when exposed to CaCl<sub>2</sub> and Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> solutions. By providing a comprehensive comparison of polymer-modified bentonites, this research aims to establish the most effective modification strategies for enhancing the durability and performance of bentonite slurry in environmental containment applications.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Materials</title>
<sec id="s2-1-1">
<label>2.1.1</label>
<title>Constituent soils and polymer</title>
<p>The unamended bentonite (i.e., Calcium-based bentonite, CB) used in the experiments is a commercial-grade sodium bentonite sourced from Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province. The selection of CB tested here is mainly to its wide distribution and easy availability in China as compared to the Sodium-based bentonite (NB). Although NB possesses superior engineering performance in slurry wall construction, it has limited stock in China and is relatively expensive. The fundamental physical properties are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, and the particle size distribution curve illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>. The grain size fractions &#x3c;75 &#x3bc;m and &#x3c;2 &#x3bc;m accounted for 100% and 32.5%, respectively. The liquid limit (<italic>w</italic>
<sub>L</sub>), plastic limit (<italic>w</italic>
<sub>P</sub>), and plasticity index (IP) were determined to be 272.3%, 34.2%, and 233.5%, respectively. The index properties of polymers provided by the manufacturer are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. The ion types of polymers include anionic and nonionic types. The average molecular weight of all polymers is equal to or greater than 800,000, and the specific gravity of the polymers is less than 1.32, which is lower than that of soil minerals.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Basic engineering properties of tested bentonite.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Physical indicators</th>
<th align="left">Value</th>
<th align="left">Test method</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Soil classification</td>
<td align="left">CH</td>
<td align="left">ASTM D2487</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Fine content, %</td>
<td align="left">100</td>
<td align="left">ASTM D422</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Clay content, %</td>
<td align="left">69</td>
<td align="left">ASTM D422</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Specific gravity (<italic>G</italic>
<sub>s</sub>)</td>
<td align="left">2.72</td>
<td align="left">ASTM D854</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Liquid limit (<italic>w</italic>
<sub>L</sub>)</td>
<td align="left">269.4</td>
<td align="left">ASTM D4318</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Plastic limit (<italic>w</italic>
<sub>P</sub>)</td>
<td align="left">34.2</td>
<td align="left">ASTM D4318</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">pH</td>
<td align="left">10.33</td>
<td align="left">ASTM D4972</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SSA (m<sup>2</sup>/g)</td>
<td align="left">252</td>
<td align="left">ASTM D1993-22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CEC (meq/100 g)</td>
<td align="left">48.1</td>
<td align="left">ASTM D7503</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>SSA, is specific surface area; CEC, is cation exchange capacity; CH, is high liquid limit clay; ASTM, is American Society for Testing and Materials.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Particle size distribution curve of bentonite.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-13-1752439-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Line graph showing cumulative mass percentage versus particle size in millimeters on a logarithmic scale, with data points for CB (0-0.075 mm) rising from approximately 45 percent to nearly 100 percent.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Index properties of the polymers.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Polymers</th>
<th align="left">Molecular weight, Da</th>
<th align="left">Apparent viscosity, mPa&#xb7;s</th>
<th align="left">Substitution degree</th>
<th align="left">Specific gravity, <italic>G</italic>
<sub>s</sub>
</th>
<th align="left">Chemical formula</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">PAC</td>
<td align="left">1,730,000</td>
<td align="left">35</td>
<td align="left">1.4</td>
<td align="left">1.26</td>
<td align="left">[C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>7</sub>O<sub>2</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>COONa]<sub>n</sub>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">HPMC</td>
<td align="left">585,000</td>
<td align="left">1,500</td>
<td align="left">3.4</td>
<td align="left">1.31</td>
<td align="left">(C<sub>10</sub>H<sub>18</sub>O<sub>6</sub>)<sub>n</sub>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CMS</td>
<td align="left">800,000</td>
<td align="left">150</td>
<td align="left">0.6</td>
<td align="left">1.26</td>
<td align="left">[C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>7</sub>O<sub>2</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub>OCH<sub>2</sub>COONa]<sub>n</sub>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">XG</td>
<td align="left">2,510,000</td>
<td align="left">1,600</td>
<td align="left">1.26</td>
<td align="left">1.24</td>
<td align="left">(C<sub>35</sub>H<sub>49</sub>O<sub>29</sub>)<sub>n</sub>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">K-PAM</td>
<td align="left">1,250,000</td>
<td align="left">1,300</td>
<td align="left">0.8</td>
<td align="left">1.32</td>
<td align="left">(C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>6</sub>O<sub>2</sub>)<sub>n</sub>(C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>5</sub>KO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>m</sub>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-1-2">
<label>2.1.2</label>
<title>Test liquids</title>
<p>Calcium chloride (CaCl<sub>2</sub>) solution was used as the simulated contaminated groundwater. The CaCl<sub>2</sub> concentrations were set at 5, 20, 50, and 100 mM, corresponding to Ca<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> mass concentrations ranging from 0 to 2,400 mg/L. This range aligns with the groundwater pollutant levels reported in previous literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Du et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Malusis and McKeehan, 2013</xref>). Deionized water (DW) served as the control group. The index properties of DW and CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>. Triplicate samples were tested for determining these five property indexes presented in this table, and thus, a total of 75 trials were made in these tests.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Index properties of CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution used in tests.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Designed concentrations (mM)</th>
<th align="left">Measured concentration (mg/L)</th>
<th align="left">Specific gravity</th>
<th align="left">Absolute viscosity/<italic>&#x3bc;</italic> (mPa&#xb7;s)</th>
<th align="left">Electric conductivity (&#x3bc;S/cm)</th>
<th align="left">pH</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">DW</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">1.00</td>
<td align="left">1.04</td>
<td align="left">0.01</td>
<td align="left">6.52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="left">207</td>
<td align="left">1.00</td>
<td align="left">1.04</td>
<td align="left">752</td>
<td align="left">6.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">20</td>
<td align="left">828</td>
<td align="left">1.01</td>
<td align="left">1.05</td>
<td align="left">2,728</td>
<td align="left">6.45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">50</td>
<td align="left">2022</td>
<td align="left">1.02</td>
<td align="left">1.06</td>
<td align="left">7,835</td>
<td align="left">6.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">100</td>
<td align="left">19,525</td>
<td align="left">1.02</td>
<td align="left">1.08</td>
<td align="left">16,907</td>
<td align="left">6.72</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Test method</title>
<sec id="s2-2-1">
<label>2.2.1</label>
<title>Polymer optimal selection test</title>
<p>A preliminary experiment was conducted to rapidly identify suitable polymers for modifying bentonite. Five polymer-amended bentonites were prepared by mixing dried bentonite with 2% polymer (by dry weight of CB). The mixtures were poured into hermetically sealed polyethylene bottles and vigorously shaken with an overhead stirrer for 1 h at a speed of 60 r/min and a controlled temperature of 20 &#xb0;C &#xb1; 2 &#xb0;C. To assess improvements in the constructability of polymer-amended bentonite, slurries were made by blending the polymer-amended bentonite with liquid (tap water or CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution) using a high-speed stirrer for 5 min. The slurries were then stored in plastic bottles for 24 h to hydrate. The engineering properties, including density, marsh funnel viscosity, filtrate volume, and pH, of the bentonite slurries were measured in accordance with API 13B-1 (API, 2009). Target values for the slurry were based on guidelines from USEPA (1984) and USACE (2010). The target values for slurry workability can be found in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">Table 7</xref> of the following <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3-2-2">Section 3.2.2</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2-2">
<label>2.2.2</label>
<title>Engineering properties test</title>
<p>After thoroughly evaluating the swell index, engineering properties in saline conditions, and hydraulic performance of the bentonite filter cake, xanthan gum was selected as the amendment for further study of polymer-amended bentonite. The preparation process for the Xanthan gum-amended bentonite (XB) mixture followed the method previously described. The polymer dosage varied from 0% to 4% by weight of dry bentonite, as determined by <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Equation 1</xref>. The bentonite dosage (CB), representing the ratio of dry bentonite mass to total slurry mass, ranged from 6% to 10%, calculated via <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2">Equation 2</xref>. The mass of slurry can be calculated as the following <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e3">Equation 3</xref>. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref> outlines the experimental design used to analyze the slurry properties of the amended bentonite.<disp-formula id="e1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(1)</label>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="e2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>slurry</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2)</label>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="e3">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>slurry</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(3)</label>
</disp-formula>where <italic>C</italic>
<sub>P</sub> is Polymer dosage (%), <italic>C</italic>
<sub>B</sub> is bentonite dosage (%), <italic>m</italic>
<sub>p</sub> is Polymer mass (g), <italic>m</italic>
<sub>s</sub> is dry bentonite mass (g), <italic>m</italic>
<sub>w</sub> is the mixing water, and <italic>m</italic>
<sub>slurry</sub> is the total slurry mass (g).</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Properties of polymer-amended bentonite and slurries.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Test content</th>
<th align="center">Sample type</th>
<th align="center">Bentonite mass ratio (%)</th>
<th align="center">Polymer dosage (%, by dry weight with bentonite)</th>
<th align="center">Water mass ratio (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">(1) Specific gravity<break/>(2) Swell index</td>
<td align="center">CB</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">XB</td>
<td align="center">96, 98, 99, 99.5</td>
<td align="center">0.5, 1, 2, 4</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Slurry workability</td>
<td align="center">CB slurry</td>
<td align="center">6, 8,10</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">90, 92, 94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">XB slurry</td>
<td align="center">6, 8,10</td>
<td align="center">0.5, 1, 2, 4</td>
<td align="center">90, 92, 94</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2-3">
<label>2.2.3</label>
<title>Modified filtrate loss (MFL) test</title>
<p>Before performing the modified filtrate loss test, the slurries were stirred for an extra 2 min. The tests used the API standard filtration apparatus with a 76.2-mm inner diameter, following ASTM D5891 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chung and Daniel, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Shen and Wei, 2018</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref> shows the schematic diagram of the modified filtrate loss test. The filtrate volume was recorded within 5 min, while the entire experiment lasted 30 min. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>, the concentrations of CaCl<sub>2</sub> were established at 5, 20, 50, and 100 mM, with tap water (i.e., 0 mM) serving as a control for all samples. Experiments were performed under an applied air pressure of 100 kPa. Following the completion of the test, the thickness of the filter cakes (<italic>L</italic>) was measured on two occasions utilising a vernier calliper, and the mean values were documented. Subsequently, the filter cakes were meticulously separated from the filter paper to evaluate their water content. This study calculated and reported the average void ratio. The hydraulic conductivity (<italic>k</italic>) of the bentonite filter cake was measured using the following equation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chung and Daniel, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Shen and Wei, 2018</xref>):<disp-formula id="e4">
<mml:math id="m4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mi>&#x3c6;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(4)</label>
</disp-formula>where <italic>&#x3b3;</italic>
<sub>w</sub> is the unit weight of the chemical solution (kN/m<sup>3</sup>), <italic>V</italic>
<sub>t</sub> is the filtrate volume at time t (mL), and <italic>P</italic>
<sub>0</sub> denotes the total applied pressure, which corresponds to the air pressure used in this study (kPa); A represents the cross-sectional area of the bentonite filter cake (cm<sup>2</sup>); <italic>&#x3c6;</italic> is the slope of the <italic>P</italic>
<sub>0</sub>
<italic>V</italic>
<sub>t</sub>/<italic>t</italic>&#x2013;<italic>V</italic>
<sub>t</sub> relation curve (kPas/cm<sup>6</sup>); and <italic>&#x3b2;</italic> is determined using the following <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e5">Equation 5</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chung and Daniel, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Shen and Wei, 2018</xref>):<disp-formula id="e5">
<mml:math id="m5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(5)</label>
</disp-formula>where BC indicates the bentonite dosage of the slurry (%); <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>L</italic>
</sub> and <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>
<sub>s</sub> represent the densities of the solution and bentonite (g/cm<sup>3</sup>), respectively; and <italic>e</italic>
<sub>ave</sub> is the average void ratio of the bentonite filter cake.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Schematic diagram of the modified filtrate loss test.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-13-1752439-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Diagram of a vertical filtration apparatus with labeled layers: a gas inlet at the top introduces air pressure, followed by a polyethylene seal, blue test liquid, filter paper, brown backfill material, and a permeable stone. A container at the bottom collects effluent. The test liquid section is highlighted with a red rectangle, and the layer thickness is labeled as 2.5 millimeters.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>At the end of the MFL test, a thin layer of a jelly-like bentonite-chemical mixture atop the bentonite filter cake was carefully and quickly removed with filter papers. The filter cake was then placed in an aluminum container for water content analysis. After oven drying, the bentonite was ground into a fine powder to determine its specific gravity according to ASTM D854. The average void ratio was calculated based on the water content and specific gravity, assuming full saturation. The total pressure in <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e4">Equation 4</xref> was taken as the air pressure, as advised by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chung and Daniel (2008)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2-4">
<label>2.2.4</label>
<title>Microstructural analysis</title>
<p>Scanning electronic micrograph (SEM) analyses were performed on CB and XB filter cake samples to examine the microstructure of Xanthan gum-modified bentonite before and after exposure to Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> solutions, using a Hitachi SU3500 Scanning Electron Microscope. The bentonite filter cakes were frozen for 5 min utilizing liquid nitrogen and subsequently transferred to a vacuum freeze-drying apparatus for a duration of 24 h at a temperature of &#x2212;79 &#xb0;C. Following the freeze-drying process, the primary dry filter cakes were sectioned into small blocks with an approximate surface area of 0.25 cm<sup>2</sup>. These samples were then coated with a thin layer of gold and subjected to SEM analyses.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<label>3</label>
<title>Test results analysis and discussion</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Polymer optimal selection results</title>
<sec id="s3-1-1">
<label>3.1.1</label>
<title>Swell index</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref> shows the variation in swell index (SI) of polymer-amended bentonites in CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions. In deionized water (0 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>), all polymer amendments significantly increased SI values compared to CB. Specifically, the HPMC-amended bentonite demonstrated the most significant improvement, with SI increasing from 15.9 mL/2 g (unamended) to 23.2 mL/2 g. Under CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions, the SI of all polymer-amended bentonites decreased as CaCl<sub>2</sub> concentration increased. At 20 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>, the CMS-amended bentonite exhibited SI values similar to those of CB. By 50 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>, all amended bentonites displayed SI values (around 7&#x2013;10 mL/2 g) that matched CB, reflecting the typical swell behavior of calcium bentonite.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Swell index of bentonite under CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-13-1752439-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart comparing swell index, SI (milliliters per two grams), for different polymer types&#x2014;Unamended PAC, HPMC, CMS, XG, and K-PAM&#x2014;at six salt concentrations: 0, 5, 20, 50, and 100 millimolar. Swell index decreases as salt concentration increases for all polymer types. Error bars are shown for each measurement.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>These findings align with previous research indicating that high-valence cations like Ca<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> decrease swell capacity by shrinking the diffuse double layer, as observed in untreated calcium bentonites. When ionic strength reaches 100 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>, both amended and unamended bentonites exhibit similar SI values of 5&#x2013;6 mL/2 g, suggesting that polymer amendments are less effective under high ionic strength. Adding high-swell polymers enhances swelling in deionized water; however, increasing the CaCl<sub>2</sub> concentration reduces swelling for both types. The positive effect of polymers diminishes at high salt levels, with SI values ranging from 5 to 6 mL/2 g at 100 mM. This finding aligns with that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Scalia et al. (2014)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Li et al. (2025)</xref>, suggesting that polymer addition does not significantly enhance seepage resistance in aggressive environments. The decreased effectiveness of polymers at high ionic strength reflects their limited ability to stabilize the structure amid strong electrostatic interactions with divalent cations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-1-2">
<label>3.1.2</label>
<title>Workability of bentonite slurry</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref> illustrates the changes in Marsh viscosity of polymer-amended bentonite slurries under CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution environment. In deionized water, all polymer amendments increased the Marsh viscosity relative to unamended bentonite; HPMC-amended bentonite exhibited the highest viscosity (53 s). The viscosity values of other amended bentonites ranged between 40 and 50 s, satisfying the workability requirements for bentonite slurry. With CaCl<sub>2</sub> concentration increasing, Marsh viscosity decreased in both unamended and amended bentonites. At 20 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>, the viscosity of unamended bentonite dropped to 38 s (below the required 40&#x2013;50 s threshold), whereas amended bentonites retained compliance with workability standards. At 50 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub> (Ca<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> concentration: 2000 mg/L), PAC- and XG-amended bentonite-maintained viscosities of 43.5 s and 44.6 s, respectively, still meeting workability requirements. Conversely, other amended bentonites fell below 40 s and failed compliance. These results demonstrate that polymer amendment enhances the salt resistance of bentonite slurry workability, PAC and XG amendments exhibit enhanced stability in saline environments.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Marsh viscosity of polymer-amended bentonite slurries under CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-13-1752439-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart comparing Marsh viscosity in seconds across six additive types&#x2014;Unamended, PAC, HPMC, CMS, XG, and K-PAM&#x2014;at five concentrations of CaCl2: zero, five, twenty, fifty, and one hundred millimolar. Error bars are included, and dashed lines highlight viscosity values between forty and fifty seconds.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref> shows how fluid loss varies in polymer-amended bentonite slurries exposed to CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions. Both unamended and polymer-amended slurries show a steady increase in fluid loss as CaCl<sub>2</sub> concentration rises. However, at the same concentrations, polymer-amended slurries consistently have lower fluid loss than unamended bentonite. At 20 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>, unamended bentonite exhibited excessive fluid loss (58 mL), well above the engineering workability threshold (&#x3c;25 mL), while all polymer-amended slurries kept fluid loss below 25 mL, meeting operational standards. At 50 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>, only PAC- and XG-amended slurries remained within limits, with fluid losses of 16.8 mL and 14.6 mL, respectively. By 100 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>, all slurries (amended and unamended) showed significant fluid loss (&#x3e;50 mL), with XG-amended bentonite having the lowest value (still over 50 mL). Mud-water separation occurred within 3&#x2013;5 min after mixing, consistent with the sedimentation behavior reported by Yang et al. (2020). This indicates that all bentonite slurries lose workability at this concentration, showing the limits of polymer amendments in reducing fluid loss under high ionic strength conditions.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Fluid loss volume of polymer-amended bentonite slurries under CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-13-1752439-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar graph illustrating filtrate volume in milliliters as a function of calcium chloride concentration in millimolar, with six additives compared: Unamended, PAC, HPMC, CMS, XG, and K-PAM. A red dashed line indicates a threshold at twenty-five milliliters.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-1-3">
<label>3.1.3</label>
<title>Hydraulic performance of bentonite filter cake</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref> presents the hydraulic conductivity of filter cakes from polymer-amended bentonite slurries exposed to CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions. Both amended and unamended bentonite slurries are influenced by Ca<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> to different extents, as evidenced by their inability to form stable filter cakes above certain CaCl<sub>2</sub> concentrations, along with a significant increase in fluid loss and visible mud-water separation after slurry standing. The hydraulic conductivity of filter cakes from both unamended and amended bentonites rises with increasing CaCl<sub>2</sub> concentration. However, polymer-amended bentonites exhibit one order of magnitude lower hydraulic conductivity than unamended bentonite. At the same concentrations, PAC- and XG-amended bentonites have the lowest conductivity values among all amendments, consistent with their superior fluid loss performance observed in previous tests. Unamended bentonite fails to form a filter cake at CaCl<sub>2</sub> concentrations above 5 mM, whereas polymer-amended counterparts maintain structural integrity until concentrations exceed 50 mM. This indicates that polymer amendment greatly enhances resistance to saline erosion and prevents structural collapse.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Hydraulic conductivity of polymer-amended bentonite cake under CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-13-1752439-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Line graph showing hydraulic conductivity on a logarithmic scale versus calcium chloride concentration for unamended and polymer-amended bentonite slurries, with two vertical dashed lines indicating filter cake formation thresholds at five millimolar and fifty millimolar, and annotated notes specifying filter cake formation limits in pink and blue text for each group.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-1-4">
<label>3.1.4</label>
<title>Optimal polymer selection</title>
<p>Through a comprehensive evaluation of swell index, workability (i.e., fluid loss), and hydraulic performance of bentonite slurry, the optimal polymer was selected for subsequent investigation; the test results are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>. Herein, <italic>c</italic>
<sub>max</sub> is defined as the threshold concentration of CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions at which polymer-amended bentonite maintains workability criteria (Marsh viscosity &#x2265;40 s; fluid loss &#x2264;25 mL). A higher <italic>c</italic>
<sub>max</sub> value signifies superior chemical compatibility of the amended bentonite. For instance, PAC-amended bentonite achieved acceptable Marsh viscosity (42.2 s) at 50 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub> but failed at 100 mM (37.5 s), resulting in <italic>c</italic>
<sub>max</sub> &#x3d; 50 mM. Although polymer amendment increased the swell index in deionized water, it considerably decreased swelling in CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions. This demonstrates the limited effectiveness of polymers in enhancing salt-affected swell performance. As a result, swell behavior was excluded from polymer screening criteria, with a focus on workability and impermeability metrics.</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Swell index, fluid loss volume, and hydraulic performance of bentonite slurry.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Parameters</th>
<th colspan="6" align="left">Polymer-amended bentonite</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left">CB</th>
<th align="left">PAC</th>
<th align="left">HPMC</th>
<th align="left">CMS</th>
<th align="left">XG</th>
<th align="left">K-PAM</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">SI<sub>w</sub> (mL/2 g)</td>
<td align="left">15.9</td>
<td align="left">20</td>
<td align="left">23.2</td>
<td align="left">24.1</td>
<td align="left">22.2</td>
<td align="left">23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>k</italic>
<sub>w</sub> (m/s)</td>
<td align="left">1.2 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;9</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">6.7 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;11</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">9.8 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;11</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">1.2 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;10</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">5.7 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;11</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">1.1 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;10</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>c</italic>
<sub>max</sub> (mM)</td>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="left">50</td>
<td align="left">50</td>
<td align="left">20</td>
<td align="left">50</td>
<td align="left">20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SI<sub>c</sub> (mL/2 g), at 50 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>
</td>
<td align="left">7.3</td>
<td align="left">8</td>
<td align="left">8.2</td>
<td align="left">7.7</td>
<td align="left">9.4</td>
<td align="left">8.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>V</italic> (mL), at 50 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>
</td>
<td align="left">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="left">16.8</td>
<td align="left">23.8</td>
<td align="left">37.2</td>
<td align="left">14.6</td>
<td align="left">25.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>k</italic>
<sub>c</sub> (m/s), at 50 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>
</td>
<td align="left">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="left">1.9 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;10</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">4.8 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;10</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">6.6 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;10</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">1.4 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;10</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">4.3 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;10</sup>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>A comparative analysis of the <italic>c</italic>
<sub>max</sub> values shows that PAC-, HPMC-, and XG-amended bentonites have better workability retention in saline environments. In 50 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>, these three polymer-enhanced bentonites keep Marsh viscosity at or above 40 s and fluid loss at or below 25 mL, fully meeting construction standards; their fluid loss volumes were 16.8 mL, 23.8 mL, and 14.6 mL, respectively, with filter cake hydraulic conductivities (<italic>k</italic>
<sub>c</sub>) of 1.9 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;10</sup> m/s, 4.8 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;10</sup> m/s, and 1.4 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;10</sup> m/s. Other tested polymers, however, failed to meet these thresholds under the same salinity conditions.</p>
<p>The findings demonstrate that PAC-, HPMC-, and XG-amended bentonites effectively contribute to fluid loss control and permeability reduction, as evidenced by the minimal fluid loss and hydraulic conductivity observed under identical ionic conditions. Among these polymer-modified bentonites, the XG-enhanced variant displays the lowest fluid loss and hydraulic conductivity. Consequently, xanthan gum (XG) has been identified as the most suitable additive for subsequent research into the anti-seepage and contaminant containment capabilities of polymer-enhanced bentonite barrier systems. Henceforth, XG-enhanced bentonites shall be referred to as XB.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Engineering property of polymer-amended bentonite</title>
<sec id="s3-2-1">
<label>3.2.1</label>
<title>Basic characteristic of polymer-amended bentonite</title>
<p>The variation in specific gravity, swell index, and liquid limit of XB with varying polymer dosage is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref>. The specific gravity (<italic>G</italic>
<sub>s</sub>) of XB exhibits an inverse relationship with polymer dosage. Within the 0%&#x2013;4% dosage range, <italic>G</italic>
<sub>s</sub> decreased from 2.72 to 2.66. This pattern is consistent with the literature, which documents lower <italic>G</italic>
<sub>s</sub> in polymer-amended sodium bentonites. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Guler et al. (2018)</xref> reported <italic>G</italic>
<sub>s</sub> of polymer-amended soils as similar to or lower than untreated soil; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Scalia and Benson (2017)</xref> also recorded a <italic>G</italic>
<sub>s</sub> of 2.67 for BPN polymer-amended bentonite compared to 2.71 for unamended soil (<italic>G</italic>
<sub>s</sub> &#x3d; 2.71). The observed <italic>G</italic>
<sub>s</sub> reduction is attributed to the intrinsic low density of superabsorbent polymers (1.24 for XG), analogous to sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, propylene carbonate, and polyacrylate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bohnhoff and Shackelford, 2014</xref>). These polymers expand interlayer spacing and generate a more porous fabric, which is consistent with their significantly lower density (1.26&#x2013;1.24 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) compared to bentonite (<italic>G</italic>
<sub>s</sub> &#x3d; 2.72). Consequently, increased polymer dosage correlates with progressively declining in amended bentonites.</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Variation of specific gravity, swell index, and liquid limit of XB with polymer dosages.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Parameters</th>
<th colspan="5" align="left">Xanthan gum dosage in bentonite (%)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left">0</th>
<th align="left">0.5</th>
<th align="left">1</th>
<th align="left">2</th>
<th align="left">4</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Specific gravity, <italic>G</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub>
</td>
<td align="left">2.72</td>
<td align="left">2.71</td>
<td align="left">2.70</td>
<td align="left">2.68</td>
<td align="left">2.66</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Swell index, SI (mL/2 g)</td>
<td align="left">15.9</td>
<td align="left">17.9</td>
<td align="left">20.1</td>
<td align="left">22.0</td>
<td align="left">24.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Liquid limit, <italic>w</italic>
<sub>L</sub> (%)</td>
<td align="left">269</td>
<td align="left">304</td>
<td align="left">341</td>
<td align="left">375</td>
<td align="left">403</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The SI of XG shows a positive correlation with polymer dosage. The unamended bentonite (CB) recorded an SI of 15.9 mL/2 g, while XB with 4% dosage achieved an SI of 24.2 mL/2 g. These values fall within the typical SI range (20&#x2013;30 mL/2 g) of sodium bentonites. The liquid Limit (<italic>w</italic>
<sub>L</sub>) variations for both amended bentonites show that <italic>w</italic>
<sub>L</sub> increases proportionally with polymer dosage. CB exhibited a <italic>w</italic>
<sub>L</sub> of 267%, while XB, with a 4% dosage, reached a <italic>w</italic>
<sub>L</sub> of 403%, indicating exponential growth compared to CB. The improved swelling behavior and liquid limits were attributed to the numerous hydrophilic functional groups (such as carboxylate, COO<sup>&#x2212;</sup>, and hydroxyl, -OH) present in Xanthan gum. These groups provide the material with excellent water-absorbing capacity, which enhances the swell index of polymer-amended bentonites.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-2">
<label>3.2.2</label>
<title>Workability of polymer-amended bentonite slurry</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">Table 7</xref> delineates the workability indices of unamended bentonite slurries at various dosages. The results indicate that slurries with bentonite dosages exceeding 8% satisfy the construction standards. To evaluate the efficacy of polymer amendments on bentonite, a slurry with suboptimal workability (specifically a 6% dosage) was selected for experimental analysis.</p>
<table-wrap id="T7" position="float">
<label>TABLE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Workability value of bentonite slurry with various dosages.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Parameters</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Target value</th>
<th colspan="3" align="left">Mass ratio of bentonite in slurry</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left">6%</th>
<th align="left">8%</th>
<th align="left">10%</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Filtrate volume (mL)</td>
<td align="left">&#x2264;25</td>
<td align="left">22.5</td>
<td align="left">16.5</td>
<td align="left">10.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Marsh viscosity (s)</td>
<td align="left">40&#x2013;45</td>
<td align="left">36</td>
<td align="left">40.2</td>
<td align="left">43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Density (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</td>
<td align="left">1.05&#x2013;1.10</td>
<td align="left">1.036</td>
<td align="left">1.047</td>
<td align="left">1.058</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">pH</td>
<td align="left">6.5&#x2013;10.0</td>
<td align="left">9.12</td>
<td align="left">9.22</td>
<td align="left">9.31</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref> shows the workability indices of XB slurries with xanthan gum (XG) content from 0% to 4%. As the XG dosage increases, the filtration loss, pH, and slurry density decrease, while the Marsh funnel viscosity increases. At a critical XG dosage of 2%, the slurry has a filtration loss of 12.5 mL, Marsh viscosity of 42.5 s, pH of 9.03, and density of 1.032 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, meeting all the specified requirements for construction workability. The results indicate that XB slurry significantly improves: (1) trench wall stabilization to prevent collapse in isolation walls; (2) pumping efficiency and cuttings suspension capacity; (3) the anti-flocculation performance of bentonite; and (4) formation pressure equilibrium to reduce fluid loss. Although pH was not independently controlled in this study, the measured pH differences between CaCl<sub>2</sub> and Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> solutions provide insight into their distinct impacts on ionic transport behavior. CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions exhibited near-neutral pH values, whereas Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> solutions were moderately acidic. The lower pH in Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> solutions increases H<sup>&#x2b;</sup> concentration, which suppresses the ionization of functional groups on xanthan gum molecular chains and weakens polymer&#x2013;cation complexation. As a result, a higher proportion of free Pb<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> ions participates in cation exchange within bentonite interlayers, leading to stronger compression of the diffuse double layer, enhanced particle flocculation, and increased permeability. In contrast, the near-neutral pH environment of CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions favors polymer hydration and pore-sealing effects, thereby reducing ionic transport and maintaining lower hydraulic conductivity. These results indicate that pH indirectly influences ion solubility and transport by regulating polymer conformation and cation exchange processes in polymer-amended bentonite systems.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>pH value and density of xanthan gum amended bentonite slurry.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-13-1752439-g007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Line graph with two y-axes shows how increasing xanthan gum dosage from zero to four percent causes both pH and density to decrease; pH is represented by a dashed blue line, density by a solid pink line.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-3">
<label>3.2.3</label>
<title>Hydraulic performance of polymer-amended bentonite slurry</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref> illustrates the curve of filter cake hydraulic conductivity versus xanthan gum (XG) dosage. The results indicate that the hydraulic conductivity of bentonite filter cakes steadily decreases as the polymer content increases. The filter cake from unamended bentonite slurry (6% dosage) has a hydraulic conductivity of 1.5 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;9</sup> m/s; in contrast, adding 4% XG reduces this value to 3.7 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;10</sup> m/s for the amended slurry. This represents a nearly order-of-magnitude reduction compared to the unamended system, confirming that XG amendment effectively reduces permeability in bentonite filter cakes. However, more research is needed to understand its permeability behavior when exposed to contaminated leachate and the microscopic mechanisms involved (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Lee et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Hydraulic conductivity of bentonite cake with various polymer dosages.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-13-1752439-g008.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Line graph showing a negative correlation between xanthan gum dosage in percent on the x-axis and hydraulic conductivity in meters per second on the y-axis, with data points highlighted in red.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Chemical compatibility of polymer-amended bentonite</title>
<sec id="s3-3-1">
<label>3.3.1</label>
<title>Chemical compatibility of bentonite with CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution</title>
<sec id="s3-3-1-1">
<label>3.3.1.1</label>
<title>Filtrate loss volume and filter cake thickness</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9a</xref> illustrates the relationship between filtrate loss volume and CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution concentration. Overall, the filtrate loss volume of all specimens increases progressively with rising CaCl<sub>2</sub> concentration. Notably, the unamended bentonite (CB) exhibits significantly higher sensitivity to variations in concentration, especially under 15 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution, where the filtrate loss of CB exceeds 25 mL, thus violating slurry workability criteria. Conversely, the xanthan gum-amended bentonite (XB) maintains filtrate loss below 25 mL, similar to its performance in deionized water. However, at concentrations exceeding 60 mM, XB experiences catastrophic degradation, with filtrate loss increasing to between 70 and 120 mL, a measurement that was hindered by cylinder overflow.</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationships between filtrate loss volume (<italic>V</italic>), filter cake thickness (<italic>L</italic>), and CaCl<sub>2</sub> concentration (<italic>c</italic>): <bold>(a)</bold> <italic>V</italic> versus <italic>c</italic>; and <bold>(b)</bold> <italic>L</italic> versus <italic>c</italic>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-13-1752439-g009.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Panel a shows a line graph of filtrate loss volume versus CaCl2 concentration comparing CB and XB, with CB sharply rising above the 25 mL threshold while XB remains lower. Panel b displays a line graph of filter cake thickness versus CaCl2 concentration, where CB increases rapidly and XB shows a modest rise.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9b</xref> illustrates the relationship between filter cake thickness and CaCl<sub>2</sub> concentration. Both specimens exhibit an increase in thickness corresponding to rising concentration; however, CB consistently produces thicker cakes than XB. The thickness of CB nearly doubles, from 2&#x2013;2.5 mm to 4&#x2013;5 mm, as the concentration increases from 0 to 15 mM, whereas the thickness of XB remains relatively stable. At a concentration of 60 mM, the thickness of XB increases to approximately 3&#x2013;3.5 mm, demonstrating a significant sensitivity to saline concentration.</p>
<p>The observed trends in filtrate loss and filter cake thickness primarily result from the following mechanism: Higher calcium chloride concentrations increase the displacement of exchangeable cations within bentonite interlayers, leading to compression of the electric double layer. This compression weakens colloidal repulsive forces, leading to particle aggregation and flocculation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Pan et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Min et al., 2019</xref>). As a result, these flocculated structures quickly settle on the surface of the filter paper, ultimately worsening both filtrate loss volume and cake thickness.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3-1-2">
<label>3.3.1.2</label>
<title>Hydraulic conductivity, swell index, and filtrate loss volume</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10</xref> shows the relationship between the hydraulic conductivity of the XB filter cake, swell index, and filtrate loss volume. The results indicate that as the filtrate loss volume increases, the hydraulic conductivity of the filter cake also rises. Under the same conditions, the hydraulic conductivity of unamended bentonite (CB) filter cake is about ten times higher than that of xanthan gum-amended bentonite (XB) filter cake. Regarding the relationship between filter cake permeability and bentonite swell index, a decrease in swell index corresponds to a gradual increase in hydraulic conductivity; this growth trend becomes more pronounced at lower swell indices. Compared to unamended CB, the hydraulic conductivity of XB filter cake demonstrates less sensitivity to changes in swell index. Specifically, when the swell index decreases from 16 mL/2 g to 10 mL/2 g, the hydraulic conductivity of CB filter cake increases by approximately one order of magnitude, whereas that of XB filter cake rises by no more than four times.</p>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 10</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship between hydraulic conductivity (<italic>k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>c</italic>
</sub>), Filtrate loss volume (<italic>V</italic>), and Swell index (SI): <bold>(a)</bold> <italic>k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>c</italic>
</sub> versus <italic>V</italic>; and <bold>(b)</bold> <italic>k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>c</italic>
</sub> versus SI.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-13-1752439-g010.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two scientific line graphs compare hydraulic conductivity for CB and XB samples. Panel a plots hydraulic conductivity versus filtrate loss volume, showing increasing trends. Panel b plots hydraulic conductivity versus swell index, showing decreasing trends. Logarithmic scale is used on both vertical axes.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>It appears that the permeability of polymer-amended bentonite is influenced not only by variations in the swell index, which reflects cation exchange effects, but also by the physical impact of polymer additives. Regarding swelling mechanisms, cation exchange within bentonite interlayers in CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions compresses the electric double layer (EDL), resulting in a reduced swell index and expanded flow channels, thereby enhancing permeability. Although cation exchange and decreased swelling continue to occur in salt solutions following polymer modification, the polymers physically seal the gaps between bentonite particles, constricting flow channels and increasing the complexity of the flow path.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3-2">
<label>3.3.2</label>
<title>Variation in chemical compatibility of bentonite exposed to lead and calcium solutions</title>
<p>To examine the effect of cation species on the chemical compatibility of bentonite, this section compares the filtrate test results when exposed to lead nitrate (Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>) and calcium chloride (CaCl<sub>2</sub>). Equal contaminant concentrations and test pressure (P<sub>0</sub> &#x3d; 100 kPa) were used to evaluate the impacts of Pb<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> and Ca<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> ions on filtrate loss volume, filter cake thickness, and permeability properties.</p>
<sec id="s3-3-2-1">
<label>3.3.2.1</label>
<title>Differences in filtrate loss and cake thickness</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11</xref> illustrates the relationship between solution concentration (<italic>c</italic>), filtrate loss volume (<italic>V</italic>), and filter cake thickness (<italic>L</italic>) for each specimen. Results show that both filtrate loss volume and cake thickness increase with increasing solution concentration; compared to Ca<sup>2&#x2b;</sup>, Pb<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> has a more significant negative impact on the permeability and swelling properties of bentonite. At 40 mM Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> concentration, the filtrate loss volume of XB approaches the slurry workability limit (&#x3c;25 mL), while at 60 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub> concentration, XB maintains filtrate loss below 10 mL.</p>
<fig id="F11" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 11</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship between Filtrate loss volume (<italic>V</italic>), filter cake thickness (<italic>L</italic>), and Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> concentration (<italic>c</italic>): <bold>(a)</bold> <italic>V</italic> versus <italic>c</italic>; and <bold>(b)</bold> <italic>L</italic> versus <italic>c</italic>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-13-1752439-g011.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two scientific graphs compare CB and XB slurry and filter cake performance in Pb(NO3)2 and CaCl2 solutions across solution concentrations from 0 to approximately 60 millimoles per liter. Panel a plots filtrate loss volume in milliliters, with a red dashed threshold at 25 milliliters, showing CB values increase dramatically above the threshold while XB remains consistently low. Panel b displays filter cake thickness in millimeters, where CB cakes thicken rapidly with concentration and XB cakes thicken only slightly in both solutions.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3-2-2">
<label>3.3.2.2</label>
<title>Difference in hydraulic performance</title>
<p>The hydraulic conductivity (<italic>k</italic>
<sub>c</sub>) and permeability ratio (<italic>k</italic>
<sub>c</sub>/<italic>k</italic>
<sub>w</sub>) for both filter cakes under Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> and CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12</xref>. As the concentration of solutions increases, the hydraulic conductivities of both specimens generally increase. Both solutions significantly influence the permeability of the filter cake composed of unamended bentonite (CB): when the concentration rises from 0 to 15 mM, the hydraulic conductivity increases by approximately one order of magnitude. Compared to CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions, Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> solutions exert a more substantial effect on the permeability of the XB filter cake.</p>
<fig id="F12" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 12</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship between Hydraulic conductivity (<italic>k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>c</italic>
</sub>) and solution concentration (<italic>c</italic>): <bold>(a)</bold> <italic>k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>c</italic>
</sub> versus <italic>c</italic>; and <bold>(b)</bold> <italic>k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>c</italic>
</sub>/<italic>k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>c</italic>
</sub> versus <italic>c</italic>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-13-1752439-g012.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Side-by-side scatter plots compare CB and XB filter cakes&#x2019; hydraulic conductivity and normalized conductivity (kc/kw) versus solution concentration in Pb(NO3)2 and CaCl2, using distinct marker shapes and colors for each condition.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Although CaCl<sub>2</sub> concentrations reach 40&#x2013;60 mM, the <italic>k</italic>
<sub>c</sub>/<italic>k</italic>
<sub>w</sub> of XB remains at 5.2, indicating that permeability has not significantly increased. The differing effects of Pb<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> and Ca<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> on filtrate loss, cake thickness, and amended slurry permeability are attributed to pH variations: test solutions with CaCl<sub>2</sub> had pH values ranging from 6.25 to 6.65, while Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> solutions ranged from 4.68 to 4.97. A lower pH increases H<sup>&#x2b;</sup> ion concentration, which inhibits the ionisation of hydroxyl (-OH) and carboxyl (-COOH) groups on xanthan gum (XG) molecular chains, preventing the formation of complexes between these functional groups and Pb<sup>2&#x2b;</sup>.</p>
<p>This increases the free Pb<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> concentration, promotes cation exchange in bentonite interlayers, compresses the electric double layer, and enhances particle flocculation and deposition, resulting in thicker filter cakes under Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>, ultimately increasing filter cake permeability.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Microstructural characteristic</title>
<p>The SEM results provide critical insight into the microstructural mechanisms governing the hydraulic and transport behavior of polymer-amended bentonite under different chemical environments. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13">Figure 13a</xref>, the unamended bentonite (CB) in deionized water exhibits a relatively uniform but loosely packed honeycomb-like fabric, which is characteristic of hydrated bentonite with limited interparticle bonding. This open structure allows the formation of continuous pore channels, explaining the comparatively higher hydraulic conductivity observed in CB filter cakes. In contrast, the xanthan gum&#x2013;amended bentonite (XB) in deionized water (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13">Figure 13b</xref>) displays a markedly different microstructure. A three-dimensional polymer&#x2013;clay network is clearly observed, where hydrated xanthan gum chains form continuous bridges between bentonite aggregates. These polymer bridges bind water molecules to form a hydrogel matrix and effectively fill and constrict intergranular pores, resulting in a denser fabric with reduced pore connectivity. This microstructural arrangement increases flow path tortuosity and significantly inhibits ionic transport, which is consistent with the lower filtrate loss and hydraulic conductivity measured for XB under neutral pH conditions. When XB is exposed to Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> solution (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13">Figure 13c</xref>), the microstructure undergoes substantial degradation. The polymer network becomes discontinuous, and the polymer strands appear thicker and more sparsely distributed, accompanied by enlarged inter-aggregate pores. This change is attributed to the acidic pH of the Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> solution, which suppresses the ionization of carboxyl and hydroxyl functional groups on xanthan gum molecular chains. The resulting reduction in electrostatic repulsion and polymer hydration induces a transition of polymer conformation from an extended to a coiled state, thereby weakening polymer&#x2013;clay interactions and diminishing the pore-sealing capability of the hydrogel network (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Shen and Wei, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Tian et al., 2019</xref>). Meanwhile, the increased availability of free Pb<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> ions enhances cation exchange and compresses the diffuse double layer of bentonite, promoting particle flocculation and the development of preferential flow channels.</p>
<fig id="F13" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 13</label>
<caption>
<p>SEM images of filter cake samples for <bold>(a)</bold> CB in deionized water; <bold>(b)</bold> XB in deionized water; and <bold>(c)</bold> XB exposed to 40 mM Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> solution.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-13-1752439-g013.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Panel (a) displays a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image showing a rough, porous surface texture at 500 times magnification. Panel (b) shows a SEM image at the same magnification, highlighting interconnected fibrous and web-like structures across the surface. Panel (c) provides a higher magnification SEM view at two thousand times, revealing fine filamentous structures bridging larger, uneven particles within a porous matrix.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Overall, the SEM observations demonstrate that the hydraulic performance of polymer-amended bentonite is governed by the stability of the polymer&#x2013;clay network, which is strongly influenced by solution chemistry and pH. Under near-neutral conditions, the extended polymer network effectively restricts pore connectivity and ionic transport, whereas under acidic conditions, polymer collapse and intensified cation exchange lead to microstructural coarsening and increased permeability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Wireko et al., 2022</xref>). These findings provide direct microstructural evidence linking pH-dependent polymer behavior to the macroscopic transport properties of bentonite filter cakes.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s4">
<label>4</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>A series of fundamental property assessments, swelling index evaluations, and magnetic flux leakage (MFL) permeability tests were conducted to examine the effect of polymer modifications on the hydraulic conductivity of standard bentonite filter cakes used in slurry trench walls, with various concentrations of CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions. The results of this research indicate the following conclusions:<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>1.</label>
<p>Five selected polymer amendments substantially improve the swelling capacity and chemical stability of bentonite in saline environments. Notably, xanthan gum-modified bentonite outperformed all others in terms of swelling and hydraulic performance, making it the preferred choice for future research. As the xanthan gum dosage increases, the swell index and liquid limit of XB show an upward trend, while the specific gravity decreases. When the xanthan gum dosage reaches 4%, the permeability coefficient of the bentonite slurry filter cake drops to as low as 3.7 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;10</sup> m/s, which is ten times lower than that of unmodified bentonite (1.5 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;9</sup> m/s).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>2.</label>
<p>Under a 15 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution, the filtrate loss volume of CB exceeds 25 mL, whereas the filtrate loss volume of XB is 9.5 mL when exposed to a 60 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution. Compared to CB, the hydraulic conductivity of the XB filter cake shows less sensitivity to changes in the swell index. Specifically, when the swell index drops from 16 mL/2 g to 10 mL/2 g, the hydraulic conductivity of the CB filter cake increases by about ten times, while that of the XB filter cake increases by no more than four times. Compared to calcium ions, lead ions have a more significant negative impact on the permeability and swelling properties of bentonite. At the same solution concentration, both CB and XB show higher filtrate loss volumes and hydraulic conductivity in Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> solution than in CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>3.</label>
<p>Polymer conformation transitions from an extended structure in deionized water to a coiled configuration in saline conditions, leading to decreased pore sealing effectiveness and increased hydraulic conductivity of XB, although it still remains lower than that of CB samples. Further research is necessary to verify the hypotheses of polymer clogging and to study the adsorption properties and membrane behavior of contaminant transport through the vertical cutoff wall backfills containing xanthan gum-amended bentonite.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s5">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s6">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>SS: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. WZ: Writing &#x2013; review and editing. NQ: Writing &#x2013; review and editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s8">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="s9">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ashmawy</surname>
<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>El-Hajji</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sotelo</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muhammad</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Hydraulic performance of untreated and polymer-treated bentonite in inorganic landfill leachates</article-title>. <source>Clays Clay Minerals</source> <volume>50</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>546</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>552</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1346/000986002320679288</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Balaganesh</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nandhini</surname>
<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ragavi</surname>
<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shankar</surname>
<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vasudevan</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Flow behaviour of wastewater contaminants in compost with manufactured sand (M-SAND) under layered conditions</article-title>. <source>J. Solid Waste Technol. Manag.</source> <volume>49</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>231</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>239</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5276/jswtm/iswmaw/492/2023.231</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bohnhoff</surname>
<given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shackelford</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Hydraulic conductivity of polymerized bentonite-amended backfills</article-title>. <source>J. Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Eng.</source> <volume>140</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>04013028</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001034</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chung</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daniel</surname>
<given-names>D. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Modified fluid loss test as an improved measure of hydraulic conductivity for bentonite</article-title>. <source>Geotechnical Test. J.</source> <volume>31</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>251</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1520/gtj100005</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de Carvalho Balaban</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vidal</surname>
<given-names>E. L. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borges</surname>
<given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Design of experiments to evaluate clay swelling inhibition by different combinations of organic compounds and inorganic salts for application in water base drilling fluids</article-title>. <source>Appl. Clay Sci.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>124</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>130</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.clay.2014.12.029</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Di Emidio</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mazzieri</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verastegui-Flores</surname>
<given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Impe</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bezuijen</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Polymer-treated bentonite clay for chemical-resistant geosynthetic clay liners</article-title>. <source>Geosynth. Int.</source> <volume>22</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>125</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>137</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1680/gein.14.00036</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Di Maio</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Exposure of bentonite to salt solution: osmotic and mechanical effects</article-title>. <source>G&#xe9;otechnique</source> <volume>46</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>695</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>707</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1680/geot.1996.46.4.695</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>S. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of polymer amendment on hydraulic conductivity of bentonite in calcium chloride solutions</article-title>. <source>J. Mater. Civ. Eng.</source> <volume>33</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>04020452</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003518</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Evans</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruffing</surname>
<given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Compatibility of soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoff wall backfill</article-title>. <source>Geotech. Front.</source>, <fpage>167</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>177</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Evans</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruffing</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barlow</surname>
<given-names>L. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coughenour</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Long-term stress and consolidation behavior of a soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoff wall</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Geo-congress 2024</source>, <fpage>612</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>620</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname>
<given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhuang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reddy</surname>
<given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>N. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Novel composite polymer-amended bentonite for environmental containment: hydraulic conductivity, chemical compatibility, enhanced rheology and polymer stability</article-title>. <source>Constr. Build. Mater.</source> <volume>378</volume>, <fpage>131200</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131200</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guler</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ozhan</surname>
<given-names>H. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Hydraulic performance of anionic polymer-treated bentonite-granular soil mixtures</article-title>. <source>Appl. Clay Sci.</source> <volume>157</volume>, <fpage>139</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>147</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.clay.2018.02.047</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jia-Kai</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang-Xiong</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yi-Xin</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mulati</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shuai</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang-Tong</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Polymer-modified bentonites with low hydraulic conductivity and improved chemical compatibility as barriers for Cu<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> containment</article-title>. <source>Acta Geotech.</source> <volume>18</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1629</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1649</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11440-022-01686-3</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lim</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>I. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Choi</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Measurement of hydraulic properties of bentonite cake formation deposited on base soil medium</article-title>. <source>Appl. Clay Sci.</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>187</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>201</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.clay.2016.01.037</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cleall</surname>
<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wen</surname>
<given-names>Y. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Stresses in soil&#x2013;bentonite slurry trench cut-off walls</article-title>. <source>G&#xe9;otechnique</source> <volume>65</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>843</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>850</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1680/geot.14.p.219</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>G. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cleall</surname>
<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Design charts for contaminant transport through slurry trench cutoff walls</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Eng.</source> <volume>143</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>06017005</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001253</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021a</year>). <article-title>Laboratory evaluation of hydraulic conductivity and chemical compatibility of bentonite slurry for grouting walls</article-title>. <source>Environ. Earth Sci.</source> <volume>80</volume> (<issue>17</issue>), <fpage>569</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12665-021-09847-5</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benson</surname>
<given-names>C. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021b</year>). <article-title>Hydraulic conductivity of bentonite-polymer composite geosynthetic clay liners permeated with bauxite liquor</article-title>. <source>Geotext. Geomembranes</source> <volume>49</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>420</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>429</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.10.015</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Estimation of the hydraulic conductivity of bentonite&#x2013;polymer GCLs with machine learning techniques</article-title>. <source>Environ. Geotech.</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>433</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>451</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1680/jenge.24.00002</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gates</surname>
<given-names>W. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bouazza</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rowe</surname>
<given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Fluid loss as a quick method to evaluate hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners under acidic conditions</article-title>. <source>Can. Geotechnical J.</source> <volume>51</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>158</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>163</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/cgj-2013-0241</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Modified fluid loss test to measure the hydraulic conductivity of heavy metal-contaminated bentonite filter cakes</article-title>. <source>Geo-Chicago</source> <volume>2016</volume>, <fpage>568</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>577</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Malusis</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McKeehan</surname>
<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Chemical compatibility of model soil-bentonite backfill containing multiswellable bentonite</article-title>. <source>J. Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Eng.</source> <volume>139</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>198</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000729</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Masoodhu</surname>
<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Natarajan</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vasudevan</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Hydraulic conductivity performance of polymer-modified composite GCLs subjected to inorganic salt solutions</article-title>. <source>J. Mater. Eng. Perform.</source>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11665-025-12906-8</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mazzieri</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Di Emidio</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pasqualini</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effect of wet-and-dry ageing in seawater on the swelling properties and hydraulic conductivity of two amended bentonites</article-title>. <source>Appl. Clay Sci.</source> <volume>142</volume>, <fpage>40</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.clay.2016.10.031</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Min</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Experimental study on property change of slurry and filter cake of slurry shield under seawater intrusion</article-title>. <source>Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.</source> <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>290</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>299</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tust.2019.03.006</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Opdyke</surname>
<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Evans</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Slag-cement-bentonite slurry walls</article-title>. <source>J. Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Eng.</source> <volume>131</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>673</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>681</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2005)131:6(673)</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ou-yang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Performance and deterioration mechanisms of PAC amended calcium bentonite in seawater with different compositions</article-title>. <source>Case Stud. Constr. Mater.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>02869</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e02869</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pandey</surname>
<given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Badiger</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sivakumar Babu</surname>
<given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of bentonite and polymer soil amendment on contaminant transport parameters</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Toxic, Radioact. Waste</source> <volume>23</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>04018034</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(asce)hz.2153-5515.0000427</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Philip</surname>
<given-names>L. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>An investigation into contaminant transport processes through single-phase cement&#x2013;bentonite slurry walls</article-title>. <source>Eng. Geology</source> <volume>60</volume> (<issue>1-4</issue>), <fpage>209</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>221</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0013-7952(00)00102-2</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rout</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effect of inorganic salt solutions on physical and mechanical properties of bentonite based liner</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Toxic, Radioact. Waste</source> <volume>24</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>04020053</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(asce)hz.2153-5515.0000553</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ryan</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruffing</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Evans</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Soil bentonite slurry trench cutoff walls: history, design, and construction practices</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Geo-congress 2022</source>, <fpage>89</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>99</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Scalia</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benson</surname>
<given-names>C. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Polymer fouling and hydraulic conductivity of mixtures of sodium bentonite and a bentonite-polymer composite</article-title>. <source>J. Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Eng.</source> <volume>143</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>04016112</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001628</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Scalia</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benson</surname>
<given-names>C. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bohnhoff</surname>
<given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edil</surname>
<given-names>T. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shackelford</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Long-term hydraulic conductivity of a bentonite-polymer composite permeated with aggressive inorganic solutions</article-title>. <source>J. Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Eng.</source> <volume>140</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>04013025</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001040</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Setz</surname>
<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benson</surname>
<given-names>C. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bradshaw</surname>
<given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effect of ammonium on the hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners</article-title>. <source>Geotext. Geomembranes</source> <volume>45</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>665</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>673</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.08.008</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>H. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reddy</surname>
<given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <source>Geoenvironmental engineering: site remediation, waste containment, and emerging waste management technologies</source>. <publisher-loc>Hoboken, NJ</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>John Wiley &#x26; Sons, Inc</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>S. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Hydraulic conductivity of polymer-amended sand-bentonite backfills permeated with lead nitrate solutions</article-title>. <source>Adv. Civ. Eng.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>9435194</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2018/9435194</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Syed Masoodhu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Natarajan</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vasudevan</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Modification of bentonite with black cotton soil and carboxyl methyl cellulose for the enhancement of hydraulic performance of geosynthetic clay liners</article-title>. <source>Water Sci. &#x26; Technol.</source> <volume>89</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>1846</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1859</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2166/wst.2024.093</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38619907</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Likos</surname>
<given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benson</surname>
<given-names>C. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Polymer elution and hydraulic conductivity of bentonite&#x2013;polymer composite geosynthetic clay liners</article-title>. <source>J. Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Eng.</source> <volume>145</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>04019071</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002097</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tong</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Evans</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Numerical analysis of consolidation behavior of soil-bentonite backfill in a full-scale slurry trench cutoff wall test</article-title>. <source>Soils Found.</source> <volume>62</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>101188</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sandf.2022.101188</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wireko</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abichou</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zainab</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effect of incineration ash leachates on the hydraulic conductivity of bentonite-polymer composite geosynthetic clay liners</article-title>. <source>Waste Manag.</source> <volume>139</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>38</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.011</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34929416</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>H. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>V. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Hydraulic conductivity and self-healing performance of engineered cementitious composites exposed to acid mine drainage</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>716</volume>, <fpage>137095</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137095</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32059325</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reddy</surname>
<given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>SHMP-amended Ca-bentonite/sand backfill barrier for containment of lead contamination in groundwater</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>370</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31935850</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/126316/overview">Tadeusz Hryniewicz</ext-link>, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2098404/overview">Sathish Kumar Palaniappan</ext-link>, King Mongkut&#x2019;s University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3316309/overview">Vasudevan Mangottiri</ext-link>, Bannari Amman Institute of Technology (BIT), India</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>