<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Mater.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Materials</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Mater.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-8016</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1655749</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmats.2025.1655749</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Materials</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Green-synthesized Mg-substituted PrFeO<sub>3</sub> perovskites via waste-derived precursors for acetone gas sensing</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Middha et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2025.1655749">10.3389/fmats.2025.1655749</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Middha</surname>
<given-names>Shiffali</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nindrayog</surname>
<given-names>Amritpal Singh</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1258330/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mahajan</surname>
<given-names>Jagriti</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tandon</surname>
<given-names>Nitin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>Satvir</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>Indu</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dosanjh</surname>
<given-names>Harmanjit Singh</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>Jaspal</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7">
<sup>7</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mahajan</surname>
<given-names>Aman</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff8">
<sup>8</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Prasad</surname>
<given-names>Nupur</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff9">
<sup>9</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Varshney</surname>
<given-names>Deekshant</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff10">
<sup>10</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff11">
<sup>11</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>Lovepreet</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff12">
<sup>12</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>Anupinder</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Physics, Multifunctional Materials Laboratory, Guru Nanak Dev University</institution>, <addr-line>Amritsar</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Physics, Lyallpur Khalsa College</institution>, <addr-line>Jalandhar</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Department of Applied Sciences, School of Engineering and Technology, CT University</institution>, <addr-line>Punjab, Ludhiana</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Department of Physics, Career Point University</institution>, <addr-line>Hamirpur</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
<institution>Center for Green Energy Research, Career Point University</institution>, <addr-line>Hamirpur</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
<institution>School of Chemical Engineering and Physical Sciences, Lovely Professional University</institution>, <addr-line>Phagwara</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff7">
<sup>7</sup>
<institution>Department of Physics, Punjabi University</institution>, <addr-line>Patiala</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff8">
<sup>8</sup>
<institution>Department of Physics, Materials Science Lab, Guru Nanak Dev University</institution>, <addr-line>Amritsar</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff9">
<sup>9</sup>
<institution>Research and Development Cell, Lovely Professional University</institution>, <addr-line>Phagwara</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff10">
<sup>10</sup>
<institution>Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University</institution>, <addr-line>Rajpura</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff11">
<sup>11</sup>
<institution>Centre for Promotion of Research, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University)</institution>, <addr-line>Uttarakhand</addr-line>, <addr-line>Dehradun</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff12">
<sup>12</sup>
<institution>Brain Science Institute, Korea Institute of Science &#x26; Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Seoul</addr-line>, <country>Republic of Korea</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1734720/overview">Jagpreet Singh</ext-link>, Rayat Bahra University, India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3126258/overview">Mohd Khan</ext-link>, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3127049/overview">Cristina Echevarria Bonet</ext-link>, University of Oviedo, Spain</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Anupinder Singh, <email>anupinders@gmail.com</email>; Lovepreet Singh, <email>lovepreet.s@kist.re.kr</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>11</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>1655749</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>28</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>21</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Middha, Nindrayog, Mahajan, Tandon, Singh, Sharma, Dosanjh, Singh, Mahajan, Prasad, Varshney, Singh and Singh.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Middha, Nindrayog, Mahajan, Tandon, Singh, Sharma, Dosanjh, Singh, Mahajan, Prasad, Varshney, Singh and Singh</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particularly acetone, is crucial for environmental monitoring and biomedical diagnostics. In this study, Mg-substituted PrFeO<sub>3</sub> perovskite oxides (PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2, 0.3) were synthesized via a sol-gel auto-combustion route using Fe and Mg precursors extracted from waste-derived materials, offering a sustainable and cost-effective synthesis pathway. Pristine PrFeO<sub>3</sub> exhibited p-type semiconducting behavior; however, Mg incorporation induced a shift to n-type conduction, attributed to the generation of oxygen vacancies and Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>/Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> charge compensation. Gas sensing measurements conducted between 60 &#xb0;C and 210 &#xb0;C identified 150 &#xb0;C as the optimal operating temperature. The <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3 composition demonstrated the highest response to acetone, with rapid response (33 s) and recovery (20 s) times. The sensor exhibited excellent repeatability at 50 ppm acetone, moderate selectivity toward ethanol, propanol, and DMF, and demonstrated good long-term stability. The VOC sensing performance is attributed to defect engineering via Mg substitution, increased oxygen vacancy concentration, and improved charge carrier dynamics. These results highlight the potential of waste-integrated perovskite sensors in advancing sustainable gas-sensing technologies.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>waste-derived materials</kwd>
<kwd>gas sensing</kwd>
<kwd>perovskite oxides</kwd>
<kwd>response time</kwd>
<kwd>and recovery time</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Colloidal Materials and Interfaces</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>The rapid expansion of industrial activities, especially in developing nations, has raised critical concerns about occupational safety and environmental pollution. Industries such as petrochemicals, chemical manufacturing, biomedical devices, and food processing frequently emit hazardous gases, necessitating reliable, real-time gas detection systems. Acetone, a prominent volatile organic compound (VOC), is widely used across sectors and poses substantial health risks, including respiratory issues, neurotoxicity, and organ damage upon prolonged exposure. Moreover, its high volatility and flammability demand continuous monitoring to mitigate fire hazards and ensure workplace safety (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fan et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">WANG et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Li et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Liu et al., 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>Metal oxide semiconductor (MOS)-based gas sensors have garnered attention due to their fast response, durability, and operational simplicity. These sensors operate by detecting changes in electrical resistance due to interactions between adsorbed oxygen species (O<sub>2</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>, O<sup>&#x2212;</sup>, O<sub>2</sub>
<sup>2-</sup>) and the target gas. However, conventional MOS materials such as ZnO and SnO<sub>2</sub> often exhibit limited selectivity, high operating temperatures, and inadequate long-term stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Leidinger et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Mirzaei et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Fergu and s, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Saha et al., 2016a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Arya et al., 2025</xref>). This has prompted the exploration of novel materials with tailored physicochemical properties.</p>
<p>Perovskite oxides (ABO<sub>3</sub>) have emerged as promising candidates for gas sensing owing to their structural flexibility, high oxygen ion mobility, and mixed ionic-electronic conductivity (MIEC) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">He et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Shannon and Prewitt, 1970</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Pei et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Litzelman et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Nakhaei and Sanavi Khoshnoud, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Benyoussef et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Harikrishnan et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ge et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Ecija et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Yang et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Sultan et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Singh et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Jia et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bertocci et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Moseley, 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Qin et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Ma et al., 2018a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Shella et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bui and Shin, 2023</xref>). Their A- and B-site cation tunability allows precise engineering of electronic structure, defect chemistry, and catalytic activity&#x2014;critical parameters for optimizing gas adsorption, charge transport, and surface reactions. Among them, praseodymium orthoferrite (PrFeO<sub>3</sub>) stands out due to its structural stability and ease of cation substitution.</p>
<p>Recent studies indicate that doping transition or rare-earth metals at the B-site&#x2014;such as Sm<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>, Ti<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>, Co<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>, Mn<sup>2&#x2b;</sup>, and Ni<sup>2&#x2b;</sup>&#x2014;can significantly enhance gas sensing by modulating oxygen vacancy concentrations and electronic properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Pei et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Litzelman et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Nakhaei and Sanavi Khoshnoud, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Benyoussef et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Harikrishnan et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ge et al., 2001</xref>; Ecija et al.; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Yang et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Sultan et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Singh et al., 2024</xref>). For example, Sm-doped PrFeO<sub>3</sub> exhibited improved acetone sensitivity due to increased defect density and better charge transport (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Pei et al., 2021</xref>). Previous studies have shown that Mg doping in rare-earth orthoferrites can significantly enhance acetone sensing performance by increasing oxygen vacancies and improving charge transport dynamics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Liu et al., 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, we explore the synthesis and gas sensing characteristics of Mg-substituted PrFeO<sub>3</sub> (PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2, 0.3), focusing on the role of Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> (ionic radius &#x3d; 0.72 &#xc5;) in replacing Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup> (0.645 &#xc5;) to induce structural distortion, create oxygen vacancies, and modify electronic behavior. Magnesium (Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup>) was selected as a dopant for Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup> due to its larger ionic radius (0.72 &#xc5;) compared to Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup> (0.645 &#xc5;) and its lower valence state. This substitution creates a charge imbalance that is compensated by the formation of oxygen vacancies (V_O<sup>..</sup>), which are known to act as active sites for gas adsorption. Additionally, the size mismatch induces lattice strain, promoting enhanced surface reactivity. Notably, both Fe and Mg precursors were extracted from waste-derived sources, aligning the synthesis approach with sustainable and circular economy principles. This green synthesis strategy aims to reduce the dependence on commercial salts, lower material costs, and minimize environmental impact.</p>
<p>Comprehensive characterization using XRD, FESEM, XPS, BET, and gas sensing measurements is employed to elucidate the structure-property-performance relationships. The findings offer valuable insights into defect-controlled perovskite design and position PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> as a candidate for VOC sensing applications, especially in acetone detection under moderate operating conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>2 Experimental methodology</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Synthesis</title>
<p>Mg-substituted PrFeO<sub>3</sub> perovskite oxides, PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3), were synthesized via a sol-gel auto-combustion method using waste-derived precursors for iron and magnesium. High-purity praseodymium oxide (Pr<sub>6</sub>O<sub>11</sub>, Sigma Aldrich, &#x2265;99.9%) was dissolved in concentrated nitric acid (HNO<sub>3</sub>, 68%) under mild heating (70 &#xb0;C) and continuous stirring for 30 min to obtain a clear praseodymium nitrate solution. Industrial red mud (rich in Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) was used as the iron source. 20 g of dried red mud powder was treated with 200 mL of 2.0 M hydrochloric acid (HCl) and heated at 80 &#xb0;C for 4 h under constant magnetic stirring (600 rpm) in a reflux setup to enhance leaching efficiency. The leachate was filtered using Whatman No. 42 filter paper to remove silicates and residual solids. The resulting Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>-enriched solution was reacted with 30 mL of concentrated nitric acid (HNO<sub>3</sub>) and evaporated at 60 &#xb0;C on a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure (150 mbar) to obtain crystalline Fe(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>&#xb7;9H<sub>2</sub>O (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bartel et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Agrawal et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Rai et al., 2012</xref>). Scrapped magnesium alloy (AZ31 type) was washed with acetone, dried, and ground into small flakes. 10 g of alloy was dissolved in 100 mL of 1.5 M nitric acid (HNO<sub>3</sub>) at 60 &#xb0;C for 3 h under stirring (500 rpm). After complete dissolution, the solution was filtered to remove insoluble residues like aluminum and zinc. The clear filtrate containing Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> ions was subjected to slow evaporation at 60 &#xb0;C to yield purified Mg(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>&#xb7;6H<sub>2</sub>O crystals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cui et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Royani et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Jiao et al., 2019</xref>). The schematic view of the sol-gel auto-combustion route shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>. The stoichiometrically required amounts of Fe(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>&#xb7;9H<sub>2</sub>O, Mg(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>&#xb7;6H<sub>2</sub>O, and praseodymium nitrate were then dissolved in 100 mL of triply distilled deionized water and thoroughly mixed for 1 h at 60 &#xb0;C. Citric acid (molar ratio 1:1 with total metal cations) was added as a chelating agent, followed by ethylene glycol (molar ratio 2:1 with citric acid) to promote the formation of a polymeric gel. The resulting solution was stirred continuously at 80 &#xb0;C until it formed a homogeneous gel (&#x223c;3 h). The gel was then dried in a hot-air oven at 250 &#xb0;C, where auto-combustion spontaneously occurred within 5&#x2013;10 min, yielding a loose, voluminous ash-like powder. This as-prepared precursor was calcined at 700 &#xb0;C for 6 h in a muffle furnace to remove organic residues and initiate perovskite phase formation. Finally, the powders were finely ground and sintered at 900 &#xb0;C for 2 h to achieve better crystallinity and phase purity.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Schematic representation of the synthesis process for PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2 &#x26; 0.3) via sol-gel auto-combustion route.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1655749-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Flowchart illustrating a process for obtaining calcined powder. It begins with weighing raw material and adding it to a solvent, followed by heating for six hours at ninety degrees Celsius. The mixture is heated above one hundred degrees Celsius for gelation, forming a chelated mass. This mass is heated in a furnace, then crushed into powder. The powder is mixed with polyvinyl alcohol and sieved. Hydraulic pressing forms pellets, which are sintered at eight hundred degrees Celsius for nine hours, resulting in calcined powder at seven hundred degrees Celsius for eight hours.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Characterization</title>
<p>The structural, morphological, chemical, and gas sensing characteristics of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2 &#x26; 0.3) were meticulously analyzed employing diverse methodologies. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed using a Bruker D8 X-ray diffractometer (Cu K&#x3b1; radiation, &#x3bb; &#x3d; 1.54 &#xc5;, 40 kV, 30 mA) to verify the single-phase orthorhombic structure. Morphological examination was conducted utilizing Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) with a Carl Zeiss Supra 55, operating at 20 kV, while compositional analysis was executed using Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) with an Oxford Instruments X-MaxN 51-XMX0004 detector. Surface area and porosity assessments were performed utilizing the Brunauer&#x2013;Emmett&#x2013;Teller (BET) technique with a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 analyzer, while pore size distribution was ascertained by the Barrett&#x2013;Joyner&#x2013;Halenda (BJH) method. An investigation of the oxidation state of elements of the prepared composition was conducted using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) using a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha &#x2b; spectrometer, employing a monochromatic Al K&#x3b1; source at 1486.6 eV. The gas detecting performance was assessed utilizing a Keithley 2,450 SourceMeter for real-time resistance measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Fabrication and measurement of gas sensors</title>
<p>A pellet is self-standing and mechanically stable. Therefore, sintered sample pellets were taken, and two electrodes of silver paste were drawn on one of their surfaces with a fine brush. The paste was then allowed to dry at room temperature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Singh et al., 2024</xref>). Finally, the sensors were connected to a measurement system to monitor their electrical responses.</p>
<p>Response and efficiency measurement of a gas sensor involves quantifying its response to the presence and concentration of specific gases in the environment, primarily through changes in its electrical properties. Initially, the sensor&#x2019;s baseline electrical characteristic, particularly resistance (R<sub>0</sub>), was measured in a clean-air environment to serve as a reference. After the sensors were exposed to a known concentration of the target gas in a controlled gas chamber. The concentration of the target gas was measured by the formula (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Jia et al., 2015</xref>):<disp-formula id="equ1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>22.4</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3a6;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Where the Concentration of the target gas is denoted by C, measured in ppm, the volume of the gas fraction is mentioned as &#x3a6;, and the liquid density is given by the symbol &#x3c1; (g/mL). V<sub>1</sub> is the volume of the liquid measured in &#x3bc;L. The chamber volume is expressed as V<sub>2</sub> (L), and M is the molecular weight of the liquid in g/mol.</p>
<p>The interaction between the gas molecules and the sensing material caused changes in its resistance, denoted by Rg. This change was due to the adsorption and reaction of gas molecules on the sensor&#x2019;s surface, altering its conductivity.</p>
<p>The sensor&#x2019;s responses &#x2018;S&#x2019; can be denoted by the formula:<disp-formula id="equ2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Where R<sub>0</sub> is the resistance in clean air, and R<sub>g</sub> is the resistance when exposed to the target gas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bertocci et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Moseley, 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Qin et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Ma et al., 2018a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Shella et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results|discussion" id="s3">
<title>3 Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Structural and morphological analysis</title>
<p>The Goldschmidt tolerance factor (<italic>t</italic>) is a key parameter used to predict the stability and structural distortion of perovskite oxides. It is defined as:<disp-formula id="equ3">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msqrt>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>where <inline-formula id="inf1">
<mml:math id="m4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the ionic radius of the A-site cation, <inline-formula id="inf2">
<mml:math id="m5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the ionic radius of the B-site cation, and <inline-formula id="inf3">
<mml:math id="m6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the ionic radius of oxygen. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bui and Shin, 2023</xref>) Upon Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> substitution in PrMg<sub>x</sub>Fe<sub>1-x</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, where Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> (0.72 &#xc5;) replaces Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup> (0.645 &#xc5;), the average B-site ionic radius increases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Shannon and Prewitt, 1970</xref>). The calculated tolerance factors for <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 are 0.951, 0.947, and 0.944, respectively. This progressive decrease suggests modifications in the lattice symmetry and octahedral connectivity. The crystal structure of pristine PrFeO<sub>3</sub>, visualized using VESTA, illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>, highlights the perovskite framework and FeO<sub>6</sub> octahedral arrangement. The decreasing tolerance factor with Mg substitution suggests an increasing degree of structural distortion due to enhanced FeO<sub>6</sub> octahedral tilting, further influencing the overall symmetry and stability of the material.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Crystal structure of PrFeO<sub>3</sub>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1655749-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Molecular structure diagram illustrating a 3D lattice. Red spheres labeled O1 and O2 represent oxygen atoms. Blue rods connect oxygen to atoms labeled Fe, likely iron. Yellow shapes around atoms labeled Pr suggest praseodymium. An axis with a, b, c directions is depicted on the left.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns confirm the formation of a single-phase orthorhombic perovskite structure for PrMg<sub>x</sub>Fe<sub>1-x</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2 &#x26; 0.3), with space group Pbnm (No. 62), consistent with PDF No. 01-074&#x2013;1472 for PrFeO<sub>3</sub>, shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>, indicating the successful incorporation of Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> into the perovskite lattice. The primary diffraction peaks at 2&#x3b8; &#x2248; 22.7 &#xb0;, 32.4 &#xb0;, 46.9 &#xb0;, and 57.9 &#xb0; correspond to the (101), (121), (202), and (123) planes, respectively. The crystallite size (D) was estimated using the Scherrer equation:<disp-formula id="equ4">
<mml:math id="m7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>D</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3bb;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Cos</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3b8;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>X-ray Diffraction (XRD) patterns of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2 &#x26; 0.3), confirming the formation of a single-phase orthorhombic perovskite structure with space group Pbnm.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1655749-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">X-ray diffraction patterns for three samples with varying x values (0.1, 0.2, 0.3) are shown. Peaks are labeled with Miller indices, indicating crystal structure. Each sample's intensity varies across the 20 to 80-degree 2&#x3B8; range.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Where K is the shape factor (0.9), &#x3bb; is the X-ray wavelength (Cu K&#x3b1; &#x3d; 1.5406 &#xc5;), &#x3b2; is the full-width at half maximum (FWHM), and &#x3b8; is the Bragg angle. The calculated crystallite sizes showed a decreasing trend with increasing Mg content: 13.21 nm (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1), 12.20 nm (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2), and 10.75 nm (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3), indicating that Mg substitution introduces structural distortions, thereby limiting crystal growth. To further analyze lattice imperfections, the dislocation density was determined using the Williamson&#x2013;Smallman relation:<disp-formula id="equ5">
<mml:math id="m8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>The calculated dislocation densities were found to be 5.72 <inline-formula id="inf4">
<mml:math id="m9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> 10<sup>15</sup> m<sup>-2</sup>, 6.72 <inline-formula id="inf5">
<mml:math id="m10">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> 10<sup>15</sup> m<sup>-2</sup>, and 8.65 <inline-formula id="inf6">
<mml:math id="m11">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> 10<sup>15</sup> m<sup>-2</sup> for <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3, respectively, demonstrating a significant increase in lattice defects with higher Mg substitution. Additionally, the microstrain (&#x3b5;) was determined using Williamson&#x2013;Hall analysis:<disp-formula id="equ6">
<mml:math id="m12">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">tan</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>&#x3b8;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Where &#x3b2; is the FWHM in radians. The microstrain values also exhibited an increasing trend, from 7.39 <inline-formula id="inf7">
<mml:math id="m13">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> 10<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>(<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1) to 7.58 <inline-formula id="inf8">
<mml:math id="m14">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> 10<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>(<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2) and 8.03 <inline-formula id="inf9">
<mml:math id="m15">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> 10<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>(<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3), suggesting enhanced lattice distortions.</p>
<p>The observed reduction in crystallite size, increase in dislocation density, and rise in microstrain strongly indicate that Mg incorporation leads to higher structural disorder and defect density. These effects can be attributed to oxygen vacancies and strain-induced lattice deformations, which are further supported by the broadening of XRD peaks.</p>
<p>Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) was performed to analyse the grain morphology and porosity of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2 &#x26; 0.3), as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>. The micrographs at 100kX magnification exhibit a polycrystalline structure characterized by distinct round grains, whilst the 50kX pictures elucidate differences in porosity. The grain size, analysed with ImageJ software, decreases from 143 nm (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1) to 134 nm (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2) and thereafter declines to 117 nm (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3), following the XRD crystallite size trend. A significant rise in porosity is noted with Mg doping; <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1 displays a dense structure, while <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2 and <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3 reveal more pronounced voids and grain boundary separation. Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x &#x3d;</italic> 0.3), shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>, verifies the existence of Pr, Fe, O, and Mg, with atomic ratios consistent with the anticipated stoichiometry. Elemental mapping reveals a consistent distribution of Mg and Fe, signifying homogenous doping within the perovskite structure.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) images of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> samples with <bold>(a)</bold> <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, <bold>(b)</bold> <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2, and <bold>(c)</bold> <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3, showing variations in average grain size with increasing Mg content.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1655749-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Three panels labeled (a), (b), and (c) display scanning electron microscope images and corresponding histograms of grain size distribution. Panel (a) shows densely packed grains with an average size of 143 nanometers. Panel (b) depicts similar grain morphology with a slightly smaller average size of 134 nanometers. Panel (c) illustrate grains with an average size of 117 nanometers. Each histogram charts the distribution of grain counts against size, indicating variations across the samples.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrum of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x &#x3d;</italic> 0.3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1655749-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Electron microscopy image showing a granular structure with several elemental maps for oxygen (O Ka1, red), magnesium (Mg Ka1, yellow), iron (Fe Ka1, orange), and praseodymium (Pr La1, green). Below is an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) spectrum displaying element peaks with a table indicating weight and atomic percentages: Oxygen 20.83% (60.36% atomic), Magnesium 4.31% (7.10% atomic), Iron 17.07% (14.46% atomic), Praseodymium 57.79% (18.08% atomic).</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The textural characteristics of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x &#x3d;</italic> 0.3) validate its mesoporous nature, as demonstrated by a Type IV nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm exhibiting a hysteresis loop illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>. The material exhibits a Brunauer&#x2013;Emmett&#x2013;Teller (BET) surface area of around 6.24 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>-1</sup>, calculated using the multi-point BET method. The total pore volume is approximately 0.030 cm<sup>3</sup> g<sup>-1</sup>, Additionally, the Barrett&#x2013;Joyner&#x2013;Halenda (BJH) analysis reveals a pore surface area of &#x223c; 5.61 m<sup>2</sup>/g and a narrow pore size distribution centered &#x223c; 3.83 nm, indicating homogeneous and well-developed mesoporosity and promoting effective gas diffusion and adsorption-desorption processes. The interlinked pore network and augmented surface area improve the accessibility of adsorption sites, increasing the material&#x2019;s structural efficacy.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Nitrogen Adsorption- Desorption Isotherms and BJH Pore Size Distribution curve for PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1655749-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Adsorption-desorption isotherm graph showing volume absorbed (cubic centimeters per gram) versus relative pressure (P/P0) from 0.0 to 1.0. Adsorption is shown in pink and desorption in blue. Inset graph displays dV/dD versus pore diameter (nanometers), highlighting peaks and troughs, indicating pore size distribution.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) was utilized to examine the oxidation states and defect structure of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2 &#x26; 0.3), concentrating on the development of oxygen vacancies and Fe valence states. The survey spectrum depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref> validated the existence of Pr, Mg, Fe, and O, with no extraneous elements identified, hence confirming the phase purity of the synthesized materials. The O 1 s spectra were deconvoluted into three separate components: lattice oxygen (O<sub>L</sub>, &#x223c;529 eV), oxygen vacancies (O<sub>V</sub>, &#x223c;531&#x2013;532 eV), and surface-adsorbed oxygen species (O<sub>A</sub>, &#x223c;532&#x2013;533 eV), as seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>. The quantitative analysis of these peaks offer information into the defect chemistry of the system summarised in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>. As the Mg concentration increased, the O<sub>L</sub> peak area diminished from 31.70% (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1) to 25.86% (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2) and subsequently to 22.71% (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3), signifying a gradual reduction of lattice oxygen. Concurrently, the O<sub>V</sub> peak area increased from 37.39% (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1) to 53.43% (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2) and 60.73% (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3), thus corroborating the augmented production of oxygen vacancies. The O<sub>A</sub> peak area associated with chemisorbed oxygen species, demonstrated reduction with Mg doping from 30.91% (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1), 20.71% (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2) to 16.56% (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3), indicating that vacancy generation prevails over surface adsorption. The Fe 2p spectra corroborate these findings illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>, indicating shifts in the peak locations of Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup> and Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup>, as well as deviations in the Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>/Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> ratio are detailed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. The Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup> 2p<sub>3/2</sub> peak changed from 711.90 eV (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1) to 711.73 eV (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2) and 711.26 eV (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3), whereas the Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> 2p<sub>3/2</sub> peak shifted from 710.50 eV (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1) to 710.21 eV (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2) and 709.72 eV (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3), signifying an increase in Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> content owing to charge compensation. The Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>/Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> area ratio for Fe 2p<sub>3/2</sub> diminished from 2.80 (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1) to 1.57 (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2) and 1.05 (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3), corroborating the reduction of Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup> to Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> linked to the creation of oxygen vacancies. The Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>-S satellite peaks exhibited a comparable pattern, with Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>-S (2p<sub>3/2</sub>) decreasing from 719.92 eV (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1) to 719.31 eV (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2) and 717.39 eV (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3), indicating alterations in the electronic structure resulting from defect generation. The Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>-S (2p<sub>1/2</sub>) peak was seen at <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1 and <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2, but it was absent in the <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3 spectrum, indicating a substantial change in the electronic environment at elevated Mg concentrations. The observed shifts in Fe 2p binding energies and Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>/Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> ratios are consistent with the increasing concentration of oxygen vacancies (as derived from the O 1 s spectra), confirming the charge compensation mechanism. The findings are further substantiated by XRD and FESEM investigations, indicating that increased Mg doping resulted in lattice distortions and alterations in grain size. The gradual rise in oxygen vacancies and Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> concentration due to Mg substitution signifies substantial changes in the electronic structure, affecting charge transport characteristics across the compositions. The conversion of Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup> to Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> and the increased concentration of oxygen vacancies strongly indicate n-type conduction characteristics in the produced materials.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>XPS survey spectra of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1,0.2 &#x26; 0.3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1655749-g007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Graph showing X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of PrMg&#x2093;Fe&#x2081;&#x208B;&#x2093;O&#x2083; with different magnesium content (x&#x3d;0.1, 0.2, 0.3). Intensity versus binding energy is plotted, highlighting peaks for Pr 4d, Pr 4p, C 1s, Pr 4s, O 1s, Fe 2p, Pr 3d, and Mg 1s. Each line represents a different magnesium concentration.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>XPS spectra of O 1 s for PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2 &#x26; 0.3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1655749-g008.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Three graphs depict the intensity versus binding energy for values x &#x3d; 0.1, x &#x3d; 0.2, and x &#x3d; 0.3, showing peaks for oxygen states O_L, O_A, and O_V. Percentages under each peak indicate their contribution, with O_V increasing from 37.39% to 60.73% as x increases.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Peak position and area percentage evaluation of deconvoluted XPS spectra of O 1 s of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2 &#x26; 0.3).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Sample (x value)</th>
<th align="center">O<sub>L</sub> (% area) (lattice oxygen, eV)</th>
<th align="center">O<sub>V</sub> (% area) (oxygen vacancies, eV)</th>
<th align="center">O<sub>A</sub> (% area) (adsorbed oxygen, eV)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1</td>
<td align="left">528.93 eV (31.70%)</td>
<td align="left">531.36 eV (37.39%)</td>
<td align="left">532.22 eV (30.91%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2</td>
<td align="left">529.42 eV (25.86%)</td>
<td align="left">531.95 eV (53.43%)</td>
<td align="left">532.88 eV (20.71%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3</td>
<td align="left">529.70 eV (22.71%)</td>
<td align="left">532.10 eV (60.73%)</td>
<td align="left">533.88 eV (16.56%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>XPS spectra of Fe 2p for PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic>&#x3d; 0.1, 0.2 &#x26; 0.3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1655749-g009.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Three graphs display intensity versus binding energy (eV) for different x-values (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3). Each graph shows peaks for Fe 2p&#x2083;/&#x2082; and Fe 2p&#x2081;/&#x2082;, with varying contributions from Fe&#xB2;&#x207A;, Fe&#xB3;&#x207A;, and Fe&#xB3;&#x207A;-S states, indicated by colored lines.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Peak position and Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>/Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> ratio of deconvoluted XPS spectra Fe 2p of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1,0.2 &#x26; 0.3).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Sample (x value)</th>
<th align="center">Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup> (2p<sub>3/2</sub>, eV)</th>
<th align="center">Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup> (2p<sub>1/2</sub>, eV)</th>
<th align="center">Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>-S (2p<sub>3/2</sub>, eV)</th>
<th align="center">Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>-S (2p<sub>1/2</sub>, eV)</th>
<th align="center">Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> (2p<sub>3/2</sub>, eV)</th>
<th align="center">Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> (2p<sub>1/2</sub>, eV)</th>
<th align="center">Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>/Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> (2p<sub>3/2</sub> ratio)</th>
<th align="center">Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>/Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> (2p<sub>1/2</sub>
<break/>Ratio)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1</td>
<td align="left">711.90</td>
<td align="left">725.85</td>
<td align="left">719.92</td>
<td align="left">732.58</td>
<td align="left">710.50</td>
<td align="left">724.01</td>
<td align="left">2.80</td>
<td align="left">2.63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2</td>
<td align="left">711.73</td>
<td align="left">725.42</td>
<td align="left">719.31</td>
<td align="left">732.16</td>
<td align="left">710.21</td>
<td align="left">723.80</td>
<td align="left">1.57</td>
<td align="left">1.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3</td>
<td align="left">711.26</td>
<td align="left">724.99</td>
<td align="left">717.39</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="left">709.72</td>
<td align="left">723.70</td>
<td align="left">1.05</td>
<td align="left">1.21</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 The gas sensing analysis</title>
<p>The gas sensing properties of PrMg<sub>x</sub>Fe<sub>1-x</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2 &#x26; 0.3) perovskite materials were thoroughly examined to assess their potential for acetone detection. Response and recovery times, repeatability, long-term stability, operating temperature optimization, and selectivity against interfering gases were among the many factors that were examined. The sensing response of all three compositions was evaluated across a temperature range from 60 &#xb0;C to 210 &#xb0;C at an acetone concentration of 50 ppm, as seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10a</xref>. The response was initially observed to increase with temperature, peaking at 150 &#xb0;C, after which a decrease in sensitivity was recorded. The observed trend can be explained by the interplay between the kinetics of adsorption and desorption processes. At low temperatures, the restricted thermal energy impedes gas molecule interaction with the sensor surface, resulting in lowered responses. As the temperature rises to 150 &#xb0;C, adequate energy is supplied to promote gas adsorption and interaction with surface oxygen species, thereby improving the sensing response. Increasing the temperature beyond 150 &#xb0;C leads to significant thermal desorption of acetone molecules, which reduces the number of surface reactions and ultimately lowers the response. From the three compositions analysed, the sample with <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3 demonstrated the most significant response at 150 &#xb0;C. Following the determination of 150 &#xb0;C as the ideal operating temperature, the gas sensing response of samples with <italic>x</italic> values of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 was methodically assessed across various acetone concentrations ranging from 5 to 500 ppm, as seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10b</xref>. The observed response values exhibited a rising trend in relation to acetone concentration, thereby validating a conventional adsorption-controlled sensing mechanism. The sample <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3 exhibited a response increase from 1.118 at 5 ppm to 1.394 at 500 ppm, indicating an improvement in sensitivity. In comparison, the compositions at <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1 and <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2 demonstrated reduced responses across all concentrations, highlighting that the <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3 composition shows the highest efficiency in charge transfer and surface reactivity. The enhanced performance observed at <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3 can be attributed to the increased density of oxygen vacancies, which act as active sites for acetone adsorption, thereby promoting swift electron transfer. The dynamics of response and recovery for the <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3 composition were analysed at 150 &#xb0;C to 50 ppm acetone as seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10c</xref>, showcasing its enhanced sensing performance. The observed response time was found to be 33 s, while the recovery time was 20 s. The rapid response and recovery observed indicate the effective kinetics of adsorption and desorption of acetone molecules on the sensor surface. In comparison, the samples with <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1 and <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.2 demonstrated slower response times of 47 s and 36 s, along with longer recovery times of 41 s and 30 s, respectively. The rapid response and recovery of <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3 highlight its significant surface reactivity and refined defect structure, positioning it as a stable candidate for acetone detection.</p>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 10</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(a)</bold> Gas sensing response of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2 &#x26; 0.3) toward 50 ppm acetone at different testing temperatures ranging from 60 &#xb0;C to 210 &#xb0;C, <bold>(b)</bold> Response of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2 &#x26; 0.3) to acetone ranging from 5 to 500 ppm at 150 &#xb0;C, <bold>(c)</bold> Response and recovery time of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3) to 50 ppm acetone at 150 &#xb0;C, <bold>(d)</bold> A 3-cycle response-recovery test of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3) sensor for 50 ppm acetone at 150 &#xb0;C, <bold>(e)</bold> Long-term stability of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3) sensor for 50 ppm acetone at 150 &#xb0;C, <bold>(f)</bold> The sensing responses of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3) upon exposing to 50 ppm DMF, propanol, ethanol and acetone at 150 &#xb0;C.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1655749-g010.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Graphs illustrating sensor responses and characteristics:(a) Line graph showing sensor response versus temperature for x equals 0.1, 0.2, 0.3.(b) Line graph of sensor response versus concentration in parts per million.(c) Line graph displaying response and recovery times versus x values.(d) Line graph of resistance over time for x equals 0.3.(e) Line graph showing response stability over 30 days for x equals 0.3.(f) 3D bar chart comparing sensor responses to different substances at 500 parts per million.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>A three-cycle test was conducted on the <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3 composition at 50 ppm acetone to assess the consistency of the sensing performance shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10d</xref>. The fluctuations in resistance across several cycles demonstrated a reliable response and recovery, highlighting the reproducibility and stability of the sensing properties. Additionally, the extended stability of the <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3 sensor, shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10e</xref>, was evaluated over a period of 30 days, with data collected at five-day intervals through continuous observation of its response to 50 ppm acetone. The sensor exhibited a consistent response throughout the duration of the study, demonstrating its reliability and endurance for extended use. The <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3 sensor&#x2019;s response to 50 ppm acetone at 150 &#xb0;C was evaluated in relation to typical interfering gases such as ethanol, propanol, and dimethylformamide (DMF) as seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10f</xref>. The findings demonstrated that the reaction to acetone (1.215) was markedly greater than that of ethanol (1.023), propanol (1.014), and DMF (1.084). The improved selectivity for acetone arises from the more robust molecular interactions and greater binding affinity of acetone molecules with the sensor surface, in contrast to other volatile organic compounds.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 Gas sensing mechanism</title>
<p>The gas sensing mechanism of n-type semiconductors, such as Mg-doped PrFeO<sub>3</sub>, involves an acetone-sensing mechanism that involves a series of adsorption, charge transfer, and chemical reactions. The parent perovskite PrFeO<sub>3</sub> is intrinsically a p-type semiconductor due to cation vacancies that serve as electron donors and foster a hole-rich conduction mechanism. However, when Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> is substituted into the parent perovskite to form PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, it starts behaving differently than it normally would. Doping Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup>(divalent ion) at the Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup>(trivalent) site in PrFeO<sub>3</sub> creates a charge imbalance. To maintain charge neutrality, the lattice compensates by generating oxygen vacancies (V_O<sup>&#x2022;&#x2022;</sup>) as per the defect reaction:<disp-formula id="equ7">
<mml:math id="m16">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>MgO&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>_</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xb7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#xb7;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>12</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>The presence of oxygen vacancies facilitates the release of electrons into the conduction band, resulting in an elevated concentration of free electrons, leading to a transition from p-type to n-type conductivity. The sensing mechanism illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11</xref> begins with the adsorption of atmospheric oxygen molecules (O<sub>2</sub>) onto the surface of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. The oxygen molecules ionize by capturing electrons from the conduction band, resulting in the formation of chemisorbed oxygen species (O<sub>2</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>, O<sup>&#x2212;</sup>, O<sup>2-</sup>). The operational temperature determines which oxygen species are going to get involved. The following are the conditions involved:<disp-formula id="equ8">
<mml:math id="m17">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="equ9">
<mml:math id="m18">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>low&#x2009;temperatures</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>150</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="equ10">
<mml:math id="m19">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>moderate&#x2009;temperatures</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>150</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>300</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="equ11">
<mml:math id="m20">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>high&#x2009;temperatures</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>300</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<fig id="F11" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 11</label>
<caption>
<p>Illustration of the gas-sensing mechanism of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.1, 0.2 &#x26; 0.3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1655749-g011.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Diagram showing the behavior of PrMg&#x2081;/&#x2082;Fe&#x2081;/&#x2082;O&#x2083; in air and acetone environments. In air, a thicker depletion layer forms around particles. In acetone, the layer is thinner due to reaction with water and acetone molecules. Below, energy band diagrams illustrate changes in electronic states for pristine n-type semiconductors before and after acetone exposure, highlighting potential barriers and depletion layers.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>These chemisorbed species induce a surface depletion layer through electron removal, leading to an increase in resistance in the n-type semiconductor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bartel et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Upon interaction with the sensor surface, acetone (CH<sub>3</sub>COCH<sub>3</sub>) molecules engage in adsorption and subsequently participate in oxidation reactions with the chemisorbed oxygen species. The process of oxidation facilitates the liberation of trapped electrons into the conduction band. The responses may be articulated in the following manner:<disp-formula id="equ12">
<mml:math id="m21">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>O</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>O</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="equ13">
<mml:math display="block" id="m22">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>O</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>8</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>O</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>O</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mspace width="0.17em"/>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>8</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mfrac bevelled="true">
<mml:mtext>low</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>moderate</mml:mtext>
<mml:mspace width=".2em"/>
<mml:mtext>temperatures</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="equ14">
<mml:math display="block" id="m23">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>O</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>O</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>O</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mspace width="0.17em"/>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>8</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mfrac bevelled="true">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>temperatures</mml:mtext>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>The aforementioned reactions lead to a reduction in the depletion layer, consequently resulting in a decreased resistance of the sensor. The alteration in the sensor&#x2019;s resistance is directly related to the concentration of the target gas. Afterwards, the elimination of acetone, atmospheric oxygen re-adsorbs onto the surface, facilitating the extraction of electrons and reinstating the depletion layer, thereby reverting the resistance to its original condition, a comparison mentioned in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>. The reversible modulation of resistance facilitates the effective detection of reducing gases, a behavior that is emblematic of n-type semiconducting materials.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison of different variables of the Fermi-level diagram of PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in air and acetone.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Condition</th>
<th align="center">Fermi level position</th>
<th align="center">Band bending</th>
<th align="center">Depletion layer</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">In air (Oxygen adsorption)</td>
<td align="center">Moves downward</td>
<td align="center">Upward band bending near the surface</td>
<td align="center">Increases</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">In acetone (Reducing gas)</td>
<td align="center">Moves upward</td>
<td align="center">Bending decreases</td>
<td align="center">Decreases</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s4">
<title>4 Conclusion</title>
<p>This study demonstrates that substituting Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> into PrFeO<sub>3</sub> significantly alters its structural, electronic and gas sensing properties. The substitution leads to a transition from p-type to n-type conductivity, primarily due to the formation of oxygen vacancies and the redox shift between Fe<sup>3&#x2b;</sup> and Fe<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> ions. Among the synthesized compositions PrMg<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>Fe<sub>1-<italic>x</italic>
</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; 0.3), exhibited the highest acetone sensing performance. It operated optimally at 150 &#xb0;C, showing a fast response time of 33 s and a recovery time of 20 s. The sensor also demonstrated excellent repeatability at 50 ppm acetone and moderate selectivity over interfering gases such as ethanol, propanol, and DMF. Notably, both Fe and Mg were successfully extracted from waste-derived sources, namely, industrial red mud and Mg alloy scrap. Environmentally benign acid-leaching methods were used for this green synthesis route. These results show that high-performance perovskite oxides can be developed using secondary raw materials without compromising structural integrity or sensor efficiency. The findings support the potential of circular material strategies for next-generation gas sensor technologies. Future work will focus on nano-architecturing and integrating these materials into flexible platforms for wearable or on-site environmental sensing applications.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s5">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s6">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>SM: Writing &#x2013; original draft. AN: Data curation, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. JM: Writing &#x2013; original draft. NT: Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. SS: Data curation, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. IS: Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. HD: Data curation, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. JS: Investigation, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. AM: Investigation, Resources, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. NP: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. DV: Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. LS: Writing &#x2013; review and editing. AS: Writing &#x2013; review and editing, Funding acquisition.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s7">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors sincerely acknowledge the financial support from the DST-INSPIRE Fellowship, Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India (Grant No. DST/INSPIRE/03/2023/000140). The authors also gratefully acknowledge the Himachal Pradesh Council for Science, Technology &#x26; Environment (HIMCOSTE) for granting the project HIMCOSTE(R&#x26;D/2023-24&#x2013;6(4)) to our co-author, IS.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s8">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="s9">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Agrawal</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sahu</surname>
<given-names>K. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pandey</surname>
<given-names>B. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Solid waste management in non-ferrous industries in India</article-title>. <source>Resour. Conservation &#x26; Recycl.</source> <volume>42</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>99</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>120</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.10.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Arya</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bajwa</surname>
<given-names>B. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Inoue</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Joshi</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sahoo</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Natarajan</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Assessment of uranium contamination in groundwater of mansa district, Punjab (India) and its remediation using SnO<sub>2</sub>
</article-title>. <source>Appl. Radiat. Isotopes</source> <volume>225</volume>, <fpage>112018</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112018</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40592170</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bartel</surname>
<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sutton</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goldsmith</surname>
<given-names>B. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ouyang</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Musgrave</surname>
<given-names>C. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghiringhelli</surname>
<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>New tolerance factor to predict the stability of perovskite oxides and halides</article-title>. <source>Sci. Adv.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>eaav0693</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/sciadv.aav0693</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30783625</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benyoussef</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jabar</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Idrissi</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tahiri</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bahmad</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>The structural, electronic, optical, thermoelectric, and magnetic properties of the perovskite PrFeO<sub>3</sub>: DFT and monte carlo simulations</article-title>. <source>J. Mol. Model.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>325</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00894-024-06122-9</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39240339</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bertocci</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fort</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vignoli</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mugnaini</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berni</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Optimization of perovskite gas sensor performance: characterization, measurement, and experimental design</article-title>. <source>Sensors Switz.</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1352</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/s17061352</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28604587</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bui</surname>
<given-names>T. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shin</surname>
<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Perovskite materials for sensing applications: recent advances and challenges</article-title>,&#x201d;, <volume>191</volume>. <publisher-name>Elsevier Inc</publisher-name>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.microc.2023.108924</pub-id>
<source>Microchem. J.</source>
<fpage>108924</fpage>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>pH-Dependent leaching characteristics of major and toxic elements from red mud</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>2046</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph16112046</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31185604</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ecija</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vidal</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larra&#xf1;aga</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ortega-San-Mart&#xed;n</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Isabel Arriortua</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qu&#xed;micas</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Synthetic methods for perovskite materials-structure and morphology</article-title>. <comment>Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.intechopen.com">www.intechopen.com</ext-link>.</comment>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Fabrication of N-type Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and P-type LaFeO<sub>3</sub> nanobelts by electrospinning and determination of gas-sensing properties</article-title>. <source>Sensors Actuators, B Chem.</source> <volume>153</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>83</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>88</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.snb.2010.10.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fergus</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Perovskite oxides for semiconductor-based gas sensors</article-title>. <source>Sensors Actuators, B Chem.</source> <volume>123</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>1169</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1179</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.snb.2006.10.051</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ge</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Preparation and gas-sensitive properties of LaFe<sub>1&#x2212;y</sub>Co<sub>y</sub>O<sub>3</sub> semiconducting materials</article-title>. <source>Sensors Actuators B Chem.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>171</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>174</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0925-4005(01)00869-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harikrishnan</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mani</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baskaran</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Influence of PrFeO3 compositions on the magnetic properties of PrFeO3/PrO2 nanocomposites: structural, optical, and magnetic studies</article-title>. <source>J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron.</source> <volume>33</volume> (<issue>23</issue>), <fpage>18565</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18586</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10854-022-08708-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Recent advances in perovskite oxides for non-enzymatic electrochemical sensors: a review</article-title>. <volume>1251</volume>. <publisher-name>Elsevier B.V</publisher-name>. <source>Anal. Chim. Acta</source>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aca.2023.341007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>F. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhong</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>W. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>G. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>A novel nonenzymatic ECL glucose sensor based on perovskite LaTiO<sub>3</sub>-Ag<sub>0.1</sub> nanomaterials</article-title>. <source>Sensors Actuators, B Chem.</source> <volume>212</volume>, <fpage>174</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>182</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.snb.2015.02.011</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiao</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Recovery of chromium and magnesium from spent magnesia-chrome refractories by acid leaching combined with alkali precipitation and evaporation</article-title>. <source>Sep. Purif. Technol.</source> <volume>227</volume>, <fpage>115705</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115705</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leidinger</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sauerwald</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Conrad</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reimringer</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ventura</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sch&#xfc;tze</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Selective detection of hazardous indoor VOCs using metal oxide gas sensors</article-title>. <source>Procedia Eng.</source> <volume>87</volume>, <fpage>1449</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1452</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.722</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Ultrasensitive sensing performances to sub-ppb level acetone for Pd-functionalized SmFeO3 packed powder sensors</article-title>. <source>RSC Adv.</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>65</issue>), <fpage>60967</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60974</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/c6ra05761f</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Litzelman</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rothschild</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tuller</surname>
<given-names>H. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The electrical properties and stability of SrTi<sub>0.65</sub>Fe<sub>0.35</sub>O<sub>3-&#x3b4;</sub> thin films for automotive oxygen sensor applications</article-title>. <source>Sensors Actuators, B Chem.</source> <volume>108</volume> (<issue>1-2 SPEC. ISS.</issue>), <fpage>231</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>237</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.snb.2004.10.040</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Acetone gas sensing properties of SmFe<sub>1-x</sub>Mg<sub>x</sub>O<sub>3</sub> perovskite oxides</article-title>. <source>Sensors Actuators, B Chem.</source> <volume>134</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>483</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>487</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.snb.2008.05.024</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>X. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>T. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>X. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018a</year>). <article-title>PrFeO<sub>3</sub> hollow nanofibers as a highly efficient gas sensor for acetone detection</article-title>. <source>Sensors Actuators, B Chem.</source> <volume>255</volume>, <fpage>2546</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2554</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.snb.2017.09.060</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mirzaei</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leonardi</surname>
<given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neri</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Detection of hazardous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by metal oxide nanostructures-based gas sensors: a review</article-title>. <source>Ceram. Int.</source> <volume>42</volume>. <publisher-name>Elsevier Ltd</publisher-name>, <fpage>15119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15141</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.145</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moseley</surname>
<given-names>P. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Materials selection for semiconductor gas sensors</article-title>. <source>Sensors Actuators B</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>156</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0925-4005(92)80047-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nakhaei</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanavi Khoshnoud</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Study on structural, magnetic, and electrical properties of ReFeO<sub>3</sub> (Re&#x3d; La, Pr, Nd, Sm &#x26; Gd) orthoferrites</article-title>. <source>Phys. B Condens. Matter</source> <volume>612</volume>, <fpage>412899</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.physb.2021.412899</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pei</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Almamoun</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Modulated PrFeO<sub>3</sub> by doping Sm<sup>3&#x2b;</sup> for enhanced acetone sensing properties</article-title>. <source>J. Alloys Compd.</source> <volume>856</volume>, <fpage>158274</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158274</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meng</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Perovskite-structured LaCoO<sub>3</sub> modified ZnO gas sensor and investigation on its gas sensing mechanism by first principle</article-title>. <source>Sensors Actuators, B Chem.</source> <volume>341</volume>, <fpage>130015</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.snb.2021.130015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rai</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wasewar</surname>
<given-names>K. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mukhopadhyay</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoo</surname>
<given-names>C. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uslu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Neutralization and utilization of red mud for its better waste management</article-title>. <source>Arch. Environ. Sci.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>13</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Royani</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sulistiyono</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prasetiyo</surname>
<given-names>A. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Subagja</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Extraction of magnesium from calcined dolomite ore using hydrochloric acid leaching</article-title>. <source>AIP Conf. Proc.</source> <volume>1964</volume>, <fpage>020017</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.5038299</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saha</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chanda</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dutta</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sinha</surname>
<given-names>T. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016a</year>). <article-title>Dielectric relaxation of PrFeO<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles</article-title>. <source>Solid State Sci.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>55</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2016.05.013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shannon</surname>
<given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prewitt</surname>
<given-names>C. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1970</year>). <article-title>Revised values of effective ionic radii</article-title>. <source>Acta crystallographica section B: structural crystallography and crystal chemistry</source>. <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>1046</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1048</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1107/S0567740870003576</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shellaiah</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>K. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Review on sensing applications of perovskite nanomaterials</article-title>. <source>Multidiscip. Digit. Publ. Inst. (MDPI)</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>55</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/chemosensors8030055</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaur</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Comparative analysis of adsorptive potential of TiO2 and its MWCNT composite (TiO2-MWCNT) as uranium (VI) scavengers</article-title>. <source>J. Radioanalytical Nucl. Chem.</source> <volume>333</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>3173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3183</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10967-023-09332-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sultan</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ikram</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Asokan</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Structural, optical, and dielectric study of Mn-doped PrFeO<sub>3</sub> ceramics</article-title>. <source>Vacuum</source> <volume>99</volume>, <fpage>251</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>258</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vacuum.2013.06.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pei</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Sensing performances to low concentration acetone for palladium doped LaFeO<sub>3</sub> sensors</article-title>. <source>J. Rare Earths</source> <volume>34</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>704</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>710</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1002-0721(16)60082-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Magnetic and microwave absorbing properties of PrFeO<sub>3</sub> ceramic prepared by different methods</article-title>. <source>J. Magnetism Magnetic Mater.</source> <volume>565</volume>, <fpage>170274</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.170274</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>