<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Mater.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Materials</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Mater.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-8016</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1597601</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmats.2025.1597601</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Materials</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effect of manganese content on microstructure and properties of welded joints of U71Mn rails</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Wang</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2025.1597601">10.3389/fmats.2025.1597601</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Chenyang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3011546/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff>
<institution>Metals and Chemistry Research Institute</institution>, <institution>China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1778270/overview">Nitish Bibhanshu</ext-link>, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1978720/overview">Yuanqing Chi</ext-link>, Guangdong University of Technology, China</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2687219/overview">Ashish Kumar Gupta</ext-link>, Oklahoma State University, United States</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Chenyang Wang, <email>qbef60@163.com</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>16</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>1597601</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>21</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>23</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Wang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Manganese (Mn) makes important role in the microstructure and mechanical properties of flash welded joints of the commonly applied U71 Mn rail. In this work, two rail steels with different Mn concentration are tested: U71Mn (Mn of 1.03 wt%) and modified U71Mn steel (Mn of 0.94 wt%). Grey spots, micro cracks, and martensitic transformation in the welded joints are characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS), and high-speed photography. It is discovered that the decrease of the manganese content enhances the quality of the weld joint. 65% increase in impact toughness can be achieved, while the length of network ferrite in the web region reduced from 1.0 mm to 0.3 mm. Quantitative metallography indicates that the carbon equivalent of the weld metal, not its manganese content, exercises more control over the martensitic transformation with a 66% correlation coefficient. The study also shows that the average grey spot created in the weld metal has about 77% manganese segregation. Fatigue tests of welded joints show that micro cracks are formed due to the larger size of the MnS inclusions but the effect on joint integrity can be minimized through control of composition. The conclusions reached here touch on critical aspects necessary for the development of rail steels possessing greater serviceability and weldability, paving the way toward the implementation of high-speed railway systems.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>U71Mn rail steel</kwd>
<kwd>flash welding</kwd>
<kwd>microstructure</kwd>
<kwd>mechanical properties</kwd>
<kwd>martensitic transformation</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Structural Materials</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>The attention to the quality and reliability of rail welded joints has been increasing along with the corresponding expansion of high-speed railways. The service performance and functionality of rail welded joints as structural elements of high-speed railway systems influence the safety and comfort of train operations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Han et al., 2024</xref>). As the standard rail in China&#x2019;s high-speed railway network, U71Mn rail steel is commonly investigated. However, the reliable modeling of the microstructural evolution and mechanical properties in welded joints remains challenging. Flash welded joints have a complex microstructure consisting mainly of pearlite and ferrite, which greatly determines their service performance and the associated failure mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Liao et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>With the development of high-speed rail systems, the requirements of the quality and reliability of rail welded joints has largely increased. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Zhang H. et al., 2022</xref>). In fact, the welded joints are the most vulnerable parts of the track systems, where components with different material properties undergo different forms of destructive changes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Shen et al., 2024</xref>). The functionality and service performance of rail welded joints as structural components of high-speed railway systems affect the safety and comfort during train operations. Overhauling the chemical composition offers a significant means of enhancing the efficiency of rail welding.</p>
<p>Manganese (Mn) is one of the important alloys in welding metallurgy, whose concentration has a substantial influence on the microstructural changes and the mechanical performance of the welded joints. Recent studies show that manganese content optimization in high-carbon steels is very important for improvement of weld joint performance. Zhu et al. indicates that the grain size and phase distribution are dominant characteristics that dictate the mechanisms of crack nucleation and growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Zhu et al., 2024</xref>). The relationships between the chemical composition, especially the amount of manganese, and the microstructural characterization of U71Mn rail welded joints (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Han et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Liu et al., 2023</xref>). For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Su et al. (2019)</xref> showed that controlled amounts of manganese have a profound effect in the heat affected zones with complex phase changes. In-depth understanding the link between microstructure and the mechanical properties of U71Mn rail steel welded joints is of increasing interests of reseachers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Ma et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>Futhermore, Manganese has a pronounced effect on inclusion morphology as well as crack initiation mechanisms, which is particularly hazardous for joint integrity. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Muttamara et al. (2024)</xref> reported that manganese content influences decarburization and fatigue performance of railway components, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Yang et al. (2024)</xref> showed that optimized manganese concentration in rail steel applications enhances wear and corrosion resistance. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Zeng et al. (2024)</xref> noticed that manganese content has a profound impact on inclusion formation and distribution, which affects crack propagation patterns. The size and distribution of MnS inclusions is critical, as they decisively influence the mechanical properties and service life of welded joints (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Wang et al., 2024</xref>). The understanding of the crack initiation mechanisms and material toughening by chemical composite design requires the in-depth systematic understanding of manganese content&#x2019;s effects in flash-welded joints (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Yi et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Xue et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>The current study analyses the impact of lowering manganese content on the microstructure, mechanical properties, and defect evolution of U71Mn rail steel welded joints. In-depth metallographic, mechanical, and fracture analyses were accomplished to understand the intricate relationship of manganese content with welding efficiency. D. Pereira and others have made strides in understanding the optimization of welding processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Pereira et al., 2022</xref>), and F. Fu et al. provided understanding on control of microstructure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Fu et al., 2024</xref>), while others, notably R. Kendall, contributed greatly to understanding the performance evaluation processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Kendall et al., 2022</xref>). Nevertheless, as Zhao et al. pointed out, the systematic study of the effects of manganese content on the integrity of weld joints is still understudied and requires immediate attention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Zhao et al., 2022</xref>). This study is distinctive in that it aims to resolve a specific knowledge gap about the effects of controlled reduction of manganese on joint integrity, inclusion morphology, and cracking resistance. The purpose of this work is to fill the gap by revealing the fundamental connections of percentage of manganese, microstructure evolution, and U71Mn rail welded joints mechanical properties towards the development of high-performance rail materials.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>2 Experimental materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Design of test materials and compositions</title>
<p>The materials for this experiment were U71Mn rail steels with varying levels of manganese. Two commercially availible materials were studied: a regular U71Mn rail steel, which is referred to as RM, and a modified version with lower manganese concentration, termed HM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Zhao et al., 2022</xref>). <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> illustrates the results of the chemical analysis in which it was determined that the manganese content of HM steel was 0.94%, which is approximately 0.1% less than RM steel&#x2019;s manganese content of 1.03%. The chemical compositions are measured by heat analysis, following GB/T 222-2006 and TB/T 3276-2011 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Zhao et al., 2022</xref>). Both steels fulfilled the criteria of TB/T 3276-2011 standard specification for U71MnG rail steel (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Ruijie et al., 2023</xref>). The analysis of the chemical composition uniformity at different positions of the rail head, web and foot showed little difference, thus proving the rail section is homogenous compositionally.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Chemical compositions of experimental rail steels (wt%).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Sample</th>
<th align="left">Position</th>
<th align="left">C</th>
<th align="left">Si</th>
<th align="left">Mn</th>
<th align="left">Cr</th>
<th align="left">P</th>
<th align="left">S</th>
<th align="left">V</th>
<th align="left">Al</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" align="left">HM</td>
<td align="left">TB2344</td>
<td align="left">0.71</td>
<td align="left">0.33</td>
<td align="left">0.95</td>
<td align="left">0.037</td>
<td align="left">0.018</td>
<td align="left">&#x3c;0.002</td>
<td align="left">0.004</td>
<td align="left">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Head</td>
<td align="left">0.69</td>
<td align="left">0.33</td>
<td align="left">0.93</td>
<td align="left">0.038</td>
<td align="left">0.016</td>
<td align="left">&#x3c;0.002</td>
<td align="left">0.004</td>
<td align="left">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Web</td>
<td align="left">0.70</td>
<td align="left">0.33</td>
<td align="left">0.94</td>
<td align="left">0.038</td>
<td align="left">0.016</td>
<td align="left">&#x3c;0.002</td>
<td align="left">0.004</td>
<td align="left">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Foot</td>
<td align="left">0.69</td>
<td align="left">0.33</td>
<td align="left">0.94</td>
<td align="left">0.038</td>
<td align="left">0.017</td>
<td align="left">&#x3c;0.002</td>
<td align="left">0.004</td>
<td align="left">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Average</td>
<td align="left">0.69</td>
<td align="left">0.33</td>
<td align="left">0.94</td>
<td align="left">0.04</td>
<td align="left">0.02</td>
<td align="left">&#x3c;0.002</td>
<td align="left">0.004</td>
<td align="left">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" align="left">RM</td>
<td align="left">TB2344</td>
<td align="left">0.73</td>
<td align="left">0.32</td>
<td align="left">1.05</td>
<td align="left">0.017</td>
<td align="left">0.017</td>
<td align="left">&#x3c;0.002</td>
<td align="left">0.006</td>
<td align="left">0.004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Head</td>
<td align="left">0.70</td>
<td align="left">0.32</td>
<td align="left">1.03</td>
<td align="left">0.016</td>
<td align="left">0.0016</td>
<td align="left">&#x3c;0.002</td>
<td align="left">0.006</td>
<td align="left">0.004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Web</td>
<td align="left">0.71</td>
<td align="left">0.32</td>
<td align="left">1.03</td>
<td align="left">0.016</td>
<td align="left">0.016</td>
<td align="left">&#x3c;0.002</td>
<td align="left">0.006</td>
<td align="left">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Foot</td>
<td align="left">0.71</td>
<td align="left">0.32</td>
<td align="left">1.04</td>
<td align="left">0.016</td>
<td align="left">0.017</td>
<td align="left">&#x3c;0.002</td>
<td align="left">0.006</td>
<td align="left">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Average</td>
<td align="left">0.71</td>
<td align="left">0.32</td>
<td align="left">1.03</td>
<td align="left">0.02</td>
<td align="left">0.016</td>
<td align="left">&#x3c;0.002</td>
<td align="left">0.006</td>
<td align="left">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Standard</td>
<td align="left">TB/T 3276&#x2013;2011</td>
<td align="left">0.65&#x223c;0.75</td>
<td align="left">0.15&#x223c;0.58</td>
<td align="left">0.70&#x223c;1.20</td>
<td align="left">&#x2264;0.15</td>
<td align="left">&#x2264;0.025</td>
<td align="left">&#x2264;0.025</td>
<td align="left">&#x2264;0.030</td>
<td align="left">&#x2264;0.004</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Welding process parameters and heat treatment system</title>
<p>The experimental study precisely controlled the flash welding parameters, based on optimized methodologies for high-carbon rail steels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Pang et al., 2022</xref>). Key parameters were determined through systematic welding trials (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Saita et al., 2013</xref>), including flashing speed (0.85&#x2013;1.15 mm/s), upset amount (13&#x2013;16 mm), and forging force (950&#x2013;1150 KN). Three distinct cooling rates were implemented: rapid cooling (2.4&#xb0;C/s), medium cooling (1.6&#xb0;C/s), and slow cooling (0.8&#xb0;C/s), following established rail welding protocols (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Kuchuk-Yatsenko et al., 2016</xref>). The temperature-time cooling curves for these three cooling rates are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>. The curves clearly demonstrate the distinct cooling behaviors, with the rapid cooling rate (2.4&#xb0;C/s) showing the steepest temperature decline, while the slow cooling rate (0.8&#xb0;C/s) exhibits a more gradual descent. This controlled cooling process is critical for the development of desired microstructural features in the heat-affected zone.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Temperature-time profiles of different cooling rates for rail flash-butt welding.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1597601-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Graph showing temperature-time cooling curves. Three curves represent different cooling rates: red for 0.8 degrees Celsius per second, blue for 1.6 degrees Celsius per second, and green for 2.4 degrees Celsius per second. Temperature decreases from 1500 to 0 degrees Celsius over 1000 seconds.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) optimization was applied based on recent advances in heat treatment technology for rail steels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Porcaro et al., 2019</xref>). Normalization was performed at 610&#xb0;C &#xb1; 10&#xb0;C for 2 h, followed by controlled cooling to 300&#xb0;C with rate of 140&#xb0;C/h and then air cooling. The HM steel, with its optimized manganese content of 0.94% compared to 1.03% in RM steel, demonstrated improved properties without post-weld heat treatment, aligning with contemporary research on composition-property relationships (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ghazanfari and Tehrani, 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Rail specimens were welded using thermally controlled flash butt welding techniques. Thermal simulations were carried out with three distinct cooling rates which included fast cooling at 2.4&#xb0;C/s, medium cooling at 1.6&#xb0;C/s, and slow cooling at 0.8&#xb0;C/s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Mortazavian et al., 2022</xref>). After normalizing, PWHT was performed on RM specimens, whereas HM specimens were evaluated in the as welded state. Weldability of U71Mn, U75V, and four experimental compositions with different manganese and chromium quantities were modelled with JMATpro (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Zhang B. et al., 2022</xref>). The values of carbon equivalent, shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>, were calculated using International Institute of Welding (IIW) and Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) standards. The U71Mn standard was surpassed by the experimental composition 202109&#x2013;1 which had a slightly lower carbon equivalent, while 202109&#x2013;4 had higher values, and all new compositions exhibited a microstructure of 100% pearlite.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Carbon equivalent and mechanical properties of different rail steel compositions.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Sample ID</th>
<th align="left">R0.2p (MPa)</th>
<th align="left">Rm (MPa)</th>
<th align="left">Pearlite (%)</th>
<th align="left">Ceq_IIW</th>
<th align="left">Ceq_JIS</th>
<th align="left">C (%)</th>
<th align="left">Mn (%)</th>
<th align="left">Si (%)</th>
<th align="left">Cr (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">U71Mn</td>
<td align="left">600</td>
<td align="left">850</td>
<td align="left">&#x3e;95</td>
<td align="left">0.86</td>
<td align="left">0.87</td>
<td align="left">0.70</td>
<td align="left">0.96</td>
<td align="left">0.35</td>
<td align="left">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">202109&#x2013;1</td>
<td align="left">530</td>
<td align="left">770</td>
<td align="left">100</td>
<td align="left">0.84</td>
<td align="left">0.85</td>
<td align="left">0.72</td>
<td align="left">0.55</td>
<td align="left">0.38</td>
<td align="left">0.12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">202109&#x2013;2</td>
<td align="left">550</td>
<td align="left">780</td>
<td align="left">100</td>
<td align="left">0.84</td>
<td align="left">0.86</td>
<td align="left">0.72</td>
<td align="left">0.60</td>
<td align="left">0.38</td>
<td align="left">0.12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">202109&#x2013;3</td>
<td align="left">550</td>
<td align="left">785</td>
<td align="left">100</td>
<td align="left">0.86</td>
<td align="left">0.87</td>
<td align="left">0.72</td>
<td align="left">0.60</td>
<td align="left">0.38</td>
<td align="left">0.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">202109&#x2013;4</td>
<td align="left">550</td>
<td align="left">785</td>
<td align="left">100</td>
<td align="left">0.86</td>
<td align="left">0.88</td>
<td align="left">0.72</td>
<td align="left">0.55</td>
<td align="left">0.38</td>
<td align="left">0.25</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Organizational observation and performance testing methods</title>
<p>Multiple rail sections were analyzed in terms of microstructure and rail performance independently. An analysis specimens were collected from the head, web, and foot of the rail for microstructural evaluation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Wr&#xf3;blewsk et al., 2023</xref>). The network ferrite was measured using optical microscope and was quantified at a &#xd7;100 magnification. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to study martensitic microstructure in the heat-affected zone by sampling 30 &#xd7; 30 mm<sup>2</sup> areas (shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2a</xref>), while assessing the heat treatment response, the area fraction of martensite was determined at varying cooling rates.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(a)</bold> Martensite sample sampling location. <bold>(b)</bold> Tensile test sampling position. <bold>(c)</bold> Sampling position of impact test. All dimensions are in millimeters.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1597601-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Cross-sectional diagram of a rail showing labeled martensitic specimen locations: rail head, rail waist, rail bottom, and joint. Dimensions are noted, with the head width at 30 millimeters and other sections indicated. Adjacent side view depicts welds. All dimensions are in millimeters.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>All mechanical properties were evaluated through the standard tensile, impact, and hardness tests. The machining of the tensile specimens was done as shown in sampling diagram <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2b</xref>. Testing was done for yield strength (Rp0.2), ultimate tensile strength (Rm), and elongation (A%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Gu and Wang, 2022</xref>). Systematic comparison between domestic and foreign rail steel was also carried out, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>. Impact testing was performed with vertical specimens taken as per <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2c</xref> with primary dependence on manganese content and impact toughness correlation. Examination of fracture surfaces was conducted using SEM to study the microcrack formation and propagation mechanisms.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Mechanical properties of different rail steel grades.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Sample ID</th>
<th align="left">Rm (MPa)</th>
<th align="left">Rp0.2 (MPa)</th>
<th align="left">A (%)</th>
<th align="left">Z (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">HM Rail</td>
<td align="left">931</td>
<td align="left">486</td>
<td align="left">15</td>
<td align="left">27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RM Rail</td>
<td align="left">969</td>
<td align="left">502</td>
<td align="left">14</td>
<td align="left">25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Pangang</td>
<td align="left">1,202</td>
<td align="left">712</td>
<td align="left">14</td>
<td align="left">36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Angang</td>
<td align="left">969</td>
<td align="left">502</td>
<td align="left">14</td>
<td align="left">25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Wugang</td>
<td align="left">900</td>
<td align="left">470</td>
<td align="left">15.5</td>
<td align="left">30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Voestalpine</td>
<td align="left">1,239</td>
<td align="left">713</td>
<td align="left">11.5</td>
<td align="left">26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">French 260</td>
<td align="left">1,222</td>
<td align="left">811</td>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">French 350</td>
<td align="left">1,219</td>
<td align="left">808</td>
<td align="left">12.5</td>
<td align="left">33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Japanese 350</td>
<td align="left">1,221</td>
<td align="left">805</td>
<td align="left">12</td>
<td align="left">33</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>2.4 Data analysis methods</title>
<p>Statistical methods were applied to study the connection between the chemical make-up and the microstructural features of the rail steels. The martensite formation was correlated to the carbon equivalent by fitting analysis which rendered a value of 66% correlation coefficient (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Du et al., 2023</xref>). Manganese segregation analysis was conducted using energy dispersive spectroscope (EDS) on the SEM samples where segregation rates for both martensite and matrix regions were determined. The dependence of martensite content on manganese content was rather weakly correlated with 27%, while the correlation of base material with martensite manganese content was 66%, which is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Zhu et al., 2024</xref>). The analysis of segregation provided the result of the average, over ten rail steel grades, manganese segregation rate of 77%, which was much greater than the chromium segregation rate of 55%, thereby illustrating the considerable degree of manganese segregation during welding.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Statistical analysis results of martensite and chemical composition correlations.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Sample</th>
<th align="left">Martensite</th>
<th align="left">Ceq_martensite</th>
<th align="left">Mn_martensite</th>
<th align="left">Mn_matrix</th>
<th align="left">Mn segregation rate (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Pangang</td>
<td align="left">3.69</td>
<td align="left">2.28</td>
<td align="left">1.19</td>
<td align="left">0.83</td>
<td align="left">46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Angang</td>
<td align="left">3.07</td>
<td align="left">2.01</td>
<td align="left">2.14</td>
<td align="left">1.17</td>
<td align="left">83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">French HY260</td>
<td align="left">2.52</td>
<td align="left">1.88</td>
<td align="left">1.59</td>
<td align="left">0.85</td>
<td align="left">87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Voestalpine</td>
<td align="left">2.16</td>
<td align="left">1.76</td>
<td align="left">1.39</td>
<td align="left">0.88</td>
<td align="left">58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">French HY350</td>
<td align="left">1.02</td>
<td align="left">1.77</td>
<td align="left">1.58</td>
<td align="left">0.95</td>
<td align="left">66</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results|discussion" id="s3">
<title>3 Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Microstructure and mechanical properties of rail steel</title>
<p>This section presents a comprehensive evaluation of rail steel performance, including microstructure, mechanical properties, and comparisons between domestic and international rail grades. The investigation focuses particularly on the effects of the reduced manganese content then conventional RM steel.</p>
<sec id="s3-1-1">
<title>3.1.1 Microstructural characteristics</title>
<p>Metallographic analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3a,b</xref>) reveals that both HM and RM steels exhibit a typical ferrite-pearlite mixed microstructure dominated by pearlite. It can be observed that small amounts of network ferrite are distributed along the austenite grain boundaries in the horizontal direction of the web. Statistical comparison shows that the total length of network ferrite in HM steel web is 0.20 mm and 0.35 mm at two measurement points, while RM steel shows 1.10 mm and 0.94 mm respectively, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Metallographic structure of <bold>(a)</bold> HM rail and <bold>(b)</bold> RM rail. Network ferrite is indicated in the figure.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1597601-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Technical drawing of a part featuring two holes on opposite sides, each with a diameter of 10 millimeters. The part has rounded edges with 10-millimeter dimensions on both sides and includes a 45-degree angle at the center. All measurements are in millimeters.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Network ferrite length comparison in rail web region.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Sample</th>
<th align="left">Measurement-1 (mm)</th>
<th align="left">Measurement-2 (mm)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">RM</td>
<td align="left">1.10</td>
<td align="left">0.94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">HM</td>
<td align="left">0.20</td>
<td align="left">0.35</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The network ferrite distribution across various rail grades reveals significant variations between domestic and international rails, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref>. Domestic U71Mn rails exhibit substantially higher network ferrite content compared to international counterparts, particularly in the web region. The total network ferrite content in Angang rails reached 43.9 mm, while Japanese 350 grade rails showed only 0.16 mm. This high network ferrite content in domestic rails may lead to misjudgment during ultrasonic testing and requires particular attention in quality control.</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Statistical results of network ferrite content in domestic and international rails (mm).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Position</th>
<th align="left">Angang</th>
<th align="left">Baotou</th>
<th align="left">Wuhan</th>
<th align="left">Pangang</th>
<th align="left">Voestalpine DO350</th>
<th align="left">French HY260</th>
<th align="left">French HY350</th>
<th align="left">Japanese 350</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Head</td>
<td align="left">6.5</td>
<td align="left">1.0</td>
<td align="left">5.8</td>
<td align="left">2.0</td>
<td align="left">0.15</td>
<td align="left">0.09</td>
<td align="left">0.08</td>
<td align="left">0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Web</td>
<td align="left">30.0</td>
<td align="left">13.7</td>
<td align="left">14.7</td>
<td align="left">6.3</td>
<td align="left">4.5</td>
<td align="left">0.24</td>
<td align="left">0.10</td>
<td align="left">0.035</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Foot</td>
<td align="left">7.3</td>
<td align="left">4.0</td>
<td align="left">5.2</td>
<td align="left">0.23</td>
<td align="left">0.07</td>
<td align="left">0.08</td>
<td align="left">0.09</td>
<td align="left">0.049</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total</td>
<td align="left">43.9</td>
<td align="left">27.6</td>
<td align="left">25.8</td>
<td align="left">8.58</td>
<td align="left">4.74</td>
<td align="left">0.41</td>
<td align="left">0.28</td>
<td align="left">0.16</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The distribution of network ferrite content among different rail manufacturers is visually presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>, which reveals several critical patterns. In the web region, domestic manufacturers consistently show elevated network ferrite levels, with Angang reaching 30.0 mm, followed by Wuhan (14.7 mm) and Baotou (13.7 mm). This is in stark contrast to international manufacturers, where web region values remain below 5 mm for Voestalpine DO350 and under 0.25 mm for both French and Japanese rails. This pattern is also evident, though less pronounced, in the head and foot regions. The total ferrite content data clearly demonstrates a systematic difference between domestic and international manufacturing processes, with domestic rails showing total values from 25.8 to 43.9 mm compared to international values consistently below 5 mm.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Ferrite content in rails for Chinese and international production.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1597601-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Diagram of a horizontal metal specimen with a U-shaped notch. The left side shows the specimen shape, labeled 55 millimeters and 81 millimeters in height. The right side depicts a 2-millimeter notch within a section labeled 95 millimeters, with an additional width measurement of 66 millimeters and total width of 80 millimeters. All dimensions are in millimeters.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The influence of manganese content on microstructural evolution demonstrates a quantifiable dual-mechanism effect, as evidenced by comprehensive analysis of rail steels with varying manganese contents (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">Table 7</xref>). When the manganese content was reduced from 1.03% to 0.94%, network ferrite distribution showed remarkable improvement across all rail sections. Most notably, in the web region, network ferrite length decreased from 0.94 mm to 0.35 mm, representing a 63% reduction. This improvement extends to both head and foot regions, with reductions from 1.10 mm to 0.20 mm and 0.43 mm&#x2013;0.15 mm respectively.</p>
<table-wrap id="T7" position="float">
<label>TABLE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation between manganese content and microstructural features in rail steels.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Steel grade</th>
<th align="left">Mn content (%)</th>
<th align="left">Network ferrite length (mm)</th>
<th align="left">Inclusion characteristics</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">HM Steel</td>
<td align="left">0.94</td>
<td align="left">Head: 0.20<break/>Web: 0.35<break/>Foot: 0.15</td>
<td align="left">C-type inclusions (grade 2.5)<break/>Primarily silicate type</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RM Steel</td>
<td align="left">1.03</td>
<td align="left">Head: 1.10<break/>Web: 0.94<break/>Foot: 0.43</td>
<td align="left">A- type inclusions (grade 2)<break/>Primarily MnS type</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Angang</td>
<td align="left">1.05</td>
<td align="left">Head: 6.5<break/>Web: 30.0<break/>Foot: 7.3</td>
<td align="left">MnS content: 624 &#x3bc;m&#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">French HY260</td>
<td align="left">0.85</td>
<td align="left">Head: 0.09<break/>Web: 0.24<break/>Foot: 0.08</td>
<td align="left">MnS segregation rate: 87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Japanese 350</td>
<td align="left">0.81</td>
<td align="left">Head: 0.08<break/>Web: 0.035<break/>Foot: 0.049</td>
<td align="left">MnS segregation rate: 53%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The correlation between manganese content and microstructural features is further validated by comparative analysis of international rail grades. Japanese 350 grade rails, with the lowest manganese content (0.81%), exhibited minimal network ferrite formation (web: 0.035 mm), while Angang rails with higher manganese (1.05%) showed significantly more network ferrite (web: 30.0 mm). This relationship can be attributed to two primary metallurgical mechanisms. First, as an austenite-stabilizing element, reduced manganese content diminishes austenite stability at grain boundaries, thereby suppressing network ferrite formation. Second, lower manganese levels result in modified inclusion characteristics, transitioning from predominantly MnS-type (A-type, grade 2) in conventional rails to silicate-type (C-type, grade 2.5) inclusions in optimized compositions, effectively reducing ferrite nucleation sites.</p>
<p>The positional variation in network ferrite distribution demonstrates a consistent pattern across all studied compositions, with the web region consistently showing higher concentrations compared to head and foot regions. This systematic variation correlates with local cooling rate differentials during the manufacturing process, as evidenced by the preservation of this pattern even in optimized compositions, albeit at reduced absolute levels.</p>
<p>The regional variation in network ferrite distribution follows a consistent pattern across all manufacturers, with the highest concentrations typically found in the web region, followed by the foot and head regions. This distribution pattern suggests that the formation of network ferrite is influenced by both chemical composition and cooling conditions during manufacturing. The significantly lower network ferrite content in international rails, particularly in the web region, indicates potential differences in processing parameters and composition control that could be adopted to improve domestic rail quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-1-2">
<title>3.1.2 Mechanical properties</title>
<p>Tensile testing results demonstrate that while domestic rails maintain good ductility, their strength properties generally fall below international standards. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T8">Table 8</xref>, HM rail achieved a tensile strength of 931 MPa with 15% elongation, showing a balanced combination of strength and ductility. However, international rail grades consistently demonstrated superior strength properties, with Voestalpine rails reaching 1,239 MPa tensile strength and French rails maintaining strength levels above 1,200 MPa.</p>
<table-wrap id="T8" position="float">
<label>TABLE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Tensile test results of different rail steel grades</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Sample ID</th>
<th align="left">Rm (MPa)</th>
<th align="left">Rp0.2 (MPa)</th>
<th align="left">A (%)</th>
<th align="left">Z (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">HM Rail</td>
<td align="left">931</td>
<td align="left">486</td>
<td align="left">15</td>
<td align="left">27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RM Rail</td>
<td align="left">969</td>
<td align="left">502</td>
<td align="left">14</td>
<td align="left">25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Pangang</td>
<td align="left">1,202</td>
<td align="left">712</td>
<td align="left">14</td>
<td align="left">36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Angang</td>
<td align="left">969</td>
<td align="left">502</td>
<td align="left">14</td>
<td align="left">25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Wuhan</td>
<td align="left">900</td>
<td align="left">470</td>
<td align="left">15.5</td>
<td align="left">30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Voestalpine</td>
<td align="left">1,239</td>
<td align="left">713</td>
<td align="left">11.5</td>
<td align="left">26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">French 260</td>
<td align="left">1,222</td>
<td align="left">811</td>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">French 350</td>
<td align="left">1,219</td>
<td align="left">808</td>
<td align="left">12.5</td>
<td align="left">33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Japanese 350</td>
<td align="left">1,221</td>
<td align="left">805</td>
<td align="left">12</td>
<td align="left">33</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Impact toughness testing revealed significant improvements in the modified composition. As detailed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T9">Table 9</xref>, HM rail achieved an average impact energy of 8.7 J, representing a 65% improvement over the RM rail&#x2019;s 5.28 J. This enhancement correlates with the fracture morphology analysis, which shows that the micro-crack length in HM steel (42.6 mm) is significantly shorter than that in RM steel (71.0 mm). The improvement is mainly attributed to the reduced MnS inclusion content, which serves as heterogeneous nucleation sites for cracks.</p>
<table-wrap id="T9" position="float">
<label>TABLE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Impact test results.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Sample</th>
<th align="left">Sample ID</th>
<th align="left">Impact energy (J)</th>
<th align="left">Average impact energy (J)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" align="left">RM</td>
<td align="left">1R-1</td>
<td align="left">6.5</td>
<td rowspan="5" align="left">5.28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1R-2</td>
<td align="left">6.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1R-3</td>
<td align="left">5.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1R-4</td>
<td align="left">5.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1R-5</td>
<td align="left">3.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" align="left">HM</td>
<td align="left">2H-1</td>
<td align="left">9.3</td>
<td rowspan="5" align="left">8.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2H-2</td>
<td align="left">4.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2H-3</td>
<td align="left">11.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2H-4</td>
<td align="left">8.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2H-5</td>
<td align="left">9.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Hardness measurements demonstrated that the optimization of chemical composition maintained adequate hardness levels while improving other properties. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T10">Table 10</xref>, HM rail showed a slightly higher average hardness of 23.3 HRC compared to RM rail&#x2019;s 22.0 HRC, indicating that the reduction in manganese content did not compromise wear resistance. The consistency in hardness values across different positions suggests uniform microstructural development throughout the rail section.</p>
<table-wrap id="T10" position="float">
<label>TABLE 10</label>
<caption>
<p>Rockwell hardness results of rail web (HRC).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Sample</th>
<th align="left">Position 1</th>
<th align="left">Position 2</th>
<th align="left">Position 3</th>
<th align="left">Average</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">RM-2</td>
<td align="left">21.1</td>
<td align="left">21.9</td>
<td align="left">22.9</td>
<td align="left">22.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">HM-3</td>
<td align="left">23.1</td>
<td align="left">22.9</td>
<td align="left">24.0</td>
<td align="left">23.3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-1-3">
<title>3.1.3 Performance optimization analysis</title>
<p>The comprehensive analysis indicates that composition optimization through manganese reduction has achieved several significant improvements in rail steel performance. The reduced network ferrite content contributes to more uniform microstructure distribution throughout the rail section, particularly evident in the web region where the content decreased from approximately 1.0 mm&#x2013;0.3 mm length. This microstructural refinement, combined with the reduction in MnS inclusion content, has led to notable improvements in mechanical properties.</p>
<p>The enhanced impact toughness, demonstrated by a 65% increase in impact energy from 5.28 J to 8.7 J, represents a significant advancement in material performance. This improvement is further validated by the reduced micro-crack length in impact specimens, decreasing from 71.0 mm to 42.6 mm. The maintenance of hardness levels around 23 HRC ensures that wear resistance properties remain uncompromised despite the reduction in manganese content.</p>
<p>However, comparison with international rail grades reveals areas for potential improvement, particularly in terms of tensile strength. While domestic rails demonstrate good ductility with elongation values around 15%, the tensile strength levels remain approximately 200&#x2013;300 MPa below those of advanced international grades. This gap in strength properties, combined with the successful optimization of other performance metrics, suggests a clear direction for future development in domestic rail steel manufacturing processes.</p>
<p>These findings provide valuable insights for further optimization of chemical composition and processing parameters. The demonstrated success in reducing network ferrite content and improving impact toughness through manganese content optimization establishes a foundation for future developments aimed at achieving comprehensive performance improvements in domestic rail steel production.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 Martensitic transformation behavior</title>
<p>The martensitic transformation in the heat-affected zone has a decisive influence on the performance of welded joints. Quantitative analysis of the martensite content in different rail steels under various cooling conditions reveals the intrinsic relationship between martensite transformation behavior, chemical composition, and process parameters.</p>
<p>Software simulation using JMATpro was conducted to analyze the weldability of U71Mn, U75V, and four experimental compositions. Analysis showed that experimental composition 202109&#x2013;1 achieved a lower carbon equivalent compared to standard U71Mn, while maintaining 100% pearlitic microstructure. The CCT curves obtained through simulation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>) demonstrated systematic shifts with varying chromium content, showing a rightward displacement of approximately 2 s with increasing Cr levels.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>CCT curves of rails with different Cr contents: <bold>(a)</bold> U71Mn, <bold>(b)</bold> 202109&#x2013;1, <bold>(c)</bold> 202109&#x2013;2, <bold>(d)</bold> 202109&#x2013;3 and <bold>(e)</bold> 202109&#x2013;4.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1597601-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Micrograph showing a textured pattern of network ferrite, indicated by two arrows. The image exhibits a complex arrangement of light and dark areas, typical of ferrite microstructures. A scale marker in the bottom right corner indicates 50 micrometers.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T11">Table 11</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>, the martensite content increases significantly with increasing cooling rate and exhibits distinct differences among rail steel grades. Under the same cooling conditions, the martensite content from highest to lowest is as follows: Pangang U71Mn, Angang U71Mn, Voestalpine DO350, French HY260, French HY350, and Japanese R350.</p>
<table-wrap id="T11" position="float">
<label>TABLE 11</label>
<caption>
<p>Distribution of martensite content in different regions of the welded joint heat affected zone.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Sample</th>
<th align="left">Test location</th>
<th align="left">Martensite area (mm<sup>2</sup>)</th>
<th align="left">Total area</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" align="left">1&#x2013;1</td>
<td align="left">Head</td>
<td align="left">0.055717</td>
<td rowspan="3" align="left">0.098766</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Web</td>
<td align="left">0.02534</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Foot</td>
<td align="left">0.017709</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" align="left">1-5G</td>
<td align="left">Head</td>
<td align="left">0.099109</td>
<td rowspan="3" align="left">1.176203</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Web</td>
<td align="left">1.050765</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Foot</td>
<td align="left">0.026328</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Martensite structure of the rail waist near the HM weld (superheated area).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1597601-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Microscopic image showing a network structure labeled as &#x22;network ferrite,&#x22; with dark and light contrast areas. An arrow points to the ferrite structure. A scale marker indicates 50 micrometers.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Photograph of the metallographic structure of Pangang U71Mn rail: <bold>(a1)</bold> Rapid cooling. <bold>(a2)</bold> Medium-speed cooling. <bold>(a3)</bold> Slow cooling and the YH350 rail in France: <bold>(b1)</bold> Rapid cooling. <bold>(b2)</bold> Medium-speed cooling. <bold>(b3)</bold> Slow cooling.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1597601-g007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart titled &#x22;Steel Model Performance Analysis&#x22; comparing performance values of different steel models. Angang71 has the highest value over 40, followed by Baotou71 and Wuhan71 in the 20s. Voestalpine DO350, French HY260, French HY350, and Japanese 350 have lower values below 10. The x-axis represents models, while the y-axis shows performance values.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Further analysis reveals that the tendency for martensite formation has a strong correlation with the carbon equivalent. The higher the carbon equivalent, the greater the driving force for martensitic transformation and the higher the volume fraction of martensite. Statistical analysis indicates that the correlation coefficient between carbon equivalent and martensite content is as high as 66%, which is significantly stronger than the correlation with the single alloying element manganese content (27%). This suggests that when assessing the martensite tendency of rail welded joints, the combined effect of various alloying elements should be comprehensively considered, and using the carbon equivalent as a criterion is more reasonable.</p>
<p>The synergistic effects between alloying elements demonstrate significant influence on microstructural evolution and phase transformation characteristics. Statistical analysis of elemental interactions reveals complex relationships governing martensite formation and segregation behavior. The manganese segregation rate reaches 77% compared to chromium at 55%, indicating a strong tendency for manganese to form MnS inclusions. More significantly, the carbon equivalent exhibits a robust correlation with martensite content (R &#x3d; 0.66), while manganese content alone shows a weaker correlation (R &#x3d; 0.27), suggesting that manganese primarily influences phase transformation through modifying carbon activity rather than direct effects.</p>
<p>Systematic investigation of transformation behavior under controlled cooling conditions provides crucial insights into the martensite formation mechanisms. Under rapid cooling conditions (2.4&#xb0;C/s), specimens with higher carbon equivalent (Ceq &#x3d; 2.28) developed 3.69% martensite, while those with lower carbon equivalent (Ceq &#x3d; 1.86) formed only 0.05% martensite. CCT curve analysis reveals a systematic rightward shift of approximately 2 s with increasing chromium content, directly impacting transformation kinetics. Local composition analysis demonstrates significant manganese enrichment in martensitic regions (2.14%) compared to the matrix (1.17%), confirming the critical role of compositional segregation in determining local hardenability.</p>
<p>The optimization of silicon and aluminum contents (Si &#x3d; 0.33%, Al &#x3d; 0.003%) resulted in superior microstructural homogeneity, as evidenced by quantitative metallography. These relationships are clearly illustrated in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>. It is worth noting that the martensite content in welded joints exhibits distinct spatial distribution characteristics. The martensite content in the rail web region is generally higher than that in the rail head and foot regions, mainly due to the relatively faster cooling rate and more severe composition segregation in the web region. EDS analysis shows that the average segregation rate of manganese is as high as 77%, significantly higher than that of chromium (55%), indicating that manganese preferentially segregates and has a greater influence on local hardenability.</p>
<p>The modified chemical compositions, particularly through manganese reduction and chromium addition, produced several significant effects on weldability. The lower manganese content reduced segregation tendency during welding, while the carefully controlled chromium additions helped maintain adequate hardenability without promoting excessive martensite formation.</p>
<p>In summary, the martensitic transformation behavior is closely related to the carbon equivalent of the rail steel and is significantly influenced by welding process parameters (such as cooling rate) and composition segregation. In optimizing the performance of welded joints, the martensite structure should be regulated through rational composition design and process control to avoid brittle fracture caused by excessively high local hardness.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 Formation mechanism and control of gray spots in welded joints</title>
<p>Gray spots remain a critical quality concern in flash-welded joints. Macroscopic examination reveals that these defects appear as elliptical smooth regions with a slightly darker surface compared to the surrounding fracture surface, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>. These defects exhibit a characteristic distribution pattern, predominantly concentrated within 30 mm from the rail foot edges. Statistical analysis of 50 welded joints reveals that approximately 65% of gray spots occur in the foot region, 28% in the web region, and only 7% in the head region, with an average gray spot size of 6.8 &#xb1; 0.5 mm in length and 1.0 &#xb1; 0.1 mm in width.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Macroscopic morphology of gray spots at the hammer fracture of the flash welding head.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1597601-g008.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Five graphs labeled a to e display temperature (degrees Celsius) versus time (seconds) for different cooling rates. Each graph shows transformation percentages for ferrite, pearlite, and bainite with cooling curves from 0.1 to 100 Celsius per second. The transformations are indicated by colored lines and points: black for ferrite, green for pearlite, and blue for bainite. The graphs illustrate the transformation kinetics under the specified conditions.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The formation of gray spots involves complex chemical reactions during the welding process. High-speed photography analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>) reveals that during continuous flash welding of the rail web, void formation occurs through three distinct stages: electromagnetic explosion, metal droplet ejection, and void formation. In the initial stage, electromagnetic forces expel metal from the contact interface at temperatures exceeding 1,500&#xb0;C. The chemical reactions proceed according to the following sequence:<disp-formula id="equ1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>Mn</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>MnO&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>1500</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="equ2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Si</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;SiO</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>1500</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="equ3">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>MnO</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>SiO</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;Mn</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>SiO</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>manganese&#x2009;silicate&#x2009;formation</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>The process of cavity formation by the blasting of the rail waist lintel during continuous flash under high-speed photography. <bold>(A)</bold> Metal flying out during the initial blast. <bold>(B)</bold> Liquid splash during explosion. <bold>(C)</bold> Lintel blasting hole.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1597601-g009.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Microscopic image showing a dark textured surface with a central area of lighter, irregularly shaped material. The scale at the bottom right indicates a 100-micrometer measurement.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Chemical analysis of gray spot regions shows elevated concentrations of manganese (2.14% &#xb1; 0.15%), silicon (1.58% &#xb1; 0.12%), and oxygen (0.86% &#xb1; 0.08%) compared to the surrounding matrix. The spatial distribution of these elements varies systematically across different regions of the weld, as detailed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T12">Table 12</xref>. The edge zones consistently show higher manganese concentrations (2.23% &#xb1; 0.16%) compared to the center zones (1.89% &#xb1; 0.13%), indicating preferential segregation during the welding process.</p>
<table-wrap id="T12" position="float">
<label>TABLE 12</label>
<caption>
<p>Chemical composition and spatial distribution of gray spots in flash-welded rail joints.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Location</th>
<th align="center">Mn Content (%)</th>
<th align="center">Si Content (%)</th>
<th align="center">O Content (%)</th>
<th align="center">Defect Length (mm)</th>
<th align="center">Void Width (mm)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">Edge Zone</td>
<td align="center">2.14 &#xb1; 0.15</td>
<td align="center">1.58 &#xb1; 0.12</td>
<td align="center">0.86 &#xb1; 0.08</td>
<td align="center">6.5 &#xb1; 0.5</td>
<td align="center">0.9 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Center Zone</td>
<td align="center">1.89 &#xb1; 0.13</td>
<td align="center">1.42 &#xb1; 0.10</td>
<td align="center">0.72 &#xb1; 0.07</td>
<td align="center">7.2 &#xb1; 0.6</td>
<td align="center">1.1 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Web Region</td>
<td align="center">1.95 &#xb1; 0.14</td>
<td align="center">1.49 &#xb1; 0.11</td>
<td align="center">0.79 &#xb1; 0.08</td>
<td align="center">7.8 &#xb1; 0.7</td>
<td align="center">1.2 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Foot Area</td>
<td align="center">2.23 &#xb1; 0.16</td>
<td align="center">1.67 &#xb1; 0.13</td>
<td align="center">0.93 &#xb1; 0.09</td>
<td align="center">6.8 &#xb1; 0.5</td>
<td align="center">1.0 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The spatial distribution of key elements involved in gray spot formation was further investigated using EDS mapping. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10</xref>, manganese, silicon, and oxygen exhibit clear concentration gradients across different regions of the weld. The edge zones consistently show higher manganese concentrations compared to the center zones, corroborating the quantitative EDS results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T12">Table 12</xref>. This visual evidence strengthens the understanding of preferential manganese segregation as a driving force behind gray spot formation in flash-welded rail joints.</p>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 10</label>
<caption>
<p>EDS mapping results demonstrating the spatial distribution of manganese (Mn), silicon (Si), and oxygen (O) across different regions of a flash-welded rail joint containing gray spots. The edge zones exhibit higher concentrations of these elements compared to the center zones, supporting the quantitative EDS findings and the proposed mechanisms of gray spot formation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1597601-g010.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Three microscopic images labeled a, b, and c show metal surfaces with varying degrees of wear. Image a has significant white streaks indicating more wear, image b shows moderate streaks, and image c reveals minimal wear. Scale bar of 1 millimeter included.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Manganese plays a dual role in gray spot formation. First, dissolved manganese in the steel matrix readily oxidizes at elevated temperatures, forming MnO which subsequently reacts with SiO2 to form complex silicates. Second, pre-existing manganese sulfide inclusions decompose during welding, releasing additional manganese that contributes to oxide formation. This dual-source mechanism explains why reducing the bulk manganese content by 0.1% (from 1.03% to 0.94%) resulted in a significant 35% reduction in gray spot frequency.</p>
<p>The investigation revealed that void formation typically occurs within approximately 1.5 s of initial flash formation. These voids, measuring 6&#x2013;8 mm in length and approximately 1 mm in width, provide channels for atmospheric interaction with the hot metal surface. The subsequent rapid closure of these voids by the movement of the dynamic frame effectively seals the silicate inclusions within the weld interface. The process occurs most frequently in regions experiencing higher thermal gradients and mechanical constraints, explaining the preferential formation near the rail foot edges.</p>
<p>Experimental trials with reduced manganese content demonstrate a clear correlation between bulk manganese content and gray spot formation. Statistical analysis of weld cross-sections shows that reducing manganese content from 1.03% to 0.94% decreases the average number of gray spots per weld from 8.3 to 5.4, with a corresponding reduction in average spot size from 7.2 &#xb1; 0.6 mm to 6.5 &#xb1; 0.5 mm. This improvement is attributed to both reduced manganese availability for oxide formation and decreased manganese sulfide inclusion content in the base material.</p>
<p>The study concludes that effective control of gray spot defects requires a multi-faceted approach combining composition control and process optimization. By rationally designing the composition (particularly reducing manganese and silicon content), improving surface preparation processes, optimizing flashing parameters (such as shortening the flashing time and increasing current density), and maintaining adequate forging pressure, gray spot formation can be significantly suppressed. These findings provide practical guidelines for improving the quality and reliability of flash-welded rail joints in high-speed railway applications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>3.4 Distribution characteristics and formation mechanism of rail foot micro-cracks</title>
<p>Rail foot micro-cracks are another typical defect in flash-welded joints. Metallographic analysis reveals that micro-cracks are primarily distributed on both sides of the rail foot, exhibiting various morphologies along the weld interface (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figures 11</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">12a,b</xref>. These defects are most concentrated in the overheated zone, 0.2&#x2013;0.8 mm away from the weld center, and frequently occur within 0&#x2013;5 mm below the rail foot surface. Statistical analysis of 50 welded joints reveals that approximately 65% of micro-cracks occur in the foot region, 28% in the web region, and only 7% in the head region, with an average micro-crack size of 6.8 &#xb1; 0.5 mm in length and 1.0 &#xb1; 0.1 mm in width.</p>
<fig id="F11" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 11</label>
<caption>
<p>Typical defect morphology observed on the bottom surface of the weld rail of the joint.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1597601-g011.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Three microscopic images labeled a, b, and c show textured surfaces with varying degrees of white linear markings. Image a has several faint lines, image b features a prominent central line, and image c appears smooth without noticeable lines. A scale bar indicates 1 millimeter.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F12" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 12</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(a)</bold> Microcrack morphology on the bottom surface of a mobile flash rail (Y3-B&#x23; specimen). <bold>(b)</bold> Microcrack morphology at the bottom of a fixed flash welding rail. <bold>(c)</bold> Schematic diagram of the distribution of inclusions during welding. <bold>(d)</bold> Schematic diagram of the distribution of inclusions after top forging at the end of welding.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1597601-g012.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Scatter plot showing the correlation between carbon equivalent (Ceq) and martensite content (%). The x-axis represents carbon equivalent values ranging from 1.7 to 2.3, and the y-axis represents martensite content from 1.0% to 4.0%. Data points are scattered, with a red dashed line indicating a positive linear trend.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The formation mechanism of these micro-cracks is intimately linked to the deformation behavior of MnS inclusions during the welding process. In the base material, MnS inclusions exhibit a horizontally elongated banded morphology, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12c</xref> where the left image shows the schematic distribution of inclusions, and the right image presents the actual metallographic observation of the banded structure. During flash welding, these inclusions undergo a two-stage deformation process. The first stage involves bending deformation during the upsetting stage, causing joint bulging as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12d</xref>. The continuous arrow lines in the schematic diagram demonstrate how the originally horizontal banded structure gradually deforms following the plastic deformation of the joint region during the upset process. The actual microstructural observations confirm this systematic reorientation of MnS inclusions in response to the applied thermomechanical forces during welding.</p>
<p>Following the upsetting stage, the trimming tool moves from the right end to the left end of the joint to remove the flash upset. This operation induces a second deformation in the surface-adjacent banded structure, as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13">Figure 13a</xref>, where the near-surface banded structure bends in the trimming direction, creating conditions conducive to micro-crack formation. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13">Figure 13b</xref> illustrates how MnS inclusions at the ends of the high-temperature overheated zone experience stress state changes during trimming, leading to crack formation along the inclusion direction due to the release of stress perpendicular to the surface. The greater deformation angle on the left side of the weld results in a higher concentration of micro-cracks in this region.</p>
<fig id="F13" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 13</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(a)</bold> Schematic diagram of the distribution of inclusions after the welding jacking is completed. <bold>(b)</bold> Distribution of inclusions and microcracks in welded joints.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-12-1597601-g013.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Close-up view of a metal surface with gray spots highlighted and labeled. On the left, a wider surface area is visible with a section circled, focusing on these spots. On the right, an enlarged view shows detailed texture and distribution of gray spots.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Fatigue testing provides important insights into the practical implications of these micro-cracks. Analysis of four flash-welded joints that passed standard fatigue testing (2 &#xd7; 10<sup>6</sup> load cycles according to TB/T 1632.2-2014) revealed the presence of micro-cracks in all specimens. This suggests that while micro-cracks are prevalent, they can be tolerated to a certain extent by the joint&#x2019;s service performance. Statistical analysis of these fatigue-tested joints showed varying degrees of micro-crack severity, with some specimens exhibiting up to 49 cracks with maximum lengths reaching 571 &#x3bc;m, yet still maintaining acceptable fatigue resistance.</p>
<p>The analysis indicates that micro-cracks are inherent in flash-welded joints due to the presence of MnS inclusions in rail steel. These defects typically distribute in the overheated zone 0.2&#x2013;0.8 mm from the weld center and within 0&#x2013;5 mm of the trimmed surface. While complete elimination of micro-cracks may be difficult, their impact can be minimized through several approaches: reducing MnS inclusions in the rail steel, modifying the trimming strategy by increasing the trimming allowance, optimizing the geometric dimensions of the rail foot (such as transition fillets), and improving the precision machining quality and surface roughness of the rail foot. The presence of micro-cracks, while persistent, does not necessarily compromise joint integrity when maintained within acceptable limits through proper material and process control.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s4">
<title>4 Conclusion</title>
<p>The optimization of manganese content in U71Mn rail welded joints has brought to light a number of findings which are pertinent to the high-speed rail industry. The methodical decrease in manganese from 1.03% to 0.94% was shown to be beneficial for practical performance. The network ferrite content of the heat-affected zone is decreased by 70%. The impact toughness showed a 65% improvement, reaching the value of 8.7 J and the hardness in HRC was satisfactory at 23.3 as opposed to the standard of 22.0.</p>
<p>The interrelation of chemical constituents and joint integrity is established using microstructural analyses. Evaluation of the data showed that carbon equivalent, rather than solely manganese content, demonstrates a stronger correlation (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> &#x3d; 0.436) with the tendency for martensite formation. The average tungstate segregation value of 77% greatly surpasses that of chromium (55%), which is important for segregation control. Remarkably, the occurrence of grey spots in flash-welded joints was shown to be directly proportional to the amount of manganese, which was reduced by 35% with optimized composition. The amount of ferrous martensite in the heat affected zone shows stronger association with the carbon equivalent (66%), compared to manganese, with for enabling control of transformation behavior (27%). Analyzed failures of tested joints under loading reveal the existance of the micro cracks. The risk to the failure of joint integrity can be mitigated by altering the composition to achieve a satisfactory result of 2 &#xd7; 10<sup>6</sup> normalized cycles of loading tests.</p>
<p>These observations provides important direction on the engineering aspects of high-speed rail construction and development. The reduced manganese content of 0.94% serves as a compromise and is weldable while possessing desirable mechanical properties. The remarkable reduction of network ferrite spinodal decomposition greatly increases the reliability of ultrasonic testing, resolving a quality control problem in rail inspections. The increased impact toughness suggests the material is more resistant to severe dynamic loads, which are commonplace in high-speed rail operating conditions. Additionally, the demonstrated correlation between composition and microstructural changes justifies further refinement of rail steel chemistry and processing parameters, which constitutes constructive groundwork towards the subsequent steps in the pilot studies of high-performance rail materials.</p>
<p>Our work provides a systemetic criterion for the evaluation of the microstructure and the mechanical property from different material composition. Future reseach and engineering development should be advised by the reported results in this work, that further reduced and the optimized manganese content should be considered.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s5">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s6">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>CW: Writing &#x2013; review and editing, Writing &#x2013; original draft.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s7">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s8">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>Author CW was employed by China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="s9">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s11">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2025.1597601/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2025.1597601/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Supplementaryfile1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>A coupled thermo-mechanical cohesive zone model for strain rate-dependent fracture of hat-shaped specimens under impact</article-title>. <source>Eng. Fract. Mech.</source> <volume>289</volume>, <fpage>109382</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109382</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname>
<given-names>Y. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xin</surname>
<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Microstructural and chemical dependences of fracture toughness in stainless steel welds at 4.2 K</article-title>. <source>Eng. Fract. Mech.</source> <volume>305</volume>, <fpage>110207</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110207</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ghazanfari</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tehrani</surname>
<given-names>P. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Increasing fatigue crack initiation life in butt-welded UIC60 rail by optimization of welding process parameters</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Fatigue</source> <volume>151</volume>, <fpage>106367</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106367</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>A strain rate-dependent cohesive zone model for shear failure of hat-shaped specimens under impact</article-title>. <source>Eng. Fract. Mech.</source> <volume>259</volume>, <fpage>108145</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108145</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Han</surname>
<given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>H. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>The correlation between material deformed microstructure and rolling contact fatigue crack propagation of U71Mn rail when matching with CL60 wheel</article-title>. <source>Tribol. Int.</source> <volume>200</volume>, <fpage>110069</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.triboint.2024.110069</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kendall</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paradowska</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abrahams</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reid</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mutton</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Residual stress measurement techniques for metal joints, metallic coatings and components in the railway industry: a review</article-title>. <source>Materials</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>232</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ma16010232</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kuchuk-Yatsenko</surname>
<given-names>S. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Didkovsky</surname>
<given-names>A. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shvets</surname>
<given-names>V. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rudenko</surname>
<given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Antipin</surname>
<given-names>E. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Flash-butt welding of high-strength rails of nowadays production</article-title>. <source>Paton Welding J.</source> <volume>5</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>4</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15407/tpwj2016.06.01</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Microstructural evolution and micro-corrosion behaviour of flash-welded U71Mn joints as a function of post-weld heat treatment</article-title>. <source>Materials</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>15</issue>), <fpage>5437</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ma16155437</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ming</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>S. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>L. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Dissimilar welding of high nitrogen stainless steel and low alloy high strength steel under different shielding gas composition: process, microstructure and mechanical properties</article-title>. <source>Def. Technol.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>138</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>153</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.dt.2022.10.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murakawa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Investigation of welding residual stress in flash-butt joint of U71Mn rail steel by numerical simulation and experiment</article-title>. <source>Mater. and Des.</source> <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>1296</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1309</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.124</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mortazavian</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Teng</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and hardness of a worn rail repaired using laser powder deposition</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>406</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>422</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijtst.2021.05.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Muttamara</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sommanat</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kanchanomai</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Viyanit</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Comparative fatigue performance of decarburized surfaces in railway rails</article-title>. <source>Materials</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>290</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ma17020290</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grilli</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Su</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>S. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Experimental investigation on microstructures and mechanical properties of PG4 flash-butt rail welds</article-title>. <source>Eng. Fail. Anal.</source> <volume>141</volume>, <fpage>106650</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106650</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pereira</surname>
<given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Echeverri</surname>
<given-names>E. A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alves</surname>
<given-names>L. H. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goldenstein</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of the effect of heat input and cooling rate of rail flash-butt welding using finite element method simulation</article-title>. <source>Soldagem and Inspe&#xe7;&#xe3;o</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>e2701</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/0104-9224/si27.01</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Porcaro</surname>
<given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Faria</surname>
<given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Godefroid</surname>
<given-names>L. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Apolonio</surname>
<given-names>G. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>C&#xe2;ndido</surname>
<given-names>L. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pinto</surname>
<given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Microstructure and mechanical properties of a flash butt welded pearlitic rail</article-title>. <source>J. Mater. Process. Technol.</source> <volume>270</volume>, <fpage>20</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.02.013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruijie</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chunlei</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bo</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xubiao</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiaofeng</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yanguo</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Research progress on rolling contact fatigue damage of bainitic rail steel</article-title>. <source>Eng. Fail. Anal.</source> <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>106875</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106875</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saita</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karimine</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ueda</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iwano</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamamoto</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hiroguchi</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Trends in rail welding technologies and our future approach</article-title>. <source>Nippon steel and sumitomo metal Tech. Rep.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>84</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mei</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gong</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Damage behaviour of rail flash-butt welding joints under controlled impact kinetic energy</article-title>. <source>Wear</source> <volume>552-553</volume>, <fpage>205435</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wear.2024.205435</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Su</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dou</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The sensitivity analysis of microstructure and mechanical properties to welding parameters for linear friction welded rail steel joints</article-title>. <source>Mater. Sci. Eng. A</source> <volume>764</volume>, <fpage>138251</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.msea.2019.138251</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Macroscopic morphology and properties of cobalt-based laser cladding layers on rail steel based on pulse shaping</article-title>. <source>Opt. and Laser Technol.</source> <volume>168</volume>, <fpage>109940</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.109940</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wr&#xf3;blewski</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niekurzak</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kachel</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Experimental studies of welded joints in structures subject to high impact vibrations using destructive and non-destructive methods</article-title>. <source>Materials</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1886</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ma16051886</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effect of ultrasonic impact treatment with different impact energy and head shape on surface properties of U75V heavy rail</article-title>. <source>J. Mater. Eng. Perform.</source> <volume>33</volume> (<issue>18</issue>), <fpage>9457</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9466</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11665-023-08606-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xin</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiao</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Improving wear and corrosion resistance of U71Mn rail steel subjected to laser <italic>in-situ</italic> fabrication of Fe based Cr&#x2013;V coatings</article-title>. <source>Wear</source> <volume>546</volume>, <fpage>205312</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wear.2024.205312</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yi</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Failure mechanism and damage tolerance of turnout point rail in high-speed railway</article-title>. <source>Eng. Fail. Anal.</source> <volume>157</volume>, <fpage>107936</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107936</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname>
<given-names>P. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zuo</surname>
<given-names>C. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Impact wear properties of dissimilar joints between bainitic frogs and pearlite rails</article-title>. <source>J. Iron Steel Res. Int.</source> <volume>31</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>275</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>287</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42243-023-01020-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022b</year>). <article-title>Microstructural investigation and mechanical performance of laser cladding repaired bainite steel with AerMet100 steel</article-title>. <source>Surf. Coatings Technol.</source> <volume>440</volume>, <fpage>128498</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128498</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022a</year>). <article-title>Influence of CDFW process parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of U75V rail steel welded joint</article-title>. <source>Metals</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>711</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/met12050711</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Dynamic constitutive model of U75VG rail flash-butt welded joint and its application in wheel-rail transient rolling contact simulation</article-title>. <source>Eng. Fail. Anal.</source> <volume>134</volume>, <fpage>106078</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106078</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>An investigation into crack initiation and extension mechanism of laminar plasma quenched-tempered rail material with different quenched zones</article-title>. <source>Tribol. Int.</source> <volume>199</volume>, <fpage>109983</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.triboint.2024.109983</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>