<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Mater.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Materials</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Mater.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-8016</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1230789</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmats.2023.1230789</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Materials</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Experimental analysis and biaxial biomechanical behaviour of <italic>ex-vivo</italic> sheep trachea</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Pandelani et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2023.1230789">10.3389/fmats.2023.1230789</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Pandelani</surname>
<given-names>Thanyani</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2313582/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ngwangwa</surname>
<given-names>Harry</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>Fulufhelo</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Unisa Biomedical Engineering Research Group</institution>, <institution>Department of Mechanical Engineering</institution>, <institution>School of Engineering</institution>, <institution>College of Science Engineering and Technology</institution>, <institution>University of South Africa</institution>, <addr-line>Pretoria</addr-line>, <country>South Africa</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Council for Scientific and Industrial and Research</institution>, <institution>Defence and Security Cluster</institution>, <addr-line>Pretoria</addr-line>, <country>South Africa</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Department of Mechanical Engineering</institution>, <institution>Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment</institution>, <institution>Durban University of Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Durban</addr-line>, <country>South Africa</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/114153/overview">Luca Valentini</ext-link>, University of Perugia, Italy</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/147517/overview">Milos Kojic</ext-link>, Houston Methodist Research Institute, United States</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/999444/overview">Irene Chiesa</ext-link>, University of Pisa, Italy</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Thanyani Pandelani, <email>epandet@unisa.ac.za</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>22</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>1230789</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>29</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>04</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Pandelani, Ngwangwa and Nemavhola.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Pandelani, Ngwangwa and Nemavhola</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Besides surgery, there are currently no other established methods for routine treatment of tracheal pathologies such a tracheal stenosis or tracheal and airway tumors. Even with several attempts to repair the infected trachea with artificial and natural prostheses, there is a need for the fundamental understanding of the tissue&#x2019;s mechanical behaviour. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanical behaviour of the tracheal tissue under biaxial tensile loading. Furthermore, the study examines the material properties of the tissue through a study of the model parameters for six constitutive models. Materials and methods: The fourteen (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 14) specimens of sheep trachea (Vleis Merino) measured to be &#x223c;30 &#xd7; 20&#xa0;mm where only the effective area of &#x223c;25 &#xd7; 16&#xa0;mm was subjected to engineering strain. In this study, we assume that the tracheal tissue is anisotropic and incom-pressible, therefore we apply and study the material parameters from six different constitutive material models. Results: The results show that the tracheal tissue is twice as stiff along the circumferential direction as it is along the longitudinal direction. It is also observed that the material properties are different (non-homogeneous) along the trachea. Conclusion: The findings of this study will benefit computational models for the study of tracheal diseases or injuries. Furthermore, these findings will assist in the development of regenerative medicine for different tracheal pathologies and in the bioengineering of replacement tissue in cases of damage.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>biaxial biomechanical behavior</kwd>
<kwd>sheep trachea</kwd>
<kwd>trachea mechanics</kwd>
<kwd>biaxial testing</kwd>
<kwd>constitutive material models</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Biomaterials and Bio-Inspired Materials</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>The trachea, commonly known as the windpipe, is a vital part of the respiratory system. It is a flexible tube made up of rings of cartilage, giving it structural support and preventing collapse. The trachea is lined with a specialized type of tissue called respiratory epithelium or pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium. This lining consists of ciliated cells, which have tiny hair-like structures called cilia. These cilia help in trapping dust, debris, and microbes, and facilitate their movement upwards towards the throat to be coughed out or swallowed, thereby protecting the lungs from potential infections. Additionally, the trachea also contains glands that produce mucus, aiding in moistening and cleaning the air as it passes through the respiratory tract.</p>
<p>The normal physiological functioning of the trachea has led to more research focussing on the understanding of its mechanical behaviour under normal airflow conditions. As a result, most research has focused on the study of fluid-structure interaction between the air and the tracheal tissue (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Koombua and Pidaparti, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Wall and Rabczuk, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Qi et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Shukla et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">DeBoer et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Zobaer and Sutradhar, 2021</xref>). These studies have examined and analysed how the tracheal wall interact with the air as it gets pulled into and pushed out of the lungs. In such studies the focus has been on understanding tracheal flow by employing computational fluid dynamics methods. However there remains questions on what part of the normal breathing action does the tracheal wall really play or if a damaged but open tracheal wall can still perform its function. When one feels the trachea during deep inhaling and exhaling exercise, the tracheal rings can be sensed moving up and down along the neck which implies that the tracheal muscle plays a part during inhaling and exhaling processes. Such subtle actions of the trachea that make breathing feel normal to an animal are a focus area in the development of replacement material for the tracheal tissue. The understanding of the working mechanisms of native trachea will elucidate the development of the tissue-engineered trachea which remains unclear (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Kojima and Vacanti, 2014</xref>), however relevant mechanical and biomechanical properties of the trachea are incompletely characterised (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hoffman et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>To understand fully the mechanical properties of the soft tissues, it is necessary to understand its mechanical behaviour (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Nemavhola et al., 2021a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Ngwangwa et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Nemavhola et al., 2021b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Greaney and Niklason, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Ngwangwa and Nemavhola, 2021</xref>). Mechanical properties of soft tissues may be utilised in developing detailed computational models to study mechanisms of diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Masithulela, 2015a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Masithulela, 2015b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Masithulela, 2015c</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Masithulela, 2016a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Masithulela, 2016b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">S&#xe1;ez and Kuhl, 2016</xref>). But how the implantation of a replacement material affects the response of the physiological response of a trachea is a challenge. In this study, the mechanical behaviour of the tracheal tissue under biaxial tensile loading is investigated. The stress-strain behaviour of the tissue in the circumferential and longitudinal directions are examined and discussed. Due to its very low physiological loading, often below the limit stresses in the toe region, the strains are kept to within 30% strain.</p>
<p>Besides studying the stress-strain behaviour of the tracheal muscle, the mechanical properties of the tissue are studied by examination of the material parameters and performances of six different constitutive material models. The Fung, Choi-Vito, Holzapfel (2000), Holzapfel (2005), Polynomial (Anisotropic) and Four-Fiber Family hyperelastic constitutive models have been previously utilised in studying mechanical behaviour of the soft tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Nemavhola et al., 2021c</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Lebea et al., 2021</xref>). The material parameters obtained from the selected hyperelastic constitutive models are normally utilised in developing finite element models (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Kortsmit et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Skatulla et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Masithulela, 2015a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Nemavhola, 2017a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Nemavhola, 2019a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Nemavhola, 2019b</xref>). It is expected that the analysis of the trachea using constitutive models may improve surgical outcomes. Within the limitations of such a study, there are two very important findings: firstly, the tracheal muscle is stiffer along its circumferential directions probably due to the circular cartilaginous rings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Roberts et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hoffman et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Safshekan et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Lee et al., 2019</xref>) which are more rigid than the adjoining soft tissue around it; secondly, the material is highly random and non-homogeneous as exhibited by the wide margin in the standard deviation of its material parameters across the different test specimens. In drawing the latter conclusion, the authors are mindful of the fact that there could be other factors that may have influenced such a finding although the stringent control conditions under which the testing was carried out may have eliminated such eventualities. The tested tissues showed anisotropy along the circumferential direction at larger strains which is typical for soft tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fung, 1993</xref>). Although it might be expected that the same trend would also be true for the longitudinal direction, it is hard to explicitly say so in the present study since it seems that 30% strain was not large enough to stretch the tissue along the longitudinal direction beyond its toe region.</p>
<p>The study is aimed at investigating the mechanical behaviour of the windpipe (trachea) in two directions: aligned along its circumference and in the direction of the airflow. The trachea serves two important purposes primarily as an air conduit into and out of the lungs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Zobaer and Sutradhar, 2021</xref>) and secondly as a preconditioner and prefilter for inhaled air. The most common tracheal injury (tracheal stenosis) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Grillo et al., 1995</xref>) is usually caused by a tracheotomy intubation with unsuitable pressure. Despite the availability of various treatment procedures, with varying degrees of success, it is reported that even after treatment, the stenosis may reappear especially in cases of serious pathologies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Belsey, 1950</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Huang, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Grillo, 2002</xref>). Such problematic situations with respect to the total treatment of tracheal injuries makes it necessary to understand its mechanical behaviour.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>2 Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Tissue acquisition and preparation for mechanical testing</title>
<p>The trachea was delivered to University of South Africa (Unisa) Biomechanics Laboratory after the slaughtering of sheep (Vleis Merino) of between 40,000 and 42,000&#xa0;g. The slaughtering of the sheep and dissection of the full length of the trachea were carried out at the local abattoir. Then the full sheep trachea was delivered within 2&#xa0;h of slaughter from the abattoir in a temperature-controlled bag. The test specimens were excised using sharp surgical equipment in the laboratory. A total length of 280&#xa0;mm was cut from the trachea&#x2019;s mid-span from which fourteen 20&#xa0;mm long specimens were obtained. The remaining pieces at both ends were thrown away to avoid the effect of residual stresses resulting from uncontrolled cutting at the abattoir. The temperature was kept at a maximum of 5&#xb0;C during transportation. In this study, the microstructural coordinates were not utilised because there was no imaging to ascertain the exact fiber direction. Therefore, two directions were defined as per the coordinate system of the trachea where longitudinal direction was along the length of the trachea and the circumferential direction was defined to be around the circumference of the trachea.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Biaxial mechanical testing</title>
<p>To capture the mechanical properties of the sheep trachea, the CellScale Biaxial testing system (BioTester 5,000 CellScalle, Wateroo, ON, Canada<sup>&#xae;</sup>) was utilised by performing equi-biaxial testing on the excised trachea tissue (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). In this study, the microstructural coordinates were not utilised because there was no imaging to ascertain the exact fiber direction. Therefore, two directions were defined as per the coordinate system of the trachea where longitudinal direction was along the length of the trachea and the circumferential direction was defined to be around the circumference of the trachea. The excised tissue was cut in approximately 30&#xa0;mm and 20&#xa0;mm in longitudinal and circumferential directions, respectively. The tissues were placed in the biaxial device that has hooks attached to a pully system as reported previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Nemavhola, 2017b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Nemavhola et al., 2021c</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Nemavhola, 2021</xref>). Vernier calliper was utilised in capturing and measuring the thickness of the tissue in four different points where the average thickness was then utilised for further processing of engineering stresses and strains. Preconditioning was performed by applying 10 cycles of 10% strain per second. In order to remove tissue slack at the beginning of the tensile test, a preload of 10% at the strain rate of 0.001/second was applied. The values used in the preconditioning and preload were arrived at by trial and error in this on other samples during pre-test preparation. The tensile tester was operated in displacement control at a uniform strain rate of 0.025/second. Saline 0.91% w/v of NaCl was heated to 33&#xa0;<sup>&#xb0;</sup>C before the sample tissue is placed in the bath for mechanical testing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Ndlovu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Lebea et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Ndlovu et al., 2021</xref>). A 0.005&#xa0;N equi-biaxial preload was applied to both longitudinal and circumferential directions. Finally, the strain rate of 30% strain/10&#xa0;s equi-biaxial loading and recovery was applied on the tissue.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Experimental set-up of trachea subjected to biaxial tensile loading. <bold>(A)</bold> The 30 &#xd7; 20&#xa0;mm sheep trachea cut tissue hooked by the CellScale Biaxial testing system (BioTester 5,000 CellScalle, Wateroo, ON, Canada<sup>&#xae;</sup>) submerged in the with Saline 0.91% w/v of NaCl was heated to 33&#xb0;C before the sample tissue is placed in the bath for mechanical testing <bold>(B)</bold> magnified sheep trachea cut tissue hooked at &#x223c; 26 &#xd7; 15&#xa0;mm. In <bold>(A)</bold>, x indicates the longitudinal direction while y indicates the circumferential direction.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-10-1230789-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>3 Theoretical formulations</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Tissue stress-strain analysis</title>
<p>In this study the stresses were calculated through the first Piola-Kirchoff stress T in the two-directions using the equation:<disp-formula id="e1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(1)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>The finite strains were calculated by the formula:<disp-formula id="e2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Where <inline-formula id="inf1">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the load vector with i &#x3d; 1,2; <inline-formula id="inf2">
<mml:math id="m4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the length of the deformed tissue; and <inline-formula id="inf3">
<mml:math id="m5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the length of the undeformed tissue as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>. The thickness of the tissue in the undeformed form is denoted as <inline-formula id="inf4">
<mml:math id="m6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Digrammatic representation of a body subjected to finite deformation showing <bold>(A)</bold> an unstretched specimen <bold>(B)</bold> biaxially stretched specimen and <bold>(C)</bold> Stress-strain direction undeformed and under different strain rate.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-10-1230789-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The calculated stress results are cut-off at 30% strain. These stress results however are noisy therefore they were further filtered with an 8-point moving average filter in Excel. The data were resampled and further smoothened using a quadratic function.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 Constitutive modelling</title>
<p>The passive response of a biological soft tissue is more complex than the response of elastic solids due to the fact that they undergo finite deformations under mechanical loads (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Fung, 1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fung, 1993</xref>). Thus, the passive phases of the tissues&#x2019; deformations are considered using the nonlinear theory of hyperelasticity. The most useful quantity in deriving the expressions for the passive response of materials that undergo finite deformation is the strain energy function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fung, 1993</xref>). There is a huge number of variations of its implementation in the literature depending on different cases. In this study, we assume that the tracheal tissue is anisotropic and incompressible, therefore we apply and study the material parameters from six models, namely, the Fung, Choi-Vito, Holzapfel (2000), Holzapfel (2005), Polynomial (Anisotropic) and Four-Fiber Family models. In the following sections, these models are presented in terms of their strain energy functions.</p>
<sec id="s3-2-1">
<title>3.2.1 The Fung model</title>
<p>The Fung model is a hyperelastic anisotropic material model for stress-strain description of arterial wall. It is phenomenological in nature and its incompressible form is given by (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chuong and Fung, 1983</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Fung, 1984</xref>).<disp-formula id="e3">
<mml:math id="m7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Q</mml:mi>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(3)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Where <inline-formula id="inf5">
<mml:math id="m8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Q</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b8;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b8;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>ZZ</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>RR</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b8;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b8;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>ZZ</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>ZZ</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>RR</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>RR</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b8;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b8;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>; and <inline-formula id="inf6">
<mml:math id="m9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are the material parameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-2">
<title>3.2.2 Choi-Vito model</title>
<p>Choi-Vito model is hyperelastic anisotropic material model developed for canine pericardium. The model is fully phenomenological and formulated through the components of Green-Lagrange strain tensor. The model is implemented in an exponential format and its strain-energy function is expressed as (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Choi and Vito, 1990</xref>).<disp-formula id="e4">
<mml:math id="m10">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">exp</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>11</mml:mn>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">exp</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>22</mml:mn>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">exp</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>11</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>22</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(4)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Where <inline-formula id="inf7">
<mml:math id="m11">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are the material parameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-3">
<title>3.2.3 The Holzapfel (2000) model</title>
<p>This model is hyperelastic anisotropic material model for stress-strain description of arterial layers. It is constituted by forms of the strain energy function that represent isotropy and anisotropy. Thus, its strain energy function is given by (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Holzapfel et al., 2000</xref>).<disp-formula id="e5">
<mml:math id="m12">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">exp</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(5)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Where <inline-formula id="inf8">
<mml:math id="m13">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are the material parameters. The model is implemented in an exponential format.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-4">
<title>3.2.4 The Holzapfel (2005) model</title>
<p>This model is a variation of the previous model also aimed at modelling stress-strain behaviour of hyperelastic anisotropic materials, specifically the arterial layers. It models the arterial walls as composite material with spirally arranged layers. Its strain energy function is expressed as (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Holzapfel et al., 2005</xref>)<disp-formula id="e6">
<mml:math id="m14">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="{" close="}" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">exp</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3ba;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>&#x3ba;</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(6)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Where <inline-formula id="inf9">
<mml:math id="m15">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are the material parameters and <inline-formula id="inf10">
<mml:math id="m16">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3ba;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is a parameter that modulates the convergence rate.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-5">
<title>3.2.5 The four-fiber family model</title>
<p>This model is hyperelastic anisotropic material model for stress-strain description of aortas and aneurysms. The model represents an elastin-dominated amorphous matrix reinforced by four families of (collagen) fibers (in axial, circumferential and diagonal directions) whose strain energy function is expressed as (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Baek et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Ferruzzi et al., 2011</xref>)<disp-formula id="e7">
<mml:math id="m17">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="{" close="}" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">exp</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(7)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>This model implements a hybrid polynomial and exponential format where <inline-formula id="inf11">
<mml:math id="m18">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are material parameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-6">
<title>3.2.6 The polynomial (anisotropic) model</title>
<p>Like its name, this model is hyperelastic anisotropic material model whose strain energy function is expressed as a polynomial series of isotropic and anisotropic strain invariants given as (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bursa et al., 2008</xref>).<disp-formula id="e8">
<mml:math id="m19">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(8)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Where <inline-formula id="inf12">
<mml:math id="m20">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>and</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are material parameters.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 Data analysis</title>
<p>In this study, we use the constrained optimisation by linear approximation algorithm (COBYLA (third party: SciPy)) implemented in Hyperfit software for fitting the equi-biaxial tensile experimental data of Fung, Choi-Vito, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Holzapfel et al. (2000)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Holzapfel et al. (2005)</xref>, Polynomial (Anisotropic) and Four-Fiber Family hyperelastic constitutive models given in Eqs <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e3">3</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e8">(8)</xref>. Five metrics that measure models&#x2019; performances are evaluated for each model. These metrics are coefficient of determination, correlation coefficient, Normalized Root Mean Square error, Normalised error, and evaluation index. Their expressions are given in Eqs <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e9">9</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e14">(14)</xref> below.</p>
<p>The coefficient of determination (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup>) (also known as Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient) is defined as follows:<disp-formula id="e9">
<mml:math id="m21">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(9)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Where <inline-formula id="inf13">
<mml:math id="m22">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the experimental data, <inline-formula id="inf14">
<mml:math id="m23">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the model predicted data, <inline-formula id="inf15">
<mml:math id="m24">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the average value of the experimental data, the indices <inline-formula id="inf16">
<mml:math id="m25">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2026;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> denote the data points, and <inline-formula id="inf17">
<mml:math id="m26">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mi>&#x3f5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="&#x2329;" close="&#x232a;" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>&#x221e;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, where a perfect fit is defined for <inline-formula id="inf18">
<mml:math id="m27">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>.</p>
<p>The Evaluation Index (EI) is a critical parameter in evaluating how the hyperelastic constitutive model fits the experimental data, and is given by<disp-formula id="e10">
<mml:math id="m28">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(10)</label>
</disp-formula>where, <disp-formula id="e11">
<mml:math id="m29">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>log</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>10</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(11)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>The <italic>R</italic>
<sub>
<italic>minimum</italic>
</sub> <italic>and R</italic>
<sub>
<italic>maximum</italic>
</sub> represent the <italic>R</italic> values for poorest and best fitting hyperelastic models, respectively. EI in Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e11">11</xref> is a comparative parameter whose values may span values between 0.0 for poorest fitting models, and 1.0 for best fitting models. Therefore, the higher the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), the higher the model fit (EI).</p>
<p>The correlation coefficient (r) is defined as<disp-formula id="e12">
<mml:math id="m30">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msqrt>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(12)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Where <inline-formula id="inf19">
<mml:math id="m31">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is an average value of the model predicted data, and all the other quantities in Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e12">12</xref> are defined as given in Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e9">9</xref>.</p>
<p>The Normalized Root Mean Square error (NRMSE) is defined as<disp-formula id="e13">
<mml:math id="m32">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msqrt>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(13)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>The Normalised error (NE) is expressed as<disp-formula id="e14">
<mml:math id="m33">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(14)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>3.4 Parameter Estimation</title>
<p>Minimisation of the error between the experimental (measured) and estimated stress in both longitudinal and circumferential directions using Eqs <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e3">3</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e7">(7)</xref> was performed to determine the constitutive parameters of each model. Sum of squares of difference (SS) was utilised as the objective function as follows:<disp-formula id="e15">
<mml:math id="m34">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x22d5;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x22d5;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(15)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>With DIFF being the absolute difference:<disp-formula id="e16">
<mml:math id="m35">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(16)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>
<inline-formula id="inf20">
<mml:math id="m36">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> - is experimental (observed) value of the fitted function at <italic>ith</italic> data-point</p>
<p>
<inline-formula id="inf21">
<mml:math id="m37">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> - is model (theoretical) value of the fitted function at <italic>ith</italic> data-point</p>
<p>W3 - is manual weight factor (for individual data-point)</p>
<p>W4 - is automatic weight factor (for normalization between the data-points)</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s4">
<title>4 Results</title>
<p>Stress-strain curves for the trachea muscle subjected to equi-biaxial tensile loading are plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>. The stress-strain curves for trachea muscle in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref> show that the circumferential direction has a well-defined nonlinear behaviour as the tissue gets stretched from the toe region to 30% strain. At 30% strain, the tissue in the longitudinal direction still appears to be within the toe region with the stress-strain curve showing much more tissue compliance. The tracheal tissue in the longitudinal direction attains 30% strain below 50&#xa0;kPa while the same level of strain is attained in the circumferential direction at stresses of about 100&#xa0;kPa (double as much as that in the longitudinal direction). These findings are in line with previous studies by other researchers on the relatively higher stiffness of the tracheal tissue along the circumferential direction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hoffman et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kaye et al., 2022</xref>) as compared to the longitudinal direction. Along the circumferential direction the toe region is only up to 15% strain as opposed to the 30% strain for the circumferential direction. The relationship between the stresses in the circumferential direction and those in the longitudinal direction are strikingly similar to the relationship between these stresses in a pressured thin-walled cylinder theory. The direct application of this theory in this study may be a little bit contentious because of an invalid ratio between the wall thickness and the diameter of the trachea which is approximately 1:2. It is therefore likely that the relationship between the stresses in the circumferential and longitudinal directions may only kick in after the diameter has stretched from the undeformed length of 8&#xa0;mm to approximately 27&#xa0;mm. However, in the present study, this was not actually the case, therefore, stiffer circumferential direction may have only been caused by the effect of the cartilaginous ring around the trachea wall which is aligned with the circumferential direction. A previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Safshekan et al., 2017</xref>) found that the cartilaginous rings in the trachea were stiffer towards the cranial regions than towards the caudal regions.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>N &#x3d; 14 sheep trachea subjected to equi-biaxial mechanical forces shoing stress vs. strain mechanical properties at 30% strain <bold>(A)</bold> Longitudinal and <bold>(B)</bold>Circumferential. Test 7 showing the highest stress and Test 1 showing the lowest stress in the longitudinal direction, respectively. Additionally, test 10 and Test 1 showing highest and lowest tress in the circumferential direction, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-10-1230789-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Before performing model fitting, we first examined the nature of the hyperelastic responses to determine a proper form of model for fitting the overall responses. To capture the observed large specimen variability, model fitting was performed for material responses at three stiffness levels, including the mean responses, the upper bound (UB) responses (mean responses &#x2b; one standard deviations) and lower bound (LB) responses (mean response - one standard deviation). The LB, mean and UB parameter values are plotted in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Tables 1</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">6</xref> for each of the constitutive models in this study. These mean values of parameters were then applied to the respective models to calculate the mean stresses. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref> show these model-estimated mean stresses plotted over the measured mean stresses. The results are remarkably close for all the models under study. It is therefore appropriate to examine the metrics such as the coefficient of determination and evaluation index further to see if there are any significant trends in the performances of the six constitutive models.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Material parameters of Fung hyperelastic constitutive models (b<sub>1</sub>, b<sub>2</sub>, b<sub>3</sub>, b<sub>4</sub>, b<sub>5</sub> and b<sub>6</sub>) for different samples of sheep trachea subjected to equi-biaxial testing. Normalised Error (NE) and Normalised RMS Error (NRMSE) were also determined for all experimental samples.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Parameters</th>
<th align="center">c</th>
<th align="center">b<sub>1</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">b<sub>2</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">b<sub>3</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">b<sub>4</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">b<sub>5</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">b<sub>6</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>NRMSE</italic>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>NE</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">LB</td>
<td align="center">7.838</td>
<td align="center">2.169</td>
<td align="center">0.959</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;4.567</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.756</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;1.79</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3.795</td>
<td align="center">0.007</td>
<td align="center">0.006</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Mean</td>
<td align="center">14.835</td>
<td align="center">4.439</td>
<td align="center">2.794</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.127</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;1.563</td>
<td align="center">0.037</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;1.495</td>
<td align="center">0.035</td>
<td align="center">0.031</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">UB</td>
<td align="center">21.832</td>
<td align="center">6.709</td>
<td align="center">4.629</td>
<td align="center">4.313</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.37</td>
<td align="center">1.864</td>
<td align="center">0.805</td>
<td align="center">0.063</td>
<td align="center">0.056</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Material parameters of Choi-Vito hyperelastic constitutive models (b<sub>o</sub>, b<sub>1</sub>, b<sub>2</sub> and b<sub>3</sub>) obtained by simultaneous fitting to the mean, UB, and LB responses for diffreent samples of sheep trachea subjected to equi-biaxial testing. Normalised Error (NE) and Normalised RMS Error (NRMSE) were also determined for all experimental samples.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Parameters</th>
<th align="center">b<sub>0</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">b<sub>1</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">b<sub>2</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">b<sub>3</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>NRMSE</italic>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>NE</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">LB</td>
<td align="center">4.28</td>
<td align="center">5.446</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.921</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3.434</td>
<td align="center">0.005</td>
<td align="center">0.004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Mean</td>
<td align="center">9.279</td>
<td align="center">8.851</td>
<td align="center">2.366</td>
<td align="center">0.794</td>
<td align="center">0.047</td>
<td align="center">0.039</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">UB</td>
<td align="center">14.278</td>
<td align="center">12.256</td>
<td align="center">5.653</td>
<td align="center">5.022</td>
<td align="center">0.089</td>
<td align="center">0.074</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Material parameters of Polynomial (Anisotropic) hyperelastic constitutive model (<italic>a</italic>
<sub>
<italic>1</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, a</italic>
<sub>
<italic>2</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, a</italic>
<sub>
<italic>3</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, b</italic>
<sub>
<italic>1</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, b</italic>
<sub>
<italic>2</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, b</italic>
<sub>
<italic>3</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, c</italic>
<sub>
<italic>2</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, c</italic>
<sub>
<italic>3</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, c</italic>
<sub>
<italic>4</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, c</italic>
<sub>
<italic>5</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, c</italic>
<sub>
<italic>6</italic>
</sub>
<italic>,</italic> <inline-formula id="inf22">
<mml:math id="m38">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c6;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) obtained by simultaneous fitting to the mean, UB, and LB responses for different samples of sheep trachea subjected to equi-biaxial testing. Normalised Error (NE) and Normalised RMS Error (NRMSE) were also determined for all experimental samples.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Parameters</th>
<th align="center">a<sub>1</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">a<sub>2</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">a<sub>3</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">b<sub>1</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">b<sub>2</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">b<sub>3</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">c<sub>2</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">c<sub>3</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">c<sub>4</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">c<sub>5</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">c<sub>6</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">&#x3c6;</th>
<th align="left">
<italic>NRMSE</italic>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>NE</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">LB</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;1.426</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;4.908</td>
<td align="center">0.07</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.201</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3.655</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;6.932</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.228</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;1.35</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.545</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;5.529</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3.013</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.631</td>
<td align="center">0.004</td>
<td align="center">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Mean</td>
<td align="center">1.236</td>
<td align="center">2.786</td>
<td align="center">2.03</td>
<td align="center">2.915</td>
<td align="center">0.228</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.82</td>
<td align="center">5.633</td>
<td align="center">2.893</td>
<td align="center">0.731</td>
<td align="center">3.411</td>
<td align="center">2.904</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.184</td>
<td align="center">0.034</td>
<td align="center">0.028</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">UB</td>
<td align="center">3.898</td>
<td align="center">10.48</td>
<td align="center">3.99</td>
<td align="center">8.031</td>
<td align="center">4.111</td>
<td align="center">5.292</td>
<td align="center">11.494</td>
<td align="center">7.136</td>
<td align="center">4.007</td>
<td align="center">12.351</td>
<td align="center">8.821</td>
<td align="center">0.263</td>
<td align="center">0.064</td>
<td align="center">0.053</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Material parameters of Holzapfel (2000) hyperelastic constitutive model (<inline-formula id="inf23">
<mml:math id="m39">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> <italic>k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>1</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>2</italic>
</sub> <italic>and</italic> <inline-formula id="inf24">
<mml:math id="m40">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c6;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) obtained by simultaneous fitting to the mean, UB, and LB responses for different samples of sheep trachea subjected to equi-biaxial testing. Error (NE) and Normalised RMS Error (NRMSE) were also determined for all experimental samples.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Parameters</th>
<th align="center">&#x3bc;</th>
<th align="center">k<sub>1</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">k<sub>2</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">&#x3c6;</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>NRMSE</italic>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>NE</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">LB</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;1.181</td>
<td align="center">5.495</td>
<td align="center">0.679</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.657</td>
<td align="center">0.015</td>
<td align="center">0.012</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Mean</td>
<td align="center">0.842</td>
<td align="center">13.726</td>
<td align="center">1.27</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.15</td>
<td align="center">0.053</td>
<td align="center">0.044</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">UB</td>
<td align="center">2.865</td>
<td align="center">21.957</td>
<td align="center">1.861</td>
<td align="center">0.357</td>
<td align="center">0.091</td>
<td align="center">0.076</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Material parameters of Holzapfel (2005) hyperelastic constitutive models (<inline-formula id="inf25">
<mml:math id="m41">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> <italic>k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>1</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>2</italic>
</sub>
<italic>,</italic> <inline-formula id="inf26">
<mml:math id="m42">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c6;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) obtained by simultaneous fitting to the mean, UB, and LB responses for different samples of sheep trachea subjected to equi-biaxial testing. Normalised Error (NE) and Normalised RMS Error (NRMSE) were also detrmined for all experimental samples.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Parameters</th>
<th align="center">&#x3bc;</th>
<th align="center">k<sub>1</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">k<sub>2</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">phi</th>
<th align="center">&#x3c6;</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>NRMSE</italic>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>NE</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">LB</td>
<td align="center">1.787</td>
<td align="center">2.527</td>
<td align="center">1.227</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;1.199</td>
<td align="center">0.846</td>
<td align="center">0.075</td>
<td align="center">0.064</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Mean</td>
<td align="center">3.028</td>
<td align="center">5.347</td>
<td align="center">3.074</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.208</td>
<td align="center">1.152</td>
<td align="center">0.138</td>
<td align="center">0.116</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">UB</td>
<td align="center">4.269</td>
<td align="center">8.167</td>
<td align="center">4.921</td>
<td align="center">0.783</td>
<td align="center">1.458</td>
<td align="center">0.201</td>
<td align="center">0.168</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Material parameters of Four-Fiber Family hyperelastic constitutive models (<italic>c, c</italic>
<sub>
<italic>11</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, c</italic>
<sub>
<italic>21</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, c</italic>
<sub>
<italic>12</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, c</italic>
<sub>
<italic>22</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, c</italic>
<sub>
<italic>134</italic>
</sub>
<italic>, c</italic>
<sub>
<italic>234</italic>
</sub> <italic>and</italic> <inline-formula id="inf27">
<mml:math id="m43">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c6;</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) obtained by simultaneous fitting to the mean, UB, and LB responses for different samples of sheep trachea subjected to equi-biaxial testing. Normalised Error (NE) and Normalised RMS Error (NRMSE) were also detrmined for all experimental samples.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Parameters</th>
<th align="center">c</th>
<th align="center">c<sub>11</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">c<sub>21</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">c<sub>12</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">c<sub>22</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">c<sub>134</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">c<sub>234</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">&#x3c6;<sub>0</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>NRMSE</italic>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>NE</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">LB</td>
<td align="center">4.869</td>
<td align="center">1.893</td>
<td align="center">1.597</td>
<td align="center">1.416</td>
<td align="center">1.334</td>
<td align="center">3.206</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.043</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.637</td>
<td align="center">0.073</td>
<td align="center">0.061</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Mean</td>
<td align="center">7.82</td>
<td align="center">3.787</td>
<td align="center">2.879</td>
<td align="center">8.454</td>
<td align="center">2.03</td>
<td align="center">8.751</td>
<td align="center">2.367</td>
<td align="center">0.335</td>
<td align="center">0.106</td>
<td align="center">0.089</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">UB</td>
<td align="center">10.771</td>
<td align="center">5.681</td>
<td align="center">4.161</td>
<td align="center">15.492</td>
<td align="center">2.726</td>
<td align="center">14.296</td>
<td align="center">4.777</td>
<td align="center">1.307</td>
<td align="center">0.139</td>
<td align="center">0.117</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean stress-time histories in <bold>(A)</bold> Circumferential and <bold>(B)</bold> Longitudinal direction. Fung model fit curves were from a mean set of constitutive parameters fitted simultaneously to the averaged responses of all specimens.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-10-1230789-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean stress-time histories in <bold>(A)</bold> Circumferential and <bold>(B)</bold> Longitudinal direction. Choi-Vito model fit curves were from a mean set of constitutive parameters fitted simultaneously to the averaged responses of all specimens.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-10-1230789-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean stress-time histories in <bold>(A)</bold> Circumferential and <bold>(B)</bold> Longitudinal directions. Polynomial (Anisotropic) hyperelastic model fit curves were from a mean set of constitutive parameters fitted simultaneously to the averaged responses of all specimens.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-10-1230789-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean stress-time histories in <bold>(A)</bold> Circumferential and <bold>(B)</bold> Longitudinal directions. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Holzapfel et al. (2000)</xref> hyperelastic model fit curves were from a mean set of constitutive parameters fitted simultaneously to the averaged responses of all specimens.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-10-1230789-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean stress-time histories in <bold>(A)</bold> Circumferential and <bold>(B)</bold> Longitudinal directions. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Holzapfel et al. (2005)</xref> hyperelastic model fit curves were from a mean set of constitutive parameters fitted simultaneously to the averaged responses of all specimens.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-10-1230789-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The ranges of the standard deviations as represented by the LB and UB parameter values tabulated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Tables 1</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">6</xref> show that all the material models vary widely from one test to another over the fourteen tests. The amount of standard deviation calculated for each material model is quite substantial. This emphasizes the probabilistic nature of tracheal tissue which shows that it is very hard to apply material parameters from one experiment to predict the tensile behaviour of a different tracheal tissue. As shown in a previous study by the authors, the most appropriate procedure is to use the average values, though such mean values will certainly yield substantial errors in some cases as can be observed in the wider ranges between LB and UB in this study. It is important however to note that these results were only calculated from the circumferential direction of the tracheal tissue.</p>
<p>In terms of anisotropy, it is extremely difficult to establish from this test the anisotropy of the tissue along the longitudinal direction since it appears that the tissue is still in its toe region. But along the circumferential direction, the tracheal tissue shows anisotropy. The tissue anisotropy grows with strain level in both directions although the circumferential direction is clearly more anisotropic from strain ranges greater than 15% strain. It is not clear what might have caused the extraneous stress-strain bevaviour of the specimen number 7 along the longitudinal direction, although its behaviour along the circumferential direction falls within the ranges of all the other specimen stress-strain curves.</p>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figures 9</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">10</xref> show the average values of the coefficient of determination (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup>), the Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE), and the evaluation index (EI) that were calculated over all the fourteen tests for each of the six different hyperelastic models. The coefficient of detemination measures the correlation between the experimental and model results while the NRMSE gives an indication of the model fitting quality in terms of the fitting error. The EI is a metric that shows how the models fit the experimental results relative to each other. The plotted results show that the polynomial (anisotropic) model performs the best in both the average <italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> and NRMSE values. Besides the highest and lowest levels of the mean for the <italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> and NRMSE, the polynomial (anisotropic) model also yields the smallest deviations and outliers of its predictions away from the mean line in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figures 9</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">10</xref>. With the exception of about three outliers, a large proporportion of the predicted results by the polynomial (anisotropic) model fall within the 95% confidence interval bounds.</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean stress-time histories in <bold>(A)</bold> Circumferential and <bold>(B)</bold> Longitudinal directions. Four-Fiber Family hyperelastic model fit curves were from a mean set of constitutive parameters fitted simultaneously to the averaged responses of all specimens.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-10-1230789-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 10</label>
<caption>
<p>Average Coefficient of determination (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup>) was determined using Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e9">9</xref> for N &#x3d; 14 of the sheep trachea soft tissue for Fung, Choi-Vito, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Holzapfel et al. (2000)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Holzapfel et al. (2005)</xref>, Polynomial (Anisotropic) and Four-Fiber Family hyperelastic constitutive models. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Holzapfel et al. (2005)</xref> hyperelastic constitutive model showing the highest variation of the average <italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> and Polynomial (Anisotropic) hyperelastic model showing lowest value of variation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-10-1230789-g010.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11</xref> the average EI values show that the Fung model yields the best performance (at 100% EI) and that it slightly outperforms the polynomial (anisotropic) model (at around 95% EI). It is interesting to note that both models are implemented as polynomial functions of the material parameters. Of course, the Fung model exhibits a wider range of deviations away from the mean value in their predicted results. The Holzapfel (2005) model yields the worst performance with <italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> greater than 95%, NRMSE below 20%, and EI equal to zero percent. Since EI is a measure of relative performance of the models, this performance of the Holzapfel (2005) cannot be considered disastrous since it still shows that it is capable of producing correlations above 95% and fitting errors of less than 20%. However, for better accuracy in the predictions of tensile behaviour of the tracheal tissue it might be recommended to apply the Fung or the polynomial (anisotropic) models which yield <italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> greater than 99.9%, fitting errors NRMSE less than 5%, and EI above 95%. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12</xref>, the Choi-Vito and Holzapfel (2000) have modest performance in the EI at 70% while the four-fiber family yields EI of approximately 20%.</p>
<fig id="F11" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 11</label>
<caption>
<p>Average Normalised RMS Error (NRMSE)was determined using Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e13">13</xref> for N &#x3d; 14 of the sheep trachea soft tissue for Fung, Choi-Vito, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Holzapfel et al. (2000)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Holzapfel et al. (2005)</xref>, Polynomial (Anisotropic) and Four-Fiber Family hyperelastic constitutive models. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Holzapfel et al. (2005)</xref> hyperelastic constitutive model showing the highest variation of the average <italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> and Polynomial (Anisotropic) hyperelastic model showing lowest value of variation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-10-1230789-g011.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F12" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 12</label>
<caption>
<p>Average Evaluation Index (EI) for all Fung, Choi-Vito, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Holzapfel et al. (2000)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Holzapfel et al. (2005)</xref>, Polynomial (Anisotropic) and Four-Fiber Family hyperelastic constitutive models. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Holzapfel et al. (2005)</xref> hyperelastic constitutive model was found to have the lowest EI as compared to the other five model. Additionally, Fung hyperelastic constitutive model was found to have the highest EI when compared to other models. This means that for this biaxial tensile data, the Fung model has produced the best <italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmats-10-1230789-g012.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s5">
<title>5 Discussion</title>
<p>The mechanical material properties of the sheep trachea were observed to be nonlinear anisotropic and hyperelastic material, similar to other biological soft tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Grillo, 1989</xref>). Biaxial testing is a reliable method utilised in understanding the mechanical behaviour of soft tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Nemavhola, 2017b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Nemavhola et al., 2021b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Nemavhola et al., 2021c</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Nemavhola et al., 2021d</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Ngwangwa et al., 2022</xref>). The data presented in this study covers the circumferential and longitudinal directions. It is observed that the best performing models are both based on the polynomial implementations having very high numbers of material parameters in their architectures. In our previous studies on soft tissues, the models with exponential implementations such as the two Holzapfel models have yielded much better predictions than the other material models and have always outperformed the Fung model. In this study, the results do not agree with that trend.</p>
<p>Secondly, the performance of the Choi-Vito model with respect to other models within the exponential implementation group is quite remarkable in this study. It performs as well as the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Holzapfel et al. (2000)</xref> model clearly outperforms the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Holzapfel et al. (2005)</xref> and the four-fiber family models. Both the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Holzapfel et al. (2005)</xref> and the four-fiber family models were shown in the oesophagus tissue test to outperform the Choi-Vito model. Thus, for the tracheal tissues, the models that performed poorly in the oesophagus perform much better in the trachea. One of the distinctive features of the trachea is that it consists of rings of cartilaginous tissue embedded within its cylindrical walls. This implies that besides its normal soft tissue which may be dominated by collagen type I, it has other forms of collagen types within its structure. The cartilage tissue is relatively rigid with much less percentage of elongation at fracture. It does not really possess much of the hyperelasticity of the other biological soft tissues. It possesses the property that is desirable for organs that must exhibit some rigidity, elasticity, and lubrication. It is this distinctive property that makes it different from the tensile behaviour of most soft tissues. However, it is not very clear in this study what makes the models such as the Choi-Vito and Fung models perform better than they have in the other soft tissues previously studied by the authors. An understanding of these underlying issues will inform the development of most effective replacement materials for the tracheal tissue.</p>
<p>The performance of the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Holzapfel et al. (2005)</xref> model over the tracheal tissue is most unreliable. It yields the largest NRMSE value with the widest standard deviation. The polynomial (anisotropic) model produces the most consistent results and therefore is shown to be the most reliable. However, its debilitating character is that it requires the largest number of material parameters which obviously affects its convergence rate, thereby making the model the slowest and most computationally expensive model of the six material models studied in this research. Therefore, a researcher is more likely to opt for the Choi-Vito or the Fung models with relatively fewer numbers of required material parameters than the polynomial (anisotropic) model.</p>
<p>In its normal physiological functioning, the trachea is not subjected to excessive mechanical loads in any of these directions. It is rather subjected to very low gauge pressure which may cause stresses well below the limit of its toe region, which were calculated as 3.3&#xa0;kPa in tension during inspiration, &#x2212;5.25&#xa0;kPa in compression during expiration and 7.2&#xa0;kPa for mechanical ventilation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Malv&#xe8; et al., 2011</xref>). However, there might be several traumatic situations and illnesses that subject the tracheal tissue to very high stresses in the circumferential, longitudinal, or radial directions. A comprehensive literature study of the published cases of tracheal replacement between 1898 and 2018 on 290 patients reported that a breakdown of large tracheal defects comprised cancerous tumour invasions (60.4%), airway trauma (6.7%), critical airway stenosis (7.8%), congenital stenosis (6.0%), tuberculosis (3.9%), prolonged intubation (3.9%), and other conditions (11.3%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Greaney and Niklason, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Zobaer and Sutradhar, 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>The higher tissue stiffness along the circumferential direction may be attributed to the effect of the rigid cartilaginous tissue which tends to be pulled axially outwards as opposed to the longitudinal direction where this tissue has no effect at all. It is therefore likely that tissue stretching along the longitudinal direction was stopped too early. Thus, differential straining may be a better way of testing the trachea than equi-biaxial stretching of the trachea tissue. This is to ensure that there is a fully developed stress-strain curve along the longitudinal direction. It might also be interesting to determine the impact of the cartilage fiber on the total tensile behaviour of the trachea tissue by testing that fiber alone.</p>
<p>The comprehensive material characterization of trachea, as provided in this study, lays a foundation for further investigations aimed at contrasting healthy and diseased tracheal conditions. Such comparisons offer deeper insights into how the trachea undergoes changes and remodeling in response to various pathological states. By comprehensively examining the material properties, this research significantly contributes to advancing our understanding of tracheal repair mechanisms. Moreover, this knowledge serves as a pivotal guide in exploring innovative strategies for addressing tracheal ailments, potentially revolutionizing treatments and interventions in respiratory health.</p>
<p>The key findings of the study reveal the tracheal tissue&#x2019;s greater stiffness along the circumferential <italic>versus</italic> longitudinal direction and regional material property variations. However, regional dependencies of the trachea were not explored. The limitation of the study is the lack of cross-sectional image analysis during experimentation which might lead to testing errors, potentially affecting results. Stress distribution assumptions during biaxial tests and unexamined effects of BioRakes&#x2019; hooking positions pose limitations. Quantitative investigation into the influence of cartilaginous rings on circumferential stiffness is lacking. Although not explored, the calculated model parameters offer promise for computational models, regenerative medicine, and bioprinting applications in tracheal tissue replacement. Integrating microstructural study comparisons could further enrich these findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>6 Patents</title>
<p>This study presents the measured mechanical properties of <italic>ex-vivo</italic> sheep trachea under biaxial loading. The mechanical data was further utilized for fitting the selected hyperelastic constitutive models. The study has two important findings: firstly, the sheep tracheal tissue is about twice as stiff along its circumferential direction as it is along its longitudinal direction; secondly, the material properties of the sheep tracheal tissue in the different regions are random and different from one another. It would be very interesting if regional dependencies of these material properties were evaluated. Besides the above limitation, the authors believe that the study would have benefitted a lot from correlating these findings with microstructural examinations. Nonetheless, it is believed that the calculated constitutive model parameters will provide more light on the development of accurate computational models for the study of various diseases or medical conditions that affect the trachea. Also, the data presented here will be useful in regenerative medicine and bioprinting of tissue replacements.</p>
<p>Limitations: The detailed cross-sectional image analysis of the trachea was not performed during experimentation. This may have caused or introduced errors during tensile testing since relative slipping of layers could have easily occurred.</p>
<p>During the experiment, uniform stress distribution was assumed in the biaxial tests, but this is highly hypothetical since in reality it is expected that there will be stress concentrations at the hooking positions of the BioRakes whose effects have not been investigated in this study.</p>
<p>The effect of the cartilaginous ring tissue along the circumferential direction has not been quantitatively investigated in this study. It might have contributed to the stiffness in the circumferential direction.</p>
<p>The results in this study were not compared with the results of microstructural studies on sheep tracheal tissue.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s7">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The animal study was approved by the UNISA-CAES health research ethics committee - ref 2021/caes_hrec/103. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>TP, HN, and FN contributed to conception, design, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation, drafted the manuscript, HN, TP, and FN contributed to the interpretation of the data and critically revised the manuscript, and finally FN, HN, and TP contributed to conception, design, data analysis, and interpretation, drafted and critically revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>Support from the National Research Foundation (NRF) Grant number (129380) is gratefully acknowledged. Unisa CAPEX Programme supported the acquisition of biaxial testing machine in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, College of Science Engineering and Technology.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s11">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s12">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Baek</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gleason</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajagopal</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Humphrey</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Theory of small on large: potential utility in computations of fluid&#x2013;solid interactions in arteries</article-title>. <source>Comput. methods Appl. Mech. Eng.</source> <volume>196</volume> (<issue>31-32</issue>), <fpage>3070</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3078</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cma.2006.06.018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Belsey</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1950</year>). <article-title>Resection and reconstruction of the intrathoracic trachea</article-title>. <source>Br. J. Surg.</source> <volume>38</volume> (<issue>150</issue>), <fpage>200</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/bjs.18003815008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="confproc">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bursa</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Skacel</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zemanek</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kreuter</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Implementation of hyperelastic models for soft tissues in FE program and identification of their parameters</article-title>,&#x201d; in <conf-name>Proceedings of the Sixth IASTED International Conference on Biomedical Engineering</conf-name>, <conf-loc>Innsbruck, Austria</conf-loc>, <conf-date>13-15 February 2008</conf-date>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Choi</surname>
<given-names>H. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vito</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Two-dimensional stress-strain relationship for canine pericardium</article-title>. <source>J. biomechanical Eng.</source> <volume>112</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>153</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>159</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1115/1.2891166</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chuong</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fung</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Three-dimensional stress distribution in arteries</article-title>. <source>J. biomechanical Eng.</source> <volume>105</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>268</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>274</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1115/1.3138417</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>DeBoer</surname>
<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kimbell</surname>
<given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pickett</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hatch</surname>
<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akers</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brinton</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Lung inflammation and simulated airway resistance in infants with cystic fibrosis</article-title>. <source>Respir. Physiology Neurobiol.</source> <volume>293</volume>, <fpage>103722</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.resp.2021.103722</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ferruzzi</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vorp</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Humphrey</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>On constitutive descriptors of the biaxial mechanical behaviour of human abdominal aorta and aneurysms</article-title>. <source>J. R. Soc. Interface</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>56</issue>), <fpage>435</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>450</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rsif.2010.0299</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fung</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Structure and stress-strain relationship of soft tissues</article-title>. <source>Am. Zoologist</source> <volume>24</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>13</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/icb/24.1.13</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fung</surname>
<given-names>Y.-C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <source>Mechanical properties of living tissues. Vol. 547</source>. <publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Greaney</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niklason</surname>
<given-names>L. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The history of engineered tracheal replacements: interpreting the past and guiding the future</article-title>. <source>Tissue Eng. Part B Rev.</source> <volume>27</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>341</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>352</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0238</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Grillo</surname>
<given-names>H. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Notes on the windpipe</article-title>. <source>Ann. Thorac. Surg.</source> <volume>47</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0003-4975(89)90227-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Grillo</surname>
<given-names>H. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Tracheal replacement: a critical review</article-title>. <source>Ann. Thorac. Surg.</source> <volume>73</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1995</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2004</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03564-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Grillo</surname>
<given-names>H. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Donahue</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mathisen</surname>
<given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wain</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wright</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Postintubation tracheal stenosis: treatment and results</article-title>. <source>J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.</source> <volume>109</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>486</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>493</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0022-5223(95)70279-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hoffman</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martin</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>B. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bonassar</surname>
<given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheetham</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Biomechanical and biochemical characterization of porcine tracheal cartilage</article-title>. <source>Laryngoscope</source> <volume>126</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>E325</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>E331</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/lary.25861</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Holzapfel</surname>
<given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gasser</surname>
<given-names>T. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ogden</surname>
<given-names>R. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models</article-title>. <source>J. Elast. Phys. Sci. solids</source> <volume>61</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/a:1010835316564</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Holzapfel</surname>
<given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sommer</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gasser</surname>
<given-names>C. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Regitnig</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Physiology-Heart Circulatory Physiology</source> <volume>289</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>H2048</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>H2058</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajpheart.00934.2004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>C.-J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Use of the silicone T-tube to treat tracheal stenosis or tracheal injury</article-title>. <source>Ann. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>192</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>196</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaye</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goldstein</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grande</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeltsman</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>L. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Biomechanical properties of the <italic>ex vivo</italic> porcine trachea: a benchmark for three-dimensional bioprinted airway replacements</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Otolaryngology</source> <volume>43</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>103217</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103217</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kojima</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vacanti</surname>
<given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Tissue engineering in the trachea</article-title>. <source>Anatomical Rec.</source> <volume>297</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>44</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ar.22799</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Koombua</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pidaparti</surname>
<given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Inhalation induced stresses and flow characteristics in human airways through fluid-structure interaction analysis</article-title>. <source>Model. Simul. Eng.</source> <volume>2008</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2008/358748</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kortsmit</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davies</surname>
<given-names>N. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Macadangdang</surname>
<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zilla</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Franz</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The effect of hydrogel injection on cardiac function and myocardial mechanics in a computational post-infarction model</article-title>. <source>Comput. Methods Biomechanics Biomed. Eng.</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>1185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1195</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10255842.2012.656611</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lebea</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ngwangwa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pandelani</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Biomechanical behaviour and hyperelastic model parameters identification of sheep omasum</article-title>. <source>Res. Square</source>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21203/rs.3.rs-1015547/v1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>J. S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shin</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryu</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>H. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Characterization of the biomechanical properties of canine trachea using a customized 3D-printed apparatus</article-title>. <source>Auris Nasus Larynx</source> <volume>46</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>407</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>416</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anl.2018.10.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Malv&#xe8;</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez del Palomar</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trabelsi</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xf3;pez-Villalobos</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ginel</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doblar&#xe9;</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Modeling of the fluid structure interaction of a human trachea under different ventilation conditions</article-title>. <source>Int. Commun. heat mass Transf.</source> <volume>38</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>10</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.09.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Masithulela</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015a</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>The effect of over-loaded right ventricle during passive filling in rat heart: a biventricular finite element model</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition</source> (<publisher-name>American Society of Mechanical Engineers</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Masithulela</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015b</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Analysis of passive filling with fibrotic myocardial infarction</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition</source> (<publisher-name>American Society of Mechanical Engineers</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Masithulela</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015c</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>The effect of over-loaded right ventricle during passive filling in rat heart: a biventricular finite element model</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>ASME 2015 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition</source>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Masithulela</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016a</year>). <article-title>Bi-ventricular finite element model of right ventricle overload in the healthy rat heart</article-title>. <source>Bio-medical Mater. Eng.</source> <volume>27</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>507</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>525</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3233/bme-161604</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Masithulela</surname>
<given-names>F. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016b</year>). <source>Computational biomechanics in the remodelling rat heart post myocardial infarction</source>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ndlovu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Desai</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ngwangwa</surname>
<given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Sheep sclera soft tissue subjected to mechanical equi-biaxial testing</article-title>. <source>Preprints</source>, <fpage>2021080388</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20944/preprints202108.0388.v1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ndlovu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Desai</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Biaxial Mechanical Characterization And Constitutive Modelling Of Sheep Sclera Soft Tissue</article-title>. <source>Russ. J. Biomechanics/Rossijski Zurnal Biomehaniki</source> <volume>24</volume> (<issue>1</issue>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017a</year>). <article-title>Fibrotic infarction on the LV free wall may alter the mechanics of healthy septal wall during passive filling</article-title>. <source>Bio-medical Mater. Eng.</source> <volume>28</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>579</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>599</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3233/bme-171698</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017b</year>). <article-title>Biaxial quantification of passive porcine myocardium elastic properties by region</article-title>. <source>Eng. Solid Mech.</source> <volume>5</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>166</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5267/j.esm.2017.6.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019a</year>). <article-title>Detailed structural assessment of healthy interventricular septum in the presence of remodeling infarct in the free wall&#x2013;A finite element model</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source> <volume>5</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>e01841</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01841</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019b</year>). <article-title>Mechanics of the septal wall may be affected by the presence of fibrotic infarct in the free wall at end-systole</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Med. Eng. Inf.</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>225</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1504/ijmei.2019.101632</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Study of biaxial mechanical properties of the passive pig heart: material characterisation and categorisation of regional differences</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mech. Mater. Eng.</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>6</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40712-021-00128-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ngwangwa</surname>
<given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pandelani</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021a</year>). <article-title>An investigation of uniaxial mechanical properties of excised sheep heart muscle fibre&#x2013;fitting of different hyperelastic constitutive models</article-title>. <comment>Preprints, 2021080566 Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202108.0566/v1">https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202108.0566/v1</ext-link>
</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ngwangwa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pandelani</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davies</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Franz</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021b</year>). <article-title>Understanding regional mechanics of rat myocardia by fitting hyperelatsic models</article-title>. <source>Res. Square</source>. <comment>Preprint (Version 1)</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21203/rs.3.rs-957393/v1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ngwangwa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davies</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Franz</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021c</year>). <article-title>Passive biaxial tensile dataset of three main rat heart myocardia: Left ventricle, mid-wall and right ventricle</article-title>. <source>Preprints</source>, <fpage>2021080153</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20944/preprints202108.0153.v1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pandelani</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ngwangwa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021d</year>). <article-title>FITTING OF HYPERELASTIC CONSTITUTIVE MODELS IN DIFFERENT SHEEP HEART REGIONS BASED ON BIAXIAL MECHANICAL PROPERTIES</article-title>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.28.466240v1">https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.28.466240v1</ext-link>
</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ngwangwa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Evaluating computational performances of hyperelastic models on supraspinatus tendon uniaxial tensile test data</article-title>. <source>J. Comput. Appl. Mech.</source> <volume>52</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22059/jcamech.2020.310491.559</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ngwangwa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pandelani</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Msibi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mabuda</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davies</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Determination of cross-directional and cross-wall variations of passive biaxial mechanical properties of rat myocardia</article-title>. <source>Processes</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>629</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/pr10040629</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ngwangwa</surname>
<given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pandelani</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nemavhola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <source>The application of standard nonlinear solid material models in modelling the tensile behaviour of the supraspinatus tendon</source>. <comment>2021080298. Preprints Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202108.0298/v1/download">https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202108.0298/v1/download</ext-link>
</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yue</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Triest</surname>
<given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Computational fluid dynamics simulation of airflow in the trachea and main bronchi for the subjects with left pulmonary artery sling</article-title>. <source>Biomed. Eng. online</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1475-925x-13-85</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roberts</surname>
<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rains</surname>
<given-names>J. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Par&#xe9;</surname>
<given-names>P. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname>
<given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wiggs</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bert</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Ultrastructure and tensile properties of human tracheal cartilage</article-title>. <source>J. biomechanics</source> <volume>31</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>81</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00112-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>S&#xe1;ez</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuhl</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Computational modeling of acute myocardial infarction</article-title>. <source>Comput. methods biomechanics Biomed. Eng.</source> <volume>19</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>1107</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1115</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10255842.2015.1105965</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Safshekan</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tafazzoli-Shadpour</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abdouss</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Behgam Shadmehr</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghorbani</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Investigation of the mechanical properties of the human tracheal cartilage</article-title>. <source>Tanaffos</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>107</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>114</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shukla</surname>
<given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Srivastav</surname>
<given-names>V. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paul</surname>
<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jain</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Fluid structure interaction studies of human airways</article-title>. <source>S&#x101;dhan&#x101;</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12046-020-01460-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Skatulla</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Legner</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rama</surname>
<given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mbewu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sansour</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davies</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Computational study of the injection therapy for myocardial infarction during the necrotic stage</article-title>,&#x201d; in <conf-name>Proceedings of 3rd South-East European conference on computational mechanics</conf-name>, <conf-loc>Kos Island, Greece</conf-loc>, <fpage>12</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wall</surname>
<given-names>W. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rabczuk</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Fluid&#x2013;structure interaction in lower airways of CT&#x2010;based lung geometries</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids</source> <volume>57</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>653</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>675</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/fld.1763</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zobaer</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sutradhar</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Modeling the effect of tumor compression on airflow dynamics in trachea using contact simulation and CFD analysis</article-title>. <source>Comput. Biol. Med.</source> <volume>135</volume>, <fpage>104574</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104574</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>