Front. Mar. Sci. Frontiers in Marine Science Front. Mar. Sci. 2296-7745 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fmars.2023.1215910 Marine Science Erratum Erratum: Operationalising ODEMM risk assessment for Integrated Ecosystem Assessment scoping: complexity vs. manageability Frontiers Production Office * Frontiers Media SA, Lausanne, Switzerland

Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

*Correspondence: Frontiers Production Office, production.office@frontiersin.org

17 05 2023 2023 10 1215910 02 05 2023 02 05 2023 Copyright © 2023 Frontiers Production Office 2023 Frontiers Production Office

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 An Erratum on Operationalising ODEMM risk assessment for Integrated Ecosystem Assessment scoping: complexity vs. manageability. By Pedreschi D, Niiranen S, Skern-Mauritzen M and Reid DG (2023) Front. Mar. Sci. 9:1037878. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.1037878 integrated ecosystem assessment ecosystem based management ecosystem large marine ecosystems scoping stakeholders risk assessment section-in-acceptance Marine Conservation and Sustainability

Due to a production error, a hyperlink was not correctly implemented.

A correction has been made to section 2 Methods, subsection 2.3 Analyses, paragraph one:

“The scorings were used to calculate Proportional Connectance, ‘Impact Risk’, ‘Recovery Lag’ and Total Risk (Table 2; Robinson et al., 2013; White et al., 2013: Knights et al., 2013b) estimates, with associated figures and tables, using R (Pedreschi et al., 2019, the code is publicly available at https://github.com/missionatlantic/MissionAtlantic-RISK-Analysis). Log transformation of the IR scores enabled a better visualisation of ranks (Figure S1). Both sum and mean scores were calculated for each element (i.e. the sum/mean of all linkages connected to each individual sector, pressure or ecosystem component) to identify which sectors and pressures contributed the most risk to the system, and which ecosystem components were most affected (rank ordering). Both the sum and the means were calculated to avoid the methodological bias possible through the use of only one metric. Both metrics provide different but complementary information, and while both are influenced by the number of linkage chains present, the sum is less sensitive”.

The publisher apologizes for this mistake. The original version of this article has been updated.